Next Article in Journal
Superinfection Exclusion in Mosquitoes and Its Potential as an Arbovirus Control Strategy
Next Article in Special Issue
Use of Animal Models in Studying Roles of Antibodies and Their Secretion Cells in Dengue Vaccine Development
Previous Article in Journal
Monkeypox Virus in Nigeria: Infection Biology, Epidemiology, and Evolution
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Pre-Existing Antibodies on Live-Attenuated Viral Vaccines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Immune Reactivity of a 20-mer Peptide Representing the Zika E Glycan Loop Involves the Antigenic Determinants E-152/156/158

Unité Mixte Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical, Plateforme Technologique CYROI, Université de La Réunion, INSERM U1187, CNRS UMR 9192, IRD UMR 249, 97491 Sainte-Clotilde, La Réunion, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2020, 12(11), 1258; https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111258
Submission received: 16 September 2020 / Revised: 31 October 2020 / Accepted: 3 November 2020 / Published: 5 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flavivirus Vaccines)

Abstract

:
Mosquito-borne Zika virus (ZIKV) causes a severe congenital syndrome and neurological disorders in humans. With the aim to develop a live-attenuated ZIKV strain, we generated a chimeric viral clone ZIKALIVax with African MR766-NIID strain as backbone and the envelope E protein of epidemic Brazilian BeH810915 strain. The MR766-NIID residues E-T152/I156/Y158 were introduced into BeH810915 E protein leading to a nonglycosylated ZIKALIVax. Recently, we reported that the residues E-152/156/158 that are part of ZIKV glycan loop (GL) region might have an impact on the availability of neutralizing antibody epitopes on ZIKV surface. In the present study, we evaluated the antigenic reactivity of a synthetic 20-mer peptide representing the ZIKALIVax GL region. The GL-related peptide was effective for the detection of GL-reactive antibody in mouse anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum. We showed that the residue E-158 influences the antigenic reactivity of GL-related peptide. The ZIKALIVax peptide was effective in generating mouse antibodies with reactivity against a recombinant E domain I that encompasses the GL region. The GL peptide-reactive antibodies revealed that antigenic reactivity of E-domain I may be impacted by both residues E-152 and E-156. In conclusion, we proposed a role for the residues E-152/156/158 as key antigenic determinants of ZIKV glycan loop region.

1. Introduction

Mosquito-borne ZIKV belonging to flavivirus genus of Flaviviridae family is the etiologic agent of Zika congenital syndrome and neurological disorders in humans [1,2,3,4,5]. ZIKV strains are mostly clustered into African and Asian lineages [6,7]. In the past decade, there has been unexpected expansion of the geographic distribution of ZIKV strains of Asian lineage and their rapid spread caused major epidemics in the South Pacific in 2013 and then South America including Brazil in 2015 [2,7,8]. Contemporary epidemics ZIKVs have been associated with birth defects as well as contaminations through various human body fluids [3,4,5,8].
Vaccination has been proposed as an efficient strategy to prevent ZIKV infection in humans [9,10,11]. It is now well established that elicitation of a protective antibody response is a critical step in the development of safe and efficient Zika vaccines [12,13,14,15]. The envelope E protein (504 aa) is responsible for virus entry into the host-cell and represents a major target for ZIKV neutralization [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. The ZIKV E ectodomain (residues E-1 to E-406) is divided into three structural envelope domains: Domain I (EDI), Domain II (EDII), and Domain III (EDIII) [1,9,17,19,25]. As depicted in Figure 6, the EDI domain contains 132 residues distributed in three spaced segments: The N-terminal residues E-1 to E-52, the central residues E-132 to E-193, and the C-terminal residues E-280 to E-296 [17,25]. EDI encompasses a flexible glycan loop GL (residues E-145 to E-164) region, which may be post-translationally N-glycosylated at N154 [27,28,29]. The 20 amino acids that compose Zika GL might have an influence on the conformation of E, in particular, on the accessibility of EDII, which encompasses the fusion loop region [30,31,32,33,34]. An important role has been also proposed for GL in relation with antigenic properties of Zika E protein [24,25,26].
ZIKALIVax (also called ZIKBeHMR-2) is a chimeric viral clone with historical African strain MR766-NIID (Genbank access LC002520) as backbone and structural protein region from epidemic Brazilian viral strain BeH810915 (Genbank access KU365778) [35,36]. Similar to BeH810915, Asian-lineage ZIKV isolates associated with recent epidemics share the common sequon N154/D155/T156, located in the GL region where an N-glycan is attached to N154 [29,30]. Unlike what has been described with Asian-lineage ZIKV, the residue N154 of African-lineage MR766-NIID E protein lacks N-glycan due to residue Ile at the position E-156, leading to a loss of the sequon [32]. In view of the importance of N-glycosylation status in the virulence of flaviviruses including ZIKV, ZIKALIVax was designed as a nonglycosylated chimeric virus [36]. Consequently, the residues I152/T156/H158 present in BeH810915 E protein were replaced with the MR766-NIID residues T152/I156/K158 [36]. The residue Ile at position E-156 results in a loss of the unique N-glycosylation site into GL region leading to a nonglycosylated ZIKALIVax [36].
We reported that inoculation of live ZIKALIVax in adult BALB/c mice resulted in production of neutralizing anti-ZIKV E antibodies [36]. While ZIKALIVax induced anti-E antibodies that neutralize MR766-NIID with high titers by plaque reduction neutralization test and flow-cytometry neutralization test (FNT), the epidemic ZIKV strains of Asian lineage were weakly neutralized by anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum [36,37]. As BeH810915 and ZIKALIVax E proteins only differ by the amino-acid substitutions at positions E-152/156/158, we questioned whether these three residues, which are part of the GL region, influence the availability of neutralizing antibody epitopes on ZIKV surface (36). In the present study, we sought to evaluate the antigenic reactivity of a synthetic peptide representing the ZIKALIVax GL region. A recombinant E-Domain I (rEDI), which encompasses the GL region of ZIKALIVax, was also generated. Both GL-related peptide and rEDI were mutated to assess the impact of residues E-152/156/158 on immune reactivity of antibodies raised against the glycan loop region. Our results showed that residues E-152/156/158 are key determinants in antigenic reactivity of ZIKV GL region.

2. Results

2.1. Reactivity of a Synthetic Peptide Representing the ZIKALIVax Glycan Loop Region

We sought to evaluate the antigenic reactivity of a 20-mer synthetic peptide named peptGLZIKALIVax representing the GL region (residues E-245 to E-264) of chimeric viral clone ZIKALIVax (Figure 1A). To investigate the impact of residues E-152/156/158 on antigenic reactivity of peptGLZIKALIVax, a mutant peptGLZIKALIVax peptide bearing the amino acid changes Thr to Ile at position 8 (residue 152 as numbered in BeH819015 E protein), Ile to Thr at position 12 (residue E-156), and His to Tyr at position 14 (residue E-158) was generated (Figure 1A). It is of note that peptide mutant peptGLZIKALIVax-(I8, T12, H14) has complete similarity with BeH819015 GL region. An Ala-rich peptide of 18 amino-acid residues (hereafter titled peptcontrol), which lacks potential B-cell epitope, served as a negative peptide control.
A pool of sera of mice that received live ZIKALIVax has ability to bind peptGLZIKALIVax by peptide-based ELISA (Figure 1B). As a negative control, no binding was observed with a pooled serum of mice that received heat-inactivated ZIKALIVax. A dose-response curve showed that peptide detection limit was about 0.1 µg mL−1, whereas the plateau was reached at 1 µg mL−1 (Figure 1B). Thus, a peptide-based ELISA using peptGLZIKALIVax is suitable for detection of GL-reactive antibodies in mouse anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera. A concentration of 3 µg mL−1 (300 ng per well of a 96-well plate) of peptGLZIKALIVax was used for peptide-based ELISA in the following experiments.
We next examined the antigenic reactivity of anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum against mutant peptGLZIKALIVax-(I8, T12, H14) (Figure 2A). Heat-inactivated ZIKALIVax immune serum served as negative serum control, whereas peptGLZIKALIVax and peptcontrol were used as positive and negative peptide controls, respectively. There was no antigenic reactivity of anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum against mutant peptGLZIKALIVax-(I8, T12, H14) regardless of the peptide concentration tested (Figure 2A). Thus, anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum had peptide-reactive antibodies raised against peptGLZIKALIVax but not a mutant peptide representing the BeH819015 GL region.
We examined the antigenic reactivity of 14 individual anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera against peptGLZIKALIVax and mutant peptGLZIKALIVax-(I8, T12, H14) by peptide-based ELISA (Figure 2B). The GL-reactive antibodies were readily detected for one-third of serum samples, whereas no recognition was observed with mutant peptide regardless of individual serum tested. Thus, individual variation in antibody response to peptGLZIKALIVax can occur in inbred laboratory mice inoculated with live ZIKALIVax.
As shown in Figure 1A, the peptide peptGLZIKALIVax is composed of amino-acids T8 and I12 but I8 and T12 in mutant peptGLZIKALIVax-(I8, T12, H14). We asked whether amino-acid permutation (Thr, Ile) at positions 8 and 12 might play a role in antigenic reactivity of peptGLZIKALIVax. Consequently, a mutant peptGLZIKALIVax-(T8, I12) was generated and tested with individual anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera (n = 7) showing a marked immune reactivity at serum dilution 1:200 (Figure 3A). Peptide-based ELISA showed that the permutation (I8, T12) has no impact on reactivity of anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera with peptGLZIKALIVax (Figure 3A). Next, we examined whether His residue at peptide position 14 contributes to the lack of peptGLZIKALIVax recognition by anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera. For this purpose, we generated a new mutant peptGLZIKALIVax-(H14) bearing the amino-acid change Tyr-to-His at peptide position 14 (Figure 1A). In contrast to what was been observed with the other amino-acid changes T8I and I12T, the mutation Y14H caused a lack of reactivity of peptGLZIKALIVax with anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera (Figure 3B). Thus, a Tyr residue at position 14 greatly influences the antigenic reactivity of peptGLZIKALIVax. Taken together, these results showed that a synthetic 20-mer peptide representing ZIKALIVax GL reacts as antibody epitope. We identified an important role for the polar residue at position E-158 in antigenic reactivity of ZIKV GL region in relation with anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera.

2.2. Immunogenicity of PeptGLZILALIVax in Mice

To evaluate the immunogenicity of peptGLZIKALIVax in inbred laboratory mice, the 20-mer peptide was N-terminally coupled to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) protein carrier. A group of five adult BALB/c mice were immunized with 20–30 µg of KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax conjugate in a prime-boost schedule with two weeks lapsing between immunizations. Immune sera were collected three weeks after the third immunization and pooled. Peptide-based ELISA was performed to evaluate the ability of the protein-peptide conjugates to elicit antibody production of relevant specificity (Figure 4). A dose-response curve showed that KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax conjugate was immunogenic in mice (Figure 4A). Pooled mouse immune sera were then tested on free peptGLZIKALIVax through a peptide-based ELISA (Figure 4B). A weak antigenic reactivity of anti-KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune sera was detected with peptGLZIKALIVax at the lower dilution of serum.
Serum samples of BALB/c mice twice inoculated with KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax conjugates were tested individually using peptGLZIKALIVax through peptide-based ELISA. Among the five individual KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune sera tested, only a serum sample from immunized mouse S1-S1-RE (for Series 1-Right Ear) at dilution 1:200 was positive for GL peptide-reactive antibodies (Figure 5). Such a result suggests that peptGLZIKALIVax is poorly immunogenic in mice. The two mutants, peptGLZIKALIVax-(I8, T12, H14) and peptGLZIKALIVax-(H14), were assayed with KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum S1-RE though peptide-based ELISA (Figure 5). The GL peptide-reactive antibodies were capable of reacting with the two peptGLZIKALIVax mutants but at a lower extent as compared to peptGLZIKALIVax. The amino-acid change T8I decreased GL peptide recognition by KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum S1-RE (Figure 5). The GL peptide-reactive antibodies showed a much lower reactivity with mutant peptGLZIKALIVax-(I8, T12, H14) representing BeH819015 GL region. Taken together, these results showed that KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum S1-RE has ability to react with GL region of ZIKALIVax. However, the efficiency of antibody binding to ZIKV GL region was weaker with epidemic viral strain BeH819015, which differs from ZIKALIVax by the amino-acid substitutions at positions E-152/156/158.
Using a flow cytometry neutralization test (FNT) (37), we were unable to detect ZIKV neutralizing antibodies in KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum S1-RE (Figure S1A). Moreover, there was no synergic effect of GL-peptide reactive antibody with anti-E mAb 4G2, which recognizes an EDII epitope involved in flavivirus neutralization (Figure S1A). The reactivity of KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum S1-RE with ZIKV was also tested on Vero cells infected with viral strain MR766-NIID. By immunofluorescence (IF) analysis, no positive signal was observed in ZIKV-infected cells (Figure S1B). Thus, these virological assays did not allow us to demonstrate that GL peptide-reactive antibodies have ability to react with live ZIKV.

2.3. Antigenic Reactivity of ZIKALIVax rEDI in Relation with GL Peptide-Reactive Antibody

The above results prompted us to determine whether KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum S1-RE can recognize GL region into a reccombinant EDI domain (rEDI) that regroups 132 discontinuous amino-acid residues of Zika E protein. A recombinant rEDI was, therefore, constructed by joining together the three ZIKV E segments (residues 1 to 52), (residues 132 to 193), and (residues 280 to 294), which compose EDI of ZIKALIVax using a mammalian codon-optimized synthetic gene (Figure 6). The middle EDI segment contains the 20 residues E-145 to E-164 of the GL sequence. The synthetic gene coding for recombinant ZIKALIVax EDI (rEDIZIKALIVax) was inserted into pcDNA3 expression vector to generate a recombinant plasmid pcDNA3/rEDIZIKALIVax. The rEDIZIKALIVax sequence was preceded by a heterologous signal peptide to target the recombinant viral protein into the secretory pathway and ended with two spaced C-terminal tags, the FLAG and 6 × (His) epitopes in tandem (Figure S2A).
The amino-acid substitutions T152I, I156T, and Y158H were introduced in pcDNA3/rEDIZIKALIVax by directed mutagenesis to generate a mutant plasmid pcDNA3/rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, T156, H158) (Figure 6). As a control, we generated a mutant rEDIZIKALIVax -(T152, Q154, I156, Y158) bearing the amino-acid change Asn to Gln at position E154. It is expected that mutation Q154 causes a loss of the N-glycosylation site of mutant rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, T156, H158). According to the role of N-glycosylation in antigenic reactivity of Zika E protein [29,30], the amino-acid substitutions T152I and I156T were introduced into rEDIZIKALIVax leading to a N-glycosylation sequon Asn-Asp-Thr into the rEDIZIKALIVax GL region (Figure 6).
Using BepiPred-2.0 web site (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/BepiPred/) to predict B-cell epitopes located into proteins [38], GL region was identified as a potential antibody epitope in both rEDIZIKALIVax and rEDIZIKALIVax -(T152, I156, Y158) mutant, the latter representing the BeH819015 GL sequence (Figure S2B). A 3D structure prediction of ZIKALIVax rEDI was performed using PHYRE2 protein fold recognition server (Figure 7). Structural analysis of rEDI showed that the mutations E-T152I and E-I156T may have an effect on GL conformation. The presence of these two mutations might also affect the positioning of residue E-158 into GL region (Figure 7). Thus, the GL region structure might be impacted by the residues E-152 and E-156.
We first evaluated the expression level of rEDIZIKALIVax and its mutant rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, T156, H158) by IF assay (Figure 8A). Human epithelial HEK-293T cells were transfected 24 h with plasmids expressing rEDI tagged with 6 × (His) epitope at the C-terminus. IF assay with anti-6 × (His) antibody readily detected intracellular expression of rEDIZIKALIVax and its mutant rEDIZIKALIVax-(T152, I156, Y158) in transfected HEK-293T cells (Figure 8A). There was no obvious change in the subcellular distribution between the two rEDI. Immunoblot assay on RIPA cell lysates was performed for assessing rEDI protein expression in transfected HEK-293T cells (Figure 8B). Anti-FLAG antibody detected the expression of rEDIZIKALIVax and its three mutants in HEK-293T cells. We observed that rEDIZIKALIVax migrated faster than mutant rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, T156, H158). The fact that rEDIZIKALIVax and mutant rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, Q154, T156, H158) have comparable migration profiles is consistent with a lack of glycan linked to rEDI. We can, therefore, consider that the faster migration of rEDIZIKALIVax is essentially due to the absence of N-glycosylation. In contrast to what was observed with rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, T156, H158), the rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, T156) mutant migrated as two closely spaced bands, suggesting that N-linked protein glycosylation of rEDI was not finalized in HEK-293T cells (Figure 8B). Structural protein analysis of glycosylated rEDIZIKALIVax mutants did not allow us to observe a conformational change explaining the lower occupancy of the N-glycosylation site in rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, T156) (Figure S3). Thus, it is unlikely that polar residue Tyr at position E-158 of rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, T156) mutant may have an effect on glycan-protein linkage leading to partially glycosylated rEDI.
FACS analysis was performed to evaluate the reactivity of KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum S1-RE with rEDIZIKALIVax and its three mutants expressed in HEK-293T cells (Figure 9). Anti-FLAG antibody showed that their expression levels were similar at 24 h post-transfection (Figure 9A). As shown in Figure 9B, KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum S1-RE has ability to react with rEDIZIKALIVax expressed in HEK-293T cells. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of GL peptide-reactive antibody and anti-FLAG antibody were similar, indicating a high level of rEDIZIKALIVax antigenic reactivity in relation with GL peptide-reactive antibodies. Introduction of amino-acid substitutions E-T152I, E-I156T, and E-Y158H reduced by at least 70% the antigenic reactivity of rEDIZIKALIVax (Figure 9B). Analysis of mutant rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, T156) revealed that the two amino-acid substitutions E-T152I and E-I156T decreased recognition of rEDIZIKALIVax. Given that amino-acid change E-I156T generates a potential sequon Asn-Asp-Thr into GL region of rEDIZIKALIVax (Figure S2), the amino-acid substitution N154Q was introduced in glycosylated mutant rEDIZIKALIVax-(I152, T156, H158) (Figure 9B). The loss of the N-glycosylation site showed no effect on immunoreactivity of mutant rEDIZIKALIVax. Thus, it seems unlikely that the glycan linked to N154 may play a role in the weaker reactivity of GL peptide-reactive antibody in relation with rEDIZIKALIVax mutants bearing the mutations E-T152I and E-I156T (Figure 9B). Taken together, these results showed that GL peptide-reactive antibody has ability to recognize the GL region into a reconstituted EDI of ZIKALIVax regardless of the presence of a glycan linked to N154. The two residues E-152 and E-156 might have a key role in the antigenic reactivity of GL region in relation with a change in GL structural conformation.

3. Discussion

Recently, we designed the chimeric viral clone ZIKALIVax as a prototype of live-attenuated ZIKV strain for the development of vaccine candidates against Zika disease [36]. ZIKALIVax is a nonglycosylated ZIKV with structural protein region from Asian BeH819015 strain and African MR766-NIID strain as viral backbone [36]. It is of note that MR766 is a laboratory-adapted viral strain since the first isolation in Uganda in 1947. The E protein of ZIKALIVax, which relates to BeH819015 sequence, was modified with the three amino-acid substitutions I152T, T156I, and H158Y, leading to a lack of N-glycosylation site for GL into the E antigenic domain I. The amino-acid residues T152, I156, and Y158 were originally identified in viral strain MR766-NIID. Our in vivo experiments identified a role for the GL region in the reactivity of anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum in relation with ZIKV strains of different lineages [36,37]. Viral strain MR766-NIID as well as ZIKALIVax were highly sensitive to neutralization by the mouse anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum. However, there was a weaker antibody-mediated neutralization of viral strain BeH819015 by anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum, despite the fact that neutralizing antibody epitopes came from BeH819015 [36]. We postulated that glycan loop residues E-152/156/158 may have an impact on availability of neutralizing antibody epitopes on ZIKV surface [36].
The aim of our study was to better understand the role of glycan loop region in the antigenic properties of ZIKALIVax containing the mutations E-I152T, E-T156I, and E-H158Y in the BeH819015 E protein. For such a purpose, we decided to evaluate the antigenic reactivity of a synthetic 20-mer peptide GSQHSGMTVNDIGYETDENR representing the GL region of ZIKALIVax in relation with a mouse anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum. The B-cell epitope prediction model identified the ZIKALIVax GL peptide as a potential antibody epitope. Peptide-based ELISA revealed that a limited number of mice inoculated with ZIKALIVax were capable of reacting with the glycan loop peptide. This would suggest that the glycan loop region is weakly immunogenic in mice challenged with ZIKV.
We noted that a ZIKALIVax GL peptide mutant bearing the amino acid change Tyr to His at position 14 (referred to as residue E-158 in ZIKV) lacks antigenic reactivity in relation with anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum. It was observed that GL-reactive antibodies raised against Asian-lineage ZIKV were inefficient to recognize viral strain MR776 bearing a residue Y158 [34]. The H158 protonation in the GL region might have an effect on the low pH-dependent fusion step at the early stage of virus replication cycle [32]. This suggests an important role for residue E-158 in the structural arrangement of ZIKV. It would be, therefore, of great interest to determine whether a ZIKALIVax mutant bearing a mutation Y158H into the GL region has ability to produce higher levels of neutralizing antibodies against epidemic ZIKV strains of Asian lineage.
To evaluate the ability of ZIKALIVax GL peptide to induce production of GL peptide-reactive antibodies, the peptide conjugated to protein carrier KLH was administrated to a small group of adult BALB/c mice by the intradermal route. Only one individual from five immunized mice developed a significant level of GL peptide-reactive antibodies. The weak immunogenicity of ZIKALIVax GL peptide correlates with the limited number of individual anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera showing antibody reactivity with GL peptide. The mouse immune serum raised against ZIKALIVax GL peptide was capable of reacting with a peptide representing the GL region of viral strain BeH819015. Thus, immunization with ZIKALIVax GL peptide induces the production of GL peptide-reactive antibodies against ZIKV strains of African and Asian lineages. The serum specimen obtained from mouse inoculated with ZIKALIVax GL peptide was assayed with live ZIKV. The GL peptide-reactive antibodies were unable to neutralize ZIKV or even to recognize the authentic E protein. It cannot rule out that sensitivity of our assays was not sufficient to evaluate the binding capacity of GL peptide-reactive antibodies to live ZIKV. In flavivirus E dimers, the hydrophobic fusion-peptide (FP) loop within the E domain II (EDII) nests into a pocket at the interface between EDI and the E domain III [39]. Structural analysis of ZIKV identified GL as a region adjacent to FP loop that is inaccessible in the mature virus structure [18,19,31]. During the low-pH-triggered flavivirus fusion process, the E dimers undergo structural transitions leading to the exposure of the FP loop at the tip of EDII [40]. Although experimental evidence for such a hypothesis is still lacking, we proposed that accessibility of ZIKV GL region for antibody binding requires that ZIKV virion adopts a conformational transition, which results in a change in the oligomeric state of E.
The lack of antigenic reactivity of live ZIKV in relation with GL peptide-reactive antibodies prompted us to determine whether the E-Domain I, which encompasses the GL region, could be recognized by immune serum of mouse that received ZIKALIVax GL peptide. Consequently, a recombinant rEDI was generated by joining the three E segments that compose the 132-amino-acid-long residues of BeH819015 EDI. The introduction of the three amino-acid changes E-I152T, E-T156I, and E-H156Y in BeH819015 EDI resulted in ZIKALIVax EDI. Based on protein structural information from the 3D predicted structure of rEDI, the two amino-acid substitutions E-T152I and E-I156T might have an effect on GL conformation leading to a change in residue E-158 positioning. The serum specimen obtained from mouse inoculated with ZIKALIVax GL peptide reacts with ZIKALIVax rEDI expressed in HEK-293T cells. The impact of residues E-152, E-156, and E-158 on the antigenic reactivity of ZIKALIVax rEDI was assessed through two mutants bearing the amino-acid changes E-T152I, E-I156T, and E-Y158H or only E-I152T and E-I156T. We showed that the mutations E-I152T and E-I156T reduced antigenic reactivity of ZIKALIVax rEDI in relation with GL peptide-reactive antibodies. In order to better understand the role of glycan linked to N154 in the antigenic reactivity of GL region, the amino-acid substitution E-N154Q was introduced into ZIKALIVax rEDI-(I152, T156, H158) mutant. We showed that the weaker antigenic reactivity of ZIKALIVax rEDI mutants bearing the mutation I156T in relation to GL-reactive peptide antibodies did not relate to glycan linked to N154.
In the present study, we demonstrated that a peptide representing the glycan loop region of chimeric viral clone ZIKALIVax reacts as a linear B-cell epitope. This is consistent with the previous reports on the immune reactivity of Zika patient sera with ZIKV GL region [34] and the ability of a recombinant soluble E protein of Asian-lineage ZIKV strain to induce the production of GL-reactive antibodies in mice [35]. Our data reveal that the three residues E-152, E-156, and E-158 have major impact on the antigenic reactivity of ZIKV glycan loop.

4. Conclusions

A major role has been proposed for the E glycan loop region (residues E-151 to E-165) located in the domain I of the E protein in the neutralizing activity of anti-ZIKV antibodies [31,32,33,34,35,36]. It has been recently reported that glycan loop of Asian-genotype ZIKV encompasses a highly conserved linear epitope, with His residue at position E-158 playing a key role in the antibody binding [34]. Consistent with this finding, we showed that sera of mice that received live ZIKALIVax, which contains the E protein of contemporary epidemic strain BeH819015 with the residues E-152/156/158 from African strain MR766-NIID, are capable of reacting with a synthetic 20-mer peptide representing ZIKALIVax GL region. Our data demonstrated that polar amino acid at position E-158 greatly influences the antigenic reactivity of glycan loop region between African- and Asian-lineage ZIKV. The residues E-152 and E-156 are proposed to be critical for antigenic reactivity of glycan loop region in relation with the conformational state of E domain I. It is of note that N154-linked glycan has no effect on the binding of ZIKALIVax GL peptide-reactive antibodies to GL region of Asian-genotype ZIKV.
It has been reported that a GL-related peptide conjugated to viral nanoparticles has ability to induce antibodies raised against the glycan loop region of Asian-lineage ZIKV [34]. We demonstrated here that immunization of BALB/c mice with ZIKALIVax GL-peptide conjugated to an immunogenic protein carrier results in production of GL peptide-reactive antibodies capable of reacting with ZIKV strains of different lineages. We and others pointed out the major role of glycan loop region in the antigenic reactivity of ZIKV E protein [31,32,33,34,35,36]. Taken in consideration with the singularity of ZIKV glycan loop region among flavivirus E proteins, the 20-mer peptide GSQHSGMTVNDIGYETDENR representing the ZIKALIVax GL sequence could be of major interest in the design of a peptide-based ELISA for ZIKV infection serological diagnosis [41]. Such a peptide would be also of great interest to provide a clearer view on the involvement of glycan loop region into the E-Domain I on the availability of neutralizing antibody epitopes on ZIKV surface.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Cells and Reagents

Vero (clone E6) and HEK-293T cells were cultured at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) growth medium supplemented with 5 to 10% of heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Dutscher, Brumath, France) and antibiotics. Mouse anti-flavivirus E mAb 4G2 was purchased from RD-Biotech (Besançon, Fance). Mouse anti-DDDDK tag (binds to FLAG tag sequence) and mouse anti-6 × (His) mAbs were purchased from Abcam (Birmingham, UK). Donkey anti-mouse IgG, HRP conjugate, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was purchased from ImmunoReagents (Raleigh, USA). Donkey anti-mouse IgG, Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate, was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Les Ulis, France). DAPI was purchased from Euromedex (Souffelweyersheim, France).

5.2. Synthetic Zika Peptides

A synthetic peptide representing the 20 amino-acid residues GSQHSGMTVNDIGYETDNER of the envelope glycan loop of chimeric viral clone ZIKALIVax was chemically synthesized by Genecust (Boynes, France). ZIKALIVax GL peptide mutants and peptcontrol peptide were also produced by Genecust (Boynes, France). The peptides peptGL were provided free or conjugated to the carrier protein keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) by Genecust (Boynes, France).

5.3. Mouse Immunization with Peptides

A group of adult BALB/c mice (n = 5) were inoculated with 20–30 µg of KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax conjugates in Complete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma, France) by intradermal administration. Two weeks after primary immunization, mice were twice boosted with the same antigen in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant with 2–3 weeks lapsing between immunizations. Mice were bled two weeks after the last immunization. Mouse immune sera were pooled or tested individually.
The protocols and subsequent experiments in mice were ethically approved by the French Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation with reference APAFIS#23095-2019111814567346 v3 (1 April 2020). All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the European Union legislation for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (Directive 2010/63/EU). Experiments were conducted following the guidelines of the Office Laboratory of Animal Care at the Cyclotron and Biomedical Research CYROI platform.

5.4. Peptide-Based ELISA

A 96-well plate was coated with 0.1 mL of peptide diluted in PBS at 4 °C overnight. Plates were incubated with mouse sera diluted in PBS-Tween supplemented 3% milk at 37 °C. The plates were washed in PBS-Tween and then incubated in the presence of HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody. After washes in PBS-Tween, plates were incubated with TMB substrate solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, les Ulis, France) and absorbance was measured at 450 nm.

5.5. Expression of Recombinant ZIKV EDI Proteins

A mammalian codon-optimized gene coding for a heterologous signal peptide, followed by the amino-acid residues (1–52), (132–193), and (280–295) that compose the EDI domain of chimeric viral clone ZIKALIVax and ended by FLAG and 6 × (His) tags in tandem with glycine-serine spacers, was synthetized by Genecust (Boynes, France) (Figure S2A). The synthetic EDI gene was cloned into Nhe I and Not I restriction site of the pcDNA3.1-Hygro plasmid to generate pcDNA3/ZIKV-rEDIZIKALIVax. The different mutants of rEDIZIKALIVax were obtained by direct mutagenesis on pcDNA3/ZIKV-rEDIZIKALIVax and all plasmids were sequence verified by Sanger method (GeneCust, Boynes, France). HEK-293T cells were transiently transfected with pcDNA3/ZIKV-rEDIZIKALIVax and mutants using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, les Ulis, France).

5.6. Immunoblot Assay

Cells were lysed with RIPA lysis buffer (Sigma, Lyon, France) containing protease inhibitors. Equal quantity of proteins was loaded on a 15% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking of the membrane in PBS supplemented with FBS and Tween-20, the blot was incubated with appropriate dilutions of anti-FLAG antibody as the primary antibody and then HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody as secondary antibody. The membrane was exposed on an Amersham imager 600 (GE Healthcare).

5.7. Immunofluorescence Assay

For IF analysis, cell monolayers grown on coverslips were fixed with 3.2% paraformaldehyde in PBS and then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. Alternatively, cells were fixed using cold methanol:acetone for 30 min. Cells were incubated with appropriate dilutions of primary mouse antibody in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin and then with Alexa 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody as secondary antibody in the same buffer. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Vectashield reagent (Cinisciences, Nanterre, France) was used for mounting of the glass coverslips. A Nikon Eclipse E2000-U microscope was used to visualize the fluorescence. Fluorescent signal capture was allowed with a Hamamatsu ORCA-ER camera coupled to the imaging software NIS-Element AR (Nikon, Champigny-sur-Marne, France).

5.8. Flow Cytometry Analysis

For flow cytometry assay, cells were seeded in 24-well plates and then transfected with pcDNA3/ZIKV-rEDIZIKALIVax or mutants. After 18 h of transfection, cells were gently harvested by trypsinization, fixed with 3.7% FA in PBS, and then permeabilized with 0.15% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. Samples were incubated with appropriate dilutions of mouse immune serum as primary antibody and then with Alexa 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody as secondary antibody. Cells were analyzed with a Cytoflex flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France).

5.9. Statistical Analysis

An unpaired t test was used to compare quantitative data. GraphPad Prism was used for all statistical analysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/12/11/1258/s1. Figure S1. Reactivity of mouse KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum with ZIKV E protein. Figure S2. Prediction of rEDI antibody epitopes in ZIKALIVax. Figure S3. Location of residue E-158 on the 3D structure of glycosylated rEDI.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: E.F., W.V., G.G. and P.D.; methodology: E.F., J.G.H., W.V. and P.D.; formal analysis: E.F., J.G.H., W.V., G.G. and P.D.; investigation: E.F., W.V., B.V., J.G.H., J.A., J.D., G.G. and P.D.; resources: P.D.; data curation: E.F., J.G.H., W.V., G.G. and P.D.; writing—original draft preparation: P.D.; writing—review and editing: E.F., W.V., B.W., G.G. and P.D.; visualization: E.F., G.G. and P.D.; supervision: P.D.; project administration: P.D.; funding acquisition: P.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from INSERM-transfert (ZIKALIVax program, CoPoC N MAT-16225-A-02) and POE FEDER 2014-20 of the Conseil Régional de La Réunion (ZIKAlert program, n° SYNERGIE RE00001902). E.F. received funding from FEDER Région (ZIKALIVax 2.0 program, n° SYNERGIE RE0012406) and La Reunion University. J.G.H. and B.V. received funding from POE FEDER 2014-20 of the Conseil Général de La Réunion (ZIKAlert program, N SYNERGIE RE00001902). J.D. has a PhD degree scholarship from La Réunion island University (Ecole Doctorale STS), funded by the French ministry MEESR.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Hervé Pascalis for implementing computer data analysis. We thank the members of UM 134 PIMIT for their interest in this study. The authors are grateful to the animal testing laboratory A1 into technology platform CYROI.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barrows, N.J.; Campos, R.K.; Liao, K.C.; Prasanth, K.R.; Soto-Acosta, R.; Yeh, S.C.; Schott-Lerner, G.; Pompon, J.; Sessions, O.M.; Bradrick, S.S.; et al. Biochemistry and molecular biology of flaviviruses. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4448–4482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Weaver, S.C.; Costa, F.; Garcia-Blanco, M.A.; Nikos, V.; Ribeiro, G.S.; Saade, G.; Shi, P.Y.; Vasilakis, N. Zika Virus: History, Emergence, Biology, and Prospects for Control. Antivir. Res. 2016, 130, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gorshkov, K.; Shiryaev, S.A.; Fertel, S.; Lin, Y.W.; Huang, C.T.; Pinto, A.; Farhy, C.; Strongin, A.Y.; Zheng, W.; Terskikh, A.V. Zika virus: Origins, pathological action, and treatment strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hussain, A.; Ali, F.; Latiwesh, O.B.; Hussain, S. A Comprehensive Review of the manifestations and pathogenesis of Zika virus in neonates and adults. Cureus 2018, 10, 3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cao-Lormeau, V.M.; Blake, A.; Mons, S.; Lastère, S.; Roche, C.; Vanhomwegen, J.; Dub, T.; Baudouin, L.; Teissier, A.; Larre, P.; et al. Guillain-Barre Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: A case-control study. Lancet 2016, 387, 1531–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Beaver, J.T.; Lelutiu, N.; Habib, R.; Skountzou, I. Evolution of two major Zika virus lineages: Implications for pathology, immune response, and vaccine development. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, T.; Li, J.; Carr, M.J.; Duchêne, S.; Shi, W. The Asian lineage of Zika virus: Transmission and evolution in Asia and the Americas. Virol. Sin. 2019, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Baud, D.; Gubler, D.J.; Schaub, B.; Lanteri, M.C.; Musso, D. An update of Zika virus infection. Lancet 2017, 390, 2099–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Heinz, F.X.; Stiasny, K. Flaviviruses and flavivirus vaccines. Vaccine 2012, 30, 4301–4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fernandez, E.; Diamond, M.S. Vaccination strategies against Zika virus. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2017, 23, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Poland, G.A.; Kennedy, R.B.; Ovsyannikova, I.G.; Palacios, R.; Ho, P.L.; Kalil, J. Development of vaccines against Zika virus. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, e211–e219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Stettler, K.; Beltramello, M.; Espinosa, D.A.; Graham, V.; Cassotta, A.; Bianchi, S.; Vanzetta, F.; Minola, A.; Jaconi, S.; Mele, F.; et al. Specificity, cross-reactivity, and function of antibodies elicited by Zika virus infection. Science 2016, 353, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sapparapu, G.; Fernandez, E.; Kose, N.; Cao, B.; Fox, J.M.; Bombardi, R.G.; Zhao, H.; Nelson, C.A.; Bryan, A.L.; Barnes, T.; et al. Neutralizing human antibodies prevent Zika virus replication and fetal disease in mice. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 540, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhao, H.; Fernandez, E.; Dowd, K.A.; Speer, S.D.; Platt, D.J.; Gorman, M.J.; Govero, J.; Nelson, C.A.; Pierson, T.C.; Diamond, M.S.; et al. Structural basis of Zika virus-specific antibody protection. Cell 2016, 166, 1016–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ngono, A.E.; Shresta, S. Immune response to dengue and Zika. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 36, 279–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Kuhn, R.J.; Rossmann, M.G. A structural perspective of the flavivirus life cycle. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 3, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, X.; Jia, R.; Shen, H.; Wang, M.; Yin, Z.; Cheng, A. Structures and functions of the envelope glycoprotein in flavivirus infections. Viruses 2017, 9, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kaufmann, B.; Rossmann, M.G. Molecular mechanisms involved in the early steps of flavivirus cell entry. Microbes Infect. 2011, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sirohi, D.; Chen, Z.; Sun, L.; Klose, T.; Pierson, T.C.; Rossmann, M.G.; Kuhn, R.J. The 3.8 A resolution cryo-EM structure of Zika virus. Science 2016, 352, 467–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sirohi, D.; Kuhn, R.J. Zika virus structure, maturation, and receptors. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, S935–S944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Heinz, F.X.; Stiasny, K. The antigenic structure of Zika virus and its relation to other flaviviruses: Implications for infection and immunoprophylaxis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017, 81, e00055-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Barba-Spaeth, G.; Dejnirattisai, W.; Rouvinski, A.; Vaney, M.C.; Medits, I.; Sharma, A.; Simon-Lorière, E.; Sakuntabhai, A.; Cao-Lormeau, V.M.; Haouz, A.; et al. Structural basis of potent Zika–dengue virus antibody cross-neutralization. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 536, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lee, I.; Bos, S.; Li, G.; Wang, S.; Gadea, G.; Desprès, P.; Zhao, R.Y. Probing molecular insights into Zika virus–host interactions. Viruses 2018, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Li, G.; Bos, S.; Tsetsarkin, K.A.; Pletnev, A.G.; Desprès, P.; Gadea, G.; Zhao, R.Y. The role of prM-E proteins in historical and epidemic Zika virus-mediated infection and neurotoxicity. Viruses 2019, 11, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Dai, L.; Song, J.; Lu, X.; Deng, Y.Q.; Musyoki, A.M.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Song, H.; Haywood, J.; et al. Structures of the Zika virus envelope protein and its complex with a flavivirus broadly protective antibody. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 19, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dai, L.; Wang, Q.; Song, H.; Gao, G.F. Zika virus envelope protein and antibody complexes. Subcell. Biochem. 2018, 88, 147–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hasan, S.S.; Miller, A.; Sapparapu, G.; Fernandez, E.; Klose, T.; Long, F.; Fokine, A.; Porta, J.C.; Jiang, W.; Diamond, M.S.; et al. A human antibody against Zika virus crosslinks the E protein to prevent infection. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fontes-Garfias, C.R.; Shan, C.; Luo, H.; Muruato, A.E.; Medeiros, D.B.; Mays, E.; Xie, X.; Zou, J.; Roundy, C.M.; Wakamiya, M.; et al. Functional analysis of glycosylation of Zika virus envelope protein. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 1180–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Annamalai, A.S.; Pattnaik, A.; Sahoo, B.R.; Muthukrishnan, E.; Natarajan, S.K.; Steffen, D.; Vu, H.L.X.; Delhon, G.; Osorio, F.A.; Petro, T.M.; et al. Zika virus encoding nonglycosylated envelope protein is attenuated and defective in neuroinvasion. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01348-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Carbaugh, D.L.; Baric, R.S.; LaZear, H.M. Envelope protein glycosylation mediates Zika virus Pathogenesis. J. Virol. 2019, 93, 00113–00119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Goo, L.; DeMaso, C.R.; Pelc, R.S.; Ledgerwood, J.E.; Graham, B.S.; Kuhn, R.J.; Pierson, T.C. The Zika virus envelope protein glycan loop regulates virion antigenicity. Virology 2018, 515, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bos, S.; Viranaicken, W.; Frumence, E.; Li, G.; Desprès, P.; Zhao, R.Y.; Gadea, G. The envelope residues E152/156/158 of Zika virus influence the early stage of virus infection in huma cells. Cells 2019, 8, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Henderson, E.A.; Tam, C.C.; Cheng, L.W.; Ngono, A.E.; Nguyen, A.V.; Shresta, S.; McGee, M.; Padgett, H.; Grill, L.K.; Shilman, M.M. Investigation of the immunogenicity of Zika glycan loop. Virol. J. 2020, 17, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Qu, P.; Zhang, C.; Li, M.; Ma, W.; Xiong, P.; Liu, Q.; Zou, G.; Lavillette, D.; Yin, F.; Jin, X.; et al. A new class of broadly neutralizing antibodies that target the glycan loop of Zika virus envelope protein. Cell Discov. 2020, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bos, S.; Viranaïcken, W.; Turpin, J.; El-Kalamouni, C.; Roche, M.; Krejbich-Trotot, P.; Desprès, P.; Gadea, G. The structural proteins of epidemic and historical strains of Zika virus differ in their ability to initiate viral infection in human host cells. Virology 2018, 516, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Frumence, E.; Viranaïcken, W.; Bos, S.; Alvarez-Martinez, M.T.; Roche, M.; Arnaud, J.D.; Gadea, G.; Desprès, P. A chimeric Zika virus between viral strains MR766 and BeH819015 highlights a role for E-glycan loop in antibody-mediated virus neutralization. Vaccines 2019, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Frumence, E.; Viranaïcken, W.; Gadea, G.; Desprès, P. A GFP reporter MR766-based flow cytometry neutralization test for rapid detection of Zika virus-neutralizing antibodies in serum specimens. Vaccines 2019, 7, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Jespersen, M.C.; Peters, B.; Nielsen, M.; Marcatili, P. BepiPred-2.0: Improving sequence-based B-cell epitope prediction using conformational epitopes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W24–W29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Rey, F.A.; Heinz, F.X.; Mandl, C.; Kunz, C.; Harrison, S.C. The envelope glycoprotein from tick-borne encephalitis virus at 2 Å resolution. Nat. Cell Biol. 1995, 375, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Stiasny, K.; Heinz, F.X. Flavivirus membrane fusion. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 2755–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Musso, D.; Desprès, P. Serological diagnosis of flavivirus-associated human infections. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Reactivity of a peptide representing the ZIKALIVax glycan loop region through peptide-based ELISA. In (A), sequences of synthetic peptides representing the GL region from viral clone ZIKALIVax and mutants. The black points and underlined amino acids are positions that differ from peptGLZIKALIVax. The irrelevant peptide peptcontrol is indicated. In (B), the optical density at 450 nm (O.D450) or signal intensity of samples tested in a dose-response curve of peptGLZIKALIVax in relation to anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum through peptide-based ELISA. Plates were coated with increasing concentrations of peptGLZIKALIVax and incubated with a pooled anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum (ZIKALIVax serum) at dilution 1:50. A pool of serum of mice that received heat-inactivated ZIKALIVax [33] at dilution 1:50 served as a negative serum control (control serum).
Figure 1. Reactivity of a peptide representing the ZIKALIVax glycan loop region through peptide-based ELISA. In (A), sequences of synthetic peptides representing the GL region from viral clone ZIKALIVax and mutants. The black points and underlined amino acids are positions that differ from peptGLZIKALIVax. The irrelevant peptide peptcontrol is indicated. In (B), the optical density at 450 nm (O.D450) or signal intensity of samples tested in a dose-response curve of peptGLZIKALIVax in relation to anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum through peptide-based ELISA. Plates were coated with increasing concentrations of peptGLZIKALIVax and incubated with a pooled anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum (ZIKALIVax serum) at dilution 1:50. A pool of serum of mice that received heat-inactivated ZIKALIVax [33] at dilution 1:50 served as a negative serum control (control serum).
Viruses 12 01258 g001
Figure 2. Immunoreactivity of peptGLZIKALIVax. The O.D450 or signal intensity of samples in dose-response curves of peptGLZIKALIVax and mutant peptide peptGLZIKALIVax-(I8, T12, H14) in relation to anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum (ZIKALIVax serum) at dilution 1:200 measured through peptide-based ELISA. Serum of mice that received heat-inactivated ZIKALIVax at dilution 1:200 served as a control serum. Peptcontrol peptide was used as a negative peptide control. In (A), plates were coated with increasing concentrations of peptides and incubated with a pooled ZIKALIVax immune serum. In (B), peptides at concentration of 3 µg mL−1 were incubated with 14 individual anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera.
Figure 2. Immunoreactivity of peptGLZIKALIVax. The O.D450 or signal intensity of samples in dose-response curves of peptGLZIKALIVax and mutant peptide peptGLZIKALIVax-(I8, T12, H14) in relation to anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum (ZIKALIVax serum) at dilution 1:200 measured through peptide-based ELISA. Serum of mice that received heat-inactivated ZIKALIVax at dilution 1:200 served as a control serum. Peptcontrol peptide was used as a negative peptide control. In (A), plates were coated with increasing concentrations of peptides and incubated with a pooled ZIKALIVax immune serum. In (B), peptides at concentration of 3 µg mL−1 were incubated with 14 individual anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera.
Viruses 12 01258 g002
Figure 3. Immunoreactivity of peptGLZIKALIVax mutants with anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum. The O.D450 or signal intensity of individual anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera in relation to peptGLZIKALIVax and its mutants at positions 8 and 12 (A) or 14 (B) measured through peptide-based ELISA. Peptides at concentration of 3 µg mL−1 were incubated with individual anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera (n = 7) (ZIKALIVax serum) showing the higher reactivity with peptGLZIKALIVax at dilution 1:200 (Figure 2B). Serum of mice (n = 7) that received heat-inactivated ZIKALIVax at dilution 1:200 served as a control serum. Each closed circle represents an individual mouse.
Figure 3. Immunoreactivity of peptGLZIKALIVax mutants with anti-ZIKALIVax immune serum. The O.D450 or signal intensity of individual anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera in relation to peptGLZIKALIVax and its mutants at positions 8 and 12 (A) or 14 (B) measured through peptide-based ELISA. Peptides at concentration of 3 µg mL−1 were incubated with individual anti-ZIKALIVax immune sera (n = 7) (ZIKALIVax serum) showing the higher reactivity with peptGLZIKALIVax at dilution 1:200 (Figure 2B). Serum of mice (n = 7) that received heat-inactivated ZIKALIVax at dilution 1:200 served as a control serum. Each closed circle represents an individual mouse.
Viruses 12 01258 g003
Figure 4. Antigenic reactivity of mouse KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune sera. The O.D450 or signal intensity of serum samples through peptide-based ELISA. Pre-immune sera and immune sera from BALB/c mice that received KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax conjugates were pooled and then tested with KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax conjugate (A) or free peptGLZIKALIVax (B) as coating antigen.
Figure 4. Antigenic reactivity of mouse KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune sera. The O.D450 or signal intensity of serum samples through peptide-based ELISA. Pre-immune sera and immune sera from BALB/c mice that received KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax conjugates were pooled and then tested with KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax conjugate (A) or free peptGLZIKALIVax (B) as coating antigen.
Viruses 12 01258 g004
Figure 5. KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum reacts with peptGLZIKALIVax. The O.D.450 or signal intensity of mouse pre-immune and KLH-peptGLMR766 immune serum S1-RE (KLH-peptGLMR766 serum) at dilution 1:200 in relation to peptGLZIKALIVax and mutant peptides through peptide-based ELISA. Peptcontrol was used as a negative peptide control. The results are the mean (±S.D.) of three repeats. Statistical values correspond to differences between peptides. Pairwise comparisons were performed and statistically significant comparisons are shown as ** p < 10−3, * p < 10−2.
Figure 5. KLH-peptGLZIKALIVax immune serum reacts with peptGLZIKALIVax. The O.D.450 or signal intensity of mouse pre-immune and KLH-peptGLMR766 immune serum S1-RE (KLH-peptGLMR766 serum) at dilution 1:200 in relation to peptGLZIKALIVax and mutant peptides through peptide-based ELISA. Peptcontrol was used as a negative peptide control. The results are the mean (±S.D.) of three repeats. Statistical values correspond to differences between peptides. Pairwise comparisons were performed and statistically significant comparisons are shown as ** p < 10−3, * p < 10−2.
Viruses 12 01258 g005
Figure 6. Schematic representation of ZIKALIVax rEDI constructs. The organization of the E protein into ZIKV polyprotein with its three segments composing the EDI domain is shown on top. The EDI residues are numbered as those in the E protein of ZIKALIVax. The glycan loop (GL) sequence of E is shown as a red, hatched segment. The rEDIZIKALIVax sequence is preceded by a N-terminal heterologous signal peptide (SP) and followed by the spaced two C-terminal FLAG and 6x(His) tags in tandem. The rEDIZIKALIVax gene was inserted into plasmid vector pcDNA3. Directed mutagenesis was performed on rEDIZIKALIVax sequence to generate three mutants. The amino-acid substitutions introduced into rEDIZIKALIVax are indicated in red bold.
Figure 6. Schematic representation of ZIKALIVax rEDI constructs. The organization of the E protein into ZIKV polyprotein with its three segments composing the EDI domain is shown on top. The EDI residues are numbered as those in the E protein of ZIKALIVax. The glycan loop (GL) sequence of E is shown as a red, hatched segment. The rEDIZIKALIVax sequence is preceded by a N-terminal heterologous signal peptide (SP) and followed by the spaced two C-terminal FLAG and 6x(His) tags in tandem. The rEDIZIKALIVax gene was inserted into plasmid vector pcDNA3. Directed mutagenesis was performed on rEDIZIKALIVax sequence to generate three mutants. The amino-acid substitutions introduced into rEDIZIKALIVax are indicated in red bold.
Viruses 12 01258 g006
Figure 7. Structural features of rEDIZIKALIVax. Tridimensional structure prediction of rEDI ZIKALIVax and its mutants was performed by comparative modeling on PHYRE2 protein recognition server (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index). The predicted structures were analyzed with Chimera, a program for interactive visualization of tridimensional molecules. In (A), predicted structure of ZIKALIVax rEDI with GL region in green. The two C-terminal tags of rEDI are not presented. In (B,C), the ZIKALIVax GL region structure (GLZIKALIVax) was compared to GL mutants bearing the two mutations E-T152I, and E-I156T (B) or the three mutations E-T152I, E-I156T, and E-Y158H (C). The hatched arrow indicates the position of residue I152 in the 3D structure of GL mutant.
Figure 7. Structural features of rEDIZIKALIVax. Tridimensional structure prediction of rEDI ZIKALIVax and its mutants was performed by comparative modeling on PHYRE2 protein recognition server (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index). The predicted structures were analyzed with Chimera, a program for interactive visualization of tridimensional molecules. In (A), predicted structure of ZIKALIVax rEDI with GL region in green. The two C-terminal tags of rEDI are not presented. In (B,C), the ZIKALIVax GL region structure (GLZIKALIVax) was compared to GL mutants bearing the two mutations E-T152I, and E-I156T (B) or the three mutations E-T152I, E-I156T, and E-Y158H (C). The hatched arrow indicates the position of residue I152 in the 3D structure of GL mutant.
Viruses 12 01258 g007
Figure 8. Expression of rEDIZIKALIVax in HEK-293T cells. HEK-293T cells were transfected 24 h with plasmids pcDNA3 expressing rEDIZIKALIVax or its mutants. In (A), IF assay was performed on fixed and permeabilized cells with anti-6x(His) monoclonal antibody (mAb) as primary antibody. Alexa 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody as secondary antibody. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Immunostained cells were visualized with a fluorescent microscope. The same magnification of ×100 was used throughout. In (B), immunoblot was performed on RIPA lysates obtained from transfected cells expressing rEDIZIKALIVax or its mutants using anti-FLAG antibody.
Figure 8. Expression of rEDIZIKALIVax in HEK-293T cells. HEK-293T cells were transfected 24 h with plasmids pcDNA3 expressing rEDIZIKALIVax or its mutants. In (A), IF assay was performed on fixed and permeabilized cells with anti-6x(His) monoclonal antibody (mAb) as primary antibody. Alexa 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody as secondary antibody. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Immunostained cells were visualized with a fluorescent microscope. The same magnification of ×100 was used throughout. In (B), immunoblot was performed on RIPA lysates obtained from transfected cells expressing rEDIZIKALIVax or its mutants using anti-FLAG antibody.
Viruses 12 01258 g008
Figure 9. Recognition of rEDIZIKALIVax in relation with peptGLZIKALIVax-reactive antibody. HEK-293T cells were transfected 24 h with plasmids expressing rEDIZIKALIVax or its mutants or mock-transfected (mock). FACS analysis was performed to detect expression of rEDI in transfected cells. For FACS analysis, cells were incubated with anti-FLAG antibody (A) or KLH-peptGLMR766 immune serum S1-S1-RE (KLH-peptGLMR766 serum) (B) as primary antibody and then Alexa 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody as secondary antibody. The MFI values of FITC were determined. The error bars represent standard errors of two independent experiments. In (A), MFI values generated by the three rEDIZIKALIVax mutants in comparison with rEDIZIKALIVax. In (B), MFI values generated by rEDIZIKALIVax and its mutants in comparison with mock. Pairwise comparisons were performed and statistically significant comparisons are shown as *** p < 10−2, ** p< 10−1, * p < 0.05. The nonstatistically significant comparisons are not indicated.
Figure 9. Recognition of rEDIZIKALIVax in relation with peptGLZIKALIVax-reactive antibody. HEK-293T cells were transfected 24 h with plasmids expressing rEDIZIKALIVax or its mutants or mock-transfected (mock). FACS analysis was performed to detect expression of rEDI in transfected cells. For FACS analysis, cells were incubated with anti-FLAG antibody (A) or KLH-peptGLMR766 immune serum S1-S1-RE (KLH-peptGLMR766 serum) (B) as primary antibody and then Alexa 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody as secondary antibody. The MFI values of FITC were determined. The error bars represent standard errors of two independent experiments. In (A), MFI values generated by the three rEDIZIKALIVax mutants in comparison with rEDIZIKALIVax. In (B), MFI values generated by rEDIZIKALIVax and its mutants in comparison with mock. Pairwise comparisons were performed and statistically significant comparisons are shown as *** p < 10−2, ** p< 10−1, * p < 0.05. The nonstatistically significant comparisons are not indicated.
Viruses 12 01258 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frumence, E.; Haddad, J.G.; Vanwalscappel, B.; Andries, J.; Decotter, J.; Viranaicken, W.; Gadea, G.; Desprès, P. Immune Reactivity of a 20-mer Peptide Representing the Zika E Glycan Loop Involves the Antigenic Determinants E-152/156/158. Viruses 2020, 12, 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111258

AMA Style

Frumence E, Haddad JG, Vanwalscappel B, Andries J, Decotter J, Viranaicken W, Gadea G, Desprès P. Immune Reactivity of a 20-mer Peptide Representing the Zika E Glycan Loop Involves the Antigenic Determinants E-152/156/158. Viruses. 2020; 12(11):1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frumence, Etienne, Juliano G. Haddad, Bénédicte Vanwalscappel, Jessica Andries, Jason Decotter, Wildriss Viranaicken, Gilles Gadea, and Philippe Desprès. 2020. "Immune Reactivity of a 20-mer Peptide Representing the Zika E Glycan Loop Involves the Antigenic Determinants E-152/156/158" Viruses 12, no. 11: 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111258

APA Style

Frumence, E., Haddad, J. G., Vanwalscappel, B., Andries, J., Decotter, J., Viranaicken, W., Gadea, G., & Desprès, P. (2020). Immune Reactivity of a 20-mer Peptide Representing the Zika E Glycan Loop Involves the Antigenic Determinants E-152/156/158. Viruses, 12(11), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111258

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop