Next Article in Journal
Nanoscale Topographical Characterization of Orbital Implant Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
Properties of Controlled Low Strength Material with Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion Ash and Recycled Aggregates
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Recycled Ceramic Aggregates for the Production of Mineral-Asphalt Mixtures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Contact Behavior of Composite CrTiSiN Coated Dies in Compressing of Mg Alloy Sheets under High Pressure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibacterial Effects of Magnetically-Controlled Ag/Fe3O4 Nanoparticles

1
Key Laboratory of Process Monitoring and System Optimization for Mechanical and Electrical Equipment in Fujian Province, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li 32023, Taiwan
3
Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li 32023, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(5), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050659
Submission received: 11 April 2018 / Revised: 21 April 2018 / Accepted: 23 April 2018 / Published: 24 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from IMETI2016)

Abstract

:
This paper presents the use of a magnetic manipulation device to remotely control the movement of Ag/Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) for enhancing the antibacterial effect of Ag particles in aqueous suspensions containing Escherichia coli (E. coli). The Ag/Fe3O4 magnetic NPs were prepared by co-precipitation method where the Ag particles are simultaneously synthesized with the Fe3O4 particles to form Ag and Fe3O4 nanocomposite materials. The manipulation system utilized a homogeneous rotating magnetic field to carry out magnetic stirring of NPs in the petri dishes containing bacterial suspensions. The optimum magnetron parameters and best antibacterial effects were implemented with six different concentrations from 0.6 wt % to 6.6 wt % of the NPs at driving frequencies from 50 rpm to 200 rpm for 3 min. The highest antibacterial effect of 99.4% was achieved at 5.4 wt % of NPs and the driving frequency of 100 rpm. A time-dependent antibacterial effect in 0.1 wt % of Ag/Fe3O4 was also observed. The results indicate that the use of specific rotating magnetic fields to manipulate Ag/Fe3O4 magnetic NPs can significantly improve the antibacterial efficacy. Due to the good biocompatibility of the Ag NPs, the presented technique can be applied to clean water resources in the future.

1. Introduction

Silver has been utilized as a bacteriostatic material for ages because Ag ions can kill bacteria by punching holes in bacterial membranes and damaging them inside. Apart from its excellent antibacterial effect, harmful byproducts are not generated during the antibacterial process of Ag sterilization like chloride derives. Hwang et al. [1] tested the efficacy of Ag ions against Legionella pneumophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in drinking water. Silvestry-Rodriguez et al. [2] launched a study in using Ag to reduce the activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aeromonas hydrophila in tap water and to evaluate the possibility for using Ag to replace or reduce the dosage of chlorine, harmful for human health and environment. Zhang [3] compared various techniques for using Ag nanoparticles (NPs) in purifying drinking water. In general, the antimicrobial efficacy of Ag ions can be enhanced by increasing the content of Ag particles. The extensive application of the Ag particles results in their inevitable release into the environment [1,2,3]. If Ag particles can be manipulated in some efficient way to increase their contact surface or frequencies with bacteria, the higher antibacterial effect could be expected with the lower concentration of Ag particles and the risks of environmental contamination from Ag particles can be reduced.
Over the past decades, magnetic NPs were widely applied to magnetic targeting medical tools [4,5], magnetic resonance imaging agents [6,7] and the carriers of the Ag-loading antimicrobials [8,9]. Among the various magnetic support materials, Fe3O4 nanostructure has gained much attention in the fields of biomedical and environmental engineering due to their stable magnetic properties and favorable biocompatibility [10,11,12]. Silver-coated Fe3O4 NPs as functional antimicrobial agents has now become an important research topic [13,14]. In the current study, a portable magnetic manipulation device was developed to remotely control the movement of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs to increase the contact of Ag ions with E. coli for enhancing the antibacterial effects of Ag particles by stirring the magnetic NPs in petri dishes containing E. coli. The use of a magnetic field is extremely versatile because the field strength and its orientation can be controlled. The rotating magnetic fields applied to induce a magnetic torque can drive the stirring action of the Ag/Fe3O4 NPs. The antibacterial effect of the Ag/Fe3O4 NPs on E. coli was investigated at different rotation speeds and different concentrations of the NPs in the suspensions. The results showed that the antibacterial effect of Ag in these aqueous suspensions was greatly improved by magnetically stirring the Ag/Fe3O4 NPs in the magnetic manipulation system. Therefore, utilizing magnetically-controlled Ag/Fe3O4 NPs in aqueous suspensions can be applied to water purification and other sterilization-related objectives.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental System and Mechanism

The major components of the experimental system included a magnetic manipulation device to manipulate the motion of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs in the petri dishes containing bacterial suspensions. Figure 1 shows the magnetic manipulation device that was implemented to generate a rotating homogeneous magnetic field. The rotation of magnetic NPs was subjected to the competing torques generated by the external magnetic field and viscous drag force of the suspension. The rotating magnetic field system was constructed using two NdFeB permanent magnets (~6.6 mT). The magnets were mounted on a rotary-motorized stage where the motor speed was tunable from 50 rpm to 200 rpm. The antibacterial effects of the NPs were investigated for different concentrations and rotation speeds of the NPs in the suspension.
The rotation of the NPs was produced by the interaction of the induced magnetization to the oscillating magnetic field. The magnitude of the magnetic torque needed to rotate the NPs can be calculated by Equation (1) where V is the volume of the NPs, χ is the material susceptibility, μ0 is the vacuum permeability, H is the magnetic field strength, and θ is the angle between the magnetic dipole moment of the NPs and H [15].
τ m = V χ 2 2 ( 2 + χ ) μ 0 H 2 sin ( 2 θ )
For a NP of radius r in a fluid with viscosity η, the rotation is subjected to a viscous drag force, τ d r a g = 3 π 2 ω η r 4 , which counterbalances the magnetic torque. Therefore, the final rotation speed of the NPs can be calculated using Equation (2) suggesting that the NPs can be rotated in a controllable fashion by modulating the time-dependent magnetic field source. Thus, the stirring of the NPs can be stopped or resumed by simply switching the DC source.
ω = V x 2 μ 0 H 2 sin ( 2 θ ) 3 π 2 η r 4

2.2. Preparation of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs

In this study, Ag/Fe3O4 NPs were prepared by the co-precipitation reaction of Fe(II) and Fe(III) with ammonia hydroxide. After 16.98 g of silver nitrate and 27.8 g of ferrous sulfate were dissolved in 100 mL of deionized water as the precursor solutions, the solutions were uniformly mixed and ammonia hydroxide was added using a stirrer to make sure the precursors were dissolved in a basic solution (pH ≥ 9). Silver ions were used as oxidation agent to oxidize ions of Fe(II) to form a solution containing both Fe(II) and Fe(III) ions. Chemical reduction and oxidation were utilized as Equation (3):
Fe2+ + Ag+ → Fe3+ + Ag0
and Equation (4):
Fe3+ + Fe2+ + 8OH → Fe3O4 + 4H2O.
Through precipitation with ammonia hydroxide, magnetic NPs containing Ag metals were obtained. The precipitates were processed next by a microwave hydrothermal process at 150 °C for 30 min. Finally, the materials were washed with deionized water until the pH value reached 7 and then the neutral materials were oven-dried at 70 °C for 24 h. The dried Ag/Fe3O4 NPs were then ground into powder using an agate mortar. In addition, bare Fe3O4 NPs were also prepared using a similar procedure without silver nitrate precursor [16].

2.3. Characterization of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs

Morphology of the prepared Ag/Fe3O4 NPs is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2a is a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the Ag/Fe3O4 NPs, showing the diameters of these NPs ranged from 30 nm to 80 nm. The agglomeration of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs can be observed. The size distribution of the prepared Ag/Fe3O4 NPs was measured by NanoSight LM100 (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) and analyzed by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) software according to the light scattering and Brown motion of the materials in the suspension. Figure 2b is the size distribution of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs between 34 nm and 79 nm. The measurements in the SEM image were consistent with those measured by NanoSight LM100.
The magnetizations of bare Fe3O4 and Ag/Fe3O4 NPs were measured using vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), as shown in Figure 3. There was almost no hysteresis when the magnetic field ranged from −10,000 to 10,000 Oe. The saturation magnetizations of bare Fe3O4 and Ag/Fe3O4 NPs were 40.4 emu/g and 31.1 emu/g, respectively. The results confirmed the good magnetic characteristics of the prepared NPs.
The crystallization behavior of the synthesized NPs was analyzed by an X-ray diffractometer (XRD). As shown in Figure 4, both the peaks at (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), and (440) with respective crystal planes at 2θ = 30.1°, 35.4°, 43.1°, 53.4°, 56.9°, and 62.5° on Fe3O4 and (111), (200), (220), and (311) with respective crystal planes at 2θ = 38.1°, 44.2°, 64.4°, and 77.5° on Ag are clearly displayed. The XRD patterns reveal that the crystallinity of the NPs agrees with the standard values of Ag/Fe3O4 composite materials.

2.4. Antibacterial Effects of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs

Experiments were carried out to investigate the antibacterial effects of magnetically controlled Ag/Fe3O4 NPs on E. coli. E. coli (ATCC 10,322, Biosafety level 1) was selected and cultured in lysogeny broth (LB) media at 37 °C for 16 h for the antibacterial tests. LB broth was prepared by dissolving 2.5 g of yeast extract, 5 g of tryptone, and 5 g of NaCl into 487.5 mL of deionized water and then autoclaving at 121 °C for 45 min. The first experiment was executed to find out the optimum operation mechanism. The original content of E. coli in petri dishes was quantified according to the absorption intensity of the bacterial suspensions using a spectrophotometer at the wavelength of 600 nm (OD600nm) [17]. The aliquots from the same E. coli suspension were used to test six concentrations of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs, i.e. 0.6 wt %, 1.8 wt %, 3.0 wt %, 4.2 wt %, 5.4 wt %, and 6.6 wt %, to explore the highest antibacterial effect and the optimum magnetron parameters. The suspensions of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs were stirred by utilizing the motor in the magnetic manipulation device with driving frequencies of 50 rpm, 80 rpm, 100 rpm, 120 rpm, and 200 rpm, for 3 min per test. After the magnetic stirring, the Ag/Fe3O4 NPs in the suspensions were attracted to the bottom of the petri dish via a magnet and the supernatants were taken out to check the amount of the remaining E. coli by measuring OD600nm. The residual bacteria rates (%) for the tests on different rotation speeds and NP weight concentrations were calculated using Equation (5) where Norigin was the OD600nm of the E. coli suspension without NPs before tests and Nsample was the OD600nm of each supernatant under different conditions after magnetic stirring.
Residual bacteria rate (%) = Nsample/Norigin × 100%

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Residual bacteria rates obtained from different treatments were analyzed by the ANOVA with the significant p-value (<0.05) by using Excel software.

3. Results and Discussion

The experiment investigating the antibacterial effects of magnetically controlled Ag/Fe3O4 NPs under different rotation speed and NP weight concentrations showed that the lowest residual bacterial rate (0.6%) was achieved at the concentration of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs at 5.4 wt % and 6.6 wt % with driving frequency of 100 rpm after 3 min (Figure 5). Because the concentration of 5.4 wt % and 6.6 wt % showed the same residual bacterial rates with five different driving frequencies, the NPs in the solution have been saturated at the concentration of 5.4 wt % and the highest antibacterial effect reached 99.4% with driving frequency of 100 rpm. This may be because higher movement speed of the NPs reduces the contact time between particles and bacteria and results in the bacteriostatic efficiency decreasing slightly for a higher driving frequency.
The antibacterial effects obtained from pure Ag and/or Fe3O4 NPs were also investigated for comparisons. Under the same NP concentration of 5.4 wt % and driving frequency of 100 rpm, the residual bacterial rates of the following were compared: (A) bacterial suspension only; (B) suspension with only non-magnetic Ag NPs; (C) suspension with only Fe3O4; (D) suspension with both Ag NPs and Fe3O4 NPs; and (E) suspension with Ag/Fe3O4 NPs (each magnetically stirred 3 min) (Figure 6). The lowest residual bacterial rate indicating the strongest antibacterial effect was observed in the suspension of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs (E), followed by the suspension with both Ag NPs and Fe3O4 NPs (D). The suspension with only non-magnetic Ag NPs (B) exhibited the worst antibacterial effect, similar to that of the suspension with only Fe3O4 NPs without Ag (C). Statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.05) were found between every pair of groups except Group Ag (B) and Group Fe3O4 (C) among Groups B–E after ANOVA analysis by Excel software. The agitation of Fe3O4 NPs can push the movement of Ag NPs to increase the contact between Ag particles and bacteria, which reduced the residual bacterial rate of solution with only Ag NPs (B) from 80% to 18% from the solution with both Ag NPs and Fe3O4 NPs. The results indicated that manipulating Ag/Fe3O4 magnetic NPs in the solutions can substantially increase the antibacterial ability of Ag NPs.
To investigate the sterilization performance of low concentration of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs, a bacterial suspension with 0.1 wt % concentration of the NPs was prepared and manipulated at the driving frequency of 100 rpm. The time-dependent antibacterial effect observed from the suspension is shown in Figure 7. The bacteria were quickly eliminated from 94% to 70% in the first hour. The trend then eased gradually after 3 h of treatment. The final residual bacterial rate was roughly 48%. This may be because the Ag/Fe3O4 NPs is low in content and the dead bacterial would attach to the surface of NPs, causing the contact between NPs and bacteria to gradually decrease.

4. Conclusions

In this study, magnetic Ag/Fe3O4 NPs were synthesized with co-precipitation method and added into E. coli suspensions to explore the application potential of water purifying platform based on the nanocomposite materials. The magnetic NPs were stirred with a custom-made magnetic manipulation system. Combined with the antimicrobial properties of Ag and the magnetically controlled Fe3O4 NPs, the antibacterial effects on E. coli at different concentrations and rotation speeds of the magnetic Ag/Fe3O4 NPs were investigated. Experimental results showed that magnetic manipulation can significantly improve the contact of Ag NPs and bacteria and thus the antibacterial abilities of Ag NPs. The strongest antibacterial effect was obtained at the concentration of 5.4 wt % of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs with driving frequency of 100 rpm, where there was only 0.6% of the original bacterial concentration left. This shows that the E. coli in suspensions can be almost completely eradicated in a short time with the proposed method. Since these magnetic nanomaterials can be recycled and reused, the magnetically-controlled Ag/Fe3O4 NPs would be a cost-effective and efficient technique for water purification and other sterilization-related applications.

Author Contributions

Ming Chang contributed the idea and wrote the manuscript; Wei-Siou Lin and Weihao Xiao executed the experiments and analyzed the data; and Yi-Ning Chen conceived the experiments and revised the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Program for Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of Huaqiao University under grant No. 16BS504 and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under grant No. MOST105-2221-E-133-012-MY2

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hwang, M.G.; Katayama, H.; Ohgaki, S. Inactivation of Legionella pneumophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Evaluation of the bactericidal ability of silver cations. Water Res. 2007, 41, 4097–4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Silvestry-Rodriguez, N.; Bright, K.R.; Uhlmann, D.R.; Slack, D.C.; Gerba, C.P. Inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aeromonas hydrophila by silver in tap water. J. Environ. Sci. Health. Part A 2007, 42, 1579–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, H. Application of Silver Nanoparticles in Drinking Water Purification. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang, Y.S.; Savitha, S.; Sadhasivam, S.; Hsu, C.K.; Lin, F.H. Fabrication, characterization and application of greigite nanoparticles for cancer hyperthermia. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 363, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chang, M.; Lin, Y.H.; Gabayno, J.L.; Li, Q.; Liu, X. Thrombolysis based on magnetically-controlled surface-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticle. Bioengineered 2017, 8, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wan, J.; Cai, W.; Meng, X.; Liu, E. Monodisperse water-soluble magnetite nanoparticles prepared by polyol process for high-performance magnetic resonance imaging. Chem. Commun. 2007, 47, 5004–5006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tan, H.; Xue, J.M.; Shuter, B.; Li, X.; Wang, J. Synthesis of PEOlated Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles via bioinspired silification for magnetic resonance imaging. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 722–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Prucek, R.; Tucek, J.; Kilianova, M.; Panacek, A.; Kvitek, L.; Filip, J.; Kolar, M.; Tomankova, K.; Zboril, R. The targeted antibacterial and antifungal properties of magnetic nanocomposite of iron oxide and silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 4704–4713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. He, Q.; Huang, C.; Liu, J. Preparation, characterization and antibacterial activity of Magnetic greigite and Fe3S4/Ag nanoparticles. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2014, 6, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, W.Z.; Li, Q.; Gao, S.; Shang, J.K. Monometallic Pd/Fe3O4 catalyst for denitrification of water. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2012, 125, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, F.H.; Doong, R.A. Bifunctional Au-Fe3O4 heterostructures for magnetically recyclable catalysis of nitrophenol reduction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 6591–6598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Amarjargal, A.; Tijing, L.D.; Im, I.T.; Kim, C.S. Simultaneous preparation of Ag/Fe3O4 core–shell nanocomposites with enhanced magnetic moment and strong antibacterial and catalytic properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 226, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, W.H.; Yang, N. Green and facile synthesis of Ag-Fe3O4 nanocomposites using the aqueous extract of Crataegus pinnatifida leaves and their antibacterial performance. Mater. Lett. 2016, 162, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ghaseminezhad, S.M.; Shojaosadati, S.A. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Ag/Fe3O4 nanocomposites synthesized using starch. Carbohyd. Polym. 2016, 144, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gabayno, J.L.; Liu, D.-W.; Chang, M.; Lin, Y.-H. Controlled manipulation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in an oscillating magnetic field for fast ablation of microchannel occlusion. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 3947–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chang, M.; Chang, M.Y.; Lin, W.S.; Gabayno, J.L. Magnetic control of Fe3O4 nanomaterial for fat ablation in microchannel. Materials 2015, 11, 7813–7820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lin, H.L.; Lin, C.C.; Lin, Y.J.; Lin, H.C.; Shih, C.M.; Chen, C.R.; Huang, R.N.; Kuo, T.C. Revisiting with a relative-density calibration approach the determination of growth rates of microorganisms by use of optical density data from liquid cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 1683–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic of the magnetic manipulation device.
Figure 1. Schematic of the magnetic manipulation device.
Materials 11 00659 g001
Figure 2. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of Ag/Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs); and (b) size distribution of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs between 34 nm and 79 nm by nanoparticle tracking analysis and NanoSight LM100.
Figure 2. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of Ag/Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs); and (b) size distribution of Ag/Fe3O4 NPs between 34 nm and 79 nm by nanoparticle tracking analysis and NanoSight LM100.
Materials 11 00659 g002
Figure 3. Magnetic saturation of bare Fe3O4 and Ag/Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Figure 3. Magnetic saturation of bare Fe3O4 and Ag/Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Materials 11 00659 g003
Figure 4. X-ray diffractometer (XRD) patters of the prepared nanoparticles: (a) Fe3O4; (b) Ag; and (c) Ag/Fe3O4.
Figure 4. X-ray diffractometer (XRD) patters of the prepared nanoparticles: (a) Fe3O4; (b) Ag; and (c) Ag/Fe3O4.
Materials 11 00659 g004
Figure 5. Residual bacterial rate under different Ag/Fe3O4 concentrations and motor driving frequencies.
Figure 5. Residual bacterial rate under different Ag/Fe3O4 concentrations and motor driving frequencies.
Materials 11 00659 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of antibacterial effects with different kinds of nanoparticles (NPs): (A) bacterial solution only; (B) solution with only non-magnetic Ag NPs; (C) solution with only Fe3O4; (D) solution with both Ag NPs and Fe3O4 NPs; and (E) solution with Ag/Fe3O4 NPs.
Figure 6. Comparison of antibacterial effects with different kinds of nanoparticles (NPs): (A) bacterial solution only; (B) solution with only non-magnetic Ag NPs; (C) solution with only Fe3O4; (D) solution with both Ag NPs and Fe3O4 NPs; and (E) solution with Ag/Fe3O4 NPs.
Materials 11 00659 g006
Figure 7. Antibacterial effect to Escherichia coli from 0.1 wt % of Ag/Fe3O4 with driving frequency of 100 rpm.
Figure 7. Antibacterial effect to Escherichia coli from 0.1 wt % of Ag/Fe3O4 with driving frequency of 100 rpm.
Materials 11 00659 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, M.; Lin, W.-S.; Xiao, W.; Chen, Y.-N. Antibacterial Effects of Magnetically-Controlled Ag/Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. Materials 2018, 11, 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050659

AMA Style

Chang M, Lin W-S, Xiao W, Chen Y-N. Antibacterial Effects of Magnetically-Controlled Ag/Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. Materials. 2018; 11(5):659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Ming, Wei-Siou Lin, Weihao Xiao, and Yi-Ning Chen. 2018. "Antibacterial Effects of Magnetically-Controlled Ag/Fe3O4 Nanoparticles" Materials 11, no. 5: 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050659

APA Style

Chang, M., Lin, W. -S., Xiao, W., & Chen, Y. -N. (2018). Antibacterial Effects of Magnetically-Controlled Ag/Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. Materials, 11(5), 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop