Is the Reproduction Capacity of Pinus brutia Stands 20 Years after Wildfire Efficient to Secure Forest Restoration in the Case of a Fire Re-Occurrence?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Collection of Stand Structural Data
2.2.2. Cone Production and Morphological Characteristics
2.2.3. Seed Measurements
2.2.4. Seed Germination Trial
2.2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Stand Characteristics
3.2. Cone Yield
3.3. Cone Characteristics
3.4. Seed Morphological Characteristics
3.5. Seed Germination
3.6. Estimation of Pinus brutia Stands Reproductive Capacity
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pérez-Sánchez, J.; Jimeno-Sáez, P.; Senent-Aparicio, J.; Díaz-Palmero, J.M.; Cabezas-Cerezo, J.D.D. Evolution of burned area in forest fires under climate change conditions in southern spain using ANN. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singleton, M.P.; Thode, A.E.; Meador, A.J.S.; Iniguez, J.M. Increasing trends in high-severity fire in the southwestern USA from 1984 to 2015. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 433, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephens, S.L.; Collins, B.M.; Fettig, C.J.; Finney, M.A.; Hoffman, C.M.; Knapp, E.E.; North, M.P.; Safford, H.; Wayman, R.B. Drought, Tree Mortality, and Wildfire in Forests Adapted to Frequent Fire. BioScience 2018, 68, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Daskalakou, E.N.; Thanos, C.A. Aleppo Pine (Pinus halepensis) Postfire Regeneration: The Role of Canopy and Soil Seed Banks. Int. J. Wildland Fire 1996, 6, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pausas, J.G.; Llovet, J.; Rodrigo, A.; Vallejo, R. Are wildfires a disaster in the Mediterranean basin?—A review. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2008, 17, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsitsoni, T.; Ganatsas, P.; Zagas, T.; Tsakaldimi, M. Dynamics of post-fire regeneration of Pinus brutia Ten. in an artificial forest ecosystem of northern Greece. Plant Ecol. 2004, 171, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thanos, C.A.; Doussi, M.A. Postfire Regeneration of P. brutia Forests. In Ecology, Biogeography and Management of Pinus halepensis and P. brutia Forest Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin; Ne’eman, G., Trabaud, L., Eds.; Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 291–301. [Google Scholar]
- Ferrandis, P.; Las Heras, J.; Martínez-Sánchez, J.J.; Herranz, J.M. Influence of a low-intensity fire on a Pinus halepensis Mill. forest seed bank and its consequences on the early stages of plant succession. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2001, 49, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enright, N.J.; Lamont, B.B.; Marsula, R. Canopy seed bank dynamics and optimum fire regime for the highly serotinous shrub Banksia hookeriana. J. Ecol. 1996, 84, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tapias, R.; Gil, L.; Fuentes-Utrilla, P.; José, A.; Pardos, J.A. Canopy seed banks in Mediterranean pines of south-eastern Spain: A comparison between Pinus halepensis Mill., P. pinaster Ait., P. nigra Arn. and P. pinea L. J. Ecol. 2001, 89, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boydak, M.; Dirik, H.; Calikoglu, M. Forest Stand Dynamic, Regeneration and Fire in Pinus brutia Ecosystems. In Biology and Silviculture of Turkish Red Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.); Istanbul Universitesi Orman Fakultesi: Ankara, Turkey, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Boydak, M. Silvicultural characteristics and natural regeneration of Pinus brutia Ten—A review. Plant Ecol. 2004, 171, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thanos, C.A.; Marcou, S. Post-fire regeneration in Pinus brutia forest ecosystems of Samos island (Greece): 6 years after. Acta Oecol./Oecol. Plant. 1991, 12, 633–642. [Google Scholar]
- Spanos, I.A.; Daskalakou, E.N.; Thanos, C.A. Post-fire, natural regeneration of Pinus brutia forests in Thasos island, Greece. Acta Oecol. 2000, 21, 2013–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavgaci, A.; Ortel, E.; Torres, I.; Safford, H. Early postfire vegetation recovery of Pinus brutia forests: Effects of fire severity, prefire stand age, and aspect. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2016, 40, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spanos, I.A.; Radoglou, K.M.; Raftoyannis, Y. Site quality effects on post-fire regeneration of Pinus brutia forest on a Greek Island. Appl. Veget. Sci. 2001, 4, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spanos, I.; Ganatsas, P.; Tsakaldimi, M. Evaluation of postfire restoration in suburban forest of Thessaloniki, northern Greece. Glob. NEST J. 2010, 12, 390–400. [Google Scholar]
- Ganatsas, P.; Tsakaldimi, M.; Thanos, C. Seed and cone diversity and seed germination of Pinus pinea in Strofylia Site of the Natura 2000 Network. Biodivers. Conserv. 2008, 17, 2427–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISTA (The International Seed Testing Association). International Rules for Seed Testing; ISTA: Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2020; p. i-19-8(8). [Google Scholar]
- Boydak, M.; Dirik, H.; Tilki, H.; Calikoglu, M. Effects of water stress on germination in six provenances of Pinus brutia seeds from different bioclimatic zones in Turkey. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2003, 27, 91–97. [Google Scholar]
- Ganatsas, P.; Tsakaldimi, M.; Damianidis, C.; Stefanaki, A.; Kalapothareas, T.; Karydopoulos, T.; Papapavlou, K. Regeneration Ecology of the Rare Plant Species Verbascum dingleri: Implications for Species Conservation. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oliver, C.D.; Larson, B.C. Forest Stand Dynamics; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1990; 467p. [Google Scholar]
- Sagnard, F.; Pichot, C.; Dreyfus, P.; Jordano, P.; Fady, B. Modelling seed dispersal to predict seedling recruitment: Recolonization dynamics in a plantation forest. Ecol. Model. 2007, 203, 464–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thanos, C.A.; Marcou, S.; Christodoulakis, D.; Yannitsaros, A. Early post-fire regeneration in Pinus brutia forest ecosystems of Samos island (Greece). Acta Oecol./Oecol. Plant. 1989, 10, 79–94. [Google Scholar]
- Thanos, C.A.; Daskalakou, E.N.; Nikolaidou, S. Early post-fire regeneration of a Pinus halepensis forest on Mount Párnis, Greece. J. Veg. Sci. 1996, 7, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nathan, R.; Ne'eman, G. Spatiotemporal dynamics of recruitment in Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Miller). Plant Ecol. 2004, 171, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De las Heras, J.; Moya, D.; Vega, J.A.; Daskalakou, E.; Vallejo, R.; Grigoriadis, N.; Tsitsoni, T.; Baeza, J.; Valdecantos, A.; Fernández, C.; et al. Post-Fire Management of Serotinous Pine Forests. In Post-Fire Management and Restoration of Southern European Forests, Managing Forest Ecosystems; Moreira, F., Arianoutsou, M., Corona, P., De las Heras, J., Eds.; Springer Science + Business Media B.V.: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganatsas, P.; Thanasis, G. Pinus halepensis invasion in Pinus pinea habitat in Strofylia forest (Site of NATURA 2000 network), southern Greece. J. Nat. Conserv. 2010, 18, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strid, A.; Tan, K. Flora Hellenica; Koeltz Scientific Books: Königstein, Germany, 1997; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Ganatsas, P.; Tsakaldimi, M.; Zachariadis, G. Effect of air traffic pollution on seed quality characteristics of Pinus brutia. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 74, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skordilis, A.; Thanos, C.A. Comparative Ecophysiology of Seed Germination Strategies in the Seven Pine Species Naturally Growing in Greece. In Basic and Applied Aspects of Seed Biology; Ellis, R.H., Black, M., Murdoch, A.J., Hong, T.D., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997; pp. 623–632. [Google Scholar]
- Paitaridou, D.; Ganatsas, P.; Sotiriou, K.; Varvarigos, G. Research on Seed Quality of Four Native Pine Species. In Proceedings of the 12th National Conference, Drama, Greece, 2–5 October 2005; Hellenic Forestry Society: Thessaloniki, Greece, 2006; pp. 151–158, (Greek with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
- González-De Vega, S.; de las Heras, J.; Moya, D. Post-Fire Regeneration and Diversity Response to Burn Severity in Pinus halepensis Mill. Forests 2018, 9, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tavsanoglu, C.; Gurkan, K. Long-term post-fire dynamics of co-occurring woody species in Pinus brutia forests: The role of regeneration mode. Plant Ecol. 2014, 215, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Location | Tree DBH cm | Tree H m | N/ha | Tree Canopy Cover (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toumpa | 8.0 (0.0983) | 3.34 (0.312) | 1410.0 | 65.3 |
Panorama | 7.63 (0.3381) | 3.47 (0.088) | 1325.0 | 68.4 |
Filippio | 9.76 (0.3867) | 3.96 (0.106) | 1042.8 | 70.1 |
Average | 8.5 (0.1812) | 3.59 (0.144) | 1259.2 | 67.9 |
Location | Number of Trees with Cones per ha | Percentage of Trees Bearing Cones (%) | Mean Number of Cones per Tree | Total Number of Cones per ha |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toumpa | 1060.0 | 84.0 | 15.0 | 15,900 |
Panorama | 875.0 | 68.0 | 6.0 | 5250 |
Filippio | 957.0 | 93.0 | 12.0 | 11,484 |
Mean | 972.0 | 81.6 | 11.0 | 10,692 |
Location | Dry Weight g | Water Content % | Cone Size | N of Normal Seeds | N of Abnormal Seeds | Percentage of Abnormal Seeds % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Length cm | Width cm | ||||||
Toumpa | 28.021 | 16.0 | 6.60 | 3.05 | 57.0 | 9.0 | 10.14 |
Panorama | 25.690 | 18.4 | 6.05 | 2.71 | 52.0 | 7.0 | 14.13 |
Filippio | 27.712 | 15.8 | 6.40 | 2.81 | 65.0 | 2.0 | 3.14 |
Average | 26.141 | 16.7 | 6.35 | 2.87 | 58.0 | 6.0 | 9.13 |
Cone Length | Cone Width | Fully Developed Seeds | Atrophic Seeds | Total Seeds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cone length | |||||
Pearson correlation | 1 | 0.821 ** | 0.528 ** | 0.302 | 0.561590 ** |
Sig (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.134 | 0.000283 | |
N | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 |
Cone width | |||||
Pearson correlation | 0.821 ** | 1 | 0.548 ** | 0.295 | 0.580449 ** |
Sig (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.144 | 0.001879 | |
N | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 |
Fully developed seeds | |||||
Pearson correlation | 0.528 ** | 0.548 ** | 1 | −0.151 | 0.995795 *** |
Sig (2-tailed) | 0.006 | 0.004 | 0.462 | 0.000000 | |
N | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 |
Atrophic seeds | |||||
Pearson correlation | 0.302 | 0.295 | −0.151 | 1 | −0.059438 |
Sig (2-tailed) | 0.134 | 0.144 | 0.462 | 0.773 | |
N | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 |
Total seeds | |||||
Pearson correlation | 0.561590 ** | 0.580449 ** | 0.995795 *** | −0.059438 | 1 |
Sig (2-tailed) | 0.000283 | 0.001879 | 0.000000 | 0.773 | |
N | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 |
Location | Seed Length mm | Seed Width mm | Width/Length Ratio | Seed Weight mg | Investment in Seed Mass (%) * |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Toumpa | 7.23a | 4.55a | 0.63 | 31.122a | 6.35%b |
Panorama | 6.92ab | 4.37ab | 0.63 | 30.296b | 6.13%b |
Filippio | 6.83b | 4.25b | 0.62 | 30.011b | 7.04a |
Mean | 7.00 | 4.39 | 0.63 | 30.207 | 6.51 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ganatsas, P.; Giannakaki, M.; Gouvas, A.; Tsakaldimi, M. Is the Reproduction Capacity of Pinus brutia Stands 20 Years after Wildfire Efficient to Secure Forest Restoration in the Case of a Fire Re-Occurrence? Forests 2021, 12, 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12080991
Ganatsas P, Giannakaki M, Gouvas A, Tsakaldimi M. Is the Reproduction Capacity of Pinus brutia Stands 20 Years after Wildfire Efficient to Secure Forest Restoration in the Case of a Fire Re-Occurrence? Forests. 2021; 12(8):991. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12080991
Chicago/Turabian StyleGanatsas, Petros, Maria Giannakaki, Alexandros Gouvas, and Marianthi Tsakaldimi. 2021. "Is the Reproduction Capacity of Pinus brutia Stands 20 Years after Wildfire Efficient to Secure Forest Restoration in the Case of a Fire Re-Occurrence?" Forests 12, no. 8: 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12080991
APA StyleGanatsas, P., Giannakaki, M., Gouvas, A., & Tsakaldimi, M. (2021). Is the Reproduction Capacity of Pinus brutia Stands 20 Years after Wildfire Efficient to Secure Forest Restoration in the Case of a Fire Re-Occurrence? Forests, 12(8), 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12080991