Next Article in Journal
High-Throughput Preparation and Characterization of ZrMoTaW Refractory Multi-Principal Element Alloy Film
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Response of Glass–Epoxy Composites with Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Mechanical Fatigue at Different States of Charge on Pouch-Type Li-Ion Batteries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Automotive Diesel Fuel Internal Stability Testing with the Use of UV and Temperature as Degradation Factors

by
Michal Borecki
1,*,
Mateusz Geca
2 and
Michael L. Korwin-Pawlowski
3
1
Institute of Microelectronics and Optoelectronics, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
3
Département d’informatique et d’ingénierie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC J8X 3X7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(23), 8548; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238548
Submission received: 19 October 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 25 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Degradation and Evolution of Energy Materials)

Abstract

:
Diesel fuel stability can be considered from many points of view, of which the two considered most important are stability in contact with the environment and internal stability. Fuel stability in touch with the environment is often defined as oxidation stability, of which measurement procedures are well developed. The presented paper shows that fuel’s internal stability can also be important. The internal stability of diesel fuel with the local use of thermal and ultraviolet radiation (UV) as degradation factors and fluorescence signals as a probe is presented in this paper. We show that the internal degradation of fuel with temperature use differs from that with UV and simultaneous both factors use. Our study shows that using temperature as a degradation factor introduces significant fluorescence fading. Moreover, the fluorescence signal restores significantly later than the sample stabilizes at room temperature. The novelty proposed based on examination is hybrid degradation and an examination cycle that enables the simultaneous use of degradation factors and fluorescence reading. For this purpose, a dedicated measurement setup of signal control and processing was constructed and programmed. The measurement procedure of the data series for specific wavelength enables calculation of signal shifts that allow the internal stability classification of diesel fuel samples in less than 30 min with the cost of a single disposable capillary probe and one polymer plug. Premium and regular fuel examination results show that internal fuel stability can be related to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) concentrations and can be modified with dedicated additives.

1. Introduction

For users of automotive diesel (EN 590), the stability of its parameters is a crucial issue [1]. Fuel stability may be analyzed from a producer, distribution chain, and end-user point of view and is directly connected with its composition. Primary chemical stability refers to the resistance of a chemical to change in a chemical reaction. While diesel fuel is a complex chemical system, reactions may occur inside the sample and in contact with surroundings, notably, tank walls and the atmosphere at specific conditions. The mentioned conditions, such as temperature and lighting, can be the energy source for the activation or progress of the fuel degradation reaction [2]. The standard diesel fuel stability testing includes oxidation stability affected by the contact of fuel with its environment. Internal stability refers to the chemical reactions inside the fuel exclusively between the internal components of the fuel. The internal stability of diesel fuel is not yet well recognized. Some initial examinations of the internal stability of fuels used infrared spectral characteristics comparisons [3].
Automotive diesel fuel consists of the fuel base, fuel improvers, and impurities. Standard fuel base components may include petroleum diesel (petro-diesel) and synthetic diesel (syn-diesel). According to the EN 590:2009 standard, the optional automotive diesel fuel components can consist of up to 7% of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME).
Petro-diesel is produced in a refinery [4]. Petro-diesel for road vehicles consists mainly of hydrocarbons with carbon numbers in the range of C9–C20, which result from distillation in the temperature range of 160–360 °C. It contains primarily branched-chain alkanes and alkenes, including cycloalkanes. Alkanes are only weakly reactive with most chemical compounds. Cycloalkanes in petro-diesel are very stable; their reactions are like alkanes [5]. Petro-diesel also contains different volumes of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), including oil-characteristic alkylated C2–C4-PAH [6,7,8]. The presence of PAHs in petro-diesel depends on the crude oil characteristics, the specific boiling point of PAH, the distillation range, and the use of a side-stream product of the distillation [9,10], as presented in Table 1. Determining the PAH concentration is not straightforward [11,12,13,14], but some PAHs offer exciting properties. For example, 1-methylnaphthalene, which delays long ignition, enables the use of it as the lowest reference point of cetane number (0) [15].
The stability of PAHs in free form can be deducted from recommended storage conditions. They should be kept in a tightly closed container kept at room temperature. For example, naphthalene sublimes at room temperature. However, the rest of the listed PAHs are stable under standard laboratory conditions, but all PAHs can be oxidized [16]. Some PAHs, such as perylene and benzo[a]pyrene, undergo photo-oxidation after sun or ultraviolet light irradiation. PAHs have intrinsic fluorescence properties in the ultraviolet and blue light spectrum [17]. Pyrene can act as an efficient fluorescent probe of polar solutions. The changes in the polarity of the immediate environment of the pyrene can result in the fluorescence spectrum changes of intensity or shift wavelength of peak [18,19]. Fluorescent sensitivity of pyrene to lipids was reported, with peaks of emissions observed at 375 nm, 400 nm, and a hill at 460 nm [20]. PAHs’ presence in diesel fuel is of concern because of their chemical activity and toxic potential [21,22,23].
Syn-diesel can be produced from any carbonaceous material based on pyrolysis, hydrotreatment, or gas-to-liquid conversion [24,25]. Syn-diesel manufactured from natural gas can create the best clean fuel characterized by a high level of stability [26,27].
Bio-diesel components may include fatty acid methyl esters (FAME), hydrogenated vegetable oil (HVO), or raw vegetable oil [28,29]. FAME may include saturated and unsaturated components [30]. Some unsaturated parts of fatty acids with double bonds are susceptible to chemical oxidation and can generate acids and water [31]. It should be noted that FAME prepared by transesterification oxidation stability can be four times worse than petro-diesel [32]. HVO derived from hydrogenation and hydrocracking has similar chemical properties as petro-diesel. Still, since it is free from sulfur, oxygen, and aromatic hydrocarbons, it is considered a high-quality diesel substitute and can be used directly as diesel fuel [33].
Diesel fuel often contains additives. Detergents and dispersants are the most crucial performance additives [34]. The function of other additives can be described as oxidation inhibitors (antioxidants), corrosion inhibitors, demulsifiers, anti-icing, and lubricants [35,36].
Diesel fuel may contain contaminations, such as water, waxes, microbes, and particulate matter [37,38]. Diesel fuel contamination starts at the refinery, continues at distribution and storage facilities, and ends at fuel tanks in vehicles. The particulate matter contaminants may include metals, such as Fe, Al, Cr, Cu, trace amounts of Zn, Na, Pb, metal oxides, debris, and oxidation by-products [39,40]. The fuel cleanliness characterization method was standardized in ISO 4406.

1.1. Automotive Diesel Fuel Stability

Automotive diesel fuel is a liquid mixture of liquids and particle components. This mixture’s main components are chemically stable hydrocarbons, but some active components, such as FAME and PAHs, are allowed in limited concentrations [41]. The basic properties of diesel fuel are described by three main characteristics of their hydrocarbon molecules, type-length, and shape of the hydrocarbon skeleton and functional groups present [42]. However, intermolecular interactions in diesel fuels are strong and cannot simply be neglected [43,44,45]. Thus, chemical and physical phenomena define the stability of automotive diesel fuel.
In everyday language, a chemical substance is stable if it does not react with the environment and is not internally self-degradable. In particular, the expected usefulness should be retained under standard storage conditions, including air, moisture, and exposure to temperature and light. Chemical stability, when used in the technical sense, means the thermodynamic stability of a chemical system. Thus, chemical stability can be defined in closed chemical systems, referred to as internal stability, or in open systems that are in contact with the environment [46,47].
The typical reactions that occur during diesel fuel storage, caused by contact with the environment, are hydrolysis, microbial growth, and oxidation. Hydrolysis happens when the fuel is exposed to water that has entered the tank with air, a situation described by relative humidity. The visible results of diesel fuel hydrolysis are a change in fuel coloration and sludge present at the bottom of the tank [48]. Microbes live in the water–diesel interface [49,50]. Oxidation reaction occurs when diesel fuel is exposed to oxygen, which happens in standard storage conditions. Oxygen attacks molecules of the fuel and various oxidation products are created, such as aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, and insoluble deposits [51].
Impurities from the refining process, as well as from the bio-diesel components treatment, result in the degradation of the fuel [52,53,54]. Mixing of fuel components can lead to chemical reactions that result in undesired products [55]. By contrast, modern microemulsion fuels with excellent time stability are candidates as alternative fuels [56].
Physical fuel stability is often related to the colloid (emulsion) form of liquid that results in phase separation and sedimentation processes. The proposed reaction type that results in sediment is due to phenalene (PAH) converted to phenalenone, which reacts further [57]. Photophysical properties of phenalenone derivatives are that some absorb 300–429 nm and emit 348–578 nm of light [58]. Physical effects of colloid stability as phase separation are used in some standardized tests of fuel oxidation stability, for example, ISO 12205:1995, DIN EN 15751, and DIN EN 16091. In most examinations, oxygen is mixed with fuel, and temperature is elevated. Therefore, these tests do not represent real-life conditions, and in many cases, test results correlation to real-life usefulness is unclear [59]. Tests without aggressive fuel mixing with oxygen have been proposed, such as ASTM D4625. The result of such tests during which fuel samples are stored at elevated temperatures are available only after 24 weeks.
Physical parameters of colloids, including phase stability, can be examined with the use of an optical sensing method, such as UV-VIS, spectroscopy, turbidimetry, and dynamic light scattering [60,61,62,63]. Besides the physical phase of colloid stability, the thermo-stability and photostability of diesel fuel are under investigation [64]. The examination method of photostability is at the proposition phase [65].

1.2. Fuel Degradation Factors

The degradation factors can be of chemical and physical type. The most intuitive chemical degradation factor is the presence of oxygen. Still, its volume is limited as modern automotive fuel systems, and storage tanks are effectively sealed to limit evaporative emissions. Therefore, oxidation of fuel is possible with oxygen present in the tank. Assuming that a 10-L tank is half filled with fuel, we obtain 5 L of fuel and about 1 L of oxygen. Thus, 5 L of fuel with a density of 0.85 kg/L gives 4.25 kg. Assuming cetane as a representative hydrocarbon with 226.44 g/mol, we obtain 18.76 mols of fuel particles. Considering that 25% of fuel particles are chemically active, the result is 4.69 mols of active particles. Parameters for oxygen are density 1.429 kg/m3 and 32 g/mol; thus, we obtained 0.044 mols of oxygen. The conclusion of comparing the number of mols of oxygen and the unsaturated hydrocarbons is that oxygen can react with about 1% of fuel hydrocarbon components. Thus, direct fuel oxidation with an unlimited oxygen supply is just a model-type measure of an automotive diesel fuel’s actual stability.
Internal chemical contaminations can significantly impact fuel stability; thus, they can be considered indirect degradation factors. Activating reactions of contaminations with unsaturated hydrocarbon components sometimes require energy, and the energy type can be viewed as a degradation factor [66,67].
The most intuitive physical degradation factors are UV radiation and temperature.
It was shown that UV irradiation impacts diesel fuel’s chemical composition and selected physicochemical properties [68]. The temperature influence on diesel fuel degradation was also presented [69]. Since steel tanks are now being replaced with polymer tanks with visible transparency, the photostability of fuel gains significance.

1.3. Summary

Automotive diesel fuel may be described as a heterogeneous reactive mixture with the chemical stability of a kinematic and a thermodynamic type [70]. Molecules of automotive diesel fuel react not only with atmospheric oxygen but also with themselves. Moreover, some contaminants can act as catalysts for reactions [71]. Until now, fuel degradation is typically examined using standard glass containers in batch thermal stressing conditions. The typical sign of fuel degradation is the formation of solid deposits. In laboratories, internal fuel stability is characterized by decomposition products that are measured using gas chromatography and mass detection. In this method, the fuel sample usually requires initial preparation, including storage in specified conditions. Direct examinations of active fuel component concentrations that can affect internal fuel stability, such as PAH in non-water liquids, are also conducted in laboratory setups using glass cuvettes, specialized optoelectronic devices, and advanced chemical procedures [72,73]. By contrast, the ultraviolet-induced fluorescence signatures seem promising to evaluate diesel fuel for detecting PAH concentration. Reported results for standard examinations showed a peak for fluorescence excitation of about 370 nm and emission in the 420 nm range [74]. The fluorescence intensity versus pollution concentration first increased and then decreased.
As of today, used automotive fuel stability testing standards are not suitable for implementation in sensors, and a new method is required. While methods of oxidation stability are well described, the practices of fuel internal stability testing are in the initial stage of investigations. To examine the internal stability of fuel, the realization of reproducible and fast energy transfer methods to fuel samples is essential. Such energy transfer can be performed with the light irradiation of fuel closed in the transparent and thin walls of a capillary positioned over micro-heaters [75]. A similar configuration of the measurement system with remote local fuel heating, but without UV irradiation, was used to test fuel quality [76]. Additionally, a similar configuration measurement setup with UV irradiation of the fuel sample but without local heating was used to examine fuel sample degradation [77,78].
This paper presents new results of examinations of the internal stability of automobile diesel fuels with the simultaneous use of two degradation mechanisms: thermal and UV. The correct simultaneous application of degradation factors and fluorescence reading is not a trivial task since, during intensive heating and lighting of the sample, partial and temporary fading of the fluorescent signal informing about the state of the fuel is to be expected. In addition, the requirement of the time necessary to regenerate the signal is presented. The novelty of the proposed method is also in the construction of a measuring system that enables quick changes in the fuel state and synchronization of degrading factors with the test signals that induce fluorescence at the appropriate moments.
The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the fuels used for the examination. Section 3 depicts a measurement head with a disposable optrode for automotive diesel fuel internal stability examination with the use of UV and temperature as the only degradation factors. Section 4 describes the measurement setup configuration, construction, and initial tests that are necessary to set the basic parameters of degradation cycles. Section 5 addresses operational research of degradation and examination cycles, including constant and modulated degradation factors. Section 6 reports the results of the fluorescent signal analysis in the hybrid degradation and examination cycle. Section 7 presents short conclusions.

2. Diesel Fuels for Experiments

Samples of commercial, automotive diesel fuels that meet EU standards from the same manufacturer of regular and premium quality fuel were used in this study. The time sequence of the investigations is presented in Figure 1.
Premium fuels of summer type were subjected to a long-term degradation test in the optical darkroom, Figure 2.
The fuels were poured to the same level and stored in closed jars and opened glasses. Sealed fuels seem not to be degraded. Their color, as well as transparency, are unchanged. Samples with free access to the atmosphere broke down completely. Color changes and deposits are visible. Some of the fuel evaporated. Interestingly, it seems that the effect of long-term oxidation does not depend on the type of fuel tested.
According to the manufacturer, the main difference between summer and winter types of fuels was in used additives that change the structure of paraffin crystals, and thus the temperature blocking the cold filter (CFPP). The parameters of the fuels in the summer version and corresponding measurement standards are presented in Table 2. The difference between regular and premium versions is mainly in the cetane number (CN) and the biofuel content; the fuel stability measured according to EN15751 standard seems to be the same for both.
The fuel samples were used unmodified and modified with an additional commercial multipurpose enriching additive, which extends engine life by cleaning and protecting against sludge formation in the fuel line. This additive was selected on the assumption that sludge formation is one of the leading indicators of fuel degradation. It is, however, challenging to choose the additive for a particular diesel fuel to achieve the expected fuel stability [79]. The standard volume of fuel samples was 100 mL, while the additive capacity was 1 mL. The colors of the fuel sample and the additive were similar. The fuel samples for the experiment were positioned in measuring glasses 20 cm tall, with a scale, and stored in dark conditions at 20 °C. The following abbreviations of fuel samples are used further on: PDFU—premium diesel fuel unmodified, PDFA—premium diesel fuel with an additional enriching additive, RDFU—regular diesel fuel unmodified, and RDFA—regular diesel fuel with an enriching additive. To account for possible differences due to the season when the tests were made, RDFU(s) is regular diesel fuel used in summer, and RDFU(w) is used in winter. Besides the mentioned fuels in selected initial experiments, an old type of diesel fuel, 100% of FAME clear component, and reference diesel fuel obtained directly from a refinery were used.

3. Design Principle of the Head with Disposable Optrode for Diesel Fuel Internal Stability Examination with the Use of UV and Temperature as Exclusive Factors of Degradation

The proposed method of stability testing based on the observation of results of diesel fuel degradation in a capillary stored on the lab windowsill and exposed to variable temperature and lighting for one year is illustrated in Figure 3. The unmodified and modified fuels of regular type were examined in different conditions of contact with air. The sample at the top of Figure 3 of fresh fuel is transparent; on its left side, the polymer cork is visible. Below, premium fuel in unmodified type stored in a capillary with both ends open is presented. The most significant changes in fuel appearance are in the area of fuel contact with air, but inside the sample, changes are also visible. The piece of unmodified fuel with one end of the capillary closed also shows that most of the changes in fuel happen at its contact with air. The modified fuel with multipurpose enriching additive shows minor optical changes at air contact. Still, changes are present in the entire sample volume, indicating that the presence of surfactants prevents the fuel from directly contacting the air.
The photodegradation of fuel samples at air contact can be explained as the result of UV radiation absorption by a PAH molecule that is subsequently transferred to molecular oxygen dissolved from the air. This process generates highly reactive singlet oxygen atoms, which results in a series of specific reactions and degradation products. These products are not characteristic of a diesel fuel’s internal stability. As PAH inside a sample absorbs UV energy, it can also be transferred to other molecules that form free radicals that can join other PAH molecules forming substituted aromatics and causing subsequent formation and growth of other PAHs. Besides basic PAHs, alkenes and complex PAHs, such as 2-methylnaphthalene or butylbenzene, can react under UV radiation, influencing fluorescence. Thus, PAHs and alkenes may be a reason for sediment growth in the fuel sample, as presented in Figure 2. Therefore, fluorescence must be measured in bands, not peaks referring to separate specified PAHs. It is also expected that temperature is essential in affecting both the structure and diversity of the PAHs formed [80].
It is evident that internal fuel degradation is a natural phenomenon and cannot be omitted when fuel stability is examined. The task of internal stability examination can be realized with a capillary optrode that provides protection of a section of the fuel sample from direct contact with the environment but enables fuel sample local degradation with UV and thermal radiation. The idea of diesel fuel internal section exclusive degradation with heat is presented in Figure 4.
Capillaries used as optrodes were of the CV7087 type made from clear fused quartz by VitroCom, with lengths of 100 mm. The examined fuel sample was positioned in the capillary with the plug and by capillary forces. The fuel inside the capillary can be ordered into three sections, including two separation sections and a section under local degradation. The heat from the micro-heater concentrates in its close area [81]. The degradation temperature was set to 90 °C below the water boiling point and significantly higher than ambient air temperatures.
The idea of diesel fuel internal degradation with UV radiation and the reading of degradation results is presented in Figure 4. The simplified scheme of the positions of light beam paths in the capillary head is illustrated in Figure 5. The main simplification is a two-dimensional and cut-down presentation of the structure of the head. The minor simplification assumes a low thickness of the capillary wall compared to the diameter of the capillary hole. Results are an arbitrary position of parasitic signals, which can be reflected from the capillary optrode, the micro-heater, and the optrode housing. The signal gathered in the detection fiber includes some portion of the excitation signal, but the usable signal of fluorescence is free of such influence. Therefore, the detection of fuel degradation can be appropriately performed.
The UV degradation factor must consider the Earth’s surface radiation by the sun [82]. That means that the deepest possible UV wavelength is 350 s. By contrast, used wavelengths should excite particles in diesel fuel, including particles of PAH and microbial organisms, giving a fluorescence signal. The wavelength of 365 nm was proposed for the excitation of PAH particles in the soil as anthracene and pyrene. This excitation results in emission peaks in 401 nm and 500 nm in bands wider than 50 nm [83]. For the mentioned excitation of fluorescence and degradation wavelength, it was shown that degradation of fuel results in a shift of peaks’ amplitude and wavelength as increasing peaks with greater wavelength and decreasing heights with lower wavelength. The 365 nm wavelength also excites the fluorescence of microbial organisms at 675 nm with a bandwidth of 10 nm.

4. Measurement Setup Construction and Configuration

The measurement setup is built using standard commercial optoelectronic modules and a house-made head; it is presented in Figure 6.
The personal computer (PC) controls the experiments and data collection. The DasyLab software is used to control the degradation factors and data synchronization. The SpectraSuite software is for spectral data acquisition from Ocean Optics spectrometer HR2000+. DasyLab and SpectraSuite run simultaneously. DasyLab is equipped with a dedicated multipurpose script named DMPS. DasyLab measurement control is realized in hardware with the use of card USB-4716 from Advantech.
The LED M365FP and LED driver DC2100 were used as the UV (365 nm) source. The LED current limit was set to 50 mA. The measurement system controls the operation of the UV source directly with a triggering signal and monitors it with the amplified detector PDA36A and with a fiber bundle probe RP20 use. The fiber bundle probe consists of an arm to carry light from a LED source to a head and an arm to bring light to the detector. The optical power delivered by fiber to the head was 1.6 mW.
The optical signal is transmitted from the head to the HR2000+ spectrometer with the patch cord P600-1-UV-VIS. The DMPS also controls the spectrometer and SpectraSuite software’s work by triggering the acquisition signal. The integration time of spectra data is set in the software to 50 ms.
The DMPS is also equipped with a proportional–integral–derivative regulation section. It controls the micro-heater through the electric power unit consisting of the programmable power supply type HM8143 and the reference power resistor that acts as a current probe enabling the stabilization of temperature generated at the micro-heater’s surface to 90 ± 0.5 °C. The temperature of the fuel sample in the capillary above the micro-heater stabilizes in about 15 s.
The schematic of the head is presented in Figure 7, and the view of the house-made head is in Figure 8.
The base of the sensor head is made of alumina, its diameter is 7 cm, and its height is 5 mm. V-groves with uniform cross-sections were used to position the optical fibers and the optrode on the base. Capillary sections used as optrode were CV7087 from VitroCom, with an outer diameter of 870 µm. As the optical fiber outer diameter must be as close as possible to the capillary optrode, thus the optical fiber FG550UEC was used. Fiber buffers were removed for positioning purposes. To secure the fibers in the base and enable appropriate optical signal coupling, a short section of capillary TSP700850 from Polymicro with an outer diameter of 850 µm and inner diameter of 700 µm was used as a fiber’s buffer replacement. The head base was mounted on the aluminum heat sink, with triple the area of the base with 2 mm high copper spacers that enable the movement of air in the head. The head was mounted in a black plastic box 14 cm in height, 26 cm wide, and 45 cm long, with a removable cover, SMA fiber connectors, and culverts for power wires.

4.1. Initial Examinations with Static Fluorescence Readings

Preliminary tests determined the fluorescence emission bands and the repeatability of the fuel sampling method. Since the fluorescence emission signal can vary in time, the fluorescence signal was recorded for 50 ms after 30 s from the UV source and was turned on in subsequent experiments.
The first study, shown in Figure 9, includes a spectral analysis of the fuels presented in Section 2.
On the left side of Figure 9, the shape of the fluorescence signal is similar for the cluster of winter and summer fuel types but not the same. In both cases, the signal is lower for the premium fuel than for the regular fuel. As lower PAH contents than regular fuel characterize premium-type fuel, see Table 2, the presented relation was expected. On the right side of Figure 9, results for nonstandard fuels are presented. The old-type diesel fuel is obtained directly from precise distillation and thus does not contain any additives. The FAME clear 100% is a bio-component without any additives. The fluorescence signal there does not show peaks characteristic of PAH components. The FAME is characterized by the highest fluorescence signals from microbial at 675 nm wavelength. Reference diesel fuel is described in comparison to other peaks by the highest low wavelength peak at 387 nm.
Fluorescence spectra changes introduced by the photodegradation of fuel samples can be observed in Figure 10.
The initial characteristics of one day of photodegradation are presented in Figure 10a. Photodegradation was made here by sample storage in a standard red plastic fuel container at the windowsill for 150 days. The stored fuel sample was the further subject of modification with an additional commercial enriching additive described in Section 2. The fluorescence signal after photodegradation presented in Figure 10b shows the shifts of fluorescence peaks up to higher wavelengths. Applying an enriching additive to the degraded fuel introduces changes in the fluorescence signal level, but the shape remains the same.
The repeatability of the experiment was tested using premium fuel that was stored for a week in a glass placed in a black box mounted on an anti-vibration base. This experiment enabled the analysis of fuel sedimentation. The signals recorded for samples taken from the upper, middle, and the end of the lower layer are shown in Figure 11. Interestingly, the characteristics of the layers mentioned above coincide precisely.
Characteristics from 380 nm to 550 nm increase with the sampling depth, which indicates fluorescence particle sedimentation. Interestingly, the signal of the microorganisms is not sensitive to sedimentation, which can be explained by the fact that they were alive and mobile or had a neutral buoyancy in the oil. Thus, in the following experiment, fuels are probed from the middle layers of the samples.

4.2. Initial Examinations with Sequence Fluorescence Readings

Photodegradation tests use UV signals simultaneously as a degradation factor and fluorescence probe. Such tests allow flexible organization of the sampling time, but the collected characteristics are subject to varying degrees of fluorescence signal decay. Therefore, the relative change in the spectral features is essential information here.
Observation of the spectral changes of the signal during the photodegradation of the regular fuel of unmodified and winter type with constant irradiation and reading with a 5-min sequence is presented in Figure 12.
First, signals’ initial and rapid changes are observed at a wavelength from 380 nm to 430 nm, while slower changes are present in the 430–550 nm band. These changes seem to have minima and maxima, and the peak fluorescence signal is variable. The degradation results are visible after several min.
Analogous examination with a 1-s sequence of sampling for premium diesel fuel of unmodified and summer type are presented in Figure 13.
The characteristics set from Figure 13 show that measurement setup wakes up to acquired spectral data in up to 2 s. Photoactivation of the sample requires a few seconds. Analysis of examination time leads to the conclusion that some characteristic signals of fluorescence in bandwidth from 375 nm to 600 nm need a few seconds to stabilize.
A repeatable procedure with a precise timestamp of signal acquisition is essential for diesel fuel stability testing using UV as a degradation factor and examination probe. Analyzing complete spectral data of fluorescence changes versus time is a complex task. Thus, the following sections present the investigations of time-dependent signals at a specific bandwidth. The bands are of ±5 nm width and are positioned at potentially interesting wavelengths: 380 nm, 390 nm, 410 nm, 430 nm, 490 nm, and 500 nm of the dominant hills of examined fuels, as well as the dominant 675 nm band of the microbial presence.

5. Operational Research of Fuel Degradation and Examination Cycles

The measurement setup enables continuous and modulated degradation of fuel samples with thermal and UV radiations and simultaneous examination of fuel degradation with UV-excited fluorescence in programmed measurement cycles. The measurement cycles used in this publication are called DCE (degradation continuous and examination) and DME (degradation modulated and examination). It should be noted that light switching requires up to 2 s, while sample photoactivation, as well as the time of sample cooling and heating, is characterized by a similar time.

5.1. Degradation and Examination Cycles with the Continuous Action of Degradation Factor

This section aims to exhibit the vital phenomenon of fluorescence signal fading in examining fuel using temperature and UV as continuous degradation factors. The cycle using only UV radiation for continuous degradation and studying its effects is shown in Figure 14. As the degradation factor is only UV, this cycle description is DCE:UVonToff.
The modification of the analyzed cycle was realized with the addition of UV switching off for 1 min at the end of 30 min degradation cycle and then again switching on. In Figure 15a, fading of fluorescence is significantly lower for exclusive photodegradation than signal changes obtained in degradation. In Figure 15b, all signals increase initially, then decrease, grow, or stabilize depending on the wavelength. Paired characteristics can be observed for pairs at 380 nm and 430 nm, 490 nm, and 500 nm. The signals at 390 nm and 410 nm differ slightly in shape, and the photoactivation of the sample is stretched over time.
The degradation with thermal radiation is made in the cycle named DCE:UVoffTon. It should be noted that thermal degradation requires UV light as the examination probe of degradation, as presented in Figure 16. In the analyzed case, the UV radiation is used for results readings and is on for only 5 s per 1 min. Thus, the fading of fluorescence signal due to sample exposition to UV radiation is minimal. The side result is that spectral data are measured in a one-minute cycle. Since the potential fading of fluorescence signal may still result from constant sample heating, the measurement cycle includes additional one-minute sample cooling after continuous thermal degradation at the end of a 30-min process, when further UV examination is performed. The results of the examinations are presented in Figure 17.
The thermal fading of fluorescence is visible at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. At the start of the experiment, when the sample is at room temperature, the fluorescence signals are higher than after one minute of heating—switching on UV radiation and examination of fluorescence in the following 1-s results in a local signal increase, Figure 17b. At the end of the experiment, at 31 min, the signal is much higher than for 30 min. Therefore, a minute of sample cooling and resting may be required for fluorescence signal regeneration.
The maximum fluorescence signal for the tested fuel in both degradation cycles, shown in Figure 15 and Figure 17, occurs for the 490 nm wavelength and has a similar value of about 13 thousand units. Analyzing the values of the final fluorescence signals, one can see that the results are not the same. Moreover, comparing semi-continuous data courses with data collected in packs is difficult in the analyzed case, as the maxima of fluorescence signals are outside the pack sampling rate.
Unwanted fluorescence fading can also arise when UV and thermal radiation are used simultaneously. The corresponding cycle DCE:UVonTon is presented in Figure 18, while the results are in Figure 19.
The fluorescence fading is visible in Figure 19a. After the sample’s cooling and regeneration, the order of signals in specified wavelengths is the same as in cycle DCE:UVoffTon presented in Figure 17. At the initial 1 min of the degradation, when temperature and UV simultaneously degrade the sample, the fluorescence signals vary more rapidly and differently than in the case of UV-only use, as presented in Figure 15. The process without degradation modulation (Figure 19) shows clear signal peaks during the tests’ first minutes, but thermal fading distorted the results further. Thus, this cycle’s specific advantage is that the sample’s photoactivation is visible.

5.2. Degradation and Examination Cycles with the Modulated Action of Degradation Factor

In the above-presented cases, the comparison of degradation factors efficiency is loaded with uncertainty caused by potential fluorescence fading. Thus, based on the time that is required for the sample to return to the ambient temperature and fluorescence regeneration, which is less than one minute, two more measurement cycles based on double modulation are proposed. The first modulation involves excluding degradation factors after 5 min for 1 min. In this minute, the second modulation of light switching with a period of 5 s is used for degradation examination. Thus, the degradation and sample regeneration are equal in the subsequent cycles, and the action of signal fading on reading results is limited. Consequently, spectral data were collected in packets every 6 min. Thus, the proposed cycles allow the comparison of the effectiveness of degradation.
The degradation and examination cycle with double-modulated UV radiation, named DME:UVonToff is presented in Figure 20, while the results are in Figure 21.
Comparing results obtained in DCE:UVonToff (Figure 15) and DME:UVonToff (Figure 21) cycles shows that due to a low sampling rate DME cycle lost information about initial signal maxima. At the same time, the characteristics after 5 min of degradation are very similar in shape and values. Analysis of the left part of Figure 21b, where the selected information pack is present, leads to a conclusion that ultra-short time fluorescence fading does not occur due to sampling irradiation.
The modulated cycle of degradation using thermal radiations for degradation and modulated UV for examination, named DME:UVoffTon, is presented in Figure 22.
From Figure 23b, one can conclude that elevated temperature fading of fluorescence is reduced after 50 s from temperature switching off. Thus, the values of the last pulse in the pack are used as information. Observed variations of signals during thermal degradation (Figure 21) are similar in values to the case of UV degradation (Figure 23), but the mentioned variations are not on the same wavelengths.
The modulated cycle of degradation using thermal and UV radiations for degradation and modulated UV for examination, named DME:UVonTon, is presented in Figure 24, while results are shown in Figure 25.
The degradation cycle results presented in Figure 25 are as expected. Firstly, the signal increases, then after reaching the maximum, the signal slowly decreases. The impact of the elevated temperature on signal fading is measurable but is lower than in the case when the temperature is the continuous or single degradation factor. Comparing cycles with dual thermal and UV degradation (DCE:UVonTon and DME:UVonTon) shows some limitations to both. The process with degradation modulation (Figure 25) correctly displays the course of the signals during medium-term degradation, but it lacks information about the initial course of the signal. The comparison of degradation results in modulated cycles is summarized in Table 3 and Table 4.
Results collected in Table 3 correspond to signal shifts calculated between values S(360s) and the end value of the cycle in 1800 s, S(1800s). This comparison can be attributed to a short-term test. The presented data confirm that temperature and UV degradation factors act differently on the sample. Both affect fuel stability, but the shifts of characteristics are more significant for UV degradation than for temperature. However, it should be noted that the most remarkable changes in the signal cause the simultaneous action of both factors. At the same time, the action of both factors cannot be presented as the sum of two independent actions. It should also be noted that in the mentioned short-term test, the signal values for the 670 nm band responsible for microbiological contamination are relatively small. Thus, the subsequent results in Table 4 represent an ultra-short-term test, i.e., they correspond to the shifts in the signal calculated between the values in the fifth second of S(5s) and the values in the 360 s of S(360s) of the cycle.
The ultra-short-term shifts in the 670 nm band are much more significant than in the short-time test. Thus, the interim conclusion is that microbial contamination is effectively reduced in proposed degradation cycles at their initial ultra-short-term stage. Therefore, the proposed method is not valid for testing the effect of microbiological contamination on the internal stability of the fuel.

6. Procedure and Experimental Results of Automotive Diesel Fuel Internal Stability Examinations

6.1. Procedure of Experimental Data Collection

The previously presented degradation cycles have, in all cases, pairs of advantages and disadvantages. Obtained results show that both degradation factors are important to fuel internal stability; both ultra-short- and short-term data are essential, and thermal fading adversely affects the measured signals. The solution seems to be a hybrid degradation and examination cycle presented in Figure 26.
Obtained time series are of the expected course, as presented in Figure 27. Initial values with active thermal factor increase rapidly, as in the DCE:UVonTon cycle. The following pack of data looks very similar to DME:UVonTon cycle.
The hybrid cycle DHE:UVonTon is proposed for further tests of fuel samples with UV and temperature as degradation factors.

6.2. Fuels Samples Internal Stability Testing

The fuels presented in Table 2 in unmodified and modified versions were selected for analysis of hybrid degradation and examination cycle. Data of cycle initiation at 490 nm are shown in Figure 28. This wavelength chosen as maximum changes of initial signals in selected fuels were observed. It should be noted that the inclusion of degradation factors creates an unstable situation. The interpretation of signals in an unstable situation is typically different from a stable position. The maximum peak of the signal can be interpreted as the photoactivation of the medium. The signal shifts down from the maximum can be construed as a reduction in medium photoactivation. Thus, the more significant the signal drop after photoactivation, the greater the potential for fuel stability to radiation exposure.
The signal at 490 nm is higher for regular than premium fuels samples listed in Table 2, assuming that the fluorescence signal is proportional to PAH concentration when there are similar environments of the mentioned particles, and the particles are of the same distribution. It is not always the case due to differences in the petrochemical processes of fuel preparation.
Collected data of initial signal shifts calculated between maximum values S(max) and semi-stable values assumed to happen at 200 s of the cycle, S(200s), are presented in Table 5.
Since the relation of signal shifts at all selected bands is similar in the sample-to-sample comparison, the average value can be assumed to measure signal changes. This measure supposes that in the ultra-short-term examination, the internal stability is lower in the case of regular fuel than of premium fuel. Moreover, the initial internal stability was increased in both fuels by the applied additive. This agrees with the observation of Figure 3, where additive reduces color changes in the degraded fuel sample.
In stabilized situations, internal stability should be correlated to stable signals. The degradation factors should force fewer changes in signals for stable fuel than unstable. Collected data of the second part of the examination and degradation cycle corresponding to signal shifts calculated between values S(360s) and the end value of process in 1800 s, S(1800s), that are not burdened with signal fading are presented in Table 6.
The data show that medium-term internal stability is also more excellent for premium fuels than for regular fuels, but some differences in signals at specified wavelengths occur. The analysis of the internal stability of modified fuels confirms, sometimes postulated thesis, that modification with the active ingredient may result in additional, unexpected further reactions that are difficult to predict.
Most significantly, the average short-term signal shift relation between premium and regular fuel is 1.07 (Table 6), while the ratio between PAH concentrations (see Table 2) is 1.08. Thus, the internal stability of diesel fuels can be related to PAH concentration.
A summary analysis of the experiment can be made with cluster analysis. The corresponding dendrograms for wavelength shifts of data collected in Table 3 and Table 4 are presented in Figure 29.
Cluster analysis shows that premium fuel remains premium during degradation regardless of the permissible modifications. The same applies to standard fuel. It can therefore be stated that the proposed measurement procedure does not introduce unexpected errors. Thus, comparing the results of signal shifts for different fuels can serve as a differential classification for the internal stability of the fuel under testing. The fuel is more stable when signals of shifts S(360s)–S(1800s) are lower than in the compared sample. Fuel also is expected to be more stable when signals shift S(max)–S(200s) of initial degradation is more significant than in the referred sample.

7. Conclusions

In the presence of oxygen, automotive diesel fuel degrades significantly. However, automotive diesel fuel samples without contact with oxygen can also degrade. We presented the results of the examination of internal fuel stability with the separate and simultaneous use of two degradation factors of thermal and UV radiations as they can be applied without physical contact and the use of any chemical reagents.
We have shown that such examination is possible when fuel is positioned in a glass capillary optrode so that the outer sections of the fuel fill the capillary, preventing the middle section from direct exposure to the atmosphere. We have shown that the continuous temperature degradation factor results in significant fluorescence fading and can prevent proper examination. Thus, we conclude that realizing degradation with two degradation factors, such as temperature and UV radiation, is not a trivial task.
From the point of view of the internal stability of the automotive diesel fuel, microbiological contaminants are positioned at the fuel–oxygen–water interface, so they are present inside the sample in limited concentrations. Moreover, UV radiation has a deadly effect on microorganisms. Thus, fast signal fading from live microorganisms is a side effect of the analyzed method.
Examination of different fuels with continuous UV degradation leads us to the conclusion that specific characteristics of fluorescence may differ significantly. Moreover, fluorescence peaks during degradation may shift in value and wavelength. Thus, signal shifts at specified wavelengths are not a good measure of fuel stability, and the signal shifts should be measured in bands. In examined cases, the bands with 10 nm fulfill the task. It should also be noted that the fluorescence signal restoring from fading in explored cases is at the rank of 50 s while the time stabilization of the sample in heating and cooling is less than 15 s. Additionally, the time of the UV source activation is not to be omitted.
Realized operational research of degradation cycles leads us to a hybrid degradation cycle that is a mixture of continuous 300 s ultra-short-time section and modulated 1500 s short-time degradation. This way, the proper reading of degradation results is possible. Measurement setup enables constant access to information in an ultra-short period of 300 s and the semi-continuous reading of short-term degradation. This hybrid cycle contains complete information on the degradation. Using it allows proper classification of the internal fuel stability with photoactivation time as its ultra-fast signal shifts as well as its short-term signal shifts in the range from 360 s of degradation to the end value of the cycle in 1800 s.
Thus, well-defined time synchronization of degradation action and its results reading is required, and the realization of examination involves quite a complex measurement setup. Again, these are costs of any chemical used, and no initial sample is prepared for internal stability testing of automotive diesel fuel.
The short list of the practical side of the investigation is as follows:
  • Temperature and UV degradation factors act differently on the sample.
  • At the same time, the action of both factors cannot be presented as the sum of two independent actions.
  • The UV degradation factor acts stronger than temperature, but both factors simultaneously used are the key to the speed and effectiveness of examinations.
  • The internal stability of automotive diesel fuel is related to the presence of unsaturated components and can be characterized by fluorescence signal shifts.
  • The internal stability of diesel fuel is more related to the proposed method than to the standard measurement of oxidative stability.
  • The proposed procedure and setup enable the comparison of different fuels’ internal stability using reference data. This comparison allows us to point to more internally stable fuel.
Thus, as the main practical result of the research, we propose the differential classification of the internal stability of fuels that may be included in future commercial specifications and fuel parameters guarantees. Future examinations can be oriented toward validating the proposed method.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.; methodology, M.G. and M.B.; software, M.G.; validation, M.L.K.-P.; formal analysis, M.B.; investigation, M.G. and M.B.; resources, M.B.; data curation, M.B. and M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B.; writing—review and editing, M.B. and M.L.K.-P.; visualization, M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ulberth-Buchgraber, M.; Charoud-Got, J.; Held, A. Certified reference materials for effective automotive diesel fuel testing. Fuel 2021, 286, 119367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Batts, B.D.; Fathoni, A.Z. A literature review on fuel stability studies with particular emphasis on diesel oil. Energy Fuels 1991, 5, 2–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Odziemkowska, M.; Czarnocka, J.; Wawryniuk, K. Study of Stability Changes of Model Fuel Blends. In Improvement Trends for Internal Combustion Engines; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Dincer, I.; Zamfirescu, C. Fossil Fuels and Alternatives. In Advanced Power Generation Systems; Dincer, I., Zamfirescu, C., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 95–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dragojlovic, V. Conformational analysis of cycloalkanes. ChemTexts 2015, 1, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gad, S.C. Diesel Fuel. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 2nd ed.; Philip, W., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. de Souza, C.V.; Corrêa, S.M. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in diesel emission, diesel fuel and lubricant oil. Fuel 2016, 185, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hall, D.E.; Doel, R.; Jorgensen, R.; King, D.J.; Mann, N.; Scorletti, P.; Heinze, P. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in auto-motive exhaust emissions and fuels. Concawe Bruss. 1998, 98, 55. [Google Scholar]
  9. Goto, Y.; Nakamuta, K.; Nakata, H. Parent and alkylated PAHs profiles in 11 petroleum fuels and lubricants: Application for oil spill accidents in the environment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 224, 112644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, Y.-C.; Lee, W.-J.; Chen, C.-B. Characterization of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from the diesel engine by adding light cycle oil to premium diesel fuel. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2006, 56, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hsieh, P.Y.; Widegren, J.A.; Slifka, A.J.; Hagen, A.J.; Rorrer, R.A.L. Direct Measurement of Trace Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Diesel Fuel with 1H and 13C NMR Spectroscopy: Effect of PAH Content on Fuel Lubricity. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 4289–4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carabajal, M.D.; Arancibia, J.A.; Escandar, G.M. Excitation-emission fluorescence-kinetic data obtained by Fenton degradation. Determination of heavy-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by four-way parallel factor analysis. Talanta 2017, 165, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Berlman, I.B. Some Uses of Fluorescence Compounds. In Handbook of Florescence Spectra of Aromatic Molecules, 2nd ed.; Berlman, I.B., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1971; pp. 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alostaz, M.; Biggar, K.; Donahue, R.; Hall, G. Petroleum contamination characterization and quantification using fluorescence emission-excitation matrices (EEMs) and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2008, 7, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kukkadapu, G.; Sung, C.-J. Autoignition Study of 1-Methylnaphthalene in a Rapid Compression Machine. Energy Fuels 2016, 31, 854–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Suzuki, S.; Kukkadapu, G.; Kiuchi, S.; Wagnon, S.W.; Kinoshita, K.; Takeda, Y.; Sakaida, S.; Konno, M.; Tanaka, K.; Oguma, M.; et al. Formation of PAHs, phenol, benzofuran, and dibenzofuran in a flow reactor from the oxidation of ethylene, toluene, and n-decane. Combust. Flame 2022, 241, 112136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ferretto, N.; Tedetti, M.; Guigue, C.; Mounier, S.J.L.; Redon, R.; Goutx, M. Identification and quantification of known polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and pesticides in complex mixtures using fluorescence excitation–emission matrices and parallel factor analysis. Chemosphere 2014, 107, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. McDougall, M.; Francisco, O.; Harder-Viddal, C.; Roshko, R.; Heide, F.; Sidhu, S.; Khajehpour, M.; Leslie, J.; Palace, V.; Tomy, G.T.; et al. Proteinaceous Nano container Encapsulate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Piñeiro, L.; Novo, M.; Al-Soufi, W. Fluorescence emission of pyrene in surfactant solutions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 215, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sahoo, D.; Narayanaswami, V.; Kay, C.M.; Ryan, R.O. Pyrene Excimer Fluorescence: A Spatially Sensitive Probe to Monitor Lipid-Induced Helical Rearrangement of Apolipophorin III. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 6594–6601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, C.; Rong, Z.; Sun, Z.; Wang, Y.; Du, W.; Wang, Y.; Lu, L. Quenched skeletal Ni as the effective catalyst for selective partial hydrogenation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 23984–23988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Włodarski, M.; Bombalska, A.; Mularczyk-Oliwa, M.; Kaliszewski, M.; Kopczyński, K. Fluorimetric techniques in analysis and classification of fuels. Proc. SPIE 2013, 8703, 87030B. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Z.; Yang, C.; Yang, Z.; Brown, C.E.; Hollebone, B.P.; Stout, S.A. Petroleum biomarker fingerprinting for oil spill characterization and source identification. In Standard Handbook Oil Spill Environmental Forensics, 2nd ed.; Stout, S.A., Wang, Z., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 131–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bezergianni, S.; Dimitriadis, A.; Faussone, G.-C.; Karonis, D. Alternative Diesel from Waste Plastics. Energies 2017, 10, 1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Louhi, E.H.; Kasiri, N.; Khalili-Garakani, A.; Heydari-Fard, M.; Ivakpour, J. Design and optimization of distillation column sequencing for the GTL process. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2021, 173, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abu-Jrai, A.; Rodríguez-Fernández, J.; Tsolakis, A.; Megaritis, A.; Theinnoi, K.; Cracknell, R.; Clark, R. Performance, combustion and emissions of a diesel engine operated with reformed EGR. Comparison of diesel and GTL fueling. Fuel 2009, 88, 1031–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Parravicini, M.; Barro, C.; Boulouchos, K. Experimental characterization of GTL, HVO, and OME based alternative fuels for diesel engines. Fuel 2021, 292, 120177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tamilvanan, A.; Jeyalakshmi, P.; Mohanraj, M.; Deepanraj, B. Feasibility study on raw Simarouba glauca oil as an alternate fuel in a diesel engine and comparative assessment with its esterified oil. Fuel 2022, 327, 125168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Meher, L.C.; Vidya Sagar, D.; Naik, S.N. Technical aspects of biodiesel production by transesterification—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2006, 10, 248–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Filho, N.R.A.; Lanças, F.M. Identification of FAMEs usingECL values and a three-dimensional Kováts retention index system. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1995, 18, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sugiyama, G.; Maeda, A.; Nagai, K. Oxidation Degradation and Acid Generation in Diesel Fuel Containing 5% FAME. SAE Tech. Pap. 2007, 1, 2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Murugesan, A.; Umarani, C.; Subramanian, R.; Nedunchezhian, N. Bio-diesel as an alternative fuel for diesel engines—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aatola, H.; Larmi, M.; Sarjovaara, T.; Mikkonen, S. Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) as a Renewable Diesel Fuel: Trade-off between NOx, Particulate Emission, and Fuel Consumption of a Heavy Duty Engine. SAE Int. J. Engines 2009, 1, 1251–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Burrington, J.D.; Pudelski, J.K.; Roski, J.P. Challenges in Detergents and Dispersants for Engine Oils. In Practical Advances in Petroleum Processing; Robinson, C.S., James, P.R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rawdon, M. Fuels Oil-Based. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Science, 2nd ed.; Worsfold, P., Townshend, A., Poole, C., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 512–518. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bennett, J. Advanced fuel additives for modern internal combustion engines. In Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicle Technologies for Improved Environmental Performance; Folkson, R., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2014; pp. 165–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dodos, G.S.; Konstantakos, T.; Loginos, S.; Zannikos, F. Effects of microbiological contamination in the quality of biodiesel fuels. Glob. Nest J. 2012, 14, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oo, Y.M.; Legwiriyakul, A.; Thawornprasert, J.; Somnuk, K. Production of diesel–biodiesel–water fuel nanoemulsions using three-dimensional printed rotor–stator hydrodynamic cavitation. Fuel 2022, 317, 123445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cardeño, F.; Lapuerta, M.; Rios, L.; Agudelo, J.R. Reconsideration of regulated contamination limits to improve filterability of biodiesel and blends with diesel fuels. Renew. Energy 2020, 159, 1243–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sentanuhady, J.; Saputro, W.; Muflikhun, M.A. Metals and chemical compounds contaminants in diesel engine lubricant with B20 and B100 biofuels for long term operation. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 45, 101161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jenkins, R.W.; Moore, C.M.; Semelsberger, T.A.; Chuck, C.J.; Gordon, J.C.; Sutton, A.D. The Effect of Functional Groups in Bio-Derived Fuel Candidates. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 922–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vera, J.H.; Wilczek-Vera, G. Mixture Behavior, Stability, and Azeotropy. In Classical Thermodynamics of Fluid Systems; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 127–149. ISBN 9781315399065. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bashkatova, S.T.; Vinokurov, V.A.; Grishina, I.N.; Egorkina, Y.B. Intermolecular interactions in a disperse fuel system and their contribution to the mechanism of action of diesel fuel additives. Pet. Chem. 2011, 51, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Felder, R.M.; Rousseau, R.W.; Bullard, L.G. Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2005; p. 293. ISBN 978-0471687573. [Google Scholar]
  45. Msimanga, H.Z.; Dockery, C.R.; Vandenbos, D.D. Classification of local diesel fuels and simultaneous prediction of their physicochemical parameters using FTIR-ATR data and chemometrics. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 279, 121451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ziółkowska, M.; Wardzińska, D. Corrosiveness of Fuels During Storage Processes. In Storage Stability of Fuels; Biernat, K., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2015; pp. 131–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Cavalcanti, E.H.D.S.; Zimmer, A.R.; Bento, F.M.; Ferrão, M.F. Chemical and microbial storage stability studies and shelf life determinations of commercial Brazilian biodiesels stored in carbon steel containers in subtropical conditions. Fuel 2019, 236, 993–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Matuszewska, A.; Odziemkowska, M. Autoxidation of Fuels During Storage. In Storage Stability of Fuels; Biernat, K., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2015; pp. 157–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gaylarde, C.C.; Bento, F.M.; Kelley, J. Micrbial contamination of stored hydrocarbon fuels and its control. Rev. Microbiol. 1999, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Komariah, L.N.; Arita, S.; Rendana, M.; Ramayanti, C.; Suriani, N.L.; Erisna, D. Microbial contamination of diesel-biodiesel blends in storage tank; an analysis of colony morphology. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kuronen, M.A.; Hartikka, T.; Kiiski, U. Diesel Fuel Oxidation Study: A Comparative Study, Part II. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2014, 7, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arfelli, W.; Power, A.; Solly, R. The Storage Stability of Automotive Distillate Fuel. SAE Tech. Pap. 1987, 871269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Barker, J.; Cook, S.; Richards, P. Sodium Contamination of Diesel Fuel, its Interaction with Fuel Additives and the Resultant Effects on Filter Plugging and Injector Fouling. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2013, 6, 826–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Fazal, M.; Rubaiee, S.; Al-Zahrani, A.; Ghazali, S. Biodiesel degradation mechanism upon exposure of metal surfaces: A study on biodiesel sustainability. Fuel 2022, 310, 122341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Krahl, J.; Munack, A.; Schaper, K.; Fey, B.; Schmidt, L.; Schroeder, O. Interactions among Fuel Components from Diesel Fuel and Biodiesel. SAE Tech. Pap. 2013, 1, 2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rastogi, P.; Kaisare, N.S.; Basavaraj, M.G. Diesel Emulsion Fuels with Ultralong Stability. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 12227–12235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Marshman, S.J.; David, P. Storage Stability of Distillate Diesel Fuels: Changes in Phenalene and Phenalenone Concentrations During Long Term Ambient Storage. Prepr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chem. 1990, 35, 1108–1116. [Google Scholar]
  58. Phatangare, K.R.; Lanke, S.K.; Sekar, N. Phenalenone Fluorophores-Synthesis, Photophysical Properties and DFT Study. J. Fluoresc. 2014, 24, 1827–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hartikka, T.; Kiiski, U.; Kuronen, M.; Mikkonen, S. Diesel Fuel Oxidation Stability: A Comparative Study. SAE Tech. Pap. 2013, 1, 2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sun, Y.; Deac, A.; Zhang, G.G.Z. Assessing Physical Stability of Colloidal Dispersions Using a Turbiscan Optical Analyzer. Mol. Pharm. 2019, 16, 877–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Derjaguin, B. Main factors affecting the stability of colloids. Prog. Surf. Sci. 1993, 43, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Matusiak, J.; Grządka, E. Stability of colloidal systems—A review of the stability measurements methods. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Sect. AA—Chem. 2017, 72, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Preetika, R.; Mehta, P.S.; Kaisare, N.S.; Basavaraj, M.G. Kinetic stability of surfactant stabilized water-in-diesel emulsion fuels. Fuel 2019, 236, 1415–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lin, R.; Tavlarides, L.L. Thermal stability and decomposition of diesel fuel under subcritical and supercritical conditions. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2013, 75, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Geca, M.; Borecki, M. Spectrometric data analysis of a capillary sensor of fuel photo-stability working with high power light emitting diode at 365 nm. Proc SPIE 2019, 11176, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nazri, M.K.H.M.; Sapawe, N. A short review on photocatalytic reaction in diesel degradation. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 31, A33–A37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, H.; Liu, F.; Ma, X.; Cui, P.; Gao, Y.; Yu, M.; Guo, M. Effects of biodiesel blends on the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of fossil diesel during thermal degradation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 198, 111930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Janus, R.; Kołomański, K.; Wądrzyk, M.; Lewandowski, M. Degradation of petroleum diesel fuel accelerated by UV irradiation: The impact of ageing on chemical composition and selected physicochemical properties. E3S Web Conf. 2019, 108, 02003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Anderson, J.E.; Collings, T.R.; Mueller, S.A.; Ball, J.C.; Wallington, T.J. Soy Biodiesel Oxidation at Vehicle Fuel System Temperature: Influence of Aged Fuel on Fresh Fuel Degradation to Simulate Refueling. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2017, 10, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wasylkiewicz, S.K.; Ung, S. Global phase stability analysis for heterogeneous reactive mixtures and calculation of reactive liquid–liquid and vapor–liquid–liquid equilibria. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2000, 175, 253–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, Z.; Tian, J.; Li, J.; Cao, C.; Wang, S.; Lv, J.; Zheng, W.; Tan, D. The development of diesel oxidation catalysts and the effect of sulfur dioxide on catalysts of metal-based diesel oxidation catalysts: A review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 233, 107317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Carabajal, M.D.; Arancibia, J.A.; Escandar, G.M. Online generation of third-order liquid chromatography–excitation-emission fluorescence matrix data. Quantitation of heavy-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1527, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bertoz, V.; Purcaro, G.; Conchione, C.; Moret, S. A Review on the Occurrence and Analytical Determination of PAHs in Olive Oils. Foods 2021, 10, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Apitz, S.E.; Borbridge, L.M.; Bracchi, K.; Lieberman, S.H. Fluorescent response of fuels in soils: Insights into fuel-soil interactions. Proc. SPIE 1993, 1716, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Geca, M.; Borecki, M.; Korwin-Pawlowski, M.L.; Kociubiński, A. Local liquid sample heating: Integration and isolation of a micro-heater. Proc. SPIE 2015, 9662, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Borecki, M.; Prus, P.; Korwin-Pawlowski, M.L. Capillary Sensor with Disposable Optrode for Diesel Fuel Quality Testing. Sensors 2019, 19, 1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Borecki, M.; Geca, M.; Korwin-Pawlowski, M.L.; Prus, P. Capillary Sensor with UV-Forced Degradation and Examination of Fluorescence for Determination of Chemical Stability of Diesel and Biodiesel Fuels. Sens. Transducers 2018, 220, 20–30. [Google Scholar]
  78. Borecki, M.; Korwin-Pawlowski, M.L. Capillary Sensor with UV-VIS Reading of Effects of Diesel and Biodiesel Fuel Degra-dation in Storage. Sens. Transducers 2016, 205, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  79. Kirgina, M.; Bogdanov, I.; Altynov, A.; Belinskaya, N.; Orlova, A.; Nikonova, N. Studying the impact of different additives on the properties of straight-run diesel fuels with various hydrocarbon compositions. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. Rev. d’IFP Energies Nouv. 2021, 76, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fernández, I. Understanding the reactivity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and related compounds. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 3769–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Borecki, M.; Doroz, P.; Prus, P.; Pszczolkowski, P.; Szmidt, J.; Korwin-Pawlowski, M.L.; Frydrych, J.; Kociubinski, A.; Duk, M. Fiber optic capillary sensor with smart optrode for rapid testing of the quality of diesel and biodiesel fuel. Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas. 2014, 7, 57–67. [Google Scholar]
  82. Borecki, M.; Olejnik, A.; Rychlik, A.; Korwin-Pawlowski, M.L.; Szmidt, J. A passive sensing device for a cloud on the skyline detection. Proc. SPIE 2019, 11176, 972–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Storrie-Lombardi, M.C.; Muller, J.-P.; Fisk, M.R.; Griffiths, A.D.; Coates, A.J. Potential for non-destructive astrochemistry using the ExoMars PanCam. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008, 35, L12201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Gantt simplified chart of fuels examinations.
Figure 1. Gantt simplified chart of fuels examinations.
Materials 15 08548 g001
Figure 2. Premium and regular fuels stored in an optical darkroom for five years: (a) in closed jars; (b) in open glasses.
Figure 2. Premium and regular fuels stored in an optical darkroom for five years: (a) in closed jars; (b) in open glasses.
Materials 15 08548 g002
Figure 3. Results of diesel fuels of premium type PDFU(s) and PDFA(s) degradation positioned in a capillary placed at a windowsill for one year.
Figure 3. Results of diesel fuels of premium type PDFU(s) and PDFA(s) degradation positioned in a capillary placed at a windowsill for one year.
Materials 15 08548 g003
Figure 4. The idea of diesel fuel local section exclusive degradation with heat.
Figure 4. The idea of diesel fuel local section exclusive degradation with heat.
Materials 15 08548 g004
Figure 5. The idea of diesel fuel local section exclusive degradation with UV radiation and reading of degradation results.
Figure 5. The idea of diesel fuel local section exclusive degradation with UV radiation and reading of degradation results.
Materials 15 08548 g005
Figure 6. The component diagram of the measurement setup.
Figure 6. The component diagram of the measurement setup.
Materials 15 08548 g006
Figure 7. The schematic of the head.
Figure 7. The schematic of the head.
Materials 15 08548 g007
Figure 8. The view of house-made head.
Figure 8. The view of house-made head.
Materials 15 08548 g008
Figure 9. Complete spectra data of fuels examined at 0.5 min after UV source activation: (a) Premium diesel fuel and regular diesel fuel of winter and summer types; (b) old-type diesel fuel, 100% of FAME clear component, and reference diesel fuel obtained directly from a refinery.
Figure 9. Complete spectra data of fuels examined at 0.5 min after UV source activation: (a) Premium diesel fuel and regular diesel fuel of winter and summer types; (b) old-type diesel fuel, 100% of FAME clear component, and reference diesel fuel obtained directly from a refinery.
Materials 15 08548 g009
Figure 10. Complete spectral data of winter-type diesel stored in standard tank: (a) Stored one day and then examined; (b) unmodified premium diesel fuel stored for 150 days and then examined as PDFU (w, 150 days later) and after modification PDFU (w, additive 150 days later).
Figure 10. Complete spectral data of winter-type diesel stored in standard tank: (a) Stored one day and then examined; (b) unmodified premium diesel fuel stored for 150 days and then examined as PDFU (w, 150 days later) and after modification PDFU (w, additive 150 days later).
Materials 15 08548 g010
Figure 11. Fluorescence spectral data of premium diesel fuel in unmodified and winter type stored in a glass in a black box mounted on an anti-vibration base for a week.
Figure 11. Fluorescence spectral data of premium diesel fuel in unmodified and winter type stored in a glass in a black box mounted on an anti-vibration base for a week.
Materials 15 08548 g011
Figure 12. Fluorescence spectral data of regular diesel fuel unmodified and winter type examined with UV signal with constant irradiation and reading with a 5-min sequence.
Figure 12. Fluorescence spectral data of regular diesel fuel unmodified and winter type examined with UV signal with constant irradiation and reading with a 5-min sequence.
Materials 15 08548 g012
Figure 13. Fluorescence spectra of premium diesel fuel of unmodified and summer type while examined with a 1-s sequence of sampling.
Figure 13. Fluorescence spectra of premium diesel fuel of unmodified and summer type while examined with a 1-s sequence of sampling.
Materials 15 08548 g013
Figure 14. Degradation and examination cycle of fuel with UV use named DCE:UVonToff.
Figure 14. Degradation and examination cycle of fuel with UV use named DCE:UVonToff.
Materials 15 08548 g014
Figure 15. Time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel fuel in unmodified and summer type RDFU(s) examined in cycle DCE:UVonToff: (a) full-time series; (b) zoom of the initial stage.
Figure 15. Time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel fuel in unmodified and summer type RDFU(s) examined in cycle DCE:UVonToff: (a) full-time series; (b) zoom of the initial stage.
Materials 15 08548 g015
Figure 16. Degradation and examination cycle of fuel with UV use named DCE:UVoffTon.
Figure 16. Degradation and examination cycle of fuel with UV use named DCE:UVoffTon.
Materials 15 08548 g016
Figure 17. Set of time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel fuel RDFU(s) in cycle DCE:UVoffTon: (a) complete time series; (b) zoom of the initial stage.
Figure 17. Set of time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel fuel RDFU(s) in cycle DCE:UVoffTon: (a) complete time series; (b) zoom of the initial stage.
Materials 15 08548 g017
Figure 18. Degradation and examination cycle of fuel with UV and thermal radiation simultaneous use named DCE:UVonTon.
Figure 18. Degradation and examination cycle of fuel with UV and thermal radiation simultaneous use named DCE:UVonTon.
Materials 15 08548 g018
Figure 19. Set of time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel fuel RDFU(s) in cycle DCE:UVonTon: (a) full-time series; (b) zoom of the initial stage.
Figure 19. Set of time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel fuel RDFU(s) in cycle DCE:UVonTon: (a) full-time series; (b) zoom of the initial stage.
Materials 15 08548 g019
Figure 20. Degradation and examination cycle of fuel with double modulated UV radiation named DME:UVonToff.
Figure 20. Degradation and examination cycle of fuel with double modulated UV radiation named DME:UVonToff.
Materials 15 08548 g020
Figure 21. Set of time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel fuel RDFU(s) in cycle DME:UVonToff: (a) full-time series; (b) zoom of the initial pack.
Figure 21. Set of time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel fuel RDFU(s) in cycle DME:UVonToff: (a) full-time series; (b) zoom of the initial pack.
Materials 15 08548 g021
Figure 22. The modulated cycle of degradation and examination uses thermal radiations for degradation and modulated UV for analysis, named DME:UVoffTon.
Figure 22. The modulated cycle of degradation and examination uses thermal radiations for degradation and modulated UV for analysis, named DME:UVoffTon.
Materials 15 08548 g022
Figure 23. Time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel fuel RDFU(s) in cycle DME:UVoffTon: (a) full-time series; (b) zoom of the initial pack.
Figure 23. Time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel fuel RDFU(s) in cycle DME:UVoffTon: (a) full-time series; (b) zoom of the initial pack.
Materials 15 08548 g023
Figure 24. The modulated cycle of degradation and examination uses thermal and UV radiations for degradation and modulated UV for examination, named DME:UVonTon.
Figure 24. The modulated cycle of degradation and examination uses thermal and UV radiations for degradation and modulated UV for examination, named DME:UVonTon.
Materials 15 08548 g024
Figure 25. Time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel RDFU(s) in cycle DME:UVonTon: (a) full-time series; (b) zoom of the initial pack.
Figure 25. Time series of fluorescence data of regular diesel RDFU(s) in cycle DME:UVonTon: (a) full-time series; (b) zoom of the initial pack.
Materials 15 08548 g025
Figure 26. The hybrid cycle of degradation and examination uses thermal and UV radiations for degradation and modulated UV for analysis named DHE:UVonTon.
Figure 26. The hybrid cycle of degradation and examination uses thermal and UV radiations for degradation and modulated UV for analysis named DHE:UVonTon.
Materials 15 08548 g026
Figure 27. Time series of data of regular diesel fuel RDFU(s) in cycle DHE:UVonTon–zoom of the initial phase.
Figure 27. Time series of data of regular diesel fuel RDFU(s) in cycle DHE:UVonTon–zoom of the initial phase.
Materials 15 08548 g027
Figure 28. Time series at 490 nm of data of DHE:UVonTon cycle initiation.
Figure 28. Time series at 490 nm of data of DHE:UVonTon cycle initiation.
Materials 15 08548 g028
Figure 29. Dendrograms of wavelength shifts: (a) data from Table 5; (b) data from Table 6.
Figure 29. Dendrograms of wavelength shifts: (a) data from Table 5; (b) data from Table 6.
Materials 15 08548 g029
Table 1. Example PAHs concentration in diesel fuel and crude oil and characteristics parameters.
Table 1. Example PAHs concentration in diesel fuel and crude oil and characteristics parameters.
ParameterNaphthaleneMethylnaphthalenePhenanthrenePyrenePeryleneBenzo[a]pyrene
concentration in diesel fuel [mg/kg]1100591012508200
concentration in crude oil [mg/kg]421097513124
Ring number223455
Boiling point [°C]217240338394467495
Appearancewhite crystalline volatile solidcolorless liquidcolorless monoclinic crystalscolorless solidyellow to colorless solidPale yellow crystals
Table 2. Measured parameters of summer fuels used in this study.
Table 2. Measured parameters of summer fuels used in this study.
Fuel TypeCetane Number (ISO 5165)Fuel Stability (EN 15751) [h]Water Volume [mg/kg]PAH [% (m/m)]FAME (EN 14078) [% (v/v)]
Premium PDFU(s)55201031.850.05
Regular RDFU(s)52201052.007
Table 3. Signal shifts S(360s)-S(1800s) obtained during the degradation of regular diesel RDFU(s) during the DME cycle.
Table 3. Signal shifts S(360s)-S(1800s) obtained during the degradation of regular diesel RDFU(s) during the DME cycle.
Cycle Type380 nm390 nm410 nm430 nm490 nm500 nm670 nm
DME:UVonToff161−436−291−10343252−9
DME:UVoffTon−90−359−218−99−142−15565
DME:UVonTon567−25010339871664124
Table 4. Results in band 670 nm of ultra-short-term test for RDFU(s) degradation in the DME cycle.
Table 4. Results in band 670 nm of ultra-short-term test for RDFU(s) degradation in the DME cycle.
Cycle Type[S(5s)–S(360s)] at 670 nm
DME:UVonToff406
DME:UVoffTon260
DME:UVonTon362
Table 5. Signals shifts S(max)–S(200s) of initial degradation in DHE:UVonTon cycle.
Table 5. Signals shifts S(max)–S(200s) of initial degradation in DHE:UVonTon cycle.
Fuel Type380 nm390 nm410 nm430 nm490 nm500 nm670 nmAvg
RDFU(s)764912432126632457287854
RDFA(s)101114248838309328442711073
PDFU(s)148531312731752348831031391650
PDFA(s)199997719952194397235731442122
Table 6. Signals shifts S(360s)–S(1800s) of the modulated part of degradation DHE:UVonTon cycle.
Table 6. Signals shifts S(360s)–S(1800s) of the modulated part of degradation DHE:UVonTon cycle.
Fuel Type380 nm390 nm410 nm430 nm490 nm500 nm670 nmAvg
RDFU(s)567−25010339871664123314
RDFA(s)5025296906791131102649658
PDFU(s)1116683264752−47−25293
PDFA(s)118266739522−273−342−51228
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borecki, M.; Geca, M.; Korwin-Pawlowski, M.L. Automotive Diesel Fuel Internal Stability Testing with the Use of UV and Temperature as Degradation Factors. Materials 2022, 15, 8548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238548

AMA Style

Borecki M, Geca M, Korwin-Pawlowski ML. Automotive Diesel Fuel Internal Stability Testing with the Use of UV and Temperature as Degradation Factors. Materials. 2022; 15(23):8548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238548

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borecki, Michal, Mateusz Geca, and Michael L. Korwin-Pawlowski. 2022. "Automotive Diesel Fuel Internal Stability Testing with the Use of UV and Temperature as Degradation Factors" Materials 15, no. 23: 8548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238548

APA Style

Borecki, M., Geca, M., & Korwin-Pawlowski, M. L. (2022). Automotive Diesel Fuel Internal Stability Testing with the Use of UV and Temperature as Degradation Factors. Materials, 15(23), 8548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238548

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop