Next Article in Journal
Stiffness Evaluation of Laboratory and Plant Produced Foamed Bitumen Warm Asphalt Mixtures with Fiber Reinforcement and Bio-Flux Additive
Next Article in Special Issue
Shear Strength Behaviors of Aeolian Sand Solidified by Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation and Basalt Fiber Reinforcement
Previous Article in Journal
Black Silicon: Breaking through the Everlasting Cost vs. Effectivity Trade-Off for SERS Substrates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on Epoxy Resin Composite Reinforced with Rice Straw Fiber
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 5
10.3390/ma16051949
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study on the Mechanical Behaviors of Aeolian Sand Treated by Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) and Basalt Fiber Reinforcement (BFR)

by
Jia Liu
1,
Xi’an Li
1,*,
Gang Li
2 and
Jinli Zhang
3
1
School of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China
2
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Safety and Durability of Concrete Structures, Xijing University, Xi’an 710123, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(5), 1949; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051949
Submission received: 8 January 2023 / Revised: 16 February 2023 / Accepted: 25 February 2023 / Published: 27 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Fiber-Reinforced Composites: Design, Properties and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aeolian sand flow is a major cause of land desertification, and it is prone to developing into a dust storm coupled with strong wind and thermal instability. The microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) technique can significantly improve the strength and integrity of sandy soils, whereas it easily leads to brittle destruction. To effectively inhibit land desertification, a method coupled with MICP and basalt fiberreinforcement (BFR) was put forward to enhance the strength and toughness of aeolian sand. Based on a permeability test and an unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test, the effects of initial dry density (ρd), fiber length (FL), and fiber content (FC) on the characteristics of permeability, strength, and CaCO3 production were analyzed, and the consolidation mechanism of the MICP-BFR method was explored. The experiments indicated that the permeability coefficient of aeolian sand increased first, then decreased, and subsequently increased with the increase in FC, whereas it exhibited a tendency to decrease first and then increase with the increase in FL. The UCS increased with the increase in the initial dry density, while it increased first and then decreased with the increase in FL and FC. Furthermore, the UCS increased linearly with the increase in CaCO3 generation, and the maximum correlation coefficient reached 0.852. The CaCO3 crystals played the roles of providing bonding, filling, and anchoring effects, and the spatial mesh structure formed by the fibers acted as a bridge effect to enhance the strength and brittle damage of aeolian sand. The findings could supply a guideline for sand solidification in desert areas.

1. Introduction

Land desertification is one of the most serious ecological and environmental issues. With desertification areas accounting for one third of the land areas, nearly one billion people in more than 100 countries are affected by desertification. Currently, the common methods to control desertification include mechanical, plant, and chemical methods, whereas some drawbacks from technical, economic, and ecological perspectives still exist. The microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) technique is an economic, environmentally friendly, and durable method that has emerged in recent years. Calcite precipitation is induced mainly through microbial metabolic processes such as photosynthetic organisms removing carbon dioxide, sulfate-reducing bacteria, and several microorganisms participating in the nitrogen cycle [1]. Among them, the nitrogen cycle is widely used in MICP. The MICP process used bacteria with high urease activity that decomposed urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide through metabolic activities, andconverted it into ammonium ions and carbonate ions when it met water. The carbonate ions reacted with the calcium ions in the environment to form calcium carbonate precipitation [2]. Calcite crystals could bond the soil particles into a whole to achieve the aim of strength increment and seepage reduction. Gao et al. [3] found that ultraviolet radiation weakened the performance of CaCO3, and the porosity of aeolian sand which was treated with MICP reached 23.6% when the radiation duration reached 1046 h. Li et al. [4] concluded that the average thickness of the overlay reached 2.0–2.5 cm after 7 days of the mineralization effect, and the strength formed by staphylococcal was 1.05 times higher than that of Bacillus. Nikseresht et al. [5] conducted wind tunnel tests to evaluate soil loss treated by using MICP at different wind speeds and found that molasse and vinasse as growth substrates have strong consolidation to resist erosion by wind, which is mainly due to the calcium carbonate content produced and is independent of extra reformations. Zhang et al. [6] studied the feasibility of the microbially induced magnesium carbonate precipitation (MIMP) method to restrain desertification in desert districts and concluded that MIMP could counteract the weakness of conventional solidified ways, and this was in particular reference to controlled desertification in Northwest China where there are rich storage resources of magnesium. Raveh-Amit et al. [7] revealed that sufficient urea hydrolysis caused an increase in pH, which is essential to calcite deposition. The rates of biostimulation were discovered to rise with carbon source concentration and they achieved the highest levels within 3 to 6 days. Tian et al. [8,9] studied the influence of the reactant inpouring rate on cementing aeolian sand via the MICP method and concluded that the cementation sample was well distributed and the UCS varied from 4.58 to 5.03 MPa when the speed of inpouring was 0.278 mol/L/h. The CaCO3 crystals generated in the samples were calcite and they had polyhedral, spherical, or flower clusters in their crystal morphology. Li et al. [10] noted that with the increase in the cement concentration, calcium carbonate production and the aeolian sand density rose, the penetration rate decreased, and the UCS rose. The calcium carbonate filled the voids between the sand grains and the void volume was reduced. Based on a field test in the Ulan Buh Desert, Meng et al. [11] reported that the MICP method could conspicuously improve the bearing capacity against wind erosion through the formation of soil crusts. The optimal concentration of cementation solution was 0.2 M and the spraying amount was 4 L/m2. Devrani et al. [12] found a decrease in soil loss from 75.23% for unsolidification to 0% which was treated by the MICP method. The concentration of a mixture of urea and calcium chloride has an important role in soil amelioration, and the highest threshold friction velocity (TFV) was 45 km/h when the concentration was0.5 M. Dubey et al. [13] revealed a reduction of one order in the magnitude of the permeability coefficient of aeolian sand after MICP treatment, and a high UCS of around 1 MPa and the highest wind speed exceeding 55 km/h with 1 M cementation solution treatment was achieved.
With the increasing application of MICP technology, the current study faces many opportunities and challenges. Achal et al. [14] verified that the dairy industry and lactose mother liquor could be used as an alternative source of the Sporosarcina pasteurii (NCIM 2477) standard medium, which could support bacterial growth and urease activity. It can save more costs than using the standard medium. Xiao et al. [15] studied the thermal conductivity of biocemented silica sand samples by transient plane source method, and the experimental results showed that MICP treatment significantly improved the thermal conductivity of samples. The empirical equation of thermal conductivity of silica sand treated with MICP under different variables was established, which provided a theoretical basis for the design of energy piles in biocemented sand layers. Li et al. [16] used the MICP technique to treat the interface between calcareous sand and steel, and studied the effects of cementing materials and surface roughness on the shear properties of the interface. The results showed that MICP technology was feasible to improve the resistance of calcareous sandsteel interface in an environmentally friendly manner. However, the difference in the time, space, and material characteristics between the biological environment and the engineering system should be resolved prior to the implementation of the project. The implementation of this work required not only researchers, practitioners, and designers with the relevant knowledge background, but also good cooperation among them [17]. These are the challenges facing the application of MICP technology.
However, the contradiction between strength and toughness was a challenge to MICP-treated soils. Although the MICP-treated sand had high strength, it behaved as a typical brittle material, namely, it lost its strength instantly after damage, which had a great impact on its wind erosion resistance. To improve its strength and toughness, researchers proposed a coupled MICP and fiberreinforcement (FR) method. Wang et al. [18] found that the FR method can significantly enhance the sand’s tensile strength, peak displacement, and residual strength, and it can reduce the brittle damage at the peak strength. The tensile strength raised by 172.4% and the peak deformation increased by 158.1% when the FC was 0.6%. Yin et al. [19] reported that the fiber increased the colonization area and calcium carbonate deposition, which further enhanced the ductility and toughness and reduced the stiffness of the calcareous sand. Li et al. [20] revealed that fiber addition could significantly improve the solidified effect of MICP: the peak penetration resistance increased first and then decreased with the increase in the FC, and the optimum FC was 0.2%. With the increase in fiber content, Xie et al. [21] reported that the unconfined compressive strength of MICP-treated sand raised first and then reduced, amd the optimum FC was 0.15%. Fiber reinforcement can improve the deposition and yield of MICP, while the cementation of CaCO3 promotes a fiber reinforcement effect. Zhao et al. [22] conducted unconfined compressive strength and splitting tensile strength experiments to assess the influence of activated carbon-fiber felt (ACFF) on the strength of MICP-treated sand. The unconfined compressive strength and splitting tensile strength were significantly improved with small amounts of ACFF and the softnesscaused by water could be enhanced by ACFF. Qiu et al. [23] studied the strength of carbon-fiber-reinforced sand using the UCS test and concluded that UCS rose first and then reduced with the increase in FC. The optimum FC of silica and calcareous sand was 0.2% and 0.1%, respectively. Li et al. [24] revealed remarkable enhancements in shear strength, malleability, and failure strain when fibers were added to MICP-treated sand. The unconfined compressive strength rose gradually with the increase in FC when the FC was less than 0.3%, and the optimal FC ranged from 0.2% to 0.3%. Hao et al. [25] pointed out that MICP modification could improve the crack-resistant properties and energy absorption capacity of fiber-reinforced cementitious composite beam samples by 58% and 69.3%, respectively. Lei et al. [26] reported that the ductility, bridging role, and CaCO3 production of biocemented calcareous sand were significantly improved in the following order of carbon fiber, basalt fiber, and glass fiber. The unconfined compressive strength, tensile strength, and CaCO3 production rose with the increase in FC, and the optimal FC was found to be 1%. Imran et al. [27] discovered that fiber content more remarkably affected the ductility, toughness, and brittleness of the MICP-treated sand than FL, and the optimum FC and FL were 3% and 15 mm, respectively. Fang et al. [28] reported that FC has an influence on the engineering characteristics of MICP-treated coral sand which is more remarkable than FL, and the optimum FC and FL were 0.2% and 9 or 12 mm, respectively. Wen et al. [29] concluded that fiber addition in MICP-treated bio-beams could improve their ductility, and the optimal FC was about 0.3%. Under the optimum fiber content, the post-peak flexural strength loss was prevented, and the ductility of the bio-beams was improved. Spencer et al. [30] found that the addition of jute fibers in the MICP-treated sand was beneficial, leading to irritation of bacterial activity and maintenance of the MICP process during a 12-d treatment. Choi et al. [31,32] concluded that the splitting tensile strength and secant elastic modulus raised with the increase in CaCO3 content or FC, and the failure strain and post-failure splitting tensile strength were improved by polyvinyl acetate fiber merging with MICP treatment. In addition, fibers facilitate the MICP process by bridging the voids between sand grains. Yao et al. [33] indicated that wool fibers supplied nucleation sites for CaCO3 and reduced porosity, and the generated calcite was distributed in the fiber-bridging microstructure uniformly, which was significantly enhanced by the MICP process.
In conclusion, the combination of fiber reinforcement and MICP technology (MICP–FR) has applicable value for improving the strength and toughness of soil. The present research results show that MICP–FR technology is mainly used to solidify calcareous sand, standard sand, coral sand, etc., and there are relatively few studies on aeolian sand. Therefore, in this paper, MICP and basalt fiberreinforcement (BFR) methods were coupled to solidify aeolian sand to explore its mechanical properties and applicability. The mechanical properties of solidified aeolian sand were investigated based on permeability and UCS tests, and the consolidation mechanism of the MICP–BFR method was explored through a scanning electron microscope (SEM) test. The findings could supply a guideline for the study of the solidification of aeolian sand and sand control in desert areas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

Aeolian sand was collected from the Ulan Buh Desert in Inner Mongolia, China, and the curvature coefficient and uniformity coefficient were 0.88 and 2.58, respectively. Based on the standard for soil test method (GB/T 50123-2019), the sand was defined as poorly graded fine sand, and Table 1 lists the physical properties of the aeolian sand. Figure 1 is the particle size distribution curve of the aeolian sand.
Bacillus pasteurii (ATCC 11859) was used in the test and it was purchased from the Shanghai Bioresource Collection Center, Shanghai, China. CASO AGAR + urea (20 g/L) was adopted as the culture medium for the bacteria, which had the following contents: tryptone (15 g), peptone (5 g), sodium chloride (5 g), agar powder (20 g), purified water (900 mL), and 20% urea (100 mL). During the test, the pH of the culture medium was adjusted to 9.0, and then, the growth medium was sterilized under 121 °C for 15 min. After cooling to 60 °C, it was added to 100 mL of 20% urea that had been filtrated and sterilized. Subsequently, 1 mL of bacteria solution concentration (OD600 = 1.0) was added to the growth medium, and it was cultured in a shaker at 32 °C with a shaking frequency of 170 rpm. Cultivation was stopped when the OD600 reached 1.5, and the culture medium was placed into a refrigerator at a temperature of 4 °C for storage. The cementation solution in the test was a mixture of CaCl2 and urea with an equal concentration and volume.
Basalt fiber is a natural fiber with high strength, corrosion prevention, and hightemperature resistance properties. It is a green and environmentally friendly material with little environmental pollution. The basalt fibers selected for the experiment were smooth, bunched and approximately golden. They were purchased from the same company as Kou et al. [34] and their performance is shown in Table 2.

2.2. Sample Preparation

A Plexiglas tube with an inner diameter of 39.1 mm and a height of 150 mm was adopted as the specimen mold. It was opened in half to facilitate the removal of the specimen and fixed with a stainless-steel clamp. The aeolian sand samples were 39.1 mm in diameter and 80 mm in height. In order to prevent leakage during the grouting process, a thin plastic sheet was placed to cover the sample. During the test, the aeolian sand was first passed through a 0.5 mm sieve. Then, the basalt fibers with a fixed fiber length (FL) and fiber content (FC) were disassembled into filaments and sunk in water to facilitate dispersion. Subsequently, the fibers were mixed evenly with the aeolian sand and loaded into the mold according to the preset dry density (ρd). The samples were prepared in four layers and ascraping process was carried out between the layers. Figure 2 exhibits the process of sample preparation. Three layers of filter paper were laid under the sample before loading, and a layer of filter paper was placed on top of the sample after loading. The upper and lower areas of the mold were blocked with rubber plugs with holes. During the test, the bacterial solution and the cementation solution were injected into the tube with a peristaltic pump at a rate of 2 mL/min.

2.3. Test Methodology

Table 3 shows the test scheme, where the cementation number refers to the grouted number of the cementation solution. The test used a repeated staged injection method, and the bacterial solution was grouted and stood for 3 h. Then, the cement liquid was poured four times, at an interval of 16 h. After grouting the bacterial solution for the last time, the cementation solution was grouted twice. After the solution was completely perfused, the samples were flushed with pure water at the same rate three times to terminate the MICP reaction and eliminate the by-products in the MICP process. The permeability test and UCS test were conducted on solidified aeolian sand. The permeability test used the variable head method to measure the permeability coefficient, and the UCS test used a soil triaxial instrument to measure the UCS. The waterhead of the permeability test was 1.5 m. After the tube was filled with water to the required height, the height and time of three different initial heads were measured, and the average value of the three calculated results was taken as the permeability coefficient. The UCS test was loaded at a strain rate of 1.0%/min, and the experiment was paused when the peak strength appeared or the axial strain reached 15%. All of the tests were repeated to eliminate any errors.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Permeability Characteristics of Solidified Aeolian Sand

For the sake of analysis of the influence of the MICP–BFR method on the permeability characteristics of aeolian sand, Figure 3 shows the curves of the permeability coefficient versus the fiber content. The dotted lines in the figure indicate the permeability of aeolian sand solidified with MICP. It can be seen that the permeability of the aeolian sand was significantly improved after the addition of basalt fiber. When the initial dry densities of the samples were 1.5 g/cm3 and 1.6 g/cm3, the permeability coefficient first increased, then decreased, and finally increased with the increase in FC. When the FC was 0.2–0.4%, the permeability coefficient increased. When the FC was small, the fiber was distributed among the sand particles, forming a seepage channel in the sample, leading to an increase in the permeability coefficient. When the FC was 0.4–0.8%, the permeability coefficient decreased with the increase in FC. When the FC increased, the fiber distribution became tighter and overlapped, which damaged the integrity of the sample, blocked the drainage path of the sample, and led to a decrease in the permeability coefficient. When the FC was 0.8–1.0%, the permeability coefficient increased gradually. When excessive fibers were added, the sand particles were distributed more dispersedly, and the pores formed by the fibers in the sample were dominant, forming new seepage channels and increasing the permeability coefficient. This is inconsistent with the research results of Choi et al. [31]. Possible reasons for the differences are the different perfusion methods and the amount of solution, which are related to the production of calcium carbonate, which affects the permeability of the sample.
Figure 4 shows the relationship between the permeability coefficient and fiber length. It can be seen that the permeability coefficient reduced first and then rose with an increase in FL. When the FL was less than 9 mm, the permeability coefficient decreased, and when the FL was more than 9 mm, the permeability coefficient increased gradually. When the FL was shorter, the fibers became nucleation sites for bacteria, and CaCO3 crystals adhered to the fiber surfaces and filled the pores between the sand grains, leading to a reduction in the permeability coefficient. With the increase in FL, the fibers determined the directional distribution of the pores and formed penetration paths inside the sample, increasing the permeability coefficient. The conclusions that come from the experimental results are that the permeability coefficient of solidified aeolian sand was lowest when the FL and FC were 9 mm and 0.8%, respectively.

3.2. Effect of Initial Dry Density on the UCS of Solidified Aeolian Sand

UCS is a significant parameter that reflects the strength properties of soil. To establish the effect of initial dry density on the UCS of solidified aeolian sand, Figure 5 shows the curves of unconfined compressive strength versus fiber length. It can be observed that the UCS increased first and then decreased with the increase in FL, and peak strength appeared with 9 mm FL. With the increase in FC, the UCS increased first and then decreased, and peak strength appeared with 0.8% FC. According to the comparison of the test results, it can be seen that the UCS of aeolian sand with a dry density of 1.5 g/cm3 was significantly lower than that of 1.6 g/cm3, thus indicating that the UCS increased with the increase in dry density, which is consistent with the conclusions of Fang et al. [28]. The primary cause is that the pores among sand grains gradually decreased as the dry density increased, and the CaCO3 crystals effectively filled the pores and cemented the sand particles, thereby improving the strength of aeolian sand. In addition, the CaCO3 crystals cemented the fibers and sand grains together, and the fibers played a bridging role, and shared the external loading with the sand particles. Owing to the high tensile strength of the fibers, the strength of solidified aeolian sand can be further improved when subjected to external loading.

3.3. Effect of Fiber Content on the UCS of Solidified Aeolian Sand

Figure 6 exhibitsa histogram of UCS versus fiber content. It can be seen that the UCS of aeolian sand was notably increased by the addition of fibers, and the UCS increased first and then reduced with the increase in FC, which is consistent with the conclusions of Qiu et al. [23]. When the dry density of the sample was 1.5 g/cm3, the UCS of the unreinforced sample was 1382.22 kPa, and the minimum UCS of the reinforced sample was 1869.18 kPa, indicating that the addition of fiber can increase the strength of the sample. The UCS was higher when the FC was 0.6% and 0.8%. When the dry density of the sample was 1.6 g/cm3, the UCS of the unreinforced sample was 1983.91 kPa, which was lower than the minimum UCS of the reinforced sample which was 2076.92 kPa. The UCS was larger when the FC was 0.4% and 0.6%. The main reason for this is that the basalt fibers had a charge, and it was easy for them to adsorb each other. When the FC was higher, more fibers came into contact to form clumps, leading to the nonuniform distribution of fibers in the samples. In addition, the pores between sand particles were occupied by fibers, which restrained the flow of bacteria, leading to uneven distribution and inhibiting the volume of CaCO3 crystals, which weakened the solidified effect of aeolian sand [35].

3.4. Effect of Fiber Length on the UCS of Solidified Aeolian Sand

Figure 7 displays a histogram of UCS versus fiber length. It can be seen that the UCS increased first and then decreased with the increase in FL, thus indicating that fiber reinforcement can significantly improve the strength of aeolian sand, and an optimal FL was present. When the dry densities of the samples were 1.5 g/cm3 and 1.6 g/cm3, the UCS was higher at an FL of 12 mm and 9 mm, respectively. A single tensile effect and interspace reticulate structure of basalt fibers could increase the strength and toughness of aeolian sand meanwhile. The long fibers had a large contact area with the soil particles and CaCO3 crystals and could form a wider transmission system. Therefore, the overall performance was better when the samples were subjected to compressive loading. However, the fibers experienced a bending and overlapping phenomenon when the FL was sufficient, thus leading to inhibition of the transmission effect and the entire mechanical performance [35]. On the whole, when the dry density of the sample was 1.5 g/cm3, the UCS was higher at 12 mm FL and 0.8% FC. When the dry density was 1.6 g/cm3, the reinforcement effect was superior at 9 mm FL and 0.4% FC.

3.5. Relationship between UCS and CaCO3 Generation

The generated CaCO3 reflected the merit of the MICP process and affected the UCS of aeolian sand. In order to research the effect of CaCO3 production on the permeability and strength properties of aeolian sand, the relationships between the permeability coefficient, UCS, and CaCO3 content were analyzed. The regression analysis results indicated that the correlation between the permeability coefficient and CaCO3 content was not obvious, so no further analysis will be carried out. Figure 8 exhibits the curves of UCS versus CaCO3 generation. The UCS of aeolian sand increased linearly with the increase in CaCO3 generation [31], and the correlation coefficient reached 0.852 at the dry density of 1.6 g/cm3, which was significantly higher than that of 1.5 g/cm3. During the MICP process, CaCO3 crystals filled the voids and cemented sand grains, leading to an increase in the cohesion between the sand particles. In the meantime, the CaCO3 crystals demonstrated an anchoring effect on the fibers, and the fibers interwove to form a mesh structure and bonded with the sand particles as a whole. The cement effect of the CaCO3 crystals and the tensile effect of the fibers were well demonstrated, leading to an improvement in the strength of aeolian sand.

3.6. Consolidation Mechanism of MICP-BFR Treated Aeolian Sand

In order to reveal the consolidation mechanism of the MICP–BFR method, SEM tests were conducted on the sample of aeolian sand, and Figure 9 shows the SEM images of solidified aeolian sand. As represented in Figure 9a, it can be seen that the CaCO3 crystals were mainly distributed on the sand surface and filled the voids between the sand grains, which played the roles of cementing and filling. The microscopic morphology of CaCO3 crystals was prismatic, indicating that the CaCO3 crystals were mainly calcite, and the stability and deposition rate were significantly superior to aragonite and vaterite [36]. As shown in Figure 9b, it can be seen that the CaCO3 crystals were primarily deposited on the fiber surfaces and between the fibers, and they demonstrated an anchoring effect. The bridging effect of the fibers can enhance the strength and toughness when the sample suffered from compressive loading. As shown in Figure 9c, the fibers interwove to form a spatial mesh structure, which limited the deformation of the sand particles to a certain extent. When the samples encountered external loading, the fibers on the shear band generated tensile stress, which further compensated for the strength losses. However, the reinforcement effect was insignificant due to part of the fibers experiencing cohesion failure. As seen in Figure 9d, the CaCO3 crystals attached to the fiber surfaces, resulting in an improvement of the fiber roughness and an increase in the contact area between the fibers and sand grains. A composite was formed by the sand particles, CaCO3 crystals, and fibers, which resists deformation according to mutual friction [37]. Understanding the mechanism of MICP–BFR-treated aeolian sand could help the research between MICP–BFR and other disciplines, and apply it to newer fields [38,39,40].

4. Conclusions

Based on the permeability test and UCS test, the mechanical properties of cemented aeolian sand were investigated, and the consolidation mechanism of the MICP–BFR method was explored according to the SEM test. The main results are as follows:
(1) With the increase in FC, the permeability coefficient presented three stages of increase-decrease-increase. With the increase in FL, it first decreased and then increased. When the FC was 0.2–0.4%, the permeability coefficient increased gradually and then decreased at 0.4–0.8%. When the FC was 0.8–1.0%, the permeability coefficient showed an increasing trend again. When the FL was less than 9 mm, the permeability coefficient decreased and then increased as the FL was greater than 9 mm. The permeability coefficient was lower at 0.8% FC and 9 mm FL, respectively, whereas it was higher at 0.4% FC and 15 mm FL, respectively.
(2) The UCS of aeolian sand rose with the increase in dry density, and the strength of the samples with a dry density of 1.5 g/cm3 was significantly lower than that of 1.6 g/cm3.
(3) The UCS of aeolian sand rose first and then decreased with the increase in FL and FC. When the dry density was 1.5 g/cm3, the optimum reinforcement condition was 12 mm FL and 0.8% FC, while it was 9 mm FL and 0.4% FC when the dry density was 1.6 g/cm3.
(4) There was no obvious correlation between the permeability coefficient and CaCO3 production, while the UCS increased linearly with the increase in CaCO3 yield. When the dry density was 1.6 g/cm3, the correlation coefficient reached 0.852.
(5) The CaCO3 crystals demonstrated cementing, filling, and anchoring effects. The interspace reticulate structure shaped by the fibers played a bridging effect to restrain displacement, and the high tensile strength of the fibers can be compensated by the brittle damage of the samples.
In this paper, a method of combining basalt fiber and microbially induced calcite precipitation technology to solidify aeolian sand is proposed. The experimental results show that this method improves the strength of microbial solidified sand to some extent. However, limitations exist in the research. From the test results, the influence of this method on the permeability coefficient is relatively complex. Verifying this through theory requires further research. It has been suggested that the content and length of the fibers should be smaller (FC < 0.6%, and FL < 9 mm) in future relevant research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L. and X.L.; methodology, J.L. and X.L.; validation, G.L. and J.Z.; writing original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, G.L.; funding acquisition, X.L. and G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 42230712, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD, grant number 300102261719, Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province, grant number 2021JM-535 and Special Fund for Scientific Research by Xijing University, grant number XJ18T01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Whiffin, V.S. Microbial CaCO3 Precipitation for the Production of Biocement. Ph.D. Thesis, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  2. DeJonga, J.T.; Mortensenb, B.M.; Martinez, B.C.; Nelson, D.C. Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gao, Y.; Yao, D.; Han, H.W.; Li, C. Micro-experiment on MICP-treated aeolian sandy soil under ultraviolet erosion environment. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2020, 42 (Suppl. S1), 254–258. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, C.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.X.; Gao, Y.; Bai, S. Field experimental study on stability of bio-mineralization crust in the desert. Rock Soil Mech. 2019, 40, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nikseresht, F.; Landi, A.; Sayyad, G.; Ghezelbash, G.; Schulin, R. Sugarecane molasse and vinasse added as microbial growth substrates increase calcium carbonate content, surface stability and resistance against wind erosion of desert soils. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 268, 110639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, M.L.; Zhao, L.; Li, G.K.; Zhu, C.; Dong, S.J.; Li, Z.B.; Tang, C.S.; Ji, J.F.; Chen, J. Microbially induced magnesium carbonate precipitation and its potential application in combating desertification. Geomicrobiol. J. 2021, 38, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Raveh-Amit, H.; Tsesarsky, M. Biostimulation in desert soils for microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tian, K.L.; Wang, X.D.; Zhang, S.C.; Zhang, H.L.; Zhang, F.; Yang, A.Q. Effect of reactant injection rate on solidifying aeolian sand via microbially induced calcite precipitation. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2020, 32, 04020291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tian, K.L.; Wu, Y.Y.; Zhang, H.L.; Li, D.; Nie, K.Y.; Zhang, S.C. Increasing wind erosion resistance of aeolian sandy soil by microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 4271–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, D.; Tian, K.L.; Zhang, H.L.; Wu, Y.Y.; Nie, K.Y.; Zhang, S.C. Experimental investigation of solidifying desert aeolian sand using microbially induced calcite precipitation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 172, 251–262. [Google Scholar]
  11. Meng, H.; Gao, Y.F.; He, J.; Qi, Y.S.; Hang, L. Microbially induced carbonate precipitation for wind erosion control of desert soil: Field-scale tests. Geoderma 2021, 383, 114723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Devrani, R.; Dubey, A.A.; Ravi, K.; Sahoo, L. Applications of bio-cementation and bio-polymerization for aeolian erosion control. J. Arid. Environ. 2021, 187, 104433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dubey, A.A.; Devrani, R.; Ravi, K.; Dhami, N.K.; Mukherjee, A.; Sahoo, L. Experimental investigation to mitigate aeolian erosion via biocementation employed with a novel ureolytic soil isolate. Aeolian Res. 2021, 52, 100727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Achal, V.; Mukherjee, A.; Basu, P.C.; Reddy, M.S. Lactose mother liquor as an alternative nutrient source for microbial concrete production by Sporosarcina pasteurii. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 36, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xiao, Y.; Tang, Y.F.; Ma, G.L.; McCartney, J.S.; Chu, J. Thermal Conductivity of Biocemented Graded Sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2021, 147, 04021106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.J.; Guo, Z.; Wang, L.Z.; Li, Y.L.; Liu, Z.Y. Shear resistance of MICP cementing material at the interface between calcareous sand and steel. Mater. Lett. 2020, 274, 128009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martinez, A.; DeJong, J.; Akin, I.; Aleali Ali Arson, C.; Atkinson, J.; Bandini, P.; Baser, T.; Borela, R.; Boulanger Ross Burrall, M.; Chen, Y.Y.; et al. Bio-inspired geotechnical engineering principles, current work, opportunities and challenges. Geotechnique 2022, 8, 687–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, D.L.; Tang, C.S.; Pan, X.H.; Liu, B.; Li, H.; Lv, C.; Cheng, Y.J. Tensile strength of fiber-reinforced MICP-treated calcareous sand. Geol. J. China Univ. 2021, 27, 670–678. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yin, L.Y.; Tang, C.S.; Zhang, L. Experimental study on mechanical behavior of MICP-fiber reinforce treated calcareous sand. Geol. J. China Univ. 2021, 27, 679–686. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, H.; Tang, C.S.; Yin, L.Y.; Liu, B.; Lv, C.; Wang, D.L.; Pan, X.H.; Wang, H.L.; Shi, B. Experimental study on surface erosion resistances and mechanical behavior of MICP-FR-treated calcareous sand. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2021, 43, 1941–1949. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xie, Y.H.; Tang, C.S.; Yin, L.Y.; Lv, C.; Jiang, N.J.; Shi, B. Mechanical behavior of microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP)-treated soil with fiber reinforcement. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2019, 41, 675–682. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhao, Y.; Fan, C.B.; Ge, F.; Cheng, X.H.; Liu, P.H. Enhancing strength of MICP-treated sand with scrap of activated carbon-fiber felt. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2020, 32, 04020061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qiu, R.K.; Tong, H.W.; Gu, M.X.; Yuan, J. Strength and micromechanism analysis of microbial solidified sand with carbon fiber. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8876617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, M.D.; Li, L.; Ogbonnaya, U.; Wen, K.J.; Tian, A.; Amini, F. Influence of fiber addition on mechanical properties of MICP-treated sand. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28, 04015166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hao, Y.F.; Cheng, L.; Hao, H.; Shahin, M.A. Enhancing fiber/matrix bonding in polypropylene fiber reinforced cementitious composites by microbial induced calcite precipitation pre-treatment. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 88, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lei, X.W.; Lin, S.Q.; Meng, Q.S.; Liao, X.H.; Xu, J.P. Influence of different fiber types on properties of biocemented calcareous sand. Arabian J. Geosci. 2020, 13, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Imran, M.A.; Gowthaman, S.; Nakashima, K.; Kawasaki, S. The influence of the addition of plant-based natural fibers (jute) on biocemented sand using MICP method. Materials 2020, 13, 4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fang, X.W.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, H.L.; Xiao, Y.; Shen, C.N. Influence of fiber content and length on engineering properties of MICP-treated coral sand. Geomicrobiol. J. 2020, 37, 582–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wen, K.J.; Bu, C.M.; Liu, S.H.; Li, Y.; Li, L. Experimental investigation of flexure resistance performance of bio-beams reinforced with discrete randomly distributed fiber and bamboo. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 176, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Spencer, C.A.; van Paassen, L.; Sass, H. Effect of jute fibres on the process of MICP and properties of biocemented sand. Materials 2020, 13, 5429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, S.G.; Wang, K.J.; Chu, J. Properties of biocemented, fiber reinforced sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 120, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Choi, S.G.; Hoang, T.; Alleman, E.J.; Chu, J. Splitting tensile strength of fiber-reinforced and biocemented sand. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2019, 31, 06019007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yao, D.F.; Wu, J.; Wang, G.W.; Wang, P.B.; Zheng, J.J.; Yan, J.Y.; Xu, L.; Yan, Y.J. Effect of wool fiber addition on the reinforcement of loose sands by microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP): Mechanical property and underlying mechanism. Acta Geotech. 2021, 16, 1401–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kou, H.G.; Ma, Q.; Han, S.L. Experimental study on the mechanical behaviors of loess reinforced with randomly distributed basalt fiber. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zheng, J.J.; Song, Y.; Wu, C.C.; Cui, M.J. Experimental study on mechanical properties of basalt fiber reinforced MICP-treated sand. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Tech. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2019, 47, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, Y.Z. Microbial-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: From Micro to Macro Scale. Doctor Dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zheng, J.J.; Song, Y.; Lai, H.J.; Cui, M.J.; Wu, C.C. Experimental study on the shear behavior of fiber-reinforced bio-cemented sand. J. Civ. Environ. Eng. 2019, 41, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yang, Y.R.; Kulandaivel, A.; Mehrez, S.; Mahariq, I.; Elbadawy, I.; Mohanavel, V.; Jalil, A.T.; Saleh, M. Mahmood. Developing a high-performance electromagnetic microwave absorber using BaTiO3/CoS2/CNTs triphase hybrid. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 2557–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, Y.R.; Li, G.; Luo, T.; Al-Bahrani, M.; Al-Ammar, E.A.; Sillanpaa, M.; Ali, S.; Leng, X.J. The innovative optimization techniques for forecasting the energy consumption of buildings using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm and different neural networks. Energy 2023, 268, 126548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, Y.R.; Logesh, K.; Mehrez, S.; Huynen, I.; Elbadawy, I.; Mohanavel, V. Alamri, Sagr. Rational construction of wideband electromagnetic wave absorber using hybrid FeWO4-based nanocomposite structures and tested by the free-space method. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 2130–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 01949 g001 550
Figure 1. Particle size distribution curve of the aeolian sand.
Figure 1. Particle size distribution curve of the aeolian sand.
Materials 16 01949 g001
Materials 16 01949 g002 550
Figure 2. The process of sample preparation.
Figure 2. The process of sample preparation.
Materials 16 01949 g002
Materials 16 01949 g003 550
Figure 3. Curves of permeability coefficient versus fiber content.
Figure 3. Curves of permeability coefficient versus fiber content.
Materials 16 01949 g003
Materials 16 01949 g004 550
Figure 4. Curves of permeability coefficient versus fiber length.
Figure 4. Curves of permeability coefficient versus fiber length.
Materials 16 01949 g004
Materials 16 01949 g005 550
Figure 5. Curves of unconfined compressive strength versus fiber length.
Figure 5. Curves of unconfined compressive strength versus fiber length.
Materials 16 01949 g005
Materials 16 01949 g006 550
Figure 6. Histogram of unconfined compressive strength versus fiber content (a) ρd = 1.5 g/cm3; and (b) ρd = 1.6 g/cm3.
Figure 6. Histogram of unconfined compressive strength versus fiber content (a) ρd = 1.5 g/cm3; and (b) ρd = 1.6 g/cm3.
Materials 16 01949 g006
Materials 16 01949 g007 550
Figure 7. Histogram of unconfined compressive strength versus fiber length (a) ρd = 1.5 g/cm3; and (b) ρd = 1.6 g/cm3.
Figure 7. Histogram of unconfined compressive strength versus fiber length (a) ρd = 1.5 g/cm3; and (b) ρd = 1.6 g/cm3.
Materials 16 01949 g007
Materials 16 01949 g008 550
Figure 8. Curves of unconfined compressive strength versus CaCO3 content (a) ρd = 1.5 g/cm3; and (b) ρd = 1.6 g/cm3.
Figure 8. Curves of unconfined compressive strength versus CaCO3 content (a) ρd = 1.5 g/cm3; and (b) ρd = 1.6 g/cm3.
Materials 16 01949 g008
Materials 16 01949 g009a 550Materials 16 01949 g009b 550
Figure 9. SEM images of solidified aeolian sand (a) CaCO3 distribution; (b) bridging effect; (c) mesh structure; and (d) composite material.
Figure 9. SEM images of solidified aeolian sand (a) CaCO3 distribution; (b) bridging effect; (c) mesh structure; and (d) composite material.
Materials 16 01949 g009aMaterials 16 01949 g009b
Table
Table 1. Physical properties of aeolian sand.
Table 1. Physical properties of aeolian sand.
ρdmax (g/cm3)ρdmin (g/cm3)d10 (mm)d30 (mm)d60 (mm)CuCc
1.851.470.0730.1090.1872.580.88
Table
Table 2. Physical and mechanical properties of basalt fiber [34].
Table 2. Physical and mechanical properties of basalt fiber [34].
Diameter (μm)Tensile Strength (MPa)Elastic Modulus (GPa)Density (g/cm3)Elongation at Fracture (%)
103500–45001002.652.2
Table
Table 3. Test scheme.
Table 3. Test scheme.
ρd (g/cm3)Cementation NumberFiber Length (mm)Fiber Content (%)
1.51860.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0
1890.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0
18120.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0
18150.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0
1.61860.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0
1890.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0
18120.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0
18150.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Li, X.; Li, G.; Zhang, J. Experimental Study on the Mechanical Behaviors of Aeolian Sand Treated by Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) and Basalt Fiber Reinforcement (BFR). Materials 2023, 16, 1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051949

AMA Style

Liu J, Li X, Li G, Zhang J. Experimental Study on the Mechanical Behaviors of Aeolian Sand Treated by Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) and Basalt Fiber Reinforcement (BFR). Materials. 2023; 16(5):1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051949

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jia, Xi’an Li, Gang Li, and Jinli Zhang. 2023. "Experimental Study on the Mechanical Behaviors of Aeolian Sand Treated by Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) and Basalt Fiber Reinforcement (BFR)" Materials 16, no. 5: 1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051949

APA Style

Liu, J., Li, X., Li, G., & Zhang, J. (2023). Experimental Study on the Mechanical Behaviors of Aeolian Sand Treated by Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) and Basalt Fiber Reinforcement (BFR). Materials, 16(5), 1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051949

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop