Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Titania–Silica Composite Aerogel at Atmospheric Pressure and Its Catalytic Performance in the Synthesis of Poly (Butylene Succinate)
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of Numerical Simulation of Laser–Arc Hybrid Welding
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Multi-Element Microalloying on the Structure and Properties of High Chromium Cast Iron
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Numerical Study on the Effect of Tool Speeds on Temperatures and Material Flow Behaviour in Refill Friction Stir Spot Welding of Thin AA7075-T6 Sheets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanical Performance and Microstructural Evolution of Rotary Friction Welding of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene and Polycarbonate Rods

by
Chil-Chyuan Kuo
1,2,3,*,
Naruboyana Gurumurthy
1,4,
Hong-Wei Chen
1 and
Song-Hua Hunag
5
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, No. 84, Gungjuan Road, New Taipei City 243, Taiwan
2
Research Center for Intelligent Medical Devices, Ming Chi University of Technology, No. 84, Gungjuan Road, New Taipei City 243, Taiwan
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chang Gung University, No.259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Presidency University, Rajankunte, Near Yelhanka, Bangalore 700073, India
5
Li-Yin Technology Co., Ltd., No. 37, Lane 151, Section 1, Zhongxing Road, Wugu District, New Taipei City 241, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(9), 3295; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093295
Submission received: 31 March 2023 / Revised: 20 April 2023 / Accepted: 21 April 2023 / Published: 22 April 2023

Abstract

:
Rotary friction welding (RFW) is a green manufacturing technology with environmental pollution in the field of joining methods. In practice, the welding quality of the friction-welded parts was affected by the peak temperature in the weld joint during the RFW of dissimilar plastic rods. In industry, polycarbonate (PC) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) are two commonly used plastics in consumer products. In this study, the COMSOL multiphysics software was employed to estimate the peak temperature in the weld joint during the RFW of PC and ABS rods. After RFW, the mechanical performance and microstructural evolution of friction-welded parts were investigated experimentally. The average Shore A surface hardness, flexural strength, and impact energy are directly proportional to the rotation speed of the RFW. The quality of RFW is excellent, since the welding strength in the weld joint is better than that of the ABS base materials. The fracture occurs in the ABS rods since their brittleness is higher than that of the PC rods. The average percentage error of predicting the peak temperature using COMSOL software using a mesh element count of 875,688 for five different rotation speeds is about 16.6%. The differential scanning calorimetry curve for the friction-welded parts welded at a rotation speed of 1350 rpm shows an endothermic peak between 400 to 440 °C and an exothermic peak between 600 to 700 °C, showing that the friction-welded parts have better mechanical properties.

1. Introduction

Rotary friction welding (RFW) [1] is one of the approaches of friction welding that is considered solid-state welding, which has lower energy consumption and environmental impact compared to gas metal arc welding. The process of RFW is that one welded element is rotated at a constant speed while the other welded element remains stationary under an axial force. In general, RFW gives many features based on its practical experience in industry compared with adhesive bonding [2,3]. The RFW process provides a lower peak temperature in the weld joint compared with fusion welding (FW) [4,5,6]. Therefore, a wide range of similar or dissimilar materials can be joined efficiently and economically. The products obtained by RFW have low defect rates and low distortion. In addition, the manufacturing costs can be reduced significantly compared with the subtractive technique, such as milling machining from buck materials [7,8].
Eslami et al. [9] reviewed the friction stir welding tooling for polymers and analyzed the weld strengths for different polymeric materials. Paoletti et al. [10] investigated the forces and temperatures in the friction spot stir welding of thermoplastic polymers. The results showed that the increase in the tool rotational speed will reduce the processing forces. Lambiase et al. [11] investigated the influence of the plunging force in the friction stir welding of polycarbonate sheets on the mechanical behavior of the welds. The results revealed that the mechanical behavior of the welds can be improved up to 37 % by plunging force. The shear strength of 34.5 MPa that yields the base material can be obtained by optimal conditions. Rehman et al. [12] investigated the effects of preheating on joint quality in the friction stir welding of polyethylene. The results showed that proper welding of this bimodal high-density polyethylene takes place when the material is maintained at high temperatures. Large elongations in the order of 60% and weld efficiencies in excess of 100% were also achieved by optimal welding temperatures. Skowrońska et al. [13] assessed the structural properties of friction-welded joints. The results revealed that a surface hardness above 340 HV was obtained in the weld joint. Dhooge et al. [14] proposed a new variant friction-welding process for the fully automatic joining of pipelines. Optimization of the duration of the friction phase of the friction-welding process was also investigated. Anwar et al. [15] investigated the microstructure, mechanical properties, and grain size of the alloy after RFW. The minimum grain size was successfully met by postweld heat treatment with improved elongation and strength. It was found that the weld metal grain size of the postweld heat treatment joints is about 35 ± 4 µm. The average grain size of the weld metal in the as-welded condition is about 20 ± 2 µm, in contrast to the weld metal grain size of the PWHT joints. Ishraq et al. [16] investigated the weld strength by optimizing the welding process parameters. The results showed that the major reason for the high strength of a welded material used is the optimal level of fiberglass. Hangai et al. [17] studied the effects of the porosity of aluminum foam on the weldability to a polycarbonate plate. A welding strength of polycarbonate plate and Al foam higher than that of the base Al foam with a porosity of 80% can be obtained. Skowrońska et al. [18] investigated the microstructure of a friction-welded joint made of stainless steel with an ultrafine-grained structure made by hydrostatic extrusion. It was found that strength is the criterion for assessing the properties of the joint because of the complexity of the microstructure of the friction-welded joint. Zhang et al. [19] investigated a thermal compression bonding process in friction welding. It was found that the frictional flow greatly enhanced the formation of intermetallic compounds along the weld interface. Eliseev et al. [20] investigated the microstructural evolution in the transfer layer of aluminum alloy welds. The results showed that the size of the incoherent intermetallic particles and the volume fraction decreased towards to the center of the layer. Ma et al. [21] investigated the effects of temperature on mechanical performances of friction-stir-welded aluminum alloy joints. It was found that the reduction in the gradient along the thickness due to the pinhole increased heat input and material flow at the bottom.
Polymers are frequently used in some structures, because the major difference between metal and polymers is that polymers are lighter than metal. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) [22] and polycarbonate (PC) [23] are two commonly used plastics in consumer products. ABS is an thermoplastic engineering material that has high tensile strength and high resistance to chemical corrosion and physical impacts. In addition, ABS is easy to use in the injection-molding process since it has low melting point. Therefore, ABS plastic is suitable for making consumer products to withstand heavy use. PC plastic is considered as an engineering plastic since it has very good heat resistance, and is widely employed for more robust materials. However, hitherto little is known about the domain knowledge of the RFW of ABS and PC polymer rods. For this reason, the objective of this study is to establish domain knowledge of the RFW of ABS and PC rods. The RFW experiment was performed using a turning machine. During RFW, the peak temperature in the weld joint was determined using an infrared thermal imager. The COMSOL multiphysics software [24,25,26] was also employed to predict the peak temperature in the weld joint and to compare the results obtained by the experiment. After RFW, the mechanical properties and microstructural evolution of the friction-welded parts were characterized using Shore A hardness, three-point bending, and impact tests. Finally, domain knowledge of the RFW of ABS and PC rods was proposed. The melting behavior, solidification characteristics, and glass transition temperature of friction-welded joints was also conducted with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).

2. Experimental Details

Figure 1 shows the flowchart of experimental details. The entire process includes designing weld specimen, fabrication of weld specimen, rotary friction welding, determining peak temperature in the weld joint via simulation by COMSOL, and experiment using infrared thermal imager, determining mechanical properties, Shore hardness tests, bending tests, impact tests, fracture surface analysis, DSC thermal analysis, and finally establishing domain knowledge of RFW of dissimilar polymer rods. In the simulation by COMSOL, the entire process involves thermal pattern analysis and suitable boundary conditions for the rotary friction model. At first, a COMSOL model is established, which involves identifying the components of the system and their physical properties. Then, the next step includes setting the parameters for RFW. Then, suitable boundary conditions, such as heat flux at various locations or temperature, need to be selected based on the system geometry and heat transfer mechanisms. Finally, peak temperature in the weld joint through the heat transfer needs to be identified, using heat transfer mechanisms such as conduction, convection, and radiation, to analyze the thermal behavior. The workpiece is a cylindrical rod with a diameter of 20 mm and a length of 40 mm. The welding workpieces were printed with a three-dimensional printing apparatus named fused deposition modeling (FDM), using two different thermoplastic filaments, i.e., PC (Thunder 3D Inc., New Taipei City, Taiwan) and ABS (Thunder 3D Inc., New Taipei City, Taiwan) [27]. Figure 2 shows the two dissimilar workpieces for RFW in this study. The FDM process parameters for ABS rods include infill percentage of 70%, print bed temperature at 100 °C, print speed of 80 mm/s, print temperature of 230 °C, shell thickness of 0.4 mm, and layer thickness of 0.1 mm. The FDM process parameters for PC rods involve infill percentage of 100%, print bed temperature at 100 °C, print speed of 80 mm/s, print temperature of 245 °C, shell thickness of 0.4 mm, and layer thickness of 0.1 mm. The printing strategy for the cylindrical polymer rod of ABS and PC is that the extruder moves in straight lines back and forth to create the parallel lines of the material.
Figure 3 shows the situation of RFW. A turning machine was selected as a friction welder to carry out RFW of dissimilar polymer rods. The welding time of RFW was set to 60 s, involving friction time of 30 s, forge time of 20 s, and cooling time of 10 s. To study the effects of rotation speed on the peak temperature in the weld joint, five rotation speeds, i.e., 330 rpm, 490 rpm, 650 rpm, 950 rpm, and 1350 rpm, were performed. During RFW, the peak temperature in the weld joint was recorded using an infrared camera (BI-TM-F01P, Panrico trading Inc., New Taipei City, Taiwan). After RFW, Charpy impact test (780, Instron Inc., Norwood, MA, USA), Shore A surface hardness test (MET-HG-A, SEAT Inc. New Taipei City, Taiwan), and bending test (RH-30, Shimadzu Inc., Kyoto, Japan) were performed to investigate the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of the friction-welded parts. Figure 4 shows the experimental set-up for impact test. The insert is the close-up view showing the arrangement of the friction-welded parts in the impact test. Figure 5 shows the experimental set-up for bending test, showing the setting of the friction-welded parts during the bending test. The macrostructure of the fracture surfaces after bending and impact tests was performed by a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) (JEC3000-FC, JEOL Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and a stereo optical microscope (Quick Vision, Mitutoyo Inc, Tokyo, Japan). In this work, DSC (STA 409 PC Luxx Simultaneous thermal analyzer, Netzsch-Geratebau GmbH Inc., Waldkraiburg, Germany) analysis was used to calculate the melting and mesomorphic transitions along with their enthalpy and entropy of the friction-welded joints after RFW with five rotation speeds. The DSC experimental setup provides two separate crucibles for heating and cooling. One is for reference and another is for a sample to be investigated. DSC evaluation was carried out under controlled experimental conditions of continuous heating rate of 15 °C/min and continuous cooling rate of 15 °C/min in temperatures ranging from 50 °C to 250 °C. Thermal properties were investigated by two continuous exothermic cycles and an endothermic cycle at 25 mL/min of nitrogen gas supply.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 6 describes the friction-welded PC and ABS rods using RFW. The top of this figure shows panoramic SEM micrographs of the friction-welded joint. This result reveals that the RFW of PC and ABS is acceptable since the bead width is consistent. Figure 7 shows the mechanical properties of surface hardness, impact energy, and flexural strength in the weld joint for RFW of dissimilar polymer rods under five rotation speeds. The maximum joint strength of 132 MPa, Shore A hardness of 80, and impact energy of 156 J can be obtained at a rotation speed of 1350 rpm. As can be seen, the increase in joint strength and surface hardness with increasing rotation speed is observed. This result reveals that the surface hardness, flexural strength, and impact energy are directly proportional to the rotation speed of RFW [28].
Figure 8 shows the number of meshes as a function of peak temperature in the weld joint. Ten different kinds of mesh sizes, i.e., 0.4 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.6 mm, 0.7 mm, 0.8 mm, 0.9 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.1 mm, 1.2 mm, and 1.3 mm, were used to investigate the peak temperature in the weld joint during RFW. The insert shows the thermal model of RFW. It should be noted that a higher number of meshes provides more computation time. As can be seen, the peak temperature predicted by the COMSOL multiphysics software using a mesh element count of 875,688 is very close to that obtained by the experimental result. The mesh size is about 0.7 mm. This shows that a mesh element count of 875,688 is suitable for predicting the peak temperature in the RFW of PC and ABS rods.
Figure 9 shows the friction-welded parts before and after bending tests. It was observed that the joining of ABS and PC by FRW is expected to improve the basic mechanical properties of the single ABS thermoplastic material. It is well known that the flexural strength of the PC material is better than that of the ABS material. According to the experimental results, the average flexural strength of the weld joint and the PC and ABS rods is about 132 MPa, 180 MPa, and 110 MPa, respectively. The fracture initiated in the ABS rods shows that the welding quality of FRW is excellent, since the welding strength in the weld joint is better than that of the ABS base materials [29]. In general, the ABS polymer is a relatively soft and flexible material. The PC polymer has a higher glass transition temperature than the ABS polymer, showing it can withstand higher temperatures before it starts to soften and lose its shape. Therefore, the PC polymer seems to be a better choice for parts that need to operate in high-temperature environments. In particular, the fractured locations in the ABS rods after bending tests are random, as shown in Figure 10.
Figure 11 shows the fracture surfaces of ABS after three-point bending tests for six different rotation speeds. Figure 12 describes the fracture surfaces of ABS after impact tests for six different rotation speeds. A small region of porous surface was also observed and highlighted. The porous surface is caused by insufficient molecular diffusion and crystallinity in FDM printing, and can be reduced by microwave [30]. Figure 13 describes the fracture surfaces of PC after impact tests for six different rotation speeds. The formation of voids and cracks after the impact test can be identified by analyzing the surfaces of fractured parts. As can be seen, jagged and irregular surfaces were found. According to the optical microscopic images of fractured surfaces, two phenomena are found. One is that the ABS material exhibits cracked surface textures. The other is that the PC material exhibits a porous structure.
Figure 14 shows the comparison of the experimental and numerical simulation results of the peak temperature for the RFW of PC and ABS rods at five different rotation speeds. As can be seen, the percentage error of the peak temperature between the experimental and numerical simulation results for 330 rpm, 490 rpm, 650 rpm, 950 rpm, and 1350 rpm is about 38.6 %, 29.3%, 18.9%, −1.8%, −2.0%, and 16.6%, respectively. Therefore, the average percentage error of predicting the peak temperature using COMSOL software for five different rotation speeds is about 16.6%. In general, DSC analyzes the melting behavior, solidification characteristics, and glass transition temperature. Figure 15 shows the DSC curve comparisons for the friction-welded part under five rotation speeds. The insert shows the DSC setup for the samples fabricated by five rotation speeds. As can be seen, the DSC peak appears at a temperature of 429 °C, showing that there is a significant thermal event happening in the weld joint. The heat capacities for the friction-welded parts welded by rotation speeds of 330 rpm, 490 rpm, 650 rpm, 950 rpm, and 1350 rpm are −1.002 mW/mg, −0.8127 mW/mg, −0.626 4mW/mg, −1.759 mW/mg, and -2.287 mW/mg, respectively. The DSC curve for the friction-welded parts welded by a rotation speed of 1350 rpm shows an endothermic peak [31] between 400 to 440 °C and an exothermic peak [32] between 600 to 700 °C. This means that higher rotation speed contributes to higher molecular orientation in the weld joints, showing that the friction-welded parts have better mechanical properties. Therefore, the structure of the friction-welded parts welded by a rotation speed of 1350 rpm is stronger.
According to the research results, the remarkable findings provide potential industrial values in the polymer-welding industry, since the RFW of dissimilar polymer rods is a green manufacturing method based on four sustainable development goals, i.e., SDGS 7, 8, 9, and 12 [33,34,35,36,37]. In particular, the RFW of polymer rods can be applied for joining the fluid mechanical components, automotive components, axle shafts, or aerospace components [38,39]. In this study, a conventional turning machine was used to carry out the RFW of polymer rods. In future studies, a high-speed lathe or computer numerical control lathe [40,41] are recommended to carry out RFW [42,43,44,45]. These topics are currently being investigated, and the results will be presented in future work.

4. Conclusions

The advantages of RFW include efficiency of production, low heat input, and environmental friendliness. PC plastic has very good heat resistance and is widely employed for more robust materials. ABS plastic provides high tensile strength and is very resistant to chemical corrosion and physical impacts. To establish domain knowledge of the RFW of ABS and PC rods, this work reports the joining of FDM-printed dissimilar thermoplastic PC and ABS rods. To establish domain knowledge of the RFW of ABS and PC rods, the RFW experiment was performed using a turning machine. The main conclusions from the experimental work in this study are as follows:
  • The average surface hardness, flexural strength, and impact energy in the weld joint are increased with increasing rotation speed of RFW. The maximum joint strength of 132 MPa, Shore A hardness of 80, and impact energy of 156 J are obtained at a rotation speed of 1350 rpm.
  • The quality of RFW is excellent, since the welding strength in the weld joint is better than that of the ABS base materials. The fracture occurs in the ABS rods since the brittleness of the ABS rods is higher than that of the PC rods.
  • The average percentage error for predicting the peak temperature using COMSOL software using a mesh element count of 875,688 for five different rotation speeds is about 16.6%.
  • The heat capacities for the friction-welded parts welded by rotation speeds of 330 rpm, 490 rpm, 650 rpm, 950 rpm, and 1350 rpm are −1.002 mW/mg, −0.8127 mW/mg, −0.626 4mW/mg, −1.759 mW/mg, and −2.287 mW/mg, respectively. The DSC curve for the friction-welded parts welded by a rotation speed of 1350 rpm shows an endothermic peak between 400 to 440 °C and an exothermic peak between 600 to 700 °C, showing that the friction-welded parts have better mechanical properties.

Author Contributions

C.-C.K. wrote the paper, conceived and designed the analysis, and performed the analysis. N.G., H.-W.C. and S.-H.H. collected the data and contributed data or analysis tools. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received financial support by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under contract nos. NSTC 111-2221-E-131-015-MY2, MOST 110-2221-E-131-023 and MOST 109-2637-E-131-004.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data and materials are available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lambiase, F.; Grossi, V.; Paoletti, A. Effect of tilt angle in FSW of polycarbonate sheets in butt configuration. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 107, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Delijaicov, S.; Rodrigues, M.; Farias, A.; Neves, M.; Bortolussi, R.; Miyazaki, M.; Brandão, F. Microhardness and residual stress of dissimilar and thick aluminum plates AA7181-T7651 and AA7475-T7351 using bobbin, top, bottom, and double-sided FSW methods. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 108, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hassan, A.J.; Boukharouba, T.; Miroud, D. Concept of forge application under effect of friction time for AISI 316 using friction welding process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 112, 2223–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yin, P.; Xu, C.; Pan, Q.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, X. Effect of Different Ultrasonic Power on the Properties of RHA Steel Welded Joints. Materials 2022, 15, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, B.; Liu, Q.; Jia, S.; Ren, Y.; Yang, P. Effect of V Content and Heat Input on HAZ Softening of Deep-Sea Pipeline Steel. Materials 2022, 15, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hamedi, H.; Kamyabi-Gol, A. A novel approach to modelling the bond characteristics between CFRP fabrics and steel plate joints under quasi-static tensile loads. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 116, 3247–3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, S.; Liang, W.; Duan, L.; Li, G.; Jinjia, C. Effects of loading rates on mechanical property and failure behavior of single-lap adhesive joints with carbon fiber reinforced plastics and aluminum alloys. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 106, 2569–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khedr, M.; Ibrahim, I.R.; Jaskari, M.; Ali, M.; Abdel-Aleem, H.A.; Mahmoud, T.S.; Hamada, A. Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Performance of Two Joints of Medium-Mn Stainless Steel with Low- and High-Alloyed Steels. Materials 2023, 16, 1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eslami, S.; Tavares, P.J.; Moreira, P.M.G.P. Friction stir welding tooling for polymers: Review and prospects. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 89, 1677–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paoletti, A.; Lambiase, F.; Di Ilio, A. Analysis of forces and temperatures in friction spot stir welding of thermoplastic polymers. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 83, 1395–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lambiase, F.; Paoletti, A.; Di Ilio, A. Friction spot stir welding of polymers: Control of plunging force. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 90, 2827–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rehman, R.U.; Sheikh-Ahmad, J.; Deveci, S. Effect of preheating on joint quality in the friction stir welding of bimodal high density polyethylene. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 117, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Skowrońska, B.; Chmielewski, T.; Zasada, D. Assessment of Selected Structural Properties of High-Speed Friction Welded Joints Made of Unalloyed Structural Steel. Materials 2023, 16, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Faes, K.; Dhooge, A.; Jaspart, O.; D’Alvise, L.; De Baets, P. New friction welding process for pipeline girth welds—Welding time optimisation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2009, 43, 982–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anwar, S.; Rehman, A.U.; Usmani, Y.; Al-Samhan, A.M. Influence of Post Weld Heat Treatment on the Grain Size, and Mechanical Properties of the Alloy-800H Rotary Friction Weld Joints. Materials 2021, 14, 4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ishraq, M.Y.; Maqsood, S.; Naeem, K.; Abid, M.; Omair, M. Analysing significant process parameters for friction stir welding of polymer composite. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 4973–4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hangai, Y.; Omika, K.; Inoue, M.; Kitamura, A.; Mitsugi, H.; Fujii, H.; Kamakoshi, Y. Effect of porosity of aluminum foam on welding between aluminum foam and polycarbonate plate during friction welding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 120, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Skowrońska, B.; Chmielewski, T.; Kulczyk, M.; Skiba, J.; Przybysz, S. Microstructural Investigation of a Friction-Welded 316L Stainless Steel with Ultrafine-Grained Structure Obtained by Hydrostatic Extrusion. Materials 2021, 14, 1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, D.; Qin, G.; Geng, P.; Ma, H. Study of plastic flow on intermetallic compounds formation in friction welding of aluminum alloy to stainless steel. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 64, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eliseev, A.; Osipovich, K.; Fortuna, S. Gradient Structure of the Transfer Layer in Friction Stir Welding Joints. Materials 2022, 15, 6772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, X.; Xu, S.; Wang, F.; Zhao, Y.; Meng, X.; Xie, Y.; Wan, L.; Huang, Y. Effect of Temperature and Material Flow Gradients on Mechanical Performances of Friction Stir Welded AA6082-T6 Joints. Materials 2022, 15, 6579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Park, S.J.; Park, S.J.; Son, Y.; Ahn, I.H. Influence of warm isostatic press (WIP) process parameters on mechanical properties of additively manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) parts. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 122, 3311–3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ho, H.T.; Nguyen, N.H.; Rollet, M.; Phan, T.N.T.; Gigmes, D. Phosphonate-Functionalized Polycarbonates Synthesis through Ring-Opening Polymerization and Alternative Approaches. Polymers 2023, 15, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, N.; Gong, Y.; He, P.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, R.; Shao, H.; Chen, G.; Lin, X.; Bie, H. Influence of Circular through Hole in Pt–Rh Bushing on Temperature Propagation at High Temperature. Materials 2022, 15, 7832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deng, X.; Li, J.; Xie, X. Effect of Preheating Temperature on Thermal–Mechanical Properties of Dry Vibrating MgO-Based Material Lining in the Tundish. Materials 2022, 15, 7699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, J.; Chen, Q.; Hu, S.; Shi, Y.; He, Z.; Huang, Y.; Hui, C.; Chen, Y.; Wu, H.; Lu, G. Effect of Electro-Thermo-Mechanical Coupling Stress on Top-Cooled E-Mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. Materials 2023, 16, 1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Issabayeva, Z.; Shishkovsky, I. Prediction of The Mechanical Behavior of Polylactic Acid Parts with Shape Memory Effect Fabricated by FDM. Polymers 2023, 15, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xie, M.; Shang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, M.; Xiong, J. Rotary Friction Welding of Molybdenum without Upset Forging. Materials 2020, 13, 1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, J.K.; Kang, S.-S.; Kim, H.G.; Kwac, L.K. Mechanical Properties and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding of Carbon Composites with Polycarbonate and Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Resins. Polymers 2023, 15, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wu, B.; Cui, C.; Guo, Y.; Yan, C. A critical review of fused deposition modeling 3D printing technology in manufacturing polylactic acid parts. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 102, 2877–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. El-Geassy, A.A.; Abdel Halim, K.S.; Alghamdi, A.S. A Novel Hydro-Thermal Synthesis of Nano-Structured Molybdenum-Iron Intermetallic Alloys at Relatively Low Temperatures. Materials 2023, 16, 2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Assawakawintip, T.; Santiwong, P.; Khantachawana, A.; Sipiyaruk, K.; Chintavalakorn, R. The Effects of Temperature and Time of Heat Treatment on Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Custom-Made NiTi Orthodontic Closed Coil Springs. Materials 2022, 15, 3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Skowrońska, B.; Bober, M.; Kołodziejczak, P.; Baranowski, M.; Kozłowski, M.; Chmielewski, T. Solid-State Rotary Friction-Welded Tungsten and Mild Steel Joints. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, K.; Zhou, T.; Liu, B.-h. Internet-based intelligent and sustainable manufacturing: Developments and challenges. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 108, 1767–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rahman, M.A.; Ali, A.; Rahamathulla, M.; Salam, S.; Hani, U.; Wahab, S.; Warsi, M.H.; Yusuf, M.; Ali, A.; Mittal, V.; et al. Fabrication of Sustained Release Curcumin-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (Cur-SLNs) as a Potential Drug Delivery System for the Treatment of Lung Cancer: Optimization of Formulation and In Vitro Biological Evaluation. Polymers 2023, 15, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Varghese, S.A.; Pulikkalparambil, H.; Promhuad, K.; Srisa, A.; Laorenza, Y.; Jarupan, L.; Nampitch, T.; Chonhenchob, V.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Renovation of Agro-Waste for Sustainable Food Packaging: A Review. Polymers 2023, 15, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Morales, M.A.; Maranon, A.; Hernandez, C.; Michaud, V.; Porras, A. Colombian Sustainability Perspective on Fused Deposition Modeling Technology: Opportunity to Develop Recycled and Biobased 3D Printing Filaments. Polymers 2023, 15, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, L.; Jain, P.K.; Sharma, A.K. A fuzzy goal programme–based sustainable Greenfield supply network design for tyre retreading industry. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 108, 2855–2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Belkahla, Y.; Mazouzi, A.; Lebouachera, S.E.I.; Hassan, A.J.; Fides, M.; Hvizdoš, P.; Cheniti, B.; Miroud, D. Rotary friction welded C45 to 16NiCr6 steel rods: Statistical optimization coupled to mechanical and microstructure approaches. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 116, 2285–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Barrionuevo, G.O.; Mullo, J.L.; Ramos-Grez, J.A. Predicting the ultimate tensile strength of AISI 1045 steel and 2017-T4 aluminum alloy joints in a laser-assisted rotary friction welding process using machine learning: A comparison with response surface methodology. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 116, 1247–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Esangbedo, M.O.; Abifarin, J.K. Cost and Quality Optimization Taguchi Design with Grey Relational Analysis of Halloysite Nanotube Hybrid Composite: CNC Machine Manufacturing. Materials 2022, 15, 8154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bouarroudj, E.; Abdi, S.; Miroud, D. Improved performance of a heterogeneous weld joint of copper-steel AISI 1045 obtained by rotary friction using a metal powder insert. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 124, 1905–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Szwajka, K.; Zielińska-Szwajka, J.; Trzepieciński, T. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Solid-State Rotary Friction Welded Inconel 713C and 32CrMo4 Steel Joints Used in a Turbocharger Rotor. Materials 2023, 16, 2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Insua, P.; Nakkiew, W.; Wisittipanich, W. Post Weld Heat Treatment Optimization of Dissimilar Friction Stir Welded AA2024-T3 and AA7075-T651 Using Machine Learning and Metaheuristics. Materials 2023, 16, 2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ahmed, M.M.Z.; Essa, A.R.S.; Ataya, S.; El-Sayed Seleman, M.M.; El-Aty, A.A.; Alzahrani, B.; Touileb, K.; Bakkar, A.; Ponnore, J.J.; Mohamed, A.Y.A. Friction Stir Welding of AA5754-H24: Impact of Tool Pin Eccentricity and Welding Speed on Grain Structure, Crystallographic Texture, and Mechanical Properties. Materials 2023, 16, 2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of experimental details.
Figure 1. Flowchart of experimental details.
Materials 16 03295 g001
Figure 2. Two dissimilar workpieces for RFW in this study.
Figure 2. Two dissimilar workpieces for RFW in this study.
Materials 16 03295 g002
Figure 3. Situation of RFW.
Figure 3. Situation of RFW.
Materials 16 03295 g003
Figure 4. Experimental set-up for impact test.
Figure 4. Experimental set-up for impact test.
Materials 16 03295 g004
Figure 5. Experimental set-up for bending test.
Figure 5. Experimental set-up for bending test.
Materials 16 03295 g005
Figure 6. Friction-welded PC and ABS rods using RFW.
Figure 6. Friction-welded PC and ABS rods using RFW.
Materials 16 03295 g006
Figure 7. Mechanical properties of (a) surface hardness, (b) impact energy, and (c) flexural strength in the weld joint for RFW of dissimilar polymer rods under five rotation speeds.
Figure 7. Mechanical properties of (a) surface hardness, (b) impact energy, and (c) flexural strength in the weld joint for RFW of dissimilar polymer rods under five rotation speeds.
Materials 16 03295 g007
Figure 8. Number of meshes as a function of peak temperature in the weld joint.
Figure 8. Number of meshes as a function of peak temperature in the weld joint.
Materials 16 03295 g008
Figure 9. Friction-welded parts (a) before and (b) after bending tests.
Figure 9. Friction-welded parts (a) before and (b) after bending tests.
Materials 16 03295 g009
Figure 10. Fractured locations in the ABS rods after bending tests.
Figure 10. Fractured locations in the ABS rods after bending tests.
Materials 16 03295 g010
Figure 11. Fracture surfaces of ABS after three-point bending tests for six different rotation speeds.
Figure 11. Fracture surfaces of ABS after three-point bending tests for six different rotation speeds.
Materials 16 03295 g011
Figure 12. Fracture surfaces of ABS after impact tests for six different rotation speeds.
Figure 12. Fracture surfaces of ABS after impact tests for six different rotation speeds.
Materials 16 03295 g012
Figure 13. Fracture surfaces of PC after impact tests for six different rotation speeds.
Figure 13. Fracture surfaces of PC after impact tests for six different rotation speeds.
Materials 16 03295 g013
Figure 14. Comparison of the experimental and numerical simulation results of the peak temperature for RFW of PC and ABS rods at five different rotation speeds.
Figure 14. Comparison of the experimental and numerical simulation results of the peak temperature for RFW of PC and ABS rods at five different rotation speeds.
Materials 16 03295 g014
Figure 15. DSC curve comparisons for friction-welded part under five rotation speeds.
Figure 15. DSC curve comparisons for friction-welded part under five rotation speeds.
Materials 16 03295 g015
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuo, C.-C.; Gurumurthy, N.; Chen, H.-W.; Hunag, S.-H. Mechanical Performance and Microstructural Evolution of Rotary Friction Welding of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene and Polycarbonate Rods. Materials 2023, 16, 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093295

AMA Style

Kuo C-C, Gurumurthy N, Chen H-W, Hunag S-H. Mechanical Performance and Microstructural Evolution of Rotary Friction Welding of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene and Polycarbonate Rods. Materials. 2023; 16(9):3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuo, Chil-Chyuan, Naruboyana Gurumurthy, Hong-Wei Chen, and Song-Hua Hunag. 2023. "Mechanical Performance and Microstructural Evolution of Rotary Friction Welding of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene and Polycarbonate Rods" Materials 16, no. 9: 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093295

APA Style

Kuo, C. -C., Gurumurthy, N., Chen, H. -W., & Hunag, S. -H. (2023). Mechanical Performance and Microstructural Evolution of Rotary Friction Welding of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene and Polycarbonate Rods. Materials, 16(9), 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop