Next Article in Journal
Monitoring Porcelain Insulator Condition Based on Leakage Current Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Electric-Field Control of Spin Diffusion Length and Electric-Assisted D’yakonov–Perel’ Mechanism in Ultrathin Heavy Metal and Ferromagnetic Insulator Heterostructure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Mono-Vacancies and Co-Vacancies of Nitrogen and Boron on the Energetics and Electronic Properties of Heterobilayer h-BN/graphene

by
Gladys Casiano Jiménez
1,2,
Juan David Morinson-Negrete
1,3,
Franklin Peniche Blanquicett
1,
César Ortega-López
1,2 and
Miguel J. Espitia-Rico
4,*
1
Grupo Avanzado de Materiales y Sistemas Complejos GAMASCO, Universidad de Córdoba, Montería CP 230001, Colombia
2
Doctorado en Ciencias Física, Universidad de Córdoba, Montería CP 2030001, Colombia
3
Grupo de Investigación AMDAC, Institución Educativa José María Córdoba, Montería CP 2300001, Colombia
4
Grupo GEFEM, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá CP 110111, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(18), 6369; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186369
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 30 August 2022 / Accepted: 5 September 2022 / Published: 14 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic First-Principles Simulation—Nano-Theory)

Abstract

:
A study is carried out which investigates the effects of the mono-vacancies of boron (VB) and nitrogen (VN) and the co-vacancies of nitrogen (N), and boron (B) on the energetics and the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of an h-BN/graphene heterobilayer using first-principles calculations within the framework of the density functional theory (DFT). The heterobilayer is modelled using the periodic slab scheme. In the present case, a 4 × 4-(h-BN) monolayer is coupled to a 4 × 4-graphene monolayer, with a mismatch of 1.40%. In this coupling, the surface of interest is the 4 × 4-(h-BN) monolayer; the 4 × 4-graphene only represents the substrate that supports the 4 × 4-(h-BN) monolayer. From the calculations of the energy of formation of the 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer, with and without defects, it is established that, in both cases, the heterobilayers are energetically stable, from which it is inferred that these heterobilayers can be grown in the experiment. The formation of a mono-vacancy of boron (1 VB), a mono-vacancy of nitrogen (1 VN), and co-vacancies of boron and nitrogen (VBN) induce, on the structural level: (a) for 1 VB, a contraction n of the B-N bond lengths of ~2.46% and a slight change in the interfacial distance D (~0.096%) with respect to the heterobilayer free of defects (FD) are observed; (b) for 1 VN, a slight contraction of the B-N of bond lengths of ~0.67% and an approach between the h-BN monolayer and the graphene of ~3.83% with respect to the FD heterobilayer are observed; (c) for VBN, it can be seen that the N-N and B-B bond lengths (in the 1 VB and 1 VN regions, respectively) undergo an increase of ~2.00% and a decrease of ~3.83%, respectively. The calculations of the Löwdin charge for the FD heterobilayer and for those with defects (1 VB, 1 VN, and VBN) show that the inclusion of this type of defect induces significant changes in the Löwdin charge redistribution of the neighboring atoms of VB and VN, causing chemically active regions that could favor the interaction of the heterobilayer with external atoms and/or molecules. On the basis of an analysis of the densities of states and the band structures, it is established that the heterobilayer with 1 VB and VBN take on a half-metallic and magnetic behavior. Due to all of these properties, the FD heterobilayer and those with 1 VB, 1 VN, and VBN are candidates for possible adsorbent materials and possible materials that could be used for different spintronic applications.

1. Introduction

Graphene was obtained by Novoselov et al. [1] by means of mechanical exfoliation in 2004; it is a bidimensional material that possesses a hexagonal lattice and sp2 hybridation. Graphene is a semimetal with a zero band gap. Because of its excellent properties and wide range of applications, (microelectronics, optoelectronics, and nanoelectronics, among others), graphene has been extensively studied, both theoretically and experimentally. Nevertheless, one of the greatest obstacles to the construction of the new generation of graphene-based micro- and nanoelectronic devices is the absence of a finite band gap. Therefore, opening the band gap in graphene is currently a subject of interest. Enormous efforts have been made in pursuit of this goal, using various techniques; among them can be mentioned: quantum confinement by means of the reduction of its dimension by cutting the graphene into nanoribbons [2,3] or nanowires [4], use of graphene bilayers [5,6], twisted graphene [7], doping [8,9,10,11], graphene subjected to tension [12], hydrogenation [13], and growth of graphene on various substrates [14,15]. In all of these techniques that have been used, the two-carbon atom in a unit cell are not equivalent, generating a finite band gap in the graphene. However, the symmetry breaking of the graphene sublattices causes a significant increase in the effective mass of the charge carriers, which produces a large reduction in its mobility. Therefore, maintaining without changes in the effective mass of the charge carriers is very important. Because of this, opening the band gap and maintaining the high degree of mobility of the charge carriers in graphene is one of the most-researched topics in materials science. Various theoretical investigations have been carried out related to the heterobilayers of graphene with other materials [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. In addition, various heterobilayers of graphene, along with other bidimensional materials, have been obtained [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], finding that they are potential candidates for the manufacture of new devices in optoelectronics and nanoelectronics based on graphene. In this sense, and due to the fact that a hexagonal BN monolayer (h-BN) has a structure similar to that of graphene (in both materials, the atoms possess a hexagonal arrangement in honeycomb form and their lattice constants differ by less than 2%), the graphene/BN [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53] and that of BN/graphene heterobilayer [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63] have been extensively studied. Some experimental studies reveal that graphene obtained by means of the aforementioned heterobilayers is of good quality and possesses a smooth morphology, free of bubbles or wrinkles, [64,65], and that the charge carriers have a high degree of mobility [64,65]. Lee et al. [66] found that the mobility of the charge carriers of graphene in the graphene/h-BN heterobilayer is three (3) times greater than that of graphene without h-BN. However, point defects can be present in any crystalline structure, with vacancies of atoms being the most frequent. Loh et al. [67], using the scanning tunneling microscopy technique, found discontinuities caused by vacancies of atoms in the graphene/h-BN heterobilayer, grown by means of the chemical vapor deposition technique. Recently, Neupename and Adhikari [68], using first-principles calculations, studied the effects of boron and nitrogen vacancies on the structural and electronic properties of a graphene/h-BN heterobilayer. However, a more thorough theoretical analysis and the knowledge of the effects of these vacancies on the electronic and energy properties of these heterobilayers is a problem that has not yet been completely resolved. A complementary study is crucial for an understanding of the functioning and performance of these graphene-based heterobilayers. Due to all of the above, in this paper, we present a detailed study of the effects that boron and nitrogen mono-vacancies and co-vacancies produce on the energetics (bonding energy, formation energy, and work of adhesion) and the electronic properties (electronic density of states (DOS), energy band structure, charge density, and Löwdin charge) of an h-BN/graphene heterobilayer. The results of the first investigations allow us to establish the intensity of the interactions between the BN and graphene monolayers and the stability of the BN/graphene heterobilayer and to infer the viability of its growth in the laboratory, while the results of the second studies allow us to perform a more complete analysis of the effects of B and N mono-vacancies and co-vacancies on the structural and electronic properties of a 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer.

2. Computational Method

The calculations were performed within the framework of density functional theory (DFT) [69,70], using Quantum ESPRESSO computational code [71,72]. The correlation and exchange potentials are modelled on the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation (PBE-GGA) [73]. The external potentials are modelled by ultrasoft pseudopotentials. For the calculations, a plane-wave basis is used for the electronic orbitals and the electronic density with cutoff energies of 59 Ry and 500 Ry, respectively. The heterobilayers are modelled on the periodic slab scheme, considering vertical stacking of a 4 × 4-(h-BN) monolayer on a 4 × 4-graphene monolayer, considering a vacuum space of 20 Å in the z direction. The effects of the weak van der Waals (vdW) interaction between the monolayers of BN-h and graphene are included through the Grimme-D2 approximation [74]. The convergence criteria for the total energy, force, and pressure are 1 meV/atom, 1 meV/Å, and 0.2 kbar, respectively.
The analysis of the energy of the FD 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer through those with 1 VB, 1 VN, and VBN was performed by means of the calculation of the bond energy (Eb), the energy of formation (Ef), and the work of adhesion (Wad), respectively. In order to avoid interactions between simultaneous vacancies of boron and nitrogen, a sufficiently large distance of 7.20 Å was used. The energy band diagrams (BD) and the total and projected densities of states (DOSs) for the principal electronic orbitals of the B, N, and C atoms were calculated in the irreducible zone of the first Brillouin zone (1 BZ) with a 14 × 14 × 1 Monkhorst–Pack mesh of k-points [75]. Finally, the study of the partial occupation of electronic states near the Fermi level (SF) was carried out by means of the Methfessel–Paxton method [76]. All the calculations were performed with spin-polarized calculations.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Strucural Parameters

Before beginning the study of the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with and without a vacancy, we first carried out a complete structural optimization of the isolated h-BN monolayer and the isolated graphene. We found that, for the h-BN monolayer, the lattice constant was aBN = 2.5150 Å and the B-N bond length was lB-N = 1.4521 Å, while the lattice constant for the graphene was agra = 2.4630 Å, and the C-C bond length was lC-C = 1.4200 Å. All these values are in excellent agreement with the results of previous theoretical [16,29,30,62,77,78,79,80,81,82] and experimental [1,83,84] investigations.
In order to investigate the effects of the mono-vacancies and co-vacancies of boron and nitrogen on the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of an h-BN)/graphene heterobilayer, initially, we constructed a 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer, which contained 32 atoms of C, 16 atoms of B, and 16 atoms of N.
The 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer exhibits a mismatch of ~1.4%. In this configuration, three types of vertical stacking are considered: in the first stacking, an atom of B is exactly in the center of the graphene hexagon (B-centered); in the second stacking, an atom of N is exactly in the center of the graphene hexagon (N-centered); and, in the third stacking, the centers of the hexagons of h-BN and the graphene coincide, that is, the B and N atoms are exactly over the C atoms (h-centered), as is shown in Figure 1a–c, respectively.
In order to determine the energetically most favorable configuration for the three cases under consideration, we calculate the bond energy in the 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer. The bond energy (which is a measure of the strength of the interlayer interaction in layered materials) is calculated with the following equation [68,77]:
E b = E B N h / g r a p h e n e E B N h f i x E G r a p h e n e f i x A
where E B N h / g r a p h e n e is the total energy of the relaxed h-BN/graphene heterobilayer; E B N h f i x and E g r a p h e n e f i x are the total energies of h-BN and graphene monolayers, respectively. For the calculation of E B N h f i x and E g r a p h e n e f i x , the h-BN and graphene monolayers were maintained fixed in the positions in which they remained in the relaxed heterobilayer. A is the area of the upper horizontal plane of the heterobilayer. In Figure 2, the variation in the bond energy of the 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer is shown as a function of the distance of the interlayer separation D (the distance of the separation between the h-BN monolayer and the graphene) for the three kinds of stacking described in Figure 1. In Figure 2, the energetically most favorable configuration is that which has a nitrogen atom exactly in the center of the graphene hexagon, since this configuration has a minimum energy value (Eb = −23.920 meV/Å), which corresponds to a distance of interlayer separation D = 3.1180. Hereafter, we refer to the energetically most favorable configuration, that is, the one that has a nitrogen atom exactly in the center of the graphene hexagon. This result is in excellent agreement with the results of the studies by Slotman et al. [85] in their investigation of dynamic stability by means of the calculation of phonons and by Giavannetti et al. [86] and Sachs et al. [87] in their studies of the energetic stability of the heterobilayer.
In Table 1, the values for the optimum structural parameters of the constituents that make up this heterobilayer (h-BN and graphene monolayers) are shown, together with the structural parameters of the isolated h-BN and graphene monolayers. It can be seen that, after the coupling process between the monolayers in order to form the N-centered h-BN/graphene heterobilayer, the h-BN contracts, with the decrease in the lattice constant and in the B-N bond length being ~1.11% and 1.12%, respectively, while the graphene expands, with the increase in the lattice constant and the bond length being ~0.98% and ~1.11%, respectively.
In this subsection, the effects of the mono-vacancies of boron (1 VB) and nitrogen (1 VN), and the co-vacancies and simultaneous vacancies of boron and nitrogen (VBN), in an h-BN/graphene heterobilayer, are established. A schematic representation of these isolated defects is shown in Figure 3a–c, respectively. As can be seen, in Figure 3, each atom of B has three atoms of N as first neighbors and vice-versa (each atom of N has three atoms of B as first neighbors). Thus, when a vacancy of B is generated, its first neighbors (each atom of N) remain bonded to the other two atoms of B. Something similar occurs when a vacancy of N is generated: its first neighbor (each atom of B) remains bonded to the other two atoms of N, as shown in Figure 3a,b, respectively. With the aim of analyzing the effects of these vacancies on the bond length of the neighboring atoms of the vacancy, the atoms of B, as well as those of N, are labelled from 1 to 16.
Table 2 shows the B-N bond length (lB-N) and the interfacial distance D of the 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer with mono-vacancy and co-vacancy after the process of structural relaxation is finished. For 1 VB, we found that there exists a contraction of the B-N bond lengths of ~2.46% with respect to the heterobilayer with no vacancy, while, for 1 VN, there exists a slight contraction in the B-N bond lengths, with the maximum contraction being ~0.67%.
For the VBN, it is found that, in both the neighborhood of the B vacancy and in the neighborhood of the N vacancy, there occurs contractions in the B-N bond lengths, with the maximum values being ~3.62% and ~2.22%, respectively.
In relation to the interfacial distance D, we found that, in the heterobilayer with 1 VB, the interfacial distance practically does not undergo any change in the discrepancy with respect to the heterobilayer, with no vacancy being ~0.096%, while, for the heterobilayer with 1 VN, the monolayer of h-BN and the graphene undergo a significant approach, since the interfacial distance undergoes a contraction of ~3.83%.
On the other hand, for 1 VB, it is found that the distance N-N (between the three first neighbors of the B vacancy, atoms labelled with N6, N7, and N11 in Figure 3a) is lN-N = 2.5639 Å, which represents an increase of ~3.08%, with respect to the N-N length (lN-N = 2.4871 Å) in the heterobilayer free of vacancies, while, for 1 VN, the B-B distance (between the three first neighbors of the N vacancy, atoms labelled B2, B6, and B7 in Figure 3b), it is lB-B = 2.3563 Å, which represents a decrease of ~5.26% with respect to the B-B length (lB-B = 2.4871 Å) in the heterobilayer free of vacancies.
In relation to the VBN covacancy, it is found that the N-N bond lengths (atoms labelled N3, N4, and N8 in Figure 3c) and B-B (atoms labelled B6, B7, and B11 in Figure 3c) are lN-N = 2.5366 Å and lB-B = 2.3917 Å, respectively; which corresponds to an increase of ~2.0% in the first case and a decrease of ~3.83% in the second one, compared to the same distances in the heterobilayer free of vacancies.
The increase in the N-N distance and decrease in the B-B distance indicate that the presence of 1 VB and 1 VN and the covacancy VBN induce significant changes in the neighborhood of the vacancy in the structure of the h-BN monolayer. These results are in good agreement with the theoretical work of Huang and Lee [88] in their study of the effects of the B and N mono-vacancies in the hexagonal monolayer of h-BN.
With the aim of making a more complete study of the energy stability of the heterobilayer with B and N mono-vacancies and co-vacancies, we calculated the energy of formation and the work of adhesion. The energy of formation is defined as the energy needed to create the heterobilayer from its corresponding elemental forms. The energy of formation of the heterobilayer was calculated by means of the following equation [89,90,91,92]:
E f = E B N h / g r a f e n o E B N h i s o E g r a f e n o i s o A
where E h B N / g r a p h e n e is the total energy of the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer (FD, 1 VB, 1 VN, and VBN); E B N h i s o and E g r a p h e n e i s o are the total energies of the isolated h-BN monolayer (FD, 1 VB, 1 VN, and VBN) and of isolated graphene monolayer, respectively. A is the area of the heterobilayer.
Additionally, the work of adhesion was calculated, which is defined as the reversible work required to separate the heterobilayer into two free monolayers. In this case, the work of adhesion is defined as a negative value of the energy of formation [89,90], that is, Wad = −Efor. The values of the calculations of the bond energy, the energy of formation, and the work of adhesion for the heterobilayer free of defects, with mono-vacancies, and with B and N co-vacancies are shown in Table 3. In all of these cases, it is found that the energy of formation is negative; therefore, the heterobilayers are energetically stable, from which it can be inferred that they can be grown experimentally (exothermic processes).

3.2. Electronic Properties

To study the electronic properties of the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer free of vacancies, with 1 VB, 1 VN, and co-vacancy VBN, the density of states (DOSs), the band structure (BS), and the distribution of the density electronic charge of Löwdin were calculated. In the calculation of the DOSs and the BS, the Fermi level was chosen as the zero energy.
Figure 4a shows the DOSs and the BS of the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer free of vacancies. The BS (Figure 4a(II)) shows, at first sight, a behavior similar to that of the graphene, since the Dirac cone can be seen at point K, exactly at the Fermi level. This result is in excellent agreement with previous reports [90]. However, upon examining the BS exactly at the Fermi level, point K (Figure 4a(III)), it can be seen that the valence and conduction bands do not touch, that is, a finite band gap of 0.0748 eV = 74.8 meV appears. The value of this band gap is in good agreement with other values reported in the literature [93,94]. This band gap appears in the graphene due to the fact that the atoms of C interact with the non-homogeneous distribution of the charge density of the h-BN, making the C atoms non-equivalent, as the authors of references [93,94] explain in detail. Furthermore, in Figure 4a(I), it is shown that the contribution to the DOSs mainly comes from the p orbitals of the B, N, and C atoms. Finally, from Figure 4a(I), it is established that the heterobilayer free of defects does not possess magnetic properties, which is inferred from the symmetry of the states with spin up and spin down.
Figure 4b shows the DOSs and the BS of the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with 1 VB. The BS (Figure 4b(II)) shows, at first sight, a behavior similar to that of the graphene, since the Dirac cone can be seen at point K, near the Fermi level. However, after closer inspection of the BS near the Fermi level, point K (Figure 4b(III)), it can be seen that there is a separation between the valence and the conduction bands, where a finite band gap of 0.0433 eV = 43.3 meV appears. Furthermore, in Figure 4bI, it is shown that the heterobilayer exhibits a half-metallic behavior. From Figure 4bI, it is established that the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with 1 VB has magnetic properties, which can be inferred from the asymmetry of the states with spin up and spin down of the valence band. The h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with 1 VB acquires its magnetic properties mainly from the 2 p orbitals of the three N atoms that are bonded to the B atom that was removed in order to generate the vacancy. The value of the magnetic moment of the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with 1 VB is ~2.00 µβ/cell. The magnetic properties acquired by the heterobilayer through the boron vacancy open the door for the heterobilayer to be used in potential spintronic applications.
Figure 4c shows the DOSs and the BS of the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with 1 VN. The BS (Figure 4c(II)), shows, at first sight, a significant separation of the Dirac cones at point K, near the Fermi level. After zooming in on the BS near the Fermi level, point K (Figure 4c(III)), a separation between the valence and the conduction bands can be seen, where a finite band gap of 0.1540 eV = 154.0 meV appears. The value of the band gap is approximately twice that of the heterobilayer free of defects. This increase in the finite band gap of the graphene in the heterobilayer represents a great improvement, since it favors the applications of the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with 1 VN in micro- and nano-electronic devices. In addition, the mono-vacancy of N in the heterobilayer does not induce magnetic effects in the hetero bilayer, which is verified by the symmetry of the density of states with spin up and spin down of the DOSs (Figure 4c(I)).
Figure 4d shows the DOSs and the BS of the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with VBN co-vacancies. The BS (Figure 4d(II)) shows, at first sight, a behavior similar to that of the graphene, since the Dirac cone can be seen at point K, near the Fermi level. However, after examining the BS near the Fermi level, point K (Figure 4b(III)), it can be seen that the valence and the conduction bands do not touch; that is, a separation of the Dirac cones occurs, and a finite band gap of 0.0592 eV = 59.2 meV, appears. Furthermore, in Figure 4d(I), it is shown that the heterobilayer exhibits a half-metallic behavior. From Figure 4d(I), it is established that the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with a VBN co-vacancy has magnetic properties, which is inferred from the asymmetry of the states with spun up and spin down of the valence band. The h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with VBN co-vacancy acquires its magnetic properties mainly from the 2 p orbitals of the three N atoms that are bonded to the B atom that was removed in order to generate the vacancy. The value of the magnetic moment of the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with co-vacancy VBN is ~2.00 µβ/cell. The magnetic properties acquired by the heterobilayer through the boron and nitrogen co-vacancy open the door for potential applications in spintronics.
In order to complete the analysis of the effect of the mono-vacancies and co-vacancies of boron and nitrogen on the electronic properties of the heterobilayer, we calculated the total electronic charge distribution and per Löwdin orbital of the atoms in the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer free of defects, with a B vacancy (1 VB), with an N vacancy (1 VN), and with a co-vacancy of nitrogen and boron (VBN). The results are shown in Table 4 and Figure 5 (distribution of the electronic charge density). As can be seen in the scale of colors of Figure 5, blue indicates a great electronic charge density in these regions; therefore, the N atoms possess a greater charge density than the B atoms in the heterobilayer. This result is confirmed by the total Löwdin charge per N atom, listed in Table 4. It can be seen in Table 4 that, when a boron vacancy is generated (1 VB) in the heterobilayer, there is a slight decrease in the total Löwdin charge in the neighboring atoms of the vacancy (nitrogen N6, N7, and N11; Figure 3a); on the other hand, due to the greater negative charge density of these three nitrogen atoms, together with the absence of the B atom, the repulsion between them shoots up, which explains the increase in the N-N separation distance between the N6, N7, and N11 atoms of ~3.08%. In addition, the calculations of the Löwdin charge density per orbital for the N6, N7, and N11 atoms show that the s-N electronic orbitals undergo, on average, an increase in the electronic charge of 0.116 e/Bohr3, while the p-N orbitals undergo, on average, a decrease in the electronic charge of 0.237 e/Bohr3. This last result is coherent with the appearance of the peaks with spin down associated mainly with the p-N states and p-B in minor contribution in the DOSs (Figure 4b(I)). The ~2.00 µβ/cell magnetic moment induced by the B mono-vacancy is associated with the redistribution and transfer of charge from the graphene to the h-BN monolayer. This result is in excellent agreement with the calculations by Park et al. [95], where a detailed explanation of this charge transfer is given.
In the same way, in Figure 5b, a contour map of the distribution of the electronic charge density associated with the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with 1 VB, significant changes can be seen in the forms of the electronic densities associated with the first-neighbor atoms (N6, N7, and N11) of the boron vacancy.
It can be seen in Table 4 that, when a nitrogen mono-vacancy (1 VN) is generated in the heterobilayer, there is a slight increase in the total Löwdin charge in the neighbor atoms of the vacancy (atoms B2, B6, and B7 Figure 3b). However, in spite of this slight charge increase, atoms B2, B6, and B7 experience an attraction, which explains the reduction in the B-B distances between atoms B2, B6, and B7 of 5.26%. Furthermore, as is shown in Table 4, the calculations of the Löwdin charge density per orbital for atoms B3, B6, and B7 show that the s-B electronic orbitals experience, on average, a decrease in the electronic charge of 0.083 e/Bohr3, while the p-B orbitals experience, on average, an increase in the electronic charge C. This last result is coherent with the appearance of the peaks associate with the p-B states, near the Fermi level in the DOSs (Figure 4c(I)).
Finally, it can be seen in Table 4 that, when a co-vacancy of boron and nitrogen (VBN) is generated in the heterobilayer, a behavior similar to that described for the mono-vacancies B and N is found. For the atoms B6, B10, and B11 (neighbors of the nitrogen vacancy 1 VN), the total Löwdin charge undergoes, on average, an increase of 0.104 e/Bohr3, the average increase in the Löwdin charge (per orbital) in the orbitals s-B and p-B are 0.087 e/Bohr3 and 0.017 e/Bohr3, respectively, while, in the atoms N3, N4, and N8 (neighbors of 1 VB), the total Löwdin charge undergoes, on average, a decrease of 0.091 e/Bohr3.
The calculation of the Löwdin charge density (per orbital) shows that the s-N orbitals of atoms N3, N4, and N8 present an average increase of 0.017 e/Bohr3, while the p-N orbitals of the atoms N3, N4, and N8 experience an average decrease of 0.198 e/Bohr3. These results are coherent with the contour map of Figure 5d, which shows the changes in the forms of the electronic densities associated with atoms B2, B6, B7, N3, N4, and N8, respectively.

4. Conclusions

The effects of mono-vacancies and co-vacancies of B and N on the energetics and electronic properties of the 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer were investigated using the GGA-PBE-D2 generalized gradient approximation and atomic pseudopotentials. Initially, from the calculations of the energetics, it was established that the heterobilayers’ FD, with boron vacancy 1 VB, nitrogen vacancy 1 VN, and co-vacancy of boron and nitrogen VBN, are energetically stable. Furthermore, it was found that the inclusion of 1 VB and 1 VN in the 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer induces slight structural changes in the distance between the monolayers of 4 × 4-(h-BN) and 4 × 4-graphene and in the bond length (B-N, B-B, and N-N) of the neighbor atoms of the 1 VB and 1 VN, respectively.
From the analysis of the Löwdin charge transfer for the 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-grafene heterobilayers’ FD and with 1 VB, 1 VN, and VBN, it was established that this type of point defect generates significant changes in the distribution of the Löwdin charge in the first-neighbor atoms of the VB and VN, respectively; these local zones are converted into chemically active regions that could favor interaction between the surfaces of these heterobilayers with external atoms and/or molecules.
From the analysis of the density of states and the band structure, it was established that the inclusion of 1 VB and 1 VBN in the 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer induces, in both cases, a half-metallic and magnetic behavior in this heterobilayer, from which it is inferred that the la 4 × 4-(h-BN)/4 × 4-graphene heterobilayer could be used in spintronic applications.

Author Contributions

G.C.J., J.D.M.-N., C.O.-L., F.P.B. and M.J.E.-R. performed computational calculations, G.C.J., C.O.-L. and M.J.E.-R. carried out the analysis of the data obtained, writing the manuscript and validation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universidad de Córdoba located in Montería Colombia, project number FCB-07-19.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data obtained in this research are unpublished and are not listed in any databases.

Acknowledgments

The GAMASCO (Grupo Avanzado de Materiales y Sistemas Complejos) group would like to thank Universidad de Córdoba for their financial support through the FCB-07-19 project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jiao, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Diankov, G.; Dai, H. Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes. Nature 2009, 458, 877–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Han, M.Y.; Özyilmaz, B.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, P. Energy band-gap engineering of graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 206805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Son, Y.W.; Cohen, M.L.; Louie, S.G. Energy Gaps in Graphene Nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 216803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Park, C.-H.; Louie, S.G. Tunable Excitons in Biased Bilayer Graphen. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guo, H.; Zhang, R.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Lu, H.; Qian, K.; Li, G.; Huang, L.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; et al. Sizable Band Gap in Epitaxial Bilayer Graphene Induced by Silicene Intercalation. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 2674–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, G.; Luican, A.; Lopes dos Santos, J.M.B.; Castro Neto, A.H.; Reina, A.; Kong, J.; Andrei, E.Y. Observation of Van Hove singularities in twisted graphene layers. Nat. Phys. 2010, 6, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, Y.; Chen, W.; Feng, Y.; He, P. Tuning the electronic structure of graphene by an organic molecule. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, M.; Tang, W.; Ren, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.; Yu, J.; Du, Y.; Hao, Y. Electronic and magnetic behaviors of graphene with 5d series transition metal atom substitutions: A first-principles study. Physica E 2016, 80, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, M.; Ren, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Chou, J.P.; Yu, J.; Tang, W. Electronic and magnetic properties of 4d series transition metal substituted graphene: A first-principles study. Carbon 2017, 120, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McChesney, J.L.; Bostwick, A.; Ohta, T.; Seyller, T.; Horn, K.; González, J.; Rotenberg, E. Extended van hove singularity and superconducting instability in doped graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 136803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gui, G.; Li, J.; Zhong, J. Band structure engineering of graphene by strain: First principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 075435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Balog, R.; Jørgensen, B.; Nilsson, L.; Andersen, M.; Rienks, E.; Bianchi, M.; Fanetti, M.; Lægsgaard, E.; Baraldi, A.; Lizzit, S.; et al. Bandgap opening in graphene induced by patterned hydrogen adsorption. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shemella, P.; Nayak, S.K. Electronic structure and band-gap modulation of graphene via substrate surface chemistry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 032101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, S.Y.; Gweon, G.-H.; Fedorov, A.V.; First, P.N.; de Heer, W.A.; Lee, D.-H.; Guinea, F.; Castro Neto, A.H.; Lanzara, A. Substrate-induced bandgap opening in epitaxial graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 770–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Espitia-Rico, M.; Rodríguez-Martínez, J.A.; Moreno-Armenta, M.G.; Takeichi, N. Graphene monolayers on GaN(0001). Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 326, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Britnell, L.; Ribeiro, R.; Eckmann, A.; Jalil, R.; Belle, B.; Mishchenko, A.; Kim, Y.; Gorbachev, R.; Georgiou, T.; Morozov, S.; et al. Strong Light-Matter Interactions in Heterostructures of Atomically Thin Films. Science 2013, 340, 1311–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Geim, A.K.; Grigorieva, I.V. Van der Waals Heterostructures. Nature 2013, 499, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gong, Y.; Lin, J.; Wang, X.; Shi, G.; Lei, S.; Lin, Z.; Zou, X.; Ye, G.; Vajtai, R.; Yakobson, B.I.; et al. Vertical and In-Plane Heterostructures from WS2/MoS2 Monolayers. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 1135–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bonaccorso, F.; Colombo, L.; Yu, G.; Stoller, M.; Tozzini, V.; Ferrari, A.C.; Ruoff, R.S.; Pellegrini, V. Graphene, Related Two-Dimensional Crystals, and Hybrid Systems for Energy Conversion and Storage. Science 2015, 347, 1246501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, X.; Xia, F. Stacked 2D Materials Shed Light. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 264–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, J.; Kumar, N.; Bellus, M.; Chiu, H.; He, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H. Electron Transfer and Coupling in Graphene-Tungsten Disulfide van der Waals Heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tang, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, Z. Graphene-Related Nanomaterials: Tuning Properties by Functionalization. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4541–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xu, P.; Tang, Q.; Zhou, Z. Structural and Electronic Properties of Graphene−ZnO Interfaces: Dispersion-Corrected Density Functional Theory Investigations. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 305401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Padilha, J.; Fazzio, A.; da Silva, A. van der Waals Heterostructure of Phosphorene and Graphene: Tuning the Schottky Barrier and Doping by Electrostatic Gating. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 066803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huang, X.; Tan, C.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, H. 25th Anniversary Article: Hybrid Nanostructures Based on Two Dimensional Nanomaterials. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2185–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, H.; Du, X.; Ding, S.; Wang, Q.; Chang, L.; Ma, X.; Xiaogang, M.; Pen, C. DFT calculations of the synergistic effect of λ-MnO2/graphene composites for electrochemical adsorption of lithium ions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 8133–8140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, S.; Fan, K.; Wu, M.; Yin, G. Two-dimensional MnO2/graphene hybrid nanostructures as anode for lithium ion batteries. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2016, 30, 1650208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Casiano-Jiménez, G.; Ortega-López, C.; Rodríguez-Martínez, J.A.; Moreno-Armenta, M.G.; Espitia-Rico, M.J. Electronic Structure of Graphene on the Hexagonal Boron Nitride Surface: A Density Functional Theory Study. Coatings 2022, 12, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Morinson-Negrete, J.D.; Ortega-López, C.; Espitia-Rico, M.J. Effects of Mono-Vacancies of Oxygen and Manganese on the Properties of the MnO2/Graphene Heterostructure. Materials 2022, 15, 2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Withers, F.; Del Pozo-Zamudio, O.; Mishchenko, A.; Rooney, A.; Gholinia, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Haigh, S.J.; Geim, A.K.; Tartakovskii, A.I.; et al. Light-Emitting Diodes by Band-Structure Engineering in van der Waals Heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Deng, J.; Wang, X.; Duan, X.; Liu, P. Facile Preparation of MnO2/Graphene Nanocomposites with Spent Battery Powder for Electrochemical Energy Storage. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1330–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peng, L.; Peng, X.; Liu, B.; Wu, C.; Xie, Y.; Yu, G. For high-performance, flexible planar supercapacitors. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 2151–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nair, R.R.; Tsai, I.-L.; Sepioni, M.; Lehtinen, O.; Keinonen, J.; Krasheninnikov, A.V.; Castro Neto, A.H.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Geim, A.K.; Grigoriev, I.V. Dual origin of defect magnetism in graphene and its reversible switching by molecular doping. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Taychatanapat, T.; Wang, H.; Hsu, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; Palacio, T. BN/Graphene/BN Transistors for RF Applications. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2011, 32, 1209–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sata, Y.; Moriya, R.; Morikawa, S.; Yabuki, N.; Masubuchi, S.; Machida, T. Electric field modulation of Schottky barrier height in graphene/MoSe2 van der Waals heterointerface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 023109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, H.; Wu, J.; Feng, Q.; Mao, N.; Wang, C.; Zhang, J. High responsivity and gate tunable graphene-MoS2 hybrid phototransistor. Small 2014, 10, 2300–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; He, D.; Ma, F.; Fu, Q.; Hu, Y. An amperometric glucose biosensor based on a MnO2/graphene composite modified electrode. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 18654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lu, R.; Liu, J.; Luo, H.; Chikan, V.; Wu, J.Z. Graphene/gase-nanosheet hybrid: Towards high gain and fast photoresponse. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nguyen, C.V.; Hieu, N.N.; Poklonski, N.A.; Ilyasov, V.V.; Dinh, L.; Phong, T.C.; Tung, L.V.; Phuc, H.V. Magneto-optical transport properties of monolayer MoS2 on polar substrates. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 125411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kim, W.; Li, C.; Chaves, F.A.; Jiménez, D.; Rodriguez, R.D.; Susoma, J.; Fenner, M.A.; Lipsanen, H.; Riikonen, J. Tunable graphene-gase dual heterojunction device. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1845–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xue, J.; Sanchez-Yamagishi, J.; Bulmash, D.; Jacquod, P.; Deshpande, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; LeRoy, B.J. Scanning tunnelling microscopy and spectroscopy of ultra-flat graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Nat Mater. 2011, 10, 282–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sun, M.; Chou, J.-P.; Ren, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, J.; Tang, W. Tunable Schottky barrier in van der Waals heterostructures of graphene and g-GaN. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 173105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fan, Y.; Zhao, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H. Tunable electronic structures of graphene/boron nitride heterobilayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 083103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kaloni, T.P.; Cheng, Y.C.; Schwingenschlögl, U. Electronic structure of superlattices of graphene and hexagonal boron nitride. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 919–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Şahin, H.; Cahangirov, s.; Topsakal, M.; Bekaroglu, E.; Akturk, E.; Senger, R.T.; Ciraci, S. Monolayer honeycomb structures of group-IV elements and III-V binary compounds: First-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wei, Z.-X.; Liu, G.-B. First-principles studies of graphene antidot lattices on monolayer h-BN substrate. Phys. Lett. A 2019, 383, 125944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peng, Q.; Zamiri, A.R.; Ji, W.; De, S. Elastic Properties of Hybrid Graphene/Boron Nitride Monolayer. Acta Mech. 2012, 223, 2591–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Abergel, D.S.L.; Wallbank, J.R.; Chen, X.; Mucha-Kruczynski, M.; Fal’ko, V.I. Infrared absorption by graphene–hBN heterostructures. New J. Phys. 2013, 15, 123009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ding, N.; Lei, Y.; Chen, X.; Deng, Z.; Ng, S.-P.; Wu, C.-M.L. Structures and electronic properties of vacancies at the interface of hybrid graphene/hexagonal boron nitride sheet. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2016, 117, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Behera, H.; Mukhopadhyay, G. Strain-tunable band gap in graphene/h-BN hetero-bilayer. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2012, 73, 818–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jung, J.; DaSilva, A.; MacDonald, A.S. Origin of band gaps in graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kharche, N.; Nayak, S.K. Quasiparticle Band Gap Engineering of Graphene and Graphone on Hexagonal Boron Nitride Substrate. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5274–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jung, S.; Park, M.; Park, J.; Jeong, T.-Y.; Kim, H.-J.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Ha, D.H.; Hwang, C.; Kim, Y.-S. Vibrational Properties of h-BN and h-BN-Graphene Heterostructures Probed by Inelastic Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, Q.; Wongwiriyapan, W.; Park, J.-H.; Park, S.; Jung, S.J.; Jeong, T.; Lee, S.; Lee, Y.H.; Song, Y.J. In situ chemical vapor deposition of graphene and hexagonal boron nitride heterostructures. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2016, 16, 1117–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, G.-H.; Yu, Y.-J.; Cui, X.; Petrone, N.; Lee, C.-H.; Choi, M.S.; Lee, D.-Y.; Lee, C.; Yoo, W.Y.; Watanabe, K.; et al. Flexible and Transparent MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors on Hexagonal Boron Nitride-Graphene Heterostructures. ACS Nano. 2013, 7, 7931–7936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kareekunnan, A.; Muruganathan, M.; Mizuta, H. Manipulating Berry curvature in hBN/bilayer graphene commensurate heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 195406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kuiri, M.; Srivastav, S.K.; Ray, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Das, T.; Das, A. Enhanced electron-phonon coupling in doubly aligned hexagonal boron nitride bilayer graphene heterostructure. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 115419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhao, Y.; Wan, Z.; Xu, X.; Patil, S.R.; Hetmaniuk, U.; Anantram, M.P. Negative Differential Resistance in Boron Nitride Graphene Heterostructures: Physical Mechanisms and Size Scaling Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Siegel, G.; Grzybowski, G.; Prusnick, T.; Snure, M. Single process CVD growth of hBN/Graphene heterostructures on copper thin films. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 4233–4240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pennachio, D.; Ornelas-Skarin, C.C.; Wilson, N.S.; Rosenberg, S.G.; Daniels, K.M.; Myers-Ward, R.L.; Gaskill, K.; Eddy Jr, C.R.; Palmstrøm, C.J. Tailoring commensurability of hBN/graphene heterostructures using substrate morphology and epitaxial growth conditions. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2019, 37, 051503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Phama, K.D.; Nguyen, C.V. First principles calculations of the geometric structures and electronic properties of van der Waals heterostructure based on graphene, hexagonal boron nitride and molybdenum diselenide. Diamond Relat. Mater. 2018, 88, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yankowitz, M.; Ma, Q.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; LeRoy, B.J. van der Waals heterostructures combining graphene and hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2019, 1, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dean, C.R.; Young, A.F.; Meric, I.; Lee, C.; Wang, L.; Sorgenfrei, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kim, P.; Shepard, K.L.; et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nature Nanotech. 2010, 5, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zomer, P.J.; Dash, S.P.; Tombros, N.; van Wees, B.J. A transfer technique for high mobility graphene devices on commercially available hexagonal boron nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 232104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lee, K.H.; Shin, H.-J.; Lee, J.; Lee, I.-y.; Kim, G.-H.; Choi, J.-Y.; Kim, S.W. Large-Scale Synthesis of High Quality Hexagonal Boron Nitride Nanosheets for Large-Area Graphene Electronics. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 714–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lu, J.; Gomes, L.C.; Nunes, R.W.; Castro Neto, A.H.; Loh, K.P. Lattice Relaxation at the Interface of Two-Dimensional Crystals: Graphene and Hexagonal Boron-Nitride. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 5133–5139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ferdous, N.; Islam, M.S.; Park, J.; Hashimoto, A. Tunable electronic properties in stanene and two dimensional siliconcarbide heterobilayer: A first principles investigation. AIP Adv. 2019, 9, 025120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. B 1964, 36, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kohn, W.; Sham, L. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. A 1965, 140, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Giannozzi, P.; Baroni, S.; Bonini, N.; Calandra, M.; Car, R.; Cavazzoni, C.; Ceresoli, D.; Chiarotti, G.L.; Cococcioni, M.; Dabo, I.; et al. QUANTUM Espresso: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2009, 21, 395502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Giannozzi, P.; Andreussi, O.; Brumme, T.; Bunau, O.; Nardelli, M.; Calandra, M.; Baroni, S. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2017, 29, 465901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, S. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104–154119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Monkhorst, H.; Pack, J. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Methfessel, M.; Paxton, A.T. High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys. Rev. B 1989, 40, 3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Peng, Q.; Wang, Z.; Sa, B.; Wu, B.; Sun, Z. Electronic structures and enhanced optical properties of blue phosphorene/transition metal dichalcogenides van der Waals heterostructures. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Neupane, H.K.; Adhikari, N.P. Effect of vacancy defects in 2D vdW graphene/h-BN heterostructure: First-principles study. Advances 2021, 11, 085218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Björkman, T.; Gulans, A.; Krasheninnikov, A.V.; Rieminen, R.M. van derWaals Bonding in Layered Compounds from Advanced Density-Functional. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 235502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Humanez-Tobar, Á; Murillo, J.F.; Ortega-López, C.; Rodríguez-Mateínez, J.A.; Espitia-Rico, M.J. Study of the structural and electronic properties of three- and two-dimensional transition-metal dioxides using first-principles calculations. Comput. Condens. Matter. 2020, 25, e00498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fujimoto, Y.; Koretsune, T.; Saito, S. Electronic structures of hexagonal boron-nitride monolayer: Strain-induced effects. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2014, 122, 346–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chigo-Anota, E.; Escobedo-Morales, A.; Salazar-Villanueva, M.; Vázquez-Cuchillo, o.; Rubio-Rosas, E. On the influence of point defects on the structural and electronic properties of graphene-like sheets: A molecular simulation study. J. Mol. Model. 2013, 19, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Jin, C.; Lin, F.; Suenaga, K.; Iijima, S. Fabrication of a Freestanding Boron Nitride Single Layer and Its Defect Assignments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 195505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Caldwell, J.D.; Aharonovich, I.; Cassabois, G.; Basov, D.N. Photonics with hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 552–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Slotman, G.J.; de-Wijs, G.A.; Fasolino, A.; Katsnelson, M.I. Phonons and electron-phonon coupling in graphene-h-BN heterostructures. Ann. Phys. 2014, 526, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Giovannetti, G.; Khomyakov, P.A.; Brocks, G.; Kelly, P.J.; van-den Brink, J. Substrate-induced band gap in graphene on hexagonal boron nitride: Ab initio density functional calculations. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 073103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sachs, B.; Wehling, T.O.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Lichtenstein, A.I. Adhesion and electronic structure of graphene on hexagonal boron nitride substrates. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 195414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Huang, B.; Lee, H. Defect and impurity properties of hexagonal boron nitride: A first-principles calculation. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 245406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Berrio, G.; Murillo, J.F.; Ortega, C.; Rodriguez, J.A.; Espitia, M.J. Adsorption effect of a chromium atom on the structure and electronic, properties of a single ZnO monolayer. Physica B Condens. Matter. 2019, 565, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fan, Y.; Ma, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, J.; Ai, H.; Zhao, M. Theoretical Design of an InSe/GaTe vdW Heterobilayer: A Potential Visible-Light Photocatalyst for Water Splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 27803–27810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shi, Z.; Shao, W.; Hu, T.; Zhao, C.; Xing, X.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Q. Adhesive sliding and interfacial property of YAlO3/TiC interface: A first principles investigation. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 805, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, C.; Wang, C.-Y. Ni/Ni3Al interface: A density functional theory study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 3669–3675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mao, Y.; Xie, Z.; Yuan, J.; Li, S.; Wei, Z.; Zhong, J. Structure and electronic properties of Au intercalated hexagonal, boron-nitride/graphene bilayer. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2013, 49, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhong, X.; Yap, Y.K.; Pandey, R.; Karna, S.P. First-principles study of strain-induced modulation of energy gaps of graphene/BN and BN bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 193403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Park, S.; Park, C.; Kim, G. Interlayer coupling enhancement in graphene/hexagonal boron nitride heterostructures by intercalated defects or vacancies. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 134706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (4 × 4) BN-h (4 × 4)/graphene heterostructure (a) B-centered stacking, (b) N-centered stacking, and (c) h-centered stacking.
Figure 1. (4 × 4) BN-h (4 × 4)/graphene heterostructure (a) B-centered stacking, (b) N-centered stacking, and (c) h-centered stacking.
Materials 15 06369 g001
Figure 2. Bond energy (Eb) vs. interfacial distance (D) for the vertical stacking h-BN/graphene heterobilayers; B-centered stacking (blue line and crosses), N-centered stacking (red line and squares), and h-centered stacking (black line and points).
Figure 2. Bond energy (Eb) vs. interfacial distance (D) for the vertical stacking h-BN/graphene heterobilayers; B-centered stacking (blue line and crosses), N-centered stacking (red line and squares), and h-centered stacking (black line and points).
Materials 15 06369 g002
Figure 3. h-BN(4 × 4)/graphene (4 × 4) heterobilayer (a) 1 VB, (b) 1 VN, and (c) VBN, respectively.
Figure 3. h-BN(4 × 4)/graphene (4 × 4) heterobilayer (a) 1 VB, (b) 1 VN, and (c) VBN, respectively.
Materials 15 06369 g003
Figure 4. The BE and DOSs of the heterobilayer (a) without vacancy, (b) 1 VB, (c) 1 VN, and (d) co-vacancy VBN, respectively.
Figure 4. The BE and DOSs of the heterobilayer (a) without vacancy, (b) 1 VB, (c) 1 VN, and (d) co-vacancy VBN, respectively.
Materials 15 06369 g004
Figure 5. Contour maps of the electronic density of the heterobilayer (a) without vacancy, (b) 1 VB, (c) 1 VN, and (d) co-vacancy VBN, respectively.
Figure 5. Contour maps of the electronic density of the heterobilayer (a) without vacancy, (b) 1 VB, (c) 1 VN, and (d) co-vacancy VBN, respectively.
Materials 15 06369 g005
Table 1. Optimum structural parameters for the h-BN and graphene monolayers obtained in the N-centered h-BN/graphene heterobilayer and optimum structural parameters for the isolated h-BN and isolated graphene monolayers.
Table 1. Optimum structural parameters for the h-BN and graphene monolayers obtained in the N-centered h-BN/graphene heterobilayer and optimum structural parameters for the isolated h-BN and isolated graphene monolayers.
a (Å)lB-N (Å)lC-C (Å)
h-BN in heterobilayer2.48711.4357-
Graphene in heterobilayer2.4870-1.4359
Isolated h-BN 2.51501.4521-
Isolated graphene 2.4630-1.4200
Table 2. Principal structural parameters measured in Å: BN bond lengths ( l N i B j ) and interfacial distances (D). The labels i and j correspond to the neighbor atoms of the vacancies. The prime superscripts (′) correspond to the images of the atoms.
Table 2. Principal structural parameters measured in Å: BN bond lengths ( l N i B j ) and interfacial distances (D). The labels i and j correspond to the neighbor atoms of the vacancies. The prime superscripts (′) correspond to the images of the atoms.
Heterostructure VB l B 2 N 6 (Å) l B 6 N 6 (Å) l B 11 N 11 (Å) l B 12 N 12 (Å) l B 3 N 7 (Å) l B 8 N 7 D (Å)
1.4003 1.4003 1.4003 1.4003 1.4003 1.4003 3.1150
Heterostructure VN l B 2 N 1 (Å) l B 2 N 2 (Å) l B 6 N 5 (Å) l B 6 N 10 (Å) l B 7 N 7 (Å) l B 7 N 11 (Å)D (Å)
1.4265 1.4264 1.4263 1.4261 1.4266 1.4267 2.9986
Heterostructure VBN l B 16 N 4 (Å) l B 1 N 4 Å l B 15 N 3 (Å) l B 3 N 3 (Å) l B 8 N 8 (Å) l B 5 N 8 (Å)D (Å)
Neighbors a VB 1.4025 1.4025 1.3837 1.3978 1.3978 1.3837 3.1203
l B 6 N 5 (Å) l B 6 N 6 (Å) l B 10 N 9 (Å) l B 10 N 14 (Å) l B 11 N 15 (Å) l B 11 N 11 (Å)D (Å)
Neighbors a VN 1.4038 1.4173 1.4133 1.4133 1.4038 1.4173 3.1100
Table 3. Energetics in the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer, FD, and with 1 VB, 1 VN, and VBN, respectively. The energy is given in units of meV/   Å 2 .
Table 3. Energetics in the h-BN/graphene heterobilayer, FD, and with 1 VB, 1 VN, and VBN, respectively. The energy is given in units of meV/   Å 2 .
Energetics E b   ( meV /   Å 2 ) Ef  ( meV /   Å 2 ) Wsep   ( meV /   Å 2 )
Heterobilayer FD 23.92 21.00 21.00
Heterobilayer VB 25.43 22.17 22.17
Heterobilayer VN 29.59 29.95 29.95
Heterobilayer VBN 24.46 22.81 22.81
Table 4. Electronic charge per Löwdin orbital (measured in units of electrons e/Bohr3) h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with vacancy and without 1 VB, 1 VN, and VBN, where Qt is total charge, Qs is the charge in the s orbital, and Qp is the total charge in the p orbital.
Table 4. Electronic charge per Löwdin orbital (measured in units of electrons e/Bohr3) h-BN/graphene heterobilayer with vacancy and without 1 VB, 1 VN, and VBN, where Qt is total charge, Qs is the charge in the s orbital, and Qp is the total charge in the p orbital.
AtomsWithout Vacancy1 VB1 VNVNB
QtQsQpQtQsQpQtQsQpQtQsΔQp
B12.5240.6111.9132.5360.6131.9232.5160.6021.9142.5410.6121.929
B22.5240.6111.9132.5530.6091.9442.6500.6941.9562.5180.6141.904
B32.5240.6111.9132.5530.6091.9442.5160.6031.9132.5420.6071.935
B42.5240.6111.9132.5360.6131.9232.5160.6061.910------------
B52.5240.6111.9132.5330.6131.9202.5090.6121.8972.5450.6021.943
B62.5240.6111.9132.5530.6091.9442.6490.6941.9552.6300.6981.932
B72.5240.6111.913------------2.6500.6941.9562.5190.6031.916
B82.5240.6111.9132.5530.6091.9442.5090.6121.8972.5420.6071.935
B92.5240.6111.9132.5330.6091.9242.5080.6091.8992.5170.6141.903
B102.5240.6111.9132.5330.6091.9242.5090.6121.8972.6230.6981.925
B112.5240.6111.9132.5530.6091.9442.5160.6031.9132.6300.6981.932
B122.5240.6111.9132.5530.6091.9442.5090.6121.8972.5180.6141.904
B132.5240.6111.9132.5330.6131.9202.5090.6121.8972.5180.6111.907
B142.5240.6111.9132.5330.6091.9242.5090.6121.8972.5170.6141.903
B152.5240.6111.9132.5330.6131.9202.5160.6061.9102.5450.6021.943
B162.5240.6111.9132.5360.6131.9232.5160.6061.9102.5410.6121.929
N15.4211.1944.2275.4101.2044.2065.3971.1974.2005.4081.1994.209
N25.4211.1944.2275.4181.1954.2235.3981.1974.2015.4151.2024.213
N35.4211.1944.2275.4101.2044.2065.4151.1894.2265.3321.2994.033
N45.4211.1944.2275.4101.1994.2115.4151.1894.2265.3261.3044.022
N55.4211.1944.2275.4101.2044.2065.3981.1974.2005.4031.2014.202
N65.4211.1944.2275.3041.3103.994------------5.4051.1974.208
N75.4211.1944.2275.2951.3103.9855.3981.1984.2005.4211.1924.229
N85.4211.1944.2275.4101.2044.2065.4141.1944.2205.3321.2994.032
N95.4211.1944.2275.4171.1954.2225.4081.1914.2175.3991.2054.194
N105.4211.1944.2275.4181.1954.2235.3971.1974.200------------
N115.4211.1944.2275.2971.3103.9875.3971.1974.2005.4051.1974.208
N125.4211.1944.2275.4181.1954.2225.4081.1914.2175.4151.2024.213
N135.4211.1944.2275.4181.1954.2235.4081.1914.2175.4101.1944.216
N145.4211.1944.2275.4171.1954.2225.4141.1944.2205.3991.2054.194
N155.4211.1944.2275.4101.2044.2065.4151.1894.2265.4031.2014.202
N165.4211.1944.2275.4101.2044.2065.4141.1944.2205.4081.1994.209
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiménez, G.C.; Morinson-Negrete, J.D.; Blanquicett, F.P.; Ortega-López, C.; Espitia-Rico, M.J. Effects of Mono-Vacancies and Co-Vacancies of Nitrogen and Boron on the Energetics and Electronic Properties of Heterobilayer h-BN/graphene. Materials 2022, 15, 6369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186369

AMA Style

Jiménez GC, Morinson-Negrete JD, Blanquicett FP, Ortega-López C, Espitia-Rico MJ. Effects of Mono-Vacancies and Co-Vacancies of Nitrogen and Boron on the Energetics and Electronic Properties of Heterobilayer h-BN/graphene. Materials. 2022; 15(18):6369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186369

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiménez, Gladys Casiano, Juan David Morinson-Negrete, Franklin Peniche Blanquicett, César Ortega-López, and Miguel J. Espitia-Rico. 2022. "Effects of Mono-Vacancies and Co-Vacancies of Nitrogen and Boron on the Energetics and Electronic Properties of Heterobilayer h-BN/graphene" Materials 15, no. 18: 6369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186369

APA Style

Jiménez, G. C., Morinson-Negrete, J. D., Blanquicett, F. P., Ortega-López, C., & Espitia-Rico, M. J. (2022). Effects of Mono-Vacancies and Co-Vacancies of Nitrogen and Boron on the Energetics and Electronic Properties of Heterobilayer h-BN/graphene. Materials, 15(18), 6369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186369

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop