Next Article in Journal
Effect of Candida albicans Suspension on the Mechanical Properties of Denture Base Acrylic Resin
Next Article in Special Issue
Embossing Pressure Effect on Mechanical and Softness Properties of Industrial Base Tissue Papers with Finite Element Method Validation
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction Model of Sound Signal in High-Speed Milling of Wood–Plastic Composites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 11
10.3390/ma15113842
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural and Optical Characterization of Mechanochemically Synthesized CuSbS2 Compounds

by
Luís Esperto
1,
Isabel Figueira
1,
João Mascarenhas
1,
Teresa P. Silva
2,
José B. Correia
1 and
Filipe Neves
1,*
1
LNEG, Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar 22, 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal
2
LNEG, Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, Estrada da Portela, Bairro do Zambujal—Alfragide, Apartado 7586, 2610-999 Amadora, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(11), 3842; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113842
Submission received: 3 May 2022 / Revised: 24 May 2022 / Accepted: 26 May 2022 / Published: 27 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MATERIAIS 2022, XX Congresso da Sociedade Portuguesa De Materiais)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
One of the areas of research on materials for thin-film solar cells focuses on replacing In and Ga with more earth-abundant elements. In that respect, chalcostibite (CuSbS2) is being considered as a promising environmentally friendly and cost-effective photovoltaic absorber material. In the present work, single CuSbS2 phase was synthesized directly by a short-duration (2 h) mechanochemical-synthesis step starting from mixtures of elemental powders. X-ray diffraction analysis of the synthesized CuSbS2 powders revealed a good agreement with the orthorhombic chalcostibite phase, space group Pnma, and a crystallite size of 26 nm. Particle-size characterization revealed a multimodal distribution with a median diameter ranging from of 2.93 μm to 3.10 μm. The thermal stability of the synthesized CuSbS2 powders was evaluated by thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis. No phase change was observed by heat-treating the mechanochemically synthesized powders at 350 °C for 24 h. By UV-VIS-NIR spectroscopy the optical band gap was determined to be 1.41 eV, suggesting that the mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 can be considered suitable to be used as absorber materials. Overall, the results show that the mechanochemical process is a viable route for the synthesis of materials for photovoltaic applications.

1. Introduction

In general, photovoltaic (PV) technologies can be divided into two main categories: wafer-based and thin-film (TF) cells [1,2]. Presently, the technologies classified as commercial for terrestrial application include wafer-based crystalline silicon (c-Si) PV, as well as the TF technologies of CdTe and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) [1,2,3,4,5]. Additionally, the wafer-based c-Si PV technologies are divided as monocrystalline or multicrystalline [1,2,4,5]. Current market share is clearly dominated by the wafer-based c-Si PV technology, accounting for about 95% of the total production in 2020, with the share of monocrystalline technology now being about 84% of total c-Si production [4]. Consequently, the TF technology market share represents about 5% of today’s global annual market. In terms of solar-cell efficiencies, the record lab-cell efficiency is 26.7% for monocrystalline and 24.4% for multicrystalline wafer-based c-Si technology. The highest lab efficiency in TF technology is 23.4% for CIGS and 21.0% for CdTe solar cells [4]. Another emerging precommercial TF technology is hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite CH3NH3PbI3, which shows a remarkable record lab-cell efficiency of 25.5% [4]. However, to satisfy the expected world’s energy demand for the next decades, on the scale of tens of terawatt, these technologies are affected by many underlying issues, namely [1,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]: 95% of total c-Si PV module production is concentrated in the Far East, the capital intensity of Si may be difficult to reduce, the scarcity and increasing prices of materials (e.g., of In and Te), the use of materials in other energy-related technologies (batteries, power electronics, etc.), the environmental friendliness of Cd and Pb are questionable and the intrinsic instability of perovskite-based devices (due to environmental factors such as oxygen, moisture, thermal stress, light and applied electric fields).
Taking into account the above-mentioned considerations, several other criteria—besides efficiency and reliability—also become important and the research focus should be then directed towards solar cells based on absorber materials containing earth-abundant, low-cost and environmentally sustainable elements. Particularly, the development of In- and Te-free chalcogenides offer attractive options for the synthesis of absorber materials with appropriate bandgaps for photovoltaic conversion. One of those absorber materials is the quaternary kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS), and the related compounds Cu2ZnSnSe4 (CZTSe) and Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe), in which the scarce elements in CIGS are replaced with the relatively abundant Zn and Sn [10,12,13]. Besides having similar optoelectronic properties with CIGS, CZTS shows a direct optical gap in a range suitable for photovoltaic applications. In 2013, the 12.6% record efficiency was demonstrated in CZTSSe [14]. However, further improvements are being hampered by compositional heterogeneities, complex defect chemistry, strong tendency for disorder and nonideal device architecture [10,13]. These limitations are leading to the research of absorber materials based on less complex chalcogenides compounds, such as the Cu–Sb–S (CAS)-based materials [10,11].
In the CAS system, the most promising phase known to have good prospect as absorber material for new single-junction or tandem TF solar cells is CuSbS2 (chalcostibite) because of its high optical-absorption coefficient (over 105 cm−1), p-type electrical conductivity, tunable optical band gap (1.4–1.5 eV), low fabrication temperatures and a high value of spectroscopic limited maximum efficiency of 22.9% [11,15]. However, up to now the efficiencies of TF solar cells with CuSbS2 absorbers remain close to 3% [16]. A variety of physical and chemical methods have been used for the synthesis of CuSbS2 absorbers, including sputtering, electrodeposition, chemical bath deposition, spray pyrolysis deposition and advanced powder technologies [11,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Within them, the use mechanochemical synthesis (MCS) process, a solid-state synthesis route using high-energy ball mills, is being considered as a faster, scalable and environmentally friendly technology than the conventional processing routes for producing chalcogenides compounds [17,21,29,30,31]. In fact, the MCS process is charecterized by high levels of mechanical energy input, which gives rise to defects and structural changes that affect the chemical reactivity of the solids being processed, and consequently, the chemical reactions are activated in a fast way at ambient pressure and room-temperature conditions [29].
The present work describes experimental studies related with the direct synthesis of CuSbS2 by a short-duration MCS step starting from mixtures of elemental powders. The observed strong thermal stability of the structure and the determined optical bandgap of 1.41 eV allow us to infer the suitability of the MCS process for the production of PV materials and the potentialities of the synthesized materials as absorbers for TFSCs.

2. Materials and Methods

The CuSbS2 powders were synthesized by MCS performed on a Retsch high-energy planetary ball mill PM400 (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany). Mixtures of the elemental copper (Cu; Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA), 99.9%, 10 μm), antimony (Sb; Sigma-Aldrich (affiliated of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 99.5%, <149 μm) and sulfur (S; Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA), 99.999%, random sizes) powders, in the ratio of 1:1:2, were filled into 250 mL stainless-steel jars together with 26 balls with a diameter of 15 mm and without any additional fluid medium. These experiments were performed at a rotational speed of 340 rpm for a total milling duration of 2 h. Before starting the MCS, the jars were evacuated and back-filled with Argon. A small fraction of the MCS powders was heat-treated in vacuum (10−2 mbar) at 350 °C for 24 h using a conventional tube furnace.
Powder X-ray diffraction data was collected using a D8 Advance Bruker AXS diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation. The XRD data treatment was performed by using DIFFRAC.EVA v5 software (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) [32], for phase identification, and DIFFRAC.TOPAS v6 software ((Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany)) [33], for a full-pattern Rietveld refinement [34]. As a measure for the goodness of the refinements the weighted profile R factor, Rwp, has been used. Morphology and chemical elemental mapping of the powder particles were obtained, respectively, by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using a Philips XL30 field-emission SEM ((FEI, Eindhoven, the Netherlands)) fitted with a Thermo Scientific™ UltraDry EDS detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Particle-size distribution of the produced CuSbS2 powders was determined with a CILAS 1064 laser granulometer. Thermogravimetry (TG) and differential thermal analysis (DTA) were performed on a Setaram TG-DTA 92–16 thermobalance (SETARAM Instrumentation, Caluire, France) to evaluate the thermal stability of the synthesized powders from room temperature up to 600 °C. The TG-DTA experiments were carried out in specimens with masses of around 50 mg, with heating and cooling rates of 7 °C min−1 and under a high-purity Argon gas flow. Diffuse reflectance spectra were collected using a PerkinElmer Lambda 950 UV/Vis/NIR Spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), with InGaAs integrating sphere, in the spectral range of 350–1250 nm for band-gap energy assessment. Diffuse reflectance spectra were collected using PerkinElmer UV WinLab software in the spectral range of 350–1500 nm. The optical absorption spectra were converted from diffuse reflectance spectra using the Kubelka–Munk function [35,36]:
F(R) = K/S = (1 − R)2/2R,
where R is the diffuse reflectance for an infinitely thick sample, K and S are the Kubelka–Munk absorption and scattering coefficients, respectively. In most cases, S can be considered as a constant independent of wavelength. In the parabolic band structure, the band gap (Eg) and absorption coefficient are related through the Tauc equation [35,36]:
αhν = A1(hν-Eg)n,
where α is the linear absorption coefficient of the material, A1 is an arbitrary constant, hν is the photon energy, and n is constant depending on the band-gap nature: n = 1/2 for direct allowed transition band-gap materials and n = 2 for indirect allowed transition band-gap materials. Assuming the material scatters in perfectly diffuse manner, the Kubelka–Munk absorption coefficient K becomes equal to 2α. Thus, the relational expression becomes:
F(R)hν = A2(hν-Eg)n.
The Eg estimation was performed by extrapolating the linear region of the Tauc plot ((F(R)hν)2 versus hν) to the horizontal axis and considering the intersecting point.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of the mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders. All the main reflections from the XRD pattern can be assigned to the CuSbS2 chalcostibite orthorhombic structure with the space group Pnma (62) (COD 9,003,580 [37]). Additionally, no secondary phases were detected, while the observable broadening of the Bragg peaks is mainly a consequence of the MCS process, which causes low crystallite size [38]. This result reflects the successful and fast conversion of the pristine elements into the chalcostibite phase with the experimental conditions used in the MCS. The reaction pathway leading to the direct synthesis of the chalcostibite CuSbS2 compound during the MCS process can be roughly assumed to follow the same path reported for other ternary chalcogenides [39,40]: (1) at the early stage of the MSC, the reaction between Cu and S occurs resulting in the formation of Cu-S binary compounds; (2) with the continuation of the MCS, Sb starts to be involved in the reaction with the Cu-S binary compounds, giving rise to the formation of the ternary chalcostibite CuSbS2 compound.
Typical Rietveld analysis outputs for the 2 h MCS CuSbS2 powders are presented in Figure 2. The orthorhombic structure with the space group Pnma (62) mentioned above was used as structural model in the refinement. As it can be seen, there is a good match between the calculated XRD pattern (Ycal) and the observed XRD pattern (Yobs). This is corroborated by the values obtained for the R factors (Rexp = 2.56% and Rwp = 3.80%) which ensure the good level of the refinement. The obtained Rietveld refined structural lattice parameters are a = 6.0222(2) Å, b = 3.80317(16) Å and c = 14.5043(6) Å. These values are in good with the reference values for the chalcostibite orthorhombic structure from the COD 9,003,580 file (a = 6.018 Å, b = 3.7958 Å and c = 14.495 Å). Moreover, the crystallite size for the mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders was calculated to be 26.5 (4) nm.
The morphology of the mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders is shown in Figure 3a. Based on SEM observations, the powder particles exhibit a quite irregular morphology, generically presenting three types of fractions: one at the submicrometric scale and the other two of the order of a few μm to tens of μm. In addition, it was seen that the submicron fraction tends to aggregate in micron-sized agglomerates. These observations were corroborated by the values of the characteristic dimensions of the particles (D10, D50 and D90) and by the granulometric distribution evaluated by laser diffractometry. As seen in Figure 3b, the frequency distribution curve (q3, histogram) revealed a multimodal distribution with three maxima. Moreover, the values obtained for D10, D50 and D90 means that 10% of the CuSbS2 powder particles are smaller than 0.52 µm, 50% are smaller than 3.02 µm, and 90% are smaller than 14.19 µm.
EDS maps of the individual elements Cu, Sb and S allowed to address the degree of homogeneity of those elements within the produced CuSbS2 powder particles. As shown in Figure 4, all the elements are evenly distributed throughout the analyzed powder particles. Considering the starting elemental powder mixture, the uniform and homogeneous spatial distribution of Cu, Sb and S after the MCS process is extremely relevant.
The DTA and TG heating curves of the mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders are shown in Figure 5. For temperatures above 400 °C, the DTA curve reveals two small endothermic (endo) peaks that are associated to the onset of the thermal decomposition of the chalcostibite CuSbS2 phase. According to the literature, the products of this thermal decomposition are Cu12Sb4S13, Sb2S3 and Sb4 [11,25]. The endothermic peak at 551 °C corresponds to the melting [11,25]. Furthermore, the small continuous weight loss observed in the TG curve, up to a temperature slightly above 551 °C, is clearly associated with the thermal decomposition of the chalcostibite CuSbS2 phase revealed by the DTA curve.
The thermal structural stability of the produced chalcostibite CuSbS2 phase was also addressed by XRD of the heat-treated mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders at 350 °C for 24 h in vacuum. It should be mentioned that the temperature chosen for this heat treatment was intentionally selected below the onset of the thermal decomposition of the chalcostibite CuSbS2 phase. As illustrated in Figure 6, all the main reflections from the obtained XRD pattern were again assigned to the orthorhombic structure with the space group Pnma (62). However, when compared to Figure 1, the observed Bragg peaks are now sharper and better defined. This can be attributed to the increase in the crystallite size and reduction in internal strains.
Figure 7 shows the Rietveld analysis outputs for the heat-treated CuSbS2 powders. The values obtained for the R factors (Rexp = 2.29% and Rwp = 5.20%) confirm the good level of the refinement with the orthorhombic structure with the space group Pnma (62). The obtained Rietveld refined structural lattice parameters and the atomic coordinates of the constituent elements of Cu, Sb and S are listed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. As expected, these results put in evidence the recovery of the crystal structure due to the heat treatment, and as a consequence, the lattice parameters are closer to the standard values for the chalcostibite orthorhombic structure from the COD 9,003,580 file (Table 1) and in good agreement with the values reported in the literature [11]. Moreover, this was also supported by the crystallite size determined for the heat-treated CuSbS2 powders, which was calculated to be 141(5) nm, and consequently, greater than the crystallite-size value shown above (26.5(4) nm) for the mechanochemically synthesized powders.
As shown in Figure 8, and explained in Section 2. Materials and Methods, the Eg estimation was performed by extrapolating the linear region of the Tauc plot to the horizontal axis and considering the intersecting point [35,36]. This has led to an Eg of 1.41 eV for the mechanochemically synthesized chalcostibite material, which is consistent with the theoretical and experimental values reported in the literature [11,15]. Consequently, the produced chalcostibite materials possess the expected optical characteristics. Considering that the optimal Eg should be in the range of 1.0–1.5 eV, the obtained result is very promising and can facilitate their potential application as an alternative absorber material for thin film solar cells. Thus, the ability to form thin films from the mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powder, also using nonvacuum processes, is important for solar-cell fabrication and is being the subject of current studies.

4. Conclusions

Powders of CuSbS2, having orthorhombic structure with the space group Pnma (62), were synthesized directly through a short 2 h-duration mechanochemical step. The absence of any phase transformation with the heat treatment at 350 °C for 24 h, demonstrated the strong structural stability of the produced phase. The band-gap energy of the CuSbS2 powders was estimated by extrapolation to be of 1.41 eV, in good agreement with the values reported in the literature. The mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 compounds can then be considered suitable to be used as absorber materials for thin-film solar cells. Furthermore, the mechanochemical synthesis process proved to be a viable and promising route for the preparation of materials for photovoltaic applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.B.C. and F.N.; investigation, L.E., I.F., J.M. and T.P.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.B.C. and F.N.; writing—review and editing, L.E., I.F., J.M., T.P.S., J.B.C. and F.N.; project administration, F.N.; funding acquisition, F.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by national funds through the FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the project PTDC/EAM-PEC/29905/2017 (LocalEnergy project, http://localenergy.lneg.pt, accessed on 2 May 2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The “Direção Geral de Energia e Geologia” participates as an “External Advisor” in LocalEnergy project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zendehdel, M.; Nia, N.Y.; Yaghoubinia, M. Emerging Thin Film Solar Panels. In Reliability and Ecological Aspects of Photovoltaic Modules; Gok, A., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; p. 26. ISBN 0000957720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Jean, J.; Brown, P.R.; Jaffe, R.L.; Buonassisi, T.; Bulović, V. Pathways for Solar Photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1200–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Taylor, N.; Jäger-Waldau, A. Photovoltaics Technology Development Report 2020; Joint Research Centre (JRC), Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2020; ISBN 9789276272748. [Google Scholar]
  4. Photovoltaics Report; Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, ISE: Freiburg, Germany, 2022.
  5. Smith, B.L.; Woodhouse, M.; Horowitz, K.A.W.; Silverman, T.J.; Zuboy, J.; Margolis, R.M. Photovoltaic (PV) Module Technologies: 2020 Benchmark Costs and Technology Evolution Framework Results; NREL/TP-7A40-78173; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 2021.
  6. Divitini, G.; Cacovich, S.; Matteocci, F.; Cinà, L.; Di Carlo, A.; Ducati, C. In Situ Observation of Heat-Induced Degradation of Perovskite Solar Cells. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Feltrin, A.; Freundlich, A. Material Considerations for Terawatt Level Deployment of Photovoltaics. Renew. Energy 2008, 33, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bae, S.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.-W.; Cho, K.J.; Park, S.; Lee, S.; Kang, Y.; Lee, H.-S.; Kim, D. Electric-Field-Induced Degradation of Methylammonium Lead Iodide Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 3091–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mbumba, M.T.; Malouangou, D.M.; Tsiba, J.M.; Bai, L.; Yang, Y.; Guli, M. Degradation Mechanism and Addressing Techniques of Thermal Instability in Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Sol. Energy 2021, 230, 954–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zakutayev, A. Brief Review of Emerging Photovoltaic Absorbers. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2017, 4, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peccerillo, E.; Durose, K. Copper—Antimony and Copper—Bismuth Chalcogenides—Research Opportunities and Review for Solar Photovoltaics. MRS Energy Sustain. 2018, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Pal, K.; Singh, P.; Bhaduri, A.; Thapa, K.B. Current Challenges and Future Prospects for a Highly Efficient (>20%) Kesterite CZTS Solar Cell: A Review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 196, 138–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nazligul, A.S.; Wang, M.; Choy, K.L. Recent Development in Earth-Abundant Kesterite Materials and Their Applications. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, W.; Winkler, M.T.; Gunawan, O.; Gokmen, T.; Todorov, T.K.; Zhu, Y.; Mitzi, D.B. Device Characteristics of CZTSSe Thin-Film Solar Cells with 12.6% Efficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1301465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Souza Lucas, F.W.; Zakutayev, A. Research Update: Emerging Chalcostibite Absorbers for Thin-Film Solar Cells. APL Mater. 2018, 6, 084501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Banu, S.; Ahn, S.J.; Ahn, S.K.; Yoon, K.; Cho, A. Fabrication and Characterization of Cost-Efficient CuSbS2 Thin Film Solar Cells Using Hybrid Inks. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 151, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dutková, E.; Sayagués, M.J.; Fabián, M.; Kováč, J.; Kováč, J.; Baláž, M.; Stahorský, M. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Ternary Chalcogenide Chalcostibite CuSbS2 and Its Characterization. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 22898–22909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ornelas-Acosta, R.E.; Shaji, S.; Avellaneda, D.; Castillo, G.A.; Das Roy, T.K.; Krishnan, B. Thin Films of Copper Antimony Sulfide: A Photovoltaic Absorber Material. Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 61, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wan, L.; Ma, C.; Hu, K.; Zhou, R.; Mao, X.; Pan, S.; Wong, L.H.; Xu, J. Two-Stage Co-Evaporated CuSbS2 Thin Films for Solar Cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 680, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chalapathi, U.; Poornaprakash, B.; Ahn, C.H.; Park, S.H. Two-Stage Processed CuSbS2 Thin Films for Photovoltaics: Effect of Cu/Sb Ratio. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 14844–14849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, H.; Xu, Q.; Tan, G. Physical Preparation and Optical Properties of CuSbS2 Nanocrystals by Mechanical Alloying Process. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2016, 12, 568–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garza, C.; Shaji, S.; Arato, A.; Perez Tijerina, E.; Alan Castillo, G.; Das Roy, T.K.; Krishnan, B. P-Type CuSbS2 Thin Films by Thermal Diffusion of Copper into Sb2S3. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2011, 95, 2001–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alqahtani, T.; Khan, M.D.; Lewis, D.J.; Zhong, X.L.; O’Brien, P. Scalable Synthesis of Cu–Sb–S Phases from Reactive Melts of Metal Xanthates and Effect of Cationic Manipulation on Structural and Optical Properties. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cho, A.; Banu, S.; Kim, K.; Park, J.H.; Yun, J.H.; Cho, J.S.; Yoo, J.S. Selective Thin Film Synthesis of Copper-Antimony-Sulfide Using Hybrid Ink. Sol. Energy 2017, 145, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Welch, A.W.; Zawadzki, P.P.; Lany, S.; Wolden, C.A.; Zakutayev, A. Self-Regulated Growth and Tunable Properties of CuSbS2 Solar Absorbers. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 132, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Edley, M.E.; Opasanont, B.; Conley, J.T.; Tran, H.; Smolin, S.Y.; Li, S.; Dillon, A.D.; Fafarman, A.T.; Baxter, J.B. Solution Processed CuSbS2 Films for Solar Cell Applications. Thin Solid Films 2018, 646, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Suehiro, S.; Horita, K.; Yuasa, M.; Tanaka, T.; Fujita, K.; Ishiwata, Y.; Shimanoe, K.; Kida, T. Synthesis of Copper-Antimony-Sulfide Nanocrystals for Solution-Processed Solar Cells. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 7840–7845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Septina, W.; Ikeda, S.; Iga, Y.; Harada, T.; Matsumura, M. Thin Film Solar Cell Based on CuSbS2 Absorber Fabricated from an Electrochemically Deposited Metal Stack. Thin Solid Films 2014, 550, 700–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Neves, F.; Stark, A.; Schell, N.; Mendes, M.J.; Aguas, H.; Fortunato, E.; Martins, R.; Correia, J.B.; Joyce, A. Investigation of Single Phase Cu2ZnSnxSb1-XS4 Compounds Processed by Mechanochemical Synthesis. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2018, 2, 075404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Neves, F.; Correia, J.B.; Hanada, K.; Santos, L.F.; Gunder, R.; Schorr, S. Structural Characterization of Cu2SnS3 and Cu2(Sn,Ge)S3 Compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 682, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Baláž, P.; Baláž, M.; Sayagués, M.J.; Eliyas, A.; Kostova, N.G.; Kaňuchová, M.; Dutková, E.; Zorkovská, A. Chalcogenide Quaternary Cu2FeSnS4 Nanocrystals for Solar Cells: Explosive Character of Mechanochemical Synthesis and Environmental Challenge. Crystals 2017, 7, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bruker AXS DIFFRAC.EVA v5, Software for the Analysis of 1D and 2D X-Ray Datasets Including Visualization, Data Reduction, Phase Identification and Quantification, Statistical Evaluation. 2019. Available online: https://www.bruker.com/en/products-and-solutions/diffractometers-and-scattering-systems/x-ray-diffractometers/diffrac-suite-software/diffrac-eva.html (accessed on 2 May 2022).
  33. Bruker AXS DIFFRAC.TOPAS v6, Profile Fitting Based Software for Quantitative Phase Analysis, Microstructure Analysis and Crystal Structure Analysis. 2016. Available online: https://www.bruker.com/en/products-and-solutions/diffractometers-and-scattering-systems/x-ray-diffractometers/diffrac-suite-software/diffrac-topas.html (accessed on 2 May 2022).
  34. Rietveld, H.M. A Profile Refinement Method for Nuclear and Magnetic Structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1969, 2, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Beleanu, A.; Mondeshki, M.; Juan, Q.; Casper, F.; Felser, C.; Porcher, F. Systematical, Experimental Investigations on LiMgZ (Z = P, As, Sb) Wide Band Gap Semiconductors. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 475302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Viezbicke, B.D.; Patel, S.; Davis, B.E.; Birnie, D.P. Evaluation of the Tauc Method for Optical Absorption Edge Determination: ZnO Thin Films as a Model System. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res. 2015, 252, 1700–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Grazulis, S.; Chateigner, D.; Downs, R.T.; Yokochi, A.F.T.; Quiros, M.; Lutterotti, L.; Manakova, E.; Butkus, J.; Moeck, P.; Le Bail, A. Crystallography Open Database—An Open-Access Collection of Crystal Structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 726–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Baláž, P.; Achimovicová, M.; Baláž, M.; Billik, P.; Zara, C.Z.; Criado, J.M.; Delogu, F.; Dutková, E.; Gaffet, E.; Gotor, F.J.; et al. Hallmarks of Mechanochemistry: From Nanoparticles to Technology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7571–7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Li, J.; Tan, Q.; Li, J.F. Synthesis and Property Evaluation of CuFeS2-x as Earth-Abundant and Environmentally-Friendly Thermoelectric Materials. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 551, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, D.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Q.; Fu, L.; Xiao, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, Z. Ternary CuSbSe2 Chalcostibite: Facile Synthesis, Electronic-Structure and Thermoelectric Performance Enhancement. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 4188–4193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 03842 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD pattern of CuSbS2 powders produced directly by mechanochemical synthesis for 2 h (solid black line—observed XRD pattern, thin black line—background).
Figure 1. XRD pattern of CuSbS2 powders produced directly by mechanochemical synthesis for 2 h (solid black line—observed XRD pattern, thin black line—background).
Materials 15 03842 g001
Materials 15 03842 g002 550
Figure 2. Rietveld refinement of the XRD pattern of CuSbS2 powders directly produced by mechanochemical synthesis.
Figure 2. Rietveld refinement of the XRD pattern of CuSbS2 powders directly produced by mechanochemical synthesis.
Materials 15 03842 g002
Materials 15 03842 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) SEM image and (b) cumulative particle-size distribution and histogram of particle-size distribution of the CuSbS2 powders directly produced by mechanochemical synthesis.
Figure 3. (a) SEM image and (b) cumulative particle-size distribution and histogram of particle-size distribution of the CuSbS2 powders directly produced by mechanochemical synthesis.
Materials 15 03842 g003
Materials 15 03842 g004 550
Figure 4. EDS elemental mapping for the CuSbS2 powder particles directly produced by mechanochemical synthesis.
Figure 4. EDS elemental mapping for the CuSbS2 powder particles directly produced by mechanochemical synthesis.
Materials 15 03842 g004
Materials 15 03842 g005 550
Figure 5. TG-DTA heating curves of mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders (DTA—black curve, TG—blue curve).
Figure 5. TG-DTA heating curves of mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders (DTA—black curve, TG—blue curve).
Materials 15 03842 g005
Materials 15 03842 g006 550
Figure 6. XRD pattern of mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders heat-treated at 350 °C/24 h (solid green line—observed XRD pattern, thin black line—background).
Figure 6. XRD pattern of mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders heat-treated at 350 °C/24 h (solid green line—observed XRD pattern, thin black line—background).
Materials 15 03842 g006
Materials 15 03842 g007 550
Figure 7. Rietveld refinement of the XRD pattern of mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders heat-treated at 350 °C/24 h.
Figure 7. Rietveld refinement of the XRD pattern of mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders heat-treated at 350 °C/24 h.
Materials 15 03842 g007
Materials 15 03842 g008 550
Figure 8. Tauc plot for the CuSbS2 compound directly produced by mechanochemical synthesis.
Figure 8. Tauc plot for the CuSbS2 compound directly produced by mechanochemical synthesis.
Materials 15 03842 g008
Table
Table 1. Results of the Rietveld refinement for the lattice parameters of the mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders and of the heat-treated CuSbS2 powders. For comparison purposes, the standard values from the COD 9,003,580 file are also shown.
Table 1. Results of the Rietveld refinement for the lattice parameters of the mechanochemically synthesized CuSbS2 powders and of the heat-treated CuSbS2 powders. For comparison purposes, the standard values from the COD 9,003,580 file are also shown.
Lattice Parameter (Å)MCSHeat TreatedCOD 9,003,580 File
a6.0222 (2)6.02061 (4)6.018
b3.80317 (16)3.80171 (2)3.7958
c14.5043 (6)14.50051 (10)14.495
Table
Table 2. Atomic coordinates (x, y and z) determined by the Rietveld refinement of the constituent elements of Cu, Sb and S of the heat-treated CuSbS2 powders.
Table 2. Atomic coordinates (x, y and z) determined by the Rietveld refinement of the constituent elements of Cu, Sb and S of the heat-treated CuSbS2 powders.
ElementSiteAtomic Coordinates
xyz
Cu4c0.75220.25000.6724
Sb4c0.22600.25000.0633
S (1)4c0.62210.25000.0950
S (2)4c0.37060.25000.6756
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Esperto, L.; Figueira, I.; Mascarenhas, J.; Silva, T.P.; Correia, J.B.; Neves, F. Structural and Optical Characterization of Mechanochemically Synthesized CuSbS2 Compounds. Materials 2022, 15, 3842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113842

AMA Style

Esperto L, Figueira I, Mascarenhas J, Silva TP, Correia JB, Neves F. Structural and Optical Characterization of Mechanochemically Synthesized CuSbS2 Compounds. Materials. 2022; 15(11):3842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Esperto, Luís, Isabel Figueira, João Mascarenhas, Teresa P. Silva, José B. Correia, and Filipe Neves. 2022. "Structural and Optical Characterization of Mechanochemically Synthesized CuSbS2 Compounds" Materials 15, no. 11: 3842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113842

APA Style

Esperto, L., Figueira, I., Mascarenhas, J., Silva, T. P., Correia, J. B., & Neves, F. (2022). Structural and Optical Characterization of Mechanochemically Synthesized CuSbS2 Compounds. Materials, 15(11), 3842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop