Next Article in Journal
Natural History of Aerosol-Induced Ebola Virus Disease in Rhesus Macaques
Next Article in Special Issue
Release of HSV-1 Cell-Free Virions: Mechanisms, Regulation, and Likely Role in Human-Human Transmission
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of the Double Mutants on Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 Lineage on the Human ACE2 Receptor Binding: A Structural Insight
Previous Article in Special Issue
Herpes Simplex Virus 1 and 2 Infections during Differentiation of Human Cortical Neurons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Stress Induced Transcription Factors Transactivate the Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infected Cell Protein 27 (ICP27) Transcriptional Enhancer

Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(11), 2296; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112296
Submission received: 27 October 2021 / Revised: 11 November 2021 / Accepted: 12 November 2021 / Published: 17 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Replication and Spread of Alphaherpesviruses)

Abstract

:
Following acute infection, herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) establishes lifelong latency in neurons, including sensory neurons within trigeminal ganglia. During latency, lytic cycle viral gene expression is silenced. However, stressful stimuli can trigger reactivation from latency. The viral tegument protein, VP-16, transactivates all immediate early (IE) promoters during productive infection. Conversely, cellular factors are expected to trigger viral gene expression during early stages of reactivation from latency and in non-neuronal cells that do not support high levels of productive infection. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR), synthetic corticosteroid dexamethasone, and certain stress-induced transcription factors cooperatively transactivate infected cell protein 0 (ICP0) and ICP4 promoters. Since ICP27 protein expression is required for productive infection, we hypothesized that the ICP27 promoter is transactivated by stress-induced transcription factors. New studies have demonstrated that ICP27 enhancer sequences were transactivated by GR and Krüppel-like factor 15 (KLF15). Mutation of a consensus Sp1 binding site within ICP27 enhancer sequences impaired transactivation by GR and KLF15. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies have demonstrated that GR and KLF15 occupy ICP27 promoter sequences during productive infection. Cells transfected with an ICP27 enhancer fragment revealed the GR and KLF15 occupancy of ICP27 enhancer sequences required the intact Sp1 binding site. Notably, GR and KLF15 form a feed-forward transcription loop in response to stress, suggesting these cellular factors promote viral replication following stressful stimuli.

1. Introduction

Herpes simplex virus 1 infection continues to be one of the most prevalent viral infections of the eye [1] Infections can lead to serious recurrent eye disease, including herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK). Corneal scarring and neovascularization are hallmarks of HSK, and chronic HSK can culminate in blindness. Most HSK cases are due to reactivation from latency [2]. However, oral acyclovir treatment only reduces recurrent HSK approximately 50% of the time [3]. Identifying cellular and viral factors that trigger reactivation from latency may serve as valuable targets designed to reduce the incidence of reactivation from latency.
Sensory neurons in the trigeminal ganglia (TG) and other neurons are sites for life-long latent infections following infection of oral, ocular, or nasal cavities [4]. In contrast to productive infection, abundant viral gene expression is not readily detected during latency. The only viral gene abundantly expressed in latently infected neurons is the locus encoding the latency-associated transcript (LAT) [4,5,6,7]. LAT expression plays an important role in reactivation from latency in small animal models of latency [8,9,10,11]. HSV-1 reactivation from latency is essential for virus transmission and recurrent disease. Notably, stressful stimuli correlate with an increased incidence of reactivation from latency in humans [12,13,14,15,16]. Corticosteroids bind to the cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) [17,18]. The MR or GR corticosteroid complex is then translocated to the nucleus, where it specifically binds glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) and activates transcription. Notably, de novo protein synthesis is not required for GR or MR activation.
Dexamethasone (DEX) inducible cellular factors in TG neurons were previously identified during early stages of bovine herpesvirus 1 (BoHV-1) reactivation from latency [19] and following explant of mouse TG [20]. A subset of these cellular genes consists of four members of the Krüppel-like factor (KLF) transcription family, for example, KLF4, KLF6, KLF15, and PZLF (promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger). KLF family members belong to the Sp1 super-family of transcription factors [21,22]. Due to the complex nature of glucocorticoid signaling pathways, dissecting the role of these transcription factors through in vitro tissue culture systems has provided important insights into GR and KLF-mediated activation of herpesvirus promoters. The Sp1 transcription factor binds and transactivates HSV-1 immediate early (IE) promoters [23]. KLF family members also can bind certain GC-rich consensus Sp1 binding sites (GGGCGG), suggesting specific KLF family members transactivate HSV-1 IE promoters [21,22]. Previous studies demonstrated GR and KLF15 cooperatively transactivate the HSV-1 ICP0 promoter [24]. Furthermore, GR and KLF4 or KLF15 cooperatively transactivate the HSV-1 ICP4 promoter [25]. GR and KLF15 synergistically activate gene expression by a positive feed-forward transcription loop [26,27,28]. With respect to this positive feed-forward transcription loop, GR stimulates KLF15 expression, leading to GR and KLF15 protein–protein interactions, which culminate in the synergistic activation of certain genes. Since viral genes necessary for productive infection are not abundantly expressed in latently infected sensory neurons, it is reasonable to predict that GR and certain stress-induced KLF family members stimulate key viral promoters during the early stages of reactivation from latency. We further predict stressful stimuli facilitate viral gene expression and productive infection in certain non-neuronal cells. This prediction is supported by the finding that HSV-1 replication is stimulated by DEX in mouse neuroblastoma cells (Neuro-2A) [24].
The multifunctional HSV-1 IE protein ICP27 is required for productive infection [29] because it interacts with numerous host proteins or RNAs and regulates gene expression (viral and cellular), cell cycle, immune responses, and stress responses (reviewed in [30]). Similar proteins are also encoded by additional α-herpesvirinae subfamily members, such as the varicella zoster virus IE4, [31], bovine herpesvirus 1 bICP27 [32], and equine herpesvirus 1 UL3 [33]. Furthermore, the beta-herpesvirus human cytomegalovirus UL69 [34] and gamma-herpesvirus Epstein–Barr virus EB2/SM [35] encode ICP27-like proteins. The most well studied functions of the ICP27 family of proteins are the inhibitions of host gene expression, while promoting virus gene expression. Widespread disruption of transcription termination is characteristic of HSV-1 infection [36], and ICP27 inhibits 3′ end processing of host RNA, including polyadenylation and intron splicing, which are critical steps in RNA post-transcriptional regulation [37,38,39]. ICP27 binds the tegument protein virus host shutoff (VHS), an endoribonuclease that degrades host mRNAs but does not target viral RNAs made during infection. VHS activity is reduced in ICP27-deficient viruses [40,41]. Interestingly, ICP27 binds the characteristically GC-rich HSV-1 RNAs not degraded by VHS [42]. In addition, bICP27 interferes with the activity of beta-interferon 1 and 3 promoters [43]. In contrast, ICP27 promotes virus gene expression, shuttling the generally intron-less virus mRNAs to the cytoplasm [44,45,46,47].
The objectives of this study were to test whether stress induced transcription factors and GR transactivate HSV-1 ICP27 promoter-enhancer sequences, identify sequences necessary for transactivation, and test whether these cellular transcription factors occupy ICP27 promoter-enhancer sequences. The rationale for examining the ICP27 promoter is the multi-functional ICP27 protein is essential for productive infection [29,30].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Cultures

Mouse neuroblastoma cells (Neuro-2A, ATCC CCL-131) and monkey kidney epithelial cells (Vero, ATCC, CCL-81) were grown in MEM with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 mg/mL Streptomycin, 10 U/mL penicillin, and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), as previously described [24,25]. Activated charcoal selectively removes lipophilic molecules, including corticosteroids that drive cellular stress responses, without affecting salts, glucose, or amino acids. This allows for improved control over glucocorticoid receptor activation with specific concentrations of dexamethasone. Neuro-2A cells were also grown in MEM containing 2% or 0.5% charcoal-stripped FBS and, where indicated, 20 µM retinoic acid (Sigma; St Louis, MO, USA; R2625). Serum starvation and retinoic acid both readily induce neurite formation of Neuro-2A cells in culture [48], which is defined as differentiation. To achieve optimal neurite formation, approximately 4 × 105 Neuro-2A cells were plated in a 60 mm dish.
As a comparison to reduced FBS, Neuro-2A cells were cultured in Neurobasal™ medium (Gibco; Birmingham, MI, USA; 21103049) containing B-27 plus supplement (Gibco, Birmingham, MI, USA; A3582801), a specialized medium for neuronal cell culture, following manufacturer’s guidelines.

2.2. Virus Infection

The McKrae strain of HSV-1 was obtained as a kind gift from Steve Wechsler and cultured as previously described [49]. For infection studies, Neuro-2A and Vero cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and the virus was added to the cells at an MOI of 1. Cells were incubated for one hour with periodic shaking, washed again with PBS, and further cultured in media containing 2% charcoal stripped FBS. Water soluble DEX (Sigma; St Louis, MO, USA; D2915; 10 μM final concentration) was added where noted. At indicated time points, cells were formaldehyde crosslinked and harvested for ChIP, described below.

2.3. Primers

Primers were used for amplification of viral DNA, ICP27 enhancer fragments, and generating Sp1-mutant enhancer fragments. Three primer sets were used in these studies, with name, sequence, and location of target DNA listed below. The ICP27 forward (pα27 pro+) and reverse (pα27 pro-) primers were used to amplify virus genomic DNA from infected cells, generating a 190 nt product (Figure 1C). The ICP27ΔSp1 forward (27ΔSp1_F) and reverse (27ΔSp1_R) were used to create Sp1 binding site mutants by PCR-directed mutagenesis and to amplify pα27B and pα27C enhancer fragments, in combination with the pGL4.24 seq primers (Figure 2A–C). Nucleotides in bold are different from template sequences, creating the Sp1 binding site mutant fragments. pGL4.24[luc2/minP] forward (pGL4.24 seq_F) and reverse (pGL4.24 seq_R) primers were used to sequence Sp1 binding site mutants. These were also used to amplify pα27B and pα27C enhancer fragments in combination with the ICP27ΔSp1 primers: pGL4.24 seq_F with 27ΔSp1_R and 27ΔSp1_F with pGL4.24 seq_R. Both primer pairs amplified wild-type and mutant pα27 B and pα27C enhancer fragments, with distinctive sized PCR products (Figure 2D,E).
The pα27 pro+ primer is 5′-CCGTCCCGTTACCAAGAC-3′ (nucleotides −237 to −220 of the ICP27 promoter). The -pα27 pro-primer is 5′-TCTCCCAACCCCTCCTC-3′ (nucleotides −64 to −47 of the ICP27 promoter).
The 27ΔSp1_F primer is 5′-CGGAGGTGGAATTCCGGCCCC-3′ (nucleotides −101 to −80 of the ICP27 promoter, mutant Sp1 binding site underlined). The 27ΔSp1_R primer is 5′-CGGGGCCGGAATTCCACCTCC-3′ (nucleotides −79 to −99 of the ICP27 promoter, mutant Sp1 binding site underlined).
The pGL4.24 seq_F primer is 5′-ACATACGCTCTCCATCAAAAC-3′ in the pause site, 5′ of multiple cloning site, and 99 nt 5′ of Kpn1 insertion site (Figure 2A,B), spanning nt 4320 to nt 4341 of pGL4.24[luc2 P/minP]. The pGL4.24 seq_R primer is: 5′-ACAGTACCGGATTGCCAA-3′ between the minP and luciferase coding sequence, 81 nt 3′ of BglII insertion site (Figure 4A,B), spanning nt 109 to nt 127 of pGL4.24[luc2 P/minP].

2.4. Plasmids

A pGL3-Promoter plasmid containing the HSV-1 strain F ICP27 enhancer element, pα27Enh, spanning nucleotides −254 to −114, cloned between MluI and XhoI restriction sites, was generously provided by Thomas Kristie (NIH; Bethesda, MD, USA). Nucleotide positions are relative to the transcription initiation site. The enhancer element was released from pGL3 and cloned into pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] (Promega; Madison, WI, USA) at unique KpnI and BglII sites upstream of the minimal promoter driving expression of a firefly luciferase gene. pGL4.24[luc2/minP] was chosen as the firefly luciferase reporter plasmid because numerous cryptic transcription factor binding sites were removed. Three additional enhancer elements were synthesized by GenScript and inserted into the pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] plasmid at the same site: pα27A (nucleotides −254 to −159), pα27B (nucleotides −167 to −75), and pα27C (nucleotides −100 to −25, Figure 1C). Sp1 binding site mutants of pα27B and pα27C were generated by PCR-directed mutagenesis: the Sp1 binding site (GGGCGG) in both plasmids was mutated by replacing the core sequence with an EcoRI restriction site (GAATTC), as shown in (Figure 1D). The C-motif and Sp1/C-motif double mutants were synthesized by GenScript in the pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] plasmid (Figure 1D). A mouse GR-α expression plasmid was obtained from John Cidlowski (NIH), and the KLF15 expression plasmid was obtained from Deborah Otteson (University of Houston; Houston, TX, USA).

2.5. PCR-Directed Mutagenesis

The Sp1 binding site (GGGCGG) in the pα27B and pα27C enhancer fragments was mutated by the QuikChangeTM site directed mutagenesis method (Stratagene; La Jolla, CA, USA) [50,51]. The 27ΔSp1_F and 27ΔSp1_R primers (see primers section) with a three-nucleotide mismatch in the Sp1 binding site (GAATGG) were used to PCR amplify the enhancer-containing plasmids grown in E. coli (DH5α, Zymo; Irvine, CA, USA; T3007). A proofreading polymerase, Pfu (M774A, Promega; Madison, WI, USA), was used to reduce second-site mutations. The restriction enzyme Dpn1, which selectively digests methylated DNA, was used to remove template DNA isolated from E. coli, leaving only PCR-amplified mutant plasmid. This sample was transformed into E. coli, isolated by alkaline lysis, and purified with cesium chloride [52,53]. Resultant pα27BΔSp1 and pα27 CΔSp1 plasmids were sequenced to confirm the Sp1-site mutation and ensure that no secondary site mutations were present. Mutant plasmids were used for dual luciferase and ChIP assays.

2.6. Dual Luciferase Assay

Neuro-2A and Vero cells were cultured in 60 mm dishes until 80% + confluency. Two hours before transfection, cells were washed with PBS and antibiotic free media with 2% charcoal stripped FBS added. Neuro-2A cells grown in Neurobasal™ medium were washed with PBS and new media were added before transfection. Neuro-2A cells cultured in reduced levels of stripped FBS (0.5 or 2%) were washed 48 h following initial incubation with stripped FBS, and new, antibiotic free media were added to dishes. Cells were transfected with pGL4.24[luc2/minP] luciferase reporter plasmid containing one of the enhancer fragments upstream of the minimal promoter (0.5 µg DNA, Figure 1C) and with a plasmid expressing Renilla luciferase (0.05 µg DNA), from a minimal TK promoter as a transfection control. Where indicated, GR-α (1 µg DNA) and KLF15 (0.5 µg DNA) expression plasmids were co-transfected with the reporter plasmid. Empty vector plasmid was added as needed to maintain equal quantities of DNA in all transfection reactions. Transfection was carried out using TransIT-X2 (Mirus; Madison, WI, USA; MIR6003) following manufacturer’s instructions. At 24 h following transfection, water soluble DEX (Sigma; St Louis, MO, USA; D2915; 10 μM final concentration) and RU486 (Sigma; St Louis, MO, USA; M8046; 10 μM final concentration) were added to designated samples. At 48 h post transcription, cells were washed, harvested using passive lysis buffer, and stored at −80 °C. Lysates were subjected to a dual luciferase assay, as previously described [24,25]. Firefly and Renilla luciferase activity in each sample were measured using a commercially available kit (Promega; Madison, WI, USA; E1910) and a Glomax 20/20 luminometer (Promega; Madison, WI, USA; E5331). Promoter activity in the pGL4.24[luc2/minP] luciferase reporter plasmid was calculated as a ratio of the reporter firefly luciferase to Renilla luciferase activity, the transfection control. Activity of the empty pGL4.24[luc2/minP] plasmid transfected alone was set as the promoter baseline. Increased promoter activity over this baseline was calculated as fold activation by the enhancer elements and transactivation by GR and KLF15.

2.7. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

Neuro-2A and Vero cells for ChIP were cultured in 100 mm dishes until ~80% confluency. At 2 h prior to transfection or infection, cells were washed with PBS and antibiotic free media with 2% stripped FBS added. Cells were transfected with pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] plasmid (4 µg DNA) containing wild-type (pα27 B, pα27 C) or mutant (pα27 BΔSp1, pα27 CΔSp1) ICP27 enhancer elements, using TransIT-X2 (Mirus; Madison, WI, USA; MIR 6003) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Where indicated, cells were co-transfected with GR-α (3 µg DNA) and KLF15 (3 µg DNA). At 24 h post transfection, designated samples were treated with DEX (10 μM). At 48 h post transfection, cells were formaldehyde crosslinked and harvested for ChIP.
Transfected cells were used for ChIP, as previously described [25,54,55]. Cell lysate was sonicated to shear DNA and cleared with agarose beads and salmon sperm DNA to reduce non-specific binding. Cleared samples were immunoprecipitated using GR-α (5 µg) or KLF15 (5 µg) specific antibodies, with non-specific IgG (5 µg) as an isotype control. Precipitated DNA was amplified by PCR using 27ΔSp1 and pGL4.24 seq primers (Figure 2A–C). Amplified DNA was separated on 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide for visualization. Bands were quantified with ImageLab software (Biorad; Hercules, CA, USA;), and data were presented as a % of the input sample, which represents approximately 13% of cleared cell lysate.
Infected cells were used for ChIP following the same protocol. Precipitated DNA from these samples was PCR amplified using pα27 pro primers (Figure 1C).

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Enhancer Sequences in the ICP27 Promoter

The HSV-1 ICP27 gene is located in unique long sequences, adjacent to the inverted repeats (Figure 1A,B). The 5′ upstream promoter/enhancer sequences contain several transcription factor binding sites, including TAATGARAT, KLF, Sp1, and ½ GREs (Figure 1C). These ICP27 enhancer sequences are crucial for transactivation by VP-16 and host cell factor 1 (HCF-1), and HCF-1 occupies these sequences during early stages of explant-induced reactivation from latency [56,57,58]. Initial studies revealed that an ICP27 promoter/enhancer construct was modestly transactivated by GR-α (hereafter referred to as GR) and KLF15. Since this construct was cloned in a vector that contains many cryptic transcription factor binding sites, four ICP27 enhancer fragments were prepared and then inserted upstream of the pGL4.24[luc2/minP vector: pα27Enh, pα27A, pα27B, and pα27 C (Figure 1C). This luciferase vector has few binding sites for cryptic transcription factors and encodes a luciferase protein with a short ½ life. Consequently, the effects of stress and stress-induced transcription factors should be readily detected in this reporter construct [20,25].
To test whether the ICP27 enhancer constructs activate a heterologous promoter and are transactivated by stress-induced transcription factors, Neuro-2A and Vero cells were transfected, and promoter activity measured. Neuro-2A cells were used for these studies because they are neuronal-like cells that can be differentiated into dopaminergic-like neurons [59]. Neuro-2A cells can also be readily transfected, whereas human neuronal cells we use are not readily transfected. Monkey kidney Vero cells are highly permissive to HSV-1 infection and are a good comparison to Neuro-2A cells. In Neuro-2A cells, the pα27B (grey column) and pα27C (white column) constructs stimulated minimal promoter activity by 53- and 38-fold, respectively (Figure 3A). The pα27Enh construct stimulated minimal promoter activity by 10-fold (Figure 3A, black column) in Neuro-2A cells, while the pα27A fragment exhibited low levels of basal enhancer activity (Figure 3A striped column). The ICP27 enhancer constructs had similar effects in transfected Vero cells (Figure 3B).
GR or GR and DEX did not dramatically increase ICP27 enhancer constructs in Neuro-2A or Vero cells. However, KLF15 significantly increased pα27B and pα27C promoter activity in Vero cells, but not Neuro-2A cells. Furthermore, DEX treatment did not significantly increase promoter activity. When pα27B or pα27C were co-transfected with GR and KLF15, promoter activity was significantly increased in Neuro-2A and Vero cells, relative to the basal enhancer activity or when the luciferase construct was transfected with GR or KLF15. Notably, DEX treatment further increased promoter activity in Vero cells but not in Neuro-2A cells. The corticosteroid antagonist RU486 [60,61] significantly reduced the effects of GR and KLF15 on pα27B and pα27C in Neuro-2A cells, despite DEX not significantly increasing promoter activity (Figure 3A). In Vero cells, RU486 reduced pα27B or pα27C promoter activity to levels observed when co-transfected with GR and KLF15 (no DEX treatment). In summary, these studies revealed GR and KLF15 synergistically transactivated the pα27B or pα27C in Neuro-2A and Vero cells. Cell-type differences were observed with respect to the effects of DEX on GR and KLF15-mediated transactivation.

3.2. Influence of Neurite Formation in Neuro-2A Cells on ICP27 Enhancer Activity

Additional studies examined ICP27 enhancer activity in Neuro-2A cells after incubating cultures with MEM containing 2% stripped FBS or Neurobasal™ media containing the B-27 plus supplement. The effects of retinoic acid (RA) on these treatments were also examined, because reducing FBS and retinoic acid consistently arrests the cell cycle and establishes a neuronal-like phenotype in Neuro-2A cells, as denoted by neurite formation [59,62]. Consistent with our previous studies [63,64,65,66], incubating Neuro-2A cells in 2% stripped FBS for 48 h stimulated neurite formation (Figure 4A), which was enhanced by RA treatment. Although Neurobasal™ and a B-27 supplement are generally used for primary rodent neurons, its effects were examined in Neuro-2A cells. Incubation of Neuro-2A cells with Neurobasal™ media containing the B-27 growth supplement and RA addition induced cells to round up and growth was arrested. However, neurite formation was not observed (Figure 4B).
The pα27B construct was strongly transactivated by GR and KLF15 regardless of DEX treatment, after the Neuro-2A cells were incubated with 2% stripped FBS (Figure 4C). Similar results were obtained when Neuro-2A cells were incubated in 0.5% stripped FBS for 2–4 days regardless of RA treatment (data not shown). When Neuro-2A cultures were incubated in Neurobasal™ and B-27 growth supplement, GR + KLF15-mediated transactivation of pα27B was reduced relative to stripped FBS-mediated differentiation. Interestingly, incubation of Neuro-2A cells with Neurobasal™ medium reduced pα27B basal promoter activity, unless RA was added.
GR and KLF15 significantly increased pα27C promoter activity when cultures were incubated with 2% stripped FBS, but DEX did not significantly change promoter activity (Figure 4D). Consistent with pα27B, incubation in Neurobasal™ media supplemented with B-27 growth supplement reduced pα27C promoter activity relative to 2% stripped FBS. In summary, induction of neurite formation in Neuro-2A cells by incubation with stripped FBS and/or RA did not dramatically alter the ability of GR and KLF15 to mediate transactivation of pα27B or pα27C compared to untreated Neuro-2A cells (Figure 3).

3.3. Sp1 Binding Site Mediates GR- and KLF15-Dependant Transactivation

Studies in Figure 3 and Figure 4 suggest ICP27 enhancer sequences located between −100 and −75 contain an important cis-acting element for GR and KLF15 cooperative transactivation. Interestingly, there is a consensus Sp1 binding site (GGGCGG) and a C-rich motif that is a reverse complement of the Sp1 binding site (CCCGCC) located between −100 and −75 (Figure 1D). Furthermore, the GC-rich motif with dyad symmetry (denoted by the light blue and gray shaded nucleotides in Figure 1D) appears to be important for transactivation by GR and KLF15. Certain Sp1 binding sites are bound by KLF family members (25, 54) because KLF and Sp1 family members belong to the same super-family of transcription factors (21, 22). The two ½ GREs are only present in pα27B sequences, suggesting they are not essential for GR and KLF15-mediated transactivation. To assess whether the GC-rich motif that contains a consensus Sp1 binding is important for transactivation by GR and KLF15, the wild-type Sp1 site, GGGCGG, in pα27B and pα27C was mutated to GAATCC, which also disrupts the dyad symmetry of this GC-rich motif (Figure 1D). Vero or Neuro-2A cells were transfected with plasmids containing wild-type (wt) enhancer constructs or the Sp1 binding site mutants (pα27BΔSp1 or pα27CΔSp1), and promoter activity was measured.
Basal enhancer activity levels of pα27BΔSp1 or pα27CΔSp1 were like the respective wt constructs in Vero (Figure 5A,B) and Neuro-2A cells (Figure 5C,D). In the context of pα27B, the Sp1 binding site mutation significantly reduced transactivation by KLF15 alone in Vero cells and cooperative transactivation by GR, DEX, and KLF15. Relative to pα27C, KLF15 and/or GR, regardless of DEX treatment, did not significantly increase pα27CΔSp1 promoter activity in Vero cells. Consistent with studies in Figure 3, DEX treatment increased the effects of transactivation by GR and KLF15 for wt pα27B and pα27C, but not the Sp1 mutants in Vero cells. GR and KLF15-mediated transactivation of pα27BΔSp1 and pα27CΔSp1 in Neuro-2A cells was significantly reduced compared to the respective wt construct. However, the effect was not as dramatic as in Vero cells. Collectively, these studies revealed that a consensus Sp1 binding site was crucial for GR and KLF15-mediated transactivation of the ICP27 enhancer.

3.4. C-Motif Was Not as Important as Sp1 Binding Site for GR and KLF15-Mediated Transactivation

Additional studies tested whether the C-rich motif adjacent to the Sp1 binding site (Figure 1D) regulated the ability of GR, KLF15, and DEX treatment to cooperatively transactivate ICP27 enhancer sequences in Vero or Neuro-2A cells (Figure 6). pα27B or pα27C reporter constructs containing a wt construct, Sp1 mutant, C-rich motif mutant, or a Sp1- and C-rich mutant were compared to the empty pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] minimal reporter construct. In Vero cells, mutation of the C-motif in pα27B (Figure 6A) and pα27C (Figure 6B) by GR and KLF15 in the presence of DEX was significantly reduced. However, mutating the Sp1 binding site or Sp1 site and C-rich motif significantly reduced promoter activity compared to just mutating the C-rich motif in Vero cells. In contrast to Vero cells, mutating the C-motif did not significantly reduce GR, KLF15, and DEX-mediated transactivation in Neuro-2A cells (Figure 6C,D). As in Vero cells, mutating the C-motif and/or Sp1 binding site significantly reduced GR, KLF15, and DEX-mediated transactivation in Neuro-2A cells. These studies demonstrated that mutating the Sp1 site alone was sufficient to block transactivation. However, the C-rich motif had a modest, but significant, effect on cooperative transactivation in Vero cells.

3.5. ICP27 Enhancer Occupancy by GR and KLF15 Requires an Intact Sp1 Binding Site

To assess whether GR and KLF15 occupy ICP27 enhancer elements, Neuro-2A and Vero cells were transfected with the wild-type pα27B or pα27C enhancer construct, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed using GR- or KLF15-specific antibodies and primers designed to specifically amplify ICP27 enhancer sequences (Figure 2). In Neuro-2A cells, low levels of endogenous GR and KLF15 were associated with pα27 B and pα27C enhancer fragments when transfected with the empty vector (Figure 7A). Overexpression of KLF15 and GR increased the occupancy of both the pα27B and pα27C enhancer sequences. Mutating the Sp1 binding site significantly reduced the occupancy of overexpressed GR and KLF15 for both pα27B and pα27C fragments. When compared to empty vector controls, GR and KLF15 occupancy increased significantly when GR and KLF15 were overexpressed in the presence of DEX in Neuro-2A cells (Figure 7B). Consistent with results in Neuro-2A cells, GR and KLF15 occupancy was significantly reduced by mutating the Sp1 binding site. These studies demonstrated GR and KLF15 occupy the ICP27 promoter. However, mutating the Sp1 binding site significantly reduced GR and KLF15 occupancy.

3.6. ICP27 Promoter/Enhancer Sequences Are Occupied by GR and KLF15 during Productive Infection

To assess whether GR and KLF15 occupy ICP27 promoter sequences during productive infection, Neuro-2A (Figure 8A) and Vero (Figure 8B) cells were infected with HSV-1 and the cells harvested at 0, 4, 8, and 16 h post infection (hpi) for ChIP studies. In Neuro-2A cells at 4 hpi, DEX treatment significantly increased KLF15 and GR occupancy relative to the isotype control (Figure 8A). By 8 hpi, GR and KLF15 occupancy, regardless of DEX treatment, increased to similar levels. GR and KLF15 occupancy of the ICP27 promoter was also readily detected at 16 hpi. However, KLF15 occupancy was only significant relative to isotype in the presence of DEX. In Vero cells, significantly higher levels of GR and KLF15 occupied the ICP27 promoter by 4 hpi when treated with DEX. By 8 hpi, GR and KLF15 occupancy of the ICP27 promoter had increased to the same level as GR with DEX at 4 hpi. However, DEX treatment did not significantly enhance promoter occupancy. GR occupancy increased by 16 hpi, but KLF15 occupancy was unchanged. KLF15 occupancy of the ICP27 promoter at 16 hpi was only significant relative to the isotype control antibody in the presence of DEX. In summary, these studies demonstrated GR and KLF15 occupy ICP27 promoter sequences during productive infection. However, DEX significantly increased promoter occupancy only at 4 hpi. These studies support the prediction that stressful stimuli and KLF15 stimulate viral replication.

4. Discussion

In this report, we demonstrate that ICP27 enhancer sequences were transactivated by GR and KLF15 in Neuro-2A and Vero cells. Although it was clear that GR and KLF15 cooperatively transactivated pα27B and pα27C enhancers, DEX treatment only had a modest effect in Vero cells but essentially no effect in Neuro-2A cells. The GR construct used for these transfection assays expresses the GR-α isoform because it transactivates GRE containing promoters better than the other 7 GR isoforms generated by alternative splicing [67]. Neuro-2A cells express a smaller GR than GR-α, which we suspect is GR-β [54]. GR-β, unlike GR-α, is not a strong trans-activator of promoters following corticosteroid treatment. However, the endogenous GR in Neuro-2A cells clearly binds to the ICP27, ICP0 [24], and ICP4 [25] promoters. Previous studies demonstrated that the immediate early transcription unit 1 (IEtu1) promoter of bovine herpesvirus 1 is transactivated by DEX more efficiently when co-transfected with the GR-α expression construct [54,68]. Two consensus GR response elements (GRE) in the IEtu1 promoter are essential for GR-α and DEX-mediated transactivation. Furthermore, the mouse mammary tumor virus LTR is strongly transactivated by DEX and GR-α expression plasmids in Neuro-2A [65], which is consistent with independent studies [69]. Hence, we believe transactivation of the ICP27 enhancer fragments by GR-α and KLF15 does not require DEX in Neuro-2A cells and only has a modest effect in CV-1 cells. Although this was unexpected, ligand-independent GR activation has been reported [70,71].
Relative to basal enhancer activity, GR or KLF15 alone did not efficiently transactivate the pα27B or pα27C enhancer construct in Neuro-2A cells. However, KLF15 significantly stimulated both enhancer constructs in Vero cells, regardless of DEX treatment. For both cell types examined, GR and KLF15 cooperative transactivation occurred. While these studies suggest cell-type specific factors are important for differences in GR and/or KLF15-mediated transactivation, mutating the Sp1 binding site clearly reduced GR and KLF15 transactivation to basal levels in both cell types. Notably, the Sp1 binding site mutants exhibited little change in basal enhancer activity in both cell lines, suggesting this motif was more important for GR and KLF15-mediated transactivation. Sequences overlapping pα27B and pα27C enhancers (−100 to −75) contain the only Sp1 binding site in the ICP27 enhancer fragment and a C-rich motif with dyad symmetry adjacent to the Sp1 binding site (Figure 1D). While mutating the C-rich motif had a modest effect on GR and KLF15 cooperative transactivation in Vero cells, mutating the Sp1 and C-rich motif had the same effect as mutating the Sp1 binding site. The occupancy of the enhancer fragments by GR and KLF15 was significantly reduced by mutating the Sp1 binding site in both enhancer fragments and in both cell lines, indicating KLF15 interacts with sequences encompassing the intact Sp1 binding site. Thus, the Sp1 consensus binding site and to a lesser extent the C-rich motif are predicted to anchor GR, KLF15, and other transcriptional coactivators to this site. Collectively, these studies provide evidence there is a correlation between KLF15 and GR cooperative transactivation and the ability of these transcription factors to interact with sequences that encompass the Sp1 binding site within ICP27 enhancer sequences.
Several dissimilar external stimuli coincide with increased reactivation from latency in humans. These stimuli include increased corticosteroid levels, UV light, trauma, and heat stress (fever) [4,5,12,13,16,72,73,74]. Strikingly, certain reactivation stimuli have been reported to activate GR by an unliganded mechanism [75]. For example, ligand independent GR phosphorylation correlates with increased UV exposure [70,76]. Consequently, GR responsive genes have increased mRNA [77]. Secondly, heat stress also activates GR by an unliganded mechanism under certain instances [69]. Cyanoketone, a glucocorticoid synthesis inhibitor, reduces the incidence of heat-stress induced reactivation from latency in a mouse ocular model of HSV-1 infection [14], suggesting that heat stress can activate GR via ligand-dependent or independent mechanisms. Finally, β2-adrenergic receptor agonists and, in part, cAMP induce ligand-independent GR activation [78]. The HSV-1 ICP4 enhancer is cooperatively transactivated by GR and KLF4, promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein (PLZF), or SLUG [25]. Furthermore, ligand-independent activation of GR and related nuclear hormone receptors also mediates transactivation of the BoHV-1 bICP0 early promoter [52,53,55]. While the mechanism that mediates unliganded activation of steroid receptors is not well understood, published studies have demonstrated that ligand-independent GR phosphorylation modulates certain cellular stress signaling pathways [70].
Stress, in general, increases the frequency of reactivation from latency in humans, as reviewed in [12,13,15,16]. While corticosteroids and GR impair immune responses [17,79], these events are predicted to influence the frequency of reactivation from latency in vivo after stress stimulates viral gene expression and productive infection. This prediction is supported by the finding that HSV-1 explant-induced reactivation from latency [49] and productive infection [24,80] are enhanced by the synthetic corticosteroid DEX. Secondly, GR and stress-induced transcription factors, including KLF15, cooperatively transactivate the ICP0 [24], ICP4 [25], and ICP27 promoters/enhancers. Thirdly, a recent study demonstrated that HSV-1 infection of cultured cells increases KLF15 steady state levels and silencing KLF15 expression significantly reduces viral replication [81]. Since GR and KLF15 form a feed-forward transcriptional circuit to stimulate gene expression [28], we suggest that the GR/KLF15 regulatory axis activates key viral promoters during early stages of reactivation from latency and/or viral spread in non-neuronal cell types following stressful stimuli. The ICP0, ICP4, and ICP27 promoters/enhancers do not contain a consensus “whole” GRE, suggesting that additional HSV-1 promoters are cooperatively transactivated by GR and KLF15 because Sp1 binding sites and other G-rich motifs are present in many viral promoters.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we believe GR activation, via liganded and un-liganded mechanisms, can increase the frequency of reactivation from latency or viral replication in certain non-neuronal cells. The feed forward transcription loop comprised of GR and KLF15 is also predicted to trigger viral gene expression and replication. Our studies do not rule out the possibility that other reactivation stimuli activate different cellular signaling pathways and transcription factors that trigger viral gene expression during early stages of reactivation. Finally, the ability of GR and stress-induced cellular transcription factors to transactivate key HSV-1 regulatory promoters may activate viral gene expression and productive infection in non-neural cells. Understanding the mechanism by which cellular factors trigger viral gene expression has translation implications. For example, if the essential cellular transcription factors necessary for activating viral gene expression during early stages of reactivation from latency are identified, these cellular transcription factors become potential therapeutic targets.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.B.O. and C.J.; methodology, J.B.O.; validation, J.B.O. and C.J.; formal analysis, J.B.O. and C.J.; investigation, J.B.O.; resources, J.B.O. and C.J.; data curation, J.B.O.; writing—original draft preparation, C.J.; writing—review and editing, C.J. and J.B.O.; visualization, C.J. and J.B.O.; supervision, C.J.; project administration, C.J.; funding acquisition, C.J. and J.B.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

These studies were supported by grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (National Institutes of Health, under award number R01NS111167), the Oklahoma Center for Respiratory and Infectious Diseases (National Institutes of Health Centers for Biomedical Research Excellence, grant number P20GM103648), and from the Sitlington Endowment. Jeffery Ostler was partially supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the USDA NIFA (2019-07214).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thomas Kristie and Jodi Vogel (NIAID, NIH) graciously provided ICP27 promoter and enhancer constructs, and we thank them for their insightful comments regarding these studies. We also thank Prasanth Thunguntla for assisting with these initial studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liesegang, T.J. Classification of herpes simplex virus keratitis and anterior uveitis. Cornea 1999, 18, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yamada, S.; Kameyama, T.; Nagaya, S.; Hashizume, Y.; Yoshida, M. Relapsing herpes simplex encephalitis: Pathological confirmation of viral reactivation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002, 74, 262–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Shimeld, C.; Efstathiou, S.; Hill, T. Tracking the Spread of a lacZ-Tagged Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 between the Eye and the Nervous System of the Mouse: Comparison of Primary and Recurrent Infection. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 5252–5262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Perng, G.-C.; Jones, C. Towards an understanding of the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 latency-reactivation cycle. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis. 2010, 2010, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Jones, C. Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Bovine Herpesvirus 1 Latency. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Phelan, D.; Barrozo, E.R.; Bloom, D.C. HSV1 latent transcription and non-coding RNA: A critical retrospective. J. Neuroimmunol. 2017, 308, 65–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wechsler, S.L.; Nesburn, A.B.; Watson, R.; Slanina, S.; Ghiasi, H. Fine mapping of the major latency-related RNA of herpes simplex virus type 1 in humans. J. Gen. Virol. 1988, 69 Pt 12, 3101–3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Perng, G.C.; Dunkel, E.C.; Geary, P.A.; Slanina, S.M.; Ghiasi, H.; Kaiwar, R.; Nesburn, A.B.; Wechsler, S.L. The latency-associated transcript gene of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is required for efficient in vivo spontaneous reactivation of HSV-1 from latency. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 8045–8055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Perng, G.C.; Ghiasi, H.; Slanina, S.M.; Nesburn, A.B.; Wechsler, S.L. The spontaneous reactivation function of the herpes simplex virus type 1 LAT gene resides completely within the first 1.5 kilobases of the 8.3-kilobase primary transcript. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 976–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Perng, G.C.; Slanina, S.M.; Ghiasi, H.; Nesburn, A.B.; Wechsler, S.L. A 371-nucleotide region between the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) LAT promoter and the 2-kilobase LAT is not essential for efficient spontaneous reactivation of latent HSV-1. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 2014–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Perng, G.C.; Slanina, S.M.; Yukht, A.; Ghiasi, H.; Nesburn, A.B.; Wechsler, S.L. The latency-associated transcript gene enhances establishment of herpes simplex virus type 1 latency in rabbits. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 1885–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Glaser, R.; Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K.; Speicher, C.E.; Holliday, J.E. Stress, loneliness, and changes in herpesvirus latency. J. Behav. Med. 1985, 8, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Padgett, D.A.; Sheridan, J.F.; Dorne, J.; Berntson, G.G.; Candelora, J.; Glaser, R. Social stress and the reactivation of latent herpes simplex virus type 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 7231–7235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Noisakran, S.; Halford, W.P.; Veress, L.; Carr, D.J. Role of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis and IL-6 in stress-induced reactivation of latent herpes simplex virus type 1. J. Immunol. 1998, 160, 5441–5447. [Google Scholar]
  15. Glaser, R.; Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K. Stress-induced immune dysfunction: Implications for health. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 5, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cassidy, L.; Meadows, J.; Catalan, J.; Barton, S. Are reported stress and coping style associated with frequent recurrence of genital herpes? Genitourin. Med. 1997, 73, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oakley, R.H.; Cidlowski, J.A. The biology of the glucocorticoid receptor: New signaling mechanisms in health and disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 1033–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Funder, J.W. Glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoid receptors: Biology and clinical relevance. Annu. Rev. Med. 1997, 48, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Workman, A.; Eudy, J.; Smith, L.; Frizzo da Silva, L.; Sinani, D.; Bricker, H.; Cook, E.; Doster, A.; Jones, C. Cellular Transcription Factors Induced in Trigeminal Ganglia during Dexamethasone-Induced Reactivation from Latency Stimulate Bovine Herpesvirus 1 Productive Infection and Certain Viral Promoters. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 2459–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sinani, D.; Cordes, E.; Workman, A.; Thunuguntia, P.; Jones, C. Stress-induced cellular transcription factors expressed in trigeminal ganglionic neurons stimulate the herpes simplex virus 1 ICP0 promoter. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 13042–13047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Black, A.R.; Black, J.D.; Azizkhan-Clifford, J. Sp1 and kruppel-like factor family of transcription factors in cell growth regulation and cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2001, 188, 143–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kaczynski, J.; Cook, T.; Urrutia, R. Sp1-and Krüppel-like transcription factors. Genome Biol. 2003, 4, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Jones, K.A.; Tjian, R. Sp1 binds to promoter sequences and activates herpes simplex virus ‘immediate-early’gene transcription in vitro. Nature 1985, 317, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ostler, J.B.; Harrison, K.S.; Schroeder, K.; Thunuguntla, P.; Jones, C. The Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR) Stimulates Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Productive Infection, in Part Because the Infected Cell Protein 0 (ICP0) Promoter Is Cooperatively Transactivated by the GR and Krüppel-Like Transcription Factor 15. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e02063-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ostler, J.B.; Thunuguntla, P.; Hendrickson, B.Y.; Jones, C. Transactivation of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 (HSV-1) Infected Cell Protein 4 Enhancer by Glucocorticoid Receptor and Stress-Induced Transcription Factors Requires Overlapping Krüppel-Like Transcription Factor 4/Sp1 Binding Sites. J. Virol. 2021, 95, e01776-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mangan, S.; Alon, U. Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 11980–11985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Sasse, S.K.; Zuo, Z.; Kadiyala, V.; Zhang, L.; Pufall, M.A.; Jain, M.K.; Phang, T.L.; Stormo, G.D.; Gerber, A.N. Response element composition governs correlations between binding site affinity and transcription in glucocorticoid receptor feed-forward loops. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 19756–19769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Sasse, S.K.; Mailloux, C.M.; Barczak, A.J.; Wang, Q.; Altonsy, M.O.; Jain, M.K.; Haldar, S.M.; Gerber, A.N. The glucocorticoid receptor and KLF15 regulate gene expression dynamics and integrate signals through feed-forward circuitry. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33, 2104–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Sacks, W.R.; Greene, C.C.; Aschman, D.P.; Schaffer, P.A. Herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP27 is an essential regulatory protein. J. Virol. 1985, 55, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Sandri-Goldin, R.M. The many roles of the highly interactive HSV protein ICP27, a key regulator of infection. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 1261–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ote, I.; Piette, J.; Sadzot-Delvaux, C. The Varicella-Zoster virus IE4 protein: A conserved member of the herpesviral mRNA export factors family and a potential alternative target in antiherpetic therapies. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010, 80, 1973–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, M.; Fraefel, C.; Bello, L.J.; Lawrence, W.C.; Schwyzer, M. Identification and characterization of BICP27, an early protein of bovine herpesvirus 1 which may stimulate mRNA 3′ processing. J. Gen. Virol. 1996, 77 Pt 4, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhao, Y.; Holden, V.R.; Smith, R.H.; O’Callaghan, D.J. Regulatory function of the equine herpesvirus 1 ICP27 gene product. J. Virol. 1995, 69, 2786–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Winkler, M.; Rice, S.A.; Stamminger, T. UL69 of human cytomegalovirus, an open reading frame with homology to ICP27 of herpes simplex virus, encodes a transactivator of gene expression. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 3943–3954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Boyer, J.L.; Swaminathan, S.; Silverstein, S.J. The Epstein-Barr virus SM protein is functionally similar to ICP27 from herpes simplex virus in viral infections. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 9420–9433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Rutkowski, A.J.; Erhard, F.; L’Hernault, A.; Bonfert, T.; Schilhabel, M.; Crump, C.; Rosenstiel, P.; Efstathiou, S.; Zimmer, R.; Friedel, C.C.; et al. Widespread disruption of host transcription termination in HSV-1 infection. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Whisnant, A.W.; Hennig, T.; Djakovic, L.; Haque, N.; Bach, C.; Sandri-Goldin, R.M.; Erhard, F.; Friedel, C.C.; et al. Mechanism and consequences of herpes simplex virus 1-mediated regulation of host mRNA alternative polyadenylation. PLoS Genet. 2021, 17, e1009263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.; Hennig, T.; Whisnant, A.W.; Erhard, F.; Prusty, B.K.; Friedel, C.C.; Forouzmand, E.; Hu, W.; Erber, L.; Chen, Y.; et al. Herpes simplex virus blocks host transcription termination via the bimodal activities of ICP27. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. He, T.; Wang, M.; Cheng, A.; Yang, Q.; Wu, Y.; Jia, R.; Liu, M.; Zhu, D.; Chen, S.; Zhang, S.; et al. Host shutoff activity of VHS and SOX-like proteins: Role in viral survival and immune evasion. Virol. J. 2020, 17, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taddeo, B.; Zhang, W.; Roizman, B. The herpes simplex virus host shutoff RNase degrades cellular and viral mRNAs made before infection but not viral mRNA made after infection. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 4516–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Taddeo, B.; Zhang, W.; Roizman, B. Role of herpes simplex virus ICP27 in the degradation of mRNA by virion host shutoff RNase. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 10182–10190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tang, S.; Patel, A.; Krause, P.R. Herpes simplex virus ICP27 regulates alternative pre-mRNA polyadenylation and splicing in a sequence-dependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 12256–12561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. da Silva, L.F.; Sinani, D.; Jones, C. ICP27 protein encoded by bovine herpesvirus type 1 (bICP27) interferes with promoter activity of the bovine genes encoding beta interferon 1 (IFN-beta1) and IFN-beta3. Virus Res. 2012, 169, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Johnson, L.A.; Li, L.; Sandri-Goldin, R.M. The cellular RNA export receptor TAP/NXF1 is required for ICP27-mediated export of herpes simplex virus 1 RNA, but the TREX complex adaptor protein Aly/REF appears to be dispensable. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 6335–6346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Johnson, L.A.; Sandri-Goldin, R.M. Efficient nuclear export of herpes simplex virus 1 transcripts requires both RNA binding by ICP27 and ICP27 interaction with TAP/NXF1. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 1184–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Chen, I.H.; Sciabica, K.S.; Sandri-Goldin, R.M. ICP27 interacts with the RNA export factor Aly/REF to direct herpes simplex virus type 1 intronless mRNAs to the TAP export pathway. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 12877–12889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Corbin-Lickfett, K.A.; Rojas, S.; Li, L.; Cocco, M.J.; Sandri-Goldin, R.M. ICP27 phosphorylation site mutants display altered functional interactions with cellular export factors Aly/REF and TAP/NXF1 but are able to bind herpes simplex virus 1 RNA. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 2212–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kumar, M.; Katyal, A. Data on retinoic acid and reduced serum concentration induced differentiation of Neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells. Data Brief 2018, 21, 2435–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Harrison, K.S.; Zhu, L.; Thunuguntla, P.; Jones, C. Antagonizing the Glucocorticoid Receptor Impairs Explant-Induced Reactivation in Mice Latently Infected with Herpes Simplex Virus 1. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e00418-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ishii, T.M.; Zerr, P.; Xia, X.M.; Bond, C.T.; Maylie, J.; Adelman, J.P. Site-directed mutagenesis. Methods Enzymol. 1998, 293, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Weiner, M.P.; Costa, G.L.; Schoettlin, W.; Cline, J.; Mathur, E.; Bauer, J.C. Site-directed mutagenesis of double-stranded DNA by the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 1994, 151, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sawant, L.; Wijesekera, N.; Jones, C. Pioneer transcription factors, progesterone receptor and Krüppel like transcription factor 4, cooperatively stimulate the bovine herpesvirus 1 ICP0 early promoter and productive late protein expression. Virus Res. 2020, 288, 198115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sawant, L.; Thunuguntla, P.; Jones, C. Cooperative activation of bovine herpesvirus 1 productive infection and viral regulatory promoters by androgen receptor and Krüppel-like transcription factors 4 and 15. Virology 2021, 552, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. El-Mayet, F.S.; Sawant, L.; Thunuguntla, P.; Jones, C. Combinatorial effects of the glucocorticoid receptor and Krüppel-like transcription factor 15 on bovine herpesvirus 1 transcription and productive infection. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e00904–e00917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. El-mayet, F.S.; Sawant, L.; Thunuguntla, P.; Zhao, J.; Jones, C. Two Pioneer Transcription Factors, Krüppel-Like Transcription Factor 4 and Glucocorticoid Receptor, Cooperatively Transactivate the Bovine Herpesvirus 1 ICP0 Early Promoter and Stimulate Productive Infection. J. Virol. 2020, 94, 1670–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Whitlow, Z.W.; Kristie, T.M. Recruitment of the Transcriptional Coactivator HCF-1 to Viral Immediate-Early Promoters during Initiation of Reactivation from Latency of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 9591–9595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kristie, T.M.; Roizman, B. Differentiation and DNA contact points of host proteins binding at the cis site for virion-mediated induction of alpha genes of herpes simplex virus 1. J. Virol. 1988, 62, 1145–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Kristie, T.M.; Roizman, B. Host cell proteins bind to the cis-acting site required for virion-mediated induction of herpes simplex virus 1 alpha genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Tremblay, R.G.; Sikorska, M.; Sandhu, J.K.; Lanthier, P.; Ribecco-Lutkiewicz, M.; Bani-Yaghoub, M. Differentiation of mouse Neuro 2A cells into dopamine neurons. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 186, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bardon, S.; Vignon, F.; Chalbos, D.; Rochefort, H. RU486, a progestin and glucocorticoid antagonist, inhibits the growth of breast cancer cells via the progesterone receptor. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1985, 60, 692–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pandit, S.; Geissler, W.; Harris, G.; Sitlani, A. Allosteric effects of dexamethasone and RU486 on glucocorticoid receptor-DNA interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 1538–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Mao, A.J.; Bechberger, J.; Lidington, D.; Galipeau, J.; Laird, D.W.; Naus, C.C. Neuronal Differentiation and Growth Control of Neuro-2a Cells After Retroviral Gene Delivery of Connexin. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 34407–34414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Sinani, D.; Frizzo da Silva, L.; Jones, C. A bovine herpesvirus 1 protein expressed in latently infected neurons (ORF2) promotes neurite sprouting in the presence of activated Notch1 or Notch3. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Thunuguntla, P.; El-Mayet, F.S.; Jones, C. Bovine herpesvirus 1 can efficiently infect the human (SH-SY5Y) but not the mouse neuroblastoma cell line (Neuro-2A). Virus Res. 2017, 232, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Zhao, J.; Zhu, L.; Wijesekera, N.; Jones, C. Specific Akt family members impair stress mediated transactivation of viral promoters and enhance neuronal differentiation: Important functions for maintaining latency. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e00901–e00920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Liu, Y.; Jones, C. Regulation of Notch-mediated transcription by a bovine herpesvirus 1 encoded protein (ORF2) that is expressed in latently infected sensory neurons. J. Neurovirol. 2016, 22, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, Z.N.; Cidlowski, J.A. Glucocorticoid receptor isoforms generate transcription specificity. Trends Cell Biol. 2006, 16, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. El-mayet, F.; El-Habbaa, A.S.; El-Bagoury, G.F.; Sharawi, S.S.A.; El-Nahas, E.M.; Jones, C. Transcription Factors Have the Potential to Synergistically Stimulate Bovine Herpesvirus 1 Transcription and Reactivation from Latency. In Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Regulation; Kais, G., Ed.; Intech: Rejeka, Croatia, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 36–54. [Google Scholar]
  69. Richard-Foy, H.; Hagera, G.L. Sequence-specific positioning of nucleosomes over the steroid-inducible MMTV promoter. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 2321–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Galliher-Beckley, A.J.; Williams, J.G.; Cidlowski, J.A. Ligand-Independent Phosphorylation of the Glucocorticoid Receptor Integrates Cellular Stress Pathways with Nuclear Receptor Signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31, 4663–4675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. O’Malley, B.; Schrader, W.T.; Mani, S.; Smith, C.; Weigel, N.L.; Conneely, O.M.; Clark, J.H. An alternative ligand-independent pathway for activation of steroid receptors. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 1995, 50, 333–347. [Google Scholar]
  72. Rooney, J.T.; Straus, S.E.; Mannix, M.L.; Wohlenberg, C.R.; Banks, S.; Jagannath, S.; Brauer, J.E.; Notkins, A.L. UV light-induced reactivation of herpes simplex virus type 2 and prevention by acyclovir. J. Infect. Dis. 1992, 166, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jones, C. Alphaherpesvirus Latency: Its Role in Disease and Survival of the Virus in Nature. In Advances in Virus Research; Maramorosch, K., Murphy, F.A., Shatkin, A.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MD, USA, 1998; Volume 51, pp. 81–133. [Google Scholar]
  74. Kushnir, A.S.; Davido, D.J.; Schaffer, P.A. Role of nuclear factor Y in stress-induced activation of the herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP0 promoter. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Bennesch, M.A.; Picard, D. Minireview: Tipping the Balance: Ligand-Independent Activation of Steroid Receptors. Mol. Endocrinol. 2015, 29, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Davies, L.; Karthikeyan, N.; Lynch, J.T.; Sial, E.-A.; Gkourtsa, A.; Demonacos, C.; Krstic-Demonacos, M. Cross Talk of Signaling Pathways in the Regulation of the Glucocorticoid Receptor Function. Mol. Endocrinol. 2018, 22, 1331–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Skobowiat, C.; Sayre, R.M.; Dowdy, J.C.; Slominski, A.T. Ultraviolet radiation regulates cortisol activity in a waveband dependent manner in human skin ex-vivo. Br. J. Dermatol. 2013, 168, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Eickelberg, O.; Roth, M.; Lorx, R.; Bruce, V.; Rudiger, J.; Johnson, M.; Blocki, L.-H. Ligand-independent Activation of the Glucocorticoid Receptor by B2-Adrenergic Receptor Agonists in Primary Human Lung Fibroblasts and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 1005–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Rhen, T.; Cidlowski, J.A. Antiinflammatory action of glucocorticoids—New mechanisms of old drugs. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1711–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Erlandsson, A.C.; Bladh, L.G.; Stierna, P.; Yucel-Lindberg, T.; Hammarsten, O.; Modéer, T.; Harmenberg, J.; Wikström, A.C. Herpes simplex virus type 1 infection and glucocorticoid treatment regulate viral yield, glucocorticoid receptor and NF-kappaB levels. J. Endocrinol. 2002, 175, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. El-Mayet, F.S.; Harrison, K.S.; Jones, C. Regulation of Krüppel-Like Factor 15 Expression by Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 or Bovine Herpesvirus 1 Productive Infection. Viruses 2021, 13, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Location of ICP27 gene and promoter within the unique long region of the HSV-1 genome. Panel (A): Schematic of HSV-1 genome. Unique long (UL) and unique short (US) segments are flanked by the long repeats (RL: white rectangles) and short repeats (RS: gray rectangles). Repeats are denoted as terminal (T) or internal (I). Panel (B): Location of ICP27 (UL54) gene in UL is shown, along with flanking genes in UL and RL. Panel (C): Schematic of ICP27 promoter, with potential transcription factor binding sites relative to the starting site of transcription (arrow): ½ GREs (grey rectangle), potential KLF binding sites (white triangle), Sp1 binding site (black diamond), and TAATAGARAT motif (striped oval). Four enhancer fragments (pα27Enh, −254 to −144; pα27A, −254 to −159; pα27B, −167 to −75; pα27C, −100 to −25) used in this study are shown. These fragments were cloned upstream of pGL4.24[luc2/minP] firefly luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega; Madison, WI, USA). Positions of pα27 pro+ and − PCR primers are indicated. These primers yield a 191 bp PCR product. Panel (D): Shared nucleotides of pα27B and pα27C fragments (−100 to −75). Sp1 binding site (blue highlighted bases) and C-rich motif containing Sp1 complementary site (yellow highlighted bases) are indicated. Mutated bases are in red and underlined in wt sequences.
Figure 1. Location of ICP27 gene and promoter within the unique long region of the HSV-1 genome. Panel (A): Schematic of HSV-1 genome. Unique long (UL) and unique short (US) segments are flanked by the long repeats (RL: white rectangles) and short repeats (RS: gray rectangles). Repeats are denoted as terminal (T) or internal (I). Panel (B): Location of ICP27 (UL54) gene in UL is shown, along with flanking genes in UL and RL. Panel (C): Schematic of ICP27 promoter, with potential transcription factor binding sites relative to the starting site of transcription (arrow): ½ GREs (grey rectangle), potential KLF binding sites (white triangle), Sp1 binding site (black diamond), and TAATAGARAT motif (striped oval). Four enhancer fragments (pα27Enh, −254 to −144; pα27A, −254 to −159; pα27B, −167 to −75; pα27C, −100 to −25) used in this study are shown. These fragments were cloned upstream of pGL4.24[luc2/minP] firefly luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega; Madison, WI, USA). Positions of pα27 pro+ and − PCR primers are indicated. These primers yield a 191 bp PCR product. Panel (D): Shared nucleotides of pα27B and pα27C fragments (−100 to −75). Sp1 binding site (blue highlighted bases) and C-rich motif containing Sp1 complementary site (yellow highlighted bases) are indicated. Mutated bases are in red and underlined in wt sequences.
Viruses 13 02296 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of ICP27 enhancer fragments in luciferase reporter plasmid and position of PCR primers used for ChIP. The pα27B (Panel (A)) and pα27C (Panel (B)) enhancer fragments cloned into pGL4.24[luc2/minP] upstream of the minimal promoter. Enhancer fragments, denoted by black lines, are shown with nucleotide positions relative to the transcriptional initiation site. Sp1 binding site (white box) is shown in the approximate location of each enhancer fragment, along with the primer pair used for mutagenesis, 27ΔSp1-F and -R. Luciferase reporter plasmid pGL4.24[luc2/minP] (grey dashed line) is shown with Kpn1 and BglII restriction sites used to insert enhancer fragments. Approximate positions of pGL4.24 seq-F and -R primers indicated. Panel (C): Primer pairs used to PCR amplify ChIP DNA and size of PCR products generated from each primer pair and enhancer fragment. Panels (D,E): PCR product from the indicated primer pair on each enhancer fragment, visualized on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.
Figure 2. Schematic of ICP27 enhancer fragments in luciferase reporter plasmid and position of PCR primers used for ChIP. The pα27B (Panel (A)) and pα27C (Panel (B)) enhancer fragments cloned into pGL4.24[luc2/minP] upstream of the minimal promoter. Enhancer fragments, denoted by black lines, are shown with nucleotide positions relative to the transcriptional initiation site. Sp1 binding site (white box) is shown in the approximate location of each enhancer fragment, along with the primer pair used for mutagenesis, 27ΔSp1-F and -R. Luciferase reporter plasmid pGL4.24[luc2/minP] (grey dashed line) is shown with Kpn1 and BglII restriction sites used to insert enhancer fragments. Approximate positions of pGL4.24 seq-F and -R primers indicated. Panel (C): Primer pairs used to PCR amplify ChIP DNA and size of PCR products generated from each primer pair and enhancer fragment. Panels (D,E): PCR product from the indicated primer pair on each enhancer fragment, visualized on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.
Viruses 13 02296 g002
Figure 3. Transactivation of ICP27 enhancer activity by GR and KLF15. Neuro-2A (Panel (A)) or Vero (Panel (B)) cells were cultured in MEM containing 10% FBS. Two hours prior to transfection, media were replaced with MEM containing 2% charcoal stripped FBS. Cells were transfected with pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] luciferase reporter plasmid containing the designated enhancer fragment (0.5 µg DNA) and a Renilla luciferase expression plasmid (0.05 μg) as a transfection control. Where indicated, cells were co-transfected with the GR (1 µg DNA) and/or KLF15 (0.5 µg DNA) expression plasmid. Empty vector was added as needed to maintain equal amounts of DNA in each reaction. Certain cultures were treated with DEX (10 µM) or RU486 (10 µM) 24 h following transfection. At 48 h post transfection, cells were harvested, and luciferase assays performed as described in the materials and methods. Promoter activity was calculated as a ratio of firefly to Renilla luciferase activity. Fold activation in each sample is relative to the pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] minimal promoter alone. Results are the mean of three separate experiments, and error bars indicate the standard error. An asterisk (*) denotes statistical significance between the indicated sample and the enhancer alone. A dagger () indicates significant differences between designated treatment groups for pα27B and pα27C enhancer fragments, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Transactivation of ICP27 enhancer activity by GR and KLF15. Neuro-2A (Panel (A)) or Vero (Panel (B)) cells were cultured in MEM containing 10% FBS. Two hours prior to transfection, media were replaced with MEM containing 2% charcoal stripped FBS. Cells were transfected with pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] luciferase reporter plasmid containing the designated enhancer fragment (0.5 µg DNA) and a Renilla luciferase expression plasmid (0.05 μg) as a transfection control. Where indicated, cells were co-transfected with the GR (1 µg DNA) and/or KLF15 (0.5 µg DNA) expression plasmid. Empty vector was added as needed to maintain equal amounts of DNA in each reaction. Certain cultures were treated with DEX (10 µM) or RU486 (10 µM) 24 h following transfection. At 48 h post transfection, cells were harvested, and luciferase assays performed as described in the materials and methods. Promoter activity was calculated as a ratio of firefly to Renilla luciferase activity. Fold activation in each sample is relative to the pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] minimal promoter alone. Results are the mean of three separate experiments, and error bars indicate the standard error. An asterisk (*) denotes statistical significance between the indicated sample and the enhancer alone. A dagger () indicates significant differences between designated treatment groups for pα27B and pα27C enhancer fragments, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Viruses 13 02296 g003
Figure 4. Effect of serum starved neurite formation and Neurobasal™ media on ICP27 enhancer activity. Panel (A): Neuro-2A cells were incubated in 10% FBS, 2% stripped FBS, or 2% stripped FBS and RA for 48 h. Neuro-2A cells were seeded at 4 × 105 cells per 60 mm dish to allow for optimal neurite formation. Panel (B): Neuro-2A cells were incubated in Neurobasal™ medium with B-27™ plus supplement for 48 h. Live cell images were captured 48 h after cells were plated using an EVOS XL Core imaging system (Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA, USA; AMEX1200). Representative images are presented (40 x magnification). Panel (C): Neuro-2A cells were transfected with pα27B (0.5 µg DNA) alone or with GR (1.0 µg DNA) and KLF15 (0.5 µg DNA) expression plasmids. Panel (D): Neuro-2A cells were transfected with pα27C (0.5 µg DNA) alone or with GR (1.0 µg DNA) and KLF15 (0.5 µg DNA) expression plasmids. For C and D, cultures were grown in 2% stripped FBS or in Neurobasal™ medium with B-27™ plus supplement. RA was added to certain cultures as indicated. Renilla luciferase expression plasmid was included as a transfection control, and empty vector added as needed to maintain equal amounts of DNA for each transfection. Certain samples were treated with DEX (10 µM) 24 h following transfection. Luciferase assays were performed as described in the materials and methods, and promoter activity calculated. Fold activation in each sample is relative to the pα27B or pα27C transfected alone. Results presented are the means of three separate experiments, with error bars denoting the standard error. An asterisk (*) signifies a statistically significant difference between the indicated sample and enhancer construct alone (black bar), as determined by the Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of serum starved neurite formation and Neurobasal™ media on ICP27 enhancer activity. Panel (A): Neuro-2A cells were incubated in 10% FBS, 2% stripped FBS, or 2% stripped FBS and RA for 48 h. Neuro-2A cells were seeded at 4 × 105 cells per 60 mm dish to allow for optimal neurite formation. Panel (B): Neuro-2A cells were incubated in Neurobasal™ medium with B-27™ plus supplement for 48 h. Live cell images were captured 48 h after cells were plated using an EVOS XL Core imaging system (Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA, USA; AMEX1200). Representative images are presented (40 x magnification). Panel (C): Neuro-2A cells were transfected with pα27B (0.5 µg DNA) alone or with GR (1.0 µg DNA) and KLF15 (0.5 µg DNA) expression plasmids. Panel (D): Neuro-2A cells were transfected with pα27C (0.5 µg DNA) alone or with GR (1.0 µg DNA) and KLF15 (0.5 µg DNA) expression plasmids. For C and D, cultures were grown in 2% stripped FBS or in Neurobasal™ medium with B-27™ plus supplement. RA was added to certain cultures as indicated. Renilla luciferase expression plasmid was included as a transfection control, and empty vector added as needed to maintain equal amounts of DNA for each transfection. Certain samples were treated with DEX (10 µM) 24 h following transfection. Luciferase assays were performed as described in the materials and methods, and promoter activity calculated. Fold activation in each sample is relative to the pα27B or pα27C transfected alone. Results presented are the means of three separate experiments, with error bars denoting the standard error. An asterisk (*) signifies a statistically significant difference between the indicated sample and enhancer construct alone (black bar), as determined by the Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Viruses 13 02296 g004
Figure 5. Mutation of Sp1 binding site impairs GR and KLF15-dependent transactivation of ICP27 enhancers. Vero cells (Panels (A,B)) or Neuro-2A cells (Panels (C,D)) were cultured in MEM with 2% stripped FBS and transfected with the denoted enhancer fragments (0.5 μg DNA) and a Renilla luciferase expression plasmid (0.05 μg DNA) as a transfection control. The reporter plasmid contained either the wt or Sp1-mutant enhancer fragment, pα27B (Panel (A)) or pα27C (Panel (B)). Where indicated, cells were co-transfected with a GR (1 μg DNA) or KLF15 (0.5 μg DNA) expression plasmid. Empty vector plasmid was added to maintain equal amounts of DNA in each transfection. Cells were treated with DEX (10 μM) or RU486 (10 μM, mifepristone) at 24 h post transfection and harvested at 48 h post transfection. Enhancer activation was measured, and fold activation was calculated. The results represent the mean of three separate experiments, and error bars indicate standard error. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant change in promoter activity between the wild-type and Sp1-null enhancer fragment. A dagger () denotes a significant difference between indicated samples, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Mutation of Sp1 binding site impairs GR and KLF15-dependent transactivation of ICP27 enhancers. Vero cells (Panels (A,B)) or Neuro-2A cells (Panels (C,D)) were cultured in MEM with 2% stripped FBS and transfected with the denoted enhancer fragments (0.5 μg DNA) and a Renilla luciferase expression plasmid (0.05 μg DNA) as a transfection control. The reporter plasmid contained either the wt or Sp1-mutant enhancer fragment, pα27B (Panel (A)) or pα27C (Panel (B)). Where indicated, cells were co-transfected with a GR (1 μg DNA) or KLF15 (0.5 μg DNA) expression plasmid. Empty vector plasmid was added to maintain equal amounts of DNA in each transfection. Cells were treated with DEX (10 μM) or RU486 (10 μM, mifepristone) at 24 h post transfection and harvested at 48 h post transfection. Enhancer activation was measured, and fold activation was calculated. The results represent the mean of three separate experiments, and error bars indicate standard error. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant change in promoter activity between the wild-type and Sp1-null enhancer fragment. A dagger () denotes a significant difference between indicated samples, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Viruses 13 02296 g005
Figure 6. Effects of C-motif mutants on transactivation of ICP27 enhancer. Vero cells (Panels (A,B)) or Neuro-2A cells (Panels (C,D)) were cultured in MEM with 2% stripped FBS and transfected with pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] (0.5 μg DNA) and a Renilla luciferase expression plasmid (0.05 μg DNA). The reporter plasmid contained wild-type, Sp1 mutant, C-motif mutant, or Sp1- and C-motif mutants, pα27B (Panel (A)) or pα27C (Panel (B)). Where indicated, cells were co-transfected with a GR (1 μg DNA) and KLF15 (0.5 μg DNA) expression plasmid. Empty vector plasmid was added to maintain equal amounts of DNA in each transfection. Cells were treated with DEX (10 μM) at 24 h post transfection and harvested. Enhancer activation was measured using a dual luciferase assay. Fold activation of each enhancer fragment was calculated. The results represent the mean of three separate experiments, and error bars indicate standard error. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant change in promoter activity between the indicated enhancer fragments with GR, DEX, and KLF15, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Effects of C-motif mutants on transactivation of ICP27 enhancer. Vero cells (Panels (A,B)) or Neuro-2A cells (Panels (C,D)) were cultured in MEM with 2% stripped FBS and transfected with pGL4.24[luc2P/minP] (0.5 μg DNA) and a Renilla luciferase expression plasmid (0.05 μg DNA). The reporter plasmid contained wild-type, Sp1 mutant, C-motif mutant, or Sp1- and C-motif mutants, pα27B (Panel (A)) or pα27C (Panel (B)). Where indicated, cells were co-transfected with a GR (1 μg DNA) and KLF15 (0.5 μg DNA) expression plasmid. Empty vector plasmid was added to maintain equal amounts of DNA in each transfection. Cells were treated with DEX (10 μM) at 24 h post transfection and harvested. Enhancer activation was measured using a dual luciferase assay. Fold activation of each enhancer fragment was calculated. The results represent the mean of three separate experiments, and error bars indicate standard error. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant change in promoter activity between the indicated enhancer fragments with GR, DEX, and KLF15, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Viruses 13 02296 g006
Figure 7. GR and KLF15 occupy ICP27 enhancer sequences. Neuro-2A (Panel (A)) and Vero cells (Panel (B)) were cultured in MEM containing 2% stripped FBS and transfected with the denoted enhancer constructs (4 μg, Figure 4A). Certain samples were co-transfected with GR (3 μg DNA) and KLF15 (3 μg DNA). Empty vector was added to maintain the same amount of DNA in each transfection. At 24 h post transfection, samples were treated with DEX (10 μM). At 48 h post transfection, ChIP was performed. DNA–protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with GR (5 μg) or KLF15 (5 μg) antibodies. Non-specific isotype IgG was used as a negative control. Immunoprecipitated DNA was purified, amplified by PCR, and run on a 2% agarose gel and then stained with ethidium bromide to visualize the PCR products. Primers for PCR are described in Figure 2C. Relative enrichment of DNA in the antibody samples was measured using image lab software (Biorad; Hercules, CA, USA) and presented as a percentage of input (13.3% of total cell lysate). Data represent the means of 3 separate experiments, and error bars indicate the standard error. Asterisks (*) denote a significant difference in DNA amplification of the Sp1 binding site mutants compared to wt samples, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. GR and KLF15 occupy ICP27 enhancer sequences. Neuro-2A (Panel (A)) and Vero cells (Panel (B)) were cultured in MEM containing 2% stripped FBS and transfected with the denoted enhancer constructs (4 μg, Figure 4A). Certain samples were co-transfected with GR (3 μg DNA) and KLF15 (3 μg DNA). Empty vector was added to maintain the same amount of DNA in each transfection. At 24 h post transfection, samples were treated with DEX (10 μM). At 48 h post transfection, ChIP was performed. DNA–protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with GR (5 μg) or KLF15 (5 μg) antibodies. Non-specific isotype IgG was used as a negative control. Immunoprecipitated DNA was purified, amplified by PCR, and run on a 2% agarose gel and then stained with ethidium bromide to visualize the PCR products. Primers for PCR are described in Figure 2C. Relative enrichment of DNA in the antibody samples was measured using image lab software (Biorad; Hercules, CA, USA) and presented as a percentage of input (13.3% of total cell lysate). Data represent the means of 3 separate experiments, and error bars indicate the standard error. Asterisks (*) denote a significant difference in DNA amplification of the Sp1 binding site mutants compared to wt samples, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Viruses 13 02296 g007
Figure 8. GR and KLF15 occupancy of the ICP27 promoter changes during productive infection. Neuro-2A (Panel (A)) or Vero cells (Panel (B)) were infected with HSV-1 (McKrae strain) at an MOI of 1 and then cultured in MEM containing 2% stripped FBS. Certain samples were treated with DEX (10 μM). At the indicated times after infection (0, 4, 8, and 16 hpi), ChIP was performed. The 0 hpi timepoint sample was washed with PBS, crosslinked, and harvested following 1 h incubation. ChIP was performed by immunoprecipitation by GR (5 μg) or KLF15 (5 μg) antibodies and non-specific isotype IgG as a negative control. ICP27 promoter DNA was amplified by PCR using pα27 pro +/− primers (Figure 1C), which generates a 191 nt PCR product. PCR products were quantified using Image Lab software. Enrichment of DNA by GR and KLF15 antibodies is presented as a percentage of the input sample (13.3% of total sample). Data shown are the means of 3 independent experiments, and error bars indicate the standard error. Asterisks (*) identify significant differences in DNA amplification between the specific antibody samples and isotype control, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Figure 8. GR and KLF15 occupancy of the ICP27 promoter changes during productive infection. Neuro-2A (Panel (A)) or Vero cells (Panel (B)) were infected with HSV-1 (McKrae strain) at an MOI of 1 and then cultured in MEM containing 2% stripped FBS. Certain samples were treated with DEX (10 μM). At the indicated times after infection (0, 4, 8, and 16 hpi), ChIP was performed. The 0 hpi timepoint sample was washed with PBS, crosslinked, and harvested following 1 h incubation. ChIP was performed by immunoprecipitation by GR (5 μg) or KLF15 (5 μg) antibodies and non-specific isotype IgG as a negative control. ICP27 promoter DNA was amplified by PCR using pα27 pro +/− primers (Figure 1C), which generates a 191 nt PCR product. PCR products were quantified using Image Lab software. Enrichment of DNA by GR and KLF15 antibodies is presented as a percentage of the input sample (13.3% of total sample). Data shown are the means of 3 independent experiments, and error bars indicate the standard error. Asterisks (*) identify significant differences in DNA amplification between the specific antibody samples and isotype control, as determined by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Viruses 13 02296 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ostler, J.B.; Jones, C. Stress Induced Transcription Factors Transactivate the Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infected Cell Protein 27 (ICP27) Transcriptional Enhancer. Viruses 2021, 13, 2296. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112296

AMA Style

Ostler JB, Jones C. Stress Induced Transcription Factors Transactivate the Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infected Cell Protein 27 (ICP27) Transcriptional Enhancer. Viruses. 2021; 13(11):2296. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ostler, Jeffery B., and Clinton Jones. 2021. "Stress Induced Transcription Factors Transactivate the Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infected Cell Protein 27 (ICP27) Transcriptional Enhancer" Viruses 13, no. 11: 2296. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112296

APA Style

Ostler, J. B., & Jones, C. (2021). Stress Induced Transcription Factors Transactivate the Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infected Cell Protein 27 (ICP27) Transcriptional Enhancer. Viruses, 13(11), 2296. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop