Next Article in Journal
Concrete Examination of 100-Year-Old Bridge Structure above the Kłodnica River Flowing through the Agglomeration of Upper Silesia in Gliwice: A Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
First-Principles Study of a MoS2-PbS van der Waals Heterostructure Inspired by Naturally Occurring Merelaniite
Previous Article in Journal
The Wear of Seal Fins during High-Speed Rub between Labyrinth Seal Fins and Honeycomb Stators at Different Incursion Rates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Electrical Properties of Silicone Composite Films Based on Silver Nanoparticle Decorated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/ma14040980
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prospects for Electrical Performance Tuning in Ca3Co4O9 Materials by Metallic Fe and Ni Particles Additions

by
Gabriel Constantinescu
1,*,
Sergey M. Mikhalev
2,
Aleksey D. Lisenkov
1,
Daniela V. Lopes
1,
Artur R. Sarabando
1,
Marta C. Ferro
1,
Tiago F. da Silva
1,
Sergii A. Sergiienko
1 and
Andrei V. Kovalevsky
1
1
Department of Materials and Ceramics Engineering, CICECO–Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
TEMA-NRD, Mechanical Engineering Department, Aveiro Institute of Nanotechnology (AIN), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(4), 980; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040980
Submission received: 27 January 2021 / Revised: 12 February 2021 / Accepted: 15 February 2021 / Published: 19 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Energy Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This work further explores the possibilities for designing the high-temperature electrical performance of the thermoelectric Ca3Co4O9 phase, by a composite approach involving separate metallic iron and nickel particles additions, and by employing two different sintering schemes, capable to promote the controlled interactions between the components, encouraged by our recent promising results obtained for similar cobalt additions. Iron and nickel were chosen because of their similarities with cobalt. The maximum power factor value of around 200 μWm−1K−2 at 925 K was achieved for the composite with the nominal nickel content of 3% vol., processed via the two-step sintering cycle, which provides the highest densification from this work. The effectiveness of the proposed approach was shown to be strongly dependent on the processing conditions and added amounts of metallic particles. Although the conventional one-step approach results in Fe- and Ni-containing composites with the major content of the thermoelectric Ca3Co4O9 phase, their electrical performance was found to be significantly lower than for the Co-containing analogue, due to the presence of less-conducting phases and excessive porosity. In contrast, the relatively high performance of the composite with a nominal nickel content of 3% vol. processed via a two-step approach is related to the specific microstructural features from this sample, including minimal porosity and the presence of the Ca2Co2O5 phase, which partially compensate the complete decomposition of the Ca3Co4O9 matrix. The obtained results demonstrate different pathways to tailor the phase composition of Ca3Co4O9-based materials, with a corresponding impact on the thermoelectric performance, and highlight the necessity of more controllable approaches for the phase composition tuning, including lower amounts and different morphologies of the dispersed metallic phases.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, there is a great need for competitive renewable energy sources and devices, and many efforts are being put into their large-scale research, development, and innovation. Among the various existing types and in the context of the present environmental challenges, thermoelectric (TE) generation stands out as one of the most promising options allowing for direct conversion of waste heat into electrical power [1,2,3,4], with no unwanted byproducts or side effects. The TE materials making up the TE generators can achieve this impressive feat directly, in a solid state, thanks to the Seebeck effect [3]. TE technology is autonomous, reliable, scalable, robust, has no moving parts, and requires virtually no maintenance, making it ideal for mobile and/or remote applications [5,6]. The relatively low conversion efficiencies of the most established TE materials significantly limit their possible number and range of applications [7], although promising new prospects are outlined with the recent aid of machine learning and artificial intelligence tools [8]. The performance of a TE material is always limited by the Carnot efficiency [9] and is measured by the dimensionless figure-of-merit ZT = (α2 σ)/κ T, where α is the absolute Seebeck coefficient, σ is the electrical conductivity, κ is the total thermal conductivity, and T is the prospective working temperature. The electrical part of ZT, (α2 σ), represents the power factor (PF) and depends entirely on the material’s intrinsic physical properties.
Established TE materials have ZT ≈ 1 and include PbTe, Bi2Te3, Bi2Se3 [10], skutterudite [11], half-Heusler alloys [12], intermetallic Zintl phases [13], and some Si-based alloys [14]. Most of them are narrow band-gap semiconductors and have optimum performances at low and intermediate working temperature ranges. Because of some limitations/drawbacks (degradation and decomposition at temperatures above ~500–600 °C, thermal and/or chemical instability, expensive, toxic, and/or scarce constituents) [15], they are not suitable for waste heat recovery applications and their use is restricted to some few, niche applications [3].
Relatively recently, large band-gap oxide semiconductors have attracted attention for potential power generation applications [16]. The discovery for the first time in 1997 of attractive TE properties in NaxCoO2 ceramics [17], led to other compositions based on transition metal oxides with promising TE properties and important intrinsic advantages (abundance, low environmental impact, moderate reactivity and high thermo-chemical stability in broad high-temperature ranges) over the ‘classical’ TE materials [18,19], to be considered for power generation applications at high temperatures and in oxygen-rich environments [20,21]. Furthermore, many of these oxides (e.g., titanium oxides [22], manganese oxides [23], nickel oxides [24], iron oxides [25], zinc oxides [26]) have been found to have adaptative crystal structures [27].
The Ca3Co4O9 compound is considered to be one of the most promising p-type TE oxide to date, suitable for waste heat recovery applications in air, at high temperatures [28]. The main challenges for this material are related to its strong anisotropic electrical properties induced by the ‘misfit layered’ crystal structures and its relatively low bulk density and weak mechanical strength (caused by the big difference between the maximum stability temperature of the Ca3Co4O9 phase and the corresponding solidus temperature). These issues severely limit its use in power generation applications and technologies.
The Ca3Co4O9 oxide is intrinsically nanostructured and has a monoclinic crystal structure (P2(3) space group) consisting of two different monoclinic alternating layers, stacked in the c-axis direction. A distorted triple rock-salt (RS) type [Ca2CoO3] insulating layer (having Co2+ cations) is sandwiched between two hexagonal (H) CdI2-type [CoO2] conductive layers (consisting of edge-shared [CoO6] octahedra) where the mean cobalt valence is between (3+) and (4+), building a complex misfit structure along the b-axis direction [29,30], since the b cell parameters are incommensurate. In contrast, the lattice parameters in the a and c directions for both layers are equal. Based on its polycrystalline structure, the Ca3Co4O9 compound is more technically written sometimes with the chemical formula [Ca2CoO3][CoO2]1.62, where ‘1.62’ is the incommensurability ratio (bRS/bH), found to be responsible for the high Seebeck coefficient values [31], among other things.
The TE performance of Ca3Co4O9 materials is usually enhanced using cation (partial) substitutions in one or both crystal sublattices [32,33], micro- and nanostructural engineering techniques [34,35] and some composite approaches [36,37]. The material’s density and grain connectivity is often controlled and increased through texturing and densification methods like spark plasma sintering, SPS [38] and laser floating zone melting, LFZ [39], and through the use of high-quality and high-reactivity, ultrafine precursor powders obtained by ‘wet chemistry’ methods [40,41].
Two-step sintering schemes also result in quite dense ceramics with improved electrical performance, but require long processing/annealing times to stabilize the TE phase [39,42,43] and can give rise to undesired secondary phases. According to the equilibrium phase diagram of the Ca–Co–O system in air [44,45], the Ca3Co4O9 phase is stable up to 1199 K (926 °C), After this point, it decomposes to Ca3Co2O6 and CoO, which are both stable up to 1299 K (1026 °C). Following the stoichiometry line further shows the first liquid phase appearing at 1623 K (1350 °C), the fact which is very important to consider for issues related to the bulk density and/or porosity of the Ca3Co4O9 phase.
It has been reported that partial substitutions with Fe and Ni for Co in Ca3Co4O9 may increase the electrical conductivity by increasing the holes concentration from the conductive layers, provided that Fe and Ni take the usual oxidation states (2+) and/or (3+) [33,46], smaller than that of the mean Co valence responsible for the good electrical conductivity from this material, between (3+) and (4+) [29]. This fact was observed for small substitutions. For higher substitutions, however, the opposite effect was observed [47]. The ionic radii of the substitutional cations also play an important role in the electrical conduction from Ca3Co4O9, due to crystal distortion and scattering effects. Furthermore, it has been recently reported that at low concentrations the iron prefers to substitute cobalt, while at high Fe additions it may even substitute calcium [48]. Fe K-edge XANES spectra have shown that Fe may select different doping sites in the Ca3Co4O9 system. Fe can substitute Ca in both Ca1 and Ca2 sites, and can also substitute Co in the Co1 sites from the RS-type layer [48]. Nevertheless, it has been shown that the preferred doping sites are Ca1 and Co1 from the RS-type layer [48].
The present research work takes advantages of the previously published results for metallic Co additions [49] and reports on a similar approach for improving the high-temperature electrical performance of bulk Ca3Co4O9 materials, by similar metallic Fe and Ni additions and employment of two different sintering schemes, for producing porous and dense Ca3Co4O9-based composites. The degree of success of this approach is measured by the electrical counterpart of the TE performance (electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient, and resulting power factor) of the resulting composites, which are compared to the best ones obtained for the Co additions and to some values reported in literature, being related to the prepared samples’ phase compositions, morphologies, and microstructural features. As an initial goal, we aimed for a beneficial porosity filling effect provided by the oxidation of the added metallic particles under the two sintering schemes employed. Additional beneficial effects were expected from possible substitutions in the conductive layers and/or formation of useful secondary phases.

2. Materials and Methods

Single-phase Ca3Co4O9 ceramic materials used as matrices for the (1 − x) Ca3Co4O9/xFe or Ni (x = 0%, 3%, 6% and 9% vol.) compositions were prepared through a ‘wet-chemistry’ modified Pechini method [49]. Appropriate amounts of micrometric Fe and Ni particles and Ca3Co4O9 powders were mixed in an agate mortar, in ethanol, to produce the desired compositions. Pristine matrix samples were kept as a reference.
The powders have been uniaxially pressed at 200 MPa (15.7 kN). The pelletized samples were subsequently sintered in air, using two distinct sintering approaches, similar to Ref. [49]. The one-stage (1ST) route includes one heating step to 1173 K (2 K/min), followed by a 24 h dwell time and then a slow cooling (2 K/min) to room temperature (RT). The two-stage (2ST) scheme providing higher densification includes a first heating step to 773 K (8 K/min), followed by a second heating step to 1473 K (2 K/min), then a 6 h dwell time at this temperature, followed by a fast cooling down to 1173 K (10 K/min), where this temperature is kept for 72 h, and finally, cooling down to room temperature, slowly (2 K/min).
After sintering, the resulted pellets were polished and finely ground or cut in the adequate shapes and sizes, for the relevant characterizations to be performed onward. The experimental densities (ρexp) of Ca3Co4O9-based ceramics were determined by geometrical measurements and weighing (masses over volumes). The estimated errors in all cases were found to be <3% (~0.03 g/cm3). Whenever possible, the ρexp values were compared to the theoretical density (ρth) values of the respective composites, calculated from the sum of the products of the theoretical densities of the reference intensity ratio-estimated phases (from X-Ray Diffraction analyses) and their respective amounts, in each case, i.e., by a simple mixing rule, using the following theoretical density values: ρth(Ca3Co4O9) = 4.69 g/cm3, from [50] and PDF card #04-016-0860; ρth(Ca3Co2O6) = 4.5 g/cm3, from PDF cards #00-051-0311 [51] and #04-010-0812; ρth(CoO) = 6.58 g/cm3, from PDF card #04-005-4395.
The phase identification was performed through X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analyses, for the various powdered Ca3Co4O9-based samples, after both sintering cycles, at RT, using a PHILIPS X’PERT system with CuKα radiation (Cuα = 1.54060 Å), with 2θ angles ranging between 5 and 90° and a step and exposure time of 0.02° 2θ and 3 s, respectively. The phase content was estimated using the reference intensity ratio (RIR) method [52], using the Panalytical HighScore Plus 4.1 (PDF-4) software. The strongest peaks from each phase were used for analysis, and the corresponding scale factors were taken from the PDF-4 database. Morphological and microstructural characterizations of representative selected fractured samples coated with carbon were performed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi SU-70 instrument (Aveiro, Portugal)), equipped with an energy-dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDX, Bruker Quantax 400 detector (Aveiro, Portugal) module.
Simultaneous electrical conductivity (σ) and Seebeck coefficient (α) measurements have been performed on selected rectangular bar-shaped samples (~10 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm), in constant air flow, from 475 K to 975 K, with a step of 50 K, employing a steady-state technique and using a custom experimental setup described in detail elsewhere [53]. Freshly cut samples of each composition have been fixed inside a specially designed alumina sample holder, placed inside a high-temperature furnace, one horizontally (σ sample, electrically connected with fine Pt wires, following a four-point probe direct current, DC technique arrangement) and the other vertically (α sample, subjected to a local constant temperature difference of ~14 K). The estimated experimental error in measured values did not exceed 3–5% for the conductivity and 5–7% for Seebeck coefficient. The PF values have been calculated from the measured σ and α, in each case, at each temperature step.
The various plots have been constructed using the OriginPro 8.5 software (Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. The Samples Processed under the 1ST Route

3.1.1. Compositional and Morpho-Structural Evolution

The following Table 1 lists the denominations of the samples and their relevant properties, related to the phase composition, density, and electrical properties.
The evolution of the phase composition for all 1ST sintered samples can be clearly seen in the corresponding XRD patterns from Figure 1 and Figure 2, where the various vertical lines of different colors mark the identified phases, and the arrows from Figure 2 mark the only peak displacements found, for the Ni added samples. The diffraction pattern for the single-phase reference matrix, Ca3Co4O9_1ST, is shown for comparison in both figures, marked by the vertical black lines, in agreement with the work of Masset et al. [29] and with other literature references [44,45]. The wide peaks representing the various crystal planes are typical for this material sintered in the described conditions [40]. The XRD patterns for the samples with Fe and Ni additions clearly show the presence of additional phases, indicated by the vertical lines of different colors, following the legends from the bottom of the figures.
The secondary phases from the iron-added samples include the solid solutions (Fe,Co)3O4 and (Fe,Co)2O3, with different transition metal oxidation states and ratios, their concentration increasing in proportion with the amount of Fe (as depicted in Figure 1 and Table 1). The formation of additional secondary phases in Fe-substituted Ca3Co4O9 samples is also reported elsewhere in the literature, for various Fe contents ([54] and references therein). In any case, the major phase in all Fe-containing samples was found to be Ca3Co4O9, probably containing some minor amount of incorporated iron. Although it is generally accepted that iron substitutes cobalt in CoO2 and/or Ca2CoO3 layers, there are indications that iron may also substitute calcium cations [54]. The phase decomposition, promoted by the iron additions, leads to the appearance of excessive porosity in the 1ST sintered samples (Table 1), in contrast to the pore filling effect provided by the cobalt additions [49].
The evolution of the phase composition in the Ni-added samples shows notably different trends (Figure 2). The addition of metallic Ni particles does not promote the formation of any major Ni-containing secondary phases and apparently results in the substitution in the TE Ca3Co4O9 phase (less) and the secondary CoO phase (more). This fact is indicated by the arrows from Figure 2, marking the shifts to higher 2θ angles of some peaks belonging to Ca3Co4O9 (black arrows) and CoO (blue arrow). One possible explanation for this preferential formation of the CoO phase is the total mutual solubility between CoO and NiO at 1173 K [55]; this phase is expected to be more stable than Ni-substituted Ca3Co4O9 and/or Ca3Co2O6. Ca3Co2O6 was also detected in the Ni-containing samples, being the major phase in the 6 and 9Ni_1ST samples. While the relative amounts of Ca3Co4O9 and Ca3Co2O6 phases appear to stabilize in the 6 and 9Ni_1ST samples, the CoO phase content increases from 3Ni_1ST to 9Ni_1ST (Table 1). All Ni-added samples possess higher relative densities than that of the pure matrix reference. It is worth pointing out that among all samples, the 3Ni_1ST samples have the highest density value (2.85 g/cm3) for the largest amount of Ca3Co4O9 phase (67 wt.%). Still, the low preservation of the main Ca3Co4O9 thermoelectric phase represents a significant disadvantage of the studied approach in this case, as compared to the pore filling effects promoted by the cobalt additions [49].
The microstructural characterization results for the 1ST samples shown in Figure 3 mainly support the previous XRD findings and obtained density values. Unlike the more evident pore-filling effect observed previously for Co additions [49], the Fe and Ni ions from this study can be found predominantly in the two different iron and cobalt containing solid solutions (Figure 3IV,VI) and in the Ca3Co4O9 and CoO phases (Figure 3VIII), respectively, providing only a marginal porosity-filling effect in the corresponding composites, upon oxidation in air at 1173 K. Only the 3Ni_1ST samples apparently show a somewhat similar pore-filling effect (Figure 3VIII), provided by the Ni-doped CoO grains. For these latter samples, the Ca3Co4O9 and CoO phases are easily distinguishable by their different characteristic morphologies (Figure 3VIII). The morphology of the Ca3Co4O9 grains (pure and substituted) remains essentially unchanged in all samples. The small grain sizes and low particle size dispersion, characteristic for the Ca3Co4O9 phase obtained by the combustion-based modified Pechini method, as well as the preferential crystal growth along the a-b crystallographic plane, can also be seen in Figure 3, where the mean Ca3Co4O9 grain sizes are estimated to be around 1 μm in the planar direction (a-b plane), and ~0.5 μm in thickness (along the c-axis). This apparent thickness value is given by the stacking of the very-thin plate-like grains of Ca3Co4O9, each one having a thickness of ~35 nm, as it was estimated for similar cobalt oxides using Scherrer’s formula [56]. On the other hand, the Fe and Ni-rich phases can be distinguished by the rather larger agglomerates (Figure 3VI,VIII).
The trends observed in the compositional and microstructural evolution from all samples are further correlated with their electrical properties.

3.1.2. Electrical Performance

The evolution of the electrical conductivity (σ), Seebeck coefficient (α), and power factor (α2·σ) with temperature for all 1ST-sintered samples is shown in Figure 4I–III, respectively. The previously obtained results for selected Co additions (3 and 6 vol.%) [49] are plotted for comparison.
All σ values increase linearly with temperature, in the whole measured temperature range, following different slopes (Figure 4I). This trend corresponds to a semiconducting-like behavior (dσ/dT ≥ 0) and is typical for this material at high temperatures (conduction is done along the c-axis direction [29]), also found elsewhere in literature, for similar cases [57,58,59]. With respect to the pure matrix reference samples, the highest σ values are still measured for the 3 and 6Co_1ST samples, reported in our previous work [49]. Between the different Fe and Ni added samples, however, only the 3 and 6Fe_1ST samples have high σ values (≥30 Scm−1), close to the ones measured for the pure matrix reference sample (~35 Scm−1). Nevertheless, these values measured for the 3 and 6Fe_1ST samples are higher than some of the best-reported values from the literature, for high-density SPS consolidated Fe-doped Ca3Co4O9 samples (~20 Scm−1) [54]. Furthermore, for the case of Ni additions, the best σ values measured for the 3Ni_1ST samples (17–27 Scm−1) are very close to some of the best reported values from literature (20–24 Scm−1), for Ni-doped Ca3Co4O9 samples prepared and measured in similar conditions [46]. In any case, it has been reported that lower substitutions of Fe and Ni in Ca3Co4O9 samples prepared by SPS can provide increased σ values [33,46,48,54,59,60,61], while higher substitutions lead to decreased σ values [47,54,59]. In general, the lower σ values measured for all Fe and Ni added samples can be attributed to the more resistive secondary phases and the increase in porosity, caused by the Ca3Co4O9 phase decomposition. Additionally, for the Ni-added samples, the lower σ values could also be explained by the partial substitutions with more Ni2+ (than Ni3+) ions, which would produce crystal distortions due to the ionic radii mismatches from the conductive CoO2 planes of the Ca3Co4O9 phase, creating more scattering centers, and resulting in lower σ values, as it was also found in other similar works from literature [33,47]. Following the basic equation for the electrical conductivity, σ = n e μ [62] (where n, e, and μ are the charge carrier concentration, in this case, holes, the electron charge, and the holes’ mobility, respectively) and using the polycrystalline-doped Ca3Co4O9 system holes concentration in the range 2–4·1020 cm−3 [63,64] and the holes mobility of ~1 cm2V−1s−1 [63], one immediately gets σ values in the range ~30–60 Scm−1, supporting the values from the current measurements (~30–40 Scm−1) for the pure matrix compositions and for the 3 and 6Fe_1ST samples (best 1ST σ values), in agreement with similar results from the literature [33].
The thermopower values for all 1ST sintered samples are positive (p-type holes conduction) and increase almost linearly with temperature (Figure 4II). The α values are significantly affected by the Fe and Ni additions, likely due to the partial incorporation into the Ca3Co4O9 phase, as reported elsewhere, for various substitution cases [47,48,59,60,61,63,65]. In general, if we assume that the progressive decrease in σ values, for both Fe and Ni additions (from 3 to 9 vol.%) is caused by progressively decreasing n values, one can easily explain the opposite trends seen for the α values, namely, a progressive increase from 3 to 9 vol.% additions. Such a correlation is typical for thermoelectric materials [47,54,59]. The highest α values are measured for the 3 and 6 Ni_1ST samples (188 and 177 μVK−1 at 975K). These samples simultaneously possess the highest relative densities obtained in this work.
The PF values calculated from the measured σ and α values are plotted in Figure 4III. All samples show a similar behavior, the PF values increasing proportionally with temperature. Besides the pure matrix compositions (105 μWm−1K−2) and the selected Co additions, the samples showing the best PF values are 3 and 6Fe_1ST (80 μWm−1K−2) and 3Ni_1ST (90 μWm−1K−2), at the highest measured temperature. The highest PF value of the pure matrix composition (105 μWm−1K−2) is higher than other reported value from the literature, measured for similar samples (70 and 80 μWm−1K−2) [42,46]. The latter witnesses that high-quality materials were used in the present work to verify the proposed approaches.
The sequence of ln(σT) vs. 1000/T (Arrhenius) plots for all 1ST sintered samples is shown in Figure 5. The activation energies Ea in each case (see Table 1) were calculated from the linear fittings (the slopes of the red lines; knowing that σT∝exp(-Ea/kBT), where kB is the Boltzmann constant) performed at high temperatures (five measurement points from ~775–975 K), indicating also the typical variable range hopping electrical conduction behavior from all samples at these temperatures [66]. The Ea values calculated for the selected 1ST sintered Ca3Co4O9 samples with 3 and 6 vol.% Co additions (used only for comparison; not shown in Table 1) are 96 meV and 86 meV, respectively. These Ea values for the best Co added samples (reported previously) are higher than the 78 meV value calculated for the pure matrix composition, probably because of the additional scattering sites created by the presence of the secondary Co3O4 phase from these samples. On the other hand, similar Ea values to those of the reference matrix samples from this work can also be found elsewhere in the literature, for similar samples and cases [59,63,66]. The addition of both Fe and Ni generally results in an increase of the activation energy, provided by the formation of less conductive phases with the more pronounced thermally activated character of the electronic transport.
The 2ST sintered samples present quite different compositional, morphological, microstructural, and electrical properties, and are discussed in the next section.

3.2. The Samples Processed under the 2ST Route

3.2.1. Compositional and Morpho-Structural Evolution

As for the 1ST case, the abbreviations, phase compositions, and relative densities for all 2ST sintered samples are presented in Table 2. As a preview, relatively high densities are expected to translate in improved TE properties, especially in larger electrical conductivity values. On the other hand, the equally large number of secondary phases, as compared to 1ST case, is also observed, and expected to have a decisive impact on the TE properties.
Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the XRD patterns for the 2ST sintered reference matrix and for all Fe and Ni added samples, respectively. The longer processing time (>80 h, in total), including the high-temperature step, results in fairly different phase compositions, compared to those found in the 1ST sintering case. These phases are marked in the corresponding figures by the various vertical lines of different colors, following the legends from the base of the figures. The arrows from the upper part from Figure 7 mark the visible peak displacements (to higher 2θ values), identified for the CoO phase, in agreement with the variable Ni containing (Co,Ni)O solid solutions, found in all Ni added samples. First of all, the sought-out Ca3Co4O9 phase (pure and/or doped) was only detected in the reference matrix composition, without any impurity phases, marked in both figures by the vertical black lines, in agreement with the work of Masset et al. [29] and with other literature references [44,45]. The slightly narrower peaks observed for this phase suggest some degree of texturing, probably due to more pronounced grain growth, expected to occur during the 2ST sintering route.
The thermoelectric Ca3Co4O9 phase could not be detected in neither the 2ST sintered Fe and Ni added samples, where the main phases have been found to be Ca3Co2O6 and brownmillerite Ca2(Co,Fe)2O5 [67], for the Fe additions, and Ca3Co2O6 and (Co,Ni)O, for the samples with Ni additions. Some minor reflections corresponding to the Ca3Co4O9 phase are slightly visible in Figure 7, only for the 3Ni_2ST samples. Additionally, the long processing time from this second route also facilitates the segregation of iron oxides, found in all Fe added samples in relatively similar, small amounts (Table 2). Similar trends are also reported elsewhere in the literature [54,59], for SPS textured samples with high Fe substitutions. On the other hand, the Ni additions promote the segregation of CoO (and, additionally, CaO, for the 9Ni_2ST samples), followed by the formation of (Co,Ni)O solid solutions, similar to the 1ST case. This is again provided by the total solubility between CoO and NiO at 1173 K [55], the resulting solid solutions having higher stability than Ni doped Ca3Co2O6.
As expected, the morphological and microstructural evolution of all Fe and Ni added samples (Figure 8) is complex and fairly distinct from the 1ST case. Quite similar results have been published previously for Co additions [49]. The reference matrix composition is the only 2ST sintered sample showing a typical Ca3Co4O9 microstructure and grain morphology. The reference sample also presents the typical plate-like crystallites, as seen for the previous 1ST route, except here the grains grew 4 or 5 times larger (~5 μm) and the porosity decreased significantly (~20%). When Fe and Ni particles are added to the Ca3Co4O9 matrix and the 2ST sintering cycle is applied, the resulting microstructures change drastically to much denser ones, and the grain morphologies become completely different than in the equivalent 1ST case, as shown in Figure 8III,V,VII. The oxidation of metallic Fe and Ni particles is integral, as expected, and the number of resulted phases found in all samples is higher than for the 1ST sintering case. The pore-filling effect of the added metallic particles is hard to be distinguished from the large grain growth, promoted by the 2ST sintering cycle.
The Fe added samples apparently present the densest microstructures from all those obtained in this work. The grains found in the representative Fe added samples are also more irregular in shape and size (Figure 8III). As for their composition, the representative EDS map from Figure 8IV (6Fe_2ST samples) unambiguously shows that the smaller grains are richer in Co (Fe doped Ca3Co2O6), while the larger ones are richer in Ca (Fe-containing brownmillerite). The 9Fe_2ST samples (Figure 8VI) show the same trends, with even smaller grains and larger Fe-rich areas, probably belonging to the Fe2O3 phase. The Ni added samples present similar microstructural and morphological features (Figure 8VII and VIII) to those seen in the Fe added samples (low porosity, irregular grains). In contrast, for these samples, Ni is mostly present in the CoO phase, similar to the 1ST case. In fact, (Co,Ni)O is actually the major phase found in the 6 and 9Ni_2ST samples (Table 2 and Figure 7).
The intimate interplay between all the characteristic features discussed up to this point is expected to have a complex effect on the electrical performances of the 2ST sintered Fe and Ni added samples.

3.2.2. Electrical Performance

The evolution of σ, α, and α2·σ with temperature can be seen in Figure 9I–III, respectively. The previously obtained results [49] for selected Co additions (3 vol.%) are displayed for comparisons. All conductivity values increase almost linearly with temperature, showing a typical semiconducting behavior in the whole measured temperature range. The reference Ca3Co4O9 sample exhibits the largest σ values (~70–80 Scm−1) owing to “ideal” phase composition and larger density achieved. These values are around the best values reported in literature, for high-density/SPS textured Ca3Co4O9 samples [42,46,54,57,58]. Since the Fe and Ni additions result in immediate phase decomposition even for relatively low addition contents, the electrical conductivities of Fe and Ni added samples are notably below that of the reference matrix composition. Still, the 3Ni_2ST sample demonstrates relatively high σ values (~56 Scm−1 at 975 K), which cannot be explained solely based on the observed phase composition (Table 2). In fact, the electrical conductivity of polycrystalline Ca3Co2O6 at high temperatures is at least 6–8 times lower [68] than that measured for the 3Ni_2ST sample, which contains ~76 wt.% of this phase (Table 2). This difference is even larger for lower temperatures. At the same time, the crystal structure of Ca3Co2O6 is highly anisotropic, and electrical conductivity values measured for single crystals along the c-axis direction reach values of up to 79 Scm−1 at 975 K [69]. Specific conditions of the Ca3Co2O6 phase formation in the studied composite formulations, namely, a continuous phase transformation of the Ca3Co4O9 phase matrix, promoted by the presence of nickel particles, oxidizing to nickel oxide, may result in a somewhat intermediate scenario between compacted polycrystalline samples and single crystal. However, it is not sufficient to explain the much less temperature-activated character of the 3Ni_2ST sample’s conductivity, as compared to Ca3Co2O6 [68,69]. Some guidelines can be obtained from the Figure 8VIII, showing a clear percolation of Co-rich phase, in opposition to isolated Co-rich grains in the case of 3Fe_2ST sample (Figure 8IV), possessing notably lower electrical conductivity. While any positive contribution of the (Co,Ni)O phase to the relatively high electrical conductivity of the 3Ni_2ST sample is rather unlikely [70], also taking into account that this phase is present in higher amounts in the 6Ni_2ST and 9Ni_2ST samples possessing lower conductivity, one might attribute the relatively high σ values observed for 3Ni_2ST to the presence of Ca2Co2O5. The layered Ca2Co2O5 phase shows electrical conductivity values in the range 50–60 Scm−1 at 400–950 K [71], comparable to those measured for 3Ni_2ST. In general, despite the large density values calculated for all samples, the lower σ values (<26 Scm−1) measured for most Fe and Ni added samples can be attributed to the high number of resistive secondary phases, found by XRD and confirmed by SEM-EDS analyses. However, the results observed for the 3Ni_2ST sample suggest that the implemented approach can still be considered promising, if lower Ni additions are used.
The values of the Seebeck coefficient for all samples are positive (holes conduction) and increase linearly with temperature, in the whole measured temperature range, following different slopes (Figure 9II). The α values also vary considerably for all samples and, although it may appear counterintuitive, the samples with the highest σ values also present the highest α values (the 3Ni and 3Fe_2ST samples). Significant variations of the Seebeck coefficient values in transition metal-substituted Ca3Co4O9 samples were also observed in other works from literature [47,48,59,60,61,63,65]. The results clearly indicate that the behavior of the Seebeck coefficient with composition is mostly determined by the complex phase composition. Similarly to the case of Co additions [49], the large α values found for the 3Ni and 3Fe_2ST samples can be explained by the large amounts of Ca3Co2O6 phase in these samples, which is known for its large high-temperature α values [68].
The resulting PF values can be seen in Figure 9III. Besides the reference sample measuring the largest PF values (225 μWm−1K−2), the next samples showing high PF values are 3Ni, 3Co, and 3Fe_2ST (~200, ~150, and ~90 μWm−1K−2, respectively), which are better than some of the best-reported values found in literature, for equivalent samples [46]. Still, this comparison is not entirely correct, since these samples no longer represent the Ca3Co4O9-based composites. The large PF value measured for the reference sample is equal or slightly higher than other best-performing high-density/textured samples of the same composition, found in literature [33,42,59].
The compositional dependence trends of the PF values from 925 K for both 1ST and 2ST sintered samples can be seen in Figure 10. From this plot, it is clear that the highest PF values (between around 190 and 210 μWm−1K−2) from this work are achieved for Ca3Co4O9_2ST and 3Ni_2ST, mostly due to the high density and less severe impact on the phase composition in the case of minor Ni addition. Higher Fe and Ni additions promote the formation of more resistive secondary phases, which lead to lower PF values in the corresponding samples.
From Figure 10 it becomes obvious that addition levels of 3% and lower are essential for more drastic improvements in thermoelectric performances, provided by the different particularities and strongly correlated nature of this semiconducting ceramic material.
This work intended to analyze the relevant effects provided by the separate Fe and Ni metallic particles additions on the electrical counterpart of the TE performance of Ca3Co4O9-based materials, inspired by our previous successful proof-of-concept, for the case of cobalt additions. Although the results appear rather pessimistic in terms of the observed performance, they clearly show the existence of different pathways to tailor the phase composition of the Ca3Co4O9-based materials, while also highlighting the necessity in more controllable approaches. Partially encouraging results achieved for the 3Ni_2ST samples suggest that the amount of transition metal additions should be lowered. The kinetics of the pore-filling effects can also be adjusted by the size of the Fe and Ni particles and by selection of more appropriate processing conditions.

4. Conclusions

This work continues the previous study on the electrical performance improvement strategy of Ca3Co4O9-based materials, by transition metal additions and employment of different sintering schemes, this time involving a combined approach using separate metallic Fe and Ni particles additions in the Ca3Co4O9 structure and sintering in one and two stages, in air. Novel composite materials with the general formula (1 − x)Ca3Co4O9/xFe (and xNi) (x = 0%, 3%, 6% and 9% vol.) have been prepared through a modified Pechini solution-based synthesis route and sintered in two different ways, producing low density (the one-step cycle, 1ST) and high density (the two-step cycle, 2ST) ceramic composites. Selected samples from each composition have been characterized by measurements of electrical conductivity (σ), Seebeck coefficient (α), and power factor (PF), between 475 and 975 K, and related to their respective composition, morphology, and microstructure. The 1ST sintered samples presented high porosity (31–62% of ρth) and the highest PF values of 80 and 90 μWm−1K−2 have been recorded for the 3% vol. Ni and 3 and 6% vol. Fe-added composites, respectively, very close to some of the best reported values in literature. In contrast, the 2ST case produced high-density samples and the best PF values have been measured for the 3% vol. Ni added composites (200 μWm−1K−2). Generally, both 1ST and 2ST sintered composites presented rather complex phase composition and microstructures, which led to only minor electrical performance improvements, compared to the pure matrix samples, but very close to or even better than some of the best reported values in literature, for similar cases and materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.C. and A.V.K.; data curation, G.C., S.M.M., A.D.L., D.V.L. and S.A.S.; formal analysis, G.C., A.R.S., M.C.F., T.F.d.S. and A.V.K.; funding acquisition, G.C. and A.V.K.; investigation, G.C., S.M.M., A.D.L., D.V.L., S.A.S. and A.V.K.; methodology, G.C., A.D.L., D.V.L., S.A.S. and A.V.K.; project administration, A.V.K.; resources, G.C. and A.V.K.; software, G.C., A.R.S., M.C.F. and T.F.d.S.; supervision, A.V.K.; validation, G.C., A.D.L., D.V.L., S.A.S. and A.V.K.; visualization, G.C. and A.V.K.; writing—original draft, G.C. and A.V.K.; writing—review and editing, G.C., S.M.M., A.D.L., D.V.L., A.R.S., M.C.F., T.F.d.S., S.A.S. and A.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Materials 14 00980 i001 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. Materials 14 00980 i002

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not available.

Acknowledgments

Gabriel Constantinescu acknowledges the support of the TEOsINTE project (Grant agreement ID: 101003375), funded under the H2020-EU.4. Programmes (Funding Scheme: MSCA-IF-EF-ST-Standard EF). Partial support of the project ‘REMOTE’ (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031875) is also acknowledged. This work was also partially developed within the scope of the project CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, UIDB/50011/2020 & UIDP/50011/2020, financed by national funds through the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology/MCTES.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Freer, R.; Powell, A.V. Realising the potential of thermoelectric technology: A Roadmap. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 441–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bahrami, A.; Schierning, G.; Nielsch, K. Waste Recycling in Thermoelectric Materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Beretta, D.; Neophytou, N.; Hodges, J.M.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Narducci, D.; Gonzalez, M.M.; Beekman, M.; Balke, B.; Cerretti, G.; Tremel, W.; et al. Thermoelectrics: From history, a window to the future. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2019, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Patil, D.S.; Arakerimath, R.R.; Walke, P.V. Thermoelectric materials and heat exchangers for power generation—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 95, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Champier, D. Thermoelectric generators: A review of applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 140, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Peng, W.; Su, D. Internet-based remote monitoring system of thermo-electric-generations with mobile communication technology. Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. 2016, 53, 154–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vining, C.B. An inconvenient truth about thermoelectrics. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Urban, J.J.; Menon, A.K.; Tian, Z.; Jain, A.; Hippalgaonkar, K. New horizons in thermoelectric materials: Correlated electrons, organic transport, machine learning, and more. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 125, 180902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karana, D.R.; Sahoo, R.R. Influence of geometric parameter on the performance of a new asymmetrical and segmented thermoelectric generator. Energy 2019, 179, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, W.; Lukas, K.C.; McEnaney, K.; Lee, S.; Zhang, Q.; Opeil, C.P.; Chen, G.; Ren, Z. Studies on the Bi2Te3-Bi2Se 3-Bi2S3 system for mid-temperature thermoelectric energy conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Artini, C.; Carlini, R.; Spotorno, R.; Failamani, F.; Mori, T.; Mele, P. Structural properties and thermoelectric performance of the double-filled skutterudite (Sm,Gd)y(FexNi1-x)4Sb12. Materials 2019, 12, 2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Qiu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Xia, K.; Fang, T.; Yu, J.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, T. Grain Boundary Scattering of Charge Transport in n-Type (Hf,Zr)CoSb Half-Heusler Thermoelectric Materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guechi, N.; Bouhemadou, A.; Benaisti, I.; Omran, B.S.; Khenata, R.; Douri, A.Y. Temperature and doping effects on the transport properties of SrIn2P2 Zintl compound. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 815, 2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wolf, M.; Hinterding, R.; Feldhoff, A. High power factor vs. high zT-A review of thermoelectric materials for high-temperature application. Entropy 2019, 21, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. LeBlanc, S. Thermoelectric generators: Linking material properties and systems engineering for waste heat recovery applications. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2014, 1, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ricoult, B.M.; Rustad, J.; Moore, L.; Smith, C.; Brown, J. Semiconducting Large Bandgap Oxides as Potential Thermoelectric Materials for High-Temperature Power Generation? Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; Volume 116, pp. 433–470. [Google Scholar]
  17. Terasaki, I.; Sasago, Y.; Uchinokura, K. Large thermoelectric power in single crystals. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1997, 56, R12685–R12687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ji, L. Metal oxide-based thermoelectric materials. In Metal Oxides in Energy Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 49–72. ISBN 978-0-12-811167-3. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fergus, J.W. Oxide materials for high temperature thermoelectric energy conversion. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 525–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kanas, N.; Bittner, M.; Desissa, T.D.; Singh, S.P.; Norby, T.; Feldhoff, A.; Grande, T.; Wiik, K.; Einarsrud, M.A. All-Oxide Thermoelectric Module with in situ Formed Non-Rectifying Complex p-p-n Junction and Transverse Thermoelectric Effect. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 9899–9906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Funahashi, S.; Guo, H.; Guo, J.; Baker, A.L.; Wang, K.; Shiratsuyu, K.; Randall, C.A. Cold sintering and co-firing of a multilayer device with thermoelectric materials. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 100, 3488–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Azough, F.; Gholinia, A.; Ruiz, A.D.T.; Duran, E.; Kepaptsoglou, D.M.; Eggeman, A.S.; Ramasse, Q.M.; Freer, R. Self-Nanostructuring in SrTiO3: A Novel Strategy for Enhancement of Thermoelectric Response in Oxides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 32833–32843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Singh, S.P.; Kanas, N.; Desissa, T.D.; Einarsrud, M.A.; Norby, T.; Wiik, K. Thermoelectric properties of non-stoichiometric CaMnO3-δ composites formed by redox-activated exsolution. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 1344–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nasani, N.; Rocha, O.C.M.; Kovalevsky, A.V.; Irurueta, O.G.; Populoh, S.; Thiel, P.; Weidenkaff, A.; Neto Da Silva, F.; Fagg, D.P. Exploring the Thermoelectric Performance of BaGd2NiO5 Haldane Gap Materials. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 2354–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tato, M.; Shimonishi, R.; Hagiwara, M.; Fujihara, S. Reactive Templated Grain Growth and Thermoelectric Power Factor Enhancement of Textured CuFeO2 Ceramics; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2020; Volume 3, pp. 1979–1987. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sun, Q.; Li, G.; Tian, T.; Man, Z.; Zheng, L.; Barré, M.; Dittmer, J.; Goutenoire, F.; Kassiba, A.H. Controllable microstructure tailoring for regulating conductivity in Al-doped ZnO ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kieslich, G.; Cerretti, G.; Veremchuk, I.; Hermann, R.P.; Panthöfer, M.; Grin, J.; Tremel, W. A chemists view: Metal oxides with adaptive structures for thermoelectric applications. Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 2016, 213, 808–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maignan, A.; Hébert, S.; Pi, L.; Pelloquin, D.; Martin, C.; Michel, C.; Hervieu, M.; Raveau, B. Perovskite manganites and layered cobaltites: Potential materials for thermoelectric applications. Cryst. Eng. 2002, 5, 365–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Masset, A.; Michel, C.; Maignan, A.; Hervieu, M.; Toulemonde, O.; Studer, F.; Raveau, B.; Hejtmanek, J. Misfit-layered cobaltite with an anisotropic giant magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2000, 62, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Miyazaki, Y.; Onoda, M.; Oku, T.; Kikuchi, M.; Ishii, Y.; Ono, Y.; Morii, Y.; Kajitani, T. Modulated Structure of the Thermoelectric Compound [Ca2CoO 3]0.62CoO2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 71, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maignan, A.; Pelloquin, D.; Hebert, S.; Klein, Y.; Hervieu, M. Thermoelectric power in misfit cobaltites ceramics: Optimization by chemical substitutions. Bol. Soc. Esp. Ceram. V 2006, 45, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liang, L.; Romo-De-La-Cruz, C.-O.; Carvilo, P.; Jackson, B.; Gemmen, E.; Navia, P.S.A.; Prucz, J.; Chen, Y.; Song, X. Difference between transition metal cation substitution and Nonstoichiometric addition on nanostructure and thermoelectric performance of complex oxide ceramics. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 277, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pinitsoontorn, S.; Lerssongkram, N.; Keawprak, N.; Amornkitbamrung, V. Thermoelectric properties of transition metals-doped Ca 3Co 3.8M 0.2O9δd (M 5 Co, Cr, Fe, Ni, Cu and Zn). J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2012, 23, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Song, M.E.; Lee, H.; Kang, M.G.; Li, W.; Maurya, D.; Poudel, B.; Wang, J.; Meeker, M.A.; Khodaparast, G.A.; Huxtable, S.T.; et al. Nanoscale Texturing and Interfaces in Compositionally Modified Ca3Co4O9 with Enhanced Thermoelectric Performance. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 10798–10810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Torres, M.A.; Costa, F.M.; Flahaut, D.; Touati, K.; Rasekh, S.; Ferreira, N.M.; Allouche, J.; Depriester, M.; Madre, M.A.; Kovalevsky, A.V.; et al. Significant enhancement of the thermoelectric performance in Ca3Co4O9 thermoelectric materials through combined strontium substitution and hot-pressing process. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 1186–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bergman, D.J.; Fel, L.G. Enhancement of thermoelectric power factor in composite thermoelectrics. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85, 8205–8216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wolf, M.; Menekse, K.; Mundstock, A.; Hinterding, R.; Nietschke, F.; Oeckler, O.; Feldhoff, A. Low Thermal Conductivity in Thermoelectric Oxide-Based Multiphase Composites. J. Electron. Mater. 2019, 48, 7551–7561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kenfaui, D.; Bonnefont, G.; Chateigner, D.; Fantozzi, G.; Gomina, M.; Noudem, J.G. Ca3Co4O9 ceramics consolidated by SPS process: Optimisation of mechanical and thermoelectric properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 2010, 45, 1240–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Madre, M.A.; Costa, F.M.; Ferreira, N.M.; Sotelo, A.; Torres, M.A.; Constantinescu, G.; Rasekh, S.; Diez, J.C. Preparation of high-performance Ca3Co4O9 thermoelectric ceramics produced by a new two-step method. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 33, 1747–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sotelo, A.; Constantinescu, G.; Rasekh, S.; Torres, M.A.; Diez, J.C.; Madre, M.A. Improvement of thermoelectric properties of Ca 3Co 4O 9 using soft chemistry synthetic methods. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 2415–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Królicka, A.K.; Piersa, M.; Mirowska, A.; Michalska, M. Effect of sol-gel and solid-state synthesis techniques on structural, morphological and thermoelectric performance of Ca3Co4O9. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 13736–13743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schulz, T.; Töpfer, J. Thermoelectric properties of Ca3Co4O9 ceramics prepared by an alternative pressure-less sintering/annealing method. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 659, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kang, M.G.; Cho, K.H.; Kim, J.S.; Nahm, S.; Yoon, S.J.; Kang, C.Y. Post-Calcination, a Novel Method to Synthesize Cobalt Oxide-Based Thermoelectric Materials; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 73, pp. 251–258. [Google Scholar]
  44. Woermann, E.; Muan, A. Phase equilibria in the system CaO-cobalt oxide in air. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1970, 32, 1455–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sedmidubský, D.; Jakeš, V.; Jankovský, O.; Leitner, J.; Sofer, Z.; Hejtmánek, J. Phase equilibria in Ca-Co-O system. J. Solid State Chem. 2012, 194, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Klyndyuk, A.I.; Matsukevich, I.V. Synthesis, structure, and properties of Ca3Co3.85M0.15O9 + δ (M = Ti-Zn, Mo, W, Pb, Bi) layered thermoelectrics. Inorg. Mater. 2015, 51, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yao, Q.; Wang, D.L.; Chen, L.D.; Shi, X.; Zhou, M. Effects of partial substitution of transition metals for cobalt on the high-temperature thermoelectric properties of Ca 3Co 4O 9+δ. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 103905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xu, W.; Butt, S.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Liu, Y.; Yu, M.; Marcelli, A.; Lan, J.; Lin, Y.H.; Nan, C.W. Nanoscale heterogeneity in thermoelectrics: The occurrence of phase separation in Fe-doped Ca3Co4O9. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 14580–14587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Constantinescu, G.; Sarabando, A.R.; Rasekh, S.; Lopes, D.; Sergiienko, S.; Amirkhizi, P.; Frade, J.R.; Kovalevsky, A.V. Redox-Promoted Tailoring of the High-Temperature Electrical Performance in Ca3Co4O9 Thermoelectric Materials by Metallic Cobalt Addition; MDPI AG: Basel, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 13, p. 1060. [Google Scholar]
  50. Büttner, G.; Populoh, S.; Xie, W.; Trottmann, M.; Hertrampf, J.; Döbeli, M.; Karvonen, L.; Yoon, S.; Thiel, P.; Niewa, R.; et al. Thermoelectric properties of [Ca2CoO3-δ][CoO2]1,62 as a function of Co/Ca defects and Co3O4 inclusions. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bezdicka, P. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Inst. of Inorganic Chemistry, Rez u Prahy, Czech Republic. ICDD Grant-in-Aid 1999. Mater. Struct. 2001, 8, 3. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hubbard, C.R.; Snyder, R.L. RIR—Measurement and Use in Quantitative XRD. Powder Diffr. 1988, 3, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kovalevsky, A.V.; Yaremchenko, A.A.; Populoh, S.; Weidenkaff, A.; Frade, J.R. Enhancement of thermoelectric performance in strontium titanate by praseodymium substitution. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 53704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Delorme, F.; Chao, D.P.; Giovannelli, F. Effect of Ca Substitution by Fe on the Thermoelectric Properties of Ca3Co4O9 Ceramics. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10832-018-0109-2 (accessed on 31 March 2020).
  55. Mansour, N.A.L. Equilibrium Relationships in the System Cu-U-O. Ber. Dtsch. Keram. Ges. eV 1979, 56, 261–265. [Google Scholar]
  56. Torres, M.A.; Sotelo, A.; Rasekh, S.; Serrano, I.; Constantinescu, G.; Madre, M.A.; Diez, J.C. Improvement of thermoelectric properties of Bi2Sr2Co1.8Ox through solution synthetic methods. Bol. Soc. Esp. Ceram. Vidr. 2012, 51, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kanas, N.; Singh, S.P.; Rotan, M.; Saleemi, M.; Bittner, M.; Feldhoff, A.; Norby, T.; Wiik, K.; Grande, T.; Einarsrud, M.A. Influence of processing on stability, microstructure and thermoelectric properties of Ca3Co4−xO9 + δ. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 1592–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bittner, M.; Helmich, L.; Nietschke, F.; Geppert, B.; Oeckler, O.; Feldhoff, A. Porous Ca3Co4O9 with enhanced thermoelectric properties derived from Sol–Gel synthesis. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 3909–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Butt, S.; Liu, Y.C.; Lan, J.L.; Shehzad, K.; Zhan, B.; Lin, Y.; Nan, C.W. High-temperature thermoelectric properties of la and Fe co-doped Ca-Co-O misfit-layered cobaltites consolidated by spark plasma sintering. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 588, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Prasoetsopha, N.; Pinitsoontorn, S.; Bootchanont, A.; Kidkhunthod, P.; Srepusharawoot, P.; Kamwanna, T.; Amornkitbamrung, V.; Kurosaki, K.; Yamanaka, S. Local structure of Fe in Fe-doped misfit-layered calcium cobaltite: An X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. J. Solid State Chem. 2013, 204, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pinitsoontorn, S.; Prasoetsopha, N.; Srepusharawoot, P.; Bootchanont, A.; Kidkhunthod, P.; Kamwanna, T.; Amornkitbamrung, V.; Kurosaki, K.; Yamanaka, S. Local structure determination of substitutional elements in Ca 3Co4-xMxO9 (M = Fe, Cr, Ga) using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 2014, 211, 1732–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Snyder, G.J.; Toberer, E.S. Complex thermoelectric materials. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, Y.; Sui, Y.; Wang, X.; Su, W.; Liu, X. Enhanced high temperature thermoelectric characteristics of transition metals doped Ca3 Co4 O9+δ by cold high-pressure fabrication. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, C.J.; Huang, L.C.; Wang, J.S. Improvement of the thermoelectric characteristics of Fe-doped misfit-layered Ca3 Co4-x Fex O9+δ (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2). Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 204102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Koshibae, W.; Tsutsui, K.; Maekawa, S. Thermopower in cobalt oxides. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2000, 62, 6869–6872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lin, Y.H.; Lan, J.; Shen, Z.; Liu, Y.; Nan, C.W.; Li, J.F. High-temperature electrical transport behaviors in textured Ca 3Co4O9-based polycrystalline ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, J.; Zheng, H.; Malliakas, C.D.; Allred, J.M.; Ren, Y.; Li, Q.; Han, T.H.; Mitchell, J.F. Brownmillerite Ca2Co2O5: Synthesis, stability, and re-entrant single crystal to single crystal structural transitions. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 7172–7182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Iwasaki, K.; Yamane, H.; Kubota, S.; Takahashi, J.; Shimada, M. Power factors of Ca3Co2O6 and Ca 3Co2O6-based solid solutions. J. Alloy. Compd. 2003, 358, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Takahashi, J.; Yamane, H.; Shimada, M. Thermoelectric properties of Ca3Co2O6 single crystal. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 2 Lett. 2004, 43, L331–L333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cox, J.T.; Quinn, C.M. Conductivity measurements on cobalt and nickel oxides in highly-enriched oxygen atmospheres. J. Mater. Sci. 1969, 4, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, S.; Funahashi, R.; Matsubara, I.; Ueno, K.; Sodeoka, S.; Yamada, H. Thermoelectric Properties of Oxides Ca2Co2O5 with Bi Substitution; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; Volume 19. [Google Scholar]
Materials 14 00980 g001 550
Figure 1. Normalized XRD patterns of the 1ST sintered reference matrix and Fe added samples. The vertical lines of different colors mark the main identified phases.
Figure 1. Normalized XRD patterns of the 1ST sintered reference matrix and Fe added samples. The vertical lines of different colors mark the main identified phases.
Materials 14 00980 g001
Materials 14 00980 g002 550
Figure 2. Normalized XRD patterns of the 1ST sintered reference matrix and Ni added samples. The vertical lines of different colors mark the main identified phases. The arrows mark the peak displacements of the phases suggesting substitution with Ni, namely Ca3Co4O9 (black arrows) and CoO (blue arrow).
Figure 2. Normalized XRD patterns of the 1ST sintered reference matrix and Ni added samples. The vertical lines of different colors mark the main identified phases. The arrows mark the peak displacements of the phases suggesting substitution with Ni, namely Ca3Co4O9 (black arrows) and CoO (blue arrow).
Materials 14 00980 g002
Materials 14 00980 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative SEM micrographs (I,III,V,VII) and EDS maps (II,IV,VI,VIII) of selected 1ST sintered samples (fractures).
Figure 3. Representative SEM micrographs (I,III,V,VII) and EDS maps (II,IV,VI,VIII) of selected 1ST sintered samples (fractures).
Materials 14 00980 g003
Materials 14 00980 g004 550
Figure 4. Electrical conductivity (I), Seebeck coefficient (II), and power factor (III) for 1ST sintered samples. The results for selected Co additions are presented for comparison.
Figure 4. Electrical conductivity (I), Seebeck coefficient (II), and power factor (III) for 1ST sintered samples. The results for selected Co additions are presented for comparison.
Materials 14 00980 g004
Materials 14 00980 g005 550
Figure 5. ln(σ·T) vs. 1000/T (Arrhenius) plots for all 1ST sintered samples. The red lines represent linear fittings at high temperatures for activation energy (Ea) calculations.
Figure 5. ln(σ·T) vs. 1000/T (Arrhenius) plots for all 1ST sintered samples. The red lines represent linear fittings at high temperatures for activation energy (Ea) calculations.
Materials 14 00980 g005
Materials 14 00980 g006 550
Figure 6. Normalized XRD patterns of the 2ST sintered reference matrix and Fe added samples. The vertical lines of different colors mark the main identified phases.
Figure 6. Normalized XRD patterns of the 2ST sintered reference matrix and Fe added samples. The vertical lines of different colors mark the main identified phases.
Materials 14 00980 g006
Materials 14 00980 g007 550
Figure 7. Normalized XRD patterns of the 2ST sintered reference matrix and Ni added samples. The vertical lines of different colors mark the main identified phases.
Figure 7. Normalized XRD patterns of the 2ST sintered reference matrix and Ni added samples. The vertical lines of different colors mark the main identified phases.
Materials 14 00980 g007
Materials 14 00980 g008 550
Figure 8. Representative SEM micrographs (I,III,V,VII) and EDS maps (II,IV,VI,VIII) of selected 2ST sintered samples (fractures).
Figure 8. Representative SEM micrographs (I,III,V,VII) and EDS maps (II,IV,VI,VIII) of selected 2ST sintered samples (fractures).
Materials 14 00980 g008
Materials 14 00980 g009 550
Figure 9. Electrical conductivity (I), Seebeck coefficient (II) and power factor (III) for 2ST sintered samples. The results for selected Co additions are presented for comparison.
Figure 9. Electrical conductivity (I), Seebeck coefficient (II) and power factor (III) for 2ST sintered samples. The results for selected Co additions are presented for comparison.
Materials 14 00980 g009
Materials 14 00980 g010 550
Figure 10. Compositional dependence of the power factor at 925 K, for the 1ST and 2ST sintered samples. The results for selected Co additions are shown for comparison.
Figure 10. Compositional dependence of the power factor at 925 K, for the 1ST and 2ST sintered samples. The results for selected Co additions are shown for comparison.
Materials 14 00980 g010
Table
Table 1. Abbreviations, phase composition, relative densities, and activation energies for all one-stage (1ST) sintered samples.
Table 1. Abbreviations, phase composition, relative densities, and activation energies for all one-stage (1ST) sintered samples.
Prepared MaterialsAbbreviationRIR-Estimated Phase
Composition, wt.%		Experimental Density
ρexp, g/cm3		ρexp/ρth *,
%		Ea **,
meV
Ca3Co4O9Ca3Co4O9_1STCa3Co4O9 (100)2.625678
Ca3Co4O9 + 3% vol. Fe3Fe_1STCa3Co4O9 (95);
(Fe,Co)3O4 (5)		2.38–90
Ca3Co4O9 + 6% vol. Fe6Fe_1STCa3Co4O9 (83);
(Fe,Co)3O4 (9);
(Fe,Co)2O3 (8)		1.68–83
Ca3Co4O9 + 9% vol. Fe9Fe_1STCa3Co4O9 (83);
(Fe,Co)3O4 (7);
(Fe,Co)2O3 (10)		1.50–114
Ca3Co4O9 + 3% vol. Ni3Ni_1STCa3Co4O9 (67);
Ca3Co2O6 (28);
CoO (5);		2.8560123
Ca3Co4O9 + 6% vol. Ni6Ni_1STCa3Co4O9 (39);
Ca3Co2O6 (43);
CoO (18)		3.0962170
Ca3Co4O9 + 9% vol. Ni9Ni_1STCa3Co4O9 (35);
Ca3Co2O6 (42);
CoO (23)		2.9057156
* ρth of the composites are calculated using the theoretical density values of the RIR-estimated phases and their respective amounts (a simple mixing rule); ** Ea is the activation energy of the electronic transport, calculated from the electrical conductivity data (see below).
Table
Table 2. Abbreviations, phase composition, and relative densities for all two-stage (2ST) sintered samples.
Table 2. Abbreviations, phase composition, and relative densities for all two-stage (2ST) sintered samples.
Prepared MaterialsAbbreviationRIR-Estimated Phase
Composition, wt.%		Experimental Density
ρexp, g/cm3
Ca3Co4O9Ca3Co4O9_2STCa3Co4O9 (100)3.74
Ca3Co4O9 + 3% vol. Fe3Fe_2STCa3Co2O6 (74);
Ca2(Fe,Co)2O5 (22);
Fe2O3 (4)		4.16
Ca3Co4O9 + 6% vol. Fe6Fe_2STCa3Co2O6 (62);
Ca2(Fe,Co)2O5 (29);
Fe2O3 (9)		3.88
Ca3Co4O9 + 9% vol. Fe9Fe_2STCa3Co2O6 (32);
Ca2(Fe,Co)2O5 (60);
Fe2O3 (8)		3.55
Ca3Co4O9 + 3% vol. Ni3Ni_2STCa3Co2O6 (73);
Ca2Co2O5 (9);
(Co,Ni)O (18)		4.12
Ca3Co4O9 + 6% vol. Ni6Ni_2STCa3Co2O6 (48);
(Co,Ni) O (52)		4.63
Ca3Co4O9 + 9% vol. Ni9Ni_2STCa3Co2O6 (42);
(Co,Ni)O (52);
CaO (6)		4.07
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Constantinescu, G.; Mikhalev, S.M.; Lisenkov, A.D.; Lopes, D.V.; Sarabando, A.R.; Ferro, M.C.; Silva, T.F.d.; Sergiienko, S.A.; Kovalevsky, A.V. Prospects for Electrical Performance Tuning in Ca3Co4O9 Materials by Metallic Fe and Ni Particles Additions. Materials 2021, 14, 980. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040980

AMA Style

Constantinescu G, Mikhalev SM, Lisenkov AD, Lopes DV, Sarabando AR, Ferro MC, Silva TFd, Sergiienko SA, Kovalevsky AV. Prospects for Electrical Performance Tuning in Ca3Co4O9 Materials by Metallic Fe and Ni Particles Additions. Materials. 2021; 14(4):980. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040980

Chicago/Turabian Style

Constantinescu, Gabriel, Sergey M. Mikhalev, Aleksey D. Lisenkov, Daniela V. Lopes, Artur R. Sarabando, Marta C. Ferro, Tiago F. da Silva, Sergii A. Sergiienko, and Andrei V. Kovalevsky. 2021. "Prospects for Electrical Performance Tuning in Ca3Co4O9 Materials by Metallic Fe and Ni Particles Additions" Materials 14, no. 4: 980. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040980

APA Style

Constantinescu, G., Mikhalev, S. M., Lisenkov, A. D., Lopes, D. V., Sarabando, A. R., Ferro, M. C., Silva, T. F. d., Sergiienko, S. A., & Kovalevsky, A. V. (2021). Prospects for Electrical Performance Tuning in Ca3Co4O9 Materials by Metallic Fe and Ni Particles Additions. Materials, 14(4), 980. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040980

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop