Next Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Printing of Multifunctional Composites: Fabrication, Applications, and Biodegradability Assessment
Next Article in Special Issue
DyMnO3: Synthesis, Characterization and Evaluation of Its Photocatalytic Activity in the Visible Spectrum
Previous Article in Journal
A Methodological Framework for Assessing the Influence of Process Parameters on Strand Stability and Functional Performance in Fused Filament Fabrication
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Densified Pine Wood and a Zero-Thickness Bio-Based Adhesive for Eco-Friendly Structural Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Post-Washing on Textural Characteristics of Carbon Materials Derived from Pineapple Peel Biomass

1
Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
2
Graduate Institute of Bioresources, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912, Taiwan
3
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(24), 7529; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247529
Submission received: 3 November 2023 / Revised: 29 November 2023 / Accepted: 4 December 2023 / Published: 6 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Obtaining and Characterization of New Materials, Volume IV)

Abstract

:
Porous carbon materials have been widely used to remove pollutants from the liquid-phase streams. However, their limited pore properties could be a major problem. In this work, the effects of post-washing methods (i.e., water washing and acid washing) on the textural characteristics of the resulting biochar and activated carbon products from pineapple peel biomass were investigated in the carbonization and CO2 activation processes. The experiments were set at an elevated temperature (i.e., 800 °C) holding for 30 min. It was found that the enhancement in pore property reached about a 50% increase rate, increasing from 569.56 m2/g for the crude activated carbon to the maximal BET surface area of 843.09 m2/g for the resulting activated carbon by water washing. The resulting activated carbon materials featured the microporous structures but also were characteristic of the mesoporous solids. By contrast, the enhancement in the increase rate by about 150% was found in the resulting biochar products. However, there seemed to be no significant variations in pore property with post-washing methods. Using the energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and the Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses, it showed some oxygen-containing functional groups or complexes, potentially posing the hydrophilic characters on the surface of the resulting carbon materials.

1. Introduction

Pineapple (Ananas comosus) is a popular and edible fruit for drinking and food industries, but it also generates large amounts of pineapple peel in the industrial and residential sectors. The biomass residue could cause adverse impacts on living quality if dumped into the environment without the proper treatment. Although pineapple peel can be treated by the sanitary landfill and incineration, these treatment methods pose potential drawbacks due to the high contents of moisture and lignocellulose. For example, treatment by thermal combustion at municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration plants not only reduces the energy efficiency for power generation but also could generate huge amounts of air pollutants. In this regard, the traditional options for utilizing pineapple peel are to reuse it as a feedstock for animal feed and a variety of natural products (e.g., organic acids, bioethanol, bromelain enzyme, and phenolic antioxidants) or organic fertilizer by composting [1]. In order to promote the circular economy, the value-added valorization of pineapple peel (PP) has been exploited and reviewed by researchers in recent years [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In the paper by Tran et al. [6], the authors reviewed the production and application of pineapple-derived carbon adsorbents (i.e., biochar and activated carbon), which were produced by thermal processing or chemical modification to improve the surface chemistry and porosity. Other carbon-based nanomaterials (e.g., carbon nanotube and carbon nanosphere) can be also produced from agricultural biomass like rice-based residues [7].
In general, the dried biomass is mainly composed of lignocellulosic constituents, thus containing oxygen-containing groups on the surface. These polar complexes can provide the features of complexation and ion exchange, suggesting that pineapple peel can be directly reused as a biosorbent for removing cationic pollutants from the water environment [6,8,9,10,11,12]. However, these biosorbents only have limited uptake capacities due to their poor pore properties like specific surface area and pore volume. In order to increase the textural characteristics of biomass-derived adsorbent, the biomass precursor must be thermally processed by pyrolysis and pyrolysis-activation methods [13,14], converting it into biochar [15,16,17,18,19,20,21] and activated biochar (activated carbon) [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], respectively. The maximal uptake capacities are highly associated with its physical properties like surface porosity and particle size. It has been found that the pore properties of the resulting biochar products derived from pineapple peel indicated relatively low values, which could be attributed to the carbonization conditions at mild temperatures. On the other hand, the production of activated carbon from pineapple peel has almost always been based on chemical activation in the literature [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. It should be noted that the commercial manufacturing process for activated carbon was to employ the physical activation process due to less wastewater treatment problems in comparison with the chemical activation process [1].
In order to enhance the physical and chemical characteristics of biomass-based carbon materials, a plenitude of post-washing treatment methods have been reviewed in the literature [30,31,32]. In a previous study [33], the findings showed that post-washing with deionized water and/or dilute acid can enhance the pore properties of cocoa pod husk (CPH)-derived biochar due to the removal of the inorganic residues and the improvement in the accessibility of the carbon structure by lessoning the pore blockage. For example, the Brunauer–Emmet–Teller (BET) surface area of the resulting biochar produced at 400 °C holding for 30 min was significantly increased from 101 m2/g to 342 m2/g after post-washing with a dilute acid (0.25 M HCl). The effects of post-washing on the enhancing pore properties of biomass-based carbon materials (i.e., biochar and activated carbon) were also found by other studies [34,35,36].
As mentioned above, it seems that no study has reported on PP-based activated carbon produced by physical activation using carbon dioxide (CO2). In order to upgrade the applicability of PP as a precursor for producing carbon adsorbents, the effects of post-washing on the textural characteristics of the resulting carbon materials were investigated in the present study. Based on the results in a previous study [21], the porous carbon products (including biochar and activated carbon) were produced at an elevated pyrolysis/activation temperature (i.e., 800 °C) holding for 30 min in this work because of the significant pore properties increased under the process conditions. Thereafter, the resulting carbon materials were further treated by water washing using deionized water and dilute acid (0.1 M HCl), respectively. The textural characteristics of the resulting carbon products were obtained by the nitrogen (N2) adsorption–desorption isotherms for determining pore properties, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) for observing porous structure, and the energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and Fourier infrared spectrometer (FTIR) for surveying surface elemental compositions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The starting feedstock (i.e., pineapple peel) for producing biochar and activated carbon was collected from a local market (Chienchen district, Kaohsiung, Taiwan). It was first dewatered in the sun and further dried in the air-circulating oven at 105 °C. A crusher was used to transform the dried biomass into powdered particles, which were sieved to the size range of 0.841 mm (opening size of mesh No. 20) to 0.420 mm (opening size of mesh No. 40). The dried and sieved biomass sample was used to find its thermochemical characteristics and perform the pyrolysis-activation experiments at 800 °C holding for 30 min.

2.2. Thermochemical Property Determination of Pineapple Peel

Due to the different sources, the proximate analysis, calorific value, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the pineapple biomass were also determined in this work. The adopted methods and analytical instruments refer to a previous study [21]. These thermochemical properties were relevant to the potential for producing carbon materials properly. Herein, the TGA was performed in the temperature range of 25–900 °C at a specific rate of 10 °C/min, which was close to the heating condition of the pyrolysis-activation experiments.

2.3. Experimental Methods

As referred to in a previous study [21], the pyrolysis-activation experiments were carried out by using a vertical fixed-bed reactor in this work. For the pyrolysis experiment, about 3 g of the dried pineapple (PP) biomass was used to produce biochar at 800 °C holding for 30 min, where the heating profile was set at about 10 °C/min. For the physical activation experiment, the first stage was to increase the system temperature from 25 °C (room temperature) to 500 °C under the inert atmosphere by purging a nitrogen (N2) flow. When the system reached 500 °C, the flowing gas was changed to pass carbon dioxide (CO2) by stopping N2 gas. Meanwhile, the system was continuously heated to 800 °C at the same rate (about 10 °C/min) holding for 30 min. The resulting biochar (BC) and activated carbon (AC) products derived from PP were further treated by washing with deionized water (WW) and dilute acid of 0.1 M HCl (AW), as based on previous studies [21,37,38]. Therefore, these carbon products were coded as PP-BC, PP-BC-WW, PP-BC-AW, PP-AC, PP-AC-WW, and PP-AC-AW.

2.4. Characterization Analysis of Resulting Carbon Materials

As mentioned above, the adopted procedures and analytical instruments for the textural characteristics of the resulting carbon products refer to previous studies [21,39]. It should be noted that the data on specific surface area were based on the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) model [20,21,22], which were correlated by 4–6 points using the relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.05–0.10. However, the elemental compositions on the surface of the resulting carbon materials were determined by the energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (model: X-stream-2; Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Thermochemical Characteristics of Pineapple Peel (PP)

According to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards, proximate analysis can give the gross compositions of the biomass without expensive precision instruments. In this work, the dried PP biomass showed the values (in duplicate) of 73.38 ± 2.33 wt% for volatile matter, 4.63 ± 0.25 wt% for ash, and 14.14 wt% for fixed carbon (determined by difference). For this biomass, the ash content had a moderate value, ranging from the low values of woody biomass to the high values of rice residues [40,41]. Using the preliminary analysis of the energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), the elemental contents of the dried PP biomass included carbon (C, 54.07 wt%), oxygen (O, 40.77 wt%), and minor elements, which will be addressed in Section 3.3. Furthermore, the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and its derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curves of the dried PP biomass are shown in Figure 1. The maximal weight loss rate occurred in the pyrolysis temperature range from 200 to 450 °C, which should be attributed to the thermal decomposition of lignocellulosic constituents, especially for hemicellulose [21,22,23]. Based on the TGA results, the physical activation conditions were operated at 500 °C in the first pyrolysis stage to produce a carbon-rich matrix which was subsequently activated at 800 °C by flowing CO2 gas.

3.2. Pore Analysis of Resulting Carbon Materials

In this work, the process conditions were set at a temperature of 800 °C and a holding time of 30 min using N2/CO2 gases and post-washing. The mass yields of the resulting carbon materials (i.e., PP-BC and PP-AC) were about 28 wt%. After post-washing with deionized water and dilute acid (i.e., 0.1 M HCl), the residual percentages indicated approximately 84 wt% and 79 wt%, respectively. Concerning the pore properties of the resulting carbon materials (i.e., PP-BC, PP-BC-WW, PP-BC-AW, PP-AC, PP-AC-WW and PP-AC-AW), they are listed in Table 1. Obviously, the values of the resulting biochar products were significantly smaller than those of the resulting activated carbon products. For example, the values of the BET surface area in the PP-BC and PP-AC samples were 100.20 m2/g and 569.56 m2/g, respectively. The effect of activation by CO2 gas on the pore property of the carbon material played a determining role in pore development. On the other hand, the post-washing of the crude carbon products also had an influential effect of enhancing pore property. It could be attributed to the removal of the residual inorganic minerals (or particles) that block the pore entrance, thus leading to more available pores and giving larger pore properties. By comparison, the enhancement in pore property reached about a 50% increase rate, increasing from 569.56 m2/g for the PP-AC to 843.09 m2/g for the PP-AC-WW or 799.25 m2/g for the PP-AC-AW. However, it seemed to show no significant variations on pore property by post-washing methods of DI water and dilute acid. From the viewpoints of economic cost and environmental protection, the post-washing with water was superior to the use of dilute acid in the production of porous carbon materials from pineapple peel.
Furthermore, the data in Table 1 can be derived from the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at −196 °C, mesopore size distributions, and micropore size distributions of the resulting activated carbon products, which are depicted in Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4, respectively. Based on the adsorption–desorption isotherms in Figure 2, the microscale structures of the resulting activated carbon products were mainly microporous. In this regard, the 2D-NLDFT-HS model was adopted to depict their micropore size distributions, which are depicted in Figure 4. These curves were consistent with the data in Table 1. The significant results were further discussed as follows:
  • Based on the classification by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), these carbon materials are typical of microporous solids, where micropore filling occurs significantly at very low relative pressure (P/P0). In this regard, they feature the Type I isotherms [42,43]. However, the adsorption–desorption isotherms also possess a hysteresis loop from the relative pressure of about 0.45, which should be associated with mesoporous solids. This isotherm shape belongs to the Type IV isotherms, where the capillary condensation occurs [42,43].
  • As compared to PP-based activated carbons produced by chemical activation [22,23,25,26,27,28,29], it was clearly shown that the resulting activated carbons produced by physical activation in this work had slightly lower pore properties (e.g., BET surface area), as shown in Table 2. For example, the BET surface area of PP-based activated carbon produced by KOH activation was 1160 m2/g [29], which was higher than the optimal value (843 m2/g) in Table 2.
  • Using the Harrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method and the data on desorption isotherms for the textural characteristics of the mesoporous solids, it was found that the significant peaks of mesopore size distribution occurred at about 3.5 nm. In addition, these peaks were more obvious for the resulting activated carbon materials (i.e., PP-AC-WW and PP-AC-AW) by post-washing in comparison with the crude product (i.e., PP-AC), thus leading to higher pore properties, as listed in Table 1.
  • As mentioned above, the micropore size distributions of the resulting activated carbon materials can be verified in Figure 3, which was obtained by the 2D-NLDFT-HS model. The micropore peak was observed at about 0.6 nm, where it was in the range of less than 2.0 nm. Assuming the cylindrical geometry for all pores, the data on the average pore diameter (or width) were slightly smaller than 2.0 nm (1.6–1.9 nm). Therefore, other significant peaks in the pore size distribution curves were observed at the left side (less than 2.0 nm), indicating micropores are present in all activated carbon products.
  • In order to see the porous textures on the surface of the resulting carbon materials, Figure 5 shows the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (i.e., ×300 and ×1000) for the resulting activated carbon samples (i.e., PP-AC, PP-AC-WW and PP-AC-AW). Obviously, the resulting activated carbon products displayed a porous texture on the rigid surface without significant difference. However, post-washing removed the residual impurities and/or particles, thus producing a cleaner surface and greater pore properties, as listed in Table 1.

3.3. Chemical Characteristics of Resulting Carbon Materials

The carbon materials also contain to some extent contents of ash, which is derived from the starting feedstock. These inorganic minerals consist mainly of silica, alumina, alkaline/alkaline earth metals, and transition metals in the forms of oxides and carbonates [44]. On the other hand, these carbon materials are generally hydrophilic because of the presence of oxygen-containing complexes on the surface, which should be derived from their lignocellulosic compositions in the starting feedstock. In order to identify the potential for the polar feature, the resulting carbon products were measured by using the Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and the dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). As seen in Figure 6, it depicts the peaks by % transmittance (T) for the corresponding functional groups of the typical activated carbon (PP-AC-AW) in comparison with the starting biomass (PP). It shows seven peaks in Figure 6, indicating the wavenumbers at around 3500, 2924, 2360, 2655, 1550, 1385, 1115, and 737 cm−1, respectively. Based on the FTIR spectra of the corresponding functional groups of carbon materials [45,46,47,48], the peak at around 3500 cm−1 generally refers to the hydroxyl (O-H) stretching due to the adsorbed or inherent water molecule (H2O). The peak at about 2924 cm−1 could be associated with C-H stretching. The peak at 2360 cm−1 may be due to the C≡C stretching in alkyne groups. The peaks (i.e., 1655 and 1550 cm−1) in the range from 1700 to 1550 cm−1 are aligned to C=C stretching. The most significant peak at 1385 cm−1 can be attributed to oxygen-containing functional groups like C=O and C–O of carboxylic groups, or O–H bending. The peak at 1115 cm−1 could correspond to the stretching vibration of the C–O group. The peak at 737 cm−1 may be related to the bending vibration of C-H. It also shows a significant difference between the oxygen-containing functional groups of PP-AC-AW and PP. Due to its highly aromatic structure, the spectrum of the resulting activated carbon seems to not have strong peaks, especially in the hydroxyl (O-H) stretching peak at around 3500 cm−1, where it was almost disappeared in the activated carbon spectrum.
Table 2 lists the values of elemental compositions on the surface for all of the resulting carbon materials, which were preliminarily obtained by the energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Obviously, the carbon contents of the resulting carbon materials (71–89 WT%) were significantly larger than that (54 wt%) of the starting feedstock (i.e., PP), showing that the thermal treatment by carbonization/activation had a determining effect on the textural characteristics. This result was consistent with the variations on the spectra by FTIR analysis. In addition, the carbon contents of the resulting activated carbon materials were smaller than those of the resulting biochar materials. It can be postulated that the oxygen content was reduced because of the reaction of biochar carbon with CO2 (gasification gas) and the release of CO gas. On the other hand, the oxygen contents of the resulting carbon materials indicated a ramping reduction. This result can be attributed to the devolatilization of non-carbon elements (e.g., oxygen and hydrogen) from the lignocellulosic constituents in the forms of oxygen-containing gases (i.e., CO, CO2, and H2O) during the thermochemical process. Concerning the inorganic elements, they could be concentrated on alkaline and alkaline earth metal oxides during the thermal process. These oxygen-containing organic groups and inorganic minerals may increase the hydrophilicity of the resulting PP-based activated carbon materials, which are advantageous for various adsorption treatment processes for effective removal of micropollutants from the aqueous phase. This application can be attributed to the excellent pore structure and electrostatic attraction between the negatively charged surface and cationic targets.

4. Conclusions

The effect of post-washing on the textural characteristics of carbon materials derived from pineapple peel biomass was investigated in this study. These carbon products (i.e., biochar and activated carbon) were produced at an elevated temperature (i.e., 800 °C) holding for 30 min under a combined N2-pyrolysis and CO2-activation process. The findings showed that the effect of activation by CO2 gas on the pore property of the carbon material played a determining role in pore development, with the maximal pore properties for the activated carbon product produced by post-water washing (i.e., BET surface area of 843 m2/g, and total pore volume of 0.391 cm3/g). These resulting carbon materials were porous carbon materials with microporous and mesoporous structures. On the other hand, post-washing of the crude carbon products also had an influential effect of enhancing pore property. However, there seemed to be no significant variations in pore property with post-washing methods of water and dilute acid (0.1 M HCl). According to the results of the energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and the Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), the chemical characteristics of the resulting carbon materials were rich in carbon (>70 wt%) and also posed hydrophilicity because of the significant oxygen-containing functional groups or complexes on the surface.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-T.T.; methodology, C.-H.T.; formal analysis, C.-H.T. and L.-A.K.; data curation, C.-H.T.; writing—original draft preparation, W.-T.T.; writing—review and editing, W.-T.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Sincere appreciation is expressed to acknowledge the National Pingtung University of Science and Technology for the assistance in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Upadhyay, A.; Lama, J.P.; Tawata, S. Utilization of pineapple waste: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. Nepal 2013, 6, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cheok, C.Y.; Mohd Adzahan, N.; Abdul Rahman, R.; Zainal Abedin, H.; Hussain, N.; Sulaiman, R.; Chong, G.H. Current trends of tropical fruit waste utilization. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 335–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aili Hamzah, A.F.; Hamzah, M.H.; Che Man, H.; Jamali, N.S.; Siajam, S.I.; Ismail, M.H. Recent updates on the conversion of pineapple waste (Ananas comosus) to value-added products, future perspectives and challenges. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hikal, W.M.; Mahmoud, A.A.; Ahl, H.A.H.S.-A.; Bratovcic, A.; Tkachenko, K.G.; Kačániová, M.; Rodriguez, R.M. Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.), waste streams, characterisation and valorisation: An overview. Open J. Ecol. 2021, 11, 610–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fouda-Mbanga, B.G.; Tywabi-Ngeva, Z. Application of pineapple waste to the removal of toxic contaminants: A review. Toxics 2022, 10, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tran, T.V.; Nguyen, D.T.C.; Nguyen, T.T.T.; Nguyen, D.H.; Alhassan, M.; Jalil, A.A.; Nabgan, W.; Lee, T. A critical review on pineapple (Ananas comosus) wastes for water treatment, challenges and future prospects towards circular economy. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 856 Pt 1, 158817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mubarik, S.; Qureshi, N.; Sattar, Z.; Shaheen, A.; Kalsoom, A.; Imran, M.; Hanif, F. Synthetic approach to rice waste-derived carbon-based nanomaterials and their applications. Nanomanufacturing 2021, 1, 109–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Krishni, R.R.; Foo, K.Y.; Hameed, B.H. Food cannery effluent, pineapple peel as an effective low-cost biosorbent for removing cationic dye from aqueous solutions. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52, 6093–6103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahmad, A.; Khatoon, A.; Mohd-Setapar, S.H.; Kumar, R.; Rafatulah, M. Chemically oxidized pineapple fruit peel for the biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solutions. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 6432–6442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koc, S.N.T.; Kipcak, A.S.; Derun, E.M.; Tugrul, N. Removal of zinc from wastewater using orange, pineapple and pomegranate peels. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 2781–2792. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gómez-Aguilar, D.L.; Rodríguez-Miranda, J.P.; Salcedo-Parra, O.J. Fruit peels as a sustainable waste for the biosorption of heavy metals in wastewater: A review. Molecules 2022, 27, 2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yılmaz, O.; Tugrul, N. Zinc adsorption from aqueous solution using lemon, orange, watermelon, melon, pineapple, and banana rinds. Water Pract. Technol. 2022, 17, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Marsh, H.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F. Activated Carbon; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  14. Basu, P. Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fu, B.; Ge, C.; Yue, L.; Luo, J.; Deng, H.; Yu, H. Characterization of biochar derived from pineapple peel waste and its application for sorption of oxytetracycline from aqueous solution. BioResources 2016, 11, 9017–9035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, C.; Gu, L.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Cao, L.; Hu, X. Sorption behavior of Cr(VI) on pineapple-peel-derived biochar and the influence of coexisting pyrene. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016, 111, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shakya, A.; Agarwal, T. Removal of Cr(VI) from water using pineapple peel derived biochars: Adsorption potential and re-usability assessment. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 293, 111497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Wen, H.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C. Comparison study on the ammonium adsorption of the biochars derived from different kinds of fruit peel. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 707, 135544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mahmuda, K.N.; Wen, T.H.; Zakaria, Z.A. Activated carbon and biochar from pineapple waste biomass for the removal of methylene blue. Environ. Toxicol. Manag. 2021, 1, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Otieno, A.O.; Home, P.G.; Raude, J.M.; Murunga, S.I.; Ngumba, E.; Ojwang, D.O.; Tuhkanen, T. Pineapple peel biochar and lateritic soil as adsorbents for recovery of ammonium nitrogen from human urine. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 293, 112794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tsai, W.T.; Ayestas, R.; Tsai, C.H.; Lin, Y.Q. Preparation and characterization of porous materials from pineapple peel at elevated pyrolysis Temperatures. Materials 2022, 15, 4686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Foo, K.Y.; Hameed, B.H. Porous structure and adsorptive properties of pineapple peel based activated carbons prepared via microwave assisted KOH and K2CO3 activation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 148, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yacob, A.R.; Azmi, A.; Mustajab, M.K.A.A. Physical and chemical activation effect on activated carbon prepared from local pineapple waste. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 699, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mahamad, M.N.; Zaini, M.A.A.; Zakaria, Z.A. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from pineapple waste biomass for dye removal. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 102, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Onia, B.A.; Abatana, O.G.; Busarib, A.; Odunlamia, O.; Nweke, C. Production and characterization of activated carbon from pineapple waste for treatment of kitchen wastewater. Desalin. Water Treat. 2020, 183, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dubey, P.; Shrivastav, V.; Singh, M.; Maheshwari, P.H.; Sundriyal, S.; Dhakate, S.R. Electrolytic study of pineapple peel derived porous carbon for all-solid-state supercapacitors. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 11736–11746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Veeramalai, S.; Ramlee, N.N.; Mahdi, H.I.; Manas, N.H.A.; Ramli, A.N.M.; Illias, R.M.; Azelee, N.I.W. Development of organic porous material from pineapple waste as a support for enzyme and dye adsorption. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 181, 114823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rosli, N.A.; Ahmad, M.A.; Noh, T.U.; Ahmad, N.A. Pineapple peel-derived carbon for adsorptive removal of dyes. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 306, 128094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rosli, N.A.; Ahmad, M.A.; Noh, T.U. Unleashing the potential of pineapple peel-based activated carbon: Response surface methodology optimization and regeneration for methylene blue and methyl red dyes adsorption. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 155, 111041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Song, N.; Li, X. Biomass-derived renewable carbon materials for electrochemical energy storage. Mater. Res. Lett. 2017, 5, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Devi, N.S.; Hariram, M.; Vivekanandhan, S. Modification techniques to improve the capacitive performance of biocarbon materials. J. Energy Storage 2021, 33, 101870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mehdi, R.; Khoja, A.H.; Naqvi, S.R.; Gao, N.; Amin, N.A.S. A Review on production and surface modifications of biochar materials via biomass pyrolysis process for supercapacitor applications. Catalysts 2022, 12, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tsai, W.T.; Hsu, C.H.; Lin, Y.Q.; Tsai, C.H.; Chen, W.S.; Chang, Y.-T. Enhancing the pore properties and adsorption performance of cocoa pod husk (CPH)-derived biochars via post-acid treatment. Processes 2020, 8, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sierra, I.; Iriarte-Velasco, U.; Cepeda, E.A.; Gamero, M.; Aguayo, A.T. Preparation of carbon-based adsorbents from the pyrolysis of sewage sludge with CO2. Investigation of the acid washing procedure. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 16053–16065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liang, Z.; Guo, S.; Dong, H.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Kang, H.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, L.; Zhao, L. Modification of activated carbon and-its application in selective hydrogenation of naphthalene. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 38550–38560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wei, X.; Huang, S.; Wu, Y.; Wu, S. Effects of washing pretreatment on properties and pyrolysis biochars of penicillin mycelial residues. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 161, 106477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tsai, W.T.; Lin, Y.Q.; Tsai, C.H.; Shen, Y.H. Production of mesoporous magnetic carbon materials from oily sludge by combining thermal activation and post-washing. Materials 2022, 15, 5794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tsai, W.T.; Lin, Y.Q. Preparation and characterization of porous carbon composites from oil-containing sludge by a pyrolysis-activation process. Processes 2022, 10, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsai, C.H.; Tsai, W.T. Optimization of physical activation process by CO2 for activated carbon preparation from Honduras Mahogany pod husk. Materials 2023, 16, 6558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jenkins, B.M.; Baxter, L.L.; Miles, T.R., Jr.; Miles, T.R. Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process. Technol. 1998, 54, 17–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vassilev, S.V.; Baxter, D.; Andersen, L.K.; Vassileva, C.G. An overview of the chemical composition of biomass. Fuel 2010, 89, 913–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gregg, S.J.; Sing, K.S.W. Adsorption, Surface Area, and Porosity; Academic Press: London, UK, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lowell, S.; Shields, J.E.; Thomas, M.A.; Thommes, M. Characterization of Porous Solids and Powders: Surface Area, Pore Size and Density; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  44. Suzuki, M. Adsorption Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  45. Li, L.; Yao, X.; Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Ma, W.; Liang, X. Thermal stability of oxygen-containing functional groups on activated carbon surfaces in a thermal oxidative environment. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2004, 47, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Islam, M.S.; Ang, B.C.; Gharehkhani, S.; Afifi, A.B.M. Adsorption capability of activated carbon synthesized from coconut shell. Carbon Lett. 2016, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Johnston, C.T. Biochar analysis by Fourier-Transform Infra-Red Spectroscopy. In Biochar: A Guide to Analytical Methods; Singh, B., Camps-Arbestain, M., Lehmann, J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 199–228. [Google Scholar]
  48. Qiu, C.; Jiang, L.; Gao, Y.; Sheng, L. Effects of oxygen-containing functional groups on carbon materials in supercapacitors: A review. Mater. Des. 2023, 230, 111952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TGA and DTG curves of dried pineapple peel (blue line: TGA; red line: DTG).
Figure 1. TGA and DTG curves of dried pineapple peel (blue line: TGA; red line: DTG).
Materials 16 07529 g001
Figure 2. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of the resulting activated carbon materials.
Figure 2. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of the resulting activated carbon materials.
Materials 16 07529 g002
Figure 3. Mesopore size distributions of the resulting activated carbon materials.
Figure 3. Mesopore size distributions of the resulting activated carbon materials.
Materials 16 07529 g003
Figure 4. Micropore size distributions of the resulting activated carbon materials.
Figure 4. Micropore size distributions of the resulting activated carbon materials.
Materials 16 07529 g004
Figure 5. SEM images (left: ×300; right: ×1000) of the resulting activated carbon materials for (a) PP-AC, (b) PP-AC-WW, and (c) PP-AC-AW.
Figure 5. SEM images (left: ×300; right: ×1000) of the resulting activated carbon materials for (a) PP-AC, (b) PP-AC-WW, and (c) PP-AC-AW.
Materials 16 07529 g005aMaterials 16 07529 g005b
Figure 6. Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of pineapple peel (PP) and the resulting activated carbon (PP-AC-AW).
Figure 6. Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of pineapple peel (PP) and the resulting activated carbon (PP-AC-AW).
Materials 16 07529 g006
Table 1. Pore properties of resulting carbon products.
Table 1. Pore properties of resulting carbon products.
Pore PropertyPP-BCPP-BC-WWPP-BC-AWPP-ACPP-AC-WWPP-AC-AW
BET surface area a100.20243.60269.94569.56843.09799.25
t-plot micropore area b92.15213.14237.60498.59717.90689.26
External surface area8.0530.4631.3470.97125.19109.99
Total pore volume c0.0420.110 e0.1210.2530.3910.371
t-plot micropore area b0.0380.0890.0970.2040.2940.283
Average pore width d1.6611.8061.8021.7781.8541.856
a Based on a relative pressure range of 0.05–0.100 (4–6 points) by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) equation. b Using the t-plot method. c Calculated at a relative pressure of about 0.995. d Estimated by the ratio of the total pore volume (Vt) to the BET surface area (SBET) (i.e., average pore width = 4 × Vt/SBET). e Analogically estimated by the total pore volume/micropore volume of the PP-BC-AW sample and the micropore volume of the PP-BC-WW sample.
Table 2. Elemental contents of resulting carbon products by EDS spectra.
Table 2. Elemental contents of resulting carbon products by EDS spectra.
Elemental Content (wt%)PPPP-BCPP-BC-WWPP-BC-AWPP-ACPP-AC-WWPP-AC-AW
Carbon (C)54.07281.82688.39185.91671.12078.83574.921
Oxygen (O)40.77314.45110.18612.40220.46615.81914.406
Sodium (Na)0.0710.0180.0070.0290.0000.0000.000
Magnesium (Mg)0.2290.4930.0750.3090.7751.1320.207
Aluminum (Al)4.4700.1230.0670.1500.0060.1112.555
Silicon (Si)0.2270.2870.2540.2831.0501.3712.530
Phosphorus (P)0.1012.4210.3700.1313.7191.0760.409
Sulfur (S)0.0580.3450.5440.4601.7380.6322.913
Calcium (Ca)0.0000.0350.1060.3191.1261.0242.060
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsai, C.-H.; Tsai, W.-T.; Kuo, L.-A. Effect of Post-Washing on Textural Characteristics of Carbon Materials Derived from Pineapple Peel Biomass. Materials 2023, 16, 7529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247529

AMA Style

Tsai C-H, Tsai W-T, Kuo L-A. Effect of Post-Washing on Textural Characteristics of Carbon Materials Derived from Pineapple Peel Biomass. Materials. 2023; 16(24):7529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsai, Chi-Hung, Wen-Tien Tsai, and Li-An Kuo. 2023. "Effect of Post-Washing on Textural Characteristics of Carbon Materials Derived from Pineapple Peel Biomass" Materials 16, no. 24: 7529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247529

APA Style

Tsai, C. -H., Tsai, W. -T., & Kuo, L. -A. (2023). Effect of Post-Washing on Textural Characteristics of Carbon Materials Derived from Pineapple Peel Biomass. Materials, 16(24), 7529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop