Next Article in Journal
Software Framework for Testing of Automated Driving Systems in the Traffic Environment of Vissim
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Impact Evaluation of Current Municipal Solid Waste Treatments in India Using Life Cycle Assessment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Energy Efficiency Improvement Solutions for Supermarkets by Low-E Glass Door and Digital Semi-Hermetic Compressor

by
Piyanut Saengsikhiao
1,* and
Juntakan Taweekun
2
1
Energy Technology Program, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand
2
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(11), 3134; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113134
Submission received: 21 April 2021 / Revised: 19 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 27 May 2021

Abstract

:
This research presents an energy efficiency improvement solution for supermarkets with the use of low-E glass doors for open refrigerators and a digital semi-hermetic compressor to fix the speed of semi-hermetic compressors. The impact of a door’s installation causes its load to be reduced by 40%, and the compressor shuts down frequently, which decreases its lifetime. In order to ensure that energy-saving solutions do not affect maintenance costs, the installation of a digital semi-hermetic compressor is proposed to lower costs and save energy. Our economic results from tests carried out at a 3000 square meter supermarket, which was open from 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and in which we installed 82 doors on 15 open refrigerators, showed a 1.1-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 192,220 kWh/year for store No.1 (R22) and in which we installed 80 doors on 15 open refrigerators, showed a 1.4-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 171,185 kWh/year for store No.2 (R404A). The energy-saving effects of the digital semi-hermetic compressor, which fixes the speed of the semi-compressor and solves the problem of impact from fridge door installation, showed a 2.9-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 26,890 kWh/year for store No.1 (R22) and showed a 2.9-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 26,571 kWh/year for store No.2 (R404A). The results of store No.1 (R22) and store No.2 (R404A) showed no differences. This research is an extension of an energy-saving project that can be carried out on a continuous basis, increasing the efficiency of energy use and being a sustainable source of energy conservation.

1. Introduction

The domestic sector’s energy consumption has the second-highest power consumption rate in Thailand [1]. Retail businesses, which are part of the business sector, continue to grow in response to consumer behavior [2]. Currently, there are more than 2000 supermarkets in Thailand. Most energy consumption in supermarkets comes from refrigeration; thus, a way to reduce energy consumption can be achieved through energy management or the use of high-performance equipment. Most freezers at supermarkets are open freezers so that consumers can see products clearly and access them easily [3,4]. Typically, freezers are designed to provide a strong air curtain in order to maintain low temperatures and control product quality. [5,6]. The air curtain principle, with the front widow making up 80% of total air volume, is responsible for maintaining the temperature of supermarket refrigerators [7,8]. The remaining 20% is the air supply that comes from the back wall inside the refrigerators, and which is responsible for lowering the temperature of the product [9,10]. All winds are combined to return air below [11,12]. Open freezers are affected by a number of external factors that result in heat loads entering the freezer [13,14]. The inefficiency of the air curtain impacts the compressor and increases energy consumption [15,16]. The development of open freezers is still ongoing, but it does not solve the problem of external factors, as expected [17,18]. There are many factors which affect the efficiency of open refrigerators, such as the following: (1) Normally, open refrigerators require a temperature of 25 °C in the store and 60% humidity; (2) the wind of an air conditioner that blows into a refrigerator will reduce the efficiency of its air curtain; (3) customers picking products from inside the cabinet also reduce the efficiency of the air curtain; (4) as does the replenishment of goods by staff; and (5) something obstructing the returned air [19,20]. All of these uncontrollable factors affect the efficiency of the air curtain and directly affect compressor energy consumption [21,22]. This research presents the installation of an energy efficiency improvement solution in supermarkets by the use of a low-E glass door and a digital semi-hermetic compressor to solve the abovementioned uncontrollable factors [23,24]. In addition to being able to maintain its temperature, a closed freezer can control the temperature of an open freezer, and can also help ensure that products do not exceed five degrees Celsius, which is where germs are formed [25,26]. The results of this research will contribute to sustainable energy reductions and the maintenance of quality products for customers [27,28,29,30].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Low-E Glass Door

Low-E glass is low heat transfer glass used in buildings [31,32]. Low-E glass is applied to doors and windows to enable buildings with low heat transfer to take advantage of the light coming from outside. Low-E glass was developed to reduce heat transfer by replacing the coating material or replacing the material used in the production of glass films [33,34]. Additionally, it has been developed using double layers, or more glass, to reduce heat transfer [35,36]. The gaps between the glass can also be used to provide insulation by increasing the air gap or adding gases to increase efficiency [37,38]. This research applied low-E glass for doors to be installed in open freezers in order to reduce the uncontrollable factors that can occur with open freezers [39,40]. In this research, two-layer glass was used and argon gas was added to increase efficiency [41,42]. Due to the glass comprising three layers, the size of the door was thick, but the price of argon gas was cheap [43,44]. The 15 open refrigerators in question were equipped with 82 additional doors for store No.1 (R22) and the 15 open refrigerators in question were equipped with 80 additional doors for store No.2 (R404A) [45,46], as shown in Figure 1. The door design must suit the size of the refrigerators, and a strong support part must be designed to support the weight of the door and customer use, as shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3 [47,48].

2.2. Digital Semi-Hermetic Compressor

Digital compressors are compressors that can be adjusted during operation in order to suit cooling needs. They were developed as scroll compressors for use in air conditioners [49,50]. A digital semi-hermetic compressor can reduce the duty cycle to suit the current load while, in the unloaded state, not sucking or compressing the refrigerant, resulting in a 50% reduction in compressor energy consumption [51,52]. As for the air conditioner, it can be adjusted according to room temperature. For air conditioners, the cycle can be adjusted according to room temperature by calculating from room temperature and suction pressure, as well as other parameters [53,54]. For refrigeration systems, the cycle can also be adjusted according to room temperature by calculating from room temperature and suction pressure or other parameters [55,56]. However, in supermarkets with high cooling requirements in medium-temperature environments, semi-hermetic compressors are usually used, as shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. This research proposes energy savings and solves the problem of door installation impacts by the use of compressors, thus reducing frequent compressor cut-offs [57,58]. The result will not only help prolong the service life of the compressor, but will also help to save energy at a specified standard temperature [59,60].
The results of this research were summarized and correlated before and after 7 days using energy and temperature meters with the following parameters: power consumption (W), voltage (V), current (I), power factor (PF), and frequency (Hz). In terms of energy consumption, pre- and post-energy consumption is summarized. Over seven days, we compared the highest and lowest energy consumptions, as separated by day and night. In order to see differences in energy consumption during the closed branch period, average hourly energy consumption was summarized to illustrate consumer behavior. In terms of thermodynamic properties, temperature was measured by the following metrics: temperature (Tev), condenser temperature (Tcd), liquid temperature (Tl), sub cool temperature (Tsc), gas temperature (Tg), and superheat temperature (Tsh). A compressor operation percentage (%) was used to compare compressor action before and after the 7-day period. The compressor design point was at −10 °C evaporator, condensate temperature was at 40 °C, and superheat temp was at 25 °C [61,62,63].

3. Results

3.1. Energy Efficiency Improvement by Low-E Glass Door

As shown in Figure 6, the results of the power consumption measurement/day, both before and after low-E glass door installation, show that the energy consumption of the average 7-day refrigeration system before door installation was 1388 kWh/day, which is divided into 997 kWh/day in the day (06:00 a.m.–10:00 p.m.) and 391kWh at night (10:00 p.m.–06:00 a.m.). The energy consumption of the average refrigeration system after low-E glass door installation was 812 kWh/day, which is divided into 579 kWh/day during the day (06:00 a.m.–10:00 p.m.) and 233 kWh at night (10:00 p.m.–06:00 a.m.). The seven-day average total for energy efficiency was 576 kWh/day, or 39.67%, which is divided into a day time consumption of 418 kWh/day, or and 41.93%, and a night time consumption of 158 kWh/day, or 33.24% for store No.1 (R22). As shown in Figure 7, the seven-day average total for energy efficiency was 469 kWh/day, or 37.37% for store no.2 (R404A). The energy savings during the day are greater than at night due to uncontrollable factors during the day. Moreover, prior to installing the low-E glass door, many supermarkets were using plastic curtains at night. The results of store No.1 (R22) and store No.2 (R404A) showed no differences.
As shown in Figure 8, the maximum and minimum energy consumptions before door installation were 83.25 kW and 44.73 kW, respectively, showing a difference of 46.72%. After installing the door, Figure 9, the highest and lowest energy consumptions before door installation were 33.15 kW and 30.19 kW, respectively, showing a difference of 8.93%. Installing the door led to a reduction in uncontrolled external factors during the day and at night, but a smaller difference in energy consumption was observed, meaning that energy can be saved. Economic results from testing at a 3000-square-meter supermarket, which was open from 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and in which we installed 82 doors on 15 open refrigerators, showed a 1.1-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 192,220 kWh/year for store no.1 (R22). As shown in Figure 8, results showed a 1.3-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 171,185 kWh/year for store no.1 (R22).

3.2. Energy Efficiency Improvement by Digital Steam Compressor

The impact of the door installation results in the compressor stopping and starting frequently, which, in turn, reduces its life. From the effect of temperature against the operating status of the compressor, as shown in Figure 10, it was found that the compressor is stopped by the pump down method, resulting in the evaporator temperature lowering to −20 °C. This is much lower than the design point of −10 °C, as the compressor was stopped many times due to excessive work.
After installing a digital compressor, the digital semi-hermetic compressor reduced the duty cycle to suit the current load, as shown in Figure 11 and Figure 12, while, in an unloaded state, the compressor did not suck or compress the refrigerant, resulting in a 50% reduction in compressor energy consumption. The compressor was operated with a pressure converter that converts pressure from suction pressure to evaporator temperature. At the design point, the controller can set a setpoint to control compressor operation in both a loaded and an unloaded state. From the effect of temperature against the operating status of the compressor, it was found that digital compressors could maintain their operation at −10 °C degrees while operating in an unloaded state, resulting in reduced overload and frequent stop-and-start problems. The energy saving effect of digital semi-hermetic compressors on fixing the speed of semi-compressor installation showed a 2.9-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 26,890 kWh/year for store No.1 (R22) and showed a 2.9-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 26,571 kWh/year for store No.2 (R404A). These energy saving results can be compared with previous research, as shown in Table 1. The results of energy use are consistent with and close to previous studies, and differences in the research depend on actual use conditions.

4. Conclusions

Installing doors in an open freezer not only reduces compressor energy consumption, but also reduces the effects of uncontrollable external factors. It helps to stabilize product temperature and maintain the quality of the product. The results from testing at a 3000-square-meter supermarket, open from 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and in which we installed 82 doors on 15 open refrigerators, showed a 1.1-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 192,220 kWh/year for store No.1 (R22) and a 1.4-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 171,185 kWh/year for store No.1 (R404A). After the doors were installed, the operating load of the compressor was reduced and the compressor shut down frequently. Installing a compressor is another option that increases its service life, and it also reduces compressor energy consumption. The energy saving effects of the digital semi-hermetic compressor, which fixes the speed of the digital semi-compressor and solves the problem of impact from fridge door installation, showed a 2.9-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 26,890 kWh/year for store No.2 (R22) and showed a 2.9-year payback period with an energy saving rate of 26,571 kWh/year for store No.2 (R404A). The results of store No.1 (R22) and store No.2 (R404A) showed no differences. This research is an extension of an energy-saving project that can be carried out on a continuous basis, increasing the efficiency of energy use and being a sustainable source of energy conservation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization; Software; Validation; Formal Analysis; Investigation; Resources; Data Curation; Writing—Original Draft Preparation; Writing—Review and Editing, P.S.; Visualization; Supervision; Project Administration; Funding Acquisition, J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Prince of Songkla University and SANYO S.M.I. (Thailand) Co., Ltd.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Prince of Songkla University and SANYO S.M.I. (Thailand) Co., Ltd.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saengsikhiao, P.; Taweekun, J.; Maliwan, K.; Sae-ung, S.; Theppaya, T. Investigation and analysis of R463A as an alternative refrigerant to R404A with lower global warming potential. Energies 2020, 13, 1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Saengsikhiao, P.; Taweekun, J.; Maliwan, K.; Sae-ung, S.; Theppaya, T. The Performance Simulation of the New R463A HFC/HFO/Carbon Dioxide Refrigerant with Lower GWP, As an Alternate Option for the R404A Refrigeration System. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2020, 76, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Redo, M.A.; Ohno, K.; Giannetti, N.; Yamaguchi, S.; Saito, K. Seasonal performance evaluation of CO2 open refrigerated display cabinets. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 163, 114354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gray, I.; Luscombe, P.; McLean, L.; Sarathy, C.S.P.; Sheahen, P.; Srinivasan, K. Improvement of air distribution in refrigerated vertical open front remote supermarket display cases. Int. J. Refrig. Rev. Int. Froid 2008, 31, 902–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rossetti, A.; Minetto, S.; Marinetti, S. A simplified thermal CFD approach to fins and tube heat exchanger: Application to maldistributed airflow on an open display cabinet. Int. J. Refrig. 2015, 57, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, X.; Chang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Li, W.; Lu, Y.; Yuan, P. A multiscale approach for refrigerated display cabinet coupled with supermarket HVAC system-Part II: The performance of VORDC and energy consumption analysis. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2015, 87, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rossetti, A.; Minetto, S.; Marinetti, S. Numerical modelling and validation of the air flow maldistribution in the cooling duct of a horizontal display cabinet. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 87, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, X.; Chang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Li, W.; Lu, Y.; Yuan, P. A multiscale approach for refrigerated display cabinet coupled with supermarket HVAC system—Part I: Methodology and verification. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2015, 87, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, Z.K.; Han, H.; Gu, B. A novel optimization strategy for the design of air curtains for open vertical refrigerated display cases. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2011, 31, 3098–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, Z.; Gu, B.; Han, H.; Mills, G. Application of an effective strategy for optimizing the design of air curtains for open vertical refrigerated display cases. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2010, 49, 976–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, K.Z.; Ding, G.L.; Chen, T.J. A correlation model of thermal entrainment factor for air curtain in a vertical open display cabinet. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2009, 29, 2904–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Marinetti, S.; Rossetti, A.; Ferrari, F.; Minetto, S. Air curtain temperature measurement in an open refrigerated display cabinet by IR thermography. Quant. Infrared Thermogr. J. 2015, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Laguerre, O.; Hoang, M.H.; Osswald, V.; Flick, D. Experimental study of heat transfer and air flow in a refrigerated display cabinet. J. Food Eng. 2012, 113, 310–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Laguerre, O.; Hoang, M.H.; Flick, D. Heat transfer modelling in a refrigerated display cabinet: The influence of operating conditions. J. Food Eng. 2012, 108, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, X.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Chang, Z.; Wang, C.; Ding, C. Experimental investigation of the performance of cool storage shelf for vertical open refrigerated display cabinet. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2017, 110, 789–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Harrington, L.; Aye, L.; Fuller, B.; Hepworth, G. Peering into the cabinet: Quantifying the energy impact of door openings and food loads in household refrigerators during normal use. Int. J. Refrig. Rev. Int. Froid 2019, 104, 437–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alzuwaid, F.; Ge, Y.; Tassou, S.; Sun, J. The novel use of phase change materials in an open type refrigerated display cabinet: A theoretical investigation. Appl. Energy 2016, 180, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Heidinger, G.G.; Nascimento, S.M.; Gaspar, P.D.; Silva, P.D. Experimental study of the fins arrangement pattern of refrigerated display cabinet evaporator towards thermal performance improvement. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 138, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Borges, B.N.; Melo, C.; Hermes, C.J. Transient simulation of a two-door frost-free refrigerator subjected to periodic door opening and evaporator frosting. Appl. Energy 2015, 147, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alzuwaid, F.; Ge, Y.T.; Tassou, S.A.; Raeisi, A.; Gowreesunker, L. The novel use of phase change materials in a refrigerated display cabinet: An experimental investigation. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 75, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Titariya, V.K.; Agarwal, A.B. Performance Analysis of the Single Jet Air Curtain for Open Refrigerated Display Cabinet by Using Artificial Neural Network. J. Therm. Eng. 2020, 6, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saidur, R.; Masjuki, H.; Choudhury, I. Role of ambient temperature, door opening, thermostat setting position and their combined effect on refrigerator-freezer energy consumption. Energy Convers. Manag. 2002, 43, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chaomuang, N.; Laguerre, O.; Flick, D. A simplified heat transfer model of a closed refrigerated display cabinet. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2020, 17, 100494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xie, Y.R.; Brecht, J.K.; Abrahan, C.E.; Bornhorst, E.R.; Luo, Y.G.; Monge, A.L.; Vorst, K.; Brown, W. Improving temperature management and retaining quality of freshcut leafy greens by retrofitting open refrigerated retail display cases with doors. J. Food Eng. 2021, 292, 110271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chaomuang, N.; Flick, D.; Denis, A.; Laguerre, O. Influence of operating conditions on the temperature performance of a closed refrigerated display cabinet. Int. J. Refrig. 2019, 103, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chaomuang, N.; Flick, D.; Laguerre, O. Experimental and numerical investigation of the performance of retail refrigerated display cabinets. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 70, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Belman-Flores, J.M.; Ledesma, S.; Rodriguez-Valderrama, D.A.; Hernandez-Fusilier, D. Energy optimization of a domestic refrigerator controlled by a fuzzy logic system using the status of the door. Int. J. Refrig. Rev. Int. Froid 2019, 104, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ben-Abdallah, R.; Leducq, D.; Hoang, H.; Fournaison, L.; Pateau, O.; Ballot-Miguet, B.; Delahaye, A. Experimental investigation of the use of PCM in an open display cabinet for energy management purposes. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 198, 111909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chaomuang, N.; Laguerre, O.; Flick, D. Dynamic heat transfer modeling of a closed refrigerated display cabinet. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 161, 114138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. De Frias, J.A.; Luo, Y.; Kou, L.; Zhou, B.; Wang, Q. Improving spinach quality and reducing energy costs by retrofitting retail open refrigerated cases with doors. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 110, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Somasundaram, S.; Chong, A.; Wei, Z.; Thangavelu, S.R. Energy saving potential of low-e coating based retrofit double glazing for tropical climate. Energy Build. 2020, 206, 109570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abundiz-Cisneros, N.; Sanginés, R.; Rodríguez-López, R.; Peralta-Arriola, M.; Cruz, J.; Machorro, R. Novel Low-E filter for architectural glass pane. Energy Build. 2020, 206, 109558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chan, H.-T.; Lin, C.-Y.; Chang, S.-C. Influence of N2 ratio in Hydrogen/Nitrogen Plasma on Titanium dioxide/Aluminum doped Zinc Oxide Bilayer Films Applied for Multifunctional Energy-saving Glass. In Proceedings of the 2020 15th International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference (IMPACT), Taipei, Taiwan, 21–23 October 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen, Y.-H.; Shih, F.-Y.; Lee, M.-T.; Lee, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-B. Development of lightweight energy-saving glass and its near-field electromagnetic analysis. Energy 2020, 193, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, H.; Nam, S. Transmission Enhancement Methods for Low-Emissivity Glass at 5G mmWave Band. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2021, 20, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Somasundaram, S.; Thangavelu, S.R.; Chong, A. Effect of Existing Facade’s Construction and Orientation on the Performance of Low-E-Based Retrofit Double Glazing in Tropical Climate. Energies 2020, 13, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, X.; Ma, Z.; Gao, C.; Li, Z. Analysis on energy consumption of rural residential buildings in Shanxi. Xi’an Jianzhu Keji Daxue Xuebao/J. Xi’an Univ. Archit. Technol. 2020, 52, 667–673. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yu, F.; Leng, J. Multivariable interactions in simulation-based energy-saving glass roof designs. Sol. Energy 2020, 201, 760–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. De Frias, J.A.; Luo, Y.G.; Zhou, B.; Turner, E.R.; Millner, P.D.; Nou, X.W. Minimizing pathogen growth and quality de-terioration of packaged leafy greens by maintaining optimum temperature in refrigerated display cases with doors. Food Control 2018, 92, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brenes, A.L.M.; Brown, W.; Steinmaus, S.; Brecht, J.K.; Xie, Y.; Bornhorst, E.R.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, B.; Shaw, A.; Vorst, K. Temperature profiling of open- and closed-doored produce cases in retail grocery stores. Food Control. 2020, 113, 107158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yu, F. Research of environment-friendly low emissivity glass. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Sci. Ed. 2007, 22, 385–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, X.; Yang, C.; Zhang, C.; Yang, H.; Yang, T. Simulation on thermal performance of energy-saving windows and doors and its influence on building energy consumption. Jianzhu Cailiao Xuebao/J. Build. Mater. 2014, 17, 261–297. [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu, L.; Chang, H.; Xu, T.; Song, Y.; Zhang, C.; Hang, Z.H.; Hu, X. Achieving low-emissivity materials with high transmission for broadband radio-frequency signals. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, Q.; Ren, J. Research on technology clusters and the energy efficiency of energy-saving retrofits of existing office buildings in different climatic regions. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2018, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Amin, M.; Dabiri, D.; Navaz, H.K. Tracer gas technique: A new approach for steady state infiltration rate measurement of open refrigerated display cases. J. Food Eng. 2009, 92, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, Z.; Huang, N.; Shi, L.; Chi, L. Comparison of independent and synchronous opening control strategies of two air-dampers in three-temperature frost-free refrigerator. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 128, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Youn, S.-J.; Noh, Y. Reliability-based design optimization of refrigerator door hinges using PIDO technology. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2015, 16, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chaomuang, N.; Flick, D.; Denis, A.; Laguerre, O. Experimental and numerical characterization of airflow in a closed re-frigerated display cabinet using PIV and CFD techniques. Int. J. Refrig. 2020, 111, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Watcharapongvinij, A.; Therdyothin, A. In Energy cost saving evaluation of VSD installation in compressor rack of refrigeration system for the retail and wholesale building. Energy Procedia 2017, 138, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tu, Q.; Dong, K.; Zou, D.; Lin, Y. Experimental study on multi-split air conditioner with digital scroll compressor. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2011, 31, 2449–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pattana, S.; Tantakitti, C.; Wiratkasem, K. Energy saving in six doors walk-in cooler. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, D.; Huang, X.; Cai, N.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z. Study on energy consumption model of multi-unit air conditioning system with digital scroll compressor. J. Therm. Sci. Technol. 2020, 15, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saengsikhiao, P.; Taweekun, J.; Maliwan, K.; Sae-ung, S.; Theppaya, T. The improvement of energy efficiency for refrigeration system in Thailand convenience store by digital scroll compressor. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2020, 74, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Saengsikhiao, P.; Taweekun, J. Improving Energy Efficiency in Supermarkets by Retrofitting Low-E Glass Doors for Open Refrigeration Systems with Digital Semi Hermetic Compressor. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2021, 82, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ye, K.; Ji, J.; Han, S. Semi-active noise control for a hermetic digital scroll compressor. J. Low Freq. Noise Vib. Act. Control. 2020, 39, 1204–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Cha, D.A.; Kwon, O.K.; Oh, M.D. An experimental study on semiconductor process chiller using the digital scroll compressor. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2014, 28, 3345–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhu, X.; Nie, X.; Lv, Y.; Wang, C.; Su, Y. Experimental research of operating performance on water source multiconnected air-conditioning system with digital scroll compressor in variable load. Energy Educ. Sci. Technol. Part A Energy Sci. Res. 2012, 30, 915–920. [Google Scholar]
  58. Vetal, D. Integrated VSD compressors: 8 key advantages. Plant Eng. 2016, 70, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhu, X.; Nie, X.; Lv, Y.; Wang, C.; Su, Y. Experimental research of variable operating performance on water source multi-connected air-conditioning system with digital scroll compressor. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2013, 5, 5370–5376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Huang, H.; Li, Q.; Yuan, D.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, Z. An experimental study on variable air volume operation of ducted air-conditioning with digital scroll compressor and conventional scroll compressor. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2008, 28, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Saengsikhiao, P.; Taweekun, J.; Maliwan, K.; Sae-ung, S.; Theppaya, T. The replacement of the R404A refrigeration sys-tem with the environmentally friendly R448A, to improve convenience store energy efficiency in Thailand. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2020, 75, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saengsikhiao, P.; Taweekun, J.; Maliwan, K.; Sae-ung, S.; Theppaya, T. Development of Environmentally Friendly and Energy Efficient Refrigerants for Refrigeration Systems. Energy Eng. 2021, 118, 411–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Issaro, A.; Saengsikhiao, P.; Taweekun, J.; Thongruang, W. The Green Logistics Idea using Vacuum Insulation Panels (VIPs). J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2021, 82, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Low-E glass door design.
Figure 1. Low-E glass door design.
Energies 14 03134 g001
Figure 2. Installation of Low-E glass door for store No.1 (R22).
Figure 2. Installation of Low-E glass door for store No.1 (R22).
Energies 14 03134 g002
Figure 3. Installation of low-E glass door for store No.2 (R404A).
Figure 3. Installation of low-E glass door for store No.2 (R404A).
Energies 14 03134 g003
Figure 4. Digital compressor rack with digital compressor and digital controller No.1 (R22).
Figure 4. Digital compressor rack with digital compressor and digital controller No.1 (R22).
Energies 14 03134 g004
Figure 5. Digital compressor rack with digital compressor and digital controller No.1 (R404A).
Figure 5. Digital compressor rack with digital compressor and digital controller No.1 (R404A).
Energies 14 03134 g005
Figure 6. Average power consumption per day before and after door retrofits for store No.1 (R22).
Figure 6. Average power consumption per day before and after door retrofits for store No.1 (R22).
Energies 14 03134 g006
Figure 7. Average power consumption per day before and after door retrofits for store No.2 (R404A).
Figure 7. Average power consumption per day before and after door retrofits for store No.2 (R404A).
Energies 14 03134 g007
Figure 8. Average power consumption per hour before and after retrofits for store No.1 (R22).
Figure 8. Average power consumption per hour before and after retrofits for store No.1 (R22).
Energies 14 03134 g008
Figure 9. Average power consumption per hour before and after retrofits for store No.2 (R404A).
Figure 9. Average power consumption per hour before and after retrofits for store No.2 (R404A).
Energies 14 03134 g009
Figure 10. Temperature result for the fixed-speed semi-hermetic compressor.
Figure 10. Temperature result for the fixed-speed semi-hermetic compressor.
Energies 14 03134 g010
Figure 11. Temperature result for the digital-speed semi-hermetic compressor.
Figure 11. Temperature result for the digital-speed semi-hermetic compressor.
Energies 14 03134 g011
Figure 12. The operating status for the digital semi-hermetic compressor.
Figure 12. The operating status for the digital semi-hermetic compressor.
Energies 14 03134 g012
Table 1. The energy savings compared with previous research.
Table 1. The energy savings compared with previous research.
Open Refrigerated with DoorsDigital Scroll Compressor
Previous ResearchEnergy Saving (%)Previous ResearchEnergy Saving (%)
Wu et al. (2015)20–30%Cha, Kwon, and Oh (2014)26.70%
Chaomuang et al. (2019)20–70%Pattana, Tantakitti, and Wiratkasem (2020)20%
Chaomuang et al. (2020)23–73%Saengsikhiao et al. (2020)34%
Xie et al. (2021)69%Present Study No.1 (R22)19%
Present Study Store No.1 R2239.67%Present Study No.2 (R404A)24%
Present Study Store No.2 R404A37.37%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saengsikhiao, P.; Taweekun, J. Energy Efficiency Improvement Solutions for Supermarkets by Low-E Glass Door and Digital Semi-Hermetic Compressor. Energies 2021, 14, 3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113134

AMA Style

Saengsikhiao P, Taweekun J. Energy Efficiency Improvement Solutions for Supermarkets by Low-E Glass Door and Digital Semi-Hermetic Compressor. Energies. 2021; 14(11):3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113134

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saengsikhiao, Piyanut, and Juntakan Taweekun. 2021. "Energy Efficiency Improvement Solutions for Supermarkets by Low-E Glass Door and Digital Semi-Hermetic Compressor" Energies 14, no. 11: 3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113134

APA Style

Saengsikhiao, P., & Taweekun, J. (2021). Energy Efficiency Improvement Solutions for Supermarkets by Low-E Glass Door and Digital Semi-Hermetic Compressor. Energies, 14(11), 3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113134

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop