Next Article in Journal
Effect of Niobium Content on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Simulated Coarse-Grained Heat-Affected Zone (CGHAZ) of High-Strength Low-Alloy (HSLA) Steels
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Bioceramic Sealer Retreatability and Its Influence on Force and Torque Generation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 9
10.3390/ma15093317
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Drying Conditions on Antioxidant Activity of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense), Sweet Violet (Viola odorata) and Elderberry Flowers (Sambucus nigra)

by
Agnieszka Zawiślak
1,*,
Renata Francik
2,3,
Sławomir Francik
4 and
Adrian Knapczyk
4
1
Department of Biotechnology and General Technology of Food, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland
2
Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Chair of Organic Chemistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków, Poland
3
Institute of Health, State Higher Vocational School, Staszica 1, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Agrophysics, Faculty of Production Engineering and Energetics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(9), 3317; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093317
Submission received: 25 March 2022 / Revised: 26 April 2022 / Accepted: 3 May 2022 / Published: 5 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Biomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Flowers of red clover (Trifolium pratense), sweet violet (Viola odorata) and elderflowers (Sambucus nigra) were dried by means of air drying at 30 °C and 50 °C and by freeze drying. The content of polyphenols was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, while anthocyanins were quantified by the pH differential method. Antioxidant activities of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of the dried flowers were measured by the DPPH and ABTS assays, as well as FRAP and reducing power methods. The highest amount of polyphenols was determined in the ethanolic extracts of fresh red clover flowers (854.76 mg/100 g), while the highest concentration of anthocyanins was determined in the aqueous extracts of fresh sweet violet flowers (99.41 mg/100 g). The results showed that, in general, the extracts of red clover flower were characterized by the highest antioxidant activity, while the sweet violet extracts had the poorest antioxidant properties, although these values fluctuated depending on the method used. There was strong correlation between antioxidant activity and TPC (r = 0.9196, FRAP method). In most cases, freeze drying was found to be the best conservation method, retaining well the antioxidant properties of the tested flowers and the compounds determining these properties.

1. Introduction

Edible flowers have been utilized in traditional medicine as well as cuisine in various regions of the world. They are used as ingredients for salads, desserts, beverages and tea blends. Edible flowers are a rich source of bioactive substances, such as polyphenols and anthocyanins. These compounds are characterized by good antioxidant properties, which makes the dishes gain new, higher nutritional quality. Bioactive compounds contained in edible flowers can protect humans against many chronic diseases, as well as the food itself against oxidative changes. Besides enriching meals with valuable ingredients, edible flowers enhance the appearance and aroma of food preparations, which also stimulates the consumer to try such products [1,2,3,4,5].
So far, there is no formal catalog of edible and non-edible flowers [6].
The genus Trifolium from Fabaceae family includes about 240 species of clover [7]. Currently, the therapeutic use of Trifolium plants is still mainly set upon the recommendations of traditional medicine, but the number of scientific reports documenting their medical effects is increasing. Clover is a rich source of isoflavones, which have curative effects in diseases associated with hormonal disorders and inflammations [8]. T. pratense has been used by various cultures to treat eczema and psoriasis. There are data from prostate cancer studies indicating anticancer properties of red clover [9]. Some of the Trifolium species may show antioxidant properties, probably due to the presence of many phenolic compounds, such as phenolic acids, catechins, saponins and others [10].
Sweet violet (Viola odorata) coming from mountainous part of northern India [11] has been very popular in cosmetology throughout centuries because of its very characteristic sweet scent. Despite the fascinating aroma, Viola odorata has been reported to have, among others, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, diuretic, anticancer and antioxidant properties. These traits have made this herb traditionally used in Ayurvedic and Iranian medicine, as well as in the Lenape culture. Sweet violet is used in treating kidney and liver disorders, whooping cough, asthma, tonsillitis, diabetes and cancer. It is very efficient in treating headache and migraine. The healing properties of Viola odorata result from the presence of bioactive compounds, such as cyclotides, flavonoids, alkaloids and triterpenoids [11,12,13].
Elderberry (Sambucus nigra) is a deciduous shrub or small tree belonging to the Adoxaceae family. It is a widespread, easy-to-grow plant with fruits and inflorescences that have been commonly used in folk medicine. Elderflowers are rich in bioactive substances, mainly polyphenols, from which the most crucial are hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonols and flavanones. Due to the presence of these compounds, flowers of Sambucus nigra show antipyretic, diaphoretic, diuretic ant antibacterial properties [14]. It was also reported that substances found in elderflowers can have an antidiabetic effect. In addition to medical applications, elderberry flowers are used as an addition to beverages and desserts due to their unique aroma [15,16].
Edible flowers are highly perishable and should therefore be preserved accordingly. Today, edible flowers are sold fresh in small plastic holders, refrigerated or dried. They are also conserved in sugar and in form of distillates. Appreciating the potential of edible flowers, the food industry continues to search for the best preservation methods for this delicate material [3].
The aim of this work was to examine the influence of different drying conditions on the antioxidant properties and on compounds determining these properties in three species of edible flowers, i.e., elderflowers (Sambucus nigra), fragrant violet (Viola odorata) and red clover (Trifolium pratense). Moreover, two most popular, from a consumer’s point of view, solvents were tested to find the one with better selectivity toward bioactive compounds. Selecting an appropriate solvent is crucial to obtain an extract with appropriate characteristics [17]. The solvents used in this study are suitable for food and pharmaceutical applications, so they can be used in the development of new products based on dried edible flowers. This work is an introductory phase to a more comprehensive study into the possibility of creating products based on the examined edible flowers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material Preparation

Flowers of Viola odorata, Trifolium pratense and Sambucus nigra were collected in Bielańsko—Tyniecki Landscape Park in Kraków during spring 2019. The soils in this area are classified as heavy and very heavy [18].
The inflorescences of each species were separated without preliminary washing and divided into four parts. One part of each material was taken fresh for analyses. The remaining parts of the material were dried in different conditions. The methods used were: freeze drying (Labor, MIM OE 950; Budapest, Hungary), air drying at 30 °C (Stöckli, 76.74; Netstal, Swizerland) for 5 h and air drying at 50 °C (Stöckli, 76.74; Netstal, Swizerland) for 3 h.
The dry matter content both in fresh and dried material was determined by the oven method at 105 °C [19].

2.1.1. Ethanolic Extracts Preparation

To prepare ethanolic extracts, 5 g of fresh flower material was subjected to extraction with ethanol and 2% hydrochloric acid solution (95:5 v/v, 95 mL) by homogenization at 25 °C for 5 min. Then, the homogenate was stirred for 45 min and centrifuged at 5500 rpm for 10 min. The obtained supernatant was decanted from the sludge to give a 5% ethanolic extract, which was intended for analyses. In the case of dried flower samples, the same procedure was applied. However, the weight of dried flower samples was recalculated, based on dry matter, to obtain 5% ethanolic extracts, imitating extracts from fresh raw material.

2.1.2. Preparation of Infusions

To prepare infusions, 5 g of fresh flower material was poured with boiling water (95 mL, 100 °C) and stirred for 5 min. Then, the infusions were filtered and cooled. In the case of dried flower samples, the same procedure was applied. The weight of dried flower samples was recalculated, basing on dry matter of the material, to obtain 5% infusions imitating extracts from fresh raw material.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Total Polyphenol Content (TPC)

Total polyphenol content was determined by the method of Singleton et al. [20]. Half of 1 mL of the 5% extract was mixed with 2.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and after 3 min, 5 mL of sodium carbonate solution (75 g/L) was added to the 50 mL volumetric flask. Afterward, the flask was made up to volume with distilled water, the contents mixed and incubated for 2 h at room temperature in darkness. After this time, the absorbance was measured at 750 nm (Cecil CE 9500 spectrophotometer, Cambridge, UK) against a blank, in which the extract was replaced with ethanol. The total polyphenol content was expressed in mg of gallic acid per 100 g of fresh raw material. Analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.2.2. Monomeric Anthocyanins Content (MAC)

The total content of monomeric anthocyanins was determined by differential pH measurement [21]. The volume of 5 mL of the extract was taken into 50 mL volumetric flask and made up to volume with pH 1 buffer (0.025 M KCl + HCl) (1 series) and the second series with 0.4 M acetate buffer at pH 4.5. The samples were incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The absorbance at 510 nm and 700 nm was then measured on a Cecil CE 9500 spectrophotometer (Cambridge, UK) against distilled water. Measurements were performed in three replicates.
M A C mg L = A × M W × D F e × l · 1000
where A—difference in absorbance:
A = A 510 − A 700 p H 1.0 − A 510 − A 700 p H 4.5
  • MW (molecular weight) = 449.2 for cyanidin-3-glucoside,
  • DF—dilution factor = 10,
  • e—molar extinction coefficient = 26.900 for cyanidin-3-glucoside,
  • l—optical path length (l = 1 cm).
The results were expressed as mg of cyanidin-3-glucoside per 100 g of fresh material.

2.2.3. Antioxidant Activity Analyses

Antioxidant activity of extracts and infusions was determined by means of four different spectrophotometric techniques. Two radical-scavenging methods were employed: with the use of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) according to Brand-William’s method [22] and applying 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylobenzotiazolino-6-sulfonate) (ABTS) in accordance with Re et al. [23]. The two other analyses were based on the reduction of Fe3+ ions to Fe2+ ions, which resulted in intense blue color. In the Benzie and Strain method [24], the ions are complexed by 2,4,6-tris (2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine (TPTZ). In the Yen and Chen method [25], the solution of prussian blue, forming during reduction reaction, is responsible for the sample color. All determinations were performed in three replicates.

Determination of Antioxidant Activity Using DPPH Free Radicals

The volume of 0.1 mL of the extract or infusion and 3.9 mL of DPPH solution (0.0236 g/L ethanol) were mixed. The absorbance was measured immediately after mixing at 517 nm (Cecil CE 9500 spectrophotometer, Cambridge, UK) relative to pure ethanol. The next measurement was recorded after one hour. The amount of DPPH free radicals remaining in the reaction mixture after 60 min was calculated as
D P P H [ % ] = A 517 T 0 − A 517 T A 517 T 0 · 100
where [A517]T—mixture absorbance at the end of the experiment, [A517]T0—the absorbance of the mixture at the beginning of the experiment.

Determination of Antioxidant Activity Using ABTS Free Radicals

The ABTS radical cations were previously prepared from the 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid ammonium salt) by oxidation with sodium persulfate. For this purpose, a stock solution was prepared by dissolving 0.0960 g ABTS and 0.0165 g of sodium persulfate in 25 mL of distilled water. After 24 h, 1 mL was taken from the stock solution and dissolved in 50 mL of PBS (phosphate buffer) solution. The assay was performed by taking 2 mL of the initial solution and 1 mL of extract. The whole mixture was stirred, and after 10 min, the absorbance was measured at 734 nm (Cecil CE 9500 spectrophotometer, Cambridge, UK) against a PBS solution. A reference test was also carried out, measured directly after the addition of free radicals, in which the extract was replaced with a PBS solution. The rate of reduction in the radicals (% RSA) was calculated according to the formula
R S A [ % ] = E 0 − E 10 E 0 · 100
where
  • E0—absorbance of the reaction mixture at the beginning of the analysis,
  • E10—absorbance of the reaction mixture at the beginning of the determination.

Determination of Antioxidant Activity by the FRAP Method

The working reaction mixture was obtained by mixing an acetate buffer (300 mM, pH 3.6), FeCl3 (20 mM) and a TPTZ solution (8 mM) in hydrochloric acid (40 mM) in a 10:1:1 ratio. An amount of 0.4 mL of the extract and 3.6 mL of the TPTZ working solution were mixed and incubated for 10 min at 37°C. Afterward, the solution was centrifuged for 2 min at 4000 rpm. The absorbance of supernatant was measured at 595 nm (Cecil CE 9500 spectrophotometer, Cambridge, England) against a blank, in which the extract was replaced with distilled water. The results were referenced to the standard curve of the Fe2+ solution and expressed in μmol/mL of the extract.

Determination of Reducing Force

The volume of 1 mL of the extract, 2.5 mL of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of potassium ferricyanide (K3[Fe (CN)6]; 10 g/L) were mixed. Afterward, the mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 30 min. Then, 2.5 mL of the trichloroacetic acid solution (100 g/L) was added, mixed, and the whole mixture was centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant (2.5 mL) was transferred to the tube, and 2.5 mL of distilled water together with 0.5 mL of iron (III) chloride solution (1 g/mL) were added. Then, after 7 min, the absorbance was measured at 700 nm (Cecil CE 9500 spectrophotometer, Cambridge, UK), in relation to the blank, in which the extract was replaced with distilled water. The results were recalculated into ascorbic acid equivalents (mg/g), based on standard curve.

2.2.4. Statistical Analysis

All of the quantitative data (TPC [mg/100 g]—total polyphenol content, MAC [mg/100 g]—monomeric anthocyanins content, DPPH [%], ABTS [% RSA]; FRAP [μmol Fe2+/mL], RP [mg/g]—reducing power) is presented as the mean value ± standard deviation (SD).
Three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to check if the analyzed parameters (independent variables) had an influence on the dependent variables [26,27,28]. ANOVA was conducted for each of the following dependent variables: TPC, MAC, DPPH, ABTS, FRAP and RP. The intergroup factors (independent variables) were plants (three levels: red clover, sweet violet, elderberry), type of drying (four levels: fresh, freeze dried, air dried at 30 °C, air dried at 50 °C) and extract (two levels: ethanolic and aqueous).
In case the null hypothesis is rejected based on the ANOVA results (no significant differences between the groups), post hoc tests (multiple comparison tests) must be performed. In order to determine homogeneous groups, the honest significant difference (HSD) of the Tukey’s test was used [26].
Data analysis was performed using Statistica (StatSoft, Inc. 2011 Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
The Pearson’s correlation coefficients were also counted for the analyzed parameters (Microsoft Office Excel 2003).

3. Results and Discussion

In Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, the measurement results for all dependent variables (TPC, MAC, DPPH, ABTS, FRAP and RP) are presented as mean values from three independent measurements ± standard deviation (SD).

3.1. Total Polyphenol Content (TPC)

In the group of fresh flowers, the highest content of polyphenols was determined in red clover (855 mg/100 g), a lower content in elderflowers (654 mg/100 g), while the lowest amount was found in sweet violet (456 mg/100 g) (Figure 1).
Generally, a greater amount of polyphenols was determined in ethanolic extracts than aqueous ones, with the exception of sweet violet extracts, with similar content of these compounds in both extracts. This phenomenon can be caused by different qualitative composition within this group of compounds in an individual flower and their different affinity for the solvents used. Edible flowers are a rich source of polyphenols, which vary in quantitative and qualitative contents [1,2,3]. Mikulic-Petkovesk et al. [14] found 1022 mg GAE/100 g of elderflowers, which is 16% more than observed in this work, while Demasi et al. [29] determined only 508 mg GAE per 100 g of fresh Sambuci flos. TPC in sweet violet flowers was at the level of 428 mg/100 g [29], which is very similar to what was observed in this study.
Drying, regardless of its type, caused a reduction in the polyphenol content in most samples. The highest stability was demonstrated by phenolic compounds during freeze drying of elderflowers (determined in both ethanolic and aqueous extracts), where no reduction in their quantity was noted compared to fresh samples. Biernacka et al. [30] confirm that the use of freeze drying allows for better preservation of phenolic compounds in the raw material compared to the raw material dried with the use of warm air. In addition, the TPC values obtained by Viapiana and Wesołowski [15] for various elderflower infusions prepared from commercially available dried products were quite similar to those determined in this work. There are, however, scientific reports informing about higher content of these compounds in Sambuci flos [31,32].
The largest decrease in the content of polyphenols in lyophilized samples was recorded for sweet violet flowers (aqueous extract). In turn, air drying at 30 °C and 50 °C led to losses in the content of polyphenols in elderflower ethanolic extracts by 82.5% and up to 91%, respectively. Opposite results were found for sweet violet and red clover flowers dried at 50 °C, especially with regard to aqueous extracts, in which the TPC was higher compared to the samples dried at 30 °C. This phenomenon may be due to the fact that these flowers contain a large amount of polyphenol oxidase [33,34], an enzyme that degrades phenolic compounds, and only the application of a drying temperature of 50 °C induces its inactivation and thus reduces the loss of polyphenolic compounds. As described by Cheng at al. [35], PPO enzymes can remain unaffected by mild heat treatments, particularly when the drying temperature is below 55°C [35]. Selvi et al. [36] observed that increasing the temperature and drying time of rose (Rosa ‘Electron’) petals resulted in an increase in TPC in this material. According to Stefaniak and Grzeszczuk [37], who studied the effect of drying temperature on, i.a., the content of polyphenols in selected edible flowers, of the three temperatures used (25 °C, 35 °C and 70 °C), in most cases, 35 °C was the most favorable for the retention of these compounds. From a review by Fernandes at al. [38], it can be concluded that the drying method should be individually selected for a given species of edible flower.
The TPC determined in this research in dry sweet violet flowers was larger than that reported by Tünde et al. [39]. In turn, the content of polyphenolic compounds noted by Tava et al. [10] in methanolic extract of freeze-dried Trifolium pratense flowers was higher than that observed in lyophilized samples in this work. The content of polyphenols in the methanolic extract of red clover bud phase (dried at 60 °C), stated by Vlaisavljević et al. [8], was higher than in flowers dried at 50 °C in this study. It has to be emphasized that the amount of determined polyphenols depends not only on the drying method but also on the extraction procedure.

3.2. Monomeric Anthocyanins Content (MAC)

Anthocyanins were not detected in Sambuci flos, which is congruent with the findings of other authors [31,32,40]. Fresh sweet violet flowers had the highest anthocyanin content (93 mg/100 g in ethanolic extract and 98.7 mg/100 g in aqueous extract). Lyophilization allowed the greatest retention of these compounds that were soluble in ethanol, while drying at 50 °C proved to be a good way to preserve the anthocyanin fraction more soluble in water (Figure 2).
Singh et al. [12] reported that dried Viola odorata flowers contain 4% of anthocyanins, while Karioti et al. [41] obtained very poor content of these compounds and assigned this to thermal degradation during the sample preparation prior to analysis.
According to Lee et.al [42], Trifolium pratense flowers dried at room temperature had more anthocyanins than any sample examined in this study.

3.3. Antioxidant Activity Analyses

Antioxidant activity was determined by four methods to make the assessment of the antioxidant capacity more complete.
An analysis of the results (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6) revealed that fresh red clovers and elderflowers were the flowers with the greatest antioxidant capacity, and freeze drying was the best method. As for the reducing power and the FRAP assays, higher antioxidant activity was found for ethanolic extracts. In turn, in the DPPH method, the choice of the suitable solvent was not clear cut. Only the RSA obtained on the basis of ABTS scavenging method differed from the others. In this case, the aqueous extracts of all the examined flowers had higher free radical quenching capacity compared to the ethanolic extracts. In addition, the highest such ability was found for the aqueous extracts of flowers dried conventionally at 30 °C and 50 °C. High antioxidant potential can be attributed to the relatively high polyphenol content of individual flowers. There are numerous studies confirming this relationship [15,32,43,44], in which it was proved that ethanolic elderflower extracts exhibited strong activity in scavenging DPPH radicals. The antioxidant potential was strongly dependent on the extraction procedure.

3.4. Statistical Analysis

The ANOVA results (Table 1) show a statistically significant effect of the independent variables (Plant, Drying and Extract) as well as their interactions (Plant*Drying, Plant*Extract, Drying*Extract and Plant*Drying*Extract) on all six dependent variables (TPC, MAC, DPPH, ABTS, FRAP and RP) apart from Plant*Extract for dependent variable MAC.
The results of Tukey’s HDS test for the dependent variables are presented in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters. Statistical analysis was performed for p < 0.05.
Table 2 presents the Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the values of the analyzed parameters without distinguishing between the results concerning the ethanolic extracts and the aqueous ones, as well as preservation method. This allows a more general view of the obtained results.
When analyzing these data, it can be observed that the results obtained from three methods (DPPH, FRAP, reducing power—RP) of testing antioxidant activity are strongly correlated with each other. The antioxidant activity determined by the ABTS method did not show much correlation with the results obtained in the remaining methods. There is strong correlation between antioxidant properties and TPC, which is consistent with some scientific reports [45,46]. However, there is no such relationship in relation to anthocyanin content. The type of observed correlations depends on the structure of polyphenolic compounds occurring in the tested material.

4. Conclusions

Edible flowers are a valuable and, at the same time, very perishable material. So, in order to preserve their precious properties, an appropriate method of their conservation should be developed. This study showed that in most cases, freeze drying preserves well the antioxidant properties of the examined raw materials, as well as the compounds determining these properties. Moreover, the choice of an appropriate solvent for the extraction of bioactive compounds is extremely important to obtain a product with specific features. The selection of a suitable solvent is an individual matter for each edible flower, due to their diverse chemical composition and interactions of chemical compounds in the biological matrix. Of the studied flowers, the highest amount of polyphenols was determined in the ethanolic extracts of fresh red clover flowers (854.76 mg/100 g), while the highest concentration of anthocyanins was detected in the aqueous extracts of fresh sweet violet flowers (99.41 mg/100 g). The flowers of red clover had the highest antioxidant activity among the analyzed edible flowers, followed by the elderflowers and sweet violet. However, these values fluctuated depending on the method used. This research also revealed that polyphenolic compounds were mainly responsible for the antioxidant activity of the studied edible flowers, since antioxidant activity and TPC (r = 0.9196, for FRAP method) were strongly correlated. There was no such relationship in the case of anthocyanins.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Z.; methodology, A.Z. and R.F.; formal analysis, A.Z. and S.F.; investigation, A.Z.; data curation, A.Z. and R.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Z.; writing—review and editing, A.Z., R.F., S.F. and A.K.; visualization, S.F. and A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by the Ministry of Education and Science for the Agricultural University of Hugo Kołłątaj in Krakow for the year 2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mlcek, J.; Rop, O. Fresh edible flowers of ornamental plants—A new source of nutraceutical foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, N.H.; Wei, S. Factors influencing consumers’ attitudes towards the consumption of edible flowers. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 56, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Takahashi, J.A.; Rezende, F.A.G.G.; Moura, M.A.F.; Dominguete, L.C.B.; Sande, D. Edible flowers: Bioactive profile and its potential to be used in food development. Food Res. Int. 2020, 129, 108868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Benvenuti, S.; Mazzoncini, M. The Biodiversity of Edible Flowers: Discovering New Tastes and New Health Benefits. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dos Santos, I.C.; Reis, S.N. Edible Flowers: Traditional and Current Use. Ornam. Hortic. 2021, 27, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gupta, Y.C.; Sharma, P.; Sharma, G.; Agnihotri, R. Edible Flowers. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Floriculture for Rural and Urban Prosperity in the Scenario of Climate Change, Pakyong, India, 16–18 February 2018; pp. 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zoric, L.; Merkulov, L.; Lukovic, J.; Boza, P. Comparative analysis of qualitative anatomical characters of Trifolium L. (Fabaceae) and their taxonomic implications: Preliminary results. Plant Syst. Evol. 2012, 298, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vlaisavljević, S.; Kaurinović, B.; Popović, M.; Vasiljević, S. Profile of phenolic compounds in Trifolium pratense L. extracts at different growth stages and their biological activities. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, 3090–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nelsen, J.; Ulbricht, C.; Barrette, E.P.; Mac, D.S.; Tsouronis, C.; Rogers, A.; Basch, S.; Hashmi, S.; Bent, S.; Basch, E. Red clover (Trifolium pratense) monograph: A clinical decision support tool. J. Herb. Pharmacother. 2002, 2, 49–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tava, A.; Pecio, Ł.; Lo Scalzo, R.; Stochmal, A.; Pecetti, L. Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity in Trifolium Germplasm from Different Environments. Molecules 2019, 24, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mittal, P.; Gupta, V.; Goswami, M.; Thakur, N. Phytochemical and Pharmacological Potential of Viola odorata formulation and Evaluation of pH Triggered in-situ Ocular Gel of Ofloxacin View project In-situ Ocular Gel View project. Int. J. Pharmacogn. 2015, 2, 215–220. [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh, A.; Dhariwal, S. Navneet Traditional uses, Antimicrobial potential, Pharmacological properties and Phytochemistry of Viola odorata: A Mini Review. J. Phytopharm. 2018, 7, 103–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fazeenah, A.; Quamri, M. Banafsha (Viola odorata Linn.)—A Review. World J. Pharm. Res. 2020, 9, 514–537. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mikulic-Petkovsek, M.; Samoticha, J.; Eler, K.; Stampar, F.; Veberic, R. Traditional elderflower beverages: A rich source of phenolic compounds with high antioxidant activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 1477–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Viapiana, A.; Wesolowski, M. The Phenolic Contents and Antioxidant Activities of Infusions of Sambucus nigra L. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2017, 72, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pereira, A.M.; Cruz, R.R.P.; Gadelha, T.M.; da Silva, Á.G.F.; da Costa, F.B.; Ribeiro, W.S. Edible flowers: Beauty, health and nutrition. Res. Soc. Dev. 2020, 9, e336972994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Flieger, J.; Flieger, W.; Baj, J.; Maciejewski, R. Antioxidants: Classification, Natural Sources, Activity/Capacity Measurements, and Usefulness for the Synthesis of Nanoparticles. Materials 2021, 14, 4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pająk, M.; Szostak, M.; Sławiński, M. Badania geostatystyczne skażenia środowiska leśnego uroczyska grodzisko w bielańsko-tynieckim parku krajobrazowym. Arch. Fotogram. Kartogr. Teledetekcji 2012, 24, 245–256. [Google Scholar]
  19. AOAC. Determination of Moisture, Ash, Protein and Fat. Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists, 18th ed.; AOAC: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  20. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, J.; Durst, R.W.; Wrolstad, R.E.; Barnes, K.W.; Eisele, T.; Giusti, M.M.; Haché, J.; Hofsommer, H.; Koswig, S.; Krueger, D.A.; et al. Determination of Total Monomeric Anthocyanin Pigment Content of Fruit Juices, Beverages, Natural Colorants, and Wines by the pH Differential Method: Collaborative Study. J. AOAC Int. 2005, 88, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Yen, G.C.; Chen, H.Y. Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Francik, S.; Francik, R.; Sadowska, U.; Bystrowska, B.; Zawiślak, A.; Knapczyk, A.; Nzeyimana, A. Identification of phenolic compounds and determination of antioxidant activity in extracts and infusions of salvia leaves. Materials 2020, 13, 5811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Francik, S.; Knapik, P.; Łapczyńska-Kordon, B.; Francik, R.; Ślipek, Z. Values of Selected Strength Parameters of Miscanthus × Giganteus Stalk Depending on Water Content and Internode Number. Materials 2022, 15, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Łapczyńska-Kordon, B.; Ślipek, Z.; Słomka-Polonis, K.; Styks, J.; Hebda, T.; Francik, S. Physicochemical Properties of Biochar Produced from Goldenrod Plants. Materials 2022, 15, 2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Demasi, S.; Caser, M.; Donno, D.; Enri, S.R.; Lonati, M.; Scariot, V. Exploring wild edible flowers as a source of bioactive compounds: New perspectives in horticulture. Folia Hortic. 2021, 33, 27–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Biernacka, B.; Dziki, D.; Kozłowska, J.; Kowalska, I.; Soluch, A. Dehydrated at different conditions and powdered leek as a concentrate of biologically active substances: Antioxidant activity and phenolic compound profile. Materials 2021, 14, 6127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Młynarczyk, K.; Walkowiak-Tomczak, D.; Łysiak, G.P. Bioactive properties of Sambucus nigra L. as a functional ingredient for food and pharmaceutical industry. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 40, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ferreira, S.S.; Silva, A.M.; Nunes, F.M. Sambucus nigra L. Fruits and Flowers: Chemical Composition and Related Bioactivities. Food Rev. Int. 2020, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hart, E.H.; Onime, L.A.; Davies, T.E.; Morphew, R.M.; Kingston-Smith, A.H. The effects of PPO activity on the proteome of ingested red clover and implications for improving the nutrition of grazing cattle. J. Proteom. 2016, 141, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kagan, I.A.; Dinkins, R.D.; Taylor, N.L.; Kagan, I.A.; Dinkins, R.D.; Taylor, N.L. Phenolic Profiles and Polyphenol Oxidase (PPO) Gene Expression of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense) Selected for Decreased Postharvest Browning. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1478–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Cheng, X.F.; Zhang, M.; Adhikari, B. The inactivation kinetics of polyphenol oxidase in mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) during thermal and thermosonic treatments. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2013, 20, 674–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Selvi, K.Ç.; Kabutey, A.; Gürdil, G.A.K.; Herak, D.; Kurhan, Ş.; Klouček, P. The Effect of Infrared Drying on Color, Projected Area, Drying Time, and Total Phenolic Content of Rose (Rose electron) Petals. Plants 2020, 9, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Stefaniak, A.; Grzeszczuk, M. Effect of drying temperature and method of extract preparation on antioxidant activity of edible flowers of some ornamental plant species. Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin. Agric. Aliment. Pisc. Zootech. 2020, 354, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fernandes, L.; Saraiva, J.A.; Pereira, J.A.; Casal, S.; Ramalhosa, E. Post-harvest technologies applied to edible flowers: A review: Edible flowers preservation. Food Rev. Int. 2019, 35, 132–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tünde, J.; Pallag, A.; Marian, E.; Mureșan, M.E.; Stan, R.L.; Vicaș, L.G. The histo-anatomical investigation and the polyphenolic profile of antioxidant complex active ingredients from three Viola species. Farmacia 2019, 67, 634–640. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lamy, S.; Muhire, É.; Annabi, B. Antiproliferative efficacy of elderberries and elderflowers (Sambucus canadensis) on glioma and brain endothelial cells under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 40, 164–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Karioti, A.; Furlan, C.; Vincieri, F.F.; Bilia, A.R. Analysis of the constituents and quality control of Viola odorata aqueous preparations by HPLC-DAD and HPLC-ESI-MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 399, 1715–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, S.G.; Brownmiller, C.R.; Lee, S.O.; Kang, H.W. Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects of Anthocyanins of Trifolium pratense (Red Clover) in Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated RAW-267.4 Macrophages. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Dawidowicz, A.L.; Wianowska, D.; Baraniak, B. The antioxidant properties of alcoholic extracts from Sambucus nigra L. (antioxidant properties of extracts). LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 39, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jakubczyk, K.; Łukomska, A.; Gutowska, I.; Kochman, J.; Janił, J.; Janda, K. Edible Flowers Extracts as a Source of Bioactive Compounds with Antioxidant Properties—In Vitro Studies. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Benvenuti, S.; Pellati, F.; Melegari, M.; Bertelli, D. Polyphenols, Anthocyanins, Ascorbic Acid, and Radical Scavenging Activity of Rubus, Ribes, and Aronia. J. Food Sci. 2004, 69, FCT164–FCT169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khiya, Z.; Oualcadi, Y.; Gamar, A.; Berrekhis, F.; Zair, T.; Hilali, F.E.L. Correlation of Total Polyphenolic Content with Antioxidant Activity of Hydromethanolic Extract and Their Fractions of the Salvia officinalis Leaves from Different Regions of Morocco. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 8585313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 03317 g001 550
Figure 1. Total polyphenol content (TPC) in ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Figure 1. Total polyphenol content (TPC) in ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Materials 15 03317 g001
Materials 15 03317 g002 550
Figure 2. Anthocyanin content (MAC) in ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Figure 2. Anthocyanin content (MAC) in ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Materials 15 03317 g002
Materials 15 03317 g003 550
Figure 3. Amount of remaining 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) as an antioxidant activity measure of ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Figure 3. Amount of remaining 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) as an antioxidant activity measure of ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Materials 15 03317 g003
Materials 15 03317 g004 550
Figure 4. Radical-scavenging activity of ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers assessed in ABTS method. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Figure 4. Radical-scavenging activity of ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers assessed in ABTS method. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Materials 15 03317 g004
Materials 15 03317 g005 550
Figure 5. Antioxidant activity of ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers assessed in FRAP method. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Figure 5. Antioxidant activity of ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers assessed in FRAP method. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Materials 15 03317 g005
Materials 15 03317 g006 550
Figure 6. Reducing power of ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Figure 6. Reducing power of ethanolic and aqueous extracts from red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Bars with a different letter indicate significant differences according to HDS Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). Homogeneous groups are marked with the same letters.
Materials 15 03317 g006
Table
Table 1. ANOVA results for TPC, MAC, DPPH, ABTS, FRAP and RP in samples of red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers.
Table 1. ANOVA results for TPC, MAC, DPPH, ABTS, FRAP and RP in samples of red clover, sweet violet and elderberry flowers.
Intergroup Factorsp
TPC 1		p
MAC 2		p
DPPH 3		p
ABTS 4		p
FRAP 5		p
RP 6
Plant0.0000 *0.0000 *0.0000 *0.0000 *0.0000 *0.0000 *
Drying0.0000 *0.0000 *0.0000 *0.00000.0000 *0.0000 *
Extract0.0000 *0.0000 *0.0008 *0.0000 *0.0000 *0.0000 *
Plant*Drying0.0000 *0.0000 *0.0000 *0.00000.0000 *0.0000 *
Plant*Extract0.0000 *0.15950.0000 *0.00000.0000 *0.0000 *
Drying*Extract0.0000 *0.0012 *0.0000 *0.00000.0000 *0.0000 *
Plant*Drying*Extract0.0000 *0.0001 *0.0000 *0.00000.0000 *0.0000 *
Significant results are indicated by asterisks * (p < 0.05). 1 TPC [mg/100 g]—total polyphenol content; 2 MAC [mg/100 g]—monomeric anthocyanins content; 3 DPPH [%]; 4 ABTS [% RSA]; 5 FRAP [μmol Fe2+/mL]; 6 RP [mg/g]—reducing power.
Table
Table 2. Correlation coefficients between values of analyzed parameters.
Table 2. Correlation coefficients between values of analyzed parameters.
Parameters TPC 1MAC 2DPPH 3ABTS 4FRAP 5RP 6
TPC10.2354−0.7623−0.31970.91960.8629
MAC 10.0048−0.17810.0994−0.0051
DPPH 1−0.0205−0.7908−0.8084
ABTS 1−0.2799−0.0201
FRAP 10.9602
RP 1
1 TPC [mg/100 g]—total polyphenol content; 2 MAC [mg/100 g]—monomeric anthocyanins content; 3 DPPH [%]; 4 ABTS [% RSA]; 5 FRAP [μmol Fe2+/mL]; 6 RP [mg/g]—reducing power.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zawiślak, A.; Francik, R.; Francik, S.; Knapczyk, A. Impact of Drying Conditions on Antioxidant Activity of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense), Sweet Violet (Viola odorata) and Elderberry Flowers (Sambucus nigra). Materials 2022, 15, 3317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093317

AMA Style

Zawiślak A, Francik R, Francik S, Knapczyk A. Impact of Drying Conditions on Antioxidant Activity of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense), Sweet Violet (Viola odorata) and Elderberry Flowers (Sambucus nigra). Materials. 2022; 15(9):3317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093317

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zawiślak, Agnieszka, Renata Francik, Sławomir Francik, and Adrian Knapczyk. 2022. "Impact of Drying Conditions on Antioxidant Activity of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense), Sweet Violet (Viola odorata) and Elderberry Flowers (Sambucus nigra)" Materials 15, no. 9: 3317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093317

APA Style

Zawiślak, A., Francik, R., Francik, S., & Knapczyk, A. (2022). Impact of Drying Conditions on Antioxidant Activity of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense), Sweet Violet (Viola odorata) and Elderberry Flowers (Sambucus nigra). Materials, 15(9), 3317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093317

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop