Next Article in Journal
The Application of Graphic Methods and the DEA in Predicting the Risk of Bankruptcy
Next Article in Special Issue
Stress Spillovers among Financial Markets: Evidence from Spain
Previous Article in Journal
The Nexus between Financial Performance and Equilibrium: Empirical Evidence on Publicly Traded Companies from the Global Financial Crisis Up to the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Systematic and Critical Review on the Research Landscape of Finance in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020

1
Centre for Interdisciplinary Social Research, Phenikaa University, Yen Nghia Ward, Ha Dong District, Hanoi 100803, Vietnam
2
College of Asia Pacific Studies, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, Beppu, Oita 874-8577, Japan
3
College of International Management, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, Beppu, Oita 874-8577, Japan
4
BeeKrowd Corporation, Deutsches Haus, 33 Le Duan, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City 710000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2021, 14(5), 219; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14050219
Submission received: 12 April 2021 / Revised: 8 May 2021 / Accepted: 10 May 2021 / Published: 12 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Markets—The Response in Crisis Moments)

Abstract

:
This paper endeavors to understand the research landscape of finance research in Vietnam during the period 2008 to 2020 and predict the key defining future research directions. Using the comprehensive database of Vietnam’s international publications in social sciences and humanities, we extract a dataset of 314 papers on finance topics in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020. Then, we apply a systematic approach to analyze four important themes: Structural issues, Banking system, Firm issues, and Financial psychology and behavior. Overall, there have been three noticeable trends within finance research in Vietnam: (1) assessment of financial policies or financial regulation, (2) deciphering the correlates of firms’ financial performances, and (3) opportunities and challenges in adopting innovations and ideas from foreign financial market systems. Our analysis identifies several fertile areas for future research, including financial market analysis in the post-COVID-19 eras, fintech, and green finance.

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 recession is considered the worst recession ever since the Great Depression, which by far is much worse than the global financial crisis in 2009 (Gopinath 2020). According to the World Economic Outlook from International Monetary Fund in April 2020, the world GDP growth was projected to fall by 6.3 percentage points to −3 percentage within 3 months (International Monetary Fund 2020). Meanwhile, when the Global Financial Crisis 2008–2009 occurred, it was only –0.1 percentage (Gopinath 2020).
After the crisis of 2008–2009, Vietnam’s GDP had soared by USD 162.791 billion, which is equivalent to the growth of approximately 264.2% in 2019 (World Bank 2021). According to the Ministry of Finance (2017), the disbursed capital of FDI in 2008 also reached USD 11.5 billion before doubling to USD 20.38 billion in 2019 (Thu Phuong 2019). The entire period witnessed a slight upward trend that ended up at USD 11.35 billion in the first 8 months of 2020 (PL 2020). Characterized by such a strong response and recovery from the effect of the 2008 financial crisis, Vietnam is thus a key emerging market worth studying. Here, it is also important to emphasize that despite a humble beginning, Vietnam is now one of the fastest-growing markets in the world only 35 years after the 1986 socioeconomic reform, Doi Moi (Locus Bulletin 2019).
Vietnam’s financial market has witnessed a series of remarkable events in recent years. In particular, the VN-Index hit a new historical peak—as it reached 1252.45 points on April 2021 along with 113,875 new trading accounts opened in March 2021, which made the total number of traders in Vietnam has reach 3.02 million—equal to 2.8% of the Vietnamese population (Nguyen 2021). Due to the exceptional control of COVID-19, the trade surplus has reached a record high over 5 recent years, at USD 19.1 billion (Nguyen 2020). In 2017, the country was ranked as one of the most globalized populous countries (Kopf 2018); such status and the dynamic growth of the financial market have led to Vietnam becoming one of the most promising lands for foreign investors. Notably, in spite of the adverse effects of COVID-19, Vietnam’s GDP still managed to grow by 2.9% in 2020 (Lee 2021).
Hence, examining the resiliency of the Vietnamese financial market in dealing with the outcomes of a post-crisis world after 2008, the process of international integration could offer actionable insights for other emerging markets’ policy makers as well as global investors. Thus, in this paper, we set out to understand Vietnam’s landscape of finance research from 2008 to 2020. Since there has been no comprehensive review of financial studies in Vietnam until now, this paper aims to contribute a systematic and critical review of key financial issues in one of the most dynamic emerging markets. Hence, it provides not only research directions but also actionable insights for researchers and policy-makers who seek to understand and strengthen financial systems in post-crisis financial markets.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents the data and methods used in the paper. Section 3 reflects on the trends of financial publication in Vietnam before reviewing in depth the four main pillars of the Vietnamese financial research, which are Structural issues, Banking system, Firm issues, and Financial psychology and behavior. Section 4 is the discussion, followed by concluding thoughts in Section 5.

2. Data and Methods

2.1. The SSHPA Database

The database we use for this review is SSHPA (Social Sciences & Humanities Peer Award), which is a nationally verified, structured, comprehensive open database specialized in social sciences and humanities research in Vietnam. This database has served to promote the transparency of science (Vuong 2020; Teixeira da Silva and Vuong 2021) and reducing the cost of doing science (Vuong 2018). All publications of Vietnamese researchers since 2008 in the fields of social sciences and humanities, which have been published in Web-of-Science and Scopus-indexed academic outlets, are tracked and recorded in the system of the database. A more detailed description of a rigorous data processing procedure and the potential for reproducibility of the system can be found in the data descriptor paper in Nature Research’s Scientific Data, which is a top-tiered data science journal (Vuong et al. 2018b) or method article in MethodsX (Vuong et al. 2020c). SDA is the short form of SSHPA Data Analysis. SDA serves the function of extracting data from the SSHPA database; then, it creates an extensive collection of visualizations from these data. By applying these two stages, common problems such as duplicate data, incorrect DOI, incorrect author names, etc. will be eradicated, thus ensuring the accuracy and precision of the outcomes, which can be utilized for different research purposes.
As SSHPA is capable of high-quality data collection and clear visual display for analysis, we have extracted a subset of the financial research database to answer the following question: “What does the landscape of finance research look like in Vietnam between 2008 and 2020?” Next, the search strategy and data-filtering process will be presented.

2.2. Data Extraction and Filtering Process

As we aim to cover the fundamental elements of a financial market (finance, investment, stock market, banking system) and to establish an inclusive view of the research trends in Vietnamese finance, we have chosen the following set of keywords: “finance”, “financial”, “financing”, “invest”, “stock”, “credit”, and “bank”. Entering the keywords into the SSHPA database, we found 563 publications containing at least one of those keywords in the title and/or the abstract. Then, the 563 publications were exported to an Excel sheet.
Next, we examine all the titles and abstracts to ensure there are no omitted parts caused by errors or incompatible format. Then, we further filter the most relevant papers for the Vietnamese market according to three criteria:
(1)
The database is collected from Vietnam or regions in which the Vietnamese market is included or strongly influenced.
(2)
The research topic of the paper is either partially related to or focused on finance in multiple fields, notably the financial market structure, financial policy, or corporate finance.
(3)
The research coherently presents its results and implications for topics such as systematic corporate governance or policies implementations.
After checking each paper one by one, the selected articles are cross-checked by at least another group member. Finally, 249 articles were removed from the data pool, and the remaining 314 articles were included in the final sample.
We examine similar papers on the topic of finance research in emerging markets (Brooks and Schopohl 2018; Han et al. 2018; Linnenluecke et al. 2016) and study their analysis approach. We find that although the review papers’ methodologies vary, the authors strike to identify the most significant characteristics of the finance research and analyze their trends. Within this setting, we decide to apply a systematic approach to our analysis for two main reasons. (1) The systematic approach enables us to review a large number of data with a high focus on empirical evidence and research output, which is critical for identifying the characteristics of the financial research database. (2) While the systematic approach is highly time consuming, our SSHPA database’s features, which includes the displays of articles’ abstracts, keywords, and significant outputs, will significantly accelerate the information gathering process.
The following figures and tables will demonstrate our final sample’s characteristics. The final dataset consists of 9 conference proceedings, 7 book sections, and 226 scientific journals with JIF ranging from 0 to 4.803 (see Figure 1). In addition, Figure 2 displays a list of top publishers in the dataset. It also addresses 14 fields, many of which are very prominent for future research (Environment/Sustainability, Sociology, Healthcare, etc.) (see Table 1). With the scope of only one financial market, this dataset is relatively comprehensive compared to other systematic review papers (Brooks and Schopohl 2018; Han et al. 2018; Linnenluecke et al. 2016).

3. Thematic Review

3.1. Vietnam’s Financial Publication Output Trends

It is noticeable that in the period from 2008 to 2017, the number of publications in Finance was relatively small, with less than 25 articles published per year. 2018 was the first time the number of published papers surpassed the figure of 25. Then, from 2019 onwards, a sudden surge was witnessed in the Finance-related publications, with the number of papers increased nearly four times, resulting in approximately 100 papers in each of the year 2019 and 2020, corresponding with the overall increase in the productivity of Vietnamese scientific research (Vuong 2018, 2019b) (See Figure 3). As the average annual growth rate is 42.94%, we expect a high level of publication output in the years to come.

3.2. Vietnam’s Finance Research Landscape

We categorize the articles mainly into four (4) larger themes: (1) Structural issues, (2) Banking system, (3) Firm issues, and (4) Financial psychology and behavior. The results are discussed as follows. One article may aim to provide answers for multiple problems, and thus, it could be categorized into different themes (see Figure 2).

3.2.1. Structure Issues

Within this category, the research focuses on any issues that affect the financial setting from a macro perspective. As the result, the researching questions could be as broad as how prejudice affects credit assessment (Pham and Talavera 2018) or to which level we can predict a currency crisis (Pham 2017). These research studies serve the purposes of understanding the markets’ mechanisms, evaluating financial policies, and establishing a more efficient financial system (Chinh and Vuong 2009a, 2009b; Nguyen et al. 2019d; Vuong and Tran 2009; Vuong et al. 2020d).

Stock Market

From the results and recommendations of relevant research on the stock market, we can identify researchers’ two main interests: to improve financial information systems and to identify risks in the stock market.
The Vietnamese stock market is relatively new, as it was launched in 2000. While the market is constantly developing with new stocks listed annually, the challenge from information inefficiency persists over the years (Vo and Bui 2016). In other words, information on the corporates’ cash flow, the book value of stock, firm sizes, etc., are either not properly listed in the firm’s financial statement or not reliable or accessible (Hung et al. 2018). As information inefficiency can have adverse impacts on both investors and the firm’s stock value (Vo and Bui 2016), the task of improving financial information systems is a must, and it can be accomplished via the following policies. The first is a stricter financial statement regulation from the State to enforce compliance from listed companies; as Hung et al. (2018) points out, complete disclosure of financial information is also encouraged for firms to gain trust from investors. Second, a healthy increase of foreign ownership could improve the informational efficiency of the equity market (Vo 2017a), as stock price informativeness, i.e., how changes in earnings are presented in the stock price (Hu et al. 2018), is found to fluctuate in accordance with the increase in foreign ownership. A robust financial information system is also critical to carry further research on the stock market, which is reflected in stock returns and stock liquidity studies (Dang et al. 2019, Huynh et al. 2018, Pham et al. 2018a).
Multiple studies point out that the Vietnam stock market is vulnerable to the strong influence of foreign markets and foreign investors. The VN Index is shown to be influenced by foreign stock markets’ fluctuation; as Vo (2020) shows, an extreme surge on stock markets in Taiwan, China, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Korea could create a similar spillover effect to the Vietnamese market. Nguyen (2011) has identified the spillover effects of US macroeconomic news on the Vietnam stock market. Another research studies the speculative stock market’s bubble formation in Asia and Latin America to apply to the emerging stock markets (Tran 2017). Stock splits, while common for many firms, are found to be correlated with vulnerable firms and insider trading (Nguyen et al. 2017b). Furthermore, foreign investors have a high potential of destabilizing stock prices if they react to information simultaneously, as a time-series analysis of foreign investors’ trading on stock returns in Vietnam reveals their sophisticated timing strategy: they are long-term and positive feedback traders; i.e., they hold their stock for a long period and only buy when the stock price has decreased and sell when stock price has increased (Vo 2017b). The sensitivity of the Vietnam stock market to changes in foreign markets and foreign investors highlights the importance of (i) finding a countermeasure for herd mentality (Faber and Vuong 2004; Dang and Lin 2016) and (ii) the early detection of risks from overseas markets and investors (Batten and Vo 2015; Vo 2017a, 2017b, 2020). The influence of foreign ownership will be further discussed in Banking and Firm sectors, while herd mentality will be explained in Financial psychology and behavior.

Foreign Investment

Over the past two decades, research on FDI in Vietnam has converged on two main areas of interest. First, it concerns how to generate a virtuous feedback loop between economic growth and FDI attractiveness. An early research on FDI by Anwar and Nguyen (2010) has pointed out the positive correlation between Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and economic growth (Dinh et al. 2019). Economic growth was determined through human capital, education and training level, financial market development status, and technology development (Anwar and Nguyen 2010). However, recent studies show that to further enhance the FDI absorptive capacity, improving these aspects is necessary (Dinh et al. 2019).
Second, this area of research focuses on limiting the negative impacts of FDI. For example, although FDI has positive impacts on multiple sectors, notably imports–exports, FDI could pose a threat of macroeconomic instability (Anwar and Nguyen 2011; Le 2016). Meanwhile, during the Asian financial crisis, FDI is found to be vital in boosting net exports (Anwar and Nguyen 2011); Le (2016) finds booming FDI real estate projects lead to the risk of macroeconomic instability in causing real estate inflation, destabilizing capital balance, and increasing bad debt ratio in the commercial banking system. Notably, FDI could exacerbate regional income inequality, as the positive correlation of FDI and economic growth is only identified in the Red River Delta, North East, South East, and Mekong River Delta, according to Anwar and Nguyen (2010). Thus, policies and research studies to understand how to promote FDI in the remaining unattractive regions are essential (Le 2016). Future studies can focus on the impacts of regulations on the construction of these FDI projects, and how to engender a shift of FDI flows from real estate to manufacturing sectors as well as how to increase eco-friendly FDI (Vuong 2021). This is to create a more sustainable financial market and distribute the economic gains of increased FDI equitably.

Financial Inclusion Promotion

Research on Financial inclusion is relatively new, being published mainly in the 2019–2020 period. This may relate to the ratification of the National Financial Inclusion Strategy in 2020, which will continue until 2025 with a vision of 2030 (Vietnam Government Portal 2020). To prepare for the establishment of a nationwide financial network, policymakers and researchers are studying financial inclusion using global datasets (Le et al. 2019a; Morgan and Long 2020; Van et al. 2019; Vo et al. 2019).
In simple terms, financial inclusion is the ideal accessibility of every demographic to beneficial and affordable financial products or services (Van et al. 2019; Vo et al. 2019). Financial inclusion has been widely researched for its potential to mitigate poverty and boost economic growth, to positively impact income quality, macroeconomic stability, and inflation control (Le et al. 2019a; Van et al. 2019; Vo et al. 2019). On the other hand, there is evidence for the adverse effect of financial inclusion and financial sustainability on financial efficiency (Le et al. 2019a). Several proposals have been put forward to increase financial inclusion while limiting its side effects. At the grassroots level, one solution is educational programs that improve general financial literacy (Morgan and Long 2020). More importantly, bank competition also seems to be encouraging financial inclusion (Pham et al. 2018b). In the future, we can expect a growth of research studies on the implementation outcomes of Vietnam’s National Financial Inclusion Strategy in Vietnam.

Rural Credit and Microcredit

In emerging markets, rural credit and microcredit play a significant role in promoting credit accessibility to the impoverished and low-income demographic. As Vietnam’s agricultural sector has grown substantively over the past 35 years, microcredit programs, offered by the formal and semiformal credit channels, have grown in demands and complexities, notably in loans’ size and the repayment period (Khoi and Gan 2016; Nguyen et al. 2019d). The effectiveness of such microcredit programs has been a popular topic.
On the one hand, the microcredit programs have been found to successfully address the poor households at the bottom of the low-income demographic, positively increase the probability of child education, and improve rural household’s self-employment profits, food consumption, and social network (Haughton and Khandker 2016; Lensink and Pham 2011; Phan et al. 2019, 2020a; Poon and Thai 2010; Tran et al. 2019b). On the other hand, there have been concerns about whether the targeting of such projects is pro-poor. Examining the preferential credit program from VBSP in 2002 and 2004, the participation rate of impoverished households in rural areas was only 12% and 6.4% nation-wide. The non-poor households also comprised approximately 67.1% of all participants and received more credit than the impoverished households (Cuong 2008). Furthermore, when examining the positive impacts of microcredits closely, there are flawed indexes. For instance, if households’ incomes stay below minimum wages, microcredit’s impact on child education probability becomes negative (Do 2015; Tran et al. 2019b). This highlights the importance of other measures to increase microcredit’s role in alleviating poverty such as risk coping measures and farming technologies.
Research on Rural Credit and Microfinance proves the importance of credit accessibility in poverty reduction in rural areas. Credits open opportunities to develop businesses, the same foundation on which a lot of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and Startups are emerging. It is also important to note as climate change disproportionately affects small local businesses; future studies can focus on the possibility of financial products that alleviate such adverse impacts (Vuong 2021). We will further discuss the influences of credit in the Firm issues section SMEs Financing.

IFRS Adoption

Vietnam is one of the countries where International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are not compulsory for financial statements. Researchers are examining the possibility of IFRS adoption by examining financial experts’ view on IFRS or its compatibility to Vietnam institutional context (Le et al. 2019b, 2019c, 2020b; Nguyen and Rahman 2019; Phan et al. 2018; Phan 2014; Phan and Mascitelli 2014).
The current Vietnamese Accounting Standards (VAS) are considered to be limited, specifically when dealing with recognition of the fair value and incurred financial tools (Nguyen and Rahman 2019). Meanwhile, the widespread adoption of IFRS could improve Vietnam’s FDI attractiveness (Gordon et al. 2012). For example, according to the experts, IFRS adoption will promote the transparency of financial information, decrease misstatements in financial reports, and increase the level of responsibility for firms to disclose information (Le et al. 2020b). However, high-cost expenditures of IFRS preparation, language barriers, and legal framework issues are the main barriers of IFRS adoption (Le et al. 2019b, 2019c, 2020b). Although the alignment of Vietnamese accounting legislation with IFRS was officially announced in November 2013, the detailed directions of IFRS adoption have not been cleared (Phan 2014).
Similar to Vietnam’s approach to economic reform (Vuong 2019a; Chinh and Vuong 2009a), the institutionalization of IFRS in Vietnam happens gradually, following a legalism-based accounting regulation approach (Nguyen and Rahman 2019). Here, the state initiates the IFRS-oriented rules to local enterprises and businesses, which would cause reassessment on exiting accounting statements. Grassroots criticisms after the “test” will help the state to adjust IFRS to suit local needs. Despite this state-led process, Big4 firms and Western professional accounting associations (WPAA) have contributed greatly to the institutionalization (Nguyen and Rahman 2019). Experts’ estimate that in order to efficiently integrate IFRS into firms’ financial statements, the optimal time for IFRS preparation is around 3–5 years, yet it has not materialized until now (Le et al. 2020b; Phan 2014; Phan and Mascitelli 2014). Vietnam would need to encourage enterprises to voluntarily apply for IFRS and then gradually set the compulsory standard for financial statements, while enterprises need to support human resources training to increase IFRS knowledge for the local accountants (Le et al. 2019c).

3.2.2. Banking System

After sorting, 72 articles discuss numerous banking issues. Specifically, the three topics of risks, performance, and policies garnered the most research interests.

Risks

Regarding bank risks, Vietnamese researchers focus on examining factors affecting bank risks and their preventive measures. Interestingly, empirical results from Vietnam reveal significant inconsistencies in the literature concerning bank risks.
Regarding the effects of banks’ income diversification, the traditional view states it would reduce bank risks, which has been demonstrated in studies of various markets: the EU (Saghi-Zedek 2016), Japan (Sawada 2013), and a sample of 111 countries (Doumpos et al. 2016). Nevertheless, Batten and Vo (2016)’s study shows that in emerging markets such as Vietnam, banks with a higher income diversification face higher levels of risk. This result was even more robust when different measures of diversification, including fee income and trading diversification indicators, were used to test this relationship. Such empirical results are they are in line with Stiroh and Rumble (2006) in the US, revealing an inconsistency in the literature.
In Vietnam, bank credit risk seems to positively correlate with bank size, contradicting results from other emerging markets (Kasman and Kasman 2016). Batten and Vo (2016) found that banks with higher expenses were associated with higher risks (Batten and Vo 2016). Concurringly, Le et al. (2020a) found that small banks seem to be more efficient than large banks as their input waste, output shortage, and risk surplus were just one-third of those of large banks. Large and well-capitalized banks in Vietnam were also proven to be less likely to increase credit without taking risks into account; in fact, after the crisis, they were better at considering the risks by reducing their credit supply (Vo and Nguyen 2014). If a tight monetary policy had existed, large banks would have faced more bank risk (Vo and Nguyen 2014).
Hoang et al. (2019a) found that banks’ credit risk, measured by the NPL ratio, was negatively affected by the unemployment rate and the real interest rate, while there was a significant positive association between loan loss reserves and the credit risk. These findings were different from the results of Boudriga et al. (2009)’s study, which applies the same FEM-REM estimation, indicating that a lower loan losses reserves ratio would increase the NPL next year. Since the loan loss provision ratio affected positively the credit risk, the authors suggested the State Bank should supervise frequently and rigorously commercial banks to ensure compliance with regulations, such as Circular 02/2013/TT-NHNN, which states commercial banks need to restructure, classify impaired loans, and make sufficient provision for each group of uncollected; or Resolution No. 42 on handling bad debt in credit institutions (Hoang et al. 2019a). Between 2008 and 2010, as a result of the global crisis, Vietnam’s credit risk increased significantly, as the growth rate of non-performing loan (NPL) reached 51%, twice as much as this period’s average credit growth (Le 2017). The NPL ratio in Vietnam peaked at 4.86% of the total outstanding loans in 2012 before going down to 2.55% in 2015 and remained stable since then, proving a relative success of post-crisis commercial banks regulation (Le 2017; Hoang et al. 2019a).
Using non-parametric and Copula approaches, Huynh et al. (2020) found stock price information reflected that a bank’s risks may transfer to other banks through stock returns, confirming the existence of a contagion risk. Consequently, Huynh et al. (2020) provided crucial insights into the dynamics of contagion risk, which are highly informative for policy-makers as well as investors to contain those risks:
  • A bank holding public capital in Vietnam will positively affect the other banks.
  • Contagion risk in the banking system emerges when banks are cross-owned, such as Vietnam Commercial Joint Stock Export-Import Bank A Chau Bank (ACB) and Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Investment and Development of Vietnam (BID).
  • A commercial bank with state-owned capital may lead to contagion risk if they operate inefficiently or invest in a weak bank.
  • Banks with a high ratio of NPL can cause a high contagion risk.

Bank Structure

Bank structure—the study of banks’ organization system—is the second-most appealing topic to Vietnamese researchers in the banking sector. Crucially, “Bank restructuring”—financial reform—was a key area of concern. Around the world, a huge volume of studies has discussed the interrelationships between bank structure and bank efficiency. Some, for example, Berg et al. (1992) and Zaim (1995), claimed that bank performance was better after deregulation, while the banking efficiency of large banks in the US was proven to remain the same (Elyasiani and Mehdian 1995). In Vietnam, there have been three major bank restructuring initiatives, corresponding to the post-Asian financial crisis (1998–2003), the WTO joining (2005–2008), and the restructuring of the Vietnamese economy (2011–2015).
Here, bank efficiency was found to decline during the bank structuring processes, as Vo and Nguyen (2018) showed the different restructuring schemes including the privatization of state-owned commercial banks, state intervention, and mergers and acquisitions (M&As) did not improve efficiency in the long term. Additionally, Vietnam’s M&As activities do harm to the return on assets (ROA) while its effects on return on equity (ROE) and net interest margins (NIMs) were not clear (Nguyen and Tran 2019). These results were the inverse of Fatima and Shehzad (2014)’s, as they concluded that M&A activities had an impact on ROE, while the influence on ROA was not clear. The role of the government is crucial, as the Vietnam government’s restructuring policies in the first stage (1998–2003) had not yet supported the banks to implement the restructuring (Vo and Nguyen 2018).
On the other hand, liquidity creation, which may increases banks’ insolvency, may be decreased by the application of Basel III (the third part of a voluntary global regulatory framework for banks’ capital adequacy, tension testing, and market liquidity risks, which were developed to cope with deficiencies in financial regulation revealed by the 2007–2008 financial crisis) (Le 2019), and banks being involved in more non-traditional activities for fees and commissions tends to reduce this component (Dang 2020). Le (2019) also pointed out that large banks were the strongest contributor to the growth of liquidity creation (LC) in general, and a negative two-way relationship between LC and bank capital in Vietnam was evidenced from 2008 to 2015. In terms of a bank’s internal control, Dinh and Tran (2019) found that the Control Environment affected the efficiency of internal control the most, followed by Information and Communication and Credit Status Ranking. The variable that had the least impact on the Effectiveness of Internal Control was Control Activities.
These results highlight the importance of communication and cooperation between the regulators and the banking sector to effectively improve bank efficiency during the restructuring process.

Banking Performance

Vietnamese researchers assessed bank performance by various criteria and some of which were different from the world. For instance, regarding the measurements for bank performance, there were plenty of criteria among researchers worldwide: interest margins (defined as the difference between interest income and expenses divided by total assets) was used by Revell (1982) for US commercial banks, or Kosmidou and Zopounidis (2008) selected a variety of particular ratios such as Net Income before taxes/Equity, Loans/Deposits, Equity/Total Assets, etc. for the evaluation of commercial banks in Greece. Meanwhile, even though when it came to measuring bank performance, profitability ratios such as ROA and ROE were commonly and traditionally used due to their advantages (Lee and Kim 2013), it was surprising that Vietnamese researchers used these two aspects in only a small number of studies. Luu et al. (2019) used the average assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) as the two proxies for bank performance, whereas Nguyen (2019) combined ROA and ROE with the bank risk (Z-score) to judge the bank performance in his article. The non-radial slack-based directional technology distance function (developed by Färe and Grosskopf (2010)) was the tool of Le et al. (2020a) to analyze the risk-adjusted efficiency, and the bank performance was also assessed via the cost efficiency of the banks through the data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) (Nguyen and Pham 2020) or the NIMs as what Nguyen et al. (2020b) conducted. The SFA method was also used to study alternative treatment for NPLs in bank cost efficiency studies (Ngo and Tripe 2017). In the meantime, credit risk, bank profitability, and bank solvency were the three issues that Dang (2019) has taken into account when it came to reviewing the bank performance.
Vietnamese researchers focused on studying the correlations between bank performance and particular components such as excess liquidity, loan growth, income diversification, etc. Speaking of negative effects, bank performance was said to be affected by the loan growth indicators (Dang 2019), excess liquidity (Nguyen et al. 2020b), bank size (Vo et al. 2019), and revenue diversification (Nguyen 2019). According to Dang (2019), the loan loss provisions would be increased from 2 to 3 subsequent years by the growth in lending and would also decrease the bank capital ratio in the next year. Even though the bank profitability was beneficial from loan growth both in the short term and long term, the banks’ expanding lending activities aggressively tended to lower the bank solvency immediately.
Meanwhile, Nguyen et al. (2020b) have proven that the excess liquidity would compress the NIMs, which reduced the efficiency of policy interest rates on NIMs, as higher monetary policy interest rates would expand NIMs. This indicated that the excess liquidity showed a tendency to induce banks to reduce lending interest rates to expand credit supply. Regarding the bad effects of revenue diversification on bank performance, Nguyen (2019) concluded that profitability is negatively impacted by diversification. Nonetheless, the more diversified the listed banks, the more increased the bank’s stability (Nguyen 2019). The author also suggested that “the Vietnamese commercial banking system needs to improve and enhance the non-credit service quality, especially e-banking services, to meet the trend of competition in banking digitization and the trend of consumer consumption. The better the banking liquidity is, the higher the profitability of the credit institutions.” (Nguyen 2019). These findings were quite in contrast to what foreign researchers found, as they claimed that banks in emerging countries could benefit from revenue diversification (Sanya and Wolfe 2010; Nisar et al. 2018).
On the other hand, the bank performance was beneficial from the income diversification (Luu et al. 2019), bank size, ownership, and age (Vu et al. 2019). However, Batten and Vo (2019)’s study found that bank size would have a negative impact on bank performance; on the other hand, bank capital and bank productivity were proved to be advantageous. Luu et al. (2019) also did an additional analysis to assess whether bank experience and ownership structure affect the interrelationship between bank performance and income diversification and found that the diversification would have a positive impact on state-owned and foreign banks, while for non-state-owned domestic banks, bank performance appeared to be lowered if banks increasingly diversified towards non-traditional businesses. This was quite similar to what Vu et al. (2019) found: not only were state-owned banks more efficient, but larger size and longer time in servicing also had a positive impact on bank performance.

Bank Policies

Speaking of the shifts in the Vietnamese bank’s lending rate, policy-related rate, and monetary policy post-crisis, Nguyen (2015a) aimed at answering three key questions. The first one was whether there are asymmetries in the Vietnamese lending policy-related rate spread and, if such asymmetries existed, how lending and central bank’s policy-related rates responded to these asymmetries, and whether responses to such asymmetries were independent or were dynamically interrelated (Nguyen 2015a). The author has found that the asymmetries existed, and the spread adapted to the threshold faster when the central bank’s policy-related rates fell in relevance to the lending rates than when the central bank’s policy-related rates followed the opposite trend (Nguyen 2015a). Moreover, it was evidenced that there was a bidirectional Granger causality between the Vietnamese lending rate and the central bank’s policy-related rate, and these rates affected each other’s movements (Nguyen 2015a). The second question is whether the Vietnamese lending institutions exhibited competitive or predatory pricing behaviors, and to what extent (Nguyen 2015a). It was indicated that the competitive pricing behavior existed, but it contradicted those studies on the rate-setting behaviors of lending institutions since the predatory behavior was witnessed in Russia (Nguyen et al. 2017a) and Thailand (Nguyen 2017a). The last one was whether the variance of the basis from one month impacted the variances and spread in the subsequent months (Nguyen 2015a).
In the meantime, Pham and Lensink (2008) chose ACB bank lending to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Vietnam as a case to study the determinants of loan contracts to business firms in Vietnam. Loan contracting included the lender–borrower relationship and concentrated on banking, skipping other issues related to the financial structure of the firm (Pham and Lensink 2008). In particular, the authors would examine the three main loan contract features that banks use in lending to business firms, which were loan maturity, collateral, and loan interest rate. The results have shown that strong interdependencies between these contract terms with significant bidirectional relationships between collateral and loan maturity, loan rate and loan maturity, and a unidirectional relationship between the loan rate and collateral existed. Each interrelationship mentioned above was aligned with particularly well-known theories of financial contracting such as those of Merton (1974); Bester (1985); Arnoud et al. (1991); or Diamond (1991). The authors also looked forward to furthering research focusing on the theoretical aspect of this preliminary proposition to study the conditions, and to what extent, bank behavior and borrower behavior determined outcomes (Pham and Lensink 2008).

3.2.3. Firm Issues

In this section, 125 articles discussing various issues related to Vietnamese firms are examined. The results present some of the salient issues of Vietnamese firms, which are the topics of capital structure, corporate governance, ownership, and SMEs financing.

Capital Structure

Capital structure is one of the vital factors affecting firm performance, and it can be defined as the ratio of debt and the ratio of equity to the total capital of a firm (Nguyen and Le 2017). In terms of capital structures’ relations, Vo and Ellis (2017) argued that there is a negative relationship between financial leverage and shareholder value. Moreover, Hoang et al. (2019b) concluded that capital structure negatively relates to financial performance. Nguyen and Nguyen (2020a) confirmed this finding in their study and further stressed that state-owned enterprises were more strongly influenced by capital structure than non-state enterprises. This result is comparable to the market of India and China, where state-owned enterprises performed the worst, and government ownership is influenced by political interference. Hence, Nguyen and Nguyen (2020b) suggested some recommendations for better-utilizing capital structure. On the firm level, business managers are recommended to establish proper measures. These measures should not only aim to use debt and increase sales but also ensure the improvement in business performance. On the state level, the government is advised to adjust the interest rates at a reasonable level to assist businesses in achieving efficiency (Nguyen and Nguyen 2020b).

Corporate Governance

Corporate governance is a system designed to protect investors’ interests. More than that, it acts as a tool directing a company to a balance status, which improves its health and its brand health (Tuan 2014). This section will elaborate on the role of the board of directors, and the definition of corporate social responsibility and its application in the Vietnamese setting.
The board of directors is a determinant of corporate governance. Nguyen and Dang (2020) and Dang et al. (2020) pointed out that the board of directors directly influences the firm value and earning quality. In the context of the Vietnamese economy, where enterprises are mostly small- and medium-sized, the expansion of the board of directors should be compatible with the company size. However, the expansion should be moderated, since a bigger board of directors may lead to extra administrative costs and contradictions between members. Therefore, an efficient managing board must be one consisting of competent and experienced members (Dang et al. 2020; Nguyen and Dang 2020).
An aspect that cannot be ignored in corporate governance is corporate social responsibility (CSR), which is a strategy devised to respond to new societal requirements (Nguyen et al. 2019a). According to Kabir and Thai (2017), firms that are more active in CSR activities tend to have better financial performance (Kabir and Thai 2017). However, CSR may be used in unnecessary projects, or it can be exploited to polish the names of opportunistic managers (Nguyen and Trinh 2020). Therefore, CSR has to be utilized with good morals (Le et al. 2019d; Nguyen and Ngoc 2020; Nguyen et al. 2019a).
Specifically, in the setting of Vietnam, though frequently being mentioned, CSR has not yet received deserving attention. Vietnamese firms still exhibit a neglected attitude toward environmental issues, and the country is lacking a platform where environmental news can be delivered to the public accurately and transparently. Therefore, it would be ideal if the government could set up a public database that holds records all of the environmental incidents caused by companies as well as keeps track of the promotions of environmental initiatives, reports on businesses’ engagement in sustainability, or long-form writings about the environment. The establishment of such a platform would create a positive impact in raising the attention and awareness of the public and businesses toward the environment as well as set an example for other countries to follow (Vuong et al. 2020b).

Ownership

The relationship between ownership concentration and firm performance has been a regularly researched topic for over two decades. Ownership concentration is an important mechanism of corporate governance to restrict the agency problem from the separation of ownership and control (Nguyen et al. 2015). In a developing market such as Vietnam, owner concentration is significantly and positively related to firm performance (Tran and Le 2020). Nguyen et al. (2015) also attributed the positive relationship to the highly constructed ownership structure. They also pointed out that the better the governance from the national government, the more positive the performance of firms. Thus, more effort should be put into enhancing national institutional characteristics, such as investor protection or rule of law, which in turn will facilitate a better environment for businesses and stakeholders (Nguyen et al. 2015).
With the flow of funds increasingly pouring into the emerging market of Vietnam, the topic of foreign ownership is also widely mentioned in recent years. Multiple research studies have shown that foreign ownership is associated with less liquidity but higher corporate cash holdings, and it is related negatively to corporate investment efficiency (Tran 2020; Vo 2016, 2017b). These findings lead the way to further implications for the policymakers. First, the government should establish policies to attract foreign investors to invest in firms in a long-term period. This will reduce the volatility of stocks as foreign traders could not trade a stock very often, and more importantly, it will increase firm performance, since foreign investors will bring managerial experience, technology transfer, clients, etc., to serve their investment in the long run. Secondly, the government should focus on creating a transparent and stable economy, which would earn the trust of foreign investors. In return, international investors would prefer to invest in high transparency and a less uncertain economy for their investment projects (Nguyen and Phan 2019; Tran 2020; Vo 2016; Vu et al. 2019).
In addition to foreign ownership corporations, state-owned firms, which tend to be in strategic industries in a socialist-oriented economy (Nguyen et al. 2020c), also attract public attention to their performances (Tran et al. 2019a). In comparison between state-owned firms and privately owned firms, although the empirical result is mixed in terms of financial performance, Tran et al. (2019a) concluded that state-owned firms have better earning quality in the Vietnamese market. The reason is a worrying trend of manipulating earnings from private firms to upgrade their positions, which is a practice that is similar to the Chinese market (Tran et al. 2019a).

SMEs Financing

In emerging markets, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) hold a substantial role as the dominant contributors to economic development. The three main interests of SMEs research are credit sources, credit accessibility, and SMEs’ performances under credit constraints.
For the credit sources, networking with government officials and political connections are important for SMEs to obtain credits through formal channels (Archer 2019; Cao 2019; Nguyen et al. 2020a). Nevertheless, the volume of bank lending among those who successfully obtain credits shows no correlation, which suggests that official networks are necessary only for the initial loaning process. Those who have successfully obtained formal credits are not bound by governmental connection (Cao 2019). Interestingly, further extension of social networks reduces the necessity for credit loans (Le and Nguyen 2009). As the procedures to obtain formal institutional credits prove to be a barrier for SMEs, social networks act as tools for seeking alternative informal credit sources, despite their unreliability and insufficient quantity (Cao 2019).
Entrepreneurs denied short-term loans are more likely to apply for credits from private money lenders, while those denied long-term loans prefer trade credit (Le and Nguyen 2009). Education levels also seem to be a factor contributing to credit source rationalizing, as entrepreneurs with low-level education are likely to be discouraged by debt aversion and burdensome paperwork of the formal credit channels. Thus, adjustments in the formal credit assessment system to simplify the procedures are needed, combining with government assists to improve entrepreneur education (Nguyen et al. 2019b). By improving the credit assessment environment, regional governments can indirectly encourage SMEs to take the initiative in choosing formal credit channels.
In Vietnam, the lack of capital is arguably the biggest impediment of SMEs (Nguyen 2015b). Therefore, it is vital to identify the determinants of credit accessibility, thus supporting SMEs to have easier access to capital. Owner characteristics, particularly educational level and gender, are the most important factors in deciding access to credit. Other following factors are the SME’s relationship with banks and customers, collateral, sources of credit, and technology qualification. Especially, with similar characteristics, in comparison to SMEs located in the north-central area and central coastal area, the probability of credit constraints in Red River Delta and south-eastern region increases, while it decreases with SMEs located in Northern Midlands and Mountainous (Ha et al. 2016; Nguyen 2015b). These results yield several recommendations to improve the credit accessibility of SMEs. Firstly, any policy targeting to improve SMEs credit accessibility should pay more attention to small-sized and female-owned enterprises, since these groups tend to less access to credit. Secondly, to encourage credit accessibility for SMEs, the collaboration between SMEs and banks is important to diversify collateral, increase collateral value, and reduce interest rates.
Thirdly, changes should be originated from enterprises themselves. Reducing the extent of external debt dependency and using acceptable sources for various purposes are effective ways to reduce interest rate risk. They should also consider employing a commercial credit policy and aim to increase revenue by using a discount policy with the required discount rate. Last but not least, management capacity and ability need to be upgraded to access information, especially business-critical information (Ha et al. 2016; Nguyen 2015b).
Credit constraint is a persistent barrier to the performance of SMEs. Credit constraint is defined as a restriction or limitation on individuals, families, and businesses borrowing from the formal financial sector. In Vietnam, results from studies show that rural areas and male-owned firms are more constrained when accessing credit. Private firms, limited, or share-holding companies are more constrained on credit than household enterprises. In addition, younger owners tend to face credit constraints more frequently than older ones. Generally, larger firms might be less constrained, while constrained firms are less likely to expand (Nguyen et al. 2019c). Furthermore, in correlation with innovation, unlike findings from developed countries proving that credit constraints negatively affect firms’ innovation, Archer et al. (2020) show that credit constraints do not always hinder the innovation of Vietnamese SMEs. Thus, to enhance innovation, managers should produce more entrepreneurial strategies to maintain their firm’s value and survival. More importantly, to reduce the credit constraint of SMEs, the policymakers should seek to reform the banking sector to facilitate better credit access for SMEs (Archer et al. 2020). Or, the policymakers in Vietnam should also consider partnering with credit providers to better handle SMEs’ demands, with measures such as diversifying credit packages by duration and interest rates to fit firm demands (Nguyen et al. 2019c).

3.2.4. Financial Psychology and Behaviors

The psychology of firm managers and investors in the Vietnamese market is influenced by many factors such as financial constraints, herd psychology, and foreign investors’ actions.
Vuong et al. (2016) confirmed that preparedness, financial resources, and participation in social networks are critical factors influencing entrepreneurial decisions. Entrepreneurs with financial constraints would only go forward with a business idea when the probability of success is high. Otherwise, they would procrastinate to wait for more favorable conditions despite the vagueness of “favorable”. However, preparedness could trump this effect as shown by Vuong et al. (2016), whether financially constrained or unconstrained, entrepreneurs who already formed a business plan are likely to launch their businesses sooner (Vuong et al. 2016; Vuong 2016a, 2016b).
Financial conditions not only affect entrepreneurial decisions but also investment behaviors, a study by Tran and Le (2017) shows. Financial conditions can be referred to as the current state of financial variables that constitute the supply or demand of financial instruments applicable to economic activity. Only investment behaviors of firms with negative cash flows are influenced by financial conditions, in the sense that improved financial conditions reduce the amount of “negative” financing constraints (i.e., the sensitivity of investment to negative cash flow). In addition, the magnitude of such impact is determined by the firm size and ownership, as this impact is stronger for larger companies, and it is more pronounced for firms that are not state-owned (Tran and Le 2017).
In terms of debt-related behaviors, in Vietnam, companies seem to prefer to reduce overall debt to raise investment. On the other hand, the long-term debt ratio does not affect firm investment as significantly as in the case of UK firms (Phan 2018). Thus, the government should establish a favorable environment to support firms access debt from various channels, including banks, equity market, and capital market (Phan 2018).
To diverge, herd behavior is also considered to be a powerful factor affecting financial players. Herding behavior is induced due to some micro-structure characteristics of the Vietnam market such as lack of transparency in information and financial management, a high degree of market volatility, etc. (Tran and Truong 2011). Several studies of various periods using different models point out the existence of significant market-wide herding behavior in the Vietnamese stock market (Faber and Vuong 2004; Kallinterakis 2007; Tran and Truong 2011). Here, international investors’ engagement could mitigate such behaviors as it could minimize impulsive spending among local investors and help them strive for more professional buying strategies. Particularly, local investors can recognize future investment opportunities based on foreign investors’ stock-holding decisions (Bekaert et al. 2017).
The psychological aspect is a topic on which more research attention should be focused. As the Vietnamese market possesses many cultural peculiarities as well as fast-evolving institutions (Vuong 2019a), the flow of financial information is difficult to manage. Thus, theory like mindsponge and its application can be useful for future research direction (Vuong and Napier 2015; Nguyen et al. 2021b). The application of these dynamic theory can help generating a kind of natural experiment to test various theories on financial psychology and behavior. As such, the number of current papers on this topic is underwhelming compared to its potential.

4. Discussion

This study suffers from a number of limitations. First of all, SSHPA is a database dedicated to Vietnamese researchers’ publication. Thus, foreign authors’ work on the Vietnam financial market might not be accounted for in the database. Secondly, the thematic results might be partially subjective as we have observed some of the major sections overlap with the keywords’ content, particularly with “stock”, “credit”, and “bank”. Finally, we recognize the potential bias of the systematic approach, in which the narrative is reshaped through selective empirical evidence.
However, through the detailed analyses, we have come to understand the distinctive characteristics and focuses of each topic in finance research in Vietnam. There is no doubt that finance research is continuously contributing to the development of emerging financial markets in general and Vietnam’s young financial market in particular. Our review enables us to identify the following three fertile areas for future research.

4.1. Continued Interests in International Integration Post-COVID-19

Vietnam’s integration into the international market is one of the most common research topics. The adoption of international financial standards such as IFRS and the establishment of policies for firms with foreign ownership are two of many examples of Vietnam strengthening its financial system and legal framework to connect extensively with foreign markets (Nguyen and Rahman 2019; Phan et al. 2018; Vo 2017a).
As COVID-19 ravaged the global economy and a deep recession is inevitable (World Bank 2020), Vietnam’s post-COVID-19 monetary regulations and foreign trades would gather much research interests. Moreover, since Vietnam has done an outstanding job in controlling the COVID-19 outbreak, thus securing a safe and secured destination for foreign investment, changes and impacts of FDI on the domestic market will be a fertile research area.

4.2. Financial Technology Research

Fintech has started to become a fast-growing sector in Vietnam with the explosion in popularity of internet banking services. Notably, there are very few studies regarding the development of Fintech in Vietnam. Future finance research focusing on the access of online financial services, the efficiency of financial technology systems, or social impacts and regulations of this disruptive technology is expected to grow. Aside from the technology integration aspects, Fintech research may further inspect the influence of Vietnam’s culture on entrepreneurs’ willingness to adopt Fintech (Vuong 2016; Vuong and Napier 2015; Vuong et al. 2018a, 2021) as the impacts of religion on behaviors has been thoroughly discussed in the Vietnamese research community in the recent period (Vuong et al. 2019, 2020a). This can be illustrated briefly by the case of crowdfunding.
There are very few studies related to crowdfunding research. In the SSHPA database, there are only two papers (Nguyen et al. 2021a; Phan et al. 2020b) that are tangentially related to crowdfunding. Looking beyond this database, there is one master thesis (Nguyen 2017b) and a paper from the Asian Institute of Research (Do 2019). All studies only focus on the performance of the founders or the banks; thus, the depth of this area of research has not been dealt with properly in these studies.
In contrast, crowdfunding has been studied extensively in Thailand and Singapore since 2016. For example, Wonglimpiyarat (2017) provided evidence that crowdfunding is an effective way for the Thailand government to support startups in bridging the funding gap in the early stage. Adopting a similar position, Hu (2015) indicated that the Monetary Authority of Singapore approved the promotion of crowdfunding as a means for startups to approach funding. According to De Buysere et al. (2012), regulation, education, and research are the three main pillars to build a solid foundation for the development of crowdfunding. Recently, in February 2020, in Decision No. 283/QĐ-TTg, The Prime Minister of Vietnam decided to create the regulatory sandbox for some types of Fintech such as eKYC, digital wallet, and P2P (peer-to-peer) lending. Taken together, these results suggest the continual growth of research articles in fintech and regulations involving fintech.

4.3. Green Bank

Another topic that is hardly covered is green finance. Many nations have started to focus on the model of a green bank. According to Tran and Tran (2015), in definitive terms, a green bank is a banking model prioritizing environmental protection and sustainable development. Through its operations, the banking sector will serve as a link between economic growth and environmental protection. With the initial objective to protect the environment by reducing the paper used in paperwork or applying new sources of clean energy, the banking sector in countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, or India has expanded the green bank model to other activities of the economics, such as funding green projects, providing green products, encouraging green communications, etc. (Tran and Tran 2015). However, except for the success of the United States, the green bank model in other countries is yet able to generate significant impacts on the environment, or its impact is still under expectations, such as in the case of China (Bai et al. 2013). In Vietnam, the application of a green bank is a relatively new topic, and the number of research papers regarding this topic is very low. Applying green bank in a developing country such as Vietnam will yield various benefits, including avoiding paperwork, creating awareness to business people about the environment, or establishing loans at a lesser rate; thus, it is high time more aspects of green finance and green bank were needed to be elaborated and examined (Tran and Tran 2015). Researchers can delve into the expected cost and requirements for green bank application, and the obstacles for companies in taking advantage of the green finance movement, as well as policy suggestions for the government to better facilitate firms in green business (Vuong 2018, 2021).

5. Conclusions

In this study, we have systematically explored the Vietnamese financial landscape via a dataset of 314 international publications from 2008 to 2020. Among the first systematic reviews of Vietnam’s financial research landscape, this study has shown empirical results from this key emerging market that underlined the importance of post-crisis regulation, which was evident in the control of non-performing loans and bank restructuring post-2008.
Moreover, over the past two decades, researchers have identified several immature aspects of the Vietnamese market, including human capital (Anwar and Nguyen 2010; Dinh et al. 2019), education level (Le et al. 2019a; Morgan and Long 2020; Van et al. 2019; Vo et al. 2019), and integration of technology (Dang et al. 2019; Huynh et al. 2018; Pham et al. 2018a). Improvement in these areas can not only increases Vietnamese market’s attractiveness but also increase its capacity to absorb investment for further economic growth. In addition, our review also identifies the need for further studies on how to engender a shift of FDI flows from real estate to manufacturing sectors, and how to increase eco-friendly FDI to create a more sustainable financial market and distribute the economic gains of increased FDI equitably (Vuong 2021).
More importantly, there are three areas of research we expect to grow in prominence in the future. Firstly, because of the exceptional control of the COVID-19 outbreak, Vietnam’s post-COVID-19 monetary regulations, and foreign trades, changes, and impacts of FDI on the domestic market will be a research area where a high level of research output is expected. Second, research on fintech and its regulations is also expected to grow, since recently, The Prime Minister of Vietnam decided to create the regulatory sandbox (Decision No. 283/QĐ-TTg) for certain types of fintech such as eKYC, digital wallet, and P2P (peer-to-peer) lending. Finally, for sustainable development, environmental protection, eco-friendly financial models should be promoted, thus launching a new wave of studies on green finance and green bank.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-T.H. (Manh-Tung Ho) and Q.-H.V.; methodology, M.-T.H. (Manh-Tung Ho); software, M.-T.H. (Manh-Toan Ho) and M.-H.N.; validation, M.-T.H. (Manh-Toan Ho) and Q.-H.V.; formal analysis, N.-T.B.L.; investigation, N.-T.B.L., Q.-H.N., H.-L.D.T.; resources, Q.-H.V.; data curation, M.-T.H. (Manh-Tung Ho), N.-T.B.L., Q.-H.N., and H.-L.D.T., writing—original draft preparation, M.-T.H. (Manh-Tung Ho), N.-T.B.L., Q.-H.N., and H.-L.D.T.; writing—review and editing, M.-T.H. (Manh-Tung Ho), N.-T.B.L., Q.-H.N., M.-H.P., M.-H.L., and H.-L.D.T.; visualization, Q.-H.N.; supervision, M.-T.H.; project administration, Q.-H.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset used in this research can be made available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anwar, Sajid, and Lan Phi Nguyen. 2010. Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Business Review 16: 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Anwar, Sajid, and Lan Phi Nguyen. 2011. Foreign direct investment and trade: The case of Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance 25: 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Archer, Lan Thanh. 2019. Formality and Financing Patterns of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Vietnam. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Archer, Lan Thanh, Parmendra Sharma, and Jen-Je Su. 2020. Do credit constraints always impede innovation? Empirical evidence from Vietnamese SMEs. Applied Economics 52: 4864–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arnoud, W. A. Boot, Anjan V. Thakor, and Gregory F. Udell. 1991. Secured lending and default risk: Equilibrium analysis, policy implications and empirical results. The Economic Journal 101: 458–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bai, Yuwen, Michael Faure, and Jing Liu. 2013. The Role of China’s Banking Sector in Providing Green Finance. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 24: 89–140. [Google Scholar]
  7. Batten, Jonathan A., and Xuan Vinh Vo. 2015. Foreign ownership in emerging stock markets. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 32–33: 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Batten, Jonathan A., and Xuan Vinh Vo. 2016. Bank risk shifting and diversification in an emerging market. Risk Management 18: 217–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Batten, Jonathan, and Xuan Vinh Vo. 2019. Determinants of Bank Profitability—Evidence from Vietnam. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55: 1417–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bekaert, Geert, Kenton Hoyem, Wei-Yin Hu, and Enrichetta Ravina. 2017. Who is internationally diversified? Evidence from the 401(k) plans of 296 firms. Journal of Financial Economics 124: 86–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berg, Sigbjørn Atle, Finn R. Førsund, Eilev S. Jansen, Sigbjorn Atle Berg, and Finn R. Forsund. 1992. Malmquist indices of productivity growth during the deregulationof Norwegian banking, 1980–1989. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94: S211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bester, Helmut. 1985. Screening vs. rationing in credit markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review 75: 850–55. [Google Scholar]
  13. Boudriga, Abdelkader, Neila Boulila Taktak, and Sana Jellouli. 2009. Banking supervision and nonperforming loans: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economic Policy 1: 286–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Brooks, Chris, and Lisa Schopohl. 2018. Topics and trends in finance research: What is published, who publishes it and what gets cited? The British Accounting Review 50: 615–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cao, Nguyet Thi Khanh. 2019. What factors determine whether small and medium enterprises obtain credit from the formal credit market? The case of Vietnam. Asian Economic Journal 33: 191–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chinh, Pham Minh, and Quan-Hoang Vuong. 2009a. Kinh tế Việt Nam: Thăng trầm và đột phá. Hà Nội: Nxb Chính trị Quốc gia. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chinh, Pham Minh, and Quan-Hoang Vuong. 2009b. Bối cảnh tài chính Việt Nam 1997–1998 và 2007–2008: khoảng cách và biến đổi. Nghiên cứu Kinh tế 48: 3–24. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cuong, Nguyen Viet. 2008. Is a governmental micro-credit program for the poor really pro-poor? Evidence from Vietnam. The Developing Economies 46: 151–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dang, Van Dan. 2019. The effects of loan growth on bank performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dang, Van Dan. 2020. Do non-traditional banking activities reduce bank liquidity creation? Evidence from Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance 54: 101257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dang, Ha V., and Mi Lin. 2016. Herd mentality in the stock market: On the role of idiosyncratic participants with heterogeneous information. International Review of Financial Analysis 48: 247–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dang, Tung Lam, Nguyen Trang Phuong Doan, Thi Minh Hue Nguyen, Thanh Thao Tran, and Xuan Vinh Vo. 2019. Analysts and stock liquidity—Global evidence. Cogent Economics & Finance 7: 1625480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dang, Ngoc Hung, Duc Cuong Pham, Xuan Thang Nguyen, and Thi Thanh Hoa Nguyen. 2020. Effects of corporate governance and earning quality on listed Vietnamese firm value. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 7: 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De Buysere, Kristof, Oliver Gajda, Ronald Kleverlaan, and Dan Marom. 2012. A Framework for European Crowdfunding. Available online: http://eurocrowd.org (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  25. Diamond, Douglas W. 1991. Debt maturity structure and liquidity risk. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 709–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dinh, The Hung, and Trung Tuan Tran. 2019. Factors affecting the effectiveness of internal control in joint stock commercial banks in Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 1799–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dinh, Trang Thi-Huyen, Duc Hong Vo, Anh The Vo, and Thang Cong Nguyen. 2019. Foreign direct investment and economic growth in the short run and long run: Empirical evidence from developing countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12: 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Do, Xuan Luan. 2015. Microcredit and poverty reduction: A case study of microfinance fund for community development in Northern Vietnam. Journal of Agricultural Science 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Do, Hoai Linh. 2019. Impacts of Founder on The Success of Crowdfunding in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Business 2: 356–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Doumpos, Michael, Chrysovalantis Gaganis, and Fotios Pasiouras. 2016. Bank diversification and overall financial strength: International evidence. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 25: 169–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Elyasiani, Elyas, and Seyed Mehdian. 1995. The comparative efficiency performance of small and large US commercial banks in the pre- and post-deregulation eras. Applied Economics 27: 1069–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Faber, André, and Quan Hoang Vuong. 2004. New empirical results on anomalies and herd behavior: Vietnam stock market 2000–2004. Economic Studies 44: 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  33. Färe, Rolf, and Shawna Grosskopf. 2010. Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research 200: 320–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fatima, Tajjali, and Amir Shehzad. 2014. An analysis of impact of merger and acquisition of financial performance of banks: A case of Pakistan. Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development 5: 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gopinath, Gita. 2020. The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn Since the Great Depression. Available online: https://blogs.imf.org/2020/04/14/the-great-lockdown-worst-economic-downturn-since-the-great-depression/ (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  36. Gordon, Lawrence A., Martin P. Loeb, and Wenjie Zhu. 2012. The impact of IFRS adoption on foreign direct investment. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 31: 374–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ha, Dao, Mai Nguyen, and Kim Nguyen. 2016. Accessibility to credit of small medium enterprises in Vietnam. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting 6: 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Han, Jianlei, Jing He, Zheyao Pan, and Jing Shi. 2018. Twenty years of accounting and finance research on the Chinese capital market. Abacus 54: 576–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Haughton, Jonathon, and Shahidur R. Khandker. 2016. Microcredit in Viet Nam: Does It Matter? Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, p. 33. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hoang, Thi Thanh Hang, Kieu Trinh Vo, and Nguyen Tuong Vy Ha. 2019a. Analysis of the factors affecting credit risk of commercial banks in Vietnam. In Paper presented at the ECONVN 2019: Beyond Traditional Probabilistic Methods in Economics, 14–16 January, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hoang, Thi Viet Ha, Ngoc Hung Dang, Manh Dung Tran, Thi Thuy Van Vu, and Quang Trung Pham. 2019b. Determinants influencing financial performance of listed firms: Quantile regression approach. Asian Economic and Financial Review 9: 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hu, Ying. 2015. Regulation of equity crowdfunding in Singapore. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 2015: 46–76. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hu, Yingyi, Tiao Zhao, and Lin Zhang. 2018. Does low price synchronicity mean more informativeness in stock prices? Empirical evidence on information integration speed in the Chinese stock market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55: 1014–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hung, Dang, Manh Tran, and Thi Nguyen. 2018. Investigation of the impact of financial information on stock prices: The case of Vietnam. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal 22: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  45. Huynh, Toan Luu Duc, Sang Phu Nguyen, and Duy Duong. 2018. Pricing assets with higher co-moments and value-at-risk by quantile regression approach: Evidence from Vietnam stock market. In Paper presented at the Econometrics for Financial Applications, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, January 15–16. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  46. Huynh, Toan Luu Duc, Muhammad Ali Nasir, Sang Phu Nguyen, and Duy Duong. 2020. An assessment of contagion risks in the banking system using non-parametric and Copula approaches. Economic Analysis and Policy 65: 105–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. International Monetary Fund. 2020. World Economic Outlook, April 2020: The Great Lockdown. Washington: International Monetary Fund, Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/04/14/weo-april-2020 (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  48. Kabir, Rezaul, and Hanh Minh Thai. 2017. Does corporate governance shape the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance? Pacific Accounting Review 29: 227–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kallinterakis, Vasileios. 2007. Herding and the thin trading bias in a start-up market: Evidence from Vietnam. SSRN Electronic Journal. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kasman, Adnan, and Saadet Kasman. 2016. Bank size, competition and risk in the Turkish banking industry. Empirica 43: 607–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Khoi, Phan Dinh, and Christopher Gan. 2016. Rural credit market and microfinance in Vietnam. In Microfinance in Asia. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 23–46. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kopf, Dan. 2018. Vietnam Is the Most globalIzed Populous Country in Modern History. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/10/vietnam-is-the-most-globalized-populous-country-in-modern-history/ (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  53. Kosmidou, Kyriaki, and Constantin Zopounidis. 2008. Measurement of bank performance in Greece. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics 6: 79–95. [Google Scholar]
  54. Le, Quoc Hoi. 2016. Foreign direct investment into real estate and macroeconomic instability in Vietnam. Afro-Asian J. of Finance and Accounting 6: 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Le, Thi Thuy Van. 2017. Xử lý nợ xấu ở Việt Nam: Thực trạng và những vấn đề đặt ra. Available online: https://www.mof.gov.vn/webcenter/portal/vclvcstc/r/m/ncvtd/ncvtd_chitiet?dDocName=MOFUCM108229&dID=112489&_afrLoop=9700893825530014 (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  56. Le, Tu. 2019. The interrelationship between liquidity creation and bank capital in Vietnamese banking. Managerial Finance 45: 331–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Le, Ngoc, and Thang Nguyen. 2009. The impact of networking on bank financing: The case of small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Le, Thai-Ha, Anh Tu Chuc, and Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary. 2019a. Financial inclusion and its impact on financial efficiency and sustainability: Empirical evidence from Asia. Borsa Istanbul Review 19: 310–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Le, Thi Tu Oanh, Thi Ngoc Bui, and Anh Tu Chuc. 2019b. Relationship between experts and enterprises viewed via the IFRS application: An empirical study in Vietnam. Asian Economic and Financial Review 9: 946–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Le, Thi Tu Oanh, Thi Ngoc Bui, and Anh Tu Chuc. 2019c. Benefits and difficulties of adopting IFRSS. Creativity and Innovation Management 10: 205. [Google Scholar]
  61. Le, Xuan Quynh, Ngoc Tien Nguyen, and Thy Ha Van Le. 2019d. The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of equity: An analysis of Vietnamese listed companies. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 16: 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Le, Minh, Viet-Ngu Hoang, Clevo Wilson, and Thanh Ngo. 2020a. Risk-adjusted efficiency and bank size in a developing economy: An analysis of Vietnamese banks. Journal of Economic Studies 47: 386–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Le, Minh, Viet-Ngu Hoang, Clevo Wilson, and Thanh Ngo. 2020b. The implication of applying IFRS in Vietnamese enterprises from an expert perspective. Management Science Letters, 551–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lee, Yen Nee. 2021. This Is Asia’s Top-Performing Economy in the Covid pandemic—It’s Not China. Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/28/vietnam-is-asias-top-performing-economy-in-2020-amid-covid-pandemic.html (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  65. Lee, Jeong Yeon, and Doyeon Kim. 2013. Bank performance and its determinants in Korea. Japan and the World Economy 27: 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lensink, Robert, and Thi Thu Tra Pham. 2011. The impact of microcredit on self-employment profits in Vietnam. Economics of Transition 20: 73–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Linnenluecke, Martina K., Xiaoyan Chen, Xin Ling, Tom Smith, and Yushu Zhu. 2016. Emerging trends in Asia-Pacific finance research: A review of recent influential publications and a research Agenda. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 36: 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Locus Bulletin. 2019. Vietnam Tops the Chart of the World’s Fastest-Growing Economies. Available online: https://locus.sh/resources/bulletin/vietnams-economic-growth/ (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  69. Luu, Hiep Ngoc, Loan Quynh Thi Nguyen, Quynh Huong Vu, and Quoc Tuan Le. 2019. Income diversification and financial performance of commercial banks in Vietnam. Review of Behavioral Finance 12: 185–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Merton, Robert C. 1974. On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. The Journal of Finance 29: 449–70. [Google Scholar]
  71. Ministry of Finance. 2017. Thu hút FDI hậu WTO: Tăng cao cả lượng và chất. Available online: https://mof.gov.vn/webcenter/portal/tttc/r/m/cochechinhsach/cochechinhsach_chitiet?dDocName=MOFUCM095331&dID=98672&_afrLoop=1223614006738808#%40%3FdID%3D98672%26_afrLoop%3D1223614006738808%26dDocName%3DMOFUCM095331%26_adf.ctrl-state%3Dwgp65cej8_4 (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  72. Morgan, Peter J., and Trinh Quang Long. 2020. Financial literacy, financial inclusion, and savings behavior in Laos. Journal of Asian Economics 68: 101197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ngo, Thanh, and David Tripe. 2017. Measuring efficiency of Vietnamese banks. Pacific Accounting Review 29: 171–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nguyen, Tho. 2011. US macroeconomic news spillover effects On Vietnamese stock market. The Journal of Risk Finance 12: 389–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nguyen, Chu V. 2015a. The Vietnamese lending rate, policy-related rate, and monetary policy post-1997 Asian Financial Crisis. Cogent Economics & Finance 3: 1007808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Nguyen, Nhung. 2015b. Credit Accessibility and Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Growth in Vietnam. Doctoral dissertation, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand. [Google Scholar]
  77. Nguyen, Ngoc Thuy. 2017a. Crowdfunding in Vietnam: The Impact of Project and Founder Quality on Funding Success. Master’s thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  78. Nguyen, V. Chu. 2017b. Asymmetries in responses of commercial banks to monetary policy: The case of Thailand. Southeast Asia Review Of Economics and Business 1: 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  79. Nguyen, Ngoc. 2019. Revenue diversification, risk and bank performance of Vietnamese commercial banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12: 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Nguyen, Huy Hoang. 2020. Việt Nam: Ước tính xuất siêu kỷ lục 19.1 tỷ USD năm 2020, cao nhất trong 5 năm qua. Available online: https://commoditytrading.vn/viet-nam-uoc-tinh-xuat-sieu-ky-luc-19-1-ty-usd-nam-2020-cao-nhat-trong-5-nam-qua/ (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  81. Nguyen, Dat. 2021. VN-Index Hits New Peak as Trading Value Surges. Available online: https://e.vnexpress.net/news/business/economy/vn-index-hits-new-peak-as-trading-value-surges-4260081.html (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  82. Nguyen, Thi Thanh Phuong, and Ngoc Hung Dang. 2020. Impact Of corporate governance on corporate value: Research in Vietnam. Research in World Economy 11: 161–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Nguyen, Minh Ha, and Minh Tai Le. 2017. Impact of capital structure and cash holdings on firm value: Case of firms listed on the Ho Chi Minh stock exchange. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 7: 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  84. Nguyen, An Khoa Truong, and Khuong Mai Ngoc. 2020. Building a Conceptual Framework of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Experience of Qualitative Approach in Vietnam. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business 21: 39–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nguyen, Hieu Thanh, and Anh Huu Nguyen. 2020a. The Impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 7: 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nguyen, Thanh Hieu, and Anh Huu Nguyen. 2020b. Capital structure and firm performance of non-financial listed companies: Cross-sector empirical evidences from Vietnam. Accounting 6: 137–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Nguyen, Phong Hoang, and Duyen Thi Bich Pham. 2020. The cost efficiency of Vietnamese banks—The difference between DEA and SFA. Journal of Economics and Development 22: 209–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Nguyen, Minh Ha, and Hiep Phan. 2019. The effect of institutional ownership on listed companies’ performance in Vietnam. International Journal of Economics and Business Research 17: 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nguyen, Lisa-Uyen, and Asheq Rahman. 2019. From totalitarianism to capitalism—The case of IFRS adoption in Vietnam. Accounting & Finance 59: 1649–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nguyen, Thi Nhung, and Thi Van Anh Tran. 2019. Has merger and acquisition been considered as a method of dealing with weak banks? Evidence from the third bank restructuring process in Vietnam. Banks and Bank Systems 14: 193–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Nguyen, Xuan-Hung, and Hiep-Thien Trinh. 2020. Corporate social responsibility and the non-linear effect on audit opinion for energy firms in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management 7: 1757841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nguyen, Tuan, Stuart Locke, and Krishna Reddy. 2015. Ownership concentration and corporate performance from a dynamic perspective: Does national governance quality matter? International Review of Financial Analysis 41: 148–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nguyen, V. Chu, LeBon Caroline, Miller Stephen, and B. Lloyd Cynthia. 2017a. The Russian landing rate, central bank’s policy related rate and intermediation premium. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR) 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nguyen, Vinh, Anh Tran, and Richard Zeckhauser. 2017b. Stock splits to profit insider trading: Lessons from an emerging Market. Journal of International Money and Finance 74: 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nguyen, Danh, Thanh Ngo, Ron Nguyen, Huy Cao, and Huy Pham. 2019a. Corporate social responsibility, balanced scorecard system and financial performance in the service sector: The case of Vietnam. Management Science Letters 9: 2215–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Nguyen, Hang Thu, Thuy Thu Nguyen, Xuan Le Phuong Dang, and Hiep Manh Nguyen. 2019b. Informal financing choice In SMEs: Do the types of formal credit constraints matter? Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nguyen, Lan Thanh, Jen-Je Su, and Parmendra Sharma. 2019c. SME credit constraints In Asia’s rising economic star: Fresh empirical evidence from Vietnam. Applied Economics 51: 3170–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nguyen, To Hong-Kong, To Viet-Ha Nguyen, Thu-Trang Vuong, Manh-Tung Ho, and Quan-Hoang Vuong. 2019d. The new politics of debt In the transition economy of Vietnam. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 12: 91–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nguyen, Hang Thu, Hiep Manh Nguyen, Michael Troege, and Anh T. H. Nguyen. 2020a. Debt aversion, education, and credit self-rationing in SMEs. Small Business Economics. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Nguyen, Thai Vu Hong, Tra Thi Thu Pham, Canh Phuc Nguyen, Thanh Cong Nguyen, and Binh Thanh Nguyen. 2020b. Excess liquidity and net interest margins: Evidence from Vietnamese banks. Journal of Economics and Business 110: 105893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nguyen, Tran Thai Ha, Massoud Moslehpour, Thi Thuy Van Vo, and Wing-Keung Wong. 2020c. State ownership and risk-taking behavior: An empirical approach to get better profitability, investment, and trading strategies for listed corporates in Vietnam. Economies 8: 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, Thanh-Hang Pham, Manh-Toan Ho, Huyen Thanh T. Nguyen, and Quan-Hoang Vuong. 2021a. On the social and conceptual structure of the 50-year research landscape in entrepreneurial finance. SN Business & Economics 1: 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, Le Tam-Tri, Nguyen T. Hong-Kong, Ho Manh-Toan, Nguyen T. Thanh-Huyen, and Vuong Quan-Hoang. 2021b. Alice in Suicideland: Exploring the Suicidal Ideation Mechanism through the Sense of Connectedness and Help-Seeking Behaviors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nisar, Shoaib, Ke Peng, Susheng Wang, and Badar Ashraf. 2018. The impact of revenue diversification on bank profitability and stability: Empirical evidence From South Asian countries. International Journal of Financial Studies 6: 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Pham, Thi Hoang Anh. 2017. Are global shocks leading indicators of currency crisis In Viet Nam? Research in International Business and Finance 42: 605–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Pham, Tra, and Robert Lensink. 2008. The Determinants of Loan Contracts to Business Firms: Empirical Evidence from a Private Bank in Vietnam. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 229–64. [Google Scholar]
  107. Pham, Tho, and Oleksandr Talavera. 2018. Discrimination, social capital, and financial constraints: The case Of Vietnam. World Development 102: 228–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Pham, Thach Ngoc, Vuong Minh Nguyen, and Duc Hong Vo. 2018a. The Cross-section of expected stock returns: New evidence from an emerging market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 54: 3566–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pham, Thi Thu Tra, Thai Vu Hong Nguyen, and Kien Son Nguyen. 2018b. Does bank competition promote financial inclusion? A cross-country evidence. Applied Economics Letters 26: 1133–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Phan, Duc Hong Thi. 2014. What factors are perceived to influence consideration of IFRS adoption by Vietnamese policymakers? Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government 20: 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Phan, Quynh Trang. 2018. Corporate debt and investment with financial constraints: Vietnamese listed firms. Research in International Business and Finance 46: 268–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Phan, Duc Hong Thi, and Bruno Mascitelli. 2014. Optimal approach and timeline for IFRS adoption in Vietnam: Perceptions from accounting professionals. Research in Accounting Regulation 26: 222–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Phan, Duc, Mahesh Joshi, and Bruno Mascitelli. 2018. What influences the willingness of Vietnamese accountants to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by 2025? Asian Review of Accounting 26: 225–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Phan, Chung Thanh, Sizhong Sun, Zhang-Yue Zhou, and Rabiul Beg. 2019. Does microcredit increase household food consumption? A study of rural Vietnam. Journal of Asian Economics 62: 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Phan, Chung Thanh, Sizhong Sun, Zhang-Yue Zhou, and Rabiul Beg. 2020a. Does microcredit improve rural households’ social network? Evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Development Studies 56: 1947–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Phan, Dinh Hoang Bach, Paresh Kumar Narayan, R. Eki Rahman, and Akhis R. Hutabarat. 2020b. Do financial technology firms influence bank performance? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 62: 101210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. PL. 2020. Thu hút FDI 8 tháng: Vốn giải ngân và đăng ký đều “hụt hơi”. Available online: https://thoibaonganhang.vn/thu-hut-fdi-8-thang-von-giai-ngan-va-dang-ky-deu-hut-hoi-105783.html (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  118. Poon, Jessie P. H, and Diep T. Thai. 2010. Micro-credit and development in northern vietnam. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 92: 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Revell, Jack. 1982. The OECD report on costs and margins in banking. In Bank Management in a Changing Domestic and International Environment: The Challenges of the Eighties. Edited by Donald E. Fair and François Léonard de Juvigny. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 287–99. [Google Scholar]
  120. Saghi-Zedek, Nadia. 2016. Product diversification and bank performance: Does ownership structure matter? Journal of Banking & Finance 71: 154–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sanya, Sarah, and Simon Wolfe. 2010. Can banks in emerging economies benefit from revenue diversification? Journal of Financial Services Research 40: 79–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Sawada, Michiru. 2013. How does the stock market value bank diversification? Empirical evidence from Japanese banks. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 25: 40–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Stiroh, Kevin J., and Adrienne Rumble. 2006. The dark side of diversification: The case of US financial holding companies. Journal of Banking & Finance 30: 2131–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., and Quan-Hoang Vuong. 2021. The right to refuse unwanted citations: Rethinking the culture of science around the citation. Scientometrics. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Thu Phuong. 2019. Giải ngân vốn FDI năm 2019 đạt kỷ lục. Available online: https://congthuong.vn/giai-ngan-von-fdi-nam-2019-dat-ky-luc-130612.html (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  126. Tran, Thi Bich Ngoc. 2017. Speculative bubbles in emerging stock markets and macroeconomic factors: A new empirical evidence for Asia and Latin America. Research in International Business and Finance 42: 454–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tran, Quoc Trung. 2020. Foreign ownership and investment efficiency: New evidence from an emerging market. International Journal of Emerging Markets 15: 1185–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Tran, Nam Hoai, and Chi Dat Le. 2017. Financial conditions and corporate investment: Evidence from Vietnam. Pacific Accounting Review 29: 183–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tran, Nam Hoai, and Chi Dat Le. 2020. Ownership concentration, corporate risk-taking and performance: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms. Cogent Economics & Finance 8: 1732640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tran, Thi Thanh Tu, and Thi Hoang Yen Tran. 2015. Green bank: International experiences and Vietnam perspectives. Asian Social Science. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Tran, Ngo My, and Huy Huynh Truong. 2011. Herding behaviour in an emerging stock market: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Research Journal of Business Management 5: 51–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Tran, Minh Tam, Minh Quang Le, Thi Khuyen Le, and Phu Thanh Ngo. 2019a. Earnings quality: Does state ownership matter? Evidence from Vietnam. In Paper presented at the Beyond Traditional Probabilistic Methods in Economics, 14–16 January, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  133. Tran, Trung, Tien Trung Nguyen, Thi Phuong Thao Trinh, and Thi Thu Hien Le. 2019b. Impact of micro-credit on child education in Vietnam: Parametric and non-parametric approaches. Asian Journal of Scientific Research 12: 249–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Tuan, Luu. 2014. From corporate governance to balanced performance measurement. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Van, Loan Thi-Hong, Anh The Vo, Nhan Thien Nguyen, and Duc Hong Vo. 2019. Financial inclusion and economic growth: An international evidence. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 57: 239–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Vietnam Government Portal. 2020. Về việc phê duyệt Chiến lược tài chính toàn diện quốc gia đến năm 2025, định hướng đến năm 2030. Available online: http://www2.chinhphu.vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/noidungchienluocphattrienkinhtexahoi?_piref33_14725_33_14721_14721.strutsAction=ViewDetailAction.do&_piref33_14725_33_14721_14721.docid=5014&_piref33_14725_33_14721_14721.substract= (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  137. Vo, Xuan Vinh. 2016. Foreign ownership and stock market liquidity—Evidence from Vietnam. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting 6: 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Vo, Xuan Vinh. 2017a. Do foreign investors improve stock price informativeness in emerging equity markets? Evidence from Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance 42: 986–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Vo, Xuan Vinh. 2017b. Trading of foreign investors and stock returns in an emerging market—Evidence from Vietnam. International Review of Financial Analysis 52: 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Vo, Dinh-Tri. 2020. Dependency on FDI inflows and stock market linkages. Finance Research Letters 38: 101463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Vo, Xuan Vinh, and Hong Thu Bui. 2016. Liquidity, liquidity risk and stock returns: Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance 9: 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Vo, Xuan Vinh, and Craig Ellis. 2017. An empirical investigation of capital structure and firm value in Vietnam. Finance Research Letters 22: 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Vo, Xuan Vinh, and Phuc Canh Nguyen. 2014. Monetary policy and bank credit risk in Vietnam pre and post Global Financial Crisis. In Risk Management Post Financial Crisis: A Period of Monetary Easing. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 277–90. [Google Scholar]
  144. Vo, Xuan Vinh, and Huu Huan Nguyen. 2018. Bank restructuring and bank efficiency—The case of Vietnam. Cogent Economics & Finance 6: 1520423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Vo, Anh The, Loan Thi-Hong Van, Duc Hong Vo, and Michael McAleer. 2019. Financial inclusion and macroeconomic stability in emerging and frontier markets. Annals of Financial Economics 14: 1950008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Vu, Thi-Hanh, Van-Duy Nguyen, Manh-Tung Ho, and Quan-Hoang Vuong. 2019. Determinants of Vietnamese listed firm performance: Competition, wage, CEO, firm size, age, and international trade. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12: 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Vuong, Quan- Hoang. 2016. Global mindset as the integration of emerging socio-cultural values through mindsponge processes: A transition economy perspective. In Global Mindsets: Exploration and Perspectives. Edited by John Kuada. London: Routledge, pp. 109–26. [Google Scholar]
  148. Vuong, Quan-Hoang. 2018. The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies. Nature Human Behaviour 2: 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Vuong, Quan-Hoang. 2019a. The financial economy of Viet Nam in an age of reform, 1986–2016. In Routledge Handbook of Banking and Finance in Asia. Edited by Ulrich Volz, Peter Morgan and Naoyuki Yoshino. London: Routledge, pp. 201–22. [Google Scholar]
  150. Vuong, Quan-Hoang. 2019b. Breaking barriers in publishing demands a proactive attitude. Nature Human Behaviour 3: 1034–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Vuong, Quan-Hoang. 2020. Reform retractions to make them more transparent. Nature 582: 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Vuong, Quan-Hoang. 2021. The semiconducting principle of monetary and environmental values exchange. Economics and Business Letters 10: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  153. Vuong, Quan Hoang, and Nancy K Napier. 2015. Acculturation and global mindsponge: An emerging market perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 49: 354–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, and Tri Dung Tran. 2009. The cultural dimensions of the Vietnamese private entrepreneurship. IUP Journal of Entrepreneurship Development 6: 54–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Vuong, Quan Hoang, Thu Hang Do, and Thu Trang Vuong. 2016. Resources, experience, and perseverance in entrepreneurs’ perceived likelihood of success in an emerging economy. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Vuong, Quan Hoang. 2016a. Survey data on entrepreneurs׳ subjective plan and perceptions of the likelihood of success. Data in Brief 6: 858–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Vuong, Quan Hoang. 2016b. Impacts of geographical locations and sociocultural traits on the Vietnamese entrepreneurship. SpringerPlus 5: 1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, Quang-Khiem Bui, Viet-Phuong La, Thu-Trang Vuong, Viet-Ha T. Nguyen, Manh-Toan Ho, Hong-Kong T. Nguyen, and Manh-Tung Ho. 2018a. Cultural additivity: Behavioural insights from the interaction of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism in folktales. Palgrave Communications 4: 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, Viet-Phuong La, Thu-Trang Vuong, Manh-Toan Ho, Hong-Kong T. Nguyen, Viet-Ha Nguyen, Hiep-Hung Pham, and Manh-Tung Ho. 2018b. An open database of productivity in Vietnam’s social sciences and humanities for public use. Scientific Data 5: 180188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, Quang-Khiem Bui, Viet-Phuong La, Thu-Trang Vuong, Manh-Toan Ho, Hong-Kong T. Nguyen, Hong-Ngoc Nguyen, Kien-Cuong P. Nghiem, and Manh-Tung Ho. 2019. Cultural evolution in Vietnam’s early 20th century: A Bayesian networks analysis of Hanoi Franco-Chinese house designs. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 1: 100001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, Manh-Tung Ho, Hong-Kong T. Nguyen, Thu-Trang Vuong, Trung Tran, Khanh-Linh Hoang, Thi-Hanh Vu, Phuong-Hanh Hoang, Minh-Hoang Nguyen, Manh-Toan Ho, and et al. 2020a. On how religions could accidentally incite lies and violence: Folktales as a cultural transmitter. Palgrave Communications 6: 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, Viet-Phuong La, Hong Kong Nguyen, Tung Ho, Thu-Trang Vuong, and Toan Ho. 2020b. Identifying the moral-practical gaps in corporate social responsibility missions of Vietnamese firms: An event-based analysis of sustainability feasibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28: 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, Anh-Vinh Le, Viet-Phuong La, Phuong-Hanh Hoang, and Manh-Toan Ho. 2020c. Making social sciences more scientific: Literature review by structured data. MethodsX 7: 100818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Vuong, Quan Hoang, Viet Phuong La, Thu Trang Vuong, Phuong Hanh Hoang, Manh Toan Ho, Manh Tung Ho, and Hong Kong To Nguyen. 2020d. Multi-faceted insights of entrepreneurship facing a fast-growing economy: A literature review. Open Economics 3: 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Vuong, Quan Hoang, Nguyen Minh Hoang, Pham Thanh Hang, Ho Manh Toan, and Nguyen Thanh Thanhh Huyen. 2021. Assessing the ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research by highly cited publications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Wonglimpiyarat, Jarunee. 2017. FinTech crowdfunding of Thailand 4.0 plicy. The Journal of Private Equity 21: 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. World Bank. 2020. The Global Economic Outlook During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Changed World. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2020/06/08/the-global-economic-outlook-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-a-changed-world (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  168. World Bank. 2021. GDP (Current US$)—Vietnam. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=VN&fbclid=IwAR0RFCQwdCE3Zm1P17H-SZ5l20NJ6UhqE_N1OVSLeMOwEPPPwE5g4UUfTfE (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  169. Zaim, Osman. 1995. The effect of financial liberalization on the efficiency of Turkish commercial banks. Applied Financial Economics 5: 257–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Characteristics of 314 publications from the final sample.
Figure 1. Characteristics of 314 publications from the final sample.
Jrfm 14 00219 g001
Figure 2. Most popular publishers by journals from the final sample.
Figure 2. Most popular publishers by journals from the final sample.
Jrfm 14 00219 g002
Figure 3. The number of published articles related to Finance in the SSHPA database, 2008–2020.
Figure 3. The number of published articles related to Finance in the SSHPA database, 2008–2020.
Jrfm 14 00219 g003
Table 1. Addressed fields by publications in the final sample.
Table 1. Addressed fields by publications in the final sample.
1Economics
2Business
3Management
4Education
5Law
6Agriculture
7Environment/Sustainability Science
8Sociology
9Political Science
10Logistics
11Law
12Healthcare
13Geography
14Urban Studies
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ho, M.-T.; Le, N.-T.B.; Tran, H.-L.D.; Nguyen, Q.-H.; Pham, M.-H.; Ly, M.-H.; Ho, M.-T.; Nguyen, M.-H.; Vuong, Q.-H. A Systematic and Critical Review on the Research Landscape of Finance in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2021, 14, 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14050219

AMA Style

Ho M-T, Le N-TB, Tran H-LD, Nguyen Q-H, Pham M-H, Ly M-H, Ho M-T, Nguyen M-H, Vuong Q-H. A Systematic and Critical Review on the Research Landscape of Finance in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2021; 14(5):219. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14050219

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ho, Manh-Tung, Ngoc-Thang B. Le, Hung-Long D. Tran, Quoc-Hung Nguyen, Manh-Ha Pham, Minh-Hoang Ly, Manh-Toan Ho, Minh-Hoang Nguyen, and Quan-Hoang Vuong. 2021. "A Systematic and Critical Review on the Research Landscape of Finance in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14, no. 5: 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14050219

APA Style

Ho, M. -T., Le, N. -T. B., Tran, H. -L. D., Nguyen, Q. -H., Pham, M. -H., Ly, M. -H., Ho, M. -T., Nguyen, M. -H., & Vuong, Q. -H. (2021). A Systematic and Critical Review on the Research Landscape of Finance in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(5), 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14050219

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop