Experimental Study on Compressive and Flexural Performance of Lightweight Cement-Based Composites Reinforced with Hybrid Short Fibers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Experimental Layout
2.1. Material Properties
2.2. Test Parameters
2.3. Specimen Preparation and Mixing Procedure
2.4. Experimental Setup and Measuring Devices
3. Experimental Results and Discussion
3.1. Compressive Strength
3.2. Flexural Performance
3.2.1. Effect of EG/B Ratios
3.2.2. Effect of Fiber Volume Fraction Ratio
3.2.3. Effect of Nylon Fiber Length
3.3. Fracture Characteristics
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- Increasing the EG/B ratio from 0.2 to 0.3 resulted in a reduction of the compressive strength by a range of 14.2% to 15.3% due to the increase in the hollow extent of the matrix. A similar tendency was observed regarding the variation in the nylon fiber content of the hybrid fiber type, with a reduction in the compressive strength by a range of 2.3% to 10.7%. In addition, the utilization of nylon fibers with a longer length of 12 mm resulted in a compressive strength reduction of approximately 13% compared to that of the 6 mm nylon fibers.
- (2)
- Regarding the fracture characteristics in flexure, the test results reveal that the AM fibers showed brittle behavior owing to a greater bonding strength inside the lightweight matrix than their tensile strength; meanwhile, the nylon fibers showed pull-out behavior due to a high elongation capacity and a lower bonding strength than their tensile strength.
- (3)
- The amount of EG particles in the composites generally affected the flexural behavior of the lightweight cement-based composites less in terms of their initial stiffness, strength, and ductility. When increasing the EG/B ratio from 0.2 to 0.3, the difference in the flexural strength was in a range of 1.5% to 4.4%, and the values regarding the difference in flexural toughness were in a range from 0.2% to 4.2%.
- (4)
- Increasing the AM fiber content from 0.5% to 1.0% in the hybrid system proportionally improved the mean flexural strength from 22.60% to 47.40%, as well as the deflection capacity at the peak load. In addition, in the post-peak stage, increasing the content of AM fibers within the matrix resulted in better ductility, represented by the improvement in the residual stress and flexural toughness. Compared to the specimen containing an AM volume fraction of 0.5%, the mean flexural toughness of those containing an AM volume fraction of 0.75% and 1.0% improved approximately by 42.80% and 57.20%, respectively. Such values regarding the improvement of the residual strength at a deflection of Lc/150 were 78.9% and 47.7%, respectively.
- (5)
- The nylon fiber length exhibited negligible effects on the flexural strength but significantly affected the deformation capacity at the peak load and the residual strength in the post-peak stage. The utilization of longer lengths of nylon fibers (12 mm) in the hybrid fiber type enhanced the flexural characteristics in the post-peak stage, such as the residual resistance and flexural toughness, when compared to the shorter ones (6 mm). Compared to the specimen using a 6 mm nylon fiber length, the specimen using a 12 mm nylon fiber length exhibited residual strength 1.6 times and 1.2 times higher corresponding to Lc/150 and the flexural toughness, respectively.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, C.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Zhao, M. Effect of steel fiber content on shear behavior of reinforced expanded-shale lightweight concrete beams with stirrups. Materials 2021, 14, 1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Maio, U.; Gaetano, D.; Greco, F.; Lonetti, P.; Pranno, A. The damage effect on the dynamic characteristics of FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete structures. Compos. Struct. 2023, 309, 116731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Maio, U.; Gaetano, D.; Greco, F.; Lonetti, P.; Nevone Blasi, P.; Pranno, A. The Reinforcing Effect of Nano-Modified Epoxy Resin on the Failure Behavior of FRP-Plated RC Structures. Buildings 2023, 13, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gadea, J.; Rodríguez, A.; Campos, P.L.; Garabito, J.; Calderón, V. Lightweight mortar made with recycled polyurethane foam. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2010, 32, 672–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alduaij, J.; Alshaleh, K.; Haque, M.N.; Ellaithy, K. Lightweight concrete in hot coastal areas. Cem. Concr. Compos. 1999, 21, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adhikary, S.K.; Rudžionis, Ž.; Vaičiukynienė, D. Development of flowable ultra-lightweight concrete using expanded glass aggregate, silica aerogel, and prefabricated plastic bubbles. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 31, 101399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sommariva, L.; Weinberger, K. Energy and natural resources saving in the production of expanded glass granules. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2015, 43, 2437–2442. [Google Scholar]
- Carsana, M.; Bertolini, L. Durability of lightweight concrete with expanded glass and silica fume. ACI Mater. J. 2017, 114, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rumsys, D.; Spudulis, E.; Bacinskas, D.; Kaklauskas, G. Compressive strength and durability properties of structural lightweight concrete with fine expanded glass and/or clay aggregates. Materials 2018, 11, 2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Erdogmus, E. Use of fiber-reinforced cements in masonry construction and structural rehabilitation. Fibers 2015, 3, 41–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iqbal, S.; Ali, A.; Holschemacher, K.; Bier, T.A. Mechanical properties of steel fibre reinforced high strength lightweight self-compacting concrete (SHLSCC). Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 98, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Niu, J.; Wan, C.; Liu, X.; Jin, Z. Comparison of flexural property between high performance polypropylene fibre reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete and steel fibre reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 157, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM C136; Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates. American Society of Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014.
- ASTM C29/C29M; Standard Test Method for Bulk Density ("Unit Weight") and Voids in Aggregate. American Society of Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1997.
- ASTM C128; Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate. American Society of Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015.
- BS EN 13055:2016; Lightweight aggregates. British Standards Institution: 389 Chiswick High Road, London, UK, 2016.
- Wang, X.H.; Jacobsen, S.; Lee, S.F.; He, J.Y.; Zhang, Z.L. Effect of silica fume, steel fibre and ITZ on the strength and fracture behavior of mortar. Mater. Struct. 2010, 43, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashad, A.M.; Seleem, H.E.D.H.; Shaheen, A.F. Effect of silica fume and slag on compressive strength and abrasion resistance of HVFA concrete. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2014, 8, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- ASTM C33/C33M; Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. American Society of Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.
- Choe, G.; Kim, G.; Kim, H.; Hwang, E.; Lee, S.; Son, M.; Nam, J. Influence of amorphous metallic fibers on spalling properties of high-strength concrete exposed to high temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 263, 120711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Liu, R.; Liu, J. Experimental study of the durability of high-performance cementitious composites with amorphous metallic fibers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 367, 130295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM C109/C109M; Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars. American Society of Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014.
- ASTM C1609/C1609M; Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fibre-Reinforced Concrete. American Society of Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
- Wang, J.Y.; Chia, K.S.; Liew, J.Y.R.; Zhang, M.H. Flexural performance of fiber-reinforced ultra lightweight cement composites with low fiber content. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 43, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanif, I.M.; Syuhaili, M.N.; Hasmori, M.F.; Shahmi, S.M. Effect of nylon fiber on mechanical properties of cement based mortar. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 271, 012080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Chen, Y.; Leung, C.K. Mechanical performance of Strain-Hardening Cementitious Composites (SHCC) with hybrid polyvinyl alcohol and steel fibres. Compos. Struct. 2019, 226, 111198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.K.; Hong, K.N.; Choi, S.I.; Han, T.H.; Kim, M.O. Experimental study on strength and flexural toughness properties of waste fishing net hybrid fibre-reinforced cementitious composites. Compos. Struct. 2022, 295, 115833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Properties | Unit | Standard | Values |
---|---|---|---|
Particle size | mm | ASTM C136 [13] | 0.25–0.5 |
Fineness modulus | – | – | 1.92 |
Bulk density | kg/m3 | ASTM C29/C29M [14] | 340 |
Apparent density | kg/m3 | ASTM C128 [15] | 680 |
Compressive strength | MPa | BS EN 13055:2016 [16] | 2.6 |
Water absorption by mass | Mass. % | ASTM C128 [15] | 28 |
Thermal conductivity | W/m.K | – | 0.07 |
Color | – | – | Creamy white |
Mix IDs | Mix Proportions of Matrix by Mass of Total Binder | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W/B * | Binder | EG/B * | Sand | SP *, % by Mass of Binder | ||
Cement | Microsilica | |||||
LCEG02 | 0.35 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | – | 0.1 |
LCEG03 | 0.35 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.3 | – | 0.2 |
Chemical Composition | Portland Cement | Microsilica |
---|---|---|
SiO2, % | 20.2 | 91.2 |
Al2O3, % | 58.0 | 1.3 |
Fe2O3, % | 3.0 | 0.8 |
CaO, % | 63.3 | 0.7 |
MgO, % | 3.4 | 0.3 |
SO3, % | 2.1 | - |
Clinker Minerals | ||
C3S, % | 54.9 | - |
C2S, % | 16.6 | - |
C3A, % | 10.3 | - |
C4AF, % | 9.1 | - |
Physical properties | ||
Specific gravity | 3.2 | 2.2 |
Fineness, m2/kg | 312 | 20.47 |
Fiber Types | Length (mm) | Diameter (µm) | Width (mm) | Thickness (µm) | Density (kg/m3) | Elastic Modulus (GPa) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amorphous metallic | 10 | - | 1.0 | 24 | 7200 | 140 |
Nylon | 6, 12 | 26 | - | - | 1160 | 2.7 |
Test Parameters | Specimens | EG/B Ratio | Fiber Volume Fraction (%) | Fiber Length (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vf,ny | Vf,AM | Lf,ny | Lf,AM | |||
EG/B ratio | EG0.2-NY1.0-AM0.5 | 0.2 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 6 | 10 |
EG0.2-NY0.5-AM1.0 | 0.2 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 6 | 10 | |
EG0.3-NY1.0-AM0.5 (1) | 0.3 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 6 | 10 | |
EG0.3-NY0.5-AM1.0 (2) | 0.3 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 6 | 10 | |
Fiber volume content ratio | RE-EG0.3 | 0.3 | - | - | - | - |
EG0.3-NY1.0-AM0.5 (1) | 0.3 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 6 | 10 | |
EG0.3-NY0.75-AM0.75 | 0.3 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 6 | 10 | |
EG0.3-NY0.5-AM1.0 (2) | 0.3 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 6 | 10 | |
Fiber length (nylon) | EG0.3-NY12-AM10 | 0.3 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 12 | 10 |
EG0.3-NY6-AM10 (1) | 0.3 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 6 | 10 |
Test Specimens | Flexural Characteristics | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fp (MPa) | δp (mm) | Toughness (KNmm) | Residual Strength at Lc/150 (MPa) | |||||
Mean | COV | Mean | COV | Mean | COV | Mean | COV | |
EG0.2-NY1.0-AM0.5 | 5.44 | 0.063 | 0.28 | 0.357 | 24.03 | 0.092 | 2.52 | 0.190 |
EG0.2-NY0.5-AM1.0 | 8.26 | 0.080 | 0.63 | 0.311 | 36.26 | 0.089 | 3.46 | 0.180 |
EG0.3-NY1.0-AM0.5 (1) | 5.69 | 0.050 | 0.34 | 0.310 | 23.01 | 0.112 | 1.76 | 0.107 |
EG0.3-NY0.5-AM1.0 (2) | 8.38 | 0.042 | 0.59 | 0.108 | 36.18 | 0.107 | 2.60 | 0.284 |
RE-EG0.3 | 4.97 | 0.054 | 0.33 | 0.293 | 4.98 | 0.204 | - | - |
EG0.3-NY1.0-AM0.5 (1) | 5.69 | 0.050 | 0.34 | 0.310 | 23.01 | 0.112 | 1.76 | 0.107 |
EG0.3-NY0.75-AM0.75 | 6.97 | 0.099 | 0.46 | 0.288 | 32.86 | 0.074 | 3.15 | 0.010 |
EG0.3-NY0.5-AM1.0 (2) | 8.38 | 0.042 | 0.59 | 0.108 | 36.18 | 0.107 | 2.60 | 0.284 |
EG0.3-NY12-AM10 | 5.58 | 0.050 | 0.79 | 0.105 | 27.53 | 0.025 | 2.80 | 0.117 |
EG0.3-NY6-AM10 (1) | 5.69 | 0.050 | 0.34 | 0.310 | 23.01 | 0.112 | 1.76 | 0.107 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dang, C.-T.; Pham, M.; Dinh, N.-H. Experimental Study on Compressive and Flexural Performance of Lightweight Cement-Based Composites Reinforced with Hybrid Short Fibers. Materials 2023, 16, 4457. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124457
Dang C-T, Pham M, Dinh N-H. Experimental Study on Compressive and Flexural Performance of Lightweight Cement-Based Composites Reinforced with Hybrid Short Fibers. Materials. 2023; 16(12):4457. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124457
Chicago/Turabian StyleDang, Cong-Thuat, My Pham, and Ngoc-Hieu Dinh. 2023. "Experimental Study on Compressive and Flexural Performance of Lightweight Cement-Based Composites Reinforced with Hybrid Short Fibers" Materials 16, no. 12: 4457. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124457
APA StyleDang, C. -T., Pham, M., & Dinh, N. -H. (2023). Experimental Study on Compressive and Flexural Performance of Lightweight Cement-Based Composites Reinforced with Hybrid Short Fibers. Materials, 16(12), 4457. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124457