Next Article in Journal
Surface Properties of Medium-Entropy Alloy Coatings Prepared through a Combined Process of Laser Cladding and Ultrasonic Burnishing
Next Article in Special Issue
Amine-Modified Carbon Xerogels as Effective Carbon-Based Adsorbents of Anionic Dye from Aqueous Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Needle Penetration Simulation: Influence of Penetration Angle and Sample Stress on the Mechanical Behaviors of Polymers Applying a Cast Silicone and a 3D-Printed Resin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Increasing the Mechanical Strength and Corrosion Resistance of Aluminum Alloy 7075 via Hydrostatic Extrusion and Aging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies on Adsorption of Rhodamine B from Aqueous Solutions Using Oxidized Mesoporous Carbons

by
Michal Marciniak
1,
Joanna Goscianska
1,
Małgorzata Norman
2,
Teofil Jesionowski
2,
Aleksandra Bazan-Wozniak
1 and
Robert Pietrzak
1,*
1
Faculty of Chemistry, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 8, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
2
Faculty of Chemical Technology, Poznan University of Technology, Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(16), 5573; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165573
Submission received: 1 July 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 10 August 2022 / Published: 13 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polish Achievements in Materials Science and Engineering)

Abstract

:
Oxidized mesoporous carbon CSBA-15, obtained by the hard method, was applied to remove rhodamine B from the aqueous system. The process of carbon oxidation was performed using 0.5 and 5 M of nitric (V) acid solution at 70 and 100 °C. Functionalization of mesoporous carbon with HNO3 solutions led to reduction in the surface area, pore volume, and micropore area, however, it also led to an increased number of oxygen functional groups of acidic character. The functional groups probably are located at the entrance of micropores, in this way, reducing the values of textural parameters. Isotherms of rhodamine B adsorption indicate that the oxidation of mesoporous carbons resulted in an increase in the effectiveness of the removal of this dye from aqueous solutions. The influence of temperature, pH, and contact time of mesoporous material/rhodamine B on the effectiveness of dye removal was tested. The process of dye adsorption on the surfaces of the materials studied was established to be most effective at pH 12 and at 60 °C. Kinetic studies of the process of adsorption proved that the equilibrium state between the dye molecules and mesoporous carbon materials is reached after about 1 h. The adsorption kinetics were well fitted using a pseudo-second-order model. The most effective in rhodamine B removal was the sample CSBA-15-5-100, containing the greatest number of oxygen functional groups of acidic character. The Langmuir model best represented equilibrium data.

1. Introduction

Water, which is the element necessary to support all forms of life, covers most of Earth’s surface. Its pollution is negative to human health and the entire hydrosphere [1,2,3,4,5]. There is a constant increase in the content of organic compounds in wastewater, especially in post-production waste produced by different types of industry [6,7], such as the textile industry, reaching several thousand tons a year, of which 10–20% is lost in the process of production [8,9,10]. Dyes are usually well soluble in water and resistant to degradation by various methods (biological, physical, and chemical) [9,10,11,12]. Therefore, they must be removed from the wastewater. At present, a few methods are used to remove organic compounds [12,13,14]. From among newly proposed methods, very attractive seems to be the method of membrane separation, offering simplicity of operation and low energy consumption [15]. On the other hand, membrane efficiency decreases with time because of the fouling of pollutant particles on the membrane surface and inside membrane pores. Moreover, molecules of many organic compounds are smaller than the membrane pores and the process of membrane separation is ineffective [16,17,18]. Currently, the most effective are the adsorption methods that can be used for the removal of organic and inorganic compounds from water solutions. The properties and quality of the adsorbent influence the adsorption efficiency. Many materials, for example, silica gels [19], alumina [20], and zeolite molecular sieves [21,22] are rather ineffective in the adsorption process. Activated carbons are used as organic pollutant adsorbents, although the presence of micropores in their structure limits the penetration of larger dye molecules into the pores. Recently, much attention was paid to ordered mesoporous carbon materials, as they show unique properties, such as thermal and mechanical stability, as well as good textural parameters [23]. These materials are easily modified, which allows for improved adsorption properties towards a range of pollutants [23,24,25,26]. Many methods for carbon material modification were proposed, but the most effective is that of wet oxidation, in which oxygen functional groups are introduced on the carbon surface [27]. A number of authors studied the adsorption of organic compounds on carbon materials, for instance, Liu et al. [28] proposed the removal of Acid Red 73 and Reactive Black 5 by CMK-3, CMK-5, and its carbon/silica composite Si-CMK-5, with different pore structures. The greatest sorption capacity towards these dyes was shown by CMK-5, which was related to double pore systems and large specific surface area. Asouhidou et al. [29] obtained mesoporous carbons, a highly ordered CMK-3 sample with hexagonal structure and a disordered mesoporous carbon (DMC), and tested them in the removal of Remazol Red 3BS, comparing their performance with that of commercial products (Takeda 5A, Calgon, and Norit SAE-2) and a HMS mesoporous silica with a wormhole pore structure. Their results show that the material structure and pore size have a significant impact on the effectiveness of adsorption. The resulting sorption capacities decreased in the order CMK-3 (0.531 mmol/g) > DMC (0.453 mmol/g) > SAE-2 (0.167 mmol/g) > Calgon (0.05 mmol/g) > Takeda 5A = HMS (0.007 mmol/g). The group of Peng [30] successfully applied the ordered mesoporous CMK-3 containing nitrogen functional groups as the adsorbent of Acid Black 1. According to their results, the modification of mesoporous carbon significantly improved its effectiveness in the removal of this dye. The maximum sorption capacities of the initial and functionalized materials were over 270 mg/g and nearly 500 mg/g, respectively.
One of the most popular textile dyes is rhodamine B, which is a cationic synthetic dye of green or red purple crystals [31]. With the release of rhodamine B into the water, several environmental and public health problems are caused [32,33]. Very popular and effective adsorbents of rhodamine B from water solutions are mesoporous carbons [34,35,36]. Therefore the aim of the study was to analyze the process of rhodamine B removal from water solutions by adsorption on oxidized mesoporous carbons of hexagonal structure. The effects of pH of the dye solution, adsorbent/adsorbate contact time, and temperature of the process were checked on the sorption capacity of obtained mesoporous carbons. The mesoporous carbon materials used as adsorbents were characterized in detail by a number of physicochemical methods.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

2.1.1. Mesoporous Carbon Synthesis

Mesoporous carbon CSBA-15 was obtained by the hard template method using the ordered silica SBA-15 as the solid template and sucrose as the carbon precursor [37,38]. The substrates for SBA-15 preparation were 50 mg of Pluronic P123 (EO20PO70EO20; Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), 19 mL of 1.6 M HCl (Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A., Gliwice, Poland), and 1.1 mL of TEOS (MERCK KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Pluronic P123 was dissolved in a water solution of HCl at 35 °C. To the mixture, TEOS was added dropwise upon stirring continued for 6 h. Then the mixture was subjected to hydrothermal treatment in poly-propylene bottles in a drier (1 day at 35 °C and the next 6 h at 100 °C). Then the material obtained was filtered off and dried (100 °C, 12 h). The template was removed by calcination (550 °C, 8 h). The procedure produced ordered mesoporous silica SBA-15 of hexagonal structure [37,38]. The mesoporous silica SBA-15 was subjected to twice repeated impregnation using sucrose solution. Next, 125 mg sucrose (MERCK KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was dissolved in H2SO4 (0.14 mL, Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A., Gliwice, Poland) and 5 mL of distilled water. The solution was added to the flask with the ordered silica. The contents were heated in the oven (6 h at 100 °C and 6 h at 160 °C). The obtained material was subjected to another impregnation with a solution of sucrose (800 mg), H2SO4 (0.09 mL), and distilled water (5 mL).
The composite was then subjected to carbonization by heating for 2 h at 900 °C. The remaining silica was washed out twice with 5% of HF solution (200 mL, Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A., Gliwice, Poland). The material was filtered off, washed with C2H5OH, and dried (12 h at 100 °C) [39].

2.1.2. Sample Functionalization

The CSBA-15 of the hexagonal structure was subjected to oxidation at 70 or 100 °C with the use of HNO3 at the concentrations of 0.5 or 5 mol/L as the oxidizing agent. Next, 0.5 g of the carbon was placed in a round-bottomed flask and flooded with 30 mL of nitric (V) acid solution. Oxidation was performed under reflux (12 h). Next, the contents were filtered off and the carbon was washed with C2H5OH and distilled water. The oxidized carbon materials were labeled as CSBA-15-0.5-70, CSBA-15-5-70, CSBA-15-0.5-100, and CSBA-15-5-100, where 70 and 100 refer to the temperature of oxidation, while 0.5 and 5 to the concentration of HNO3.

2.2. Analytical Procedures

The texture parameters of the samples obtained were characterized by low-temperature nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms measured on a sorptometer Quantachrome AutosorbiQ (Boynton Beach, FL, USA) [9].
X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained on a Bruker AXS DB Advance diffractometer (CuKα radiation, λ = 0.154 nm, step size 0.02°).
The number of surface oxygen functional groups was determined by the Boehm method [40]. A portion of 0.25 g of adsorbent was placed in 25 mL of 0.1 mol/L solutions of either NaOH or HCl. The vials were sealed and shaken for 24 h and then 10 mL of each filtrate was pipetted and the excess of base or acid was titrated with 0.1 mol/L HCl or NaOH, as required. The numbers of acidic sites of various types were calculated assuming that NaOH neutralizes all acidic groups and HCl reacts with all basic groups.
Structural changes in the oxidized mesoporous carbon materials were determined by FT-IR spectroscopy. The preparation of samples is described in the paper [9]. The study was carried out on a Varian 640-IR spectrometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Zeta potential was determined using a Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument equipped with an autotitrator (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, United Kingdom) [41]. The electrophoretic mobility of the particles was measured and converted to the zeta potential according to the Henry Equation (1):
R e f = 2 ε ζ f ( K a ) 3 η
where Ref is the electrophoretic mobility, ε the dielectric constant; ζ the electrokinetic (zeta) potential; η the viscosity, and f (Ka) the Henry function. The isoelectric point is a pH value at which zeta potential is zero, the surface has net electrical neutrality. When pH > iep, the surface charge is negative and pH < iep, it is positive.

2.3. Adsorption of Rhodamine B

The carbon material portions of 0.02 g were placed in flasks and flooded with 50 mL of a dye solution of a given concentration (25–250 mg/L), and the contents were shaken at 22 ± 1 °C for 24 h. Spectrophotometric measurements were carried out with a spectrometer Cary 100 Bio (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Rhodamine B absorbs the irradiation of λmax = 553 nm. The amount of rhodamine B adsorbed on the oxidized mesoporous carbons was calculated from Equation (2):
q e = C 0 C e m × V
where: C0—initial rhodamine B concentration (mg/L); Ce—equilibrium rhodamine B concentration (mg/L); m—the mass of mesoporous carbon sample (g); V—volume of rhodamine B solution (L). The experimental adsorption studies were carried out twice and are shown with a standard deviation error.
The effects of pH (CP-401 pH-meter, ELMETRON, Zabrze, Poland) of the dye solutions, temperature, and contact time of the sample/rhodamine B on the sorption capacities of mesoporous carbons were studied.

2.4. Adsorption Modeling

Experimental data were fitted to pseudo-first-order (3) and pseudo-second-order (4) models [9]:
l n ( q e q t ) = l n q e k 1 t 2.303
where: qe—sorption capacity of the rhodamine B adsorbed at equilibrium state (mg/g); qt —sorption capacity of the rhodamine B adsorbed in time (mg/g); and k1—the rate constant for the pseudo-first order model (min−1).
The pseudo-second-order model can be expressed by the equation:
t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + t q e
where: k2—the rate constant for pseudo-second order model (g/mg·min).

2.5. Thermodynamic Study

Thermodynamic parameters [42,43,44] were calculated by using the following Equation (5):
Δ G 0 = R T l n K d
where: ΔG0—Gibbs free energy (J·mol−1); R—universal constant (8.314 J·mol−1·K−1); T temperature (K); and Kd—thermodynamic equilibrium constant.
The Gibbs free energy of adsorption (ΔG0) can be represented by the Equation (6):
Δ G 0 = Δ H 0 T Δ S 0
where: ΔH0—enthalpy change; ΔS0—entropy change.
Thermodynamic parameters can be also calculated from Equation (7):
l n K d = Δ S 0 R + Δ H 0 R T
ΔH0 and ΔS0 parameters were calculated (7) from the slope and intercept of the plot of lnKd versus 1/T yields, respectively.

2.6. Adsorption Isotherms

In our work, we used the Langmuir and Freundlich models to explain the mechanism of rhodamine B adsorption on oxidized carbon materials [45,46].
The linear equation of Langmuir isotherm (8) is represented as follows:
C e q e = 1 K L × q m a x + C e q m a x
where: Ce—equilibrium concentration of rhodamine B (mg/L); qe—sorption capacity of rhodamine B adsorbed onto the adsorbent at equilibrium (mg/g); qm—maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of adsorbent (mg/g); and KL—Langmuir adsorption constant (L/mg).
The Freundlich isotherm is expressed mathematically as [46] (9):
l n q e = l n K F + 1 n l n C e
where: qe—sorption capacity of rhodamine B adsorbed at equilibrium (mg/g); Ce—equilibrium concentration of rhodamine B (mg/L); KF—Freundlich adsorption constant (mg/g·(L/mg)1/n); and n—Freundlich constant indicates how favorable the adsorption process is.
Experimental data were also fitted to the non-linear Langmuir and Freundlich models.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Adsorbents

The data on textural parameters are presented in Table 1. The sample of CSBA-15 is characterized by a well-developed surface area (SBET = 1203 m2/g) and a total pore volume (Vt) of 1.32 cm3/g. The carbon obtained in this way also has micropores, whose area (Smicro) is 682 m2/g. The process of functionalization of sample CSBA-15 leads to a decrease in these parameters. However, the changes are not uniform and depend on the conditions of the oxidation process. Although sample CSBA-15-5-100 was obtained by treatment with a 5 mol/L solution of HNO3 at 100 °C, it shows the largest surface area from among all oxidized materials (854 m2/g). The micropore area and total pore volume of this material are 198 m2/g and 1.10 cm3/g, respectively. Most probably in the conditions applied (100 °C, 5 mol/L HNO3), the micropores are unblocked again and the carbon compounds are removed, which increases the micropore area and total surface area [47]. The smallest SBET of 685 m2/g, Smicro of 106 m2/g, and Vt of 0.89 cm3/g were obtained for sample CSBA-15-5-70. The reduced values of textural parameters are most probably caused by the localization of the newly generated oxygen functional groups in micropores, which leads to their blocking and decreases the surface area.
Recorded in the small angle range XRD, diffractograms of the adsorbents obtained are depicted in Figure 1. Diffractograms of all samples show one intensive peak characteristic of hexagonal pore arrangement [9]. The diffractograms of the initial material CSBA-15 and samples CSBA-15-0.5-100 and CSBA-15-5-100 contain also the reflections in the range 2Θ ≈ 1.7–2.5°, corresponding to the planes (100), (110), and (200) of P6 mm structure, evidencing good ordering of the materials. No analogous reflections are observed for CSBA-15-0.5-70 and CSBA-15-5-70, which indicates a partial disturbance in the mesoporous structure.
Table 2 presents the results obtained from Boehm titration. The oxidation of mesoporous sample CSBA-15 with a solution of HNO3 generates on its surface acidic functional groups whose content depends on the conditions of the process. When using 0.5 mol/L and 5 mol/L HNO3 solution, the content of basic groups decreased to 0.13 mmol/g for samples CSBA-15-0.5-70 and CSBA-15-0.5-100, and to their total disappearance on samples CSBA-15-5-70 and CSBA-15-5-100. For the acidic functional groups, the results are different. The content of acidic groups in the initial carbon material CSBA-15 is 1.09 mmol/g. The content of such groups increases after oxidation and clearly depends on the functionalization conditions, which are the concentration of nitric (V) acid and process temperature. The highest content of the acidic functional groups of 4.88 mmol/g was observed for the sample oxidized with 5 mol/L HNO3 solution at 100 °C (CSBA-15-5-100). Reduction in the temperature of the process or in the concentration of the oxidizing agent led to lower content of acidic surface functional groups: CSBA-15-0.5-70–2.14 mmol/g, CSBA-15-5-70–3.24 mmol/g, and CSBA-15-0.5-100–3.45 mmol/g.
Figure 2 presents the transmission FT-IR spectra of the initial carbon CSBA-15 and oxidized samples of acidic surface nature.
The FT-IR spectra show a rather broad band at about 1200 cm−1 that can be assigned to the stretching vibrations of the C–O bond in ethers, acid anhydrides, or phenol. The bands about 1600 cm−1 correspond to the stretching vibrations of carbon–carbon bonds in the aromatic ring. There is also a clearly visible band at 3400 cm−1, assigned to the stretching vibrations of O–H bonds in hydroxyl groups, whose presence can indicate the oxidation of mesoporous carbon surface and the presence of carboxyl or phenol oxygen groups [48,49]. For the oxidized materials, a new band appeared at about 1750 cm−1, which was most pronounced for CSBA-15-5-100. This band can be assigned to the carbonyl group of aldehyde, ester, or carboxyl acid. The most probable origin of this band is the presence of -COOH groups on the surface of oxidized carbons, which is supported by the simultaneous presence of a band at about 3400 cm−1 [48,49]. The bands of the highest intensity were obtained for sample CSBA-15-5-100, which has the highest content of functional acidic groups. The bands recorded for the other samples were less intensive because of the lower content of functional groups.

3.2. Adsorption Studies

In this work, we studied the kinetics of adsorption (Figure 3). The adsorption of rhodamine B on the surface of the carbon materials studied is very fast for the first 10 min. After this time, the majority of the active sites on the carbon surface is already occupied by the dye molecules and the rate of adsorption considerably decreases. After 1 h, no increase qe was noted, which means that a state of equilibrium was reached and there are no more active sites on the carbon material studied. Next step, the experimental data were fitted to two kinetic models: pseudo-first-order (PFO) and pseudo-second-order models (PSO).
According to data collected in Table 3, the R2 for the PFO model takes values from the range 0.9265 to 0.9865. Much higher, and the same for all carbon material values of R2 (0.9999), were obtained assuming the PSO model. Moreover, the sorption capacities calculated assuming this model are mostly in agreement with their experimental values. Therefore, we conclude that the kinetics of rhodamine B adsorption on the surface of the samples studied can be described by the PSO model.
Figure 4 illustrates the effect of the adsorbate solution pH, changed in the range 2–12, on the amount of adsorbed rhodamine B, while Figure 5A presents the zeta potential curves vs. pH of mesoporous carbons before the dye adsorption, and Figure 5B, after its adsorption. As shown in Figure 5A, sample CSBA-15 has the isoelectric point (iep) at 3.4. The functionalization changes the adsorbents’ surface, for CSBA-15-5-70 the isoelectric point is at pH 2.6 and for CSBA-15-5-100 it does not exist; the zeta potential in the whole range of measurement is negative. The negative zeta potential indicates that oxidation treatment with HNO3 introduces hydroxyl, carboxylic, and carbonyl groups on the surfaces of the samples, which dissociate generating the negatively charged surface [50,51]. The zeta potential value higher than 25 mV, positive or negative, is indicative of electrokinetic stability [52]. Pristine carbon sample CSBA-15, and the samples after oxidation (CSBA-15-5-70 and CSBA-15-5-100), show good electrokinetic stability at pH values higher than 6 (Figure 5A). The data presented in Figure 4 suggest that the effectiveness of rhodamine B removal from water solutions depends on the pH of the adsorbate solution. The lowest sorption capacity was recorded at pH 2, which can be explained as a result of the protonation of carboxyl, amide, and hydroxyl groups, leading to the generation of a positive charge, which is engaged in repulsive interaction with the positive charge of the cationic dye (rhodamine B). In addition, at low pH, the H+ cations compete with rhodamine B cations for the adsorption sites. The surface is more negatively charged when the pH increases as a result of deprotonation of the functional groups by the hydroxide anion OH-, which is more favorable for the adsorption of rhodamine B. Then, we have strong electrostatic attraction between the negatively charged surface of the adsorbent and the positively charged cationic dye. At pH 12, the sorption capacities of all adsorbents increased by about 20 mg/g in relation to that of the initial carbon sample. The zeta potential values of CSBA-15-5-100 after adsorption of rhodamine B from the solutions of the concentration of 50 mg/L and 150 mg/L (Figure 5B) differ from those for CSBA-15-5-100 before adsorption, and iep can be observed (changes in iep value suggest the chemical adsorption) [53].
The effect of temperature on the amount of rhodamine B adsorbed on the surface of the samples studied was also checked (Figure 6). The amount of rhodamine B adsorbed (qe) on the surface of mesoporous carbon materials before and after their oxidation increases with temperature. It follows the consequence of increased mobility of dye molecules at higher temperatures. For instance, the amount of organic dye adsorbed on the surface of sample CSBA-15-5-100 is 227 mg/g (25 °C), 254 mg/g (45 °C), and 261 mg/g (60 °C).
According to the data collected in Table 4, the results of ΔG° prove that the process of adsorption of dye is spontaneous. For all samples, the degree of spontaneity was the highest at 60 °C. The positive values of ΔH obtained reveal an endothermic adsorption process. In addition, the positive values of ΔSevidence increased the degree of randomness at the interface in the process of the rhodamine B adsorption.
Figure 7 presents the isotherms of dye adsorption on the surface of carbon adsorbents. According to the results, the initial carbon CSBA-15 proved to be the least effective in the removal of dye, despite having the largest surface area from among all samples studied (1203 m2/g). However, this material also has the lowest number of surface functional groups of acidic character. Further data analysis allows us to conclude that the process of the adsorption of organic dye depends on surface functional groups of acidic character. Sample CSBA-15-5-100, showing the largest sorption capacity towards rhodamine B (325 mg/g), has the greatest content of such functional groups (4.88 mmol/g). The process of its oxidation was performed with 5 mol/L nitric (V) acid solution at 100 °C. The amounts of rhodamine B adsorbed on the other oxidized carbon materials CSBA-15-0.5-70, CSBA-15-5-70, and CSBA-15-0.5-100 were 248, 268, and 302 mg/g, respectively.
Analysis of the adsorption data was performed with the use of two theoretical models of Langmuir and Freundlich (Figure 8 and Figure 9, Table 5 and Table 6). Comparison of the experimental data with the predictions of a particular model provides information on the mechanism of adsorption and mesoporous carbon/rhodamine B interactions. The criterion of best fitting was the determination coefficient R2.
The determination coefficient R2 for the linear form of the Langmuir model takes values from 0.9987 to 0.9999 for all adsorbents obtained. The values of R2 (Freundlich model) for particular carbon materials were: 0.8564 for CSBA-15, 0.7993 for CSBA-15-0.5-70, 0.8009 for CSBA-15-5-70, 0.8611 for CSBA-15-0.5-100, and 0.8598 for CSBA-15-5-100. Therefore, the isotherms of rhodamine B adsorption on the surface of the carbon materials studied correspond to the Langmuir model. It should be noted that the experimental values of qe are slightly lower from the theoretical qm. For the oxidized mesoporous carbons, the coefficient KL values are higher than for the initial material CSBA-15, which means that the bonding between rhodamine B and the functionalized carbon material surfaces is stronger. The coefficient 1/n for the Freundlich model lies between (0 < 1/n < 1) which shows that this isotherm is favorable.
Additionally, the comparison of the non-linear form of the Langmuir and the Freundlich [54] isotherm models with experimental data for the adsorption of rhodamine B on the surface of carbon adsorbents is presented in Table 6 and Figure 9. It was established that the Langmuir adsorption model indicates a better fit to the experimental data than the Freundlich model. The R2 values for the non-linear and linear Langmuir isotherms were similar.
Table 7 presents a comparison of the sorption capacities of carbon samples obtained towards tested dye with those of other adsorbents. The comparison implies that the ordered mesoporous carbon materials are very effective in the removal of rhodamine B from water solutions. The majority of literature reported adsorbents, including hierarchical SnS2 nanostructure [5], TA-G [55], iron-pillared bentonite [56], sago waste activated carbon [57], kaolinite [58], [Ni(bipy)2]2(HPW12O40) [59], orange peel [60], whose sorption capacities are lower than for the oxidized carbon materials studied in this work. From among all materials mentioned in Table 6, the highest sorption capacity towards rhodamine B showed the magnetic mesoporous carbon materials (342–400 mg/g) [61], also high sorption capacities were noted for MoS2/MIL-101-345 mg/g [62] and oxidized ordered mesoporous carbon material CSBA-15-5-100 (325 mg/g). The hierarchical SnS2 nanostructure [5] and TA-G [55] adsorption capacity was at a level of 200 mg/g, and the sorption capacities of the other samples listed in Table 7 were much lower: iron-pillared bentonite—99 mg/g [56], sago waste activated carbon—47 mg/g [57], kaolinite—46 mg/g [58], [Ni(bipy)2]2(HPW12O40)—23 mg/g [59], and orange peel—14 mg/g [60].

4. Conclusions

According to the above-presented results, functionalization of the ordered mesoporous carbon of hexagonal structure (CSBA-15) using a solution of nitric (V) acid, has brought about an increase in its effectiveness of rhodamine B removal from water solutions. Oxidization of mesoporous carbon reduced its textural parameters but increased the acidic character of the surface. Moreover, for the samples functionalized at 70 °C, the oxidation resulted in the disappearance of the reflections corresponding to the carbon structure ordering, as confirmed by XRD diffractograms in the small angle range. Sample CSBA-15-5-100 was characterized by the highest content of surface functional groups of acidic nature and the largest surface area from among the functionalized carbon materials studied. This sample was the most effective in the removal of tested dye from water solutions (325 mg/g). The sorption capacity towards rhodamine B depended also on the pH of the solution and the process temperature. The adsorption of organic dye was more effective at higher pH because of deprotonation of the surface functional groups on the carbon samples by the hydroxide anion. The measurements of zeta potential, before and after adsorption, proved that with increasing pH, the surface charge on carbon samples changed. The amount of adsorbed rhodamine B was also found to increase with the increasing temperature of the process, which is related to increased mobility of the dye molecules at higher temperatures. The thermodynamic parameters showed that the adsorption process of dye was endothermic and proceeded spontaneously. The adsorption of rhodamine B onto oxidized mesoporous carbons was described by the Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M. and J.G.; methodology, M.M.; validation, M.M., J.G., M.N. and A.B.-W.; formal analysis, M.M. and J.G.; investigation, M.M., M.N. and A.B.-W.; resources, J.G., T.J. and R.P.; data curation, M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M. and J.G.; writing—review and editing, M.M., J.G., M.N., T.J., A.B.-W. and R.P.; visualization, M.M. and J.G.; supervision, R.P.; funding acquisition, R.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, R.C.; Zhang, B.; Mei, D.D.; Zhang, H.Q.; Liu, J.D. Adsorption of methyl violet from aqueous solution by halloysite nanotubes. Desalination 2011, 268, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liang, Z.J.; Zhao, Z.W.; Sun, T.Y.; Shi, W.X.; Cui, F.Y. Enhanced adsorption of the cationic dyes in the spherical CuO/meso-silica nano composite and impact of solution chemistry. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2017, 485, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hao, O.J.; Kim, H.; Chiang, P.C. Decolorization of wastewater. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 30, 449–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bulai, I.M.; Venturino, E. Biodegradation of organic pollutants in a water body. J. Math. Chem. 2016, 54, 1387–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, S.; Yang, B.; Liu, Y. Synthesis of a hierarchical SnS2 nanostructure for efficient adsorption of Rhodamine B dye. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2017, 507, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huang, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Shi, J.; Zhang, N.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Gao, L.; Zhang, Y. Modified bentonite adsorption of organic pollutants of dye wastewater. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 202, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Raman, C.D.; Kanmani, S. Textile dye degradation using nano zero valent iron: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 177, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Patil, S.P.; Bethi, B.; Sonawane, G.H.; Shrivastava, V.S.; Sonawane, S. Efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B dye over Bi2O3-bentonite nanocomposites: A kinetic study. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 34, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ptaszkowska-Koniarz, M.; Goscianska, J.; Pietrzak, R. Adsorption of dyes on the surface of polymer nanocomposites modified with methylamine and copper(II) chloride. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2017, 504, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, S.; Jia, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhu, R. Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous carbon nanofibers and its adsorption for dye in wastewater. Adv. Powder Technol. 2016, 27, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Firmino, P.I.M.; Da Silva, M.E.R.; Cervantes, F.J.; Dos Santos, A.B. Colour removal of dyes from synthetic and real textile wastewaters in one- and two-stage anaerobic systems. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 7773–7779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cooper, C.; Burch, R. Mesoporous materials for water treatment processes. Water Res. 1999, 33, 3689–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arshadi, M.; Mousavinia, F.; Amiri, M.J.; Faraji, A.R. Adsorption of methyl orange and salicylic acid on a nano-transition metal composite: Kinetics, thermodynamic and electrochemical studies. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2016, 483, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Errais, E.; Duplay, J.; Darragi, F. Textile dye removal by natural clay-case study of Fouchana Tunisian Clay. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marcucci, M.; Ciardelli, G.; Matteucci, A.; Ranieri, L.; Russo, M. Experimental campaigns on textile wastewater for reuse by means of different membrane processes. Desalination 2002, 149, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alzahrani, S.; Mohammad, A.W. Challenges and trends in membrane technology implementation for produced water treatment: A review. J. Water Process Eng. 2014, 4, 107–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Damodar, R.A.; You, S.; Ou, S. Coupling of membrane separation with photocatalytic slurry reactor for advanced dye wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 76, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ou, W.; Zhang, G.; Yuan, X.; Su, P. Experimental study on coupling photocatalytic oxidation process and membrane separation for the reuse of dye wastewater. J. Water Process Eng. 2015, 6, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kanagaraj, J.; Senthilvelan, T.; Panda, R.C. Degradation of azo dyes by laccase: Biological method to reduce pollution load in dye wastewater. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 2015, 17, 1443–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kannan, C.; Sundaram, T.; Palvannan, T. Environmentally stable adsorbent of tetrahedral silica and non-tetrahedral alumina for removal and recovery of malachite green dye from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 157, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, C.Z.; Zhong, H.; Wang, S.; Xue, J.R.; Zhang, Z.Y. Removal of basic dye (methylene blue) from aqueous solution using zeolite synthesized from electrolytic manganese residue. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 23, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dong, K.; Qiu, F.X.; Guo, X.R.; Xu, J.C.; Yang, D.Y.; He, K.C. Polyurethane-attapulgite porous material: Preparation, characterization, and application for dye adsorption. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 129, 1697–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Goscianska, J.; Olejnik, A.; Pietrzak, R. In vitro release of L-phenylalanine from ordered mesoporous materials. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2013, 177, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Derylo-Marczewska, A.; Marczewski, A.W.; Winter, S.; Sternik, D. Studies of adsorption equilibria and kinetics in the systems: Aqueous solution of dyes–mesoporous carbons. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 5164–5170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Goscianska, J.; Ptaszkowska, M.; Pietrzak, R. Equilibrium and kinetic studies of chromotrope 2R adsorption onto ordered mesoporous carbons modified with lanthanum. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 270, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Goscianska, J.; Marciniak, M.; Pietrzak, R. Ordered mesoporous carbons modified with cerium as effective adsorbents for azo dyes removal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 154, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bazula, P.A.; Lu, A.H.; Nitz, J.T.; Schüth, F. Surface and pore structure modification of ordered mesoporous carbons via a chemical oxidation approach. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2008, 108, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, F.; Guo, Z.; Ling, H.; Huang, Z.; Tang, D. Effect of pore structure on the adsorption of aqueous dyes to ordered mesoporous carbons. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2016, 227, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Asouhidou, D.D.; Triantafyllidis, K.S.; Lazaridis, N.K.; Matis, K.A.; Kim, S.S.; Pinnavaia, T.J. Sorption of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions by ordered hexagonal and disordered mesoporous carbons. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2009, 117, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, X.; Hu, X.; Fu, D.; Lam, F.L.Y. Adsorption removal of acid black 1 from aqueous solution using ordered mesoporous carbon. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 294, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cai, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Dong, W.; Chen, H.; Zeng, W.; Xia, X.; Zeng, G. Activation of persulfate by photoexcited dye for antibiotic degradation: Radical and nonradical reactions. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 375, 122070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sulistina, D.R.; Martini, S. The effect of Rhodamine B on the cerebellum and brainstem tissue of Rattus norvegicus. J. Public Health Res. 2020, 9, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, L.; Liu, H.; Ren, X. Synthesis and characterization of magnetic metal–organic framework for the adsorptive removal of rhodamine B from aqueous solution. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 34, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Deng, J.; Chen, Y.J.; Lu, Y.A.; Ma, X.Y.; Feng, S.F.; Gao, N.; Li, N. Synthesis of magnetic CoFe2O4/ordered mesoporous carbon nanocomposites and application in Fenton-like oxidation of rhodamine B. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 14396–14408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Moradi, S.E.; Nasrollahpour, A. Competitive adsorption and photodegradation of Methyl orange and Rhodamine B by TiO2modified mesoporous carbon photo-catalyst on UV irradiation. Mater. Technol. 2017, 32, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tripathi, N.K. Porous carbon spheres: Recent developments and applications. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2018, 5, 1016–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, D.; Huo, Q.; Feng, J.; Chmelka, B.F.; Stucky, G.D. Nonionic triblock and star diblock copolymer and oligomeric surfactant syntheses of highly ordered hydrothermally stable mesoporous silica structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6024–6036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, D.; Feng, J.; Huo, Q.; Melosh, N.; Fredrickson, G.H.; Chmelka, B.F.; Stucky, G.D. Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores. Science 1998, 279, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Joo, H.; Choi, J.; Oh, I.; Kwak, J.; Liu, Z.; Terasaki, O.; Ryoo, R. Ordered nanoporous arrays of carbon supporting high dispersions of platinum nanoparticles. Nature 2001, 412, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Boehm, H.P. Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons. Carbon 1994, 32, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Olejnik, A.; Gosicianska, J. On the importance of physicochemical parameters of copper and aminosilane functionalized mesoporous silica for hydroxychloroquine release. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 130, 112438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nashine, A.L.; Tembhurkar, A.R. Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of As(III) on coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) fiber. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 3267–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Konggidinata, M.I.; Chao, B.; Lian, Q.; Subramaniam, R.; Zappi, M.; Gang, D.D. Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of BTEX onto Ordered Mesoporous Carbon (OMC). J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 336, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dursun, A.Y.; Kalayci, C.S. Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies on the adsorption of phenol onto chitin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 123, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Langmuir, I. The constitutional and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38, 2221–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Freundlich, H. Überdie Adsorption in Lösungen. Z. Phys. Chem. 1907, 57, 385–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, Z.; Webley, P.A.; Zhao, D. Comprehensive Study of Pore Evolution, Mesostructural Stability, and Simultaneous Surface Functionalization of Ordered Mesoporous Carbon (FDU-15) by Wet Oxidation as a Promising Adsorbent. Langmuir 2010, 26, 10277–10286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cohn, A.P.; Erwin, W.R.; Share, K.; Oakes, L.; Westover, A.S.; Carter, R.E.; Bardhan, R.; Pint, C.L. All Silicon Electrode Photocapacitor for Integrated Energy Storage and Conversion. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2727–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Prahas, D.; Kartika, Y.; Indraswati, N.; Ismadji, S. Activated carbon from jackfruit peel waste by H3PO4 chemical activation: Pore structure and surface chemistry characterization. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 140, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Y.; Dua, Q.; Liua, T.; Peng, X.; Wang, J.; Sun, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, S.; Wang, Z.; Xia, Y.; et al. Comparative study of methylene blue dye adsorption onto activated carbon, graphene oxide, and carbon nanotubes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2013, 91, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Galán, J.; Rodríguez, A.; Gómez, J.M.; Allen, S.J.; Walker, G.M. Reactive dye adsorption onto a novel mesoporous carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 219, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Goscianska, J.; Olejnik, A.; Nowak, I. APTES-functionalized mesoporous silica as a vehicle for antipyrine–adsorption and release studies. Colloid Surf. A 2017, 533, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dawood, S.; Sen, T.K.; Phan, C. Synthesis and Characterisation of Novel-Activated Carbon from Waste Biomass Pine Cone and Its Applicationin the Removal of Congo Red Dye from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014, 225, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alswieleh, A.M. Efficient Removal of Dyes from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption on L-Arginine-Modified Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Processes 2022, 10, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, K.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Gou, X.; Duan, Y. Adsorption and removal of rhodamine B from aqueous solution by tannic acid functionalized graphene. Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2015, 477, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hou, M.F.; Ma, C.X.; Zhang, W.D.; Tang, X.Y.; Fan, Y.N.; Wan, H.F. Removal of rhodamine B using iron-pillared bentonite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 1118–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kadirvelu, K.; Karthika, C.; Vennilamani, N.; Pattabhi, S. Activated carbon from industrial solid waste as an adsorbent for the removal of rhodamine-B from aqueous solution: Kinetic and equilibrium studies. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 1009–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Khan, T.A.; Dahiya, S.; Ali, I. Use of kaolinite as adsorbent: Equilibrium, dynamics and thermodynamic studies on the adsorption of Rhodamine B from aqueous solution. Appl. Clay Sci. 2012, 69, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, F.; Chen, Y.; Huang, H.; Cao, W.; Li, T. Removal of rhodamine B and Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by a polyoxometalate adsorbent. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2015, 100, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Annadurai, G.; Juang, R.S.; Lee, D.J. Use of cellulose-based wastes for adsorption of dyes from aqueous solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2002, 92, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dong, Y.; Lin, H.; Qu, F. Synthesis of ferromagnetic ordered mesoporous carbons for bulky dye molecules adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 193–194, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, C.; Cheng, J.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Y. Enhanced adsorption performance of MoS2 nanosheet-coated MIL-101 hybrids for the removal of aqueous rhodamine B. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 504, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of adsorbents obtained.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of adsorbents obtained.
Materials 15 05573 g001
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of carbon adsorbents obtained.
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of carbon adsorbents obtained.
Materials 15 05573 g002
Figure 3. Amount of rhodamine B adsorbed on adsorbents obtained (C0–75 mg/L).
Figure 3. Amount of rhodamine B adsorbed on adsorbents obtained (C0–75 mg/L).
Materials 15 05573 g003
Figure 4. The pH influence on the sorption capacity of adsorbents obtained.
Figure 4. The pH influence on the sorption capacity of adsorbents obtained.
Materials 15 05573 g004
Figure 5. Zeta potential curves vs. pH for CSBA-15, CSBA-15-5-70, and CSBA-15-5-100 mesoporous carbons before dye adsorption (A) and for CSBA-15 and CSBA-15-5-100 after adsorption of rhodamine B (B).
Figure 5. Zeta potential curves vs. pH for CSBA-15, CSBA-15-5-70, and CSBA-15-5-100 mesoporous carbons before dye adsorption (A) and for CSBA-15 and CSBA-15-5-100 after adsorption of rhodamine B (B).
Materials 15 05573 g005
Figure 6. Effect of temperature on the adsorption of dye (100 mg/L) onto adsorbents obtained.
Figure 6. Effect of temperature on the adsorption of dye (100 mg/L) onto adsorbents obtained.
Materials 15 05573 g006
Figure 7. Adsorption of rhodamine B onto adsorbents obtained.
Figure 7. Adsorption of rhodamine B onto adsorbents obtained.
Materials 15 05573 g007
Figure 8. Linear fitting of rhodamine B adsorption isotherms onto carbon adsorbents to Langmuir (A) and Freundlich (B) models.
Figure 8. Linear fitting of rhodamine B adsorption isotherms onto carbon adsorbents to Langmuir (A) and Freundlich (B) models.
Materials 15 05573 g008
Figure 9. Non-linear fitting of rhodamine B adsorption isotherms to Langmuir and Freundlich models for samples: CSBA-15 (A), CSBA15-0.5-70 (B), CSBA-15-5-70 (C), CSBA-15-0.5-100 (D), and CSBA-15-5-100 (E).
Figure 9. Non-linear fitting of rhodamine B adsorption isotherms to Langmuir and Freundlich models for samples: CSBA-15 (A), CSBA15-0.5-70 (B), CSBA-15-5-70 (C), CSBA-15-0.5-100 (D), and CSBA-15-5-100 (E).
Materials 15 05573 g009
Table 1. Textural parameters of adsorbents obtained 1.
Table 1. Textural parameters of adsorbents obtained 1.
AdsorbentSBET (m2/g)Vt (cm3/g)Smicro (m2/g)Average Pore Diameter (nm)
CSBA-1512031.326854.45
CSBA-15-0.5-707891.121475.66
CSBA-15-5-706850.891065.18
CSBA-15-0.5-1008371.042044.91
CSBA-15-5-1008541.101985.18
1 Error range between 2% and 5%.
Table 2. The results obtained from Boehm titration.
Table 2. The results obtained from Boehm titration.
AdsorbentAcidic Groups
(mmol/g)
Basic Groups
(mmol/g)
Total Content of Acidic and Basic Groups (mmol/g)
CSBA-151.09 ± 0.010.74 ± 0.011.83
CSBA-15-0.5-702.14 ± 0.020.13 ± 0.012.27
CSBA-15-5-703.24 ± 0.020.00 ± 0.003.24
CSBA-15-0.5-1003.45 ± 0.020.13 ± 0.013.58
CSBA-15-5-1004.88 ± 0.030.00 ± 0.004.88
Table 3. Kinetic models parameters.
Table 3. Kinetic models parameters.
Adsorbentqe (mg/g)PFO ModelPSO Model
qe[cal]
(mg/g)
k1 (min−1)R2qe[cal]
(mg/g)
k2 (g/mg min)R2
CSBA-15159.41 ± 3.199.940.0190.9391161.290.0030.9999
CSBA15-0.5-70171.29 ± 3.437.350.0180.9265172.410.0040.9999
CSBA-15-5-70174.46 ± 3.4911.930.0220.9253175.440.0030.9999
CSBA-15-0.5-100174.90 ± 3.4911.440.0260.9865175.450.0030.9999
CSBA-15-5-100180.71 ± 3.6110.720.0230.9687181.810.0030.9999
Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters obtained.
Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters obtained.
AdsorbentTemperature (°C)G0 (kJ·mol−1)H0 (kJ·mol−1)S0 (J·mol−1·K−1)
CSBA-1525−16.4131.20159.71
45−19.53
60−22.01
CSBA-15-0.5-7025−19.5123.96145.66
45−22.18
60−24.51
CSBA-15-5-7025−22.2722.44149.90
45−25.14
60−27.53
CSBA-15-0.5-10025−19.1243.69210.76
45−23.24
60−26.51
CSBA-15-5-10025−21.6647.17230.88
45−26.19
60−29.73
Table 5. The parameters of linear form of Langmuir and Freundlich models for rhodamine B adsorption onto carbon materials.
Table 5. The parameters of linear form of Langmuir and Freundlich models for rhodamine B adsorption onto carbon materials.
MaterialLangmuirFreundlich
qm (mg/g)KL (L/mg)R2KF (mg/g (L/mg)1/n)1/nR2
CSBA-15196.070.3690.9999102.480.13730.8564
CSBA15-0.5-70250.000.7270.9998119.920.17010.7993
CSBA-15-5-70270.270.7870.9998127.980.17830.8009
CSBA-15-0.5-100303.030.4930.9988141.830.17170.8611
CSBA-15-5-100322.580.5740.9987153.340.17800.8598
Table 6. The parameters of non-linear Langmuir and Freundlich models for rhodamine B adsorption onto carbon materials.
Table 6. The parameters of non-linear Langmuir and Freundlich models for rhodamine B adsorption onto carbon materials.
MaterialLangmuirFreundlich
qm (mg/g)KL (L/mg)R2KF (mg/g (L/mg)1/n)1/nR2
CSBA-15200.640.1790.9999122.130.09490.8983
CSBA15-0.5-70248.730.5660.9986171.940.07930.8053
CSBA-15-5-70268.280.6600.9995208.070.05300.9357
CSBA-15-0.5-100296.660.4540.9942197.630.08600.9953
CSBA-15-5-100319.830.5050.9950212.120.08970.9922
Table 7. Comparison of sorption capacities of oxidized mesoporous carbons with other adsorbents presented in literature.
Table 7. Comparison of sorption capacities of oxidized mesoporous carbons with other adsorbents presented in literature.
AdsorbentSorption Capacity (mg/g)References
oxidized mesoporous carbon248–325This study
hierarchical SnS2 nanostructure200[5]
TA-G201[55]
iron-pillared bentonite99[56]
sago waste activated carbon47[57]
kaolinite46[58]
[Ni(bipy)2]2(HPW12O40)23[59]
orange peel14[60]
magnetic mesoporous carbon materials342–400[61]
MoS2/MIL-101345[62]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marciniak, M.; Goscianska, J.; Norman, M.; Jesionowski, T.; Bazan-Wozniak, A.; Pietrzak, R. Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies on Adsorption of Rhodamine B from Aqueous Solutions Using Oxidized Mesoporous Carbons. Materials 2022, 15, 5573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165573

AMA Style

Marciniak M, Goscianska J, Norman M, Jesionowski T, Bazan-Wozniak A, Pietrzak R. Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies on Adsorption of Rhodamine B from Aqueous Solutions Using Oxidized Mesoporous Carbons. Materials. 2022; 15(16):5573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165573

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marciniak, Michal, Joanna Goscianska, Małgorzata Norman, Teofil Jesionowski, Aleksandra Bazan-Wozniak, and Robert Pietrzak. 2022. "Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies on Adsorption of Rhodamine B from Aqueous Solutions Using Oxidized Mesoporous Carbons" Materials 15, no. 16: 5573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165573

APA Style

Marciniak, M., Goscianska, J., Norman, M., Jesionowski, T., Bazan-Wozniak, A., & Pietrzak, R. (2022). Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies on Adsorption of Rhodamine B from Aqueous Solutions Using Oxidized Mesoporous Carbons. Materials, 15(16), 5573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165573

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop