Next Article in Journal
Patient Decision-Making about Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Cancer Management: Context and Process
Previous Article in Journal
Principles to Guide Integrative Oncology and the Development of an Evidence Base
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Talking to Cancer Patients about Complementary Therapies: Is It the Physician’s Responsibility?

1
Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
2
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2008, 15(s2), 88-93; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i0.282
Submission received: 6 May 2008 / Revised: 10 June 2008 / Accepted: 15 July 2008 / Published: 1 August 2008

Abstract

Background: To ensure the safety and effectiveness of cancer management, it is important for physicians treating cancer patients to know whether their patients are using complementary and alternative medicine (cam) and if so, why. Objective: Here, we discuss the ethical and legal obligations of physicians to discuss cam use in an oncology setting, and we provide practical advice on how patient–provider communication about cam can be improved. Results: Physicians have both ethical and legal obligations to their patients, including the obligation to respect patient autonomy. This latter obligation extends to use of cam by patients and needs to be addressed beginning early in the patient–provider relationship. Because lack of education in this field and lack of time during patient consultations are barriers to talking with patients about cam, we provide resources to facilitate such discussions. These resources include suggestions on how to discuss the topic of cam and a wide range of information sources. Conclusions: Discussing cam with patients is the physician’s responsibility, and such discussion will facilitate evidence-based, patient-centred cancer care.
Keywords: complementary and alternative medicine; cam; physicians; patients; communication complementary and alternative medicine; cam; physicians; patients; communication

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Verhoef, M.J.; Boon, H.S.; Page, S.A. Talking to Cancer Patients about Complementary Therapies: Is It the Physician’s Responsibility? Curr. Oncol. 2008, 15, 88-93. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i0.282

AMA Style

Verhoef MJ, Boon HS, Page SA. Talking to Cancer Patients about Complementary Therapies: Is It the Physician’s Responsibility? Current Oncology. 2008; 15(s2):88-93. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i0.282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Verhoef, M. J., H. S. Boon, and S. A. Page. 2008. "Talking to Cancer Patients about Complementary Therapies: Is It the Physician’s Responsibility?" Current Oncology 15, no. s2: 88-93. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i0.282

APA Style

Verhoef, M. J., Boon, H. S., & Page, S. A. (2008). Talking to Cancer Patients about Complementary Therapies: Is It the Physician’s Responsibility? Current Oncology, 15(s2), 88-93. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i0.282

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop