Next Article in Journal
From Electronic Waste to 3D-Printed Product, How Multiple Recycling Affects High-Impact Polystyrene (HIPS) Filament Performances
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Potassium Doping on the Structural and Catalytic Properties of Co/MnOx Catalyst in the Steam Reforming of Ethanol
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Withdrawal Rate on Solidification Microstructures of DD9 Single Crystal Turbine Blade
Previous Article in Special Issue
Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Catalysts Dedicated for Continuous Flow Synthesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/ma16093411
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Effect of P Doping and Mo-Ni-Based Heterostructure Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting

by
Feihong Jia
,
Xiangyu Zou
*,
Xueling Wei
,
Weiwei Bao
*,
Taotao Ai
,
Wenhu Li
and
Yuchen Guo
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(9), 3411; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093411
Submission received: 18 March 2023 / Revised: 22 April 2023 / Accepted: 24 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Catalysts: Preparation, Catalytic Performance and Catalytic Reaction)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Heterostructure construction and heteroatom doping are powerful strategies for enhancing the electrolytic efficiency of electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Herein, we present a P-doped MoS2/Ni3S2 electrocatalyst on nickel foam (NF) prepared using a one-step hydrothermal method. The optimized P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF exhibits a cluster nanoflower-like morphology, which promotes the synergistic electrocatalytic effect of the heterostructures with abundant active centers, resulting in high catalytic activity for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in alkaline electrolyte. The electrode exhibits low overpotentials and Tafel slopes for the HER and OER. In addition, the catalyst electrode used in a two-electrode system for overall water splitting requires an ultralow voltage of 1.42 V at 10 mA·cm−2 and shows no obvious increase in current within 35 h, indicating excellent stability. Therefore, the combination of P doping and the heterostructure suggests a novel path to formulate high-performance electrocatalysts for overall water splitting.

1. Introduction

The excessive use of traditional fossil fuels has caused a series of problems, such as global warming and environmental pollution, and the dependence on nonrenewable energy sources has led to resource depletion [1,2]. Therefore, the exploitation of fresh and clean energy sources is an efficacious strategy to accomplish low-carbon emissions and mitigate environmental problems [3]. Hydrogen is an ideal clean fuel for solving energy and environmental issues [4,5]. Currently, most sustainable hydrogen processes are not clean enough; nevertheless, the electrochemical water-splitting method can be used more prevalently as a new approach to produce high-purity H2. However, the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) involve complex multi-electron transfer mechanisms, resulting in a thermodynamic potential of 1.23 V. The high potential is considered a major challenge for water splitting [6]. Noble metal Pt-based [7] and Ru/Ir-based oxides have been considered ideal HER and OER electrocatalysts because of their good catalytic intrinsic activity [8]. However, their high price, scarcity, and inferior stability limit their commercial applications [9,10]. Thus, the production of inexpensive water-splitting electrocatalysts with high catalytic activity, conductivity, and durability is highly desirable.
Currently, transition metal sulfides [11,12], (oxy)-hydroxides [13,14], nitrides [15,16], phosphides [15,17], and selenides [18], which enhance electrochemical performance and exhibit low overpotentials for water splitting, are preferable alternatives to noble metals. Among these electrocatalysts, nickel-sulfur compounds (NiS, NiS2, and Ni3S2) [19] have been used as OER catalysts because of their high conductivity, large specific surface areas, and Ni–Ni bond network structures of nickel sulfide (Ni3S2) [20]. However, poor HER activity and stability reduce their overall water-splitting efficiency [21,22]. Mo–S bonds are conducive to hydrogen chemisorption, and Mo-based sulfides are often used as typical HER catalysts [23,24]. The MoS2/Ni3S2 heterostructure can be engineered to reduce the overpotential and enhance the reaction kinetics [25,26]. For example, MoS2/Ni3S2-layered nanorods prepared by Yang et al. [25] formed a one-dimensional heterostructure of Mo-S-Ni, which promoted the overall water-splitting rate in electrocatalysis. However, MoS2/Ni3S2 still requires further modification to obtain electrocatalysts with high HER and OER activities.
Based on the construction of heterostructures, heteroatoms [27,28,29,30,31] are usually introduced to increase the number of active sites, optimize the electronic structure, and improve the reaction kinetics for the HER and OER. In recent years, V-doped Ni3S2 nanowire arrays (V-Ni3S2) have been prepared using a hydrothermal method [29], and the results showed that a large number of free carriers produced by V doping improved the catalytic performance of Ni3S2. Ma et al. [32] prepared N-doped hierarchical MoSx/Ni3S2-heterostructured nanowires on nickel foam (N-MoSx/Ni3S2-4@NF) for use as hydrogen evolution catalysts. They confirmed that N doping enhanced the conductivity and charge transfer rate of MoSx. P doping can expose more active sites and enhance the intrinsic conductivity and electrocatalytic activity of the catalysts [33,34]. Xue et al. [33] introduced P into the MoS2 matrix using the solid-phase ion exchange method, and the synthesized P-MoS2 catalyst exhibited good electrocatalytic performance for both the HER and OER. The P-MoS2/Mo2C electrocatalyst, which was prepared via high-temperature phosphating in a H2 atmosphere, exhibited highly efficient HER activity [34]. P doping also increases the number of active sites and reduces the adsorption free energy. Wang et al. [35] used P-induced electron density modulation to activate the basal plane of WS2 (P-WS2), and the HER performance of the P-WS2 nanowire arrays is superior to that of undoped WS2. Although the activity of these electrocatalysts has been vastly improved, P-doped electrocatalysts still require a lower overpotential for overall water splitting. Therefore, an effective approach to obtain highly efficient electrocatalysts is to further improve the synergistic effect of P doping and interface heterostructures, which could reduce the overpotential and increase the number of active sites for both the HER and OER processes.
Herein, a self-supporting P-doped MoS2/Ni3S2@NF heterostructure electrocatalyst was synthesized using a one-step hydrothermal method. Through the optimization and regulation of P doping, the synergistic effect of P doping and the interface heterostructure of the electrocatalyst resulted in remarkable electrocatalytic activity toward the overall water splitting. This study provides a new strategy for Mo-Ni-based electrocatalysts for efficient water electrolysis.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of P[xmM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF and MoS2/Ni3S2@NF

(NH4)2MoS4 (41 mg) and (NH4)2HPO4 (0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 mM) were used as Mo, S, and P sources, respectively, which were fully dissolved in 35 mL DMF solvent by magnetic stirring and ultrasound to form a homogeneous solution. The solution and the pretreated carrier NF (1 × 4 cm2) were then transferred to a 50 mL polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon)-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 200 °C for 12 h. Finally, the P[xmM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst electrodes with different initial P concentrations were obtained by repeatedly washing with deionized water and ethanol, and then drying at 60 °C for 10 h. A similar preparation method was used for MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, except that (NH4)2HPO4 was no longer added.

2.2. Preparation of MoS2@NF

When synthesizing MoS2 powder, the mixed solution of (NH4)2MoS4 (41 mg) and DMF (35 mL) was directly transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave. After heating at 200 °C for 12 h, the black powder at the bottom of the autoclave was collected, washed several times, centrifuged, and dried. The MoS2 powder (7.13 mg) with the same loading as the target electrode was fully dissolved with ethanol, deionized water (VH2O/Vethanol = 5/4), and Nafion binder (10 μL) to form a homogeneous solution, which was uniformly coated on NF (1 × 1 cm2) to prepare the MoS2@NF electrode.

2.3. Preparation of Ni3S2@NF

The preparation process is similar to that of P-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF. The NF was immersed in the homogeneous solution formed by CH3CSNH2 (91 mg) and DMF (35 mL), and then heated in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave at 200 °C for 12 h. Finally, the Ni3S2@NF electrode was prepared after cleaning and drying.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phase and Structural Analyses of P-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF

A simple one-step hydrothermal process was used to prepare the P-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst for the overall water splitting by controlling the initial concentration of the P doping. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the synthesis process. The three-dimensional porous NF structure (Figure S1g) displayed a role as a catalyst carrier and provided the Ni source, owing to its good electrical conductivity. The P-doped MoS2/Ni3S2@NF nanoflower heterostructure was formed via a hydrothermal reaction with MoS42− and PO43− in (NH4)2MoS4 as well as (NH4)2HPO4, respectively.
The surface morphology and structure of the catalysts were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM image of the MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst exhibits an irregular particle stacking structure (Figure 2a,b and Figure S1f). When the heteroatom P was introduced, the morphology and structure changed, and the low- and high-resolution SEM images of the P[xmM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF (x = 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 mM) doped with different P concentrations are shown in Figure 2c,d and Figure S1a–e. When the initial P concentration was 0.3 mM, the granularity significantly decreased and lamellar growth was observed (Figure S1a). A small amount of nanoflowers (approximately 50 nm) began to form at a P concentration of 0.6 mM (Figure S1b). Finally, when the P concentration was increased to 0.9 mM, the nanoflowers were uniformly clustered to form a nanosphere heterostructure with a size of approximately 200 nm (Figure 2c,d and Figure S1c) and the spherical surface was distinctively covered with lamellae. As the P concentration increased, the nanoflowers gradually disappeared (Figure S1d) and finally became undulating cells (Figure S1e) owing to the excessive attachment. The results demonstrate that the content of P doping can affect the specific surface area of the catalytic materials [36], which can effectively modify the morphology and structure of Mo-Ni-based materials, while the high content of P doping changes the structure of the materials to a great extent [33]. In addition, the low-resolution SEM image in Figure S1g shows that the surface of the NF was initially smooth. However, the structure of the NF scaffold became rough after the P[xmM]-MoS2/Ni3S2 synthesis (Figure S1a–f) due to an increase in the number of active attachment sites on the catalyst. The internal structural characteristics of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF were further analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Figure 2e,f and Figure S2a,b show typical nanoflower structures and the presence of irregular flakes around the sphere, which may be due to the low crystallinity of the crystal [34]. The crystal structures of the nanoflowers were further explored using high-resolution TEM (HRTEM). The lattice fringes of the inner and outer lamellar structures of the spheres are shown in Figure 2g,h and Figure S2c,d. The edge lattice fringes with the d-spacings of 0.25, 0.63, and 0.27 nm were calculated based on the figures, and the results correlate well with the corresponding d values of the (102), (002), and (100) crystal planes of the MoS2 phase (JCPDS No. 75-1539), respectively. The intermediate lattice fringes with the d-spacings of 0.29 nm are also consistent with the d value of the (110) crystal plane of the Ni3S2 phase (JCPDS No. 44-1418) [37]. Figure 2g shows the interface between the outer MoS2 and inner Ni3S2 crystals, which confirms that the nanoflower heterostructure consists of MoS2 nanosheets wrapped around Ni3S2. The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) diffraction patterns (Figure S2e,f) of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF corresponding to the MoS2 and Ni3S2 single crystals were analyzed. In addition, the scanning TEM (STEM) image in Figure 2i and the corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy elemental mapping confirmed the presence of Ni, Mo, S, and P in the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst (Figure S3), which agrees with the TEM results.
The crystal-phase structure of the prepared P[xmM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst was characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), and the results are shown in Figure 3a and Figure S4a. The XRD patterns of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, and Ni3S2@NF catalyst electrodes are shown in Figure 3a. The characteristic peaks of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF at 2θ = 21.8°, 30.3°, 37.8°, 49.7°, and 55.2° are attributed to the (101), (110), (003), (113), and (122) crystal planes of the Ni3S2 phase (JCPDS No. 44-1418), respectively. Except for the remaining impurity peaks formed by molybdate oxidation, the phase diffraction peaks correlate well. The XRD spectrum of the carrier NF exhibits highly crystalline diffraction peaks at 44.6°, 52.0°, and 77.0° corresponding to the (111), (200), and (220) crystal planes of the Ni phase (JCPDS No. 04-0850), respectively. Figure S4b displays the XRD pattern of the MoS2 powder. Owing to the low crystalline state [30,38], the MoS2 diffraction peak is relatively broad, which is consistent with the HRTEM results. No obvious peak shift was observed between the Ni3S2 and Ni after P doping, indicating that the introduction of P did not change the crystal structure of the MoS2/Ni3S2.
The chemical composition and valence of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst were further analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The full spectrum displays the presence of elements such as Ni, Mo, S, and P (Figure 3b), which is consistent with the EDX results. The high-resolution XPS spectrum of Ni 2p is shown in Figure 3c. The P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF exhibits strong Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 peaks at binding energies of 856.31 and 874.18 eV, respectively. The energy difference of 17.87 eV between the two peaks indicates the coexistence of the Ni2+ and Ni3+ oxidation states [39], in which “Sat” is the oscillating satellite peak formed by the Ni–O bond [40]. Compared with the single-component Ni3S2@NF, the Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 peaks of the MoS2/Ni3S2@NF and P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF show a positive shift. Compared with MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, the prominent Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 peaks continue to shift positively by 0.23 and 0.28 eV after P doping. It was confirmed that the MoS2/Ni3S2 heterostructure achieved interfacial charge transfer and distribution through the Mo–S–Ni bonds [41]. The high-resolution XPS spectrum of Mo 3d (Figure 3d) exhibits two main peaks of Mo4+ (Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2) and Mo6+ [42,43]. The signals at 229.08, 232.73, and 235.97 eV correspond to the characteristic peaks of Mo 3d5/2, Mo 3d3/2, and Mo6+ of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, respectively. Compared with the MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, the Mo 3d3/2 and Mo6+ peaks of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF show positive shifts of 0.41 and 0.52 eV, and the Mo 3d5/2 peaks show negative shifts of 0.18 eV. Furthermore, the intensity of the peak of Mo 3d5/2 is significantly enhanced, whereas that of Mo6+ is weakened, which may be attributed to the reduction in the Mo valence due to the formation of P–Mo bonds by P doping [44]. In addition, a small S 2s peak was observed at 226.42 eV owing to oxidation, indicating the formation of S–O bonds. Figure 3e displays the high-resolution S 2p spectrum. The binding energies of the characteristic S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 peaks of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF were 162.23 and 162.97 eV, respectively, indicating the formation of the S2− corresponding metal sulfides at the Ni–S and Mo–S bond sites [45]. Compared to the single-component Ni3S2@NF and MoS2, the corresponding peaks of the target electrode exhibit a certain energy shift. In particular, the characteristic S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 peaks of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF negatively shifted by 0.56 and 1.37 eV, respectively, compared to the MoS2/Ni3S2@NF. In addition, the intensity of the S 2p1/2 peak is significantly enhanced, which corresponds to the results of the Mo 3d spectrum, indicating an increase in the Mo–S bond energy. In addition, a high-intensity peak of the residual SO42− species (168.88 eV) was formed owing to S oxidation. Compared with MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, the positive shift of the Ni 2p, Mo 3d3/2, and Mo6+ peaks and the negative shift of the Mo 3d5/2 and S 2p peaks indicate that there is charge transfer between the MoS2 and Ni3S2 interface, which is beneficial to improve the electrocatalytic reaction process [42]. Figure 3f exhibits the high-resolution P 2p spectrum. The P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF spectrum exhibits strong peak signals at 133.33 and 134.27 eV, which correspond to P 2p3/2 and P 2p1/2, respectively. This is possibly ascribed to the P–Mo and P–Ni bonds, which further verify the successful introduction of P into MoS2/Ni3S2@NF [33,46,47]. The XPS results show that there is a strong electronic interaction between the MoS2 and Ni3S2 species, suggesting that the establishment of the MoS2/Ni3S2 heterointerface and P doping are beneficial for further enhancing the electronic interaction and synergistically optimizing the electronic structure. In addition, P can regulate the charge redistribution at the interface of the MoS2/Ni3S2 heterostructure [34], thereby improving the charge transfer and reaction kinetics of Mo-S-Ni in electrocatalysis.

3.2. Electrocatalytic HER Activity

The HER performance of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF electrocatalysts was evaluated using a three-electrode system in 1 M KOH alkaline electrolyte, and the hydrogen evolution activities of MoS2@NF, Ni3S2@NF, MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, Pt/C@NF, and NF were tested for comparison. The obtained catalysts, a carbon rod, and Hg/HgO were used as the working, counter, and reference electrodes, respectively. Figure 4a displays the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of the various catalyst electrodes after iR correction. Other than the noble metal Pt/C@NF catalyst, which exhibited the best activity, the optimized P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF electrode also exhibited remarkable HER activity. When the same cathode current was reached, the applied driving voltage was the lowest and the current density increased sharply. Figure 4b exhibits the overpotential (η10) required for each electrode when the current density reached 10 mA·cm−2. The P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF exhibited a low overpotential of 86 mV, which is smaller than that of MoS2@NF (139 mV), Ni3S2@NF (206 mV), MoS2/Ni3S2@NF (127 mV), and NF (225 mV). The substantial improvement in the HER activity indicates that the heteroatom P doping promotes synergy between MoS2 and Ni3S2. The Tafel slopes of the electrodes were calculated and fitted (Figure 4c). Compared with MoS2@NF (75.8 mV·dec−1), Ni3S2@NF (149.9 mV·dec−1), MoS2/Ni3S2@NF (47.7 mV·dec−1), and NF (214.8 mV·dec−1), the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF has the lowest Tafel slope of 28.5 mV·dec−1, which is close to the Tafel slope of the Pt/C@NF (27.9 mV·dec−1), and the lowest onset potential (ηonset) of 61 mV. These results indicate that the kinetic activity of the HER is enhanced with an increase in the hydrogen production rate, which corresponds to the high-activity polarization curve shown in Figure 4a. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) curves in Figure 4d display the charge transfer resistance (Rct) of the different catalysts. It can be seen from the semicircle diameter of the fitted Nyquist curve that the Rct of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF (0.73 Ω) is the smallest among the catalysts, except for Pt/C@NF. Thus, P doping is advantageous for accelerating electron transport on the NF surface for hydrogen evolution and improving the charge transfer kinetics in the HER, which correlates well with the electronic structure regulation measured by XPS [29,48]. The HER catalyst can be maintained with good stability, and Figure 4e displays the LSV curves of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF before and after 3000 cycles. When the driving current density reached 50 mA·cm−2, the η50 value of the polarization curve changed from 120 to 123 mV, the potential difference was small, and the curve was highly coincident. The electrode was also tested for long-term hydrogen evolution electrolysis at η = 115 mV for 50 h using chronoamperometry (Figure 4e). The stability curve of the electrolysis process exhibited a smooth trend, and the percentage change in the current density slightly decreased to 99.91%, indicating that the cathodic current loss was negligible. Based on the LSV results, the EIS curves of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF electrode before and after 3000 cycles were obtained. As shown in Figure 4f, the diameter of the fitted semicircle remained almost unchanged, with certain repeatability and coincidence. The smooth step obtained from the multi-current (Figure S7a) and multi-potential steps (Figure S7b) tests indicates that the catalyst has good stability and durability for the electrocatalytic HER and can meet the practical application requirements of the industry. The effects of different P-doping concentrations of the P[xmM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalysts on the HER performance were also explored. Figure S5 displays a comparison of the HER performance of the P[0.3mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, P[0.6mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, P[1.2mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, and P[1.5mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF. After optimization, the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst, with a P-doped amount of 0.9 mM, exhibited the best electrocatalytic HER activity. Based on these results, P doping can improve the activity of MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, and too little or too much P doping can slightly decrease the activity.

3.3. Electrocatalytic OER Activity

The OER performance of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF electrocatalyst was evaluated under identical conditions. Firstly, the P-doping concentration was optimized, and the electrocatalytic OER performances of the P[0.3mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, P[0.6mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, P[1.2mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, and P[1.5mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF were evaluated (Figure S6). It was observed that the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF exhibited good OER activity, which is consistent with the HER activity. The OER performances of the MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, MoS2@NF, Ni3S2@NF, IrO2@NF, and NF were further investigated, and the results are shown in Figure 5. Figure 5a displays the LSV curves of the catalyst electrodes. The P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF had the lowest ηonset, and its anode current increased sharply with increasing driving voltage, even exceeding the performance of the noble metal IrO2@NF catalyst. Figure 5b displays the overpotential of each catalyst at a current density of 100 mA·cm−2 (η100). Compared with MoS2@NF (416 mV), Ni3S2@NF (439 mV), MoS2/Ni3S2@NF (347 mV), IrO2@NF (400 mV), and NF (597 mV), the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF had the lowest overpotential of η100 = 312 mV. The Tafel slope of each catalyst is shown in Figure 5c. Compared with MoS2@NF (188.8 mV·dec−1), Ni3S2@NF (206.2 mV·dec−1), MoS2/Ni3S2@NF (129.2 mV·dec−1), and NF (261.4 mV·dec−1), the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF had the smallest Tafel slope of 47.2 mV·dec−1. The EIS fitting curve in Figure 5d displays the Rct values of the different electrodes. The semicircle diameter of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF was the smallest, affording a minimum impedance resistance of Rct = 0.68 Ω. These results confirmed that P doping and MoS2/Ni3S2 heterostructures synergistically improve the charge transfer rate in the electrolyte [49]. The OER stability of the optimized P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst was also evaluated. The LSV (Figure 5e) and EIS (Figure 5f) curves before and after 3000 cycles were coincident, the η100 of the polarization curve increased from 312 to 318 mV at a current density of 100 mA·cm−2, and the potential difference was small. The oxygen evolution electrolysis test performed at η = 290 mV for 50 h using chronoamperometry is illustrated in Figure 5e. The stability curve of the electrolysis process exhibits a smooth and gradual downward trend; the percentage change in the current density decreases to 99.76%, whereas the anode current loss is negligible. The multi-current (Figure S7c) and multi-potential steps (Figure S7d) over a short period of time were also examined. It can be seen that the steps formed by the step current and potential are smooth and stable, indicating that the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF has good stability and durability for the electrocatalytic OER. Table S1 summarizes and compares the HER and OER performances of the previously reported electrocatalysts. The performance of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF is better than that of most non-noble metal catalysts reported to date and it also exhibits good electrocatalytic activity for the HER and OER.
To further explore the effect of P doping on the electrocatalytic active sites of the MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, the electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) test was conducted. The scanning speed of 20–100 mV/s and current density of j 0.504 V = j a − j b / 2 were used as the horizontal and vertical coordinates, respectively. The double-layer capacitance (Cdl) values of the P[xmM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, MoS2@NF, Ni3S2@NF, and NF were obtained via calculations and fitting, and the results are shown in Figure S8 and Figure 6. Compared with the morphological and structural analyses by SEM and TEM, a large number of uniform flower-like spheres were formed on the surface of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst, which increased the number of exposed interfacial active sites and enlarged the active area. Therefore, the effective ECSA value obtained at the same scanning speed and potential range was larger, and the image was rounder and more symmetrical. The ECSA and Cdl curves of the P[xmM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF (Figure S8) demonstrate that as the P-doping concentration increases, the Cdl value of the P[xmM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF initially decreases and then increases to the maximum value of 122.5 mF·cm−2 (x = 0.9 mM), after which it decreases to 20.2 mF·cm−2 (x = 1.5 mM). The ECSA curves (Figure 6a–e) and Cdl values (Figure 6f) of the different catalysts show that the optimized P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst has the largest active surface area. Compared with the Cdl values of the MoS2/Ni3S2@NF (68.7 mF·cm−2), MoS2@NF (27.9 mF·cm−2), Ni3S2@NF (15.0 mF·cm−2), and NF (6.5 mF·cm−2), the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF exhibits a maximum Cdl value of 122.5 mF·cm−2. The increase in the Cdl value indicates that the proper doping of heteroatom P can promote the uniform integration of MoS2 and Ni3S2, enriching a large number of active sites between the interfaces of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst, which increases the effective active area for electrocatalytic hydrogen production [50,51] and improves the electrocatalytic activity.
In summary, the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF exhibited good electrocatalytic performance for the following reasons. The electronegativity of a P atom is less than that of a S atom, so P doping can produce a positive charge in a sulfide structure, and the lone pair electrons in a P atom can increase the electron spin density [52] and increase the active sites in the reaction process, thereby promoting the progress of the HER and OER. In addition, a TEM analysis shows that P doping can expose more edge structure defects, and the porous nanoflower structure forms a large specific surface area, which provides a sufficient reaction site for the HER and OER. It is worth noting that an SEM analysis shows that the introduction of a high concentration of P destroys the nanoflower structure of sulfides, thus reducing the electrical conductivity of Mo-Ni-based materials. Therefore, proper P content doping (2.06 wt%) can significantly improve the electrocatalytic performance of MoS2/Ni3S2. In addition, we also explored the electrocatalytic HER performance of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF in neutral (0.5 M PBS, pH = 7) and acidic (0.5 M H2SO4, pH = 0) electrolytes (Figure S9). Unfortunately, the performance of its electrocatalytic OER is poor, so further research is still needed.

3.4. Overall Water-Splitting Performance

Based on the evaluation results of the electrocatalytic HER and OER (Figure S10 and Table S2), the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst exhibits excellent activity for hydrogen and oxygen evolution. Thus, its performance as a bifunctional catalyst for overall water splitting in a two-electrode system of 1 M KOH alkaline electrolyte (Figure 7a) was examined. In the experiment, the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF||P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF coupling electrode was used as the anode and cathode of the electrolysis cell. During the water-splitting process with an applied driving voltage, large amounts of H2 and O2 bubbles were continuously generated at the cathode and anode of the device diagram, respectively (Figure 7c). As shown in Figure 7b, the overall water-splitting polarization curve of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF reached 10 mA·cm−2 at a driving voltage of 1.42 V, and the combined overpotential of the electrocatalytic water-splitting process was only 190 mV, which is significantly lower than the voltage required for the MoS2/Ni3S2@NF electrolysis cell (1.51 V). The considerable decrease in the driving voltage indicates that the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst promotes the reaction kinetics of the HER and OER [9]. The performance of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst is superior to that of most non-noble metal bifunctional catalysts previously reported (Figure 7d), including MoS2-Ni3S2 HNRs/NF (1.50 V) [25], Fe-MoS2/Ni3S2/NF-2 (1.61 V) [30], Ni3S2/MnS-O (1.54 V) [50], and as-anodic CoSx/Co (1.64 V) [53]. Figure 7c exhibits the chronoamperometry curve of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF operating for 35 h at 1.5 V. The results indicate that the electrolysis cell provides a stable current. During the long-term water-splitting process, the percentage change in the cathode and anode current densities was 98.9%, indicating that the water-splitting performance decreased slightly by 1.1%. The morphology of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF after overall water splitting was also examined using SEM (Figure S11a,b), showing that most of the nanoflower structures were retained. The EDX elemental mapping spectrum (Figure S11c–g) confirmed the uniform distribution of Ni, Mo, S, and P on the catalyst surface. In conclusion, the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF exhibits excellent overall water-splitting performance and stability in alkaline solution.
In order to explore the mechanism of P doping in the electrocatalytic reaction process, the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF was characterized by XPS after a long-term OER test (Figure 8). The XPS full spectrum after the test correlates well with that before the test (Figure S12). Compared to the high-resolution spectrum of the initial P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF sample, the corresponding characteristic peaks of the Ni 2p (Figure 8a) and Mo 3d (Figure 8b) spectra shifted to the low-energy direction and became electron-rich centers. In contrast, the corresponding characteristic peaks of the S 2p (Figure 8c) and P 2p (Figure 8d) spectra shifted to the high-energy direction and became electron-poor centers. In Figure 8c, the intensity of the S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 peaks was significantly weakened, which may be attributed to the leaching of S during the electrocatalytic process. Compared with the spectrum before the test, the characteristic P 2p3/2 (133.75 eV) and P 2p1/2 (134.61 eV) peaks of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF after testing were positively shifted by 0.42 and 0.34 eV, respectively (Figure 8d). The above results show that the S atom with weaker electronegativity has a charge exchange with Ni and Mo with stronger electronegativity, which optimizes the internal electronic structure of MoS2 and Ni3S2. At the same time, the P atom with the weakest electronegativity also has electron transfer, and the electrons transfer from the P atom to Ni, Mo, and S, so that P has more positive charge, resulting in an increase in the OER active center material [54]. It is confirmed that P doping is beneficial to promote the synergistic effect of MoS2 and Ni3S2 in the OER process. In summary, the optimized electronic configuration due to P doping contributed to the enhanced electrocatalytic performance of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF heterostructure.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a P-doped MoS2/Ni3S2@NF heterostructure electrocatalyst was synthesized using a facile one-step hydrothermal method. The results of various tests and characterizations showed that the nanoflowers morphology formed by the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF exposed more active sites, resulting in a large specific surface area and abundant active centers. In addition, the introduction of P promoted the synergistic effect of the MoS2/Ni3S2 heterostructure interface, optimized the electronic structure, and effectively improved the transport speed of the carriers in alkaline media. The combination of these engineering system properties synergistically enhanced the electrocatalytic performance and reaction kinetics of the P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF catalyst for the HER, OER, and overall water splitting. When used as an electrode in an electrolysis cell, P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF only requires an ultralow driving voltage of 1.42 V for water splitting at 10 mA·cm−2, which is superior to that of most bifunctional electrocatalysts reported to date. This study opens a novel avenue for designing highly active, stable, and economical multi-component P-doped heterostructure electrocatalysts.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma16093411/s1, Figure S1: Low- and high-resolution SEM images: (a) P[0.3mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (b) P[0.6mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (c) P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (d) P[1.2mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (e) P[1.5mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (f) MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, and (g) carrier NF; Figure S2: (a,b) TEM images, (c,d) HRTEM images, and corresponding (e,f) FFT patterns of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF; Figure S3: The EDX spectrum of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF and the corresponding atomic (Ni, Mo, S, P) contents; Figure S4: The XRD patterns of (a) catalyst electrodes doped with different P concentrations and (b) MoS2 powders; Figure S5: Comparison of HER performance of catalyst electrodes doped with different P concentrations: (a) LSV curve, (b) overpotential histogram at a current density of 10 mA·cm−2, (c) Tafel slope, and (d) Nyquist curve; Figure S6: Comparison of OER performance of catalyst electrodes doped with different P concentrations: (a) LSV curve, (b) overpotential histogram at a current density of 100 mA·cm−2, (c) Tafel slope, and (d) Nyquist curve; Figure S7: Multi-current and multi-potential steps for (a,b) HER, (c,d) OER; Figure S8: Comparison of electrocatalysts with different P-doping concentrations, ECSA curves of (a) P[0.3mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (b) P[0.6mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (c) P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (d) P[1.2mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (e) P[1.5mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, and (f) Cdl curves; Figure S9: The electrocatalytic HER performance LSV curves of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF in (a) neutral (0.5 M PBS, pH = 7) and (b) acidic (0.5 M H2SO4, pH = 0) electrolytes; Figure S10: Comparison of overpotentials and Tafel slopes of as-prepared catalysts doped with different P concentrations and single-component (a) HER, (b) OER; Figure S11: After electrochemical testing of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF: (a,b) SEM images, (c–g) EDX mapping spectrum of corresponding elements (Ni, Mo, S, P); Figure S12: XPS full spectrum comparison before and after electrochemical OER testing of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF; Table S1: Comparison of the electrocatalytic HER and OER performance of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF and recently reported catalysts in alkaline electrolyte; Table S2: Comparison of Rct and Cdl of prepared catalysts with different P concentrations and single-component catalysts. Refs [9,15,20,25,26,29,30,31,32,37,42,49,50,51,53,55] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

F.J.: conceptualization, analysis, writing—original draft, conducted the synthesis of the electrodes, and carried out corresponding characterizations; X.Z. and X.W.: funding acquisition, writing—review and editing; W.B., T.A., W.L. and Y.G.: helped to conduct data analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.51504147) and the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Department of Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province (2023-JC-YB-404).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Guo, K.L.; Wang, Y.T.; Yang, S.Z.; Huang, J.F.; Zou, Z.H.; Pan, H.R.; Shinde, P.S.; Pan, S.L.; Huang, J.; Xu, C.L. Bonding interface boosts the intrinsic activity and durability of NiSe@Fe2O3 heterogeneous electrocatalyst for water oxidation. Sci. Bull. 2021, 66, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Seh, Z.W.; Kibsgaard, J.; Dickens, C.F.; Chorkendorff, I.; Nørskov, J.K.; Jaramillo, T.F. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science 2017, 355, eaad4998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bao, W.W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.J.; Ai, T.T.; Yang, C.M.; Feng, L.L. Interface engineering of the NiCo2O4@MoS2/TM heterostructure to realize the efficient alkaline oxygen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 12176–12184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, J.J.; Li, M.Y.; Li, X.; Bao, W.W.; Jin, C.Q.; Feng, X.H.; Liu, G.; Yang, C.M.; Zhang, N.N. Chromium-modified ultrathin CoFe LDH as high-efficiency electrode for hydrogen evolution reaction. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, H.M.; Gao, X.L.; Lv, Z.C.; Abdelilah, T.; Lei, A.W. Recent advances in oxidative R1-H/R2-H cross-coupling with hydrogen evolution via photo-/electrochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 6769–6787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, C.; Shang, H.Y.; Xu, H.; Du, Y.K. Nanoboxes endow non-noble-metal-based electrocatalysts with high efficiency for overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 857–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.W.; Liang, M.L.; Huang, Y.X. Electrochemical activity of layered double hydroxides supported nano Pt clusters toward methanol oxidation reaction in alkaline solutions. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 5463–5473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Song, J.J.; Wei, C.; Huang, Z.F.; Liu, C.T.; Zeng, L.; Wang, X.; Xu, Z.J. A review on fundamentals for designing oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 2196–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, J.; Wang, T.; Pohl, D.; Rellinghaus, B.; Dong, R.H.; Liu, S.H.; Zhuang, X.D.; Feng, X.L. Interface engineering of MoS2/Ni3S2 heterostructures for highly enhanced electrochemical overall-water-splitting activity. Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 6814–6819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bao, W.W.; Yang, C.M.; Ai, T.T.; Zhang, J.J.; Zhou, L.H.; Li, Y.; Wei, X.L.; Zou, X.Y.; Wang, Y. Modulating interfacial charge distribution of NiSe nanoarrays with NiFe-LDH nanosheets for boosting oxygen evolution reaction. Fuel 2023, 332, 126227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, Q.S.; Yao, Z.J.; Wang, H.H.; Yang, J.F.; Zhang, Y.H.; Qian, L.W.; Zhang, S.F. Interface engineering of NixSy@MoS2 heterostructured nanorods as high-efficient electrocatalysts for water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 35077–35087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pataniya, P.M.; Late, D.; Sumesh, C.K. Photosensitive WS2/ZnO nano-heterostructure-based electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, L.; Jiang, Q.Q.; Xiao, Z.H.; Li, X.Y.; Huo, J.; Wang, S.Y.; Dai, L.M. Plasma-engraved Co3O4 nanosheets with oxygen vacancies and high surface area for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 5363–5367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zou, X.Y.; Wei, X.L.; Bao, W.W.; Zhang, J.J.; Jiang, P.; Ai, T.T. Local electronic structure modulation of NiVP@NiFeV-LDH electrode for high-efficiency oxygen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 32385–32393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yan, H.J.; Xie, Y.; Wu, A.P.; Cai, Z.C.; Wang, L.; Tian, C.G.; Zhang, X.M.; Fu, H.G. Anion-modulated HER and OER activities of 3D Ni-V-based interstitial compound heterojunctions for high-efficiency and stable overall water splitting. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1901174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Q.; Luo, F.; Long, X.; Yu, X.X.; Qu, K.G.; Yang, Z.H. N, P doped carbon nanotubes confined WN-Ni Mott-Schottky heterogeneous electrocatalyst for water splitting and rechargeable zinc-air batteries. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 298, 120511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, H.J.; Maijenburg, A.W.; Li, X.P.; Schweizer, S.L.; Wehrspohn, R.B. Bifunctional heterostructured transition metal phosphides for efficient electrochemical water splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2003261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kannichankandy, D.; Pataniya, P.M.; Sumesh, C.K.; Solanki, G.K.; Pathak, V.M. WSe2-PANI nanohybrid structure as efficient electrocatalyst for photo-enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 876, 160179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jing, F.; Lv, Q.Y.; Xiao, J.; Wang, Q.J.; Wang, S. Highly active and dual-function self-supported multiphase NiS–NiS2–Ni3S2/NF electrodes for overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 14207–14214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dong, J.; Zhang, F.Q.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.B.; He, H.L.; Huang, X.F.; Fan, X.J.; Zhang, X.M. (003)-Facet-exposed Ni3S2 nanoporous thin films on nickel foil for efficient water splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 243, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feng, L.L.; Yu, G.T.; Wu, Y.Y.; Li, G.D.; Li, H.; Sun, Y.H.; Asefa, T.; Chen, W.; Zou, X.X. High-index faceted Ni3S2 nanosheet arrays as highly active and ultrastable electrocatalysts for water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 14023–14026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhu, W.X.; Yue, X.Y.; Zhang, W.T.; Yu, S.X.; Zhang, Y.H.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.L. Nickel sulfide microsphere film on Ni foam as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 1486–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jaramillo, T.F.; Jørgensen, K.P.; Bonde, J.; Nielsen, J.H.; Horch, S.; Chorkendorff, I. Identification of active edge sites for electrochemical H2 evolution from MoS2 nanocatalysts. Science 2007, 317, 100–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sorribes, I.; Liu, L.C.; Doménech-Carbó, A.; Corma, A. Nanolayered cobalt–molybdenum sulfides as highly chemo-and regioselective catalysts for the hydrogenation of quinoline derivatives. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 4545–4557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Y.Q.; Zhang, K.; Lin, H.L.; Li, X.; Chan, H.C.; Yang, L.C.; Gao, Q.S. MoS2-Ni3S2 heteronanorods as efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 2357–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, F.; Zhang, D.F.; Xu, R.C.; Fu, W.F.; Lv, X.J. Superhydrophilic heteroporous MoS2/Ni3S2 for highly efficient electrocatalytic overall water splitting. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 3929–3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gu, J.X.; Magagula, S.; Zhao, J.X.; Chen, Z.F. Boosting ORR/OER activity of graphdiyne by simple heteroatom doping. Small Methods 2019, 3, 1800550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zou, X.X.; Zhang, Y. Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 5148–5180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qu, Y.J.; Yang, M.Y.; Chai, J.W.; Tang, Z.; Shao, M.M.; Kwok, C.T.; Yang, M.; Wang, Z.Y.; Chua, D.; Wang, S.J.; et al. Facile synthesis of vanadium-doped Ni3S2 nanowire arrays as active electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 5959–5967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xue, J.Y.; Li, F.L.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Li, C.; Ni, C.Y.; Gu, H.W.; Braunstein, P.; Huang, X.Q.; Lang, J.P. A hierarchically-assembled Fe-MoS2/Ni3S2/nickel foam electrocatalyst for efficient water splitting. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 12186–12192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Du, X.Q.; Ma, G.Y.; Zhang, X.S. Cobalt and nitrogen Co-doped Ni3S2 nanoflowers on nickel foam as high-efficiency electrocatalysts for overall water splitting in alkaline media. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 8955–8962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ma, X.; Chen, W.R.; Li, Q.; Xue, L.J.; Peng, C. Nitrogen-doped hierarchical heterostructured aerophobic MoSx/Ni3S2 nanowires by one-pot synthesis: System engineering and synergistic effect in electrocatalysis of hydrogen evolution reaction. Energy Environ. Mater. 2021, 4, 658–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xue, H.Y.; Meng, A.L.; Chen, C.J.; Xue, H.Y.; Li, Z.J.; Wang, C.S. Phosphorus-doped MoS2 with sulfur vacancy defects for enhanced electrochemical water splitting. Sci. China Mater. 2022, 65, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, Y.R.; Xin, W.; Liu, B.T.; Li, H.X.; Xu, Y.Q.; Zhang, Z.X. Synergistic effect of S vacancies and P dopants in MoS2/Mo2C to promote electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 3461–3469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, F.; Niu, S.W.; Liang, X.Q.; Wang, G.M.; Chen, M.H. Phosphorus incorporation activates the basal plane of tungsten disulfide for efficient hydrogen evolution catalysis. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 2855–2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Choi, C.H.; Park, S.H.; Woo, S.I. Binary and ternary doping of nitrogen, boron, and phosphorus into carbon for enhancing electrochemical oxygen reduction activity. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7084–7091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dong, W.X.; Zhou, H.B.; Mao, B.D.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Liu, Y.S.; Liu, Y.H.; Li, F.H.; Zhang, D.Q.; Zhang, D.X.; Shi, W.D. Efficient MOF-derived V-Ni3S2 nanosheet arrays for electrocatalytic overall water splitting in alkali. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 10773–10782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, X.L.; Liu, Q.; Wang, P.; Liu, Y.Z.; Huang, B.B.; Rozhkova, E.A.; Zhang, Q.Q.; Wang, Z.Y.; Dai, Y.; Lu, J. Efficient photocatalytic H2 production via rational design of synergistic spatially-separated dual cocatalysts modified Mn0.5Cd0.5S photocatalyst under visible light irradiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 337, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, F.F.; Zhu, Y.F.; Tian, W.; Lv, X.B.; Zhang, H.L.; Hu, Z.F.; Zhang, Y.X.; Ji, J.Y.; Jiang, W. Co-doped Ni3S2@CNT arrays anchored on graphite foam with a hierarchical conductive network for high-performance supercapacitors and hydrogen evolution electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 10490–10496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, L.; Chang, C.; Hsu, C.W.; Chang, C.W.; Lu, S.Y. Hollow nanocubes composed of well-dispersed mixed metal-rich phosphides in N-doped carbon as highly efficient and durable electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction at high current densities. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 19656–19663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, Y.; Chai, X.J.; Ren, T.L.; Yu, H.J.; Yin, S.L.; Wang, Z.Q.; Li, X.N.; Wang, L.; Wang, H.J. Synergism of Interface and Electronic Effects: Bifunctional N-Doped Ni3S2/N-Doped MoS2 Hetero-Nanowires for Efficient Electrocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Chem. A Eur. J. 2019, 25, 16074–16080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lin, J.H.; Wang, P.C.; Wang, H.H.; Li, C.; Si, X.Q.; Qi, J.L.; Cao, J.; Zhong, Z.X.; Fei, W.D.; Feng, J.C. Defect-rich heterogeneous MoS2/NiS2 nanosheets electrocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jiao, S.L.; Yao, Z.Y.; Xue, F.; Lu, Y.F.; Liu, M.C.; Deng, H.Q.; Ma, X.F.; Liu, Z.X.; Ma, C.; Huang, H.W.; et al. Defect-rich one-dimensional MoS2 hierarchical architecture for efficient hydrogen evolution: Coupling of multiple advantages into one catalyst. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 258, 117964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, D.Z.; Xie, Y.Y.; Wu, Z.Z. Amorphous phosphorus-doped MoS2 catalyst for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 205401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, N.; Yang, L.C.; Wang, S.N.; Zhong, Z.W.; He, S.; Yang, X.Y.; Gao, Q.S.; Tang, Y. Ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets growing within an in-situ-formed template as efficient electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. J. Power Source 2015, 275, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jiang, Y.Y.; Lu, Y.Z.; Lin, J.Y.; Wang, X.; Shen, Z.X. A hierarchical MoP nanoflake array supported on Ni foam: A bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1700369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cheng, C.; Zong, S.C.; Shi, J.W.; Xue, F.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Gua, X.J.; Zheng, B.T.; Deng, J.K.; Guo, L.J. Facile preparation of nanosized MoP as cocatalyst coupled with g-C3N4 by surface bonding state for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 265, 118620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, B.X.; Qian, H.; Nie, Z.W.; Luo, Z.P.; Wu, Z.X.; Liu, P.; He, H.; Wu, J.H.; Chen, S.G.; Zhang, F.F. Ni3S2 nanorods growing directly on Ni foam for all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor and efficient overall water splitting. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 46, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Muthurasu, A.; Ojha, G.P.; Lee, M.; Kim, H.Y. Zeolitic imidazolate framework derived Co3S4 hybridized MoS2-Ni3S2 heterointerface for electrochemical overall water splitting reactions. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 334, 135537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, Y.; Fu, J.L.; Zhao, H.; Jiang, R.J.; Tian, F.; Zhang, R.J. Tremella-like Ni3S2/MnS with ultrathin nanosheets and abundant oxygen vacancies directly used for high speed overall water splitting. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 257, 117899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhou, G.Y.; Wu, X.M.; Zhao, M.M.; Pang, H.; Xu, L.; Yang, J.; Tang, Y.W. Interfacial engineering-triggered bifunctionality of CoS2/MoS2 nanocubes/nanosheet arrays for high-efficiency overall water splitting. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, M.; Dai, L. Carbon nanomaterials as metal-free catalysts in next generation fuel cells. Nano Energy 2012, 1, 514–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bian, H.D.; Chen, T.Y.; Chen, Z.X.; Liu, J.H.; Li, Z.B.; Du, P.; Zhou, B.B.; Zeng, X.R.; Tang, J.N.; Liu, C. One-step synthesis of mesoporous Cobalt sulfides (CoSx) on the metal substrate as an efficient bifunctional electrode for overall water splitting. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 389, 138786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wu, Z.X.; Guo, J.P.; Wang, J.; Liu, R.; Xiao, W.P.; Xuan, C.J.; Xia, K.D.; Wang, D.L. Hierarchically porous electrocatalyst with vertically aligned defect-rich CoMoS nanosheets for the hydrogen evolution reaction in an alkaline medium. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 5288–5294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lv, X.F.; Liu, G.S.; Liu, S.; Chen, W.T.; Cao, D.H.; Song, T.Z.; Wang, N.N.; Zhu, Y.Q. Three-Dimensional Flower-like Fe, C-Doped-MoS2/Ni3S2 Heterostructures Spheres for Accelerating Electrocatalytic Oxygen and Hydrogen Evolution. Crystals 2021, 11, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 03411 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of preparation process of P-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF electrocatalyst.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of preparation process of P-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF electrocatalyst.
Materials 16 03411 g001
Materials 16 03411 g002 550
Figure 2. Low- and high-resolution SEM images: (a,b) MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (c,d) P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF; insets show the NF skeleton and enlarged nanoflowers. (e,f) TEM image, (g,h) HRTEM image, with (i) STEM image and corresponding EDX element (Ni, Mo, S, P) mappings of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF.
Figure 2. Low- and high-resolution SEM images: (a,b) MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (c,d) P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF; insets show the NF skeleton and enlarged nanoflowers. (e,f) TEM image, (g,h) HRTEM image, with (i) STEM image and corresponding EDX element (Ni, Mo, S, P) mappings of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF.
Materials 16 03411 g002
Materials 16 03411 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, and Ni3S2@NF electrodes. XPS of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF (b) full spectrum, high-resolution spectra of (c) Ni 2p, (d) Mo 3d, (e) S 2p, and (f) P 2p.
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, and Ni3S2@NF electrodes. XPS of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF (b) full spectrum, high-resolution spectra of (c) Ni 2p, (d) Mo 3d, (e) S 2p, and (f) P 2p.
Materials 16 03411 g003
Materials 16 03411 g004 550
Figure 4. HER performance of different electrocatalysts: (a) LSV curve, (b) overpotential histogram at a current density of 10 mA·cm−2, (c) Tafel slope, and (d) Nyquist curve. Electrocatalytic HER stability of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF: (e) LSV curves before and after 3000 cycles and chronoamperometry curves of insets, (f) Nyquist curves before and after 3000 cycles.
Figure 4. HER performance of different electrocatalysts: (a) LSV curve, (b) overpotential histogram at a current density of 10 mA·cm−2, (c) Tafel slope, and (d) Nyquist curve. Electrocatalytic HER stability of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF: (e) LSV curves before and after 3000 cycles and chronoamperometry curves of insets, (f) Nyquist curves before and after 3000 cycles.
Materials 16 03411 g004
Materials 16 03411 g005 550
Figure 5. OER performance of different electrocatalysts: (a) LSV curve, (b) overpotential histogram at a current density of 100 mA·cm−2, (c) Tafel slope, and (d) Nyquist curve. Electrocatalytic OER stability of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF: (e) LSV curves before and after 3000 cycles and chronoamperometry curves of insets, (f) Nyquist curves before and after 3000 cycles.
Figure 5. OER performance of different electrocatalysts: (a) LSV curve, (b) overpotential histogram at a current density of 100 mA·cm−2, (c) Tafel slope, and (d) Nyquist curve. Electrocatalytic OER stability of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF: (e) LSV curves before and after 3000 cycles and chronoamperometry curves of insets, (f) Nyquist curves before and after 3000 cycles.
Materials 16 03411 g005
Materials 16 03411 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparison of different electrocatalysts ECSA curves of (a) MoS2@NF, (b) Ni3S2@NF, (c) MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (d) P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (e) NF, and (f) Cdl curves.
Figure 6. Comparison of different electrocatalysts ECSA curves of (a) MoS2@NF, (b) Ni3S2@NF, (c) MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (d) P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF, (e) NF, and (f) Cdl curves.
Materials 16 03411 g006
Materials 16 03411 g007 550
Figure 7. Overall water-splitting performance of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF. (a) Schematic diagram of electrolyzed water, (b) polarization curve, (c) long-term durability curve measured by chronoamperometry, and (d) comparison with recently reported electrochemical overall water-splitting performance of bifunctional catalysts.
Figure 7. Overall water-splitting performance of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF. (a) Schematic diagram of electrolyzed water, (b) polarization curve, (c) long-term durability curve measured by chronoamperometry, and (d) comparison with recently reported electrochemical overall water-splitting performance of bifunctional catalysts.
Materials 16 03411 g007
Materials 16 03411 g008 550
Figure 8. XPS comparison before and after electrochemical OER testing of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF: high-resolution spectra of (a) Ni 2p, (b) Mo 3d, (c) S 2p, and (d) P 2p.
Figure 8. XPS comparison before and after electrochemical OER testing of P[0.9mM]-MoS2/Ni3S2@NF: high-resolution spectra of (a) Ni 2p, (b) Mo 3d, (c) S 2p, and (d) P 2p.
Materials 16 03411 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, F.; Zou, X.; Wei, X.; Bao, W.; Ai, T.; Li, W.; Guo, Y. Synergistic Effect of P Doping and Mo-Ni-Based Heterostructure Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. Materials 2023, 16, 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093411

AMA Style

Jia F, Zou X, Wei X, Bao W, Ai T, Li W, Guo Y. Synergistic Effect of P Doping and Mo-Ni-Based Heterostructure Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. Materials. 2023; 16(9):3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093411

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Feihong, Xiangyu Zou, Xueling Wei, Weiwei Bao, Taotao Ai, Wenhu Li, and Yuchen Guo. 2023. "Synergistic Effect of P Doping and Mo-Ni-Based Heterostructure Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting" Materials 16, no. 9: 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093411

APA Style

Jia, F., Zou, X., Wei, X., Bao, W., Ai, T., Li, W., & Guo, Y. (2023). Synergistic Effect of P Doping and Mo-Ni-Based Heterostructure Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. Materials, 16(9), 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093411

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop