Applied Control and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Management: An Overview of Trends in EV Charging, Cyber-Physical Security and Predictive Maintenance
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- EV charging,
- cyber-physical security, and
- predictive maintenance,
1.1. Motivation
1.2. Paper Structure
2. Cost-Effective Charging of Electric Vehicles in Service Areas
- investing in production capacity and a skilled workforce;
- using data and analytics for network planning purposes;
- reducing “range anxiety” of EV drivers.
3. Cyber-Physical System Security
4. Predictive Maintenance and Anomaly Detection in Energy Management
- reduce unplanned downtime events by up to 12% and
- increase operating margins by 15%.
- aerial reconnaissance of electric poles in the power grid for maintenance and surveillance purposes;
- robust anomaly detection in photovoltaic production plants
- anomaly detection in horizontal axis wind turbines;
- data-driven estimation of current and ampacity on overhead lines;
- AI for learning the behavioural profiles of power consumers as relevant insight for estimating power demand in distribution networks.
4.1. Aerial Reconnaissance of Electric Poles in the Power Grid for Maintenance and Surveillance Purposes
4.2. Robust Anomaly Detection in Photovoltaic Production Plants
4.3. Anomaly Detection in Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines
4.4. Data-Driven Estimation of Current and Ampacity on High-Voltage Overhead Lines
4.5. AI for Learning the Behavioural Profiles of Power Consumers as Relevant Insight for Estimating Power Demand in Distribution Networks
- ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average) models are widely used in time series forecasting. They capture the dependencies and trends in historical load data and use them to make future predictions, handling both deterministic and stochastic components in the data, thus making them suitable for load curve forecasting.
- SARIMA (seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average) models extend the capabilities of ARIMA models by incorporating seasonal patterns in the data. Load curves often exhibit seasonal variations, such as daily or weekly patterns. SARIMA models can effectively capture and forecast these seasonal fluctuations.
- Gaussian processes are flexible and non-parametric models that can capture patterns in data. They are particularly suitable when the underlying relationships between variables are nonlinear. They have been successfully applied to load curve forecasting by modeling the load curve as a function of time and capturing the uncertainty through the covariance structure.
- BSTS (Bayesian structure time series) models are Bayesian state-space models that can capture both trend and seasonality in the data. These models decompose the load curve into multiple components, such as level, trend, seasonality and noise, allowing for a more comprehensive analysis. The Bayesian framework also enables the incorporation of prior knowledge and updating of forecasts as new data becomes available.
- Finally, LSTM (long short-term memory) networks are a type of recurrent neural network that can effectively model sequential data. They have shown promise in load curve forecasting by capturing long-term dependencies and temporal patterns in the data, due to their flexible architecture, allowing for modeling complex relationships within the load curve data.
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- 2023 States General of Artificial Intelligence, Gli Stati Generali dell’Intelligenza Artificiale. 2023. Available online: https://www.classagora.it/eventi/gli-stati-generali-2023-dell-intelligenza-artificiale-2023 (accessed on 14 April 2023).
- Mellit, A.; Kalogirou, S.A. Artificial intelligence techniques for photovoltaic applications: A review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2008, 34, 574–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deb, N.; Singh, R.; Brooks, R.R.; Bai, K. A Review of Extremely Fast Charging Stations for Electric Vehicles. Energies 2021, 14, 7566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elyasichamazkoti, F.; Khajehpoor, A. Application of machine learning for wind energy from design to energy-Water nexus: A Survey. Energy Nexus 2021, 2, 100011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.; Gupta, S.; Kumar, S.; Saxena, R. A Comprehensive Survey on Role of Artificial Intelligence in Solar Energy Processes. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 7th International conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), Mumbai, India, 7–9 April 2022; pp. 1–6.
- Charef, N.; Ben Mnaouer, A.; Aloqaily, M.; Bouachir, O.; Guizani, M. Artificial intelligence implication on energy sustainability in Internet of Things: A survey. Inf. Process. Manag. 2023, 60, 103212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega-Fernandez, I.; Liberati, F. A Review of Denial of Service Attack and Mitigation in the Smart Grid Using Reinforcement Learning. Energies 2023, 16, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szumska, E.M. Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure along Highways in the EU. Energies 2023, 16, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajar, K.; Guo, B.; Hably, A.; Bacha, S. Smart charging impact on electric vehicles in presence of photovoltaics. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Valencia, Spain, 10–12 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Negarestani, S.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Rastegar, M.; Rajabi-Ghahnavieh, A. Optimal Sizing of Storage System in a Fast Charging Station for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2016, 2, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, N.; Cha, S.; Peng, H. Optimal Control of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle. IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol. 2011, 19, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar]
- Heymann, B.; Bonnans, J.F.; Martinon, P.; Silva, F.J.; Lanas, F.; Jiménez-Estévez, G. Continuous optimal control approaches to microgrid energy management. Energy Syst. 2018, 9, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zheng, C.; Li, W.; Liang, Q. An Energy Management Strategy of Hybrid Energy Storage Systems for Electric Vehicle Applications. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2018, 9, 1880–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kou, P.; Liang, D.; Gao, L.; Gao, F. Stochastic Coordination of Plug-In Electric Vehicles and Wind Turbines in Microgrid: A Model Predictive Control Approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2015, 7, 1537–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kou, P.; Feng, Y.; Liang, D.; Gao, L. A model predictive control approach for matching uncertain wind generation with PEV charging demand in a microgrid. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 105, 488–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casini, M.; Vicino, A.; Zanvettor, G.G. A receding horizon approach to peak power minimization for EV charging stations in the presence of uncertainty. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 126, 106567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Giorgio, A.; De Santis, E.; Frettoni, L.; Felli, S.; Liberati, F. Electric Vehicle Fast Charging: A Congestion-Dependent Stochastic Model Predictive Control under Uncertain Reference. Energies 2023, 16, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liberati, F.; Di Giorgio, A.; Koch, G. Optimal stochastic control of energy storage system based on pontryagin minimum principle for flattening pev fast charging in a service area. IEEE Control Syst. Lett. 2021, 6, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Giorgio, A.; Atanasious, M.M.H.; Guetta, S.; Liberati, F. Control of an Energy Storage System for Electric Vehicle Fast Charging: Impact of Configuration Choices and Demand Uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2021 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Bari, Italy, 7–10 September 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Kucevic, D.; Englberger, S.; Sharma, A.; Trivedi, A.; Tepe, B.; Schachler, B.; Hesse, H.; Srinivasan, D.; Jossen, A. Reducing grid peak load through the coordinated control of battery energy storage systems located at electric vehicle charging parks. Appl. Energy 2021, 295, 116936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, X.; Zhang, W.; Wei, S.; Wang, Z. Optimization of an energy storage system for electric bus fast-charging station. Energies 2021, 14, 4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, B. A multi-objective optimization model for fast electric vehicle charging stations with wind, PV power and energy storage. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 288, 125564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonori, S.; Rizzoni, G.; Mascioli, F.M.F.; Rizzi, A. Intelligent energy flow management of a nanogrid fast charging station equipped with second life batteries. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 127, 106602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Yona, A.; Takahashi, H.; Hemeida, A.M.; Mandal, P.; Mikhaylov, A.; Senjyu, T.; Lotfy, M.E. Energy management system optimization of drug store electric vehicles charging station operation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Pang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, S.; Feng, J.; Shen, B. Techno-economic study of a 100-MW-class multi-energy vehicle charging/refueling station: Using 100% renewable, liquid hydrogen, and superconductor technologies. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 276, 116463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parlikar, A.; Schott, M.; Godse, K.; Kucevic, D.; Jossen, A.; Hesse, H. High-power electric vehicle charging: Low-carbon grid integration pathways with stationary lithium-ion battery systems and renewable generation. Appl. Energy 2023, 333, 120541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Kumar, T.; Nema, S.; Thakur, T. A comprehensive planning framework for electric vehicles fast charging station assisted by solar and battery based on Queueing theory and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II in a co-ordinated transportation and power network. J. Energy Storage 2022, 49, 104180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Ji, S.; Lee, C.; Jeong, D.; Choung, S.; Bae, S. Grid-Connected Inverter for a PV-Powered Electric Vehicle Charging Station to Enhance the Stability of a Microgrid. Sustainability 2021, 13, 14022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Z.; Gao, Y.; Yu, N. Learning to Operate an Electric Vehicle Charging Station Considering Vehicle-Grid Integration. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2022, 13, 3038–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deilami, S.; Muyeen, S.M. An Insight into Practical Solutions for Electric Vehicle Charging in Smart Grid. Energies 2020, 13, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Faramondi, L.; Oliva, G.; Setola, R. Optimal Stealth Attacks to Cyber-Physical Systems: Seeking a Compromise between Maximum Damage and Effort. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 2022, 55, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamsky, F.; Aubigny, M.; Battisti, F.; Carli, M.; Cimorelli, F.; Cruz, T.; Di Giorgio, A.; Foglietta, C.; Galli, A.; Giuseppi, A.; et al. Integrated protection of industrial control systems from cyber-attacks: The ATENA approach. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 2018, 21, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sridhar, S.; Hahn, A.; Govindarasu, M. Cyber–physical system security for the electric power grid. Proc. IEEE 2011, 100, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amini, S.; Pasqualetti, F.; Mohsenian-Rad, H. Dynamic load altering attacks against power system stability: Attack models and protection schemes. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 9, 2862–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liberati, F.; Garone, E.; Di Giorgio, A. Review of Cyber-Physical Attacks in Smart Grids: A System-Theoretic Perspective. Electronics 2021, 10, 1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohsenian-Rad, A.; Leon-Garcia, A. Distributed Internet-Based Load Altering Attacks Against Smart Power Grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2011, 2, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amini, S.; Mohsenian-Rad, H.; Pasqualetti, F. Dynamic load altering attacks in smart grid. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Power Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), Washington, DC, USA, 18–20 February 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Di Giorgio, A.; Giuseppi, A.; Liberali, F.; Ornatelli, A.; Rabezzano, A.; Celsi, L.R. On the optimization of energy storage system placement for protecting power transmission grids against dynamic load altering attacks. In Proceedings of the 2017 25th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), Valletta, Malta, 3–6 July 2017; pp. 986–992. [Google Scholar]
- Germana, R.; Giuseppi, A.; Di Giorgio, A. Ensuring the Stability of Power Systems Against Dynamic Load Altering Attacks: A Robust Control Scheme Using Energy Storage Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 European Control Conference (ECC), St. Petersburg, Russia, 12–15 May 2020; pp. 1330–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germanà, R.; Giuseppi, A.; Pietrabissa, A.; Di Giorgio, A. Optimal Energy Storage System Placement for Robust Stabilization of Power Systems Against Dynamic Load Altering Attacks. In Proceedings of the 2022 30th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), Vouliagmeni, Greece, 28 June 2022–1 July 2022; pp. 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xun, P.; Zhu, P.D.; Maharjan, S.; Cui, P.S. Successive direct load altering attack in smart grid. Comput. Secur. 2018, 77, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yankson, S.; Ghamkhari, M. Transactive energy to thwart load altering attacks on power distribution systems. Future Internet 2020, 12, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, G.; Wang, G.; Sun, J.; Chen, J. Optimal partial feedback attacks in cyber-physical power systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 2020, 65, 3919–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnaboldi, L.; Czekster, R.M.; Morisset, C.; Metere, R. Modelling Load-Changing Attacks in Cyber-Physical Systems. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 2020, 353, 39–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katewa, V.; Pasqualetti, F. Optimal Dynamic Load-Altering Attacks Against Power Systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 American Control Conference (ACC), New Orleans, LA, USA, 25–28 May 2021; pp. 4568–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, J.; Berg, T.; Anderson, B.; Wright, B. Review of Electric Vehicle Charger Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities, Potential Impacts, and Defenses. Energies 2022, 15, 3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IRENA. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019. Available online: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Jun/IRENA_Power_Generation_Costs_2019.pdf (accessed on 17 April 2023).
- Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Long, H.; Xu, J.; Liu, R. Wind Turbine Gearbox Failure Identification with Deep Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2017, 13, 1360–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Xiao, W.; Zhang, Z. Non-iterative and Fast Deep Learning: Multilayer Extreme Learning Machines. J. Frankl. Inst. 2020, 357, 8925–8955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Shone, F.; Li, Z.; Frangi, A.F.; Xie, S.Q.; Zhang, Z.-Q. Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Musculoskeletal Modeling: Predicting Muscle Forces and Joint Kinematics from Surface EMG. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2022, 31, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whitworth, C.; Jones, D.; Duller, A.; Earp, G. Aerial video inspection of overhead power lines. Power Eng. 2001, 15, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, V.N.; Jenssen, R.; Roverso, D. Automatic autonomous vision-based power line inspection: A review of current status and the potential role of deep learning. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 99, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Matikainen, L.; Lehtomäki, M.; Ahokas, E.; Hyyppä, J.; Karjalainen, M.; Jaakkola, A.; Kukko, A.; Heinonen, T. Remote sensing methods for power line corridor surveys. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 2016, 119, 10–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, H.; Tang, Z.; Xie, Y.; Yuan, H.; Chen, Q.; Gui, W. Siamese Time Series and Difference Networks for Performance Monitoring in the Froth Flotation Process. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 18, 2539–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bronstein, M.M.; Bruna, J.; LeCun, Y.; Szlam, A.; Vandergheynst, P. Geometric Deep Learning: Going beyond Euclidean data. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2017, 34, 18–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Devoto, A.; Spinelli, I.; Murabito, F.; Chiovoloni, F.; Musmeci, R.; Scardapane, S. Reidentification of Objects from Aerial Photos With Hybrid Siamese Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2023, 19, 2997–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhuri, U.; Banerjee, B.; Bhattacharya, A. Siamese graph convolutional network for content based remote sensing image retrieval. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 2019, 184, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kipf, T.; Van der Pol, E.; Welling, M. Contrastive learning of structured world models. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1911.12247. [Google Scholar]
- Locatello, F.; Weissenborn, D.; Unterthiner, T.; Mahendran, A.; Heigold, G.; Uszkoreit, J.; Kipf, T. Object-centric learning with slot attention. In Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2020), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 11 December 2020; pp. 11525–11538. [Google Scholar]
- Kreuzer, D.; Beaini, D.; Hamilton, W.; Létourneau, V.; Tossou, P. Rethinking graph transformers with spectral attention. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2021, 34, 21618–21629. [Google Scholar]
- De Benedetti, M.; Leonardi, F.; Messina, F.; Santoro, C.; Vasilakos, A. Anomaly detection and predictive maintenance for photovoltaic systems. Neurocomputing 2018, 310, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashir, N.; Chen, D.; Irwin, D.; Shenoy, P. Solar-TK: A Data-driven Toolkit for Solar PV Performance Modeling and Forecasting. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), Monterey, CA, USA, 4–7 November 2019; pp. 456–466. [Google Scholar]
- Bonacina, F.; Corsini, A.; Cardillo, L.; Lucchetta, F. Complex Network Analysis of Photovoltaic Plant Operations and Failure Modes. Energies 2019, 12, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arena, E.; Corsini, A.; Ferulano, R.; Iuvara, D.A.; Miele, E.S.; Ricciardi Celsi, L.; Sulieman, N.A.; Villari, M. Anomaly Detection in Photovoltaic Production Factories via Monte Carlo Pre-Processed Principal Component Analysis. Energies 2021, 14, 3951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parashar, S.; Swarnkar, A.; Niazi, K.R.; Gupta, N. Optimal integration of electric vehicles and energy management of grid connected microgrid. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference (ITEC-India), Pune, India, 13–15 December 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Fernando, T.M.L.; Marcelo, L.G.E.; David, V.M.H. Substation Distribution Reliability Assessment using Network Reduction and Montecarlo Method, a comparison. In Proceedings of the 2019 FISE-IEEE/CIGRE Conference—Living the Energy Transition (FISE/CIGRE), Medellin, Colombia, 4–6 December 2019; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Leger, G. Combining adaptive alternate test and multi-site. In Proceedings of the 2015 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), Grenoble, France, 9–13 March 2015; pp. 1389–1394. [Google Scholar]
- Kong, X.; Tong, X. Monte-Carlo Tree Search for Graph Coalition Structure Generation. In Proceedings of the 2020 13th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI), Chengdu, China, 17–19 October 2020; pp. 1058–1063. [Google Scholar]
- Saracco, P.; Batic, M.; Hoff, G.; Pia, M.G. Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) in generic MonteCarlo simulations. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC), Anaheim, CA, USA, 27 October–3 November 2012; pp. 651–656. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, K.; Parthasarathy, G.; Uluyol, O.; Foslien, W.; Sheng, S.; Fleming, P. Use of SCADA data for failure detection in wind turbines. Energy Sustain. 2011, 54686, 2071–2079. [Google Scholar]
- Dao, C.; Kazemtabrizi, B.; Crabtree, C. Wind turbine reliability data review and impacts on levelised cost of energy. Wind Energy 2019, 22, 1848–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stetco, A.; Dinmohammadi, F.; Zhao, X.; Robu, V.; Flynn, D.; Barnes, M.; Keane, J.; Nenadic, G. Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review. Renew. Energy 2019, 133, 620–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lebranchu, A.; Charbonnier, S.; Bérenguer, C.; Prévost, F. A combined mono- and multi-turbine approach for fault indicator synthesis and wind turbine monitoring using SCADA data. ISA Trans. 2018, 87, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Menezes, D.; Mendes, M.; Almeida, J.A.; Farinha, T. Wind Farm and Resource Datasets: A Comprehensive Survey and Overview. Energies 2020, 13, 4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulmer, M.; Jarlskog, E.; Pizza, G.; Manninen, J.; Goren Huber, L. Early fault detection based on wind turbine scada data using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, Virtual Conference, 27–31 July 2020; Volume 5, p. 9. [Google Scholar]
- Miele, E.S.; Bonacina, F.; Corsini, A. Deep anomaly detection in horizontal axis wind turbines using Graph Convolutional Autoencoders for Multivariate Time series. Energy AI 2022, 8, 100145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soto, F.; Alvira, D.; Martin, L.; Latorre, J.; Lumbreras, J.; Wagensberg, M. Increasing the capacity of overhead lines in the 400 kV Spanish transmission network: Real time thermal ratings. Electra 1998, 22, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Seppa, T.O.; Salehian, A. Guide for Selection of Weather Parameters for Bare Overhead Conductor Ratings; CIGRE Technical Brochures; CIGRÉ: Paris, France, 2006; p. 299. [Google Scholar]
- Lawry, D.; Fitzgerald, B. Finding hidden capacity in transmission lines. N. Am. Wind. 2007, 4, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Black, C.R.; Chisholm, W.A. Key considerations for the selection of dynamic thermal line rating systems. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2015, 30, 2154–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chisholm, W.A.; Barrett, J.S. Ampacity studies on 49 degrees C-rated transmission line. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 1989, 4, 1476–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halverson, P.G.; Syracuse, S.J.; Clark, R.; Tesche, F.M. Non-Contact Sensor System for Real-Time High-Accuracy Monitoring of Overhead Transmission Lines. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Overhead Lines, Fort Mill, SC, USA, 1 April 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Albizu, I.; Fernandez, E.; Eguia, P.; Torres, E.; Mazon, A.J. Tension and ampacity monitoring system for overhead lines. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2013, 28, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seppa, T.O. Increasing transmission capacity by real time monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, New York, NY, USA, 27–31 January 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Engelhardt, J.S.; Basu, S.P. Design, installation, and field experience with an overhead transmission dynamic line rating system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Transmission and Distribution Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 15–20 September 1996; pp. 366–370. [Google Scholar]
- Bernauer, C.; Böhme, H.; Hinrichsen, V.; Gromann, S.; Kornhuber, S.; Markalous, S.; Muhr, M.; Strehl, T.; Teminova, R. New method of temperature measurement of overhead transmission lines (OHTLs) utilizing surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 27–31 August 2007; pp. 287–288. [Google Scholar]
- Douglass, D.; Chisholm, W.; Davidson, G.; Grant, I.; Lindsey, K.; Lancaster, M.; Lawry, D.; McCarthy, T.; Nascimento, C.; Pasha, M.; et al. Real-time overhead transmission-line monitoring for dynamic rating. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2016, 31, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawson, L.; Knight, A.M. Applicability of dynamic thermal line rating for long lines, Power Deli. IEEE Trans. 2018, 33, 719–727. [Google Scholar]
- Sugihara, H.; Funaki, T.; Yamaguchi, N. Evaluation method for real-time dynamic line ratings based on line current variation model for representing forecast error of intermittent renewable generation. Energies 2017, 10, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Esfahani, M.M.; Yousefi, G.R. Real time congestion management in power systems considering quasi-dynamic thermal rating and congestion clearing time. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform. 2016, 12, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ippolito, M.G.; Massaro, F.; Zizzo, G.; Filippone, G.; Puccio, A. Methodologies for the exploitation of existing energy corridors. Gis Analysis and Dtr Applications. Energies 2018, 11, 979. [Google Scholar]
- Ippolito, M.G.; Massaro, F.; Cassaro, C. HTLS conductors: A way to optimize RES generation and to improve the competitiveness of the electrical market—A case study in Sicily. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2018, 2018, 2073187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coccia, R.; Tonti, V.; Germanò, C.; Palone, F.; Papi, L.; Ricciardi Celsi, L. A Multi-Variable DTR Algorithm for the Estimation of Conductor Temperature and Ampacity on HV Overhead Lines by IoT Data Sensors. Energies 2022, 15, 2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strielkowski, W.; Streimikiene, D.; Fomina, A.; Semenova, E. Internet of Energy (IoE) and High-Renewables Electricity System Market Design. Energies 2019, 12, 4790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ramos, S.; Duarte, J.M.; Duarte, F.J.; Vale, Z. A data-mining-based methodology to support MV electricity customers’ characterization. Energy Build. 2015, 91, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Räsänen, T.; Voukantsis, D.; Niska, H.; Karatzas, K.; Kolehmainen, M. Data-based method for creating electricity use load profiles using large amount of customer-specific hourly measured electricity use data. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 3538–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Jarrah, O.Y.; Al-Hammadi, Y.; Yoo, P.D.; Muhaidat, S. Multi-Layered Clustering for Power Consumption Profiling in Smart Grids. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 18459–18468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Ning, C.; Deb, C.; Zhang, F.; Cheong, D.; Lee, S.E.; Sekhar, C.; Tham, K.W. k-Shape clustering algorithm for building energy usage patterns analysis and forecasting model accuracy improvement. Energy Build. 2017, 146, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, A.; Haydarov, K.; Haq, I.U.; Muhammad, K.; Rho, S.; Lee, M.; Baik, S.W. Deep Learning Assisted Buildings Energy Consumption Profiling Using Smart Meter Data. Sensors 2020, 20, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rhodes, J.D.; Cole, W.J.; Upshaw, C.R.; Edgar, T.F.; Webber, M.E. Clustering analysis of residential electricity demand profiles. Appl. Energy 2014, 135, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Richard, M.A.; Fortin, H.; Poulin, A.; Leduc, M.A.; Fournier, M. Daily load profiles clustering: A powerful tool for demand side management in medium-sized industries. In Proceedings of the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry, Denver, CO, USA, 15–18 August 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.; Ko, J.-M.; Choi, S.-H. Methods for generating TLPs (typical load profiles) for smart grid-based energy programs. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence Applications in Smart Grid (CIASG), Paris, France, 11–15 April 2011; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Popat, S.K.; Emmanuel, M. Review and comparative study of clustering techniques. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2014, 5, 805–812. [Google Scholar]
- Bonacina, F.; Miele, E.S.; Corsini, A. Time Series Clustering: A Complex Network-Based Approach for Feature Selection in Multi-Sensor Data. Modelling 2020, 1, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, L.N.; Zhao, L. Time series clustering via community detection in networks. Inf. Sci. 2016, 326, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Portera, R.; Bonacina, F.; Corsini, A.; Miele, E.S.; Celsi, L.R. Energy profiling of end-users in service and industry sectors with use of Complex Network Analysis. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 312, 10001. [Google Scholar]
- Javed, A.; Lee, B.S.; Rizzo, D.M. A benchmark study on time series clustering. Mach. Learn. Appl. 2020, 1, 100001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corsini, A.; Bonacina, F.; Feudo, S.; Marchegiani, A.; Venturini, P. Internal Combustion Engine sensor network analysis using graph modeling. Energy Procedia 2017, 126, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Mata, A.S. Complex Networks: A Mini-review. Braz. J. Phys. 2020, 50, 658–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suraci, V.; Celsi, L.R.; Giuseppi, A.; Di Giorgio, A. A distributed wardrop control algorithm for load balancing in smart grids. In Proceedings of the 2017 25th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), Valletta, Malta, 3–6 July 2017; pp. 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, H.; Goude, Y.; Brossat, X.; Yao, Q. Modeling and Forecasting Daily Electricity Load Curves: A Hybrid Approach. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2013, 108, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chaouch, M. Clustering-Based Improvement of Nonparamatric Functional Time Series Forecasting: Application to Intra-Day Household-Level Load Curves. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2014, 5, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Review Paper Title | Challenges Discussed | Reference |
---|---|---|
Artificial intelligence techniques for photovoltaic applications: a review | Enabling fault tolerance in photovoltaic systems—namely, forecasting and modeling of meteorological data, sizing of photovoltaic systems and modeling, simulation and control of photovoltaic systems—via AI, exploiting their capability in terms of symbolic reasoning, flexibility and explanation | [2] |
A review of extremely fast charging stations for electric vehicles | Current technology gaps in EV fast charging stations, ranging from infrastructure through power electronics to extremely fast charging | [3] |
Application of machine learning for wind energy from design to energy-water nexus: a survey | Using AI and in particular neural networks for wind energy technology, namely wind speed prediction, design optimization, fault detection, optimal control and maintenance planning | [4] |
A comprehensive survey on the role of artificial intelligence in solar energy processes | Using AI—artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, hybrid systems, wavelets and genetic algorithms—for the simulation and estimation of renewable energy performance management, in order to improve photovoltaic power generation | [5] |
Artificial intelligence implications on energy sustainability in Internet of Things: a survey | Integrating machine learning and swarm intelligence for the design of innovative protocols aimed at predicting and forecasting demand and at optimizing energy use based on the availability of a massive number of Internet of Things devices | [6] |
A review of denial of service attacks and mitigation in the smart grid using reinforcement learning | Exploiting reinforcement learning for detecting and mitigating denial of service attacks in smart grids, providing a detailed analysis of the strengths and limitations of current approaches as well as of prospects for future research | [7] |
Challenge Faced | Methodological Approach | Reference |
---|---|---|
Service area control problem | Continuous-time calculus of variations (PMP) | [10,11,12,13] |
Service area control problem | Discrete-time controller (MPC) | [14,15,16] |
Fast charging service area | Optimal control of an ESS via PMP (continuous-time) | [18] |
Fast charging service area | MPC, assuming perfect knowledge of the future charging demand | [19] |
Fast charging service area | Stochastic MPC with minimization of the power flow at the POC, without assuming perfect knowledge of the future charging demand | [17] |
Urban distribution grids with a high share of PEVs | Reducing charging peak power by controlling a certain number of ESS via linear optimization | [20] |
Charging station for electric buses | Optimal sizing and management of an ESS (ESS control) | [21] |
Fast EV charging stations with wind, PV power and ESS | Sub-optimal heuristic power scheduling strategy to minimize costs and pollution | [22] |
Public fast charging station in a grid-connected nanogrid | Energy management system based on a fuzzy logic controller to tackle the stochastic nature of fast charging demand | [23] |
Smart grid with charging stations, renewable plants and ESSs | Deterministic cost minimization for power flow control | [24] |
Service area control in the presence of hydrogen production and storage facilities | Rule-based control scheme with maximization of locally produced clean energy | [25] |
Service area control in the presence of hydrogen production and storage facilities | Linear optimization-based deterministic MPC | [26] |
Smart grid with charging stations, renewable plants and ESSs | Minimizing operating costs with optimal planning of location, number and dimension of ESS devices, renewable plants and charging stations | [27] |
Photovoltaic-powered EV charging station | Grid-connected inverter | [28] |
Service area control problem | Reinforcement-learning-based optimal charging schedule with uncertain arrival time and charging demands of EVs | [29] |
Fast charging service area | Control strategy based on the combination of maximum sensitivity selection and a suitably designed genetic algorithm | [30] |
Challenge Faced | Methodological Approach | Reference |
---|---|---|
Industrial automation and control systems (IACSs). | Security framework and advanced tools to properly manage vulnerabilities, and to react in a timely manner to the threats | [32] |
Cyber infrastructure security | Layered approach for evaluating risk based on the security of both the physical power applications and the supporting cyber infrastructure | [33] |
Power transmission grid affected by dynamic LAAs | Protection system is designed against D-LAAs by formulating and solving a non-convex pole-placement optimization problem | [34] |
Designing cyber-physical attacks for destabilizing a smart grid | Formulation of dynamic LAAs as a new class of cyber-physical attacks | [37] |
Power transmission grid affected by dynamic LAAs | Managing active components of the grid such as a group of optimally placed ESSs to protect power transmission networks so that any destabilizing effects of dynamic LAAs are compensated without the need for resorting to any real-time detection or reconstruction of the attack, under the assumption that the attack characteristics be completely known a priori | [38] |
Power transmission grid affected by dynamic LAAs | Extension of the approach in [32] to a set of identified potential dynamic LAAs | [39] |
Power transmission grid affected by dynamic LAAs | Extensive description of the dynamics of the control actions and their effects in different network scenarios provided with the support of numerical simulations | [40] |
Generic smart grid subject to internet-based LAAs | Cost-efficient load protection strategy | [36] |
Generic smart grid | Optimal switching data injection strategy for a direct LAA is presented to be used from the attacker’s perspective | [41] |
Power grid harmed by LAAs | Attack-thwarting system for countering LAAs | [42] |
Power grid subject to coordinated load-changing attacks | Models to enhance power plant responses to active attacks targeting the energy infrastructure | [44] |
Challenge Faced | Methodological Approach | Reference |
---|---|---|
Pole mapping on overhead power lines | Mapping out all the poles of the networks with cyclically planned aerial flights | [51] |
Pole mapping on the generic power grid | Mapping out all the poles of the networks with cyclically planned aerial flights | [52] |
Power line corridor surveys | Algorithm for automatic reidentification of the same object from different pictures | [53] |
Mission of aerial reconnaissance for the reidentification of electric poles in the Italian power grid | Deep learning-based strategy for reidentifying the same object in different photos taken from separate positions and angles | [56] |
Predictive maintenance for photovoltaic power plants | Data-driven toolkit | [62] |
Predictive maintenance for photovoltaic power plants | Data-driven approach based on sensor network analysis for unveiling hidden precursors in failure modes | [63] |
Anomaly detection for the 3SUN solar cell production plant in Catania, Italy | Robust anomaly detection using Monte Carlo-based pre-processing | [64] |
Fault detection for wind turbines from SCADA data | Clustering algorithms and principal component analysis combined with anomaly detection to capture fault signatures | [70] |
Wind turbine reliability data review | LCOE estimation using reliability data | [71] |
Fault indicator synthesis and wind turbine monitoring using SCADA data | Combined mono- and multi-turbine method for fault indicator synthesis | [73] |
Early fault detection in wind turbines | Exploitation of CNNs for enhancing detection accuracy and robustness | [75] |
Anomaly detection in horizontal axis wind turbines | Unsupervised deep anomaly detection based on SCADA data | [76] |
Estimation of dynamic thermal capacity of overhead transmission lines | Direct methods for DTLR | [80] |
Real-time monitoring of overhead transmission lines | Prototype for real-time transmission line monitoring via direct methods | [82] |
Voltage and ampacity monitoring for overhead lines | Real-time monitoring system based on conductor tension, ambient temperature, solar radiation and current intensity | [83] |
Predictive maintenance in power transmission networks | Real-time monitoring | [84] |
Dynamic thermal rating on overhead transmission lines | Design, installation and field experience | [85] |
Dynamic thermal rating on overhead transmission lines | Temperature measurement via surface acoustic wave sensors | [86] |
Dynamic line rating on overhead lines | Real-time monitoring | [87] |
Dynamic line rating on overhead lines | Line current variation model for representing the forecasting error of intermittent renewable energy sources, with the aim of preventive control | [89] |
Real time congestion management in power systems | Quasi-dynamic thermal rating considering congestion clearing time | [90] |
Predictive maintenance on the case study of the Sicilian power network in Italy | Optimization of generation from renewable energy | [92] |
DTLR for current and ampacity estimation on high-voltage overhead lines | Dynamic thermo-mechanical model using weather data measured by IoT sensors to properly estimate conductor’s temperature and ampacities of power grids | [93] |
Characterization of the medium-voltage loads | Data-mining based methodology | [95] |
Learning the behavioural profiles of power consumption in a smart grid | Data-driven method based on hourly measured electricity used data from a large number of customers | [96] |
Learning the behavioural profiles of power consumption in a smart grid | Multi-layered clustering | [97] |
Detection of building energy usage patterns | K-shape clustering algorithms | [98] |
Profiling energy consumption in buildings | Adaptive self-organizing map for clustering | [99] |
Profiling residential electricity demand | K-means clustering | [100] |
Learning the behavioural profiles of power consumption in a smart grid | TPL (typical load profile) data-driven generation | [102] |
Learning the behavioural profiles of power consumption in a smart grid | Feature selection in multi-sensor data for time series clustering | [104] |
Learning the behavioural profiles of power consumption in a smart grid | Community detection in complex networks for time series clustering | [105] |
Learning the behavioural profiles of power consumers as relevant insight for estimating power demand in distribution networks | Profiling algorithm based on DTW combined with CNA | [106] |
Analysis of photovoltaic power plant operations and failure modes | Data-driven approach based on graph modeling techniques | [63] |
Load balancing in smart grids | Wardrop control algorithm | [110] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ricciardi Celsi, L.; Valli, A. Applied Control and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Management: An Overview of Trends in EV Charging, Cyber-Physical Security and Predictive Maintenance. Energies 2023, 16, 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124678
Ricciardi Celsi L, Valli A. Applied Control and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Management: An Overview of Trends in EV Charging, Cyber-Physical Security and Predictive Maintenance. Energies. 2023; 16(12):4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124678
Chicago/Turabian StyleRicciardi Celsi, Lorenzo, and Anna Valli. 2023. "Applied Control and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Management: An Overview of Trends in EV Charging, Cyber-Physical Security and Predictive Maintenance" Energies 16, no. 12: 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124678
APA StyleRicciardi Celsi, L., & Valli, A. (2023). Applied Control and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Management: An Overview of Trends in EV Charging, Cyber-Physical Security and Predictive Maintenance. Energies, 16(12), 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124678