Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Compression of a SiC Foam
Next Article in Special Issue
Scattering Analysis of AlGaN/AlN/GaN Heterostructures with Fe-Doped GaN Buffer
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue: Structural Concrete Material—New Trends for Eco-Efficiency and Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of Ga2O3 Schottky Barrier Diode and Heterojunction Diode by MOCVD
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of a Nucleation Layer on Morphology and Grain Size in MOCVD-Grown β-Ga2O3 Thin Films on C-Plane Sapphire

1
Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia, Kengaraga Street 8, LV-1063 Riga, Latvia
2
Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwaldi Str. 1, 50412 Tartu, Estonia
3
Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(23), 8362; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238362
Submission received: 3 November 2022 / Revised: 17 November 2022 / Accepted: 20 November 2022 / Published: 24 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wide and Ultra-Wide Bandgap Semiconductor Materials for Power Devices)

Abstract

:
β-Ga2O3 thin films grown on widely available c-plane sapphire substrates typically exhibit structural defects due to significant lattice and thermal expansion mismatch, which hinder the use of such films in electronic devices. In this work, we studied the impact of a nucleation layer on MOCVD-grown β-Ga2O3 thin film structure and morphology on a c-plane sapphire substrate. The structure and morphology of the films were investigated by X-ray diffraction, atomic force microscopy, transmission and scanning electron microscopy, while the composition was confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and micro-Raman spectroscopy. It was observed that the use of a nucleation layer significantly increases the grain size in the films in comparison to the films without, particularly in the samples in which H2O was used alongside O2 as the oxygen source for the nucleation layer growth. Our study demonstrates that a nucleation layer can play a critical role in obtaining high quality β-Ga2O3 thin films on c-plane sapphire.

1. Introduction

Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) has recently attracted significant scientific attention as a new, promising ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor [1,2]. Several Ga2O3 polymorphs exist of which monoclinic β-Ga2O3 is the thermodynamically most stable phase [3]. It has a 4.6–4.9 eV wide bandgap [4]; therefore, the theoretical limit value of its breakdown voltage exceeds those of the more commonly studied SiC and GaN [5]. Together with its high mechanical strength and chemical and thermal stability [4], β-Ga2O3 properties show promise for a variety of applications in power electronics [5,6,7] and solar-blind deep-ultraviolet photodetectors [8,9].
β-Ga2O3 thin films have been grown by a variety of methods, such as pulsed laser deposition [10,11] and magnetron sputtering [12]; however, molecular beam epitaxy [13,14] and metalorganic chemical vapour deposition (MOCVD) [15,16,17,18] are the most promising methods for high deposition rates and high-quality device fabrication. MOCVD in particular has the advantage of high growth rates (up to 10 μm/h) with sub-nanometre surface roughness [16]. Typically, triethylgallium (TEGa) is used as the Ga precursor and O2 as the oxygen precursor in Ga2O3 MOCVD growth; however, films with a comparable quality have also been grown with the significantly cheaper trimethylgallium (TMGa) [19,20]. Regarding the oxygen precursor, commonly used O2 is the established choice, yet the use of N2O can lead to a lower background charge carrier concentration [21] and the use of water (H2O) vapour can potentially have a positive effect on the kinetic conditions during film growth due to the presence of hydrogen [20]. There are only a few papers reporting the use of H2O as an oxygen precursor; Alema et al. demonstrated a reduction in carrier concentration by adding a small amount of H2O to the O2 flow during the film growth [22], while Lee et al. and Chen et al. reported Ga2O3 film growth using H2O as the oxygen precursor without further discussions on the choice [23,24,25].
The use of native Ga2O3 substrates leads to the highest quality epitaxial films [10,21]; however, they are still expensive and thus currently uneconomical for large-scale production. On the other hand, α-Al2O3 (sapphire) substrates are widely available, but the significant 6.6% lattice and thermal expansion mismatch between the (0001) c-plane sapphire and β-Ga2O3 [26] leads to structural defects during the growth process such as threading dislocations, which hinder the use of such films in electronic devices. Large numbers of threading dislocations lead to formation of low-angle grain boundaries represented as a configuration of edge dislocations, whose axes lie in the plane of the boundary between the grains. In the case of GaN on c-plane sapphire, the high density of dislocations due to the large (~14%) lattice mismatch was overcome by introducing a buffer layer through controlled nucleation of highly crystalline islands [27]. As for Ga2O3, to the best of our knowledge, there are no dedicated reports on the role of a nucleation or a buffer layer in MOCVD growth. Alema et al. reported deposition of a 30 nm thick low-temperature (650 °C) buffer layer on c-plane sapphire before the film overgrowth in order to improve its crystalline quality [16], and Chen et al. used a 15 nm thick nucleation layer, deposited at 600 °C, to grow ε-Ga2O3 film on c-plane sapphire [28]. However, no comparison of the films grown with and without a nucleation layer has been made. A positive effect of a seed layer was recently demonstrated by Gu et al. [29] for sputter-deposited Ga2O3 films on variously oriented silicon substrates, as well as of α-Cr2O3 buffers for α-Ga2O3 growth by Polyakov et al. [30].
In this work, we investigated and compared MOCVD-grown β-Ga2O3 thin films (A) without any nucleation layer, (B) with a nucleation layer grown by using an O2 precursor as the oxygen source and (C) with a nucleation layer grown by using a combination of H2O and O2 precursors. The focus of this study was the film structure and morphology. It was observed that the use of a nucleation layer significantly increases the grain size in our films, particularly in the samples in which H2O was used alongside O2 in the nucleation layer growth. Further development of a more complex nucleation or buffer layer could lead to significantly higher crystalline quality β-Ga2O3 films on widely available c-plane sapphire wafers.

2. Materials and Methods

Heteroepitaxial β-Ga2O3 thin films were grown on 2-inch c-plane sapphire wafers (Biotain Crystal Co. Ltd., Xiamen, China) using the AIX-200RF (AIXTRON, Herzogenrath, Germany) MOCVD system. Trimethyl gallium (TMGa) was used as the gallium source, while water (H2O) and oxygen (O2) were used as oxygen sources. Nitrogen (N2) was used as a carrier gas with the total flow of 3000 standard cubic centimetres per minute (sccm) during the deposition process. Before growth, the sapphire substrates were annealed for 2 min at 1070 °C in a N2 atmosphere at 200 mbar pressure. The main Ga2O3 layer for all samples was deposited in a N2 atmosphere and 30 mbar pressure at 820 °C temperature. TMGa and O2 flow rates were 120 µmol/min and 20 mmol/min, respectively. For a 30 min growth process the thickness of the as-grown thin films was measured to be around 1.5 μm.
Three types of growth procedures were implemented and studied:
  • Sample A was prepared without any nucleation layer.
  • Sample B was prepared with a low-temperature (LT) nucleation layer deposited using O2 precursor as the oxygen source. The amorphous LT layer (around 30 nm thick) was deposited at 720 °C for 150 s with a 90 µmol/min TMGa flow rate and a 16 mmol/min O2 flow rate (Step 1 in Figure 1). Then, the sample temperature was raised to 1030 °C to perform high-temperature annealing of the layer (Step 2 in Figure 1), supposedly crystallizing it as suggested by X-ray diffraction measurements in Figure S1 in supplementary materials. After a 150-s-long dwell time, the temperature of the sample was decreased to the main layer growth temperature (see above) followed by the 30 min deposition (Step 3 in Figure 1).
  • Sample C was prepared with a nucleation layer deposited using both precursors H2O and O2 as the oxygen sources. One LT layer was grown as it was described for Sample B. An additional LT layer was overgrown on top of the first one for 60 s using TMGa and H2O as the gallium and oxygen sources, respectively. The flow rates were 90 µmol/min for TMGa and 320 µmol/min for H2O precursors. Before the growth of the main layer, the temperature was increased to anneal the LT layers similarly as for Sample B.
The thin film surface morphology was examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Thermo Scientific Helios 5 UX, Waltham, MA, USA) and an atomic force microscope (AFM, Veeco, Dimension Edge, Plainview, NY, USA) in tapping mode using a Pointprobe non-contact AFM tip NCHR-50, while the film thickness was determined by ellipsometry (Woollam RC2-XI, Lincoln, NE, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical, X’Pert Pro, Malvern, UK) patterns were measured using Cu Kα irradiation in Bragg–Brentano Theta–Theta geometry, with a step size of 0.026 deg, tube powered by 40 kV and 30 mA and rocking curves (ω-scans) were measured using parallel beam optics and monochromatic (Cu Kα1) radiation, with a step size of 0.001 deg. The lamellae were prepared by focused ion beam (FIB, Thermo Scientific Helios 5 UX, Waltham, MA, USA) to investigate the cross-section of the thin film with a transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Tecnai G20, Hillsboro, OR, USA) operated at 200 kV. The thin film was coated with a 30 nm thick Au layer and a 1.5 µm thick Pt layer to protect the surface from Ga+ exposure during FIB preparation. Micro-Raman spectroscopy measurements were performed using a TriVista 777 confocal Raman system (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ, USA, 750 mm focal length, 1800 lines/mm grating) equipped with an Olympus microscope and UIS2 MPlanN 100 ×/0.90 objective, a continuous-wave diode-pumped laser Cobolt Samba 150 (HÜBNER Photonics, Kassel, Germany) (λ = 532 nm) and Andor iDus DV420A-OE CCD camera (Andor Technology, Belfast, Northern Ireland). The X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS) measurements were performed by an ESCALAB 250Xi (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) instrument to determine the film chemical composition. An Al Kα X-ray tube with the energy of 1486 eV was used as an excitation source, the size of the analysed sample area was 650 μm × 100 μm and the angle between the analyser and the sample surface was 90°. An electron gun was used to perform charge compensation. The base pressure during the spectra acquisition was better than 10−7 mbar.

3. Results and Discussion

The surface morphology of the as-deposited Ga2O3 thin films was investigated with AFM and SEM and is shown in Figure 2. It can be observed that the size of the crystalline domains or grains significantly increases when a nucleation layer is used. The sample without any nucleation layer (Sample A) exhibits a small-grained (sub-micron) structure without any visually distinguishable orientation, while the use of a nucleation layer in Sample B and Sample C seems to lead to much larger grains. Furthermore, the use of a H2O precursor alongside O2 in the nucleation layer growth in Sample C increases the grain size in the overgrown Ga2O3 film even further. During the establishment of the film growth process, a series of films using various O2 and H2O precursor ratios were deposited and it was observed that increasing the proportion of O2 in the precursor flow leads to a higher growth rate and larger grains (see SEM images in Figure S2 in supplementary materials); however, it also favours growth of grains of crystalline orientations other than (−201), as can be seen in the XRD patterns in Figure S3 in supplementary materials. This is caused by the intensive parasitic reaction between TMGa and O2 precursors. In order to reduce the influence of the parasitic reaction, a low process pressure (below 50 mBar) was used. By increasing the pressure above 50 mBar, the film deposition rate decreases drastically. However, in the case of the H2O precursor, even 200 mBar pressure during growth does not affect the deposition rate. Therefore, the use of H2O during the nucleation layer growth in Sample C seems to reduce the misorientation of grains in the initial growth step, which consequently leads to fewer structural defects in the overgrown film and thus, larger grains. The mean grain size was calculated from processing several AFM measurements for each sample. Regarding the surface roughness, maximum peak height values, Rp, were determined from the AFM measurements and calculated to be 178.2 nm (Sample A), 202.9 nm (Sample B) and 367.6 nm (Sample C). The increase in the surface roughness can be attributed to the formation of larger single-crystalline grains, which tend to protrude.
The crystalline structure of the prepared films was studied with XRD and TEM. A typical XRD pattern (2Θ scan) of the films can be seen in Figure 3a, showing a highly crystalline monoclinic β-Ga2O3 phase (ICDD-PDF #41-1103) oriented along [−201] direction. Since all the samples gave qualitatively similar patterns, only one is shown here. Rocking curves (ω-scans) of the (−201) peak for all prepared samples showed similar full-width half-maximum (FWHM) values in the range of 1.82–1.93°, which is comparable to the best reported values in the literature for β-Ga2O3 growth on c-plane sapphire [31,32]. Furthermore, lamellas were prepared in SEM-FIB in order to perform the film cross-section studies with TEM and reveal the crystalline structure of the films. The Ga2O3/sapphire interface can be seen in Figure 3b, confirming the oriented growth of the film. Interplanar distance (d-spacing) of the resolved atomic planes in the Ga2O3 film was measured to be 4.73 Å, which matches well with the [−201] growth direction [33]. The analysis of the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern in Figure 3c also supports this. SEM images of the cross-sections (see Figure 3d for Sample C and Figure S4 in supplementary materials for Samples A and B) show columnar structures with different contrast, which could be visible due to slightly misoriented grains. Grain boundaries visible in the cross-section cuts (see Figure 3e) are typically low-angle grain boundaries with misalignment of 1–3°; however, regions of grain misalignment of up to 18° could be occasionally identified in Sample A and Sample B (see Figure S4). The characteristic quantities for the film structure and morphology are summarised in Table 1.
The film composition and purity were verified with micro-Raman spectroscopy and XPS. The Raman spectrum of a Ga2O3 film is shown in Figure 4a together with a pure sapphire substrate spectrum for comparison. The sapphire substrate peaks are marked with ‘S’, while the rest can be attributed to multiple phonon modes with Ag and Bg symmetry of β-Ga2O3, closely matching the spectral positions reported previously in the literature [34]. The XPS survey scan (see Figure 4b) only indicated the presence of Ga and O elements in stoichiometry closely matching the Ga2O3 compound, as well as surface carbon contaminants. The spectra were calibrated to the adventitious C1s peak at 285.0 eV binding energy. No other elements were detected. The high-resolution spectra of Ga3d and O1s peaks are shown in the inset. The Ga3d peak was located at 20.0 eV with an overlapping O2s peak at around 23.5 eV, while the O1s peak was measured to be at 530.8 eV with a shoulder contribution from the C-O chemical state in the organic surface contaminations. The Ga and O peak binding energy values correspond to the Ga2O3 compound as expected [35].

4. Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated an improvement in grain size and morphology of MOCVD-grown β-Ga2O3 thin films on c-plane sapphire by using a nucleation layer in the initial film growth step. The structure and morphology of the films were investigated by XRD, TEM, SEM and AFM, and the composition was confirmed by XPS and micro-Raman spectroscopy. The films in which a H2O precursor was used alongside O2 as the oxygen source in the nucleation layer growth exhibit larger grains and slightly better crystallinity in comparison to the films with an O2 only nucleation layer. This is possibly due to less intensive parasitic reactions between TMGa and H2O in comparison to TMGa and O2 precursors, causing fewer structural defects in the nucleation layer and thus larger and highly oriented crystalline grains in the overgrown β-Ga2O3 film. Our study demonstrates that a nucleation layer can play a critical role in obtaining high quality β-Ga2O3 thin films on c-plane sapphire, therefore further development of a more complex nucleation or buffer layer recipe could lead to significantly higher crystalline quality β-Ga2O3 films on widely available c-plane sapphire substrates.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15238362/s1, Figure S1: X-ray diffraction patterns of the nucleation layers after annealing at 1030 °C for 150 s. The layers were prepared with (a) O2 and (b) O2 + H2O as the oxygen precursors. The low-temperature layers deposited at 720 °C before the annealing are X-ray amorphous. The unmarked peaks belong to the c-plane sapphire substrate., Figure S2: Scanning electron microscope images of MOCVD-grown Ga2O3 thin films using H2O vapour and O2 gas as oxygen precursors at various ratios. Total oxygen precursor flow was kept constant at 500 sccm. Higher O2 proportion leads to larger grain sizes. Scale bars correspond to 2 μm., Figure S3: X-ray diffraction patterns of MOCVD-grown Ga2O3 thin films using H2O vapour and O2 gas as oxygen precursors at various ratios. Total oxygen precursor flow was kept constant at 500 sccm., Figure S4: Scanning electron images of cross-section cuts of (a) Sample A and (c) Sample B. Transmission electron microscope images of the studied grain boundaries in (b) Sample A and (d) Sample B. Typically, most boundaries found in the samples are low-angle grain boundaries with misalignment of 1–3°, however, regions of grain misalignment up to 18° could be occasionally identified.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.D. and E.B.; Methodology, L.D. and E.B.; Validation, L.D. and E.B.; Investigation, G.S., L.D., B.P., E.B., L.B. and S.O.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, E.B.; Writing—Review & Editing, L.D., E.B. and B.P.; Visualization, E.B.; Supervision, L.D. and E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by the Latvian Council of Science project “Epitaxial Ga2O3 thin films as ultrawide bandgap topological transparent electrodes for ultraviolet optoelectronics” No. lzp-2020/1-0345. S.O. was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 program, under Grant Agreement No. 856705 (ERA Chair “MATTER”). Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia as the Center of Excellence has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme H2020-WIDESPREAD-01-2016-2017-TeamingPhase2 under grant agreement No. 739508, project CAMART².

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Jevgenijs Gabrusenoks for micro-Raman measurements and Annamarija Trausa for assistance with AFM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shi, J.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Qu, M.; Qi, D.; Zhang, K.H.L. Wide Bandgap Oxide Semiconductors: From Materials Physics to Optoelectronic Devices. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2006230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chi, Z.; Asher, J.J.; Jennings, M.R.; Chikoidze, E.; Pérez-Tomás, A. Ga2O3 and Related Ultra-Wide Bandgap Power Semiconductor Oxides: New Energy Electronics Solutions for CO2 Emission Mitigation. Materials 2022, 15, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bosi, M.; Mazzolini, P.; Seravalli, L.; Fornari, R. Ga2O3 polymorphs: Tailoring the epitaxial growth conditions. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 10975–10992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pearton, S.J.; Yang, J.; Cary, P.H., IV; Ren, F.; Kim, J.; Tadjer, M.J.; Mastro, M.A. A review of Ga2O3 materials, processing, and devices. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2018, 5, 011301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Green, A.J.; Speck, J.; Xing, G.; Moens, P.; Allerstam, F.; Gumaelius, K.; Higashiwaki, M. β-Gallium oxide power electronics. APL Mater. 2022, 10, 029201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pearton, S.J.; Ren, F.; Tadjer, M.; Kim, J. Perspective: Ga2O3 for ultra-high power rectifiers and MOSFETS. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 124, 220901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zhang, J.; Dong, P.; Dang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, Q.; Xiang, H.; Su, J.; Liu, Z.; Si, M.; Gao, J.; et al. Ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor Ga2O3 power diodes. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Varshney, U.; Aggarwal, N.; Gupta, G. Current advances in solar-blind photodetection technology: Using Ga2O3 and AlGaN. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 1573–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaur, D.; Kumar, M. A Strategic Review on Gallium Oxide Based Deep-Ultraviolet Photodetectors: Recent Progress and Future Prospects. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2002160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jeon, H.M.; Leedy, K.D.; Look, D.C.; Chang, C.S.; Muller, D.A.; Badescu, S.C.; Chabak, K.D. Homoepitaxial β-Ga2O3 transparent conducting oxide with conductivity σ = 2323 S cm−1. APL Mater. 2021, 9, 101105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khartsev, S.; Nordell, N.; Hammar, M.; Purans, J.; Hallén, A. High-Quality Si-Doped β-Ga2O3 Films on Sapphire Fabricated by Pulsed Laser Deposition. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res. 2021, 258, 2–6. [Google Scholar]
  12. Saikumar, A.K.; Nehate, S.D.; Sundaram, K.B. Review: RF Sputtered Films of Ga2O3. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2019, 8, Q3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vogt, P.; Hensling, F.; Azizie, K.; Chang, C.; Turner, D.; Park, J.; McCandless, J. Adsorption-controlled growth of Ga2O3 by suboxide molecular-beam epitaxy. APL Mater. 2021, 9, 031101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Krishnamoorthy, S.; Xia, Z.; Bajaj, S.; Brenner, M.; Rajan, S. Delta-doped β-gallium oxide field-effect transistor. Appl. Phys. Express 2017, 10, 051102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Alema, F.; Mauze, A.; Koksaldi, O.S.; Miller, R.; Osinsky, A.; Speck, J.S. MOCVD grown epitaxial β-Ga2O3 thin film with an electron mobility of 176 cm2/Vs at room temperature. APL Mater. 2019, 7, 022506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Alema, F.; Hertog, B.; Osinsky, A.; Mukhopadhyay, P.; Toporkov, M.; Schoenfeld, W.V. Fast growth rate of epitaxial β–Ga2O3 by close coupled showerhead MOCVD. J. Cryst. Growth 2017, 475, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kjapsna, A.; Dimitrocenko, L.; Tale, I.; Trukhin, A.; Ignatans, R.; Grants, R. Characterization of crystalline structure and morphology of Ga2O3 thin film grown by MOCVD technique. Key Eng. Mater. 2017, 721, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, Z.; Anhar Uddin Bhuiyan, A.F.M.; Karim, M.R.; Zhao, H. MOCVD homoepitaxy of Si-doped (010) β-Ga2O3 thin films with superior transport properties. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 114, 250601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Seryogin, G.; Seryogin, G.; Alema, F.; Valente, N.; Fu, H.; Steinbrunner, E.; Neal, A.T.; Osinsky, A. MOCVD growth of high purity Ga2O3 epitaxial films using trimethylgallium precursor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 117, 262101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wagner, G.; Baldini, M.; Gogova, D.; Schmidbauer, M.; Schewski, R.; Albrecht, M.; Fornari, R. Homoepitaxial growth of β-Ga2O3 layers by metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy. Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 2014, 211, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alema, F.; Alema, F.; Zhang, Y.; Osinsky, A.; Orishchin, N.; Valente, N.; Mauze, A.; Speck, J.S. Low 10·14 cm−3 free carrier concentration in epitaxial β-Ga2O3 grown by MOCVD. APL Mater. 2020, 8, 021110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alema, F.; Zhang, Y.; Mauze, A.; Itoh, T.; Speck, J.S.; Hertog, B.; Osinsky, A. H2O vapor assisted growth of β-Ga2O3 by MOCVD. AIP Adv. 2020, 10, 085002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, J.; Kim, H.; Gautam, L.; He, K.; Hu, X.; Dravid, V.; Razeghi, M. Study of Phase Transition in MOCVD Grown Ga2O3 from κ to β Phase by Ex Situ and In Situ Annealing. Photonics 2021, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, J.; Kim, H.; Gautam, L.; Razeghi, M. Highly Conductive Co-Doped Ga2O3:Si-In Grown by MOCVD. Coatings 2021, 11, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, W.; Chen, Z.; Li, Z.; Fei, Z.; Pei, Y.; Wang, G.; He, Z. Heteroepitaxy of ε-Ga2O3 thin films grown on AlN/Si(111) templates by metal–organic chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 581, 152335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nakagomi, S.; Kokubun, Y. Crystal orientation of β-Ga2O3 thin films formed on c-plane and a-plane sapphire substrate. J. Cryst. Growth 2012, 349, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gibart, P. Metal organic vapour phase epitaxy of GaN and lateral overgrowth. Reports Prog. Phys. 2004, 67, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhuo, Y.; Chen, W.; Ma, X.; Pei, Y.; Wang, G. Layer-by-layer growth of ε-Ga2O3 thin film by metal–organic chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Express 2018, 11, 101101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gu, K.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, K.; Huang, J.; Shang, Y.; Shen, Y.; Liao, M.; Wang, L. Effect of a seed layer on microstructure and electrical properties of Ga2O3 films on variously oriented Si substrates. Vacuum 2022, 195, 110671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Polyakov, A.; Nikolaev, V.; Stepanov, S.; Almaev, A.; Pechnikov, A.; Yakimov, E.B.; Kushnarev, B.O.; Shchemerov, I.V.; Scheglov, M.; Chernykh, A.V.; et al. Effects of sapphire substrate orientation on Sn-doped α-Ga2O3 grown by halide vapor phase epitaxy using α-Ga2O3 buffers. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2022, 55, 495102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gogova, D.; Ghezellou, M.; Tran, D.Q.; Richter, S.; Papamichail, A.; Hassan, J.U.; Darakchieva, V. Epitaxial growth of β-Ga2O3 by hot-wall MOCVD. AIP Adv. 2022, 12, 055022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rafique, S.; Han, L.; Neal, A.T.; Mou, S.; Tadjer, M.J.; French, R.H.; Zhao, H. Heteroepitaxy of N-type β-Ga2O3 thin films on sapphire substrate by low pressure chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 132103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Åhman, J.; Svensson, G.; Albertsson, J. A Reinvestigation of β-Gallium Oxide. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1996, 52, 1336–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kranert, C.; Sturm, C.; Schmidt-Grund, R.; Grundmann, M. Raman tensor elements of β-Ga2O3. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Ghose, S.; Rahman, S.; Hong, L.; Rojas-Ramirez, J.S.; Jin, H.; Park, K.; Droopad, R. Growth and characterization of β-Ga2O3 thin films by molecular beam epitaxy for deep-UV photodetectors. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 122, 095302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic of Ga2O3 thin film MOCVD growth steps using a nucleation layer. After the high-temperature annealing of the substrate, a few-nm thick low-temperature Ga2O3 layer is deposited at 720 °C (Step 1). It is then annealed for 150 s at 1030 °C (Step 2), followed by the overgrowth of Ga2O3 film at 820 °C (Step 3).
Figure 1. A schematic of Ga2O3 thin film MOCVD growth steps using a nucleation layer. After the high-temperature annealing of the substrate, a few-nm thick low-temperature Ga2O3 layer is deposited at 720 °C (Step 1). It is then annealed for 150 s at 1030 °C (Step 2), followed by the overgrowth of Ga2O3 film at 820 °C (Step 3).
Materials 15 08362 g001
Figure 2. Atomic force microscopy (10 µm × 10 µm scans) and scanning electron microscopy images of (a,b) Sample A, (c,d) Sample B and (e,f) Sample C, respectively, showing the surface morphology of the as-grown Ga2O3 films.
Figure 2. Atomic force microscopy (10 µm × 10 µm scans) and scanning electron microscopy images of (a,b) Sample A, (c,d) Sample B and (e,f) Sample C, respectively, showing the surface morphology of the as-grown Ga2O3 films.
Materials 15 08362 g002
Figure 3. (a) A typical X-ray diffraction pattern of a Ga2O3 film on c-plane sapphire, all samples gave qualitatively similar patterns. The inset shows rocking curves (ω-scans) of the (−201) peak of the studied samples. (b) A transmission electron microscope image of the Ga2O3/sapphire interface in Sample C, showing the Ga2O3 growth direction and interplanar spacing, with (c) selected area electron diffraction pattern of the Ga2O3 film. (d) Scanning electron image of the cross-section cut of Sample C. (e) An example of a low-angle grain boundary typically observed in Sample C.
Figure 3. (a) A typical X-ray diffraction pattern of a Ga2O3 film on c-plane sapphire, all samples gave qualitatively similar patterns. The inset shows rocking curves (ω-scans) of the (−201) peak of the studied samples. (b) A transmission electron microscope image of the Ga2O3/sapphire interface in Sample C, showing the Ga2O3 growth direction and interplanar spacing, with (c) selected area electron diffraction pattern of the Ga2O3 film. (d) Scanning electron image of the cross-section cut of Sample C. (e) An example of a low-angle grain boundary typically observed in Sample C.
Materials 15 08362 g003
Figure 4. (a) A typical micro-Raman spectrum of as-grown Ga2O3 thin films, the phonon modes and their respective values in cm−1 are indicated above each peak. The sapphire substrate spectrum is shown for comparison, its Raman peaks are marked with ‘S’. (b) A typical XPS survey spectrum of as-grown Ga2O3 thin films. The insets show individual Ga 3d and O 1s peak scans. All the prepared samples gave qualitatively similar results.
Figure 4. (a) A typical micro-Raman spectrum of as-grown Ga2O3 thin films, the phonon modes and their respective values in cm−1 are indicated above each peak. The sapphire substrate spectrum is shown for comparison, its Raman peaks are marked with ‘S’. (b) A typical XPS survey spectrum of as-grown Ga2O3 thin films. The insets show individual Ga 3d and O 1s peak scans. All the prepared samples gave qualitatively similar results.
Materials 15 08362 g004
Table 1. Characteristic parameters for the as-grown β-Ga2O3 film structure and morphology.
Table 1. Characteristic parameters for the as-grown β-Ga2O3 film structure and morphology.
Sample ASample BSample C
Maximum peak height (roughness) Rp, nm178.2202.9367.6
Mean grain size, μm0.3891.5021.989
Rocking curve FWHM, degrees1.931.871.82
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dimitrocenko, L.; Strikis, G.; Polyakov, B.; Bikse, L.; Oras, S.; Butanovs, E. The Effect of a Nucleation Layer on Morphology and Grain Size in MOCVD-Grown β-Ga2O3 Thin Films on C-Plane Sapphire. Materials 2022, 15, 8362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238362

AMA Style

Dimitrocenko L, Strikis G, Polyakov B, Bikse L, Oras S, Butanovs E. The Effect of a Nucleation Layer on Morphology and Grain Size in MOCVD-Grown β-Ga2O3 Thin Films on C-Plane Sapphire. Materials. 2022; 15(23):8362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238362

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dimitrocenko, Lauris, Gundars Strikis, Boris Polyakov, Liga Bikse, Sven Oras, and Edgars Butanovs. 2022. "The Effect of a Nucleation Layer on Morphology and Grain Size in MOCVD-Grown β-Ga2O3 Thin Films on C-Plane Sapphire" Materials 15, no. 23: 8362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238362

APA Style

Dimitrocenko, L., Strikis, G., Polyakov, B., Bikse, L., Oras, S., & Butanovs, E. (2022). The Effect of a Nucleation Layer on Morphology and Grain Size in MOCVD-Grown β-Ga2O3 Thin Films on C-Plane Sapphire. Materials, 15(23), 8362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238362

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop