Next Article in Journal
Effect of Microimplant Neck Design with and without Microthread on Pullout Strength and Destruction Volume
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of Room Temperature Ethanol Sensing by Optimizing the Density of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanofibers Decorated with Gold Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of A-Site Cation Deficiency on Charge Transport in La0.5−xSr0.5FeO3−δ
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 20
10.3390/ma14205989
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Carbon Electrodes in Perovskite Photovoltaics

by
Preawpun Pradid
1,
Kanyanee Sanglee
2,
Non Thongprong
1 and
Surawut Chuangchote
3,4,*
1
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Graduate Program, King Mongkut’s University of Thonburi (KMUTT), 126 Prachauthit Road, Bangmod, Thungkru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
2
Solar Photovoltaic Research Team (SPVT), National Energy Technology Center (ENTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 114 Thailand Science Park, Phahonyothin Road, Khlong Luang 12120, Thailand
3
Department of Tool and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), 126 Prachauthit Road, Bangmod, Thungkru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
4
Research Center of Advanced Materials for Energy and Environmental Technology (MEET), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), 126 Prachauthit Road, Bangmod, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(20), 5989; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14205989
Submission received: 14 August 2021 / Revised: 3 October 2021 / Accepted: 7 October 2021 / Published: 12 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon-Based Electronic Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
High-performance lab-scale perovskite solar cells often have a precious metal as the top electrode. However, there are drawbacks to using metal top electrodes on a large scale, such as inducing degradation processes, requiring a high-temperature deposition process under vacuum, and having low scalability. Recently many studies have shown the potentials of using a carbon electrode because of its conductivity, flexibility, low cost, and ease of fabrication. This review article presents an overview of using carbon materials to replace the top electrode in perovskite photovoltaics. We discuss various fabrication techniques, various carbon-based device structures, and the advantages of using carbon materials. A collection of research works on device performance, large-scale fabrication, and device stability is presented. As a result, this review offers insight into the future of large-scale flexible solar cells.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Using solar cells to convert sunlight into electricity provides various benefits, including sustainability, reducing pollution, and being environmentally friendly. However, compared with other types of renewable energy, energy production using silicon solar cells, which are the most commonly available nowadays, is still relatively expensive. As a result, photovoltaic research for less expensive solar energy is currently ongoing. Recently, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have emerged as the next generation of solar cells because of their high energy conversion efficiency and low production cost [1].
Perovskite crystals can be entirely inorganic or hybrid organic-inorganic compounds. The chemical formula for perovskite is ABX3; where the A site contains a cation, such as formamidinium ion (HC(CH2)2+ or FA), methylammonium ion (CH3NH3+ or MA), cesium ion (Cs+), and their mixture; the B site contains a divalent metal cation (e.g., Pb2+, Sn2+); and the X site is a halide anion (e.g., I−, Br−, Cl−) [2]. Some outstanding properties of perovskite include high light absorption coefficient, tunable bandgaps through compositional control, and low exciton binding energy [3].
In under a decade, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of perovskite solar cells has risen from a single digit to over 20%. The photovoltaic function of perovskite was first discovered in a liquid electrolyte sensitizer photovoltaic cell containing CH3NH3PbI3 nanocrystalline sensitizer on TiO2 mesoporous substrate with the PCE of 3.8% in 2009 [4]. In 2013, Henry J. Snaith reported the emergence of new solid-phase perovskite solar cell structures that marks the new era for low-cost, high-efficiency solar cells [5]. To date, the highest certified PCE of perovskite solar cells is at 25.5%, according to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) chart [6]. From the chart, the efficiency of perovskite solar cells is still in an upward trend, which has piqued the interest of both the research community and the business sector.
Typical planar perovskite solar cell structures consist of five layers, which are a perovskite light-absorbing layer, an electron transporting layer (ETL), a hole transporting layer (HTL), cathode, and anode electrodes, as shown in Figure 1. The bottom electrode is usually a glass or plastic substrate coated with transparent conducting oxide (TCO). The ETL is a metal oxide semiconductor such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), tin dioxide (SnO2), or zinc oxide (ZnO) [7,8,9]. Poly[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine] (PTAA), copper thiocyanate (CuSCN), 2,2′,7,7′-Tetrakis[N,N-di(4-methoxyphenyl)amino]-9,9’-spirobifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD) are common HTL materials [10,11]. Metallic electrodes, such as gold (Au), silver (Ag), and aluminum (Al), are used for the top electrode and are prepared using a thermal evaporation process.
However, because of the high cost of precious metals and their interaction with the HTL layer that speeds up perovskite solar cell degradation [12], utilizing Au and Ag for the top electrode may not be the ideal choice for large-scale perovskite solar cell production. For Al, its electrodes are used in only planar (p–i–n) structures (Figure 1). As a result, one of the primary goals of perovskite solar cell research is to find alternatively low-cost materials for the top electrode, which can be used in several structures of perovskite solar cells.
Unique mechanical and electrical properties of carbon materials have piqued researchers’ interest in many fields, including supercapacitors [13], photovoltaics [14], sensors [15], conductive ink [16,17], lithium-ion batteries [18], and redox flow batteries [19]. Carbon nanotube ink’s potential, according to Ryan P. Tortorich et al., includes flexible and transparent printable electrodes due to low surface tension and the ability to be printed on various substrates, including paper, glass, and flexible substrates [20]. These carbon applications coincide with the advancements of perovskite solar cells, making carbon materials promising field additives.
Replacing the metallic electrode with carbon-based materials has gained much attention recently, owing to their chemical stability, being abundant, low preparation cost, good electrical conductivity, and hydrophobic properties [21,22]. Several techniques, such as screen printing, doctor blade, and spray, can be used to make a conductive electrode from solution-based carbon, and they offer more advantages over high-temperature thermal evaporation approaches. A carbon material with a work function of 5.0 eV has been demonstrated to be a suitable replacement for the Au electrode, with a work function of 5.1 eV [23]. Commercial carbon materials in a variety of forms, including carbon paste, carbon black, carbon ink, graphite, graphene, and others, have been successfully applied to perovskite solar cells [24,25,26]. According to a recent article [27], an ecologically friendly perovskite solar cell using bio-carbon electrodes prepared by carbonizing biomass can have a PCE as high as 12.82 percent. Using carbon materials for the back contact is also promising for flexible photovoltaics and wearable electronic applications [28,29].
In this review, the use of carbon-composite materials in perovskite solar cells, focusing on electrode applications, is discussed. In Section 2, the structures of carbon electrode-based devices, as well as their benefits for increasing efficiency, long-term stability, and lowering environmental impact, are reviewed. Section 3 summarizes various carbon fabrication techniques, as well as their corresponding device structures and performance. Section 4 summarizes large-scale perovskite solar cell developments, especially in the stability and efficiency perspectives. Finally, in Section 5, this review is concluded, and some outlooks on the future of perovskite photovoltaics with carbon layers are provided.

2. Features of Carbon Electrodes in Perovskite Photovoltaics

2.1. Structure of Carbon Electrode-Based Perovskite Photovoltaics

Carbon can be found in natural allotropes (such as diamond and graphite) as well as other synthesized forms such as fullerenes, carbon nanotubes, graphene, and carbon black [30]. Two-dimensional carbon allotropes can have an extended network of sp2 hybridized structures like in Graphite [31] or a very large polyaromatic hydrocarbon [32]. Graphite absorbs a broad spectrum of wavelengths, from deep ultraviolet to radio frequencies [33]. For diamond, the sp3 tetrahedral structure results in hardness, low electrical conductivity, and optical transparency in visible wavelengths. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are one-dimensional rolled-up graphene sheets with high thermal and electrical conductivity, low thermal expansion, and high flexibility [34].
Carbon materials have properties suitable for use as electrodes in perovskite solar cells, such as electron transfer surface coverage, absorption, and conductivity. Carbon paste made from carbon composites and conducting polymers can be used to fabricate carbon electrodes. This approach is more practical and cost-effective than metal electrode deposition under vacuum using an e-beam evaporator [35] or thermal evaporation [36], both of which have limited scalability. Huiyin Zhang et al. compared perovskite solar cells with the structure of FTO/TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/electrode but different top electrodes [37]. The results showed that carbon electrodes prepared by doctor blade techniques result in PCE values as high as 19.2%, comparable to the devices with evaporated Au electrodes with a PCE of 20%. In addition, the device made of carbon electrodes has significantly improved long-term stability. After 1000 h of storage in an ambient atmosphere, it retained almost 95% of its initial efficiency (where the one made of Au electrodes showed the PCE of 84% of its initial efficiency). Furthermore, after 80 h aging at maximum power point under illumination and in a nitrogen atmosphere, the Au-made one faster degraded (retained around only 22% of its initial efficiency) than carbon-based cells, which could retain about 94% of its initial performance [37]. In comparison with vacuum evaporated metal electrodes, the macroporous carbon electrode has excellent interface contact, high efficiency, and better stability. Carbon materials have also been applied to supercapacitors, batteries, and electrodes because of the higher surface area with lower matrix resistivity at an acceptable cost [24,25,26].
Replacing the top metal electrode with carbon using fabrication techniques, such as dip coating, doctor blade, spray, screen printing, and inkjet printing, can result in reasonable photovoltaic performances. For example, in a work by Mario Alejandro Mejia Escobar et al. [6] hybrid perovskite solar cells with a structure of FTO/c-TiO2 (20 nm)/n-ZrO2 (25 nm)/Perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag (120 nm) show PCE values up to 16.13%. This work used thermal evaporation for the top silver electrode and spin coating for the other layers. Compared with the work of Camellia Raminafshar et al. [38], devices with a similar structure (FTO/mp-TiO2/mp-ZrO2/Perovskite/Carbon) show device efficiencies of up to 9.5% in ambient conditions with 20–30% humidity and no encapsulation. One benefit of the carbon electrode, according to the research, is its hydrophobicity. However, the study of layer thickness effects in this work suggested optimal thicknesses of the carbon electrode, mp-TiO2, and mp-ZrO2 as 25 μm, 400 nm, and 1.7 μm, respectively.
Carbon nanotube-based hole transporting material and hole contact are exciting options for stable perovskite solar cells [39]. Namyoung Ahn et al. demonstrated that by combining encapsulation and carbon sandwiched perovskite solar cells (ITO/C60/MAPbI3/P3HT/CNT), the cost of the device can be reduced by 5.5% while maintaining stability for up to 2200 h under the sun [40]. Another example is the work of Kerttu Aitola et al., who reported on the HTL layer using a mixed single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) and drop-cast Spiro-OMeTAD composite [41]. While devices with an Au contact have a PCE of around 18%, the SWCNT device has PCE values up to 15.0%. However, the Au-based device shows exponential degradation at an elevated temperature of 60 °C, with a 20% loss of the PCE in the first 8 h. Evidently, Au ion migration is the reason for the rapid loss of performance. Conversely, the SWCNT device demonstrated a slow decay, estimated using a linear function with a -0.005% h-1 slope, assuming this trend continues.

2.2. Benefits of Carbon Electrodes in Perovskite Photovoltaics

Aside from the practicality and low cost of carbon materials, there are many other advantages to using them in perovskite solar cells. Using different forms of carbon as additives to each layer offers different benefits, as summarized in the review article by Ferguson et al. [42]. Quantum dots made of carbon and graphene, for example, improve the thermal stability of transporting layers. Carbon nanotubes improve electrical conductivity significantly. Further, the mechanical stability of free-standing graphene could be the future of flexible perovskite solar cells.
Graphene’s high electrical conductivity and light transmittance make it an excellent material for flexible electrodes. Peng You et al. demonstrate the fabrication of graphene electrodes in semitransparent perovskite solar cells using a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method, resulting in PEDOT-doped two-layer graphene: PSS layer with a sheet resistance of 140 ± 35 sq−1 and visible transmittance of over 90%. Adding a stack of 1 to 4 layers of graphene electrodes causes the sheet resistance and transmittance to drop. By optimizing the number of graphene layers, they found that devices with two layers of graphene bring about the highest PCE of 12.02% ± 0.32%. However, because of imperfections in the graphene layers and increased surface roughness, efficiencies of devices with 3 or 4 layers of graphene electrodes decrease. This research suggests that CVD graphene is an excellent candidate for flexible and transparent electrodes in perovskite solar cells. Furthermore, the free-standing, 2D form of graphene has also proven to be an intriguing route for flexible transparent electrodes in perovskite solar cell research. A single layer of the material is stable in air and has ~97% visible light transmission, which offers great potential for further development [43]. Another critical benefit of graphene is that solution-based graphene can be used in scalable processes for low-cost printable electronics [44].
Habisreutinger et al. reported charge transfer properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in extracting photo-generated holes in perovskite devices [34]. According to the paper, CNTs can perform a variety of purposes, including additive and interface modifiers, as well as hole-transporting systems and charge-selective layers. CNT inherent robustness, stability, outstanding charge transport properties, and intrinsic mechanical flexibility appear to be significant advantages over other materials. CNT-based devices could become a highly preferable option for high-performance, long-term stable devices if their PCEs improve further. CNT morphology can also provide advantages in structural properties and high porosity, which have already been shown to be key factors in supercapacitors [26]. A.G. Pandolfo reported that a variety of porous forms of carbon are currently more favorable than metal electrodes because of their extremely high surface areas, relatively high electronic conductivity, and acceptable costs [26].
Combining different allotropes of carbon to maximize device performance and stability is also a fascinating route, as suggested by Rui He et al. [22] Carbon materials’ excellent properties could improve perovskite solar cell lifetime, stability, and performance when multiple different layers of carbon are applied. Hydrophobic 0D to 3D carbon materials can also protect the perovskite layer from moisture and degradation caused by high temperatures. At high operating temperatures, PCE loss can be attributed to perovskite deterioration. High moisture levels are still an issue because water molecules can be absorbed by perovskite precursor materials, changing their properties, causing poor stability and degradation. The water-soluble MA iodide degrades the perovskite crystal structure, resulting in a lower PCE after outdoor exposure. Because of superior water resistance or hydrophobicity of carbon, carbon material can improve stability in high humidity and high temperature (Figure 2). In this sense, Wei et al. compared perovskite solar cells with Au electrodes to carbon electrodes and found that carbon film can offer good flexibility and conductivity, while thicker carbon film can cover and protect CH3NH3PbI3 film from high humidity [45].

3. Fabrication Methods for Carbon Electrodes in Perovskite Photovoltaics and Their Performances

In this section, different carbon electrode fabrication techniques in perovskite solar cells (Figure 3), as well as different types of carbon materials, device structures, and efficiency parameters, have been reviewed. Table 1 summarizes the findings from the literature.
Different types of carbon and fabrication techniques produce different levels of device performance, as shown in Table 1, but carbon nanotube films from drop-casting appear to have the highest PCE with an n–i–p mesoporous structure, at 17.58% [62]. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes have high electrical conductivity and, due to their hydrophobicity, form a good interface with the CuSCN layer, resulting in improved perovskite solar cell stability. The well-forming interface between CuSCN and CNTs at the contact also results in a flat and smooth interface between the perovskite and CuSCN. Although the drop-casting method is simple to use, customizing the thickness can be difficult. Inkjet printing techniques allow us to design the carbon electrode more precisely and controllably [65]. However, the contact between the perovskite layer and carbon is not very well-formed, as evidenced by large pinholes being visible at the interface. Chemically engineering carbon ink is one way to solve the problem. According to the findings, adding CH3NH3CI to carbon ink can boost efficiency from 8.51%to 11.60% [65].
Il Jeon et al. [57] showed flexible inverted perovskite solar cells with transparent carbon electrodes made of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) or graphene at the bottom as well as a comparison of ITO glass and polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) substrates. It can be seen that the structure ITO/graphene/MoO3(2 nm)/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/ BCP/Al/LiFgraphene had a PCE of 14.20% compared with 12.80% for single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs). When fabricated on PEN, the PCE of graphene-based and SWSNT-based solar cells were 13.30% and 11.00% respectively. It can be seen that the PCE of graphene is higher than that of the SWNTs because the graphene film has a higher transmittance and flatter surface. It can be seen that the PCE of graphene is higher than that of the SWNTs because the graphene film has a higher transmittance and flatter surface. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) demonstrating that the average roughness value of the SWNT films was much higher (Ra = 15.1 nm) than that of the graphene films (Ra = 3.5 nm). It can be seen that graphene has a smoother surface than SWNTs. The higher JSC is due to the intrinsically high transmittance of single-layered graphene compared with SWTN-based perovskite solar cells.

4. Substrates, Stabilities, and Performances of Large-Area Perovskite Photovoltaics Made of Carbon Electrodes

We commonly know that highly efficient perovskite solar cells are achieved in the laboratory with small active areas (~0.05–1.0 cm2) so up-scaling film fabrication to market photovoltaic panels is necessary for the next-generation photovoltaic technology. A layer-by-layer deposition is still a required method for making large-scale devices (Figure 4). However, the production of uniform films with no pinholes, matching the interface layers in the cells, and ensuring durability are difficult. For large-scale panel production, deposition of metal electrodes in a vacuum environment is also challenging. We discuss the use of carbon electrodes in perovskite solar cells with more realistic sizes in this section.
For mass production of carbon-based perovskite solar cells, printing technologies appear to be the industrial solutions. Printing techniques have several advantages, including the ability to apply to flexible materials and being low cost. However, printing a perovskite solar cell does not guarantee a high photovoltaic function on a large scale. In Table 2, the photovoltaic performances of various large-scale perovskite solar cells with different substrates and device structures in the literature are summarized. Some remarks on the information in the table as follows are given.
Carbon-based electrodes still have been potentially applied in perovskite solar cells due to their low cost and compatibility with up-scaling processes, indicating their great mass-production potential. Carbon material characteristics are also responsible for perovskite layer protection. In comparison to metal materials, carbon is hydrophobic and does not corrode in high humidity.
Carbon-based perovskite solar cells have promisingly low fabrication costs. For example, colloidal graphite carbon paste (PELCO©) was used in the research of Sawanta S. Mali et al., [70] which is available in the market for about 14.50 USD/25 g (estimated from the commercial price on the website). It can be seen that the price of carbon-based electrodes is 3 times lower compared with the prices of metal-based electrodes.
In the viewpoint of substrates of perovskite solar cells, large-scaled cells are conventionally produced on transparent conducting oxide (TCO)-coated glasses. The conductive glass material is heavy and has no flexibility, causing its ease to break. Anyway, now solar cells have a variety of applications on various material substrates. For example, flexible plastics or even papers (bendable materials) can be used as alternative substrates. It can be seen that flexible materials have begun to be used in the production of perovskite solar cells to alleviate weight issues, be easy to produce, reduce the problem of breakage when we produce solar cells in large-scale materials, and be able to use in a variety of tasks.
In terms of stability, perovskite solar cells made of carbon electrodes on glass substrates were stable for more than 160 days in the test at room temperature under an open atmosphere with a PCE of 13.4% (Figure 5) [70]. The carbon layer was shown to be beneficial in terms of waterproofing and air stability. Table 2 also shows whether perovskite solar cells made of carbon electrodes on flexible materials or papers have moisture resistance.
In terms of performance, it can be seen that device on flexible material such as PET foil has a PCE of up to 15.18% (Figure 6) [74].
Duraisamy Selvakumar et al. [28] demonstrated that incorporation of boron into reduced graphene oxide (B-rGO) to be used for the hole transport material (HTM) of the devices on FTO paper could improve conductivity and mobility (Figure 7). They found that their FTO/TiO2/CH3NH3/PbI3/B-rGO/FTO sandwich structure with an active area of 1 cm2 performed better for flexible solar devices, showing the highest PCE value of 8.96%.
Yue Hu et al. demonstrated large-area perovskite solar cell fabrication on FTO glass substrates, which could be used in industrial applications [67]. They used screen printing to deposit all the layers, including the top electrode, which is made of graphite and carbon. According to the paper, the thickness alignment of the triple mesoscopic layer was optimized to achieve a PCE of 14.02% for a single cell under illumination intensity of 100 mW/cm2. They further developed a 10 serially connected cells module (10 × 10 cm2) with an active area of 49 cm2 that shows a PCE of 10.4%. They also conducted multiple stability tests, including 1000 h under light soaking, one month in an outdoor setting, and over a year of shelf-life stability.
Amba Bashir et al. developed large-scale carbon-based perovskite solar cells by incorporating screen-printed carbon and a p-type inorganic interlayer of spinel cobaltite oxides (Co3O4) [69]. The carbon and Co3O4 layers serve the purposes of repelling moisture and suppressing charge recombination, respectively. These approaches improve energy level matching, efficiency, and stability, resulting in an efficiency of 13.27%, up from 11.25% in a standard carbon-based perovskite solar cell, and a cell that is stable for 2500 h under ambient conditions. They also created a monolithic perovskite module with a 70 cm2 active area and a PCE of over 11%.
Using carbon as the HTL was also shown by Sawanta S. Mali et al. [70]. They modified commercially available carbon ink with methylammonium lead iodide (MAI) and used a doctor blade technique to fabricate perovskite solar cells having a device configuration Glass/FTO/mp-TiO2/MAPbI3-xClx/carbon + MAI/Carbon. An optimized device can sustain the PCE for 160 days in ambient air and showed a PCE of 13.04% for a large area device (1.1 cm2).
Many studies, according to Table 2, used carbon electrodes in an HTL-free perovskite solar cell configuration. Zhiyong Liu et al., for example, used a modified two-step approach for CH3NH3PbI3 nanocrystalline deposition under high humidity and a printed carbon counter electrode to create HTL-free devices without encapsulation [71]. The device exhibited superior stability in the air in the dark (temperature ~20 °C, humidity ~20%) with a PCE of 6.21% for over 2000 h.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

In order to overcome the limitations of metal electrodes used in perovskite solar cells, such as high-temperature and vacuum processes, humidity sensitivity, poor scalability, and price, carbon is a promising alternative. Carbon materials have many advantages over metal electrodes, including eco-friendliness, flexibility, hydrophobicity, high surface area, and porosity. Because carbon is hydrophobic, using it as the HTL and the top electrode can protect the device from moisture, resulting in an air-stable solar cell even without encapsulation. These properties pave the way for a wide range of future applications, including flexible air-stable solar panels that can be attached to a variety of surfaces at a lower cost. Wearable electronics and indoor photovoltaics are also catching on in terms of technological advancement. Carbon materials are also appealing commercially because of their lower cost and impressive performance.
Future carbon materials research for perovskite solar cells may include synthesizing less expensive carbon materials and investigating the potential of carbon nanoparticles. Typically, powdered carbon is used to create a solution prior to use in many research works. We can change the properties of the resulting film by synthesizing nanoparticles of various sizes and types as powders or as precursor solutions.
In the present review paper, we discuss the advantages of replacing metal electrodes and HTL materials with carbon materials. We go over various carbon-film fabrication techniques as well as device structures. The advantages of using carbon materials, such as superior optical, electrical, and mechanical properties, have positive effects on the perovskite solar cell lifetime, stability, and performance. We can achieve long-term stability, good flexibility, and high performance in carbon-based perovskite solar cells, according to the research we compiled in this work. Another advantage of carbon is the availability of a variety of low-temperature, low-cost, large-scale fabrication techniques. Several studies have successfully demonstrated how to fabricate a large-scale flexible substrate from carbon materials using inkjet printing, screen printing, and roll-to-roll printing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C. writing—original draft preparation, P.P.; writing—review and editing, N.T. and K.S.; visualization, K.S., N.T., and S.C.; supervision and funding acquisition, S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Co-Research Strengthening Project of the Faculty of Engineering and Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable.

Acknowledgments

P.P. acknowledges Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Graduate Program, King Mongkut’s University of Thonburi (KMUTT) for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Loi, M.A.; Hummelen, J.C. Perovskites under the Sun. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 1087–1089. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Saliba, M.; Matsui, T.; Seo, J.Y.; Domanski, K.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Tress, W.; Abate, A.; Hagfeldtd, A.; et al. Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: Improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1989–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wehrenfennig, C.; Eperon, G.E.; Johnston, M.B.; Snaith, H.J.; Herz, L.M. High charge carrier mobilities and lifetimes in organolead trihalide perovskites. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1584–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Snaith, H.J. Perovskites: The emergence of a new era for low-cost, high-efficiency solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 3623–3630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/best-research-cell-efficiencies.20200104.pdf (accessed on 31 March 2021).
  7. Azmi, R.; Hwang, S.; Yin, W.; Kim, T.W.; Ahn, T.K.; Jang, S.Y. High efficiency low-temperature processed perovskite solar cells integrated with alkali metal doped ZnO electron transport layers. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 1241–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Su, H.; Xiao, J.; Li, Q.; Peng, C.; Zhang, X.; Mao, C.; Yao, Q.; Lu, Y.; Ku, Z.; Zhong, J.; et al. Carbon film electrode based square-centimeter scale planar perovskite solar cells exceeding 17% efficiency. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020, 107, 104809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bai, S.H.; Cheng, N.A.; Yu, Z.H.; Liu, P.; Wang, C.L.; Zhao, X.Z. Cubic: Column composite structure (NH2CH=NH2)x(CH3NH3)1-xPbI3 for efficient hole-transport material-free and insulation. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 190, 775–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, Q.; Wu, R.; Zhang, Z.; Xiong, J.; He, Z.; Fan, B.; Dai, Z.; Yang, B.; Xue, X.; Cai, P.; et al. Achieving efficient inverted planar perovskite solar cells with nondoped PTAA as a hole transport layer. Org. Electron. 2019, 71, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Y.; Hoang, M.T.; Yao, D.; Pham, N.D.; Tiong, V.T.; Wang, X.; Wang, H. Spiro-OMeTAD or CuSCN as a preferable hole transport material for carbon-based planar perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 12723–12734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, D.S.; Kim, W.; Cha, B.G.; Kwon, J.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, M.; Kim, J.; Wang, D.H.; Park, J.H. Self-position of Au NPs in perovskite solar cells: Optical and electrical contribution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Frackowiak, E. Carbon materials for supercapacitor application. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 1774–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kalita, G.; Adhikari, S.; Aryal, H.R.; Afre, R.; Soga, T.; Sharon, M.; Umeno, M. Functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with nitrogen plasma for photovoltaic device application. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2009, 9, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Raoof, J.B.; Ojani, R.; Baghayeri, M.; Amiri-Aref, M. Application of a glassy carbon electrode modified with functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a sensor device for simultaneous determination of acetaminophen and tyramine. Anal. Methods 2012, 4, 1579–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Phillips, C.; Al-Ahmadi, A.; Potts, S.J.; Claypole, T.; Deganello, D. The effect of graphite and carbon black ratios on conductive ink performance. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 9520–9530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ji, A.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, C. Inkjet printed flexible electronics on paper substrate with reduced graphene oxide/carbon black ink. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 13032–13042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, T.; Ran, F. Design Strategies of 3D Carbon-Based Electrodes for Charge/Ion Transport in Lithium Ion Battery and Sodium Ion Battery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2010041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, H.; Chen, N.; Sun, C.; Luo, X. Investigations on physicochemical properties and electrochemical performance of graphite felt and carbon felt for iron-chromium redox flow battery. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 3839–3853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tortorich, R.P.; Choi, J.W. Inkjet printing of carbon nanotubes. Nanomaterials 2013, 3, 453–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Hu, Z.; Hawash, Z.; Qiu, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ono, L.K.; Qi, Y. Highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells via modification of energy levels at the perovskite/carbon electrode interface. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1804284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, R.; Huang, X.; Chee, M.; Hao, F.; Dong, P. Carbon-based perovskite solar cells: From single-junction to modules. Carbon Energy 2019, 1, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chu, Q.-Q.; Ding, B.; Li, Y.; Gao, L.-L.; Qiu, Q.; Li, C.-X.; Li, C.-J.; Yang, G.-J.; Fang, B. Fast drying boosted performance improvement of low-temperature paintable carbon-based perovskite solar cell. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 9758–9765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Burchell, T.D. (Ed.) Carbon Materials for Advanced Technologies; Elsevier Science: Oxford, UK, 1999; p. 540. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pierson, H.O. Handbook of Carbon, Graphite, Diamonds and Fullerenes: Processing, Properties and Applications; William Andrew: Norwich, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pandolfo, A.G.; Hollenkamp, A.F. Carbon properties and their role in supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2006, 157, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gao, L.; Zhou, Y.; Meng, F.; Li, Y.; Liu, A.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Fan, M.; Wei, G.; Ma, T. Several economical and eco-friendly bio-carbon electrodes for highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Carbon 2020, 162, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Selvakumar, D.; Murugadoss, G.; Alsalme, A.; Alkathiri, A.M.; Jayavel, R. Heteroatom doped reduced graphene oxide paper for large area perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy 2018, 163, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Xu, W.; Kulkarni, S.A.; Batabyal, S.K.; Zhang, S.; Cao, A.; Wong, L.H. TiO2 nanotube arrays based flexible perovskite solar cells with transparent carbon nanotube electrode. Nano Energy 2015, 11, 728–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tiwari, S.K.; Kumar, V.; Huczko, A.; Oraon, R.; De Adhikari, A.; Nayak, G.C. Magical Allotropes of Carbon: Prospects and Applications. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2016, 41, 257–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hirsch, A. The era of carbon allotropes. Nat. Mater 2010, 9, 868–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, X.; Xue, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Xiao, Q.; Jiang, K.; Yip, H.L.; Yan, H.; Li, Z. Fluoranthene-based dopant-free hole transporting materials for efficient perovskite solar cells. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 2698–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Yang, L.; Yang, P.; Wang, J.; Hao, Y.; Li, Y.; Lin, H.; Zhao, X. Low-temperature preparation of crystallized graphite nanofibers for high performance perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy 2019, 193, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Habisreutinger, S.N.; Nicholas, R.J.; Snaith, H.J. Carbon nanotubes in perovskite solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1601839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Parida, B.; Singh, A.; Oh, M.; Jeon, M.; Kang, J.W.; Kim, H. Effect of compact TiO2 layer on structural, optical, and performance characteristics of mesoporous perovskite solar cells. Mater. Today Commun. 2019, 18, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, Y.; Nardes, A.M.; Zhu, K. Mesoporous perovskite solar cells: Material composition, charge-carrier dynamics, and device characteristics. Faraday Discuss. 2015, 176, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, H.; Xiao, J.; Shi, J.; Su, H.; Luo, Y.; Li, D.; Wu, H.; Chen, Y.-B.; Meng, Q. Self-adhesive macroporous carbon electrodes for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Raminafshar, C.; Dracopoulos, V.; Mohammadi, M.R.; Lianos, P. Carbon based perovskite solar cells constructed by screen-printed components. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 276, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aitola, K.; Domanski, K.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Sveinbjörnsson, K.; Saliba, M.; Abate, A.; Grätzel, M.; Kauppinen, E.; Johansson, E.M.J.; Tress, W.; et al. High temperature-stable perovskite solar cell based on low-cost carbon nanotube hole contact. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahn, N.; Jeon, I.; Yoon, J.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Matsuo, Y.; Maruyama, S.; Choi, M. Carbon-sandwiched perovskite solar cell. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 1382–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aitola, K.; Sveinbjörnsson, K.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Kaskela, A.; Abate, A.; Tian, Y.; Johansson, E.M.J.; Grätzel, M.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Hagfeldt, A.; et al. Carbon nanotube-based hybrid hole-transporting material and selective contact for high efficiency perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ferguson, V.; Silva, S.R.P.; Zhang, W. Carbon materials in perovskite solar cells: Prospects and future challenges. Energy Environ. Mater. 2019, 2, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Liu, Z.; You, P.; Xie, C.; Tang, G.; Yan, F. Ultrathin and flexible perovskite solar cells with graphene transparent electrodes. Nano Energy 2016, 28, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bouclé, J.; Herlin-Boime, N. The benefits of graphene for hybrid perovskite solar cells. Synth. Met. 2016, 222, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wei, H.; Xiao, J.; Yang, Y.; Lv, S.; Shi, J.; Xu, X.; Dong, J.; Luo, Y.; Li, D.; Meng, Q. Free-standing flexible carbon electrode for highly efficient hole-conductor-free perovskite solar cells. Carbon 2015, 93, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhou, H.; Shi, Y.; Dong, Q.; Zhang, H.; Xing, Y.; Wang, K.; Du, Y.; Ma, T. Hole-conductor-free, metal-electrode-free TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3 heterojunction solar cells based on a low-temperature carbon electrode. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 3241–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. He, S.; Qiu, L.; Son, D.Y.; Liu, Z.; Juarez-Perez, E.J.; Ono, L.K.; Stecker, C.; Qi, Y. Carbon-based electrode engineering boosts the efficiency of all low-temperature-processed perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 2032–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vijayaraghavan, S.N.; Wall, J.; Li, L.; Xing, G.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, F. Low-temperature processed highly efficient hole transport layer free carbon-based planar perovskite solar cells with SnO2 quantum dot electron transport layer. Mater. Today Phys. 2020, 13, 100204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, Y.; Hoang, M.T.; Yao, D.; Pham, N.D.; Tiong, V.T.; Wang, X.; Sun, W.; Wang, H. High performance carbon-based planar perovskite solar cells by hot-pressing approach. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 210, 110517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cheng, N.; Liu, P.; Bai, S.; Yu, Z.; Liu, W.; Guo, S.; Zhao, X. Application of mesoporous SiO2 layer as an insulating layer in high performance hole transport material free CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. J. Power Sources 2016, 321, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cao, K.; Zuo, Z.; Cui, J.; Shen, Y.; Moehl, T.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M.; Wang, M. Efficient screen printed perovskite solar cells based on mesoscopic TiO2/Al2O3/NiO/carbon architecture. Nano Energy 2015, 17, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chu, Q.Q.; Ding, B.; Qiu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, C.X.; Li, C.J.; Yang, G.-J.; Fang, B. Cost effective perovskite solar cells with a high efficiency and open-circuit voltage based on a perovskite-friendly carbon electrode. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 8271–8279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, X.; Xie, L.; Lin, K.; Lu, J.; Wang, K.; Feng, W.; Fan, B.; Yin, P.; Wei, Z. Efficient and stable carbon-based perovskite solar cells enabled by the inorganic interface of CuSCN and carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 12236–12243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, Y.; Chen, H.; Zheng, X.; Meng, X.; Zhang, T.; Hu, C.; Bai, Y.; Xiao, S.; Yang, S. Ultrasound-spray deposition of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on NiO nanoparticles-embedded perovskite layers for high-performance carbon-based perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 2017, 42, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, R.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, M.; Jing, L.; Ma, C.; Bian, J.; Shi, Y. Carbon-based HTL-free modular perovskite solar cells with improved contact at perovskite/carbon interfaces. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 9262–9270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zheng, X.; Chen, H.; Li, Q.; Yang, Y.; Wei, Z.; Bai, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Zhou, D.; Wong, K.S.; Yang, S. Boron doping of multiwalled carbon nanotubes significantly enhances hole extraction in carbon-based perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 2496–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Jeon, I.; Yoon, J.; Ahn, N.; Atwa, M.; Delacou, C.; Anisimov, A.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Choi, M.; Maruyama, S.; Matsuo, Y. Carbon nanotubes versus graphene as flexible transparent electrodes in inverted perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 5395–5401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yoon, J.; Kim, U.; Yoo, Y.; Byeon, J.; Lee, S.-K.; Nam, J.-S.; Kim, K.; Zhang, Q.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Maruyama, S.; et al. Foldable Perovskite Solar Cells Using Carbon Nanotube-Embedded Ultrathin Polyimide Conductor. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2004092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jeon, I.; Shawky, A.; Seo, S.; Qian, Y.; Anisimov, A.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Matsuo, Y.; Maruyama, S. Carbon nanotubes to outperform metal electrodes in perovskite solar cells via dopant engineering and hole-selectivity enhancement. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 11141–11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, J.W.; Jeon, I.; Lin, H.S.; Seo, S.; Han, T.H.; Anisimov, A.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Matsuo, Y.; Maruyama, S.; Yang, Y. Vapor-assisted ex-situ doping of carbon nanotube toward efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett. 2018, 19, 2223–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tian, M.; Woo, C.Y.; Choi, J.W.; Seo, J.Y.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, S.H.; Song, M.; Lee, H.W. Printable free-standing hybrid graphene/dry-spun carbon nanotube films as multifunctional electrodes for highly stable perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 54806–54814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zong, B.; Fu, W.; Guo, Z.A.; Wang, S.; Huang, L.; Zhang, B.; Bala, H.; Cao, J.; Wang, X.; Sun, G.; et al. Highly stable hole-conductor-free perovskite solar cells based upon ammonium chloride and a carbon electrode. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 540, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ryu, J.; Lee, K.; Yun, J.; Yu, H.; Lee, J.; Jang, J. Paintable carbon-based perovskite solar cells with engineered perovskite/carbon interface using carbon nanotubes dripping method. Small 2017, 13, 1701225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Duan, M.; Tian, C.; Hu, Y.; Mei, A.; Rong, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Xu, M.; Sheng, Y.; Jiang, P.; Hou, X.; et al. Boron-doped graphite for high work function carbon electrode in printable hole-conductor-free mesoscopic perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 31721–31727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wei, Z.; Chen, H.; Yan, K.; Yang, S. Inkjet printing and instant chemical transformation of a CH3NH3PbI3/nanocarbon electrode and interface for planar perovskite solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 13239–13243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, H.; Wei, Z.; He, H.; Zheng, X.; Wong, K.S.; Yang, S. Solvent engineering boosts the efficiency of paintable carbon-based perovskite solar cells to beyond 14%. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hu, Y.; Si, S.; Mei, A.; Rong, Y.; Liu, H.; Li, X.; Han, H. Stable large-area (10×10 cm2) printable mesoscopic perovskite module exceeding 10% efficiency. Sol. RRL 2017, 1, 1600019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cai, L.; Liang, L.; Wu, J.; Ding, B.; Gao, L.; Fan, B. Large area perovskite solar cell module. J. Semicond. 2017, 38, 014006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bashir, A.; Shukla, S.; Lew, J.H.; Shukla, S.; Bruno, A.; Gupta, D.; Baikie, T.; Patidar, R.; Akhter, Z.; Priyadarshi, A.; et al. Spinel Co3O4 nanomaterials for efficient and stable large area carbon-based printed perovskite solar cells. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 2341–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mali, S.S.; Kim, H.; Kim, H.H.; Park, G.R.; Shim, S.E.; Hong, C.K. Large area, waterproof, air stable and cost effective efficient perovskite solar cells through modified carbon hole extraction layer. Mater. Today Chem. 2017, 4, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, Z.; Shi, T.; Tang, Z.; Sun, B.; Liao, G. Using a low-temperature carbon electrode for preparing hole-conductor-free perovskite heterojunction solar cells under high relative humidity. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 7017–7023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chang, X.; Li, W.; Chen, H.; Zhu, L.; Liu, H.; Geng, H.; Xiang, S.; Liu, J.; Zheng, X.; Yan, Y.; et al. Colloidal precursor-induced growth of ultra-even CH3NH3PbI3 for high-performance paintable carbon-based perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 30184–30192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wei, Y.; Li, W.; Xiang, S.; Liu, J.; Liu, H.; Zhu, L.; Chen, H. Precursor effects on methylamine gas-induced CH3NH3PbI3 films for stable carbon-based perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy 2018, 174, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Babu, V.; Fuentes Pineda, R.; Ahmad, T.; Alvarez, A.O.; Castriotta, L.A.; Di Carlo, A.; Fabregat-Santiago, F.; Wojciechowski, K. Improved stability of inverted and flexible perovskite solar cells with carbon electrode. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 5126–5134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 05989 g001 550
Figure 1. Types of perovskite solar cells, mesoporous and planar structures.
Figure 1. Types of perovskite solar cells, mesoporous and planar structures.
Materials 14 05989 g001
Materials 14 05989 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the perovskite solar cells and contact angel of H2O on carbon. Modified after Huawei Zhou et al., (2014) [46].
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the perovskite solar cells and contact angel of H2O on carbon. Modified after Huawei Zhou et al., (2014) [46].
Materials 14 05989 g002
Materials 14 05989 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of several techniques for fabrications of carbon electrodes in perovskite solar cells.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of several techniques for fabrications of carbon electrodes in perovskite solar cells.
Materials 14 05989 g003
Materials 14 05989 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the proposed production line of large-scaled perovskite solar cells. Reprinted from Yue Hu et al., (2017), [67] Copyright (2017), with permission from WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the proposed production line of large-scaled perovskite solar cells. Reprinted from Yue Hu et al., (2017), [67] Copyright (2017), with permission from WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Materials 14 05989 g004
Materials 14 05989 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) A schematic image of the device configuration of a perovskite solar cell made of carbon electrode on a glass substrate. (b–d) Energy level diagram, a cross-sectional SEM image, and J-V characteristic curve of the device, respectively. Modified and reprinted from Sawanta S. Mali et al., (2017), [70] Copyright (2017), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 5. (a) A schematic image of the device configuration of a perovskite solar cell made of carbon electrode on a glass substrate. (b–d) Energy level diagram, a cross-sectional SEM image, and J-V characteristic curve of the device, respectively. Modified and reprinted from Sawanta S. Mali et al., (2017), [70] Copyright (2017), with permission from Elsevier.
Materials 14 05989 g005
Materials 14 05989 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) A cross-section SEM image of a carbon electrode-based perovskite solar cell on a PET foil. (b) A photograph image of the carbon electrode-based flexible perovskite solar cell with (i) a photocatalytic current density and voltage curve and (ii) thermal (85 °C) stability of the device over 1000 h of aging. Reprinted from Vivek Babu et al., (2020), [74] Copyright (2020), with permission from The American Chemical Society (further permissions related to the material excerpted should be directed to The American Chemical Society).
Figure 6. (a) A cross-section SEM image of a carbon electrode-based perovskite solar cell on a PET foil. (b) A photograph image of the carbon electrode-based flexible perovskite solar cell with (i) a photocatalytic current density and voltage curve and (ii) thermal (85 °C) stability of the device over 1000 h of aging. Reprinted from Vivek Babu et al., (2020), [74] Copyright (2020), with permission from The American Chemical Society (further permissions related to the material excerpted should be directed to The American Chemical Society).
Materials 14 05989 g006
Materials 14 05989 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Schematic illustration of the fabrication of boron-doped rGO paper as an HTL in perovskite solar cells. (b) Energy level diagram of the devices. Reprinted from D. Selvakumar et al., (2018), [28] Copyright (2018), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 7. (a) Schematic illustration of the fabrication of boron-doped rGO paper as an HTL in perovskite solar cells. (b) Energy level diagram of the devices. Reprinted from D. Selvakumar et al., (2018), [28] Copyright (2018), with permission from Elsevier.
Materials 14 05989 g007
Table
Table 1. Summary of several techniques for fabrications of carbon electrodes in perovskite solar cells.
Table 1. Summary of several techniques for fabrications of carbon electrodes in perovskite solar cells.
TechniqueType of CarbonDevice StructureJsc (mA/cm2)Voc
(V)		FFPCE
(%)		Ref.
Doctor blade coatingCuPc-doped Carbon FTO/TiO2/Perovskite/
Carbon		21.401.020.6814.80[47]
Carbon pasteFTO/SnO2/Perovskite/
Spiro-OMeTAD/Al foil/
Carbon		19.721.090.7015.38[8]
FTO/TiO2/Perovskite/
Carbon		22.150.870.6713.03[9]
ITO/SnO2/Perovskite/
Carbon		22.191.080.5713.64[48]
FTO/SnO2/Perovskite/CuSCN/
Carbon		20.401.080.6614.60[49]
FTO/TiO2/SiO2/Perovskite/
Carbon		20.300.890.6511.9[50]
Carbon black and graphiteFTO/TiO2/Al2O3/NiO/Perovskite/
Carbon		21.620.920.7615.03[51]
FTO/TiO2/Perovskite/
Carbon		20.251.050.6313.50[52]
Drop castingMWNTsFTO/TiO2/Perovskite/
CuSCN/Carbon		23.701.010.7317.58[53]
FTO/ c-TiO2/ m-TiO2/
Perovskite/Carbon		19.310.880.7112.08[54]
Spray coatingO-MWNTsFTO/SnO2/Perovskite/
O-MWNTs/Carbon		21.960.990.418.99[55]
Thermal evaporationB-MWNTsFTO/c-TiO2/m-TiO2/
Perovskite/B-MWNTs		21.350.900.7614.60[56]
Al2O3-B-MWNTsFTO/ TiO2/Al2O3-B-MWNTs-Perovskite21.500.920.7715.23[56]
GrapheneITO/graphene/MoO3 (2 nm)/
PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/
C60/BCP/Al/LiF		21.200.960.701420[57]
PEN/graphene/MoO3 (2 nm)/
PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/
C60/BCP/Al/LiF		20.000.970.6913.30[57]
SWNTsITO/SWNT/MoO3 (2 nm)/
PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/
C60/BCP/Al/LiF		17.500.960.7612.80[57]
PEN/SWNT/MoO3 (2 nm)/
PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/
C60/BCP/Al/LiF		18.800.900.6511.00[57]
EmbeddedSWNTsSWNT-PI/MoOx/
poly(triarylamine) (PTAA)/
Perovskite/C60/BCP/Cu		19.001.050.7615.20[58]
LaminatedTFMS-doped SWNTsITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/
SWNT/Spiro-MeOTAD		22.701.120.7318.80[59]
TFMS-doped SWNTsITO/SnO2/Perobskite/
SWNT/Spiro-MeOTAD		24.211.000.7217.60[60]
Graphene/Carbon nanotubeFTO/TiO2/Perovskite/
Spiro-OMeTAD/
graphene/CNT		21.881.070.4515.36[61]
Scrape coatingCarbon
ink		FTO/TiO2/ZrO2/Perovskite/
Carbon		22.380.870.509.89[62]
Screen printingCarbon pasteFTO/TiO2/ZrO2/Perovskite/
Carbon		21.400.880.5710.70[38]
FTO/TiO2 /Perovskite
(CNT drip)/Carbon		18.971.990.7113.57[63]
Graphite pasteFTO/TiO2/ZrO2/Perovskite/
Graphite		22.820.900.6012.40[64]
Boron dope graphite pasteFTO/TiO2/ZrO2/Perovskite/
B-Graphite		22.870.940.6313.60[64]
Inkjet printingCarbon pasteFTO/TiO2/Perovskite/Carbon15.000.900.638.51[65]
FTO/TiO2/Perovskite/
Carbon+CH3NH3I ink		17.200.950.7111.60[65]
BrushingCarbon pasteFTO/TiO2/Perovskite/Carbon21.271.040.6514.38[66]
CuPc, MWNTs, O-MWNTs, B-MWNT, SWCNTs, BCP, TFMS, and Al2O3 are copper phthalocyanine, multi-walled carbon nanotubes, oxidized muti-walled carbon nanotubes, boron doping of multi-walled carbon nanotubes, single-walled carbon nanotube, bathocuproine, trifluoromethane sulfonic acid, and aluminum oxide, respectively.
Table
Table 2. Summary of several techniques to fabricate carbon electrodes in perovskite solar cells (PSC).
Table 2. Summary of several techniques to fabricate carbon electrodes in perovskite solar cells (PSC).
SubstratePSCs StructureActive Area (cm2)Test ConditionStabilityPCE (%)HumidityRef.
Glass
FTO/m-TiO2/
Perovskite/
Carbon		1A 500 W xenon lamp (XIL model 05A50KS source units) -12.6380%[63]
FTO/m-TiO2/
Perovskite/Carbon		1The solar light simulator (Newport solar simulator, model number 6255, 150 W Xe lamp, AM 1.5 global filter) was calibrated to 1 sun (100 mW cm−2) -9.72-[66]
FTO/ZnO/
Perovskite/
Carbon		1Illumination of 100 mW/cm2 by a 450 W class AAA solar simulator equipped with an AM1.5G filter (Sol2A, Oriel Instruments) 140 d 15.1-[68]
FTO/ZnO/
Perovskite/
Carbon		17.6Illumination of 100 mW/cm2 by a 450 W class AAA solar simulator equipped with an AM1.5G filter (Sol2A, Oriel Instruments)
140 d 10.6-[68]
FTO/TiO2/ZrO2/
Perovskite/
Carbon		49AM1.5 illumination, without any additional UV filter and under simulated AM 1.5 100mW/cm2 sunlight.
1000 h 10.465–70%[67]
FTO/m-TiO2/
(Perovskite/ ZrO2/Co3O4)/
Carbon		70AM 1.5G without any maskin2500 h11.3970%[69]
Glass
FTO/m-TiO2/
Perovskitex/
Carbon+MAI/
Carbon		>1.1Illumination of 100 mAcm2, AM 1.5 illumination 160 d 13.04-[70]
FTO/TiO2/
Perovskite/
Carbon		1Illumination of one sun illumination 2000 h6.21~20%[71]
FTO/TiO2/
Perovskite/
Carbon		0.05A solar light simulator (Newport solar simulator, model number 6255, 150 W Xe lamp, AM 1.5 global filter) was calibrated to 1 sun (100 mW cm−2)-14.58-[72]
FTO/m-TiO2/
Perovskite/Carbon		0.05Newport solar simulator, model number 6255, 150 W Xe lamp, AM 1.5 global filter 120 d 11.6410–20%[73]
PaperFTO/ TiO2/
Perovskite/
B-rGO/FTO		1The standard AM 1.5G conditions 250 h8.9660%[28]
B-rGO = boron reduced graphene oxideLonghua Cai et al. [68] used a gas-pumping method to create a large-area perovskite solution film and screen-printed carbon electrodes on top of it. They make PSCs with two different active areas: 1 cm2 and 17.6 cm2, and then test them for 140 days in the open air. The small and large modules have PCEs of 10.6% and 15.1%, respectively. After the testing period, they discovered no significant degradation. Their method allows for the practical fabrication of high-performance large-area PSCs.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pradid, P.; Sanglee, K.; Thongprong, N.; Chuangchote, S. Carbon Electrodes in Perovskite Photovoltaics. Materials 2021, 14, 5989. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14205989

AMA Style

Pradid P, Sanglee K, Thongprong N, Chuangchote S. Carbon Electrodes in Perovskite Photovoltaics. Materials. 2021; 14(20):5989. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14205989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pradid, Preawpun, Kanyanee Sanglee, Non Thongprong, and Surawut Chuangchote. 2021. "Carbon Electrodes in Perovskite Photovoltaics" Materials 14, no. 20: 5989. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14205989

APA Style

Pradid, P., Sanglee, K., Thongprong, N., & Chuangchote, S. (2021). Carbon Electrodes in Perovskite Photovoltaics. Materials, 14(20), 5989. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14205989

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop