Next Article in Journal
Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Response to Lactoferrin-based Composite Coatings
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Pseudowollastonite on the Performance of Low Calcium Amorphous Hydraulic Binders
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Bone Regeneration between Porcine-Derived and Bovine-Derived Xenografts in Rat Calvarial Defects: A Non-Inferiority Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tribomechanical Comparison between PVA Hydrogels Obtained Using Different Processing Conditions and Human Cartilage

1
Centro de Química Estrutural (CQE), Instituto Superior Técnico-Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
2
Instituto de Engenharia Mecânica Instituto Superior Técnico (IDMEC)-Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
3
Institut Supérieur des BioSciences (ISBS), École Supérieure d’Ingénieurs de Paris-Est Créteil, 71 Rue Saint-Simon, 94000 Créteil, France
4
Departamento de Ortopedia, Hospital Lusíadas Lisboa, R. Abílio Mendes 12, 1500-458 Lisboa, Portugal
5
Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz, Quinta da Granja, Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Caparica, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(20), 3413; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203413
Submission received: 28 September 2019 / Revised: 11 October 2019 / Accepted: 15 October 2019 / Published: 18 October 2019

Abstract

:
Designing materials for cartilage replacement raises several challenges due to the complexity of the natural tissue and its unique tribomechanical properties. Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hydrogels have been explored for such purpose since they are biocompatible, present high chemical stability, and their properties may be tailored through different strategies. In this work, the influence of preparation conditions of PVA hydrogels on its morphology, water absorption capacity, thermotropic behavior, mechanical properties, and tribological performance was evaluated and compared with those of human cartilage (HC). The hydrogels were obtained by cast-drying (CD) and freeze-thawing (FT), in various conditions. It was found that the method of preparation of the PVA hydrogels critically affects their microstructure and performance. CD gels presented a denser structure, absorbed less water, were stiffer, dissipated less energy, and withstood higher loads than FT gels. Moreover, they led to friction coefficients against stainless steel comparable with those of HC. Overall, CD hydrogels had a closer performance to natural HC, when compared to FT ones.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Articular cartilage (AC) is a connective tissue whose primary function is to provide a smooth and lubricated joint surface, mediating the transmission of loads with low friction [1]. AC may suffer traumatic degeneration, e.g., as a result of an accident or due to intense sports activity, or progressive degeneration due to loss of structure and function, generally associated with aging or obesity. Because of its avascular nature, cartilage has a poor nutrient supply and a slow turnover of the extracellular matrix, whereby damaged tissues have a limited ability to self-repair [2]. Depending on the nature and extent of damage, regeneration or replacement is possible through different techniques. Procedures such as marrow stimulation (e.g., microfracture, drilling, and abrasion arthroplasty), AC grafts, and cell-based therapies have been successfully used [3,4]. However, these strategies present some disadvantages. For example, stimulation techniques have a limited repairing capacity. In addition, the heat generated by drills and high-speed burrs can cause damage to the subchondral bone [4]. Conversely, autografts cause injury to healthy tissues and provide a limited amount of transplant material, while allografts have the risk of disease transmission and immunogenic reaction, and a higher cost [5]. Recently, tissue engineering has raised interest among the scientific community. The rapid development of molecular biology and transplantation techniques has benefitted the application of mesenchymal stem cells and other cell types in regenerative medicine [6,7,8]. Nevertheless, strong efforts continue to be carried out to develop artificial materials that satisfy the very demanding mechanical and tribological requirements and ensure proper performance as AC substitutes [9].
The characteristics of the biomaterials selected for AC replacement depend on the intended application site, as different loads and ranges of motion can be observed. Most of the actual options for AC substitution use materials that lack the specific architecture and properties of the living tissue, leading to biomechanical failure. Therefore, in the last few years, a substantial effort has been made to mimic the natural cartilage and better approach its mechanical behavior and lubricating mechanism.
In this regard, hydrogels have emerged as promising candidates, since many are biocompatible and present several characteristics comparable to natural tissues, namely the ability to absorb and retain water and other molecules [10]. Some authors explored the possibility of using poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hydrogels due to their biocompatibility, chemical stability, and the possibility of tailoring their properties through different strategies [11,12]. The preparation of PVA gels involves the dissolution of the polymer, followed by crosslinking and eventually further processing techniques [13]. Factors such as the polymer molecular weight, hydrolysis degree and initial concentration, and the method and conditions of crosslinking, or the addition of other compounds, may significantly affect the characteristics of the resulting hydrogel.
Concerning the crosslinking method, chemical and physical approaches have been attempted. Chemical crosslinking implies the use of chemical agents such as borates, glyoxal, aldehydes (glutaraldehyde, acetaldehyde, and formaldehyde) in the presence of methanol, acetic acid, or sulfuric acid, to create acetal bridges between the pendant OH groups of the PVA chains [12,13,14]. The main drawback of using chemicals as crosslinking agents is that they can leave toxic residues, which can compromise the hydrogels’ biocompatibility [12]. Agents like radiation (electron beam or gamma radiation), can also promote the covalent bond between the PVA chains [13,15,16], with the crosslinking density depending on the irradiation dose. Although the irradiation technique does not leave toxic residues, may be used for crosslinking and sterilizing in a single step, and improves cell adhesion [13,14], it is expensive and requires specially trained staff and adequate facilities. Physical crosslinking of PVA hydrogels involves the establishment of non-covalent bonds, i.e., hydrogen bonds between the OH groups of the PVA chains, which leads to the formation of microcrystallites and amorphous zones [11]. It can be achieved through different methods, e.g., cast-drying, freezing-thawing, freeze-drying and theta gelation [11,13,17,18]. Generally, physically prepared PVA hydrogels present a high degree of swelling, an elastic nature (tissue-like viscoelasticity), and higher mechanical strength than those crosslinked by chemical or irradiative techniques [12,13,16,19].
Cast-drying (CD) and freezing-thawing (FT) are the most commonly used methods for PVA hydrogels preparation. In the CD method (also called solvent casting or solvent evaporation), the PVA solution (aqueous or not) is slowly evaporated at a given temperature and humidity by natural air drying, hot air drying or freeze-drying [20]. FT induces PVA network reticulation by a combination of three main mechanisms: liquid-liquid phase separation, hydrogen bonding, and crystallite formation [14,21]. During freezing, the growth of ice crystals expels the polymer PVA chains, leading to phase separation and the creation of “rich” and “poor” polymer regions. During the thawing period, voids (pores) appear between the crosslinked regions. The number of FT cycles and the duration of each freezing and thawing step affects the hydrogels microstructure, and consequently, their swelling and mechanical properties.
The main objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of PVA hydrogels preparation conditions on their mechanical and tribological behavior. Hydrogel materials were prepared by CD and FT, in different conditions. After the characterization of their surface morphology, water absorption capacity and thermotropic behavior, mechanical properties were analyzed by compressive tests, and tribological performance was studied through ball-on-disc experiments. The obtained results were compared with those of human cartilage (HC) tested under similar conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

PVA powder (Kuraray PovalTM 28–99) with an average molecular weight of 145,000 ± 21,750 g∙mol−1, degree of hydrolysis of 99–99.8 mol% and degree of polymerization of 3300, was used to prepare the hydrogel samples. The pore-forming agents, sodium chloride and sodium bicarbonate were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA) and PanReac AppliChem (Darmstadt, Germany), respectively. Hydrochloric acid (37% w/w aqueous solution) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.4 at 25 °C) were both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Hyaluronic acid sodium salt (HA) with an average molecular weight of 1–2 million Da and lyophilized bovine serum albumin (BSA, Fraction V, pH 7) used in the preparation of simulated synovial fluid were individually supplied by Carbosynth (Compton, Berkshire, UK) and Serva Electrophoresis GmbH (Heidelberg, Germany). Distilled and deionized (DD) water was obtained using a Milli−Q® Integral 3 water purification system from Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany).
For the tribological tests, precision balls of austenitic stainless steel AISI 316L, with a diameter of 6 mm, were purchased from Luis Aparicio SL (Barcelona, Spain).
Human articular cartilage (HC) of the femoral condyles was obtained from four distal femurs, harvested from two frozen male cadavers (81 and 82 years old), without any previous lower limb fracture, injury, or reported disease. The material was kept frozen at −80 °C until samples were prepared. The studies with HC were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Instituto Superior Técnico (Project identification Ref. No. 24/2019 (CE-IST)).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Materials Preparation

Hydrogels

PVA aqueous solutions at 15% w/v were prepared at 95 °C. The solutions were kept at this temperature for 6 h, being gently agitated every hour, to ensure solution homogeneity and avoid gas bubble formation. The resulting polymer solutions were poured into preheated (at 95 °C) glass Petri dishes and then cooled to room temperature for 3 h.
After that, some PVA solutions were placed at different temperatures (4, 20 and 30 °C) until the weight became constant. The resulting cast-dried (CD) samples were designated CD 4, CD 20, and CD 30 correspondingly (Table 1).
The remaining PVA solutions were processed by the freeze-thawing (FT) method using a different number of cycles and treatment times for the procedures of freezing (at −25 °C) and thawing (approx. 20 °C): 15 cycles of 23 h of freezing and 1 h of thawing for samples FT 23-1 (×15); 15 or 10 cycles of 21 h of freezing and 3 h of thawing for FT 21-3 (×15) and FT 21-3 (×10), respectively; and 5 cycles of 10 h of freezing and 2 h of thawing for FT 10-2 (×5) (Table 1). The Petri dishes containing the PVA solutions were always covered during the freezing time.
To increase the hydrogels porosity, two approaches were used: (1) following the procedure described by Tai et al. [22], a sodium chloride (SC) aqueous solution (25% w/w) was added to the initial PVA solution in a proportion of 1:10 (v/v), resulting in a ratio of 1:6 (w/w) NaCl:PVA, or (2) sodium bicarbonate (SB) powder was incorporated directly into the initial PVA solution at 5:1 or 8:1 (w/w) NaHCO3:PVA ratios, similarly to what was done by Coluccino et al. [23]. Afterward, the PVA-salt solutions were carefully stirred to ensure complete mixing before being transferred to the preheated Petri dishes and submitted to FT under the same conditions used to prepared FT 10-2 (×5) samples, giving rise to FT 10-2 (×5) + SC, FT 10-2 (×5) + SB5 and FT 10-2 (×5) + SB8, respectively (Table 1).
The resulting materials were washed by immersion in DD water for 48 h (replaced three times/day), cut with appropriate dimensions for the characterization tests, and finally stored in the hydrated state in sealed containers until use. The average thickness of the swollen samples was 2.4 ± 0.4 mm.

Human Cartilage

Each cadaveric knee was dissected to remove all soft tissue and expose the cartilage surfaces from the distal femur. The femoral condyles were initially sectioned transversely into four cartilage-bone blocks. These blocks were used to obtain cylindrical and rectangular osteochondral plugs, on randomly selected sites. Articular human cartilage (HC) samples were obtained after careful separation of the tissue from the underlying bone. The harvested samples (thickness ≈ 1.9 ± 0.4 mm) were then washed in DD water, carefully blotted in absorbent paper, and stored at −25 °C until ready for use. Prior to each test, prepared specimens were previously hydrated in DD water for 24 h (at 4 °C).

2.2.2. Materials Characterization

Samples were characterized concerning their surface morphology, water uptake, thermotropic behavior, mechanical properties, and tribological performance. The number of replicates is reported in each case. The quantitative measurements are always given as average ± standard deviation.

Surface Morphology

Discs (diameter 12 mm) of each type of hydrogel were fully hydrated in DD water for 24 h and thereafter, carefully blotted with absorbent paper, placed in a freezer at −80 °C for 30 min and lyophilized (ModulyoD-230, from Thermo Electron Corporation, Asheville, NC, USA) during 48 h. The resulting samples were coated with a thin layer (20 nm) of gold/palladium (Au:Pd = 80:20) using a Quorum Technologies (Q150T-ES) turbo-pumped sputter coater and analyzed in a Field Emission Gun-Scanning Electron Microscope (FEG-SEM, JEOL JSM-7001F, Tokyo, Japan) using an accelerating voltage of 3 kV. For comparison purposes, cylindrical specimens (diameter 12 mm) of HC were also coated with the conductive layer and evaluated.

Water Uptake

Hydrogel discs (8 mm diameter) previously hydrated in DD water for at least 24 h, were dried at 60 °C, and weighed until a constant weight was achieved. The swelling capacity (SC) and equilibrium water content (EWC) were determined using the following equations:
SC   ( % ) = W W 0 W 0   × 100 ,
EWC   ( % ) = W W 0 W   × 100 ,
where W is the weight of the swollen hydrogel in equilibrium with water and W 0 is the weight of the dry hydrogel. The weighing was performed in a semi-micro analytical balance OHAUS (Model Discovery DV215CD). For each tested condition, at least six independent measurements were done.
The SC and EWC were also determined for HC samples (n = 10, diameter 8 mm) following the same procedure.

Thermotropic Behavior

Dry samples with an average weight of 5.8 mg were dried at 60 °C for 8 days. After that, they were sealed in aluminum crucibles and analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, 200 F3 Maia, NETZSCH), from 20 °C to 280 °C, at a heating rate of 10 °C∙min−1, under a nitrogen gas flow rate of 50 mL∙min−1. An empty pan was used as reference. The glass transition temperature (Tg) was determined as the midpoint in the heat flow baseline change of the endothermic peak, and the melting temperature (Tm) was considered the middle temperature of the fusion peak. The degree of crystallinity was estimated through the equation:
χ   ( % ) =   H H * × 100 ,
where H denotes the heat of fusion, estimated by measuring the area of the peak in the thermograms, and H * corresponds to the heat of fusion of a PVA 100% crystalline (138.6 J/g) [24].
Hydrated samples with ≈ 5.5 mg were also evaluated by DSC. Samples were cooled to −40 °C and heated to 40 °C at a rate of 10 °C∙min−1. The percentage of free/loosely bound (freezable) water present in the swollen materials was determined as:
w f   ( % ) = H w H w * × 100 ,
where H w is the enthalpy of fusion of the freezable water, obtained from the total area of the thermogram peaks and H w * is the enthalpy of fusion of the pure water (334 J/g [25]). The percentage of freezable water was then subtracted from the EWC (%) to calculate the amount of tightly bound (non-freezable) water ( w n ):
w n ( % ) = EWC   ( % ) w f   ( % )  
Three independent DSC runs were performed in each case.

Mechanical Properties

Uniaxial compression tests were performed in a texturometer TA.XT Express Texture Analyzer (Stable Micro Systems) with a load cell of 50 N in unconfined mode. Sample discs with a diameter of 8 mm, immersed in DD water at 37 °C, were compressed at a strain rate of 0.1 mm∙s−1. For each type of hydrogel, at least six samples were tested. The compressive elastic modulus and the elastic and dissipated energies were calculated from the obtained engineering stress-strain curves. HC samples (n = 17, diameter 8 mm) were also assayed at compression for comparison of the biomechanical performance.

Tribological Behavior

The friction coefficients (CoF) of PVA hydrogels against 316L stainless steel balls (SS, Ø = 6 mm) were determined in reciprocal oscillating mode using a pin-on-disc tribometer (TRM 1000, Wazau). All experiments were done in lubricated conditions, with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution or a simulated synovial fluid (SSF) prepared by dissolving hyaluronic acid (HA, 3 mg∙mL−1) and bovine serum albumin (BSA, 4 mg∙mL−1) in a PBS solution. The viscosities of the lubricant solutions measured at 20 °C with a viscometer BROOKFIELD DV-II + Pro (AMETEK Brookfield) were 0.83 mPa·s for the PBS solution and 19.93 mPa·s for the SSF solution. Discs of hydrated samples (Ø ≈ 75 mm) were pre-equilibrated for 2 h in the lubricating media before testing. The experiments were done at room temperature (≈20 °C), with a tangential sliding velocity of 43 mm∙s−1, a stroke length of 10 mm, and a sliding distance of 13 m. The contact loads were set to 10 and 20 N, which correspond to Hertzian contact pressures of 0.69 and 0.87 MPa, respectively. At least three replicates were performed for each set of conditions.
Friction tests in the same conditions described above were also carried out with HC samples (n ≥ 4, ≈ 2.5 cm length × 2 cm width), using SS balls as counterbody and PBS solution as lubricant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Morphology

Direct observation of the hydrogels allows us to clearly distinguish between CD and FT hydrogels: while the former are all transparent, the latter present a milky, white appearance. Similar findings are reported by other authors, which attributed it to differences in the network structure, as will be discussed below [11,26,27].
SEM micrographs of the different PVA samples are shown in Figure 1. It can be observed a similarity in the morphology of the materials prepared using the same methodology, i.e., CD or FT (with or without the addition of salts).
CD gels show relatively smooth surfaces with slight differences between the three gelation temperatures (Tgel = 4, 20 and 30 °C). Perfetti et al. [28] also did not found significant differences in a study that aimed to evaluate the effect of drying temperature on the morphology of PVA cast films (from room temperature to 70 °C).
Contrarily to CD materials, FT gels exhibit a porous surface, even in the absence of salts. Suzuki et al. [26] state that PVA hydrogels prepared both by CD and FT consist of swollen amorphous networks that are physically crosslinked by microcrystallites. The nanostructures of both types of hydrogels are similar, with small differences in terms of the average size of the microcrystallites and average distance between them [12,29]. The differences in morphology result from a different distribution of the microcrystallites at the micrometer level: while in FT gels, they are grouped in discrete zones giving rise to crystalline and amorphous regions, on CD gels, they are uniformly distributed [30,31,32].
Porosity is an important characteristic that shall be taken into account in the development of new hydrogels for cartilage replacement. According to Coluccino et al. [23], the introduction of microporosity in the hydrogel contributes to mimicking the natural fluid exudation and pressurization that occurs in the cartilaginous tissue, as well as its load dissipation ability. More, a porous and permeable hydrogel structure will not only facilitate the diffusion of water and other molecules but also cell migration and mechanical anchorage of the implanted material, favoring the in vivo integration [32]. Several techniques can be used to produce interconnected water-based PVA structures with controlled pore size [33,34]. The use of porogens that can be leached out after hydrogel crosslinking [35] has revealed a suitable method, since it allows tuning the pore geometry, by setting the nature, amount and size of the porogen particles.
In this work, the addition of sodium chloride and sodium bicarbonate to the FT gels induced, as expected, the formation of larger pores. A small number of pores (size 1–3 µm) dispersed in an irregular and porous matrix can be observed in the FT 10-2 (×5) + SC samples. For FT 10-2 (×5) + SB5 and FT 10-2 (×5) + SB8 samples, the pores reach average diameters higher than 15 µm. It is known that the porous morphology of PVA gels is affected by both the nature and the concentration of added salts [36]. Patachia et al. [37] observed a large distribution of pore dimensions and shapes in PVA gels prepared with NaCl in the ratio of 1:6 relatively to the PVA weight. In another work, Coluccino et al. [23] demonstrated that it is possible to achieve tunable porosity by mixing different PVA/sodium bicarbonate ratios (from 1:5 to 1:8). They found that the porosity of hydrogels prepared by freeze-thawing increased with the total amount of porogen added, reaching values around 50%, and that the size distribution was not affected by the PVA/porogen ratio.
SEM analysis of HC was performed for comparison purposes. The image presented in Figure 1 shows a dense collagen fiber meshwork on the tissue surface, which is known to be composed of macromolecular units of collagen type II, IX, and XI [38]. Although the tissue seems smooth and intact, with fibers running mainly parallel to the articular surface, a patchy texture can be observed in some locations, with some disassembly of the collagen fibers. This splitting of fibers usually occurs at relatively early stages of osteoarthritis, but it may have been caused during the sample’s preparation. The pattern of collagen fiber meshwork from the articular surface is consistent with previous reports for HC [38,39].

3.2. Water Uptake

The swelling capacity of the hydrogels was investigated, and the results are shown in Figure 2. It can be observed that CD gels have the lowest swelling ratios, with values that range between 168 and 203%. Among them, CD 30 was the one that absorbed less water. FT hydrogels, prepared without salts, swelled about 1.5–2.2 times more water than CD hydrogels, except FT 10-2 (×5), which swelled more than 3 times. Adding sodium chloride as a pore-forming agent enhanced, even further, the capacity of water absorption, reaching a value of 776%. Sodium bicarbonate originated materials with lower swelling capacities (533%–546%) than observed for the bare reference hydrogel FT 10-2 (×5).
As expected, the most porous hydrogels present higher swelling capacities because of the increased solvent diffusion rate in the matrix. The observed tendency of swelling decreasing, with the increase of drying temperature of CD gels or with the number of freeze-thawing cycles of FT gels, was also observed by Noh et al. [40]. They attribute this to the increased formation of microcrystallites, which is enhanced by reducing the water content (i.e., evaporation of bound water) of polymers with an increase in Tgel (in CD gels) or by repeating the FT process (in FT gels). In our study, such tendency on CD gels was only observed for the highest temperature. For lower temperatures, the rate of water evaporation is lower, and therefore, structural differences shall be less pronounced. Concerning FT gels, other authors, like Holloway et al. [41], did not find any relation between the number of freeze-thaw cycles and swelling behavior.
HC has a swelling capacity of about 300%, which is between that observed for CD gels and that of FT gels without salts. Such swelling capacity corresponds to an EWC of about 75% and falls in the range of values found in the literature (EWC = 60%–80% [42]). Swelling of cartilage results from the combined effect of the electrostatic and hydrostatic interactions. It depends on the depth of the tissue (higher values are found near the surface than in the inner zone), decreases with aging, and increases with pathologies like osteoarthritis.

3.3. Thermotropic Behavior

DSC thermograms of dry hydrogels are presented in the supplementary information (Figure S1). Two endothermic peaks are shown for all hydrogels. The major peaks correspond to the melting of the polymeric crystallites, while the smaller bulges may possibly be attributed to the glass transition temperature (Tg), indicating that the polymers have a semi-crystalline structure. The degree of crystallinity estimated from the enthalpy of fusion of the melting peaks using Equation (3) is given in Figure 3, together with the glass transition (Tg) and melting (Tm) temperatures, which were obtained for all samples.
The glass transition temperatures of all samples fall in a straight range of temperatures, 43.2–44.6 °C, showing that the degree of crosslinking of the hydrogels is similar. Gupta et al. [43] found close values (40–42.5 °C) for PVA materials prepared by freeze-thawing with 8–14% of the polymer. Higher values (70.5–73.4 °C) were observed by Nkhwa et al. [44] for FT gels obtained from solutions with 10%–30% PVA. For CD hydrogels prepared with the same PVA concentrations (10%–30%), they verified that Tg decreased from 73.4 to 58 °C when the polymer concentration increased.
Concerning the melting temperatures, they also presented similar values for the different studied hydrogels, all falling in the range of 214.2–217.3 °C, except for the gels prepared with sodium bicarbonate, where higher values were observed (225.2–225.4 °C). The obtained results are in the range of those found by other authors (210–215 °C [44]), although higher temperatures are also common (e.g., 220.6–227 °C [45]), depending on the characteristics of the PVA used to prepare the hydrogels.
The estimated degrees of crystallinity assume values between 35.2 and 38.7% for all the gels and higher for FT 10-2 (×5) + SB5 and FT 10-2 (×5) + SB8 samples (around 46.2%), probably due to the presence of the salt.
DSC thermograms of the swollen hydrogels are also provided in the supplementary information (Figure S2). They present two overlapping endothermic peaks between −20 and 20 °C, which may be attributed to the fusion of freezable water that interacts in two different ways with the polymeric matrix [45]: loosely bound water, weakly associated with the polymer and with Tf < 0 °C, and free water that does not interact with the polymer and presents Tf ≥ 0 °C. Tightly bound water, considered non-freezable, corresponds to water molecules directly bound to the polar groups of the polymer matrix through hydrogen bonds and is not detected in the obtained thermograms since it only freezes at Tf < −93 °C. The fractions of free/loosely bound water and tightly bound water contained in the studied PVA gels are shown in Figure 4 (data reported in Table S1 in the supplementary information).
In all cases, the fraction of freezable water (free/loosely bound) is higher than that of non-freezable water (tightly bound), assuming values of 59%–83% of the total water content. FT samples absorb more water than CD samples and present a higher fraction of freezable water. In global terms, the comparison of water content obtained for the PVA gels (63% to 87%) with that of HC, tested in the same conditions (75%), shows that they are relatively close and in agreement with other values reported in the literature (typically 60%–80% [43]). It should be stressed that the water content is an important property since it affects the material’s behavior e.g., permeability, strength, and elasticity [43].

3.4. Mechanical Properties

The stress-strain curves of the compression tests performed with PVA hydrogels are shown in Figure 5a. The different groups of samples reveal a similar mechanical response to compression loads within each group. While CD samples exhibited an almost linear behavior, FT samples led to curves with a variable slope, with the existence of two distinct zones being evident, especially when the samples were prepared with salts. CD gels also contrasted with FT ones in their viscoelastic behavior: FT samples showed higher hysteresis and, consequently, dissipated more energy.
The variation of the elastic modulus (slope of the stress-stain curves during loading) with the strain (up to 50%) and the elastic and dissipated energies (area of the hysteresis loop and total area under the unloading curve, respectively) were calculated from the acquired data and are displayed in Figure 5b,c. The results reveal that among the studied hydrogels, CD present the higher elastic modulus for a given strain and dissipate less energy (≈0.01 MJ∙m−3). FT gels prepared with 10 or 15 cycles and without the addition of salts have elastic modulus significantly lower than those found for CD samples, elastic energies within the same range of those gels, and higher dissipated energy (≈0.03 MJ∙m−3). The curves of the FT gels produced within 5 cycles demonstrate that, independently of the addition of pore-forming agents, these materials are the ones with the lowest elastic modulus, highest dissipated energies (0.03–0.06 MJ∙m−3), and lowest elastic energies (0.07 to 0.14 MJ∙m−3).
Murakami et al. [46] also compared the mechanical properties of PVA materials obtained by CD and FT and found that the elastic modulus of CD gel was significantly superior to that of FT gel. This behavior shall be related to the lower porosity of CD materials, which present a more compact structure and lower water content. Coluccino et al. [23] produced PVA hydrogels with different porosities by adding sodium bicarbonate and observed a decrease in the compressive modulus with the increase of porosity. The results show that, although porosity is an important characteristic to mimic the natural cartilage and favor the bio-integration of the synthetic materials, it impairs the mechanical performance of the materials.
A comparison of the stress-strain curves of the hydrogels with HC shows that the CD gels are the ones that present the closest behavior to the natural tissue. HC can be seen as a biphasic 3D network with hierarchical structural characteristics, that shows both creep and stress relaxation behaviors [47]. Its viscoelastic properties are determined by the way the fluid flows through the extracellular matrix. Cartilage exhibits a nonlinear permeability response when submitted to compression, which constitutes a protective mechanism for the tissue. In fact, increasing the pressure and strain enhances fluid exudation from the cartilage and its stiffening, which prevents more fluid from flowing. The results presented in Figure 5b confirm this behavior. The mechanical properties of cartilage depend on the type of cartilage and its location since collagen fibers’ organization varies from zone to zone. According to the literature, the elastic modulus in compression may assume values that range from 0.13 to 1.91 MPa [48], depending not only on the type and location of the cartilaginous tissue but also on the measurement conditions. It shall be stressed that, because of its unique structure, cartilage exhibits anisotropic properties, and its stiffness in tension is generally 5–20 times higher than in compression [48].

3.5. Tribological Behavior

Figure 6a shows the average CoF values for PVA hydrogels tested under 10 N of loading in PBS. The majority of the hydrogel samples exhibit CoF values in the range 0.062 to 0.081. However, CD 4 and FT 10-2 (×5) + SB5 presented significantly higher friction values: 0.103 ± 0.003 and 0.115 ± 0.008, respectively. FT 10-2 (×5) + SB8 sample did not withstand the applied load (10 N), and for that reason, no values for CoF could be measured. Tests carried out with HC in the same conditions led to a higher value of CoF (0.192 ± 0.015), which shows that all hydrogels, except FT 10-2 (×5) + SB8, reveal promising tribological properties at this load.
Comparison with data available in the literature is not straightforward since study conditions are not standardized, and the CoF values are strongly affected by the system geometry and configuration, test parameters (e.g., sliding speed, applied load) and lubricant, among other factors. However, the values obtained for the PVA hydrogels are within the range found by other authors: Pan et al. [49] tested FT gels against SS balls in different media (distilled water, physiological saline, and bovine serum), under loads between 5 and 15 N and sliding speeds 45–225 rpm and found CoF values in the range 0.03–0.075. Also, Kosukegawa et al. [50] got values between 0.01 and 0.1 for the CoF of PVA gels tested against SS balls under different pressures (0.022–0.146 MPa) and sliding speeds (0.5–600 mm·s−1). Agreement with literature data was also observed for cartilage assay. For example, Li et al. [51] measured the CoF of HC pins against SS plates in Ringer’s solution, with a contact pressure of 0.4 MPa and a sliding speed of 2 mm·s−1, and reached values of 0.266.
An attempt to use a load of 20 N was also performed with all the FT materials, but these did not resist and cracked during the assay. Therefore, for this normal force, only the CoF for the CD materials were obtained (Figure 6b). Overall, as the normal force increased, a tendency to decrease the friction values was observed. The same was observed with HC. Both hydrogel and HC are permeable to interstitial fluid and deform during friction tests. According to Amontons’ First Law, the CoF should be directly proportional to the normal force. However, several authors verified that both hydrogels and cartilage do not obey this law, and instead, the CoF depends on stiffness, roughness, speed, and load [52,53].
In the experiments carried out in SSF, equal or higher CoF values were registered with both applied forces. Due to the increased viscosity of the fluid (19.93 mPa·s), which contains albumin and hyaluronic acid, it was expected that the thickness of the lubricating layer between the contact surfaces would increase, thereby reducing the friction between the sliding pairs. The higher CoF values may be attributed to the interactions between the biomolecules present in the lubricant and the matrix of the PVA gels. Indeed, both the initial conformation of the adsorbed molecules and eventual structural changes that occur during the experiment are responsible for the observed behavior [54]. In recent work, Nečas et al. [53], also found that protein free-lubricants led to lower CoF than solutions containing albumin and/or γ-globulin, in tests performed with a metal/UHMWPE sliding pair. They concluded that friction is dependent on both protein type and concentration in the lubricant, as well as on the kinematic conditions. Depending on the sliding velocity, the protein molecules may partially or totally denature and lose their original secondary structure, leading to adsorbed protective films with different thicknesses and viscoelastic properties.
Nevertheless, further tribological studies at higher sliding distances should be performed with the systems studied here to evaluate the evolution of both CoF and wear rates in these materials.

4. Conclusions

PVA hydrogels are materials with a high potential to be used in cartilage replacement since they can be tailored to exhibit properties similar to the native biological tissue. The preparation conditions of such materials are critical for their performance. In this work, different strategies were followed to produce such hydrogels: cast-drying (CD) and freeze-thawing (FT).
CD gels presented a compact structure and a relatively smooth surface. Contrarily, FT gels showed some porosity, which could be increased through the addition of salts that acted as pore-forming agents. As a consequence of their non-porous structure, the CD gels exhibited a lower water absorption capacity. The differences in the production method almost did not affect the materials’ thermotropic properties. The crystallinity estimated from the DSC measurements was similar for all hydrogels. FT gels presented a higher fraction of freezable water (free/loosely bound) than CD gels. Concerning mechanical properties, gels showed similar behavior when using the same production methodology. CD gels were stiffer and dissipated less energy. In friction tests, carried out against SS in PBS solution, similar values of CoF were obtained for the majority of the studied hydrogels. However, FT samples revealed a lower wear resistance. Due to its superior performance, CD gels were selected to be tested under a higher load and in the presence of biological molecules (albumin and hyaluronic acid). The increase in load generally led to lower values of CoF, while the biomolecules maintained or increased the CoF.
For comparison, HC was tested in the same conditions of the studied hydrogels. Overall, CD gels were the ones that presented more similarities with the natural tissue in terms of morphology, water content, and mechanical behavior, and also led to lower CoF values. Thus, when cartilage repair is no longer possible, CD gels seem to be more suitable and promising as potential substitutes for articular cartilage.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/20/3413/s1, Figure S1: DSC thermograms of dry PVA hydrogels, Figure S2: DSC thermograms of hydrated PVA hydrogels, Table S1: Estimated percentage values of free/loosely bound and tightly bound water contained in the hydrogels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.S.O., R.C. and A.P.S.; Methodology: A.S.O., O.S. and N.R.; Software: A.S.O.; Validation: A.S.O.; Formal analysis: A.S.O., R.C. and A.P.S.; Investigation: A.S.O. and O.S.; Data curation: A.S.O.; Writing-original draft preparation: A.S.O. and A.P.S.; Writing-review and editing: A.S.O., R.C. and A.P.S.; Supervision: R.C. and A.P.S.; Project administration: R.C. and A.P.S.; Funding acquisition: R.C. and A.P.S.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through the Ph.D. grant PD/BD/128140/2016 (MIT-Portugal program) of A.S. Oliveira, the research project PTDC/CTM-CTM/29593/2017 and the unit projects UID/QUI/00100/2019 (CQE), UID/BIM/04585/2019 (CiiEM) and UID/EMS/50022/2019 (LAETA, IDMEC).

Acknowledgments

Kuraray Co., Ltd. is deeply acknowledged for providing the PVA powder used in this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fox, S.A.J.; Bedi, A.; Rodeo, S.A. The Basic Science of Articular Cartilage: Structure, Composition, and Function. Sport. Heal. A Multidiscip. Approach 2009, 1, 461–468. [Google Scholar]
  2. Karuppal, R. Current concepts in the articular cartilage repair and regeneration. J. Orthop. 2017, 14, A1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Redman, S.; Oldfield, S.; Archer, C. Current strategies for articular cartilage repair. Eur. Cells Mater. 2005, 9, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rönn, K.; Reischl, N.; Gautier, E.; Jacobi, M. Current Surgical Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Arthritis 2011, 2011, 454873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vyas, D.; Rabuck, S.J.; Harner, C.D. Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. J. Orthop. Sport. Phys. Ther. 2012, 42, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Han, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Han, Y.; Chang, F.; Ding, J. Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine. Cells 2019, 8, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, C.; Feng, N.; Chang, F.; Wang, J.; Yuan, B.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, H.; Yu, J.; Zou, J.; Ding, J.; et al. Injectable Cholesterol-Enhanced Stereocomplex Polylactide Thermogel Loading Chondrocytes for Optimized Cartilage Regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, 1900312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, J.; Dong, S.; Sivak, W.N.; Sun, H.B.; Chang, P. Stem Cells in Cartilage Diseases and Repair 2018. Stem Cells Int. 2018, 2018, 454873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Murakami, T.; Yarimitsu, S.; Nakashima, K.; Sakai, N.; Yamaguchi, T.; Sawae, Y.; Suzuki, A. Biphasic and boundary lubrication mechanisms in artificial hydrogel cartilage: A review. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 2015, 229, 864–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rey-Rico, A.; Madry, H.; Cucchiarini, M. Hydrogel-Based Controlled Delivery Systems for Articular Cartilage Repair. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 1215263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Katta, J.K.; Marcolongo, M.; Lowman, A.; Mansmann, K.A. Friction and wear behavior of poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) hydrogels for articular cartilage replacement. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2007, 83, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hassan, C.M.; Peppas, N.A. Structure and Applications of Poly (vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels Produced by Conventional Crosslinking or by Freezing/Thawing Methods. In Biopolymers PVA Hydrogels, Anionic Polymerisation Nanocomposites; Advances in Polymer Science; Springer: Heidelberg/Berlin, Germany, 2000; Volume 153, pp. 37–65. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar, A.; Han, S.S. PVA-based hydrogels for tissue engineering: A review. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2017, 66, 159–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moreau, D. Design and Characterization of Hydrogel Films and Hydrogel-Ceramic Composites for Biomedical Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, PSL Research University, Paris, France, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bray, J.C.; Merrill, E.W. Poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels. Formation by electron beam irradiation of aqueous solutions and subsequent crystallization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1973, 17, 3779–3794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shi, Y.; Xiong, D.; Zhang, J. Effect of irradiation dose on mechanical and biotribological properties of PVA/PVP hydrogels as articular cartilage. Tribol. Int. 2014, 78, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bodugoz-Senturk, H.; Choi, J.; Oral, E.; Kung, J.H.; Macias, C.E.; Braithwaite, G.; Muratoglu, O.K. The effect of polyethylene glycol on the stability of pores in polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels during annealing. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, A.; Mishra, R.; Reinwald, Y.; Bhat, S. Cryogels: Freezing unveiled by thawing. Mater. Today 2010, 13, 42–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Y.; Geever, L.M.; Kennedy, J.E.; Higginbotham, C.L.; Cahill, P.A.; McGuinness, G.B. Thermal behavior and mechanical properties of physically crosslinked PVA/Gelatin hydrogels. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2010, 3, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sasaki, S.; Suzuki, A. Factors influencing the swelling and elution properties of poly (vinyl alcohol) cast gels. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2016, 27, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kawanishi, K.; Komatsu, M.; Inoue, T. Thermodynamic consideration of the sol-gel transition in polymer solutions. Polymer 1987, 28, 980–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tai, B.C.U.; Du, C.; Gao, S.; Wan, A.C.A. Synthetic Poly (Vinyl Alcohol)—Based Membranes for Cartilage Surgery and Repair. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 12, 1700134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Coluccino, L.; Gottardi, R.; Ayadi, F.; Athanassiou, A.; Tuan, R.S.; Ceseracciu, L. Porous Poly (vinyl alcohol)—Based Hydrogel for Knee Meniscus Functional Repair. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 4, 1518–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peppas, N.A.; Merrill, E.W. Differential scanning calorimetry of crystallized PVA hydrogels. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1976, 20, 1457–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guan, L.; Xu, H.; Huang, D. The investigation on states of water in different hydrophilic polymers by DSC and FTIR. J. Polym. Res. 2011, 18, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Suzuki, A.; Murakami, T. High-Strength Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogels for Artificial Cartilage. In Encyclopedia of Biocolloid and Biointerface Science 2V Set; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 269–270. [Google Scholar]
  27. Holloway, J.L.; Lowman, A.M.; Palmese, G.R. The role of crystallization and phase separation in the formation of physically cross-linked PVA hydrogels. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 826–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Perfetti, G.; Jansen, K.M.B.; Wildeboer, W.J.; Hee, P.V.; Meesters, G.M.H. Characterization of physical and viscoelastic properties of polymer films for coating applications under different temperature of drying and storage. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 384, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Otsuka, E.; Komiya, S.; Sasaki, S.; Xing, J.; Bando, Y.; Hirashima, Y.; Sugiyama, M.; Suzuki, A. Effects of preparation temperature on swelling and mechanical properties of PVA cast gels. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 8129–8136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Murakami, T.; Yarimitsu, S.; Sakai, N.; Nakashima, K.; Yamaguchi, T.; Sawae, Y.; Suzuki, A. Superior lubrication mechanism in poly(vinyl alcohol) hybrid gel as artificial cartilage. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2017, 231, 1160–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Murakami, T.; Sakai, N.; Yamaguchi, T.; Yarimitsu, S.; Nakashima, K.; Sawae, Y.; Suzuki, A. Evaluation of a superior lubrication mechanism with biphasic hydrogels for artificial cartilage. Tribol. Int. 2015, 89, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marrella, A.; Lagazzo, A.; Dellacasa, E.; Pasquini, C.; Finocchio, E.; Barberis, F.; Pastorino, L.; Giannoni, P.; Scaglione, S. 3D Porous Gelatin/PVA Hydrogel as Meniscus Substitute Using Alginate Micro-Particles as Porogens. Polymers 2018, 10, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kumar, B.Y.S.; Isloor, A.M.; Kumar, G.C.M. Viscoelastic Behavior of HAp Reinforced Polyvinyl Alcohol Composite Hydrogel for Tissue Engineered Articular Cartilages. In Advances in Polymer Composites: Mechanics, Characterization And Applications, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Polymer Composites (ICPC 2018), Surathkal, India, 15–16 December 2018; Kumar, G.C.M., Doddamani, M.R., Eds.; American Institute of Physic: College Park, MD, USA, 2019; p. 20062. [Google Scholar]
  34. Miao, T.; Miller, E.J.; McKenzie, C.; Oldinski, R.A. Physically crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol and gelatin interpenetrating polymer network theta-gels for cartilage regeneration. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 9242–9249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Draghi, L.; Resta, S.; Pirozzolo, M.G.; Tanzi, M.C. Microspheres leaching for scaffold porosity control. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2005, 16, 1093–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lozinsky, V.I.; Okay, O. Basic Principles of Cryotropic Gelation. In Polymeric Cryogels: Macroporous Gels with Remarkable Properties; Okay, O., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 263, pp. 49–101. [Google Scholar]
  37. Patachia, S.; Florea, C.; Friedrich, C.; Thomann, Y. Tailoring of poly (vinyl alcohol) cryogels properties by salts addition. Express Polym. Lett. 2009, 3, 320–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gottardi, R.; Hansen, U.; Raiteri, R.; Loparic, M.; Düggelin, M.; Mathys, D.; Friederich, N.F.; Bruckner, P.; Stolz, M. Supramolecular Organization of Collagen Fibrils in Healthy and Osteoarthritic Human Knee and Hip Joint Cartilage. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Changoor, A.; Nelea, M.; Méthot, S.; Tran-Khanh, N.; Chevrier, A.; Restrepo, A.; Shive, M.S.; Hoemann, C.D.; Buschmann, M.D. Structural characteristics of the collagen network in human normal, degraded and repair articular cartilages observed in polarized light and scanning electron microscopies. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2011, 19, 1458–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Noh, T.; Bando, Y.; Ota, K.; Sasaki, S.; Suzuki, A. Tear force of physically crosslinked poly (vinyl alcohol) gels with different submicrometer-scale network structures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 41356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Holloway, J.L.; Spiller, K.L.; Lowman, A.M.; Palmese, G.R. Analysis of the in vitro swelling behavior of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels in osmotic pressure solution for soft tissue replacement. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 2477–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pavelka, M.; Roth, J. Articular Cartilage. In Functional Ultrastructure; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2010; pp. 294–295. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gupta, S.; Pramanik, A.K.; Kailath, A.; Mishra, T.; Guha, A.; Nayar, S.; Sinha, A. Composition dependent structural modulations in transparent poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 74, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nkhwa, S.; Lauriaga, K.F.; Kemal, E.; Deb, S. Poly (vinyl alcohol): Physical Approaches to Designing Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications. Conf. Pap. Sci. 2014, 2014, 403472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tranoudis, I.; Efron, N. Water properties of soft contact lens materials. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2004, 27, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Murakami, T.; Yarimitsu, S.; Nakashima, K.; Yamaguchi, T.; Sawae, Y.; Sakai, N.; Suzuki, A. Superior lubricity in articular cartilage and artificial hydrogel cartilage. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2014, 228, 1099–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gaharwar, A.; Schexnailder, P.; Schmidt, G. Nanocomposite Polymer Biomaterials for Tissue Repair of Bone and Cartilage. In Nanobiomaterials Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  48. Akizuki, S.; Mow, V.C.; Müller, F.; Pita, J.C.; Howell, D.S.; Manicourt, D.H. Tensile properties of human knee joint cartilage: I. Influence of ionic conditions, weight bearing, and fibrillation on the tensile modulus. J. Orthop. Res. 1986, 4, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pan, Y.-S.; Xiong, D.-S.; Chen, X.-L. Friction Behavior of Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Gel Against Stainless Steel Ball in Different Lubricant Media. J. Tribol. 2008, 130, 031802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kosukegawa, H.; Fridrici, V.; Kapsa, P.; Sutou, Y.; Adachi, K.; Ohta, M. Friction Properties of Medical Metallic Alloys on Soft Tissue—Mimicking Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogel Biomodel. Tribol. Lett. 2013, 51, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, F.; Su, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, G.; Wang, C. Influence of dynamic load on friction behavior of human articular cartilage, stainless steel and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel as artificial cartilage. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010, 21, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Covert, R.J.; Ott, R.D.; Ku, D.N. Friction characteristics of a potential articular cartilage biomaterial. Wear 2003, 255, 1064–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, F.; Wang, A.; Wang, C. Analysis of friction between articular cartilage and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel artificial cartilage. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2016, 27, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Serro, A.P.; Colaço, R.; Saramago, B. Effect of Albumin Adsorption on Biotribological Properties of Artificial Joint Materials. In Proteins at Interfaces III State of the Art; Horbett, T.A., Brash, J.L., Norde, W., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012; Volume 1120, pp. 497–523. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of PVA hydrogels’ (ah,j,k) and human cartilage samples’ (i,l) surfaces.
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of PVA hydrogels’ (ah,j,k) and human cartilage samples’ (i,l) surfaces.
Materials 12 03413 g001
Figure 2. Swelling capacity of PVA hydrogels and human cartilage.
Figure 2. Swelling capacity of PVA hydrogels and human cartilage.
Materials 12 03413 g002
Figure 3. Glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), and degree of crystallinity (χ) of PVA hydrogels.
Figure 3. Glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), and degree of crystallinity (χ) of PVA hydrogels.
Materials 12 03413 g003
Figure 4. Equilibrium water content (EWC) values of PVA hydrogels and human cartilage. Fractions of free/loosely bound water and tightly bound water contained in the PVA samples.
Figure 4. Equilibrium water content (EWC) values of PVA hydrogels and human cartilage. Fractions of free/loosely bound water and tightly bound water contained in the PVA samples.
Materials 12 03413 g004
Figure 5. Typical compression stress-strain curves (a), elastic modulus variation (b), and elastic and dissipated energies (c) of PVA samples and human cartilage.
Figure 5. Typical compression stress-strain curves (a), elastic modulus variation (b), and elastic and dissipated energies (c) of PVA samples and human cartilage.
Materials 12 03413 g005
Figure 6. Friction coefficients measured for the tribological sliding pairs hydrogel/SS 316L and human cartilage/SS 316L under 10 N of load using PBS as lubricant (a) and for CD hydrogels/SS 316L and human cartilage/SS 316L under 10 and 20 N of load using both PBS and SSF solutions as lubricants (b).
Figure 6. Friction coefficients measured for the tribological sliding pairs hydrogel/SS 316L and human cartilage/SS 316L under 10 N of load using PBS as lubricant (a) and for CD hydrogels/SS 316L and human cartilage/SS 316L under 10 and 20 N of load using both PBS and SSF solutions as lubricants (b).
Materials 12 03413 g006
Table 1. Conditions of preparation of the cast-dried and freeze-thawed samples.
Table 1. Conditions of preparation of the cast-dried and freeze-thawed samples.
Cast-DryingFreeze-Thawing
SamplesDrying Temperature (°C)SamplesFreezing Time/Cycle (h)Thawing Time/Cycle (h)Number of CyclesPore-Forming Agent
CD 44
CD 2020
CD 3030
FT 23-1 (×15)23115-
FT 21-3 (×15)21315-
FT 21-3 (×10)21310-
FT 10-2 (×5)1025-
FT 10-2 (×5) + SC1025NaCl (1:6 w/w) *
FT 10-2 (×5) + SB51025NaHCO3 (5:1 w/w) *
FT 10-2 (×5) + SB81025NaHCO3 (8:1 w/w) *
* Ratios relative to PVA weight.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oliveira, A.S.; Seidi, O.; Ribeiro, N.; Colaço, R.; Serro, A.P. Tribomechanical Comparison between PVA Hydrogels Obtained Using Different Processing Conditions and Human Cartilage. Materials 2019, 12, 3413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203413

AMA Style

Oliveira AS, Seidi O, Ribeiro N, Colaço R, Serro AP. Tribomechanical Comparison between PVA Hydrogels Obtained Using Different Processing Conditions and Human Cartilage. Materials. 2019; 12(20):3413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203413

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oliveira, Andreia Sofia, Oumar Seidi, Nuno Ribeiro, Rogério Colaço, and Ana Paula Serro. 2019. "Tribomechanical Comparison between PVA Hydrogels Obtained Using Different Processing Conditions and Human Cartilage" Materials 12, no. 20: 3413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203413

APA Style

Oliveira, A. S., Seidi, O., Ribeiro, N., Colaço, R., & Serro, A. P. (2019). Tribomechanical Comparison between PVA Hydrogels Obtained Using Different Processing Conditions and Human Cartilage. Materials, 12(20), 3413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203413

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop