Next Article in Journal
Role of Chemistry and Crystal Structure on the Electronic Defect States in Cs-Based Halide Perovskites
Next Article in Special Issue
An Engineering Zirconia Ceramic Made of Baddeleyite
Previous Article in Journal
Development of TiAl–Si Alloys—A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Flash Sintering of YSZ/Al2O3 Composites: Effect of Processing and Testing Conditions

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38123 Trento, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(4), 1031; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14041031
Submission received: 25 January 2021 / Revised: 4 February 2021 / Accepted: 17 February 2021 / Published: 22 February 2021

Abstract

:
The flash sintering behavior of yttria-stabilized zirconia/alumina composites was investigated to understand the role of the fundamental processing and testing parameters (electric field intensity, electric current limit, thermal insulation, homogeneity and dispersion of the two phases) on densification. A strong relation between the composite compositions and the electric parameters needed to promote flash sintering is revealed. Interestingly, the composite preparation method, which affects the two-phases dispersion homogeneity, was shown to have a relevant effect on the flash onset conditions, where the more homogeneous material is more difficult to be flashed. Moreover, the use of a simple thermal insulation system around the green body allowed to improve the final density of the composites under constant electric current.

1. Introduction

Flash sintering (FS) is a novel field-assisted sintering technology [1,2,3,4] where an electric field is directly applied to a ceramic green body while it is heated up within a conventional furnace. An electric current is forced to pass through the ceramic activating, at an onset combination of electric field and furnace temperature, the so called flash event [4,5,6] which induces Joule heating and ultra-rapid sintering. The flash transition is also accompanied by a bright glowing and a drop in the electrical resistivity which are considered a footprint of the process [4,5,6]. Such amazing effect, which changes the sintering time form 104 s to 101 s range, has attracted a relevant scientific interest aiming at unraveling the physical and chemical mechanisms behind the phenomenon [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Although definitive conclusions cannot be drawn yet, the mainstream is that the process is predominantly driven by the Joule effect coupled with side field/current-induced athermal phenomena [23] which can be possibly use to develop ceramics with new functional [24,25,26,27] and mechanical [28] properties. On the other hand, several researchers focused on the application of the process to different class of ceramics employing commercially-available spark plasma sintering [26,29,30,31,32] and microwave sintering [33,34] equipment.
Since flash sintering is an electrically-activated phenomenon, a certain interest has risen in the consolidation of composites containing phases characterized by different electrical properties [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], where the conductive one facilitates the flash activation. Yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ)/alumina composites are among the most studied compositions; in fact, they are model systems combining a good ionic conductor and an insulator. Over than the scientific relevance of the composite in the field of flash sintering, biphasic YSZ / Al2O3 systems are among the most diffuse technical ceramics for structural application as they combine relatively lightweight and low price (Al2O3) with high fracture toughness (YSZ) and refractory properties. The first studies were carried out by Naik et al., who investigated the onset conditions and grain coarsening upon FS in 50 vol.% YSZ/Al2O3 composite [40]. More recently, Ojaimi et al., have studied the densification of 75 vol.% ZrO2/25 vol.% Al2O3 composite using two different current and voltage limits [39]. Finally, M’Peko investigated the onset flash condition in well-dispersed YSZ/Al2O3 composites with different compositions, pointing out that FS could not be activated if the YSZ content was lower than 30 vol.%. This was due to the lack of a percolative conductive phase if the YSZ load was below a threshold value.
The goal of the present work was to further investigate the flash sintering behavior of YSZ/Al2O3 composites and identify the role of composition, phases dispersion, electric current and electric field on densification which could be improved also by the use of a simple thermal insulation systems to avoid heat dissipation [44,45].

2. Materials and Methods

Commercially available high purity α-Al2O3 (Taimicron TM-DAR, Taimei Chemicals Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, purity > 99.99%, SSA = 15.6 m2/g) and yttria-stabilized zirconia (TZ-8YSZ, TosohCorp., Shunan, Japan, SSA = 14.5 m2/g) were used in the present study. The two powders were mixed in an agate mortar with distilled water and 6 wt.% binder (B-1000, Duramax, DowChemical, Midland, MI, USA) in different volumetric composition (YSZ:Al2O3): 100:0, 50:50, 25:75, 15:85 and 10:90. The slurry was let to dry overnight at 80 °C.
An additional powder batch was produced by mixing 85 vol.% α-Al2O3 and 15 vol.% YSZ in toluene (Honeywell, 34494, Charlotte, NC, USA) overnight in a TURBULA®T2F (Artisan technology group, Champaign, IL, USA) high energy planetary mixer (together with zirconia balls) to obtain a more homogeneous dispersion of the two phases. The solvent was then evaporated in a fume hood. In the followings, this batch of sample is referred as “turbula mixed”.
Dog-bone samples were produced by uniaxial pressing at 120 MPa and, by average, the specimens’ cross section was 2.6 mm × 2.9 mm. The pressed green bodies were pre-sintered at 1100 °C for 1 h (heating rate = 10 °C/min). The density after pre-sintering was 49–50% of the theoretical one.
Two sets of FS experiments were carried out. The first one was performed to determine the onset temperature for the flash event. Flash sintering was accomplished at constant heating rate (20 °C/min) in a Linseis L75 PT (Linseis, Selb, Germany) horizontal dilatometer. Pt electrodes were inserted in the holes at the sample terminals, where Pt paste was previously placed. The electrodes were connected to a DC power supply (Glassman, 5 kV-120 mA) and a digital multimeter Keithley 2100 (Keithley, Solon, OH, USA). Once the system reached the current limit (set at 8 mA/mm2), the power source worked under current control for 120 s for all samples. The flash onset temperature was determined by the usual tangent method in the Arrhenius power dissipation plots (ln(power) vs. reciprocal of the absolute furnace temperature): the tangent to the power plot was determined before and after the non-linearity of the flash event, their intersection identifies the flash onset furnace temperature.
The second set of experiments aimed at understanding the electric current effect on sintering. The samples were introduced in a pre-heated Nabertherm P330 (Carbolite Gero, Hope, UK) tubular furnace at 1000 °C and, after 5 min, the electric field was applied. Since composites with far different electric properties were tested, two power supplies were used Glassman 5 kV-120 mA (Glassman, Hauppauge, NY, USA); and Sorensen DLM 300-2 (AMETEK Programmable Power, San Diego, CA, USA). Current limits in the range 4–130 mA/mm2 were applied to the specimens and the set voltage limit was high enough to guarantee that the system worked in current control for the entire experiment. The samples were kept in the flash state for 120 s and then the power source was switched off. In order to understand the effect of a thermal insulation systems on the densification by FS, a 5 mm thick silicon nitride felt (produced according to [46]) was wrapped around some samples (50 vol.% of YSZ) before the test. All flash experiments were carried out in air.
The density of the sintered specimens was determined by the Archimedes’ method using an analytical balance (Gibertini) with sensitivity of 0.1 mg. The microstructure was studied by SEM (Jeol JSM 5500, Tokyo, Japan) on fresh fracture surfaces, the samples being coated with a thin Pt/Pd alloy layer by sputtering before the analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

The power dissipation plots recorded during constant heating rate flash experiments are reported in Figure 1. The flash event is signaled by a non-linear power surge whose onset temperature depends on the applied electric field and on the composite composition. Interestingly, all composites produced by manually mixing the powders and containing 15 vol.% or more YSZ were flashed, whereas the samples containing only 10 vol.% conductive phase did not flash even using very high electric fields (800 V/cm). The flash sinterability of the composite containing 15 vol.% YSZ is a rather surprising result if one considers that 15 vol.% is theoretically below the percolation limit of the conductive phase, i.e., YSZ. In this regard, M’Peko [41] reported that well-dispersed YSZ/Al2O3 composites containing 20 vol.% (or less) YSZ cannot be flashed. To check our results a flash experiment was carried out on 15 vol.% YSZ/85 vol.% Al2O3 mixture produced by milling the ceramic powders in toluene using a Turbula mixer. Such processing route allowed to manufacture a homogeneous dispersion of the two phases. Figure 1 points out that the well-dispersed composite cannot be flash sintered under 500 V/m or 800 V/cm, whereas the same composition produced by manually mixing the powders was flashed with electric fields as low as to 350 V/cm. These results point out the relevance of the powder mixing method on the flash sintering behavior of the composites.
The slope of the log(power) vs. 1000/T plot during the flash incubation represents the activation energy for conductivity, Q. It is similar for all tested compositions ranging between 1.05 and 1.25 eV (Figure 1) and it is in rather good agreement with that measured for ionic conductivity in YSZ (typically reported around 0.9–1.1 eV [47]). The independency of Q on the composite composition suggests that the conduction mechanism is likely the same in all materials and it is related to the motion of oxygen ions in the percolative YSZ phase. It is worth spotting that, whereas conductivity is likely predominantly ionic during the incubation, it is expected to switch to electronic n-type at the flash onset [48,49] because of field-induced electrochemical reduction of YSZ under DC.
Figure 2 shows the effect of the composite composition and electric field on the flash onset temperature for materials produced by manually mixing the powders. As expected the onset flash temperature decreases when increasing the applied electric field [50,51] because of the quadratic dependence of the electric power dissipation on field strength. On the other hand, the composite composition plays a key role on the flash activation. In fact, the higher is the YSZ load, the lower is the flash onset temperature. This is clearly due to the fact that charge transport and power dissipation are possible only in the YSZ phase, high purity Al2O3 being a perfect insulator at the tested temperatures [52]. Therefore, as YSZ content increases, so does the composite electrical conductivity which facilitates the activation of the flash thermal runaway. The effect of the composite composition on the electrical conductivity is well-visible in the power dissipation plots (Figure 1) which shift upward with YSZ load. One can also observe that the flash onset temperature is non-linearly correlated with the composite composition. As an example, if samples treated with 500 V/cm are considered, one can observe that the FS temperature increases by ≈130 °C when YSZ is reduced from 100% to 50%. A further YSZ decrease by 25% produces an increase in the onset temperature by ≈110 °C and an additional reduction of 10% (from 25% to 15% YSZ) causes a surge of the flash temperature by nearly 500 °C. This suggests that the sample containing 15 vol.% YSZ is very close to the percolation limit of the conductive phase, below which flash sintering is not possible.
The effect of the current limit on the ceramic bodies densification is reported in Figure 3. The results refer to the experiments carried out at constant furnace temperature (1000 °C) and maintaining the power source in current limit for the entire process (120 s), thus avoiding the incubation step for FS. One can observe high density (90%) can be achieved in all tested compositions. The relative density of all composites grows with the set current limit since Joule heating increases the sample temperature. The composition-related variation of the electrical conductivity causes a substantial shift in the current density required for densification: the larger is the YSZ load, the higher are the conductivity and the current required for densification. In particular, one can observe that the composite containing 15 vol.% YSZ can be densified with current limits in the order of 101 mA/mm2, whereas pure YSZ requires currents in the order of 102 mA/mm2. It is also worth mentioning that the relative density of both the turbula-mixed samples (which did not show the non-linearity of FS in the power plots, Figure 1) was only 50–52%. These values are only slightly above the pre-sintered materials density (49–50%), confirming that no substantial densification occurred. The result agrees with the idea that the flash is a power-activated phenomenon and only modest densification takes place during the incubation stage. Hence, the field alone does not appear to be the real reason for fast densification upon FS, the process being instead related to power dissipation.
The SEM micrographs in Figure 4 confirm the current effect on densification, pointing out that a current limit increase improves densification and activates grain coarsening. One can also notice that the composites manufactured by manually mixing the powders (Figure 4) are not really homogeneous, they presenting big alumina islands within a mixed YSZ/Al2O3 matrix. The confinement of part of the insulating phase (i.e., Al2O3) within these islands decreases its load in the matrix where the electric current is supposed to flow. For such reason, it was possible to flash sinter composites containing only 15 vol.% YSZ, the real YSZ load in the percolative matrix being definitively larger than 15 vol.%. In this case, inhomogeneity helps.
A second key observation from Figure 4 is that the Al2O3 islands are fully dense and possess coarse grains although no current is supposed to pass through them. Therefore, their densification appears substantially related to thermal effects (not a current-induced phenomenon) although occurring in a few seconds. Although this can be considered a side result of the present work and additional investigations are probably required, it could represent a new approach to discriminate the current effects on sintering in the next future.
Density measurements and SEM micrographs in Figure 3 and Figure 5 reveal that the use of ceramic felts to insulate the specimen (and limit heat dissipation) accounts for a significant FS improvement. In fact, the use of thermal insulation allows to increase the relative density by about 10% in the samples treated with 22 and 40 mA/mm2 (50 vol.% of YSZ). Moreover, the microstructure appears coarser because of the heat concentration within the sample. This is really evident in the alumina islands, where the grain size exploded when employing thermal insulation. This further confirms the predominant thermal nature of the mass transport phenomena in the alumina pockets.

4. Conclusions

Yttria-stabilized zirconia/alumina composites can be densified by flash sintering if the conductive phase load exceeds 15 vol.%. The composite preparation method affects the flash onset conditions. In particular, the presence of Al2O3 agglomerates facilitate the activation of the flash transition even in mixtures containing only small amounts of zirconia.
The flash onset temperature strongly depends on the composite composition and on the applied electric field, whereas the density of the sintered bodies varies according to their composition and the current limit. Specifically, mixtures containing larger amount of YSZ require lower fields to be flashed and higher currents to be densified. Moreover, the densification is improved if the ceramic body is thermally insulated upon flash sintering.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B. and V.M.S.; methodology, M.B. and A.O.; formal analysis, A.O.; investigation, A.O.; resources, V.M.S.; data curation, M.B. and A.O.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B.; writing—review and editing, V.M.S.; visualization, M.B.; supervision, M.B. and V.M.S.; funding acquisition, V.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was fund by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) within the programs PRIN2017-2017FCFYHK “DIRECTBIOPOWER”, PRIN2017-2017PMR932 “Nanostructured Porous Ceramics for Environmental and Energy Applications” and Departments of Excellence 2018–2022 (DII-UNITN).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in [Mendeley Data] at [http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/x6dgwwwjcf.1], reference [Flash sintering YSZ/alumina composites].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cologna, M.; Rashkova, B.; Raj, R. Flash sintering of nanograin zirconia in <5 s at 850 °C. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 3556–3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Biesuz, M.; Sglavo, V.M. Flash sintering of ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 115–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Biesuz, M.; Grasso, S.; Sglavo, V.M. What’s new in ceramics sintering? A short report on the latest trends and future prospects. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2020, 24, 100868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ze’ev, B.M.; Shomrat, N.; Tsur, Y. Recent Advances in Mechanism Research and Methods for Electric-Field-Assisted Sintering of Ceramics. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dancer, C.E.J. Flash sintering of ceramic materials. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 102001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yu, M.; Grasso, S.; Mckinnon, R.; Saunders, T.; Reece, M.J. Review of flash sintering: Materials, mechanisms and modelling. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2017, 116, 24–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Naik, K.S.; Sglavo, V.M.; Raj, R. Flash sintering as a nucleation phenomenon and a model thereof. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 34, 4063–4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zapata-Solvas, E.; Gómez-García, D.; Domínguez-Rodríguez, A.; Todd, R.I. Ultra-fast and energy-efficient sintering of ceramics by electric current concentration. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Nie, J.; Chan, J.M.; Luo, J. Probing the densification mechanisms during flash sintering of ZnO. Acta Mater. 2017, 125, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chaim, R. Insights into photoemission origins of flash sintering of ceramics. Scr. Mater. 2021, 196, 113749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Biesuz, M.; Sglavo, V.M. Electric forces effect on field-assisted sintering. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 6259–6265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Biesuz, M.; Sglavo, V.M. Microstructural temperature gradient-driven diffusion: Possible densification mechanism for flash sintering of zirconia? Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Steil, M.C.; Marinha, D.; Aman, Y.; Gomes, J.R.C.; Kleitz, M. From conventional ac flash-sintering of YSZ to hyper-flash and double flash. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 33, 2093–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chaim, R. On the kinetics of liquid-assisted densification during flash sintering of ceramic nanoparticles. Scr. Mater. 2019, 158, 88–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mishra, T.P.; Neto, R.R.I.; Raj, R.; Guillon, O.; Bram, M. Current-rate flash sintering of gadolinium doped ceria: Microstructure and Defect generation. Acta Mater. 2020, 189, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mishra, T.P.; Neto, R.R.I.; Speranza, G.; Quaranta, A.; Sglavo, V.M.; Raj, R.; Guillon, O.; Bram, M.; Biesuz, M. Electronic conductivity in gadolinium doped ceria under direct current as a trigger for flash sintering. Scr. Mater. 2020, 179, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mishra, T.P.; Avila, V.; Neto, R.R.I.; Bram, M.; Guillon, O.; Raj, R. On the role of Debye temperature in the onset of flash in three oxides. Scr. Mater. 2019, 170, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ren, K.; Wang, Q.; Lian, Y.; Wang, Y. Densification kinetics of flash sintered 3mol% Y2O3 stabilized zirconia. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 747, 1073–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chaim, R.; Estournès, C. On thermal runaway and local endothermic/exothermic reactions during flash sintering of ceramic nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 6378–6389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Du, Y.; Stevenson, A.J.; Vernat, D.; Diaz, M.; Marinha, D. Estimating Joule heating and ionic conductivity during flash sintering of 8YSZ. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zapata-Solvas, E.; Bonilla, S.; Wilshaw, P.R.; Todd, R.I. Preliminary investigation of flash sintering of SiC. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 33, 2811–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ji, W.; Parker, B.; Falco, S.; Zhang, J.Y.; Fu, Z.Y.; Todd, R.I. Ultra-fast firing: Effect of heating rate on sintering of 3YSZ, with and without an electric field. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 2547–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Biesuz, M.; Sglavo, V.M. Beyond flash sintering: How the flash event could change ceramics and glass processing. Scr. Mater. 2020, 187, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kayaalp, B.; Klauke, K.; Biesuz, M.; Iannaci, A.; Sglavo, V.M.; D’Arienzo, M.; Noei, H.; Lee, S.; Jung, W.; Mascotto, S. Surface Reconstruction under the Exposure of Electric Fields Enhances the Reactivity of Donor-Doped SrTiO3. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 16883–16892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yamashita, Y.; Kurachi, T.; Tokunaga, T.; Yoshida, H.; Yamamoto, T. Blue photo luminescence from 3 mol%Y2O3-doped ZrO2 polycrystals sintered by flash sintering under an alternating current electric field. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 2072–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Du, B.; Gucci, F.; Porwal, H.; Grasso, S.; Mahajan, A.; Reece, M.J. Flash spark plasma sintering of magnesium silicide stannide with improved thermoelectric properties. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 1514–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yu, M.; Saunders, T.; Grasso, S.; Mahajan, A.; Zhang, H.; Reece, M.J. Magnéli phase titanium suboxides by Flash Spark Plasma Sintering. Scr. Mater. 2018, 146, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cho, J.; Phuah, X.L.; Li, J.; Shang, Z.; Wang, H.; Charalambous, H.; Tsakalakos, T.; Mukherjee, A.K.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X. Temperature effect on mechanical response of flash-sintered ZnO by in-situ compression tests. Acta Mater. 2020, 200, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grasso, S.; Saunders, T.; Porwal, H.; Milsom, B.; Tudball, A.; Reece, M. Flash Spark Plasma Sintering (FSPS) of alpha and beta SiC. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 99, 1534–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Manière, C.; Lee, G.; Olevsky, E.A. All-Materials-Inclusive Flash Spark Plasma Sintering. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tyrpekl, V.; Cologna, M.; Holzhäuser, M.; Svora, P. Power-controlled flash spark plasma sintering of gadolinia-doped ceria. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Niu, B.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, J.; Ji, W.; Wang, W.; Fu, Z. Ultra-fast densification of boron carbide by flash spark plasma sintering. Scr. Mater. 2016, 116, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bykov, Y.V.; Egorov, S.V.; Eremeev, A.G.; Kholoptsev, V.V.; Plotnikov, I.V.; Rybakov, K.I.; Sorokin, A.A. On the mechanism of microwave flash sintering of ceramics. Materials 2016, 9, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Manière, C.; Lee, G.; Zahrah, T.; Olevsky, E.A. Microwave flash sintering of metal powders: From experimental evidence to multiphysics simulation. Acta Mater. 2018, 147, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xiao, W.; Ni, N.; Fan, X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, P. Ambient flash sintering of reduced graphene oxide/zirconia composites: Role of reduced graphene oxide. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fele, G.; Biesuz, M.; Bettotti, P.; Moreno, R.; Sglavo, V.M. Flash sintering of yttria-stabilized zirconia/graphene nano-platelets composite. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 23266–23270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bichaud, E.; Chaix, J.M.; Carry, C.; Kleitz, M.; Steil, M.C. Flash sintering incubation in Al2O3/TZP composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 2587–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marinha, D.; Belmonte, M. Mixed-ionic and electronic conduction and stability of YSZ-graphene composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ojaimi, C.L.; Ferreira, J.A.; Chinelatto, A.L.; Chinelatto, A.S.A.; de Jesus Agnolon Pallone, E.M. Microstructural analysis of ZrO2/Al2O3 composite: Flash and conventional sintering. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 2473–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Naik, K.S.; Sglavo, V.M.; Raj, R. Field assisted sintering of ceramic constituted by alumina and yttria stabilized zirconia. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 34, 2435–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. M’Peko, J.-C. Flash sintering in well-dispersed insulator-ionic conductor composites: The case of diphasic alumina-zirconia (Al2O3-3YSZ) system. Scr. Mater. 2020, 175, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guan, L.; Li, J.; Song, X.; Bao, J.; Jiang, T. Graphite assisted flash sintering of Sm2O3 doped CeO2 ceramics at the onset temperature of 25 °C. Scr. Mater. 2019, 159, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Muccillo, R.; Ferlauto, A.S.; Muccillo, E.N.S. Flash Sintering Samaria-Doped Ceria–Carbon Nanotube Composites. Ceramics 2019, 2, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Biesuz, M.; Dong, J.; Fu, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, D.; Hu, C.; Grasso, S. Thermally-insulated flash sintering. Scr. Mater. 2019, 162, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, J.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Huang, R.; Jia, Z. Alternating current field flash sintering 99% relative density ZnO ceramics at room temperature. Scr. Mater. 2020, 176, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Biesuz, M.; Zera, E.; Tomasi, M.; Jana, P.; Ersen, O.; Baaziz, W.; Lindemann, A.; Sorarù, G.D. Polymer-derived Si3N4 nanofelts for flexible, high temperature, lightweight and easy-manufacturable super-thermal insulators. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 20, 100648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Suzuki, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Nagae, N. The behavior of electrical conductivity of Y2O3-stabilized zirconia. Solid State Ion. 1981, 3–4, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Biesuz, M.; Pinter, L.; Saunders, T.; Reece, M.; Binner, J.; Sglavo, V.; Grasso, S. Investigation of Electrochemical, Optical and Thermal Effects during Flash Sintering of 8YSZ. Materials 2018, 11, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Jovaní, M.; Beltrán-mir, H.; Cordoncillo, E.; West, A.R. Field-induced p-n transition in yttria-stabilized zirconia. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Downs, J.A.; Sglavo, V.M. Electric field assisted sintering of cubic zirconia at 390 °C. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 96, 1342–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cologna, M.; Prette, A.L.G.; Raj, R. Flash-sintering of cubic yttria-stabilized zirconia at 750 °C for possible use in SOFC manufacturing. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cologna, M.; Francis, J.S.C.; Raj, R. Field assisted and flash sintering of alumina and its relationship to conductivity and MgO-doping. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 31, 2827–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Specific power density as a function of the reciprocal of the furnace temperature for composites possessing different compositions (constant heating rate = 20 °C/min). Where not otherwise specified, the composites were produced by manually mixing YSZ and alumina powders. The sample containing 10 vol.% YSZ was tested twice under 800 V/cm to confirm the absence of the flash transition. All the plots refer to samples without thermal insulation, the current limit was 8 mA/mm2.
Figure 1. Specific power density as a function of the reciprocal of the furnace temperature for composites possessing different compositions (constant heating rate = 20 °C/min). Where not otherwise specified, the composites were produced by manually mixing YSZ and alumina powders. The sample containing 10 vol.% YSZ was tested twice under 800 V/cm to confirm the absence of the flash transition. All the plots refer to samples without thermal insulation, the current limit was 8 mA/mm2.
Materials 14 01031 g001
Figure 2. Flash onset furnace temperature as a function of the electric field and composite composition in samples produced by manually mixing the powders (constant heating rate = 20 °C/min). The samples were not thermally insulated and the current limit was 8 mA/mm2.
Figure 2. Flash onset furnace temperature as a function of the electric field and composite composition in samples produced by manually mixing the powders (constant heating rate = 20 °C/min). The samples were not thermally insulated and the current limit was 8 mA/mm2.
Materials 14 01031 g002
Figure 3. Bulk density of the flash sintered bodies as a function of the applied current density and composite composition (furnace temperature = 1000 °C, dwell time in the flash state = 120 s). The materials were produced by manually mixing the powders. Where not otherwise specified the samples were not thermally insulated. The power source was kept in current limit for whole the process.
Figure 3. Bulk density of the flash sintered bodies as a function of the applied current density and composite composition (furnace temperature = 1000 °C, dwell time in the flash state = 120 s). The materials were produced by manually mixing the powders. Where not otherwise specified the samples were not thermally insulated. The power source was kept in current limit for whole the process.
Materials 14 01031 g003
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the composite containing 15 vol.% YSZ flashed with different current densities (furnace temperature = 1000 °C, dwell time in the flash state = 120 s). The samples were not thermally insulated and the power source was kept in current limit for the entire process. The materials were produced by manually mixing the powders.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the composite containing 15 vol.% YSZ flashed with different current densities (furnace temperature = 1000 °C, dwell time in the flash state = 120 s). The samples were not thermally insulated and the power source was kept in current limit for the entire process. The materials were produced by manually mixing the powders.
Materials 14 01031 g004
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of the composite containing 50 vol.% of YSZ and flash sintered with and without thermal insulation (furnace temperature = 1000 °C, dwell time in the flash state = 120 s). The power source was kept in current limit for the entire process. The materials were produced by manually mixing the powders.
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of the composite containing 50 vol.% of YSZ and flash sintered with and without thermal insulation (furnace temperature = 1000 °C, dwell time in the flash state = 120 s). The power source was kept in current limit for the entire process. The materials were produced by manually mixing the powders.
Materials 14 01031 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Biesuz, M.; Ometto, A.; Sglavo, V.M. Flash Sintering of YSZ/Al2O3 Composites: Effect of Processing and Testing Conditions. Materials 2021, 14, 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14041031

AMA Style

Biesuz M, Ometto A, Sglavo VM. Flash Sintering of YSZ/Al2O3 Composites: Effect of Processing and Testing Conditions. Materials. 2021; 14(4):1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14041031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Biesuz, Mattia, Andrea Ometto, and Vincenzo Maria Sglavo. 2021. "Flash Sintering of YSZ/Al2O3 Composites: Effect of Processing and Testing Conditions" Materials 14, no. 4: 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14041031

APA Style

Biesuz, M., Ometto, A., & Sglavo, V. M. (2021). Flash Sintering of YSZ/Al2O3 Composites: Effect of Processing and Testing Conditions. Materials, 14(4), 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14041031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop