Next Article in Journal
Spatial Distribution of Critically Endangered Hopea chinensis Plant Seedlings and Relationships with Environmental Factors
Previous Article in Journal
From Air to Space: A Comprehensive Approach to Optimizing Aboveground Biomass Estimation on UAV-Based Datasets
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Restorative Effects of Unique Green Space Design: Comparing the Restorative Quality of Classical Chinese Gardens and Modern Urban Parks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of the Relationships Among the Value, Benefit, and Activities of Forest Culture in Korea: An Application of Means-Chain Value Theory

1
Division of Forest Human Services Research, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Culture Contents, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2025, 16(2), 213; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020213
Submission received: 31 October 2024 / Revised: 2 January 2025 / Accepted: 3 January 2025 / Published: 23 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green Spaces, Human Health and Happiness)

Abstract

:
This study explores the relationship between forest culture (FC) and sustainable consumption by applying the means-end chain (MEC) theory. Compared with general products, FC products are consumed from a value consumption perspective, and their benefits have varying impacts on individuals and society. This study uses MEC theory to link the preferred attributes of FC with the expected benefits and pursued values (PVs) of FC. We (1) identified the indicators of the expected benefits of PVs and preferred activities (PAs) of FC through factor analysis, (2) examined the relationships between these factors using MEC theory, and (3) validated the factors through structural equation modeling (SEM). We surveyed 1700 Koreans to explore how FC benefits, values, and activities relate to consumer behavior. Factor analysis divided PVs into symbolic, social, and consumption values and PAs into tourism–exploration, cultural–artistic, and living–leisure activities of FC. According to SEM analysis, the contributing characteristics of FC affect the PVs and, in turn, the PAs of FC, yielding an acceptable model fit (GFI > 0.9). Thus, the concrete attitudes of consumers toward FC were categorized via abstract concepts, which influenced their practical and behavioral attitudes. In conclusion, FC products should be developed with a focus on value consumption.

1. Introduction

As the roles of forests have diversified, research has expanded beyond the traditional focus on sustainable development and protection to include contributions to revitalizing local economies and improving individual quality of life [1,2,3,4]. Although forest culture (FC) is deeply connected to both individuals and local communities, it has not been extensively studied. However, related areas such as forest healing, ecotourism, and forest recreation have gradually attracted increased research attention.
Forests have maintained long-standing, sustainable relationships with humans, providing products and services through their cultural, social, and ecological functions [5,6,7]. FC, which consists of products and services, provides humans with individual and social values globally—these comprise Western values, such as ecological, economic, and sociocultural values [8], and Eastern values, such as physical and mental values [9,10,11,12,13]. Identifying these values can contribute to the sustainable development of society [4,14,15]. The United Nations promotes sustainable development globally through its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with sustainable consumption and production specifically outlined in SDG 12 [2,16,17,18]. Notably, according to the sub-targets of SDG 12, forests are closely related to sustainable tourism development, which can contribute to local economies, environmental protection, and community empowerment and education [2,19,20,21,22].
Covering 63% of the land area of South Korea, forests have been the foundation of the spirit and culture of the country. The definition of FC provided in Article 2 of Korea’s Forest Recreation Act refers to the totality of mental and material products derived from the interaction between forests and humans, including traditions, heritage, and forest-related lifestyles, as well as all activities that utilize, view, enjoy, experience, and create forests [23]. Despite the importance and significance of the cultural value of Korean forests, public awareness of FC is low, at 37.7%, whereas interest in FC is high, at 81.9% [24]. This is because few studies have investigated how the cultural value of forests can be directly or indirectly consumed as products by individuals or communities.
Recently, Korean cultural content (e.g., K-pop, K-food) has been spreading globally, and its economic and social impact has been rapidly increasing. In addition, the importance of the cultural content industry, which is based on high technology and creativity, is gaining even more importance and is contributing significantly to the country’s status. Forests have high value for conservation and utilization, and FC also has high value for utilization as a unique content [24]. To enhance the value expression and utilization of FC resources as cultural products, it is necessary to identify how FC is converted into products based on the pursued values (PVs) of Koreans in FC. While FC plays an essential role in South Korea, similar cultural ecosystems exist in other regions, making this study relevant for developing global strategies in forest-related cultural productization and sustainable policy making.
The means-end chain (MEC) theory by Gutman [25] explains consumer decision-making as a cognitive process that links product attributes to personal consequences, which ultimately lead to desired values. According to this theory, consumers select products not only based on their functional attributes but also because these attributes help them achieve personal goals and fulfill deeper values. Recently, MEC theory was advanced to analyze the deep values and motivations of consumers and proposed methods to incorporate them into marketing and advertising strategies [26]. Furthermore, MEC theory has been extensively applied across various sectors, including tourism, culture, and the arts, to understand how products and experiences resonate with consumer values [27,28,29].
Previous research suggests that the reverse application of MEC theory emphasizes the significance of emotional and abstract values in consumer decision-making, particularly in the context of cultural and artistic products [27]. It also demonstrated that when selecting cultural and artistic products, consumers prioritized emotional, abstract, and ideological attributes over physical attributes. MEC theory has been established as an important tool for understanding consumer behavior, and its value has been recognized not only in academic research but also in practical applications [25,26]. The theory is particularly useful in marketing, brand strategy, consumer engagement, and behavioral analysis and can contribute to understanding the deep values and motivations of consumers, which can lead to the development of effective marketing strategies. It also underlines the multidimensional nature of consumer behavior and can provide critical insights for future research and practice [30,31,32,33,34]. However, in the forestry sector, this approach remains underexplored.
Previous studies have qualitatively assessed consumer values using MEC theory. However, quantitative research on FC products and consumer values based on MEC theory is lacking. Thus, to explore how FC values impact consumption behavior, we employed MEC theory, linking product attributes to personal values and outcomes. MEC theory provides a framework for analyzing how FC benefits translate into consumer preferences and activities.
The study aims are as follows:
(1)
To empirically investigate the perceived value, pursued benefits, and product attributes of FC and identify their respective components.
(2)
To investigate the impact of the perceived value of FC on pursued benefits and product attributes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Process

In the first step of our research methodology, we performed a literature review, which led to the selection of 11 pursued forest values, 4 expected forest benefits (positive functions), and 19 FC activity indicators. In the second step, an online survey was conducted with 1700 participants nationwide to assess their perceptions on a five-point Likert scale for each variable. In the third step, we analyzed the collected data. The study methods and analysis framework are shown in Figure 1. The study model was structured as shown in Figure 1 to identify the subdimensions of the PV of FC, expected benefits, and preferred activities (PAs). By applying MEC theory and the laddering method [25] in reverse, their relationships and the consumption structure of FC were determined.
Considering the approaches presented in previous studies, we applied MEC theory in reverse in the current study to consider the unique characteristics of FC products. FC products can never be fully explained by simple physical attributes because they create a deeper consumer experience by providing consumers with environmental, coexistence, and life values. These values are directly connected to the consequential values that consumers expect and thus serve as an important factor in determining the PAs of these products.

2.2. Model Development

As shown in Figure 2 below, we reversed the application of MEC theory to highlight the contributing characteristics of FC products in the following order: contributing characteristics → values → PAs. This emphasizes that the depth of value and experience provided by FC products holds more significance for consumers than the physical attributes when selecting FC products. For example, the environmental value provided by FC products influences consumers to select activities such as appreciating natural scenery or exploring forests.

2.3. Selection of Indicators

To derive the subdimensions of the values, benefits, and activities of consumers regarding FC and to reveal the relationship among these three variables, indicators were identified as shown in Table 1 based on the literature and legal evidence.
PVs were selected based on the types and attributes of FC values, including the value of forests, FC, and cultural heritage (Table 1). Values refer to the values that people pursue through FC. Eleven corresponding indicators were identified, including V1—public interest, V2—economic, V3—environmental, V4—moral, V5—historical, V6—artistic, V7—academic, V8—life, V9—coexistence, V10—community, and V11—emotional values (Table 1).
Contributed benefits were selected by considering the contribution characteristics presented in laws and systems (Table 1). Benefits refer to the positive functions that can be expected from FC. The following four indicators were selected: B1—improvement of the quality of life among the public, B2—revitalizing the local economy, B3—relevance to real life, and B4—accessibility of enjoyment by the public.
PAs were selected by considering the FC attributes from 25 types of forest welfare activities in Korea, referencing the regulations (Table 1). The attributes represent tangible and intangible products and services for enjoying FC. The following 19 indicators were selected: A1—visiting a museum exhibition in the forest, A2—attending a musical performance in the forest, A3—participating in a literary event in the forest, A4—participating in an artistic activity in the forest, A5—participating in a forest-based handicraft activity, A6—experiencing afforestation, A7—experiencing forest product harvesting, A8—observing and learning about plants and animals, A9—participating in forest leisure activities, A10—participating in valley leisure activities, A11—participation in health promotion activities, A12—forest exploration, A13—exploration of natural scenic spots of FC resources, A14—appreciation of natural scenery, A15—experiencing forest life, A16—playing games related to forests (mountains, trees, and forests), A17—reading books related to forests (mountains, trees, and forests), A18—self-development and learning in forestry, and A19—social service activities related to forests.

2.4. Data Collection

Based on the 2023 National Forest Culture Awareness, Attitude, and Enjoyment Survey, a representative population of FC product consumers was established. The sample was chosen to reflect the demographic diversity of FC consumers in Korea. Individuals aged 15–69 were selected to capture a broad range of consumer behaviors and attitudes, ensuring that the results represent the general population. The entire survey was conducted online and commissioned by a professional survey company. The following analyses were performed to identify the subdimensions of the contributing characteristics, PV, and PAs of the consumers of FC products. Exploratory factor and reliability analyses were conducted using SPSS 20.0. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). To validate the factors, confirmatory factor analysis and a structural equation model were applied using AMOS 29.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Confirmatory factor analysis of PVs was conducted using a sample size of 1639 out of 1700 after removing outliers or missing values through data preprocessing. We removed missing values and items in this analysis that gave the same score for all items and excluded two items with low factor loadings (“observing and learning about plants and animals” and “attending performances and music concerts in the forest”), resulting in a sample size of 1084 out of 1700. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the relationship between the subdimensions of each variable and how contributing characteristics influence PAs via PVs.

2.5. Analytical Methods

To analyze the relationship between the variables, we conducted a survey focusing on quantitative data. Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were conducted to analyze the validity of the variables derived from previous studies. SEM is a complex statistical technique that allows for the analysis of relationships between multiple variables. In this study, latent variables—values, benefits, and activities—were used for the analysis. These latent variables were estimated through their respective measured variables, where values reflect individual beliefs or goals, benefits denote the positive outcomes gained from participation, and activities represent the specific behaviors people prefer to engage in.
Through SEM, we examined how contributing characteristics (e.g., demographic factors) directly influence PVs (e.g., environmental conservation and health improvement) and further tested the mediation effects of these values on PAs (e.g., recreational activities in forests). Mediation effects are the pathways through which characteristics affect values, which then influence activities. This analytical approach enabled us to analyze both direct and indirect interactions between the variables.
SEM was employed to examine the relationships among the subdimensions of each variable. The SEM analyzed how contributing characteristics influence PAs by mediating PV. All indicators in this analysis met the criteria, with the goodness of fit index (GFI = 0.902), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI = 0.874), and comparative fit index (CFI = 0.882) approaching or exceeding 0.9. Additionally, the RMSEA value was 0.066, which falls within the acceptable range; therefore, the measurement model was considered adequate. In this way, we analyzed the contributing characteristics, PVs, and PAs of FC product consumers and derived policy implications for the sustainable management and development of FC based on these findings.

3. Results

3.1. Participants

Frequency analysis was conducted to determine the demographic characteristics of the participants. The participants comprised 50.9% males and 49.1% females. The age distribution was as follows: 50s (21.8%), 40s (20.5%), 60 or older (18.9%), 20s (18.7%), 30s (16.7%), and 10s (3.4%). The educational level was as follows: college graduate (60.9%), high school graduate (22.1%), and postgraduate degree (6.8%). The occupations of FC product consumers included office workers (29.5%), housewives (15.2%), technical workers (8.5%), and others (7.8%). The regions of residence were Gyeonggi (26.8%), Seoul (18.9%), Busan (6.4%), and Gyeongnam (6.2%) (Table 2).

3.2. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of PVs

3.2.1. Factor Analysis of PVs

A factor analysis of the 11 items associated with the PVs of FC revealed three factors with an explanatory power of 59.71% of the total variance: symbolic, social, and consumption value. All items fulfilled the factor loadings; therefore, no items were removed. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis were df = 41, p = 0.000, GFI = 0.974, AGFI = 0.958, RMR = 0.024, NFI = 0.956, CFI = 0.967, and RMSEA = 0.05, indicating that all factors met the standards, and thus, the measurement model was considered valid (Table 3). Since the exogenous variables of the three factors were distinguishable from each other, the conceptual validity was verified. Cronbach’s alpha values were above 0.89, indicating that each factor had internal consistency, reliability, and focus validity across all items. The results of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are presented in Table 3.
Factor 1, labeled as Symbolic Value, included community, moral, and historical values, with a total explained variance of 41.95%. Factor 2, labeled as Social Value, included environmental, coexistential, and public interest values, explaining 10.69% of the variance. Factor 3, labeled as Consumption Value, included economic, academic, and artistic values, explaining 7.07% of the variance (Table 4).

3.2.2. Factor Analysis of PAs

To investigate the subdimensions of the PAs of FC, an exploratory factor analysis was performed on the 19 PA items, resulting in the extraction of three factors with an explanatory power of 56.56% of the total variance.
All factors were initially retained without removing any items. However, during the confirmatory factor analysis, seven items (A5, A6, A7, A8, A15, A17, and A19) from the PA category were removed due to low factor loadings, which fell below the threshold of 0.45.
The analysis yielded the following results: df = 32, p = 0.000, GFI = 0.948, AGFI = 0.911, RMR = 0.068, NFI = 0.928, CFI = 0.936, and RMSEA = 0.087. While RMR failed to meet the standard criteria, the other indicators did, including NFI = 0.928 and CFI = 0.936, indicating that the measurement model was valid. Conceptual validity was verified because the exogenous variables of the three factors were clearly distinguishable from each other, and Cronbach’s alpha values were all above 0.91, indicating that each factor demonstrated internal consistency, reliability, and focused validity among all items. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are presented in Table 5 and Table 6.
Factor 1, labeled as Tourism–Exploration Activity, included “exploration of forests”, “participation in health promotion activities”, “appreciation of natural scenery”, and “exploration of natural scenic spots”, explaining 37.31% of the total variance. Factor 2, labeled as Cultural–Artistic Activity, included “participating in an artistic activity”, “attending a musical performance”, “participating in a literary event”, and “visiting a museum exhibition”, explaining 11.99% of the variance. Factor 3, labeled as Living–Leisure Activity, included “participating in forest leisure activities”, “participating in valley leisure activities”, “playing games related to forests”, and “self-development and learning in forestry”, explaining 7.27% of the variance.

3.3. Comparative Analysis of Means of PVs, PAs, and Contributing Characteristics

Based on Figure 3, the environmental value (M = 4.01) and appreciation of natural scenery (M = 4.12) emerged as the highest-ranking factors among PVs and product attributes, respectively, indicating a strong preference for ecological and scenic elements of FC. In contrast, artistic value (M = 3.44) and self-development activities (M = 3.06) had the lowest means, indicating less importance placed on cultural and personal growth within forest experiences.
When considering the values above the overall mean of 3.67, coexistential value (M = 3.88) and life value (M = 3.81) stood out, showing that participants placed high value on the interconnectedness of life and coexistence within forest environments. Similarly, product attributes such as exploration of forests (M = 4.11) and participation in health promotion activities (M = 4.08) were rated above the average of 3.61, suggesting that participants were particularly drawn to engaging with nature for both exploration and health benefits.
In terms of expected benefits, the overall mean was 3.59. The improvement of the quality of life among the public (B1, M = 3.67) had the highest score, followed by relevance to real life (B3, M = 3.65) and revitalizing the local economy (B2, M = 3.59). However, accessibility of enjoyment to the public (B4, M = 3.45) was rated the lowest, suggesting that while forests play a significant role in improving public quality of life, there is a relatively negative perception regarding the accessibility of cultural enjoyment within forest settings.
Overall, the analysis indicated a strong preference for the ecological and health-promoting aspects of FC, with low emphasis on artistic and self-development activities, as well as concerns about accessibility to cultural experiences in forests.

3.4. SEM of PVs, Contributing Characteristics, and PAs

SEM analysis revealed significant pathways between the subdimensions of expected benefits, PVs, and product attributes of FC products (Figure 4). Specifically, expected benefits significantly influenced PVs, which in turn affected product attributes. The analysis indicated that the mediating factors of Symbolic Value and Consumption Value influenced all activities, while Social Value influenced only tourism–exploration activities. The subdimensions B1-improvement of the quality of life among the public, B2-revitalizing the local economy, and B3-relevance to real life had the greatest effect on tourism–exploration activities through the mediation of Social Value, while enjoyment by the public had the largest impact on living–leisure activities through the mediation of Symbolic Value. Additionally, the SEM analysis yielded acceptable model fit indices: GFI = 0.902, AGFI = 0.874, CFI = 0.882, and RMSEA = 0.066. These results suggest that the model fit the data well (Table 7).
Although some indices fell slightly below the recommended threshold (e.g., AGFI = 0.874 and CFI = 0.882), the overall model fit was considered acceptable. According to Hu and Bentler [39], models with fit indices close to the recommended thresholds (e.g., GFI ≥ 0.90 and RMSEA ≤ 0.08) can be considered reasonable, particularly in the presence of complex models or large sample sizes. Furthermore, Marsh, Hau, and Wen [40] emphasized that absolute adherence to strict cutoff values may not always be realistic, particularly when using real-world data where slight deviations from the criteria typically occur without compromising the interpretive validity of the model.
In this study, all major fit indices, including GFI = 0.902 and RMSEA = 0.066, fell within ranges that are generally considered acceptable in the SEM literature. Thus, the model fit the data sufficiently well, allowing for meaningful interpretations of the relationships among the latent constructs.

4. Discussion

4.1. Classification Characteristics of the Values and Attributes of FC

Factor analysis identified three key factors for both PVs and PAs in FC. The first factor, Symbolic Value, reflects temporal characteristics such as history, morality, and community values, indicating that FC functions as a symbolic good. The second factor, Social Value, highlights collective values based on ecological characteristics, showing that FC serves as a social good. The third factor, Consumption Value, includes academic, artistic, and emotional values, aligning with Bourdieu’s [41] concept of high-end cultural capital and characterizing FC as a consumer good. The product attributes of FC were divided into three categories. The first, tourism and exploration activities, involves appreciating nature’s beauty and understanding ecosystem diversity. The second, cultural–artistic activities, integrates the enjoyment of both nature and cultural elements of FC. The third, living–leisure activities, includes recreational and sports activities that contribute to community development. Among these, Consumption Value closely ties to Bourdieu’s [41] theory of cultural capital, where artistic and academic activities are key components of social capital formation. FC, through events like artistic performances or academic activities, operates as a form of high cultural capital. These activities demonstrate that FC is not merely a natural resource but also a cultural asset. Eagleton [42] further emphasized the importance of cultural capital, arguing that participation in cultural activities can enhance an individual’s social status. In the context of SDG 12, which focuses on responsible consumption and production, FC plays a crucial role in promoting sustainable consumption patterns. Specifically, SDG 12 encourages practices that reduce environmental impact and promote the efficient use of resources. FC, through its emphasis on activities such as tourism, cultural experiences, and community-based leisure, aligns with these principles by offering ways to engage with natural resources without depleting them. The factor of tourism and exploration activities highlights the value of nature-based tourism, which directly supports SDG 12.b, focusing on sustainable tourism. These activities, such as exploring natural scenic spots and participating in health-promoting forest activities, are designed to enhance environmental appreciation while ensuring the responsible use of forest resources. By promoting tourism that fosters a deeper connection to nature, FC contributes to both environmental protection and the local economy, fulfilling SDG 12’s objectives of sustainable consumption and production. Similarly, the cultural–artistic activities related to FC encourage the sustainable consumption of cultural resources. These activities—such as art performances and educational events in forests—are not only culturally enriching but also help reinforce community empowerment by encouraging locals to engage with and take pride in their forested environments. This aligns with SDG 12’s focus on the efficient use of resources, ensuring that cultural capital is built without harming ecological systems. Finally, the factor of living–leisure activities underscores the importance of fostering recreational activities that are in harmony with environmental sustainability. Activities such as forest-based sports or community-building efforts are directly connected to responsible consumption of the environment. By promoting forest leisure in a way that respects ecological balance, these activities help reduce the negative environmental impacts associated with overconsumption and contribute to SDG 12’s overarching goals of creating sustainable consumption patterns.
In summary, FC encourages activities that balance ecological preservation with cultural and recreational engagement and thus offers a clear example of how SDG 12 can be implemented in practice. Through sustainable tourism, cultural enrichment, and responsible leisure activities, FC promotes the responsible consumption of natural and cultural resources.

4.2. Characteristics of FC in MEC Theory

Applying MEC theory to FC products, benefits are first recognized, then values are formed, and finally, attributes are selected. The laddering method in the traditional MEC model is a process in which consumers first recognize attributes when choosing a product, experience the benefits provided by those attributes, and ultimately reach a value [43]. Furthermore, cultural and artistic products are differentiated from general goods, such as clothes and shoes. This is because cultural and artistic products do not focus solely on functional aspects. Instead, their symbolism is reflected through individual experience and taste. Shin and Lee [28] applied MEC theory and the laddering method in a reversed manner, emphasizing that cultural and artistic products, unlike other consumer goods, are highly dependent on the perception of value by consumers.
Essentially, consumers are drawn to deeper experiences and values, such as environmental, emotional, and social benefits, rather than physical characteristics themselves [44]. Compared with general consumer goods, the benefits of FC products include individual as well as shared characteristics. However, forest consumer experiences that reflect collective interests beyond the individual level, such as community features, ecological sustainability, and environmental conservation [45], seem to have changed.
We believe this is logical because the essence of FC products is closely connected to value consumption, as argued by Sheth et al. [46]. According to the value consumption theory of Sheth et al. [46], consumers make consumption choices based on five values (e.g., functional, conditional, social, emotional, and epistemic values). From the perspective of FC, factors such as social, emotional, and conditional values have a strong influence on choices closely related to FC.
This theory also implies that FC products are not merely consumer goods but also positioned as value-based products that offer a moral, emotional, and environmental experiences [47]. This is consistent with the service-dominant logic argued by Vargo and Lusch [48], which states the importance of the value and experience provided by the product rather than the product itself.
The service-dominant logic (S-D Logic) theory of Vargo and Lusch [48] suggests that services are the core of economic activity, which shifts away from the traditional product-centered economy and emphasizes community characteristics. This is because FC is shaped by human relationships and has strong community characteristics, similar to regional products. Additionally, tourists and users gain satisfaction through interactions by visiting and experiencing forest resources and engaging with local residents. This theory emphasizes the community characteristics of value creation and explains that consumers play a crucial role as active participants in the process of value creation rather than merely receiving services. Applying this theory to FC studies provides a useful framework for understanding the role of forest resources as a means of service provision. It also helps explain how value is co-created through interactions between consumers and suppliers.
In conclusion, the direction of benefits → value → activities in FC products reflects the values and cultural understanding of consumers, which differs from that of general consumer goods. Consumers would rather prioritize the emotional, social, and ethical benefits of the experience than the physical experience provided by forests. This demonstrates that FC products are not mere consumer goods but products that should be approached from the perspective of value consumption. Furthermore, this suggests that these products function as an important medium to realize the value that consumers seek.

4.3. Proposal and Limitations

Our analysis suggests that understanding forest tourism demand and developing strategies to expand the market, while ensuring sustainable environmental development, can potentially revitalize local economies [17,20,48]. To achieve SDG 12.b and strengthen community empowerment, it is essential to implement schemes and certifications such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC), which will encourage the active involvement of governments, corporations, and consumers.
Limitations of this study include the following: first, the categorization of values and PAs was limited in terms of comparative analysis of the characteristics of each type and did not identify differences between groups; second, the focus on analyzing consumer-oriented value perceptions did not fully reflect the specific economic and environmental contributions generated at each stage of the value chain. In future studies, we plan to systematically analyze the value creation and distribution process of FC by combining a value-chain model with a comparative analysis of specific data on the values and PAs of different generations and propose a sustainable consumption of FC.

5. Conclusions

Our findings are distinct from those of previous studies in that earlier MEC studies primarily focused on the general relationship between consumers’ personal values and product attributes, while this study extends the application of MEC theory by specifically analyzing how the multidimensional values of FC impact consumer behavior. Forest cultural products offer consumers a wide range of social and environmental values, which are crucial for informing both policy development and productization strategies.
We aimed to propose policies and strategies from a value consumption perspective, focusing on the expected benefits of FC. We thus seek to enhance the sustainability of FC and maximize its social contributions. Our results suggest that to ensure the universal distribution of FC benefits, it is necessary to provide policy support for tourism and exploration programs within FC activities. Furthermore, expanding the market for cultural products requires active support for cultural and artistic activities, emphasizing their consumption value. This approach offers fundamental data for building an integrated marketing strategy that reflects the multidimensional values of FC and provides key insights into understanding the connections between consumers’ deep values and emotions. Additionally, we found that the contributing characteristics of FC are closely tied to the values that consumers pursue, which, in turn, guide their PAs. Ultimately, this study highlights that FC is a valuable cultural resource that offers multidimensional benefits.
Therefore, it is essential to develop regional revitalization policies that connect communities and people through FC and devise strategies for productizing FC-based regional products that reflect these values, such as social and symbolic consumption. Adopting an integrated approach that encompasses the diverse values of FC will be crucial in the future. This will not only enhance the sustainability of FC but also maximize its social impact.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C. and S.K.; methodology, J.C.; software, N.C.; validation, J.C. and S.K.; formal analysis, J.C. and N.C.; investigation, S.K.; data curation, J.C., T.K. and N.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C. and N.C.; writing—review and editing, J.C.; visualization, J.C. and N.C.; supervision, J.C. and S.K.; project administration, S.K.; funding acquisition, S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yamamoto, Y.; Matsumoto, K. The effect of forest certification on conservation and sustainable forest management. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 363, 132374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lazaridou, D.C.; Michailidis, A.; Trigkas, M. Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a forest-based circular economy: A literature review. Forests 2021, 12, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Joung, D.; Park, B.-J.; Kang, S. Quality of life and mental health benefits of public participation in forest conservation activities in urban areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kurniasari, D.R.; Wibowo, L.R.; Seraphine, N.; Kurniawan, A.S. Healing forests as potential natural resources for visitor health therapy in the post-pandemic period. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 1266, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kanowski, P.J.; Williams, K.J.H. The reality of imagination: Integrating the material and cultural values of old forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Agnoletti, M.; Piras, F.; Venturi, M.; Santoro, A. Cultural values and forest dynamics: The Italian forests in the last 150 years. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2022, 503, 119655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ngo, T.T.H.; Nguyen, T.P.M.; Duong, T.H.; Ly, T.H. Forest—Related culture and contribution to sustainable development in the Northern mountain region in Vietnam. For. Soc. 2021, 5, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Agnoletti, M.; Santoro, A. Cultural values and sustainable forest management: The case of Europe. J. For. Res. 2015, 20, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chae, J.H.; Zoh, K.J. Data, Finding the Value of Suburban Mountains. Mt. Kwanak; Korean Studies Information: Paju, Republic of Korea, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jeon. Suggestions for Promoting Cultural Forestry; Society for Forests & Culture: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2003; Volume 12, pp. 37–52. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chae, J.H. Change of Pluralistic Value in Mt. Gwanak as Suburban Mountain. Ph.D. Thesis, Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program in Landscape Architecture Major Graduate School Seoul National Uiversity, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2016; pp. 1–208. [Google Scholar]
  12. Forest and Culture Association. Forest and Culture; Society for Forests & Culture: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2018; Volume 27. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, T.K.; Kim, S.H. Typifying cultural values through literature research on ‘Forest’ in Korea. Humancon 2023, 70, 85–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ito, T. Review of Forest Culture Research in Japan: Toward a New Paradigm of Forest Culture; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 149–155. ISBN 9780792352808. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ritter, E.; Dauksta, D. Human–forest relationships: Ancient values in modern perspectives. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2013, 15, 645–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guevara, S.; Julián, I.P. Sustainable consumption and production: A crucial goal for sustainable development—Reflections on the Spanish SDG implementation report. J. Sustain. Res. 2019, 1, e190019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gasper, D.; Shah, A.; Tankha, S. The framing of sustainable consumption and production in SDG 12. Glob. Policy 2019, 10, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Arora, N.K.; Mishra, I. Responsible consumption and production: A roadmap to sustainable development. Environ. Sustain. 2023, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bengtsson, M.; Alfredsson, E.; Cohen, M.; Lorek, S.; Schroeder, P. Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: Moving beyond efficiency. Sustain. Sci. 2018, 13, 1533–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sgroi, F. Forest resources and sustainable tourism, a combination for the resilience of the landscape and development of mountain areas. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 736, 139539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Natalia, K.; Emilia, J. Forest education with the use of educational infrastructure in the opinion of the public-experience from Poland. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, R.K.; Kumar, A.; Singh, A.; Singhal, P. Evidence that cultural food practices of Adi Women in Arunachal Pradesh, India, improve social-ecological resilience: Insights for sustainable development goals. Ecol. Process. 2020, 9, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ministry of Government Legislation of South Korea. Available online: https://moleg.go.kr (accessed on 2 January 2025).
  24. Kim, S.H.; Chae, J.H.; Ryu, D.H. Trends in Cultural Contents for the Use of Forest Culture; National Institute of Forest Science: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2024; Volume 1116, pp. 1–177. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, S.H.; Chae, J.H. Forest Culture Awareness and Cultural Content Trends Changes and Implications; National Institute of Forest Science: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2024; Volume 184, pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gutman, J. A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. J. Mark. 1982, 46, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reynolds, T.J. Understanding Consumer Decision Marketing: The Means-End Approach to Marketing and Advertising Stategy; Lawrence Elbaum Associates Publishers: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shin, E.J.; Lee, Y.S. The effect of consumers’ value perception of cultural and artistic products on benefits seeked and product attributes. Asia Mark. J. 2012, 14, 177–207. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, I.S.; Cho, M.H. Analysis of the relationships among Jeju Olle Tourist attractions, benefits for walking tourists, and perceived value: Application of means-end chain theory. J. Tour. Res. 2011, 23, 127–154. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim, I.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Baek, T.H.; Choi, Y.K. An exploratory study on the perception and consumption behavior of Korean and American consumers toward ‘eco-friendly products’: Application of means-end chain and Topic modeling. J. Advert Res. 2024, 35, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Borgardt, E. Means-end chain theory: A critical review of literature. Pr. Nauk. Uniw. Ekon. We Wrocławiu 2020, 64, 141–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carrillat, F.A.; d’Astous, A.; Grégoire, E.M. Leveraging social responsibility: The influence of corporate ability and cause proximity on attitudes toward the sponsor. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 329–336. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mooij, M.; Hofstede, G. Cross-cultural consumer behavior: A review of research findings. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2011, 23, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McIntosh, A.J.; Thyne, M.A. Understanding Tourist behavior using means-end chain theory. Ann. Tour. Res. 2005, 32, 259–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. McDonald, R.; Thyne, M.A. Understanding the use of laddering as a research technique for a means-end chain analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 104, 59–72. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jeon, Y.W.; Tak, K.I. Cultural forestry: Its scope and the scheme for dissemination. Sci. For. 1997, 9, 5–28. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jeon, Y.W. Development of Forest Culture; Society for Forests & Culture: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1996; Volume 5, pp. 12–26. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jeon, Y.W. Why Should We Graft Culture on Forests? Society for Forests & Culture: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1997; Volume 6, pp. 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hu, L.T.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marsh, H.W.; Wen, Z.; Hau, K.T. Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychol. Methods 2004, 9, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bourdieu, P. The forms of capital. In The Sociology of Economic Life; Granovetter, M., Swedberg, R., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Eagleton, T. After Theory. New Left Rev. 2003, 2, 67–86. [Google Scholar]
  43. Grunert, K.G.; Grunert, S.C. Measuring subjective meaning structures by the laddering method: Theoretical considerations and methodological problems. Int. J. Res. Mark. 1995, 12, 209–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yoon, S.; Kim, Y.; Baek, T.H. Effort Investment in Persuasiveness: A Comparative Study of Environmental Advertising in the United States and Korea. Int. J. Advert. 2015, 35, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sheth, J.N.; Newman, B.I.; Gross, B.L. Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. J. Bus. Res. 1991, 22, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, J.L.; Kim, S.Y. Urban residents’ cultural recognition of forest resources in Korea. J. For. Recreat. 2000, 4, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  48. Vargo, S.L.; Lusch, R.F. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 2004, 68, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overview of the research process.
Figure 1. Overview of the research process.
Forests 16 00213 g001
Figure 2. Analytical framework of the study.
Figure 2. Analytical framework of the study.
Forests 16 00213 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of the mean for each variable of forest culture: (a) contributed benefits, (b) pursued value, and (c) preferred activities.
Figure 3. Analysis of the mean for each variable of forest culture: (a) contributed benefits, (b) pursued value, and (c) preferred activities.
Forests 16 00213 g003
Figure 4. Structural equation modeling results.
Figure 4. Structural equation modeling results.
Forests 16 00213 g004
Table 1. Selection of variables.
Table 1. Selection of variables.
DivisionVariablesVariable NamesPrevious Studies
Values: values sought for forest culturePublic interest valueV1[11,13,35,36,37,38]
Cultural Heritage Protection Act
World Heritage Convention
Cultural Heritage Conservation Principles
U.S. Forest Service
Economic valueV2
Environmental valueV3
Moral valueV4
Historical valueV5
Artistic valueV6
Academic valueV7
Life valueV8
Coexistential valueV9
Community valueV10
Emotional valueV11
Benefits:
positive functions of forest culture
Improvement of the quality of life among the publicB1Framework Act on Forestry, Forest Welfare Act, Forest Recreation Act, Framework Act on Culture
Revitalizing the local economyB2
Relevance to real lifeB3
Accessibility of enjoyment to the publicB4
Activities:
products and services for enjoying the forest culture
Visiting a museum exhibition in the forestA1Out of 25 forest recreation activities, 19 activities related to forest recreational and leisure functions are designated as indicators.
Attending a musical performance in the forestA2
Participating in a literary event in the forestA3
Participating in an artistic activity in the forestA4
Participating in a forest-based handicraft activityA5
Experiencing afforestationA6
Experiencing forest product harvesting A7
Observing and learning about plants and animalsA8
Participating in forest leisure activitiesA9
Participating in valley leisure activitiesA10
Participation in health promotion activitiesA11
Exploration of forestsA12
Exploration of natural scenic spots of forest cultural resourcesA13
Appreciation of natural sceneryA14
Experiencing forest lifeA15
Playing games related to forests (mountains, trees, and forests)A16
Reading books related to forests (mountains, trees, and forests)A17
Self-development and learning in forestryA18
Social service activities related to forestsA19
Table 2. Characteristics of the participants.
Table 2. Characteristics of the participants.
DivisionnPercentageDivisionnPercentage
SexMale86550.9%EducationElementary school graduation
(Including no schooling)
60.4%
Female83549.1%
Attending middle school70.4%
Age10s573.4%Middle school graduate261.5%
Attending high school291.7%
20s31818.7%
High school graduate37522.1%
30s28416.7%
Attending college844.9%
40s34920.5%
College graduate103660.9%
50s37021.8%
Attending graduate school (master’s or doctorate course)211.2%
60s or older32218.9%
Residential regionSeoul32118.9%Postgraduate degree (master’s or doctorate degrees)1166.8%
Busan1096.4%
OccupationForestry workers40.2%
Daegu784.6%
Office workers50229.5%
Incheon1005.9%
Gwangju482.8%
Service workers1267.4%
Daejeon492.9%
Sales workers543.2%
Ulsan382.2%
Technical workers1448.5%
Sejong130.8%
Gyeonggi45626.8%
Manual laborers694.1%
Gangwon492.9%
Specialists (including professors)533.1%
Chungbuk523.1%
Managerial workers372.2%
Chungnam684.0%
Self-employed (individual business owner)1176.9%
Jeonbuk563.3%
Jeonnam543.2%
Government employees (including teachers)744.4%
Gyeongbuk824.8%
Students (including graduate students)1287.5%
Gyeongnam1056.2%
Housewives25915.2%
Jeju221.3%
Others1337.8%
Total1700100.0%Total1700100.0%
Table 3. Confirmatory factor analysis results of PVs.
Table 3. Confirmatory factor analysis results of PVs.
Fit IndexCriteriaResults
Degrees of Freedom (df)-41
p-value<0.050.000
GFI (Goodness-of-Fit Index)≥0.900.974
AGFI (Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index)≥0.900.958
RMR (Root Mean Residual)≤0.050.024
NFI (Normed Fit Index)≥0.900.956
CFI (Comparative Fit Index)≥0.900.967
RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation)≤0.05 to ≤0.080.05
Table 4. Exploratory factor analysis of PVs.
Table 4. Exploratory factor analysis of PVs.
FactorItemsFactor LoadingStandard LoadingStandard ErrorT-Value
Symbolic Value V4-Moral value10.612
V5-Historical value0.9550.6020.06315.082 ***
V10-Community value0.9990.6320.06415.595 ***
Social Value V3-Environmental value10.692
V9-Coexistential value1.0070.7340.04820.825 ***
V1-Public interest value0.9430.6750.04919.405 ***
V8-Life value0.9730.70.04920.024 ***
V11-Emotional value0.9170.6890.04619.739 ***
Consumption Value V2-Economic value10.554
V6-Artistic value1.0520.6210.07314.387 ***
V7-Academic value1.0620.6090.07514.227 ***
***: p < 0.001.
Table 5. Confirmatory factor analysis results of PAs.
Table 5. Confirmatory factor analysis results of PAs.
Fit IndexCriteriaResults
Degrees of Freedom (df)-32
p-value<0.050.000
GFI (Goodness-of-Fit Index)≥0.900.948
AGFI (Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index)≥0.900.911
RMR (Root Mean Residual)≤0.050.068
NFI (Normed Fit Index)≥0.900.928
CFI (Comparative Fit Index)≥0.900.936
RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation)≤0.05 to ≤0.080.087
Table 6. Exploratory factor analysis of PAs.
Table 6. Exploratory factor analysis of PAs.
FactorItemsFactor LoadingStandard LoadingStandard Errort-Value
Tourism–exploration activityA12-Exploration of forests10.818
A11-Participation in health promotion activities0.9840.7770.03826.13 ***
A14-Appreciation of natural scenery0.9150.7550.03625.35 ***
A13-Exploration of natural scenic spots of forest cultural resources0.9830.7340.0424.581 ***
Cultural–artistic activityA4-Participating in an artistic activity in the forest10.828
A2-Attending a musical performance in the forest0.6690.5920.04215.942 ***
A3-Participating in a literary event in the forest0.7780.6420.04616.766 ***
A1-Visiting a museum exhibition in the forest0.7860.5830.04517.320 ***
Living–leisure activityA9-Participating in forest leisure activities10.852
A10-Participating in valley leisure activities0.9680.7980.04521.498 ***
A16-Playing games related to forests (mountains, trees, and forests)0.6360.5470.03816.651 ***
A18-Self-development and learning in forestry0.7180.6110.03616.867 ***
***: p < 0.001.
Table 7. Structural equation modeling (SEM) results.
Table 7. Structural equation modeling (SEM) results.
Fit IndexCriteriaResults
GFI (Goodness-of-Fit Index)≥0.900.902
AGFI (Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index)≥0.900.874
CFI (Comparative Fit Index)≥0.900.882
RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation)≤0.080.066
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chae, J.; Kim, S.; Choi, N.; Kim, T. Analysis of the Relationships Among the Value, Benefit, and Activities of Forest Culture in Korea: An Application of Means-Chain Value Theory. Forests 2025, 16, 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020213

AMA Style

Chae J, Kim S, Choi N, Kim T. Analysis of the Relationships Among the Value, Benefit, and Activities of Forest Culture in Korea: An Application of Means-Chain Value Theory. Forests. 2025; 16(2):213. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020213

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chae, Jinhae, Seonghak Kim, Nakmin Choi, and Taekwon Kim. 2025. "Analysis of the Relationships Among the Value, Benefit, and Activities of Forest Culture in Korea: An Application of Means-Chain Value Theory" Forests 16, no. 2: 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020213

APA Style

Chae, J., Kim, S., Choi, N., & Kim, T. (2025). Analysis of the Relationships Among the Value, Benefit, and Activities of Forest Culture in Korea: An Application of Means-Chain Value Theory. Forests, 16(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020213

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop