Next Article in Journal
Poor Health Behaviour in Medical Students at a South African University: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Jarzynka, S. et al. Combination of High-Pressure Processing and Freeze-Drying as the Most Effective Techniques in Maintaining Biological Values and Microbiological Safety of Donor Milk. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2147
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of a COVID-19 Vulnerability Index (CVI) for the Counties and Residents of New Jersey, USA
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 21
Issue 7
10.3390/ijerph21070823
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Rainfall and Temperature Influences on Childhood Diarrhea and the Effect Modification Role of Water and Sanitation Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Gorfu Geremew
1,*,
Oliver Cumming
2,
Alemayehu Haddis
1,
Matthew C. Freeman
3 and
Argaw Ambelu
4
1
Department of Environmental Health Science and Technology, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 378, Ethiopia
2
Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Disease, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
3
Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
4
Division of Water and Health, Ethiopian Institute of Water Resources, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1165, Ethiopia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(7), 823; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070823
Submission received: 22 March 2024 / Revised: 26 April 2024 / Accepted: 29 April 2024 / Published: 24 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Environmental Changes, Pathogens Spread and Influences on Infectious Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) highlighted the worsening impacts of climate change. Two climate factors—temperature and rainfall uncertainties—influence the risk of childhood diarrhea, which remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries. They create a conducive environment for diarrhea-causing pathogens and overwhelm environmental prevention measures. This study aimed to produce comprehensive evidence on the association of temperature and rainfall variability with the risk of childhood diarrhea and the influence of water and sanitation conditions on those associations. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) approach. Records published in English from 2006 to 2023 were searched on 8 January 2024 via PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Google/Google Scholar using comprehensive search terms. We assessed studies for any risk of bias using the Navigation Guide and rated the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. The heterogeneity among estimates was assessed using I-squared statistics (I2). The findings of the analysis were presented with forest plots using an incidence rate ratio (IRR). A meta-analysis was conducted on effect modifiers (water supply and sanitation conditions) using a random effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The statistical analyses were conducted using R 4.3.2 software and Review Manager 5.3. A total of 2017 records were identified through searches, and only the 36 articles that met the inclusion criteria were included. The analysis suggests a small positive association between increased temperature and the occurrence of under-five diarrhea, with the pooled IRR = 1.04; 95% CI [1.03, 1.05], at I2 = 56% and p-value < 0.01, and increased rainfall and U5 diarrhea, with IRR = 1.14; 95% CI [1.03, 1.27], at I2 = 86% and p-value < 0.01. The meta-analysis indicated a positive association between unimproved latrine facilities and drinking water sources with a rainfall-modified effect on U5 diarrhea, with IRR = 1.21; 95% CI [0.95, 1.53], at I2 = 62% and p-value = 0.03. We found that an increase in mean temperature and rainfall was associated with an increased risk of childhood diarrhea. Where there were unimproved latrine facilities and drinking water sources, the increase in mean rainfall or temperature would increase the incidence of childhood diarrhea. The results of this review help in assessing the effectiveness of current intervention programs, making changes as needed, or creating new initiatives to lower the prevalence of childhood diarrhea.

1. Introduction

In a rapidly changing world, environmental variability due to climate change has been one of the major challenges to human health and growth, particularly children’s health [1,2]. It is estimated that from 2030 to 2050, climate change could cause approximately 250,000 additional deaths per year from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea, and heat stress [3]. Worldwide, the burden of environmental disease is much greater for children than adults, particularly under-five-year-olds [2]. According to climate change evidence, among the disease burdens occurring in the world due to climate change, 88% fall on children under the age of five [4]. Moreover, the WHO evidence suggests that 48,000 deaths from diarrheal disease will occur annually by 2050 due to climate change [5].
Climate change affects children’s health through more frequent and intense heat waves, decreasing water quality and quantity, food shortages, and greater exposure to toxicants [6]. The disruption of the water sources and increasing temperatures due to global climate change are risk factors for increased water- and foodborne illnesses, leading to diarrhea and dehydration among children [7]. Temperature variability is one of the climate change effects that is estimated to influence diarrhea incidence by creating a conducive environment for pathogens to survive or multiply within the environment. Globally, temperatures are projected to rise by 2 °C and may increase by 4.8 °C in 2100 unless the current trends in emissions are changed [8].
Under-five children are especially susceptible to environmental factors, particularly contaminated food and drinking water, which are affected by the variability of temperature and rainfall events [9].
Globally, the burden of diarrheal disease has been one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among under-five children, even though different preventive measures have been implemented. In 2019, diarrheal illness claimed the lives of 370,000 children under the age of five worldwide [10]. This is also supported by the evidence summarized from 15 high-burden focus countries: every day, about 1200 young children die due to diarrhea [11].
To identify the reasons for the increasing burden of diarrheal disease, in the recent decade, studies have been conducted on the association between climate factors and diarrheal disease. Among these parameters, temperature and rainfall are the most important ones on which diarrhea-causing pathogens are mainly dependent [12]. There were systematic reviews and meta-analyses that were conducted on the impact of rainfall or temperature on diarrhea in people of all ages [13,14,15]. Their conclusions show that changes in temperature due to global climate change may affect or are already affecting diarrheal disease incidence, and bacterial and parasitic diarrhea were more common during rainy seasons. However, they did not assess the pooled effect estimate on the impact of temperature or rainfall on U5 diarrhea, even though they included articles conducted on the influence of either rainfall or temperature on U5 diarrhea.
As compared to adults, children, particularly young ones, are uniquely vulnerable to climate change, in part because of the natural physiology of their developing and growing bodies [16]. They have less control over their physical environments, less knowledge about the health effects of climate change, and less ability to remove themselves from harm [17]. Thus, conducting a systematic review is crucial to assessing the extent of the burden that climatic variability places on under-five children.
There is no existing systematic review of the evidence on the association between rainfall or temperature and under-five diarrheal disease. Rainfall and temperature variability by themselves do not directly cause diarrheal disease. This is because there should be drinking water and sanitation conditions that are favorable for the pathogens to spread in conditions related to rainfall and temperature.
Thus, the review objective was to answer the following research questions: What relationship exists between changing rainfall patterns and the occurrence of childhood diarrhea? What relationship exists between changes in temperature and the occurrence of childhood diarrhea? Where there are poor water and sanitation conditions, what is the relationship between rainfall and childhood diarrhea, as well as the relationship between temperature and childhood diarrhea?
Therefore, based on the above research questions, this systematic review aimed to assess and produce comprehensive evidence on the association of rainfall and temperature with childhood diarrhea, as well as the influence of water and sanitation conditions on the relationship of temperature and rainfall with childhood diarrhea.

2. Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) approach. The review article was registered on the PROSPERO checking system with receipt number CRD42023447638.

2.1. Eligibility Criteria

Articles that met the following criteria were included in the review: Articles that assessed the impact of rainfall and/or temperature on under-five diarrhea were included. Articles that assessed the impact of rainfall and/or temperature on diarrhea in people of all ages but produced separate analyses (effect estimates) on U5 children were included. In addition, articles conducted on the influence of water and sanitation conditions on the relationship between rainfall and/or temperature on U5 diarrhea were included. Articles of any research design (either observational or experimental) with a minimum six-month study period were included. In order to have sufficient evidence for our review, we included records that were published in English from January 2006 to December 2023, with no limit to the study country. Because the review was quantitative, published articles with effect estimates were included.
In order to keep the precision of the effect estimate, we did not convert other scales of measurements such as the correlation coefficient (r), standard mean difference (SD), and the like into the common incidence rate ratio (IRR). In addition, studies whose effect estimates could not be converted to the incidence rate ratio (IRR) were excluded from the analysis.

2.2. Information Sources

The review title was structured according to the PECO (Population, Exposure, Comparator, Outcome) statement. This is because a clearly framed question creates the structure and delineates the approach to defining research objectives and conducting systematic reviews [18]. In addition, it informs the study design or inclusion and exclusion criteria for a review, as well as facilitates the interpretation of the directness of the findings based on how well the actual research findings represent the original question [19]. Thus, our review question contained population (under-five children); exposures (temperature and rainfall variability); comparators (water and sanitation conditions: type, availability, accessibility, and quality); and an outcome variable (diarrhea). We searched databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google, and Google Scholar for the relevant records using comprehensive search terms.

2.3. Search Strategy

The search strategy was developed in line with the research question formulated according to the PECO statement. We conducted a pilot test for the sensitivity and/or comprehensiveness of the search strategy against benchmark papers. In addition, to have comprehensive search terms that provide all relevant records, we searched for records by exchanging search terms combined with the Boolean operators. Finally, we used the main search terms combined as follows: “Rain* OR temperature AND “water quality” OR sanitation AND diarrhea OR diarrhoea AND child*”. The final search for records through the databases was conducted on 8 January 2024. The search strategies and combined research terms used for databases are described in an Excel spreadsheet; see the Supplementary Excel file, Table S1. In addition, we assessed the references listed under relevant articles for inclusion in the review.

2.4. Study Selection

First, two reviewers (GG and AA) searched, identified, and screened articles by reading titles and abstracts. For each article included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, a consensus was reached among the reviewers (GG, AA, and AH). Prior to the data extraction, the reviewers GG and AA adopted the standardized Excel sheet, and consensus was reached with the support of the third reviewer, AH.

2.5. Data Extraction

The authors (GG, AA, and AH) extracted data such as first author, publication year, study country, study design, study duration, number of U5 diarrhea cases, the definition of exposures and outcome variables, cut-off points for rainfall and temperature, source of drinking water, WASH factors, effect estimates, the scale of effect measures, adjusted covariates, lag type, statistically analyzed model, major findings, study country by region, and income level from the articles.

2.6. Data Items

2.6.1. Outcome Variable

Diarrhea was used as an outcome variable: Articles that reported diarrheal disease among U5 children in different ways, such as diarrhea, diarrhoea, acute watery diarrhea, gastrointestinal infection, bacterial dysentery, rotavirus infection, etc., that operationalized it according to the WHO definition of diarrheal disease, ‘three or more loose or liquid stools per day’ [20], were included in the review. We included studies that measured childhood diarrhea with different recall periods but in accordance with the WHO definition.

2.6.2. Exposure Variables

In this review, temperature (an exposure variable) was defined as the mean, so that the temperature reported in different ways in the selected articles was approximated to the mean value. Therefore, the term ‘mean temperature’ was used to determine the association between childhood diarrhea and temperature.
Rainfall, another exposure variable, was defined as the monthly mean so that the rainfall reported in different ways in the selected article was approximated to the monthly mean value. Therefore, the term ‘mean rainfall’ was used to determine the association between childhood diarrhea and rainfall.
The ‘water conditions’ that were considered in this review refer to the type, accessibility, availability, and quality of drinking water sources that households use.
The phrase ‘sanitation conditions’ that were considered in this review included the availability, type, and accessibility of latrines as well as household and compound sanitation.

2.7. Risk of Bias Assessment

Two reviewers, GG and AA, independently assessed the risk of bias for each study using the Navigation Guide tool for systematic review methodology [21]. We preferred to use this risk of bias assessment tool because there was no new or updated tool designed for time-series count data. This tool consists of eight risk domains: sample representativeness, blinding, exposure assessment, confounding, incomplete data, selective outcome reporting, conflict of interest, and other sources of bias. Using pre-determined criteria, the reviewers rated the risk of bias domain as “not applicable”, “low risk of bias”, “probably low risk of bias”, “high risk of bias,” or “probably high risk of bias,” so that the final result was decided through the agreement of three reviewers (GG, AA, and AH); see Supplementary Excel Material, Table S2. Furthermore, we also showed this finding by categorizing it as unclear, low risk of bias, or high risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias graph and summary, as shown in Figure 1).
The authors’ view judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study are presented as a risk of bias summary (see Supplementary Material File, Figure S1).

2.8. Rating the Quality of Evidence

The same reviewers assessed the overall quality of evidence for outcomes across the included studies using the GRADE framework, adapted for environmental and occupational health [22]. Hence, all studies included in the review were observational; we first rated the evidence quality as low and then considered eight critical components to upgrade or downgrade the evidence quality. In the end, we rated the body of evidence for primary outcomes using four levels of quality: “very low”, “low”, “moderate”, or “high” quality. The overall process of certainty in evidence assessment is presented in the evidence summary table; see the Supplementary Excel File, Table S3.

3. Data Analysis

Prior to the analysis, the effect estimate reported in another ratio scale measure in each selected study was converted into a common ratio scale measure, the incidence rate ratio measure (IRR). We followed different approaches to convert the effect estimate presented in various ratio scale measures into the incidence rate ratio. In a given study, if the odds ratio (OR) of people exposed to a particular exposure was less than 10%, it was roughly equivalent to the IRR. In a study in which the relative risk (RR) was determined from a rare exposure or from evenly spaced time-series data, the value of the RR is approximately equivalent to the IRR. Similar assumptions were held for other effect estimates, such as the prevalence ratio (PR) and hazard ratio (HR).
Moreover, for articles that reported the influence of temperature or rainfall on childhood diarrhea in lag categories, we averaged the effect estimate and used it in accordance with the predictor variables.
Because the data extracted from the articles were effect estimates with confidence intervals (CIs), we determined the standard error (SE) from the CI using the RevMan software. Then, the natural logarithm of the incidence rate ratio (LogIRR) and corresponding SE were determined using the generic inverse variance data (effect estimate and standard error). Finally, the inverse variance statistical method was used to produce the analyses with LogIRR, SE, and weight (the contribution of each effect estimate to the pooled effect size). Thus, the pooled effect estimates of the exposure–outcome associations were reported via a random effect model with the IRR. For some analysis, to increase the visibility of forest and funnel plots, we used R 4.3.2 software with the meta package consisting of metagen, forest, and funnel functions.
In this review, we conducted separate analyses on the influence of rainfall and temperature on childhood diarrhea. After excluding the studies that did not consider the lag effect, we assessed the presence of variation in the pooled effect estimate produced on the influence of temperature on childhood diarrhea. Similarly, we looked at the pooled effect estimate of temperature after excluding studies with a cross-sectional study design, then studies with a cross-sectional design, and those that did not consider the lag effect. The reason for this assessment was to discern whether there is significant variation due to the lag effect and study design or not.
In this review, in addition to the systematic reviews, we conducted subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-analyses using RevMan software. A subgroup analysis was conducted to determine the status of temperature’s influence on childhood diarrhea by country income level.
The sensitivity analyses were conducted on the influence of rainfall and temperature, separately, on childhood diarrhea. The reason is that both exposures are sensitive to each other, so the findings of rainfall on childhood diarrhea can be influenced by the temperature and vice versa. In order to control these confounders’ effects on the outcome findings, some studies tried to adjust the model during the analysis, even though it is not possible to control them completely. It is assumed that the pooled effect estimate produced from articles that assessed both exposures is more reliable.
We assessed studies with effect estimates that could contribute high heterogeneity to the pooled effect size using the one-living-out method during each analysis. The heterogeneity contributed via each article was reported using the I-squared (I2) statistic, and the publication bias was shown via funnel plots.
In the end, we assessed the influence of water and sanitation conditions on the relationship between temperature and rainfall on childhood diarrhea in meta-analyses using a random effect model. We conducted separate stratified meta-analyses because the extent of the influence of water and sanitation conditions might vary based on temperature and rainfall associations with diarrhea. In addition, the effect modifiers, in this case the water and sanitation variables, were different and their influence might also be varied.

4. Results

A total of 2017 records were identified via searches in selected major e-databases and Google/Google Scholar, of which only 430 papers were selected after being reviewed through titles and abstracts. A total of 231 articles were identified for full-text review; 36 articles with effect estimates were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis (Table 1). For the meta-analysis that was conducted on the influence of water and sanitation conditions, eight articles with eleven effect estimates were retrieved, as shown in the PRISM diagram; Figure 2. Furthermore, these studies (36) with selected main characters are presented in Table S4.
Of these, 12 examined only the impact of temperature (in Table S5), 8 examined the impact of rainfall (in Table S6), and 16 looked at the influence of both temperature and rainfall on childhood diarrhea (in Table S7).
In this review, two exposures of interest—rainfall and temperature—were separately analyzed. In the analysis of the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea, a total of 29 articles were selected (see Table S8). When the effect estimates of these articles were analyzed, the pooled effect estimates of temperature on childhood diarrhea became IRR = 1.05, 95% CI [1.02, 1.09] (see Supplementary Materials; forest plot Figure S2 and funnel plot Figure S3). This indicates that there was a 1.05-fold higher incidence of diarrhea among U5 children for a 1 °C increase in mean temperature. We re-analyzed the model by removing effect estimates, one at a time, and identified studies that contributed to high heterogeneity. After removing these studies, the overall effect estimate of temperature on childhood diarrhea became IRR = 1.04, 95% CI [1.03, 1.05], with I2 = 56% (p < 0.01), as shown in Figure 3.
Furthermore, we analyzed the model by removing effect estimates from cross-sectional studies and those that did not consider the lag effect; however, there was no change in the overall effect estimate; IRR = 1.05, 95% CI [1.03, 1.08], with I2 = 55%. Under the temperature–diarrhea assessment, a subgroup analysis based on the income level of countries was conducted. The finding shows that the pooled effect estimates on the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea varied across country income categories, from a low association in high-income countries to a high association in low-income countries (see the Supplementary Materials, Figures S5 and S6). We also conducted a sensitivity analysis for 16 articles that assessed both temperature and rainfall influence on U5 diarrhea. As a result, the overall effect estimates produced on the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea was IRR = 1.05, 95% CI [1.01, 1.10], with I2 =100% (p < 0.0001); see the Supplementary data provided in Table S7.
We determined the association between rainfall and childhood diarrhea using the same approach applied to temperature. A total of 21 articles that were assessed for the influence of rainfall on childhood diarrhea were identified (see Table S9). In the first analysis, the pooled effect estimates of 21 articles became IRR = 1.01 [1.00, 1.01]. This shows that there was a 1.01-fold higher incidence of diarrhea among U5 for a 1mm increase in mean rainfall. Finally, after removing those with high heterogeneity, a total of 16 articles were included, so that the pooled effect estimates of rainfall on diarrhea became IRR = 1.14 [1.03, 1.27], with I2 = 87% (p < 0.01) as shown in Figure 4.
Of the total studies that examined the relationship between rainfall and diarrhea among U5 children, 14 evaluated their relationship in the rainy season. Most of them reported that childhood diarrhea cases increased during the rainy season or during periods of heavy rain following dry days.
Prior to conducting the meta-analysis, we extracted effect estimates of rainfall and temperature from included articles that were produced after interacting with the effect modifiers during analysis (see Table S10). The effect modifiers we used in these meta-analyses were high access to piped (improved) drinking water sources, access to the public sewerage network, unimproved latrine facilities, and low access to piped drinking water sources.
Since the effect modifiers were different, their influence on the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea was presented separately in a stratified meta-analysis. Accordingly, two effect modifiers categorized as improved (high access to piped drinking water sources and high access to the public sewerage network) and two effect modifiers categorized as unimproved (unimproved latrine facilities and low access to piped drinking water sources) were reported in the forest plot, as shown in Figure 5.
Even though not pooled, the forest plot shows that unimproved effect modifiers had a positive influence on the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea (see the Supplementary Materials for the funnel plot: Figure S8).
Similarly, another meta-analysis conducted on six studies indicated that the overall effect estimate of the association between rainfall and childhood diarrhea among study populations with poor access to water and sanitation was IRR = 1.01, 95% CI [1.00, 1.01], with I2 = 73% (p = 0001) (see the Supplementary Materials, Figures S9 and S10). After excluding one study with high heterogeneity, the pooled effect estimates became = 1.21, 95% [0.95, 1.53], I2 = 62% (p = 0.03), as shown in Figure 6.
Heterogeneity: The potential heterogeneity that could be introduced via each estimate on the overall effect estimate was assessed using I2 and the p-value in the forest plot. Accordingly, most analyses show that there was considerable heterogeneity, even though its level varied from low to high in percent. In addition, the heterogeneity contributed via each effect estimate (outliers) was checked by removing them one by one from the model. As a result, those articles that could introduce considerable heterogeneity were shown in the analysis. Based on this, we conducted sensitivity and subgroup analyses.
Publication Bias: In this review, publication bias was assessed by looking at the distribution of effect estimates on the funnel plot. The plot shows the SE (log [incidence rate ratio]) on the y-axis against the incidence rate ratio (IRR) on the x-axis. Accordingly, the findings show the effect estimates were asymmetrically distributed over the plot. However, depending on the analysis, the distributions ranged from slightly to considerably asymmetric. Funnel plots of each pooled effect estimate produced for pre-defined exposure–outcome associations are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

5. Discussion

In this systematic review, we assessed the influence of temperature and rainfall on under-five diarrheal disease as well as the effect size modification potential of water supply and sanitation conditions. The analyses produced pooled effect estimates that revealed there is a positive association between rainfall/temperature and childhood diarrhea.
This systematic review suggests that an increase in rainfall and temperature would increase the incidence of childhood diarrhea. This is consistent with the previous review meta-analysis finding that an increase in temperature and rainfall predicts an increase in cryptosporidiosis, a primarily waterborne diarrheal illness [59]. Our findings strengthen the evidence of an overview of the systematic review [60] and clustered random trial [61] that reported temperature and rainfall as the main contributors to the occurrence of diarrheal disease. In addition, the review of studies conducted on the association between global climate change and children’s health supports our findings by summarizing that the change in temperature and rainfall increased diarrheal diseases [62]. Our findings also support the implications that climate change will likely increase children’s diarrhea through more heavy rainfall and rising water temperatures, particularly in the developing world [8,63]. The reviews of scientific evidence from Asian cities [64] and Ethiopia [65] are in line with our findings. However, systematic reviews and meta-analyses that were conducted on the association of temperature and rainfall on rotavirus diarrhea reported, in contrast, that diarrhea increases in colder or drier seasons rather than in higher mean temperatures or rainfall conditions [66].
In this systematic review, the pooled effect estimates of 29 studies indicate a significant positive association between temperature and childhood diarrhea. This could be because the diarrhea-causing pathogen could multiply with increasing temperatures. This is consistent with the previous systematic review’s finding that there is an association between ambient temperature and diarrhea, even though it was not based on diarrhea in under-five children [13,67]. Another systematic review analysis [6] and review of studies [68] on the impact of ambient temperature on children’s health support our findings, revealing that temperature is a significant contributor to the occurrence of gastrointestinal diseases among children. However, evidence from a systematic review reflected that, except for viral diarrhea cases, there is a positive association between ambient temperature and diarrheal diseases [15].
In this systematic review, a subgroup analysis that was conducted on the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea based on the income level of countries showed positive associations among all categories, with the highest being in low-income countries. This is consistent with the previous systematic review that showed a positive association between temperature and diarrhea in all income categories of countries [13].
In this systematic review, the pooled effect estimates of 16 studies indicate a significant positive association between rainfall and childhood diarrhea. In the evidence associated with rainfall, there are two different concepts. The first suggests that heavy rain decreases diarrhea by cleaning pathogens from the environment; it is low rainfall that exaggerates the pathogens [69]. The second piece of evidence says that heavy rainfall increases the incidence of diarrhea by flushing pathogens into drinking water sources, especially in areas where access to piped water and improved latrines is limited. Our findings support the idea that an increase in rainfall would increase the incidence of childhood diarrhea. This is also supported by the previous systematic review that suggests diarrhea could occur with increased rainfall [14]. In addition, the present study is supported by evidence that summarized anomalously wet conditions increase the risk of diarrhea in humid, subtropical regions [70]. However, our finding contrasts with the evidence found in the global cross-sectional study of diarrhea incidence in children under 5; there is a negative association between increased rainfall and the occurrence of diarrhea [71]. It is here that assessing the pooled modification effect of WASH factors on the relationship between rainfall, temperature, and childhood diarrhea is needed.
Our meta-analysis suggests that where there were no or low-improved WASH factors, the increased mean temperature or rainfall would increase the incidence of childhood diarrhea. This meta-analysis produced the pooled effect estimates in terms of WASH variables: latrine facilities and drinking water sources. This is consistent with the finding of the study that shows that when mean temperature and rainfall increase, households using unimproved sanitation or unimproved water have more cases of diarrhea [43]. On the other hand, the interventional study reported that when there were co-occurrence shifts in temperature and precipitation, the prevalence of childhood diarrhea increased by half in areas with unimproved WASH [72].
The pooled effect estimate of the interaction of unimproved latrine and rainfall on childhood diarrhea was IRR = 1.29 [0.87, 1.9]. This is supported by the evidence that shows that following heavy rain, there is an increased risk of gastrointestinal disease, particularly in areas with poor hygiene [15,73]. Furthermore, another piece of evidence reflected that the change in rainfall posed a risk to unimproved sanitation services, which in turn led to infectious diseases, including diarrhea [74]. The present evidence demonstrates that even though the pooled effect estimate is based on a few studies [28,49], in areas with poor or no toilet usage, heavy or low rainfall could increase the incidence of childhood diarrhea.
The other finding of this review shows that the pooled effect estimate of the interaction of unimproved drinking water sources and rainfall [28,30,42] on childhood diarrhea was IRR = 1.22 [0.89, 1.68]. This is consistent with the finding that shows heavy precipitation could adversely contaminate drinking water supplies, which in turn results in childhood diarrhea [75]. This could be heavy rain that stirs up sediment of diarrhea-causing pathogens in water, leading to the accumulation of large pathogens [76].
In addition, our meta-analysis suggests that where there is low access to improved toilets and drinking water sources, there is a positive pooled effect estimate between temperature and childhood diarrhea, with IRR = 1.06 [1.00, 1.13]. This is supported by other research that indicated high access to piped water and the public sewerage network could decrease the incidence of diarrhea with an increased mean temperature [47].
Furthermore, our meta-analysis findings are consistent with the previous meta-analysis of WASH interventions that revealed basic sanitation services with sewer connections resulted in a reduction in diarrhea compared to unimproved sanitation [77]. However, this evidence was not based on articles on under-five diarrhea and did not take into account temperature and rainfall variables. Similarly, other systematic reviews conducted on the impact of basic sanitation on diarrhea support our meta-analysis findings [78]. In general, our meta-analysis of a few studies indicates that unimproved latrine and drinking water sources exaggerate the incidence of childhood diarrhea in cases of increased temperature and rainfall.
The review study has many strengths: Initially, it has tried to address the recommendations put forth by the prior systematic review studies: the age-specific review and the potential of WASH factors on the effect modification [13,14,79]. Accordingly, in this review, articles were searched systematically and analyzed to determine the overall effect of temperature and rainfall on childhood diarrhea. The WASH factors operationalized in this review were assessed for their potential to modify the effects of temperature and rainfall on childhood diarrhea.
There were also limitations to the review: As has been the case in many review studies, limiting the review to English-language published articles is a weakness of this review. The evidence shows that rainfall and temperature variability have become major sources of infectious diseases, including diarrhea, in developing countries. However, few studies were included from low-income countries. This indicates that there is a considerable publication bias. Confounding, both manageable and unmanageable, could have an impact on the effect estimates of the identified articles. Even though studies evaluating the seasonal variation in diarrhea attributed to rainfall were identified, one of the review’s weaknesses is that it did not generate a pooled effect estimate based on seasonal variation.

6. Conclusions

We found that an increase in mean temperature and rainfall was associated with an increased risk of childhood diarrhea. In addition, the status of the WASH condition plays a major role in influencing the relationship between temperature and rainfall in childhood diarrhea. Where there were unimproved latrine facilities and drinking water sources, the increase in mean rainfall or temperature would increase the incidence of childhood diarrhea. To our knowledge, this systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to produce comprehensive evidence on the impact of rainfall and temperature on childhood diarrhea as well as the influence of unimproved drinking water sources and sanitary facilities.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph21070823/s1: Figure S1: Risk of bias summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item (using green symbol for low risk of bias, yellow for unclear and red for high risk of bias) for each included study, Figure S2: Forest plot of the systematic review of the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea, Figure S3: Funnel plot of the systematic review of the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea, Figure S4: Funnel plot of the systematic review of the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea after removing those articles that contributed high heterogeneity, Figure S5: Forest plot of the systematic review of the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea at country income level, Figure S6: Funnel plot of the systematic review of the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea at country income level, Figure S7: Funnel plot of the systematic review of the association between rainfall and childhood diarrhea, Figure S8: Funnel plot of meta-analysis on the modified association of temperature with childhood diarrhea due to water and sanitation conditions, Figure S9: Forest plot of meta-analysis on the modified association of rainfall with childhood diarrhea due to water and sanitation conditions (without removing any study), Figure S10: Funnel plot of meta-analysis on the modified association of rainfall with childhood diarrhea due to water and sanitation conditions (without removing any study), Figure S11: Funnel plot of meta-analysis on the modified association of rainfall with childhood diarrhea due to water and sanitation conditions. Table S1: Search strategies used to retrieve relevant records for systematic review and meta-analysis, Table S2: Risk of bias assessment for each included study using the Navigation Guide - Woodruff (2014) tool, Table S3: GRADE approach: Summary of Findings Table, Table S4: Selected studies with main characteristics conducted on the association of rainfall, temperature, water, and sanitation factors on childhood diarrhea, Table S5: Selected studies (with main characteristics) that assessed temperature influence, but not rainfall on childhood diarrhea, Table S6: Selected studies (with main characteristics) that assessed rainfall influence, but not temperature on childhood diarrheal, Table S7: Selected studies (with main characteristics) that assessed both rainfall and temperature influence on childhood diarrhea, Table S8: Selected studies (with main characteristics) that assessed influence of temperature on childhood diarrhea (articles included were either contained rainfall assessment or rainfall and temperature), Table S9: Selected studies (with main characteristics) that assessed influence of rainfall on childhood diarrhea (articles included were either contained rainfall assessment or rainfall and temperature), Table S10: Data of selected study characteristics of articles included Water and Sanitation conditions in meta-analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.G., A.A., A.H. and M.C.F.; methodology, G.G. and A.A.; software, G.G. and A.A.; validation, O.C. and M.C.F.; formal analysis, G.G.; investigation, G.G. and A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, G.G.; writing—review and editing, G.G., A.A., O.C. and M.C.F.; visualization, A.A. and A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review study received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for this review study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Hidayangsih, P.S.; Dharmayanti, I.; Tjandrarini, D.H.; Sukoco, N.E.W. Relationship Between Climate Variability, WASH and Diarrhea Cases in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference for Health Research BRIN (ICHR 2022), Jakarta, Indonesia, 23–24 November 2022; Nurlaila, I., Ulfa, Y., Anastasia, H., Putro, G., Rachmalina, R., Agustiya, R.I., Panjaitan, N.S.D., Sarassari, R., Poetranto, A.L., Mariya, S.S., Eds.; Atlantis Press International BV: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 642–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pronczuk, J.; Surdu, S. Children’s environmental health in the twenty-first century: Challenges and solutions. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1140, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. WHO. Climate Change. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health (accessed on 14 February 2024).
  4. American Public Health Association; ecoAmerica. Making the connection: Climate Changes Children’s Health. 2021. Available online: https://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/webinars/climate-webinars/climate-changes-health (accessed on 24 February 2024).
  5. Kovats, S.; Lloyd, S. Quantitative Risk Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Selected Causes of Death, 2030s and 2050s; Hales, S., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Eds.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  6. Xu, Z.; Etzel, R.A.; Su, H.; Huang, C.; Guo, Y.; Tong, S. Impact of ambient temperature on children’s health: A systematic review. Environ. Res. 2012, 117, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shannon, M.W.; Best, D.; Binns, H.J.; Forman, J.A.; Johnson, C.L.; Karr, C.J.; Kim, J.J.; Mazur, L.J.; Roberts, J.R.; Shea, K.M.; et al. Global climate change and children’s health. Pediatrics 2007, 120, 1149–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Philipsborn, R.P.; Chan, K. Climate change and global child health. Pediatrics 2018, 141, e20173774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Campbell-Lendrum, D.; Woodruff, R. Comparative Risk Assessment of the Burden of Disease from Climate Change. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 1935–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. WHO. Diarrhoea Disease. 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/diarrhoea#tab=tab_1 (accessed on 20 January 2024).
  11. International Vaccine Access Center (IVAC); Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Pneumonia and Diarrhea Progress Report 2020; p. 21. Available online: https://www.jhsph.edu/ivac/resources/pdpr/ (accessed on 22 February 2024).
  12. Bandyopadhyay, S.; Kanji, S.; Wang, L. The impact of rainfall and temperature variation on diarrheal prevalence in Sub-Saharan Africa. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 33, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carlton, E.J.; Woster, A.P.; DeWitt, P.; Goldstein, R.S.; Levy, K. A systematic review and meta-analysis of ambient temperature and diarrhoeal diseases. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 45, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kraay, A.N.M.; Man, O.; Levy, M.C.; Levy, K.; Ionides, E.; Eisenberg, J.N.S. Understanding the impact of rainfall on diarrhea: Testing the concentration-dilution hypothesis using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2020, 128, 126001–126016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Levy, K.; Woster, A.P.; Goldstein, R.S.; Carlton, E.J. Untangling the Impacts of Climate Change on Waterborne Diseases: A Systematic Review of Relationships between Diarrheal Diseases and Temperature, Rainfall, Flooding, and Drought. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 4905–4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahdoot, S.; Pacheco, S.E.; Paulson, J.A.; Baum, C.R.; Bole, A.; Brumberg, H.L.; Campbell, C.C.; Lanphear, B.P.; Lowry, J.A.; Pacheco, S.E.; et al. Global Climate Change and Children’s Health. Pediatrics 2015, 136, e1468–e1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Climate Change and Children’s Health and Well-Being in the United States. U.S. (EPA 430-R-23-001). 2023. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-04/CLiME_Final%20Report.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2024).
  18. Guyatt, G.H.; Oxman, A.D.; Kunz, R.; Atkins, D.; Brozek, J.; Vist, G.; Alderson, P.; Glasziou, P.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Schünemann, H.J. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 64, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Morgan, R.L.; Whaley, P.; Thayer, K.A.; Schünemann, H.J. Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes. Environ. Int. 2018, 121 Pt 1, 1027–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. WHO. Diarrhoea/symptoms—World Health Organization (WHO). 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/diarrhoea#tab=tab_2 (accessed on 5 March 2024).
  21. Woodruff, T.J.; Sutton, P. The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Morgan, R.L.; Thayer, K.A.; Bero, L.; Bruce, N.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Ghersi, D.; Guyatt, G.; Hooijmans, C.; Langendam, M.; Mandrioli, D.; et al. GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health. Environ. Int. 2016, 92–93, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Alemayehu, B.; Ayele, B.T.; Melak, F.; Ambelu, A. Exploring the association between childhood diarrhea and meteorological factors in Southwestern Ethiopia. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 741, 140189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Andhikaputra, G.; Sharma, A.; Sapkota, A.; He, H.; Lin, Y.-K.; Deng, L.-W.; Wang, Y.-C. Quantifying the effects of anomalies of temperature, precipitation, and surface water storage on diarrhea risk in Taiwan. Epidemiol. Health 2023, 45, e2023024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Atchison, C.J.; Tam, C.C.; Hajat, S.; Van Pelt, W.; Cowden, J.M.; Lopman, B.A. Temperature-dependent transmission of rotavirus in Great Britain and the Netherlands. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 277, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Azage, M.; Kumie, A.; Worku, A.; Bagtzoglou, A.C. Childhood Diarrhea Exhibits Spatiotemporal Variation in Northwest Ethiopia: A SaTScan Spatial Statistical Analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bhandari, D.; Bi, P.; Sherchand, J.B.; Dhimal, M.; Hanson-Easey, S. Assessing the effect of climate factors on childhood diarrhoea burden in Kathmandu, Nepal. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 223, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bhavnani, D.; Goldstick, J.E.; Cevallos, W.; Trueba, G.; Eisenberg, J.N.S. Impact of rainfall on diarrheal disease risk associated unimproved water and sanitation. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 90, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bush, K.F.; O’Neill, M.S.; Li, S.; Mukherjee, B.; Hu, H.; Ghosh, S.; Balakrishnan, K. Associations between extreme precipitation and gastrointestinal-related hospital admissions in Chennai, India. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Berendes, D.M.; Leon, J.S.; Kirby, A.E.; Clennon, J.A.; Raj, S.J.; Yakubu, H.; Robb, K.A.; Kartikeyan, A.; Hemavathy, P.; Gunasekaran, A.; et al. Associations between open drain flooding and pediatric enteric infections in the MAL-ED cohort in a low-income, urban neighborhood in Vellore, India. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. D’Souza, R.M. Climatic factors associated with hospitalizations for rotavirus diarrhoea in children under 5 years of age. Epidemiol. Infect. 2008, 136, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Delahoy, M.J.; Cárcamo, C.; Huerta, A.; Lavado, W.; Escajadillo, Y.; Ordoñez, L.; Vasquez, V.; Lopman, B.; Clasen, T.; Gonzales, G.F.; et al. Meteorological factors and childhood diarrhea in Peru, 2005–2015: A time series analysis of historic associations, with implications for climate change. Environ. Health A Glob. Access Sci. Source 2021, 20, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dharmayanti, I.; Hapsari, D.; Hidayangsih, P.S. Climatic Factors and Childhood Diarrhea in South Kalimantan in 2017–2020. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2022, 53, 65–80. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dhimal, M.; Adhikari, T.R.; Khanal, M.; Bhatt, N.R.; Jha, B.K.; Pun, S.; Chaudhary, A. Assessment of Effects of Climate Factors on Diarrheal Diseases at National and Sub-National Levels in Nepal; Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC): Kathmandu, Nepal, 2016; p. 80.
  35. Dhimal, M.; Bhandari, D.; Karki, K.B.; Shrestha, S.L.; Khanal, M.; Shrestha, R.R.P.; Dahal, S.; Bista, B.; Ebi, K.L.; Cissé, G.; et al. Effects of Climatic Factors on Diarrheal Diseases among Children below 5 Years of Age at National and Subnational Levels in Nepal: An Ecological Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gleason, J.A. Effect of drinking water source on associations between gastrointestinal illness and heavy rainfall in New Jersey. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hao, Q.; Wang, H. The Effect and Attributable Risk of Daily Temperature on Category C Infectious Diarrhea in Guangdong Province, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 23963–23974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hao, Y.; Liao, W.; Ma, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, N.; Zhong, S.; Wang, Z.; Yang, L.; Huang, C. Effects of ambient temperature on bacillary dysentery: A multi-city analysis in Anhui Province, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 671, 1206–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hashizume, M.; Armstrong, B.; Hajat, S.; Wagatsuma, Y.; Faruque, A.S.G.; Hayashi, T.; Sack, D.A. Association between climate variability and hospital visits for non-cholera diarrhoea in Bangladesh: Effects and vulnerable groups. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 36, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hashizume, M.; Wagatsuma, Y.; Faruque, A.S.G.; Hayashi, T.; Hunter, P.R.; Armstrong, B.; Sack, D.A. Factors determining vulnerability to diarrhoea during and after severe floods in Bangladesh. J. Water Health 2008, 6, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, N.N.; Zheng, H.; Li, B.; Fei, G.Q.; Ding, Z.; Wang, J.J.; Li, X.B. The Short-term Effects of Temperature on Infectious Diarrhea among Children under 5 Years Old in Jiangsu, China: A Time-series Study (2015–2019). Curr. Med. Sci. 2021, 41, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jagai, J.S. Extreme Precipitation and Emergency Room Visits for Gastrointestinal Illness in Areas with and without Combined Sewer Systems: An Analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kemajou, D.N. Climate variability, water supply, sanitation and diarrhea among children under five in Sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel analysis. J. Water Health 2022, 20, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lai, H.; Hales, S.; Woodward, A.; Walker, C.; Marks, E.; Pillai, A.; Chen, R.X.; Morton, S.M. Effects of heavy rainfall on waterborne disease hospitalizations among young children in wet and dry areas of New Zealand. Environ. Int. 2020, 145, 106136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lee, H.S.; Ha Hoang, T.T.; Pham-Duc, P.; Lee, M.; Grace, D.; Phung, D.C.; Thuc, V.M.; Nguyen-Viet, H. Seasonal and geographical distribution of bacillary dysentery (shigellosis) and associated climate risk factors in Kon Tam Province in Vietnam from 1999 to 2013. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2017, 6, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ma, Y.; Wen, T.; Xing, D.; Zhang, Y. Associations between floods and bacillary dysentery cases in main urban areas of Chongqing, China, 2005–2016: A retrospective study. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2021, 26, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Masinaei, M. Estimating the seasonally varying effect of meteorological factors on the district-level incidence of acute watery diarrhea among under-five children of Iran, 2014–2018: A Bayesian hierarchical spatiotemporal model. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2022, 66, 1125–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mengistie, B.; Gobena, T.; Admassu, D.; Assefa, N.; Mekbib Ayele, D.; Mengistu, D.A.; Worku, A.; Kumie, A.; Terfa, W.; Bikila, Z.; et al. Seasonal Variability Influence on the Prevalence of Diarrhoea among Under-Five-Year-old Children in Kersa District, Eastern Ethiopia: A Community-Based Longitudinal Study. Environ. Health Insights 2022, 16, 117863022210934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mertens, A.; Balakrishnan, K.; Ramaswamy, P.; Rajkumar, P.; Ramaprabha, P.; Durairaj, N.; Hubbard, A.E.; Khush, R.; Colford, J.M.; Arnold, B.F. Associations between high temperature, heavy rainfall, and diarrhea among young children in rural Tamil Nadu, India: A prospective cohort study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 047004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Morral-puigmal, C.; Martínez-solanas, È.; Villanueva, C.M. Weather and gastrointestinal disease in Spain: A retrospective time series regression study. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Musengimana, G.; Mukinda, F.K.; Machekano, R.; Mahomed, H. Temperature variability and occurrence of diarrhoea in children under five-years-old in Cape Town metropolitan sub-districts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Phung, D.; Rutherford, S.; Chu, C.; Wang, X.; Nguyen, M.; Nguyen, N.H.; Manh, C.; Nguyen, T.H.; Huang, C. Temperature as a risk factor for hospitalisations among young children in the Mekong Delta Area, Vietnam. Occup. Environ. Med. 2015, 72, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rahaman, M.R.; Dear, K.; Satter, S.M.; Tong, M.; Milazzo, A.; Marshall, H.; Varghese, B.M.; Rahman, M.; Bi, P. Short-Term Effects of Climate Variability on Childhood Diarrhoea in Bangladesh: Multi-Site Time-Series Regression Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 6279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Thiam, S.; Diène, A.N.; Sy, I.; Winkler, M.S.; Schindler, C.; Ndione, J.A.; Faye, O.; Vounatsou, P.; Utzinger, J.; Cissé, G. Association between childhood diarrhoeal incidence and climatic factors in urban and rural settings in the health district of Mbour, Senegal. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, P.; Goggins, W.B.; Chan, E.Y.Y. A time-series study of the association of rainfall, relative humidity and ambient temperature with hospitalizations for rotavirus and norovirus infection among children in Hong Kong. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 643, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wu, J.; Yunus, M.; Streatfield, P.K.; Emch, M. Association of climate variability and childhood diarrhoeal disease in rural Bangladesh, 2000–2006. Epidemiol. Infect. 2014, 142, 1859–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Xu, Z.; Huang, C.; Turner, L.R.; Su, H.; Qiao, Z.; Tong, S. Is Diurnal Temperature Range a Risk Factor for Childhood Diarrhea? PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Z.; Toloo, G.; Hu, W.; Tong, S. Assessment of the temperature effect on childhood diarrhea using satellite imagery. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jagai, J.S.; Castronovo, D.A.; Monchak, J.; Naumova, E.N. Seasonality of cryptosporidiosis: A meta-analysis approach. Environ. Res. 2009, 109, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rocque, R.J.; Beaudoin, C.; Ndjaboue, R.; Cameron, L.; Poirier-Bergeron, L.; Poulin-Rheault, R.-A.; Fallon, C.; Tricco, A.C.; Witteman, H.O. Health effects of climate change: An overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e046333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Grembi, J.A.; Nguyen, A.T.; Riviere, M.; Heitmann, G.B.; Patil, A.; Athni, T.S.; Djajadi, S.; Ercumen, A.; Lin, A.; Crider, Y.; et al. Influence of climatic and environmental risk factors on child diarrhea and enteropathogen infection and predictions under climate change in rural Bangladesh. Public Glob. Health 2022, preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sheffield, P.E.; Landrigan, P.J. Global Climate Change and Children’s Health: Threats and Strategies for Prevention. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hanna, R.; Oliva, P. Implications of Climate Change for Children in Developing Countries. Future Child. 2016, 26, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kovats, S.; Akhtar, R. Climate, climate change and human health in Asian cities. Environ. Urban. 2008, 20, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Simane, B.; Beyene, H.; Deressa, W.; Kumie, A.; Berhane, K.; Samet, J. Review of climate change and health in Ethiopia: Status and gap analysis. Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 2016, 30, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Levy, K.; Hubbard, A.E.; Eisenberg, J.N. Seasonality of rotavirus disease in the tropics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2009, 38, 1487–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Philipsborn, R.; Ahmed, S.M.; Brosi, B.J.; Levy, K. Climatic Drivers of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 214, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ghazani, M.; FitzGerald, G.; Hu, W.; Toloo, G.; Xu, Z. Temperature Variability and Gastrointestinal Infections: A Review of Impacts and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mukabutera, A.; Thomson, D.; Murray, M.; Basinga, P.; Nyirazinyoye, L.; Atwood, S.; Savage, K.P.; Ngirimana, A.; Hedt-Gauthier, B.L. Rainfall variation and child health: Effect of rainfall on diarrhea among under 5 children in Rwanda, 2010. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dimitrova, A.; McElroy, S.; Levy, M.; Gershunov, A.; Benmarhnia, T. Precipitation variability and risk of infectious disease in children under 5 years for 32 countries: A global analysis using Demographic and Health Survey data. Lancet Planet. Health 2022, 6, e147–e155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Res, C.; Lloyd, S.J.; Kovats, R.S.; Armstrong, B.G. Global diarrhoea morbidity, weather and climate. Lloyd SJ, Kovats RS, Armstrong BG. Global diarrhoea morbidity, weather and climate. Clim. Res. 2007, 34, 119–127. [Google Scholar]
  72. Nguyen, A.T.; Grembi, J.A.; Riviere, M.; Heitmann, G.B.; Hutson, W.D.; Athni, T.S.; Patil, A.; Ercumen, A.; Lin, A.; Crider, Y.; et al. Influence of temperature and precipitation on the effectiveness of water, sanitation, and handwashing interventions against childhood diarrheal disease in rural Bangladesh: A re-analysis of a randomized control trial. Epidemiology 2022, preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Alderman, K.; Turner, L.R.; Tong, S. Floods and human health: A systematic review. Environ. Int. 2012, 47, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Howard, G.; Calow, R.; Macdonald, A.; Bartram, J. Climate Change and Water and Sanitation: Likely Impacts and Emerging Trends for Action. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2016, 41, 253–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kistin, E.J.; Fogarty, J.; Pokrasso, R.S.; McCally, M.; McCornick, P.G. Climate change, water resources and child health. Arch. Dis. Child. 2010, 95, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wu, X.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, S.; Chen, L.; Xu, B. Impact of climate change on human infectious diseases: Empirical evidence and human adaptation. Environ. Int. 2016, 86, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wolf, J.; Hubbard, S.; Brauer, M.; Ambelu, A.; Arnold, B.F.; Bain, R.; Bauza, V.; Brown, J.; Caruso, B.A.; Clasen, T.; et al. Effectiveness of interventions to improve drinking water, sanitation, and handwashing with soap on risk of diarrhoeal disease in children in low-income and middle-income settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2022, 400, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. MCFreeman, M.C.; Garn, J.; Sclar, G.D.; Boisson, S.; Medlicott, K.; Alexander, K.T. The impact of sanitation on infectious disease and nutritional status: A systematic review and meta-analysi. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2017, 220, 928–949. Available online: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/ (accessed on 10 January 2024). [CrossRef]
  79. Liang, M.; Ding, X.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Y. Temperature and Risk of Infectious Diarrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta- analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 68144–68154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 21 00823 g001
Figure 1. Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figure 1. Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Ijerph 21 00823 g001
Ijerph 21 00823 g002
Figure 2. The PRISMA diagram of the study selection for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between rainfall and temperature on childhood diarrhea and their influence on water and sanitation factors.
Figure 2. The PRISMA diagram of the study selection for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between rainfall and temperature on childhood diarrhea and their influence on water and sanitation factors.
Ijerph 21 00823 g002
Ijerph 21 00823 g003
Figure 3. Forest plot of the systematic review of the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea after removing the articles that contributed to high heterogeneity (the funnel plot displaying the corresponding publication bias is shown in the Supplementary Materials; Figure S4) [24,26,27,32,33,35,37,39,41,43,45,47,50,51,52,53,54,55,58].
Figure 3. Forest plot of the systematic review of the association between temperature and childhood diarrhea after removing the articles that contributed to high heterogeneity (the funnel plot displaying the corresponding publication bias is shown in the Supplementary Materials; Figure S4) [24,26,27,32,33,35,37,39,41,43,45,47,50,51,52,53,54,55,58].
Ijerph 21 00823 g003
Ijerph 21 00823 g004
Figure 4. Forest plot of the systematic review of the association between rainfall and childhood diarrhea (the funnel plot of this analysis is shown in the Supplementary Materials; Figure S7) [23,26,27,28,29,34,36,39,44,45,46,49,54,55,58].
Figure 4. Forest plot of the systematic review of the association between rainfall and childhood diarrhea (the funnel plot of this analysis is shown in the Supplementary Materials; Figure S7) [23,26,27,28,29,34,36,39,44,45,46,49,54,55,58].
Ijerph 21 00823 g004
Ijerph 21 00823 g005
Figure 5. Forest plot of the meta-analysis on the modified association between temperature and childhood diarrhea due to water and sanitation conditions. Effect modifiers on temp-diarrhea association refers Effect modifiers on the temperature-diarrhea association [32,39,47].
Figure 5. Forest plot of the meta-analysis on the modified association between temperature and childhood diarrhea due to water and sanitation conditions. Effect modifiers on temp-diarrhea association refers Effect modifiers on the temperature-diarrhea association [32,39,47].
Ijerph 21 00823 g005
Ijerph 21 00823 g006
Figure 6. Forest plot of the meta-analysis on the modified effect of the association of rainfall on childhood diarrhea by water and sanitation conditions (see the Supplementary Materials for funnel plot, Figure S11). Effect modifiers on Rainfall-diarrhea associa refers Effect modifiers on the Rainfall-diarrhea association [28,30,42,49].
Figure 6. Forest plot of the meta-analysis on the modified effect of the association of rainfall on childhood diarrhea by water and sanitation conditions (see the Supplementary Materials for funnel plot, Figure S11). Effect modifiers on Rainfall-diarrhea associa refers Effect modifiers on the Rainfall-diarrhea association [28,30,42,49].
Ijerph 21 00823 g006
Table 1. Selected articles with main study characteristics for systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of rainfall and temperature on childhood diarrhea and the modification effect of water and sanitation conditions: January 2006–December 2023 [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58].
Table 1. Selected articles with main study characteristics for systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of rainfall and temperature on childhood diarrhea and the modification effect of water and sanitation conditions: January 2006–December 2023 [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58].
S. NFirst Author, YearStudy CountryStudy DesignStudy PopulationOutcome Exposure
Variable/s		Lag UnitAssociationIncome
01(Alemayehu et al., 2020) [23]Bench Maji,
Ethiopia		Retrospective study<5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall,
Temperature 		NonePositiveLI
02(Andhikaputra et al., 2023) [24]TaiwanHMIS data <5 age childrenDiarrheaTemperatureMonthPositiveUM
03(Atchison et al., 2010) [25]Great Britain & NetherlandsSurveillance study<5 age childrenRotavirus
diarrhea		Rainfall,
Temperature		weekPositiveHI
04(Azage et al., 2015) [26]Amhara,
Ethiopia		Retrospective study<5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall,
Temperature 		MonthPositiveLI
05(Bhandari et al., 2020) [27]Kathmandu,
Nepal		Retrospective study<5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall,
Temperature 		MonthPositiveLM
06(Bhavnani et al., 2014) [28] Borbo area,
Ecuador		Serial
case–control		<5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall DayNegativeUM
07(Bush et al., 2014) [29]Chennai city,
India		Time-series study<5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall DayPositiveLM
08(Berendes et al., 2019) [30] Vellore,
India		Cohort study<5 age childrenInfectious
Diarrhea		Rainfall NonePositiveLM
09(D’Souza, 2008) [31]Brisbane,
Australia		Time-series study<5 age childrenRotavirus
diarrhea 		TemperatureWeekPositiveHI
10(Delahoy et al., 2021) [32]PeruEcological study <5 age childrenDiarrheaTemperature WeekPositiveUM
11(Dharmayanti et al., 2023) [33]Kalimantan,
Indonesia		Ecological time-series study <5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall,
Temperature		MonthPositiveUM
12(Dhimal et al., 2016) [34]Kathmandu, NepalRetrospective study<5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall,
Temperature		NonePositiveLM
13(Dhimal et al., 2022) [35]NepalEcological study<5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall,
Temperature		NonePositiveUM
14(Gleason, 2017) [36]New Jersey, USABi-directional
case-crossover 		<5 age childrenGI
infection		RainfallDayPositiveHI
15(Q. Hao & Wang, 2021) [37]Guangdong, ChinaSurveillance study<5 age childrenInfectious
diarrhea		TemperatureDayPositiveUM
16(Y. Hao et al., 2019) [38]Anhui, ChinaEcological study<5 age childrenBacillary
dysentery		TemperatureWeekPositiveUM
17(Hashizume et al., 2007) [39]Dhaka,
Bangladesh		Surveillance study <5 age childrenNone-cholera
diarrhea		Rainfall,
Temperature 		WeekPositiveLM
18(Hashizume et al., 2008) [40]Dhaka,
Bangladesh		Surveillance study<5 age childrenRotavirus
Diarrhea		Temperature WeekPositiveLM
19(Huang et al., 2021) [41]Jiangsu,
China		Time-series study<5 age childrenInfectious
diarrhea		Temperature DayPositiveUM
20(Jagai, 2015) [42]Massachusetts, USAEcological time-series study<5 age childrenGI illness
diarrhea		Rainfall DayPositiveHI
21(Kemajou, 2022) [43]SSADemographic and health surveys <5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall,
Temperature		MonthPositiveLI
22(Lai et al., 2020) [44]New ZealandNested case-crossover<5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfallDayPositiveHI
23(Lee et al., 2017) [45]Kon Tum,
Vietnam		Retrospective study<5 age childrenBacillary
dysentery		Rainfall,
Temperature 		MonthPositiveLM
24(Ma et al., 2021) [46]Chongqing, ChinaTime-series study<5 age childrenBacterial
dysentery		Rainfall DayPositiveUM
25(Masinaei, 2022) [47]IranRetrospective time-series study<5 age childrenWatery
diarrhea		Temperature NonePositiveLM
26(Mengistie et al., 2022) [48]Kersa,
Ethiopia		A community-based longitudinal survey<5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfallNonePositiveLI
27(Mertens et al., 2019) [49]Tamil Nadu,
India		Prospective
Cohort 		<5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall,
Temperature 		WeekPositiveLM
28(Morral-puigmal et al., 2018) [50]SpainEcological time-series study <5 age childrenGI
disease		Temperature DayPositiveHI
29(Musengimana et al., 2016) [51]Cape Town,
South Africa		Cross-sectional study<5 age childrenDiarrheaTemperatureWeekPositiveUM
30(Phung et al., 2015) [52]Can Tho City, VietnamTime-series study<5 age childrenGI
infection		Rainfall,
Temperature		DayPositiveLM
31(Rahaman et al., 2023) [53]BangladeshSurveillance study <5 age childrenDiarrheaTemperature DayPositiveLM
32(Thiam et al., 2017) [54]Mbour,
Senegal		Retrospective study <5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall,
Temperature		MonthNegativeLI
33(Wang et al., 2018) [55]Hong Kong, ChinaTime-series study<5 age childrenRoto virus
diarrhea		Rainfall,
Temperature		DayNegativeUM
34(Wu et al., 2014) [56]Matlab,
Bangladesh		Cohort study <5 age childrenDiarrheaRainfall,
Temperature 		DayPositiveLM
35(Xu et al., 2013) [57]Brisbane, QueenslandTime-series observational study <5 age childrenDiarrheaTemperature DayPositiveHI
36(Xu et al., 2014) [58]Brisbane,
Australia		Ecological study <5 age childrenDiarrheaTemperature DayPositiveHI
HI—High Income, LI—Low Income, LM—Lower-Middle Income, UM—Upper-Middle Income.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Geremew, G.; Cumming, O.; Haddis, A.; Freeman, M.C.; Ambelu, A. Rainfall and Temperature Influences on Childhood Diarrhea and the Effect Modification Role of Water and Sanitation Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070823

AMA Style

Geremew G, Cumming O, Haddis A, Freeman MC, Ambelu A. Rainfall and Temperature Influences on Childhood Diarrhea and the Effect Modification Role of Water and Sanitation Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(7):823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070823

Chicago/Turabian Style

Geremew, Gorfu, Oliver Cumming, Alemayehu Haddis, Matthew C. Freeman, and Argaw Ambelu. 2024. "Rainfall and Temperature Influences on Childhood Diarrhea and the Effect Modification Role of Water and Sanitation Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 7: 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070823

APA Style

Geremew, G., Cumming, O., Haddis, A., Freeman, M. C., & Ambelu, A. (2024). Rainfall and Temperature Influences on Childhood Diarrhea and the Effect Modification Role of Water and Sanitation Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(7), 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070823

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop