Next Article in Journal
Investigation on Thermal Barrier Coating Damages for Ultrafast Laser Drilling of Cooling Holes
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Dimensional Graphene-Based Potassium Channels Built at an Oil/Water Interface
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Nd Substitution on the Phase Constitution in (Zr,Ce)Fe10Si2 Alloys with the ThMn12 Structure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Substitution of Mn by Pd on the Structure and Thermomagnetic Properties of the Mn1−xPdxCoGe Alloys (Where x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07 and 0.1)

Department of Physics, Częstochowa University of Technology, Armii Krajowej 19, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(15), 5394; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155394
Submission received: 13 June 2023 / Revised: 21 July 2023 / Accepted: 27 July 2023 / Published: 31 July 2023

Abstract

:
In the present paper, the influence of partial substitution of Mn by Pd on structure, thermomagnetic properties, and phase transitions in the MnCoGe alloys was investigated. The studies of phase constitution revealed an occurrence of the orthorhombic TiNiSi-type and hexagonal Ni2Ti- type phases. Deep analysis of the XRD pattern supported by the Rietveld analysis allowed us to notice the changes in lattice parameters and quantity of recognized phases depending on the Pd content. An increase of palladium in alloy composition at the expense of manganese induced a rise in the Curie temperature. The values of ΔSM measured for the variation of external magnetic field ~5 T equaled 8.88, 23.99, 15.63, and 11.09 for Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe, Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe, Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe, and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe alloy, respectively. The highest magnetic entropy change ΔSM was observed for samples with Pd content x = 0.05 induced by magnetostructural transformation. The analysis of the n vs. T curves allowed confirmation of the XRD and DSC results of an occurrence of the first-order magnetostructural transition in Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe and Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe alloys samples.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, taking care of the natural environment is extremely important. The consumption of energy for heating/cooling devices increases every year. Traditional cooling techniques are based on compression-decompression processes of freon gases, which are very dangerous for the ozone layer and global warming. Chlorofluorocarbons or hydrochlorofluorocarbons should be drastically reduced in the future, according to the Montreal protocol. The efficiency of cooling based on gas compression-decompression processes achieves about 45%. Research on novel, more efficient cooling techniques is being conducted. The most attractive, among others, is the magnetocaloric effect (MCE), discovered by Warburg in 1881 [1]. The MCE is the cooling or heating of magnetic material in an external magnetic field, and its efficiency reaches the highest values of even 60%. The magnitudes describing this phenomenon are adiabatic temperature change (ΔTad) or isothermal magnetic entropy change (ΔSM) [2]. Since the discovery of the giant MCE in Gd5Ge2Si2 by Pecharsky and Gschneidner Jr. in 1997 [2,3], an enormous number of papers have been published. The MCE is observed in all magnetic materials, as it is the result of the coupling of the magnetic field with the magnetic sublattice, which leads to a change in the magnetic part of the entropy of the solids. The isothermal magnetic entropy change is measured indirectly based on field dependencies of magnetization collected at a wide range of temperatures [2,3].
The Gd5Ge2Si2 alloys are very hard in preparation and contain relatively expensive gadolinium and germanium elements, which are rare-earth alloys covered by embargoes related to the political situation in the world. These reasons induce high material prices for an active magnetic regenerator in commercial refrigerators. Taking into account the development of novel magnetic materials and lowering the price, many compounds were investigated, i.e., manganites [4], La(Fe,Si)13-type alloys [5,6], amorphous alloys [7], and others.
Researchers have been interested in MnCoGe alloys, which belong to the MM’X group of alloys (where M or M’—transition metal and X—metaloid) and are characterized by excellent magnetocaloric properties [8,9,10]. They are formed into independent crystal structures as low-temperature orthorhombic TiNiSi-type (space group Pnma) and high-temperature hexagonal Ni2Ti (space group P63/mmc). For many years, the MnCoGe- prototype alloys have been modified by the introduction vacancies [11], off-stoichiometry composition [12], or partial substitution of the content element by others, i.e., Ge by Si [13]; Mn by V [14], Cr [15] or Pd [16]; Co by Ni [17]. Such modifications induced magneto-structural transition, which improved the magnetothermal properties. Qian and coworkers in [18] proposed a selective substitution of Mn by Zr. Such careful modification of alloy composition resulted in magneto-structural transition accompanied by strengthening of magnetic exchange interactions. All of these effects allowed the achievement of excellent values of magnetic entropy change near to the room temperature and relatively weak magnetic fields. In our previous paper [19], we also studied the influence of the partial substitution of Mn by Zr. The results delivered by Qian et al. in [18] were partially confirmed. As shown in [16], the partial substitution of Mn by Pd improves the value of magnetic entropy change and raises the Curie temperature. According to that, a much deeper analysis of Pd substitution in the range <0, 0.1>, including microstructural studies, the differential scanning calorimetry, and its influence on magnetic properties, is naturally expected, which was performed in the present paper.
Taking into account the results described in papers [16,18,19], we decided to investigate the influence of selective substitution of Mn by Pd on the structure and magnetocaloric properties in the Mn1−xPdxCoGe (where x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07, and 0.1).

2. Sample Preparation and Experimental Details

The series of ingot samples corresponding to the following compositions: Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe, Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe, Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe, and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe were produced by the arc melting technique in an atmosphere of inert gas (Ar). During the process, the high-purity elements (3N) were used. Taking into account good homogeneity, the specimens were remelted five times. The X-ray diffraction studies were carried out using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with CuKα radiation. Phase recognition and quantity analysis were supported by Bruker EVA 4.0 software and PowderCell 2.4 package for the Rietveld refinement [20]. The thermomagnetic properties (the Curie temperature and magnetic isotherms) were investigated using the Quantum Design Physical Properties Measuring System (PPMS) model 6000, working with a wide range of magnetic fields and temperatures. Calorimetric measurements were carried out on a differential scanning calorimeter DSC 214 Polyma produced by Netzsch (Selb, Germany) using a heating and cooling rate of 10 K/min. The microstructure was photographed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) JEOL 6610 LV equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS).

3. Results and Discussion

The ambient temperature XRD patterns of samples with different content of Pd were plotted in Figure 1. The analysis revealed the coexistence of two phases: the hexagonal Ni2In- type and orthorhombic NiTiSi- type, for all investigated specimens. A visible increase in the intensity of reflexes corresponding to the NiTiSi- type phase was observed. Moreover, the highest content of volume fraction of the NiTiSi- type phase with minor Ni2Ti-type phase for the Mn0.95Pd0.05CoSi alloy was detected. The calculations of the lattice constant of recognized phases showed a monotonic rise with an increase of Pd in a sample. Such effect is related to the different ionic radius of Pd (rPd = 1.37 Å) compared to much lower Mn radius (rMn = 1.18 Å). According to Bażela and coworkers in [21], the orthorhombic cell was treated as a distorted hexagonal cell. In such cases, the Pd atoms induce some distortions and promote crystallization hexagonal Ni2In-type phase. Careful examination of the X-ray diffraction patterns excluded an occurrence of some additional phases of impurities. The qualitative and quantitative analyses were strongly supported by the Rietveld refinement; the results are presented in Table 1.
The homogeneity of the samples was studied using the SEM technique. The micrograph of the Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe alloy sample is shown in Figure 2a. EDS maps, collected for observed microstructure, present homogenous distribution of constituent elements (Figure 2b–e). Moreover, the concentration of nominal composition Mn—31.67 at.%, Pd—1.67 at.%, Co—33.33 at.% and Ge—33.33 at.% corresponds well with measured by EDS Mn—31.45 ± 0.22 at.%, Pd—1.65 ± 0.18 at.%, Co—33.42 ± 0.25 at.%, and Ge—33.41 ± 0.36 at.%, respectively.
As it was reported by Johnson in [22], the structural transition from hexagonal to orthorhombic structure was called a martensitic-type diffusionless transition. Moreover, he showed some relations between the lattice parameters of these two phases, which were given as [22]:
a o r t h c h e x ;   b o r t h a h e x ;   c o r t h 3 a h e x
These relations were used to construct Pd content dependence of lattice parameters of the hexagonal Ni2In-type structure and orthorhombic NiTiSi-type structure for investigated samples presented in Figure 3. During the transformation from orthorhombic to hexagonal, the first cell contracts by 11.5% along the a-axis. However, the enlargements of the orthorhombic structure by 7% and 0.03% along the b and c axes were noticed. Such behavior is expected in magnetocaloric materials because magnetostructural transformation leads to an increase in the total entropy of the material, even about 90% [23].
As shown by Qian and coworkers in Reference [18], the nearest interatomic distances could manifest some variations depending on the Zr content. Taking into account these results, the Mn-Mn and Co-Co distances were calculated and presented as Pd content dependence (Figure 4). Significantly shorter Mn-Mn distances were observed, while the Co-Co distances increased visibly. The results are similar to the data delivered in [18]. Such variations of distances of magnetic elements significantly influenced magnetic exchange interactions, which resulted in strong coupling between the magnetic and structural transitions.
In order to confirm the results of the XRD analysis and determination of temperatures of structural and magnetic transitions, the DSC measurements were conducted (Figure 5a). The lambda-type peaks were detected for samples with the lowest (x = 0.03) and the highest (x = 0.1) Pd content in the vicinity of 290 and 315 K, respectively. These temperatures are in agreement with the Curie temperature manifested by M vs. T curves collected for appropriate specimens. The lambda peaks were not observed for two of the samples, while the magnetostructural transition was detected. Similar results were observed for (Mn,Zr)CoGe samples by Qian et al. in [18]. The Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe alloy sample shows the structural transition from the paramagnetic hexagonal to a ferromagnetic orthorhombic structure at 300 K. Moreover, a visible temperature hysteresis was observed, which was confirmed by thermomagnetic measurements (Figure 5b).
The M vs. T dependences measured in the external magnetic field up to 0.1 T (in field cooling regime) for all samples are presented in Figure 5b. The thermal hysteresis is visible in all studied samples, which could suggest an occurrence of first-order phase transition in the produced materials [24]. A first derivative of M(T) dependences allowed us to obtain the values of the Curie temperature. The minimum of the dM(T)/dT curves made it possible to estimate the Curie point, which equaled 294 ± 1 K, 298 ± 1 K, 307 ± 1 K, and 318 ± 1 K for the concentration of Pd content x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07, and 0.1, respectively. Moreover, the gradual increase of the TC, was expected, based on results delivered in [18]. Such a rise in the Curie point could be related to an increase in the lattice constant with an increase in Pd content, which was confirmed by the XRD studies. As mentioned, the Pd atoms are larger than the Mn atoms, and the structure expands (Table 1). It could induce strengthening interactions between Mn—Mn and Mn—Co atoms.
Further studies concerning thermomagnetic properties were conducted in order to show the magnetocaloric properties. They were investigated indirectly based on magnetic isotherms measured in a wide range of temperatures. Measured curves allowed for calculations of magnetic entropy change ΔSM according to the following relation [25]:
Δ S M ( T , Δ H ) = μ 0 0 H ( M ( T , H ) T ) H d H ,
where μ0, H, M, and T represent the magnetic permeability of the vacuum, the strength of the magnetic field, magnetization, and temperature, respectively.
Due to the fact that discrete data were used for the calculation, the Relation (2) was realized using the following algorithm [26]:
Δ S M ( T i + T i + 1 2 ) 1 T i + 1 T i [ 0 B max M ( T i + 1 , B ) d B 0 B max M ( T i , B ) d B ]
where B represents the induction of the magnetic field, related to equation B = μ0H.
The temperature dependences of the magnetic entropy change determined for all investigated samples are shown in Figure 6. Symmetrical (caret) shapes of ΔSM(T) dependences were observed for samples Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe alloys, which suggests an occurrence of second-order phase transition [27]. Otherwise, an asymmetric shape was observed for Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe and Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe alloys, which is indirect proof of first-order phase transition and confirms DSC observations. The values of magnetic entropy change ΔSM measured under the change of external magnetic field ~5 T equaled 8.88, 23.99, 15.63, and 11.09 for Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe, Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe, Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe, and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe alloy, respectively. Taking into account the value of ΔSM calculated for the base MnCoGe alloy studied in [18], in the present case, they reached higher values. Moreover, similar to results delivered in previous work [19] concerning the selective substitution of Mn by Zr, the magnetic entropy change was the highest for the Pd content x = 0.05. Further increase of Pd content involved the reduction of magnetic entropy change value; however, even for rest additions (x = 0.07 and 0.1) was noteworthy. Such a high increase of the magnetic entropy change (for x = 0.05 sample) was caused by the magnetostructural transition visible in the DSC curve measured for this alloy. Revealed values are higher than the values delivered in a previous paper [19] concerning (Mn,Zr)CoGe alloys; however, they are comparable or slightly higher than the values described in [12,13,15,28,29,30]. Relatively large magnetic entropy change is probably caused by the magnetostructural phase transition, similar to that observed in [18,19] for Zr-doped MnCoGe alloys. It is realized as a structural reconfiguration, similar to the order–disorder setting of magnetic moments. A combination of lattice rearrangement and magnetic transition at TC may induce a giant magnetocaloric effect because the total entropy of magnetic material is a sum of magnetic, lattice, and electronic contributions. This last term could be omitted because studied materials do not manifest itinerant electron metamagnetic transition. A similar effect was observed by Qian et al. in [18] during studies of (Mn,Zr)CoGe alloys.
Taking into account the practical utility of fabricated alloys in household appliances, the refrigeration capacity (RC) was studied. The RC values were calculated based on ΔSM vs. T curves using the following equation [31]:
R C ( δ T , H M A X ) = T c o l d T h o t Δ S M ( T , H M A X ) d T
where RC and HMAX represent refrigerant (cooling) capacity and maximum amplitude of external magnetic field change, δT = ThotTcold is related to the temperature range of the thermodynamic cycle (in practical calculations, the full width at half maximum of magnetic entropy change peak).
The calculated values of magnetic entropy change and cooling capacity for several values of the external magnetic field are collected in Table 2. The highest value of refrigeration capacity was calculated for the Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe alloy sample, which is comparable with the values delivered for Gd-based amorphous alloys by Pierunek et al. in [32]. Moreover, the delivered values are higher than the ones revealed for samples with Zr addition [19].
Law and coworkers in [33] proposed a relatively fast technique for investigation and order of phase transition. The Law–Franco method is based on the phenomenological B vs. H curve [29], which could be written in the following form:
Δ S M = C ( B M A X ) n
where C is the proportionality constant depending on temperature and n is the exponent strongly dependent on the magnetic ordering of the specimen.
Franco and coworkers in [34] proposed that the calculations of the exponent n are possible based on the modification of Equation (5) in the following relation:
n = d l n | S M | d l n | H |
A more simple way to make known the n exponent was proposed in [35], and Equation (5) was rewritten in the present form:
ln Δ S M = ln C + n ln B M A X
As shown in [34], the exponent n is hardly dependent on the magnetic ordering of the material. Assuming that the studied material obeys the Curie–Weiss law, the exponent should equal 1 and 2 in the ferromagnetic and paramagnetic states, respectively. Its value at TC is strongly related to critical exponents and could be written in the following form:
n = 1 + 1 δ ( 1 1 β )
where β and δ are critical exponents in the vicinity of the critical point (i.e., TC).
Recently, Moreno-Ramirez et al. in [36] presented more precise conditions of the Law–Franco method adapted for the investigation of first-order phase transition. They showed that during phase transition, exponent n reaches values much higher than 2. Moreover, the n(TC) is lower than 0.4. Similar results were observed for Gd5Si2Ge2- type alloys studied in [37].
The n vs. T curves for all investigated alloy samples are collected in Figure 7. The shape of the n vs. T curves constructed for the Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe alloys is characteristic of the second-order phase transition. In the case of rest two samples, an evident first-order phase transition is detected. Moreover, close to the Curie point, a characteristic hump is observed, which is typical for structural transformation, similar to the results described in [33,37]. The values of the exponent n revealed at the Curie point of Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe and Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe were 0.34 and 0.45, respectively. Such values on exponent n confirmed the first order phase transition in these two alloys, taking into account the results delivered in [33,36,37].

4. Conclusions

The studies conducted in the present paper were focused on the influence of the partial substitution of Mn by Pd on the structure, thermomagnetic properties, and phase transitions in the MnCoGe alloys. The XRD investigation showed an occurrence of two phases in all investigated samples, the orthorhombic TiNiSi-type phase and hexagonal Ni2In- type phases with different content depending on the Pd addition. Deep analysis of the X-ray diffraction patterns assisted by the Rietveld refinement revealed a structure transformation. A rise of palladium content in the alloy at the expense of manganese induced an increase in the Curie temperature. The DSC studies showed lambda peaks corresponding to the Curie temperature and characteristic peaks associated with the magnetostructural transition. The maximum value of magnetic entropy change was observed for the sample with a Pd content x = 0.05, and it was induced by magnetostructural first-order phase transition. This transition was manifested by the enormous changes in the interatomic distances between the magnetic exchange interactions. An occurrence of lattice transformation and magnetic transition involved giant magnetic entropy change. Moreover, for the Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe alloy sample, the same type of transition was detected, which resulted in relatively good magnetocaloric properties. In the case of Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe alloy samples, a relatively high value of the ΔSM was calculated. The presence of magnetostructural first-order phase transition in the Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe and Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe alloy samples was confirmed by careful analysis of the n vs. T curves.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.K., A.P. and P.G.; methodology, K.K. and A.P.; validation, P.G.; formal analysis, K.K., A.P. and P.G.; investigation, K.K., A.P. and P.G.; writing the original manuscript, K.K. and P.G.; writing, review and editing, K.K., A.P. and P.G.; supervision, P.G.; funding acquisition, P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by private vouchers of P.G.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors do not declare any conflict of interest.

References

  1. Warburg, E. Magnetische untersuchugen. Ann. Phys. 1881, 13, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneidner, K.A., Jr. Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in Gd5Si2Ge2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 4494–4497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneidner, K.A., Jr. Magnetocaloric effect and magnetic refrigeration. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999, 200, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Botello-Zubiate, M.E.; Grijalva-Castillo, M.C.; Soto-Parra, D.; Sáenz-Hernández, R.J.; Santillán-Rodríguez, C.R.; Matutes-Aquino, J.A. Preparation of La0.7Ca0.3−xSrxMnO3 Manganites by Four Synthesis Methods and Their Influence on the Magnetic Properties and Relative Cooling Power. Materials 2019, 12, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Yan, A.; Muller, K.H.; Gutfleisch, O. Magnetocaloric effect in the LaFe11.8−xCoxSi1.2 melt-spun ribbons. J. Alloys Compd. 2008, 450, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gębara, P.; Pawlik, P.; Hasiak, M. Alteration of negative lattice expansion of the La(Fe,Si)13-type phase in LaFe11.14−xCo0.66NixSi1.2 alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 422, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Law, J.Y.; Franco, V.; Ramanujan, R.V. The magnetocaloric effect of partially crystalline Fe-B-Cr-Gd alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 113919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.T.; Wang, D.S.; Chen, C.F.; Nashima, O.; Kanomata, T.; Mizuseki, H.; Kawazoe, Y. Vacancy induced structural and magnetic transition in MnCo1−xGe. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 262504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pal, S.K.; Frommen, C.; Kumar, S.; Hauback, B.C.; Fjellvag, H.; Woodcock, T.G.; Nielsch, K.; Helgesen, G. Comparative phase transformation and magnetocaloric effect study of Co and Mn substitution by Cu in MnCoGe compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 775, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Si, X.; Zhou, K.; Zhang, R.; Ma, X.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y. Prediction of magnetocaloric effect and spontaneous magnetization in Cu-doped MnCoGe system. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 126104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, J.; Gottschall, T.; Skokov, K.P.; Moore, J.D.; Gutfleisch, O. Giant magnetocaloric effect driven by structural transitions. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ma, S.C.; Ge, Q.; Hu, Y.F.; Wang, L.; Liu, K.; Jiang, Q.Z.; Wang, D.H.; Hu, C.C.; Huang, H.B.; Cao, G.P.; et al. Driving higher magnetic field sensitivity of the martensitic transformation in MnCoGe ferromagnet. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 192406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Tao, K.; Wang, Y.; Wu, M.; Long, Y. Giant magnetocaloric effect induced by reemergence of magnetostructural coupling in Si-doped Mn0.95CoGe compounds. Mater. Des. 2017, 114, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ma, S.C.; Zheng, Y.X.; Xuan, H.C.; Shen, L.J.; Cao, Q.Q.; Wang, D.H.; Zhong, Z.C.; Du, Y.W. Large room temperature magnetocaloric effect with negligible magnetic hysteresis losses in Mn1−xVxCoGe alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2012, 324, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Trung, N.T.; Biharie, V.; Zhang, L.; Caron, L.; Buschow, K.H.J.; Brück, E. From single- to double-first-order magnetic phase transition in magnetocaloric Mn1−xCrxCoGe compounds. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 162507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gębara, P.; Śniadecki, Z. Structure, magnetocaloric properties and thermodynamic modeling of enthalpies of formation of (Mn,X)-Co-Ge (X = Zr, Pd) alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 796, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ren, Q.; Hutchison, W.D.; Wang, J.; Studer, A.J.; Campbell, S.J. Magnetic and structural transitions tuned through valence electron concentration in magnetocaloric Mn(Co1−xNix)Ge. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 1324–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Qian, F.; Zhu, Q.; Miao, X.; Fan, J.; Zhong, G.; Yang, H. Tailoring the magneto-structural coupling in Mn1−xZrxCoGe alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 1472–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kutynia, K.; Gębara, P. Tuning of the structure and magnetocaloric effect of Mn1−xZrxCoGe alloys (where x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07 and 0.1). Materials 2021, 14, 3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kraus, W.; Nolze, G. PowderCell 2.0 for Windows. Powder Differ. 1998, 13, 256. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bażela, W.; Szytuła, A.; Todorović, J.; Tomkowicz, Z.; Zięba, A. Crystal and magnetic structure of NiMnGe. Phys. Status Solidi A 1976, 38, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Johnson, V. Diffusionless orthorhombic to hexagonal transitions in ternary silicides and germanides. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14, 1117–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gschneidner, K.A., Jr.; Mudryk, Y.; Pecharsky, V.K. On the nature of the magnetocaloric effect of the first-order magnetostructural transition. Scr. Mater. 2012, 67, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kaeswurm, B.V.; Franco, K.P.; Skokov, O. Gutfleisch, Assessment of the magnetocaloric effect in La,Pr(Fe,Si) under cycling. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 406, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneider, K.A., Jr. Magnetocaloric effect from indirect measurements: Magnetization and heat capacity. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 86, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Świerczek, J. Medium range ordering and some magnetic properties of amorphous Fe90Zr7B3 alloy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2010, 322, 2696–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tishin, A.M.; Spichkin, Y.I. The Magnetocaloric Effect and Its Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  28. Diaz-Garcia, A.; Moreno-Ramirez, L.M.; Law, J.Y.; Albertini, F.; Fabbrici, S.; Franco, V. Characterization of thermal hysteresis in magnetocaloric NiMnIn Heusler alloys by Temperature First Order Reversal Curves (TFORC). J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 867, 159184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Wei, Z.; Liu, E.; Han, X.; Du, Z.; Li, L.; Xi, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, S.; et al. An efficient scheme to tailor the magnetostructural transitions by staged quenching and cyclical ageing in hexagonal martensitic alloys. Acta Mater. 2019, 174, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tozkoparan, O.; Yildirim, O.; Yüzüak, E.; Duman, E.; Dincer, I. Magnetostructural transition in Co-Mn-Ge systems tuned by valence electron concentration. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 791, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wood, M.E.; Potter, W.H. General analysis of magnetic refrigation and its optimization using a new concept: Maximization of refrigerant capacity. Cryogenics 1985, 25, 667–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pierunek, N.; Śniadecki, Z.; Marcin, J.; Skorvanek, I.; Idzikowski, B. Magnetocaloric effect of amorphous Gd65Fe10Co10Al10 × 5 (X = Al, Si, B) alloys. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2014, 50, 6971595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Law, J.Y.; Franco, V.; Moreno-Ramírez, L.M.; Conde, A.; Karpenkov, D.Y.; Radulov, I.; Skokov, K.P.; Gutfleisch, O. A quantitative criterion for determining the order of magnetic phase transitions using the magnetocaloric effect. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Franco, V.; Conde, A.; Provenzano, V.; Shull, R.D. Scaling analysis of the magnetocaloric effect in Gd5Si2Ge1.9X\(X = Al,Cu,Ga,Mn,Fe,Co). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2010, 322, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Świerczek, J. Superparamagnetic behavior and magnetic entropy change in partially crystallized Fe–Mo–Cu–B alloy. Phys. Status Solidi A 2014, 211, 1567–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Moreno-Ramirez, L.M.; Law, J.Y.; Borrego, J.M.; Barcza, A.; Greneche, J.M.; Franco, V. First-order phase transition in high-performance La(Fe,Mn,Si)13H despite negligible hysteresis. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 950, 169883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gębara, P.; Hasiak, M. Determination of Phase Transition and Critical Behavior of the As-Cast GdGeSi-(X) Type Alloys (Where X = Ni, Nd and Pr). Materials 2021, 14, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The X-ray diffraction patterns collected at room temperature for samples of produced alloys.
Figure 1. The X-ray diffraction patterns collected at room temperature for samples of produced alloys.
Materials 16 05394 g001
Figure 2. The SEM micrograph (a) and corresponding to it the EDS maps of the (be) Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe alloy sample.
Figure 2. The SEM micrograph (a) and corresponding to it the EDS maps of the (be) Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe alloy sample.
Materials 16 05394 g002
Figure 3. The Pd content x dependence of the unit cell parameters constructed for Mn1−xPdxCoGe (where x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07, and 0.1). Due to the symbol size being comparable to the error, the errors were not matched. (a) Pd content x vs. aort and chex, (b) Pd addition x vs. ahex, bort and cort/(3)1/2.
Figure 3. The Pd content x dependence of the unit cell parameters constructed for Mn1−xPdxCoGe (where x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07, and 0.1). Due to the symbol size being comparable to the error, the errors were not matched. (a) Pd content x vs. aort and chex, (b) Pd addition x vs. ahex, bort and cort/(3)1/2.
Materials 16 05394 g003
Figure 4. The Pd content x dependences of interatomic distances calculated for the Mn1−xPdxCoGe samples (a) Mn-Mn distances and (b) Co-Co distances. The errors were not marked due to being smaller than the symbol size.
Figure 4. The Pd content x dependences of interatomic distances calculated for the Mn1−xPdxCoGe samples (a) Mn-Mn distances and (b) Co-Co distances. The errors were not marked due to being smaller than the symbol size.
Materials 16 05394 g004
Figure 5. The DSC curves (a) and temperature dependences of magnetization (field cooling regime at Δ(μ0H) = 0.1 T) (b) collected for the studied specimens.
Figure 5. The DSC curves (a) and temperature dependences of magnetization (field cooling regime at Δ(μ0H) = 0.1 T) (b) collected for the studied specimens.
Materials 16 05394 g005
Figure 6. The ΔSM vs. T curves revealed for Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe (a), Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe (b), Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe (c), and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe (d) specimens.
Figure 6. The ΔSM vs. T curves revealed for Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe (a), Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe (b), Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe (c), and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe (d) specimens.
Materials 16 05394 g006
Figure 7. Temperature evolutions of exponent n revealed for all studied specimens.
Figure 7. Temperature evolutions of exponent n revealed for all studied specimens.
Materials 16 05394 g007
Table 1. The data delivered by the Rietveld analysis for investigated Mn1−xPdxCoGe alloys samples.
Table 1. The data delivered by the Rietveld analysis for investigated Mn1−xPdxCoGe alloys samples.
AlloyRecognized PhasesLattice Constant [Å] ± 0.001Volume Fraction [%]
Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGehex
Ni2Ti-type
a = 4.07393
c = 5.283
ort
NiTiSi-type
a = 5.9397
b = 3.823
c = 7.053
Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGehex
Ni2Ti-type
a = 4.07534
c = 5.285
ort
NiTiSi-type
a = 5.94266
b = 3.824
c = 7.055
Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGehex
Ni2Ti-type
a = 4.07952
c = 5.285
ort
NiTiSi-type
a = 5.94348
b = 3.825
c = 7.056
Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGehex
Ni2Ti-type
a = 4.08145
c = 5.286
ort
NiTiSi-type
a = 5.94455
b = 3.827
c = 7.058
Table 2. Thermomagnetic data (ΔSM and cooling capacity RC) for Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe, Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe, Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe, and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe alloys.
Table 2. Thermomagnetic data (ΔSM and cooling capacity RC) for Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe, Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe, Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe, and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe alloys.
SampleMagnetic Field Change Δ(μ0H) [T]Magnetic Entropy Change ΔSM [J (kg K)−1]Cooling Capacity
RC [J kg−1]
Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe12.6790
24.64154
36.82267
47.75317
58.88402
Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe15.41104
210.37249
315.62365
420.98499
523.99646
Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe13.9193
26.50165
39.65225
413.10320
515.63463
Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe12.0239
24.3386
36.67131
48.82209
511.09238
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kutynia, K.; Przybył, A.; Gębara, P. The Effect of Substitution of Mn by Pd on the Structure and Thermomagnetic Properties of the Mn1−xPdxCoGe Alloys (Where x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07 and 0.1). Materials 2023, 16, 5394. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155394

AMA Style

Kutynia K, Przybył A, Gębara P. The Effect of Substitution of Mn by Pd on the Structure and Thermomagnetic Properties of the Mn1−xPdxCoGe Alloys (Where x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07 and 0.1). Materials. 2023; 16(15):5394. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155394

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kutynia, Karolina, Anna Przybył, and Piotr Gębara. 2023. "The Effect of Substitution of Mn by Pd on the Structure and Thermomagnetic Properties of the Mn1−xPdxCoGe Alloys (Where x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07 and 0.1)" Materials 16, no. 15: 5394. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155394

APA Style

Kutynia, K., Przybył, A., & Gębara, P. (2023). The Effect of Substitution of Mn by Pd on the Structure and Thermomagnetic Properties of the Mn1−xPdxCoGe Alloys (Where x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07 and 0.1). Materials, 16(15), 5394. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155394

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop