Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Effect of Mineral Oil Exposure on Changes in the Structure and Mechanical Properties of Polymer Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
From Waste to Water Purification: Textile-Derived Sorbents for Pharmaceutical Removal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vertical Interconnection Technology for RF MicroSystem Packaging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diffusion Barrier Performance of Ni-W Layer at Sn/Cu Interfacial Reaction

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116000, China
2
School of Microelectronics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(15), 3682; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17153682
Submission received: 8 July 2024 / Revised: 23 July 2024 / Accepted: 24 July 2024 / Published: 25 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Electronic Packaging Technology: From Hard to Soft)

Abstract

:
As the integration of chips in 3D integrated circuits (ICs) increases and the size of micro-bumps reduces, issues with the reliability of service due to electromigration and thermomigration are becoming more prevalent. In the practical application of solder joints, an increase in the grain size of intermetallic compounds (IMCs) has been observed during the reflow process. This phenomenon results in an increased thickness of the IMC layer, accompanied by a proportional increase in the volume of the IMC layer within the joint. The brittle nature of IMC renders it susceptible to excessive growth in small-sized joints, which has the potential to negatively impact the reliability of the welded joint. It is therefore of the utmost importance to regulate the formation and growth of IMCs. The following paper presents the electrodeposition of a Ni-W layer on a Cu substrate, forming a barrier layer. Subsequently, the barrier properties between the Sn/Cu reactive couples were subjected to a comprehensive and systematic investigation. The study indicates that the Ni-W layer has the capacity to impede the diffusion of Sn atoms into Cu. Furthermore, the Ni-W layer is a viable diffusion barrier at the Sn/Cu interface. The “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 can be observed in all Ni-W coatings during the soldering reflow process, and its growth was almost linear. The structure of the Ni-W layer is such that it reduces the barrier properties that would otherwise be inherent to it. This is due to the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 that covers the original Ni-W barrier layer. At a temperature of 300 °C for a duration of 600 s, the Ni-W barrier layer loses its blocking function. Once the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 has completely covered the original Ni-W barrier layer, the diffusion activation energy for Sn diffusion into the Cu substrate side will be significantly reduced, particularly in areas where the distortion energy is concentrated due to electroplating tension. Both the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 and Sn will grow rapidly, with the formation of Cu-Sn intermetallic compounds (IMCs). At temperatures of 250 °C, the growth of Ni3Sn4-based IMCs is controlled by grain boundaries. Conversely, the growth of the Ni2WSn4 layer (consumption of Ni-W layer) is influenced by a combination of grain boundary diffusion and bulk diffusion. At temperatures of 275 °C and 300 °C, the growth of Ni3Sn4-based IMCs and the Ni2WSn4 layer (consumption of Ni-W layer) are both controlled by grain boundaries. The findings of this study can inform the theoretical design of solder joints with barrier layers as well as the selection of Ni-W diffusion barrier layers for use in different soldering processes. This can, in turn, enhance the reliability of microelectronic devices, offering significant theoretical and practical value.

1. Introduction

The demand for the miniaturization, portability, and multifunctionality of electronic products has driven a significant increase in the packaging density of electronic devices [1,2,3]. This has led to the development of electronic packaging technology from 2D to 3D, with a concomitant reduction in the size of solder joints [4,5,6]. As the dimensions of the solder joints diminish, the electric, thermal, and mechanical forces exerted on the solder joints increase, rather than decrease, and the reliability of the solder joints faces significant challenges [7,8]. Furthermore, the solder joint interface element interaction, diffusion enhancement, and electromigration are intensified by multiple effects including those of the solder joint soldering reflow process of the intermetallic compound (IMC) grain size [9]. This results in an increase in the thickness of the IMC layer and a corresponding increase in the proportion of the volume of the solder joints accounted for by the IMC layer. The brittleness of the IMC renders it susceptible to overgrowth in small-sized solder joints, which in turn compromises the reliability of the solder joints [10,11]. It is therefore of great importance to regulate the formation and growth of IMCs.
The incorporation of a diffusion barrier layer within the solder joint structure represents an effective means of addressing the potential reliability issues that may arise as a consequence of IMC overgrowth [12]. The diffusion barrier should possess the following characteristics: the diffusion barrier should be capable of maintaining a robust bond with the microbump copper and solder, should not dissolve during the reflow process, and should exhibit good solderability [13,14,15]. The classification of diffusion barriers is based on the type of material from which they are constructed. These barriers can be classified into five categories: simple substances, binary compounds, ternary compounds, composites, and multilayer membrane structures [16,17]. Ni is an optimal material for use as a diffusion barrier, exhibiting both high bonding strength and long-lasting diffusion effects [18,19]. Consequently, the employment of Ni as a diffusion barrier has been demonstrated to effectively inhibit the excessive growth of IMCs. The incorporation of Ni can impede the interaction between Cu elements in Cu substrates and Sn-based soldering materials [20,21]. In the solder joints of the actual service temperature conditions, the atomic diffusion of Ni to the grain boundary diffusion is dominated by Ni in the Cu diffusion rate of 2.9 × 10−6 cm2/s and Cu in the Ni diffusion rate of 1.7 × 10−6 cm2/s. Nevertheless, despite the two being in the same order of magnitude, the diffusion rate of the two metal atoms will significantly increase with an increase in the density of the circuit [22]. This results in the Ni being eroded by the Cu, which causes electromigration holes. It is therefore essential to incorporate refractory metal elements within the Ni blocking layer with the objective of reducing the diffusion rate of Ni [23].
The incorporation of metal W into the coating results in enhanced thermal stability and mechanical properties when compared to pure nickel coatings [24]. Consequently, Ni-W alloy coatings exhibit excellent corrosion and wear resistance, hardness, and other properties [25,26]. Further systematic studies are required to investigate the interfacial reaction behavior between Ni-W coatings and lead-free solder and to assess the feasibility of Ni-W coatings as brazing diffusion barrier layers. In this investigation, an electrodeposition process was employed to deposit a Ni-W coating on a Cu substrate. The objective of this study was to examine the wetting behavior between molten Sn and Ni-W/Cu substrates and present a discussion of the evolution of the microstructure of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu interface and the depletion behavior of the Ni-W barrier layer. The findings of this study can inform the theoretical design of solder joints with a Ni-W diffusion barrier layer.

2. Materials and Methods

Prior to electrodeposition, the Cu substrates, with a purity of 99.95%, had a dimension of 200 mm × 200 mm × 1 mm and underwent sanding and polishing steps. Subsequently, a series of cleaning and activation steps were undertaken. The process comprised an acid wash with a 5% HCl solution (to eliminate surface oxides), a deionized water wash, sensitization with SnCl2 (10 g/L), and activation with 15% H2SO4 (to create specific sensitized, activated centers on the surface, which facilitate the subsequent nucleation of the plating). The electrodeposition of Ni-W coatings is characterized by a significant disparity in atomic radii between Ni and W, which gives rise to a rapid deposition rate. However, this also results in the generation of substantial internal stresses, which can lead to the formation of surface cracks in the coating [27]. Consequently, ultrasonic assistance was employed during the electrodeposition of Ni-W in order to eliminate internal stresses and suppress surface cracks.
The composition of the electrodeposition solution is presented in Table 1. The electrodeposition time and temperature were 60 min and 65 °C, respectively. The pH was set to 7.5, the current density was 1.5 A/dm2, and the ultrasonic frequency was 80 kHz. The solder balls, with a diameter of 1000 μm, were attached to Ni-W/Cu substrates at temperatures of 250, 275, and 300 °C. The solder balls were composed of pure Sn. The interfacial IMCs were chemically etched using a solution comprising 5 vol.% HNO3, 2 vol.% HCl, and 93 vol.% CH3OH.
Figure 1 depicts the process flow diagram of soldering. The morphological and compositional characteristics of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates and IMCs were verified through the utilization of a secondary electron microscope (SEM, SUPARR 55, Zeiss Optical Instruments Co., Ltd., Oberkochen, Germany) and electron probe X-ray microanalyzer (EPMA, JXA-8530F PLUS, Japan Electron Optics Laboratory Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The wetting rate was quantified utilizing an SDC 350 contact angle measuring instrument (Shengding Precision Instrument Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Ni-W Diffusion Barrier Layer

Figure 2a illustrates the typical cellular morphology of the Ni-W particles. The substitution of W for Ni resulted in the formation of localized distortions around the lattice of the W atoms. Figure 2b illustrates the X-ray diffraction pattern of the Ni-W coating, which exhibited no diffraction peaks associated with the Cu substrate. This observation indicates that the coating had a greater thickness and had completely encapsulated the Cu substrate. As depicted in Figure 2c, the thickness of the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer was found to be 6.0 ± 0.2 μm. As illustrated in Figure 2d–f, the Ni-W coating exhibited uniform and dense characteristics throughout the cross-section. The Cu substrate and the Ni-W barrier layer were continuous and exhibited no undulations. Furthermore, no discernible instances of delamination, looseness, holes, or other defects were observed. This indicates that the Cu substrate and Ni-W diffusion barrier layer exhibited excellent bonding characteristics. Table 2 indicates that the W content of the Ni-W layer was approximately 25 wt.%.

3.2. Microstructure Evolution of IMCs

Figure 3 illustrates that the variation in the wetting angle of molten pure Sn on a Ni-W/Cu substrate varies under different soldering conditions. A reduction in the contact angle is indicative of an enhanced wettability between the molten solder balls and the substrate [28]. As shown in Figure 3, the contact angle exhibited a decreasing trend with an increase in welding time at a constant welding temperature. Furthermore, an increase in the temperature of the weld at a constant weld time also resulted in a reduction in the contact angle. This phenomenon can be attributed to the fact that the surface tension of the molten Sn balls increases in proportion to the ambient temperature, resulting from the thermal vibration of the metal atoms within. The wetting angle of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu solder joints in this soldering process was found to be within the range of 39°–53°. It is postulated that within this range, the wettability of the Ni-W/Cu substrate is satisfactory [29].
Figure 4 illustrates that following refluxing at 250 °C for varying periods, the pure Sn soldering material underwent a reaction with the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer, resulting in the formation of the Ni3Sn4 IMC. The thickness of the Ni3Sn4 IMC increased gradually with the extension of time. Additionally, a continuous “bright layer” could be observed on the lower side of the Ni3Sn4 IMC. The bright part of the original Ni-W diffusion barrier layer, which was evidently distinct from the surrounding phase, was designated as the “bright layer”. This phenomenon can be attributed to the fact that at the outset of the interfacial reaction, Ni-W reacts with liquid Sn, leading to the formation of a continuous layer of the Ni3Sn4 IMC phase. Subsequently, the Ni atoms in the Ni-W solid solution in the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer continue to react by diffusion into pure Sn, resulting in a notable increase in the W content at the top of the alloy layer in direct contact with the pure Sn solder. Figure 5 illustrates the EDS maps of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates that had undergone soldered for 30 s at 250 °C. The shift from dark blue to red in the graph reflects a gradual increase in concentration. In the diagram illustrating the distribution of Sn, the red color represents pure Sn, the yellow area represents Ni3Sn4, and the green area represents “bright layer” Ni2WSn4. In the diagram showing the distribution of Cu, the orange color represents the Cu substrate. In the diagram showing the distribution of Ni, the light blue color is Ni3Sn4, the dark blue color is the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4, and the orange color represents the Ni-W layer. In the W distribution diagram, the red area is the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4, and the yellow area represents the Ni-W layer. As illustrated in Figure 5 and Table 3, a continuous layer formed at the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer/pure Sn solder interface, comprising 29% at.%Ni, 14% at.%W, and 57% at.%Sn. It is reasonable to posit that the “bright layer” is Ni2WSn4. The Ni2WSn4 layer further impeded the further diffusion of Ni in the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer. As the soldering time increased, the thickness of the Ni3Sn4 IMC, which formed between the Sn and Ni-W diffusion barrier layer, also increased. Concurrently, the thickness of the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 also increased. This process occurred gradually, with the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer becoming progressively covered. Concurrently, it was observed that the thickness of the original Ni-W diffusion barrier layer underwent a notable reduction. It can be reasonably assumed that Ni2WSn4 is generated at the same rate as the original Ni-W diffusion barrier layer is consumed.
The microstructure of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for different times at 275 °C is presented in Figure 6. The matrix Cu did not react with the pure Sn solder at this temperature, as evidenced by the lack of any observed reaction. Upon soldering the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates at 275 °C, the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer began to decompose, with Sn diffusing into the diffusion barrier layer. The IMC layer, comprising Sn and Ni atoms, underwent a diffusion process to form the Ni3Sn4 IMC. The thickness of the Ni3Sn4 IMC exhibited a gradual increase over time. Furthermore, a continuous layer of “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 could be observed on the lower side of the Ni3Sn4 IMC. The thickness of the Ni3Sn4 IMC and “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 increased at 275 °C in comparison to 250 °C. Figure 7 depicts the EDS maps of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for 600 s at 275 °C. The transition from dark blue to red in the graph represents a gradual increase in concentration. The distribution diagram of Sn exhibited a red color representing pure Sn, a yellow area representing Ni3Sn4, and a green area representing the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4. Similarly, the distribution diagram of Cu displayed an orange color representing the Cu substrate. In the Ni distribution diagram, the light blue color is Ni3Sn4, the dark blue color is the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4, and the orange color represents the Ni-W layer. In the W distribution diagram, the orange area is the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4, and the green area represents the Ni-W layer. As illustrated in Figure 7 and Table 4, at 275 °C for 300 s and 600 s, a significant portion of Ni2WSn4 had completely replaced the original Ni-W diffusion barrier layer.
Figure 8 presents the cross-sectional SEM images of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates subjected to soldering at 300 °C for varying periods. As illustrated in Figure 8, the cross-sectional microstructures of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered at 300 °C for 15, 30, and 300 s (Figure 8a–c) displayed markedly disparate characteristics in comparison to the cross-sectional microstructures of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for 600 s (Figure 8d). Soldering at 300 °C for a period of less than 300 s resulted in the formation of an IMC comprising Ni3Sn4. Figure 9 depicts the EDS maps of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for 600 s at 300 °C. The shift from dark blue to red in the graph reflects a gradual increase in concentration. In the Sn distribution diagram, the red color represents pure Sn, the yellow area represents (Ni,Cu)3Sn4, the green area represents the transition region between (Ni,Cu)3Sn4 and the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4, and the light blue represents the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4. In the Cu distribution diagram, this blue region depicts the reaction of (Ni,Cu)3Sn4 with Sn through the Ni-W diffusion barrier, the green color is Cu3Sn, and the orange color represents the Cu substrate. In the Ni distribution diagram, the light blue color represents (Ni,Cu)3Sn4, the dark blue color denotes the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4, and the orange color signifies the Ni-W layer. In the W distribution diagram, the orange area corresponds to the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4, while the yellow area represents the Ni-W layer. However, when the soldering time at 300 °C was 600 s, as illustrated in Figure 9 and Table 5, the (Ni,Cu)3Sn4 IMC was formed, in addition to a minor quantity of the Cu3Sn IMC. The varying Cu content at different locations resulted in the formation of a mixture of the (Cu1Ni42)3Sn4 and (Cu3Ni40)3Sn4 IMC. It can be observed that the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer lost its blocking function to inhibit the diffusion of Cu atoms when the interfacial reaction time was 600 s. The diffusion of Sn and Cu atoms through the IMC layer resulted in the formation of the (Ni,Cu)3Sn4 IMC and Cu3Sn IMC. The formation of voids as a result of the outward diffusion of Cu atoms has been demonstrated to have a deleterious effect on the reliability of solder joints [30,31].

3.3. Growth Kinetics Analysis of Interfacial Reactions

The interfacial growth kinetics of Sn/Cu solder joints can be expressed by Schaefer’s classical power rate empirical formula [32]. It can be demonstrated that the growth thickness of the interfacial IMC layer (the consumption thickness of the interfacial Ni-W diffusion barrier layer) and the soldering reaction time can be expressed by a power–exponential relationship equation.
L = k t n
The interfacial reaction time (t) of the soldering process is a function of the average thickness (L) of the Ni3Sn4-based IMC and Ni2WSn4 layers, the growth coefficient (K), and the growth index (n).
When n = 1, the growth conforms to the linear law and is therefore controlled by the interfacial reaction. When n = 1/2, the growth conforms to the parabolic law, and the growth is controlled by bulk diffusion. When n = 1/3, the growth conforms to the parabolic law, and the growth is controlled by grain boundary diffusion.
Upon taking logarithms on both sides of Equation (1), the following result is obtained:
ln L = ln k + n ln t
Figure 10a presents the mean thickness of the Ni3Sn4-based IMCs obtained from Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates subjected to distinct welding conditions. As illustrated in Figure 10a, the mean thickness of the interfacial Ni3Sn4-based IMCs of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates acquired at 300 °C for periods of 300 and 600 s was markedly greater than that of the interfacial Ni3Sn4-based IMCs of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates obtained under alternative conditions. This may be attributed to the disparate diffusion mechanisms of Ni3Sn4-based IMC growth. Figure 10b presents a plot of the total thickness of the Ni3Sn4-based IMC layer versus the interfacial reaction time during the soldering process. At a soldering temperature of 250 °C, the growth coefficient n was 0.24, which indicates that the growth mode of the IMC was grain boundary diffusion. Nevertheless, the growth coefficients n were 0.24 and 0.33 for soldering temperatures of 275 °C and 300 °C, respectively, indicating that the growth of IMC is still controlled by grain boundary diffusion.
Figure 10c illustrates the thickness of the Ni2WSn4 layer (consumption of Ni-W diffusion barrier layer) in relation to different soldering conditions. As the temperature and duration of the soldering process increased, the average thickness of the Ni2WSn4 layer also increased. This is due to the fact that with the increase in soldering temperature and time, the dissolution of Ni and W elements in the liquid pure Sn solder increases, which is more favorable to the formation of Ni2WSn4. Figure 10d presents the average thickness of the Ni2WSn4 layer/consumption of the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer as a function of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates’ soldering time at various temperatures. At a soldering temperature of 250 °C, the depletion coefficient n was 0.37, which is situated between 1/3 and 1/2. Consequently, the total thickness of the Ni2WSn4 layer (consumption of Ni-W diffusion barrier layer) was influenced by both the grain boundary diffusion and bulk diffusion. At a welding temperature of 275 °C, the growth coefficient (depletion coefficient) n was 0.30, while at a welding temperature of 300 °C, the growth coefficient (depletion coefficient) n was still 0.30, which was close to 1/3. Consequently, the total thickness of the Ni2WSn4 layer (consumption of Ni-W diffusion barrier layer) was controlled by grain boundary diffusion. As shown in Table 6, the growth diffusion rate of the Ni3Sn4-based IMC and the Ni2WSn4 layer (consumption diffusion rate of the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer) exhibited an increase with the rise in soldering temperature.

4. Conclusions

The objective of this study was to electrodeposit a Ni-W layer on a Cu substrate for the purpose of creating a diffusion barrier. Subsequently, the barrier properties between the Sn and Cu reactive couples were studied in a systematic and comprehensive manner. The main conclusions are as follows. The Ni-W layer has the capacity to impede the diffusion of Sn atoms into Cu. Furthermore, the Ni-W coating is a viable diffusion barrier at the Sn/Cu interface. The “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 could be observed in all Ni-W coatings during the soldering reflow process and its growth was almost linear. The structure of the Ni-W layer was such that it reduced the barrier properties that would otherwise be inherent to it. This was due to the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 that covered the original Ni-W barrier layer. At a temperature of 300 °C for a duration of 600 s, the Ni-W barrier layer lost its blocking function. Once the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 had completely covered the original Ni-W barrier layer, the diffusion activation energy for Sn diffusion into the Cu substrate side was significantly reduced, particularly in the area where the distortion energy was concentrated due to electroplating tension. Both the “bright layer” Ni2WSn4 and Sn grew rapidly, with the formation of Cu-Sn intermetallic compounds. At temperatures of 250 °C, the growth of Ni3Sn4-based IMCs was controlled by grain boundaries. Conversely, the growth of the Ni2WSn4 layer (consumption of Ni-W layer) was influenced by a combination of grain boundary diffusion and bulk diffusion. At temperatures of 275 °C and 300 °C, the growth of Ni3Sn4-based IMCs and the Ni2WSn4 layer (consumption of Ni-W layer) were both controlled by grain boundaries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Y., X.L. and H.M. (Haitao Ma); Methodology, C.L., M.S., X.C. and Y.W.; Software, J.Y., Y.W. and H.M. (Haoran Ma); Resources, X.L. and H.M. (Haitao Ma); Data curation, J.Y., C.L., X.C., M.S., H.M. (Haoran Ma) and Y.W.; Writing—original draft, J.Y. and Y.W.; Supervision, X.L. and H.M. (Haitao Ma); Funding acquisition, H.M. (Haoran Ma). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52101035).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tu, K.; Liu, Y. Recent advances on kinetic analysis of solder joint reactions in 3D IC packaging technology. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2019, 136, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, M.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, N.; Zhang, L.; Zhong, S. Materials modification of the lead-free solders incorporated with micro/nano-sized particles: A review. Mater. Des. 2021, 197, 109224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dele-Afolabi, T.T.; Ansari, M.; Hanim, M.A.; Oyekanmi, A.A.; Ojo-Kupoluyi, O.J.; Atiqah, A. Recent advances in Sn-based lead free solder interconnects for microelectronics packaging: Materials and technologies. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 25, 4231–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lau, J.H. Recent advances and trends in advanced packaging. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 12, 228–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, S.; Li, Z.; Zhou, H.; Li, R.; Wang, S.; Paik, K.; He, P. Challenges and recent prospectives of 3D heterogeneous integration. E-Prime-Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy 2022, 2, 100052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lau, J.H. Advanced Packaging Trends. In Semiconductor Advanced Packaging; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 465–489. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, Y.; Fu, G.; Wan, B.; Wu, Z.; Yan, X.; Zhang, W. A study on the effects of electrical and thermal stresses on void formation and migration lifetime of Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu solder joints. Solder. Surf. Mt. Technol. 2022, 34, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.; Fu, G.; Wan, B.; Yan, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, W. Phase-field modelling of lead-free solder joint void growth under thermal-electrical coupled stress. J. Electron. Mater. 2022, 51, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Z.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Han, Y.; Yu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, P.; Yang, S. Effects of solder thickness on interface behavior and nanoindentation characteristics in Cu/Sn/Cu microbumps. Weld. World 2022, 66, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Huo, L.; Li, H.; Tian, W.; Ji, H.; Chen, S. Research on the Reliability of Advanced Packaging under Multi-Field Coupling: A Review. Micromachines 2024, 15, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yao, J.; Shang, M.; Chen, X.; Xing, J.; Guo, T.; Wang, Y.; Ma, H.; Gao, Z. Thermal stability and diffusion barrier performance of amorphous Ni-P layer at Sn/Ni-P/Cu interface. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2024, 35, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mao, Z.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Dong, S.; Lin, X.; Jian, X.; Wu, P. The obstruction effect of Ni layer on the interdiffusion of Cu substrate and Sn solder: A theoretical investigation. J. Electron. Mater. 2020, 49, 6559–6571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cheng, H.; Lin, Y.; Chen, C.; Liu, K.; Wang, Y.; Liu, T. Microstructural evolution of Cu/solder/Cu pillar-type structures with different diffusion barriers. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2016, 47, 3971–3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, J.; Park, D.; Ahn, B.; Bang, J.; Kim, M.; Park, H.; Sohn, Y.; Ko, Y. Effective (Pd, Ni)Sn4 diffusion barrier to suppress brittle fracture at Sn-58Bi-xAg solder joint with Ni (P)/Pd (P)/Au metallization pad. Microelectron. Reliab. 2022, 129, 114472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Park, J.M.; Hyeon, D.Y.; Ma, H.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.; Nguyen, Y.N.; Son, I.; Yi, S.; Kim, K.T.; Park, K. Enhanced output power of thermoelectric modules with reduced contact resistance by adopting the optimized Ni diffusion barrier layer. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 884, 161119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, P.; Liu, J.; Hu, A.; Li, M. Effect of Co-W and Co-Fe-W Diffusion Barriers on the Reliability of the Solder/Cu Interface during Reflow Conditions. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2024, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, L.; Chen, S.; Chen, P.; Cao, L.; Li, M.; Hang, T. Interface reliability and diffusion barrier property of Co-W barrier layer with modulated structure. Mater. Lett. 2023, 331, 133501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Z.; Tian, Y.; Teng, C.; Cao, H. Recent advances in barrier layer of cu interconnects. Materials 2020, 13, 5049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sohn, Y. Effect of Morphological Change of Ni3Sn4 Intermetallic Compounds on the Growth Kinetics in Electroless Ni-P/Sn-3.5 Ag Solder Joint. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2020, 51, 2905–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiao, J.; Wang, F.; Li, J.; Chen, Z. Comparison of interfacial reactions and isothermal aging of cone Ni-P and flat Ni-P with Sn3.5Ag solders. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 625, 157219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chi, P.; Li, Y.; Pan, H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, N.; Li, M.; Gao, L. Effect of Ni (P) Layer Thickness on Interface Reaction and Reliability of Ultrathin ENEPIG Surface Finish. Materials 2021, 14, 7874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yu, H.Y.; Yang, T.H.; Chiu, Y.S.; Kao, C.R. Surface diffusion and the interfacial reaction in Cu/Sn/Ni micro-pillars. J. Electron. Mater. 2020, 49, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Labie, R.; Ruythooren, W.; Van Humbeeck, J. Solid state diffusion in Cu–Sn and Ni–Sn diffusion couples with flip-chip scale dimensions. Intermetallics 2007, 15, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tsai, Y.; Wu, F.; Chen, Y.; Peng, P.; Duh, J.; Tsai, S. Thermal stability and mechanical properties of Ni–W–P electroless deposits. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2001, 146, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, L.; Dong, J.X.; Yang, F.Z.; Xu, S.K.; Zhou, S.M. Studies on the mechanism, structure and microhardness of Ni-W alloy electrodeposits. Trans. IMF 1999, 77, 185–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, Y.; Wang, D.; Sheng, M.; Wang, H.; Guo, R.; Qu, T.; Hu, S. The Effect of Heat Treatment on Phase Structure and Mechanical and Corrosion Resistance Properties of High Tungsten Ni-W Alloy Coating. Coatings 2023, 13, 1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mizushima, I.; Tang, P.T.; Hansen, H.N.; Somers, M.A. Residual stress in Ni–W electrodeposits. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 6128–6134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jung, D.; Jung, J. Review of the wettability of solder with a wetting balance test for recent advanced microelectronic packaging. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2019, 44, 324–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hasnine, M.; Tolla, B.; Karasawa, M. Effect of Ge addition on wettability, copper dissolution, microstructural and mechanical behavior of SnCu–Ge solder alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2017, 28, 16106–16119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jiang, N.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Sun, L.; Long, W.; He, P.; Xiong, M.; Zhao, M. Reliability issues of lead-free solder joints in electronic devices. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2019, 20, 876–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, K.; Ling, H.; Hu, A.; Wu, Y.; Gao, L.; Hang, T.; Li, M. Growth behavior and formation mechanism of porous Cu3Sn in Cu/Sn solder system. Mater. Charact. 2021, 178, 111271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. King-Ning, T.U. Solder Joint Technology, Materials, Properties, and Reliability; Springer Series in Materials Science; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007; Volume 117, p. 373. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic of the soldering reflow experiment: (a) soldering process; (b) interface reaction of the pure Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates; (c) wetting angle measurement.
Figure 1. Schematic of the soldering reflow experiment: (a) soldering process; (b) interface reaction of the pure Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates; (c) wetting angle measurement.
Materials 17 03682 g001
Figure 2. (a) Top-view SEM images of the Ni-W coating; (b) XRD pattern of the Ni-W coating; (c) Cross-sectional SEM images of the Ni-W/Cu substrate. (df) The corresponding EDS maps of the cross-sectional SEM images of the Ni-W/Cu substrate.
Figure 2. (a) Top-view SEM images of the Ni-W coating; (b) XRD pattern of the Ni-W coating; (c) Cross-sectional SEM images of the Ni-W/Cu substrate. (df) The corresponding EDS maps of the cross-sectional SEM images of the Ni-W/Cu substrate.
Materials 17 03682 g002
Figure 3. Contact angle of the molten pure Sn on Ni-W/Cu substrates under different soldering conditions.
Figure 3. Contact angle of the molten pure Sn on Ni-W/Cu substrates under different soldering conditions.
Materials 17 03682 g003
Figure 4. Cross-sectional SEM images of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for different periods of time at 250 °C: (a) 15 s; (b) 30 s; (c) 300 s; (d) 600 s.
Figure 4. Cross-sectional SEM images of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for different periods of time at 250 °C: (a) 15 s; (b) 30 s; (c) 300 s; (d) 600 s.
Materials 17 03682 g004
Figure 5. EDS maps of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for 30 s at 250 °C.
Figure 5. EDS maps of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for 30 s at 250 °C.
Materials 17 03682 g005
Figure 6. Cross-sectional SEM images of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for different periods of time at 275 °C: (a) 15 s; (b) 30 s; (c) 300 s; (d) 600 s.
Figure 6. Cross-sectional SEM images of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for different periods of time at 275 °C: (a) 15 s; (b) 30 s; (c) 300 s; (d) 600 s.
Materials 17 03682 g006
Figure 7. EDS maps of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for 600 s at 275 °C.
Figure 7. EDS maps of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for 600 s at 275 °C.
Materials 17 03682 g007
Figure 8. Cross-sectional SEM images of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for different periods of time at 300 °C: (a) 15 s; (b) 30 s; (c) 300 s; (d) 600 s.
Figure 8. Cross-sectional SEM images of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for different periods of time at 300 °C: (a) 15 s; (b) 30 s; (c) 300 s; (d) 600 s.
Materials 17 03682 g008
Figure 9. EDS maps of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for 600 s at 300 °C.
Figure 9. EDS maps of Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates soldered for 600 s at 300 °C.
Materials 17 03682 g009
Figure 10. (a) The average thickness of Ni3Sn4-based IMCs. (b) The thickness of the Ni3Sn4-based IMCs as a function of soldering time at various temperatures on Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates. (c) The average thickness of the Ni2WSn4 layer/consumption of the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer. (d) The average thickness of the Ni2WSn4 layer/consumption of the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer as a function of soldering time at various temperatures on Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates.
Figure 10. (a) The average thickness of Ni3Sn4-based IMCs. (b) The thickness of the Ni3Sn4-based IMCs as a function of soldering time at various temperatures on Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates. (c) The average thickness of the Ni2WSn4 layer/consumption of the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer. (d) The average thickness of the Ni2WSn4 layer/consumption of the Ni-W diffusion barrier layer as a function of soldering time at various temperatures on Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates.
Materials 17 03682 g010
Table 1. Chemical composition of the electrodeposition solution.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the electrodeposition solution.
MaterialNiCl2·6H2ONiSO4·6H2ONa3C6H5O7·H2ONa2WO4·2H2OC6H4SO2NNaCO·2H2OC12H25SO4Na
Concentration15 g/L80 g/L100 g/L80 g/L5 g/L0.5 g/L
Table 2. Ni-W coating compositions corresponding to the indicated point in Figure 2.
Table 2. Ni-W coating compositions corresponding to the indicated point in Figure 2.
Indicated PositionElementwt.%at.%
1Ni75.1890.43
W24.829.57
2Ni74.6190.29
W25.399.71
Table 3. Ni-W coating and IMC compositions corresponding to the indicated point in Figure 5.
Table 3. Ni-W coating and IMC compositions corresponding to the indicated point in Figure 5.
Indicated PositionElementwt.%at.%
3Cu0.070.03
Sn74.3657.11
Ni25.5742.86
W0.000.00
4Cu0.000.00
Sn60.6357.40
Ni16.4128.59
W22.9614.01
5Cu0.580.67
Sn1.550.96
Ni73.2988.79
W24.589.58
Table 4. Ni-W coating and IMC compositions corresponding to the indicated point in Figure 7.
Table 4. Ni-W coating and IMC compositions corresponding to the indicated point in Figure 7.
Indicated PositionElementwt.%at.%
6Cu0.080.04
Sn74.8457.77
Ni23.7842.19
W0.000.00
7Cu0.000.00
Sn60.9157.86
Ni16.2128.25
W22.8813.89
8Cu0.570.93
Sn1.661.03
Ni72.8788.18
W24.909.86
Table 5. Ni-W coating and IMC compositions corresponding to the indicated point in Figure 9.
Table 5. Ni-W coating and IMC compositions corresponding to the indicated point in Figure 9.
Indicated PositionElementwt.%at.%
9Cu0.731.03
Sn75.1357.41
Ni24.2441.56
W0.000.00
10Cu1.822.56
Sn75.0257.03
Ni23.1640.41
W0.000.00
11Cu0.000.00
Sn60.2857.46
Ni16.2828.31
W23.4414.23
12Cu0.530.87
Sn1.761.09
Ni72.6888.13
W25.039.91
13Cu63.5076.78
Sn36.4623.2
Ni0.000.00
W0.040.02
Table 6. The diffusion rate (k) and kinetics time index (n) of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates during the soldering process.
Table 6. The diffusion rate (k) and kinetics time index (n) of the Sn/Ni-W/Cu substrates during the soldering process.
Temperature (°C)k (μm/s1/2)n
Ni3Sn4-based IMCs
(Growth)
2500.540.24
2750.680.24
3000.800.33
Ni2WSn4 (Growth)
Ni-W diffusion barrier layer (Consumption)
2500.300.37
2750.480.30
3000.650.30
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, J.; Li, C.; Shang, M.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Ma, H.; Ma, H.; Liu, X. Diffusion Barrier Performance of Ni-W Layer at Sn/Cu Interfacial Reaction. Materials 2024, 17, 3682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17153682

AMA Style

Yao J, Li C, Shang M, Chen X, Wang Y, Ma H, Ma H, Liu X. Diffusion Barrier Performance of Ni-W Layer at Sn/Cu Interfacial Reaction. Materials. 2024; 17(15):3682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17153682

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Jinye, Chenyu Li, Min Shang, Xiangxu Chen, Yunpeng Wang, Haoran Ma, Haitao Ma, and Xiaoying Liu. 2024. "Diffusion Barrier Performance of Ni-W Layer at Sn/Cu Interfacial Reaction" Materials 17, no. 15: 3682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17153682

APA Style

Yao, J., Li, C., Shang, M., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Ma, H., Ma, H., & Liu, X. (2024). Diffusion Barrier Performance of Ni-W Layer at Sn/Cu Interfacial Reaction. Materials, 17(15), 3682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17153682

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop