Next Article in Journal
A Stochastic Filling and Modeling Algorithm of Non-Equal Diameter Particles with Specified Probability Density for Porous Permeable Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Cost Cranioplasty—A Systematic Review of 3D Printing in Medicine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Fe/Mg/Fe Multilayer Composite Sheet Fabricated by Roll Cladding

1
School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Equipment Design and Manufacturing Technology, Tianjin 300072, China
3
School of Microelectronics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
4
School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(14), 4732; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144732
Submission received: 25 June 2022 / Accepted: 4 July 2022 / Published: 6 July 2022

Abstract

:
A new multilayer composite sheet consisting of Fe/Mg/Fe was fabricated from galvanized steels and Mg alloy sheets via roll cladding. The clad steel improved the Mg surface hardness from HV 65 to HV 132. Bonding occurred as the reduction ratios increased up to over 10%. Investigation of the microstructure of the Mg/steel interface revealed a 5 μm- to 10 μm-thick transition layer between Mg and each steel sheet, consisting of Zn and an intermetallic compound (0.97Mg–0.03Zn). Zinc coating from the galvanized steel sheet improved the metallurgical bonding between Mg and Fe by forming new intermetallic phases.

1. Introduction

Lightweight materials have increasingly gained attention due to their desired properties, such as high strength and low density. Magnesium alloys are widely used in the automotive industry. However, magnesium alloys have some properties, such as poor corrosion resistance, low wear resistance, and high chemical reactivity, limiting their use in the industry [1,2]. Conversely, materials with such properties do not satisfy the requirements for advanced applications. Numerous methods have been employed to enhance alloy properties. Plasma electrolytic oxidation is an attractive surface process for magnesium alloys, and the surface of a magnesium alloy is converted into a hard ceramic coating [3,4]. Coatings based on chitosan and bioactive glass particles fabricated by electrophoretic deposition pretreated magnesium alloys have promising potential to suppress the substrate corrosion and additionally incorporate bioactivity [5,6]. Spray coatings are used to improve the corrosion resistance of magnesium alloys [7,8] However, such surface-treatment methods are performed after casting or deformation, requiring additional manufacturing processes [9]. Thus, alternative cost-effective approaches must be developed.
Roll-clad composites exhibit better physical and chemical properties than other traditional materials [10,11]. Roll-clad composites are produced by rolling Mg alloy sheets without additional surface-treatment processes. Steels and Al alloys are significantly used to produce roll-clad composite structures. Mg/Al and Mg/Al/stainless steel composite sheets have been successfully fabricated using the roll-cladding process [12,13,14,15], but only a few studies have focused on fabricating Fe/Mg/Fe multilayer composites. Fe/Mg/Fe multilayer composites can potentially increase surface hardness, resistance corrosion, and magnetic property, useful in engineering applications. However, Mg alloys and steels are difficult to roll or weld because of their different large properties [16]. The boiling temperature of Mg alloys is considerably lower than the melting point of steel [17]. In addition, Mg hardly reacts with Fe, and the intersolubility between the two materials is negligible at ambient pressure [18]. These differences severely limit the metallurgical bonding between steel and Mg alloys.
Galvanized steel (GS) offers higher wear and corrosion resistance than most Mg alloys. In the present study, an improved technique for fabricating Fe-clad Mg alloy sheets was proposed. A three-ply composite sheet composed of GS/Mg/GS was produced from GS and Mg alloy (AZ31) sheets through roll cladding. The interfacial microstructures and bonding mechanism of the composite were then investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

A commercial AZ31 Mg alloy (Mg–2.93Al–0.67Zn–0.43Mn–0.08Si) and galvanized steel (Fe–0.04C–0.2Mn–0.06Al–0.02Cu) were used in the experiments. The AZ31 Mg alloy sheet was rolled to 1.7 mm before roll cladding. 0.1 mm thick steel sheets with different thick Zn coating were used, and the thickness was 2 μm and 20 μm, respectively. Steel sheets were cut into 300 × 100 mm pieces; this size was the same as the Mg alloy sheet. Before roll cladding, the Mg alloy and galvanized steel sheets were stacked in a Fe–Mg–Fe sequence and heated up to 400 °C for 10 min. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the roll-cladding process. Two roll mill was used in the experiment. The rolling velocity and diameter of rolls are 250 mm and 42 r/min. Different nominal deformation was set to investigate the bonding properties. After the rolling process, the roll-clad composites were cooled in air.
The morphology across the clad interface of fabricated Fe-clad Mg composite was characterized using a scanning electronic microscope (SEM) equipped (Carl Zeiss SUPRA55, Oberkochen, Germany). Elemental mapping was performed using an electron probe microanalyzer (JEOL-8530F Plus, Japan). The phase was detected by X-ray diffraction (Empyrean, Netherlands), and the microhardness of the sheet was tested at a load of 100 g for 15 s.

3. Results and Discussion

Four reduction ratios (5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) were tested in the roll-clad process, and the result is shown in Table 1. When the reduction ratio is 5%, the Mg–Fe interface cracks after the roll-clad process. Strong bonding occurs as the reduction ratios increase up to over 10%. The high chemical reactivity of Mg alloy always results in oxide film on the surface, and the film is a barrier for dissimilar sheets in the roll bonding process. Zn and Mg can intermetallic react at relatively low temperatures, so the bonding threshold of the reduction ratio is relatively low compared to other roll-clad composites.
Wear resistance is not always related directly to hardness because of many wear mechanisms; however, hardness remains a helpful indicator. The microhardness of the Mg sheet and the composite sheet surface was measured after roll cladding. The microhardness of the AZ31 substrate is approximately HV 65, whereas that for the composite sheet surface is relatively higher (HV 132 to HV 138). A substantial increase in microhardness enhances wear resistance. Moreover, GS is a commonly used corrosion-resistant material that can increase corrosion resistance. The magnetic property of the composite sheet can also facilitate easy transport and assembly. The mechanical properties of the composite sheet contribute to many potential engineering applications.
After the rolling process, the produced multilayer sheets with different thicknesses of Zn coating showed no visible difference, as shown in the cross-section image of the composite sheet in Figure 2. As the hardness of Fe is higher than that of Mg, deformation mainly occurred in the softer AZ31 sheets. As a result, the thickness of the steel sheet nearly remained at 0.1 mm during hot roll cladding. No obvious defects were observed along with the AZ31/steel clad interface.
Mg/Fe interfaces with varying thicknesses of Zn coating exhibited different microstructures, as shown in Figure 3a,b. Transition layers formed at the interface exhibited different microstructural characteristics than the AZ31 substrate and clad steel sheet. Interfaces with 2 μm-thick Zn coating showed a thin transition layer with a width of 5 μm to 10 μm, whereas the thickness of the transition layer with 20 μm-thick Zn coating was up to 33 μm. Moreover, the thicker Zn coating generated complex transition layers. Two layers with different microstructural characteristics are shown in Figure 3b, in which layer 2 (L2) exhibited etch-pits, and layer 1 (L1) exhibited lamellar structures.
EDX was used to analyze the composition of different regions across the transition layers in Figure 3. As shown in Table 2, Zn contents in both transition layers were higher than in the AZ31 Mg alloy, which indicated that Zn from the GS can penetrate the AZ31 substrate during the rolling process. However, the maximum Zn content in the transition layer was only 4.2% when the 2 μm-thick Zn coating was used. In this case, the Zn coating is almost wholly diffused into the AZ31 substrate, and the amount is not sufficient to form large Zn-rich structures. The complex transition layer is shown in Figure 3b has a composition gradient from the AZ31 side to the steel side. The average contents of Mg and Zn are 58% and 35% in layer 1 and changed to 34% and 63% in layer 2, respectively. Based on the Mg–Zn phase diagram and the microstructure observation, layer 1 can be inferred to have eutectic structures of α-Mg and MgZn. The Zn/Mg (at.%) ratio was approximately 2:1 in layer 2. Thus, layer 2 could be mainly composed of MgZn2 combined with other intermetallic compounds (IMCs). The above finding is very similar to an Mg/Al welded joint with a Zn interlayer [19,20]. As reported in the literature, Mg–Zn intermetallic compounds, such as MgZn and MgZn2, are characterized by high brittleness, which reduces the strength of the welded joint [21,22]. When the 20 μm-thick Zn coating was used, the excessive Zn resulted in a thick transition layer composed of Mg–Zn intermetallic compounds, which could severely affect the mechanical properties. Hence, the 2 μm-thick Zn coating was the most suitable for Fe/Mg/Fe multilayer sheet roll cladding based on the microstructures.
To elucidate the elemental diffusion and formation mechanism of the microstructure in the roll cladding process using the 2 μm-thick Zn coating, elemental mapping of the interface was performed to determine the chemical composition (Figure 4). The elemental distribution showed composition gradients of Mg, Fe, and Zn at the interface. Results indicated that elemental diffusion occurred in each layer. Zn was concentrated at the interface, and the width was nearly the same as the width of the transition layer in Figure 3a. The Mg and Fe contents gradually decreased in the transition layer compared with those in the AZ31 substrate and steel sheet. Elemental analysis showed that Zn is vital in bonding steel and AZ31. Furthermore, the intersolubility between Mg and steel was negligible. Thus, the transition layer was formed by either an Mg–Zn reaction or a Fe–Zn reaction. The detailed mechanism is discussed in the subsequent paragraphs.
The roll-clad composite sheet was peeled to investigate the bonding characteristics. The peeled-off specimen from the AZ31/steel bonding interface because of the weak multilayer composite sheet. Figure 5a,b shows the peel-fracture surfaces of the steel side and AZ31 side, respectively. Both fracture surfaces exhibited large cleavage planes, which suggests the occurrence of a typical brittle fracture during the peel test.
The XRD patterns of the fracture surfaces are shown in Figure 5c,d. Fe was present in the fracture surface of the steel side. However, no Fe–Zn compounds were detected. Meanwhile, Zn was detected on both sides, which indicated that the Zn coating did not completely melt or react with Mg due to the high cooling speed. However, Mg was not detected on the fracture surface of the AZ31 side, and only the 0.97Mg–0.03Zn phase was observed. The appearance of the new phase indicated that during the roll cladding process, the Zn coating diffused into the AZ31 and reacted with Mg under the high heat and pressure conditions. The solid solubility limit of Zn in Mg is approximately 2% and implies that the 0.97Mg–0.03Zn phases can precipitate from the supersaturated solid during the cooling process. Intermetallic compounds are generally characterized by brittleness or low ductility. The observed composite sheet fractures from the 0.97Mg–0.03Zn phase can be attributed to the abovementioned characteristics. Similar results were reported in the deformation of Mg alloys, particularly in welding Mg alloy to steel via solid-phase friction-stir welding [23,24,25]. The XRD results showed that the Zn coating from GS improved the metallurgical bonding of AZ31 and steel. The two materials were bonded by the transition layer composed of Zn and the 0.97Mg–0.03Zn intermetallic compound.

4. Conclusions

GSs were roll-clad on the AZ31 Mg alloy sheet surface, and a new multilayer composite sheet composed of Fe/Mg/Fe was successfully produced. Bonding occurred as the reduction ratios increased up to over 10%. Results revealed that clad Fe significantly improved the surface hardness of the Mg alloy sheet from HV 65 to HV 132. A transition layer that consists of Zn and a 0.97Mg–0.03Zn IMC was formed at the steel/AZ31 interface. This transition layer bonds the different materials. Furthermore, the Zn coating from GS improved the metallurgical bond between Mg and Fe.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.R.; methodology, D.R. and Y.M.; data curation, Y.M. and R.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.M.; writing—review and editing, R.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT22JC20), and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Equipment Design and Manufacturing Technology (Tianjin University).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing does not apply to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jonda, E.; Łatka, L.; Pakiea, W. Comparison of Different Cermet Coatings Sprayed on Magnesium Alloy by HVOF. Materials 2021, 14, 1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, C.R.; Deng, K.K.; Bai, Y. Microstructure, and Mechanical and Wear Properties of Grp/AZ91 Magnesium Matrix Composites. Materials 2019, 12, 1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Su, P.; Wu, X.; Jiang, Z. Plasma electrolytic oxidation of low friction casting on ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 3124–3126. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arrabal, R.; Matykina, E.; Viejo, F.; Skeldon, P.; Thompson, G.E.; Merino, M.C. AC Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation of Magnesium with Zirconia Nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 6937–6942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baiocco, G.; Rubino, G.; Ucciardello, N. Heat Treatment of AZ91 Magnesium Alloy Coated with an Al2O3 Thin Film with Fluidized Bed Technology. Materials 2019, 12, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Vijayalakshmi, U.; Chellappa, M.; Anjaneyulu, U.; Manivasagam, G.; Sethu, S. Influence of Coating Parameter and Sintering Atmosphere on the Corrosion Resistance Behavior of Electrophoretically Deposited Composite Coatings. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2016, 31, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Murtaza, Q.; Pandey, S.M.; Niranjan, M.S. A Novel Manufacturing Route for Automobile Parts through Two-Wire-Arc Thermal Spray Process. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2016, 31, 1424–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, F.; Zhao, M. Simulation of Particle Deposition Behavior in Cold-Sprayed Mg Anticorrosion Coating. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2016, 31, 1483–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, H.; Cao, F.; Song, G.L.; Zheng, D.; Shi, Z.; Dargusch, M.S.; Atrens, A. Review of the atmospheric corrosion of magnesium alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Naseri, M.; Reihanian, M.; Borhani, E. Bonding behavior during cold roll-cladding of tri-layered Al/brass/Al composite. J. Manuf. Process. 2016, 24, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Weng, F.; Yu, H.; Chen, C.; Liu, J.; Zhao, L.; Dai, J. Fabrication of Co-Based Coatings on Titanium Alloy by Laser Cladding with CeO2 Addition. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2016, 31, 1461–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bae, J.; Rao, A.P.; Kim, K.; Kim, N.J. Cladding of Mg alloy with Al by twin-roll casting. Scr. Mater. 2011, 64, 836–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, C.; Wang, Q.; Jia, Y.; Jing, R.; Zhang, B.; Ma, M.; Liu, R. Microstructures and mechanical properties of Mg/Mg and Mg/Al/Mg laminated composites prepared via warm roll bonding. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 556, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chang, H.; Zheng, M.; Gan, W.; Wu, K.; Maawad, E.; Brokmeier, H. Texture evolution of the Mg/Al laminated composite fabricated by the accumulative roll bonding. Scr. Mater. 2009, 61, 717–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, K.; Kim, J.; Jo, Y.; Lee, S.; Heo, J.; Chang, Y.; Lee, Y. Interface-correlated deformation behavior of a stainless steel-Al–Mg 3-ply composite. Mater. Charact. 2013, 75, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kang, M.; Kim, C.; Kim, Y.M. Joining of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy and Steel Sheet under Four Different Coating Conditions Based on Gas Metal Arc Weld-Brazing. Mater. Trans. 2017, 58, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tan, C.W.; Chen, B.; Song, X.G. Influence of Al Interlayer Thickness on Laser Welding of Mg/Steel. Weld. J. 2016, 95, 384–394. [Google Scholar]
  18. Miao, Y.; Han, D.; Li, J.Y. Dissimilar spot welding joints of AZ31-443 ferritic stainless steel with cover plate. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 85, 1539–1545. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao, L.; Zhang, Z. Effect of Zn alloy interlayer on interface microstructure and strength of diffusion-bonded Mg–Al joints. Scr. Mater. 2008, 58, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, F.; Ren, D.; Liu, L. Effect of Al foils interlayer on microstructures and mechanical properties of Mg–Al butt joints welded by gas tungsten arc welding filling with Zn filler metal. Mater. Des. 2013, 46, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Scherm, F.; Bezold, J.; Glatzel, U. Laser welding of Mg alloy MgAl3Zn1 (AZ31) to Al alloy AlMg3 (AA5754) using ZnAl filler material. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2012, 17, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Qi, X.D.; Liu, L.M. Fusion welding of Fe-added lap joints between AZ31B magnesium alloy and 6061 aluminum alloy by hybrid laser–tungsten inert gas welding technique. Mater. Des. 2012, 33, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Z.; Dong, Z.; Yu, C. Microstructure and properties of Mg–5.21 Li–3.44 Zn–0.32 Y–0.01 Zr alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 559, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, X.J.; Wu, Y.L.; Zhang, Z.K.; Guo, T.K.; Lu, Y.X.; Shi, J.P. The Study of the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Friction Stir Spot Welding Joint between AZ31B Magnesium Alloy and Steel. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 668, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, X.J.; Zhang, C.Q.; Li, B.Q.; Li, T. A Preliminary Investigation on Friction Stir Spot Welding of Steel/Mg. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2011, 84, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the roll cladding of a multilayer composite sheet.
Figure 1. Schematic of the roll cladding of a multilayer composite sheet.
Materials 15 04732 g001
Figure 2. Cross-section of the multilayer sheet.
Figure 2. Cross-section of the multilayer sheet.
Materials 15 04732 g002
Figure 3. Microstructures of the bonding interfaces depicting the (a) 2 μm-thick zinc coating, and (b) 20 μm-thick zinc coating (Numbers 1–8 are the test positions of Table 2).
Figure 3. Microstructures of the bonding interfaces depicting the (a) 2 μm-thick zinc coating, and (b) 20 μm-thick zinc coating (Numbers 1–8 are the test positions of Table 2).
Materials 15 04732 g003
Figure 4. Map analysis of the interface: (a) Mg, (b) Fe, (c) Zn, and (d) Al.
Figure 4. Map analysis of the interface: (a) Mg, (b) Fe, (c) Zn, and (d) Al.
Materials 15 04732 g004
Figure 5. (a,b) Fracture surfaces of the steel side and of the AZ31 side. (c,d) XRD spectra of the steel side and of the AZ31 side (Zn: ICCD card M010870713; Fe: ICCD card N010851410; Mg0.97Zn0.03: ICCD card N030654596;).
Figure 5. (a,b) Fracture surfaces of the steel side and of the AZ31 side. (c,d) XRD spectra of the steel side and of the AZ31 side (Zn: ICCD card M010870713; Fe: ICCD card N010851410; Mg0.97Zn0.03: ICCD card N030654596;).
Materials 15 04732 g005
Table 1. Roll-clad results of Fe/Mg/Fe composite.
Table 1. Roll-clad results of Fe/Mg/Fe composite.
Rolling DraftFe/Mg/Fe Composite
5%Not bonded
10%bonded
15%bonded
20%bonded
Table 2. Element composition of different regions in Figure 3, in at pct.
Table 2. Element composition of different regions in Figure 3, in at pct.
ElementsR-1R-2R-3R-4R-5R-6R-7R-8
Mg092.693.796.132.635.458.695.2
Al0.42.71.92.72.92.15.82.6
Zn0.24.44.21.264.162.135.42.2
Fe99.30.30.200.40.40.20
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, D.; Ma, Y.; Zheng, R. Fe/Mg/Fe Multilayer Composite Sheet Fabricated by Roll Cladding. Materials 2022, 15, 4732. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144732

AMA Style

Ren D, Ma Y, Zheng R. Fe/Mg/Fe Multilayer Composite Sheet Fabricated by Roll Cladding. Materials. 2022; 15(14):4732. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144732

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Daxin, Yanhua Ma, and Rencheng Zheng. 2022. "Fe/Mg/Fe Multilayer Composite Sheet Fabricated by Roll Cladding" Materials 15, no. 14: 4732. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144732

APA Style

Ren, D., Ma, Y., & Zheng, R. (2022). Fe/Mg/Fe Multilayer Composite Sheet Fabricated by Roll Cladding. Materials, 15(14), 4732. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144732

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop