Next Article in Journal
Acid Leaching Extraction Mechanism of Aluminum and Iron Ions from Coal Gangue Based on CaF2 Assistance and Process Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Characteristics of Plasma in Ultrasonic-Assisted Narrow-Gap Laser Welding with Filler Wire
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Phase Change Materials in Building Wall Construction—A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Energy in Construction and Building Materials

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Chimica e Ambientale—DICCA, Università degli Studi di Genova, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genova, Italy
Materials 2023, 16(2), 504; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020504
Submission received: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 28 December 2022 / Published: 4 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy in Construction and Building Materials)
Energy efficiency in buildings has become a major challenge in both science and industry. It is driven by the urgent need to strongly reduce the anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases and to cut back on the inefficient usage of the worldwide primary energy demand [1]. Building stock is, in fact, responsible for over one-third of the global energy consumption and is, additionally, responsible for nearly 40% of total direct and indirect CO2 emissions, making it the largest European energy consumer [2].
Therefore, a major leap in energy-saving is vital to protect our environment and to boost the EU’s green economy. However, the main problem we face is that we still construct our buildings with obsolete technologies and/or materials. We still believe that energy efficiency in buildings means completely insulating from all outer heat fluxes. The current trend is to deal with developing new challenging materials, and concepts, based on dynamic thermal manipulations [3,4], which can provide excellent building envelopment performance, in contrast with most classical solutions which are extremely inefficient because of being based on outdated concepts of insulation [5] and/or the R-value parameter, the latter defined as thermal resistances per unit area [6,7,8].
In this context, innovations in the construction sector are seeking breakthrough answers by using smart and intelligent components, materials and composites [9], energy saving concepts [10], and cost-effective solutions, in order to ultimately reach technologies with nearly zero CO2 emissions.
The aim of this Special Issue was to explore the current state of the art, new ideas, and novel developments on the relevant topics that link energy efficiency to construction and building materials. A wide range of research outputs on various topics, which are contributing to enhanced energy efficiency and sustainable materials used for residential and non-residential buildings, was provided.
The emphasis of these works has been on collecting fundamental studies, experimental research, numerical approaches, analysis tools, and design receipts for energy-efficient materials and constructions. It has the ambition to stimulate and spread the latest knowledge on energy and construction and building materials, making the basis for new ideas on various topics for young investigators as well as leading experts in the field of Materials Science and Engineering.
The collection counts fifteen research papers and one review study. Most of the research studies covered the topic of thermal energy storage (TES) in construction and building components: i.e., in wooden façade [11], optimum placement of heating tubes [12], use of iron (III) oxide powders for modifying the mortar thermal conductivity and diffusivity [13], fiber-reinforced geopolymers for sensible TES [14], thermal insulation waste extruded polystyrene [15], highly insulated wall systems with exterior insulation of polyisocyanurate [16], thermal properties of high-strength concrete containing CBA fine aggregates [17], heat conductivity properties of hemp-lime composites [18], insulating glass units subjected to climatic loads [19], conduction mechanisms in graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs)-cement composite [20], and bio-waste thermal insulation panels [21]. The remaining articles directly disseminated research on storing solar and/or environmental latent heat to level-out daily temperature differences through the smart use of Phase Change Material (PCM) [22,23,24,25]. They provided experimental and numerical studies on advanced PCM (latent) composites, consisting of porous cementitious materials, which have the potential to store/release large latent TES energy during phase changes, i.e., from solid to liquid and vice versa. Major research contributions address their physical, TES, and mechanical design and how to achieve stable integrated systems where PCMs are homogeneously distributed among the porous cementitious materials. Finally, a review study discussed the potential of PCMs in building wall constructions [26].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Commission, Causes of Climate Change. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/change/causes_en (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  2. IEA, Key World Energy Statistics. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/key-world-energy-statistics-2020 (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  3. Peralta, I.; Fachinotti, V.D.; Koenders, E.A.; Caggiano, A. Computational design of a Massive Solar-Thermal Collector enhanced with Phase Change Materials. Energy Build. 2022, 274, 112437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sam, M.; Caggiano, A.; Dubyey, L.; Dauvergne, J.L.; Koenders, E. Thermo-physical and mechanical investigation of cementitious composites enhanced with microencapsulated phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 340, 127585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gilka-Bötzow, A.; Folino, P.; Maier, A.; Koenders, E.A.; Caggiano, A. Triaxial Failure Behavior of Highly Porous Cementitious Foams Used as Heat Insulation. Processes 2021, 9, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saber, H.H.; Maref, W.; Hajiah, A.E. Effective R-value of enclosed reflective space for different building applications. J. Build. Phys. 2020, 43, 398–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khoukhi, M. The combined effect of heat and moisture transfer dependent thermal conductivity of polystyrene insulation material: Impact on building energy performance. Energy Build. 2018, 169, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Atsonios, I.A.; Mandilaras, I.D.; Kontogeorgos, D.A.; Founti, M.A. A comparative assessment of the standardized methods for the in–situ measurement of the thermal resistance of building walls. Energy Build. 2017, 154, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bre, F.; Caggiano, A.; Koenders, E.A. Multiobjective Optimization of Cement-Based Panels Enhanced with Microencapsulated Phase Change Materials for Building Energy Applications. Energies 2022, 15, 5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tarpani, E.; Piselli, C.; Fabiani, C.; Pigliautile, I.; Kingma, E.J.; Pioppi, B.; Pisello, A.L. Energy Communities Implementation in the European Union: Case Studies from Pioneer and Laggard Countries. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Almusaed, A.; Yitmen, I.; Almsaad, A.; Akiner, İ.; Akiner, M.E. Coherent investigation on a smart kinetic wooden façade based on material passport concepts and environmental profile inquiry. Materials 2021, 14, 3771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ghalambaz, M.; Mohammed, H.I.; Naghizadeh, A.; Islam, M.S.; Younis, O.; Mahdi, J.M.; Chatroudi, I.S.; Talebizadehsardari, P. Optimum placement of heating tubes in a multi-tube latent heat thermal energy storage. Materials 2021, 14, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Masdeu, F.; Carmona, C.; Horrach, G.; Muñoz, J. Effect of Iron (III) Oxide Powder on Thermal Conductivity and Diffusivity of Lime Mortar. Materials 2021, 14, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Frattini, D.; Occhicone, A.; Ferone, C.; Cioffi, R. Fibre-reinforced geopolymer concretes for sensible heat thermal energy storage: Simulations and environmental impact. Materials 2021, 14, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, A.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, J.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, R. Pyrolysis kinetic properties of thermal insulation waste extruded polystyrene by multiple thermal analysis methods. Materials 2020, 13, 5595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Iffa, E.; Tariku, F.; Simpson, W.Y. Highly insulated wall systems with exterior insulation of polyisocyanurate under different facer materials: Material characterization and long-term hygrothermal performance assessment. Materials 2020, 13, 3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, I.H.; Park, J. A study on the thermal properties of high-strength concrete containing CBA fine aggregates. Materials 2020, 13, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Pochwała, S.; Makiola, D.; Anweiler, S.; Böhm, M. The heat conductivity properties of hemp–lime composite material used in single-family buildings. Materials 2020, 13, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Respondek, Z. Heat transfer through insulating glass units subjected to climatic loads. Materials 2020, 13, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Goracci, G.S.; Dolado, J. Elucidation of conduction mechanism in graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs)/Cement composite using dielectric spectroscopy. Materials 2020, 13, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pavelek, M.; Adamová, T. Bio-waste thermal insulation panel for sustainable building construction in steady and unsteady-state conditions. Materials 2019, 12, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Guardia, C.; Barluenga, G.; Palomar, I. PCM Cement-Lime Mortars for Enhanced Energy Efficiency of Multilayered Building Enclosures under Different Climatic Conditions. Materials 2020, 13, 4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fachinotti, V.D.; Bre, F.; Mankel, C.; Koenders, E.A.; Caggiano, A. Optimization of multilayered walls for building envelopes including PCM-based composites. Materials 2020, 13, 2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sam, M.N.; Caggiano, A.; Mankel, C.; Koenders, E. A comparative study on the thermal energy storage performance of bio-based and paraffin-based PCMs using DSC procedures. Materials 2020, 13, 1705. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Mankel, C.; Caggiano, A.; König, A.; Schicchi, D.S.; Sam, M.N.; Koenders, E. Modelling the thermal energy storage of cementitious mortars made with PCM-recycled brick aggregates. Materials 2020, 13, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kurdi, A.; Almoatham, N.; Mirza, M.; Ballweg, T.; Alkahlan, B. Potential Phase Change Materials in Building Wall Construction—A Review. Materials 2021, 14, 5328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caggiano, A. Energy in Construction and Building Materials. Materials 2023, 16, 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020504

AMA Style

Caggiano A. Energy in Construction and Building Materials. Materials. 2023; 16(2):504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caggiano, Antonio. 2023. "Energy in Construction and Building Materials" Materials 16, no. 2: 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020504

APA Style

Caggiano, A. (2023). Energy in Construction and Building Materials. Materials, 16(2), 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020504

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop