Next Article in Journal
Study on Properties and Optimization of Ternary Auxiliary Cementing Materials for IOTs
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal Conductivity of Helium and Argon at High Pressure and High Temperature
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on the High Temperature Impact Torsional Behavior of Ti-1023 Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Entropy Borides under Extreme Environment of Pressures and Temperatures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pressure-Enhanced Photocurrent in One-Dimensional SbSI via Lone-Pair Electron Reconfiguration

1
Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Shanghai 201203, China
2
College of Material and Chemical Engineering, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450007, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(11), 3845; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113845
Submission received: 13 April 2022 / Revised: 23 May 2022 / Accepted: 25 May 2022 / Published: 27 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials Behavior under Compression)

Abstract

:
Understanding the relationships between the local structures and physical properties of low-dimensional ferroelectrics is of both fundamental and practical importance. Here, pressure-induced enhancement in the photocurrent of SbSI is observed by using pressure to regulate the lone-pair electrons (LPEs). The reconfiguration of LPEs under pressure leads to the inversion symmetry broken in the crystal structure and an optimum bandgap according to the Shockley–Queisser limit. The increased polarization caused by the stereochemical expression of LPEs results in a significantly enhanced photocurrent at 14 GPa. Our research enriches the foundational understanding of structure–property relationships by regulating the stereochemical role of LPEs and offers a distinctive approach to the design of ferroelectric-photovoltaic materials.

1. Introduction

Ferroelectric materials with intrinsic spontaneous polarization have shown great promise for applications in advanced sensors, random-access memory devices, and photovoltaics [1,2,3,4]. Although significant progress has been made, ferroelectrics with appropriate bandgaps in the visible range and high photovoltaic performances are still scarce [1,5]. Recently, symmetry-breaking sulfides, such as Ba3Zr2S7 [6], SbSI, and CuInP2S6 [7,8,9,10], contain the less electronegative sulfur atom and have smaller bandgaps compared with the ferroelectric oxides, which have been developed as potential ferroelectric materials [11].
The behavior of lone-pair electrons (LPEs) in the ferroelectric sulfides containing 14- and 15-group metal ions has gained increasing research interest due to the enhanced polarization from the stereochemical expression of LPEs [12,13,14,15]. The ns2 lone pairs (n is the group number) have shown an exceptionally rich chemistry because of the combination of stereochemical activity and structural flexibility [16,17,18,19]. Such behavior of LPEs results in unusual anharmonic lattice dynamics for polar distortions linked to the special optoelectronic properties [16,17]. Particularly, the 5s2-Sb3+ in one-dimensional ferroelectric semiconductor SbSI drives ion displacement and leads to ferroelectric phase transition at a Curie temperature near room temperature (TC = 295 K) [20]. The strong lattice polarization is significant for the generation of large shift currents, which can considerably improve the efficiency of charge separation and migration [7,21]. Therefore, the large polarization and suitable bandgap make SbSI a promising candidate for solar cell applications [22]. Despite the great importance of LPEs in SbSI, the dynamic behavior of LPEs remains unclear. Addressing the challenge requires advanced in situ characterization methods.
As an alternative thermodynamic parameter, pressure can effectively modify the local structure and coordination, and further achieve modification of LPEs [23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. In this work, by using high pressure to modulate the local structure of SbSI, the stereochemical role of LPEs is controllably manipulated towards designable optoelectronic properties. The increased polarization driven by LPEs is crucial for the improvement of charge separation and migration, resulting in an enhanced photocurrent. Our research provides new insights into the optimization of optoelectronic properties by regulating the stereochemical role of LPEs ferroelectric semiconductors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

The SbSI crystal was synthesized by the chemical vapor deposition method (CVD). Sb2S3 and SbI3 powders were used as solid precursors.
Sb2S3 + SbI3---------3SbSI
We put the starting materials Sb2S3 and SbI3 into the center and upper stream of the furnace, respectively. The furnace was pumped to 0.5 Torr and maintained the pressure at 100 Torr by argon filled. Then, the furnace was heated rapidly to 650 K and reached a higher melting point for samples. The furnace was kept heating for 40 min and finally cooled down naturally. Finally, the dark red SbSI crystals were obtained. After cooling, the samples were rinsed in ethanol to remove residual SbI3. The morphology of obtained crystals was investigated by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL, JSM6510). The composition of single crystals was examined by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS) (Oxford). As shown in Figure S2, the SEM image presents large sizes of SbSI crystals (>100 μm). The presence of Sb, S, and I are confirmed by semiquantitative EDXS as shown in Figure S2. The Sb/S/I ratio is approximately 1:1:1 in Table S2, which is in accordance with the stoichiometric ratio of SbSI.

2.2. In Situ High-Pressure Characterizations

The symmetric Diamond Anvil Cell (DAC) was used in high-pressure experiments, where the size of the diamond anvils was 300 μm. We used laser-drilling to pre-indent a stainless-steel gasket to 150 μm diameter and 50μm thickness hole, which served as the sample chamber. The SbSI crystals and a small ruby ball were placed into the sample chamber. The ruby fluorescence method was used to determine the pressures [30]. In our in situ high-pressure characterizations, optical absorption and X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments used silicone oil as a pressure transmitting medium [31], while no pressure-transmitting medium was used in resistance and photocurrent measurement. All the high-pressure measurements are at room temperature of 300 K.

2.3. XRD Measurements

In situ high-pressure powder XRD experiments were conducted at 4W2 station of the Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility. The wavelength of the X-ray beam is 0.6199 Å. The CeO2 was used to calibrate the distance and tilting of the detector. In experiments, we use the FIT2D program to collect, integrate and deal with 2D XRD images. Structure refinements were carried out by using the Rietveld method in JANA2006 software [32]. Fitting cell volume data to the third-order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state:
P V = 3 B 0 2 V 0 V 7 3 V 0 V 5 3 1 + 3 4 B 4 V 0 V 2 3 1  
where V0 is the initial volume, V is the deformed volume, and B′ is the derivative of the bulk modulus with respect to pressure [33].

2.4. Optical Absorption Measurements

We chose the 60 × 15 μm size of rodlike shape single-crystal SbSI and loaded it into the DAC chamber for the high-pressure optical absorption measurements. The absorption spectra and optical images were measured in a micro-region spectroscopy system (Gora-UVN-FL, built by Ideaoptics, Shanghai, China). The absorption spectra were carried out between 300 and 1000 nm by using a Xenon light source. The fiber spectrometer is a Nova, ideaoptics spectrometer. A camera (MiChrome 5 Pro, Hinckley, UK) equipped with a microscope was used to record the photographs of the sample under the same conditions including exposure time and intensity. The bandgaps at different pressures are assessed by extrapolating the linear portion of the α1/2 versus the curve, where α is the absorption coefficient and is the photon energy [34].

2.5. Resistance and Photocurrent Measurement

The crystal was carefully grounded before loading into the DAC chamber for high-pressure electrical experiments. In situ resistance was measured by a van de Pauw (vdP) method. The current source, nano voltmeter, and voltage/current switch system were used the Keithley 6221, 2182A, and 7001m, respectively [35]. In order to avoid a short circuit, the cubic boron nitride was coated on a steel gasket, which served as an electrical insulator. For the photocurrent measurement, a two point-probe method was conducted under a 20 W incandescent lamp.

2.6. Density Functional Theory (DFT) Calculations

The DFT calculation was performed by the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) [36]. The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) of the general gradient approximation (GGA) function was employed in the present work [37]. The projector augmented wave (PAW) potential was used on a plane-wave basis. Here, a plane wave cut-off energy was 400 eV. A 3 ×3 × 3 k-mesh was used for the conventional cell in structure optimization. To understand the bonding character of SbSI during compression, the electron localization function (ELF) was calculated [38,39]:
ELF r = { 1 + [ K r Kh ρ r ] 2 } 1
where ρ(r) is the density at r, K is the curvature of the electron pair density, and Kh(ρ(r)) is the value of K under density ρ homogeneous electron gas.

3. Results and Discussion

The crystal structure of the paraelectric SbSI with the Pnma space group consists of double chains of covalent bonds formed along the c-axis at ambient conditions. The weak electrostatic interactions exist in the perpendicular direction, which originated from the interlayer coupling of LPEs (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 1a, the in situ structural evolution of SbSI up to 28.5 GPa was investigated by synchrotron XRD. The selected Rietveld analysis XRD profiles are shown in Table S1 and Figure S1. During compression, all diffraction peaks shifted to higher angles monotonically, indicating the shrinkage of the lattice and the volume compression. It is worth noting that the paraelectric to ferroelectric phase transition occurs due to the symmetry break at 2.9 GPa, evidenced by the variation of diffraction peaks in XRD. Rietveld refinements of the XRD patterns at 2.9 GPa confirmed that the space group from Pnma to Pna21 is caused by the off-centering displacement of LPEs. Furthermore, the isostructural transition from one-dimensional to three-dimensional (1D to 3D) occurs around 15 GPa, which mainly arises from the suppression of the LPEs (Figure 1a) [16]. The evolutions of lattice parameters of SbSI under pressure are shown in Figure 1b. The a and b directions were more compressible than the c direction, which contributes to the shrinkage of the interchain. The variation of the cell volumes of SbSI during compression is displayed in Figure 1c. The values of bulk modulus (B0) 36.5(2) GPa for the 1D structure and 63.4(8) GPa for the 3D structure were obtained by fitting the Birch–Murnaghan equation of state, which indicates the less compressible nature due to the formation of Sb−I rigid bonding [16]. The decompression process indicates that the phase transition is reversible (Figure S3).
The optical absorption spectroscopy measurements of SbSI up to 30.0 GPa were conducted to examine the bandgap evolution. As shown in Figure 2a, the absorption edge was found at about 650 nm (1.89 eV), which is in line with the previous report. The redshift of the absorption edge is ascribed to the shortening of bonds, which leads to the broadening of the valence and conduction bands. During compression, the variation of bandgap and slope of band edge show a significant change at 14.2 GPa (Figure 2b and Figure S4), which indicates a phase transition. Such behavior is consistent with 1D to 3D structural transition around 15 GPa. According to Shockley–Queisser theory, an optimum bandgap is about 1.34 eV [40,41]. With increasing pressure, the variation of the bandgap for SbSI suggests that an optimum bandgap of 1.34 eV is achieved at around 15 GPa (Figure 3b). Thus, considering the optimized bandgap, it is presumable to expect enhanced optoelectronic properties.
The photocurrents of SbSI were measured with an on–off switch at different bias voltages up to 23 GPa. It is reported that the ferroelectrics have an intrinsic internal built-in electric field that separates photo-generated charge carriers and thus have a photocurrent at zero bias voltage [22,42]. SbSI initially had no zero-bias photoresponse, which is consistent with the paraelectric property. The pressure-induced obvious photocurrent was observed from 2.6 to 14 GPa at zero bias voltage (Figure 3a), which indicates the emergence of the ferroelectric feature under high pressure. With increasing pressure, the photocurrent significantly enhances and then reaches the maximum value at 14 GPa at different bias voltages (Figure 3b,c and Figure S5). The stereochemical role of LPEs brings a highly distorted local structure at 14 GPa, which gives rise to enhanced spontaneous polarization. Such behavior considerably improves the efficiency of charge separation and migration relied on enhanced spontaneous polarization, which results in the enhancement of photocurrents under pressure. This measurement deepens the fundamental understanding of the relationship between LPEs and ferroelectric-photovoltaic properties, which will guide the exploration of new devices with emergent properties by ambient methods [43].
The resistivity evolution of SbSI as a function of pressure up to 25 GPa was measured by the vdP method (Figure 3d) [35]. The resistivity increases during compression up to 12 GPa. The abnormally increasing resistivity is attributed to the suppression of the LPEs, which leads to distorted local structures with increased electron scattering and thus hinders electron transport. Upon further compression, the decrease in resistivity is associated with the disappearance of LPEs, which results in the 1D to 3D isostructural transition and enhances electron transport.
To simulate the stereochemical expression of LPEs in SbSI under high pressures, we carried out density functional theory (DFT) calculations on the band structure and electron localization function (ELF) [38,39]. The band structure of SbSI has strong dispersions along the S-Y points, while the Γ-Z-U-R-T-X points are relatively flat, which are typical for electronically 1D band structural motifs (Figure S6) [44,45]. As shown in Figure 4, it is seen that an apparent non-spherical lobe charge distributes from the Sb atoms, which is regarded as the Sb3+-5s2 LPEs [46]. The Sb3+-5s2 LPEs are gradually suppressed and eventually disappeared above 14.8 GPa, which indicates the disappearance of electrostatic interactions between chains and the formation of Sb-I bonding (Figure 1 and Figure 4). Furthermore, the interchain between Sb and I atoms shows low charge distributions in the valence electron density map at 1.2 GPa, which indicates weak electrostatic interactions (Figure 4a). The apparent distribution of charge along the Sb-I direction suggests a strong covalent bond at 28.5 GPa, resulting in the formation of 3D structures (Figure 4b). Therefore, our experimental results and theoretical simulations provide consistent findings which provide new insights into the structure-relationship of ferroelectric semiconductors from the perspective of lone-pair behavior.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have revealed the relationship between crystal structures and optoelectronic properties of SbSI under high pressures by in situ experimental characterization and DFT calculations, including XRD, absorption spectroscopy, photocurrent, and resistivity measurements. The reconfiguration of LPEs causes structural symmetry-breaking and an optimum bandgap according to the Shockley–Queisser limit. Furthermore, by regulating stereochemical LPEs, SbSI shows an enhanced photocurrent under high pressures. This work provides new insights into the fundamental understanding of the stereochemical expression of LPEs in ferroelectric photovoltaics.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15113845/s1. Figure S1: Rietveld refinement results of SbSI at selected pressures. Figure S2: The scanning electron microscope (SEM) image and X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) of SbSI single crystal. Figure S3: XRD patterns of the SbSI initial sample and the recovered sample. Figure S4: Selective the plot of α1/2hv versus bandgap on a single-crystal SbSI under compression. Figure S5: Photocurrent of 14 GPa at different bias voltages. Figure S6: Electronic band structure of SbSI. Table S1: The lattice parameters of the SbSI at selected pressures. Table S2: Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis results of SbSI.

Author Contributions

T.L., K.B. and X.L. conceived the project. T.L., J.L. and Q.Z. synthesized single-crystal samples. P.Z., Q.Z., J.L. and S.G. collected the high-pressure X-ray diffraction data. K.B. and P.Z. carried out the DFT calculations. K.B., B.W. and S.G. carried out the high-pressure optical absorption measurements with the assistance of H.Z. and Y.W.; K.B., B.W. and T.L. measured resistance and photocurrent of samples with the help of W.Y. and Q.Z.; K.B. and T.L. wrote the manuscript and revised by H.Z., Y.W., W.Y., and X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Qian Zhang, who is supported by the Natural Science Foundation for the Youth (NSFY) (Grant Nos. 12004016).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The high-pressure XRD measurements were performed at 4W2 High Pressure Station of the Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cohen, R.E. Origin of ferroelectricity in perovskite oxides. Nature 1992, 358, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Park, B.H.; Kang, B.S.; Bu, S.D.; Noh, T.W.; Lee, J.; Jo, W. Lanthanum-substituted bismuth titanate for use in non-volatile memories. Nature 1999, 401, 682–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Baek, S.H.; Jang, H.W.; Folkman, C.M.; Li, Y.L.; Winchester, B.; Zhang, J.X.; He, Q.; Chu, Y.H.; Nelson, C.T.; Rzchowski, M.S.; et al. Ferroelastic switching for nanoscale non-volatile magnetoelectric devices. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, H. Ferroelectric photovoltaics. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 134–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grinberg, I.; West, D.V.; Torres, M.; Gou, G.; Stein, D.M.; Wu, L.; Chen, G.; Gallo, E.M.; Akbashev, A.R.; Davies, P.K.; et al. Perovskite oxides for visible-light-absorbing ferroelectric and photovoltaic materials. Nature 2013, 503, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Niu, S.; Sarkar, D.; Williams, K.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Bianco, E.; Huyan, H.; Cronin, S.B.; McConney, M.E.; Haiges, R.; et al. Optimal bandgap in a 2D Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite chalcogenide for single-junction solar cells. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 4882–4886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sotome, M.; Nakamura, M.; Fujioka, J.; Ogino, M.; Kaneko, Y.; Morimoto, T.; Zhang, Y.; Kawasaki, M.; Nagaosa, N.; Tokura, Y.; et al. Spectral dynamics of shift current in ferroelectric semiconductor SbSI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 1929–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Varghese, J.; O’Regan, C.; Deepak, N.; Whatmore, R.W.; Holmes, J.D. Surface roughness assisted growth of vertically oriented ferroelectric SbSI nanorods. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 3279–3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, F.; You, L.; Seyler, K.L.; Li, X.; Yu, P.; Lin, J.; Wang, X.; Zhou, J.; Wang, H.; He, H.; et al. Room-temperature ferroelectricity in CuInP2S6 ultrathin flakes. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Simon, A.; Ravez, J.; Maisonneuve, V.; Payen, C.; Cajipe, V.B. Paraelectric-ferroelectric transition in the lamellar thiophosphate CuInP2S6. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 1575–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kooi, B.J.; Noheda, B. Ferroelectric chalcogenides—Materials at the edge. Science 2016, 353, 221–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fabini, D.H.; Laurita, G.; Bechtel, J.S.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Evans, H.A.; Kontos, A.G.; Raptis, Y.S.; Falaras, P.; Van der Ven, A.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Dynamic stereochemical activity of the Sn2+ lone pair in perovskite CsSnBr3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 11820–11832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Nguyen, S.D.; Yeon, J.; Kim, S.H.; Halasyamani, P.S. BiO(IO3): A new polar iodate that exhibits an aurivillius-type (Bi2O2)2+ layer and a large SHG response. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12422–12425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Smith, E.H.; Benedek, N.A.; Fennie, C.J. Interplay of octahedral rotations and lone pair ferroelectricity in CsPbF3. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 8536–8543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lü, X.; Stoumpos, C.; Hu, Q.; Ma, X.; Zhang, D.; Guo, S.; Hoffman, J.; Bu, K.; Guo, X.; Wang, Y.; et al. Regulating off-centering distortion maximizes photoluminescence in halide perovskites. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021, 8, nwaa288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bu, K.; Luo, H.; Guo, S.; Li, M.; Wang, D.; Dong, H.; Ding, Y.; Yang, W.; Lü, X. Pressure-Regulated Dynamic Stereochemical Role of Lone-Pair Electrons in Layered Bi2O2S. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 9702–9707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fabini, D.H.; Seshadri, R.; Kanatzidis, M.G. The underappreciated lone pair in halide perovskites underpins their unusual properties. MRS Bull. 2020, 45, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Remsing, R.C.; Klein, M.L. Lone pair rotational dynamics in solids. Phy. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 066001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nielsen, M.D.; Ozolins, V.; Heremans, J.P. Lone pair electrons minimize lattice thermal conductivity. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fatuzzo, E.; Harbeke, G.; Merz, W.J.; Nitsche, R.; Roetschi, H.; Ruppel, W. Ferroelectricity in SbSI. Phys. Rev. 1962, 127, 2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ogawa, N.; Sotome, M.; Kaneko, Y.; Ogino, M.; Tokura, Y. Shift current in the ferroelectric semiconductor SbSI. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 241203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mistewicz, K.; Nowak, M.; Stróż, D. A ferroelectric-photovoltaic effect in SbSI nanowires. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yoo, C. Chemistry under extreme conditions: Pressure evolution of chemical bonding and structure in dense solids. Matter Radiat. Extremes 2020, 5, 018202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Mao, H.-K.; Chen, X.-J.; Ding, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, L. Solids, liquids, and gases under high pressure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018, 90, 015007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Guo, S.; Bu, K.; Li, J.; Hu, Q.; Luo, H.; He, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, W.G.; et al. Enhanced Photocurrent of All-Inorganic Two-Dimensional Perovskite Cs2PbI2Cl2 via Pressure-Regulated Excitonic Features. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2545–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ji, C.; Li, B.; Liu, W.; Smith, J.S.; Majumdar, A.; Luo, W.; Ahuja, R.; Shu, J.; Wang, J.; Sinogeikin, S.; et al. Ultrahigh-pressure isostructural electronic transitions in hydrogen. Nature 2019, 573, 558–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, M.; Guo, S.; Bu, K.; Lee, S.; Luo, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Yan, Z.; Dong, H.; Yang, W.G.; et al. Pressure-induced robust emission in a zero-dimensional hybrid metal halide (C9NH20)6Pb3Br12. Matter Radiat. Extremes 2021, 6, 058401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.Q.; Guo, S.H.; Luo, H.; Zhou, C.; Lin, H.; Ma, X.; Hu, Q.; Du, M.-H.; Ma, B.; Yang, W.G.; et al. Reaching 90% photoluminescence quantum yield in one-dimensional metal halide C4N2H14PbBr4 by pressure-suppressed nonradiative loss. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 16001–16006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Luo, H.; Guo, S.; Zhang, Y.; Bu, K.; Lin, H.; Wang, Y.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, D.; Jin, S.; Zhang, W.Q.; et al. Regulating Exciton–Phonon Coupling to Achieve a Near-Unity Photoluminescence Quantum Yield in One-Dimensional Hybrid Metal Halides. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2100786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mao, H.-K.; Xu, J.; Bell, P. Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1986, 91, 4673–4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, X.; Lou, H.; Zeng, Z.; Cheng, B.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Xu, D.; Yang, K.; Zeng, Q. Structural transitions of 4: 1 methanol–ethanol mixture and silicone oil under high pressure. Matter Radiat. Extremes 2021, 6, 038402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Petříček, V.; Dušek, M.; Palatinus, L. Crystallographic computing system JANA2006: General features. Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 2014, 229, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Birch, F. Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals. Phys. Rev. 1947, 71, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kortüm, G.; Braun, W.; Herzog, G. Principles and techniques of diffuse-reflectance spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1963, 2, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, X.; Gao, C.; Han, Y.; Li, M.; He, C.; Hao, A.; Zhang, D.; Yu, C.; Zou, G.; Ma, Y. Finite element analysis of resistivity measurement with van der Pauw method in a diamond anvil cell. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 242102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Silvi, B.; Savin, A. Classification of chemical bonds based on topological analysis of electron localization functions. Nature 1994, 371, 683–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Savin, A.; Silvi, B.; Colonna, F. Topological analysis of the electron localization function applied to delocalized bonds. Can. J. Chem. 1996, 74, 1088–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shockley, W. The Shockley-Queisser limit. J. Appl. Phys. 1961, 32, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Konstantakou, M.; Stergiopoulos, T. A critical review on tin halide perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 11518–11549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Samara, G. Effects of pressure on the dielectric properties of and the vanishing of the ferroelectricity in SbSI. Phys. Rev. B 1975, 9, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mirsian, S.; Khodadadian, A.; Hedayati, M.; Manzour-ol-Ajdad, A.; Kalantarinejad, R.; Heitzinger, C. A new method for selective functionalization of silicon nanowire sensors and Bayesian inversion for its parameters. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 142, 111527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, L.; Zhao, L.; Qiu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, K.; Lin, Q.; Wang, G. Quasi-one-dimensional structure and possible helical antiferromagnetism of RbMn6Bi5. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 12941–12949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, H.; Cao, G.; Cao, C. Electronic structure of quasi-one-dimensional superconductor K2Cr3As3 from first-principles calculations. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Bu, K.; Huang, J.; Luo, M.; Guan, M.; Zheng, C.; Pan, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Zhao, W.; Shi, X.; et al. Observation of High Seebeck Coefficient and Low Thermal Conductivity in [SrO]-Intercalated CuSbSe2 Compound. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 5539–5543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pressure-induced structural evolution of SbSI. (a) Comparison of SbSI XRD at different pressures. (b) The lattice constants fitting by the Rietveld method and (c) the unit-cell volume as a function of pressure. (d) The crystal structures at 0 and 22.8 GPa.
Figure 1. Pressure-induced structural evolution of SbSI. (a) Comparison of SbSI XRD at different pressures. (b) The lattice constants fitting by the Rietveld method and (c) the unit-cell volume as a function of pressure. (d) The crystal structures at 0 and 22.8 GPa.
Materials 15 03845 g001
Figure 2. Optical absorption spectra of SbSI under pressure. (a) Optical absorption spectra of SbSI under pressure. (b) Pressure dependence of the bandgap energy for SbSI. Inset: optical micrographs of SbSI collected at different pressures.
Figure 2. Optical absorption spectra of SbSI under pressure. (a) Optical absorption spectra of SbSI under pressure. (b) Pressure dependence of the bandgap energy for SbSI. Inset: optical micrographs of SbSI collected at different pressures.
Materials 15 03845 g002
Figure 3. Photocurrent and resistivity of SbSI at different pressures. (a,b) Pressure-dependent photocurrent of SbSI at 0 and 5 V bias voltages. (c) Photocurrent as a function of pressure at different bias voltages. (d) The resistivity of SbSI under high pressures. The inset shows the schematic diagram for resistivity measurement.
Figure 3. Photocurrent and resistivity of SbSI at different pressures. (a,b) Pressure-dependent photocurrent of SbSI at 0 and 5 V bias voltages. (c) Photocurrent as a function of pressure at different bias voltages. (d) The resistivity of SbSI under high pressures. The inset shows the schematic diagram for resistivity measurement.
Materials 15 03845 g003
Figure 4. Electron localization function (ELF) of SbSI at different pressures. The calculated ELF plots and ELF in the (0 0 1) sections of SbSI at (a) 1.2 GPa and (b) 28.5 GPa. The isosurface value ranges from 0 to 0.93.
Figure 4. Electron localization function (ELF) of SbSI at different pressures. The calculated ELF plots and ELF in the (0 0 1) sections of SbSI at (a) 1.2 GPa and (b) 28.5 GPa. The isosurface value ranges from 0 to 0.93.
Materials 15 03845 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, T.; Bu, K.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, P.; Guo, S.; Liang, J.; Wang, B.; Zheng, H.; Wang, Y.; Yang, W.; et al. Pressure-Enhanced Photocurrent in One-Dimensional SbSI via Lone-Pair Electron Reconfiguration. Materials 2022, 15, 3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113845

AMA Style

Liu T, Bu K, Zhang Q, Zhang P, Guo S, Liang J, Wang B, Zheng H, Wang Y, Yang W, et al. Pressure-Enhanced Photocurrent in One-Dimensional SbSI via Lone-Pair Electron Reconfiguration. Materials. 2022; 15(11):3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113845

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Tianbiao, Kejun Bu, Qian Zhang, Peijie Zhang, Songhao Guo, Jiayuan Liang, Bihan Wang, Haiyan Zheng, Yonggang Wang, Wenge Yang, and et al. 2022. "Pressure-Enhanced Photocurrent in One-Dimensional SbSI via Lone-Pair Electron Reconfiguration" Materials 15, no. 11: 3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113845

APA Style

Liu, T., Bu, K., Zhang, Q., Zhang, P., Guo, S., Liang, J., Wang, B., Zheng, H., Wang, Y., Yang, W., & Lü, X. (2022). Pressure-Enhanced Photocurrent in One-Dimensional SbSI via Lone-Pair Electron Reconfiguration. Materials, 15(11), 3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113845

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop