Next Article in Journal
PbS and PbO Thin Films via E-Beam Evaporation: Morphology, Structure, and Electrical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Internal Defects on the Fatigue Behavior of Additive Manufactured Metal Components: A Comparison between Ti6Al4V and Inconel 718
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 19
10.3390/ma15196883
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Flexible Perfluoropolyethers-Functionalized CNTs-Based UHMWPE Composites: A Study on Hydrogen Evolution, Conductivity and Thermal Stability

by
Maurizio Sansotera
1,2,*,
Valeria Marona
1,2,
Piergiorgio Marziani
1,
Nadka Tzankova Dintcheva
3,4,
Elisabetta Morici
3,5,
Rossella Arrigo
3,4,
Gianlorenzo Bussetti
6,
Walter Navarrini
1,2 and
Luca Magagnin
1,2
1
Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica, Politecnico di Milano, Via Mancinelli 7, 20131 Milan, Italy
2
Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali (UdR-PoliMi), Via G. Giusti, 9, 50121 Firenze, Italy
3
Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 6, 90128 Palermo, Italy
4
Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali (UdR-Palermo), Via G. Giusti, 9, 50121 Firenze, Italy
5
Advanced Technologies Network (ATeN) Center, Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Ed. 18, 90128 Palermo, Italy
6
Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(19), 6883; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196883
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 21 September 2022 / Accepted: 26 September 2022 / Published: 3 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Composites)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Flexible conductive composites based on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) filled with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) modified by perfluoropolyethers (PFPEs) were produced. The bonding of PFPE chains, added in 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios, on CNTs influences the dispersion of nanotubes in the UHMWPE matrix due to the non-polar nature of the polymer, facilitating the formation of nanofillers-rich conductive pathways and improving composites’ electrical conductivity (two to five orders of magnitude more) in comparison to UHMWPE-based nanocomposites obtained with pristine CNTs. Electrochemical atomic force microscopy (EC-AFM) was used to evaluate the morphological changes during cyclic voltammetry (CV). The decrease of the overpotential for hydrogen oxidation peaks in samples containing PFPE-functionalized CNTs and hydrogen production (approximately −1.0 V vs. SHE) suggests that these samples could find application in fuel cell technology as well as in hydrogen storage devices. Carbon black-containing composites were prepared for comparative study with CNTs containing nanocomposites.

1. Introduction

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been the object of a great deal of attention since their discovery in 1985 due to their peculiar physico-chemical properties, such as high electrical conductivity, mesoporosity and flexibility [1,2]. Among the high-profile applications devised for this distinctive class of carbon-based nanomaterials, those elaborating on their energy conversion and energy storage capabilities represent a host of promising new technologies viable for the manufacture of supercapacitors [3,4], batteries [5,6], fuel cells [7,8,9], solar cells [10,11], field-effect transistors (FETs) [12], hydrogen storage systems [13,14,15] and in shape memory alloys used for MEMS [16]. In particular, the last two decades have witnessed the development of innovative CNT-based composite materials. The addition of guest species into the flexible and light polymeric matrix allows the transfer of useful mechanical–chemical properties to the host, such as electron mobility [17], electrical conductivity [18,19,20,21] and mechanical resistance [22]. Thanks to these excellent qualities, in addition to low cost and easy processability, conductive polymer nanocomposites are facing new promising industrial applications, in particular as flexible electrodes in energy storage, biomedical mechanical improvements for implants, pressure sensors and interfering electromagnetic shields [23,24,25]. Despite this, the dispersion of carbonaceous fillers in a polymeric medium is difficult to achieve, owing to their propensity to aggregate and possibly segregate at interfaces [26,27,28,29]. This behavior can be counteracted by modifying or otherwise functionalizing the surface of such carbonaceous structures, improving their affinity toward the host matrix [30,31,32]. Notably, direct surface fluorination with elemental fluorine, or functionalization with perfluoropolyether (PFPE) side chains, can be employed to lower surface energy and thus improve the dispersibility of the nanofillers, as well as enhance the chemical stability and processability of the resulting composite materials [33,34,35,36].
In our previous studies, we described an efficient procedure to attain a homogeneous dispersion of PFPE-modified CNTs into a host matrix of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). The functionalization of CNTs and CB using perfluoropolyethers (PFPE), which are well known as highly performing fluorinated polymers suitable for coatings, membranes, solvents and lubricants in harsh environments, can be considered an attractive alternative procedure to fluorination. This procedure, used for different carbon allotropes, consists of the thermolysis of PFPE peroxides to generate carbon-centred perfluorinated free radicals, which bond to the unsaturated moieties on the carbonaceous surfaces of carbon, which act as radical scavengers. Thus, it was expected that the typical properties of fluorinated materials, in particular low surface energy, were transferred to the surface of carbonaceous materials by means of a stable carbon–carbon bonds. The composite was characterized by good viscoelastic properties due to the formation of a percolation network across the UHMWPE matrix at low nanofillers concentration [37]. The nanofillers also showed good electron conductivity [38,39] and slightly higher electrical resistivity compared to bare CNTs and native CB. Indeed, PFPE functionalization allowed the preservation of the polyaromatic bulk structure, maintaining the electrical features of such composites in the typical range of conducting materials. In sharp contrast, surface modification of CNTs and CB with elemental fluorine caused the disruption of the underlying conjugated structure, leading to higher electrical resistivity values compared to pristine fillers and PFPE-containing composites [33,35]. Therefore, the functionalization of carbonaceous structures with PFPE oligomeric chains represents a suitable technique to improve CNTs dispersibility while simultaneously preserving their electrochemical and morphological properties [33,35,37].
In this work, electrical properties, thermal stability and hydrogen storage capabilities of hot compacted composites based on UHMWPE and PFPE-modified CNTs and CB were studied and compared to those of similar composite materials containing pristine fillers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The UHMWPE was a commercial grade polymer purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), characterized by a weight-average molecular weight of 3–6 MDa, softening point of T = 136 °C (Vicat, ASTM D 1525B), melting point of Tm = 138 °C (determinate by DSC) and a density of 0.94 g cm−3 at 25 °C. Multi-walled CNTs produced via chemical vapor deposition (average diameter: 9.5 nm, average length: 1.5 μm, product code: 7000) were acquired from Nanocyl, S.A. (Sambreville, Belgium). Cabot Vulcan® XC72R (Cabot Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) was used in this work as high conductive and commercially available graphitic CB (particle size 30 nm) [40]. PFPE peroxide (Fomblin® Z PFPE peroxide), prepared by oxidative photopolymerization of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) [41], was kindly provided by Solvay Specialty Polymers (Brussels, Belgium). Its general chemical structure is as follows: TO(CF2CF2O)m(CF2O)n(O)vT’, where terminal groups T and T’ are trifluoromethyl, CF3 or an acyl fluoride group, e.g., C(O)F or CF2C(O)F. The specific chemical characteristics of PFPE peroxide are as follows: average molecular weight around 29 kDa, m/n ratio (between perfluoroethylene oxide, CF2CF2O and perfluoromethylene oxide, CF2O, units) equal to 1.15, peroxidic content of 1.3 wt.% and equivalent molecular weight (EMW) around 1200 g eq−1. CF3OCFClCF2Cl (b.p. 4–41 °C) was used as an inert fluorinated solvent during the chemical treatments of carbonaceous fillers with PFPE peroxide.

2.2. Chemical Treatment of Carbonaceous Materials

The functionalization of CNTs and CB with PFPE peroxide was previously accurately studied and documented by Navarrini et al. [33,35]. Modified CNTs specimens were prepared at reagent CNT:PFPE peroxide weight ratios of 2:1 and 1:1, hereafter referred to as CNTF1 and CNTF2 fillers, respectively. Modified CB specimens, labelled CBF1 fillers, were prepared at a reagent CB:PFPE peroxide weight ratio of 1.67:1. Pristine species were labelled as CNT0 and CB0 fillers.

2.3. Preparation of UHMWPE-Based Composites

Composites were produced using all fillers mentioned in Section 2.2, i.e., CNT0, CNTF1, CNTF2, CB0 and CBF1 [37]. Powdered UHMWPE was mixed with different filler loadings (i.e., 0.5, 1.0, 3.0 and 5.0 wt.%) under magnetic stirring at room temperature until the formation of a homogeneous black powder. The resulting samples were successively hot compacted at 200 °C and 17.2 MPa (2500 psi) for 5 min to produce thin films for characterization purposes. The average thickness of the thin films amounts to 200 ± 40 µm. Due to their polymeric nature and small thickness, these UHMWPE-based nanocomposites show very high flexibility and notable mechanical stability. A series of samples were also prepared at 32.5 MPa (4700 psi). Pure UHMWPE was subjected to the same treatment in order to produce a control sample. Composite specimens were referred to as PE-filler-wt.%, e.g., UHMWPE composite samples containing a 5% weight ratio of MWCNT-based fillers obtained by functionalization with PFPE peroxide at a reagent weight ratio of 2:1 (Section 2.2) were labelled as PE-CNTF1-5.

2.4. Characterization

The characterization of UHMWPE-based samples comprised of resistivity, voltammetric and thermogravimetric measurements. In addition, UHMWPE-based samples were also observed with different microscopic techniques in order to obtain complementary information on the morphology of UHMWPE-based samples. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) coupled with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (EDS) was used for recording the elemental map showing the spatial distribution of fluorine atoms in the cross-section of a sample. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) was employed in order to observe the dispersion of CNTs in the UHMWPE matrix. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) was coupled with an electrochemical cell in order to perform electrochemical-AFM (EC-AFM): the AFM head was immersed in an electrolyte, and images were acquired in situ and in real-time during cyclic-voltammetry, showing the morphological changes of a UHMWPE-based sample used as a flexible electrode. Resistivity was estimated using an experimental apparatus purposely designed and realized on the basis of a model described in the literature [42]. A Princeton Applied EG&G 273A (Ametek, Berwin, PA, USA) potentiostat was used to record resistance values by varying the potential difference at the two electrodes between −1.00 V (vs. RE) and +1.00 V (vs. OC) with a scan rate of 20 mV s−1, while a piston was applying a pressure of either 17.2 kPa or 32.5 kPa to the sample. The resistivity was then calculated taking into account geometrical parameters such as tube radius, r, and sample thickness, l, in the following Equation (1),
ρ = R   π   r 2 l = 1 k ,
where k is the specific conductivity, ρ is the specific resistivity and R is the cylinder resistance.
Experimental settings were optimized towards homogeneous conducting conditions according to the second Ohm’s law. All measurements were repeated three times on each sample in order to obtain averaged values.
Hydrogen evolution and storage capabilities of the composites were assessed by means of voltammetric techniques. The samples, a Pt wire, and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) were used as working, counter and reference electrodes, respectively, in a common voltammetric three-electrode cell filled with 50 mL of a 1 M H2SO4 solution, which was purged with nitrogen prior to usage. A Princeton Applied EG&G 273A potentiostat was used for all the experiments. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments were set as follows: three scans starting from +1.0 V, scanning to the vertex potential of −1.5 V and then back to +1.0 V, with reference to SCE. The scan rate was set at 10 mV s−1. All potentials in this manuscript are henceforth expressed with respect to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). The tests were performed in a typical cell while the overall working conditions of the electrode can be easily associated with energy storage devices of every dimension and shape. The electrode reflects a series of complementary properties related to the flexibility guaranteed by the polymeric matrix, the conductivity of the carbonaceous filler and the stability introduced by the performed PFPE functionalization. These advantages allow us to present our preliminary research on the promising and bright future of these nanocomposites as flexible, innovative electrodes.
A scanning electron microscope (Zeiss EVO–50, Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA; working distance 8.0 mm, beam current 100 pA, acceleration voltage 20.00 kV) equipped with an EDS probe (EDS Spectrometer Oxford Inca Energy 200, resolution 132 eV, sensitivity 0.4, accelerating voltage 10 kV, Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK) was employed for the cross-sectional analysis of the samples. Microscopy was performed on bare samples without deposition of a conductive layer, and the cross-section was obtained by fracturing the sample at liquid nitrogen temperature. TEM was performed using a Philips CM200 FEG electron microscope (acceleration voltage 200 kV) equipped with a Field Emission Gun filament (FEI Company, Thermo Fisher Scientific Group, Eindhoven, NL, USA). A UHMWPE-based sample with dispersed PFPE-modified CNTs was embedded in a low viscosity resin, obtaining a resin block characterized by good adhesion to the fluorinated sample. Ultrathin sections with a thickness of approximately 100 nm were prepared by ultramicrotomy. AFM images were acquired in non-contact mode by a Keysight 5500 (Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) system coupled with an electrochemical cell used in a three-electrodes configuration.
Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were carried out using a THASS TGA XP-10 (Thass, Friedberg, Germany) analyzer in order to evaluate the thermal stability of the composites. The samples were heated under nitrogen flow from 30 °C to 900 °C on a heating ramp of 10 °C min−1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Preparation of Flexible PFPE-Functionalized CNTs-Based UHMWPE Composites

The flexibility of the UHMWPE functionalized electrodes was investigated with conventional methods of bend and torsional tests. In Figure 1b, the PE-CNTF2-5 sample is completely curved, reaching a bending radius of 2 mm, behaving similar to the electrode containing the pristine carbon guest. This test was performed on all the electrodes subjected to the study, and the results were coherent with the electrode displayed. This property coming from the polymeric matrix was not significantly modified by either the addition of carbon-based fillers or their fluorination treatment and did not depend on the degree of fluorination. This important property opens the possibility of the employment of these polymeric composites as electrodes in numerous fields, such as energy storage and pressure sensors [21,22,23,24,25].

3.2. Electrical Resistivity

The electrical behavior of UHMWPE-based nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes and carbon black was studied by resistivity measurements at two different values of applied pressures (Section 2.4). The electrical resistance was measured three times for each sample, and average values, as well as standard deviations, were calculated (see Table S1 in Supplementary Materials). Electrical resistivity values for CNTs- and CB-based nanocomposites are reported in Figure 2 as a function of their composition, expressed in terms of the percentage of filler content.
As expected, composites manufactured using pristine CNTs (PE-CNT0) yielded higher values of resistivity at each and every polymer:filler weight ratio compared to PE-CB0 composites. The resistivity of the PE-CNT0 composites decreased in a seemingly logarithmically fashion, moving from 1.0 to 5.0 wt.% and reaching values comparable to the PE-CB0 composites around the maximum polymer:filler weight ratios tested. A certain minimum amount of pure CNT fillers, above 1.0 wt.%, as seen in Figure 2a,b, is thus required for the development of enhanced electrical conductivity features in UHMWPE hot pressed thin films.
Functionalization of carbonaceous fillers has different effects on CNTs and CB. The inherent insulating character of PFPE chains is only evident for CB-based composites, for which functionalization systematically results in a slightly higher resistivity compared to the pristine CB filler. In the case of functionalized CNT fillers, this effect is largely exceeded by morphological effects, also considering the flexibility as perfectly preserved. It was demonstrated that the functionalization of CNTs with PFPE peroxide leads to a slight increase in nanotube resistivity [33]. However, the formation of a three-dimensional CNTs network [43] is strongly facilitated by the presence of PFPE chains, largely overcoming the loss of conductivity due to functionalization.
PE-CNTF1 and PE-CNTF2 composites show strikingly similar electric behaviors regardless of the polymer:filler weight ratio. As recently reported [37], PFPE chains bond directly to the external walls of CNTs, providing them with a fluorinated liquid-like thin layer characterized by very low surface energy. Its thin layer perfectly fits with the adaptive flexible nature of the nanocomposite. This peculiar feature also allows a homogeneous dispersion of the modified CNTs into the polymeric host matrix. As a result, it is possible for such composite materials to reach saturation conditions, whereas further addition of fillers does not improve conductivity. PFPE-modified fillers per se also suffer from similar issues. There exists a limit to the number of PFPE chains attachable to the carbonaceous particle so increasing the reagent CNT/PFPE peroxide weight ratio past surface saturation does not lead to an increased degree of functionalization. In this instance, TGA measurements on powdered fillers suggest CNTF1 samples, i.e., modified CNTs-based fillers produced from the highest starting CNT/PFPE peroxide weight ratio considered herein, already lead to nearly complete surface functionalization. Indeed, the amount of PFPE bonded on CNTs obtained for CNTF1 and CNTF2 filler samples was 14.3 wt.% and 17.6 wt.%, respectively [33].
Overall, PFPE-modified fillers CNTF1 and CNTF2 readily impart electrical conductivity to UHMWPE. Resistivity values of composites prepared by dispersing the PFPE-modified CNTs are two to five orders of magnitude lower compared to samples containing unmodified CNTs (Figure 2a,b). This means that fluorinated CNT displays a high surface area and higher electrical conductivity compared to the pristine carbonaceous material (two to five orders of magnitude more), lightweight, perfect hexagonal structure and many unusual mechanical, electrical and chemical properties. Thanks to these properties, a fuel cell containing this hybrid material could easily overcome the actual technological limits, especially related to the high intrinsic resistivity of CNTs [44,45]. Only by increasing the pristine CNTs concentration above 4 wt.% in the UHMWPE matrix is it possible to observe a resistivity decrease comparable to that produced by PFPE-modified CNTs at 1 wt.% concentration. It is important to note that this increase in conductivity is evident at filler loadings as low as 0.5 wt.%, and it is particularly pronounced at loadings in the range of 1 to 3 wt.% (Figure 2a,b). Indeed, PFPE-modified CNTs-based composites feature resistivity values equivalent to or even lower than composites fabricated using commercially available conductive specialty carbon black fillers.
In the literature, it is reported that in the CNT/UHMWPE composite, the pure CNTs were located only at the matrix–grain boundaries and bundles of pure CNTs were observed to be clustered together, constructing a conducting chain between UHMWPE particles [43,46,47,48,49]. TEM was used to observe the details of the structures in the PFPE-modified CNTs-based UHMWPE composites, and these images provided more detailed information on the conductive pathways due to PFPE-functionalized CNTs conserving their morphological advantages, such as flexibility.
Samples obtained at different pressure applied during the sample hot compacting procedure were also compared: 17.2 and 32.5 kPa. The results showed that this pressure only slightly influenced the resistivity trends of the specimens (Figure 2).

3.3. Morphology SEM and TEM

The morphological analyses of the PE-CNTF2-3 sample were performed using both the Scanning Electrode Microscope (SEM) and the Transmission Electrode Microscope (TEM). The solution used a 1:1 ratio of the CNT-PFPE, and filler loading of the UHMWPE at 3%wt. showed the best resistivity reduction at 17.2 kPa of compacting pressure, so it is able to display the networking condition reached by the functionalized CNT-based nanocomposite.
The elemental map, provided by the EDS probe equipped with the SEM, shows a clear homogenous distribution of the fluorine atoms (brighter spots) inside the polyethylene matrix while the functionalized nanotubes tend to segregate on the surface. This phenomenon can be explained by analyzing the non-polar nature of the UHMWPE matrix. This hydrocarbon is highly hydrophobic, so it drives the fluorinated carbon species towards the border of the section, as underlined in Figure 3b. From these considerations on the cross-section, obtained by fracturing the sample at liquid nitrogen temperature, it is confirmed that during chemical treatment with PFPE peroxide, the polyperoxidic structure of PFPE peroxide allowed the linkage in a network of several connected PFPE chains, gradually growing an entire PFPE layer on the MWCNT surface. This placement explains the increased conductivity of the CNT-based nanocomposite, as already widely demonstrated in Section 3.2. On the other side, CB-based nanocomposites resulted in being less aggregated due to the lower degree of order of the carbon atoms, with smoother effects on the conductivity of the UHMWPE.
TEM images of the PE-CNTF2-3 sample are reported in Figure 4 and show the spatial distribution of PFPE-functionalized CNTs inside the UHMWPE matrix.
In Figure 4a, a three-dimensional network of PFPE-functionalized CNTs is clearly shown [43]. The creation of this network was facilitated by the functionalization of CNTs with PFPE chains. The creation of an ordinated network allows the preservation of conductive electrical properties within a flexible polymeric matrix. In fact, the decrease in CNTs surface energy induced by the linkage of perfluorinated chains allowed the dispersion of smaller CNTs agglomerates inside the UHMWPE matrix. Thus, a packed network of CNTs was created, and UHMWPE could reach the conductivity properties with a lower amount of filler. Although the PFPE-functionalized CNTs agglomerates are mainly uniformly dispersed in a network inside the UHMWPE bulk, isolated rows of CNTs aggregates were also observed (Figure 4b). The SEM and TEM morphological analyses can be clearly compared to the bare PE-CNT sample, widely present in state-of-the-art [50,51]. In the cited articles, a non-uniform and non-orientated dispersion of carbon nanotubes inside the UHMWPE matrix is evident proof of the effect of fluorination in the orientated state of CNT-functionalized filaments, as already discussed in these two paragraphs.

3.4. Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER): Voltammetry and Electrochemical AFM (EC-AFM)

The voltammograms recorded for the CNTs- and CB-based nanocomposites are shown in Figure 5a,b. A marked difference is evident between these two series of measurements. Both measurements present a reduction reaction signal (at higher onset potentials for CB-based composites), but only CNTs-based thin films possess the characteristic peak of hydrogen oxidation. Therefore, CB, unlike CNTs, seems to be unable to store hydrogen electrochemically.
Figure 5a shows the cyclic voltammetry results obtained for PE-CNT0-5, PE-CNTF2-5 and PE-CNTF1-5 nanocomposites. In particular, during the onward scan, the faradic currents increased due to a reduction reaction, while during the backward scan, as mentioned earlier, an oxidation peak was observed [52,53]. The former is due to proton reduction to produce hydrogen, which is trapped inside nanotubes or within the PFPE liquid-like phase. The latter is due to the oxidation of said absorbed hydrogen [54].
Because excess hydrogen is not trapped but instead released, the faradic current in the corresponding backward scan leads to the oxidation peak in a seemingly diffusion-controlled fashion. Once the absorbed hydrogen is depleted, the peak is reached, and the current rapidly plummets to zero.
In the experimental trials, a strong increment of the faradic currents in the cathodic region was observed in association with the increment of the PFPE content of the fillers, and the expected intense increment of the associated oxidation peak was indeed detected; furthermore, these oxidation peaks shifted towards lower potentials. This effect was presumably promoted by the gas-permeable PFPE coating on the carbon nanotubes, which promoted hydrogen diffusion to and from the CNTs. Therefore, the overpotential decrease and the cathodic current increase can be ascribed to the presence of the PFPE layer that quickly removes hydrogen from the electrically active surface of CNTs, lowering the local concentration of hydrogen and acting as a gas reservoir as well as gas diffusion layer [34,55].
The presence of the PFPE layer on the outer surface of CNTs can also decrease the composite wettability, as well as the diffusion of the polar species (e.g., water and protonated water) toward the CNTs’ surface [37]. With reference to the experimental data presented, it is possible to notice that the diffusion-enhancing effect of the PFPE layer is dominant over the hydrophobic one.
In fact, hydrogen oxidation current peaks are systematically more pronounced with both increasing PFPE content in the filler (Figure 5a) and increasing filler load at the same PFPE content (Figure 6a).
Furthermore, PFPE content and filler load influence the hydrogen oxidation overpotentials obtained during backward scans in a similar manner. The overpotential associated with hydrogen oxidation reactions (Figure 5a and Figure 6a) decreases with increasing PFPE and filler content.
Performing multiple consecutive cyclic voltammetry scans shows that the hydrogen oxidation peak for all tested samples (Figure 6b reports PE-CNTF2-3 results as an example) is systematically observed around 1.0 ± 0.1 V (vs. SHE). This feature suggests that it is steadily possible for the electrode to evolve and store hydrogen again during the onward scan.
The decrease of the overpotential for hydrogen oxidation in samples containing PFPE-functionalized CNTs suggests that the latter could find application in fuel cell technology, in particular as catalyst support in the anodic compartment of polymer exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), where the hydrogen oxidation reaction takes place (HOR). Indeed, the utilization of CNTs in PEMFC devices has been proposed by several authors in recent literature [7,8,56,57,58,59,60,61], either as a cathode catalyst support for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), as a gas diffusion layer or as a component in the fabrication of polymer exchange membranes. However, the usage of CNTs as catalyst support at the anode has seldom been subject to extensive investigation [62,63,64]. The experimental evidence presented herein suggests that the functionalization of CNTs with PFPE chains reduces the overpotential for HOR, making them suitable for the fabrication of anode layers in PEMFCs. These trends are comparable to the actual state of the art materials for hydrogen storage; in particular, the overpotential of hydrogen oxidation is very low but comparable to the existing technologies [65,66,67].
The morphology of CNTs-based nanocomposites (both PE-CNT0 and PE-CNTF1) was studied by AFM, as reported in Figure 7.
The surface quality of the as-prepared samples acquired in air was significantly influenced by the sample history (sample preparation procedure, contaminants, etc.). The surface roughness was then influenced by the presence of adsorbates, clearly visible from the profiles reported at the bottom of each image. When the samples were immersed inside the electrolyte (H2SO4 1 M), and the potential was set at the open circuit potential (OCP) value, the morphology showed significant changes (see panels 7b and 7d) with respect to the images acquired in air. In both cases, the sample prepared in air clearly showed a rough surface compared to the smoother one of the one immersed in the electrolyte. This analysis is an efficient example of the relevant effort brought by the adsorbates on the samples. The PE-CNT0 sample was characterized by wide swellings, while the PE-CNTF1 nanocomposite showed nano-structuring of the surface. The acquired profiles enhance this qualitative analysis of the two samples. In addition, we note that (at the OCP value) no further changes were observed on both PE-CNT0 and PE-CNTF1 after hours of measurement (data not reported). Reasonably, the adsorbates were dissolved when the electrochemical cell was filled, allowing the possibility to observe the electrode surface.
The morphological stability of the CNTs-nanocomposites can also be investigated during the electrochemical potential sweep of the cyclic-voltammetry. In Figure 8, we report the collected images.
Starting from the top of the images (both a and b panels), the electrochemical potential was initially set at the OCP value. From the white dot-dash line, the cyclic-voltammetry was synchronized with the AFM tip scan. Each line of the latter corresponds to a different potential value, as reported in the voltammograms placed on the left of the images. No changes were observed in the surface morphology regarding roughness or dependency on the voltage applied. Nonetheless, when we reached the cathodic current enhancement region (at about −1.0 V vs. SHE), the AFM acquisition became unstable, and it was not possible to proceed with the data acquisition. This is due to the evolution of hydrogen gas bubbles (also observed by our eyes) that perturbed the AFM cantilever. As soon as the gas bubbles were removed, the AFM acquisition was stable, and the CNTs-nanocomposites surfaces showed the same behavior.

3.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The thermogravimetric profiles of CNTs- and CB-filled nanocomposites, as well as of pristine UHMWPE, showed a degradation inflection at ~590 °C, related to the UHMWPE polymer matrix (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The samples containing carbon nanotubes showed a further signal at about 800 °C, which was ascribed to CNTs degradation (pristine CNTs thermogravimetric profile is also reported); in samples containing CB, any further inflections were observed at high temperatures due to the typical thermal stability of graphitic carbon black. The degradation of carbon nanotubes was not fully achieved in nitrogen; hence, samples containing bare or PFPE-modified CNTs showed residual weight (2–4 wt.%) at 900 °C, which is compatible with the nanofiller loading. Similarly, composites containing bare CB and PFPE-modified CB showed residues at 900 °C (3–4 wt.%).
The thermogravimetric profiles of nanocomposites containing PFPE-modified fillers showed PFPE degradation, which was expected at temperatures around 250–350 °C (Figure 9a and Figure 10a). However, the overall amount of PFPE in the nanocomposites results was close to the detection threshold of the TGA instrument (Figure 6b and Figure 7a), and differences in the decomposition onset were only observed at a low percentage of weight loss. Indeed, by comparing the thermograms of PE-CNT0-5, PE-CNTF1-5 and PE-CNTF2-5, it was possible to notice the slight instability of the samples containing PFPE-modified CNTs in the region between 0 and 5 wt.% of weight loss at 250–350 °C (Figure 9c). The same phenomenon occurred in PE-CBF1-5 (Figure 10b). This decomposition onset can be ascribed to the loss of PFPE from the nanocomposites.

4. Conclusions

In this work, flexible conductive composites based on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) filled with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) modified by perfluoropolyethers (PFPEs) were synthetized. The electrical properties, thermal stability and hydrogen evolution of UHMWPE nanocomposites filled with PFPE-modified multi-walled CNTs on nanocomposites containing CNTs were assessed by means of several different characterizations. The PFPE, added in 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios, used as a functionalizing agent for CNTs, induced a beneficial effect on the overall conductivity of the nanocomposites, in particular at low loadings of nanofillers: the resistivity values of UHMWPE samples containing 1 wt.% of PFPE-functionalized and bare nanofillers were 2.8 × 103 and 3.9 × 108 Ω·m, respectively, with a significant difference of five orders of magnitude that largely overcomes the loss of conductivity. The dispersion of PFPE-functionalized CNTs in the polymeric matrix seemed to drive the formation of a continuous 3D network of CNTs characterized by enhanced conductivity and high flexibility. These preliminary results open up new promising perspectives regarding the utilization of PFPE-modified CNTs as flexible electrodes for fuel cells and hydrogen storage devices.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15196883/s1, Table S1: Electrical resistivity values of CNTs-based nanocomposites. Table S2: Electrical resistivity values of CB-based composites.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M.; investigation, M.S., V.M., E.M., R.A. and G.B.; methodology, N.T.D.; validation, W.N.; writing—review & editing, P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Part of this work (EC-AFM) was achieved at the Solid–liquid Interface and Nanomicroscopy (SoLINano) laboratory, an inter-Departmental laboratory of the Politecnico di Milano.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qiu, H.; Yang, J. Chapter 2—Structure and Properties of Carbon Nanotubes. In Industrial Applications of Carbon Nanotubes Chen (Micro and Nano Technologies); Peng, H., Li, Q., Tao, B.T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 47–69. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tarfaoui, M.; Lafdi, K.; EL Moumen, A. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes based polymer composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 103, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shin, D.; Ko, Y.; Cho, J. Layer-by-layer assembled (high-energy carbon nanotube/conductive carbon nanotube)n nanocomposites for high volumetric capacitance supercapacitor electrodes. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 21844–21853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, L.; Niu, Z.; Chen, J. Flexible supercapacitors based on carbon nanotubes. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Licht, S.; Douglas, A.; Ren, J.; Carter, R.; Lefler, M.; Pint, C.L. Carbon Nanotubes Produced from Ambient Carbon Dioxide for Environmentally Sustainable Lithium-Ion and Sodium-Ion Battery Anodes. ACS Central Sci. 2016, 2, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Arai, S.; Fukuoka, R. A carbon nanotube-reinforced noble tin anode structure for lithium-ion batteries. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2016, 46, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, Z.; Lei, H.; Cao, R.; Zhang, M. Cobalt Corrole on Carbon Nanotube as a Synergistic Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Acid Media. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 171, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Padmavathi, R.; Devi, A.S.; Saranya, N.; Gnanasundaram, P.; Sangeetha, D. Synthesis and characterization of Pt supported on multiwalled carbon nanotubes for improved catalytic performance in fuel cell applications. J. Porous Mater. 2015, 22, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Subianto, S.; Pica, M.; Casciola, M.; Cojocaru, P.; Merlo, L.; Hards, G.; Jones, D. Physical and chemical modification routes leading to improved mechanical properties of perfluorosulfonic acid membranes for PEM fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2013, 233, 216–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiao, Y.; Lin, J.-Y.; Wu, J.; Tai, S.-Y.; Yue, G.; Lin, T.-W. Dye-sensitized solar cells with high-performance polyaniline/multi-wall carbon nanotube counter electrodes electropolymerized by a pulse potentiostatic technique. J. Power Sources 2013, 233, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jeon, I.; Matsuo, Y.; Maruyama, S. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Solar Cells BT—Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Preparation, Properties and Applications; Li, Y., Maruyama, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 271–298. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rother, M.; Brohmann, M.; Yang, S.; Grimm, S.B.; Schießl, S.P.; Graf, A.; Zaumseil, J. Aerosol-Jet Printing of Polymer-Sorted (6,5) Carbon Nanotubes for Field-Effect Transistors with High Reproducibility. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3, 1700080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mohan, M.; Sharma, V.K.; Kumar, E.A.; Gayathri, V. Hydrogen Storage in Carbon Materials—A Review. Energy Storage 2019, 1, e35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rivard, E.; Trudeau, M.; Zaghib, K. Hydrogen Storage for Mobility: A Review. Materials 2019, 12, 1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Sharma, A. Investigation on platinum loaded multi-walled carbon nanotubes for hydrogen storage applications. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2020, 45, 2967–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chaudhari, R.; Khanna, S.; Vora, J.; Patel, V.K.; Paneliya, S.; Pimenov, D.Y.; Giasin, K.; Wojciechowski, S. Experimental investigations and optimization of MWCNTs-mixed WEDM process parameters of nitinol shape memory alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 2152–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khanna, S.; Patel, R.; Marathey, P.; Chaudari, R.; Vora, J.; Banerjee, R.; Ray, A.; Mukhopadhyay, I. Growth of titanium dioxide nanorod over shape memory material using chemical vapor deposition for energy conversion application. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 28, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; Chang, E.; Zhao, C.; Ameli, A.; Naguib, H.E.; Park, C.B. Evaluation and modeling of electrical conductivity in conductive polymer nanocomposite foams with multiwalled carbon nanotube networks. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 411, 128382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Candelario, V.M.; Moreno, R.; Guiberteau, F.; Ortiz, A.L. Enhancing the sliding-wear resistance of SiC nanostructured ceramics by adding carbon nanotubes. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 3083–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yan, X.; Gu, J.; Zheng, G.; Guo, J.; Galaska, A.M.; Yu, J.; Alam Khan, M.; Sun, L.; Young, D.P.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Lowly loaded carbon nanotubes induced high electrical conductivity and giant magnetoresistance in ethylene/1-octene copolymers. Polymer 2016, 103, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kil, T.; Jin, D.; Yang, B.; Lee, H. A comprehensive micromechanical and experimental study of the electrical conductivity of polymeric composites incorporating carbon nanotube and carbon fiber. Compos. Struct. 2021, 268, 114002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, S.; Liu, J.; Li, Q. Mechanical properties and microstructure of multi-walled carbon nanotube-reinforced cement paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 76, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mondal, S.; Ghosh, S.; Ganguly, S.; Das, P.; Ravindren, R.; Sit, S.; Chakraborty, G.; Das, N.C. Highly conductive and flexible nano-structured carbon-based polymer nanocomposites with improved electromagnetic-interference-shielding performance. Mater. Res. Express 2017, 4, 105039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Erdem, T.; Idris, M.; Demir, H.V.; Tuncel, D. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 11/2017. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Su, Z.; Wang, H.; Ye, X.; Tian, K.; Huang, W.; He, J.; Guo, Y.; Tian, X. Anisotropic thermally conductive flexible polymer composites filled with hexagonal born nitride (h-BN) platelets and ammine carbon nanotubes (CNT-NH2): Effects of the filler distribution and orientation. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 109, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gardea, F.; Lagoudas, D.C. Characterization of electrical and thermal properties of carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 56, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mittal, G.; Dhand, V.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.-J.; Lee, W.R. A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 21, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Graf, A.; Tropf, L.C.; Zakharko, Y.; Zaumseil, J.; Gather, M. Near-infrared exciton-polaritons in strongly coupled single-walled carbon nanotube microcavities. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pal, G.; Kumar, S. Multiscale modeling of effective electrical conductivity of short carbon fiber-carbon nanotube-polymer matrix hybrid composites. Mater. Des. 2016, 89, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dintcheva, N.; Arrigo, R.; Gambarotti, C.; Carroccio, S.; Filippone, G.; Cicogna, F.; Guenzi, M. α-Tocopherol-induced radical scavenging activity in carbon nanotubes for thermo-oxidation resistant ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene-based nanocomposites. Carbon 2014, 74, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zare, Y.; Rhee, K.Y. Development and modification of conventional Ouali model for tensile modulus of polymer/carbon nanotubes nanocomposites assuming the roles of dispersed and networked nanoparticles and surrounding interphases. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 506, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Castellino, M.; Rovere, M.; Shahzad, M.I.; Tagliaferro, A. Conductivity in carbon nanotube polymer composites: A comparison between model and experiment. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 87, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Talaeemashhadi, S.; Sansotera, M.; Gambarotti, C.; Famulari, A.; Bianchi, C.L.; Guarda, P.A.; Navarrini, W. Functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with perfluoropolyether peroxide to produce superhydrophobic properties. Carbon 2013, 59, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gola, M.; Sansotera, M.; Navarrini, W.; Bianchi, C.L.; Stampino, P.G.; Latorrata, S.; Dotelli, G. Perfluoropolyether-functionalized gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2014, 258, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sansotera, M.; Navarrini, W.; Resnati, G.; Metrangolo, P.; Famulari, A.; Bianchi, C.L.; Guarda, P.A. Preparation and characterization of superhydrophobic conductive fluorinated carbon blacks. Carbon 2010, 48, 4382–4390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sansotera, M.; Navarrini, W.; Gola, M.; Dotelli, G.; Stampino, P.G.; Bianchi, C.L. Conductivity and superhydrophobic effect on PFPE-modified porous carbonaceous materials. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 6277–6284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dintcheva, N.T.; Morici, E.; Arrigo, R.; Zerillo, G.; Marona, V.; Sansotera, M.; Magagnin, L.; Navarrini, W. High performance composites containing perfluoropolyethers-functionalized carbon-based nanoparticles: Rheological behavior and wettability. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 95, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Donnadio, A.; D’Amato, R.; Marmottini, F.; Panzetta, G.; Pica, M.; Battocchio, C.; Capitani, D.; Ziarelli, F.; Casciola, M. On the evolution of proton conductivity of Aquivion membranes loaded with CeO2 based nanofillers: Effect of temperature and relative humidity. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 574, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Y.; Huang, X.; Zeng, L.; Li, R.; Tian, H.; Fu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, W.-H. A review of the electrical and mechanical properties of carbon nanofiller-reinforced polymer composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 1036–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, S.S.; Herrero, J.S.; Irusta, S.; Scott, K. The effect of pretreatment of Vulcan XC-72R carbon on morphology and electrochemical oxygen reduction kinetics of supported Pd nano-particle in acidic electrolyte. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2010, 647, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guarda, P.; Barchiesi, E.; Fontana, G.; Petricci, S.; Pianca, M.; Marchionni, G. Peroxidic perfluoropolyether from tetrafluoroethylene oxidation: Micro structural analysis by NMR spectroscopy and mechanistic considerations. J. Fluor. Chem. 2005, 126, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Slobodian, P.; Riha, P.; Olejnik, R.; Saha, P. Electromechanical properties of carbon nanotube networks under compression. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 124006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pang, H.; Chen, C.; Bao, Y.; Chen, J.; Ji, X.; Lei, J.; Li, Z.-M. Electrically conductive carbon nanotube/ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composites with segregated and double percolated structure. Mater. Lett. 2012, 79, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Luo, C.; Xie, H.; Wang, Q.; Luo, G.; Liu, C. A Review of the Application and Performance of Carbon Nanotubes in Fuel Cells. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; An, B.; Huang, R.; Wang, C.; Zhou, Z.-Y.; Lin, W. Networking Pyrolyzed Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks by Carbon Nanotubes Improves Conductivity and Enhances Oxygen-Reduction Performance in Polymer-Electrolyte-Membrane Fuel Cells. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pang, H.; Yan, D.X.; Bao, Y.; Chen, J.B.; Chen, C.; Li, Z.M. Super-tough conducting carbon nano-tube/ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene composites with segregated and double-percolated structure. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 23568–23575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Haghgoo, M.; Ansari, R.; Hassanzadeh-Aghdam, M. Prediction of electrical conductivity of carbon fiber-carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer hybrid composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 167, 728–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hu, H.L.; Zhang, G.; Xiao, L.G.; Wang, H.J.; Zhang, Q.S.; Zhao, Z.D. Preparation and electrical conductivity of graphene/ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composites with a segregated structure. Carbon 2012, 50, 4596–4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sadeghi, S.; Arjmand, M.; Otero Navas, I.; Zehtab Yazdi, A.; Sundararaj, U. Effect of Nanofiller Geometry on Network Formation in Polymeric Nanocomposites: Comparison of Rheological and Electrical Properties of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube and Graphene Nanoribbon. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 3954–3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sharma, V.; Prakash, U.; Kumar, B.M. Surface composites by friction stir processing: A review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2015, 224, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lebedev, O.; Ozerin, A.N.; Kechek’Yan, A.S.; Golubev, E.K.; Shevchenko, V.G.; Kurkin, T.S.; Beshenko, M.A.; Sergeev, V.G. Strengthened electrically conductive composite materials based on ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene reactor powder and nanosized carbon fillers. Nanotechnologies Russ. 2015, 10, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, H.; Wang, T.; Xu, Y.; Gao, W.; Li, P.; Niu, Q.J. Fabrication of polyimide and functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes by in-situ polymerization for CO2 separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 177, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Prosini, P.P.; Pozio, A.; Botti, S.; Ciardi, R. Electrochemical studies of hydrogen evolution, storage and oxidation on carbon nanotube electrodes. J. Power Sources 2003, 118, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lombardi, I.; Bestetti, M.; Mazzocchia, C.; Cavallotti, P.L.; Ducati, U. Electrochemical Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes for Hydrogen Storage. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2004, 7, A115–A118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sansotera, M.; Gola, M.; Dotelli, G.; Navarrini, W. The role of perfluoropolyethers in the development of polymeric proton exchange membrane fuel cells. In Fluorinated Polymers: Volume 2: Applications; Ameduri., B., Sawada, H., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2016; pp. 356–376. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kumar, R.M.; Sharma, S.K.; Kumar, B.M.; Lahiri, D. Effects of carbon nanotube aspect ratio on strengthening and tribological behavior of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene composite. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 76, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zamani, P.; Higgins, D.C.; Hassan, F.; Fu, X.; Choi, J.-Y.; Hoque, A.; Jiang, G.; Chen, Z. Highly active and porous graphene encapsulating carbon nanotubes as a non-precious oxygen reduction electrocatalyst for hydrogen-air fuel cells. Nano Energy 2016, 26, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, C.; Waje, M.; Wang, X.; Tang, J.M.; Haddon, R.C.; Yan, Y. Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with Carbon Nanotube Based Electrodes. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Moreno, N.G.; Gervasio, D.; García, A.G.; Robles, J.F.P. Polybenzimidazole-multiwall carbon nanotubes composite membranes for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2015, 300, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ebenezer, D.; Neelima, K.; Jagannatham, M.; Haridoss, P. Carbon Nanotubes and Nanohorn Hybrid Composite Buckypaper as Microporous Layer for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell. Fuel Cells 2016, 16, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Berber, M.R.; Hafez, I.H.; Fujigaya, T.; Nakashima, N. A highly durable fuel cell electrocatalyst based on doublepolymer-coated carbon nanotubes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. MoghadamEsfahani, R.A.; Vankova, S.K.; Easton, E.B.; Ebralidze, I.I.; Specchia, S. A hybrid Pt/NbO/CNTs catalyst with high activity and durability for oxygen reduction reaction in PEMFC. Renew. Energy 2020, 154, 913–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jung, D.W.; Park, S.; Ahn, C.Y.; Kim, J.B.; Oh, E.S. Performance Comparison of Pt1–xPdx/Carbon Nanotubes Catalysts in Both Electrodes of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. Fuel Cells 2012, 12, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shahgaldi, S.; Hamelin, J. Improved carbon nanostructures as a novel catalyst support in the cathode side of PEMFC: A critical review. Carbon 2015, 94, 705–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Niaz, S.; Manzoor, T.; Pandith, A.H. Hydrogen storage: Materials, methods and perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 457–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gribov, E.N.; Kuznetsov, A.N.; Golovin, V.A.; Krasnikov, D.V.; Kuznetsov, V.L. Effect of modification of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with nitrogen-containing polymers on the electrochemical performance of Pt/CNT catalysts in PEMFC. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2019, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kojima, Y. Hydrogen storage materials for hydrogen and energy carriers. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 18179–18192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 06883 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Four samples of flexible CNT-filled ultra-high molecular weight PFPE-functionalized electrodes. In figure (b), the electrode is bent until reaching a bent radius of 2 mm, while in figure (c), the flexibility of the PE-CNTF2-5 electrode is displayed.
Figure 1. (a) Four samples of flexible CNT-filled ultra-high molecular weight PFPE-functionalized electrodes. In figure (b), the electrode is bent until reaching a bent radius of 2 mm, while in figure (c), the flexibility of the PE-CNTF2-5 electrode is displayed.
Materials 15 06883 g001
Materials 15 06883 g002 550
Figure 2. Electrical resistivity of UHMWPE-based nanocomposites as a function of the filler contents at two different applied pressures: 17.2 kPa (a,c) and 32.5 kPa (b,d). Trends referred to as PE-CNT0, PE-CNTF1 and PE-CNTF2 are reported in plots (a,b); those related to PE-CB0 and PE-CBF1 are shown in plots (c,d).
Figure 2. Electrical resistivity of UHMWPE-based nanocomposites as a function of the filler contents at two different applied pressures: 17.2 kPa (a,c) and 32.5 kPa (b,d). Trends referred to as PE-CNT0, PE-CNTF1 and PE-CNTF2 are reported in plots (a,b); those related to PE-CB0 and PE-CBF1 are shown in plots (c,d).
Materials 15 06883 g002
Materials 15 06883 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of PE-CNTF2-3 fractured surface with a 100 k× magnification: cross-section (a) and elemental map (b), with elemental fluorine as bright spots of the analyzed sample.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of PE-CNTF2-3 fractured surface with a 100 k× magnification: cross-section (a) and elemental map (b), with elemental fluorine as bright spots of the analyzed sample.
Materials 15 06883 g003
Materials 15 06883 g004 550
Figure 4. TEM images of the PFPE-modified CNTs-based UHMWPE with 1:1 ratio CNT:PFPE and 3% carbon content (PE-CNTF2-3). Details of the functionalized CNT spread network (a) and the scattered rows (b).
Figure 4. TEM images of the PFPE-modified CNTs-based UHMWPE with 1:1 ratio CNT:PFPE and 3% carbon content (PE-CNTF2-3). Details of the functionalized CNT spread network (a) and the scattered rows (b).
Materials 15 06883 g004
Materials 15 06883 g005 550
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammograms of PE-CNT0-5, PE-CNTF1-5, PE-CNTF2-5 (a) and PE-CB0-5, PE-CBF1-5 (b) nanocomposites.
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammograms of PE-CNT0-5, PE-CNTF1-5, PE-CNTF2-5 (a) and PE-CB0-5, PE-CBF1-5 (b) nanocomposites.
Materials 15 06883 g005
Materials 15 06883 g006 550
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of PE-CNTF2-3 and PE-CNTF2-5 composites (a) and three consecutive runs operated on a PE-CNTF2-3 sample (b).
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of PE-CNTF2-3 and PE-CNTF2-5 composites (a) and three consecutive runs operated on a PE-CNTF2-3 sample (b).
Materials 15 06883 g006
Materials 15 06883 g007 550
Figure 7. Surface morphology images [(1.50 × 0.75) μm2] of the CNTs-based nanocomposites. (a) PE-CNT0 sample acquired as-prepared and in air and (b) when the sample is immersed inside the electrolyte (H2SO4 1 M) at the open circuit potential (OCP) (about 0.06 V vs. SHE). (c) PE-CNTF1 sample acquired as prepared and in air and (d) when the sample is immersed inside the electrolyte (H2SO4 1 M) at the OCP (about 0.04 V vs. SHE).
Figure 7. Surface morphology images [(1.50 × 0.75) μm2] of the CNTs-based nanocomposites. (a) PE-CNT0 sample acquired as-prepared and in air and (b) when the sample is immersed inside the electrolyte (H2SO4 1 M) at the open circuit potential (OCP) (about 0.06 V vs. SHE). (c) PE-CNTF1 sample acquired as prepared and in air and (d) when the sample is immersed inside the electrolyte (H2SO4 1 M) at the OCP (about 0.04 V vs. SHE).
Materials 15 06883 g007
Materials 15 06883 g008 550
Figure 8. Surface morphology images of the CNTs-based nanocomposites immersed inside the electrolyte (H2SO4 1 M) and synchronized with the cyclic-voltammetry. (a) PE-CNT0 [(1.50 × 0.55) μm2] and (b) PE-CNTF1 [(1.50 × 0.88) μm2] sample. The (a,b) scanned areas have dissimilar sizes due to different scan rates (1.5 nm/s and 3.0 nm/s, respectively) used to optimize the image quality during the acquisition. The cyclic-voltammetry scan rate is 10 mV/s for both images.
Figure 8. Surface morphology images of the CNTs-based nanocomposites immersed inside the electrolyte (H2SO4 1 M) and synchronized with the cyclic-voltammetry. (a) PE-CNT0 [(1.50 × 0.55) μm2] and (b) PE-CNTF1 [(1.50 × 0.88) μm2] sample. The (a,b) scanned areas have dissimilar sizes due to different scan rates (1.5 nm/s and 3.0 nm/s, respectively) used to optimize the image quality during the acquisition. The cyclic-voltammetry scan rate is 10 mV/s for both images.
Materials 15 06883 g008
Materials 15 06883 g009 550
Figure 9. Thermogravimetric profiles of pristine UHMWPE, bare CNTs, PFPE peroxide, PE-CNT0-3 and PE-CNT0-5 (a), PE-CNTF1-3, PE-CNTF2-3, PE-CNTF1-5 and PE-CNTF2-5 (b) and a detail of the thermograms between 0 to 5 wt.% weight loss of PFPE peroxide, PE-CNT0-5, PE-CNTF1-5 and PE-CNTF2-5 (c).
Figure 9. Thermogravimetric profiles of pristine UHMWPE, bare CNTs, PFPE peroxide, PE-CNT0-3 and PE-CNT0-5 (a), PE-CNTF1-3, PE-CNTF2-3, PE-CNTF1-5 and PE-CNTF2-5 (b) and a detail of the thermograms between 0 to 5 wt.% weight loss of PFPE peroxide, PE-CNT0-5, PE-CNTF1-5 and PE-CNTF2-5 (c).
Materials 15 06883 g009
Materials 15 06883 g010 550
Figure 10. Thermograms of pristine UHMWPE, bare CB, PFPE peroxide, PE-CB0-5 and PE-CBF1-5 (a) and a detail of the thermograms between 0 to 5 wt.% weight loss of PFPE peroxide, PE-CB0-5 and PE-CBF1-5 (b).
Figure 10. Thermograms of pristine UHMWPE, bare CB, PFPE peroxide, PE-CB0-5 and PE-CBF1-5 (a) and a detail of the thermograms between 0 to 5 wt.% weight loss of PFPE peroxide, PE-CB0-5 and PE-CBF1-5 (b).
Materials 15 06883 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sansotera, M.; Marona, V.; Marziani, P.; Dintcheva, N.T.; Morici, E.; Arrigo, R.; Bussetti, G.; Navarrini, W.; Magagnin, L. Flexible Perfluoropolyethers-Functionalized CNTs-Based UHMWPE Composites: A Study on Hydrogen Evolution, Conductivity and Thermal Stability. Materials 2022, 15, 6883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196883

AMA Style

Sansotera M, Marona V, Marziani P, Dintcheva NT, Morici E, Arrigo R, Bussetti G, Navarrini W, Magagnin L. Flexible Perfluoropolyethers-Functionalized CNTs-Based UHMWPE Composites: A Study on Hydrogen Evolution, Conductivity and Thermal Stability. Materials. 2022; 15(19):6883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196883

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sansotera, Maurizio, Valeria Marona, Piergiorgio Marziani, Nadka Tzankova Dintcheva, Elisabetta Morici, Rossella Arrigo, Gianlorenzo Bussetti, Walter Navarrini, and Luca Magagnin. 2022. "Flexible Perfluoropolyethers-Functionalized CNTs-Based UHMWPE Composites: A Study on Hydrogen Evolution, Conductivity and Thermal Stability" Materials 15, no. 19: 6883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196883

APA Style

Sansotera, M., Marona, V., Marziani, P., Dintcheva, N. T., Morici, E., Arrigo, R., Bussetti, G., Navarrini, W., & Magagnin, L. (2022). Flexible Perfluoropolyethers-Functionalized CNTs-Based UHMWPE Composites: A Study on Hydrogen Evolution, Conductivity and Thermal Stability. Materials, 15(19), 6883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196883

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop