Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Canopy Closure Estimation of Plantations Using Parametric, Semi-Parametric, and Non-Parametric Models Based on GF-1 Remote Sensing Images
Next Article in Special Issue
Cinara splendens (Hemiptera: Aphididae: Lachninae)—First Record in Palaearctic Region
Previous Article in Journal
National Set of MAES Indicators in Greece: Ecosystem Services and Management Implications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/f11050596
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Host Range of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Slovak Arboreta

by
Katarína Pastirčáková
1,*,
Katarína Adamčíková
1,
Marek Barta
1,
Jozef Pažitný
1,
Peter Hoťka
2,
Ivana Sarvašová
3 and
Miriam Kádasi Horáková
1
1
Department of Plant Pathology and Mycology, Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Akademická 2, SK-94901 Nitra, Slovakia
2
Mlyňany Arboretum, Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Vieska nad Žitavou 178, SK-95152 Slepčany, Slovakia
3
Borová Hora Arboretum, Technical University in Zvolen, Borovianska cesta 2171/66, SK-96053 Zvolen, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(5), 596; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050596
Submission received: 13 April 2020 / Revised: 22 May 2020 / Accepted: 22 May 2020 / Published: 25 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pests and Pathogens of Urban Trees)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The health of 34 different Fraxinus taxa in association with the pathogenic fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus was assessed in four Slovak arboreta. Averaged across all arboreta, nearly one-quarter (24.9%) of all evaluated trees showed ash dieback symptoms. The damage was most serious on the common ash F. excelsior, a native species. The percentage of dead trees did not exceed 2% for all evaluated trees. Generally, ash trees of all ages were affected, though the intensity of the damage varied among the sites. The identity of H. fraxineus was confirmed by conventional PCR targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences of the nuclear ribosomal DNA, as well as the 18S gene/ITS-2 region of the rDNA operon. In Slovakia, the pathogen has expanded its host range from native species not only to their ornamental cultivars, but also to introduced North American (F. cinerea, F. latifolia, F. pennsylvanica, F. quadrangulata) and Asian (F. bungeana, F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla, F. mandshurica) ash species. H. fraxineus was also observed on the previous year’s leaf petioles of the native European species F. ornus, considered a weakly susceptible host. In Slovak arboreta, H. fraxineus was found on 23 Fraxinus taxa; 21 of them represent first records for the country. F. bungeana is recorded as a new host species of H. fraxineus.

1. Introduction

Fraxinus L. (Oleaceae) is widely distributed over North and Central America, Asia, Europe, and Northwest Africa, from tropical to temperate climates [1]. Although Fraxinus often grows in forests, at their edges, and along tree-lined roads, it is also planted in urban greenery and parks as an ornamental tree. Since the early 1990s, ash dieback is a serious disease that has been killing ash across Europe [2,3,4,5]. The disease is caused by the invasive fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (T. Kowalski) Baral, Queloz & Hosoya (syn. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus Queloz, Grünig, Berndt, T. Kowalski, T.N. Sieber & Holdenr.), the anamorph of which is Chalara fraxinea T. Kowalski. Currently, it is one of seven known species of the genus Hymenoscyphus Gray (Helotiales) occurring on ash trees. The non-pathogenic species Hymenoscyphus albidus (Gillet) W. Phillips has been known from Europe since 1851 [6]. Gross and Han [7] and Gross et al. [8] described three Asian Hymenoscyphus species, H. koreanus A. Gross & J.G. Han, H. linearis Hosoya, A. Gross & Baral, and H. occultus A. Gross & J.G. Han. Although pathogenicity tests revealed that H. linearis is avirulent [8], there is currently no information on the pathogenicity of H. koreanus and H. occultus. Recently, Kowalski and Bilanski [9] have identified another species, H. pusillus T. Kowalski & P. Bilański, from F. pennsylvanica Marshall in Poland, but the pathogenicity of this fungus has not yet been confirmed. H. caudatus (P. Karst.) Dennis, occurring on various plant species, has also been recorded on ash in China [10] and the British Isles [11].
H. fraxineus is widespread in both East Asia (Northeastern China, Japan, Korea, and the Russian Far East) and Europe [12]. In Europe, this pathogen mainly attacks common ash (F. excelsior L.) and narrow-leaved ash (F. angustifolia Vahl), but it is also recorded on North American (F. americana L., F. nigra Marshall, F. pennsylvanica) and Asian (F. mandshurica Rupr., F. sogdiana Bunge) ash species in Estonia [13,14]. H. fraxineus has been recorded from F. ornus L. only in Austria [15]. In Danish arboretum, H. fraxineus apothecia were equally well-formed on many introduced host Fraxinus species as it was on common ash [16]. Most recently, the fungus has been found on three new oleaceous host plant species (Chionanthus virginicus L., Phillyrea angustifolia L., Phillyrea latifolia L.) at Westonbirt Arboretum in the United Kingdom [17]. These were the first findings on hosts other than Fraxinus. In Slovakia, two native European ash species (F. excelsior, F. angustifolia) are attacked by H. fraxineus [18,19,20,21]. Previous papers have only recorded ash dieback on these two native Fraxinus species in forest stands, seed orchards, and tree alleys in Slovakia. The health of non-native ash trees and ornamental cultivars of native species, however, has not yet been investigated in Slovakia.
The aims of this study were (i) to evaluate the health of introduced ash species and ornamental cultivars of native Fraxinus species in terms of the occurrence of H. fraxineus in Slovak arboreta and (ii) to determine the host range of H. fraxineus in the arboreta.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites

Study material was collected in three arboreta situated in central Slovakia and one arboretum in Southwestern Slovakia (Figure 1, Table 1).
The Borová Hora Arboretum (Zvolen District) is spread over the southwestern slopes of Zvolenská vrchovina upland, which is one of the geomorphological units of the Zvolenská kotlina basin; it is characteristically upland. From a climatic point of view, this area is warm and slightly humid (Figure 2), with a cold winter [22].
The Kysihýbel Arboretum (Banská Štiavnica District) is located near the town of Banská Štiavnica. The area is protected by the Štiavnické vrchy Mountains Protected Landscape Area. This forestry arboretum is a unique experimental forestry area specialized in rapidly growing exotic wood species [23]. It is in a warm temperate zone with a humid climate (Figure 2), without extreme temperature changes.
The Liptovský Hrádok Arboretum (Liptovský Mikuláš District) is situated in an urban area in the town of Liptovský Hrádok. This area has warm, humid summers and cold winters. The Liptovský Hrádok Arboretum is the highest elevation arboretum in Central Europe and is registered as a protected area under the Nature and Landscape Protection Act of Parliament [24].
The Mlyňany Arboretum (Zlaté Moravce District) is a large park situated in one of the warmest and driest areas of Slovakia in the southern foothills of the Carpathian Mountains at the northern edge of the hottest part of Slovakia. The area is characterized by prolonged dry periods during the height of summer; during some years, there is sometimes no summer rain at all. The Mlyňany Arboretum manages the largest collection of non-native trees and shrubs in Slovakia, which also happens to be one of the richest collections in Central Europe [25].

2.2. Ash Dieback Damage Assessment in Study Sites

Ash trees in the arboreta were assessed for ash dieback symptoms (necrotic leaf spots, brownish to orange colored bark necrosis and cankers on stems and branches, shoot dieback, apothecia on the previous year’s leaf petioles lying in the litter under the tree) during the growing season (July–August) in Mlyňany in 2015 and in Borová hora, Kysihýbel, and Liptovský Hrádok in 2018. The extreme droughts caused by precipitation deficits in Mlyňany in 2015 were also common during the four years before the assessment. Two years prior to the assessments in Borová hora, Kysihýbel, and Liptovský Hrádok in 2018, the annual precipitation was higher and the average annual temperature was lower than in the year of the assessment. The dieback damage assessments were made before leaf fall and covered a total of 470 trees (20–118 years old) of 34 taxa. Ash dieback crown damage was assessed visually by the same person. The extent of tree crown defoliation was reported as the percentage of defoliation [27].

2.3. Collection of Field Samples

Apothecia of H. fraxineus on rachises and petioles of Fraxinus spp. in the litter of the previous year’s leaf fall under symptomatic trees were collected from August to September in 2015 and 2016 in Mlyňany and during the first half of August 2018 in Borová hora, Kysihýbel, and Liptovský Hrádok. The samples were placed in plastic tubes and brought to the laboratory for molecular analysis to confirm species identity. In arboreta, individual ash species are spatially separated from each other. Particular ash species grow either solitarily or in monoculture groups surrounded by non-ash tree species, thus minimizing the possibility that the leaf litter under a tree would contain leaves of another ash species.
Voucher specimens were deposited in the Plant Pathology Herbarium (NR) of the Institute of Forest Ecology SAS in Nitra, Slovakia under the accession numbers NR5544–NR5551 and NR5553–NR5556 (Mlyňany Arboretum), NR5696–NR5713 (Borová hora Arboretum), NR5714–NR5719 (Kysihýbel Arboretum), and NR5729–NR5736 (Liptovský Hrádok Arboretum).

2.4. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

DNA was extracted from the samples by grinding apothecia in liquid nitrogen with a disposable polypropylene pellet pestle directly in 1.5 mL microtubes. DNA extractions were performed using the EZ-10 Spin Column Fungal Genomic DNA Mini-Preps Kit (Bio Basic Inc., Markham, ON, Canada) according to the protocol of the manufacturer. DNA was resuspended in 50 µL of elution buffer and stored at −20 °C.
The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) was amplified with the universal primer pair ITS1F/ ITS4 [28,29]. For identification of H. fraxineus, species–specific primers targeting the 18S gene and the ITS-2 region of rDNA operon [30] were used in conventional PCR.
All PCRs were performed in a total volume of 20 µL. The PCR mixtures consisted of 4 µL 5× HOT FIREpol® BlendMaster Mix (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia), 0.4 µL of each primer (final concentration 0.2 µM), deionized water of molecular grade (Pro injection, B. Braun), and ~10 ng of template DNA. Every reaction was performed with a negative control containing the master mix without template DNA. The PCRs were carried out on a T100™ Thermal Cycler (Biorad, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). For the ITS region, the PCR cycling conditions included an initial denaturation for 14 min at 95 °C followed by 35 cycles for 15 s at 95 °C, annealing for 30 s at 50 °C, elongation for 80 s at 72 °C, and a final elongation step for 10 min at 72 °C. PCR conditions for the specific primer 18S gene/ITS2 region included an initial denaturation step for 15 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles for 20 s at 95 °C, annealing for 30 s at 62 °C, elongation for 1 min at 72 °C, and a final elongation step for 8 min at 72 °C. All PCR products were visualized by electrophoresis on 0.8% (w/v) TBE agarose gels stained with SimplySafe stain (EURx, Gdansk, Poland).
The target PCR fragments were purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced by the Sanger method using an ABI 3130xl sequencer (Applied Biosystems) at SEQme Ltd. (Dobříš, Czech Republic). The obtained DNA sequences were compared by BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, available at https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) against ITS sequences in the NCBI GenBank Sequence Database.

2.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

The ITS sequences obtained were trimmed and edited using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software Version 7.0 (MEGA7) [31]. Final datasets were aligned with the BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor Version 7.2.5 [32]. To demonstrate differences in sequences of the studied material of H. fraxineus from Slovakia, we performed a phylogenetic analysis using corresponding GenBank sequence deposits of several known species of the Hymenoscyphus genus on Fraxinus as references, i.e., H. albidus, H. fraxineus, H. occultus, H. pusillus, H. koreanus, H. linearis, and H. caudatus. Hymenoscyphus menthae (W. Phillips) Baral was used as the outgroup. All samples used in our analysis are represented by ITS sequence. The ITS dataset was analyzed using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method based on the Tamura–Nei model [33]. The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using MEGA7.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data on crown defoliation of different Fraxinus taxa inspected in four Slovak arboreta were tested with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Taxa with low sample size (n < 2) were excluded from the test. Significance of the differences in defoliation means among arboreta was evaluated by Duncan test. The statistical analysis was performed using STATISTICA software Version 10 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA, 2011).

3. Results

3.1. Defoliation Level of Ash Trees in Slovak Arboreta

In Borová hora Arboretum, 28 trees of 12 Fraxinus taxa were evaluated (Table 2). The percentage of defoliation varied among taxa. Out of six F. angustifolia trees, three showed less than 10% defoliation, one was slightly defoliated (up to 25%), and two were moderately defoliated (30% and 40%). A single specimen of F. angustifolia ssp. pannonica Soó & T. Simon was heavily defoliated (85%). Variation in the level of defoliation was observed also among cultivars of F. excelsior. The ‘Aurea Pendula’, ‘Diversifolia’ (one out of three trees), ‘Heterophylla Pendula’, and ‘Nana’ cultivars showed less than 20% defoliation, and two ‘Diversifolia’, ‘Pendula’ and ‘Pruhoniciana’ were heavily defoliated (60–95%). F. ornus trees showed no defoliation. Three trees of F. mandshurica, the only Asian species growing in the arboretum, were moderately defoliated (40%). Three trees of the North-American species, F. pennsylvanica, showed defoliation (one had up to 10% defoliation, two showed moderate defoliation (30% and 50%)); two trees of ‘Aucubifolia’ cultivar had a defoliation level of 20%. No ash tree had the crown completely defoliated. Average percent defoliation of ash trees in Borová hora was 31.8%. All Fraxinus taxa, except F. ornus, showed ash dieback symptoms.
In Kysihýbel Arboretum, 54 trees of 9 taxa were inspected (Table 2). Out of 25 F. excelsior trees, two showed slight defoliation (up to 20%), 12 had moderate defoliation (30%–60%), nine were heavily defoliated (70%–95%), and two were completely defoliated. It should be noted that several of the dying F. excelsior trees had also been heavily attacked by the ash bark beetle, Hylesinus sp. (Curculionidae, Coleoptera). All trees of F. ornus showed up to 10% defoliation. Of the assessed Asian species, F. bungeana A. DC. and F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla (Hance) A.E. Murray showed up to 5% defoliation. Out of four F. mandshurica trees, three had up to 10% defoliation and one showed 20% defoliation. The North American species F. americana, F. cinerea Bosc, and F. latifolia Benth. were slightly defoliated (15%–30%). All trees of F. pennsylvanica had up to 30% defoliation. Average percent defoliation of ash trees in Kysihýbel was 35.7%.
In Liptovský Hrádok Arboretum, 20 trees of 7 taxa were assessed (Table 2). Out of 12 F. excelsior trees, three showed up to 10% defoliation, two showed slight defoliation (up to 25%), and seven were moderately defoliated (30%–40%). The single specimen of F. excelsior ‘Globosa’ was heavily defoliated (80%). Of the assessed Asian ash species represented by one tree each, F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla showed <10% defoliation, F. mandshurica was slightly defoliated (20%), and F. bungeana had up to 30% defoliation. North American F. pennsylvanica and F. pennsylvanica v. lanceolata (Borkh.) Sarg. showed moderate to heavy defoliation. Average percent defoliation of ash trees reached 34.5%. All Fraxinus taxa, except F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla, showed ash dieback symptoms.
In Mlyňany Arboretum, a total of 368 trees of 23 taxa were assessed for ash dieback symptoms (Table 2). Out of 12 F. excelsior trees, three showed less than 10% defoliation, one was slightly defoliated (up to 20%), two were moderately defoliated (30% and 50%), one had heavy defoliation (80%), and five were dead. Of the F. excelsior cultivars, one ‘Angustifolia’, five ‘Diversifolia’ and a single specimen of ‘Pendula’ had 50%–75% defoliation, and one tree of ‘Angustifolia’ cultivar was dead. Out of 18 F. angustifolia ssp. syriaca (Boiss.) Yalt., 14 showed up to 10% defoliation and four had 15%–20% defoliation. All 5 trees of F. angustifolia ssp. oxycarpa (M. Bieb. ex Willd.) Franco & Rocha Afonso showed up to 75% defoliation. Out of 17 F. ornus trees, 13 showed slight defoliation (up to 20%), three had 30% defoliation, and one had heavy defoliation (70%). Up to 50 trees of two F. pennsylvanica varieties (v. lanceolata and v. subintegerrima) showed no or less than 10% defoliation, two trees were slightly defoliated (up to 20%), and one was moderately defoliated (50%). One tree of v. subintegerrima had up to 90% defoliation. Both F. americana trees showed moderate defoliation (30% and 50%). Out of four F. quadrangulata Michx., three had no defoliation and one was up to 20% defoliated. Six trees of the North American species F. velutina Torr. showed 20%–30% defoliation. Of the assessed Asian species, all 15 trees of F. bungeana, 126 of F. chinensis Roxb., 13 of F. longicuspis Siebold & Zucc., and one F. pubinervis Blume showed no or less than 10% defoliation. Out of 70 F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla trees, 65 had no defoliation and five showed up to 20% defoliation. Out of seven F. mandshurica, one showed up to 5% defoliation, three were slightly defoliated (up to 20%), and three had heavy defoliation (70%–90%). F. sogdiana and F. paxiana Lingelsh., represented by one tree each, showed 20% and 50% defoliation, respectively. A single specimen of F. xanthoxyloides v. dimorpha (Coss. & Durieu) Wenz. showed no defoliation. In summary, 296 trees (80.4%) of evaluated trees showed no or less than <10% defoliation, 37 trees were classified as slightly defoliated, 16 as moderately defoliated, 13 as severely defoliated, and 6 trees were dead. Average percent defoliation of ash trees in Mlyňany Arboretum was 8.9%. Ten Fraxinus taxa showed ash dieback symptoms. Although F. americana, F. angustifolia ssp. syriaca, F. longicuspis, F. paxiana, F. pennsylvanica v. lanceolata, F. pennsylvanica v. subintegerrima, F. sogdiana, and F. velutina showed slight to moderate defoliation, no other symptoms of ash dieback or production of apothecia were observed.
A total of 470 trees of 34 taxa were evaluated. In all arboreta, 69.6% of evaluated trees showed no, or less than 10%, defoliation. The mean value of defoliation reached 14.5%. Dead trees accounted for 1.7% of all assessed trees. Figure 3 shows the estimated crown defoliation of ash trees in Mlyňany in 2015 and in Borová hora, Liptovský Hrádok, and Kysihýbel in 2018.
Defoliation percentage or range of defoliation percentage (if more than 2 trees of the same taxon on the same site showed different levels of defoliation) of individual Fraxinus taxa in each arboretum is given in Table 2. Severe to extreme defoliation was common in F. excelsior and most of its cultivars and rarely in F. mandshurica, F. pennsylvanica, and two subspecies of F. angustifolia (Figure 4). F. excelsior was the only species that was completely defoliated in Mlyňany and Kysihýbel. Percentage of defoliation varied significantly among Fraxinus taxa (F(24, 436) = 36.707, p < 0.001) when analyzed after omitting the nine taxa represented by one tree each (F. angustifolia ‘Pendula’, F. angustifolia ssp. pannonica, F. excelsior ‘Globosa’, F. excelsior ‘Heterophylla Pendula’, F. excelsior ‘Nana’, F. paxiana, F. pubinervis, F. sogdiana, F. xanthoxyloides v. dimorpha).
Only three species of ash, F. excelsior, F. mandshurica, and F. pennsylvanica, were present in all Slovak arboreta. Percentage of defoliation of F. excelsior (including taxa of lower rank) varied significantly among arboreta (F(3, 64) = 3.35, p = 0.024; Figure 5). The crown damage of F. excelsior trees in Liptovský Hrádok was significantly lower than in Mlyňany and Kysihýbel. There was also a significant difference in the percentage of defoliation of F. pennsylvanica among arboreta (F(3, 63) = 20.93, p < 0.001; Figure 5). The highest defoliation was observed in Liptovský Hrádok, the lowest in Mlyňany. The average defoliation showed a similar level in Borová hora and Kysihýbel, but it was significantly higher than in Mlyňany and lower than in Liptovský Hrádok. Although F. mandshurica grew in all arboreta, we did not include it in the analysis due to the low sample size in Liptovský Hrádok.

3.2. Sequencing Analysis

DNA was extracted from 64 apothecia samples. The amplicons of ITS region using the ITS1F/ITS4 primers ranged from 700 to 875 bp. The obtained ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA sequences exhibited between 99.07% (GenBank accession no. KY593990) to 100% (GenBank accession no. MN833901) similarity to previously deposited sequences of H. fraxineus in GenBank. The obtained ITS sequences (a single sequence per Fraxinus taxon and per site) were deposited in the NCBI GenBank; accession numbers are given in Table 2.
In 57 of the 64 samples, the presence of H. fraxineus was detected by species–specific PCR, which produced an amplicon of size 456 bp and showed positive results for all samples except three samples from F. pennsylvanica v. subintegerrima, three from F. pennsylvanica v. lanceolata, and one from F. americana that were collected in Mlyňany (Table 2).

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The ITS dataset contained 65 sequences representing eight Hymenoscyphus species. Among them, 32 sequences were newly obtained and 33 were retrieved from GenBank. In the phylogenetic analysis, Hymenoscyphus menthae from Solidago canadensis L. was chosen as the outgroup.
Phylogenetic analysis of 32 samples of H. fraxineus from different Fraxinus species collected in Slovak arboreta showed high sequence similarity with all reference sequences of H. fraxineus from GenBank. They all grouped together in one strongly supported (81% bootstrap support) clade with H. fraxineus from different Fraxinus species collected in other European localities and Asia (Figure 6).
The obtained ITS sequences of Slovak samples were identical irrespective of the host and concurred with those of European samples but differed from Asian samples at some positions. All Slovak ITS sequences differed from the three ITS sequences (KF188725, KJ511194, KP068051) from Japan, Korea, and China at two nucleotide positions, 433 (a gap instead of G) and 474 (T instead of C), and from one ITS sequence (KU323580) from Russia at three positions, 424 (a gap instead of G), 465 (T instead of C), and 679 (C instead of T).

3.4. Host Range of H. fraxineus in Slovak Arboreta

In four Slovak arboreta, the identity of the fungus H. fraxineus was molecularly confirmed in 23 out of 34 evaluated Fraxinus taxa. Ash dieback was recorded in 11 out of 12 taxa in Borová hora, in 6 out of 9 taxa in Kysihýbel, in 6 out of 7 taxa in Liptovský Hrádok, and in 9 out of 23 taxa in Mlyňany. The numbers of ash trees (at species level), of both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, in each of the examined arboreta are given in Table 3.
In total, 64.3% of the trees of native ash species showed symptoms of ash dieback in the arboreta. The fungus was confirmed on the common ash F. excelsior as well as its eight cultivars in all evaluated arboreta; on F. angustifolia and its two subspecies and one variety in Borová hora and Mlyňany; and on F. ornus in Mlyňany.
Analysis of samples from Asian Fraxinus species confirmed the presence of H. fraxineus on F. mandshurica in all arboreta, on F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla in Kysihýbel, and on F. bungeana in Liptovský Hrádok. Four Asian species, F. longicuspis, F. paxiana, F. pubinervis, and F. sogdiana, were not attacked by the pathogen. Less than 6% of the trees of Asian species showed ash dieback symptoms in all examined arboreta.
The causal agent of ash dieback was recorded on four North American ash species: F. cinerea and F. latifolia in Kysihýbel; on F. pennsylvanica and its one cultivar and one variety in Borová hora, Kysihýbel, and Liptovský Hrádok; and on F. quadrangulata in Mlyňany. Although F. velutina showed slight defoliation, no other symptoms of ash dieback or production of apothecia were observed. F. americana was moderately defoliated in Mlyňany but without clear symptoms and with a negative result for a single sample from this host tested using H. fraxineus-specific PCR primers. In Slovak arboreta, 25% of the trees of North American species were attacked by H. fraxineus.
The North African ash tree species F. xanthoxyloides v. dimorpha, an endangered species listed in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017, had no symptoms of ash dieback in Mlyňany.
The highest number of assessed trees was in Mlyňany Arboretum, and the number of trees of introduced ash taxa greatly exceeded the native species in this locality. In Mlyňany, 9.5% of evaluated trees showed ash dieback symptoms in 2015. Most of the asymptomatic trees in Mlyňany belong to introduced species. The percentage of symptomatic ash trees in Kysihýbel, Borová hora, and Liptovský Hrádok ranged from 70% to 95% in 2018. The native species predominated in these three arboreta with lower total numbers of ash trees.
Ash dieback symptoms were recorded in ash trees of all ages (Table 2). Together in all arboreta, 24.9% of all evaluated trees showed ash dieback symptoms (Table 3). The greatest damage caused by H. fraxineus was recorded on F. excelsior and five of its eight cultivars. F. mandshurica, F. angustifolia ssp. oxycarpa, F. angustifolia ssp. pannonica (represented by a single tree), and F. pennsylvanica rarely showed serious dieback. The following 21 taxa represent new hosts of H. fraxineus in Slovakia: F. angustifolia ssp. oxycarpa, F. angustifolia ssp. pannonica, F. angustifolia v. australis, F. bungeana, F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla, F. cinerea, 8 cultivars of F. excelsior (‘Angustifolia’, ‘Aurea Pendula’, ‘Diversifolia’, ‘Globosa’, ‘Heterophylla Pendula’, ‘Nana’, ‘Pendula’, ‘Pruhoniciana’), F. latifolia, F. mandshurica, F. ornus, F. pennsylvanica, F. pennsylvanica ‘Aucubifolia’, F. pennsylvanica v. lanceolata, and F. quadrangulata. F. bungeana is reported here as a new host species for H. fraxineus; it had not previously been reported as a host for this fungus.

4. Discussion

Three Hymenoscyphus species, H. albidus, H. fraxineus, and H. pusillus, are known to occur on Fraxinus trees in Europe. The non-pathogenic H. albidus has not been recorded in Slovakia to date. One herbarium specimen from Slovakia (PRM857180, Nízke Tatry Mts., 2005), originally identified as H. albidus, was revised as H. fraxineus by Koukol et al. [35] on the basis of ITS rDNA sequences. None of the samples examined in the present study were identified as H. albidus. Hymenoscyphus pusillus, recently discovered and described from F. pennsylvanica in Poland [9], has not yet been recorded in Slovakia. The pathogenic H. fraxineus, the cause of massive mortality of ash trees in forest stands throughout Europe, mainly attacks the native ash species F. excelsior and F. angustifolia [2,36,37]. In Slovakia, the invasive fungus H. fraxineus causes much damage to both F. excelsior and F. angustifolia in forest stands and seed orchards [19,20,21]. The third native European species, F. ornus, seemed to be tolerant to ash dieback until recently. However, Kirisits and Schwanda [15] recently isolated H. fraxineus from leaf rachises of F. ornus seedlings in Austria. We also recorded F. ornus as a host of the pathogen in the Mlyňany Arboretum.
The present study of introduced ash species in Slovak arboreta confirmed that the pathogen has a much larger host range in Slovakia. H. fraxineus is considered a weak pathogen of the Asian species F. mandshurica in Japan [38,39], China [40], the Russian Far East [10,41], and South Korea [42]. However, F. mandshurica trees were moderately, and occasionally badly, affected with symptoms of dieback of shoots and twigs in the evaluated Slovak arboreta. Drenkhan and Hanso [13] also recorded F. mandshurica trees affected with ash dieback in Estonian parks. Cleary et al. [43] confirmed the presence of H. fraxineus in asymptomatic leaves of F. mandshurica from Eastern Russia.
In South Korea [42] and in the Russian Far East [10], apothecia of H. fraxineus have been recorded on fallen leaves of F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla. Nielsen et al. [16] did not detect H. fraxineus DNA in the leaves of F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla after intensive spore exposure, and no bark lesions were developed after direct stem inoculation. As a result, they suggested that F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla may be less susceptible to leaf infection by H. fraxineus than F. mandshurica. When exposed to natural infection in a Danish arboretum, some of the additional Asian Fraxinus species examined were also asymptomatic or showed only a few dead shoots. In the present study, F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla trees in Kysihýbel Arboretum showed slight symptoms, including minor shoot dieback and bark necrosis.
In 2015, Drenkhan et al. [14] recorded F. sogdiana, a Central Asian ash species, as a new host of H. fraxineus in Estonia, indicating that some additional Asian ash species planted in Europe can serve as hosts for this invasive pathogen. Fraxinus sogdiana growing in Mlyňany Arboretum under the name F. potamophila had no symptoms of ash dieback. However, F. bungeana, native to Northeast China, showed symptoms of the disease in Liptovský Hrádok Arboretum in 2018. These observations are the first report of H. fraxineus on F. bungeana; our finding of H. fraxineus apothecia on petioles of fallen leaves of F. bungeana in Slovakia represents a new host among Asian ash species.
Although H. fraxineus has not yet been recorded in North America, some North American Fraxinus species (F. albicans Buckley, F. americana, F. latifolia, F. nigra, F. pennsylvanica, F. profunda (Bush) Bush, F. quadrangulata, F. velutina) seem to be susceptible to shoot infection [13,16,44,45]. Fraxinus pennsylvanica naturally infected by the ash dieback pathogen was recorded in Estonia and Austria [13,46]. The results from Slovak arboreta confirmed F. cinerea, F. latifolia, F. pennsylvanica, F. pennsylvanica ‘Aucubifolia’, F. pennsylvanica v. lanceolata, and F. quadrangulata as hosts of H. fraxineus. On the other hand, F. americana and F. velutina planted in Slovak arboreta were not infected by the pathogen. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus has already been reported on these two host species from European parks and arboreta [13,16]. Although several F. pennsylvanica v. lanceolata and v. subintegerrima trees in Mlyňany Arboretum showed severe defoliation, the presence of H. fraxineus was not confirmed by our molecular work. Hymenoscyphus-like apothecia collected under these trees will be subjected to further analysis.
Four ash species, F. longicuspis, F. paxiana, F. pubinervis, and F. xanthoxyloides v. dimorpha, not yet recorded as hosts of H. fraxineus, showed no symptoms of dieback in Slovak arboreta. Nielsen et al. [16] assumed that failure of H. fraxineus to infect two Asian ash species, F. sieboldiana Blume and F. paxiana, may reflect cases of non-host resistance. We recommend, however, that monitoring and analysis of all asymptomatic exotic ash trees be continued; their resistance to ash dieback should not be assumed.
The phylogram (Figure 6) shows that ITS sequences of all Slovak samples of H. fraxineus are grouped in a separate clade together with 16 sequences from other European samples retrieved from the GenBank database. The Slovak ITS sequences concur with sequences of European samples and form a subgroup within a H. fraxineus clade with a strong nodal support (ML = 82). The phylogram also demonstrates an intraspecific variation in H. fraxineus. The four GenBank sequences of Asian strains are clearly separated from the Slovak and all European samples due to differences at two nucleotide positions for strains from F. mandshurica (KF188725, KJ511194, KP068051) and at the other three positions for a strain from F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophylla (KU323580). These observations are in accordance with several recent studies and confirm that the ITS region of H. fraxineus from Asian populations (from Japan, China, and Korea) as well as samples from the Russian Far East are genetically divergent from European population of H. fraxineus [10,39,40,42].
The artificial inoculations as well as field observations of recent studies have demonstrated that Asian ash species tended to be immune to ash dieback disease compared to European ash species [10,13,43,47]. Field observations of ash dieback symptoms in this study also suggest that H. fraxineus is more pathogenic to European ash species (e.g., F. excelsior and F. angustifolia) than to Asian ash species (F. mandshurica and F. chinensis). It is important to note that no pathogenicity tests were carried out in this study and the above findings are solely based on the field observations of symptoms.
There are clear differences in the progression of ash dieback in trees of different age, irrespective of stand disease history, but there are also differences among stands in different regions, depending on their disease histories [48]. Trees are subject to dieback at all ages [3]; our results confirm this. Although semi-mature trees (20–60 years old) of introduced ash species growing in arboreta situated in temperate and humid areas displayed ash dieback symptoms, they were not infected (or only rarely infected) in the warmest and driest arboretum (Mlyňany). It has been shown that a high number of the youngest and intermediate-aged future crop trees in forest stands in Norway were dead, while development of the disease in large, dominant trees was slower [48]. The higher mortality of young trees and nursery saplings causes immense problems for establishing and tending young stands [49]. Due to the different age structure of individual Fraxinus taxa in Slovak arboreta, it was not possible to evaluate the influence of tree age on susceptibility to infection. However, the influence of tree age is considered a secondary factor [50]. We should note that the number of dead trees can be affected by regular tree maintenance (removal of dead and/or dying trees) in the arboreta. For example, during our investigations, no ash tree had its crown completely defoliated in Liptovský Hrádok Arboretum—however, seven dead trees (5 F. excelsior, 1 F. excelsior ‘Pendula’, 1 F. pennsylvanica ‘Aucubifolia’) were felled 1–2 years before our assessment [51]. In addition, from 2012 to 2019, 31 dead ash trees (26 F. excelsior cultivars, 4 F. ornus, 1 F. angustifolia) were removed in Borová hora Arboretum. In Mlyňany Arboretum, 9 dead trees of F. excelsior and 1 F. mandshurica were felled from 2019–2020. The cause of the death of ash trees that were felled before our survey was not determined. From the time of our survey to 2019, no ash trees were felled due to H. fraxineus attack in Kysihýbel Arboretum [52].
Climate and site conditions have a fundamental influence on H. fraxineus sporulation, spore release and dispersal, as well as on infection rate throughout the growing season [53,54,55,56,57]. The dynamics of apothecia production varied depending on weather conditions during the years of our survey. Longer periods with low rainfall adversely affected the fructification of the pathogen. Thus, apothecia were not found under some trees with ash dieback symptoms in Mlyňany in 2015. A lower infection rate (9.5%) was recorded in Mlyňany Arboretum, while the proportion of symptomatic ash trees in Kysihýbel, Borová hora, and Liptovský Hrádok ranged from 70% to 95%. We assume that the higher percentage of infected trees in the three arboreta from central Slovakia was influenced by more favorable microclimatic conditions at the localities. Borová hora, Kysihýbel, and Liptovský Hrádok experience lower average temperatures and higher amounts of precipitation compared to Mlyňany Arboretum, which is situated in one of the warmest and driest areas of Slovakia. Likewise, Ogris [58], Kessler et al. [49], Hauptman et al. [59], and Gross et al. [60] recorded higher severity of ash dieback on sites with high relative air humidity and lower temperatures. The differences in the infection rates of ashes among Slovak arboreta can be caused not only by environmental factors (e.g., tree competition, shading, microclimate, etc.) or crown and canopy management, but also by ash species composition and tree size. The lesser amount of damage found in Mlyňany might be due to the fact that the investigation in Mlyňany took place in 2015, whereas the other three arboreta were surveyed in 2018. The disease progression in these arboreta will be further monitored.
Insect pests and other plant pathogenic fungi represent a noticeable threat to stressed and weakened ash trees and may contribute to the progress of ash dieback disease in ash stands. Numerous fungal taxa on ash stems and twigs in the initial and advanced stages of dieback were recorded by Bakys et al. [3], Kowalski et al. [61], and Pastirčáková et al. [62]. The development and severity of ash dieback may also be correlated with soil moisture in stands and with Armillaria root infections [48,63]. In Slovak seed orchards, Longauerová et al. [20] observed frequent occurrence of Armillaria cepistipes Velen. and Armillaria gallica Marxm. & Romagn. on trees affected by ash dieback. However, we did not find any Armillaria fruiting bodies on assessed ash trees in Slovak arboreta. Post-dieback invasion by secondary pests also accelerates the death of dieback-weakened trees. In Kysihýbel Arboretum, we observed that common ash trees with symptoms of ash dieback had been heavily attacked by the ash bark beetle, Hylesinus sp., which affected the degree of crown defoliation. In older ash stands in Slovakia, Kunca et al. [64] and Zúbrik et al. [65] noted an increased number of the secondary invaders Hylesinus fraxini Panzer and Hylesinus crenatus Fabricius on trees already weakened by H. fraxineus.
Recent research studies have focused on finding resistance in host trees. The evidence for genetic control of resistance was provided by studies of clonal seed orchards for the native species F. angustifolia and F. excelsior [66,67]. In addition, species–specific variation in disease susceptibility has been previously documented among European, North American, and Asian Fraxinus species [16]. Recently, Stocks et al. [68] identified ash genes that may confer resistance to ash dieback. Given the importance of ash in forest management and urban greenery, it is crucial to continue developing resistant trees for the purpose of safeguarding European ash populations for future generations.

5. Conclusions

The invasive fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus decimates not only native European Fraxinus species, but introduced ash species as well. A survey of four Slovak arboreta revealed that the host range of H. fraxineus in Slovakia also includes Asian and North American ash species. Ash dieback was recorded from F. bungeana for the very first time. Since many introduced ash species have been attacked in arboreta in Northern and Central Europe, we assume that a similar situation can be found in arboreta and botanical gardens in other parts of Europe.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.P.; methodology, K.P. and M.K.H.; investigation, K.P., M.K.H., K.A., M.B., P.H. and I.S.; formal analysis, K.P., M.K.H. and J.P.; data curation, K.P. and M.K.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.P. and M.K.H.; writing—review and editing, K.P., M.K.H., K.A., M.B., J.P., P.H. and I.S.; supervision, K.P. and M.K.H.; project administration and funding acquisition, M.K.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic and of Slovak Academy of Sciences, grant number VEGA 2/0062/18.

Acknowledgments

We thank Martin Slávik (Kysihýbel Arboretum in Banská Štiavnica, National Forest Centre, Zvolen, Slovakia) and Jozef Meluš (Liptovský Hrádok Arboretum, Liptovský Hrádok, Slovakia) for providing data on Fraxinus species growing in the arboreta. We sincerely thank Scott LaGreca (Duke University, Durham, NC, USA) and Gretchen Freed (Scott Community College, Bettendorf, IA, USA) for kindly correcting the English. The authors also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped to improve this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wallander, E. Systematics and floral evolution in Fraxinus (Oleaceae). Belg. Dendrol. Belg. 2013, 2012, 38–58. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kowalski, T. Chalara fraxinea sp. nov. associated with dieback of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Poland. For. Pathol. 2006, 36, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bakys, R.; Vasaitis, R.; Barklund, P.; Thomsen, I.M.; Stenlid, J. Occurrence and pathogenicity of fungi in necrotic and non-symptomatic shoots of declining common ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Sweden. Eur. J. For. Res. 2009, 128, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Timmermann, V.; Børja, I.; Hietala, A.M.; Kirisits, T.; Solheim, H. Ash dieback: Pathogen spread and diurnal patterns of ascospore dispersal, with special emphasis on Norway. Bull. OEPP 2011, 41, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. van Opstal, N.A. Introduction to the EPPO Workshop on Chalara fraxinea, a major threat for ash trees in Europe. Bull. OEPP 2011, 41, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Queloz, V.; Grunig, C.R.; Berndt, R.; Kowalski, T.; Sieber, T.N.; Holdenrieder, O. Cryptic speciation in Hymenoscyphus albidus. For. Pathol. 2011, 41, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gross, A.; Han, J.G. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and two new Hymenoscyphus species identified in Korea. Mycol. Prog. 2015, 14, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gross, A.; Hosoya, T.; Zhao, Y.J.; Baral, H.O. Hymenoscyphus linearis sp. nov: Another close relative of the ash dieback pathogen H. fraxineus. Mycol. Prog. 2015, 14, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kowalski, T.; Bilanski, P. Hymenoscyphus pusillus, a new species on leaves of Fraxinus pennsylvanica in Poland. For. Pathol. 2019, 49, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Drenkhan, R.; Solheim, H.; Bogacheva, A.; Riit, T.; Adamson, K.; Drenkhan, T.; Maaten, T.; Hietala, A.M. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus is a leaf pathogen of local Fraxinus species in the Russian Far East. Plant Pathol. 2017, 66, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thomas, P.A. Biological flora of the British Isles: Fraxinus excelsior. J. Ecol. 2016, 104, 1158–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Farr, D.F.; Rossman, A.Y. Fungal Databases. U.S. National Fungus Collections, ARS, USDA. Continuously Updated. Available online: https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ (accessed on 9 May 2019).
  13. Drenkhan, R.; Hanso, M. New host species for Chalara fraxinea. New Dis. Rep. 2010, 22, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Drenkhan, R.; Adamson, K.; Hanso, M. Fraxinus sogdiana, a Central Asian ash species, is susceptible to Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Plant Protect. Sci. 2015, 51, 150–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kirisits, T.; Schwanda, K. First definite report of natural infection of Fraxinus ornus by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. For. Pathol. 2015, 45, 430–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nielsen, L.R.; McKinney, L.V.; Hietala, A.M.; Kjær, E.D. The susceptibility of Asian, European and North American Fraxinus species to the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus reflects their phylogenetic history. Eur. J. For. Res. 2017, 136, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). Ash Dieback Found on Three New Host Species of Tree in the UK. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ash-dieback-found-on-three-new-host-species-of-tree-in-the-uk--2 (accessed on 9 August 2018).
  18. Kunca, A.; Brutovský, D.; Finďo, S.; Gubka, A.; Konôpka, B.; Konôpka, J.; Leontovyč, R.; Longauerová, V.; Minďáš, J.; Novotný, J.; et al. Výskyt Škodlivých Činiteľov v Lesoch Slovenska za rok 2005 a ich Prognóza na rok 2006, 1st ed.; National Forest Centre: Zvolen, Slovakia, 2006; 89p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Adamčíková, K.; Kádasi Horáková, M.; Jankovský, L.; Havrdová, L. Identification of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the causal agent of ash dieback in Slovakia. Biologia 2015, 70, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Longauerová, V.; Maľová, M.; Adamčíková, K.; Kunca, A.; Kádasi Horáková, M.; Pastirčáková, K. Zdravotný stav jaseňov v semenných sadoch Slovenska v súvislosti s chradnutím vplyvom Chalara fraxinea (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus). In Proceedings of the Aktuálne Problémy v Ochrane Lesa 2015, Nový Smokovec, Slovakia, 29–30 January 2015; Kunca, A., Ed.; National Forest Centre: Zvolen, Slovakia, 2015; pp. 78–82. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kádasi Horáková, M.; Adamčíková, K.; Pastirčáková, K.; Longauerová, V.; Maľová, M. Natural infection of Fraxinus angustifolia by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Slovakia. Balt. For. 2017, 23, 52–55. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lukáčik, I.; Sarvašová, I. Arborétum Borová Hora 1965–2015, 1st ed.; Technical University in Zvolen: Zvolen, Slovakia, 2017; 131p. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jankovič, J. Lesnícke Arboretum Kysihýbel—Odborný Sprievodca; National Forest Centre—Forest Research Institute: Zvolen, Slovakia, 2015; 24p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Makara, O.; Meluš, J.; Pavlík, J. Sprievodca Zbierkami Chráneného Areálu Hrádocké Arboretum, 1st ed.; Secondary Forestry and Wood Technology School of Joseph Decret Matejovie in Liptovský Hrádok: Liptovský Hrádok, Slovakia, 2016; 56p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hoťka, P.; Barta, M. Dreviny Arboréta Mlyňany SAV 2012, 1st ed.; Veda: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2012; 136p. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sobíšek, B. Meteorologický Slovník, Výkladový a Terminologický, 1st ed.; Academia: Prague, Czech Republic, 1993; 594p. [Google Scholar]
  27. Müller, E.; Stierlin, H.R. Sanasilva Tree Crown Photos with Percentages of Foliage Loss, 2nd ed.; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research: Birmensdorf, Switzerland, 1990; 129p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications, 1st ed.; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Johansson, S.B.K.; Vasaitis, R.; Ihrmark, K.; Barklund, P.; Stenlid, J. Detection of Chalara fraxinea from tissue of Fraxinus excelsior using species-specific ITS primers. For. Pathol. 2010, 40, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetic analysis version 7.0 for bigger data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Hall, T. BioEdit, Biological Sequence Alignment Editor for Windows 95/98/NT/2000/XP/7, Version 7.2.5; Ibis Biosciences: Carlsbad, CA, USA. Available online: https://www.mybiosoftware.com/bioedit-7-0-9-biological-sequence-alignment-editor.html (accessed on 9 November 2019).
  33. Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden: St. Louis, MO, USA. Available online: http://www.tropicos.org/ (accessed on 10 February 2020).
  35. Koukol, O.; Haňáčková, Z.; Dvořák, M.; Havrdová, L. Unseen, but still present in Czechia: Hymenoscyphus albidus detected by real-time PCR, but not by intensive sampling. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 15, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kirisits, T.; Matlakova, M.; Mottinger-Kroupa, S.; Halmschlager, E.; Lakatos, F. Chalara fraxinea associated with dieback of narrow-leafed ash (Fraxinus angustifolia). Plant Pathol. 2010, 59, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vasaitis, R.; Enderle, R. Dieback of European Ash (Fraxinus spp.): Consequences and Guidelines for Sustainable Management; Report on European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action FP1103 FRAXBACK; SLU Service/Repro: Uppsala, Sweden, 2017; 300p. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hosoya, T.; Otani, Y.; Furuya, K. Materials for the fungus flora of Japan (46). Trans. Mycol. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 34, 429–432. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhao, Y.J.; Hosoya, T.; Baral, H.O.; Hosaka, K.; Kakishima, M. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the correct name for Lambertella albida reported from Japan. Mycotaxon 2012, 122, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zheng, H.D.; Zhuang, W.Y. Hymenoscyphus albidoides sp. nov. and H. pseudoalbidus from China. Mycol. Prog. 2014, 13, 625–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baral, H.O.; Bemmann, M. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus vs. H. albidus—A comparative light microscopic study on the causal agent of European ash dieback and related foliicolous, stroma-forming species. Mycology 2014, 5, 228–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Han, J.G.; Shrestha, B.; Hosoya, T.; Lee, K.H.; Sung, G.H.; Shin, H.D. First report of the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Korea. Mycobiology 2014, 42, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Cleary, M.; Nguyen, D.; Marčiulynienė, D.; Berlin, A.; Vasaitis, R.; Stenlid, J. Friend or foe? Biological and ecological traits of the European ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in its native environment. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kowalski, T.; Bilański, P.; Holdenrieder, O. Virulence of Hymenoscyphus albidus and H. fraxineus on Fraxinus excelsior and F. pennsylvanica. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gross, A.; Sieber, T. Virulence of Hymenoscyphus albidus and native and introduced Hymenoscyphus fraxineus on Fraxinus excelsior and Fraxinus pennsylvanica. Plant Pathol. 2016, 65, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kirisits, T.; Krumboeck, S.; Kraeutler, K. Nucleotide. Accession No. KP994902, Hymenoscyphus fraxineus voucher ST/FP/4-2 18S Ribosomal RNA Gene, Partial Sequence; Internal Transcribed Spacer 1, 5.8S Ribosomal RNA Gene, and Internal Transcribed Spacer 2, Complete Sequence; and 28S Ribosomal RNA Gene, Partial Sequence; National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information: Bethesda, MD, USA, 1988. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KP994902 (accessed on 21 February 2020).
  47. Kirisits, T.; Matlakova, M.; Mottinger-Kroupa, S.; Cech, T.L.; Halmschlager, E. The current situation of ash dieback caused by Chalara fraxinea in Austria. SDU Fac. For. J. Ser. A 2009, 97–119. [Google Scholar]
  48. Timmermann, V.; Nagy, N.E.; Hietala, A.M.; Børja, I.; Solheim, H. Progression of ash dieback in Norway related to tree age, disease history and regional aspects. Balt. For. 2017, 23, 150–158. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kessler, M.; Cech, T.L.; Brandstetter, M.; Kirisits, T. Dieback of ash (Fraxinus excelsior and Fraxinus angustifolia) in Eastern Austria: Disease development on monitoring plots from 2007 to 2010. J. Agric. Ext. Rural Dev. 2012, 4, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Skovsgaard, J.P.; Wilhelm, G.J.; Thomsen, I.M.; Metzler, B.; Kirisits, T.; Havrdová, L.; Enderle, R.; Dobrowolska, D.; Cleary, M.; Clark, J. Silvicultural strategies for Fraxinus excelsior in response to dieback caused by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Forestry 2017, 90, 455–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Meluš, J.; Secondary Vocational School of Forestry and Wood Technology of Joseph Decret Matejovie, Liptovský Hrádok, Slovakia. Personal communication, 2018.
  52. Slávik, M.; Kysihýbel Arboretum, National Forest Centre, Zvolen, Slovakia. Personal communication, 2020.
  53. Schumacher, J. The general situation regarding ash dieback in Germany and investigations concerning the invasion and distribution strategies of Chalara fraxinea in woody tissue. Bull. OEPP 2011, 40, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kirisits, T.; Kritsch, P.; Kräutler, K.; Matlakova, M.; Halmschlager, E. Ash dieback associated with Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus in forest nurseries in Austria. J. Agric. Ext. Rural Dev. 2012, 4, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hietala, A.M.; Timmermann, V.; Børja, I.; Solheim, H. The invasive ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus exerts maximal infection pressure prior to the onset of host leaf senescence. Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Havrdová, L. An analysis of selected environmental factors affecting the occurrence of Chalara fraxinea. Ph.D. Thesis, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dvorak, M.; Rotkova, G.; Botella, L. Detection of airborne inoculum of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and H. albidus during seasonal fluctuations associated with absence of apothecia. Forests 2016, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ogris, N. Jesenov ožig, Chalara fraxinea. Novice Iz Varstva Gozdov 2008, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Hauptman, T.; Piškur, B.; de Groot, M.; Ogris, N.; Ferlan, M.; Jurc, D. Temperature effect on Chalara fraxinea: Heat treatment of saplings as a possible disease control method. For. Pathol. 2013, 43, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gross, A.; Holdenrieder, O.; Pautasso, M.; Queloz, V.; Sieber, T.N. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the causal agent of European ash dieback. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2014, 15, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kowalski, T.; Kraj, W.; Bednarz, B. Fungi on stems and twigs in initial and advanced stages of dieback of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Poland. Eur. J. For. Res. 2016, 135, 565–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Pastirčáková, K.; Ivanová, H.; Pastirčák, M. Species diversity of fungi on damaged branches and leaves of ashes (Fraxinus spp.) in different types of stands in Slovakia. Cent. Eur. For. J. 2018, 64, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Marçais, B.; Husson, C.; Godart, L.; Caël, O. Influence of site and stand factors on Hymenoscyphus fraxineus-induced basal lesion. Plant Pathol. 2016, 65, 1452–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kunca, A.; Leontovyč, R.; Zúbrik, M.; Gubka, A. Bark beetle outbreak on weakened ash trees and applied control measures. Bull. OEPP 2011, 41, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zúbrik, M.; Kunca, A.; Galko, J.; Vakula, J.; Leontovyč, R.; Gubka, A.; Nikolov, C.; Rell, S. Jaseň—Najčastejšie choroby a škodcovia jaseňa. Les & Letokruhy 2017, 7–8, 32–33. [Google Scholar]
  66. Diminić, D.; Kajba, D.; Milotić, M.; Andrić, I.; Kranjec, J. Susceptibility of Fraxinus angustifolia clones to Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in lowland Croatia. Balt. For. 2017, 23, 233–243. [Google Scholar]
  67. Adamčíková, K.; Pažitný, J.; Pastirčáková, K. Individual resistance of Fraxinus angustifolia and F. excelsior clones to Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. J. Plant Protect. Res. 2018, 58, 227–233. [Google Scholar]
  68. Stocks, J.J.; Metheringham, C.L.; Plumb, W.J.; Lee, S.J.; Kelly, L.J.; Nichols, R.A.; Buggs, R.J.A. Genomic basis of European ash tree resistance to ash dieback fungus. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 1686–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Forests 11 00596 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of Slovakia showing the four sampled arboreta.
Figure 1. Map of Slovakia showing the four sampled arboreta.
Forests 11 00596 g001
Forests 11 00596 g002 550
Figure 2. Lang’s rain factor (LRF) for the years 2009 to 2018. The LRF was calculated as the ratio of the mean annual precipitation (in mm) and the mean annual air temperature (in °C) [26].
Figure 2. Lang’s rain factor (LRF) for the years 2009 to 2018. The LRF was calculated as the ratio of the mean annual precipitation (in mm) and the mean annual air temperature (in °C) [26].
Forests 11 00596 g002
Forests 11 00596 g003 550
Figure 3. Crown defoliation (in percentages) of ash trees in Slovak arboreta (BH—Borová hora, K—Kysihýbel, LH—Liptovský Hrádok, M—Mlyňany). The number of trees examined/number of taxa is shown in parenthesis under the location name.
Figure 3. Crown defoliation (in percentages) of ash trees in Slovak arboreta (BH—Borová hora, K—Kysihýbel, LH—Liptovský Hrádok, M—Mlyňany). The number of trees examined/number of taxa is shown in parenthesis under the location name.
Forests 11 00596 g003
Forests 11 00596 g004 550
Figure 4. Crown defoliation (in percentages) of Fraxinus taxa in four Slovak arboreta. The number of assessed trees is enclosed in parenthesis after the taxon name.
Figure 4. Crown defoliation (in percentages) of Fraxinus taxa in four Slovak arboreta. The number of assessed trees is enclosed in parenthesis after the taxon name.
Forests 11 00596 g004
Forests 11 00596 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparison of crown defoliation (in percentages) of F. excelsior and F. pennsylvanica (both at species level) among Slovak arboreta (BH—Borová hora, K—Kysihýbel, LH—Liptovský Hrádok, M—Mlyňany). The number of trees examined is indicated in parenthesis under the location name.
Figure 5. Comparison of crown defoliation (in percentages) of F. excelsior and F. pennsylvanica (both at species level) among Slovak arboreta (BH—Borová hora, K—Kysihýbel, LH—Liptovský Hrádok, M—Mlyňany). The number of trees examined is indicated in parenthesis under the location name.
Forests 11 00596 g005
Forests 11 00596 g006 550
Figure 6. Maximum likelihood tree based on ITS rDNA sequences of Hymenoscyphus spp. The bootstrap values >60% are indicated at the nodes. The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. Material collected in Slovak arboreta (BH—Borová hora, K—Kysihýbel, LH—Liptovský Hrádok, M—Mlyňany) and sequenced in this work are shown in bold type. Sequences from type materials are marked with an asterisk (*).
Figure 6. Maximum likelihood tree based on ITS rDNA sequences of Hymenoscyphus spp. The bootstrap values >60% are indicated at the nodes. The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. Material collected in Slovak arboreta (BH—Borová hora, K—Kysihýbel, LH—Liptovský Hrádok, M—Mlyňany) and sequenced in this work are shown in bold type. Sequences from type materials are marked with an asterisk (*).
Forests 11 00596 g006
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of study sites in Slovakia.
Table 1. Characteristics of study sites in Slovakia.
ArboretumTotal Area [ha]CoordinatesAltitude [m a.s.l.]MAT [°C]MTGS [°C]APS [mm]MPSGS [mm]
Borová hora47.8048°35′ N 19°08′ E291–3779.716.8763.3432.1
Kysihýbel7.7848°27′ N 18°56′ E530–5639.115.8853.3465.8
Liptovský Hrádok7.2449°02′ N 19°43′ E641–6468.014.6729.5460.2
Mlyňany67.0048°19′ N 18°22′ E163–21710.717.5555.5337.0
MAT—mean annual temperature; MTGS—mean temperature in the growing season; APS—annual precipitation sum; MPSGS—mean precipitation sum in the growing season. The growing season is from April to September. The climatic data were computed for the ten-year period 2009–2018 (data source: Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, Bratislava).
Table
Table 2. Summary of Fraxinus taxa examined for the presence of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in four Slovak arboreta, including the extent of tree defoliation, results of species–specific PCR, and GenBank accession numbers of representative sequences.
Table 2. Summary of Fraxinus taxa examined for the presence of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in four Slovak arboreta, including the extent of tree defoliation, results of species–specific PCR, and GenBank accession numbers of representative sequences.
HostArboretum aNo. of TreesAge of Trees b [yrs.]Tree Defoliation c [%]Year of Apothecia CollectionTesting Results of SSPP dGenBank Acc. No. ITS
F. americanaK211815n.f.
F. americanaM23630; 502015–
F. angustifoliaBH6375–402018+MK522151
F. angustifolia ‘Pendula’M1365n.f.
F. angustifolia ssp. oxycarpaM536752015+MF175248
F. angustifolia ssp. pannonicaBH143852018+MK491641
F. angustifolia ssp. syriacaM185310–20n.f.
F. angustifolia v. australisM7330–402015+MF175249
F. bungeanaK4295n.f.
F. bungeanaLH135302018+MK491649
F. bungeanaM15450n.f.
F. chinensisM12630–500–10n.f.
F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophyllaK62952018+MK491647
F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophyllaLH12010n.f.
F. chinensis ssp. rhynchophyllaM7030–450–20n.f.
F. cinereaK2113302018+MK491646
F. excelsiorK2592–11820–1002018+MK491642
F. excelsiorLH1245–8010–402018+MK491651
F. excelsiorM12515–1002015+MF175245
F. excelsior ‘Angustifolia’M25370; 1002015+MF175250
F. excelsior ‘Aurea Pendula’BH235; 4010; 202018+MK491632
F. excelsior ‘Diversifolia’BH3445–802018+MK491635
F. excelsior ‘Diversifolia’M536502015+MF175252
F. excelsior ‘Globosa’LH136802018+MK491652
F. excelsior ‘Heterophylla Pendula’BH14352018+MK491639
F. excelsior ‘Nana’BH139102018+MK491638
F. excelsior ‘Pendula’BH139952018+MK491637
F. excelsior ‘Pendula’M160752015+MF175251
F. excelsior ‘Pruhoniciana’BH25070; 902018+MK491634
F. latifolia *K3112202018+MK491645
F. longicuspisM13350–10n.f.
F. mandshuricaBH353402018+MK491640
F. mandshuricaK42910–202018+MK491643
F. mandshuricaLH133202018+MK491648
F. mandshuricaM730–505–902015+MF175246
F. ornusBH3550n.f.
F. ornusK311410n.f.
F. ornusM1748–5720–702015+MF175247
F. paxianaM15350n.f.
F. pennsylvanicaBH35510–502018+MK491636
F. pennsylvanicaK5113302018+MK491644
F. pennsylvanicaLH24550; 902018+MK491650
F. pennsylvanica ‘Aucubifolia’BH245202018+MK491633
F. pennsylvanica v. lanceolataLH232402018+MK491653
F. pennsylvanica v. lanceolataM1030–450-202016–
F. pennsylvanica v. subintegerrimaM43360–902016–
F. pubinervisM1465n.f.
F. quadrangulataM4340–202016+MF175253
F. sogdiana **M13420n.f.
F. velutinaM64020–30n.f.
F. xanthoxyloides v. dimorphaM1330n.f.
Notes: Nomenclature accepted according to the world’s largest botanical database, Tropicos [34]. * The host species grows in the Kysihýbel Arboretum under the synonymous name F. oregona Nutt. ** The host species grows in the Mlyňany Arboretum under the synonymous name F. potamophila Herder. a Abbreviations: BH, Borová hora; K, Kysihýbel; LH, Liptovský Hrádok; M, Mlyňany. b The age of each tree was obtained from its registration card. If trees of the same taxon at different ages were evaluated on the site, their age range is given. c If more than two trees of the same taxon on the same site showed different levels of percentage defoliation, the range of percentage defoliation is given. d SSPP, species–specific primed PCR; ‘+’ if DNA fragment corresponded to the expected size of PCR product. n.f. (not found) if no apothecia were present on fallen ash leaf rachises and petioles in the litter from the previous year.
Table
Table 3. Fraxinus species with and without ash dieback symptoms in study sites.
Table 3. Fraxinus species with and without ash dieback symptoms in study sites.
Natural DistributionFraxinus SpeciesNumber of Asymptomatic/Symptomatic Trees% of Symptomatic Trees in all Arboreta
BHKLHMAll Arboreta
Asiabungeana 4/00/115/019/15
chinensis * 3/31/0196/0200/31.5
longicuspis 13/013/00
mandshurica0/33/10/11/64/1173.3
paxiana 1/01/00
pubinervis 1/01/00
sogdiana 1/01/00
Europe to Asiaangustifolia *0/7 24/724/1436.8
excelsior *0/100/250/132/182/6697.1
ornus3/03/0 14/320/313
North Americaamericana 2/0 2/04/00
cinerea 0/2 0/2100
latifolia 1/2 1/266.7
pennsylvanica *0/50/50/453/053/1420.9
quadrangulata 3/13/125
velutina 6/06/00
North Africaxanthoxyloides * 1/01/00
Totals3/2516/381/19333/35353/11724.9
Abbreviations: BH—Borová hora, K—Kysihýbel, LH—Liptovský Hrádok, M—Mlyňany. * including taxa of lower rank.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pastirčáková, K.; Adamčíková, K.; Barta, M.; Pažitný, J.; Hoťka, P.; Sarvašová, I.; Kádasi Horáková, M. Host Range of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Slovak Arboreta. Forests 2020, 11, 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050596

AMA Style

Pastirčáková K, Adamčíková K, Barta M, Pažitný J, Hoťka P, Sarvašová I, Kádasi Horáková M. Host Range of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Slovak Arboreta. Forests. 2020; 11(5):596. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050596

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pastirčáková, Katarína, Katarína Adamčíková, Marek Barta, Jozef Pažitný, Peter Hoťka, Ivana Sarvašová, and Miriam Kádasi Horáková. 2020. "Host Range of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Slovak Arboreta" Forests 11, no. 5: 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050596

APA Style

Pastirčáková, K., Adamčíková, K., Barta, M., Pažitný, J., Hoťka, P., Sarvašová, I., & Kádasi Horáková, M. (2020). Host Range of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Slovak Arboreta. Forests, 11(5), 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050596

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop