Next Article in Journal
High Martensitic Steel after Welding with Micro-Jet Cooling in Microstructural and Mechanical Investigations
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of PC12 Cells’ Proliferation, Adhesion and Migration with the Use of an Extracellular Matrix (CorMatrix) for Application in Neural Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of Mortars with Commercially-Available Reactive Magnesium Oxide as Alternative Binder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Non-Iridescent Metal Nanomesh with Disordered Nanoapertures Fabricated by Phase Separation Lithography of Polymer Blend as Transparent Conductive Film
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Upconversion Luminescence of Silica–Calcia Nanoparticles Co-doped with Tm3+ and Yb3+ Ions

by
Katarzyna Halubek-Gluchowska
1,*,
Damian Szymański
1,
Thi Ngoc Lam Tran
2,
Maurizio Ferrari
2 and
Anna Lukowiak
1,*
1
Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Okolna 2, 50-422 Wroclaw, Poland
2
IFN-CNR CSMFO Lab. and FBK Photonics Unit, Via alla Cascata 56/C, Povo, 38100 Trento, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(4), 937; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040937
Submission received: 30 December 2020 / Revised: 28 January 2021 / Accepted: 7 February 2021 / Published: 16 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Nanostructured Materials)

Abstract

:
Looking for upconverting biocompatible nanoparticles, we have prepared by the sol–gel method, silica–calcia glass nanopowders doped with different concentration of Tm3+ and Yb3+ ions (Tm3+ from 0.15 mol% up to 0.5 mol% and Yb3+ from 1 mol% up to 4 mol%) and characterized their structure, morphology, and optical properties. X-ray diffraction patterns indicated an amorphous phase of the silica-based glass with partial crystallization of samples with a higher content of lanthanides ions. Transmission electron microscopy images showed that the average size of particles decreased with increasing lanthanides content. The upconversion (UC) emission spectra and fluorescence lifetimes were registered under near infrared excitation (980 nm) at room temperature to study the energy transfer between Yb3+ and Tm3+ at various active ions concentrations. Characteristic emission bands of Tm3+ ions in the range of 350 nm to 850 nm were observed. To understand the mechanism of Yb3+–Tm3+ UC energy transfer in the SiO2–CaO powders, the kinetics of luminescence decays were studied.

1. Introduction

Rare-earth-activated systems have been demonstrated to be the pillar of photonic technologies enabling a broad spectrum of crucial applications in strategic social and economic priorities [1,2,3,4,5]. Systems based on rare-earth-doped upconverters are largely employed in bioimaging, drug delivery, laser, lighting, photon management, environmental sensing, and nanothermometry [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Upconversion (UC) mechanism is a process of energy transfer from a sensitizer in a proper host matrix, which is excited under low-energy radiation (usually near infrared, NIR), to an emitter that emits higher energy photons than the excitation ones. This is a multi-photon process in which two or more low-energy photons are needed to generate in consequence shorter wavelength photon and the emission with higher photon energy (ultraviolet (UV), visible (VIS), or NIR radiation) than the energy of the pumping source [16,17].
Yb3+ ions are excellent luminescence sensitizers for other rare earth ions due to their effective absorption cross section at 980 nm [16]. The Yb3+ ion has been demonstrated to be a crucial element for upconverters [16], high power lasers [18], photovoltaic systems [19], and integrated optics [5]. The couple Tm3+/Yb3+ ions have been largely investigated because of the need to efficiently pump the Tm3+ ion to obtain upconversion-based photonic devices on a broad spectrum of wavelengths. There are reports on Tm3+/Yb3+ upconversion luminescence in single crystals [9], nanocrystals [17], glasses [20], ceramics [21], and glass-ceramics [19]. Interesting research was performed on Tm3+/Yb3+ upconversion luminescence in silicate glasses [22,23] to enhance the optical amplification spectroscopic properties of thulium in silica. Moreover, studies were also dedicated to the downconversion mechanism between Tm3+/Yb3+ in glass or nanocrystals [17,24].
Properly synthesized silica-based glasses can be described as bioactive materials able to form a hydroxyapatite-like surface layer when immersed in a simulated body fluid similar to the blood plasma. Non-toxic and biocompatible bioactive glass is used in medicine to replace defects in bones or to stimulate growing new bones. Recently, lanthanides co-doped with ytterbium ions were introduced into bioactive glass matrices to study their optical properties and upconversion luminescence. For example, Li et al. described a couple of Er3+/Yb3+ ions in CaSiO3 [25] and Kalaivani et al. doped sol–gel-derived glasses of SiO2–Na2O–CaO–P2O5 with Tb3+ and Yb3+ [26]. The systems were tested to estimate their biological properties and applications for regenerative medicine. In addition to conducting a bioactivity test of Gd3+/Yb3+-co-doped SiO2–Na2O–CaO–P2O5 glass [27], the group of Borges had also a second goal to study the role of rare earth ions in the modification of glass structure [28].
Within this work, we successfully used the sol–gel method to prepare powders of silica–calcia glass doped with different concentrations of Tm3+ and Yb3+ ions (not studied so far) and characterized their structure and morphology. The spectroscopic properties of the samples, such as absorption, UC emission, and photoluminescence decay times, were also investigated to propose the energy transfer mechanism in the studied system.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of SiO2–CaO Particles Doped with Rare Earth Ions

The analytical reagents comprising tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), HNO3, NH4OH, Ca(NO3)2∙4H2O (Avantor Performance Materials, Gliwice, Poland), and high purity Yb2O3 and Tm2O3 (≥99.99%, Stanford Materials Co., Lake Forest, CA, USA) were used as starting materials to obtain seven samples of different compositions varied through the incorporation of rare earth elements: (xTm3+/yYb3+):63SiO2–37CaO, where x = 0.15, 0.3 or 0.5 and y = 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 (mol%). Additionally, one sample without rare earth ions was synthesized as well.
The silica–calcia glasses were prepared by the sol–gel method as described previously [29]. The starting materials were mixed in requisite proportions and order. The derived powders were centrifuged and washed three times with distilled water and dried at 70 °C overnight. Then, the samples were calcined at 800 °C for 2 h.

2.2. Characterization

The structure of the samples was identified by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, X’Pert PRO, PANalytical, Bruker, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) scanning the diffraction angles (2θ) between 10° and 70° at room temperature.
The morphology and microstructure were examined by a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) (Philips CM-20 SuperTwin, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, operating at 160 kV) equipped with a selected area electron diffraction (SAED). TEM measurements have been performed on a copper grid coated with carbon. The grain size distribution has been determined for about 200 particles. The chemical composition of the samples was determined using a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM) (FEI Nova NanoSEM 230, Fremont, CA, USA) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDAX Genesis XM4). The EDS analyses were performed at 18.0 kV from the large area (250 μm × 200 μm) of the samples. The powder samples were included in the carbon resin and then pressed to obtain a large and flat area. Signals from three randomly selected areas were collected to ensure satisfactory statistical averaging.
The absorption spectra of the powders were collected in the reflection mode using a UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (Agilent Cary 5000, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in the wavelength range from 200 to 1300 nm. Photoluminescence spectra were measured using an FLS980 fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments, Livingstone, UK) equipped with a 980 nm laser diode as an excitation source and a photomultiplier as a detector. For decay time measurements, triggering was used with a 150 W xenon pulsed flash lamp (pulse duration 1–2 µs, 20 Hz) and the same photomultiplier as a detector. Spectra were corrected with respect to the detector sensitivity and lamp characteristic. All the measurements were done at room temperature. From the measured photoluminescence decay curves, 1/e decay times (τ1/e) were determined for all samples [30].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural and Morphological Characterization

The chosen method allowed the preparation of two series of samples with various Tm3+ and Yb3+ concentrations (Table 1). The XRD patterns of all compositions are shown in Figure 1. All patterns were characterized by signals displaying the amorphous nature of the glass with typical broad reflections. For three samples with the lowest thulium concentration of 0.15% (Figure 1a), a low reflection signal at 2θ = 30° was recorded indicating partial crystallization of the glass probably in the wollastonite phase of calcium silicate (CaSiO3, JCPDS No. 96-900-5779). Due to the low samples’ crystallinity, this phase cannot be fully confirmed but it is pointed out here to be the most probable. In the case of samples doped with 4% of Yb3+ and a higher concentration of Tm3+ ions (Figure 1b), a higher degree of crystallization occurred and the second phase of calcium silicate was detected—pseudowollastonite (JCPDS No. 96-900-2180). Thus, it can be concluded that the introduction of selected rare earth ions in the system favors the formation of glass-ceramic.
In order to determine the morphology of the silica–calcia powders, a transmission electron microscope was used. Figure 2 shows representative TEM images of the un-doped and Tm3+/Yb3+-co-doped samples, which reveal that examined SiO2–CaO particles were nanosized and exhibited two different morphologies. TEM image of the un-doped glass and the particle size distribution (Figure 2a) indicated that SiO2–CaO had a regular morphology and relatively good monodispersity with diameters of particles from 80 to 120 nm. It can also be seen that spherical particles were non-aggregated and uniformly distributed. On the other hand, the particles of Tm3+/Yb3+-doped samples exhibited undefined shapes and formed large groups of agglomerates (see Figure 2b–d). The size distribution histograms showed that the maximum size of particles decreased from 30–80 nm to 15–30 nm for the 0.15Tm2Yb and 0.5Tm4Yb samples, respectively. As is well known, the sol–gel synthesis conditions strongly influence the final morphology of the samples. This effect is easily observed in the case of synthesis of silica–calcia system where both particles of undefined shape as well as spheres with different diameters can be obtained [29]. From these studies, it is evident that even a low concentration of introduced rare earth ions modifies synthesis conditions and effects in different shapes of the particles.
To confirm the structure of SiO2–CaO samples, SAED images were also employed. The selected area electron diffraction pattern displayed an amorphous pattern of SiO2–CaO glass (see insets in Figure 2). It is clearly visible that a diffraction pattern of examined samples exhibited a ring pattern as a result of the absence of long-range order, which is consistent with the XRD results showing broad reflections from the amorphous phase. SAED technique has not shown the minor crystalline phases, most probably due to the analysis performed on a selected area of the samples.
The elemental compositions of the SiO2–CaO glasses were analyzed by Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy. The EDS spectra presented in Figure 2 show three strong bands of oxygen (O), silicon (Si), and calcium (Ca). Other recorded bands with maxima at 7.15 and 7.42 keV have been attributed to thulium (Tm) and ytterbium (Yb) elements, respectively. Moreover, additional bands from other elements were not detected which indicates that the samples were free from contaminants. Table 1 shows the weight percentage of the SiO2, CaO, Tm2O3, and Yb2O3 obtained from the EDS analysis.

3.2. Spectroscopic Properties

3.2.1. Absorption Spectra

The absorption spectrum of 0.5Tm4Yb powder in the NIR-Vis spectral range is shown in Figure 3. In the 300–1300 nm range, there were observed relatively intense and well separated bands of intraconfigurational 4fN4fN transitions from 3H6 and 2F5/2 ground state to the high-lying levels of Tm3+ and Yb3+ ions, respectively. The absorption bands with maxima at 356, 463, 683, and 1210 nm have been assigned to the transitions from the 3H6 ground state to the 3H5, 3H4, <3F3, 3F2>, 1G4, and 1D2 excited states of Tm3+, respectively. The absorption bands related to the higher energy level of trivalent thulium ion were not observed due to the strong absorption of the SiO2–CaO host and scattering of the light on the sample.
The absorption band located at 840–1135 nm, assigned to the spin-allowed 2F7/22F5/2 transition of Yb3+ (present in the sample at a higher concentration than Tm3+ ions), exhibits the maximum value of absorbance. The observed shape of the Yb3+ absorption band showed inhomogeneous broadening features due to the short-range order in the amorphous matrix. This band consisted of broad weakly resolved bands located between 840 and 1110 nm, which corresponded to the Stark components of the 2F7/22F5/2 transitions. The strongest absorption line is the 0-phonon line at around 976 nm. This is the transition from the lowest Stark level of the 2F7/2(1) ground state to the lowest Stark level of the 2F5/2(5) excited state. The others, much less intensive and less separated components, are more difficult to spectrally resolve.

3.2.2. Emission Spectra

The upconversion emission spectra shown in Figure 4 were registered under near infrared excitation (980 nm) to study the energy transfer between Yb3+ and Tm3+ at various active ions concentrations. In these spectra, four emission bands in the ultraviolet (centered at 366 nm), blue (475 nm), red (651 nm), and near infrared (805 nm) were observed and all the emission bands corresponded to the Tm3+ intraconfigurational f-f transitions. The ultraviolet emission band is assigned to the 1D23H6 transition while the blue and the red emission bands are corresponding to the 1G43H6 and the 1G43F4 transitions, respectively. In particular, the NIR band can be contributed by two different transitions: 1G43H5 and 3H43H6, of which the luminescence bands overlap at around 800 nm region as reported in the previous works [23,31,32]. From both sets of spectra shown in Figure 4, one can see that the most intense upconversion emission was the NIR emission. At the same constant concentration of Tm3+ (0.15%), increasing Yb3+ concentration up to 4% led to an enhancement of all the observed UC emission bands (Figure 4a). Most probably, this effect arose due to a more efficient energy transfer between Yb3+ and Tm3+ ions at a higher concentration of the donor. At the same, Yb3+ concentration of 4%, the UC emission bands were enhanced when the Tm3+ concentration increased from 0.15% to 0.3%, but they diminished when the Tm3+ concentration reached 0.5% (Figure 4b). A higher concentration of acceptor (Tm3+) might also favor energy migration observed as more intense luminescence, but above some level of Tm3+, concentration quenching may occur.

3.2.3. Time-Resolved UC Photoluminescence

In this section, the time-resolved UC photoluminescence in the visible and NIR ranges are analyzed separately. The emission intensity in the UV, i.e., at 366 nm, had a very low intensity and therefore, these bands were not taken into consideration in the studies.
To study the luminescence decay times of the 1G4 manifolds of Tm3+ in silica–calcia co-doped with different Tm3+ and Yb3+ concentrations, the time-resolved UC photoluminescence spectra of the branching 1G43H6 transition (at 475 nm) and 1G43F4 transition (at 650 nm) were measured as shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. In the particular case of the SiO2–CaO powder co-doped with 0.3% Tm3+ and 4% Yb3+ (0.3Tm4Yb), the time-resolved luminescence spectra of both branching 1G43H6 and 1G43F4 transitions showed a single exponential decay with comparable values of 1G4 decay times of around 100 µs (see Table 2). This single exponential decay (indicating that only one site of Tm3+ ions in the 0.3Tm4Yb powder is involved in these UC processes) is in nature with the characteristic lifetime of the 1G4 manifolds of Tm3+ reported in cases of Tm3+-single-doped silica fibers [23,33,34] and thus, it is suggested to be the spontaneous decay time of the 1G4 manifolds of Tm3+ in the SiO2–CaO matrix. In comparison with the 1G4 decay times of Tm3+ in fluorides being typically in ms range, these ions in silica-based matrices exhibit a shorter luminescence lifetime [35] indicating a strong contribution from non-radiative pathways. This was expected due to the chemical composition of the network where [SiO4]4− groups give rise to the vibrational energies in the order of 1100 cm−1 (relatively high compared to other host materials, such as fluorides (350 cm−1) or tellurites (700 cm−1)). Additionally, possible defective structure on a microscopic level of the sol–gel-derived SiO2–CaO glassceramic can also induce the shortening of the decay times of Tm3+.
The powders other than 0.3Tm4Yb exhibited non-single exponential decays for both branching 1G43H6 and 1G43F4 transitions of Tm3+ with shorter 1/e decay times. As discussed in Section 3.1, the structure of the SiO2–CaO changed with the dopants concentrations. These changes most probably give rise to the presence of multiple, crystallographically inequivalent sites due to the short-range order in the glassceramics [2]. Consequently, this can induce the complex features and shortening of the decay times in the investigated samples. Moreover, the shortening of the 1/e decay times of the 1G4 manifolds can be contributed as well by several processes such as cross-relaxation between Tm3+ ions and back energy transfer from Tm3+ to Yb3+ [23,36]. In other words, there are several decay processes possibly occurring at the depletion of the 1G4 populated ions but further investigations would be needed to describe them in detail.
To investigate more deeply the effect of Tm3+ and Yb3+ concentrations on the UC photoluminescence, the 1/e decay times of the 1G4 manifolds for all the samples were collected in Table 2 and analyzed. The decay times of 1G4 manifolds derived from both branching transitions 1G43H6 and 1G43F4 of the investigated powders showed the same behavior concerning the concentration of the dopants, as well as their Yb3+:Tm3+ concentration ratios varying from 7 to 27 (Table 2). In the SiO2–CaO samples doped with the same Tm3+ concentration of 0.15%, the powders doped with the smallest Yb3+ concentration, i.e., 1%, with Yb3+:Tm3+ ratio equal to 7, exhibited a short 1/e lifetime of the 1G4 manifolds in the range of 13–15 µs. The 0.5Tm4Yb sample having almost the same Yb3+:Tm3+ ions ratio (equal to 8) showed a similar 1/e lifetime. Considering the powders doped with 0.15% of Tm3+ and higher Yb3+ concentrations (2, 3, and 4%), the 1/e decay times showed comparable longer values in the range from 23 to 63 µs. On the other hand, concerning the SiO2–CaO powders doped with a constant Yb3+ concentration of 4%, they have not shown a clear tendency of the variation of the 1/e decay times with Tm3+ content. Among them, the 0.3Tm4Yb sample exhibited the longest 1G4 decay time of about 100 µs.
The above observations may rise to the following conclusions. The 0.3Tm4Yb powder showed a single exponential 1G4 decay times indicating that the processes of spontaneous decays from the 1G4 manifolds to other lower energy electronic states of the Tm3+ ions dominated the depletion of such ions at the excited 1G4 state. Moreover, the possible impact of the multiple, crystallographically inequivalent sites, back energy transfer from Tm3+ to Yb3+, and non-radiative processes were negligible in the de-population of Tm3+ ions at 1G4 manifolds for this sample. For other Yb3+:Tm3+ concentration ratios, especially at low Yb3+:Tm3+ ratios of 7 or 8, fast decay processes may take place evidenced by the non-single-exponential behaviors and shortening of the 1G4 decay times (see Figure 5 and Figure 6). The aforementioned processes absent in the case of 0.3Tm4Yb may derive the depletion of the 1G4 populated ions in the other samples. Eventually, the SiO2–CaO powder co-doped with 0.3% Tm3+ and 4% Yb3+ with their dominant spontaneous emission is the most optimal composition for obtaining upconversion photoluminescence in the blue and red spectral ranges.
Looking at the time-resolved UC photoluminescence at 805 nm emission band of the investigated samples (Figure 7), one may note that the decay curves of the 3H4 manifolds of Tm3+ in all the samples exhibited non-single-exponential decays profiles. The 1/e decay time τ1/e of the 3H4 manifolds of Tm3+ are also tabulated in Table 2. For powders with a Yb3+:Tm3+ molar ratio ranging from 13 to 27, the decay times had comparative values ranging from 31 µs to 39 µs. On the other hand, for the SiO2–CaO powders with a Yb3+:Tm3+ molar ratio of 7 and 8, the same parameter exhibited shorter time of about 13 µs. Thus, the 1/e decay times of the 3H4 of Tm3+ ions concerning dopants concentrations showed similar behavior with the 1/e 1G4 decay times. The 0.3Tm4Yb sample also exhibited the longest 1/e decay time of the 3H4 manifolds as in the case of the 1G4. However, unlike the cases of the blue and red emission bands from the 1G4 manifold, the time-resolved photoluminescence NIR band of Tm3+ ions of this sample did not show single-exponential behavior. These observations are not surprising since, at the 805 nm emission band, there exists an overlap of the two transitions: 3H43H6 and 1G43H5.
To define the decay time of the 3H4 manifolds of Tm3+ ions as well as reveal the contribution of both 3H43H6 and 1G43H5 transitions to the emission band centered at 805 nm, the time-resolved UC photoluminescence at 805 nm emission band of the 0.3Tm4Yb sample was fitted into a double exponential function as shown in Figure 8 together with the decay curves from 1G4 manifolds, i.e., blue and red emission band. The fitting result is listed in Table 3.
As one can see from Figure 8, the time-resolved UC photoluminescence at 805 nm emission band of Tm3+ of the 0.3Tm4Yb powder is well-fitted to the double exponential function. Thus, a sum function of two exponentials was employed to describe the luminescence decay function as suggested by Righini et al. [30]:
ϕ ( t ) = A × exp [ t τ 1 ] + ( 1 A ) exp [ t τ 2 ]
where ϕ(t) is the decay function, τ1 and τ2 are the two decay time components, and A is the fitting parameter describing the amplitude of the contribution of the decay time component τ1 (Table 3).
The double exponential fitting results unravel the contribution of both the 1G43H5 and 3H43H6 transitions. The short component of around 9 µs is assigned to the decay time of the 3H4 manifolds, which is slightly lower than the value of around 20 µs reported in the literature [23]. This reduction of the 3H4 manifold decay time can be due to the multiphonon processes or cross-relaxation in the SiO2–CaO matrix. The long decay component of around 88 µs which is comparable to the 1G4 decay time (see Table 3) indicates the contribution of the 1G43H5 transition to the UC photoluminescence at 805 nm. Moreover, the obtained fitting parameter A of 0.55 indicates that both 1G43H5 and 3H43H6 transitions contributed comparably to the UC photoluminescence at 805 nm.
It must be also mentioned that the existence of the crystalline phases in selected samples may influence the kinetics of the photoluminescence processes because the decay times of thulium ions depend also on the matrix [37,38].

3.2.4. UC Excitation Power Dependence and Yb3+-Tm3+ UC Energy Transfer

The upconversion emission intensity for the observed UV, blue, red, and NIR signals was examined as a function of the laser diode (980 nm) excitation power density (Figure 9).
In general, the number of photons which are required to populate the upper emitting state under unsaturated conditions can be obtained by the relation [39,40]:
IL ∝ PN
where IL is the photoluminescence intensity, P is the pump laser power density (W·cm−2), and N is the number of the laser photons required to observe UC emission. At low incident power at which the unsaturated condition is satisfied, the UC photoluminescence intensity is proportional to the incident pump power following the relation (2). Therefore, the slope values N in Figure 9 can provide information on the number of photons absorbed to provide upconversion photoluminescence. The values are determined from the linear dependencies range as marked in Figure 9 (points at high incident powers are not taken into account due to the saturation effect [41]). The summary of N numbers for different UC processes observed as emission at 366 nm, 475 nm, 651 nm, and 805 nm for the investigated samples is listed in Table 4.
The slope value N of all transitions varies slightly upon the concentrations of the active ions in the investigated samples. It was concluded that in the 3H43H6 transitions, absorption of one photon is required whereas, for other transitions, two or more photons are involved in the upconversion process. The unexpected low value of N = 0.32 for 1D23H6 transition in the case of 0.15Tm1Yb sample was not taken into account because of the difficulties to correctly estimate the power dependence due to the low intensity of this luminescence.
To understand the mechanism of Yb3+-Tm3+ UC energy transfer, the energy level diagrams of the Yb3+ and Tm3+ ions were prepared as illustrated in Figure 10. Taking into account the NIR upconversion at 805 nm, as discussed above, two main transitions are contributing to this emission band: the 1G43H5 and 3H43H6 transitions. Concerning the latter one, under 980 nm excitation, the population of 3H4 manifolds of Tm3+ can be derived by one photon energy transfer from Yb3+ ion at the excited state 2F5/2 (1 photon ETU; mentioned here possible energy transfer processes are marked in Figure 10) and the missing energy gap between 2F5/2 (Yb3+) and 3H4 states in this process can be fulfilled by phonons, i.e., phonon assistance upconversion (PAET). However, there is another possibility that several Tm3+ ions at a ground state can be excited into the 3H4 by the cross-relaxation processes (CR) between the excited Tm3+ ions and the Tm3+ ions at the ground state, i.e., ground state absorption (GSA). This can be an explanation for the complex decay times behavior of the investigated powders in the observed UC photoluminescence. With this UC mechanism, the number of 980 nm excitation photons needed is 1. On the other hand, referring to the 1G43H5 transition, the UC mechanism to populate the Tm3+ into the 1G4 is assigned to a two-photon energy transfer from Yb3+ ion at the excited state 2F5/2 to the Tm3+ ions and the necessary number of 980 nm excitation photon is 2 (2 photon ETU). If there is only the combination of these two UC energy transfers according to the excitation to 1G4 and 3H4 manifolds, the slope number of this transition should be in the range from 1 to 2 as in the cases of the samples with the lowest Tm3+ concentration (0.15%). However, since there can be the occurrence of the GSA and CR processes and contribution of phonon energy, the slope number of the powder can be lower than 1 as also observed in the work of Simpson et al. [23]. Furthermore, this effect probably occurs in the cases of the powders with Tm3+ concentration higher than 0.15%, which can be due to the higher contribution of the CR and GSA processes to the excitation of the ions to the 3H4 excited state occurring when there are higher Tm3+ concentration.
In the case of the UC photoluminescence at both the blue and red emission bands according to the 1G43H6 and 1G43F4 transitions, the observed slope values are ranging from 1.41 to 2.07 among the investigated powders, which is sufficiently in agreement with the proposed two-photon energy transfer from Yb3+ ion at the excited state 2F5/2 to the Tm3+ ions (2 photon ETU) as shown in Figure 10. As mentioned, the cases of the slope values below 2 can be due to the contribution of the CR processes and the contribution of multiphonon processes.
Last but not least, concerning the UC photoluminescence at 366 nm, in principle, the three-photon energy transfer from Yb3+ ion at the excited state 2F5/2 to the Tm3+ ions (3 photon ETU) is proposed to be the mechanism driving this UV emission band. However, the slope values of the powders are generally close to 2 or even below 2. As discussed, the effect of cross-relaxation and multiphonon processes can account for this as in the other emission bands.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, we have successfully synthesized new Tm3+/Yb3+-co-doped SiO2–CaO powders by the sol–gel method. XRD analysis and transmission electron microscope images showed the influence of thulium and ytterbium ions on the structure and morphology of derived nanoparticles. For a smaller amount of dopants, the amorphous structure of the material was registered. With an increased amount of the dopants, a smaller size of the particles and partial crystallization of calcium silicate phases were observed. Furthermore, optical measurements were performed. Upconversion emission was registered upon 980 nm excitation at room temperature and four main emission bands were observed from 300 nm to 850 nm due to the transitions from 1D2 excitation level to 3H6 (ultraviolet), from 1G4 level to 3H6 (blue), 3F4 (red) and 3H5 (NIR), and from 3H4 level to 3H6 (NIR). The intensities of photoluminescence and decay times of Tm3+ were dependent on the concentration of both Yb3+ (changing from 1 to 4 mol%) and Tm3+ (changing from 0.15 to 0.5 mol%) ions. The highest emission intensity and single exponential decay time were registered for the concentration of 0.3% Tm3+ and 4% Yb3+, which would indicate this sample as the most promising one in further studies. The optical measurement data including decay times were used to propose the most likely energy transfer diagram between ytterbium and thulium ions.
The experimental results indicate that these new up-converting nanoparticles are promising materials for biological testing and applications; although, further investigation is mandatory to optimize the properties of the system. Compared to the commonly used nanoparticles like fluorides, bioactive glasses have many advantages, such as non-toxicity, biocompatibility, the possibility of surface functionalization, and more environment-friendly synthesis methods [25,26,42]. The luminescent ions in the amorphous glass are weaker coordinated, so usually, the emission from these ions is less intense and has a lower efficiency compared to fluorides and thus, the way these two materials might be used is different. In fluorides, high emission efficiency is helpful for biomarkers applications. In the case of glasses, that are designed mainly as bioactive materials in regenerative medicine or drug delivery, the UC luminescence can be helpful in biosensing and controlling the compositional and structural changes of the glass.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.H.-G., A.L.; formal analysis, K.H.-G., D.S., T.N.L.T.; investigation, K.H.-G.; data curation, K.H.-G., D.S.; writing—original draft preparation, K.H.-G., A.L.; writing—review and editing, K.H.-G., D.S., T.N.L.T., M.F., A.L.; visualization, K.H.-G., D.S.; supervision, A.L.; funding acquisition, A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland under grant SONATA BIS no. 2016/22/E/ST5/00530.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lukowiak, A.; Zur, L.; Tomala, R.; LamTran, T.N.; Bouajaj, A.; Strek, W.; Righini, G.C.; Wickleder, M.; Ferrari, M. Rare earth elements and urban mines: Critical strategies for sustainable development. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 26247–26250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lukowiak, A.; Chiasera, A.; Chiappini, A.; Righini, G.C.; Ferrari, M. Active sol-gel materials, fluorescence spectra, and lifetimes. In Handbook of Sol-Gel Science and Technology; Klein, L., Aparicio, M., Jitianu, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 1–43. ISBN 978-3-319-32099-1. [Google Scholar]
  3. Quandt, A.; Ferrari, M.; Righini, G.C. Advancement of glass-ceramic materials for photonic applications. In Sol-Gel Based Nanoceramic Materials: Preparation, Properties and Applications; Mishra, A.K., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 133–155. ISBN 978-3-319-49512-5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferrari, M.; Righini, G.C. Glass-ceramic materials for guided-wave optics. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 2015, 6, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ferrari, M.; Righini, G.C. Physics and Chemistry of Rare-Earth Ions Doped Glasses; Trans Tech Publications: Bäch, Switzerland, 2008; pp. 71–120. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Y.; Chen, G.; Liu, X.; Xu, J.; Zhou, X.; Yang, T.; Yuan, C.; Zhou, C. Upconversion luminescence, optical thermometric properties and energy transfer in Yb3+/Tm3+ co-doped phosphate glass. Opt. Mater. (Amst.) 2018, 81, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xia, H.; Lei, L.; Xia, J.; Hua, Y.; Deng, D.; Xu, S. Yb/Er/Tm tri-doped Na3ZrF7 upconversion nanocrystals for high performance temperature sensing. J. Lumin. 2019, 209, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deng, Y.; Niu, C. Up-conversion luminescence properties of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped oxyfluoride glass ceramic. J. Lumin. 2019, 209, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kasprowicz, D.; Brik, M.G.; Majchrowski, A.; Michalski, E.; Głuchowski, P. Up-conversion emission in triply-doped Ho3+/Yb3+/Tm3+ KGd(WO4)2 single crystals. Opt. Commun. 2011, 284, 2895–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Han, Q.; Wang, G.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.; Gao, W.; Zheng, H. Metal-enhanced upconversion luminescence of NaYF4:Yb/Er with Ag nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 88, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Pokhrel, M.; Valdes, C.; Mao, Y. Ultraviolet upconversion enhancement in triply doped NaYF4:Tm3+,Yb3+ particles: The role of Nd3+ or Gd3+ Co-doping. Opt. Mater. (Amst.) 2016, 58, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hassairi, M.A.; Dammak, M.; Zambon, D.; Chadeyron, G.; Mahiou, R. Red–green–blue upconversion luminescence and energy transfer in Yb3+/Er3+/Tm3+ doped YP5O14 ultraphosphates. J. Lumin. 2017, 181, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, S.; Huang, S.; He, Q.; Wang, L. Upconversion nanophosphores for bioimaging. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 66, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zmojda, J.; Kochanowicz, M.; Miluski, P.; Righini, G.C.; Ferrari, M.; Dorosz, D. Investigation of upconversion luminescence in Yb3+/Tm3+/Ho3+ triply doped antimony-germanate glass and double-clad optical fiber. Opt. Mater. (Amst.) 2016, 58, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rafique, R.; Kailasa, S.K.; Park, T.J. Recent advances of upconversion nanoparticles in theranostics and bioimaging applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 120, 115646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Auzel, F. Upconversion and anti-Stokes processes with f and d ions in solids. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 139–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lukowiak, A.; Stefanski, M.; Ferrari, M.; Strek, W. Nanocrystalline lanthanide tetraphosphates: Energy transfer processes in samples co-doped with Pr3+/Yb3+ and Tm3+/Yb3+. Opt. Mater. (Amst.) 2017, 74, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sudarshanam, V.; Abedin, K.S.; Nicholson, J.W.; Headley, C.E.; DiGiovanni, D.J. Kilo-Watt high-power Yb fiber laser at 1117 nm. In Proceedings of the Fiber Lasers XV: Technology and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA, 29 January–1 February 2018; Carter, A.L., Hartl, I., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2018; Volume 10512, p. 12. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chiappini, A.; Zur, L.; Enrichi, F.; Boulard, B.; Lukowiak, A.; Righini, G.C.; Ferrari, M. Glass ceramics for frequency conversion. In Solar Cells and Light Management: Materials, Strategies and Sustainability; Enrichi, F., Righini, G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 391–414. ISBN 9780081027622. [Google Scholar]
  20. Boulard, B.; Dieudonné, B.; Gao, Y.; Chiasera, A.; Ferrari, M. Up-conversion visible emission in rare-earth doped fluoride glass waveguides. Opt. Eng. 2014, 53, 071814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lahoz, F.; Martín, I.R.; Méndez-Ramos, J.; Núñez, P. Dopant distribution in a Tm3+-Yb3+ codoped silica based glass ceramic: An infrared-laser induced upconversion study. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 6180–6190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Watekar, P.R.; Ju, S.; Boo, S.; Han, W.T. Linear and non-linear optical properties of Yb3+/Tm3+ co-doped alumino-silicate glass prepared by sol-gel method. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2005, 351, 2446–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Simpson, D.A.; Gibbs, W.E.; Collins, S.F.; Blanc, W.; Dussardier, B.; Monnom, G.; Peterka, P.; Baxter, G.W. Visible and near infra-red up-conversion in Tm3+/Yb3+ co-doped silica fibers under 980 nm excitation. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 13781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maalej, O.; Lukowiak, A.; Bouajaj, A.; Chiasera, A.; Righini, G.C.; Ferrari, M.; Boulard, B. Blue to NIR down-conversion in Tm3+/Yb3+-codoped fluorozirconate glasses compared to Pr3+/Yb3+ ion-pair. J. Lumin. 2018, 193, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Q.; Xing, M.; Chen, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhao, C.; Qiu, J.; Yu, J.; Chang, J. Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped bioactive glasses with up-conversion luminescence prepared by containerless processing. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 13168–13175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kalaivani, S.; Srividiya, S.; Vijayalakshmi, U.; Kannan, S. Bioactivity and up-conversion luminescence characteristics of Yb3+/Tb3+ co-doped bioglass system. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 18640–18647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zambanini, T.; Borges, R.; Faria, P.C.; Delpino, G.P.; Pereira, I.S.; Marques, M.M.; Marchi, J. Dissolution, bioactivity behavior, and cytotoxicity of rare earth-containing bioactive glasses (RE = Gd, Yb). Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2019, 16, 2028–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Borges, R.; Schneider, J.F.; Marchi, J. Structural characterization of bioactive glasses containing rare earth elements (Gd and/or Yb). J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 11390–11399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lukowiak, A.; Lao, J.; Lacroix, J.; Marie Nedelec, J. Bioactive glass nanoparticles obtained through sol–gel chemistry. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6620–6622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Righini, G.C.; Ferrari, M. Photoluminescence of rare-earth-doped glasses. La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 2005, 28, 1–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsuboi, T. Luminescence of Tm3+ Ion in LiNbO3 Crystal. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2000, 147, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Serra, O.A.; Nassar, E.J.; Calefi, P.S.; Rosa, I.L.V. Luminescence of a new Tm3+ β-diketonate compound. J. Alloys Compd. 1998, 275–277, 838–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gomes, A.S.L.; Carvalho, M.T.; Sundheimer, M.L.; Bastos-Filho, C.J.A.; Martins-Filho, J.F.; Von der Weid, J.P.; Margulis, W. Low-pump-power, short-fiber copropagating dual-pumped (800 and 1050 nm) thulium-doped fiber amplifier. Opt. Lett. 2003, 28, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Davydov, A.S. The Radiationless transfer of energy of electronic excitation between impurity molecules in crystals. Phys. Status Solidi 1968, 30, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yu, D.; Yu, T.; Bunningen, A.J.; Zhang, Q.; Meijerink, A.; Rabouw, F.T. Understanding and tuning blue-to-near-infrared photon cutting by the Tm3+/Yb3+ couple. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Marconi da Silva MD Linhares, H.; Felipe Henriques Librantz, A.; Gomes, L.; Coronato Courrol, L.; Lícia Baldochi, S.; Marcia Ranieri, I. Energy transfer rates and population inversion investigation of 1G4 and 1D2 excited states of Tm3+ in Yb:Tm:Nd:KY3F10 crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 083533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dwaraka Viswanath, C.S.; Babu, P.; Martín, I.R.; Venkatramu, V.; Lavín, V.; Jayasankar, C.K. Near-infrared and upconversion luminescence of Tm3+ and Tm3+/Yb3+-doped oxyfluorosilicate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2019, 507, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Grzyb, T.; Balabhadra, S.; Przybylska, D.; Węcławiak, M. Upconversion luminescence in BaYF5, BaGdF5 and BaLuF5 nanocrystals doped with Yb3+/Ho3+, Yb3+/Er3+ or Yb3+/Tm3+ ions. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 649, 606–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, G.; Ohulchanskyy, T.Y.; Kumar, R.; Ågren, H.; Prasad, P.N. Ultrasmall monodisperse NaYF4:Yb3+/Tm3+ nanocrystals with enhanced near-infrared to near-infrared upconversion photoluminescence. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3163–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Qiu, H.; Yang, C.; Shao, W.; Damasco, J.; Wang, X.; Ågren, H.; Prasad, P.; Chen, G. Enhanced Upconversion Luminescence in Yb3+/Tm3+-Codoped Fluoride Active Core/Active Shell/Inert Shell Nanoparticles through Directed Energy Migration. Nanomaterials 2014, 4, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Pollnau, M.; Gamelin, D.R.; Lüthi, S.R.; Güdel, H.U. Power dependence of upconversion luminescence in lanthanide and transition-metal-ion systems. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 3337–3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, Q.-Z.; Rezwan, K.; Françon, V.; Armitage, D.; Nazhat, S.N.; Jones, F.H.; Boccaccini, A.R. Surface functionalization of Bioglass®-derived porous scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2007, 3, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the samples with various rare earth ions concentrations: (a) different Yb3+ concentrations (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 mol%) and the same Tm3+ concentration (0.15 mol%); (b) different Tm3+ (0.3 and 0.5 mol%) and the same Yb3+ concentration (4 mol%) (▼—wollastonite and ⁎—pseudowollastonite phase of CaSiO3 assigned to JCPDS Nos. 96-900-5779 and 96-900-2180 patterns, respectively).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the samples with various rare earth ions concentrations: (a) different Yb3+ concentrations (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 mol%) and the same Tm3+ concentration (0.15 mol%); (b) different Tm3+ (0.3 and 0.5 mol%) and the same Yb3+ concentration (4 mol%) (▼—wollastonite and ⁎—pseudowollastonite phase of CaSiO3 assigned to JCPDS Nos. 96-900-5779 and 96-900-2180 patterns, respectively).
Materials 14 00937 g001aMaterials 14 00937 g001b
Figure 2. TEM images (on the left) with selected area electron diffraction (SAED) (as insets), histograms of size particle distribution (in the middle), and EDS spectra (on the right) of (a) un-doped (SiO2-CaO), (b) 0.15Tm2Yb, (c) 0.3Tm4Yb, and (d) 0.5Tm4Yb samples.
Figure 2. TEM images (on the left) with selected area electron diffraction (SAED) (as insets), histograms of size particle distribution (in the middle), and EDS spectra (on the right) of (a) un-doped (SiO2-CaO), (b) 0.15Tm2Yb, (c) 0.3Tm4Yb, and (d) 0.5Tm4Yb samples.
Materials 14 00937 g002
Figure 3. Absorption spectra of the 0.5Tm4Yb sample.
Figure 3. Absorption spectra of the 0.5Tm4Yb sample.
Materials 14 00937 g003
Figure 4. Upconversion emission spectra of silica–calcia matrix doped with different (a) Yb3+ (1, 2, 3, and 4 mol%) and (b) Tm3+ (0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 mol%) concentrations.
Figure 4. Upconversion emission spectra of silica–calcia matrix doped with different (a) Yb3+ (1, 2, 3, and 4 mol%) and (b) Tm3+ (0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 mol%) concentrations.
Materials 14 00937 g004aMaterials 14 00937 g004b
Figure 5. The time-resolved upconversion (UC) photoluminescence of the branching of 1G43H6 transition from 1G4 manifolds of Tm3+ in silica–calcia matrix doped with: (a) different Yb3+ concentrations (1, 2, 3, and 4 mol%) and the same Tm3+ concentration (0.15 mol%); (b) different Tm3+ concentrations (0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 mol%) and the same Yb3+ concentration (4 mol%).
Figure 5. The time-resolved upconversion (UC) photoluminescence of the branching of 1G43H6 transition from 1G4 manifolds of Tm3+ in silica–calcia matrix doped with: (a) different Yb3+ concentrations (1, 2, 3, and 4 mol%) and the same Tm3+ concentration (0.15 mol%); (b) different Tm3+ concentrations (0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 mol%) and the same Yb3+ concentration (4 mol%).
Materials 14 00937 g005
Figure 6. The time-resolved UC photoluminescence of the branching of 1G43F4 transition from 1G4 manifolds of Tm3+ in silica–calcia matrix doped with: (a) different Yb3+ concentrations (1, 2, 3, and 4 mol%) and the same Tm3+ concentration (0.15 mol%); (b) different Tm3+ concentrations (0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 mol%) and the same Yb3+ concentration (4 mol%).
Figure 6. The time-resolved UC photoluminescence of the branching of 1G43F4 transition from 1G4 manifolds of Tm3+ in silica–calcia matrix doped with: (a) different Yb3+ concentrations (1, 2, 3, and 4 mol%) and the same Tm3+ concentration (0.15 mol%); (b) different Tm3+ concentrations (0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 mol%) and the same Yb3+ concentration (4 mol%).
Materials 14 00937 g006
Figure 7. The time-resolved UC photoluminescence at 805 nm emission band of Tm3+ in silica–calcia matrix doped with: (a) different Yb3+ concentrations (1, 2, 3, and 4 mol%) and the same Tm3+ concentration (0.15 mol%); (b) different Tm3+ concentrations (0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 mol%) and the same Yb3+ concentration (4 mol%).
Figure 7. The time-resolved UC photoluminescence at 805 nm emission band of Tm3+ in silica–calcia matrix doped with: (a) different Yb3+ concentrations (1, 2, 3, and 4 mol%) and the same Tm3+ concentration (0.15 mol%); (b) different Tm3+ concentrations (0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 mol%) and the same Yb3+ concentration (4 mol%).
Materials 14 00937 g007
Figure 8. The time-resolved UC photoluminescence at 805 nm emission band of Tm3+ of the 0.3Tm4Yb sample and its fitting based on a double exponential function. The time-resolved UC photoluminescence at the 651 nm and 475 nm emission bands from the 1G4 manifolds are also recalled for a comparison.
Figure 8. The time-resolved UC photoluminescence at 805 nm emission band of Tm3+ of the 0.3Tm4Yb sample and its fitting based on a double exponential function. The time-resolved UC photoluminescence at the 651 nm and 475 nm emission bands from the 1G4 manifolds are also recalled for a comparison.
Materials 14 00937 g008
Figure 9. A log-log plot of the dependence of luminescence intensities (bands at 366 nm, 475 nm, 651 nm, and 805 nm) on the laser power density of excitation source for samples co-doped with different concentration of Tm3+ and Yb3+ ions.
Figure 9. A log-log plot of the dependence of luminescence intensities (bands at 366 nm, 475 nm, 651 nm, and 805 nm) on the laser power density of excitation source for samples co-doped with different concentration of Tm3+ and Yb3+ ions.
Materials 14 00937 g009
Figure 10. Simplified energy-level diagram of the Yb3+ and Tm3+ ions and the proposed UC mechanism from different energy states of Tm3+ ions. ETU—energy transfer upconversion; GSA—ground state absorption; PAET—phonon assistance upconversion; CR—cross-relaxation.
Figure 10. Simplified energy-level diagram of the Yb3+ and Tm3+ ions and the proposed UC mechanism from different energy states of Tm3+ ions. ETU—energy transfer upconversion; GSA—ground state absorption; PAET—phonon assistance upconversion; CR—cross-relaxation.
Materials 14 00937 g010
Table 1. Samples names, nominal lanthanides concentration (mol%), and chemical composition (wt.%) of SiO2–CaO powders calculated on the basis of a quantitative EDS analysis.
Table 1. Samples names, nominal lanthanides concentration (mol%), and chemical composition (wt.%) of SiO2–CaO powders calculated on the basis of a quantitative EDS analysis.
Sample NameLanthanides Concentration (mol%)Chemical Composition (wt.%) (a)
Tm3+Yb3+SiO2CaOTm2O3 (b)Yb2O3
0Tm0Yb0086.813.2--
0.15Tm0Yb0.15086.413.6--
0.15Tm1Yb0.15186.59.6-3.9
0.15Tm2Yb0.15276.516.3-7.2
0.15Tm3Yb0.15373.415.8-10.8
0.15Tm4Yb0.15470,716.9-12.4
0.3Tm4Yb0.3469.418.0-12.6
0.5Tm4Yb0.5469.516.71.212.6
(a) The relative errors of EDS method are less than 2% and 4% for main (above 20%) and major (5–20%) elements, respectively. (b) The concentration of the Tm element was below the detection limit.
Table 2. The 1/e luminescence decay times of the 1G4 and 3H4 manifolds of Tm3+ of the silica–calcia powders doped with different Tm3+ and Yb3+ concentrations.
Table 2. The 1/e luminescence decay times of the 1G4 and 3H4 manifolds of Tm3+ of the silica–calcia powders doped with different Tm3+ and Yb3+ concentrations.
Tm3+
(mol%)
Yb3+
(mol%)
Yb3+:Tm3+
Concentration Ratio
1/e Decay Time (µs)
1G43H6 Transition (@475 nm)1G43F4 Transition (@651 nm)3H43H6, 1G43H5 Transitions
(@805 nm)
0.151713 ± 715 ± 814 ± 2
0.1521363 ± 727 ± 1436 ± 5
0.1532041 ± 1423 ± 631 ± 2
0.1542763 ± 1434 ± 431 ± 2
0.3413104 ± 28109 ± 939 ± 5
0.54819 ± 215 ± 413 ± 1
Table 3. Values of τ1, τ2, and A of the double exponential function fitting of the time-resolved UC photoluminescence at 805 nm emission band of Tm3+ of the 0.3Tm4Yb powder. The values of 1G4 decay times are also listed for comparison.
Table 3. Values of τ1, τ2, and A of the double exponential function fitting of the time-resolved UC photoluminescence at 805 nm emission band of Tm3+ of the 0.3Tm4Yb powder. The values of 1G4 decay times are also listed for comparison.
Double Exponential Function Fitting of 805 nm Decay Curve
(1G4 + 3H4)
1G4 Decay Time (µs)
Long decay componentShort decay componentR-squareDerived from 1G43H6 Transition
(@475 nm)
Derived from 1G43F4 Transition
(@651 nm)
A τ1 (µs)1-Aτ2 (µs)
0.55 ± 0.0188 ± 20.45 ± 0.019 ± 10.998104 ± 28109 ± 9
Table 4. The summary of N numbers of different UC photoluminescence at 366 nm, 475 nm, 651 nm, and 805 nm for different concentrations of Tm3+ and Yb3+ in silica–calcia powders.
Table 4. The summary of N numbers of different UC photoluminescence at 366 nm, 475 nm, 651 nm, and 805 nm for different concentrations of Tm3+ and Yb3+ in silica–calcia powders.
Tm3+
(mol%)
Yb3+ (mol%)N Number
366 nm475 nm651 nm805 nm
0.151(0.32)2.071.561.26
0.1521.621.951.821.08
0.1531.671.831.761.04
0.1541.651.571.511.11
0.342.121.501.430.70
0.541.731.411.430.75
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Halubek-Gluchowska, K.; Szymański, D.; Tran, T.N.L.; Ferrari, M.; Lukowiak, A. Upconversion Luminescence of Silica–Calcia Nanoparticles Co-doped with Tm3+ and Yb3+ Ions. Materials 2021, 14, 937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040937

AMA Style

Halubek-Gluchowska K, Szymański D, Tran TNL, Ferrari M, Lukowiak A. Upconversion Luminescence of Silica–Calcia Nanoparticles Co-doped with Tm3+ and Yb3+ Ions. Materials. 2021; 14(4):937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040937

Chicago/Turabian Style

Halubek-Gluchowska, Katarzyna, Damian Szymański, Thi Ngoc Lam Tran, Maurizio Ferrari, and Anna Lukowiak. 2021. "Upconversion Luminescence of Silica–Calcia Nanoparticles Co-doped with Tm3+ and Yb3+ Ions" Materials 14, no. 4: 937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040937

APA Style

Halubek-Gluchowska, K., Szymański, D., Tran, T. N. L., Ferrari, M., & Lukowiak, A. (2021). Upconversion Luminescence of Silica–Calcia Nanoparticles Co-doped with Tm3+ and Yb3+ Ions. Materials, 14(4), 937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040937

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop