Next Article in Journal
A Novel Zirconia-Based Composite Presents an Aging Resistant Material for Narrow-Diameter Ceramic Implants
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Quenching and Subsequent Annealing on the Conductivity and Electromechanical Properties of Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3-BaTiO3
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two-Step Sintering of Partially Stabilized Zirconia for Applications in Ceramic Crowns
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/ma14092152
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of the Hydrolytic Stability of Fine-Grained Ceramics Based on Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 Oxide with a Garnet Structure under Hydrothermal Conditions

by
Liudmila Alekseeva
*,
Aleksey Nokhrin
*,
Maksim Boldin
,
Eugeniy Lantsev
,
Artem Murashov
,
Albina Orlova
and
Vladimir Chuvil’deev
Materials Science Department, Physico-Technical Research Institure, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(9), 2152; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092152
Submission received: 16 March 2021 / Revised: 8 April 2021 / Accepted: 16 April 2021 / Published: 23 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sintering and Grain Growth Behavior of Ceramics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The hydrolytic stability of ceramics based on Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 oxide with a garnet structure obtained by the spark plasma sintering (SPS) method has been studied. The tests were carried out in distilled water under hydrothermal conditions in an autoclave and, for comparison, in a static mode at room temperature. The mechanism of leaching of Y and Nd from the ceramics was investigated. It has been shown that at “low” temperatures (25 and 100 °C), the destruction of pores occured, and the intensity of the leaching process was limited by the diffusion of ions from the inner part of the sample to the surface. At “high” test temperatures (200 and 300 °C), intense destruction of the ceramic grain boundaries was observed. It was assumed that the accelerated leaching of neodymium is due to the formation of grain-boundary segregations of Nd3+ in sintered ceramics.

1. Introduction

Handling of high-level waste (HLW) including minor actinides (MA) accumulated over many years of nuclear power operation is an important task of modern radiochemistry. The high-level waste generated after the extraction of uranium and plutonium from spent reactor fuel is known to contain radioactive isotopes of about 40 elements, 27% of which are the Rare Earth Elements (REE). The study of such compounds is very important for the immobilization of actinide elements (which constitute a special group of long-term ecologically hazardous radionuclides) in order to isolate these ones from the biosphere for the long time required for the storage and disposal. For this purpose, the world’s leading laboratories are currently studying ceramic materials based on natural minerals [1]: monazite [2,3], garnet [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], kosnarite [18,19,20,21], pyrochlore [10,22,23,24,25], scheelite [26], etc. The garnet structure is one of the most promising matrices for the MA immobilization.
Garnets belong to a group of minerals with the general formula B2+3R3+2(XO4)3. The garnet structure is stable in a very wide range of cationic substitutions, and in all crystallographic positions. The position of the B2+ cation can be occupied by Mg, Fe, Mn, Ca; actinides (including Pu (IV)) and REE; the concentration of the substitutes can achieve 4–16 wt% [5,6]). The position of the R3+ cation can be occupied by Al, Fe, Cr, and Ga, the position of the X cation—by Al, Fe, Ga, and Si cations [3,6]. In addition, compounds with a garnet structure have high hydrolytic and radiation stability [3,4,7,8,9,27].
In the present work, the hydrolytic stability of ceramics based on Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 (YAG/Nd) oxide with a garnet structure obtained by the spark plasma sintering (SPS) method at elevated temperatures and pressures was studied. The SPS process is based on high-rate heating of powders in vacuum or in an inert ambient by simultaneously applying a strong millisecond electric DC pulses and a constant pressure to a graphite mold containing the powder [20,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. An opportunity to reduce the sintering time drastically (as a compared to conventional sintering process) while preserving a high density of obtained material is an important advantage of SPS process, especially relevant for the radioactive materials. High heating rates in SPS allow limiting the grain growth considerably and provide conditions for the resulting phase composition of the sintered ceramic to remain identical to the one of the initial powders. This affect positive the hydrolytic, thermal, and radiation stability of the produced ceramics. This is true for simple (oxide) compositions as well as for more complex saline ones composed of many kinds of ions. In recent years, the technologies for producing the garnet-based ceramics the developing rapidly and intensively. In [38], electron beam assisted synthesis was proposed for producing the ceramics based on yttrium-aluminum garnet doped with lanthanides. The ceramic production time was ~1 s. However, the photographs presented in [38] indicate a structure inhomogeneity of the ceramics, which can affect its properties negatively.
The mechanisms of high-speed sintering of Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 ceramics with the garnet structure were described in detail in [3,39,40]. In present work, a special attention was paid to the problem of studying the high-temperature hydrolytic stability of ceramics with a garnet structure. In [11], the hydrolytic stability of various garnet single crystals (including pure yttrium–aluminum garnet not doped with lanthanides) was investigated at 200 °C and a pressure of 150 bar for 28 days. The leaching rate of yttrium ranged from 1.29 × 10−3 to 5.64 × 10−4 g/m2·day. Note that there is almost no information on the hydrolytic resistance of ceramics with the garnet structure at elevated temperatures (200–300 °C). This makes it difficult to predict the long-term hydrolytic resistance of the ceramics obtained by SPS.

2. Materials and Methods

The Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 garnet powder was obtained by the co-precipitation method. An aqueous solution containing Y(NO3)3, Nd(NO3)3, and Al(NO3)3 was mixed with a 5% ammonia solution. The resulting mixture was heated for dehydration up to 90 °C. The dry residue was heated at 300, 500, 800, and 1000 °C for 6 h at each stage and subjected to dispersing in an agate mortar after each thermostating (annealing) stage.
The ceramics were obtained by the SPS method on a Dr. Sinter® Model-625 system (NJS Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The powders were placed in a graphite mold with the inner diameter of 12 mm and heated by passing the of high power millisecond electric current pulses (up to 3 kA). The sintering temperature was 1400 °C. It was measured with a Chino® IR-AH pyrometer (Chino IR-AHS2 infrared, Chino Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) focused onto the graphite mold surface. Sintering was carried out in vacuum (6 Pa). The heating rate was 50 °C/min, the uniaxial pressure applied was 70 MPa. The uncertainly of the temperature measurements was ±10 °C, the one of the pressure maintenance was 1 MPa. The density of the obtained ceramics was measured by hydrostatic weighing in distilled water on a Sartorius® CPA balance (Göttingen, Germany).
The phase composition of the obtained ceramics was studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) method using Shimadzu® LabX XRD-6000 diffractometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a Cu Kα-filter (the emission wavelength λ = 1.54078 Å) in the diffraction angler range of 2θ = 20–60° with the step 0.02° and exposure 0.6 s at every point. The structure of the ceramics was studied with a Jeol JSM-6490 scanning electron microscope (SEM, Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with an Oxford Instruments INCA 350 energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, Oxford Instruments pls., Oxford, England). The average size of the grains and particles of the second phase was determined with GoodGrains 2.0 software. The specimens for the grain-structure study were mechanically polished with diamond suspension and finished to roughness under 1 μm.
The hydrolytic stability of ceramics was studied under hydrothermal conditions in an autoclave at temperatures of 100, 200, and 300 °C in distilled water. The tests were carried out in a metal autoclave with an internal volume of 3000 cm3. the ceramic samples were placed in ceramic beakers placed inside the autoclave (the volume of the beakers (100 cm3) was much less than the one of the autoclaves). The uncertainty of maintaining the temperature was 5 °C. The tests were carried out at temperatures of 100 °C (pressure 0.1 MPa), 200 °C (1.56 MPa), and 300 °C (8.59 MPa). Thus, the tests were carried out according to the scheme: Stage 1: 100 h, Stage 2: +200 h, Stage 3: +200 h, Stage 4: +200 h, Stage 5: +300 h. For comparison, leaching was also carried out in a static mode at room temperature (25 °C).
Water samples for testing were taken after testing, for a total time of 100 h, 300 h, 500 h, 700 h, and 1000 h. The concentration of elements passed into the solution during leaching was determined by inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) using Thermo Scientific® ELEMENTTM 2 high-resolution mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) within the framework of an external calibration. The calibration was carried out using solutions in the ICP-MS-68A-A multielement standard (High Purify Standards, North Charleston, SC, USA). Before the experiment, the ceramic samples surfaces were mechanically grinded and polished to the roughness level Rz20 in order to remove graphite residues.
To calculate the leaching rate of the cations, the weight losses of the component i (normalized weight loss) were calculated using the formula:
NLi = aki / (Moi × S) ,
where NLi is the normalized weight loss of the ith component (in g/cm2), aki is the net weight of the ith component passed into the solution during leaching (in g), M0i is the mass concentration of the ith I component in the sample at the beginning of tests (in g/g), and S is the open area of the sample surface (in cm2).
The leaching rate of the ith component Ri was calculated according to the formula:
Ri = NLi / tn,
where tn represents the time interval (in days).
The leaching mechanism for Y and Nd from investigated ceramics was evaluated in accordance with the de Groot-van der Sloot model [41], which can be represented as an equation of a linear dependence:
lgBi = Algt + const,
where Bi is the total yield of the ith element from the sample during the time of contact with water (in mg/m2), and t is the contact time (in days).
The quantities Bi were calculated using Equation (4):
Bin = Cin (L/S)√tn/(√tn – √tn–1),
where Cin is the concentration of ith element in the leaching solution by the end of nth period (in mg/L); L/S is the ratio of the solution volume to the sample surface area (in L/m2); tn and tn–1 are total contact times at the end of nth period and its beginning, respectively (in days).

3. Results and Discussion

The powders obtained were pale violet colored with a polycrystalline sample. The composites obtained contain easily destructible agglomerates ranging in size from ~1 to ~10 µm. The sintered ceramics had a dense fine-grained microstructure with an average grain size of 3–10 µm (Figure 1). The relative density of the sintered samples was ~99.5–99.7% of the theoretical value (ρth = 4.77 g/cm3). There were no microcracks on the surface of the sintered samples. Few pores of micron and submicron sizes were observed on the fracture of the sample (see, for example, Figure 1; the large pores are marked with yellow arrows).
The ceramics were identified to be single phase materials with a garnet structure (sp. gr. Ia3d, ICDD Card No. 08-0178). There were no changes in the phase composition during leaching (Figure 2).
The study of the microstructure of the samples after the leaching tests has shown the test temperature to affect the nature of the surface destruction significantly. At “low” test temperatures (25 and 100 °C), a destruction of the surface near the pores is observed (Figure 3a,b). Some light deposits were observed on the surface of the samples. Most likely, these ones were formed as a result of the interaction of the test environment with the materials of the autoclave. Holding in distilled water at a 200 °C for 1000 h led to a drastic increase in the etching intensity of the sample surface (Figure 3c). It is important to note that the destruction areas on the sample surface were arranged along the grain boundaries (in Figure 3c, such an area is framed by a yellow dashed rectangle).
With further increase of the test temperature up to 300 °C, the destruction intensity at grain boundaries increased. After 1000 h of testing, the entire surface of the sample was covered by traces of the “intergranular corrosion” (Figure 3d and Figure 4a). Thus, the mechanisms of surface destruction at “low” and “high” test temperatures differ significantly. At “low” temperatures, the destruction is observed mainly near the pores whereas at “high” temperatures the destruction of ceramic grain boundaries took place. We assume that there are two factors promoting accelerated destruction of grain boundaries in hot water: (i) the special composition of the ceramic grain boundaries; (ii) special chemical reactions of water with ceramics at elevated temperatures leading to “intergranular corrosion”. In our opinion, both of these factors are important since “intergranular corrosion” was observed at elevated temperatures only. At present, it is difficult to identify which of these two factors is most important.
Probably, one of the factors promoting the accelerated destruction of grain boundaries in YAG/Nd ceramics is segregation of neodymium at these ones. As shown in [42], the grain boundaries of the YAG/Nd ceramics obtained by the high isostatic pressure (HIP) method contained a higher neodymium concentration than the crystal lattice inside the grains. This assumption, according to [43], can explains a number of anomalies in the optical properties of YAG/Nd ceramics.
This conclusion is confirmed by the assessment of the leaching mechanism according to the de Groot and van der Sloot model. The smallest leaching rates of yttrium and neodymium are given in Table 1. The graph of the normalized weight loss and of the leaching rates Ri vs the time t are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. As one can see from the data obtained, the leaching rates of cations under hydrothermal conditions were significantly higher than the ones in the static regime at room temperature. Furthermore, it increased with increasing temperature up to 200 °C. However, the leaching rates of cations remained almost unchanged with further increasing test temperature up to 300 °C. The leaching rates achieved characterize the samples studied as having a high hydrolytic stability. The leaching rate of yttrium was comparable to the data obtained for the YAG single crystal [11]. We assume the insignificant differences observed are associated, first of all, with the presence of residual porosity as well as with more accelerated destruction of grain boundaries in YAG/Nd ceramics sintered. Because of the low leach rates measured and the flexibility of various garnet structures to incorporate a wide range of REEs, the investigated garnet are promising as viable waste forms for hosting minor actinides from nuclear wastes.
The analysis of the data presented in Table 1 shows that at elevated temperatures (100–300 °C) the rate of neodymium leaching is higher than the one for yttrium. This cannot be due to differences in the diffusion coefficients of Y and Nd in the YAG crystal lattice. According to [44], the effective diffusion coefficient of Nd3+ in fine-grained YAG ceramics can be calculated using the equation: DNd = 177 × exp(−623 [kJ/mol]/RT) (in m2/s). In [45,46], it was reported that the diffusion activation energy and diffusion coefficients of Nd3+ in YAG/Nd ceramics are close. The activation energy of diffusion of Y3+ in YIG (yttrium–iron garnet) is ~502 kJ/mol, and the diffusion coefficient of Y in YIG garnet is much higher than the one of Nd in YAG [45]. In [47], the highest values of the diffusion coefficient of Y3+ in YAG (2.43 × 10−10 cm2/s at 1750 °C) were reported. It [48], the activation energy of grain boundary diffusion of yttrium Y3+ for YAG garnet was reported to be ~565 kJ/mol. It is less than the activation energy of grain boundary diffusion of Nd3+ (~637 kJ/mol). Also, a low activation energy for Y3+ diffusion in the YAG lattice was reported to be ~530 kJ/mol [49].
Thus, the accelerated leaching of Nd observed in the sintered ceramics cannot be explained by differences in the diffusion coefficients of Nd3+ and Y3+ ions: the analysis of the literature shows that the diffusion coefficient of Y3+ in YAG exceeds the one of Nd3+. In our opinion, the leaching of neodymium observed during the hydrolytic tests is due to an increased segregation of Nd3+ at the grain boundaries of garnet (see above).
To clarify the mechanism of leaching of Y and Nd from the ceramics, the de Groot and van der Sloot dependence were plotted (Figure 7). The slopes of the approximating straightline point to the predominant leaching mechanism. Earlier, the values of coefficient A in Equation (3) were shown to point to the following leaching mechanisms: A < 0.35—leaching from the surface; A = 0.35–0.65—diffusion from inner layers; A > 0.65—dissolution of the surface layer [50,51]. The leaching of Y and Nd in the static mode and under hydrothermal conditions at 100 °C was found to be due to diffusion from the inner layers of the ceramic (A = 0.4–0.54, Figure 7). At 200 and 300 °C under hydrothermal conditions, leaching from the ceramic surface took place (A ~0.01, Figure 7).
In our opinion, a change in the destruction mechanism of the samples surface during hydrolytic tests is one of possible origins for the change in the leaching mechanism at “high” test temperatures (see Figure 3 and Figure 4 ). The grain boundaries of polycrystalline materials are known to have an increased diffusion permeability—the grain boundary diffusion coefficient in fine-grained materials is much higher than the one in the crystal lattice [52,53]. This suggests the diffusion of diffusion of Y and Nd ions to the surface to occurs mainly along the grain boundaries.
In conclusion, it should be noted that such an intergranular nature of fracture may be undesirable, since the crack-like defects formed on the surface can be sources of the premature destruction of ceramics under thermal shock (rapid temperature changes) or under mechanical stress.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A. and A.N.; methodology, L.A., M.B., E.L. and A.M.; formal analysis, L.A., A.N., M.B., E.L. and A.M.; investigation, L.A., M.B., E.L., and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.A., A.N., A.O. and V.C.; writing—review and editing, L.A., A.N., A.O. and V.C.; project administration, A.O. and V.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant No. 20-21-00145 Rosatom.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to P.A. Ryabochkina (Ogareva Mordovia State University) and N.Yu. Tabachkova (National University of Science and Technology “MISiS”; Prokhorov General Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Science) for their help in analyzing the results.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Orlova, A.I.; Ojovan, M.I. Ceramic mineral waste-forms for nuclear waste immobilization. Materials 2019, 12, 2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ewing, R.C.; Webert, W.J.; Clinard, F.W. Radiation effects in nuclear waste forms for high-level radioactive waste. Prog. Nucl. Energy 1995, 29, 63–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Potanina, E.; Golovkina, L.; Orlova, A.; Nokhrin, A.; Boldin, M.; Sakharov, N. Lanthanide (Nd, Gd) compounds with garnet and monazite structures. Powders synthesis by “wet” chemistry to sintering ceramics by Spark Plasma Sintering. J. Nucl. Mater. 2016, 473, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tomilin, S.V.; Lizin, A.A.; Lukinykh, A.N.; Livshits, T.S. Radiation resistance and chemical stability of yttrium aluminum garnet. Radiochemistry 2011, 53, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Burakov, B.E.; Anderson, E.B. Experience of V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute on synthesis and investigation of Pu-doped ceramics. In Proceedings of the Plutonium Future—The Science, AIP Conference, Melville, NY, USA, 10–13 May 2000; pp. 159–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yudintsev, S.V. A structural-chemical approach to selecting crystalline matrices for actinide immobilization. Geol. Ore Deposites 2003, 45, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Livshits, T.S.; Lizin, A.A.; Zhang, J.M.; Ewing, R.C. Amorphization of rare earth aluminate garnets under ion irradiation and decay of 244Cm admixture. Geol. Ore Deposites 2010, 52, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Livshits, T.S. Stability of artificial ferrite garnets with actinides and lanthanoids in water solutions. Geol. Ore Deposites 2008, 50, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lukinykh, A.N.; Tomilin, S.V.; Lizin, A.A.; Livshits, T.S. Radiation and chemical resistance of synthetic ceramics based on ferritic garnet. Radiochemistry 2008, 50, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Laverov, N.P.; Yudintsev, S.V.; Livshits, T.S.; Stefanovsky, S.V.; Lukinykh, A.N.; Ewing, R.C. Synthetic Minerals with the Pyrochlore and Garnet Structures for Immobilization of Actinide-Containing Wastes. Geochem. Int. 2010, 48, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Caporuscio, F.A.; Scott, B.L.; Xu, H.; Feller, R.K. Garnet nuclear waste forms—Solubility at repository conditions. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2014, 266, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Utsunomiya, S.; Wang, L.; Yudintsev, S.; Ewing, R. Ion Irradiation Effects in Synthetic Garnets Incorporating Actinides. MRS Proc. 2011, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Konovalov, E.E.; Lastov, A.I.; Nerozin, N.A. On immobilization of high-level waste in an Y-Al garnet-based cermet matrix in SHS conditions. Nucl. EnergyTech. 2015, 12, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Weber, W.; Navrotsky, A.; Stefanovsky, S.; Vance, E.R.; Vernaz, E. Materials Science of High-Level Nuclear Waste Immobilization. MRS Bull. 2009, 34, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Rák, Z.; Ewing, R.; Becker, U. Ferric garnet matrices for immobilization of actinides. J. Nucl. Mater. 2013, 436, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, X.; Rak, Z.; Tavakoli, A.H.; Becker, U.; Ewing, R.C.; Navrotsty, A. Thermodynamics of thorium substitution in yttrium iron garnet: Comparison of experimental and theoretical results. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain. 2014, 2, 16945–16954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Rák, Z.; Ewing, R.C.; Becker, U. Electronic structure and thermodynamic stability of uranium-doped yttrium iron garnet. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2013, 25, 495502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Scheetz, B.E.; Agrawal, D.K.; Breval, E.; Roy, R. Sodium Zirconium-phosphate (NZP) as a Host Structure for Nuclear Waste Immobilization—A Review. Waste Manag. 1994, 14, 489–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bykov, D.M.; Orlova, A.I.; Tomilin, S.V.; Lizin, A.A.; Lukinykh, A.N. Americium and plutonium in trigonal phosphates (NZP type) Am1/3[Zr2(PO4)3] and Pu1/4[Zr2(PO4)3]. Radiochemistry 2006, 48, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Orlova, A.I.; Koryttseva, A.K.; Kanunov, A.E.; Chuvil’deev, V.N.; Moskvicheva, A.V.; Sakharov, N.; Boldin, M.; Nokhrin, A.V. Fabrication of NaZr2(PO4)3-type ceramic materials by spark plasma sintering. Inorg. Mater. 2012, 48, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gregg, D.J.; Karatchevtseva, I.; Triani, G.; Lumpkin, G.R.; Vance, E.R. The thermophysical properties of calcium and barium zirconium phosphate. J. Nucl. Mat. 2013, 441, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raison, P.E.; Haire, R.G.; Sato, T.; Ogawa, T. Fundamental and technological aspects of actinide oxide pyrochlores: Relevance for immobilization matrices. In Proceedings of the Sympos. “Sci. Basis for Nucl. Waste Management XXII”, Boston, MA, USA, 30 November–4 December 1998; MRS: Warrendale, PA, USA, 1999; Volume 556, pp. 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ewing, R.C. The design and evaluation of nuclearwaste forms: Clues from mineralogy. Can. Mineral. 2001, 39, 697–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Strachan, D.M.; Scheele, R.D.; Icenhower, J.P.; Buck, E.C.; Kozelisky, A.E.; Sell, R.L.; Elovich, R.J.; Buchmiller, W.C. Radiation Damage Effects in Candidate Ceramics for Plutonium Immobilization: Final Report; Pacific North West National Laboratory: Richland, WA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  25. Strachan, D.M.; Scheele, R.D.; Buck, E.C.; Icenhower, J.P.; Kozelisky, A.E.; Sell, R.L.; Elovich, R.J.; Buchmiller, W.C. Radiation damage effects in candidate titanates for Pu disposition: Pyrochlore. J. Nucl. Mater. 2005, 345, 109–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Potanina, E.A.; Orlova, A.I.; Mikhailov, D.A.; Nokhrin, A.V.; Chuvil’deev, V.N.; Boldin, M.S.; Sakharov, N.V.; Lantcev, E.A.; Tokarev, M.G.; Murashov, A.A. Spark Plasma Sintering of fine-grained SrWO4 and NaNd(WO4)2tungstates ceramics with the scheelite structure for nuclear waste immobilization. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 774, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Saifulin, M.M.; O’Connell, J.H.; Janse van Vuuren, A.; Skuratov, V.A.; Kirilkin, N.S.; Zdorovets, M.V. Latent tracks in bulk yttrium-iron garnet crystals irradiated with low and high velocity krypton and xenon ions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2019, 460, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tokita, M. Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) Method, Systems, and Applications (Chapter 11.2.3). In Handbook of Advanced Ceramics, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 1149–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Olevsky, E.; Dudina, D. Field-Assisted Sintering; Springer Int. Publ.: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Papynov, E.K.; Shichalin, O.O.; Mayorov, V.Y.; Kuryavyi, V.; Kaidalova, T.A.; Teplukhina, L.V.; Portnyagin, A.S.; Slobodyuk, A.; Belov, A.; Tananaev, I.G.; et al. SPS technique for ionizing radiation source fabrication based on dense cesium-containing core. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 369, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Papynov, E.K.; Shichalin, O.O.; Mayorov, V.Y.; Portnyagin, A.S.; Gridasova, E.; Agafonova, I.G.; Zakirova, A.E.; Tananaev, I.G.; Avramenko, V. Sol-gel and SPS combined synthesis of highly porous wollastonite ceramic materials with immobilized Au-NPs. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 8509–8516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. O’Brien, R.; Ambrosi, R.; Bannister, N.; Howe, S.; Atkinson, H. Spark Plasma Sintering of simulated radioisotope materials within tungsten cermets. J. Nucl. Mater. 2009, 393, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ryu, H.; Lee, Y.; Cha, S.; Hong, S. Sintering behaviour and microstructures of carbides and nitrides.for the inert matrix fuel by spark plasma sintering. J. Nucl. Mater. 2006, 352, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Papynov, E.K.; Shichalin, O.O.; Mironenko, A.Y.; Ryakov, A.; Manakov, I.; Makhrov, P.; Buravlev, I.; Tananaev, I.; Avramenko, V.; Sergienko, N. Synthesis of High-Density Pellets of Uranium Dioxide by Spark Plasma Sintering in Dies of Different Types. Radiochemistry 2018, 60, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shichalin, O.O.; Papynov, E.K.; Maiorov, V.Y.; Belov, A.; Buravlev, I.; Azarova, Y.; Golub, A.; Gridasova, E.; Sukhorada, A.; Tananaev, I.; et al. Spark Plasma Sintering of Aluminosilicate Ceramic Matrices for Immobilization of Cesium Radionuclides. Radiochemistry 2019, 61, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chu, X.; Qing, Q.; Li, B.; Yang, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, H.; Shao, D.; Lu, X. Rapid immobilization of complex simulated radionuclides by as-prepared Gd2Zr2O7 ceramics without structural design. J. Nucl. Mater. 2019, 526, 151782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, L.; Shu, X.; Yi, F.; Shao, D.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, H.; Xirui, L. Rapid fabrication and phase transition of Nd and Ce co-doped Gd2Zr2O7 ceramics by SPS. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 2863–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Karipbayev, Z.T.; Lisitsyn, V.M.; Mussakhanov, D.A.; Alpyssova, G.K.; Popov, A.; Polisadova, E.; Elsts, E.; Akilbekov, A.T.; Kukenova, A.B.; Kemere, M.; et al. Time-resolved luminescence of YAG:Ce and YAGG:Ce ceramics prepared by electron beam assisted synthesis. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2020, 479, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Golovkina, L.S.; Orlova, A.I.; Nokhrin, A.V.; Boldin, M.S.; Chuvil’deev, V.N.; Sakharov, N.V.; Belkin, O.A.; Shotin, S.V.; Zelenov, A.Y. Spark Plasma Sintering of fine-grain ceramic-metal composites based on garnet-structure oxide Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 for inert matrix fuel. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 214, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Golovkina, L.S.; Orlova, A.I.; Chuvil’deev, V.N.; Boldin, M.S.; Lantcev, E.A.; Nokhrin, A.V.; Sakharov, N.V.; Zelenov, A.Y. Spark Plasma Sintering of high-density fine-grained Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12+SiC composite ceramics. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 103, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. De Groot, G.J.; Van der Sloot, H.A. Determination of leaching characteristics of waste minerals leading to environmental product certification. In Stabilization and Solidification of Hazardous, Radioactive and Mixed Wastes; Gilliam, T.M., Wiles, C.C., Eds.; ASTM: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1992; Volume 2, pp. 149–170. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ikesue, A.; Kamata, K.; Yoshida, K. Effect of neodymium concentration on optical characteristics of polycrytstallineNd:YAG laser materials. J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 1996, 79, 1921–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Garanin, S.S.; Dmitryuk, A.V.; Mikhailov, M.D.; Zhilin, A.A.; Rukavishnikov, N.N. Laser ceramics. 2. Spectroscopic and lasing properties. J. Opt. Technol. 2011, 78, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hollingsworth, J.P.; Kuntz, J.D.; Ryerson, F.J.; Soules, T.F. Nd diffusion in YAG ceramics. Opt. Mater. 2011, 33, 592–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cherniak, D.J. Rare earth element and gallium diffusion in yttrium aluminum garnet. Phys. Chem. Miner. 1998, 26, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Boulesteix, R.; Maîte, A.; Baumard, J.-F.; Rabinovitch, Y.; Sallé, C.; Weber, S.; Kilo, M. The effect of silica doping on neodymium diffusion in yttrium aluminum garnet ceramics: Implications for sintering mechanisms. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 2517–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, P.; Jiang, B.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chen, S.; Fan, J.; Zhang, L. Spatial ions distribution on the binding interface in YAG/Nd:LuAG composite laser ceramic. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 100, 5030–5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Boulesteix, R.; Maîte, A.; Baumard, J.-F.; Sallé, C.; Rabinovitch, Y. Mechanism of the liquid-phase sintering for Nd:YAG ceramics. Opt. Mater. 2009, 31, 711–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jiménez-Melendo, M.; Haneda, H.; Nozawa, H. Ytterbium cation diffusion in yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) — implications for creep mechanisms. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 84, 2356–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Torras, J.; Buj, I.; Rovira, M.; de Pablo, J. Semi-dynamic leaching tests of nickel containing wastes stabilized/solidified with magnesium potassium phosphate cements. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 1954–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Xue, Q.; Wang, P.; Li, J.-S.; Zhang, T.-T.; Wang, S. Investigation of the leaching behavior of lead in stabilized/solidified waste using a two-year semi-dynamic leaching test. Chemosphere 2017, 166, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Segal, V.M.; Beyerlein, I.J.; Tome, C.N.; Chuvil’deev, V.N.; Kopylov, V.I. Fundamentals and Engineering of Severe Plastic Deformation; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pelleg, J. Diffusion in Ceramics; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
Materials 14 02152 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM image of a fracture of a sintered ceramic sample.
Figure 1. SEM image of a fracture of a sintered ceramic sample.
Materials 14 02152 g001
Materials 14 02152 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD curves for ceramics Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 before (initial) and after leaching.
Figure 2. XRD curves for ceramics Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 before (initial) and after leaching.
Materials 14 02152 g002
Materials 14 02152 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of the ceramic samples surface after hydrolytic tests for 1000 h at room temperature (a) at 100 °C (b) at 200 °C (c) and at 300 °C (d).
Figure 3. SEM images of the ceramic samples surface after hydrolytic tests for 1000 h at room temperature (a) at 100 °C (b) at 200 °C (c) and at 300 °C (d).
Materials 14 02152 g003
Materials 14 02152 g004 550
Figure 4. Surface of a ceramic sample after hydrolytic tests for 1000 h at a temperature of 300 °C (magnification: (a) ×1000, (b) ×10,000).
Figure 4. Surface of a ceramic sample after hydrolytic tests for 1000 h at a temperature of 300 °C (magnification: (a) ×1000, (b) ×10,000).
Materials 14 02152 g004
Materials 14 02152 g005 550
Figure 5. The normalized weight loss NLi vs the time t for Y (a) and Nd (b).
Figure 5. The normalized weight loss NLi vs the time t for Y (a) and Nd (b).
Materials 14 02152 g005
Materials 14 02152 g006 550
Figure 6. The leaching rate Ri vs the time t for Y (a) and Nd (b).
Figure 6. The leaching rate Ri vs the time t for Y (a) and Nd (b).
Materials 14 02152 g006
Materials 14 02152 g007 550
Figure 7. Logarithmic dependence of Y (a) and Nd (b) yield on the time of contact with water.
Figure 7. Logarithmic dependence of Y (a) and Nd (b) yield on the time of contact with water.
Materials 14 02152 g007
Table
Table 1. Minimum achieved leaching rate of cations.
Table 1. Minimum achieved leaching rate of cations.
Experimental Conditions T (°C) Leaching Rate Ri (at 1000 h), g/(cm2·d)
Y Nd
Static Mode 25 7.11 × 10−10 4.14 × 10−10
Hydrothermal Conditions 100 1.08 × 10−8 1.38 × 10−8
200 1.75 × 10−7 4.99 × 10−7
300 2.46 × 10−7 4.97 × 10−7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alekseeva, L.; Nokhrin, A.; Boldin, M.; Lantsev, E.; Murashov, A.; Orlova, A.; Chuvil’deev, V. Study of the Hydrolytic Stability of Fine-Grained Ceramics Based on Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 Oxide with a Garnet Structure under Hydrothermal Conditions. Materials 2021, 14, 2152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092152

AMA Style

Alekseeva L, Nokhrin A, Boldin M, Lantsev E, Murashov A, Orlova A, Chuvil’deev V. Study of the Hydrolytic Stability of Fine-Grained Ceramics Based on Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 Oxide with a Garnet Structure under Hydrothermal Conditions. Materials. 2021; 14(9):2152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092152

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alekseeva, Liudmila, Aleksey Nokhrin, Maksim Boldin, Eugeniy Lantsev, Artem Murashov, Albina Orlova, and Vladimir Chuvil’deev. 2021. "Study of the Hydrolytic Stability of Fine-Grained Ceramics Based on Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 Oxide with a Garnet Structure under Hydrothermal Conditions" Materials 14, no. 9: 2152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092152

APA Style

Alekseeva, L., Nokhrin, A., Boldin, M., Lantsev, E., Murashov, A., Orlova, A., & Chuvil’deev, V. (2021). Study of the Hydrolytic Stability of Fine-Grained Ceramics Based on Y2.5Nd0.5Al5O12 Oxide with a Garnet Structure under Hydrothermal Conditions. Materials, 14(9), 2152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092152

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop