Next Article in Journal
Respirometric Study of Optical Brighteners in Textile Wastewater
Previous Article in Journal
Phase Transition and Metallization of Orpiment by Raman Spectroscopy, Electrical Conductivity and Theoretical Calculation under High Pressure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/ma12050783
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanical Properties and Anti-Spalling Behavior of Ultra-High Performance Concrete with Recycled and Industrial Steel Fibers

by
Juan Yang
*,
Gai-Fei Peng
,
Guo-Shuang Shui
and
Gui Zhang
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(5), 783; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050783
Submission received: 19 January 2019 / Revised: 11 February 2019 / Accepted: 1 March 2019 / Published: 7 March 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Experimental investigations on the mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) incorporating two types of recycled steel fiber processed from waste tires and three types of industrial steel fiber were carried out for comparison. Mechanical properties of UHPC include compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, fracture energy, and elastic modulus. Their explosive spalling behaviors under high temperatures were also investigated. The results show that all types of steel fiber exhibit a beneficial effect on the mechanical properties and the anti-spalling behavior of UHPC, except that recycled steel fiber with rubber attached (RSFR) has a slightly negative effect on the compressive strength of UHPC. Compared to industrial steel fibers, recycled steel fibers have a more significant influence on improving the splitting tensile strength and fracture energy of UHPC, and the improvement of RSFR was much higher than that of recycled steel fiber without rubber (RSF). UHPC that incorporates industrial hooked-end steel fiber (35 mm in length and 0.55 mm in diameter) exhibits the best resistance to explosive spalling, and the second is the RSF reinforced UHPC. The positive relationship between the fracture energy and the anti-spalling behavior of steel fiber reinforced UHPC can be presented. These results suggest that recycled steel fiber can be a toughening material and substitute for industrial steel fibers to be used in ultra-high performance concrete, especially RSFR.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Environmental concerns associated with waste rubber tires have attracted significant attention in recent years. A number of related associations and councils have been established in numerous countries, such as the Tire Industry Association and the Rubber Division of the American Chemical Society. Additionally, because waste rubber tires are not biodegradable, the disposal of waste tires in landfills has been banned by law [1].
In view of environmental protection and economic benefit, more and more attention has been paid to the recycling of waste rubber tires. Recycling of waste rubber tires has focused on extracting the rubbers and steel fibers. A large number of studies have reported the applications of these materials in many types of concretes [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. It has also been confirmed that the mechanical properties of concrete reinforced with recycled steel fiber from tires are comparable to those of concrete with industrial steel fibers [10]. The thickness of concrete pavement could be reduced by up to 26% due to the addition of recycled steel fibers when only taking into account their effect on the fatigue property [11]. An economic analysis of recycled steel fiber reinforced concrete found that using recycled steel fiber alone could save up to 33% [12]. Moreover, a comprehensive study was conducted to evaluate the anchoring characteristics of recycled steel fiber through a pull-out test, the flexural capacity of steel fiber reinforced concrete, and new stress–strain models for design purposes [13]. Another result revealed that the combination of silica fume and recycled steel fiber improved the mechanical properties and impact resistance of specimens [14]. However, few of the results on the application of recycled steel fibers in ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) can be found.
Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) has excellent strength performance and super durability. The excellent properties have led to increasing use of UHPC in engineering structures, such as ultra-high-rise buildings in Japan [15,16], military shielding panels in Germany [17], the National Great Theater [18], the International Finance Center [19], and Huangchao Wanxin Building in China [20]. Applications have focused on optimizing its use by reducing concrete member thickness [21], reducing the size of anchorage blocks and amounts of reinforcements in the pre-stressed concrete structures [22], securing economic efficiency by achieving a lightweight superstructure [23], and realizing sufficient connection performance of lap-spliced cast-in-place joints in bridge deck slabs [24]. Under impact loading, UHPC was approximately twice as strong as conventional fiber reinforced concrete and exhibited excellent impact resistance [25]. UHPC can be used for the reinforcement of structure elements but developing the applicable confinement model is needed [26]. Additionally, many existing bridges built many years ago have exhibited poor quality, such as low shear capacity, the inappropriate location of lap splices in pier members, and a lack of adequate reinforcement details [27,28], and there is an urgent need to further assess their performance and then strengthen them [29,30]. Adding UHPC layers to the existing components can upgrade these conventional reinforced concrete structures [31].
However, because of the lower water to binder ratio (W/B), the microstructure of UHPC incorporating three types of mineral admixtures is much denser. Results indicated that the tensile strengths of concrete specimens decreased with the increasing addition of mineral admixtures [32]. The axial tensile properties of concrete are important parameters which have great effects on crack resistance, and the denser microstructure of concrete also results in the poor cracking resistance. Therefore, UHPC without any steel fiber exhibits high brittleness and is more prone to encounter explosive spalling when exposed to high temperatures [33]. Adding steel fiber is a common approach for improving the toughness of UHPC due to its crack resistance, resulting in the significant improvement of the shear capacity and bonding performance of UHPC. It has been shown that increasing the dosage of steel fiber in UHPC beams without shear stirrups did not only increase the shear capacity of the beams but also changed their failure modes from shear tension to shear compression [34,35]. Specifically, the use of steel fibers as a better alternative to shear reinforcement in high-strength concrete beams can be considered [36]. Steel fiber improves the bonding performance of concrete elements with lap-spliced reinforced bars remarkably, suggesting that the UHSC structure increase the volume fraction of steel fibers rather than increase splice length to ensure bonding strength [37]. Moreover, the fiber reinforcement can significantly change the shear behavior and increase the shear capacity [38], even in the fiber-reinforced UHPC without shear reinforcement [39]. Additionally, the steel fiber reinforced cementitious composite (SFRCC) jacketing can be an appropriate alternative to the carbon fiber reinforced polymers external reinforcement for the reinforcement of existing poor-quality concrete structures [40]. An innovative application of SFRCC for the repair and retrofit of damaged columns is also proposed and validated experimentally [41]. In terms of ductility, concrete specimens strengthened with the SFRCC did not show a sensitive increase of deformation capacity in the post-peak phase during loading [42]. These conclusions show that there are many advantages in the design practice of the steel fiber reinforced UHPC.
Explosive spalling of concrete under high temperatures is, in essence, severe cracking, which steel fibers also have a positive effect on improving the resistance to [43,44]. However, influences of steel fiber on preventing concrete from explosive spalling still remain controversial, not only in high-strength or high-performance concrete [45,46] but also in reactive powder concrete [47,48]. Additionally, a researcher proposed that the positive effect of steel fiber on improving the anti-spalling behavior of high and ultra-high performance concrete can be ignored [49].
Based on the above mention, further investigations on the mechanical properties and explosive spalling behavior of UHPC that incorporates different types of steel fiber are needed. In this investigation, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, fracture energy, elastic modulus, and explosive spalling behavior of plain UHPC and UHPC reinforced with two types of recycled steel fiber and three types of industrial steel fiber were determined for comparison to explore the characteristics of steel fiber reinforced UHPC and find out the optimum steel fiber for the optimum UHPC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Concretes were prepared using ordinary raw materials. 52.5R Portland cement and silica fume (SF) were used as binders. Basalt with two particle sizes in the ranges of 5–10 mm and 10–16 mm by a mass ratio of 3:7 was used as the coarse aggregate. Artificial sand was used as fine aggregate. Five different types of steel fibers are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. Polycarboxylate superplasticizer with a solid content of 50% was used to maintain excellent workability of fresh concrete.

2.2. Concrete Preparation

Six types of UHPC specimens prepared in the forms of 100 × 100 × 100 mm cube and 100 × 100 × 300 mm beam were designated as Plain/UHPC, SF1/UHPC, SF2/UHPC, SF3/UHPC, RSF/UHPC, and RSFR/UHPC. Their mix proportions are given in Table 2. After casting, each specimen was immediately wrapped in plastic to minimize moisture loss and stored at room temperature for 24 hours. Next, these specimens were de-molded and placed in a tank of water at a constant temperature of 20 °C for 56 days.

2.3. Test Methods

2.3.1. Concrete Strength and Static Modulus of Elasticity

Strength tests and static elastic modulus tests on all types of UHPCs at the age of 28 days were performed according to a Chinese standard GB/T 50081-2002 Standard for test method of mechanical properties on ordinary concrete [50]. The data presented in this study are the average value of the three specimens tested.
Cube specimens of 100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm were employed for the compressive strength test. The specimens were loaded using a testing machine of 200-ton capacity at the rate of 1.0 MPa/s until failure. Cube specimens of 100 mm size were used to determine the splitting tensile strength at a loading rate of 0.1 MPa/s.
Six prismatic specimens of 100 mm × 100 mm × 300 mm were employed to determine the static modulus of UHPC. Firstly, three specimens were used to determine their axial compressive strength and their average strength value obtained was the result. Secondly, two deformation measuring instruments were mounted on the center line on both sides of the specimen symmetrically, and then the center position of the specimen was adjusted repeatedly to make the difference less than 20% between the deformation values and their average value. Thirdly, during loading, the load values and deformation values were recorded. Finally, the static modulus of elasticity of concrete could be calculated by using Equation (1)
Ec = [(Fa − F0)/A] × [L/(εa − ε0)]
where Ec is the static modulus of elasticity (MPa); Fa is the load when the stress is 1/3 of the axial compressive strength (N); F0 is the initial load when the stress is 0.5 MPa; A is the pressure area of specimen (mm2); L is the measuring scale of 100 mm; εa is the average deformation value of both sides when load is Fa (mm); ε0 is the average deformation value on both sides when load is F0 (mm).

2.3.2. Fracture Energy Test

Notched beam specimens of 100 × 100 × 300 mm were employed to determine the fracture energy at the age of 56 days. The fracture energy was determined according to a RILEM test method [51]. The configuration of the tested specimen is shown in Figure 2. A notch was prepared during the casting of specimens to form a crack at the mid-span of each specimen. In this investigation, the notch depth was 30 mm.
A three-point bending test was conducted on a notched beam specimen. The loading was displacement controled at a rate of 0.05 mm/min. The mid-span deflection δ was recorded during the whole loading process until failure. From the recorded load–deflection curve, the fracture energy of concrete could be calculated by using Equation (2) as specified in the RILEM test method [51].
G F = [ ∫ 0 δ 0 P ( δ ) + m g δ 0 ] / A l i g
where G F is the fracture energy (J/m2), m = m 1 + m 2 (kg), m 1 = M s / L (the weight of the beam support, calculated as beam weight multiplied by s / L ), M is the mass of the specimen, m 2 is the weight of the part of the loading arrangement not attached to the machine but that follows the beam until failure, s is the span, L is the length of the specimen, g = 9.81 m/s2, δ 0 is the mid-span deflection of the specimen at failure (m), A l i g is the area of the ligament (m2), δ is the mid-span deflection (m), and P is the load (N).

2.3.3. Explosive Spalling Test

Explosive spalling tests were conducted on the 100 mm cube specimens after they were stored at room temperature for 365 days. The test method is according to the reported literature [52]. Specimens were heated in a muffle furnace from room temperature to 800 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. The temperature was measured by a thermocouple located in the air. The thermocouple was positioned approximately 40 mm above the forming surface of the concrete specimen inside the electric furnace, as shown in Figure 3.

3. Results

3.1. Mechanical Properties

The compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and fracture energy of UHPCs with different types of steel fiber and plain UHPC are shown in Figure 4.

3.1.1. Compressive Strength

The results of the influence of adding fibers on the compressive strength of mixtures are indicated in Figure 4. Adding steel fiber SF1, SF2, SF3, and RSF improved the compressive strength of plain UHPC by 7.1%, 3.2%, 13.9%, and 4.3%, respectively. The improvement can be attributed to the frictional stress and mechanical anchorage provided by the geometry of hooked-end industrial steel fibers and corrugated RSF [53]. The compressive strength of SF1/UHPC and SF2/UHPC revealed that steel fiber with a higher aspect ratio more effectively enhanced the compressive strength of UHPC than that with a lower aspect ratio. Similarly, steel fiber with an aspect ratio of 80 increased the compressive strength of concrete more efficiently than that with an aspect ratio of 40 [54]. Additionally, the effect of the aspect ratio of steel fiber on the compressive strength of concrete is related to its volume fraction. Concretes with a fiber volume of 1.5%, 1.0%, and 0.5% have the highest compressive strength with the aspect ratios of 45, 65, and 80, respectively [55].
The compressive strength of UHPC that incorporates industrial steel fiber SF3 with a tensile strength of 1800–2000 MPa was 10.4% higher than that reinforced by SF2 with the lower tensile strength of 900 MPa. However, the effect of the tensile strength of steel fiber itself on increasing the compressive strength of concrete was not significant and therefore may require more research [56].
Among all of the types of steel fibers, only RSFR had a slightly negative effect on the compressive strength of UHPC. The compressive strength of UHPC that incorporated RSFR was lower than that of plain UHPC by 5.3 MPa. This difference may be attributed to both the weak interfacial bonding between rubber particles and the cement matrix due to its hydrophobic nature and the stress concentration generated by rubber particles with much lower stiffness. Additionally, the decrease in compressive strength of RSFR/UHPC may be related to the increased air voids of mixtures due to the rubber-attached RSFR [57]. When the rubber in the RSFR was disposed of, the adverse effect of the steel fiber on the compressive strength of UHPC was eliminated, as demonstrated by the compressive strength of RSF/UHPC which was higher than that of plain UHPC.

3.1.2. Splitting Tensile Strength

Figure 4 indicates the efficiency of steel fibers on the splitting tensile strength of UHPC. All types of steel fibers—SF1, SF2, SF3, RSF, and RSFR—significantly improved the splitting tensile strength of plain UHPC by 27.9%, 30.1%, 26.6%, 35.9%, and 70.8%, respectively. The improvements of both recycled steel fibers were higher than industrial steel fiber, especially the RSFR. The efficient influence can be attributed to the high capacity of steel fibers in hindering the further crack propagation, resulting in the fiber bridging and the increase of the splitting tensile strength of concrete.
The splitting strength of UHPC with industrial steel fibers SF1, SF2, and SF3 was 8.84 MPa, 8.99 MPa, and 8.75 MPa, respectively. It indicates that the effect of the aspect ratio and tensile strength of hooked-end steel fiber on the splitting tensile strength of UHPC were not pronounced. Similarly, a study showed that the splitting tensile strengths of concretes with the aspect ratios of 45, 60, and 80 were 4.50 MPa, 4.51 MPa, and 4.58 MPa, respectively [55]. However, the tensile strength of steel fiber had a significant influence on the splitting tensile strength of concrete [56]. The splitting tensile strength of UHPC reinforced with RSF was slightly higher than that of UHPC with industrial steel fibers. This result may be attributed to the fact that RSF is 5 mm longer and has a corrugated shape. A study reported that the carbon black on the surface of RSF decreased the flexural strength of concrete by approximately 15% compared to concrete that incorporated industrial steel fibers with a tensile strength similar to that of RSF [13]. The effect of carbon black on mechanical properties and pore microstructure of UHPC needs further research.
Additionally, the influence of recycled steel fiber RSFR in improving the splitting tensile strength of UHPC was superior to that of RSF, which was attributed to the combination of the beneficial effect of the synergistic action between the rubber-attached RSFR and steel fiber itself, as well as the disadvantageous effect resulting from high-temperature damage to RSF during heat treating.

3.1.3. Fracture Energy

The fracture energies of UHPC that incorporate different types of steel fiber are shown in Figure 4. Steel fiber improved the fracture energy of plain UHPC significantly. Recycled steel fibers exhibited the best efficiency. The fracture energies of RSFR/UHPC and RSF/UHPC were 13,828 J/m2 and 6636 J/m2, respectively, while those of the UHPCs reinforced with industrial steel fibers were less than 5000 J/m2. Therefore, the capacity of UHPC to absorb energy is greatly improved by recycled steel fibers, especially RSFR. Many previous studies also identified the capacity of recycled waste tires to absorb fracture energy [58]. Therefore, its excellent ability to improve the fracture toughness of UHPC suggests that recycled steel fiber has a promising application in concrete.
Except for the fracture energy value in Figure 4, the other data obtained also demonstrate that RSFR can remarkably improve the fracture energy of UHPC.
Firstly, the morphology of pulled-out steel fibers on the fracture surfaces of the notched specimens after fracture energy testing indicates the differences among the exposed sections of steel fibers, as shown in Figure 5. This illustrates that the exposed section of RSFR is the longest among all of the steel fibers. The longer the length was, the more time the fracture process took to absorb energy and the higher the fracture energy of UHPC was.
Secondly, steel fiber was ruptured or pulled out during fracture energy testing. The appearance of a ruptured steel fiber and a pulled-out fiber on the fracture surface was observed by an optical microscope, as is shown in Figure 6. The data in Table 3 provide an accurate number of ruptured or pulled-out fibers on the fracture surfaces of the specimens. There were more pulled-out fibers than ruptured fibers for recycled steel fibers and SF3. For SF1 and SF2, there were more ruptured steel fibers. Pulled-out steel fiber with a long exposed section absorbed more energy than ruptured fibers, resulting in the high fracture energy of concrete.
Thirdly, as shown in Figure 6, D1 and D2 were used to label the end diameters of the ruptured steel fiber and pulled-out steel fiber, respectively. The average value of ten steel fibers demonstrated that the end diameters of all ruptured steel fibers or pulled-out steel fibers were smaller than their natural diameters (D). The decreased percentage of the end diameters is presented in Figure 7. The decreased percentage of the end diameter of the ruptured RSFR was much higher than that of other steel fibers. Therefore, RSFR underwent the largest tensile deformation during fracture energy testing and absorbed the most energy among all types of steel fiber.
Finally, the fracture energy of concrete was illustrated by its load–deflection curve during fracture energy testing, as shown in Figure 8. For UHPC reinforced with recycled steel fibers, after the peak load was reached, the load maintained almost no decrease. The descent stage of the curve was also much slower than that of UHPC with industrial steel fiber. These factors resulted in the fact that the load–deflection curve area of RSFR/UHPC was much larger than that of any other types of UHPC. During fracture energy testing, when cracking occurred, the concrete matrix lost its uncracked load-bearing capacity, and the steel fiber began to shoulder the load, displaying its post-peak loading toughness, which can be expressed by the descent stage of the load–deflection concrete curve. The peak load of the curve depends on the combined function between the load-bearing capacity of concrete and the post-peak loading toughness of steel fiber. Therefore, although the post-peak loading toughness of RSFR/UHPC was much better than industrial steel fiber, its uncracked load-bearing capacity was lower than that of UHPC with SF1. The negative effect of RSFR on the compressive strength of UHPC, as shown in Figure 3, demonstrates this fact. This effect led to the different trends between the peak load and the area of the load–deflection curve during fracture energy testing.
RSFR displayed better post-peak loading toughness than RSF, which can be explained as follows. After cracking occurred during fracture energy testing, the rubber began shouldering the load (mainly tension) earlier than the steel fiber, and rubber’s high flexibility contributed to its tension resistance. Moreover, some rubbers displayed their preferable bonding strength with the concrete matrix. As shown in Figure 9, these rubbers remained in the matrix after the steel fiber was pulled out or ruptured. Conversely, the tensile strength of RSFR itself was much higher than that of RSF, which may be the most important factor.

3.1.4. Static Elastic Modulus

The static elastic modulus of UHPC is shown in Figure 10. It can be seen that RSFR displayed the most significant increase in the static elastic modulus of UHPC. The variation of the static elastic modulus of UHPC with various steel fibers was similar to that of the splitting tensile strength, except for RSF/UHPC. The static elastic modulus of RSF/UHPC was slightly lower than that of industrial steel fibers and much lower than that of RSFR/UHPC. RSF has a much lower stiffness than RSFR because of the damage it suffered when exposed to high temperatures of approximately 450 °C. The combined function of rubber and steel fiber with higher stiffness means that RSFR has a higher stiffness than RSF, although the attached rubbers decrease the stiffness of RSFR.

3.2. Explosive Spalling Behavior

3.2.1. Temperature–Time Curve during Explosive Spalling

All types of UHPC specimens encountered explosive spalling in different temperature ranges, as presented in Figure 11. At temperatures lower than 400 °C, no spalling occurred for all types of specimens. After spalling occurred, different temperature ranges and durations of explosive spalling occurrence in different types of UHPC specimens could be observed, indicating that UHPCs with different types of steel fibers suffered significantly different severities of explosive spalling. SF2/UHPC suffered the most severe explosive spalling in the largest temperature range and the longest duration, followed by the SF3/UHPC. Recycled steel fibers significantly decreased the temperature range and the duration of the explosive spalling occurrence. There was an interesting result in which the temperature range of plain UHPC was the minimum, but its duration was not the shortest and the increase rate of temperature was the slowest. When explosive spalling occurred, moisture released from the spalled blocks and resulted in the decrease in temperature. The slower increase rate of temperature may imply the more serious explosive spalling.

3.2.2. Morphology of Spalled Specimens

The morphology of all specimens after being subjected to 800 °C is shown in Figure 12. Plain UHPC suffered the severe explosive spalling, whereby six specimens spalled into fragments. Only one specimen remained intact without spalling occurrence for SF2/UHPC and SF3/UHPC. Based on the results in Figure 11, it can be concluded that the slower increase rate of temperature can be a parameter to estimate the severity of explosive spalling occurrence.

3.2.3. Number of Spalled Specimens and Average Spalling Depth

The number of spalled specimens and the average spalling depth of six specimens of all concretes are given in Table 4. It indicates that all six specimens of the plain UHPC encountered explosive spalling. Adding steel fiber can relieve the explosive spalling severity of UHPC specimens, especially SF1 and recycled steel fibers, in which only three specimens spalled. To distinguish the spalling severity of SF1/UHPC, RSF/UHPC, and RSFR/UHPC, spalling depth of specimens was determined. The average spalling depth was the average value of the maximum spalling depth of six specimens. If no spalling occurred, the spalling depth of the specimen was confirmed as 0 mm. If the specimen spalled into several small fragments, its spalling depth was 100 mm. The average spalling depth of SF1/UHPC was only 12 mm, much smaller than other types of UHPC. SF1 exhibited the best influence on improving anti-spalling behavior.

3.2.4. Particle Sieving

After the explosive spalling test, sieve tests were conducted on all of the UHPC specimens to further confirm the spalling degree of all concretes for comparison, as shown in Figure 13. For SF1/UHPC and RSF/UHPC, the mass percentages of particles with the sizes above 90 mm were 91% and 82%, respectively. In comparison, this percentage was only 20% for the plain UHPC. The results indicate that the explosive spalling of plain UHPC was extremely severe, as specimens spalled into many small fragments. Adding steel fiber can improve the anti-spalling behavior of UHPC.

3.2.5. Analysis of Results

Based on the above results, it can be concluded that recycled steel fiber can improve the anti-spalling behavior of UHPC, and RSF had a better effect than RSFR. The beneficial effect of RSFR could be attributed to the rubber. After exposure to high temperature, melted rubber on the surface of RSFR created many channels, which released the vapor pressure, and thus impeded explosive spalling [59]. However, RSF unattached rubber showed a better effect than RSFR, and this result may be closely related to the fact that the content of the rubber attached to RSFR was approximately 10% of RSFR by mass. After exposure to high temperature, the attached rubbers with a high dosage can create much wider pores and cracks, which are detrimental to the anti-spalling behavior of concrete. For the RSF/UHPC, this adverse effect decreased due to the lower damage of the interface zone between RSF and concrete matrix compared to that of RSFR, as shown in Figure 14.
Additionally, the above results indicate that recycled steel fibers significantly improved the fracture energy of UHPC. Explosive spalling is essentially severe cracking, and the anti-spalling behavior of concrete can be related to its fracture toughness with a positive relation. The result suggests that improvements of fracture toughness of concrete can be effective measures to enhance the resistance to explosive spalling of UHPC.
Compared to recycled steel fiber, industrial steel fiber SF1 presented the best effect on improving the anti-explosive spalling behavior of UHPC. This effect may be attributed to the higher distribution density of SF1. The number of SF1 and other types of steel fibers inside a 100 mm cube specimen were approximately 441 and 150, respectively. Steel fibers with a higher distribution density can significantly reduce the cracking of concrete. Additionally, SF1 can decrease thermal stress by improving the thermal conductivity property of concrete.

4. Discussion

The results in this experimental investigation indicate that the different types of steel fiber tested have a positive effect in improving the fracture energy and alleviating the explosive spalling severity of UHPC, but different efficiencies were presented. Industrial steel fibers SF1 with a smaller diameter have the most distribution density among all types of steel fiber, which could significantly decrease the inner temperature difference to reduce the thermal stress inside the specimens and caused the improvement of the anti-spalling behavior of concrete [60]. However, the smaller tensile strength of the SF1 limited its efficiency on improving the fracture energy of UHPC. Thus, compared to the improvement of steel fibers on the fracture energy of UHPC, the distribution density of steel fiber can be a more accurate parameter to evaluate its influence in improving the anti-spalling behavior of UHPC. However, the effect of inner thermal stress in inducing the explosive spalling occurrence of UHPC needs further research.
Recycled steel fibers not only improved the fracture energy of UHPC significantly but also alleviated the severity of explosive spalling occurrence in UHPC. This result indicates that the anti-spalling behavior of UHPC is closely related to the fracture toughness of concrete with a positive relationship, i.e., the higher the fracture toughness, the better the resistance to explosive spalling. UHPC with the industrial steel fibers SF2 and SF3 also have the same relationship trend between their fracture energies and the anti-spalling behaviors. Thus, to some extent, the steel fibers which can remarkably enhance the fracture energy of UHPC are able to improve the anti-spalling behavior of UHPC.

5. Conclusions

The results obtained from this work lead us to draw the following conclusions.
(1) Compared to plain ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC), adding industrial steel fiber and recycled steel fiber can increase mechanical properties of UHPC and alleviate its explosive spalling, except that recycled steel fibers with rubber particle attached (RSFR) have a slightly negative effect on the compressive strength of UHPC.
(2) Recycled steel fibers, especially RSFR, have the best effect on increasing the splitting tensile strength, fracture energy, and static elastic modulus of any industrial steel fiber. Compared to other properties in this experiment, the improvement of recycled steel fibers on the fracture energy of UHPC is the most significant. It is suggested that recycled steel fiber, especially RSFR, can be a toughening material used in concrete, and can substitute for industrial steel fiber in some concrete members, especially those with high toughness requirements.
(3) All of the plain UHPC specimens encountered severe explosive spalling. Steel fiber significantly alleviates the explosive spalling of UHPC but cannot avoid the occurrence of explosive spalling. UHPC incorporating industrial hooked-end steel fiber (35 mm in length and 0.55 mm in diameter) exhibits the best resistance to explosive spalling. Recycled steel fiber, especially RSF, can also improve the anti-spalling behavior of UHPC.
(4) Characteristics of steel fiber affect the mechanical properties, and explosive spalling behavior of steel fiber reinforced UHPC significantly. The steel fiber which has a large distribution density or that without a large distribution density but can make concrete have high toughness (fracture energy), is more appropriate to be utilized in UHPC structures. In addition, the application of recycled steel fiber is environmentally friendly and can help to efficiently save engineering costs.

Author Contributions

G.-F.P. conceived the experimental plan. J.Y. performed the testing, carried out the interpretation of the data, and wrote the manuscript. G.-S.S. and G.Z. helped a lot in writing.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51878032) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (Project No. 8172036).

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Science Foundation of China. Yutian Zhitai Steel Fiber Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is acknowledged for providing steel fibers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Commission. Council directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste. Off. J. Eur. Commun. 1999, 182, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  2. Meddah, A.; Beddar, M.; Bali, A. Use of shredded rubber tire aggregates for roller compacted concrete pavement. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 72, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, X.Y.; Ranade, R.; Ni, W.; Li Victor, C. On the use of recycled tire rubber to develop low e-modulus ECC for durable concrete repairs. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 46, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Azevedo, F.; Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Jesus, C.; Aguiar, J.L.B.D.; Camões, A.F. Properties and durability of HPC with TYRE rubber wastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 34, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tortum, A.; Celik, C.; Aydin, A.C. Determination of the optimum conditions for tire rubber in asphalt concrete. Build. Environ. 2005, 40, 1492–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gesoğlu, M.; Güneyisi, E.; Khoshnaw, G.; Ipek, S. Investigating properties of pervious concretes containing waste tire rubbers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 63, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yung, W.H.; Yung, L.C.; Hua, L.H. A study of the durability properties of waste tire rubber applied to self-compacting concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 41, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Long, X.H. Experimental Research on Mechanical Properties of Waste Steel Fiber Rubber Modified Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Master Thesis, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bjegovic, D.; Baricevic, A.; Lakusic, S.; Damjanovic, D.; Duvnjak, I. Positive interaction of industrial and recycled steel fibres in fibre reinforced concrete. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2013, 19, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Centonze, G.; Leone, M.; Aiello, M.A. Steel fibers from waste tires as reinforcement in concrete: A mechanical characterization. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 36, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Graeffang, A.G.; Pilakoutas, K.; Neocleous, K.; Peres, M.V.N.N. Fatigue resistance and cracking mechanism of concrete pavements reinforced with recycled steel fibres recovered from post-consumer tires. Eng. Struct. 2012, 45, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bjegovic, D.; Baricevic, A.; Lakusic, S. Innovative low cost fiber-reinforced concrete. Part I: Mechanical and durability properties. In Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting III; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tlemat, H.D.I. Steel Fibers from Waste Forms to Concrete: Testing, Modeling and Design. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mastali, M.; Dalvand, A. Use of silica fume and recycled steel fibers in self-compacting concrete (SCC). Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kojima, M.; Mitsui, K.; Wachi, M. Application of 150 N/mm2 advanced performance composites to high-rise R/C building. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Utilization of High-Strength and High-Performance Concrete, Tokyo, Japan, 27–29 October 2008; Japan Concrete Institute: Tokyo, Japan, 2008; pp. 1199–1206. [Google Scholar]
  16. Park, C.; Kim, D.; Lee, J. Development of 200 N/mm2 ultra high strength concrete and test application for super high rise building. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Utilization of High-Strength and High-Performance Concrete, Tokyo, Japan, 27–29 October 2008; Japan Concrete Institute: Tokyo, Japan, 2008; pp. 1276–1281. [Google Scholar]
  17. Riedel, W.; Markus, N.; Elmar, S. Local damage to ultra-high performance concrete structures caused by an impact of aircraft engine missiles. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2010, 240, 2633–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lu, L.J. Construction technology of C100 high performance concrete in National Great Theater. Constr. Technol. 2003, 9, 48–50. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gu, G.R. Preparation, production and ultra-high pumping technology of C100 self-compacting concrete and C100 in Xita building. China Concr. 2009, 7, 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dong, Y.N.; Su, L.N.; Xiao, L.Q. Concrete construction technology of Shenyang Huangchao Wanxin building. Coal Technol. 2011, 9, 140–141. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mush, H.; Ohkuma, H.; Watanabe, N. UFC technology and applications in Japan. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on High Performance Concrete, Design, Verification & Utilization, Rotorua, New Zealand, 9–11 August 2011. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, J.S.; Kim, T.H. A stress analysis of the post-tensioned anchorage zones using UHPC. Key Eng. Mater. 2017, 737, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, B.S.; Kim, S.W.; Park, S.Y.; Koh, K.T. R and D activities and application of high performance concrete to cable stayed bridges. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete, Kassel, Germany, 7–9 March 2012. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hwang, H.; Park, S.Y. A study on the flexural behavior of lap-spliced cast-in-place joints under static loading in ultra-high performance concrete bridge deck slabs. Can. Civ. Eng. 2014, 41, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bindiganvile, V.; Bantha, N.; Aarup, B. Impact response of ultra-high-strength fiber-reinforced cement composite. ACI Mater. J. 2002, 99, 543–548. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shin, H.O.; Min, K.H.; Mitchell, D. Confinement of ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete columns. Compos. Struct. 2017, 176, 124–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pinto, P.E.; Franchin, P. Issues in the Upgrade of Italian Highway Structures. J. Earthq. Eng. 2010, 14, 1221–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Borzi, B.; Ceresa, P.; Franchin, P.; Noto, F.; Calvi, G.M.; Pinto, P.E. Seismic vulnerability of the Italian roadway bridge stock. Earthq. Spectra. 2015, 31, 2137–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Di Sarno, L.; Del Vecchio, C.; Maddaloni, G.; Prota, A. Experimental response of an existing RC bridge with smooth bars and preliminary numerical simulations. Eng. Struct. 2017, 136, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schramm, N.; Fischer, O. Investigations on the shear behavior of bridge girders made of normal and ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Procedia Eng. 2016, 156, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brühwiler, E. Design and Construction of Steel Fiber-Reinforced UHPC/RC Composite Members; School of Engineering & Architecture: Fribourg, Switzerland, 2011; pp. 121–136. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Y.; Li, J.Q. Relationship between fracture area and tensile strength of cement paste with supplementary cementitious materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 79, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peng, G.F.; Yang, J. Residual mechanical properties and explosive spalling of ultra-high-strength concrete exposed to high temperature. J. Harbin Inst. Technol. 2017, 24, 62–70. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mansur, M.A.; Ong, K.C.G.; Paramasivam, P. Shear strength of fibrous concrete beams without stirrups. J. Struct. Eng. 1986, 112, 2066–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fehling, E.; Schmidt, M.; Walraven, J.; Leutbecher, T.; Fröhlich, S. Ultra-High Performance Concrete UHPC: Fundamentals, Design, Examples; John Wiley & Sons: Berlin, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gustafsson, J.; Noghabai, K. Steel Fibers as Shear Reinforcement in High Strength Concrete Beams; Nordic Concrete Research Publications, Nordic Concrete Federation: Oslo, Norway, 1999; pp. 35–52. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, J.-K. Bonding behavior of lap-spliced reinforcing bars embedded in ultra-high strength concrete with steel fibers. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2016, 20, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Thiemicke, J.; Fehling, E. Proposed model to predict the shear bearing capacity of UHPC-beams with combined reinforcement. In Proceedings of the HiPerMat 4th International Symposium on Ultrahigh Performance Concrete and High Performance Construction Materials, Kassel, Germany, 9–11 March 2016; Kassel University Press: Kassel, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  39. Fehling, E.; Bunje, K.; Leutbecher, T. Bemessung für Biegung und Querkraft bei Bauteilen aus UHFB. In Ultrahochfester Beton; Bauwerk Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2003; pp. 183–198. [Google Scholar]
  40. Del Zoppo, M.; Di Ludovico, M.; Balsamo, A.; Prota, A. Comparative analysis of existing RC columns jacketed with CFRP or FRCC. Polymers 2018, 10, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Del Vecchio, C.; Di Ludovico, M.; Balsamo, A.; Prota, A.; Cosenza, E. Experimental response and fiber-reinforced cement composites strengthening of real reinforced concrete columns with poor-quality concrete. Struct. Concr. 2019, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Del Zoppo, M.; Di Ludovico, M.; Balsamo, A.; Prota, A. Response of RC columns strengthened with composite materials. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen, Q. Influence of High Temperature in Explosive Spalling Behavior and Mechanical Properties of Reactive Powder Concrete. Master Thesis, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sun, B.; Lin, Z. Investigation on spalling resistance of ultra-high-strength concrete under rapid heating and rapid cooling. Case Stud. Const. Mater. 2016, 4, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  45. Peng, G.F. Effect of steel fiber on explosive spalling and permeability of high performance concrete after exposure to high temperature. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Concrete under Severe Conditions (Environment and Loading), Merida Yucatan, Mexico, 7–9 June 2010; pp. 1029–1035. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen, B. Residual strength of hybrid fiber reinforced high-strength concrete after exposure to high temperature. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 1065–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Qin, X.L. Experimental research of compressive strength of reactive powder concrete with steel fiber at elevated temperature. New Build. Mater. 2015, 42, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu, H.B.; Li, K.L.; Ju, Y.; Wang, H.J.; Tian, K.P.; Wei, S. Explosive spalling of steel fiber reinforced reactive powder concrete subject to high temperature. Concrete. 2010, 8, 6–8. [Google Scholar]
  49. Klingsch, E.W.; Frangi, A.; Fontana, M. High-And Ultrahigh Performance Concrete: A Systematic Experimental Analysis on Spalling; ACI Special Publication, American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2011; Volume 9, pp. 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  50. GB/T 50081—2002, Standard for test method of mechanical properties on ordinary concrete. Chinese National Standard: Beijing, China, 2003.
  51. RILEM, FMC1. Determination of the Fracture Energy of Mortar and Concrete by Means of Three-Point Bend Tests on Notched Beams, RILEM Technical Recommendations for the Testing and Use of Construction Materials; E and FN SPON: London, UK, 1994; pp. 99–101. [Google Scholar]
  52. Peng, G.F.; Yang, W.W.; Zhao, J. Explosive spalling and residual mechanical properties of fiber-toughened high-performance concrete subjected to high temperatures. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 723–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mastali, M.; Dalvand, A.; Sattarifard, A.R. Development of eco-efficient and cost-effective self-consolidation concretes reinforced with hybrid industrial/recycled steel fibers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 166, 214–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yazıcı, S.; Arel, H.S. The effect of steel fiber on the bond between concrete and deformed steel bar in SFRCs. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 40, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yazıcı, S.; Inan, G.; Tabak, V. Effect of aspect ratio and volume fraction of steel fiber on the mechanical properties of SFRC. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 1250–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sahin, Y.; Köksal, F. The influences of matrix and steel fibre tensile strengths on the fracture energy of high-strength concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 1801–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mastali, M.; Dalvand, A.; Sattarifard, A.R.; Abdollahnejad, Z.; Illilainen, M. Characterization and optimization of hardened properties of self-consolidating concrete incorporating recycled steel, industrial steel, polypropylene and hybrid fibers. Compos. Part B. 2018, 151, 186–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aiello, M.A.; Leuzzi, F.; Centonze, G.; Maffezzoli, A. Use of steel fibers recovered from waste tires as reinforcement in concrete: Pull-out behavior, compressive and flexural strength. Waste Manag. 2009, 29, 960–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Guo, Y.C.; Zhang, J.H.; Chen, G.M.; Chen, G.M.; Xie, Z.H. Compressive behavior of concrete structures incorporating recycled concrete aggregates, rubber crumb and reinforced with steel fiber, subjected to elevated temperatures. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 72, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Peng, G.F.; Yang, J.; Shi, Y.X.; Niu, X.J.; Zhao, Y.L.; Shang, Y.J. Explosive spalling resistance of ultra-high performance concrete. J. Build. Mater. 2017, 20, 229–233, 238. [Google Scholar]
Materials 12 00783 g001 550
Figure 1. Steel fibers in this investigation: (a) Steel fiber (SF)1; (b) SF2; (c) SF3; (d) recycled steel fiber (RSF); (e) recycled steel fiber with rubber (RSFR).
Figure 1. Steel fibers in this investigation: (a) Steel fiber (SF)1; (b) SF2; (c) SF3; (d) recycled steel fiber (RSF); (e) recycled steel fiber with rubber (RSFR).
Materials 12 00783 g001
Materials 12 00783 g002 550
Figure 2. Configuration of three-point bending notched beam specimen.
Figure 2. Configuration of three-point bending notched beam specimen.
Materials 12 00783 g002
Materials 12 00783 g003 550
Figure 3. Heating setup for the explosive spalling test. (a) Front view; (b) lateral view.
Figure 3. Heating setup for the explosive spalling test. (a) Front view; (b) lateral view.
Materials 12 00783 g003
Materials 12 00783 g004 550
Figure 4. Compressive strengths, splitting tensile strengths, and fracture energies of UHPCs with various steel fibers and plain UHPC.
Figure 4. Compressive strengths, splitting tensile strengths, and fracture energies of UHPCs with various steel fibers and plain UHPC.
Materials 12 00783 g004
Materials 12 00783 g005 550
Figure 5. Morphology of steel fibers on the fracture surfaces of specimens after fracture energy testing. (a) SF1; (b) SF2; (c) SF3; (d) RSF; (e) RSFR.
Figure 5. Morphology of steel fibers on the fracture surfaces of specimens after fracture energy testing. (a) SF1; (b) SF2; (c) SF3; (d) RSF; (e) RSFR.
Materials 12 00783 g005
Materials 12 00783 g006 550
Figure 6. Ruptured and pulled-out steel fibers on a fracture surface observed by an optical microscope after fracture energy testing.
Figure 6. Ruptured and pulled-out steel fibers on a fracture surface observed by an optical microscope after fracture energy testing.
Materials 12 00783 g006
Materials 12 00783 g007 550
Figure 7. Percentage decrease of the diameter of steel fibers during fracture energy testing.
Figure 7. Percentage decrease of the diameter of steel fibers during fracture energy testing.
Materials 12 00783 g007
Materials 12 00783 g008 550
Figure 8. Load–deflection curves of various steel fiber-reinforced UHPC and plain UHPC during fracture energy testing.
Figure 8. Load–deflection curves of various steel fiber-reinforced UHPC and plain UHPC during fracture energy testing.
Materials 12 00783 g008
Materials 12 00783 g009 550
Figure 9. Rubber particles reserved in fiber holes on a fracture surface of a notched specimen after fracture energy testing.
Figure 9. Rubber particles reserved in fiber holes on a fracture surface of a notched specimen after fracture energy testing.
Materials 12 00783 g009
Materials 12 00783 g010 550
Figure 10. Elastic modulus of UHPC with various steel fibers and plain UHPC.
Figure 10. Elastic modulus of UHPC with various steel fibers and plain UHPC.
Materials 12 00783 g010
Materials 12 00783 g011 550
Figure 11. Temperature–time curves of all UHPC types during explosive spalling.
Figure 11. Temperature–time curves of all UHPC types during explosive spalling.
Materials 12 00783 g011
Materials 12 00783 g012 550
Figure 12. Morphology of UHSC with various steel fibers after subjected to a temperature of 800 °C. (a) Plain/UHPC; (b) SF1/UHPC; (c) SF2/UHPC; (d) SF3/UHPC; (e) RSF/UHPC; (f) RSFR/UHPC.
Figure 12. Morphology of UHSC with various steel fibers after subjected to a temperature of 800 °C. (a) Plain/UHPC; (b) SF1/UHPC; (c) SF2/UHPC; (d) SF3/UHPC; (e) RSF/UHPC; (f) RSFR/UHPC.
Materials 12 00783 g012
Materials 12 00783 g013 550
Figure 13. Particle size distribution of all types of specimens exposed to a temperature of 800 °C.
Figure 13. Particle size distribution of all types of specimens exposed to a temperature of 800 °C.
Materials 12 00783 g013
Materials 12 00783 g014 550
Figure 14. Observations of the interface zones between steel fibers and concrete matrix which specimens encountered no spalling by an optical microscope. (a) SF1; (b) SF2; (c) SF3; (d) RSF; (e) RSFR.
Figure 14. Observations of the interface zones between steel fibers and concrete matrix which specimens encountered no spalling by an optical microscope. (a) SF1; (b) SF2; (c) SF3; (d) RSF; (e) RSFR.
Materials 12 00783 g014
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of steel fibers.
Table 1. Characteristics of steel fibers.
TypeIndustrial Steel FibersRecycled Steel Fibers1
SF1SF2SF3RSFRSFR
ShapeHooked-endHooked-endHooked-endCorrugatedCorrugated
Nominal length (mm)3535304040
Nominal diameter (mm)0.551111.1
Aspect ratio6435304040
Tensile strength (MPa)11009001800–2000>12501800–2000
1 Recycled steel fiber to which rubber was attached (RSFR), was treated by a high-temperature processing technique at approximately 450 °C to dispose of the rubber. Then, the recycled steel fiber with carbon black attached (RSF) was obtained and exhibited a lower tensile strength than RSFR.
Table
Table 2. Mix proportions of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) (kg/m3).
Table 2. Mix proportions of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) (kg/m3).
TypeW/BBindersArtificial SandCoarse AggregateSteel FiberSuper-Plasticizer
CSF*TypeContent
Plain/UHPC0.1881090620930—07.2
SF1/UHPC0.1881090620930SF13010.8
SF2/UHPC0.1881090620930SF23010.8
SF3/UHPC0.1881090620930SF33010.8
RSF/UHPC0.1881090620930RSF3012.6
RSFR/UHPC0.1881090620930RSFR3013.5
SF*, silica fume.
Table
Table 3. Number of ruptured or pulled-out steel fibers on a surface of beam specimen during fracture energy testing.
Table 3. Number of ruptured or pulled-out steel fibers on a surface of beam specimen during fracture energy testing.
Fiber SF1SF2SF3RSFRSFR
Ruptured fiber4926101310
Pulled-out fiber4010172022
Table
Table 4. Occurrence of explosive spalling of all UHSC types exposed to high temperature.
Table 4. Occurrence of explosive spalling of all UHSC types exposed to high temperature.
TypePlain/UHPCSF1/UHPCSF2/UHPCSF3/UHPCRSF/UHPCRSFR/UHPC
Number of spalled specimens6(6)13(6)5(6)5(6)3(6)3(6)
Average spalling depth (mm)921282762736
1 The data inside the brackets indicate the amount of the total specimens for each condition. The data outside the brackets indicate the number of specimens that encountered explosive spalling.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Peng, G.-F.; Shui, G.-S.; Zhang, G. Mechanical Properties and Anti-Spalling Behavior of Ultra-High Performance Concrete with Recycled and Industrial Steel Fibers. Materials 2019, 12, 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050783

AMA Style

Yang J, Peng G-F, Shui G-S, Zhang G. Mechanical Properties and Anti-Spalling Behavior of Ultra-High Performance Concrete with Recycled and Industrial Steel Fibers. Materials. 2019; 12(5):783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050783

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Juan, Gai-Fei Peng, Guo-Shuang Shui, and Gui Zhang. 2019. "Mechanical Properties and Anti-Spalling Behavior of Ultra-High Performance Concrete with Recycled and Industrial Steel Fibers" Materials 12, no. 5: 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050783

APA Style

Yang, J., Peng, G. -F., Shui, G. -S., & Zhang, G. (2019). Mechanical Properties and Anti-Spalling Behavior of Ultra-High Performance Concrete with Recycled and Industrial Steel Fibers. Materials, 12(5), 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050783

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop