Next Article in Journal
Buckling Behavior of Substrate Supported Graphene Sheets
Next Article in Special Issue
Deposition of Visible Light Active Photocatalytic Bismuth Molybdate Thin Films by Reactive Magnetron Sputtering
Previous Article in Journal
Triggered Release from Thermoresponsive Polymersomes with Superparamagnetic Membranes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Degradation of Tetracycline with BiFeO3 Prepared by a Simple Hydrothermal Method
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/ma9010030
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Facile Synthesis of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy Nanocomposite with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity under Visible Light

by
Alfredo Márquez-Herrera
1,*,
Victor Manuel Ovando-Medina
2,
Blanca Estela Castillo-Reyes
2,
Martin Zapata-Torres
3,
Miguel Meléndez-Lira
4 and
Jaquelina González-Castañeda
5
1
Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola, DICIVA, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, Universidad de Guanajuato, Ex Hacienda el Copal, Carr. Irapuato-Silao km 9, Irapuato Gto 36500, Mexico
2
Ingeniería Química, COARA, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Carr. a Cedral Km 5+600, San José de las Trojes, Matehuala, San Luis Potosí 78700, Mexico
3
Centro de Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada, Unidad Legaría IPN, Calzada Legaría 694, Col. Irrigación, México D.F. 11500, Mexico
4
Departamento de Física, CINVESTAV-IPN, Apartado Postal 14-740, México D.F. 07000, Mexico
5
Departamento de Ingeniería Ambiental, DICIVA, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, Universidad de Guanajuato, Ex Hacienda el Copal, Carr. Irapuato-Silao km 9, Irapuato Gto 36500, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9010030
Submission received: 1 October 2015 / Revised: 2 December 2015 / Accepted: 3 December 2015 / Published: 6 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancement of Photocatalytic Materials 2016)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pyrrole monomer was chemically polymerized onto SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 powders to obtain SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/polypyrrole nanocomposite to be used as a candidate for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye (MB). The material was characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, UV/Vis spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction (XRD). It was observed from transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) analysis that the reported synthesis route allows the production of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanoparticles with particle size below 100 nm which were embedded within a semiconducting polypyrrole matrix (PPy). The SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites were tested in the photodegradation of MB dye under visible light irradiation. Also, the effects of MB dye initial concentration and the catalyst load on photodegradation efficiency were studied and discussed. Under the same conditions, the efficiency of photodegradation of MB employing the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite increases as compared with that obtained employing the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite.

1. Introduction

During the past decade, photocatalytic degradation has proven to be a promising technology for the removal of various organic pollutants in waste water because of its many attractive advantages, including its environmental friendly feature, relatively low cost, and low energy consumption [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Photocatalytic processes are methods that utilize the solar radiation energy to perform catalytic processes such as water splitting, waste mineralization, recovery of precious metals, etc. [11,12]. Many photocatalytic materials have wide bad-gap values and require ultraviolet light (UV) to be photoactive. However, the need of UV light for activating the photocatalyst greatly limits practical applications because of the low content of UV light in the solar spectrum (about 4%) [13]. Therefore to take complete advantage of the sunlight one needs to make a visible light activated photocatalyst or increase its efficiency in the UV light region. In order to narrow the band gap of these materials, several researchers have focused on modifications by doping with appropriate ions [6,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Also, it has been reported that by using composite films or powders consisting of two semiconducting photocatalysts the absorption edge is shifted to the visible light region, e.g., TiO2-SrTiO3-δ [22], BiVO4-SrTiO3:Rh [23], Ag3PO4-Cr-SrTiO3 [24], Fe2O3-SrTiO3 [25], SrCO3-SrTiO3 [26], TiO2-SO4 [27], g-C3N4/Fe3O4/Ag3VO4 [28].
Conducting polymers (e.g., polyaniline, polypyrrole, and polythiophene) with delocalized conjugated structures have been widely studied due to their rapid photoinduced charge separation and relatively slow charge recombination [29,30]. In particular, polypyrrole (PPy) with extended p-conjugated electron systems has recently shown great promises to enhance photocatalytic activity owing to its unique electrical and optical properties, such as high absorption coefficients in the visible light, high mobility of charge carriers, and excellent stability [31,32]. Furthermore, PPy is also an efficient electron donor and good hole transporter upon visible light excitation. It was proposed that polypyrrole has the ability to channel the photoinduced holes from the surface of the semiconductor to the polymer/solution interface at a fast rate, which can then oxidize the pollutants [33,34]. The photocatalytic activity of semiconductors modified with PPy have shown that PPy can effectively enhance the photoactivity of TiO2 [35,36,37], Ag-TiO2 [38], Bi2WO6 [39], Fe3O4/ZnO [40], Bi2O2CO3 [41], etc.
Taking into account some reports about SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 composite as background [42,43,44,45,46,47], and due the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite has not been studied as a photocatalyst candidate, this manuscript describes a modified strategy for the preparation of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite, followed by coating with the semiconducting polypyrrole (PPy) to increase its photoactivity in the visible light range. Both SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites were tested for photodegradation of MB dye under visible light irradiation. The effects on MB dye initial concentration and the catalyst load on photodegradation efficiency were studied and discussed.

2. Results and Discussion

The process here described to obtain SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite consists of two straightforward steps. The first step implies the production of Sr(OH)2 powders as a water insoluble white dust, which precipitates from the reaction medium according to the double-displacement chemical reaction in which the hydrated form of Sr(OH)2 can be formed.
In the search to find a cheap and straight route to obtain the SrCO3 phase, it was chose to dry Sr(OH)2 at ambient atmosphere to take advantage of the reaction with CO2 present in the air [42,43,44,45,46,47].
The second step implied the chemical polymerization of pyrrole monomer dispersing SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) surfactant. Since a practical point of view, the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite can be easily removed from MB aqueous solutions due to its water insolubility, facilitating its recovery. The most interesting characteristic of the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy composite is its high photoactivity under visible light as will be discussed later.

2.1. Characterization

2.1.1. Chemical Composition

Figure 1 shows the FTIR spectra of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites, also it can be observed the characteristic signals of PPy chains. The peak at 1480 cm−1 is ascribed to C–C ring stretching; the peak around 1560 cm−1 is due to C=C backbone stretching; and the peaks at 1300 and 1120 cm−1 are due to C–H in-plane and C–N stretching vibrations, respectively [48]. The peak located at 1560 cm−1 is considered as a reflection of the conducting polymer. Combined signals of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy were observed in Figure 1b indicating the interaction of SrCO3, Sr(OH)2 and PPy in the composite. The spectrum corresponding to SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite shows three main peaks, Figure 1a. The Peak at 3350 cm−1 is due to O–H physically adsorbed on the surface, the signal at 3500 cm−1 is ascribed to O–H bonds in Sr(OH)2 phase. The peak at 1440 cm−1 is usually observed when C=O bonds are present [46]; in our case this signal can be due to the presence of the SrCO3 phase. When the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite is coated with PPy, the signals corresponding to SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 are masked by the semiconducting PPy, Figure 1b.
Materials 09 00030 g001 1024
Figure 1. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of (a) SrCO3-Sr(OH)2; (b) SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites; and the characteristic signals of (c) polypyrrole matrix (PPy) chains.
Figure 1. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of (a) SrCO3-Sr(OH)2; (b) SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites; and the characteristic signals of (c) polypyrrole matrix (PPy) chains.
Materials 09 00030 g001
In order to obtain insights into the chemical environment of the elements of the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 powders a study using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed. The general survey XPS spectrum, Figure 2, shown peaks related with Sr, O and C.
Materials 09 00030 g002 1024
Figure 2. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum for SrCO3-Sr(HO)2 nanocomposite.
Figure 2. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum for SrCO3-Sr(HO)2 nanocomposite.
Materials 09 00030 g002
Figure 3 shows the high resolution XPS spectrum associated to the Sr binding energies for the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 sample. It shows a peak fit analysis of the Sr 3d5/2 and Sr 3d3/2 signals with mixed Gaussian-Lorentzian profiles that reveals two underlying components of the binding energies at 133.2 eV and 134.8 eV. The inset in Figure 3 shows only the deconvolution of the Sr 3d5/2 signal that is attributed to Sr bonded to Sr(HO)2·8H2O and SrCO3. The deconvolution for the Sr 3d3/2 signal was not carried out because there is no reported information about its strength in the compound Sr(OH)2. The positions of the peaks were obtained from the X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database of NIST [49]. This result confirms that Sr(HO)2·8H2O and SrCO3 phases are present in the composite.
Materials 09 00030 g003 1024
Figure 3. XPS spectrum of Sr 3d5/2 and Sr 3d3/2 for the SrCO3-Sr(HO)2 sample. The inset shows the deconvolution of the Sr 3d5/2 signal.
Figure 3. XPS spectrum of Sr 3d5/2 and Sr 3d3/2 for the SrCO3-Sr(HO)2 sample. The inset shows the deconvolution of the Sr 3d5/2 signal.
Materials 09 00030 g003

2.1.2. Crystallinity and Morphology

Figure 4 shows the transmission electron micrograph corresponding to SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 sample without polypyrrole. As can be seen, the powders consisted of clusters of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanoparticles. Although the morphology of nanoparticles is not clearly defined, it looks like circular shapes. It can be observed that the particle size is below 100 nm. Due TEM technique burns the polypyrrole, it is not appropriate to verify the existence of PPy on the surface of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 sample with TEM images. However it is worth to mentioning that the composite SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy has a core-shell structure [50].
BET area for SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 particles was found to be 8.5 m2/g, this high surface area is already evident from TEM image. This value is similar to the reported by Viriya-Empikul, et al. [51] for SrCO3-Sr(OH)2·H2O composite (5.2 m2/g). This high surface area has a relevance because the surface of the photocatalytic material in contact with the contaminant plays an important role in determining the photocatalytic activity of the composite powders [52].
Figure 5 shows X-ray diffractogram of the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite; the corresponding to the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy composite just incorporated a broad signal characteristic of amorphous polypyrrole. The positions of the diffraction peaks associated to the orthorhombic Sr(OH)2∙8H2O, Sr(OH)2∙H2O and SrCO3 from the 271438, 281222 and 050418 cards of the Powder Diffraction File database (PDF card) are also shown. The close coincidence with the reported positions allows to establish that the peaks presented in the experimental diffractogram are due to the diffraction from the planes of the Sr(OH)2∙H2O and Sr(OH)2∙8H2O. A small signal from the planes of the SrCO3 phase was found. The X-ray diffraction analysis corroborates that the powders are composed by Sr(OH)2∙H2O, Sr(OH)2∙8H2O and SrCO3 (called SrCO3-Sr(OH)2) highly ordered crystals because there is a complete correspondence between the experimental diffraction peaks and the data base positions (for annealed sample see Figure S1).
Materials 09 00030 g004 1024
Figure 4. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the as-prepared SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanoparticles without polypyrrole.
Figure 4. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the as-prepared SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanoparticles without polypyrrole.
Materials 09 00030 g004
Materials 09 00030 g005 1024
Figure 5. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern obtained for the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite.
Figure 5. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern obtained for the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite.
Materials 09 00030 g005
From Rietveld refinement with an adjust factor RWP better than 10%, the percentage of phases found in the composite were 59.3% ± 1.2%, 32.3% ± 0.7% and 8.4% ± 0.3% for Sr(OH)2∙8H2O, Sr(OH)2∙H2O and SrCO3, respectively.

2.1.3. Photocatalytic Activity

The photocatalytic performances of the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites were studied following the degradation process of aqueous solutions of MB dye under visible light irradiation. Figure 6 shows the UV/Vis spectra of MB aqueous solutions at different times. Solutions were prepared employing an initial MB concentration of 20 mg/L and 0.2 g of both (a) SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and (b) SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite load. It should be noted that there is a small difference in the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 weight of the catalyst employed because the PPy. However, it highlights the positive effect of PPy on the photocatalytic activity of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2. It can be seen that the peak at λ = 665 nm decreases with the visible light irradiation time, reaching a minimum after 30 min for the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite. Insets in Figure 6 clearly shown a more discolored solution for the catalyst containing PPy. Based in the above results, photodegrading kinetics studies were made considering 30 min of reaction.
Materials 09 00030 g006 1024
Figure 6. Ultraviolet-visible (UV/Vis) spectra of methylene blue dye (MB) aqueous solutions at different times for a 0.2 g of (a) SrCO3-Sr(OH)2; and (b) SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites.
Figure 6. Ultraviolet-visible (UV/Vis) spectra of methylene blue dye (MB) aqueous solutions at different times for a 0.2 g of (a) SrCO3-Sr(OH)2; and (b) SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites.
Materials 09 00030 g006
Figure 7 shows the ratio of residual to initial MB concentration (C/C0) as a function of time using the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites (0.2 g for both cases) at different MB initial concentrations. It can be observed that for the lower value of MB initial concentration, similar degradation efficiencies can be achieved after 30 min of visible light exposition for both materials (efficiency around 85%). However when the MB initial concentration was increased up to 50 mg/L, maintaining constant the catalyst load to 0.2 g, lower degradation efficiencies were obtained; 9.8% for bare SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite compared to 75.6% for SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite. Furthermore, only 10 min were needed to achieve 71% of degradation for 10 mg/L of initial MB concentration using the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite.
By other hand, Figure 8 shows the effect of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite photocatalyst load on the photodegradation kinetics with a fixed initial MB concentration (20 mg/L). Employing 0.3 g of catalyst load, it can be observed for the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite that 43.1% of degradation efficiency was achieved after 10 min of visible light irradiation and 83.6% after 30 min, whereas for the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite the corresponding efficiencies were 73.6% and 93.2%, respectively. Decreasing the amount of catalyst to 0.1 g and after 30 min of degradation, it resulted in a decrease in degradation efficiency from 93.2% to 75.1% for the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite; while for SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite dropped the degradation efficiency to 43.1%, thus, the photocatalyst amount strongly affects the efficiency of MB degradation, and show the enhanced performance of the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite under the studied conditions. These results show that SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 based nanocomposites are promising materials with excellent performance in photocatalytic applications, and the incorporation of PPy enhances noticeably their performance.
Materials 09 00030 g007 1024
Figure 7. Kinetics of MB dye photodegradation under visible light irradiation using SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites for the MB initial concentrations indicated in the label. The catalyst load was 0.2 g for each case.
Figure 7. Kinetics of MB dye photodegradation under visible light irradiation using SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites for the MB initial concentrations indicated in the label. The catalyst load was 0.2 g for each case.
Materials 09 00030 g007
Materials 09 00030 g008 1024
Figure 8. MB dye photodegradation kinetics under visible light irradiation using 20 mg/L of MB initial concentration and different SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites loading.
Figure 8. MB dye photodegradation kinetics under visible light irradiation using 20 mg/L of MB initial concentration and different SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites loading.
Materials 09 00030 g008
Blank measurements were carried out employing both catalysts and MB solutions at low concentrations without observe any degradation at all confirming that these catalysts are activated by visible light (Figures S2–S4).
Because Sr(OH)2 is an ionic compound, not a semiconductor, the photocatalytic activity of the composite containing Sr(OH)2 cannot explained by changes in the band structure of it [52]. It is possible that the presence of the SrCO3 phase is the responsible of the improvement in the photocatalytic activity of the composite [26]. The increase in carriers due to the absorption process in the semiconductor PPy coating injects more electrons to the SrCO3 compound [48,53,54] increasing its photodegradation activity efficiency. However, the principle of the photocatalytic oxidation due to the Sr(OH)2 phase still needs to be clarified.
In our particular case, the formation of semiconducting SrCO3 (which has a reported band gap energy of 3.17 eV) [54,55] during both, drying of pure Sr(OH)2 and dye photodegradation due to the CO2 adsorption from air and water, respectively, permits the explanation of dye photodegradation mechanism as shown in the Figure 9. The performance of this composite is determined by the relative positions of the bands of nanoparticles and PPy. The values of each bandgap are reported in Figure 9, however, the exact determination of their position is beyond the scope of this work.
Materials 09 00030 g009 1024
Figure 9. Possible MB dye photodegradation process.
Figure 9. Possible MB dye photodegradation process.
Materials 09 00030 g009
When visible light impinges on the composite surface, electrons are promoted from HOMO to LUMO of PPy (which has a reported band gap energy of 2.2 eV) [56], generating holes in the PPy chain (h+), electrons in the LUMO (−1.15 V versus NHE) [56], travel through PPy chains to conduction band (CB), (−0.23 V versus NHE) [57], of inorganic material, which can react with oxygen solved in the aqueous phase initiating photo-reduction. On the other hand, electrons in the valence band (VB) of inorganic material travels to h+ in the HOMO of PPy, generating a hole in the VB in the inorganic material. These holes can react with water generating ·OH radicals, which attack organic molecules (photo-oxidation) until mineralization is done.
In the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue, not only do O 2 − and ·OH play important roles, but the holes generated in the HOMO band of PPy also play a role, however they have a lower oxidative capability than those in the valence band of SrCO3, as shown in Figure 9. It is energetically unfavorable to use pure PPy to oxidize methylene blue molecules to form ·OH radicals, because the methylene blue molecules need to be attacked by hydroxyl radicals to generate organic radicals or other intermediates.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

In the present study, all chemicals used were analytical reagent grade. Strontium nitrate hexahydrate (Sr(NO3)2∙6H2O) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were purchased from Onyx-Met, Inc. (Olsztyn, Poland). Methylene blue dye was purchased from Fluka (Toluca, Mexico). Pyrrole monomer and ammonium persulfate (APS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Toluca, Mexico). Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was acquired from Hycel (Guadalajara, Mexico). Deionized water was used in all the experiments.

3.2. Methods

3.2.1. Synthesis of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy Nanocomposite

The SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite was prepared as described in Figure 10: first, NaOH (2.0000 g) and Sr(NO3)2∙6H2O (10.5814 g) were mixed together in distilled water (30 mL) (molar ratio of NaOH/Sr(NO3)2 of 2:1) under 450 rpm magnetic stirring by 2 h, resulting in a precipitate as a fine white powder of Sr(OH)2 which was water insoluble. Afterward, the precipitates were filtered using Whatman 42 filter paper, washed several times with de-ionized water. Then, sample was dried at 90 °C in air for 2 h without annealing (Figures S5 and S6). Afterwards, dried sample of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 (0.2500 g) was well dispersed in an aqueous solution of SDS (consisting in 30 mL of water and 0.8 g of SDS). This mixture was ultrasonicated (Cole-Parmer Instruments, CPX 130, Vermon Hill, IL, USA) by 10 min for homogenization; 0.4 g of pyrrole monomer was added and homogenized under magnetic stirring through 2 h. Then, APS was dissolved in 10 mL of water (0.6 M) and added to the reaction mixture to start pyrrole polymerization. The reaction proceeded under magnetic stirring for 1 h. The reaction mixture was poured into an excess of methanol to precipitate the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy composite (black dust). The sample was decanted and dried at 60 °C in an oven for 24 h.
Materials 09 00030 g010 1024
Figure 10. Experimental process to obtain SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite.
Figure 10. Experimental process to obtain SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite.
Materials 09 00030 g010

3.2.2. Characterization

The chemical environment structures of strontium, carbon and oxygen were analyzed by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) (model K alpha, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, CT, USA). The general survey, as well as the high resolution spectra in the regions of the C 1s, O 1s and Sr 3d were obtained. The binding energy of the C 1s line at 284.5 eV was taken as the reference peak to calibrate the obtained spectra. The background subtraction was performed using the mathematical model derived by Shirley [58]. The Sr signal curve was fitted with an asymmetric Gaussian-Lorentzian function. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement was performed with a Rigaku X’pert diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokio, Japan) using the CuKα line (λkα1 = 1.54056 Å and λkα2 = 1.54439 Å) and the correspondence between the experimental diffraction peaks and database position was made using the Match! 3 phase identification from powder diffraction software (Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany). In order to determinate the percentage of each phase in the composite, the quantitative phase composition was analyzed according to the Rietveld refinement method [59] using the software Maud (University of Trento, Trento, Italy) [60]. The crystal data for each phase used in the quantitative phase analysis were obtained from Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD). By other hand, the particle size of representative SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 powders were observed via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL-2010 system (Jeol, Pleasanton, CA, USA) operated at 200 kV where the powders were dispersed in distilled water and deposited on carbon foil on copper grids. The particle size was calculated using the ImageJ 1.46c software (National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD, USA) in TEM images. The average surface area (SBET) of the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 particles was obtained using a Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method [61]. For measuring nitrogen adsorption, 68.7 mg of sample, was used. It was dehydrated for four hours at 200 °C, then the adsorption of nitrogen was measured at liquid nitrogen temperature (−197.392 °C).

3.2.3. Photoactivity in the Visible Light of Synthesized Materials

The synthesized SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites were tested by photodegradation of aqueous solutions of MB dye under visible light irradiation. The reactor consisted of a glass vessel with two quartz bulbs, the first for water recirculation at constant temperature (20 °C) and the second to insert the visible light source. The effect of the catalyst load on MB degradation was studied using 0.1 g, 0.2 g and 0.3 g of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites; catalyst were mixed with 150 mL of aqueous solutions of MB at 20 mg/L of initial concentration (C0). Afterwards, the mixture was charged to the reactor. In each case, the tested solutions were exposed to a visible light source from a halogen lamp with tungsten filament (Philips LongLife EcoVision H7, 12 V, and 55 W) and a cutoff filter (λ > 400 nm). Aliquots of 1.5 mL were obtained at different times, centrifuged and poured into a quartz cuvette to determine UV/Vis spectra (250 nm to 800 nm of wavelength) and absorbance (Genesys 10, Thermo-Spectronic) at a wavelength of 664 nm to calculate residual MB concentrations (C) from a calibration curve. In addition, initial MB concentrations were varied from 10 mg/L to 50 mg/L when working with SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy composites at a fixed load of 2.0 g/L.

4. Conclusions

On the basis of FTIR spectroscopy, XPS, XRD and TEM results, the successful synthesis of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite was obtained using Sr(NO3)2∙6H2O, NaOH, SDS and pyrrole monomer as precursors. The measurements indicate that the obtained material corresponds to SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite with particle size below 100 nm, which were immersed into a semiconducting polypyrrole matrix. The SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 particles showed only 9.7% of MB dye photodegradation after 30 min of visible light irradiation using a MB initial concentration of 50 mg/L and a catalyst load of 1.3 g/L of solution; and for the same conditions but with 20 mg/L of MB dye initial concentration, the efficiency was 67.0%. The corresponding efficiencies using the SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy composite were 75.6% and 85.2%, respectively. It was also observed that using a catalyst load of 2.0 g/L of solution with 20 mg/L of MB dye initial concentration and after 30 min of photodegradation, 83.6% and 93.2% of efficiency were obtained for SrCO3-Sr(OH)2and SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposites, respectively. In summary, the results obtained in the present study indicate that SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy nanocomposite increased the catalytic efficiency of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2 nanocomposite and it may serve as a promising efficient photocatalyst for the degradation of organic contaminants as the methylene blue. Also, it is important to note that this nanocomposite meets at least four requirements: easy preparation/synthesis with availability of the raw materials, low cost, and highly effective.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/9/1/30/s1.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Universidad de Guanajuato through project 525/2015. The Technical support from Eng. Wilian Cahuich, José Bante, Marcela Guerrero, Angel Guillen-Cervantes, Rogelio Fragoso-Soriano, Laura Lopez, Daniel Perez-Escamilla and Luis Hernández-Hernandez is acknowledged. Victor Manuel Ovando-Medina acknowledges the hospitality of Lorena. Farías-Cepeda at the sabbatical leave in FCQ-UA de Coahuila, Saltillo.

Author Contributions

Alfredo Márquez-Herrera conceived and designed the experiments; Alfredo Márquez-Herrera and Blanca Estela Castillo-Reyes performed the experiments; Alfredo Márquez-Herrera, Victor Manuel Ovando-Medina, Martin Zapata-Torres and Miguel Meléndez-Lira analyzed the data; Alfredo Márquez-Herrera, Martin Zapata-Torres, Miguel Meléndez-Lira and Jaquelina González-Castañeda contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Alfredo Márquez-Herrera wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T.; Ohwaki, T.; Aoki, K.; Taga, Y. Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science 2001, 293, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tang, J.; Zou, Z.; Ye, J. Efficient photocatalytic decomposition of organic contaminants over CaBi2O4 under visible-light irradiation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4463–4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kim, T.W.; Hwang, S.-J.; Jhung, S.H.; Chang, J.-S.; Park, H.; Choi, W.; Choy, J.H. Photolysis: Nickel oxide-containing porous nanocomposite. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hameed, A.; Montini, T.; Gombac, V.; Fornasiero, P. Surface phases and photocatalytic activity correlation of Bi2O3/Bi2O4-x nanocomposite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9658–9659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zeng, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, M.K.; Yan, H. Hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic properties of pyrochlore La2Sn2O7 nanocubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 11879–11887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, J.W.; Chen, G.; Li, Z.H.; Zhang, Z.G. Electronic structure and visible light photocatalysis water splitting property of chromium-doped SrTiO3. J. Solid State Chem. 2006, 179, 3704–3708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yang, J.; Li, D.; Wang, X.; Yang, X.J.; Lu, L.D. Rapid synthesis of nanocrystalline TiO2/SnO2 binary oxides and their photoinduced decomposition of methyl orange. J. Solid State Chem. 2002, 165, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, C.; Zhao, J.C.; Wang, X.M.; Mai, B.X.; Sheng, G.Y.; Peng, P.A.; Fu, J.M. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of nano-sized ZnO/SnO2 coupled photocatalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2002, 39, 269–279. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yamashita, H.; Harada, M.; Misaka, J.; Takeuchi, M.; Ikeue, K.; Anpo, M. Degradation of propanol diluted in water under visible light irradiation using metal ion-implanted titanium dioxide photocatalysts. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2002, 148, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Herrmann, J.M. Heterogeneous photocatalysis: Fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants. Catal. Today 1999, 53, 115–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Matos, J.; Garcia, A.; Zhao, L.; Magdalena-Titirici, M. Solvothermal carbon-doped TiO2 photocatalyst for the enhanced methylene blue degradation under visible light. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2010, 390, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kachina, A.; Puzenat, E.; Ould-Chikh, S.; Geantet, C.; Delichere, P.; Afanasiev, P. A new approach to the preparation of nitrogen-doped titania visible light photocatalyst. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Yin, S.; Komatsu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Saito, F.; Sato, T. Preparation and characterization of nitrogen doped SrTiO3 photocatalyst. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2004, 165, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chang, C.H.; Shen, Y.H. Synthesis and characterization of chromium doped SrTiO3 photocatalyst. Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xie, T.H.; Sun, X.; Lin, J. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of RhB driven by visible light-induced MMCT of Ti(IV)−O−Fe(II) formed in Fe-doped SrTiO3. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 9753–9759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sulaeman, U.; Yin, S.; Suehiro, T.; Sato, T. Solvothermal synthesis of SrTiO3-LnTiO2N solid solution and their visible light responsive photocatalytic properties. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2009, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ouyang, S.; Tong, H.; Umezawa, N.; Cao, J.; Li, P.; Bi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, J. Surface alkalinization induced enhancement of photocatalytic H2 evolution over SrTiO3 based photocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1974–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nishiro, R.; Tanaka, S.; Kudo, A. Hydrothermal-synthesized SrTiO3 photocatalyst codoped with rhodium and antimony with visible-light response for sacrificial H2 and O2 evolution and application to overall water splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 150, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shen, S.; Jia, Y.; Fan, F.; Feng, Z.; Li, C. Time-resolved infrared spectroscopic investigation of roles of valence states of Cr in (La,Cr)-doped SrTiO3 photocatalysts. Chin. J. Catal. 2013, 34, 2036–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Subramanian, V.; Roeder, R.K.; Wolf, E.E. Synthesis and UV-visible-light photoactivity of noble-metal-SrTiO3 composites. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 2187–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ueda, M.; Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S. Preparation of tabular TiO2–SrTiO3-δ composite for photocatalytic electrode. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2004, 5, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jia, Q.; Iwase, A.; Kudo, A. BiVO4-Ru/SrTiO3: Rh composite Z-scheme photocatalyst for solar water splitting. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 1513–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, J.; Ouyang, S.; Li, P.; Zhang, Y.; Kako, T.; Ye, J. A new heterojunction Ag3PO4/Cr-SrTiO3 photocatalyst towards efficient elimination of gaseous organic pollutants under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 134, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, Z.; Yu, T.; Ye, J.; Zou, Z. Preparation of Fe2O3/SrTiO3 composite powders and their photocatalytic properties. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2007, 68, 280–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Márquez-Herrera, A.; Ovando-Medina, V.M.; Castillo-Reyes, B.E.; Meléndez-Lira, M.; Zapata-Torres, M.; Saldaña, N. A novel synthesis of SrCO3–SrTiO3 nanocomposites with high photocatalytic activity. J. Nanopart Res. 2014, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Del-Ángel-Sánchez, M.T.; García-Alamilla, P.; Lagunes-Gálvez, L.M.; García-Alamilla, R.; Cabrera-Culebro, E.G. Aplicación de metodología de superficie de respuesta para la degradación de naranja de metilo con TiO2 sol-gel sulfatado. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 2015, 31, 99–106. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mousavi, M.; Habibi-Yangjeh, A. Ternary g-C3N4/Fe3O4/Ag3VO4 nanocomposites: Novel magnetically separable visible-light-driven photocatalysts for efficientlydegradation of dye pollutants. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 163, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, S.B.; Xu, T.G.; Fu, H.B.; Zhao, J.C.; Zhu, Y.F. Synergetic effect of Bi2WO6 photocatalyst with C60 and enhanced photoactivity under visible irradiation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 6234–6239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Shang, M.; Wang, W.Z.; Sun, S.M.; Ren, J.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, L. Efficient visible light-induced photocatalytic degradation of contaminant by spindle-like PANI/BiVO4. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 20228–20233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liang, H.C.; Li, X.Z. Visible-induced photocatalytic reactivity of polymer-sensitized titania nanotube films. Appl. Catal. B 2009, 86, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Luo, Q.Z.; Li, X.Y.; Wang, D.S.; Wang, Y.H.; An, J. Photocatalytic activity of polypyrrole/TiO2 nanocomposites under visible and UV light. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 1646–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kandiel, T.A.; Dillert, R.; Bahnemann, D.W. Enhanced photocatalytic production of molecular hydrogen on TiO2 modified with Pt-polypyrrole nanocomposites. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2009, 8, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cooper, G.; Noufi, R.; Frank, A.J.; Nozik, A.J. Oxygen evolution on tantalum-polypyrrole-platinum anodes. Nature 1982, 295, 578–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chowdhury, D.; Paul, A.; Chattopadhyay, A. Photocatalytic polypyrrole-TiO2-nanoparticles composite thin film generated at the air-water interface. Langmuir 2005, 21, 4123–4128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, C.R.; Li, Q.L.; Li, J.Q. Synthesis and characterization of polypyrrole/TiO2 composite by in situ polymerization method. Synth. Met. 2010, 160, 1699–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, D.S.; Wang, Y.H.; Li, X.Y.; Luo, Q.Z.; An, J.; Yue, J.X. Sunlight photocatalytic activity of polypyrrole-TiO2 nanocomposites prepared by “in situ” method. Catal. Comm. 2008, 9, 1162–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, Y.; Wen, J.; Wei, J.; Xiong, R.; Shi, J.; Pan, C. Polypyrrole-decorated Ag-TiO2 nanofiber exhibiting enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible-light illumination. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 6201–6207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, Z.; Wang, W.; Gao, E. Polypyrrole/Bi2WO6 composite with high charge separation efficiency and enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 7325–7332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. An, L.; Wang, G.; Shi, X.; Su, M.; Gao, F.; Cheng, Y. Recyclable Fe3O4/ZnO/PPy composite photocatalyst: Fabrication and photocatalytic activity. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 88, 2419–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Q.; Zheng, L.; Chen, Y.; Fang, J.; Huang, H.; Su, B. Synthesis and characterization of novel PPy/Bi2O2CO3 composite with improved photocatalytic activity for degradation od Rhodamine-B. J. Alloy. Compd. 2015, 637, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Song, L.; Zhang, S.; Chen, B. A novel visible-light-sensitive strontium carbonate photocatalyst with high photocatalytic activity. Catal. Commun. 2009, 10, 1565–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alavi, M.A.; Morsali, A. Syntheses and characterization of Sr(OH)2 and SrCO3 nanostructures by ultrasonic method. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2010, 17, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, L.; Lin, R.; Tong, Z.; Feng, Q. Facile synthesis of SrCO3 nanostructures in methanol/water solution without additives. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mondal, M.K.; Lenka, M. Solubility of CO2 in aqueous strontium hydroxide. Fluid Ph. Equilib. 2012, 336, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Momenian, H.R.; Gholamrezaei, S.; Salavati-Niasari, M.; Pedram, B.; Mozaffar, F.; Ghanbari, D. Sonochemical synthesis and photocatalytic properties of metal hydroxide and carbonate (M:Mg, Ca, Sr or Ba) Nanoparticles. J. Clust. Sci. 2013, 24, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Song, L.; Li, Y.; He, P.; Zhang, S.; Wu, X.; Fang, S.; Shan, J.; Sun, D. Synthesis and sonocatalytic property of rod-shape Sr(OH)2·8H2O. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2014, 21, 1318–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ovando-Medina, V.M.; Martínez-Gutiérrez, H.; Corona-Rivera, M.A.; Cervantes-González, E.; Flores-Mejía, J.; Farías-Cepeda, L. Silver/silver bromide/polypyrrole nanoparticles obtained by microemulsion photopolymerization in the presence of a cationic surfactant. Colloid. Polym. Sci. 2013, 291, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Naumkin, A.V.; Kraut-Vass, A.; Gaarenstroom, S.W.; Powell, C.J. NIST X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database, Version 4.1. National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, 2012. Available online: http://srdata.nist.gov/xps/ (accessed on 22 September 2015). [Google Scholar]
  50. Castillo-Reyes, B.E.; Ovando-Medina, V.M.; Omar González-Ortega, O.; Alonso-Dávila, P.A.; Juárez-Ramírez, I.; Martínez-Gutiérrez, H.; Márquez-Herrera, A. TiO2/polypyrrole nanocomposites photoactive under visible light synthesized by heterophase polymerization in the presence of different surfactants. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2015, 41, 8211–8231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Viriya-empikul, N.; Changsuwan, P.; Faungnawakij, K. Preparation of strontium-based fibers via electrospinning technique. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 2633–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hoffmann, M.R.; Martin, S.T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D.W. Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hassan, M.E.; Chen, J.; Liu, G.; Zhu, D.; Cai, J. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange dye under the daylight irradiation over CN-TiO2 modified with OMS-2. Materials 2014, 7, 8024–8036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ni, S.; Yang, X.; Li, T. Hydrothermal synthesis and photoluminescence properties of SrCO3. Mater. Lett. 2010, 65, 766–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cho, M.H.; Lee, Y.S. Optical detection of Mn impurity in oxides: A case study of Sr(NO3)2 and SrCO3. New Phys. Sae Mulli 2014, 64, 891–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, S.; Chen, M.; He, L.; Xu, F.; Zhao, G. Preparation and characterization of polypyrrole/TiO2nanocomposite and its photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. J. Mater. Res. 2009, 24, 2547–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Scaife, D.E. Oxide semiconductors in photoelectrochemical conversion of solar energy. Solar Energy 1980, 25, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shirley, D.A. High-resolution X-Ray photoemission spectrum of the valence bands of gold. Phys. Rev. B 1972, 5, 4709–4714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rietveld, H.M. Line profiles of neutron powder-diffraction peaks for structure refinement. Acta Cryst. 1967, 22, 151–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lutterotti, L.; Bortolotti, M.; Ischia, G.; Lonardelli, I.; Wenk, H.-R. Rietveld texture analysis from diffraction images. Z. Kristallogr. Suppl. 2007, 26, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Leite, E.R.; Nobre, M.A.L.; Cerqueira, M.; Longo, E. Particle growth during calcination of polycation oxides synthesized by the polymeric precursors method. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1997, 80, 2649–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Márquez-Herrera, A.; Ovando-Medina, V.M.; Castillo-Reyes, B.E.; Zapata-Torres, M.; Meléndez-Lira, M.; González-Castañeda, J. Facile Synthesis of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy Nanocomposite with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity under Visible Light. Materials 2016, 9, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9010030

AMA Style

Márquez-Herrera A, Ovando-Medina VM, Castillo-Reyes BE, Zapata-Torres M, Meléndez-Lira M, González-Castañeda J. Facile Synthesis of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy Nanocomposite with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity under Visible Light. Materials. 2016; 9(1):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9010030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Márquez-Herrera, Alfredo, Victor Manuel Ovando-Medina, Blanca Estela Castillo-Reyes, Martin Zapata-Torres, Miguel Meléndez-Lira, and Jaquelina González-Castañeda. 2016. "Facile Synthesis of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy Nanocomposite with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity under Visible Light" Materials 9, no. 1: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9010030

APA Style

Márquez-Herrera, A., Ovando-Medina, V. M., Castillo-Reyes, B. E., Zapata-Torres, M., Meléndez-Lira, M., & González-Castañeda, J. (2016). Facile Synthesis of SrCO3-Sr(OH)2/PPy Nanocomposite with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity under Visible Light. Materials, 9(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9010030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop