Next Article in Journal
Serological Responses of Raccoons and Striped Skunks to Ontario Rabies Vaccine Bait in West Virginia during 2012–2016
Next Article in Special Issue
ABO Blood Types and COVID-19: Spurious, Anecdotal, or Truly Important Relationships? A Reasoned Review of Available Data
Previous Article in Journal
Targeted Profiling of Immunological Genes during Norovirus Replication in Human Intestinal Enteroids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chlorovirus PBCV-1 Multidomain Protein A111/114R Has Three Glycosyltransferase Functions Involved in the Synthesis of Atypical N-Glycans
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/v13020156
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Influenza A Virus Hemagglutinin and Other Pathogen Glycoprotein Interactions with NK Cell Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30

by
Jasmina M. Luczo
1,2,
Sydney L. Ronzulli
1,3 and
Stephen M. Tompkins
1,2,3,*
1
Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
2
Emory-UGA Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (CEIRS), Athens, GA 30602, USA
3
Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(2), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020156
Submission received: 15 December 2020 / Revised: 10 January 2021 / Accepted: 11 January 2021 / Published: 21 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Glycans in Viral Infection and Immunity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Natural killer (NK) cells are part of the innate immunity repertoire, and function in the recognition and destruction of tumorigenic and pathogen-infected cells. Engagement of NK cell activating receptors can lead to functional activation of NK cells, resulting in lysis of target cells. NK cell activating receptors specific for non-major histocompatibility complex ligands are NKp46, NKp44, NKp30, NKG2D, and CD16 (also known as FcγRIII). The natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs), NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30, have been implicated in functional activation of NK cells following influenza virus infection via binding with influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA). In this review we describe NK cell and influenza A virus biology, and the interactions of influenza A virus HA and other pathogen lectins with NK cell natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs). We review concepts which intersect viral immunology, traditional virology and glycobiology to provide insights into the interactions between influenza virus HA and the NCRs. Furthermore, we provide expert opinion on future directions that would provide insights into currently unanswered questions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Natural killer (NK) cells are considered an ancient cytotoxic immune effector cell involved in the innate immune response. It was about 45 years ago that these cells were characterized for their non-specific cytotoxic abilities [1,2,3]. NK cells develop mainly in the bone marrow from a common lymphoid progenitor [4]. They are large, granular lymphocytes that comprise approximately 15% of lymphocytes in the human circulatory system [5,6,7]. Unlike, B and T lymphocytes that express somatically rearranged receptors that specifically target one antigen antigen [8,9,10], NK cells express germline encoded activating and inhibitory receptors that do not undergo receptor rearrangement [11,12], and function to recognize various ligands expressed on target cells [13,14,15].
NK cells are the frontline of defense in an immune response against many pathogens, including intracellular and extracellular bacteria, protozoa, fungi, and viruses (reviewed in [16,17,18,19]). The critical role for NK cells against viral pathogens is highlighted by a case report of a patient lacking NK cells whom was highly susceptible to herpesvirus infection [20]. Mice lacking a key NK cell activating receptor, natural cytotoxicity receptor (NCR) 1, are highly susceptible to influenza infection [21,22,23]. NK cells can kill transformed or pathogen-infected cells through the secretion of cytokines and chemokines, or by directly lysing the target upon recognition via numerous activating receptors. A delicate balance of signals relayed through activating and inhibitory receptors on NK cells is important to determine the outcome of the interaction; whether target cells will be killed via the release of cytotoxic granules (containing perforin and granzymes), via death receptors that cause direct lysis, or spared [24,25,26].
NK cell activating and inhibitory receptors are grouped into three major superfamilies: (1) the C-type lectin superfamily, which primarily recognizes non-classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-E on transformed or foreign cells, (2) the killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) superfamily, which recognizes classical HLA-A through HLA-C on transformed or foreign cells, and (3) the NCRs that recognize target cells in a HLA-independent manner [27]. The NCR family of activating receptors include NKp46 (also known as NCR1, cluster of differentiation (CD) 335), NKp44 (NCR2, CD336), and NKp30 (NCR3, CD337), and recognize various, sometimes unknown, ligands on transformed, foreign, or pathogen-infected cells.
Viral glycoproteins from multiple virus families have been reported to interact with NCRs, including members of Orthomyxoviridae (influenza A virus (IAV) [21,22,23,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37] and influenza B virus (IBV) [29]), Paramyxoviridae (Sendai virus (SeV) [28,29,38,39], human parainfluenza virus 3 (HPIV3) [37], and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) [40]), Pneumoviridae (human metapneumovirus (HMPV) [41]), Herpesviridae (human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) [42], herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV1) [43] and Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) [44]), Poxviridae (Vaccinia virus (VACV) [45,46], Cowpox virus [45], Camelpox virus [45] and Ectromelia virus (ECTV) [46]), and the Flaviviriviridae family of viruses (Dengue virus (DENV) and West Nile virus (WNV) ) [47]) (Table 1). Moreover, interactions between NCRs and bacterial and parasitic pathogens have been described for Mycobacterium [48,49,50], Plasmodium falciparum [51], Enterococcus faecium [50], and Fusobacterium nucleatum [33] (Table 1). Of these pathogens, the interactions between the IAV hemagglutinin (HA) glycoprotein and human NCRs has been the most extensively studied.
The mechanisms underlying the recognition of IAV by NK cells is under extensive investigation. In this review, we describe NK cell functional biology, NK cell NCR glycobiology, the role of NK cells in influenza disease outcomes, influenza virus biology with a particular focus on HA structure and function, and the interactions of influenza virus HA and NK cell NCRs. We summarize current knowledge regarding the carbohydrate-mediated interactions of influenza virus HA with the NK cell NCRs, currently unanswered questions, and provide discussion as to future directions.

2. NK Cell Functional Biology

NK cells, regardless of phenotype, survey and eliminate aberrant cells that fail to express major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I ligands, a process known as the “missing self” hypothesis [4,11,63]. When NK cells were first described in the 1970s [1,2], it was thought that these cells were not MHC-restricted [11]. However, Ljunggren and Karre reported that NK cells were activated or inhibited depending on MHC I expression on tumor cells [64]. Furthermore, NK cells were demonstrated to have specificity to MHC class I ligands [65,66]. Following this discovery, it was thought that NK cells are inhibited or activated through recognition of MHC class I, a misconception. MHC class I inhibitory receptors may only serve to dampen the response, rather than completely inhibit NK cell function [11].
Many pathogens, particularly viruses, downregulate MHC class I on the surface of infected cells, rendering them targets for NK cell recognition and lysis (reviewed in [67]). While aspects of the activation of NK cells that lead to lysis of target cells are relatively well described, the processes by which NK cells acquire the ability to act on cells that fail to express self MHC are not completely understood. Recent findings suggest that although NK cells do not undergo receptor rearrangement and selection (in contrast to T and B cells), licensing via inhibitory receptors and MHC Class I molecules is required for development into cytotoxic NK cells (reviewed in [68]).
When an NK cell interacts with a target, activating and inhibitory receptors on the NK cell engage cognate receptors on targets cells, and the combination of receptor engagement determines target cell outcomes. When MHC class I is present on the target cell, the NK cell activating and inhibitory receptors engage simultaneously, suppressing NK cell activation and lysis of the target cell (Figure 1A). In the absence of MHC class I, engagement of activating receptors in the absence of MHC class I-dependent inhibitory signals leads to activation of the NK cell and lysis of the target cell (Figure 1B). When the target cell presents both MHC class I and activating ligands, the fate of the target cell is determined by a balance of signals (Figure 1C). This balance is determined by the amount of activating and inhibitory receptors on the NK cells and also the number of ligands expressed by the aberrant cell [69].
NK cells develop from a variety of tissues, including bone marrow (BM), liver, and spleen. While not completely understood, immature NK cells depart the BM and undergo differentiation in secondary lymphoid organs, where the majority of NK cells have a CD56bright phenotype, indicative of potential for further differentiation and/or activation [70]. These NK cells have undergone licensing or education, in the BM or other developmental tissues, whereby inhibitory receptors bind to self-MHC molecules to render them tolerant to self-MHC as well as enabling future recognition of the absence of self-MHC inhibiting receptors. The precise mechanisms are as yet unclear, but it is apparent that it results in variable expression of inhibitory receptors having functional consequences [70]. Furthermore, prior stimulation and engagement of NK cells with MHC class I molecules through their inhibitory receptors allows for a greater response when recognizing abnormal cells, this process is known as NK cell licensing (education) [71]. Although NK cell receptors do not undergo somatic rearrangement, studies suggest that the number and strength of inhibitory receptors engaged with MHC class I calibrates the potential response for cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion [72,73]. Phenotypic characterization of unlicensed NK cells from an MHC class I-deficient environment and mature MHC class I-stimulated NK cells revealed that mature NK cells express a greater number of activating and inhibitory receptors, and exhibit increased functional activity when stimulated with MHC class I [72,74]. The absence of NK receptors for self-MHC or the absence of MHC altogether results in NK cell hypo-responsiveness and tolerance to MHC-deficient cells [4,72]. However, NK cell licensing can be overcome during viral infection, as NK cells need to produce a robust response against virally-infected cells down-regulating MHC class I, for early elimination of pathogens and minimize disease progression [75].

3. NK Cell Phenotypic Subsets

Two distinct phenotypic populations of circulating NK cells have been identified to date. These two populations are based on the cell surface density of CD56 and CD16 (Figure 2). CD56 is an isoform of the human neural-cell adhesion molecule expressed on the surface of human NK cells and the function of CD56 on NK cells in currently unclear [76,77]. In contrast, CD16 is a low affinity FcγRIII found on the cell surface of human NK cells, and acts on antibody coated targets to direct antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) [24]. Although CD56 is not significant for NK cell functionality, certain cell-surface markers have unique functions on CD56dim and CD16bright human NK cell subsets. CD56 expression levels have also been associated with NK cell activation, and rare populations of CD56- NK cells have been associated with disease states [77]. NK cell ontogenesis was recently thoroughly reviewed [70,78], so we will only briefly discuss this topic here.
Approximately 15% of circulating lymphocytes in humans are NK cells [5,6,7]. The CD56bright CD16dim subset comprises about 10% of the NK cells in peripheral blood and spleen, but 75–90% of NK cells in LNs [70,79]. In contrast, the CD56dim CD16bright subset makes up the remaining 90% of circulating and splenic NK cells in humans [24,70,79]. Approximately 10–20% of lymphocytes in the lung are NK cells, with the majority being CD56dim CD16bright [26,70].
All resting NK cells, regardless of subset, express medium affinity IL-2 receptor for IL-2 mediated lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cytolytic activity and proliferation whereas the high affinity IL-2 receptor is expressed on the CD56bright population only [80,81] (Figure 2). Additionally, L-selectin is generally restricted to the CD56bright population [82] whereas CD56dim express PEN5/P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (P5/PSGL-1) [83]. CD107a, a lysosomal membrane protein that is trafficked to the surface of NK cells upon degranulation can be used as a marker for NK cell activation [84,85].
CD56bright CD16dim NK cells are known for their capacity to produce a variety of cytokines following activation, specifically, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), lymphotoxin-alpha (LT-α), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-13 [24,26]. The low expression of CD16 limits Fc-mediated ADCC responses, hence the ability to lyse target cells is functionally low. The CD56bright CD16dim population has low expression of KIRs and NCRs and high expression of the inhibitory receptor CD94- NKG2A [24,83,86]. CD56bright CD16dim NK cells express the high-affinity IL-2 receptor (IL-2R), L-selectin, and multiple chemokine receptors including CCR5, CCR7, and high levels of CXCR3 for recruitment to the site of infection [82,87] (Figure 2A). CD56bright CD16dim NK cells are generally considered immunomodulatory, with the potential to drive pro- or anti-inflammatory immune responses through differential cytokine production. For example, IFN-γ and TNF-α production promote Th1 responses along with macrophage and dendritic cell activation during influenza virus infection. Alternatively, CD56bright CD16dim NK cells can produce IL-10 during chronic viral infections to regulate CD8 T cell responses and mitigate tissue damage [26]. CD56bright NK cells are thought to be activated, produce cytokines, and differentiate into more mature CD56dim NK cells [26,70].
The CD56dim CD16bright population express higher levels of the NCRs, are more granular, and have increased cytotoxic activity compared to CD56bright CD16dim NK cells [24,26]. The high expression of CD16 enables increased ADCC and a greater ability to lyse target cells. This population expresses the intermediate affinity IL-2R, has high expression of the KIRs, and low expression of inhibitory receptors such as the C-type lectin CD94-NKG2A [24,83,86]. CD56dim CD16bright NK cells lack L-selectin but express PEN5/P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (P5/PSGL-1)) [83] (Figure 2B). The biology and function of CD56 NK cell subsets have been limited to in vitro studies using human NK cells as murine NK cells, which are analogous to human NK cells, do not express CD56 and comparable murine subsets have proven difficult to identify [76,88,89].

4. NK Cell Activating Receptors–the Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors

Major NK cell activating receptors include the NCRs, NKG2D, and CD16 (Figure 3A). Other activating receptors include NKG2C-CD94 [90] and the co-activating receptor 2B4 [91]. Human NCRs include NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30, are structurally conserved (Figure 4) and belong to the Ig-superfamily. NKp30 and NKp44 are comprised of one Ig-like domain [92,93], while NKp46 is comprised of two C2-type Ig-like domains [94]. NKp46 and NKp30 are constitutively expressed on resting and activated NK cells [54,92], whereas the expression of NKp44 is induced following IL-2 activation [95]. Murine NK cells do not express NKp44 or NKp30, however, NKp30 is present as a pseudogene in inbred laboratory mice and a soluble form may be expressed in the Ryukyu mouse (Mus carolis) [96]. NCRs are highly expressed on certain populations of NK cells, namely, the CD56dim CD16bright population (Figure 2). Importantly, NCR surface expression levels have been shown to be positively correlated with NK cell cytolytic activity [97,98,99] and NK cell mediated cytolysis of normal and tumor cells can involve synergistic signaling through multiple NCRs, or lysis can be mediated through individual NCRs [92].
The signaling cascade for NK cell activation is similar for most activating receptors. Kinases are recruited through immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activating motifs (ITAMs) for downstream phosphorylation and subsequent activation of NK cells. All three NCRs associate with ITAM-containing molecules via a positively charged amino acid in the transmembrane domain that interacts with a negatively charged amino acid in the transmembrane domain of cognate signaling partner [12,104,105,106]. NKp46 and NKp30 associate with CD3ζ chain homodimers or with CD3ζ/FcRγ heterodimers [92,106], while NKp44 associates with homodimeric intracellular protein, DAP12 [107,108] (Figure 3). Inhibitory receptors recruit phosphatases through immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs to inhibit downstream phosphorylation and activation of NK cells [108].
It has been suggested that engagement of a single NCR can lead to the activation of the other NCRs through cross-talking that leads to amplification of the signaling cascade [109]. In the context of pathogen infections, antibody blockade of both NKp46 and NKp30 results in a synergistic dampening of NK cell cytolytic activity against Plasmodium falciparum-parasitized erythrocytes [51]. It has been reported that HIV-1 infection functionally impairs NK cytolytic activity by way of downregulation of all NCRs [98], this may explain the increased tumor incidence in HIV+ patients.

4.1. NKp46

NKp46 was the first NCR identified and is named based on the 46 kDa band isolated from human NK cells [94]. Functionally, NKp46 engagement leads to NK cell mediated lysis of transformed cells [54,94,97]. Human NKp46 (hNKp46) is known to have a functional ortholog in mice, termed NCR1 [105]. To determine the cellular expression of NKp46, Gazit et al. generated an NCR1gfp/gfp knockout mouse and found that NCR1 (NKp46) expression was restricted to NK cells [21]. All GFP+ cells also expressed DX5+ (a murine NK cell marker), but not CD3 or B220, markers for murine T and B cells [21]. However, it has been shown that NKp46 is expressed on certain T cell populations in mice and human [110,111,112]. NKp46 orthologs have been identified in non-human primates, swine, bovine, and rats [113,114,115,116] (Figure 4A), in addition to other species such as black-flying foxes, horses and seals. To date, NKp46 has not been identified in chickens [117] or ducks, which are important for the maintenance and transmission of (avian) influenza viruses.
NKp46 is considered to be a major NK cell lytic receptor and evidence suggests that these cells are activated against a variety of targets, however the target cell ligands are still largely unknown [103,118]. Surface expressed heparin sulfate proteoglycans have been reported as a NKp46 (and NKp30) ligand ligand [55]. Interestingly, NKp46 can bind to human pancreatic β cells and could lyse β cells via a NKp46-dependant mechanism [119]. More recently, complement factor P (properdin), a glycoprotein found in serum was identified as a ligand for NKp46. While complement factor P is not expressed on the surface of NK cell targets, it may be part of a larger multimeric protein complex found on the surface of target cells [120].
Many viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitic pathogens activate NK cells via NKp46 (Table 1). Vimentin has been identified as the NKp46 ligand on Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB)-infected monocytes [49]. Although evidence for NCR interactions between fungal ligands are scarce, NKp46 has been shown to interact with Candida glabrata Epa1, Epa6, and Epa7 adhesion molecules [62].
Interactions between NCRs and viral pathogens are supported by numerous studies. Of these, influenza A virus hemagglutinin andNKp46 interactions have been extensively studied and will be described in detail below.

4.2. NKp44

NKp44 is expressed on human and non-human primate NK cells [95,114] (Figure 4B) and orthologs have been identified in multiple other species such as pigs, horses, and black flying foxes. To date, NKp44 has not been identified in chickens or ducks. NKp44 is not normally expressed on human resting NK cells, although its expression is induced following IL2 activation [95]. NKp44 has also been reported to be expressed on plasmacytoid dendritic cells [121], and T cells [110,122]. The cellular ligand for NKp44 on neoplastic cells was identified in 2005. Termed NKp44L, it is a truncated isoform of mixed lineage leukemia-5 protein (also known as inactive histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2E) (NCBI accession: NP_891847). NKp44L localizes to the cellular membrane as a result of its unique C-terminal sequence, where it is then able to interact with NKp44 [123]. Subsequently, proliferating cell nuclear antigen has also been identified as a cellular ligand of NKp44 [124].
U2 cells chronically infected with human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) induce expression of NKp44L [56], which is likely to mediate increased recognition by NK cells for clearance of HIV infected cells. Expression of the cellular ligand was blocked by anti-gp41 polyclonal sera, suggesting that gp41 influences NKp44L expression, or may itself interact with NKp44. In contrast, Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) has been shown to downregulate NKp44L expression in vitro [44], a possible mechanism to evade NK cell recognition. NKp44L is pivotal for recognition of tumorigenic or transformed cells as it is expressed on aberrant cells and absent from normal tissues [123].

4.3. NKp30

To date, NKp30 expression has been identified on humans and non-human primate NK cells [92,125] (Figure 4C) and orthologs have been identified in other species such as pigs, horses, and black flying foxes. Similar to NKp44, NKp30 has not been identified in chickens or ducks. Along with NKp46, NKp30 is constitutively expressed on all resting and activated NK cells [92] and has also been identified on some T cell subsets [126,127,128]. Although NKp30 is a pseudogene in most mouse strains, it is functional in the Ryukyu mouse, Mus caroli [96]. NKp30 can synergize with the other NCRs in lysing tumor-bearing cells [92]. NKp30 may also play an immunomodulatory role. Dendritic cells can activate NK cells through NKp30 signaling signaling [129], and NK and dendritic cell interactions though NKp30 signaling can modulate dendritic cell maturation [130], or lysis. DC lysis is particularly potent when NKp30 and NKp46 signaling synergizes [131].
Several cellular ligands have been identified for NKp30, including heparin sulfate proteoglycans [55], B7-H6 [132] and the nuclear human leukocyte antigen-B-associated transcript 3 [133]. NKp30 has been shown to interact with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) pp65 protein, reducing cytolytic activity via CD3 zeta chain dissociation, potentially reducing NK cell lysis of immature dendritic cells, a reservoir for latent HCMV [42].
A growing body of evidence highlights NCRs contribution to defense against other pathogens, in addition to transformed cells, and this is currently still a subject of intense investigation. As described earlier, there has been extensive research investigating the interactions of NK cell NCRs with various pathogens. The commonality with most pathogens is that the protein interacting with NCR is a lectin. Of these pathogens, influenza virus has been shown to interact extensively with NCRs NKp46 and NKp44, but not NKp30 [21,22,28,29,30,39,58]. In particular, the surface glycoprotein of IAV, HA, which is a lectin and functions to bind sialylated glycan receptors on the surface of the host cell membrane, has been shown to interact with NK cell NCRs. To provide further insights into NCR and IAV HA interactions, it is necessary to understand NCR glycobiology and IAV HA functional biology.

5. Glycobiology of Human NK Cell NCRs

To characterize the sialylated glycobiology of human CD56+ CD3- NK cells, Owen et al. stained human NK cells with lectins that are specific for either α2,3-linked sialic acids (Maackia amurensis), or α2,6-linked sialic acids (Sambucus nigra), and found that both α2,3- and α2,6-receptor linkages are present on human NK cells. Moreover, basal levels of α2,3-linked sialic acids on human NK cells was higher [57]. The presence of surface expressed sialylated glycans would facilitate the interaction of viral lectins with NK cells. The glycostatus of the NK cell NCRs has been characterized predominately by in silico methods and are described in detail below.

5.1. NKp46

Contemporary in silico prediction of hNKp46 occupied O- and N-linked glycosylation sites reveals that hNKp46 (NCBI: CAA04714 (isoform a)) is predicted to contain four occupied O-linked glycosites (serine (Ser) 218, threonine (Thr) Thr230, Ser288, Ser291) and no occupied N-linked glycosites [101,102]. Of the four predicted O-linked glycosites in hNKp46, only Ser218 and Thr230 are extracellular, and both potential glycosites are located on the stalk domain (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Contemporary algorithms predict NCR1 (NP_034876) to have one occupied N-linked glycosite (Asparagine (Asn) 139), and three O-linked glycosites occupied (Ser217, Ser218, Ser227) [101,102], whereas previously it was reported to possess N-linked glycosites only (Asn139, Asn216 and Asn238) [105]. As per hNKp46, all O-linked glycosites in NCR1 are located within the stalk domain, whereas the N-linked glycosite is located in the membrane proximal Ig domain II (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
When NKp46 (isoform a) was first cloned in 1998 (NCBI: nucleotide: AJ001383; protein: CAA04714), it was predicted to contain one N-linked and two O-linked glycosylation sites [94]. At this time, Thr125, Thr225, and Asn216 glycosites were predicted to be occupied. However, as described above, contemporary algorithms do not predict that these specific sites harbor glycans. Thr225 was initially predicted to be occupied (with research focused on this residue)-contemporary algorithms now predict Thr230, rather than Thr225, to be glycosylated. However, it is best to exercise caution when interpreting specific O-linked glycosites-rather than focusing on the specific amino acid, it is suggested that the local protein region is likely to harbor an O-linked modification [102]. Robust experimental analysis of glycosites is needed to confirm computationally predicted glycostatus of NKp46.
Initial biochemical analysis of hNKp46 by Sivori et al. [54] suggested that hNKp46 does not contain occupied N-linked glycosites (in concordance with contemporary computational predictions), although it does contain occupied O-linked glycosites. The absence of N-linked glycosites on hNKp46 was confirmed biochemically by Vitale et al. [95]. Subsequently Pessino et al. [94] reported conflicting results, suggesting that hNKp46 is N-linked glycosylated. However, this study combined PNGase F treatment, which is specific for N-linked oligosaccharides, with additional glycan hydrolyzing enzymes that target both N- and O-linked glycans, weakening the conclusions [94]. HPLC analysis of O-linked glycans present on COS-7-expressed hNKp46, revealed that NKp46 contains both α2-3- and α2,6-linked sialic acids, present on both linear and branched O-linked glycans [31].

5.2. NKp44

Computational prediction of occupied O- and N-linked glycosylation sites in hNKp44 (NCBI: NP_004819) reveals one N-linked glycosite (Asn180), and extensive O-linked glycosylation, with 18 potential glycosites predicted (Ser130, Ser133, Thr136, Thr138, Ser139, Thr141, Ser147-148, Thr150, Thr152, Ser154, Thr159, Ser168, Ser170, Thr171, Ser176, Ser181, and Thr182) [101,102]. The potential N-linked glycosite is located extracellularly, close to the transmembrane domain. All predicted O-linked glycosites are located extracellularly–Ser130 is specifically located within the Ig-domain (Figure 4).
When hNkp44 was first cloned in 1998, biochemical analysis of rhNKp44 suggested that it was indeed N-glycosylated [95], however, the authors concluded that hNKp44 did not harbor O-linked glycosites (although the biochemical data pertaining to O-linked deglycosylation was not shown). Subsequent computational analysis of hNKp44 by Cantoni et al. [93,134] suggested that hNKp44 (NCBI: CAB39168) contained one N-linked glycosite (Asn180), and 13 O-linked glycosites and were all predicted to occur extracellularly.

5.3. NKp30

In contrast to the extensively glycosylated hNKp44, and to some degree, hNKp46, hNKp30 is less extensively glycosylated. Initial computational characterization of hNKp30 (NCBI: CAB54004) identified two N-linked glycosites (Asn42 and Asn121) and no O-linked glycosites were identified [92]. Reanalysis of the glycostatus of hNKp30 (NCBI: CAB54004) using contemporary algorithms suggests the presence of only one N-linked glycosite (Asn121), and no O-linked glycosites [101,102]. Computational prediction of occupied O- and N-linked glycosylation sites in humanNKp30 (NCBI: NP_667341) reveals only one N-linked glycosite (Asn121) and one O-linked glycosite (Thr168) [101,102]. The predicted N-linked glycosite is located within the Ig-domain, whereas the predicted O-linked glycosite is located within the intracellular domain (Figure 4). Collectively, this information suggests that hNKp30 generally harbors one predicted N-linked glycosite, present in the Ig-domain, and no extracellular O-linked glycosites.
As described above, the exact number and type of sialyated glycans on the human and murine NCRs remains unclear. An in-depth analysis of NCR glycans is needed to clarify whether predicted glycosites are indeed occupied, and of biological relevance. MALDI mass spectrometry analysis of wild-type and mutated hNKp46, including the various isoforms, would provide robust insight as to the number of occupied glycosites, in addition to structure and branching of glycans present on NKp46. Although computational predictions of occupied NCR glycosites have merit, verification with experimental data is ultimately needed to clarify whether predicted NCR glycosites are occupied or not. This information would be useful in determining mechanisms that facilitate interactions with viral lectins.

6. Role of NK Cells in Influenza Infection

Influenza A viruses continue to threaten the human population by way of seasonal epidemics and sporadic pandemics. Seasonal epidemics of influenza A viruses cause approximately 3–5 million cases of severe illness and 290,000–560,000 deaths annually [135]. NK cells are recruited during the early phase of influenza infection, with the peak of NK cell activation and recruitment to the lung occurring ~5–6 days post influenza infection [136,137]. Recruitment of NK cells to the sites of infection is mediated by several chemokines including CCL3 (macrophage inflammatory protein 1α), CCL4 (macrophage inflammatory protein 1β), and CXCL10 (IFN-γ-inducible protein 10) [138]. Specifically, recruitment of NK cells to influenza infected lungs is dependent on CXCR3 chemokine receptor expression, and CCR5 chemokine receptor expression is required for localization of NK cells to influenza infected epithelial cells [136]. Following recruitment and activation, NK cells secrete a variety of cytokines and cytotoxic granules (Figure 2). Tissue resident NK cells initially described as unresponsive can be activated by influenza infection, but additional studies are needed to define stimulatory factors and functional potential or these resident NK cells [26,139,140]. Upon recruitment to the lung, both CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells have been shown to be activated and produce INF-γ, perforin and granzymes, although CD56bright had greater proliferative marker expression while CD56dim cells expressed greater perforin suggesting greater effector function [139,140]. However, whether these are resident or infiltrating NK cells is unclear [26]. IFN-γ production by NK cells enhances the cytotoxic activity of NK and infiltrating CD8+ T cells and may be contribute to resolution of influenza infection or pathology [26]. Additional studies are needed to clarify the impact of the NK cell cytokine response during influenza infection. Elimination of influenza infected cells by activated NK cells is mediated by the cytotoxic granules, perforin and granzymes. Perforin generates pores in the target cell membrane and granzymes triggers a signaling cascade that leads to apoptosis. Alternatively, death receptor-mediated cytotoxicity of influenza infected cells can be mediated by Fas ligand or TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand mechanisms (reviewed in [141]).
Numerous studies investigating the role of NK cells in influenza pathogenesis suggested that NK cells are protective. Depletion of (Asialo GM-1+) NK cells was associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the murine model [142], and influenza infection of NCR1 knockout mice was lethal [21]. However, other studies have reported contrasting results where depletion of Asialo GM-1+ or NK1.1+ NK cells was shown to be protective following influenza infection and was associated with decreased lung pathology [143,144]. In the murine model, NK cell depletion had no effect on lung virus titers [143,145] suggesting that NK cells have a pathological role in influenza infection. Further, NK cell depletion also impaired influenza-specific NP366–374 CD8+ T cell responses [145]. Most of these reports assessed outcomes in C57BL/6 mice using A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) as the challenge virus. However, this strain is extensively lab-adapted with different variants having dramatically different lethal doses. In fact, different stocks of the same virus can have distinct phenotypes in vivo, depending on the infectious particle to non-infectious (defective-interfering (DI)) particle ratio [146]. It is possible that the A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 variants may differentially activate or infect NK cells or differentially activate type I and/or type III interferons, altering the subsequent inflammatory environment in the lung. Specific studies using a defined influenza virus strains or A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 variants would address these possibilities.
Work from Zhou et al. may also explain some of the differences seen across the various studies. The impact of NK cell depletion on outcome of infection was assessed using a range of inoculum doses. Antibody depletion of NK1.1+ NK cells improved survival rate with a high-dose infection, while NK cell depletion resulted in reduced survival with a medium inoculum dose, and there was no difference in survival between control and NK cell-depleted mice infected with a low inoculum dose [147]. The data suggest that disease severity may alter the impact of NK cells on outcomes of infection. Whether virus virulence has a similar effect as virus dose remains to be tested. Finally, age of the mice during infection has also been suggested as a variable across studies with increasing frequencies of NK cells in the lung as mice age [144].
Influenza viruses predominately infect mucosal epithelial cells of the respiratory tract, however IAV can also infect human NK cells in vitro and induce NK cell apoptosis, which would counteract their function during the early immune response [148]. This result has been subsequently confirmed in vivo [149]. Importantly, the ability of different IAVs to activate NK cells varies. Highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus and 1918 pandemic influenza virus pseudotyped particles were able to more robustly activate NK cells than pdmH1N1 pseudotyped particles [32]. While the mechanisms of differential activation are unclear, the variable stimulation of NK cells may contribute to altered IAV infection outcomes in vivo.

7. Functional Biology of Influenza a Virus Hemagglutinin

Two influenza A surface glycoproteins, HA and neuraminidase (NA), have been shown to interact with NK cell NCRs, and these surface glycoproteins are critical to the life cycle of influenza A and B viruses. To understand mechanisms driving these interactions, it is necessary to understand the functional biology of these glycoproteins. Influenza (A and B) virus host cell binding and fusion is mediated by [150,151] and NA is crucial for progeny virus release from infected cells [152,153]. The HA glycoprotein is a lectin (carbohydrate binding protein), and is present on the surface of the virion as a trimer of protomers [154] (Figure 5A). Each HA protomer is composed of two structural domains, (1) the membrane-proximal stem domain, which upon cleavage by host cell serine proteases, liberates the fusogenic peptide, and (2) the membrane-distal globular head, which contains the receptor binding site (RBS) [155] (Figure 5B).
The IAV HA glycoprotein binds to sialic acid receptors on surface of the host cell membrane [160]. Upon HA binding to sialic acid receptors, the virion is internalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis and exposure to the low pH in the endosome induces an irreversible conformational change of the cleaved HA glycoprotein [161,162], resulting in the fusion domain being inserted into the host cell membrane and subsequent fusion of viral and host membranes [161,163,164]. Following virus replication, packaging, and virus assembly at the host cell membrane, the NA glycoprotein cleaves sialic acid receptors bound by newly formed virions, enabling the release of progeny virions from the infected cell.
As described above, NK cell NCR interactions with invading pathogens seem to be mediated by interactions with viral lectins, the primary function of which is to bind host cell receptors. The RBS of influenza A HA, located on the distal globular head domain, contains conserved secondary structure features that interact with sialic acid receptor moieties; namely, the 130-loop, the 220-loop, and the 190-helix [165] (Figure 5B). Host cell receptors are bound within the RBS by hydrophobic interactions, in addition to hydrogen bonding with the 130- and 220-loops, and conserved amino acids located at base of the RBS: Y98, W153, H183, and Y195 (H3 numbering used throughout) ) [151,165,166]. Site directed mutagenesis of these conserved amino acid residues (Y98F, H183F, and L194A) almost completely abolishes receptor binding [167].
The host range of influenza virus is determined by several factors, a major determinant being the expression pattern and configuration of sialic acid receptors on host tissues [168,169]. There are two major types of influenza A virus receptors, based on the linkage of the sialic acid moiety to the penultimate galactose within carbohydrate side chains [151] human influenza viruses have an almost exclusive preference for α2,6-linked sialic acids, whereas avian influenza viruses preferentially bind α2,3-linked sialic acids [170]. However, there are exceptions to this rule, human influenza viruses isolated early in the 20th century such as A/London/1/1918 (pdmH1N1) [171] and A/New York/1/1918 (pdmH1N1) [172] (although not all 1918 pandemic isolates possess dual receptor specificity), A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) [170,173,174], A/Fort Leonard Wood/1/1952 (H1N1) [174], and A/Roma/1/1949 (H1N1) [174] exhibit dual receptor specificity. The recent H7N9 influenza viruses also exhibit dual receptor specificity, mediated by residues G186V and Q226L on the H7 HA [175]. Structural analyses of influenza receptor specificity have revealed that human influenza viruses with α2,6 sialic acid specificity exhibit interactions beyond the RBD, with HA residues D190 and D225 contributing to favorable receptor interactions. In contrast, avian HA receptor binding (α2,3 sialic acid specific) is mediated primarily by the sialic acid moiety, with no detectable interactions beyond the RBD contributing to glycan interactions [173].

8. Influenza Haemagglutinin Interactions with NK Cell NCRS

The ability of the influenza haemagglutinin glycoprotein to interact with, and functionally activate, NK cells have been well documented since the 1980s. Initial studies reported the functional activation of NK cells by IAV HA glycoprotein [52,53]. These studies demonstrated that NK cell cytolytic activity was blocked by pre-treatment of virus with anti-HA antisera [53], or by pretreatment of NK cells with either whole virus, or purified HA glycoprotein [52].

8.1. Inlfuenza A Virus HA Interaction with NKp46

The first study describing the interaction of IAV and NK cell NKp46 was in 1998 by Mandelboim et al. [28]. In this maiden study, the authors cloned the extracellular domain of hNKp46 isoform b (NCBI: AJ006121) and fused it will the Fc domain of human IgG1. It is unclear whether the conserved glycosylation sites present in the IgG1 Fc domain [176,177] remained intact or were mutated. The hNKp46-Ig fusion protein recognized SeV- and IAV-infected cells, and this interaction was abrogated by anti-SeV hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) or anti-IAV HA mAb blockade, respectively. NKp46-Ig binding to SeV HN-transfected cells recapitulated results using virally infected cells and suggests that the SeV HN glycoprotein is mediating the interaction with hNKp46-Ig. Additionally, Mandelboim et al. reported that hNKp46-Ig blocked IAV-mediated agglutination of sheep erythrocytes (data was not shown)-sheep erythrocytes almost exclusively express α2,3-linked sialic acids [178], suggesting that 2,3-linked sialic acids play a role in IAV and NKp46 interactions. Virally-infected cells (IAV or SeV) or SeV HN transfected cells also induced NK cell effector functions, which was abrogated by anti-NKp46 antisera, anti-HN (SeV) or anti-HA (IAV) antibody blockade. Pretreatment of NKp46-Ig with purified IAV HA abrogated binding to IAV-infected cells. Finally, inhibition of IAV NA activity enhanced binding of NKp46-Ig to IAV-infected cells and NA-treatment of NKp46-Ig reduced NKp46-Ig binding to IAV-infected cells–these results suggest that the interaction is sialic acid-dependent and is mediated by influenza virus HA.

8.2. Inlfuenza A Virus HA Interaction with NKp44 and NKp30

Building upon this initial study, Arnon et al. demonstrated that IAV and SeV infected cells, in addition to SeV HN transfected cells, interact with hNKp44-Ig, but not hNKp30-Ig [39]. This interaction was also abrogated by anti-HA (IAV) or anti-HN (SeV) antibody blockade, or pretreatment with purified HA (IAV). Anti-NA antibody blockade increased IAV interactions with NCRs [39], confirming results previously reported by Mandelboim et al. [28]. IAV-infected cells more readily engage with hNKp44-Ig than hNKp46-Ig [29]. This observation aligns with the predicted glycostatus of the NCRs–hNKp44 is more heavily glycosylated than hNKp46 and is likely to have increased binding opportunities simply due to number of glycosites present.

8.3. Identification of NCR Domain that Engages with Influenza A Virus HA

Human NKp46 isoforms a and b possess two Ig domains, Ig-like domain I and Ig domain II (domain II is not present in isoforms c or d) (Figure 4A). To elucidate the domain interacting with IAV HA and SeV HN glycoproteins, Arnon et al. [29] generated two truncated hNKp46-Ig fusion proteins: (1) hNKp46D1-Ig fusion protein encoding amino acids 1–100 (NCBI: AJ006121), and (2) the hNKp46D2-Ig truncated fusion protein encoded the 24 amino acid signal peptide of CD5, followed by residues 101–235 of hNKp46 (NCBI: AJ006121). Specifically, hNKp46D1-Ig encoded Ig domain I, whereas hNKp46D2-Ig encoded Ig-domain II and the stalk domains. hNKp46D2-Ig is predicted to contain O-linked glycosites, whereas hNKp46D1-Ig does not contain any predicted glycosites. Using these tools, the proximal Ig-like and stem domains of NKP46 were shown to interact with IAV HA [29]. It has also been shown that Plasmodium falciparum interacts with the proximal Ig-like domain of NKp46 [51]. NKp30 and NKp44 have three and six isoforms, respectively, however NKp44 splice variants have not been shown to have altered lectin binding [179]. While single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been reported for all three NCRs [180], there is no data suggesting potential SNPs alter NCR interactions with HA or other pathogen glycoproteins.

8.4. Sialylated Glycans Are Required for Influenza A Virus HA to Interact with NCRs

O-linked glycosylation sites are present in the membrane proximal stem domain of hNKp46D2-Ig and desialylation abolished interactions with IAV or SeV infected cells further suggesting that the NKp46 interaction with pathogen lectins is a sialic acid-dependent event. To provide insights to the receptor linkage mediating the interaction (α2,6 vs. α2,3), truncated fusion proteins were produced in CHO cells, rather than COS-7 cells, resulting in the production of fusion proteins with α2,3-linked sialylation only (CHO cells lack functional α2,6-sialyltransferase [181]). This abolished the interaction of human influenza viruses with hNKp46-Ig. However, a major caveat is that all IAVs tested exhibit a strict preference for α2,6-linked sialic acids. Further, Mandelboim et al. had previously reported that hNKp46-Ig blocked binding of IAV (A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)) to sheep erythrocytes [28]. Sheep erythrocytes almost exclusively express α2,3-linked sialic acids [178], which suggests that α2,3-linked sialic acids do contribute to IAV HA and hNKp46-Ig interactions.
To determine the glycosite(s) that were mediating the interaction of IAV with hNKp46-Ig, Arnon et al. [29] mutated the three predicted hNKp46 glycosites: T125A, N216A, and T225A/N (current algorithms predict four O-linked and no N-linked glycosites). Mutation of T225/N O-linked glycosite diminished NKp46-Ig binding to IAV-infected cells (of note, the cell line used was LCL 721.221 cells (ATCC CRL-1855) and are not typically used in the influenza field, it would be of interest to repeat this using MDCK cells). Thr225 is located in the stalk domain, and is conserved in all species investigated, with the exception of rNKp46, which contains valine at this position [113,182] (Figure 4). Mutation of Thr125 or Asn216 generally had minimal effect on binding, although Asn216 exhibited some strain dependent variation–this aligns with the contemporary in silico predictions that these particular sites are likely not glycosylated. Additional studies by Achdout et al. [58] confirm that Thr225 is likely involved, Thr125 has little influence on binding, and that Asn216 may play a role.
In a follow up study characterizing IAV HA interactions with murine NCRs, Glasner et al. [22] reported that N-linked glycosylation is crucial for HA and (mouse) NCR1-Ig interactions. NA or PNGase F treatment of NCR1-Ig abolished interactions with IAV ‘coated’ cells, and O-glycanase cocktail treatment had little effect. NA treatment of NCR1-Ig reduced binding to influenza (A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)) infected MDCK cells, although this reduction was minimal. An N139A NCR1-Ig mutant demonstrated marginally reduced binding to MDCK-infected cells, however a triple mutant (N139A N216A N238) did not reduce binding. Collectively, Glasner et al. concluded that although N-linked glycosylation was crucial for IAV HA interaction with NCR1, the three N-linked glycosites in NCR1-Ig (N139, N216, N238) were not crucial and that other N-linked glycosites must contribute.
In a follow up study, Glasner investigated the role of O-linked glycosylation on IAV HA and NCR1-Ig binding [35]. Confirming previous results, a triple N-glycosylation NCR1-Ig mutant did not reduce binding, although in this study they concluded that N-linked glycosylation was not a requirement. Following mutagenesis of the predicted O-linked residues Thr222 and Thr225, reduction in binding was observed. As per hNKp46, NCR1 Thr225 was identified to be critical to IAV and NCR1 interactions [35], highlighting this sialylated O-linked glycosite as an important contributor to IAV HA and NCR1 interactions.

8.5. Neuraminidase Treatment of NCRs Abrogates HA Binding

Several studies have demonstrated that sialidase/NA treatment of the NKp46/NKp44, to remove terminal sialic acid moieties, reduces binding [23,28,29,34,36,40,46,61], highlighting that the sialic acid is predominant factor facilitating interactions. In contrast, inhibition of NA enzymatic activity by the anti-NA drug, oseltamivir carboxylate, results in increased recognition of NKp46-Ig by IAV HA [23,34,36] and NDV HN [40].

8.6. Sialic Acid Linkage and NCR Recognition

However, despite providing evidence that the interaction is indeed a sialic acid-dependent event, characterization of IAV HA with α2,6- vs. α2,3 binding preferences to NK cell NCRs remains understudied. Numerous studies have described the interaction of NK cell NCRs with human pandemic influenza viruses, human seasonal influenza viruses, and swine influenza viruses. Some studies have investigated avian influenza virus interaction with NCRs, although there remains a paucity of data (Table 1). The influenza A virus that has been most extensively studied is the human-origin, highly lab-adapted isolate, A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) (Table 1). This virus has been shown to exhibit dual receptor specificity in some instances [173] and two different stocks of this virus has even been reported to exhibit opposite binding preferences [183]. Hence, the use of A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) may complicate conclusions. Rather than selecting isolates according to seasonal or pandemic classification, selection of viruses based on their receptor specificity will provide further insight into mechanisms driving NCR and IAV HA interactions.
One such question pertains to interactions of avian influenza viruses with the NCRs. Avian influenza viruses are classified as one of two pathotypes, based on their pathogenicity characteristics in chickens. Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) cause severe disease and high mortality rates and low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses cause no to mild disease and low mortality rates [184,185,186]. Despite the stark contrast in disease manifestation, the receptor binding preferences of both pathotypes are the same. Thus, binding analyses utilizing both pathotypes should lead to the same binding outcomes. Several studies have investigated avian influenza virus interactions with the NCRs. Two studies utilized the low pathogenicity A/VNH5N1-PR8/CDC-rg vaccine strain (modified to represent a low pathogenicity virus with a monobasic cleavage site motif) [30,58], one used H5N1 HPAIV virus-like particles (VLPs) [32], and another used cells transfected with H5N1 HPAIV HA [30]. H5N1 HPAIV HA was shown to interact with hNKp44, and elicit NK cell degranulation and IFN-γ production [30]. Induction of NK cell degranulation and IFN-γ production by H5N1 HPAIV was subsequently confirmed when HPAIV VLPs were used [32]. However, this NK cell activation was not recapitulated when hNKp46 was investigated [58]. It was demonstrated that hNKp46-Ig interacted with both A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) and A/VNH5N1-PR8/CDC-rg-infected cells (suggesting a role for α2,3-linked sialic acids), although, the A/VNH5N1-PR8/CDC-rg vaccine strain did not induce NK cell cytolytic activity. While both HPAIV and low pathogenicity isolates were capable of interacting with NCRs, the functional activation outcomes of NK cells differed. Thus, there is conflicting data on the impact of HA ligand specificity on NCR ligation and NK cell activation.

9. Concluding Remarks

Experimental approaches used to elucidate IAV HA and NCR interactions include staining of virally-infected cells with the NCR fusions proteins, staining of HA transfected cells with the NCR fusion proteins, ELISA using recombinant proteins, and antibody blockade of HA and NCR interactions. However, there is a need to delineate whether binding is mediated by a pathogen protein, or a pathogen-induced cellular factor [40]. Supporting evidence for NCR interactions with viral glycoproteins on IAV-, SeV-, or NDV-infected cells arise from anti-HA or anti-HN antibody blockade. The evidence for other pathogens is not so clear. For example, it has been reported that NK cells NCRs interact with TB [48,50], VACV [45], HSV1 [43], malaria [51], HMPV [41], and WNV [47], and that this interaction is abrogated following an anti-NCR antibody blockade. hNKp46 was found interact with a ligand present on HMPV-infected cells, however binding studies of human and mouse NCR1 revealed that the interaction was not mediated by HMNV proteins [41]. Furthermore, TB-infected monocytes were demonstrated to interact with NKp46-Ig, however it was determined that NKp46-Ig was interacting with a cellular ligand (vimentin), rather than a pathogen derived ligand [49]. Inclusion of pull-down experiments, in addition to mass spectrometry, as employed by Arnon et al. [42] and Garg et al. [49] will directly address whether NCR interactions are with a pathogen-derived protein, or a cellular factor that has been induced as a result of infection.
Whilst there has been considerable progress in elucidating the mechanisms of IAV HA and NCR interactions, some questions remain unanswered. The incredible complexity of potential glycan receptors calls for a robust analysis of the glycan structures and sialic acids present on the natural cytotoxicity receptors. An in-depth glycan analysis by mass spectrometry and/or liquid chromatography may provide insight as to why HA is able to bind NKp46 and NKp44, though not NKp30 nor CD99. Is this due to variation in glycan architecture present on each of these proteins? This example highlights the need to clarify the glycobiology of the NCRs, which would shed light on the intricacies of IAV and NCR interactions, and that further analyses into glycan structures mediating this interaction are necessary. Robust binding assays, such as solid-phase binding assays or biolayer interferometry, will serve to confirm protein:protein or protein:carbohydrate interactions (and their affinity), and eliminate any uncertainty posed by assays utilizing virally-infected or ‘coated’ cells.
Moreover, inclusion of avian and human IAVs with defined sialic acid binding properties would help to clarify whether IAV HA interactions with NCRs are sialic acid linkage specific. Comparisons of IAV and NK cell NCR interactions using a panel of influenza viruses with defined binding specificities (α-2,3 and α-2,6), hosts (avian, swine and human) and pathotypes (HPAIV and LPAIV) would be of immense interest. Importantly, inclusion of reverse genetics generated influenza virus receptor binding mutants (such as Y98F, H183F, and L194A mutants, described above), in robust binding assays will provide compelling evidence that interactions are mediated by HA binding to sialic acid receptors. Finally, a crystal structure of HA in complex with NKp46 would confirm the nature of IAV HA and NK cell NCR interactions. Ultimately, cross-disciplinary research encompassing immunology, virology, structural biology, and biochemistry will help to clarify mechanisms of influenza a virus HA and NK cell NCR interactions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.L. and S.M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M.L. and S.L.R.; writing—review and editing, J.M.L., S.M.T. and S.L.R.; supervision, S.M.T.; project administration, S.M.T.; funding acquisition, S.M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Emory-University of Georgia Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance contract HHSN272201400004C (J.M.L. and S.M.T.), Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance Training Program HHSN272201400008C (J.M.L.) and National Institutes of Health R01AI130065 (S.L.R. and S.M.T.). The funders had no role in conceptualization, synthesis, or decision to submit this work for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Greenberg, A.H.; Hudson, L.; Shen, L.; Roitt, I.M. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity due to a “null” lymphoid cell. Nat. New Biol. 1973, 242, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Harding, B.; Pudifin, D.J.; Gotch, F.; Maclennan, I.C.M. Cytotoxic lymphocytes from rats depleted of thymus processed cells. Nat. New Biol. 1971, 232, 80–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Van Boxel, J.A.; Stobo, J.D.; Paul, W.E.; Green, I. Antibody-dependent lymphoid cell-mediated cytotoxicity: No requirement for thymus-derived lymphocytes. Science 1972, 175, 194–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shifrin, N.; Raulet, D.H.; Ardolino, M. NK cell self tolerance, responsiveness and missing self recognition. Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Vivier, E. What is natural in natural killer cells? Immunol. Lett. 2006, 107, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cheent, K.; Khakoo, S.I. Natural killer cells: Integrating diversity with function. Immunology 2009, 126, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vivier, E.; Tomasello, E.; Baratin, M.; Walzer, T.; Ugolini, S. Functions of natural killer cells. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maeda, K.; Nakanishi, N.; Rogers, B.L.; Haser, W.G.; Shitara, K.; Yoshida, H.; Takagaki, Y.; Augustin, A.A.; Tonegawa, S. Expression of the T-cell receptor gamma-chain gene products on the surface of peripheral T cells and T-cell blasts generated by allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 6536–6540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Sakano, H.; Kurosawa, Y.; Weigert, M.; Tonegawa, S. Identification and nucleotide sequence of a diversity DNA segment (D) of immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes. Nature 1981, 290, 562–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hozumi, N.; Tonegawa, S. Evidence for somatic rearrangement of immunoglobulin genes coding for variable and constant regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1976, 73, 3628–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lanier, L.L. NK cell recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 23, 225–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Biassoni, R.; Cantoni, C.; Pende, D.; Sivori, S.; Parolini, S.; Vitale, M.; Bottino, C.; Moretta, A. Human natural killer cell receptors and co-receptors. Immunol. Rev. 2001, 181, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Glas, R.; Franksson, L.; Une, C.; Eloranta, M.-L.; Öhlén, C.; Örn, A.; Kärre, K. Recruitment and activation of natural killer (NK) cells in vivo determined by the target cell phenotype: An adaptive component of NK cell–mediated responses. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 191, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Spits, H.; Blom, B.; Jaleco, A.-C.; Weijer, K.; Verschuren, M.C.M.; Dongen, J.J.M.; Heemskerk, M.H.M.; Res, P.C.M. Early stages in the development of human T, natural killer and thymic dendritic cells. Immunol. Rev. 1998, 165, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Herberman, R.B.; Nunn, M.E.; Lavrin, D.H. Natural cytotoxic reactivity of mouse lymphoid cells against syngeneic and allogeneic tumors. I. Distribution of reactivity and specificity. Int. J. Cancer 1975, 16, 216–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Horowitz, A.; Stegmann, K.; Riley, E. Activation of Natural Killer cells during microbial infections. Front. Immunol. 2012, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Korbel, D.S.; Finney, O.C.; Riley, E.M. Natural killer cells and innate immunity to protozoan pathogens. Int. J. Parasitol. 2004, 34, 1517–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lodoen, M.B.; Lanier, L.L. Natural killer cells as an initial defense against pathogens. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2006, 18, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schmidt, S.; Tramsen, L.; Lehrnbecher, T. Natural killer cells in antifungal immunity. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Biron, C.A.; Byron, K.S.; Sullivan, J.L. Severe herpesvirus infections in an adolescent without natural killer cells. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989, 320, 1731–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gazit, R.; Gruda, R.; Elboim, M.; Arnon, T.I.; Katz, G.; Achdout, H.; Hanna, J.; Qimron, U.; Landau, G.; Greenbaum, E.; et al. Lethal influenza infection in the absence of the natural killer cell receptor gene NCR1. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Glasner, A.; Zurunic, A.; Meningher, T.; Lenac Rovis, T.; Tsukerman, P.; Bar-On, Y.; Yamin, R.; Meyers, A.F.A.; Mandeboim, M.; Jonjic, S.; et al. Elucidating the mechanisms of influenza virus recognition by NCR1. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bar-On, Y.; Glasner, A.; Meningher, T.; Achdout, H.; Gur, C.; Lankry, D.; Vitenshtein, A.; Meyers, A.F.; Mandelboim, M.; Mandelboim, O. Neuraminidase-mediated, NKp46-dependent immune-evasion mechanism of influenza viruses. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cooper, M.A.; Fehniger, T.A.; Caligiuri, M.A. The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends Immunol. 2001, 22, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Della Chiesa, M.; Marcenaro, E.; Sivori, S.; Carlomagno, S.; Pesce, S.; Moretta, A. Human NK cell response to pathogens. Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frank, K.; Paust, S. Dynamic Natural Killer Cell and T Cell Responses to Influenza Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Joyce, M.G.; Sun, P.D. The structural basis of ligand recognition by natural killer cell receptors. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 2011, 203628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mandelboim, O.; Lieberman, N.; Lev, M.; Paul, L.; Arnon, T.I.; Bushkin, Y.; Davis, D.M.; Strominger, J.L.; Yewdell, J.W.; Porgador, A. Recognition of haemagglutinins on virus-infected cells by NKp46 activates lysis by human NK cells. Nature 2001, 409, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arnon, T.I.; Achdout, H.; Lieberman, N.; Gazit, R.; Gonen-Gross, T.; Katz, G.; Bar-Ilan, A.; Bloushtain, N.; Lev, M.; Joseph, A.; et al. The mechanisms controlling the recognition of tumor- and virus-infected cells by NKp46. Blood 2004, 103, 664–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ho, J.W.; Hershkovitz, O.; Peiris, M.; Zilka, A.; Bar-Ilan, A.; Nal, B.; Chu, K.; Kudelko, M.; Kam, Y.W.; Achdout, H.; et al. H5-type influenza virus hemagglutinin is functionally recognized by the natural killer-activating receptor NKp44. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 2028–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mendelson, M.; Tekoah, Y.; Zilka, A.; Gershoni-Yahalom, O.; Gazit, R.; Achdout, H.; Bovin, N.V.; Meningher, T.; Mandelboim, M.; Mandelboim, O.; et al. NKp46 O-Glycan Sequences That Are Involved in the Interaction with Hemagglutinin Type 1 of Influenza Virus. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 3789–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Du, N.; Zhou, J.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Shu, Y. Differential activation of NK cells by influenza A pseudotype H5N1 and 1918 and 2009 pandemic H1N1 viruses. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 7822–7831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Chaushu, S.; Wilensky, A.; Gur, C.; Shapira, L.; Elboim, M.; Halftek, G.; Polak, D.; Achdout, H.; Bachrach, G.; Mandelboim, O. Direct recognition of Fusobacterium nucleatum by the NK cell natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp46 aggravates periodontal disease. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Bar-On, Y.; Seidel, E.; Tsukerman, P.; Mandelboim, M.; Mandelboim, O. Influenza virus uses its neuraminidase protein to evade the recognition of two activating NK cell receptors. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 210, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Glasner, A.; Roth, Z.; Varvak, A.; Miletic, A.; Isaacson, B.; Bar-On, Y.; Jonjic, S.; Khalaila, I.; Mandelboim, O. Identification of putative novel O-glycosylations in the NK killer receptor NCR1 essential for its activity. Cell Discov. 2015, 1, 15036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Duev-Cohen, A.; Bar-On, Y.; Glasner, A.; Berhani, O.; Ophir, Y.; Levi-Schaffer, F.; Mandelboim, M.; Mandelboim, O. The human 2B4 and NTB-A receptors bind the influenza viral hemagglutinin and co-stimulate NK cell cytotoxicity. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 13093–13105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. McQuaid, S.; Loughran, S.; Power, P.; Maguire, P.; Walls, D.; Cusi, M.G.; Orvell, C.; Johnson, P. Haemagglutinin-neuraminidase from HPIV3 mediates human NK regulation of T cell proliferation via NKp44 and NKp46. J. Gen. Virol. 2018, 99, 763–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Achdout, H.; Arnon, T.I.; Markel, G.; Gonen-Gross, T.; Katz, G.; Lieberman, N.; Gazit, R.; Joseph, A.; Kedar, E.; Mandelboim, O. Enhanced recognition of human NK receptors after influenza virus infection. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 915–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Arnon, T.I.; Lev, M.; Katz, G.; Chernobrov, Y.; Porgador, A.; Mandelboim, O. Recognition of viral hemagglutinins by NKp44 but not by NKp30. Eur. J. Immunol. 2001, 31, 2680–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jarahian, M.; Watzl, C.; Fournier, P.; Arnold, A.; Djandji, D.; Zahedi, S.; Cerwenka, A.; Paschen, A.; Schirrmacher, V.; Momburg, F. Activation of natural killer cells by Newcastle disease virus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 8108–8121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Diab, M.; Glasner, A.; Isaacson, B.; Bar-On, Y.; Drori, Y.; Yamin, R.; Duev-Cohen, A.; Danziger, O.; Zamostiano, R.; Mandelboim, M.; et al. NK-cell receptors NKp46 and NCR1 control human metapneumovirus infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 2017, 47, 692–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Arnon, T.I.; Achdout, H.; Levi, O.; Markel, G.; Saleh, N.; Katz, G.; Gazit, R.; Gonen-Gross, T.; Hanna, J.; Nahari, E.; et al. Inhibition of the NKp30 activating receptor by pp65 of human cytomegalovirus. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chisholm, S.E.; Howard, K.; Valés Gómez, M.; Reyburn, H.T. Expression of ICP0 is sufficient to trigger natural killer cell recognition of herpes simplex virus—infected cells by natural cytotoxicity receptors. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 195, 1160–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Madrid, A.S.; Ganem, D. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus ORF54/dUTPase downregulates a ligand for the NK activating receptor NKp44. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 8693–8704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Chisholm, S.E.; Reyburn, H.T. Recognition of vaccinia virus-infected cells by human natural killer cells depends on natural cytotoxicity receptors. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 2225–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Jarahian, M.; Fiedler, M.; Cohnen, A.; Djandji, D.; Hämmerling, G.J.; Gati, C.; Cerwenka, A.; Turner, P.C.; Moyer, R.W.; Watzl, C.; et al. Modulation of NKp30- and NKp46-mediated natural killer cell responses by poxviral hemagglutinin. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hershkovitz, O.; Rosental, B.; Rosenberg, L.A.; Navarro-Sanchez, M.E.; Jivov, S.; Zilka, A.; Gershoni-Yahalom, O.; Brient-Litzler, E.; Bedouelle, H.; Ho, J.W.; et al. NKp44 receptor mediates interaction of the envelope glycoproteins from the West Nile and Dengue viruses with NK cells. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 2610–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vankayalapati, R.; Wizel, B.; Weis, S.E.; Safi, H.; Lakey, D.L.; Mandelboim, O.; Samten, B.; Porgador, A.; Barnes, P.F. The NKp46 receptor contributes to NK cell lysis of mononuclear phagocytes infected with an intracellular bacterium. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 3451–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Garg, A.; Barnes, P.F.; Porgador, A.; Roy, S.; Wu, S.; Nanda, J.S.; Griffith, D.E.; Girard, W.M.; Rawal, N.; Shetty, S.; et al. Vimentin expressed on Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected human monocytes is involved in binding to the NKp46 receptor. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 6192–6198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Esin, S.; Batoni, G.; Counoupas, C.; Stringaro, A.; Brancatisano, F.L.; Colone, M.; Maisetta, G.; Florio, W.; Arancia, G.; Campa, M. Direct binding of human NK cell natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp44 to the surfaces of Mycobacteria and other bacteria. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 1719–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Mavoungou, E.; Held, J.; Mewono, L.; Kremsner, P.G. A duffy binding—like domain is involved in the NKp30-mediated recognition of Plasmodium falciparum—Parasitized erythrocytes by natural killer cells. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 195, 1521–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Ali, S.A.; Rees, R.C.; Oxford, J. Modulation of human natural killer cytotoxicity by influenza virus and its subunit protein. Immunol. 1984, 52, 687–695. [Google Scholar]
  53. Arora, D.J.; Houde, M.; Justewicz, D.M.; Mandeville, R. In vitro enhancement of human natural cell-mediated cytotoxicity by purified influenza virus glycoproteins. J. Virol. 1984, 52, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Sivori, S.; Vitale, M.; Morelli, L.; Sanseverino, L.; Augugliaro, R.; Bottino, C.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A. p46, a novel natural killer cell–specific surface molecule that mediates cell activation. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 1129–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Bloushtain, N.; Qimron, U.; Bar-Ilan, A.; Hershkovitz, O.; Gazit, R.; Fima, E.; Korc, M.; Vlodavsky, I.; Bovin, N.V.; Porgador, A. Membrane-associated heparan sulfate proteoglycans are involved in the recognition of cellular targets by NKp30 and NKp46. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 2392–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Vieillard, V.; Strominger, J.L.; Debré, P. NK cytotoxicity against CD4+ T cells during HIV-1 infection: A gp41 peptide induces the expression of an NKp44 ligand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 10981–10986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Owen, R.E.; Yamada, E.; Thompson, C.I.; Phillipson, L.J.; Thompson, C.; Taylor, E.; Zambon, M.; Osborn, H.M.I.; Barclay, W.S.; Borrow, P. Alterations in receptor binding properties of recent human influenza H3N2 viruses are associated with reduced natural killer cell lysis of Infected cells. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 11170–11178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Achdout, H.; Meningher, T.; Hirsh, S.; Glasner, A.; Bar-On, Y.; Gur, C.; Porgador, A.; Mendelson, M.; Mandelboim, M.; Mandelboim, O. Killing of Avian and Swine Influenza Virus by Natural Killer Cells. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 3993–4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Mao, H.; Tu, W.; Liu, Y.; Qin, G.; Zheng, J.; Chan, P.-L.; Lam, K.-T.; Peiris, J.S.M.; Lau, Y.-L. Inhibition of human natural killer cell activity by influenza virions and hemagglutinin. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 4148–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ito, K.; Higai, K.; Sakurai, M.; Shinoda, C.; Yanai, K.; Azuma, Y.; Matsumoto, K. Binding of natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp46 to sulfate- and α2,3-NeuAc-containing glycans and its mutagenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 406, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ito, K.; Higai, K.; Shinoda, C.; Sakurai, M.; Yanai, K.; Azuma, Y.; Matsumoto, K. Unlike natural killer (NK) p30, natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp44 binds to multimeric α2,3-NeuNAc-containing N-glycans. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 35, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Vitenshtein, A.; Charpak-Amikam, Y.; Yamin, R.; Bauman, Y.; Isaacson, B.; Stein, N.; Berhani, O.; Dassa, L.; Gamliel, M.; Gur, C.; et al. NK cell recognition of Candida glabrata through binding of NKp46 and NCR1 to fungal ligands Epa1, Epa6, and Epa7. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 20, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Guo, H.; Kumar, P.; Malarkannan, S. Evasion of natural killer cells by influenza virus. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2011, 89, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Ljunggren, H.-G.; Kärre, K. Experimental strategies and interpretations in the analysis of changes in MHC gene expression during tumour progression. Int. J. Immunogenet. 1986, 13, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bix, M.; Liao, N.-S.; Zijlstra, M.; Loring, J.; Jaenisch, R.; Raulet, D. Rejection of class I MHC-deficient haemopoietic cells by irradiated MHC-matched mice. Nature 1991, 349, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liao, N.; Bix, M.; Zijlstra, M.; Jaenisch, R.; Raulet, D. MHC class I deficiency: Susceptibility to natural killer (NK) cells and impaired NK activity. Science 1991, 253, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Schuren, A.B.C.; Costa, A.I.; Wiertz, E.J.H.J. Recent advances in viral evasion of the MHC Class I processing pathway. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2016, 40, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Orr, M.T.; Lanier, L.L. Natural killer cell education and tolerance. Cell 2010, 142, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lanier, L.L.; Corliss, B.; Phillips, J.H. Arousal and inhibition of human NK cells. Immunol. Rev. 1997, 155, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Di Vito, C.; Mikulak, J.; Mavilio, D. On the Way to Become a Natural Killer Cell. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Thomas, L.M.; Peterson, M.E.; Long, E.O. Cutting edge: NK cell licensing modulates adhesion to target cells. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 3981–3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Joncker, N.T.; Fernandez, N.C.; Treiner, E.; Vivier, E.; Raulet, D.H. NK cell responsiveness is tuned commensurate with the number of inhibitory receptors for self-MHC class I: The rheostat model. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4572–4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Johansson, S.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Johansson, M.H.; Pickman, Y.; Brodin, P.; Kärre, K.; Mehr, R.; Höglund, P. Probing natural killer cell education by Ly49 receptor expression analysis and computational modelling in single MHC class I mice. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Brodin, P.; Lakshmikanth, T.; Johansson, S.; Kärre, K.; Höglund, P. The strength of inhibitory input during education quantitatively tunes the functional responsiveness of individual natural killer cells. Blood 2009, 113, 2434–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Sun, J.C.; Lanier, L.L. Cutting edge: Viral infection breaks NK cell tolerance to “missing self”. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 7453–7457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Suzuki, N.; Suzuki, T.; Engleman, E.G. Evidence for the involvement of CD56 molecules in alloantigen-specific recognition by human natural-killer-cells. J. Exp. Med. 1991, 173, 1451–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Van Acker, H.H.; Capsomidis, A.; Smits, E.L.; Van Tendeloo, V.F. CD56 in the immune system: More than a marker for cytotoxicity? Front. Immunol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Abel, A.M.; Yang, C.; Thakar, M.S.; Malarkannan, S. Natural Killer Cells: Development, Maturation, and Clinical Utilization. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Ferlazzo, G.; Thomas, D.; Lin, S.-L.; Goodman, K.; Morandi, B.; Muller, W.A.; Moretta, A.; Münz, C. The abundant NK cells in human secondary lymphoid tissues require activation to express killer cell Ig-like receptors and become cytolytic. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 1455–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Caligiuri, M.A.; Zmuidzinas, A.; Manley, T.J.; Levine, H.; Smith, K.A.; Ritz, J. Functional consequences of interleukin 2 receptor expression on resting human lymphocytes. Identification of a novel natural killer cell subset with high affinity receptors. J. Exp. Med. 1990, 171, 1509–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Trinchieri, G.; Matsumoto-Kobayashi, M.; Clark, S.C.; Seehra, J.; London, L.; Perussia, B. Response of resting human peripheral blood natural killer cells to interleukin 2. J. Exp. Med. 1984, 160, 1147–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Frey, M.; Packianathan, N.B.; Fehniger, T.A.; Ross, M.E.; Wang, W.-C.; Stewart, C.C.; Caligiuri, M.A.; Evans, S.S. Differential expression and function of L-selectin on CD56bright and CD56dim natural killer cell subsets. J. Immunol. 1998, 161, 400–408. [Google Scholar]
  83. André, P.; Spertini, O.; Guia, S.; Rihet, P.; Dignat-George, F.; Brailly, H.; Sampol, J.; Anderson, P.J.; Vivier, E. Modification of P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 with a natural killer cell-restricted sulfated lactosamine creates an alternate ligand for L-selectin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 3400–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bryceson, Y.T.; March, M.E.; Barber, D.F.; Ljunggren, H.-G.; Long, E.O. Cytolytic granule polarization and degranulation controlled by different receptors in resting NK cells. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 1001–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Alter, G.; Malenfant, J.M.; Altfeld, M. CD107a as a functional marker for the identification of natural killer cell activity. J. Immunol. Methods 2004, 294, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Voss, S.D.; Daley, J.; Ritz, J.; Robertson, M.J. Participation of the CD94 receptor complex in costimulation of human natural killer cells. J. Immunol. 1998, 160, 1618–1626. [Google Scholar]
  87. Campbell, J.J.; Qin, S.; Unutmaz, D.; Soler, D.; Murphy, K.E.; Hodge, M.R.; Wu, L.; Butcher, E.C. Unique subpopulations of CD56+ NK and NK-T peripheral blood lymphocytes identified by chemokine receptor expression repertoire. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 6477–6482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Cooper, M.A.; Fehniger, T.A.; Fuchs, A.; Colonna, M.; Caligiuri, M.A. NK cell and DC interactions. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hayakawa, Y.; Huntington, N.D.; Nutt, S.L.; Smyth, M.J. Functional subsets of mouse natural killer cells. Immunol. Rev. 2006, 214, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lanier, L.L.; Corliss, B.; Wu, J.; Phillips, J.H. Association of DAP12 with Activating CD94/NKG2C NK Cell Receptors. Immunity 1998, 8, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Garni-Wagner, B.A.; Purohit, A.; Mathew, P.A.; Bennett, M.; Kumar, V. A novel function-associated molecule related to non-MHC-restricted cytotoxicity mediated by activated natural killer cells and T cells. J. Immunol. 1993, 151, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. Pende, D.; Parolini, S.; Pessino, A.; Sivori, S.; Augugliaro, R.; Morelli, L.; Marcenaro, E.; Accame, L.; Malaspina, A.; Biassoni, R.; et al. Identification and molecular characterization of NKp30, a novel triggering receptor involved in natural cytotoxicity mediated by human natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 190, 1505–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Cantoni, C.; Bottino, C.; Vitale, M.; Pessino, A.; Augugliaro, R.; Malaspina, A.; Parolini, S.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A.; Biassoni, R. NKp44, a triggering receptor involved in tumor cell lysis by activated human natural killer cells, is a novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 189, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Pessino, A.; Sivori, S.; Bottino, C.; Malaspina, A.; Morelli, L.; Moretta, L.; Biassoni, R.; Moretta, A. Molecular cloning of NKp46: A novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily involved in triggering of natural cytotoxicity. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 188, 953–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Vitale, M.; Bottino, C.; Sivori, S.; Sanseverino, L.; Castriconi, R.; Marcenaro, E.; Augugliaro, R.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A. NKp44, a novel triggering surface molecule specifically expressed by activated natural killer cells, is involved in non–major histocompatibility complex–restricted tumor cell lysis. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 187, 2065–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hollyoake, M.; Campbell, R.D.; Aguado, B. NKp30 (NCR3) is a pseudogene in 12 inbred and wild mouse strains, but an expressed gene in Mus caroli. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22, 1661–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sivori, S.; Pende, D.; Bottino, C.; Marcenaro, E.; Pessino, A.; Biassoni, R.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A. NKp46 is the major triggering receptor involved in the natural cytotoxicity of fresh or cultured human NK cells. Correlation between surface density of NKp46 and natural cytotoxicity against autologous, allogeneic or xenogeneic target cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 1999, 29, 1656–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. De Maria, A.; Fogli, M.; Costa, P.; Murdaca, G.; Puppo, F.; Mavilio, D.; Moretta, A.; Moretta, L. The impaired NK cell cytolytic function in viremic HIV-1 infection is associated with a reduced surface expression of natural cytotoxicity receptors (NKp46, NKp30 and NKp44). Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 2410–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Costello, R.T.; Sivori, S.; Marcenaro, E.; Lafage-Pochitaloff, M.; Mozziconacci, M.-J.; Reviron, D.; Gastaut, J.-A.; Pende, D.; Olive, D.; Moretta, A. Defective expression and function of natural killer cell–triggering receptors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2002, 99, 3661–3667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D493–D496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gupta, R.; Jung, E.; Brunak, S. NetNGlyc 1.0 Server—Prediction of N-glycosylation sites in human proteins. Available online: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/ (accessed on 14 August 2018).
  102. Steentoft, C.; Vakhrushev, S.Y.; Joshi, H.J.; Kong, Y.; Vester-Christensen, M.B.; Schjoldager, K.T.B.G.; Lavrsen, K.; Dabelsteen, S.; Pedersen, N.B.; Marcos-Silva, L.; et al. Precision mapping of the human O-GalNAc glycoproteome through SimpleCell technology. EMBO J. 2013, 32, 1478–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Arnon, T.I.; Markel, G.; Mandelboim, O. Tumor and viral recognition by natural killer cells receptors. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2006, 16, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Moretta, A.; Biassoni, R.; Bottino, C.; Mingari, M.C.; Moretta, L. Natural cytotoxicity receptors that trigger human NK-cell-mediated cytolysis. Immunol. Today 2000, 21, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Biassoni, R.; Pessino, A.; Bottino, C.; Pende, D.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A. The murine homologue of the human NKp46, a triggering receptor involved in the induction of natural cytotoxicity. Eur. J. Immunol. 1999, 29, 1014–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Watzl, C.; Long, E.O. Signal transduction during activation and inhibition of natural killer cells. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2010, 90, 11.19B.11–11.19B.17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Campbell, K.S.; Yusa, S.-I.; Kikuchi-Maki, A.; Catina, T.L. NKp44 triggers NK cell activation through DAP12 association that is not influenced by a putative cytoplasmic inhibitory sequence. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Byrd, A.; Hoffmann, S.C.; Jarahian, M.; Momburg, F.; Watzl, C. Expression analysis of the ligands for the natural killer cell receptors NKp30 and NKp44. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Augugliaro, R.; Parolini, S.; Castriconi, R.; Marcenaro, E.; Cantoni, C.; Nanni, M.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A.; Bottino, C. Selective cross-talk among natural cytotoxicity receptors in human natural killer cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Meresse, B.; Curran, S.A.; Ciszewski, C.; Orbelyan, G.; Setty, M.; Bhagat, G.; Lee, L.; Tretiakova, M.; Semrad, C.; Kistner, E.; et al. Reprogramming of CTLs into natural killer–like cells in celiac disease. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 1343–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Stewart, C.A.; Walzer, T.; Robbins, S.H.; Malissen, B.; Vivier, E.; Prinz, I. Germ-line and rearranged Tcrd transcription distinguish bona fide NK cells and NK-like γδ T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 1442–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bensussan, A.; Remtoula, N.; Sivori, S.; Bagot, M.; Moretta, A.; Marie-Cardine, A. Expression and function of the natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp46 on circulating malignant CD4+ T lymphocytes of Sézary Syndrome patients. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2011, 131, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Falco, M.; Cantoni, C.; Bottino, C.; Moretta, A.; Biassoni, R. Identification of the rat homologue of the human NKp46 triggering receptor. Immunol. Lett. 1999, 68, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. De Maria, A.; Ugolotti, E.; Rutjens, E.; Mazza, S.; Radic, L.; Faravelli, A.; Koopman, G.; Di Marco, E.; Costa, P.; Ensoli, B.; et al. NKp44 expression, phylogenesis and function in non-human primate NK cells. Int. Immunol. 2009, 21, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Mair, K.H.; Essler, S.E.; Patzl, M.; Storset, A.K.; Saalmüller, A.; Gerner, W. NKp46 expression discriminates porcine NK cells with different functional properties. Eur. J. Immunol. 2012, 42, 1261–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Storset, A.K.; Kulberg, S.; Berg, I.; Boysen, P.; Hope, J.C.; Dissen, E. NKp46 defines a subset of bovine leukocytes with natural killer cell characteristics. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004, 34, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Straub, C.; Neulen, M.-L.; Sperling, B.; Windau, K.; Zechmann, M.; Jansen, C.A.; Viertlboeck, B.C.; Göbel, T.W. Chicken NK cell receptors. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2013, 41, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Seidel, E.; Glasner, A.; Mandelboim, O. Virus-mediated inhibition of natural cytotoxicity receptor recognition. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 3911–3920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gur, C.; Enk, J.; Kassem, S.A.; Suissa, Y.; Magenheim, J.; Stolovich-Rain, M.; Nir, T.; Achdout, H.; Glaser, B.; Shapiro, J.; et al. Recognition and killing of human and murine pancreatic β cells by the NK receptor NKp46. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 3096–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Narni-Mancinelli, E.; Gauthier, L.; Baratin, M.; Guia, S.; Fenis, A.; Deghmane, A.-E.; Rossi, B.; Fourquet, P.; Escalière, B.; Kerdiles, Y.M.; et al. Complement factor P is a ligand for the natural killer cell–activating receptor NKp46. Sci. Immunol. 2017, 2, eaam9628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Fuchs, A.; Cella, M.; Kondo, T.; Colonna, M. Paradoxic inhibition of human natural interferon-producing cells by the activating receptor NKp44. Blood 2005, 106, 2076–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Von Lilienfeld-Toal, M.; Nattermann, J.; Feldmann, G.; Sievers, E.; Frank, S.; Strehl, J.; Schmidt-Wolf, I.G.H. Activated γδ T cells express the natural cytotoxicity receptor natural killer p44 and show cytotoxic activity against myeloma cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2006, 144, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Baychelier, F.; Sennepin, A.; Ermonval, M.; Dorgham, K.; Debré, P.; Vieillard, V. Identification of a cellular ligand for the natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp44. Blood 2013, 122, 2935–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Rosental, B.; Brusilovsky, M.; Hadad, U.; Oz, D.; Appel, M.Y.; Afergan, F.; Yossef, R.; Rosenberg, L.A.; Aharoni, A.; Cerwenka, A.; et al. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen is a novel inhibitory ligand for the natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp44. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 5693–5702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. De Maria, A.; Biassoni, R.; Fogli, M.; Rizzi, M.; Cantoni, C.; Costa, P.; Conte, R.; Mavilio, D.; Ensoli, B.; Cafaro, A.; et al. Identification, molecular cloning and functional characterization of NKp46 and NKp30 natural cytotoxicity receptors in Macaca fascicularis NK cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2001, 31, 3546–3556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Tang, Q.; Grzywacz, B.; Wang, H.; Kataria, N.; Cao, Q.; Wagner, J.E.; Blazar, B.R.; Miller, J.S.; Verneris, M.R. Umbilical cord blood T cells express multiple natural cytotoxicity receptors after IL-15 stimulation, but only NKp30 Is functional. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 4507–4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Correia, D.V.; Fogli, M.; Hudspeth, K.; da Silva, M.G.; Mavilio, D.; Silva-Santos, B. Differentiation of human peripheral blood Vδ1+ T cells expressing the natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp30 for recognition of lymphoid leukemia cells. Blood 2011, 118, 992–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Hudspeth, K.; Fogli, M.; Correia, D.V.; Mikulak, J.; Roberto, A.; Della Bella, S.; Silva-Santos, B.; Mavilio, D. Engagement of NKp30 on Vδ1 T cells induces the production of CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5 and suppresses HIV-1 replication. Blood 2012, 119, 4013–4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Ferlazzo, G.; Tsang, M.L.; Moretta, L.; Melioli, G.; Steinman, R.M.; Münz, C. Human dendritic cells activate resting natural killer (NK) cells and are recognized via the NKp30 receptor by activated NK cells. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 195, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Vitale, M.; Chiesa, M.D.; Carlomagno, S.; Pende, D.; Aricò, M.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A. NK-dependent DC maturation is mediated by TNFα and IFNγ released upon engagement of the NKp30 triggering receptor. Blood 2005, 106, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Spaggiari, G.M.; Carosio, R.; Pende, D.; Marcenaro, S.; Rivera, P.; Zocchi, M.R.; Moretta, L.; Poggi, A. NK cell-mediated lysis of autologous antigen-presenting cells is triggered by the engagement of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase upon ligation of the natural cytotoxicity receptors NKp30 and NKp46. Eur. J. Immunol. 2001, 31, 1656–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Brandt, C.S.; Baratin, M.; Yi, E.C.; Kennedy, J.; Gao, Z.; Fox, B.; Haldeman, B.; Ostrander, C.D.; Kaifu, T.; Chabannon, C.; et al. The B7 family member B7-H6 is a tumor cell ligand for the activating natural killer cell receptor NKp30 in humans. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 1495–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. von Strandmann, E.P.; Simhadri, V.R.; von Tresckow, B.; Sasse, S.; Reiners, K.S.; Hansen, H.P.; Rothe, A.; Böll, B.; Simhadri, V.L.; Borchmann, P.; et al. Human leukocyte antigen-B-associated transcript 3 is released from tumor cells and engages the NKp30 receptor on natural killer cells. Immunity 2007, 27, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Cantoni, C.; Ponassi, M.; Biassoni, R.; Conte, R.; Spallarossa, A.; Moretta, A.; Moretta, L.; Bolognesi, M.; Bordo, D. The three-dimensional structure of the human NK cell receptor NKp44, a triggering partner in natural cytotoxicity. Structure 2003, 11, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. World Health Organization. Influenza (Seasonal). Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs211/en/ (accessed on 3 July 2018).
  136. Carlin, L.E.; Hemann, E.A.; Zacharias, Z.R.; Heusel, J.W.; Legge, K.L. Natural killer cell recruitment to the lung during influenza a virus infection is dependent on CXCR3, CCR5, and virus exposure dose. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Pommerenke, C.; Wilk, E.; Srivastava, B.; Schulze, A.; Novoselova, N.; Geffers, R.; Schughart, K. Global transcriptome analysis in influenza-infected mouse lungs reveals the kinetics of innate and adaptive host immune responses. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Taub, D.D.; Sayers, T.J.; Carter, C.R.; Ortaldo, J.R. Alpha and beta chemokines induce NK cell migration and enhance NK-mediated cytolysis. J. Immunol. 1995, 155, 3877–3888. [Google Scholar]
  139. Cooper, G.E.; Ostridge, K.; Khakoo, S.I.; Wilkinson, T.M.A.; Staples, K.J. Human CD49a(+) Lung Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity in Response to Influenza A Virus. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Scharenberg, M.; Vangeti, S.; Kekäläinen, E.; Bergman, P.; Al-Ameri, M.; Johansson, N.; Sondén, K.; Falck-Jones, S.; Färnert, A.; Ljunggren, H.G.; et al. Influenza A Virus Infection Induces Hyperresponsiveness in Human Lung Tissue-Resident and Peripheral Blood NK Cells. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Prager, I.; Watzl, C. Mechanisms of natural killer cell-mediated cellular cytotoxicity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 105, 1319–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Stein-Streilein, J.; Guffee, J. In vivo treatment of mice and hamsters with antibodies to asialo GM1 increases morbidity and mortality to pulmonary influenza infection. J. Immunol. 1986, 136, 1435–1441. [Google Scholar]
  143. Abdul-Careem, M.F.; Mian, M.F.; Yue, G.; Gillgrass, A.; Chenoweth, M.J.; Barra, N.G.; Chew, M.V.; Chan, T.; Al-Garawi, A.A.; Jordana, M.; et al. Critical role of natural killer cells in lung immunopathology during influenza infection in mice. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 206, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zhou, G.; Juang, S.W.W.; Kane, K.P. NK cells exacerbate the pathology of influenza virus infection in mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013, 43, 929–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Ge, M.Q.; Ho, A.W.S.; Tang, Y.; Wong, K.H.S.; Chua, B.Y.L.; Gasser, S.; Kemeny, D.M. NK cells regulate CD8+ T cell priming and dendritic cell migration during influenza a infection by IFN-γ and perforin-dependent mechanisms. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 2099–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Rabinowitz, S.G.; Huprikar, J. The influence of defective-interfering particles of the PR-8 strain of influenza A virus on the pathogenesis of pulmonary infection in mice. J. Infect. Dis. 1979, 140, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Zhou, K.; Wang, J.; Li, A.; Zhao, W.; Wang, D.; Zhang, W.; Yan, J.; Gao, G.F.; Liu, W.; Fang, M. Swift and strong NK cell responses protect 129 mice against high-dose influenza virus infection. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 1842–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Mao, H.; Tu, W.; Qin, G.; Law, H.K.W.; Sia, S.F.; Chan, P.-L.; Liu, Y.; Lam, K.-T.; Zheng, J.; Peiris, M.; et al. Influenza virus virectly infects human natural killer cells and induces cell apoptosis. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 9215–9222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Guo, H.; Kumar, P.; Moran, T.M.; Garcia-Sastre, A.; Zhou, Y.; Malarkannan, S. The functional impairment of natural killer cells during influenza virus infection. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2009, 87, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Cross, K.J.; Burleigh, L.M.; Steinhauer, D.A. Mechanisms of cell entry by influenza virus. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2001, 3, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Skehel, J.J.; Wiley, D.C. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: The influenza hemagglutinin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 531–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Seto, J.T.; Chang, F.S. Functional significance of sialidase during influenza virus multiplication: An electron microscope study. J. Virol. 1969, 4, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Seto, J.T.; Rott, R. Functional significance of sialidase during influenza virus multiplication. Virology 1966, 30, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wiley, D.C.; Skehel, J.J.; Waterfield, M. Evidence from studies with a cross-linking reagent that the haemagglutinin of influenza virus is a trimer. Virology 1977, 79, 446–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wilson, I.A.; Skehel, J.J.; Wiley, D.C. Structure of the haemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza at 3 Å resolution. Nature 1981, 289, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Chen, J.; Lee, K.H.; Steinhauer, D.A.; Stevens, D.J.; Skehel, J.J.; Wiley, D.C. Structure of the hemagglutinin precursor cleavage site, a determinant of influenza pathogenicity and the origin of the labile conformation. Cell 1998, 95, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Arnold, K.; Bordoli, L.; Kopp, J.; Schwede, T. The SWISS-MODEL workspace: A web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Biasini, M.; Bienert, S.; Waterhouse, A.; Arnold, K.; Studer, G.; Schmidt, T.; Kiefer, F.; Cassarino, T.G.; Bertoni, M.; Bordoli, L.; et al. SWISS-MODEL: Modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, W252–W258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Bordoli, L.; Kiefer, F.; Arnold, K.; Benkert, P.; Battey, J.; Schwede, T. Protein structure homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL workspace. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 4, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Family: Orthomyxoviridae. Available online: https://talk.ictvonline.org/ictv-reports/ictv_9th_report/negative-sense-rna-viruses-2011/w/negrna_viruses/209/orthomyxoviridae (accessed on 10 November 2020).
  161. Bullough, P.A.; Hughson, F.M.; Skehel, J.J.; Wiley, D.C. Structure of influenza haemagglutinin at the pH of membrane fusion. Nature 1994, 371, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Skehel, J.J.; Bayley, P.M.; Brown, E.B.; Martin, S.R.; Waterfield, M.D.; White, J.M.; Wilson, I.A.; Wiley, D.C. Changes in the conformation of influenza virus hemagglutinin at the pH optimum of virus-mediated membrane fusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79, 968–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Han, X.; Bushweller, J.H.; Cafiso, D.S.; Tamm, L.K. Membrane structure and fusion-triggering conformational change of the fusion domain from influenza hemagglutinin. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Han, X.; Tamm, L.K. pH-dependent self-association of influenza hemagglutinin fusion peptides in lipid bilayers. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 304, 953–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Gamblin, S.J.; Haire, L.F.; Russell, R.J.; Stevens, D.J.; Xiao, B.; Ha, Y.; Vasisht, N.; Steinhauer, D.A.; Daniels, R.S.; Elliot, A.; et al. The structure and receptor binding properties of the 1918 influenza hemagglutinin. Science 2004, 303, 1838–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Gamblin, S.J.; Skehel, J.J. Influenza hemagglutinin and neuraminidase membrane glycoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 28403–28409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Martín, J.; Wharton, S.A.; Lin, Y.P.; Takemoto, D.K.; Skehel, J.J.; Wiley, D.C.; Steinhauer, D.A. Studies of the binding properties of influenza hemagglutinin receptor-site mutants. Virology 1998, 241, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Van Riel, D.; Munster, V.J.; de Wit, E.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Fouchier, R.A.M.; Osterhaus, A.; Kuiken, T. H5N1 virus attachment to lower respiratory tract. Science 2006, 312, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Van Riel, D.; Munster, V.J.; de Wit, E.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Fouchier, R.A.M.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E.; Kuiken, T. Human and avian influenza viruses target different cells in the lower respiratory tract of humans and other mammals. Am. J. Pathology 2007, 171, 1215–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Rogers, G.N.; Paulson, J.C. Receptor determinants of human and animal influenza virus isolates: Differences in receptor specificity of the H3 hemagglutinin based on species of origin. Virology 1983, 127, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Reid, A.H.; Janczewski, T.A.; Lourens, R.M.; Elliot, A.J.; Daniels, R.S.; Berry, C.L.; Oxford, J.S.; Taubenberger, J.K. 1918 influenza pandemic and highly conserved viruses with two receptor-binding variants. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Glaser, L.; Stevens, J.; Zamarin, D.; Wilson, I.A.; García-Sastre, A.; Tumpey, T.M.; Basler, C.F.; Taubenberger, J.K.; Palese, P. A single amino acid substitution in 1918 influenza virus hemagglutinin changes receptor binding specificity. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 11533–11536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Xu, R.; McBride, R.; Nycholat, C.M.; Paulson, J.C.; Wilson, I.A. Structural characterization of the hemagglutinin receptor specificity from the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 982–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Rogers, G.N.; D’Souza, B.L. Receptor binding properties of human and animal H1 influenza virus isolates. Virology 1989, 173, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Dortmans, J.C.F.M.; Dekkers, J.; Wickramasinghe, I.N.A.; Verheije, M.H.; Rottier, P.J.M.; van Kuppeveld, F.J.M.; de Vries, E.; de Haan, C.A.M. Adaptation of novel H7N9 influenza A virus to human receptors. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  176. Mimura, Y.; Ashton, P.R.; Takahashi, N.; Harvey, D.J.; Jefferis, R. Contrasting glycosylation profiles between Fab and Fc of a human IgG protein studied by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Immunol. Methods 2007, 326, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Hayes, J.M.; Cosgrave, E.F.J.; Struwe, W.B.; Wormald, M.; Davey, G.P.; Jefferis, R.; Rudd, P.M. Glycosylation and Fc receptors. In Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology; Daeron, M., Nimmerjahn, F., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 382, pp. 165–199. [Google Scholar]
  178. Trombetta, C.M.; Ulivieri, C.; Cox, R.J.; Remarque, E.J.; Centi, C.; Perini, D.; Piccini, G.; Rossi, S.; Marchi, S.; Montomoli, E. Impact of erythrocyte species on assays for influenza serology. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2018, 59, E1–E7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Shemesh, A.; Brusilovsky, M.; Kundu, K.; Ottolenghi, A.; Campbell, K.S.; Porgador, A. Splice variants of human natural cytotoxicity receptors: Novel innate immune checkpoints. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2018, 67, 1871–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Clare, M.A.; Collins, R.; Vaughan, R. Polymorphism in the natural cytotoxicity receptors(NCR) NKp30, NKp44 and NKp46 – a preliminary study. Hum. Immunol. 2005, 66, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Lee, E.U.; Roth, J.; Paulson, J.C. Alteration of terminal glycosylation sequences on N-linked oligosaccharides of Chinese hamster ovary cells by expression of beta-galactoside alpha 2,6-sialyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 13848–13855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Storset, A.K.; Slettedal, I.Ö.; Williams, J.L.; Law, A.; Dissen, E. Natural killer cell receptors in cattle: A bovine killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor multigene family contains members with divergent signaling motifs. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 980–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Meng, B.; Marriott, A.C.; Dimmock, N.J. The receptor preference of influenza viruses. Influenza Resp. Viruses 2010, 4, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. World Organisation for Animal Health. Avian Influenza (version adopted May 2015). In Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (Mammals, Birds and Bees); World Organisation for Animal Health: Paris, France, 2015; Volume 1, pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  185. Swayne, D.E.; Suarez, D.L.; Sims, L.D. Influenza. In Diseases of Poultry, 13th ed.; Swayne, D.E., Glisson, J.R., McDougald, L.R., Nolan, L.K., Suarez, D.L., Nair, V., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Ames, Iowa, 2013; pp. 181–218. [Google Scholar]
  186. Luczo, J.M.; Stambas, J.; Durr, P.A.; Michalski, W.P.; Bingham, J. Molecular pathogenesis of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza: The role of the haemagglutinin cleavage site motif. Rev. Med. Virol. 2015, 25, 406–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Viruses 13 00156 g001 550
Figure 1. Natural killer (NK) cell activating and inhibitory signaling mediates phenotypic outcomes. (A) When NK cell inhibitory receptors bind MHC class I on the target cell, this interaction suppresses NK cell activation and lysis of the target cell. (B) In some circumstances, the activating receptor on NK cells will bind the activating ligand on the target cell, while the inhibitory receptor does not bind MHC Class I, leading to NK cell activation and lysis of the target cell. (C) When the target cell expresses both MHC Class I and activating ligands, the fate of the target cell is determined by a balance of signals.
Figure 1. Natural killer (NK) cell activating and inhibitory signaling mediates phenotypic outcomes. (A) When NK cell inhibitory receptors bind MHC class I on the target cell, this interaction suppresses NK cell activation and lysis of the target cell. (B) In some circumstances, the activating receptor on NK cells will bind the activating ligand on the target cell, while the inhibitory receptor does not bind MHC Class I, leading to NK cell activation and lysis of the target cell. (C) When the target cell expresses both MHC Class I and activating ligands, the fate of the target cell is determined by a balance of signals.
Viruses 13 00156 g001
Viruses 13 00156 g002 550
Figure 2. Phenotype of activated human NK cell populations. (A) CD56bright CD16dim NK cells are functionally higher in cytokine production and lymphokine-activated killer activity, and have low ADCC and natural cytotoxicity. (B) CD56dim CD16bright NK cells are functionally lower in cytokine production and lymphokine-activated killer cytotoxicity but have high ADCC activity and natural cytotoxicity. + = low expression/functionality, +++ = high expression/functionality. Figure adapted from Cooper et al. [24].
Figure 2. Phenotype of activated human NK cell populations. (A) CD56bright CD16dim NK cells are functionally higher in cytokine production and lymphokine-activated killer activity, and have low ADCC and natural cytotoxicity. (B) CD56dim CD16bright NK cells are functionally lower in cytokine production and lymphokine-activated killer cytotoxicity but have high ADCC activity and natural cytotoxicity. + = low expression/functionality, +++ = high expression/functionality. Figure adapted from Cooper et al. [24].
Viruses 13 00156 g002
Viruses 13 00156 g003 550
Figure 3. NK cell activating receptors. (A) Schematic of human NK cell activating receptors. (B) Structural features of hNKp46. In addition to the two predicted O-linked glycosites in the stalk, an additional two O-linked glycosites in the intracellular domain are predicted (NCBI: CAA04714). (C) Structural features of murine NCR1 (NCBI: NP_034876). Protein domain predictions were performed using SMART protein domain annotation resource [100]. N-linked glycosylation predicted performed using NetNGlyc 1.0 server [101], and O-linked glycosylation prediction performed using NetOGlyc 4.0 server [102]. Panel (A) modified from Arnon et al. [103], panels (B,C) modified from Glasner et al. [22].
Figure 3. NK cell activating receptors. (A) Schematic of human NK cell activating receptors. (B) Structural features of hNKp46. In addition to the two predicted O-linked glycosites in the stalk, an additional two O-linked glycosites in the intracellular domain are predicted (NCBI: CAA04714). (C) Structural features of murine NCR1 (NCBI: NP_034876). Protein domain predictions were performed using SMART protein domain annotation resource [100]. N-linked glycosylation predicted performed using NetNGlyc 1.0 server [101], and O-linked glycosylation prediction performed using NetOGlyc 4.0 server [102]. Panel (A) modified from Arnon et al. [103], panels (B,C) modified from Glasner et al. [22].
Viruses 13 00156 g003
Viruses 13 00156 g004 550
Figure 4. Amino acid sequence alignment of natural cytotoxicity receptor homologs from various species. (A) NKp46, (B) NKp44, and (C) NKp30. Protein domains are indicated above consensus sequence. Sequence alignments were performed using MUSCLE. Conserved amino acids are highlighted. Protein domain predictions were performed using SMART protein domain annotation resource [100]. Predicted O-linked glycosylation site (Thr225) identified to be crucial to HA and hNKp46-Ig interactions indicated by hash sign. NCBI protein accession numbers are indicated.
Figure 4. Amino acid sequence alignment of natural cytotoxicity receptor homologs from various species. (A) NKp46, (B) NKp44, and (C) NKp30. Protein domains are indicated above consensus sequence. Sequence alignments were performed using MUSCLE. Conserved amino acids are highlighted. Protein domain predictions were performed using SMART protein domain annotation resource [100]. Predicted O-linked glycosylation site (Thr225) identified to be crucial to HA and hNKp46-Ig interactions indicated by hash sign. NCBI protein accession numbers are indicated.
Viruses 13 00156 g004
Viruses 13 00156 g005 550
Figure 5. Protein homology model of influenza A virus haemagglutinin. Protein homology model of A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) (NCBI: ABO21709), based on the crystal structure of 1HA0 [156]. (A) Haemagglutinin trimer. (B) Haemagglutinin protomer. Protein homology model was generated with SWISS-MODEL [157,158,159], and visualized in Discovery Studio (Dassault Systemès BIOVIA).
Figure 5. Protein homology model of influenza A virus haemagglutinin. Protein homology model of A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) (NCBI: ABO21709), based on the crystal structure of 1HA0 [156]. (A) Haemagglutinin trimer. (B) Haemagglutinin protomer. Protein homology model was generated with SWISS-MODEL [157,158,159], and visualized in Discovery Studio (Dassault Systemès BIOVIA).
Viruses 13 00156 g005
Table
Table 1. Selected literature describing viral, bacterial, and parasite interactions with the natural killer cell natural cytotoxicity receptors.
Table 1. Selected literature describing viral, bacterial, and parasite interactions with the natural killer cell natural cytotoxicity receptors.
Pathogen (Species)IsolateNCRs InvestigatedSummaryReference
Influenza A virusA/Bangkok/1/1979 (H3N2)-Pre-treatment of effector cells with purified HA blocked NK cell cytolytic activity. Suggests HA binds and functionally activated NK cells.Ali et al. 1984 Immunology [52]
A/Victoria/1/1975 H3N2)
Influenza B virusB/Lyon/1979
Influenza A virusA//Port Chalmers/1/1973 (H3N2)-Whole IAV or rHA functionally activates NK cells. Pre-treatment of IAV with anti-HA antisera or anti-HA F(ab’)2 blocked NK cell cytolytic activity.Arora et al. 1984
J. Virol. [53]
--hNKp46,
hCD16		Biochemical analysis of hNKp46. Suggests that hNKp46 does not harbor N-linked glycosites, though does possess O-linked glycosites. Sivori et al. 1997 J. Exp. Med. [54]
Influenza A virusA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)hNKp46, hCD16SeV-infected cells bind NKp46-Ig. Cells transfected with SeV rHN bind NKp46-Ig. IAV HA binds NKp46-Ig, but not CD16-Ig or CD99-Ig. NA-treatment of hNKp46-Ig reduced binding by IAV. Lysis of SeV or IAV infected cells is reduced following anti-HN or anti-HA mAb treatment, respectively.Mandelboim et al. 2001 Nature [28]
Murine respirovirusSendai virus
Influenza A virusA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)hNKp44, hNKp30, hNKp46, hCD16Recognition of transformed cell lines by NKp46-Ig, NKp44-Ig, NKp30-Ig, and CD16-Ig, but not CD99-Ig. NKp44-Ig bound SeV or IAV infected, or SeV HN transfected cells.Arnon et al. 2001 Eur. J. Immunol. [39]
Murine respirovirusSendai virus
Mycobacterium tuberculosisH37Ra strain (avirulent)
H37Rv strain (virulent)		hNKp46NKp46 blockade with antisera reduced NKp46-mediated NK cell lysis of infected monocytes.Vankayalapati et al. 2002 J. Immunol. [48]
Murine respirovirusSendai virushNKp46hNKp46-Ig, but not hCD99-Ig, binds to SeV infected cells. Blockade of HN and hNKp46 binding with anti-HN mAb reduced binding.Achdout et al. 2003 J. Immunol. [38]
Influenza A virusA/Beijing/262/1995-like (H1N1)hNKp46, hNKp44, hNKp30SeV, IAV, and IBV bind NKp44-Ig and NKp46-Ig, but poorly to NKp30-Ig, and not at all to CD99-Ig. NA-treatment of NKp46-Ig reduced binding by SeV or IAV. Interaction with NKp46 specifically occurs with the proximal C2-type Ig-like domain. Suggests α-2,6 sialic acids on Thr225 critical for interaction.Arnon et al. 2004 Blood [29]
A/Moscow/10/1999-like (H3N2)
A/Sydney/5/1997-like (H3N2)
A/X-31 (A/Aichi/2/1968*A/Puerto Rico/8/1934) (H3N2)
A/X-127 (A/Beijing/262/1995* A/Puerto Rico/8/1934) (H1N1)
A/New Caledonia/20/1999 (H1N1)
Influenza B virusB/Yamanashi/166/1998 (Yamagata lineage)
Murine respirovirusSendai virus
--hNKp46, hNKp30Identified 6-O-sulfo-N-acetylglucosamine and hNK46 and hNKp30 interactions. Pretreatment of NKp30-Ig or NKp46-Ig with 6-O-sulfo-LacNAc reduced NCR binding to tumor cells. Pre-treatment with 3-O-sulfo-LacNAc or 4,6-di-O-sulfo-LacNAc did not affect binding. Additionally, heparin or heparan sulfate pre-treatment inhibited binding of NCRs to tumor cells. Bloushtain et al. 2004 J. Immunol. [55]
Human betaherpesvirus 5Human cytomegalovirus (AD169 strain) hNKp46, hNKp44, hNKp30, hCD16HCMV-infected cells bind NKp30-Ig, no binding to NKp46-Ig, NKp44-Ig, CD16-Ig or CD99-Ig was detected. Pulldown experiments identified HCMV pp65 protein bound to NKp30-Ig. Recombinant pp65 bound NKp30-Ig only (KD 10 nM). Preincubation of NK cells with rpp65 blocked anti-NKp30 mAb binding. Counterintuitively, pp65 engagement of NKp30-Ig resulted in reduced NK cell cytolytic activity, resulting from CD3ζ chain dissociation from NKp30 complex.Arnon et al. 2005 Nat. Immunol. [42]
Human immunodeficiency virus 1Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (Sf2 strain)hNKp44HIV-1 infected cells induce NKp44L expression, and are highly susceptible to NK cell-mediated lysis. Ex vivo, NKp46L expressed on CD4+, but not CD8+, HIV positive individuals. NKp46L induced by gp41 (and its precursor, gp160). Anti-gp41 treatment of infected cells reduced NKp44L expression and blocked NK cytolytic activity.Vieillard et al. 2005 PNAS [56]
Influenza A virusA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)
msNKp46IAV HA binds msNKp46-Ig. Generated NCR1gfp/gfp knockout mice. Lack of NCR1 resulted in 100% mortality following IAV infection.Gazit et al. 2006 Nat. Immunol. [21]
Vaccinia virusModified vaccinia virus AnkarahNKp46, hNKp44, hNKp30Vaccinia virus-infected cells recognize NKp30-Ig, NKp44-Ig, and NKp46-Ig. NKp30-Ig ligand was the most potently induced on virally-infected cells. Anti-NCR mAb blockade abrogated virally-infected cell:NCR interactions. Virally-induced ligand not directly identified.Chisholm et al. 2006 J. Virol. [45]
Vaccinia virus Western Reserve
Vaccinia virus Copenhagen
Vaccinia virus Wyeth
Vaccinia virus Lister
Vaccinia virus IHD-J
Vaccinia virus IHD-W
Vaccinia virus Tian-Tan
Vaccinia virus Tashkent
Vaccinia virus USSR
Vaccinia virus Patwadangar
Vaccinia virus King Institute
Vaccinia virus Dairen
Buffalopox virus
Rabbitpox virus (strain unknown)
Vaccinia virus Evans
Cowpox virusCowpox virus Brighton Red
Elephantpox virus
Camelpox virusCamelpox virus (strain unknown)
Mycobacterium tuberculosisH37Ra strain (avirulent)
hNKp46NKp46-Ig binds to TB-infected monocytes. Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry analysis of NKp46-Ig membrane bound ligands from TB-infected monocytes identified vimentin (type III intermediate filament) as a ligand of NKp46. Vimentin was shown to be surface exposed on TB-infected monocytes. Vimentin was also upregulated on Listeria-infected monocytes. Vimentin antisera reduced NK cell-mediated lysis.Garg et al. 2006 J. Immunol. [49]
Listeria monocytogeneseLm68 strain, Serovar 1/2b
Human alphaherpesvirus 1Herpes simplex virus 1 (strain 17)
Herpes simplex virus 1 (strain F)		hNKp46, hNKp44, hNKp30HSV1 virally-infected cells and HSV1 infected cell protein 0 (ICP0)-transfected cells are more susceptible to NK cell lysis. Cells infected with ∆ICP0 HSV mutant were less susceptible to lysis. Antibody blockade of the NCRs reduced NK cell lysis of HSV1-infected cells. Blockade of all three NCRs abrogate NK cell lysis of target cells. ICP0 is not surface expressed, thus ligand is likely to be cellular.Chisholm et al. 2007 J. Infect. Dis. [43]
Plasmodium falciparumFCR-3, D10, FP8, and 3D7 strainshNKp46, hNKp30, hCD99P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein-1 duffy binding-like 1α domain peptides bound NKp30-Ig, and minimally with NKp46-Ig. NKp46 and NKp30 bound to P. falciparum infected erythrocytes. NCRs bound to proximal Ig-like domain. Treatment with trypsin abrogated erythrocyte:NCR interaction. Blockade with anti-NKp46 or NKp30 reduced NK cell cytolytic activity.Mavoungou et al. 2007 J. Infect. Dis. [51]
Influenza A virusA/England/878/1969 (H3N2)-CD56+ CD3- NK cells express both α-2,3 and α-2,6 sialic acids. Historical H3N2 virally-infected cells are lysed more efficiently by NK cells than those infected with contemporary H3N2 viruses. Treatment of NK cells with NA reduced NK-mediated lysis of IAV-infected cells.Owen et al. 2007 J. Virol. [57]
A/England/401/1985 (H3N2)
A/England/327/1990 (H3N2)
A/England/289/1993 (H3N2)
A/England/41/1996 (H3N2)
A/England/356/1996 (H3N2)
A/England/26/1999 (H3N2)
A/England/919/1999 (H3N2)
A/England/24/2000 (H3N2)
Mycobacterium aviumNBL112/87 strainhNKp46, hNKp44, hNKp30M. bovis induced expression of NKp44 on CD56bright NK cells, but not NKp30 or NKp46. All mycobacterium tested bound to NKp46-Ig. Additionally, N. farcinica (Gram-positive) and P. aeruginosa (Gram-negative) interacted with NKp44-Ig, minimally with NKp46-Ig, and not at all with NKp30-Ig. Electron microscopy revealed NKp44-Ig bound to surface of M. bovis and E. faecium, but not NKp46-Ig or NKp30-Ig. Interestingly, anti-NCR mAbs did not reduce M. bovis-induced NK cell activation, however, NKp44-Ig mAb reduced binding of NKp44-Ig to M. bovis.Esin et al. 2008 J. Virol. [50]
Mycobacterium smegmatismc2 155 strain
Mycobacterium tuberculosisH37Rv strain (virulent)
Mycobacterium bovis
Salmonella entericaBacillus Calmette-Guérin (Pasteur) strain
Escherichia coli
Streptococcus pyogenesSerovar Enteritidis
Enterococcus faecium
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Actinomyces meyeri
Cellulomonas denverensisDSM 15764
Nocardia farcinicaDSM 43665
Influenza A virusA/VNH5N1-PR8/CDC-rg (A/Vietnam/1203/2004*A/Puerto Rico/8/1934) (H5N1–LPAIV) A/Cambodia/408008/2005 (H5N1–HPAIV)
A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)		hNKp44, hNKp30Infection of cells with IAV enhances NK cell mediated lysis. Cells transfected with IAV HA (H5N1–HPAIV) bind NKp44-Ig, poorly to NKp30-Ig. rHA binds hNKp-44-Ig (ELISA). IAV pseudoparticles bind to hNKp44 transduced cells.Ho et al. 2008 J. Virol. [30]
West Nile virus
Dengue virus		West Nile virus ISR98-Goo1
Dengue virus 1 FGA/89
Dengue virus 4 Burma 1976		hNKp44, hNKp46,
hNKp30		Recombinant DENV and WNV E glycoproteins bind hNKp44-Ig. WNV rE glycoprotein bound membrane-associated hNKp44-Ig. Binding was also demonstrated for WNV VLPs (E and prM glycoproteins) and virally-infected cells. VLP and hNKP44-Ig interaction was augmented by low pH treatment. Interactions mapped to domain III of WNV E glycoprotein. Anti-NKp44 serum reduced WNV E binding to hNKp44-Ig and reduce NK cell cytolytic activity.Hershkovitz et al. 2009 J. Immunol [47]
Avian orthoavulavirus 1Newcastle disease virus (Ulster 2C strain)
Newcastle disease virus (MTH-68/H strain)		hNK46, hNKp44, hNKp30NDV-infected cells bind hNKp46-Ig and hNKp44-Ig, but not hNKp30-Ig. Treatment with anti-HN mAb reduced HN binding to hNKp46-Ig and hNKp44-Ig. HN or F transfected cells revealed interaction directly mediated by HN. Desialylation of hNKp46-Ig and hNKp44-Ig abrogated interaction with HN. NK cells lysis blocked when NDV cells treated with NA-inhibitor or anti-HN mAb.Jarahian et al. 2009 J. Virol. [40]
Influenza A virusA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)hNKp46Suggests Thr225 does not harbor a unique glycoform (compared to Thr125). Characterized α2,3- and α2,6- O-linked glycans present on HEK293T, CHO and COS-7 expressed hNKp46.Mendelson et al. 2010 J. Virol. [31]
A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1)
A/New Caledonia/20/1999 (H1N1)
Influenza A virusA/VNH5N1-PR8/CDC-rg (A/Vietnam/1203/2004*A/Puerto Rico/8/1934) (H5N1–LPAIV)
A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)
A/Texas/1/1977 (H3N2)
A/Swine/Israel/2009 (pdmH1N1)		hNKp46, hNKp30Avian and human influenza viruses interact with hNKp46, although H5N1 HA:hNkp46 interaction did not induce NK cell-mediated lysis of H5 infected cells, whereas H1N1 did. Authors conclude no increase in lysis of H5 cells as H5 avian viruses have not evolved/adapted to humans.Achdout et al. 2010 J. Virol. [58]
Influenza A virusA/Brevig Mission/1/1918 (pdmH1N1)
A/California/07/2009 (pdmH1N1)
A/Anhui/1/2005 (H5N1–HPAIV)
A/Brisbane/10/2007 (H3N2)		hNKp46In contrast to Achdout et al. 2010, Du et al. H5N1 and 1918 pdmH1N1 HA (pseudoviruses) induced greater NK cell activation and lysis, than 2009 pdmH1N1 IAV. hNKp46 was found to be downregulated upon stimulation. Treatment with anti-NKp46 mAb lead to reduced CD69 expression.Du et al. 2010 J. Virol. [32]
Influenza A virusA/Hong Kong/54/1998 (H1N1)-Pre-treatment of NK cells with whole IAV virions or rHA inhibits NK cell cytolytic activity by way of downregulation of the CD3 ζ chain and cytolytic granule exocytosis (NKp46 and NKp30 surface expression levels remained unchanged). NA-treatment of human NK cells reduces rHA internalization.Mao et al. 2010 J. Virol. [59]
A/New Caledonia/20/1999 (H1N1)
--hNKp46Glycan-binding analysis of E. coli expressed NKp46-His and sulfate- or neuraminic acid containing multimeric glycans. Recombinant hNKp46 bound heparin-BSA and heparan-sulfate-BSA in the low µM range; 2-O-linked, 6-O-linked, and N-linked sulfates important for interaction. Binding to Sialyl Lewis X-expressing transferrin also demonstrated.Ito et al. 2011 Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. [60]
Vaccinia virus
Ectromelia virus		Vaccinia virus (Western Reserve strain)
Ectromelia virus (MP-Nü strain)		hNKp46, hNKp30, hNKp44VV and ECTV infected cells upregulated ligands for hNKp46-Ig and hNKp30-Ig, but not hNKp44-Ig. ∆HA virus did not induce NCR ligands. Anti-HA mAb blocked HA hNKp46-Ig and hNKp30-Ig interactions. Desialyation/deglycosylation of hNKp46-Ig reduced binding with HA, though increased binding with hNKp30-Ig. Demonstrated that VV HA reduces B7-H6 binding to hNKp30. VV-infected cells less susceptible to NK cell-mediated lysis.Jarahian et al. 2011 PLoS Path. [46]
Fusobacterium nucleatum
Influenza A virus		PK1594 strainhNKp46, msNKp46, hNKp44, hNKp30, hCD16F. nucleatum bacterium bind NKp46-Ig and NCR1-Ig, minimally with NKp44-Ig, and not at all with NKp30-Ig, CD16-Ig. Interaction was not sialic acid-dependent; and was heat, proteinase K, and pronase sensitive.Chaushu et al. 2012 PLoS Path. [33]
A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)
Influenza A virusA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)msNKp46Binding of IAV HA to NCR1 is mediated by N-linked glycosylation. Deglycosylation of msNKp46 with PNGase F abolished binding. Deglycosylation of msNKp46 with O-linked glycanase cocktail had little effect on binding. Surprisingly, mutation of Asn139, Asn216 or Asn238 N-linked glycosites did not affect binding.Glasner et al. 2012 PLoS ONE [22]
--hNKp44, hNKp30Glycan-binding analysis of E. coli expressed NKp44-His and NKp30-His to sulfate- or neuraminic acid containing multimeric glycans. Recombinant hNKp46 and hNKp30 bound heparin-BSA in the low to mid nM range. NKp44, but not NKp30, bound Sialyl Lewis X-expressing transferrin. NA-treatment of transferrin abrogated binding.Ito et al. 2012 Biol. Pharm. Bull. [61]
Human gammaherpesvirus 8Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirushNKp44NKp44-Ig recognizes KSHV-infected cells. KSHV ORF54 downregulates NKp44L surface expression on KSHV-infected cells.Madrid & Ganem 2012 J. Virol. [44]
Influenza A virusA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)hNKp46, msNKp46,Mortality and lung virus load of IAV-infected NCR1gfp/gfp knockout mice is dose-dependent. NCR1 is not protective at high IAV challenge doses. IAV NA impairs sialic acid-dependent HA recognition of NKp46-Ig. Inhibition of NA activity augments HA binding of NKp46-Ig. Blockade of NA augments NK cell cytolytic activity. NA treatment of IAV-infected NCR1gfp/gfp mice reduces mortality.Bar-On et al. 2013 Cell Rep. [23]
A/Texas/1/1977 (H3N2)
Influenza A virusA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)hNKp46, msNKp46, hNKp44, hNKp30,
KIR2DS4, KIR2DL1		NA hinders NCR interactions with IAV HA. Inhibition of IAV NA activity increases NK cytolytic function.Bar-On et al. 2014 J. Infect.Dis. [34]
Influenza A virusA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)msNKp46Analysis of NCR1 glycosylation status. Identified occupied O-linked glycosites at Thr222 and Thr225. T225A and T225A mutation reduced lectin binding. Reported that O-linked glycosites are crucial for interactions with IAV HA and subsequent NK cytolytic activity.Glasner et al. 2015 Cell Disc. [35]
Candida glabrataBG2hNKp46
NCR1		Candida glabrata adhesins Epa1, Epa6, and Epa7 (all of which are lectins) engage with hNKp46 and NCR1. Fungal clearance was impaired in NCR knockout mice. Vitenshtein et al.
2016 Cell Host & Microbe [62]
Influenza A virusA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)hNKp46mAb blockade of hNKp46 inhibits NKp46 mediated NK cytolytic activity. Inhibition of NA activity increased HA binding to NKp46-Ig. HA binding to NA-treated NKp46-Ig was reduced. Demonstrate that HA also binds the 2B4 and NTB-A SLAM-family receptors in a sialic-acid dependent manner.Duev-Cohen et al. 2016 Oncotarget [36]
A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1)
Human metapneumovirusHuman metapneumovirus (strain not reported)hNKp46, msNKp46HMPV-infection induces expression of NKp46-Ig/NCR1-Ig ligand(s) in vitro. Blockade of HMPV and NKp46-Ig/anti-NCR1 interaction with anti-NKp46/anti-NCR1 mAb reduced NKp46-mediated NK cytolytic activity. Despite this, HMPV proteins do not interact directly with NKp46-Ig/NCR1-Ig. NCR1 controls HMPV virus load in vivo.Diab et al. 2017 Eur. J. Immunol. [41]
Human respirovirus 3
Influenza A virus		Human pararainfluenza virus 3 (strain C-243)
A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)		hNKp46, hNKp44HPIV3 HN induces NKp44 surface expression on CD14+ monocytes more potently than IAV HA. The opposite holds true for NKp46 expression. This effect can be abrogated by anti-HN or anti-HA antibody treatment.McQuaid et al. 2018 [37]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luczo, J.M.; Ronzulli, S.L.; Tompkins, S.M. Influenza A Virus Hemagglutinin and Other Pathogen Glycoprotein Interactions with NK Cell Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30. Viruses 2021, 13, 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020156

AMA Style

Luczo JM, Ronzulli SL, Tompkins SM. Influenza A Virus Hemagglutinin and Other Pathogen Glycoprotein Interactions with NK Cell Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30. Viruses. 2021; 13(2):156. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020156

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luczo, Jasmina M., Sydney L. Ronzulli, and Stephen M. Tompkins. 2021. "Influenza A Virus Hemagglutinin and Other Pathogen Glycoprotein Interactions with NK Cell Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30" Viruses 13, no. 2: 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020156

APA Style

Luczo, J. M., Ronzulli, S. L., & Tompkins, S. M. (2021). Influenza A Virus Hemagglutinin and Other Pathogen Glycoprotein Interactions with NK Cell Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30. Viruses, 13(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020156

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop