Next Article in Journal
Nanomechanical Behavior of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Particulate Reinforced Aluminum Nanocomposites Prepared by Ball Milling
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel HA/β-TCP-Collagen Composite Enhanced New Bone Formation for Dental Extraction Socket Preservation in Beagle Dogs
Previous Article in Journal
Alendronate Functionalized Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanospheres
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Radiation Sterilization on Properties of Biodegradable Lactide/Glycolide/Trimethylene Carbonate and Lactide/Glycolide/ε-caprolactone Porous Scaffolds with Shape Memory Behavior
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 9
Issue 3
10.3390/ma9030133
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Newly Developed Techniques on Polycondensation, Ring-Opening Polymerization and Polymer Modification: Focus on Poly(Lactic Acid)

by
Yunzi Hu
1,
Walid A. Daoud
1,
Kevin Ka Leung Cheuk
2 and
Carol Sze Ki Lin
1,*
1
School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
2
The Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(3), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030133
Submission received: 21 December 2015 / Revised: 16 February 2016 / Accepted: 18 February 2016 / Published: 26 February 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodegradable and Bio-Based Polymers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polycondensation and ring-opening polymerization are two important polymer synthesis methods. Poly(lactic acid), the most typical biodegradable polymer, has been researched extensively from 1900s. It is of significant importance to have an up-to-date review on the recent improvement in techniques for biodegradable polymers. This review takes poly(lactic acid) as the example to present newly developed polymer synthesis techniques on polycondensation and ring-opening polymerization reported in the recent decade (2005–2015) on the basis of industrial technique modifications and advanced laboratory research. Different polymerization methods, including various solvents, heating programs, reaction apparatus and catalyst systems, are summarized and compared with the current industrial production situation. Newly developed modification techniques for polymer properties improvement are also discussed based on the case of poly(lactic acid).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The enormous disposal of plastic trash, around 140 million tons per year [1], ends up as solid waste disposal on land and ocean dumping which leads to long-term contamination in soils and water environment. Therefore, in recent decades, biodegradable plastics (BDPs) derived from renewable sources have undergone extensive investigations in academic research and industry. Instead of disposal in landfills or by incineration, biodegradable plastic could be decomposed by bacteria or other living microorganisms due to their potentially hydrolysable ester bonds [2].
Among numerous bioplastics, poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is considered the most promising and popular material because of its ideal properties in use: low weight, low processing temperature (compared to metal and glass), no environmental pollution, good printability, and ease of conversion into different forms [3]. It has been produced in large scale by firms, such as Cargill Dow Polymers (Minnetonka, MN, USA), with wide applications from medical materials to disposable food tableware. However, at this stage, petroleum products still dominate the plastic market, due to the high production cost and limited properties of PLA and other BDPs [4].
Polymer synthesis known as polymerization is the process of connecting monomers into chain or network. Belonging to hydroxyl acids, the monomer of PLA is lactic acid (α-hydroxypropionic acid) with a hydroxyl acid at α position, facilitating its polymerization. PLA is usually synthesized by polycondensation and ring-opening polymerization. These two typical synthesis routes are also generally applied in other polymer production.
Therefore, this review takes PLA as the representative to evaluate the different synthesis methods newly developed in the period of 2005–2015. Four synthesis methods, direct polycondensation (DP), azeotropic polycondensation (AP), solid state polymerization (SSP) and ring-opening polymerization (ROP), will be mainly discussed to present the improved techniques and processes in polymer synthesis, especially for polyesters. Newly developed techniques in bulk modification and surface modification to enhance polymer properties are also presented in this review.

2. PLA Synthesis

Generally, there are three routes to produce PLA polymers from lactic acid as shown in Figure 1. Direct condensation polymerization forms low molecular weight PLA. Two steps polymerization (e.g., SSP) can achieve higher molecular weight, but is still limited by the equilibrium reaction of polycondensation due to hydrolysis of ester bonds [5].
In 1932, a new method named ring-opening polymerization was firstly demonstrated by Carothers [6]. In this route, lactic acid is firstly polymerized to a low molecular weight oligomer, which is catalytically depolymerized through internal transesterification to lactide, in the “back-biting” reaction [7]. Then, the ring of lactide opens to form high molecular weight PLA. Actually, this is the most largely used route in PLA industrial production.
Although in the recent decade many studies have been progressively conducted in this area for technique improvement, there has been no summary or comparison of these synthesis methods. Therefore, this review aims strategically at filling the gap between laboratory research and industrial techniques.

3. Polymer Synthesis by Polycondensation

Polycondensation is polymer formation process by linking small molecules (monomers) together, accompanied by elimination of byproducts (e.g., water and alcohols). In case of PLA, polycondensation of lactic acid by connecting carboxyl and hydroxyl groups produces water byproduct simultaneously. Due to the difficulty in removing byproducts completely from the highly viscous reaction mixture, polymer produced through direct polycondensation is usually of low molecular weight (<50,000 g·mol−1) and low quality. In order to overcome this main disadvantage, numerous newly developed polycondensation methods have been proposed. In recent years, azeotropic polycondensation (AP) and solid state polymerization (SSP) are two main directions.
For AP approach, the water is removed efficiently by appropriate azeotropic solvents, by which the equilibrium between monomer and polymer is manipulated in organic solvent to produce polymer with relatively high molecular weight in one step. Besides, the temperature applied is allowed to be lower than polymer melting point, avoiding impurities caused by depolymerization and racemization [5]. Therefore, appropriate solvent is critical to performance conditions and polymer properties.
Normally, SSP consists of two steps: melt state to produce oligomer at high temperature (150–200 °C) and solid state to further increase molecular weight at temperature between the glass transition and melting point. In the second step, the prepolymer of relatively low molecular weight is semi-crystalline powder, chip, pellet or fiber, which is usually pulverized and thoroughly dried before heating. Hence, heat transfer and distribution among dry particles is highly efficient and homogeneous, resulting in high molecular weight [8]. Moreover, since the cyclisation, decomposition and other side reactions are limited at low temperature, SSP polymers usually have improved properties and purity.

Recent Development in PLA Synthesis by Polycondensation

In the recent decade, polycondensation techniques have been improved with more efficient synthesis methods. Several modified methods have been reported to produce PLA with high molecular weight successfully. The selected methods starting from commercial lactic acid are summarized in Table 1.
Achmad et al. reported an improved direct polycondensation method producing PLA with molecular weight of 90,000 g·mol−1 even without any catalyst, initiator or solvent [9]. However, the cost of energy consumed for long time heating (>100 h at 200 °C) would be much higher than that of catalyst. With better heating effect, microwave-assisted synthesis was reported as a more efficient direct polycondensation method which resulted in PLA (Mw 16,000 g·mol−1) within 30 min [10]. This research also pointed out the enhanced catalytic effect of binary catalyst such as SnCl2/p-TsOH. Nevertheless, potential higher yield (>54%) and higher molecular weight needs further study.
In the AP approach, besides azeotropic solvents, a Soxhlet extractor with molecular sieve (3 Å) inside was also mounted simultaneously to remove trace water from refluxed solvent and over 30,000 g·mol−1 polymer was obtained [11]. Fukushima et al. pulverized prepolymer synthesized at melt-polycondensation stage to particles with diameter less than 150 µm and thoroughly dried them before SSP [8]. In SSP, the heating program started at 130 °C and rose to 160 °C stepwise as polymer melting point increasing, resulting PLA with Mw over 200,000 g·mol−1 [8], a breakthrough in polycondensation. Moreover, this team also suggested that a starting mixture of l-PLA and d-PLA in 1:1 ratio in solid state polycondensation could improve the polymer melting point from 160–170 °C to over 200 °C, indicating reinforced thermal stability [12]. These methods presented efficient improvements in the heating program and increasing the molecular weight by elimination of byproducts.

4. Polymer Synthesis by Ring-Opening Polymerization

Ring-opening polymerization is a propagation process of cyclic monomers initiated by different ions. As the reactive center of propagation, the terminal end of a polymer classifies the mechanism into anionic ROP, cationic ROP and radical ROP [13]. For PLA, the cyclic monomer is the intermediate namely lactide, which is the cyclic dimer of lactic acid. Particularly, the controlled ROP could lead to polymer with specific and desirable properties (e.g., refractive index, molecular weight) [14], making it very significant in polymer synthesis today. As mentioned above, for a high molecular weight PLA synthesis, the route through ROP of lactide is the most commonly used. Comparing with polycondensation, polymerization of lactide can produce polymer with wider range of molecular weight by controlling the purity of lactide and synthesis conditions, without chain coupling agent or azeotropic system. Therefore, ROP is applied by some PLA leading producers, such as Cargill Dow (Minnetonka, MN, USA) and Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) [15].

4.1. Recent Development in PLA Synthesis Method through Ring Opening Polymerization

PLA production through ROP has been developed for more than 80 years since it was firstly invented in 1935. The high molecular weight PLA was produced with improved purification method by DuPont in 1954 [16]. Since the reaction is sensitive to experimental conditions, including temperature, heating rate, inner pressure, catalyst and reagent, it is important to investigate the optimal manipulation. For this, various methods and catalysts have been studied. In 1992, Cargill (US) successfully applied ROP in industrial production and patented its method [17]. In 2005, Rajeev et al. summarized several typical methods of 1990s [4]. In his review, various catalyst, solvents and reaction temperature were summarized in relation to the molecular weight of PLA product. It revealed that using stannous octoate as a catalyst accomplished by heating at 150–210 °C could contribute to high molecular weight. In 2007, Gupta et al. summarized over one hundred catalysts used in lactide polymerization [5]. However, the given information was not elaborated enough to raise a comparison or advise the specific production process.
On the other hand, information regarding further study in particular production process and laboratory operating techniques is rarely reported in recent publications, due to the wide application of the traditional method (e.g., oil bath heating under vacuum environment with tin-based catalyst) in PLA industrial production. In order to fill the gap, recent publications and patents on newly developed ROP techniques are selected and summarized in this review.

4.1.1. Lactide Synthesis

As the intermediate in ROP, lactide is of most significance in PLA production and its purity is critical to PLA properties. Therefore, synthesis of lactide and PLA is usually separated to purify the obtained lactide by recrystallization in proper solvent such as ethyl acetate and toluene. Accordingly, the processes of lactide and PLA production are summarized separately in Table 2 and Table 3. Based on the traditional method, the production and separation of lactide through depolymerization and distillation at high temperature (180–300 °C) under vacuum is quite time and energy consuming [5]. The newly developed laboratory techniques proposed several higher efficient or cost-effective production methods.
The first method in Table 2 is a Chinese patent, where catalysts used were chemically treated stones, such as acidified montmorillonite, which is a readily available lower cost material as compared to the typical tin-based catalyst. The second method was reported by researchers in Switzerland, in which a short path distillation is applied for lactic acid dehydration and reactive distillation of raw lactide, yielding 95%–97% (w/w), much higher than conventional condensation system [19]. However, higher amount of catalyst (3 wt %) and high temperature (250 °C) were still required. Hong et al. and Liang et al. used nitrogen gas flow to improve reaction efficiency by removing lactide from reaction system instantly [20,21]. Moreover, constant temperature heating device and modified microwave were also employed for better heating effect in recent years. The result revealed that both of these reaction setups could produce lactide at temperature lower than 210 °C [22,24]. Besides, microwave shortened the synthesis time by more than 50% [24]. Instead of using lactic acid as a starting material, Upare et al. investigated the production of lactide from alkyl lactate and the highest conversion yield of 46% was obtained from ethyl lactate, which is lower than the yield obtained using lactic acid as raw material (53%) [25].

4.1.2. Polymerization of Lactide

All polymerization mentioned below started from purified and dried lactide (>99% purity). Initiators, such as solvents or trace amount of water, are required to work with catalyst to induce ROP process. Different types of initiators would lead to different reaction mechanisms, and they can be classified into three types: anionic polymerization, cationic polymerization and coordination–insertion mechanism [5]. The catalyst system mainly includes one or more components of metal powders, metal salts, Lewis acid, Lewis bases and organic compounds [16]. Contrary to polycondensation, molecular weight of PLA produced by ROP is not of positive correlation to long heating duration. Sanglard et al. found that PLA molecular weight did not always increase with time and the highest value, 172,663 g·mol−1, was obtained at 15 min under 170 °C [19]. Then the molecular weight decreased after 30 min and tended to be stable [19]. This indicated the polymerization of lactide could reach a plateau in short time and long heating duration may cause degradation instead.
As to the equipment, a twin-screwed extruder was used to conduct reactive extrusion which improved the conversion yield to 99% and shortened duration time to only 7 min, significantly improving the efficiency [26]. Korhonen et al. investigated polymerization with different co-initiators and proposed that more hydroxyl groups of co-initiators led to higher molecular weight (>400,000 g·mol−1) and faster polymerization (<5 h), without affecting the polymer thermal properties [27]. In contrast, Zhong et al. compared solution polymerization and solvent-free polymerization, from which higher molecular weight PLA was obtained with higher efficiency in solvent-free set [28]. Kaihara et al. successfully achieved PLA with high Mw (100,000 g·mol−1) only at 140 °C for 10 h, however, extremely low pressure (0.001 kPa) and dry condition requires longer period of preparation [29]. This study also pointed out lower temperature (≤140 °C) could contribute to improve molecular weight by avoiding decomposition resulted from back-biting reaction [29], whereas Korhonen et al. achieved better quality PLA (160,000 g·mol−1) at 200 °C for 1 h even without solvent as co-initiator [27]. In Korhonen’s research, the highest molecular weight was obtained at 15–20 min [27], the same trend as study result of Sanglard et al. [19]. That is possibly because higher temperature (170–200 °C) aggravates both chain-growth polymerization and decomposition, but polymerization has the priority at first. After 30 min, heat accumulation turns decomposition to dominate the reaction balance to decrease the polymer molecular weight. Figure 2 shows the process of this hypothesis (the arrows point out the dominating reaction), which requires further investigation for confirmation.
In terms of catalyst selection, apart from the mostly used organometallic catalyst (e.g., zinc and tin based), metal-free organocatalyst has undergone a renaissance in polymerization since 2005 [36]. Guanidine and amidine organocatalyst have proven highly effective towards ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters, such as lactide [32]. According to research of Hedrick and Waymouth (2006), TBD enabled shorter ROP reaction time of 20 s to 1 min with conversion yield of 95%–99% [32]. Alcohol adducts of N-Heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) also polymerized lactide into PLA within 10 min at room temperature [34]. The combined catalyst of bis-sulfonamide and tertiary amines could control the molecular weight of PLA under mild conditions [37]. Direct ROP of lactide with amine could prepare amine end-caped PLA and help to remove unreacted monomer without affecting polymer properties [38]. As a new class of catalyst, these potent organocatalysts contribute to reaction efficiency improvement, perform ROP under atmospheric pressure at room temperature and prevent residual metal contamination from organometallic catalysts, thus showing extraordinary advances and providing a powerful strategy in polymer synthesis. Nevertheless, the resultant polymer is usually with limited molecular weight (10,000–50,000 g·mol−1). The acute toxicity and high cost of some organocatalysts (e.g., 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene and 4-Dimethylaminopyridine) are also noteworthy [36]. Therefore, the particularly safe operation process, proper recovery method of organocatalyst system and its economic flexibility in industrial application require further study and environmental assessment.
Besides, a novel and versatile potassium-based catalyst was reported to produce high molecular weight PLA (98,400 g·mol−1) in 20 min at room temperature [30]. However, according to the proposed mechanism, the final product probably was not stable due to the double-carbon bonds at the end group [30]. Therefore, this new promising catalyst might need further investigation to confirm. Moreover, enzyme was also employed as a green biocatalyst by which PLA with Mw 37,800 g·mol−1 was harvested without organometallic risk or contamination [35]. Novozyme 435, a typical commercial enzyme in esterification and transesterification, has been applied in biodiesel production. This study originally revealed its catalytic effect in ROP with ionic liquid as low-toxic solvent at moderate reaction temperature (90 °C), providing a viable alternative in catalyst system. Nonetheless, compare to metal catalysts, the low yield (63.2%) and longer process time (7 days) weakened the competitiveness of enzyme catalysts. The employed enzyme amount (10−15 mol %) was much higher than the organometallic catalyst or organocatalysts, so the feasibility of enzyme/ionic liquid system recycle and its activity in reuse deserve more attention to enhance its sustainability and environmental advantage as a green catalyst.

5. Newly Developed PLA Modification Techniques

The natural properties of polymer produced are usually not satisfactory for particular or special purposes in applications. In fact, consumption of PLA always falls behind its production. In 2006, 140 kilo tonnes (KT) PLA was produced by Cargill in USA, while only 60 KT was consumed [17]. This is mainly due to the limited properties of PLA, such as poor thermal stability and hydrophilicity [39], brittleness and high crystallinity [1], preventing its further application as replacement of petroleum-plastics. For instance, less than 10% elongation at break limits PLA material’s application in which plastic deformation at high levels is demanded [40]. To overcome its natural limitations, several modification techniques have been studied to improve the quality of PLA plastic products. Contrary to decreasing attention on PLA synthesis methods, the studies on polymer modification and PLA modification techniques both keep exponential increase in the recent decade as shown in Figure 3.
Generally, modification includes bulk modification and surface modification [41,42], in which the detailed techniques are presented as follows.

5.1. Bulk Modification

Bulk modification influences the chemical composition and structure of PLA by copolymerization with other monomers or blending with other polymers [43]. In the existence of carboxyl and hydroxyl groups, lactic acid is available to be copolymerized with other monomers by polycondensation to produce low molecular weight copolymers [41]. Poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) was suggested to improve biodegradability with lower melting point and stronger solubility, hence it has been applied as the best defined biomaterial with great performance in drug release application [1]. The degradation characteristic could be adjusted by controlling the ratio of monomers, i.e., lactic acid and glycolic acid [44]. Thermal stability and elastic property could also be reinforced by introducing biomesogenic units [45]. Lactide is also accessible to other cyclic or linear monomers (e.g., glycolide, trimethylene carbonate) in ring opening copolymerization for high molecular weight copolymers. Furthermore, combination of lactide in different stereoisomers (l-lactide, d-lactide and meso-lactide) has significant effect on PLA thermal and mechanical properties [46]. In 2005, Bigg et al. observed elongation at break and tensile strength of PLA increased by poly(l-co-meso-lactide) at 80%/20% [47].
In addition, the blending of PLA with other bio-polymers [e.g., chitosan, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(e-caorolactone) (PCL)] could also contribute to property improvement [5]. For instance, blending of PLA with PCL has been reported with enhanced flexibility but reduced toughness [5]. Poly(meso-lactide-co-g-chitosan) was reported to reinforce the adsorption of drugs and adhesion of cells as a new biomedical material [48].
Moreover, controlling the end group of PLA by copolymerizing with diols or anhydride to eliminate hydroxyl or carboxyl groups at the endpoint could improve molecular weight, resulting in better thermal stability [49].
In summary, bulk modification is usually used to improve toughness, stability and degradation rate.

5.2. Surface Modification

As PLA’s surface properties are crucial to its application, surface modification could render desirable surface properties. Different from bulk modification, surface modification usually serves to promote hydrophilicity, roughness and to introduce reactive groups [41]. Plasma polymerization, surface coating, entrapment and radiation induction are newly developed methods in this area [43]. There has been numerous research and review about these techniques in recent years, so this review will just focus on some latest cases.
In entrapment method, alginate, chitosan and gelatin have been entrapped on PLA surface in reversible swelling process to associate bio-macromolecules onto PLA by enhancing adsorption [50]. For plasma polymerization, Park et al. reinforced ultimate tensile strength of PLA to 2 MPa by chemical modification using oxygen plasma treatment, and successfully made nanofiber scaffold with this modified PLA material in 2007 [51]. In 2014, Jordá et al. proved the effectiveness of air plasma treatment in surface energy improvement, by which the surface energy of PLA was increased from 37.1 to 60 mJ·m−2, promoting its further adhesion uses [52]. Moreover, biodegradation of PLA and PLGA has been successfully improved further by e-beam radiation to promote their performance in medical device, e.g., orthopedic fixation [53]. In 2014, Norazlina reviewed PLA/graphene-based nanocomposites as reinforcement materials with improved thermal, electrical and mechanical properties, which are suitable for applications in electronic circuits, sensors and electrodes [54]. Chao et al. also proposed an improved alkali-acid hydrolysis method, which enhanced hydrophilicity of PLA by using citric acid as the washing solution to increase PLA surface roughness significantly, and to decrease PLA film’s surface water contact angle at the same time [55].
Overall, most of polymer modifications aim at a desired property for specific commodity products. The abundant successful cases indicate that further research in this area is promising to unlock future market of PLA and other biopolymers.

6. Comparison and New Trends of Poly(Lactic Acid) Synthesis and Modification Development

In summary, polycondensation is mostly used to produce PLA with low molecular weight using basic equipment and process, while ROP aims for production of a wider range of molecular weight polymer by controlling the purity of lactide and its polymerization. Since each approach has its unique advantages and limitations, the selection of a specific method should be based on the application. For instance, drug release materials favor low molecular weight PLA as it could be degraded quickly. While high molecular weight PLA is suitable to produce packaging and textile products. In the light of current development, the advantages and disadvantages of different methods presented in this review are summarized in Table 4.
Generally, demanding synthesis conditions, such as high temperature heating (150–250 °C) under vacuum pressure for long time, are essential and requiring precise control at this stage. Therefore, based on the discussions presented above on the newly developed synthesis methods of ROP and polycondensation, two crucial factors deserve further investigation. The first factor is high-performance catalyst, such as organocatalyst and potassium-based catalyst mentioned above, could perform polymerization efficiently at room temperature under atmospheric pressure, reducing most of the energy cost required by conventional methods. Furthermore, as compared to single catalyst (e.g., stannous octoate), binary catalysts showed better synergic effect at appropriate condition [57]. On the other hand, it would be more environmental benign if metal-based catalysts could be replaced by green catalysts (e.g., low-toxic organocatalyst and enzymes).
The second factor is equipment with high efficiency heating system, which is usually necessary to obtain PLA with high molecular weight (>100,000 g·mol−1). For instance, microwave heating accelerated both PLA polycondensation and lactide synthesis [10,24]. Short path distillation and screw extruder were also suggested as effective setups to demonstrate immediate separation of product from reaction system [19,26].
Apart from the techniques in polymerization and modification, source of lactic acid is another significant factor contributing to PLA production cost. Currently, lactic acid is usually produced by bacterial or yeast fermentation using carbohydrates (e.g., glucose) from agricultural crops such as corn [58]. To reduce the cost of raw material, cheaper alternatives, such as agricultural residues and food waste are suggested [59,60]. In our previous study, food waste has been reported as high nutritional resource for production of chemicals and fuels [61]. Nowadays, research on PLA synthesis using lactic acid derived from food waste (Figure 4) is undergoing in our group. The project is titled as “Conversion of Food Waste into Polylactic acid Fibre”, building for a closed life cycle in which PLA fiber is produced for textile applications using food waste as cost-free feedstock.
In this study, both polycondensation and ROP have been investigated. In order to reduce carbonization and possible side reactions caused by trace impurities from fermentation broth, process with low temperature is desired. For polycondensation, we designed a new heating program consisting of two stages in which different temperatures and inner pressures were served. It has been found that this new method could improve PLA molecular weight (>30,000 g·mol−1) efficiently under moderate conditions. In ROP method, nanoparticles of metallic oxide has presented higher catalytic efficient than tin-octoate in lactide synthesis, probably due to more sufficient surface area. The new nanoparticle catalyst is of lower toxicity and less metal contamination as compared to organotin. This study is currently under investigation in our laboratory.
Further to laboratory research, the feasibility of applying newly developed synthesis methods in industry using organic waste as raw material needs detailed evaluation, such as techno-economic analysis and environmental impact assessment [62].
In terms of modification, since most techniques are recently developed, its further investigation requires systematic principles based on PLA and other polymers’ market demands and areas of improvement. Furthermore, the evaluation on economic feasibility of modification techniques at industrial scale is still in progress and is eager for thorough investigation.

7. Conclusions

PLA synthesis has been developed over 80 years and has achieved its industrial production. However, its demanding manufacturing operations lead to high cost and limit product properties, which impede its further development and competition with petroleum-derived plastics. At this stage, production techniques in both polycondensation and ring-opening polymerization have been improved a lot by modified synthesis methods. The recently developed methods in the period of 2005–2015 are discussed and summarized in this review for potential enhancement in PLA and other polymers synthesis.
From the authors’ perspective, high performance catalyst and high efficiency heating system are of the most desired elements for polymer synthesis in greener manner. Modification of PLA product by copolymers and nanocomposites presents good potential in a broad variety of applications. Techno-economic evaluation and environmental impact assessment are also necessary to fill the gap between laboratory research and industrial production.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the industrial sponsorships from the Hong Kong Organic Waste Recycling Centre (HKOWRC), Central Textiles (HK) Ltd., Hong Kong Non-Woven Fabric Industrial Co., Ltd. and Rizhao Kaishun Tire Co., Ltd. We are also grateful to the Hong Kong Research Institute of Textiles and Apparel (HKRITA), Bin Fei and Ray Chen, as well as the Innovation and Technology Commission for the Innovation and Technology Fund (ITP/002/14TP).

Author Contributions

This review was edited by Yunzi Hu, Walid A. Daoud, Kevin Ka Leung Cheuk, and Carol Sze Ki Lin. Yunzi Hu prepared the draft of the manuscript with figures and tables. Walid Daoud and Kevin Cheuk provided comments and suggestions on revision. Carol Lin instructed the project on which this review is based as well as revised and submitted the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AP
Azeotropic polycondensation
BDPs
Biodegradable plastics
DP
Direct polycondensation
Mw
Molecular weight
KT
Kilo tonnes
PCL
Poly(e-caorolactone)
PEG
Poly(ethylene glycol)
PGL
polyglycerine
PLGA
Poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid)
PLA
Poly(lactic acid)
ROP
Ring-opening polymerization
SIMes
1,3-Bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-4,5-dihydroimidazol-2-ylidene
SSP
Solid state polycondensation
T
Temperature
TBD
1,5,7-Triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene
P
Pressure

References

  1. Nampoothiri, K.M.; Nair, N.R.; John, R.P. An overview of the recent developments in polylactide (PLA) research. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8493–8501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nakasaki, K.; Ohtaki, A.; Takano, H. Biodegradable plastic reduces ammonia emission during composting. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2000, 70, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lim, L.T.; Auras, R.; Rubino, M. Processing technologies for poly(lactic acid). Prog. Polym. Sci. 2008, 33, 820–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mehta, R.; Kumar, V.; Bhunia, H.; Upadhyay, S. Synthesis of poly(lactic acid): A review. J. Macromol. Sci. Polym. Rev. 2005, 45, 325–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gupta, A.; Kumar, V. New emerging trends in synthetic biodegradable polymers–polylactide: A critique. Eur. Polym. J. 2007, 43, 4053–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carothers, W.H.; Dorough, G.; Natta, F.V. Studies of polymerization and ring formation. X. The reversible polymerization of six-membered cyclic esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1932, 54, 761–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Thomas, C.M. Stereocontrolled ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters: Synthesis of new polyester microstructures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fukushima, K.; Kimura, Y. An efficient solid-state polycondensation method for synthesizing stereocomplexed poly(lactic acid)s with high molecular weight. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 3714–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Achmad, F.; Yamane, K.; Quan, S.; Kokugan, T. Synthesis of polylactic acid by direct polycondensation under vacuum without catalysts, solvents and initiators. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 151, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nagahata, R.; Sano, D.; Suzuki, H.; Takeuchi, K. Microwave-assisted single-step synthesis of poly(lactic acid) by direct polycondensation of lactic acid. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, K.W.; Woo, S.I. Synthesis of high-molecular-weight poly (l-lactic acid) by direct polycondensation. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2002, 203, 2245–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fukushima, K.; Furuhashi, Y.; Sogo, K.; Miura, S.; Kimura, Y. Stereoblock poly (lactic acid): Synthesis via solid-state polycondensation of a stereocomplexed mixture of poly (l-lactic acid) and poly (d-lactic acid). Macromol. Biosci. 2005, 5, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nuyken, O.; Pask, S.D. Ring-opening polymerization-an introductory review. Polymers 2013, 5, 361–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stridsberg, K.M.; Ryner, M.; Albertsson, A.C. Controlled ring-opening polymerization: Polymers with designed macromolecular architecture. In Degradable Aliphatic Polyesters, 1st ed.; Albertsson, A.C., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; Volume 157, pp. 41–65. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, J.; Krishnamachari, P.; Lou, J.; Shahbazi, A. Synthesis of poly(L(+) lactic acid) by polycondensation method in solution. In Proceedings of the 2007 National Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Greensboro, NC, USA, 12–14 September 2007; Uzochukwu, G., Schimmel, K., Chang, S.Y., Kabadi, V., Luster-Teasley, S., Reddy, G., Nzewi, E., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Garlotta, D. A literature review of poly(lactic acid). J. Polym. Environ. 2001, 9, 63–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Avérous, L. Polylactic acid: Synthesis, properties and applications. In Monomers, Polymers and Composites from Renewable Resources, 1st ed.; Mohamed, N.B., Alessandro, G., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 433–450. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lei, Z.; Huang, X. Method for Catalytic Synthesis of Lactide from Lactic Acid. CN Patent 1,721,418A, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sanglard, P.; Adamo, V.; Bourgeois, J.; Chappuis, T.; Vanoli, E. Poly(lactic acid) synthesis and characterization. Chim. Int. J. Chem. 2012, 66, 951–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hong, C.H.; Kim, S.H.; Seo, J.Y.; Han, D.S. Manufacturing Method of Lactide from Lactic Acid. CN Patent 102,796,071A, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liang, S.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Li, F. Synthesis and purif ication of intermediate lactide. New Chem. Mater. 2005, 33, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, J.; Cheng, C.; Wang, Y. The synthesis of lactide catalyzed by ZnO-Sn(Oct)2. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2007, 23, 74–76. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yoo, D.K.; Kim, D.; Lee, D.S. Synthesis of lactide from oligomeric pla: Effects of temperature, pressure, and catalyst. Macromol. Res. 2006, 14, 510–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, X.; Liu, L. Improved preparation of d,l-lactide from d,l-lactic acid using microwave irradiation. Polym. Bull. 2008, 61, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Upare, P.P.; Hwang, Y.K.; Chang, J.S.; Hwang, D.W. Synthesis of lactide from alkyl lactate via a prepolymer route. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 4837–4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jacobsen, S.; Fritz, H.G.; Degée, P.; Dubois, P.; Jérôme, R. New developments on the ring opening polymerisation of polylactide. Ind. Crops Prod. 2000, 11, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Korhonen, H.; Helminen, A.; Seppälä, J.V. Synthesis of polylactides in the presence of co-initiators with different numbers of hydroxyl groups. Polymer 2001, 42, 7541–7549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhong, Z.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Feijen, J. [(salen)Al]-mediated, controlled and stereoselective ring-opening polymerization of lactide in solution and without solvent: Synthesis of highly isotactic polylactide stereocopolymers from racemic d,l-lactide. Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4692–4695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kaihara, S.; Matsumura, S.; Mikos, A.G.; Fisher, J.P. Synthesis of poly(l-lactide) and polyglycolide by ring-opening polymerization. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2767–2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lemmouchi, Y.; Perry, M.C.; Amass, A.J.; Chakraborty, K.; Schacht, E. A novel and versatile potassium—Based catalyst for the ring opening polymerization of cyclic esters. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 5348–5362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Katiyar, V.; Nanavati, H. Ring-opening polymerization of L-lactide using N-heterocyclic molecules: Mechanistic, kinetics and dft studies. Polym. Chem. 2010, 1, 1491–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lohmeijer, B.G.; Pratt, R.C.; Leibfarth, F.; Logan, J.W.; Long, D.A.; Dove, A.P.; Nederberg, F.; Choi, J.; Wade, C.; Waymouth, R.M. Guanidine and amidine organocatalysts for ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 8574–8583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dove, A.P.; Pratt, R.C.; Lohmeijer, B.G.; Waymouth, R.M.; Hedrick, J.L. Thiourea-based bifunctional organocatalysis: Supramolecular recognition for living polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13798–13799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Csihony, S.; Culkin, D.A.; Sentman, A.C.; Dove, A.P.; Waymouth, R.M.; Hedrick, J.L. Single-component catalyst/initiators for the organocatalytic ring-opening polymerization of lactide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9079–9084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lopes, M.S.; Jardini, A.; Maciel Filho, R. Poly(lactic acid) production for tissue engineering applications. Procedia Eng. 2012, 42, 1402–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kamber, N.E.; Jeong, W.; Waymouth, R.M.; Pratt, R.C.; Lohmeijer, B.G.; Hedrick, J.L. Organocatalytic ring-opening polymerization. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5813–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Alba, A.; Schopp, A.; De Sousa Delgado, A.P.; Cherif-Cheikh, R.; Martín-Vaca, B.; Bourissou, D. Controlled ring-opening polymerization of lactide by bis-sulfonamide/amine associations: Cooperative hydrogen—Bonding catalysis. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2010, 48, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alba, A.; du Boullay, O.T.; Martin-Vaca, B.; Bourissou, D. Direct ring-opening of lactide with amines: Application to the organo-catalyzed preparation of amide end-capped pla and to the removal of residual lactide from pla samples. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singh, R.; Pandey, J.; Rutot, D.; Degée, P.; Dubois, P. Biodegradation of poly (ε-caprolactone)/starch blends and composites in composting and culture environments: The effect of compatibilization on the inherent biodegradability of the host polymer. Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338, 1759–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rasal, R.M.; Hirt, D.E. Toughness decrease of pla-phbhhx blend films upon surface-confined photopolymerization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2009, 88, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rasal, R.M.; Janorkar, A.V.; Hirt, D.E. Poly(lactic acid) modifications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 338–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cheng, Y.; Deng, S.; Chen, P.; Ruan, R. Polylactic acid (PLA) synthesis and modifications: A review. Front. Chem. Chin. 2009, 4, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Luckachan, G.E.; Pillai, C. Biodegradable polymers—A review on recent trends and emerging perspectives. J. Polym. Environ. 2011, 19, 637–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fukushima, K.; Tabuani, D.; Camino, G. Nanocomposites of PLA and PCL based on montmorillonite and sepiolite. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2009, 29, 1433–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Du, J.; Fang, Y.; Zheng, Y. Synthesis and characterization of poly(l-lactic acid) reinforced by biomesogenic units. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2008, 93, 838–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gruber, P.; Drumright, R.; Henton, D. Polylactic acid technology. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1841–1846. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bigg, D. Polylactide copolymers: Effect of copolymer ratio and end capping on their properties. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2005, 24, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, Y.C.; Huang, C.C.; Huang, Y.Y.; Chen, K.S. Surface modification and characterization of chitosan or PLGA membrane with laminin by chemical and oxygen plasma treatment for neural regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2007, 82, 842–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Tuominen, J.; Seppälä, J.V. Synthesis and characterization of lactic acid based poly(ester-amide). Macromolecules 2000, 33, 3530–3535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhu, H.; Ji, J.; Shen, J. Surface engineering of poly(dl-lactic acid) by entrapment of biomacromolecules. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 819–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Park, K.; Ju, Y.M.; Son, J.S.; Ahn, K.D.; Han, D.K. Surface modification of biodegradable electrospun nanofiber scaffolds and their interaction with fibroblasts. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2007, 18, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jordá-Vilaplana, A.; Fombuena, V.; García-García, D.; Samper, M.; Sanchez-Nacher, L. Surface modification of polylactic acid (PLA) by air atmospheric plasma treatment. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 58, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Leonard, D.J.; Pick, L.T.; Farrar, D.F.; Dickson, G.R.; Orr, J.F.; Buchanan, F.J. The modification of PLA and PLGA using electron-beam radiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2009, 89, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Norazlina, H.; Kamal, Y. Graphene modifications in polylactic acid nanocomposites: A review. Polym. Bull. 2015, 72, 931–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guo, C.; Xiang, M.; Dong, Y. Surface modification of poly(lactic acid) with an improved alkali-acid hydrolysis method. Mater. Lett. 2015, 140, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Maharana, T.; Mohanty, B.; Negi, Y. Melt–solid polycondensation of lactic acid and its biodegradability. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 99–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Furlan, L.G.; Casagrande, O.L., Jr. Dual catalyst system composed by nickel and vanadium complexes containing nitrogen ligands for ethylene polymerization. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2005, 16, 1248–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lunt, J. Large-scale production, properties and commercial applications of polylactic acid polymers. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1998, 59, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. John, R.P.; Nampoothiri, K.M.; Pandey, A. Solid-state fermentation for l-lactic acid production from agro wastes using lactobacillus delbrueckii. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pleissner, D.; Lam, W.C.; Sun, Z.; Lin, C.S.K. Food waste as nutrient source in heterotrophic microalgae cultivation. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 137, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Lin, C.S.K.; Pfaltzgraff, L.A.; Herrero Davila, L.; Mubofu, E.B.; Abderrahim, S.; Clark, J.H.; Koutinas, A.A.; Kopsahelis, N.; Stamatelatou, K.; Dickson, F. Food waste as a valuable resource for the production of chemicals, materials and fuels. Current situation and global perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 426–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kwan, T.H.; Pleissner, D.; Lau, K.Y.; Venus, J.; Pommeret, A.; Lin, C.S.K. Techno-economic analysis of a food waste valorization process via microalgae cultivation and co-production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed from algal biomass and food waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 198, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 09 00133 g001 1024
Figure 1. Routes of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) synthesis from lactic acid.
Figure 1. Routes of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) synthesis from lactic acid.
Materials 09 00133 g001
Materials 09 00133 g002 1024
Figure 2. Proposed scheme of ROP for lactide.
Figure 2. Proposed scheme of ROP for lactide.
Materials 09 00133 g002
Materials 09 00133 g003 1024
Figure 3. Number of publications with keyterms “Polymer modification” or “PLA modification” in the period of 1991 to 2014.
Figure 3. Number of publications with keyterms “Polymer modification” or “PLA modification” in the period of 1991 to 2014.
Materials 09 00133 g003
Materials 09 00133 g004 1024
Figure 4. Flow chart of PLA production from food waste.
Figure 4. Flow chart of PLA production from food waste.
Materials 09 00133 g004
Table
Table 1. Newly developed laboratory methods of polycondensation.
Table 1. Newly developed laboratory methods of polycondensation.
MethodCatalystSolventT (°C)P (kPa)Duration (h)Yield (%)Mw (g·mol−1)Ref.
DPNilNil2001.37>10034.5290,000[9]
DPStannous chloride (0.6 mol %)TsOH a20040.55416,000[10]
APStannous octoate (0.2 wt %)m-Xylene138Normal72-33,000[11]
SSP
(1)
c Stannous chloride (0.1 wt %)
TSA b180-59936,000[8]
(2)
c Nil
Nil130–1600.073068202,000
SSP
(1)
c Stannous octoate (0.05 mol %)
TSA b150–1801.310–128446,000[12]
(2)
c Nil
Nil120–2000.610–3063102,000
a: p-toluenesulfonic acid; b: p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate; c: (1) conditions in melt-polycondensation stage; (2) conditions in solid state polycondensation stage.
Table
Table 2. Newly developed laboratory synthesis methods of lactide.
Table 2. Newly developed laboratory synthesis methods of lactide.
CatalystSet up/EquipmentT (°C)P (kPa)Duration (h)Yield (%)Ref.
Acidified chloride catalyst supported on silica gelSilica gel catalyst system with nitrogen gas flow170–2600.08–104–1260[18]
Stannous octoate (3 wt %)Short path distillation170–2500.5-95–97[19]
Zinc oxide (1 wt %)Heating gas stream230–2401.33–26.6-72[20]
Stannous octoate-toluene (0.04 wt %)Oil bath with nitrogen gas flow220–24011.36–880[21]
Zinc oxide-stannous octoateConstant temperature heating device180–20695786.4[22]
Stannous oxide (0.1 wt %)Oil bath2202.67>877[23]
Zinc powder (1.2 wt %)Modified domestic microwave oven170–1803.993–540.3[24]
Stannous octoate (1 wt %)Oil bath and ice bath180–2101.331641.3[25]
Table
Table 3. New developed methods of lactide polymerization.
Table 3. New developed methods of lactide polymerization.
CatalystSolventT (°C)P (kPa)Duration (h)Yield (%)Mw (g·mol−1)Ref.
Stannous octoate (0.04 wt %)Nil170Normal a291–93172,663[19]
Stannous octoatePEG b180–185Nitrogen flow7 min97–9993,300[26]
Stannous octoate (0.05 mol %)PGL-50 c160–200Nitrogen flow3–595–96468,000[27]
Aluminum isopropoxideNil130Nitrogen flow4894.824,900[28]
Stannous octoate (0.03 wt %)1-dodecanol14010−310>95100,000[29]
Potassium hexamethyl-disilazideToluene25-20 min10098,400[30]
-PDP d180–2101.331641.328,000[31]
TBD e (0.1 mol %)CH2Cl2, 4-pyrenebutanol25-1 min9562,600[32]
Thiourea amine (5 mol %)CH2Cl225-1059842,000[33]
SIMes fTHF25-10 min8716,500[34]
Novozyme 435 (10 wt %)Ionic liquids904 × 10−516863.237,800[35]
a: atmospheric pressure (101 kPa); b: polyethylene glycol; c: polyglycerine-50; d: 4-pyrrolidino-pyridine; e: 1,5,7-Triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene; f: 1,3-Bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-4,5-dihydroimidazol-2-ylidene.
Table
Table 4. Advantages and disadvantages of different polymer synthesis methods.
Table 4. Advantages and disadvantages of different polymer synthesis methods.
MethodAdvantagesDisadvantages
Azeotropic polycondensationLow costLow yield
Basic equipmentLow purity (usually with residual solvent and byproducts in polymer)
Moderate temperature (<180 °C)Solvent waste and pollution
Solid state polycondensationHigh purity (suppression of side reactions)Low yield
High molecular weightLong duration
Moderate conditionsComplicated operation
Ring opening polymerizationHigh purityLow overall yield
Wide range of molecular weight (2 × 104 to 6.8 × 105 g·mol−1) [56]Long duration
Availability in high molecular weightDemanding condition
Controlled polymer propertiesComplicated operation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, Y.; Daoud, W.A.; Cheuk, K.K.L.; Lin, C.S.K. Newly Developed Techniques on Polycondensation, Ring-Opening Polymerization and Polymer Modification: Focus on Poly(Lactic Acid). Materials 2016, 9, 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030133

AMA Style

Hu Y, Daoud WA, Cheuk KKL, Lin CSK. Newly Developed Techniques on Polycondensation, Ring-Opening Polymerization and Polymer Modification: Focus on Poly(Lactic Acid). Materials. 2016; 9(3):133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030133

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Yunzi, Walid A. Daoud, Kevin Ka Leung Cheuk, and Carol Sze Ki Lin. 2016. "Newly Developed Techniques on Polycondensation, Ring-Opening Polymerization and Polymer Modification: Focus on Poly(Lactic Acid)" Materials 9, no. 3: 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030133

APA Style

Hu, Y., Daoud, W. A., Cheuk, K. K. L., & Lin, C. S. K. (2016). Newly Developed Techniques on Polycondensation, Ring-Opening Polymerization and Polymer Modification: Focus on Poly(Lactic Acid). Materials, 9(3), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030133

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop