Next Article in Journal
Effect of Ruthenium and Cerium Oxide (IV) Promotors on the Removal of Carbon Deposit Formed during the Mixed Methane Reforming Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental and Computational Studies of Compression and Deformation Behavior of Hafnium Diboride to 208 GPa
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Pd and Zr Co-Doping on the Microstructure and Oxidation Resistance of Aluminide Coatings on the CMSX-4 Nickel Superalloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Pressure Brillouin Spectroscopy and X-ray Diffraction of Cerium Dioxide
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 24
10.3390/ma14247563
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Future Study of Dense Superconducting Hydrides at High Pressure

by
Dong Wang
,
Yang Ding
* and
Ho-Kwang Mao
Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Beijing 100094, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(24), 7563; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247563
Submission received: 17 October 2021 / Revised: 17 November 2021 / Accepted: 1 December 2021 / Published: 9 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials Behavior under Compression)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The discovery of a record high superconducting transition temperature (Tc) of 288 K in a pressurized hydride inspires new hope to realize ambient-condition superconductivity. Here, we give a perspective on the theoretical and experimental studies of hydride superconductivity. Predictions based on the BCS–Eliashberg–Midgal theory with the aid of density functional theory have been playing a leading role in the research and guiding the experimental realizations. To date, about twenty hydrides experiments have been reported to exhibit high-Tc superconductivity and their Tc agree well with the predicted values. However, there are still some controversies existing between the predictions and experiments, such as no significant transition temperature broadening observed in the magnetic field, the experimental electron-phonon coupling beyond the Eliashberg–Midgal limit, and the energy dependence of density of states around the Fermi level. To investigate these controversies and the origin of the highest Tc in hydrides, key experiments are required to determine the structure, bonding, and vibrational properties associated with H atoms in these hydrides.

1. Introduction

Since the discovery of the superconductivity of mercury at 4.2 K by H. K. Onnes in 1911 [1], scientists have been relentlessly hunting for superconducting materials with higher Tc values. There are several ‘rushes’ in the research history of high-Tc superconductors that were marked by the discoveries of cuprates (Tc of 133 K at ambient pressure [2] and 164 K at high pressure [3]), iron based superconductors (Tc of above 50 K [4,5]), and MgB2 with Tc of 39 K [6].
In 2004, Ashcroft predicted that compressed hydrogen-rich hydrides are good candidates for high-Tc superconductors due to chemical “pre-compression” effects [7]. This idea has driven subsequent efforts on studying the hydrides, eventually leading to the discovery of superconductivity above 200 K, first in H3S (Tc of 203 K) [8] and more recently in LaH10 (Tc up to 260 K) [9,10] and a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (CSH) (Tc of 288 K) [11]. Since 2015, superconductivity has been reported in the following compounds at high pressure: PHx above 100 K under 207 GPa [12], YHx at 243 K above 200 GPa [13,14], ThHx at 161 K under 175 GPa [15], PrHx at 9 K under 130 GPa [16], LaYHx at 253 K under 183 GPa [17], CeHx at 115–120 K under 95 GPa [18], SnHx at 70 K under 200 GPa [19], BaHx around 20 K under 140 GPa [20], CaHx at 215 K under 172 GPa [21], ScHx at 22.4 K under 156 GPa, and LuHx at 15 K under 128 GPa [22]. The experiment conditions and results are summarized in the Table 1. In these experiments, electric resistance and powder X-ray diffraction are commonly performed. However, due to the very weak scattering power and background from the pressure vessels, the position of H in the hydrides is unable to be determined by experiments.
To demonstrate the relationship between Tc and pressure, we plot the figure of merit S, which is an index designed [23,24] to compare experimental reported superconductors. The S value of MgB2 is 1, which serves as a benchmark. The higher the merit index S, the higher superconducting Tc of hydride under comparable high pressure. Amongst these, CeHx, to date, has the highest S value as 1.12 below 100 GPa (Figure 1). The isotope effects were also experimentally observed in D2S [8], YD6 [14], LaD10 [9], and CeD9 [18]. These experimental results (see Figure 1) have confirmed theoretical predictions for the basic structures and superconducting properties [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40], thereby starting a new era for exploring the ambient condition superconductivity.
Currently, predictions based on the BCS–Eliashberg–Midgal theory [41,42,43] with the aid of the first principle density functional theory (DFT) calculations [44,45] have already contributed a large amount of computational data on binary hydrides [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], and more works are being rapidly extended to the ternary, quadratic, and non-hydrogen systems. Recently several new hydrides with high Tc values are predicted, including a binary hydride NaH6 with a Tc of 267 K within 100 GPa [23], a ternary hydride Li2MgH16 of a Tc of 473 K at 250 GPa [46], and another ternary hydride LaBH8 with a Tc of 126 K at 50 GPa [47], which are driving more experimental discoveries in the future.

2. Discussions

2.1. Unexplained Anomalous Superconducting Behaviors in Hydrides

According to the established understanding of superconductivity [48], both typical conventional and unconventional superconductors are universally characterized by three parameters: the London penetration depth λL, the Peppard coherence length ξ, and the electron mean free path. Type I superconductors with λL < ξ are a limited set of materials, mostly pure forms of elements, which are all considered as conventional superconductors [49], while most superconducting materials, including both conventional and unconventional, are type II with ξ < λL or strong type II have ξ ≪ λL superconductors. According to Ginzburg–Landau (GL) theory, strong type II superconductors commonly show a broadening of transition temperature as ∆T/Tc ~ 0.02, which increases with increasing applied magnetic field. For instance, in cuprate it finds ∆T/Tc ∝ H2/3 [50]. Intriguingly, J. E. Hirsch [51,52,53] points out that the ∆T/Tc of hydrides shows no significant broadening in the increasing magnetic field, as examples in Figure 2 shown. Even ∆T/Tc of H3S without magnetic field are regarded to be too small according to GL theory [11,52,53]. Therefore, although the superconducting hydrides have been accepted as typical BCS conventional superconductors, their most notable anomalous superconducting behavior remains unexplained by the classical GL theory.
The contradiction between the successful and accurate prediction of Tc in many high-pressure hydrides, and the fact that they do not follow the classical GL theory, requires further investigations in which the utmost urgent thing is to experimentally prove whether the high-pressure hydrides are superconductors or not by confirming if the key Meissner effect coexists with zero resistance. To date, a total of about seven magnetization measurements have been reported to observe the Meissner effect in CSH [11], LaHx [38,54], and HxS [8,54,55,56] with magnetic susceptibility and nuclear resonant scattering (Table 2). However, the validity of these results has been strongly questioned by J. E. Hirsch [57,58,59] and the question remains open.
This anomalous behavior of hydrides can be caused by several possible reasons: (1) the pressure increases during cooling [60], which suppresses the broadening of Tc. This phenomenon is commonly observed in low temperature diamond anvil experiments. To solve this problem, it requires minimizing the variation of the pressure values during the cooling process or accurately determining how the pressure changes with temperature [60]. Then a reliable temperature dependence of resistance curve could be measured to determine the broadening of Tc; (2) the significant resistance drop might be caused by other phase transitions rather than superconducting transition [52], such as metallization phase transitions, structural or magnetic phase transitions. These possibilities can be verified by investigating if the changes in crystal structure, phonon structure, electronic structure, or magnetic structure concur with the resistance drops. More importantly, the Meissner effects must be conclusively confirmed to concur with the resistance drops; (3) it is a new type of superconductivity. That means not only GL theory but also BCS theory is inapplicable to this type of superconductivity, and new mechanisms need to be explored in the first priority for hydrides.

2.2. How to Understand the Origin of the Highest Tc in Hydrides

The BCS theory accounts for why hydrides could have high-Tc values, but is unable to describe material-related properties, such as why LaH10 and CSH have the highest Tc values but other hydrides do not. Is there any other hydride having even higher Tc values? The answers to these questions are still unclear but fundamentally important for searching the higher Tc superconductors.
Marvin Cohen has long believed that the secret for increasing superconducting temperatures resides in covalent bonds; he asserts that these new compounds allow for testing of this idea [61]. Actually in 1971, J. Gilman already predicted the possibility of making a new form of hydrogen in a metallic state through the preparation of a covalent compound LiH2F under pressure [62]. Quan and Pickett proposed the metallization of the covalent bond is the key driving force for high-Tc in MgB2 [63]. Covalent metals such as MgB2 are rare at ambient pressure but may be formed and become stabilized at high pressures. Indeed, it is noteworthy that so far all systems with Tc > 200 K under pressure are hydrogen rich compounds, typically the covalent H3S [8], LaH10 [9] and CSH [64,65] systems. Besides, covalent hydrogen-rich organic-derived materials are another class of high-Tc materials that combine the advantages of covalent metals and metal superhydrides. A common feature for all these classes of materials is the existence of covalent bonds, which probably implies that strong-covalent bonding is the key to driving the high-Tc superconductivity in hydrides, as shown in Figure 3a–d. In addition, van Hove singularity around the Fermi level is also observed in H3S [25,63,66,67] and LaH10 [68] from calculations, which shows remarkable effects on Tc and thus is regarded as a possible origin for high Tc (see Figure 3e,f). Recently, Coulomb effects [69], Lifshitz transition [70], multiband pairing [71] and anharmonicity [27,72,73,74,75,76] are also proposed to account for the high-Tc superconductivity in the dense hydrides. Therefore, more efforts are demanded on investigating the origin of material-dependent high-Tc in hydrides, especially identifying and confirming the role of metallic covalent bonds in the high-Tc superconducting hydrides.

2.3. The Limits of the BCS-Eliashberg Theory

It is shown that electron-phonon coupling constant λ for many hydrides is typically predicted to above 2 and some even reaches 5.8 in CaH6 [23]. Provided BCS–Eliashberg-Migdal theory usually accounts for the universal behavior of conventional superconductors with λ < 1.5–2, the validity of the theory for strongly coupling hydrides is still under debate [78,79,80]. In addition, anharmonic effects and energy dependent electronic structure also play significant roles in the high-Tc the superconductivity, which are neglected in the theory and requires particular attention in the future predictions.
(1)
The Migdal-Eliashberg (ME) theory [41,42], in which vertex corrections are neglected for simplification, usually describes electron-phonon coupling effects accurately for conventional superconductors. As the electron-electron repulsion in the theory is usually approximated by an empirical parameter μ* (mostly considered to be ~0.1) to reproduce the experimental Tc [43], this approach becomes less accurate in the limit of sizeable electron–phonon coupling or in the case of systems with strongly anisotropic electronic properties [68,78,79,80]. It is more appropriate to use other methods based on a perturbative Green’s function approach such as the full ab-initio Migdal–Eliashberg approach or SCDFT method [44,45,68]. The latter recently has been applied to reproduce the Tc of H3S, in good agreement with the experiment [44].
(2)
Neglecting the energy dependence of density of states (DOS) around the Fermi level in the Migdal–Eliashberg theory for simplification may overlook some peculiar energy dependent electronic structures occurring in hydrides (i.e van Hove singularity in H3S [63,66,81,82] and LaH10 [68], Fermiology due to Lifshitz transitions [70]) around Fermi level, which may suppress the Tc. For instance, predictions beyond the constant DOS approximation, by explicitly considering the electronic structure around the Fermi level in H3S, show the constant DOS approximation employed, to date, overestimates Tc by ∼60 K, or underestimates by ∼10 K when the energy dependence of DOS are present or absent near the Fermi level [66], respectively.
(3)
Because of the low mass of hydrogen and its large quantum fluctuations from equilibrium, substantial anharmonic corrections to Tc have been predicted in some superconducting hydrides and phases of hydrogen [27,72,73,74,75,76]. For instance, PtH at 100 GPa shows strong anharmonic hardening of the phonon energies, which suppresses the Tc by over an order of magnitude [73]. Anharmonic effects are also predicted to lead to an inverse isotope effect in superconducting palladium hydride [74] and cause the value of Tc falls 22% from 250 K to 194 K in H3S [27]. Thus, it becomes urgent to extensively develop an understanding of the anharmonic effects on Tc of the superconducting dense hydrides.
In addition, the BCS theory also faces some other unexplained experimental phenomena, such as the reversible phase transition between the normal and superconducting phases in the H-T plane (for type I superconductors); the electron mass in the London magnetic field should be twice of the free electron mass (2m) rather than twice of an effective mass (2m*) as predicted. These phenomena can now be explained with a new theory which attributes the superfluid to the nonlinear Berry connection emerging from the many-body wave function connection [83,84,85], which might also be applicable to the superconductivity of hydrides.

2.4. More Experiments Are Demanded

Due to the complexity and challenges of high-pressure experiments, the high-pressure measurements of hydrides is only limited to <20 groups, which stays far behind theoretical predictions (more than 5000), and the experiment results are largely outnumbered by those theoretical predictions [68]. The experiments are not only performed to confirm and the benchmark of theoretical predictions, but it is more importantly to reveal breakthrough discoveries that may be overlooked by theories. Thus, in addition to routine resistance measurements, more experimental efforts should be devoted to developing new high-pressure techniques facilitating the following measurements on the superconducting hydrides.
(1)
Crystal structure determination of hydrides. Crystal structure is the most fundamental information, however, to date, the positions of H atoms in hydrides remain undetermined with conventional X-ray methods due to their weak scattering power. Consequently, all hydrogen network and the nature of bonding predicted from theory have never been confirmed. However, owing to the new technology developments of high pressure X-ray diffraction beamline for diamond anvil cell [86], recently a successful unit cell parameters determination of the phase IV of hydrogen at 200 GPa with synchrotron X-ray by Ji et al. [87,88] shows promise for conquering the problems in the future. Powder neutron diffraction has been applied at high pressure study up to 90 GPa and could be an ideal probe to study the H structures [89].
(2)
The magnetic responses of superconducting hydrides. To date, only seven magnetization measurements have been reported: AC magnetic susceptibility measurements for CSH [11], three for HxS [8,54,56], LaHx [38,54], the nuclear resonant scattering measurements for H3S [55]. However, the magnetic signal from samples are commonly complicated by the noise from backgrounds [57,58,59], which leaves the reported Meissner effects in debate [57,58,59]. To increase the required signal-to-background ratio required the development of a new high-pressure technique, such as specially designed miniature nonmagnetic DAC cells made of Cu-Ti alloy is needed to accommodate in a SQUID magnetometer [90].
(3)
Electronic and vibrational properties of hydrides. The electron pairing in hydrides are mediated by electron-phonon coupling, which is essentially associated with interactions between the electronic states near Fermi level and the high frequencies phonons of H atoms. The information on the electronic and vibrational properties of H is crucial for understanding the mechanisms underlying the material-dependent high Tc in hydrides. Experimentally, the electronic structure of H atoms (and host atoms) can be probed with X-ray Raman [91] and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [92]. The vibrational properties of hydrides can be obtained from the phonon dispersion, which can be measured with the high resolution (meV)-energy resolution inelastic X-ray scattering. The zone-center vibrational optical modes and superconducting gap can be also studied with or Raman and Infrared spectroscopes [93].
Combing the results from (1)–(3), it is also possible to determine (a) if the anomalous resistive behavior hydrides is originated from superconducting transition or other phase transitions or errors from experiments; and (b) the anharmonic effects on the Tc.

2.5. Perspective

The exploration of room temperature superconductors has been a coveted goal of many scientists. The progress in the last 30 years has been tremendous. The discovery of new superconductors, including cuprates, heavy fermion superconductors, organic superconductors, iron-based superconductors, two-dimensional superconductors, topological superconductors, nickelates, and now dense superhydrides, has not only provided important topics for physics and materials science but also opened up new research fields. The research of superconductivity has gone through the London equation [94], Landau-Ginzberg theory [95], and BCS theory [96]. The Meissner effect, as a result of spontaneous symmetry breaking, is a manifestation of the Anderson–Higgs mechanism [97,98,99]. The BCS theory is one of the most important theoretical advances after the establishment of quantum mechanics and has been successfully applied to the conventional superconductors. However, the mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity remains as a grand-challenge in physics and a unified theory remains elusive. To date, the existence of d-wave symmetry and pseudo-energy gaps in copper-oxygen is well established [100,101,102]. Studies of iron-based superconductors, organic superconductors, heavy fermion superconductors, two-dimensional superconductors, nickelates, and topological superconductors have also shown the existence of multiple cooperative and competing orders is a universal phenomenon [103,104,105,106,107,108]. These results provide a base for developing an ultimate theories in the future.
The discovery of the room-temperature superconductivity in dense superhydrides at high pressure is unexpected but promises a completely new research direction for the realization of high temperature (or room temperature) superconductivity at ambient pressure. Due to the complicated high-pressure environments, the current research is limited with experimental techniques because many advance techniques such as scanning tunneling electron microscope (STEM), angular resolved photoelectron emission spectroscopy (ARPES), neutron inelastic scattering (NIS) are inapplicable at high pressure conditions, and also faces some challenges to obtain high-quantity signals from samples. However, in contrast to other superconducting materials, the experimentally measured superconducting temperature in hydrides commonly shows an excellent agreement with the theoretical predicted ones. This implies theoretical calculations might be able to play a leading and active role in the research of hydride superconductivity. Apart from aforementioned unexplained and debated experimental results, several possible research directions could be prospected: (1) developing reliable methods to accurately predict the superconducting Tc; (2) exploring the ternary and quaternary hydrides by increases the number of possible structures and thereby the more choices of low-pressure-high-Tc hydrides; (3) replacing H with other light atoms, such as B and C. Materials made of boron and carbon also form covalent bonds and have phonons suitable for high-temperature superconductivity; (4) developing novel techniques to enable more key measurements and advance the research of superconducting hydrides. The ultimate goal is to achieve the room temperature superconductivity at low or ambient pressure.

3. Conclusions

Since 2004, many hydrides have been reported to show (nearly) zero resistance at high pressure with the transition temperature Tc values close to the ones predicted with BCS–Eliashberg Theory. With magnetization and isotopic effects measurements, these zero-resistance hydrides have been widely accepted as typical BCS conventional superconductors, even though their anomalous superconducting behavior remained unexplained with the classical GL theory. The contradiction between the successful prediction of Tc and unsuccessful application of the classical GL theory becomes an utmost urgent question to be investigated.
To search for or make the higher Tc superconductors, more research is demanded to investigate the key driving force for the high Tc superconductivity in hydrides, including the metallization of the strong covalent bond, van Hove singularity around the Fermi level, Coulomb effects, Lifshitz transition, multiband pairing, and anharmonicity.
The validity of the BCS–Eliashberg–Migdal theory for strongly coupling hydrides is still in debate, which may limit its application in prediction of the Tc in dense hydrides. In addition, anharmonic effects and energy dependent electronic structure may also play significant roles in the high-Tc the superconductivity, which requires particular attention in the predictions.
The discovery of the room-temperature superconductivity in dense superhydrides at high pressure promises a new research direction for the realization of high temperature (or room temperature) superconductivity at ambient pressure. Some key experimental results remained to be confirmed, and thus more efforts need to be devoted to studying the structure, bonding, and vibrational properties of H atoms in hydrides. It is also expected that the breakthrough discoveries from experiments could lead to revolutions in theories [109].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.D.; methodology, Y.D.; software, D.W. and Y.D.; validation, D.W., Y.D. and H.-K.M.; formal analysis, D.W. and Y.D.; investigation, D.W. and Y.D.; resources, Y.D. and H.-K.M.; data curation, D.W. and Y.D.; writing—original draft preparation, D.W., Y.D. and H.-K.M.; writing—review and editing, D.W., Y.D. and H.-K.M.; visualization, D.W. and Y.D.; supervision, Y.D.; project administration, Y.D. and H.-K.M.; funding acquisition, Y.D. and H.-K.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Y. Ding is grateful for support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFA0305703, Science Challenge Project, No TZ2016001, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC):11874075. H.K.M. acknowledges supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. U1530402 and U1930401.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Onnes, H.K. The superconductivity of mercury. Comm. Phys. Lab. Univ. Leiden 1911, 122, 122–124. [Google Scholar]
  2. Schilling, A.; Cantoni, M.; Guo, J.D.; Ott, H.R. Superconductivity above 130 K in the Hg–Ba–Ca–Cu–O system. Nature 1993, 363, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gao, L.; Xue, Y.Y.; Chen, F.; Xiong, Q.; Meng, R.L.; Ramirez, D.; Chu, C.W.; Eggert, J.H.; Mao, H.K. Superconductivity up to 164 K in HgBa2Cam−1CumO2m+2+δ (m = 1, 2, and 3) under quasihydrostatic pressures. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 4260–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ren, Z.A.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.; Yi, W.; Shen, X.L.; Li, Z.C.; Che, G.C.; Dong, X.L.; Sun, L.L.; Zhou, F.; et al. Superconductivity at 55 K in iron-based F-doped layered quaternary compound Sm[O1–xFx]FeAs. In Superconductivity Centennial; Peking University-World Scientific Advanced Physics Series; World Scientific: Singapore, 2018; pp. 223–227. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, Q.-Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, W.-H.; Zhang, Z.-C.; Zhang, J.-S.; Li, W.; Ding, H.; Ou, Y.-B.; Deng, P.; Chang, K.; et al. Interface-induced high-temperature superconductivity in single unit-cell FeSe films on SrTiO3. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2012, 29, 037402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Nagamatsu, J.; Nakagawa, N.; Muranaka, T.; Zenitani, Y.; Akimitsu, J. Superconductivity at 39 K in magnesium diboride. Nature 2001, 410, 63–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ashcroft, N.W. Hydrogen dominant metallic alloys: High temperature superconductors? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 187002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Drozdov, A.P.; Eremets, M.I.; Troyan, I.A.; Ksenofontov, V.; Shylin, S.I. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature 2015, 525, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Drozdov, A.P.; Kong, P.P.; Minkov, V.S.; Besedin, S.P.; Kuzovnikov, M.A.; Mozaffari, S.; Balicas, L.; Balakirev, F.F.; Graf, D.E.; Prakapenka, V.B.; et al. Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures. Nature 2019, 569, 528–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Somayazulu, M.; Ahart, M.; Mishra, A.K.; Geballe, Z.M.; Baldini, M.; Meng, Y.; Struzhkin, V.V.; Hemley, R.J. Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 027001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Snider, E.; Dasenbrock-Gammon, N.; McBride, R.; Debessai, M.; Vindana, H.; Vencatasamy, K.; Lawler, K.V.; Salamat, A.; Dias, R.P. Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride. Nature 2020, 586, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Drozdov, A.; Eremets, M.; Troyan, I. Superconductivity above 100 K in PH3 at high pressures. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1508.06224. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kong, P.; Minkov, V.; Kuzovnikov, M.; Besedin, S.; Drozdov, A.; Mozaffari, S.; Balicas, L.; Balakirev, F.; Prakapenka, V.; Greenberg, E. Superconductivity up to 243 K in yttrium hydrides under high pressure. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1909.10482. [Google Scholar]
  14. Troyan, I.A.; Semenok, D.V.; Kvashnin, A.G.; Sadakov, A.V.; Sobolevskiy, O.A.; Pudalov, V.M.; Ivanova, A.G.; Prakapenka, V.B.; Greenberg, E.; Gavriliuk, A.G.; et al. Anomalous high-temperature superconductivity in YH6. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2006832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Semenok, D.V.; Kvashnin, A.G.; Ivanova, A.; Svitlyk, V.; Fominski, V.Y.; Sadakov, A.V.; Sobolevskiy, O.A.; Pudalov, V.M.; Troyan, I.A.; Oganov, A.R. Superconductivity at 161 K in thorium hydride ThH10: Synthesis and properties. Mater. Today 2019, 33, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhou, D.; Semenok, D.V.; Duan, D.; Xie, H.; Chen, W.; Huang, X.; Li, X.; Liu, B.; Oganov, A.R.; Cui, T. Superconducting praseodymium superhydrides. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaax6849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Semenok, D.V.; Troyan, I.A.; Ivanova, A.G.; Kvashnin, A.G.; Kruglov, I.A.; Hanfland, M.; Sadakov, A.V.; Sobolevskiy, O.A.; Pervakov, K.S.; Lyubutin, I.S.; et al. Superconductivity at 253 K in lanthanum–yttrium ternary hydrides. Mater. Today 2021, 48, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, W.; Semenok, D.V.; Huang, X.; Shu, H.; Li, X.; Duan, D.; Cui, T.; Oganov, A.R. High-temperature superconducting phases in cerium superhydride with a Tc up to 115 K below a pressure of 1 megabar. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 117001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hong, F.; Shan, P.; Yang, L.; Yue, B.; Yang, P.; Liu, Z.; Sun, J.; Dai, J.; Yu, H.; Yin, Y. Superconductivity at ~70 K in tin hydride SnHx under high pressure. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2101.02846. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, W.; Semenok, D.V.; Kvashnin, A.G.; Huang, X.; Kruglov, I.A.; Galasso, M.; Song, H.; Duan, D.; Goncharov, A.F.; Prakapenka, V.B.; et al. Synthesis of molecular metallic barium superhydride: Pseudocubic BaH12. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, L.; Wang, K.; Xie, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Liu, H.; Liu, G.; Wang, H.; Ma, Y. Experimental observation of superconductivity at 215 K in calcium superhydride under high pressures. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2103.16282. [Google Scholar]
  22. Shao, M.; Chen, S.; Chen, W.; Zhang, K.; Huang, X.; Cui, T. Superconducting ScH3 and LuH3 at megabar pressures. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 15330–15335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shipley, A.M.; Hutcheon, M.J.; Needs, R.J. High-throughput discovery of high-temperature conventional superconductors. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2105.02296v2 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pickard, C.J.; Errea, I.; Eremets, M.I. Superconducting hydrides under pressure. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2020, 11, 57–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bernstein, N.; Hellberg, C.S.; Johannes, M.D.; Mazin, I.I.; Mehl, M.J. What superconducts in sulfur hydrides under pressure and why. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 060511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Duan, D.; Liu, Y.; Tian, F.; Li, D.; Huang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Yu, H.; Liu, B.; Tian, W.; Cui, T. Pressure-induced metallization of dense (H2S)2H2 with high-Tc superconductivity. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Errea, I.; Calandra, M.; Pickard, C.J.; Nelson, J.R.; Needs, R.J.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Mauri, F. High-pressure hydrogen sulfide from first principles: A strongly anharmonic phonon-mediated superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 157004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Flores-Livas, J.A.; Amsler, M.; Heil, C.; Sanna, A.; Boeri, L.; Profeta, G.; Wolverton, C.; Goedecker, S.; Gross, E. Superconductivity in metastable phases of phosphorus-hydride compounds under high pressure. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 020508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Flores-Livas, J.A.; Sanna, A.; Gross, E. High temperature superconductivity in sulfur and selenium hydrides at high pressure. Eur. Phys. J. B 2016, 89, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Li, Y.; Hao, J.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y. The metallization and superconductivity of dense hydrogen sulfide. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 174712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Liu, H.; Naumov, I.I.; Hoffmann, R.; Ashcroft, N.W.; Hemley, R.J. Potential high-Tc superconducting lanthanum and yttrium hydrides at high pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 6990–6995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nicol, E.J.; Carbotte, J.P. Comparison of pressurized sulfur hydride with conventional superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 220507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Papaconstantopoulos, D.A.; Klein, B.M.; Mehl, M.J.; Pickett, W.E. Cubic H3S around 200 GPa: An atomic hydrogen superconductor stabilized by sulfur. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 184511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Peng, F.; Sun, Y.; Pickard, C.J.; Needs, R.J.; Wu, Q.; Ma, Y. Hydrogen clathrate structures in rare earth hydrides at high pressures: Possible route to room-temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 107001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Salke, N.P.; Davari Esfahani, M.M.; Zhang, Y.; Kruglov, I.A.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Lin, J. Synthesis of clathrate cerium superhydride CeH9 at 80 GPa with anomalously short H.. H distance. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1805.02060. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tsuppayakorn-Aek, P.; Pinsook, U.; Luo, W.; Ahuja, R.; Bovornratanaraks, T. Superconductivity of superhydride CeH10 under high pressure. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 086001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zurek, E.; Bi, T. High-temperature superconductivity in alkaline and rare earth polyhydrides at high pressure: A theoretical perspective. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 050901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Struzhkin, V.; Li, B.; Ji, C.; Chen, X.-J.; Prakapenka, V.; Greenberg, E.; Troyan, I.; Gavriliuk, A.; Mao, H.-K. Superconductivity in La and Y hydrides: Remaining questions to experiment and theory. Matter Radiat. Extrem. 2020, 5, 028201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chen, X.; Lou, H.; Zeng, Z.; Cheng, B.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Xu, D.; Yang, K.; Zeng, Q. Structural transitions of 4:1 methanol–ethanol mixture and silicone oil under high pressure. Matter Radiat. Extrem. 2021, 6, 038402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, X.-J. Exploring high-temperature superconductivity in hard matter close to structural instability. Matter Radiat. Extrem. 2020, 5, 068102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Eliashberg, G. Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrations in a superconductor. Sov. Phys. JETP 1960, 11, 696–702. [Google Scholar]
  42. Migdal, A. Interaction between electrons and lattice vibrations in a normal metal. Sov. Phys. JETP 1958, 7, 996–1001. [Google Scholar]
  43. Morel, P.; Anderson, P.W. Calculation of the superconducting state parameters with retarded electron-phonon interaction. Phys. Rev. 1962, 125, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sanna, A.; Pellegrini, C.; Gross, E.K.U. Combining Eliashberg theory with density functional theory for the accurate prediction of superconducting transition temperatures and gap functions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 057001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sanna, A.; Flores-Livas, J.A.; Davydov, A.; Profeta, G.; Dewhurst, K.; Sharma, S.; Gross, E.K.U. Ab initio Eliashberg theory: Making genuine predictions of superconducting features. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2018, 87, 041012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Sun, Y.; Lv, J.; Xie, Y.; Liu, H.; Ma, Y. Route to a superconducting phase above room temperature in electron-doped hydride compounds under high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 097001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Di Cataldo, S.; Heil, C.; von der Linden, W.; Boeri, L. LaBH8: Towards high- Tc low-pressure superconductivity in ternary superhydrides. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104, L020511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tinkham, M. Introduction to Superconductivity; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 4–13. [Google Scholar]
  49. Webb, G.; Marsiglio, F.; Hirsch, J. Superconductivity in the elements, alloys and simple compounds. Phys. C Supercond. 2015, 514, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Tinkham, M. Resistive transition of high-temperature superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 61, 1658–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hirsch, J.E.; Marsiglio, F. Unusual width of the superconducting transition in a hydride. Nature 2021, 596, E9–E10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hirsch, J.E.; Marsiglio, F. Nonstandard superconductivity or no superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 134505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dogan, M.; Cohen, M.L. Anomalous behavior in high-pressure carbonaceous sulfur hydride. Phys. C Supercond. 2021, 583, 1353851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Minkov, V.; Bud’ko, S.; Balakirev, F.; Prakapenka, V.; Chariton, S.; Husband, R.; Liermann, H.; Eremets, M. The Meissner effect in high-temperature hydrogen-rich superconductors under high pressure. Res. Sq. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Troyan, I.; Gavriliuk, A.; Rüffer, R.; Chumakov, A.; Mironovich, A.; Lyubutin, I.; Perekalin, D.; Drozdov, A.P.; Eremets, M.I. Observation of superconductivity in hydrogen sulfide from nuclear resonant scattering. Science 2016, 351, 1303–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Duan, D.; Sundqvist, B.; Li, X.; Huang, Y.; Yu, H.; Li, F.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, B.; et al. High-temperature superconductivity in sulfur hydride evidenced by alternating-current magnetic susceptibility. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2019, 6, 713–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Hirsch, J.; Marsiglio, F. Absence of magnetic evidence for superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure. Phys. C Supercond. 2021, 584, 1353866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hirsch, J.; Marsiglio, F. Meissner effect in nonstandard superconductors. Phys. C Supercond. 2021, 587, 1353896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hirsch, J.E. Faulty evidence for superconductivity in ac magnetic susceptibility of sulfur hydride under pressure. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2109.08517. [Google Scholar]
  60. Deng, H.; Zhang, J.; Jeong, M.Y.; Wang, D.; Hu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Sereika, R.; Nakagawa, T.; Chen, B.; Yin, X.; et al. Metallization of quantum material GaTa4Se8 at high pressure. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 5601–5607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rini, M. Easing the squeeze on superconductors. Physics 2021, 14, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gilman, J.J. Lithium dihydrogen fluoride—An approach to metallic hydrogen. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1971, 26, 546–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Quan, Y.; Pickett, W.E. Van Hove singularities and spectral smearing in high-temperature superconducting H3S. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 104526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Sun, Y.; Tian, Y.; Jiang, B.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Iitaka, T.; Zhong, X.; Xie, Y. Computational discovery of a dynamically stable cubic SH3 -like high-temperature superconductor at 100 GPa via CH4 intercalation. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 174102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cui, W.; Bi, T.; Shi, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Zurek, E.; Hemley, R.J. Route to high- Tc superconductivity via CH4-intercalated H3S hydride perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 134504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sano, W.; Koretsune, T.; Tadano, T.; Akashi, R.; Arita, R. Effect of van Hove singularities on high- Tc superconductivity in H3S. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 094525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Liu, L.; Wang, C.; Yi, S.; Kim, K.W.; Kim, J.; Cho, J.-H. Microscopic mechanism of room-temperature superconductivity in compressed LaH10. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 140501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Flores-Livas, J.A.; Boeri, L.; Sanna, A.; Profeta, G.; Arita, R.; Eremets, M. A perspective on conventional high-temperature superconductors at high pressure: Methods and materials. Phys. Rep. 2020, 856, 1–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, H.-T. Room-temperature-superconducting Tc driven by electron correlation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bianconi, A.; Jarlborg, T. Superconductivity above the lowest Earth temperature in pressurized sulfur hydride. EPL Europhys. Lett. 2015, 112, 37001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Wang, C.; Yi, S.; Cho, J.-H. Multiband nature of room-temperature superconductivity in LaH10 at high pressure. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 104506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Rousseau, B.; Bergara, A. Giant anharmonicity suppresses superconductivity in AlH3 under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 104504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Scheler, T.; Degtyareva, O.; Marqués, M.; Guillaume, C.L.; Proctor, J.; Evans, S.; Gregoryanz, E. Synthesis and properties of platinum hydride. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 214106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Errea, I.; Calandra, M.; Mauri, F. First-principles theory of anharmonicity and the inverse isotope effect in superconducting palladium-hydride compounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 177002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Errea, I.; Calandra, M.; Mauri, F. Anharmonic free energies and phonon dispersions from the stochastic self-consistent harmonic approximation: Application to platinum and palladium hydrides. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 064302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Borinaga, M.; Riego, P.; Leonardo, A.; Calandra, M.; Mauri, F.; Bergara, A.; Errea, I. Anharmonic enhancement of superconductivity in metallic molecular Cmca—4 hydrogen at high pressure: A first-principles study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2016, 28, 494001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yi, S.; Wang, C.; Jeon, H.; Cho, J.-H. Stability and bonding nature of clathrate H cages in a near-room-temperature superconductor LaH10. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2021, 5, 024801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bauer, J.; Han, J.E.; Gunnarsson, O. Quantitative reliability study of the Migdal-Eliashberg theory for strong electron-phonon coupling in superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 184531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Chubukov, A.V.; Abanov, A.; Esterlis, I.; Kivelson, S.A. Eliashberg theory of phonon-mediated superconductivity—When it is valid and how it breaks down. Ann. Phys. 2020, 417, 168190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Esterlis, I.; Nosarzewski, B.; Huang, E.W.; Moritz, B.; Devereaux, T.P.; Scalapino, D.J.; Kivelson, S.A. Breakdown of the Migdal-Eliashberg theory: A determinant quantum Monte Carlo study. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 140501(R). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Souza, T.X.R.; Marsiglio, F. The possible role of van Hove singularities in the high Tc of superconducting H3S. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2017, 31, 1745003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Ortenzi, L.; Cappelluti, E.; Pietronero, L. Band structure and electron-phonon coupling in H3S: A tight-binding model. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 064507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Koizumi, H. Explanation of superfluidity using the Berry connection for many-body wave functions. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2020, 33, 1697–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Koizumi, H. London moment, London’s superpotential, Nambu-Goldstone mode, and Berry connection from many-body wave functions. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2021, 34, 1361–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Koizumi, H. Superconductivity by Berry connection from many-body wave functions: Revisit to Andreev−Saint-James reflection and Josephson effect. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2021, 34, 2017–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hirao, N.; Kawaguchi, S.I.; Hirose, K.; Shimizu, K.; Ohtani, E.; Ohishi, Y. New developments in high-pressure X-ray diffraction beamline for diamond anvil cell at SPring-8. Matter Radiat. Extrem. 2020, 5, 018403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Ji, C.; Li, B.; Liu, W.; Smith, J.S.; Björling, A.; Majumdar, A.; Luo, W.; Ahuja, R.; Shu, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Crystallography of low Z material at ultrahigh pressure: Case study on solid hydrogen. Matter Radiat. Extrem. 2020, 5, 038401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ji, C.; Li, B.; Liu, W.; Smith, J.S.; Majumdar, A.; Luo, W.; Ahuja, R.; Shu, J.; Wang, J.; Sinogeikin, S.; et al. Ultrahigh-pressure isostructural electronic transitions in hydrogen. Nature 2019, 573, 558–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Boehler, R.; Guthrie, M.; Molaison, J.; dos Santos, A.; Sinogeikin, S.; Machida, S.; Pradhan, N.; Tulk, C. Large-volume diamond cells for neutron diffraction above 90 GPa. High Press. Res. 2013, 33, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Drozdov, A. Superconductivity in Hydrogen-Rich Materials at High Pressures; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz: Mainz, Germany, 2016; pp. 67–70. [Google Scholar]
  91. Li, B.; Ding, Y.; Kim, D.Y.; Wang, L.; Weng, T.-C.; Yang, W.; Yu, Z.; Ji, C.; Wang, J.; Shu, J.; et al. Probing the electronic band gap of solid hydrogen by inelastic X-ray scattering up to 90 GPa. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 036402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Meier, T.; Trybel, F.; Khandarkhaeva, S.; Steinle-Neumann, G.; Chariton, S.; Fedotenko, T.; Petitgirard, S.; Hanfland, M.; Glazyrin, K.; Dubrovinskaia, N.; et al. Pressure-induced hydrogen-hydrogen interaction in metallic FeH revealed by NMR. Phys. Rev. X 2019, 9, 031008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Capitani, F.; Langerome, B.; Brubach, J.-B.; Roy, P.; Drozdov, A.; Eremets, M.I.; Nicol, E.J.; Carbotte, J.P.; Timusk, T. Spectroscopic evidence of a new energy scale for superconductivity in H3S. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 859–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. London, F.; London, H. The electromagnetic equations of the supraconductor. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1935, 149, 71–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ginzburg, V.L.; Landau, L.D. On the theory of superconductivity. J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. 1950, 20, 546–568. [Google Scholar]
  96. Bardeen, J.; Cooper, L.N.; Schrieffer, J.R. Theory of Superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 1957, 108, 1175–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Anderson, P.W. Plasmons, gauge invariance, and mass. Phys. Rev. 1963, 130, 439–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Higgs, P.W. Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1964, 13, 508–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Higgs, P. Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields. Phys. Lett. 1964, 12, 132–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tsuei, C.C.; Kirtley, J.R. Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2000, 72, 969–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Valla, T.; Fedorov, A.V.; Lee, J.; Davis, J.C.; Gu, G.D. The ground state of the pseudogap in cuprate superconductors. Science 2006, 314, 1914–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Varma, C.M. Theory of the pseudogap state of the cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 155113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Cruz, C.D.; Huang, Q.; Lynn, J.W.; Ratcliff, W.; Ii, W.R.; Zarestky, J.L.; Mook, H.A.; Chen, G.F.; Luo, J.L.; Wang, N.L.; et al. Magnetic order close to superconductivity in the iron-based layered LaO1-xFxFeAs systems. Nature 2008, 453, 899–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Vuletić, T.; Auban-Senzier, P.; Pasquier, C.; Tomić, S.; Jérome, D.; Héritier, M.; Bechgaard, K. Coexistence of superconductivity and spin density wave orderings in the organic superconductor (TMTSF)2PF6. Eur. Phys. J. B 2002, 25, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Park, T.; Ronning, F.; Yuan, H.Q.; Salamon, M.B.; Movshovich, R.; Sarrao, J.L.; Thompson, J.D. Hidden magnetism and quantum criticality in the heavy fermion superconductor CeRhIn5. Nature 2006, 440, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Li, L.; Richter, C.; Mannhart, J.; Ashoori, R.C. Coexistence of magnetic order and two-dimensional superconductivity at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces. Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 762–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Hu, L.-H.; Wu, C. Two-band model for magnetism and superconductivity in nickelates. Phys. Rev. Res. 2019, 1, 032046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Wray, L.A.; Xu, S.-Y.; Xia, Y.; Hor, Y.S.; Qian, D.; Fedorov, A.; Lin, H.; Bansil, A.; Cava, R.J.; Hasan, M.Z. Observation of topological order in a superconducting doped topological insulator. Nat. Phys. 2010, 6, 855–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mao, H.-K.; Chen, B.; Gou, H.; Li, K.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Xiao, H.; Yang, W. 2020—Transformative science in the pressure dimension. Matter Radiat. Extrem. 2021, 6, 013001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 07563 g001 550
Figure 1. The superconducting hydrides reported from experiments. Merit index S, calibrated with Tc of MgB2 39 K, is estimated as Tc/(( T c , M g B 2 )2 + Pressure 2)1/2 that is introduced in Reference [23], T c , M g B 2 is the superconductivity transition temperature (39 K) of conventional superconductor MgB2, Tc represents the superconductivity transition temperature (Tc) of a hydride under a certain pressure (P).
Figure 1. The superconducting hydrides reported from experiments. Merit index S, calibrated with Tc of MgB2 39 K, is estimated as Tc/(( T c , M g B 2 )2 + Pressure 2)1/2 that is introduced in Reference [23], T c , M g B 2 is the superconductivity transition temperature (39 K) of conventional superconductor MgB2, Tc represents the superconductivity transition temperature (Tc) of a hydride under a certain pressure (P).
Materials 14 07563 g001
Materials 14 07563 g002 550
Figure 2. Resistive transition values for (a) CHS [11], (b) LaH10 [9], (c) H3S [8] and (d) YH9 [13] in a magnetic field ranging from 0 to 9 T, which, in contrast to most typical type II superconductors (f) [52], shows no appreciable broadening (∆T/Tc) with increasing of magnetic field (e) [52].
Figure 2. Resistive transition values for (a) CHS [11], (b) LaH10 [9], (c) H3S [8] and (d) YH9 [13] in a magnetic field ranging from 0 to 9 T, which, in contrast to most typical type II superconductors (f) [52], shows no appreciable broadening (∆T/Tc) with increasing of magnetic field (e) [52].
Materials 14 07563 g002
Materials 14 07563 g003 550
Figure 3. Predicted crystal structure models for (a) H3S (red = H atom and yellow = sulfur atom) and (b) LaH10. (c) Calculated isosurface of the charge density obtained from states within the energy range of ± 1 eV (yellow = sulfur atom, blue = H atom), which demonstrates the covalent bonding forming between sulfur atoms and H atoms with revealed by in H3S. (d) Calculated total charge densities of LaH10 with the contour spacing of 0.1 e/Å3 (left), the charge connection between La and H atoms around the point marked “×” represents the metallic covalent character of the La−H bond (mid), and the ELF of LaH10 with the contour spacing of 0.1 (right). (e) Calculated density of states of H3S compared to that of H3H at the same volume. The peak at Fermi level arises van Hove singularities. (f) Calculated DOS of LaH10 at 300 GPa. The peak at Fermi level is associated with van Hove singularity. The data in (a,c,e) for H3S are cited from Reference [63] and the data in (b,d,f) for LaH10 are cited from Reference [77].
Figure 3. Predicted crystal structure models for (a) H3S (red = H atom and yellow = sulfur atom) and (b) LaH10. (c) Calculated isosurface of the charge density obtained from states within the energy range of ± 1 eV (yellow = sulfur atom, blue = H atom), which demonstrates the covalent bonding forming between sulfur atoms and H atoms with revealed by in H3S. (d) Calculated total charge densities of LaH10 with the contour spacing of 0.1 e/Å3 (left), the charge connection between La and H atoms around the point marked “×” represents the metallic covalent character of the La−H bond (mid), and the ELF of LaH10 with the contour spacing of 0.1 (right). (e) Calculated density of states of H3S compared to that of H3H at the same volume. The peak at Fermi level arises van Hove singularities. (f) Calculated DOS of LaH10 at 300 GPa. The peak at Fermi level is associated with van Hove singularity. The data in (a,c,e) for H3S are cited from Reference [63] and the data in (b,d,f) for LaH10 are cited from Reference [77].
Materials 14 07563 g003
Table
Table 1. The experiment conditions and results of superconducting hydrides.
Table 1. The experiment conditions and results of superconducting hydrides.
HydridesStarting
Materials		Laser HeatingElectric ResistanceXRDIsotope EffectsMagnetizationTc/PressureRef.
PHxLiquid PH₃NoR(Tc,onset) = ~5 Ω
Zero resistance		———103 K/207 GPa[12]
YHxY + H2/D2
YH3/YD3 + H2/D2
YH3 + AB		2000(10) KR(Tc,onset) = ~0.37 Ω
Zero resistance		YesYes—243 K/201 GPa[13]
ThHxTh + AB179 GPa, 1.064 nm laser, power: 35–40 WR(Tc,onset) = ~0.081 Ω
Zero resistance		Yes——161 K/175 GPa[15]
PrHxPr + AB1650 K@115 GPaR(Tc,onset) = ~0.9 ΩYes——~9 K/130 GPa[16]
LaYHxLaY alloys + AB2000 K@170–196 GPaR(Tc,onset) = ~0.392 Ω
Zero resistance		Yes——253 K/183 GPa[17]
LaHxLa + H2
La + D2		1500 K@145 GPaR(Tc,onset) = ~0.95 Ω
Zero resistance		YesYes—250 K/170 GPa[9]
La + AB2000 K@~180 GPaR(Tc,onset) = ~0.92 Ω
Zero resistance		Yes——260 K/188 GPa[10]
SnHxSn + AB1700 K@200 GPaR(Tc,onset) = ~0.52 Ω, Yes——~70 K/200 GPa[19]
CSHC + S + H24.0 GPa
532-nm laser light, power: 10–25 mW.		R(Tc,onset) = ~1.66 Ω
Zero resistance		Yes—Yes287.7 K/267 GPa[11]
HxSLiquid H2S or D2S NoZero resistanceYesYesYes203 K/155 GPa a[8]
CaHxCa foil + AB2000 K@160–190 GPaR(Tc,onset) = ~0.97 Ω
Zero resistance		Yes——215 K/172 GPa[21]
CeHxCe + AB
Ce + ND3BH3
Ce + ND3BD3
Ce + D2		1500 K@90–137 GPaZero resistanceYesYes—115 K/95 GPa[18]
BaHxBa + AB1600 K@90 GPaR(Tc,onset) = ~1.12 ΩYes——20 K/140 GPa[20]
ScHxSc + AB1500 KR(Tc,onset) = 0.26 ΩYes——22.4 K/156 GPa[22]
LuHxLu + AB1500 K/110 GPaR(Tc,onset) = 0.05 Ω
Zero resistance		Yes——15 K/128 GPa[22]
Notes: AB: NH3BH3; “—”means this term is not mentioned in corresponding literature; “Yes” means this measurement was mentioned to characterize the hydrides; a value comes from Magnetic susceptibility measurement.
Table
Table 2. The list of reported magnetization measurements.
Table 2. The list of reported magnetization measurements.
HydridesMethodsYearRef.
HxSAC magnetic susceptibility measurements2015[8]
HxSnuclear resonant scattering2016[55]
HxSAC magnetic susceptibility measurements2019[56]
LaHxAC magnetic susceptibility measurements2020[38]
CSHAC magnetic susceptibility measurements2020[11]
HxS/LaHxaccurate magnetometry measurements2021[54]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, D.; Ding, Y.; Mao, H.-K. Future Study of Dense Superconducting Hydrides at High Pressure. Materials 2021, 14, 7563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247563

AMA Style

Wang D, Ding Y, Mao H-K. Future Study of Dense Superconducting Hydrides at High Pressure. Materials. 2021; 14(24):7563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247563

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Dong, Yang Ding, and Ho-Kwang Mao. 2021. "Future Study of Dense Superconducting Hydrides at High Pressure" Materials 14, no. 24: 7563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247563

APA Style

Wang, D., Ding, Y., & Mao, H. -K. (2021). Future Study of Dense Superconducting Hydrides at High Pressure. Materials, 14(24), 7563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247563

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop