Improved Method for Cryopreservation of Embryogenic Callus of Fraxinus mandshurica Pupr. by Vitrification
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Materials
2.2. Experimental Method
2.2.1. Cryopreservation of EC by Vitrification
- (1)
- Sucrose concentration selection: 1.0 g of EC was inoculated on solid WPM with different concentrations of sucrose (0, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8 mol·L−1). It was cultured in the dark at 25 °C for 1 d. The pre-cultured EC was added to a 1.8 mL cooling tube, along with the loading solution (2 mol·L−1 glycerol + 0.4 mol·L−1 sucrose + liquid WPM), and treated at room temperature for 40 min. Afterward, the loading solution was removed, and 2 mL of plant vitrification solution 2 (PVS2) was added (30% glycerol + 15% DMSO + 15% ethylene glycol + 0.4 mol·L−1 sucrose + liquid WPM). It was dehydrated in the ice water mixture for 40 min, then added to the cooling tube, which was kept in liquid nitrogen immediately. It was then rewarmed for 2 min at 40 °C water bath after 2 h. After rapid removal of PVS2, it was washed 4 times with loading solution in the horizontal flow clean bench, at intervals of 10–15 min. Finally, the EC was evenly dispersed on the filter paper, and the excess water was absorbed with a pipette and transferred to WPM for dark culture at 25 °C. After 24 h, the relative survival percentage of cells was calculated.
- (2)
- Pre-culture time selection: The sucrose concentration of the pre-culture with the highest relative survival percentage was selected, and different pre-culture times (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 d) were screened at room temperature, wherein 0 d was the control group. After loading, dehydration, rewarming and washing for 24 h, for different pre-culture times, we compared their effects on the relative survival of cells after vitrification cryopreservation of F. mandshurica EC.
- (3)
- Loading time selection: The loading time (30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 min) was determined by the treatments with higher cell relative survival percentage in pre-cultured sucrose concentration and time. The relative survival percentage of cells was detected after dehydration, cooling, rewarming and washing for 24 h.
- (4)
- Dehydration time selection: Vitrification dehydration time was screened based on the highest relative survival percentage in pre-culture and loading time treatment. A total of 2 mL of PVS2 (30% glycerol + 15% DMSO + 15% ethylene glycol + 0.4 mol·L−1 sucrose + liquid WPM) was added to the EC mixture, and the dehydration times were 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70 min. We then compared the effects of different dehydration times on the cell relative survival percentage after cryopreservation of F. mandshurica EC after vitrification.
- (5)
- Rewarming method selection: The different rewarming methods (25 °C room temperature, 40 °C water bath and running water washing) were determined by the treatment with the highest cell survival percentage with sucrose concentration, pre-culture time, loading time and dehydration time. We then compared the effects of different rewarming methods on the cell relative survival percentage after cryopreservation of F. mandshurica EC after vitrification.
- (6)
- Rewarming time selection: Based on the abovementioned experiments, the rewarming time (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 min) was determined. Then the loading solution was washed for 24 h, and the cell survival percentage was detected.
- (7)
- Recovery culture of EC after resuscitation was based on the Yu et al. [15] recovery culture method for EC of F. mandshurica. Specific methods: After cryopreservation and resuscitation by vitrification, the EC of F. mandshurica was restored in WPM with 0.1 mg·L−1 6-BA and 0.15 mg·L−1 2,4-D. Subculture multiplication was carried out after 15–20 d. Differentiation culture was performed on ½MS with 1.0 mg·L−1 6-BA medium. Then, it was mature cultured on ½MS with 1.0 mg·L−1 ABA medium. Germination and rooting culture was performed on ⅓MS medium with 0.01 mg·L−1 NAA medium, and the images were taken.
2.2.2. Determination of the Cell Relative Survival Percentage and Observation of Recovery Culture
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Effects of Sucrose Concentration on Fresh Weight and Cell Survival Percentage of EC
3.2. Effect of Pre-Culture Time on Fresh Weight and Cell Survival Percentage of EC
3.3. Effect of Loading Time on Fresh Weight and Cell Survival Percentage of EC
3.4. Effects of Dehydration Time on Fresh Weight and Cell Survival Percentage of EC
3.5. Effects of Rewarming Methods on Fresh Weight and Cell Survival Percentage of EC
3.6. Effect of Rewarming Time on Fresh Weight and Cell Survival Percentage of EC
3.7. Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration after Resuscitation
4. Discussion
4.1. Study of Cryopreservation Methods
4.2. Effect of Pre-Culture on Vitrification Cryopreservation
4.3. Effect of Dehydration on Vitrification Cryopreservation
4.4. Study of Resuscitation Culture Conditions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hardstaff, L.K.; Sommerville, K.D.; Funnekotter, B.; Bunn, E.; Offord, C.A.; Mancera, R.L. Myrtaceae in Australia: Use of Cryobiotechnologies for the Conservation of a Significant Plant Family under Threat. Plants 2022, 11, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hasan, M.; Fayter Alice, E.R.; Gibson, M.I. Ice recrystallization inhibiting polymers enable glycerol-free cryopreservation of microorganisms. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 3371–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kaczmarczyk, A.; Turner, S.R.; Bunn, E.; Mancera, R.L.; Dixon, K.W. Cryopreservation of threatened native Australian species—what have we learned and where to from here? Vitr. Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2011, 47, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panis, B. Sixty years of plant cryopreservation: From freezing hardy mulberry twigs to establishing reference crop collections for future generations. Acta Hortic. 2019, 1234, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhan, L.; Li, M.G.; Hays, T.; Bischof, J. Cryopreservation method for Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2412–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozudogru, E.A.; Capuana, M.; Kaya, E.; Panis, B.; Lambard, M. Cryopreservation of Fraxinus excelsior L. embryogenic callus by one-step freezing and slow cooling techniques. Cryo Lett. 2010, 31, 63–75. [Google Scholar]
- Bekheet, S.A.; Sota, V.; EI-shabrawi, H.M.; EI-Minisy, A.M. Cryopreservation of shoot apices and callus cultures of globe artichoke using vitrification method. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2020, 18, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, M.R.; Bi, W.L.; Shukla, M.R.; Ren, L.; Hamborg, Z.; Blystad, D.R.; Saxena, P.K.; Wang, Q.C. Epigenetic and genetic integrity, metabolic stability, and field performance of cryopreserved plants. Plants 2021, 10, 1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahy, G.M.; Wowk, B. Principles of ice-free cryopreservation by vitrification. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2180, 27–97. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, M.; Cao, H.S.; Meng, Q.H.; Li, J.M.; Jiang, P.X. Insights into the crystallization and vitrification of cryopreserved cells. Cryobiology 2022, 106, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warner, R.M.; Ampo, E.; Nelson, D.; Benson, J.D.; Eorglu, A.; Higgins, A.Z. Rapid quantification of multi-cryoprotectant toxicity using an automated liquid handling method. Cryobiology 2021, 98, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zamecnik, J.; Faltus, M.; Bilavcik, A. Vitrification solutions for plant cryopreservation: Modification and properties. Plants 2021, 10, 2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, N.S.; Zhan, Y.G.; Yu, L.; Wang, Z.Q.; Zeng, F.S. Characteristics and expression analysis of FmTCP15 under abiotic stresses and hormones and interact with DELLA protein in Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. Forests 2019, 10, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, L.; Wei, C.; Huang, C.; Liu, H.N.; Zhang, D.Y.; Shen, H.L.; Li, Y.H. Role of hydrogen peroxide in stress-induced programmed cell death during somatic embryogenesis in Fraxinus mandshurica. J. For. Res. 2019, 30, 767–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Wei, C.; Wang, H.; Ma, X.; Shen, H.L.; Yang, L. Indirect somatic embryogenesis and regeneration of Fraxinus mandshurica plants via callus tissue. J. For. Res. 2021, 32, 1613–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.Q.; Liu, Y.Y.; Liu, X.Q.; Tretyakova, I.N.; Nosov, A.M.; Shen, H.L.; Yang, L. Cryopreservation of Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. by using the slow cooling method. Forests 2022, 13, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, S.R.; Yin, M.H. A simple and efficient protocol for cryopreservation of embryogenic calli of the medicinal plant Anemarrhena asphodeloides Bunge by vitrification. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2012, 109, 287–296. [Google Scholar]
- Popova, E.; Shukla, M.; Kim, H.H.; Saxena, P.K. Root cryobanking: An important tool in plant cryopreservation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2020, 144, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engelmann, F. Use of biotechnologies for the conservation of plant biodiversity. Vitr. Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2011, 47, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozudogru, E.A.; Lambardi, M. Cryotechniques for the Long-Term Conservation of Embryogenic Cultures from Woody Plants. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1359, 537–550. [Google Scholar]
- Arav, A. Cryopreservation by directional freezing and vitrification focusing on large tissues and organs. Cells 2022, 11, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhan, L.; Rao, J.S.; Sethia, N.; Slama, M.Q.; Han, Z.H.; Tobolt, D.; Etheridge, M.; Peterson, Q.P.; Dutcher, C.S.; Bischof, J.C.; et al. Pancreatic islet cryopreservation by vitrification achieves high viability, function, recovery and clinical scalability for transplantation. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 798–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guzmán-García, E.; Bradaï, F.; Sánchez-Romero, C. Cryopreservation of avocado embryogenic cultures using the droplet-vitrification method. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghaffarzadeh-Namazi, L.; Joachim Keller, E.R.; Senula, A.; Babaeian, N. Investigations on various methods for cryopreservation of callus of the medicinal plant Satureja spicigera. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aroma. Plants 2017, 5, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammond, S.D.H.; Viehmannova, I.; Zamecnik, J.; Panis, B.; Faltus, M. Droplet-vitrification methods for apical bud cryopreservation of yacon [Smallanthus sonchifolius (Poepp. and Endl.) H. Rob.]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2021, 147, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, R.; Singh, V.; Keshavkant, S.; Quraishi, A. Vitrification-based cryopreservation of in vitro-grown apical meristems of Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant et Fernand: A critically endangered species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2021, 91, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.H.; Lee, S.C. ‘Personalisation’ of droplet-vitrification protocols for plant cells: A systematic approach to optimising chemical and osmotic effects. Cryo Lett. 2012, 33, 271–279. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, N.; Gowthami, R.; Devi, S.V.; Malhotra, E.V.; Pandey, R.; Agrawal, A. Cryopreservation of shoot tips of Gentiana kurroo Royle—A critically endangered medicinal plant of India. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2021, 144, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Żabicki, P.; Mikuła, A.; Sliwinska, E.; Migdałek, G.; Nobis, A.; Żabicka, J.; Kuta, E. Cryopreservation and post-thaw genetic integrity of Viola stagnina Kit., an endangered species of wet habitats—A useful tool in ex situ conservation. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 284, 110056–110066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, X.J.; Wang, Q.; Yang, H.; Qi, Y.R.; Hao, X.L.; Wang, Y.P. Vitrification and proteomic analysis of embryogenic callus of Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer. Vitr. Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2021, 57, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.Y.; Li, Y.D.; Sun, H.Y.; Liu, H.G.; Tang, X.D.; Wang, Q.C.; Zhang, Z.D. An efficient droplet-vitrification cryopreservation for valuable blueberry germplasm. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 219, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.R.; Zhang, Z.B.; Zámečník, J.; Bilavčík, A.; Blystad, D.R.; Haugslien, S.; Wang, Q.C. Droplet-vitrification for shoot tip cryopreservation of shallot (Allium cepa var. aggregatum): Effects of PVS3 and PVS2 on shoot regrowth. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2020, 140, 185–195. [Google Scholar]
Concentration (mol·L−1) | Culture Time (d) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 30 | 60 | |
0 | 0.91 ± 0.02 a | 0.93 ± 0.01 a | 0.94 ± 0.02 a | 1.00 ± 0.01 c | 1.02 ± 0.02 b | 1.04 ± 0.01 c |
0.3 | 0.90 ± 0.01 a | 0.93 ± 0.02 a | 0.94 ± 0.01 a | 1.15 ± 0.02 b | 1.24 ± 0.04 b | 1.52 ± 0.03 b |
0.4 | 0.93 ± 0.05 a | 0.96 ± 0.03 a | 0.98 ± 0.02 a | 1.16 ± 0.02 b | 1.26 ± 0.03 b | 1.56 ± 0.04 b |
0.5 | 0.92 ± 0.06 a | 0.95 ± 0.05 a | 0.97 ± 0.03 a | 1.31 ± 0.03 a | 1.54 ± 0.04 a | 1.82 ± 0.03 a |
0.6 | 0.93 ± 0.01 a | 0.95 ± 0.01 a | 0.98 ± 0.02 a | 1.15 ± 0.02 b | 1.25 ± 0.04 b | 1.53 ± 0.03 b |
0.7 | 0.93 ± 0.05 a | 0.95 ± 0.03 a | 0.96 ± 0.01 a | 1.13 ± 0.02 b | 1.23 ± 0.03 b | 1.54 ± 0.04 b |
Pre-Culture Time (d) | Culture Time (d) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 30 | 60 | |
0 | 0.93 ± 0.02 a | 1.00 ± 0.03 a | 1.02 ± 0.03 a | 1.09 ± 0.02 c | 1.11 ± 0.01 c | 1.13 ± 0.02 c |
1 | 0.92 ± 0.03 a | 0.99 ± 0.05 a | 1.01 ± 0.05 a | 1.14 ± 0.02 b | 1.27 ± 0.03 b | 1.35 ± 0.03 b |
2 | 0.93 ± 0.02 a | 1.01 ± 0.04 a | 1.03 ± 0.03 a | 1.18 ± 0.02 a | 1.35 ± 0.03 a | 1.37 ± 0.03 b |
3 | 0.92 ± 0.01 a | 1.00 ± 0.03 a | 1.03 ± 0.03 a | 1.19 ± 0.04 a | 1.36 ± 0.03 a | 1.56 ± 0.04 a |
4 | 0.94 ± 0.02 a | 1.00 ± 0.04 a | 1.02 ± 0.04 a | 1.14 ± 0.01 b | 1.15 ± 0.02 c | 1.35 ± 0.04 b |
5 | 0.93 ± 0.01 a | 0.99 ± 0.03 a | 1.01 ± 0.02 a | 1.14 ± 0.02 b | 1.26 ± 0.03 b | 1.34 ± 0.05 b |
Loading Time (min) | Culture Time (d) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 30 | 60 | |
30 | 0.96 ± 0.02 a | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 1.05 ± 0.01 a | 1.09 ± 0.02 c | 1.10 ± 0.02 d | 1.11 ± 0.01 e |
40 | 0.95 ± 0.03 a | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 1.03 ± 0.01 a | 1.14 ± 0.03 b | 1.27 ± 0.03 bc | 1.34 ± 0.07 c |
50 | 0.95 ± 0.02 a | 0.99 ± 0.02 a | 1.02 ± 0.02 a | 1.24 ± 0.02 a | 1.31 ± 0.02 a | 1.44 ± 0.08 b |
60 | 0.97 ± 0.02 a | 1.01 ± 0.02 a | 1.03 ± 0.02 a | 1.27 ± 0.02 a | 1.37 ± 0.04 a | 1.76 ± 0.03 a |
70 | 0.96 ± 0.01 a | 1.01 ± 0.02 a | 1.04 ± 0.03 a | 1.12 ± 0.03 b | 1.21 ± 0.04 c | 1.51 ± 0.03 b |
80 | 0.96 ± 0.01 a | 0.98 ± 0.02 a | 1.03 ± 0.02 a | 1.08 ± 0.04 bc | 1.21 ± 0.03 c | 1.24 ± 0.03 d |
Dehydration Time (min) | Culture Time (d) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 30 | 60 | |
30 | 0.98 ± 0.06 a | 1.01 ± 0.05 a | 1.04 ± 0.03 a | 1.12 ± 0.04 b | 1.22 ± 0.03 b | 1.34 ± 0.05 b |
40 | 0.97 ± 0.02 a | 0.99 ± 0.02 a | 1.01 ± 0.02 a | 1.16 ± 0.03 b | 1.32 ± 0.09 b | 1.69 ± 0.05 a |
50 | 0.99 ± 0.03 a | 1.01 ± 0.04 a | 1.02 ± 0.04 a | 1.27 ± 0.10 a | 1.48 ± 0.12 a | 1.75 ± 0.10 a |
60 | 0.97 ± 0.04 a | 1.02 ± 0.02 a | 1.03 ± 0.02 a | 1.11 ± 0.03 b | 1.19 ± 0.03 b | 1.38 ± 0.02 b |
70 | 0.98 ± 0.04 a | 1.00 ± 0.03 a | 1.02 ± 0.07 a | 1.14 ± 0.02 b | 1.21 ± 0.03 b | 1.29 ± 0.03 b |
Rewarming Method | Culture Time (d) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 30 | 60 | |
25 °C room temperature | 0.97 ± 0.03 a | 0.99 ± 0.02 a | 0.99 ± 0.01 a | 1.01 ± 0.01 c | 1.02 ± 0.01 c | 1.05 ± 0.02 c |
40 °C water bath | 0.91 ± 0.02 a | 0.94 ± 0.03 a | 0.96 ± 0.02 a | 1.14 ± 0.01 a | 1.19 ± 0.01 a | 1.33 ± 0.04 a |
Running water | 0.92 ± 0.05 a | 0.94 ± 0.04 a | 0.98 ± 0.04 a | 1.05 ± 0.03 b | 1.12 ± 0.02 b | 1.18 ± 0.03 b |
Rewarming Time (min) | Culture Time (d) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 30 | 60 | |
1 | 0.94 ± 0.01 a | 0.98 ± 0.01 a | 0.99 ± 0.02 a | 1.09 ± 0.05 ab | 1.12 ± 0.06 b | 1.17 ± 0.03 b |
2 | 0.92 ± 0.04 a | 0.95 ± 0.05 a | 0.99 ± 0.04 a | 1.14 ± 0.06 a | 1.26 ± 0.05 a | 1.47 ± 0.12 a |
3 | 0.92 ± 0.02 a | 0.94 ± 0.02 a | 0.97 ± 0.06 a | 1.15 ± 0.09 a | 1.21 ± 0.06 a | 1.28 ± 0.03 b |
4 | 0.90 ± 0.03 a | 0.93 ± 0.03 a | 0.98 ± 0.05 a | 1.01 ± 0.04 b | 1.10 ± 0.02 b | 1.22 ± 0.03 b |
5 | 0.94 ± 0.02 a | 0.94 ± 0.02 a | 0.97 ± 0.04 a | 1.03 ± 0.05 b | 1.11 ± 0.03 b | 1.19 ± 0.03 b |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Yu, X.; Tretyakova, I.N.; Nosov, A.M.; Shen, H.; Yang, L. Improved Method for Cryopreservation of Embryogenic Callus of Fraxinus mandshurica Pupr. by Vitrification. Forests 2023, 14, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010028
Liu X, Liu Y, Yu X, Tretyakova IN, Nosov AM, Shen H, Yang L. Improved Method for Cryopreservation of Embryogenic Callus of Fraxinus mandshurica Pupr. by Vitrification. Forests. 2023; 14(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010028
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Xueqing, Yingying Liu, Xiaoqian Yu, Iraida Nikolaevna Tretyakova, Alexander Mikhaylovich Nosov, Hailong Shen, and Ling Yang. 2023. "Improved Method for Cryopreservation of Embryogenic Callus of Fraxinus mandshurica Pupr. by Vitrification" Forests 14, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010028
APA StyleLiu, X., Liu, Y., Yu, X., Tretyakova, I. N., Nosov, A. M., Shen, H., & Yang, L. (2023). Improved Method for Cryopreservation of Embryogenic Callus of Fraxinus mandshurica Pupr. by Vitrification. Forests, 14(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010028