Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
- The SPS special insert designed by the authors of the study makes it possible to obtain roughness parameters similar to those obtained with the Wiper insert, although the special insert was not provided with an anti-wear coating.
- The lowest values of the roughness parameter, Sq, were obtained when machining at the lowest applied feed, f = 0.05 mm/rev for all cutting inserts. The difference is that with a special insert, the lowest Sq value was obtained in dry machining (Sq = 0.355 µm and Sq = 0.352 µm, respectively), while for a conventional insert, the lowest Sq = 0.359 µm was obtained with coolant.
- Sticking appears on the machined surface only during dry machining and the frequency of their occurrence depends on the type of inserts and the feed value. In machining with the use of the conventional insert, sticking appeared at the lowest feed used in the investigation f = 0.15 mm/rev. On the surface machined by the Wiper insert, sticking appeared when using the feed of 0.15 mm/rev. When machining with the special insert, the highest frequency of the occurrence of sticking was observed at the feed of f = 0.25 mm/rev. This means that the frequency of the occurrence of sticking is related to the active cutting edge entering the machined material.
- The sticking caused a significant increase in the parameters, Ssk = 6.530 and Sku = 53.533. Machining with the use of a Wiper insert has generated sticking at the feed of 0.15 mm/rev, the kurtosis parameter, Sku = 16.170. A surface composed of many high peaks will degrade quickly when matching another surface, causing the formation of backlash (e.g., between a pin and a bush). Thus, dry cutting of Inconel 718 does not provide the desired functional properties. The roughness parameter, Ssk, is positive with three exceptions: after wet and dry machining at the lowest feed used for the special insert and after dry machining with the highest feed used for the Wiper insert.
- In design drawings, roughness is often determined by the Ra parameter. In the aircraft industry, general roughness is often defined by the value of Ra = 1.6 µm. If we assume that Ra is equivalent to Sa, all the surfaces under investigation are in accordance with the requirements with the exception of one case (turning by means of a conventional insert at the feed of 0.25 mm/rev with cooling).
- The occurrence of sticking on the machined surface after dry turning is dependent on the feed and the length of the active cutting edge. For a conventional insert with an active cutting-edge length of 0.65 mm, sticking appeared on the machined surface at the feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev. In the case of the Wiper insert with an active cutting edge length of 0.93 mm, sticking appeared on the machined surface at the feed rate of 0.15 mm/rev. In the case of the special insert with an active cutting edge length of 0.99 mm/rev, sticking appeared at all applied values of the feed; however, the largest quantity was observed at the feed rate of 0.25 mm/rev.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mohsan, A.U.H.; Zhanqiang, L.; Padhy, K.G. A review on the progress towards improvement in surface integrity of Inconel 718 under high pressure and flood cooling conditions. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 91, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- M’Saoubi, R.; Axinte, D.; Soo, S.L.; Nobel, C.; Attia, H.; Kappmeyer, G.; Engin, S.; Sim, W.M. High performance cutting of advanced aerospace alloys and composite materials. CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol. 2015, 64, 557–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, A.; Gangopadhyay, S. Dry machining of nickel-based super alloy as a sustainable alternative using TiN/TiAlN coated tool. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 129, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soares, E.; Malheiros, L.F.; Sacramento, J.; Valente, M.A.; Oliveira, F.J. Microstructures and properties of submicrometer carbides obtained by conventional sintering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 95, 951–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abderrazak, H.; Schoenstei, F.; Abdellaoui, M.; Jouini, N. Spark plasma sintering consolidation of nanostructured TiC prepared by mechanical alloying. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 2011, 29, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tokita, M. Progress of Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) Method, Systems, Ceramics Applications and Industrialization. Ceramics 2021, 4, 160–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wachowicz, J.; Dembiczak, T.; Stradomski, G.; Bałaga, Z.; Dyner, M.; Wilkowski, J. Properties of WCCo Composites Produced by the SPS Method Intended for Cutting Tools for Machining of Wood-Based Materials. Materials 2021, 14, 2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elbah, M.; Athmane Yallese, M.; Aouici, H.; Mabrouki, T.; Rigal, J.F. Comparative assessment of wiper and conventional ceramic tools on surface roughness in hard turning AISI 4140 steel. Measurement 2013, 46, 3041–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labuda, W. The influence of changing of treatment condition on surface roughness parameter during turning process by Wiper insert. J. KONES Powertrain Transp. 2019, 26, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karolczak, P.; Kowalski, M.; Raszka, K. The Effect of the Use of Cutting Zone Minimum Quantity Lubrication and Wiper Geometry Inserts on Titanium Ti6Al4V Surface Quality After Turning. Tribol. Ind. 2021, 43, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkata Subbaiah, K.; Raju Ch Pawade, R.S.; Suresh, C. Hard Turning with Wiper Ceramic Insert; Parametric Analysis and Optimization with Desirability Approach. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. IJETT 2017, 19, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stachurski, W.; Kruszynski, B.; Midera, S. Influence of Cutting Conditions in Turning with Wiper Type Inserts on Surface Roughness and Cutting Forces. Mech. Mech. Eng. 2012, 16, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
- Abbas, A.T.; Abubakr, M.; Elkaseer, A.; El Rayes, M.M.; Mohammed, M.L.; Hegab, H. Towards an adaptive design of quality, productivity and economic aspects when machining AISI 4340 steel with Wiper inserts. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 159206–159219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, A.; Anwar, S.; Hegab, H.; Benyahia, F.; Ali, H.; Elkaseer, A. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Quality, Tool Wear, and Specific Cutting Energy for Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel. Materials 2020, 13, 5233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Umar, M.; Saleem, M.Q.; Mufti, N.A.; Raza, S.F. Experimental investigations on wiper inserts’ edge preparation, workpiece hardness and operating parameters in hard turning of AISI D2 steel. J. Manuf. Process. 2018, 34, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Pradhan, S.K. Investigations into hard turning process using wiper tool inserts. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 12579–12587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Correia, A.E.; Davim, J.P. Surface roughness measurement in turning carbon steel AISI 1045 using wiper inserts. Measurement 2011, 44, 1000–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szablewski, P.; Smak, K.; Krawczyk, B. Analysis of the Impact of Wiper Geometry Insert on Surface Roughness and Chips in Machining Materials Used in the Aviation Industry. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2022, 16, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guddat, J.; M’Saoubi, R.; Alm, P.; Meyer, D. Hard turning of AISI 52100 using PCBN wiper geometry inserts and the resulting surface integrity. Procedia Eng. 2011, 19, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paiva, A.P.; Campos, P.H.; Ferreira, J.R.; Lopes, L.G.D.; Paiva, E.J.; Balestrassi, P.P. A multivariate robust parameter design approach for optimization of AISI 52100 hardened steel turning with wiper mixed ceramic tool. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2012, 30, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurniawan, D.; Yusof, N.; Sharif, S. Hard Machining of Stainless Steel Using Wiper Coated Carbide: Tool Life and Surface Integrity. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2010, 25, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Addona, D.M.; Raykar, S.J. Analysis of surface roughness in hard turning using wiper insert geometry. Procedia CIRP 2016, 41, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P.R.; Liu, Z.Q.; Guo, Y.B. Machinability for dry turning of laser cladded parts with conventional vs. wiper insert. J. Manuf. Process. 2017, 28, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, A.; Rayes, M.; Luqman, M.; Naeim, N.; Hegab, H.; Elkaseer, A. On the Assessment of Surface Quality and Productivity Aspects in Precision Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel Alloy: Relative Performance of Wiper vs. Conventional Inserts. Materials 2020, 13, 2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Özbek, N.A.; Özbek, O. Effect of cryogenic treatment holding time on mechanical and microstructural properties of Sverker 21 steel. Mater. Test. 2022, 64, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Martínez, E.; Miguel, V.; Martínez-Martínez, A.; Coello, J.; Andrés Naranjo, J.; Carmen Manjabacas, M. Optimization of the Dry Turning Process of Ti48Al2Cr2Nb Aluminide Based on the Cutting Tool Configuration. Materials 2022, 15, 1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Martínez, E.; Miguel, V.; Manjabacas, M.C.; Martínez-Martínez, A.; Naranjo, J.A. Low initial lubrication procedure in the machining of copper-nickel 70/30 ASTM B122 alloy. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 62, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, C.T.; Shareef, I. Dry machining parameter optimization for γ-TiAl with a rhombic insert. Procedia Manuf. 2021, 53, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivchenko, O.; Ivanov, V.; Trojanowska, J.; Zhyhyli, D.; Ciszak, O.; Zaloha, O.; Pavlenko, I.; Hladyshev, D. Method for an Effective Selection of Tools and Cutting Conditions during Precise Turning of Non-Alloy Quality Steel C45. Materials 2022, 15, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smak, K.; Szablewski, P.; Legutko, S.; Krawczyk, B.; Miko, E. Investigation of the influence of anti-wear coatings on the surface quality and dimensional accuracy during finish turning of the Inconel 718 alloy. Materials 2023, 16, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Królczyk, G.M.; Maruda, R.W.; Królczyk, J.B.; Nieslony, P.; Wojciechowski, S.; Legutko, S. Parametric and nonparametric description of the surface topography in the dry and MQCL cutting conditions. Measurement 2018, 121, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krawczyk, B.; Szablewski, P.; Legutko, S.; Smak, K.; Gapiński, B. Anomalies in the Geometric Surface Structure of Shaped Elements Composed of Inconel 718 Alloy. Materials 2021, 14, 7524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rybicki, M.; Szablewski, P. Investigation of chips morphology after turning of materials applied in aerospace industry. MATEC Web Conf. 2017, 121, 03020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Królczyk, G.M.; Królczyk, J.B.; Maruda, R.W.; Legutko, S.; Tomaszewski, M. Metrological changes in surface morphology of high-strength steels in manufacturing processes. Measurement 2016, 88, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamczak, S. Pomiary geometryczne powierzchni. In Zarysy Kształtu, Falistość i Chropowatość; Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne: Warszawa, Poland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Maruda, R.W.; Krolczyk, G.M.; Niesłony, P.; Krolczyk, J.B.; Legutko, S. Chip formation zone analysis during the turning of austenitic stainless steel 316L under MQCL cooling condition. Procedia Eng. 2016, 149, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Szablewski, P.; Legutko, S.; Mróz, A.; Garbiec, D.; Czajka, R.; Smak, K.; Krawczyk, B. Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique. Materials 2023, 16, 949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16030949
Szablewski P, Legutko S, Mróz A, Garbiec D, Czajka R, Smak K, Krawczyk B. Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique. Materials. 2023; 16(3):949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16030949
Chicago/Turabian StyleSzablewski, Piotr, Stanisław Legutko, Adrian Mróz, Dariusz Garbiec, Rafał Czajka, Krzysztof Smak, and Bartłomiej Krawczyk. 2023. "Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique" Materials 16, no. 3: 949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16030949
APA StyleSzablewski, P., Legutko, S., Mróz, A., Garbiec, D., Czajka, R., Smak, K., & Krawczyk, B. (2023). Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique. Materials, 16(3), 949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16030949