2. Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows optical images of the corroded surface after immersion test in modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentrations of NaHCO
3 and mucin. The surface of AZ31 magnesium alloy after immersion in solution #1 without NaHCO
3 and mucin was covered with white corrosion products. There was also evidence of delamination of corrosion products from alloy, which was occurred during drying process after immersion test due to their brittle property. After immersion in solution #2, the surface color changed to brown with the presence of localized corrosion at the edges and center parts of the sample. With an increase in concentration of NaHCO
3, a darker brown color was observed, but there was no evidence of further localized corrosion. The surface color changed to mixture of white and brown and localized corrosion greatly diminished with the addition of 0.1 g·L
−1 of mucin in solution #1. The surface color changed to a brown increasing the concentration of NaHCO
3 in solutions. The concentrations of physiological ions in solution can affect the formation of corrosion products and corrosion type such as uninform corrosion and pitting corrosion on the surface of magnesium alloys [
17,
18].
Figure 1.
Optical images of corroded surface after immersion test for 10 days in modified Gamble’s solutions: (a) Solution #1; (b) Solution #2; (c) Solution #3; (d) Solution #4; (e) Solution #5; (f) Solution #6; (g) Solution #7; (h) Solution #8.
Figure 1.
Optical images of corroded surface after immersion test for 10 days in modified Gamble’s solutions: (a) Solution #1; (b) Solution #2; (c) Solution #3; (d) Solution #4; (e) Solution #5; (f) Solution #6; (g) Solution #7; (h) Solution #8.
The average daily pH change for solutions during immersion tests of AZ31 magnesium alloy in each solution for 10 days is shown in
Figure 2. During immersion tests, the pH of physiological solutions in the presence of magnesium alloys usually increases due to the generation of (OH)
− as magnesium alloys corrode [
19]. However, the pH of solutions in which NaHCO
3 was not added decreased during immersion tests even with the addition of mucin. The pH of solution #1 without NaHCO
3 and mucin decreased to 6.9, while the pH of solution #5 which included 0.1 g·L
−1 of mucin and no NaHCO
3 addition, decreased to 7.1. The decrease of solution pH during immersion test of magnesium alloy can be attributed to relative amount of OH
− and H
+ generated by corrosion of alloy and by chemical reactions involved in the formation and transformation of calcium phosphates respectively [
17]. In solution #1, the deposition of calcium phosphate more actively occurred on the surface of alloy due to localized pH increase near surface of alloy by weaker buffering effect than other solutions, but the corrosion of alloy can be retarded by the formation of thick calcium phosphates. The addition of NaHCO
3 in the solution resulted in a substantial increase in pH. The pH of solution #4 increased to 8.7. This indicated that the amount of OH
− ions generated from the corrosion of magnesium alloy by carbonate ions was significantly higher than the amount of H
+ ions generated from the formation and transformation of calcium phosphates in solution [
17]. The change of pH increased less with the addition of 0.1 g·L
−1 mucin in solutions in comparison with solutions that have the same concentration of NaHCO
3. It is proposed that adsorption of mucin on the surface can retard both the corrosion of magnesium alloys and the rate of hydroxyapatite formation. This explains the suppression of pH change with the addition of mucin. The effects of protein adsorption for the biodegradation of magnesium alloys has been reported by previous studies [
14,
15,
19,
20], which can be referred for this study even though most studies used albumin in their experiments. They show that the adsorption of protein can affect the degradation of magnesium alloys, which is dependent with the kind of alloys, the concentration of protein and experimental time. For example, Gu
et al. [
15] confirmed that the corrosion rates of AZ31 and AZ91 decrease with the addition of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) after immersion for 7 days, but Mg-Ca alloy shows increased corrosion rate in contrast to AZ alloys. They explained that it is because more stable and compact Al
2O
3 layer formed on AZ alloys make protein adhere easier than MgO/Mg(OH)
2, which can retard the anodic reaction [
20], in other hand, increased corrosion rates of Mg-Ca alloys by the addition of FBS in physiological solutions can be explained by chelating effect [
7,
14,
20].
Figure 2.
Daily pH change of modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentration of NaHCO3 and mucin during immersion of AZ31 magnesium alloys (n = 3).
Figure 2.
Daily pH change of modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentration of NaHCO3 and mucin during immersion of AZ31 magnesium alloys (n = 3).
Figure 3 shows SEM (scanning electron microscope) images on the surface of the samples after immersion tests for 10 days in the modified Gamble solutions. In solution #1, porous corrosion products composed of tiny rod-shaped microstructures formed on the surface, and some corrosion products were chipped off from matrix after immersion test. Corrosion products formed on the surface after immersion test in solution #2 were composed of many globular microstructures, denser than the products observed after immersion in solution #1. The globular microstructures disappeared and increasingly denser corrosion products were formed as the NaHCO
3 concentration increased (solutions #3 and #4). This result shows that addition of HCO
3− in solution makes corrosion products dense and improves their adhesive properties on magnesium alloys. The corrosion products formed after immersion in solution #5 were changed to smaller rod-shaped microstructures. Also corrosion product detachment from the matrix in this solution was less than the corrosion products formed after immersion in solution #1. The corrosion products formed on the surface after immersion in solution #8 with the addition of both NaHCO
3 and mucin were the densest of all tested solutions. Similar precipitation of smaller calcium phosphate was observed by addition of bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 4 times revised simulated body fluid (r-SBF) using a constant-composition double-diffusion device in previous research [
21]. It was determined that protein like BSA was co-precipitated with calcium phosphate and had a strong negative effect on the precipitation of calcium phosphates. Studies of adsorptivity of mucin on titanium powders have shown that hydroxyapatite has superior adsorptive strength in comparison to titanium powder alone [
22,
23]. It was shown that the amount of mucin adsorbed on hydroxyapatite powder and calcium treated titanium powder was about 1.8 times and 3 times higher, respectively, than on titanium powders. Thus the existence of calcium phosphate compounds in corrosion products can accelerate the absorption of mucin on the surface.
Figure 3.
SEM (scanning electron microscope) images of corroded surface of AZ31 magnesium alloys after immersion test for 10 days in modified Gamble’s solutions: (a) Solution #1; (b) Solution #2; (c) Solution #3; (d) Solution #4; (e) Solution #5; (f) Solution #6; (g) Solution #7; (h) Solution #8.
Figure 3.
SEM (scanning electron microscope) images of corroded surface of AZ31 magnesium alloys after immersion test for 10 days in modified Gamble’s solutions: (a) Solution #1; (b) Solution #2; (c) Solution #3; (d) Solution #4; (e) Solution #5; (f) Solution #6; (g) Solution #7; (h) Solution #8.
Table 1 shows the chemical composition of corrosion products formed on the surface after immersion tests for 10 days in modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentrations of NaHCO
3 as detected by EDX (energy dispersive X-ray) analysis. The EDX table shows corrosion products formed on the surface of AZ31 magnesium alloy after immersion in solution #1 are mainly composed of Ca, P and O, with a Ca/P ratio of about 1.7 while magnesium was hardly detected in the corrosion products. The Ca/P ratio and morphology of this corrosion product is similar to hydroxyapatite (Ca/P = 1.67) [
24,
25]. Also, little magnesium in corrosion products was detected in contrast with corrosion products formed in other solutions. It could be attributed to the stable hydroxyapatite with porous structure, which made magnesium ions release in solution more easily. Also, stable hydroxyapatite crystal formed from early stage of immersion might hinder the formation of other corrosion products such as magnesium apatite or magnesium phosphate. However, with increasing the concentrations of NaHCO
3, the content of Mg increased greatly, but the content of Ca and P decreased. The Ca/P ratios also decreased as they ranged from 0.8 to 1.25 as the concentrations of NaHCO
3 increased. It is possible that this can be attributed to the presence of magnesium apatite ((Ca
0.86,Mg
0.14)
10(PO
4)
6(OH)
2) [
26] or calcium magnesium phosphate (Ca
3Mg
3(PO
4)
4) [
27]. This could also be due to the coexistence of Mg(OH)
2 with calcium phosphate compounds of low Ca/P ratios like calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite (Ca/P = 1.5–1.67), octacalcium phosphate (Ca/P = 1.33) and amorphous calcium phosphate (Ca/P = 1.2–2.2) [
24,
28].
Table 1.
Chemical composition of corrosion products formed on the surface after immersion test in solutions for 10 days detected by EDX (energy dispersive X-ray) analysis. (Unit: Atomic %)
Table 1.
Chemical composition of corrosion products formed on the surface after immersion test in solutions for 10 days detected by EDX (energy dispersive X-ray) analysis. (Unit: Atomic %)
Solutions | C | O | Mg | Al | P | Cl | Ca | Zn |
---|
#1 | 6.51 | 42.10 | 0.95 | 0.23 | 18.42 | 0.00 | 31.06 | 0.25 |
#2 | 6.46 | 46.24 | 18.04 | 0.16 | 12.81 | 0.06 | 16.03 | 0.00 |
#3 | 3.89 | 50.24 | 21.40 | 0.34 | 11.75 | 0.09 | 12.16 | 0.00 |
#4 | 5.58 | 44.94 | 29.60 | 0.98 | 9.96 | 0.50 | 8.42 | 0.00 |
The presence of hydroxyapatite in corrosion products formed on the surface of AZ31 magnesium alloy after immersion was confirmed by XRD (X-ray diffraction) analysis. However, this hydroxyapatite peak was only identified on the surfaces after immersion in solutions #1, and was not observed in corrosion products formed after immersion in others solutions as shown
Figure 4. This shows that the existence of HCO
3− in physiological solution inhibits apatite crystal growth [
29]. Even though considerable amounts of Ca, P and Mg were detected by EDX, there was no peak shown in XRD as these corrosion products are considered to be amorphous. Also the relative intensity of Mg(OH)
2 and calcium phosphate compounds are very weak in comparison with the intensity of Mg peak [
17].
Figure 5 shows the thickness of corrosion products formed on the surface after immersion in solutions for 10 days. Hydroxyapatite appeared to have precipitated on the surface with a thickness of about 40 μm, but the corrosion products were observed to burrow into the alloy with the addition of NaHCO
3 and mucin in solutions. The thickness of this corrosion product increased as the concentration of NaHCO
3 in solution increased. However, the thickness of corrosion product with the addition of 0.1 g·L
−1 mucin in solution was thinner in comparison with the corrosion products formed in solutions with same concentration of NaHCO
3 with no added mucin. This implies that the role of HCO
3− in solution is to accelerate corrosion of magnesium alloy [
30] and retard the formation of hydroxyapatite at physiological pH [
29]. The formation of calcium phosphate compounds and the corrosion rate of magnesium alloys are sensitive to the concentration of HCO
3− in physiological solution [
17]. The corrosion rate of magnesium usually increases in a solution with concentrations of HCO
3− above 40 mg·L
−1 by accelerated dissolution of the magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)
2) protective film [
13,
30]. Since the concentrations of HCO
3− in solutions #2 to #4 are over 726 mg·L
−1, the corrosion of AZ31 magnesium alloy was accelerated by the HCO
3−.
Figure 4.
XRD (X-ray diffraction) patterns of AZ31 magnesium alloys after immersion for 10 days in modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentrations of NaHCO3: (a) AZ31 magnesium alloy; (b) Solution #1; (c) Solution #2; (d) Solution #3; (e) Solution #4.
Figure 4.
XRD (X-ray diffraction) patterns of AZ31 magnesium alloys after immersion for 10 days in modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentrations of NaHCO3: (a) AZ31 magnesium alloy; (b) Solution #1; (c) Solution #2; (d) Solution #3; (e) Solution #4.
Figure 5.
Thickness of corrosion products formed on the surface after immersion for 10 days in modified Gamble’s solutions: (a) Solution #1; (b) Solution #2; (c) Solution #3; (d) Solution #4; (e) Solution #5; (f) Solution #6; (g) Solution #7; (h) Solution #8.
Figure 5.
Thickness of corrosion products formed on the surface after immersion for 10 days in modified Gamble’s solutions: (a) Solution #1; (b) Solution #2; (c) Solution #3; (d) Solution #4; (e) Solution #5; (f) Solution #6; (g) Solution #7; (h) Solution #8.
Figure 6 shows the results of EDX mapping and line analysis of corrosion products formed on the surface of AZ31 magnesium alloy after immersion in solution #4 for 10 days. The bottom of corrosion product is mainly composed of Mg and O while the amount of P and Ca gradually increases as the distance from AZ31 substrate increases. It is surmised that the bottom part of the corrosion products are composed of magnesium apatite or calcium magnesium phosphate as well as magnesium hydroxide [
26,
27]. The top part of the corrosion products is believed to be composed of hydroxyapatite or apatite-like compounds [
31] even though it is not detected by XRD.
Figure 6.
EDX mapping and line analysis of corrosion products formed on the surface after immersion for 10 days in solution #4.
Figure 6.
EDX mapping and line analysis of corrosion products formed on the surface after immersion for 10 days in solution #4.
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) testing was performed to probe the effect(s) of carbonate ions and mucin on the corrosion behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloys and the resulting data was fit to the equivalent electrical circuits proposed by King
et al. [
32]. In the equivalent electrical circuit of
Figure 7, (1)
Rs represents the solution resistance; (2) One of the constant phase element (CPE), CPE
1 is contributed from the capacitance of double-layer and corrosion product layer; (3)
R1 is represents the pore resistance of corrosion product layer; (4)
R2/CPE
2 is contributed the adsorption of intermediates induced by charge transfer process; (5)
R3/
L is contributed from accelerated Mg
2+ dissolution via fast intermediate steps at actively dissolving areas [
20,
32,
33].
Figure 7.
Schematic representation of corresponding equivalent electrical circuits of Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) plots acquired in (a) Solutions #1 and #5; (b) Solutions #2, #3, #4, #6, #7 and #8.
Figure 7.
Schematic representation of corresponding equivalent electrical circuits of Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) plots acquired in (a) Solutions #1 and #5; (b) Solutions #2, #3, #4, #6, #7 and #8.
Figure 8 and
Figure 9 show the temporal changes of Nyquist plots for AZ31 magnesium alloys during immersion in modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentrations of NaHCO
3 and mucin up to 24 h at 37 °C respectively. Polarization resistance,
Rp, of Nyquist plots which include the inductive response was determined by
after fitting with
Figure 7a as suggested by King
et al. [
32], and
Rp of Nyquist plots without inductive response was calculated by
Rp =
R1 +
R2 after fitting with
Figure 7b, which were summarized in
Figure 10. In solution #1 and #5 which did not include NaHCO
3, the inductive response was observed and
Rp was increased up to 10 and 15 h respectively and then decreased during immersion. However,
Rp increased with increasing the concentration of NaHCO
3 in solution during immersion, and
Rp more sharply increased with addition of 0.1 g·L
−1 mucin than in those solutions that did not. Relative lower increment of
Rp in solution #1 and #5 in comparison with other solution and the inductive response could be caused by the formation of porous corrosion products on the surface of AZ31 magnesium alloy. The increment of
Rp and no inductive response with increase of NaHCO
3 in solution was caused by formation of dense corrosion product layer [
32,
33]. More increment of
Rp with addition of mucin in solution although the corrosion product layer is thinner as shown in
Figure 5 might result from the adsorption of mucin on the surface and the formation of more dense corrosion product layer than the corrosion product layer formed in solution without mucin.
Figure 8.
Change of Nyquist plot for AZ31 magnesium alloys in modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentrations of NaHCO3 during immersion up to 24 h: (a) Solution #1; (b) Solution #2; (c) Solution #3; (d) Solution #4.
Figure 8.
Change of Nyquist plot for AZ31 magnesium alloys in modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentrations of NaHCO3 during immersion up to 24 h: (a) Solution #1; (b) Solution #2; (c) Solution #3; (d) Solution #4.
Figure 9.
Change of Nyquist plot for AZ31 magnesium alloys with addition of 0.1 g·L−1 in modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentrations of NaHCO3 during immersion up to 24 h: (a) Solution #5; (b) Solution #6; (c) Solution #7; (d) Solution #8.
Figure 9.
Change of Nyquist plot for AZ31 magnesium alloys with addition of 0.1 g·L−1 in modified Gamble’s solutions with different concentrations of NaHCO3 during immersion up to 24 h: (a) Solution #5; (b) Solution #6; (c) Solution #7; (d) Solution #8.
Figure 10.
Temporal change of (a) coating resistance (Rc) by corrosion products and (b) charge transfer resistance (Rt) for AZ31 magnesium alloys during immersion in modified Gamble’s solutions up to 24 h.
Figure 10.
Temporal change of (a) coating resistance (Rc) by corrosion products and (b) charge transfer resistance (Rt) for AZ31 magnesium alloys during immersion in modified Gamble’s solutions up to 24 h.
Figure 11 shows potentiodynamic polarization curves for AZ31 magnesium alloy in Gamble solution (Solution #3) with different concentrations of mucin. The corrosion potentials increased and corrosion current density (
icorr) remarkably reduced with the increase of mucin in the solution. It implied that mucin can effectively decrease the corrosion rate of magnesium by acting as a barrier shield from the initial stages of corrosion. This results in the formation of denser corrosion products. These results can support the reason why
Rp increased by addition of mucin in
Figure 9. Although we could not find literature related to the effect of mucin on the corrosion of magnesium alloys, it has been shown that mucin in physiological solutions retarded the corrosion of other metallic biomaterials such as silver alloys through electrochemical analysis [
34]. Also, the effect of absorption of other proteins on corrosion resistance has been identified on magnesium alloys [
20,
35] and other biomaterials [
36,
37].
Figure 11.
Potentiodynamic polarization curves for AZ31 magnesium alloy in Gamble solution (Solution #3) with different concentrations of mucin.
Figure 11.
Potentiodynamic polarization curves for AZ31 magnesium alloy in Gamble solution (Solution #3) with different concentrations of mucin.
Biocompatibility of magnesium as airway stent material was assessed using Porcine Tracheal Epithelial (PTE) cells to determine the cell responses on the surfaces of pure magnesium wire.
Figure 12a shows many cells were well attached but distributed non-uniformly on the wire which may be due to the cylindrical morphology of the wire. Cells were attached closely together showing good interaction between cells and corrosion products formed on the wire as shown
Figure 12b,c. Cell adhesion can be affected by various factors such as hydrogen gas evolution, increment of localized pH and released ions and corrosion products. Thus, good cell interaction on the surface of magnesium wire means that the increment of localized pH and magnesium ions produced from stent dissolution is not expected to lead to toxic reactions during biodegradation.
Figure 12.
SEM images of Porcine Tracheal Epithelial (PTE) cells adhered on the surfaces of pure magnesium wire after the cell adhesion test for 12 h: (a) Low magnification image of pure magnesium wire after cell adhesion test; (b) High magnification image of cell adhesion poor area; (c) High magnification image of cell adhesion rich area.
Figure 12.
SEM images of Porcine Tracheal Epithelial (PTE) cells adhered on the surfaces of pure magnesium wire after the cell adhesion test for 12 h: (a) Low magnification image of pure magnesium wire after cell adhesion test; (b) High magnification image of cell adhesion poor area; (c) High magnification image of cell adhesion rich area.