Next Article in Journal
Central Nervous System and Ocular Manifestations in Puumala Hantavirus Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Viruses and Bacteria Associated with Cancer: An Overview
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/v13061038
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

RuvB-Like Protein 2 Interacts with the NS1 Protein of Influenza A Virus and Affects Apoptosis That Is Counterbalanced by Type I Interferons

by
Yimeng Wang
1,†,‡,
Jianhong Zhou
1,†,
Samuel G. Mackintosh
2 and
Yuchun Du
1,*
1
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
2
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
Current address: ReVacc Biotech, 4539 Metropolitan Court, Frederick, MD 21704, USA.
Viruses 2021, 13(6), 1038; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061038
Submission received: 25 March 2021 / Revised: 12 May 2021 / Accepted: 28 May 2021 / Published: 31 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The NS1 protein of influenza A virus (IAV) plays important roles in viral pathogenesis and host immune response. Through a proteomic approach, we have identified RuvB-like proteins 1 and 2 (RuvBL1 and RuvBL2) as interacting partners of the NS1 protein of IAVs. Infection of human lung A549 cells with A/PR/8/34 (PR8) virus resulted in reductions in the protein levels of RuvBL2 but not RuvBL1. Further studies with RuvBL2 demonstrated that the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction is RNA-independent, and RuvBL2 binds the RNA-binding domain of the NS1. Infection of interferon (IFN)-deficient Vero cells with wild-type or delNS1 PR8 virus reduced RuvBL2 protein levels and induced apoptosis; delNS1 virus caused more reductions in RuvBL2 protein levels and induced more apoptosis than did wild-type virus. Knockdown of RuvBL2 by siRNAs induced apoptosis and overexpression of RuvBL2 resulted in increased resistance to infection-induced apoptosis in Vero cells. These results suggest that a non-NS1 viral element or elements induce apoptosis by suppressing RuvBL2 protein levels, and the NS1 inhibits the non-NS1 viral element-induced apoptosis by maintaining RuvBL2 abundance in infected cells in the absence of IFN influence. In contrast to Vero cells, infection of IFN-competent A549 cells with PR8 virus caused reductions in RuvBL2 protein levels but did not induce apoptosis. Concomitantly, pretreatment of Vero cells with a recombinant IFN resulted in resistance to infection-induced apoptosis. These results demonstrate that the infection-induced, RuvBL2-regulated apoptosis in infected cells is counterbalanced by IFN survival signals. Our results reveal a novel mechanism underlying the infection-induced apoptosis that can be modulated by the NS1 and type I IFN signaling in IAV-infected cells.

1. Introduction

Host cells have developed various defenses against influenza A virus (IAV) infection. The most important defense mechanism is the innate response of production of type I interferons (IFNs), which induce an antiviral state in infected cells and neighboring uninfected cells by triggering the expression of IFN-inducible genes or IFN-stimulated genes [1,2,3]. In addition, host cells can limit IAV replication by inducing apoptosis of infected cells [4,5]. Despite the strong antiviral defenses of host cells, IAVs still replicate in host cells because they have evolved strategies to thwart host antiviral defenses. The non-structural protein 1 (NS1) of IAVs is a master in this regard and facilitates IAV replication by inhibiting both IFN induction and apoptosis in infected cells [2,3,6]. The NS1 protein suppresses IFN expression through the inhibition of retinoic acid-inducible gene (RIG-I)-mediated activation of the transcription factors interferon regulatory factor-3 (IRF-3), activating protein–1 (AP-1), and NF-kB that target the IFN promoter [7,8]. The NS1 protein also suppresses IFN expression by inhibiting the maturation and nuclear export of host mRNAs, including IFN mRNAs [9,10]. One of the major mechanisms by which the NS1 inhibits apoptosis is to activate the PI3K/Akt pathway via binding the p85 subunit of PI3K [11,12].
RuvB (bacterial RuvB gene/protein)-like proteins 1 and 2 (RuvBL1 and RuvBL2) are putative ATPases and belong to the AAA+ (ATPase associated with diverse cellular activities) family of ATPase [13,14,15]. In addition to the ATPase activity, they contain helicase activity that unwinds DNAs and RNAs [16]. In addition, the chaperone activity of the proteins enables them to play important roles in the assembly and remodeling of protein–protein and protein–DNA/RNA complexes [13,14,17]. RuvBL1 and RuvBL2 consist of 456 and 463 amino acids, respectively, share 43% identity, can form hetero-complexes, and may function together or individually [16,18,19]. They are conserved in evolution and play important roles in a variety of cellular processes, such as chromatin remodeling, transcription regulation, and DNA repair [13,14,20,21,22]. It has been shown that RuvBL1 and/or RuvBL2 are involved in cancer [23,24,25] and replication or other aspects of different viruses, including IAVs [26,27], HIV [28], Ebola virus [29], West Nile virus [30], adenovirus [31], and Hepatitis B virus [32].
In the present study, we identified RuvBL1 and RuvBL2 as interacting partners of the NS1 protein of influenza A/PR/8/34 (PR8) virus. Infection of human lung A549 cells with PR8 virus resulted in a reduction of the protein levels of RuvBL2 but not RuvBL1. Further studies with RuvBL2 demonstrated that the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction is RNA-independent, and RuvBL2 binds the RNA-binding domain (RBD) of the NS1. PR8 virus induces apoptosis in infected cells by suppressing the protein levels of RuvBL2 in the absence of IFN influence, and the NS1 protein inhibits infection-induced apoptosis by maintaining RuvBL2 protein abundance. In addition, we show that the viral infection-induced, RuvBL2-regulated apoptosis is counterbalanced by the survival signals of type I IFNs in infected cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture, Virus Infection, and Plasmid Preparation

Human lung epithelial A549 cells and African green monkey kidney Vero cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in Dulbecco modified eagle medium (DMEM; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlanta Biologicals, Lawrenceville, GA, USA) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin. Wild-type (WT) PR8 virus was purchased from ATCC, propagated, and titrated, as described previously [33]. delNS1 influenza PR8 virus was kindly provided by Dr. Adolfo Garcia-Sastre (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA) [34], propagated, and titrated in Vero cells as WT virus. The DNA sequence coding for the IAV H7N9 NS1 protein from the pCX-V5-H7N9-NS1 plasmid [35] was cloned into the vector pcDNA 3.1 for the expression of the NS1 in 293T cells. The plasmids for the expression of other genes/gene regions are described in other sections.

2.2. Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis (2-DE), LC-MS/MS Analysis, and Database Search

We used a 2-DE-based proteomic approach to identify cellular proteins that interacted with the NS1 protein. Briefly, two populations of 293T cells were transiently transfected with plasmids that expressed Flag alone (control) or Flag-NS1, respectively. After affinity purification of the cell lysates from the two populations of cells with immobilized anti-Flag antibodies, the bound proteins were fractionated by 2-DE, as described previously [33,36,37]. The protein spots uniquely appearing in the gel that resolved the proteins purified from the cells that expressed Flag-NS1 were excised, in-gel digested, and the resulting peptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS.
LC-MS/MS analysis was performed as described previously [36,37,38]. Briefly, proteins in 2-D gel spots were digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) overnight at 37 °C and the resulting peptides were dissolved in 20 μL 0.1% formic acid, and analyzed with an LTQ-XL mass spectrometer (Thermo, San Jose, CA, USA) at the Proteomic Facility at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (Little Rock, AR, USA), as described [38]. The raw data were converted into peak lists in mgf files with ProteoWizard 3.0.7665 through Mascot Daemon (2.5.1; Matrix Science, London, UK). Mascot was used to search against a composite target-decoy SwissProt database taxonomic field for human (May 2019, 20,432 entries) or virus (May 2019, 16,647 entries) using the mgf files. The parameters for database searching were as follows: 2.0-Da mass error tolerance for MS and 0.5 Da for MS/MS, tryptic enzyme specificity with a maximum of 2 missed cleavages, fixed modification of carbamidomethyl of cysteine, and variable modifications of acetylation at the peptide N terminus, and oxidation on methionine. Peptide matches with significant homology (p < 0.05) were considered to be identified peptides. Search results were further processed by Scaffold software (version 4.9.0; Proteome Software, Portland, OR, USA) to validate MS/MS-based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 70.0% probability to achieve a false discovery rate of less than 1.0%. Protein identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 99.0% probability to achieve a false discovery rate of less than 1.0% and contained at least 2 identified peptides.

2.3. Immunoprecipitation (IP)

The HA-tagged RuvBL1 or RuvBL2 were inserted into the pCruz vector (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and the Flag-tagged NS1 of PR8 virus was inserted into pcDNA 3.1 for expression in 293T cells. For co-IPs, lysates from the cells expressing Flag-NS1 and HA-RuvBL2/HA-RuvBL1, and the cells expressing Flag alone and HA-RuvBL2/HA-RuvBL1 were immunoprecipitated with an immobilized anti-Flag antibody. After washing, the bound proteins were eluted by boiling in SDS-PAGE loading buffer and analyzed with Western blotting using an anti-HA antibody. For reciprocal co-IPs, lysates from the cells expressing Flag-NS1 and HA-RuvBL2/HA-RuvBL1, and the cells expressing HA alone and Flag-NS1 were immunoprecipitated with an immobilized anti-HA antibody. After washing, the bound proteins were eluted by boiling in SDS-PAGE loading buffer and analyzed with Western blotting using an anti-Flag antibody. Transfection and IPs were performed as described previously [37]. An RNase A treatment (0, 5, or 50 µg/mL of RNase A at 4 °C for 1 h) in IPs was performed on immunoprecipitated proteins on beads before washing. After washing, the bound proteins were eluted by a buffer containing 3× Flag peptide and analyzed with Western blotting using the indicated antibodies. In the Western blot analysis, the amount of each Input sample loaded onto the SDS-PAGE gel was 1% of the cell lysate used for the IP.

2.4. Protein Expression and In-Vitro Binding Assay

The DNA sequences encoding GST, GST-tagged full-length NS1, the GST-tagged RBD (amino acids 1–73), or the effector domain (ED) (amino acids 85–230) of the NS1 of PR8 virus were cloned in the vector pGEX-6p-2, and the sequences encoding Flag-tagged human RuvBL2 were cloned in the vector pET-28. The recombinant proteins were expressed in E. coli, as described previously [36]. Equal molar amounts of purified GST-NS1 (GST, GST-RBD, or GST-ED) and Flag-RuvBL2 were mixed and incubated in a binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors) for 2.5 h at 4 °C with end-to-end rotation. Then, 15 μL of glutathione agarose resin (Gold Biotechnology, St. Louis, MO, USA) were added to the mixtures and the mixture was incubated for an additional 1.5 h at 4 °C with end-to-end rotation. After washing 3 times with a wash buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.1% Triton X-100), the bound proteins were eluted with an elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 10 mM reduced glutathione) and examined by Western blotting.

2.5. siRNAs and Overexpression

Two siRNA sequences targeting RuvBL2 (5′-GAGACCAUCUACGACCUGGGCAC-3′ and 5′-GAGAGUGACAUGGCGCCUGUCCU-3′) [39] were co-transfected into Vero cells to knock down the expression of RuvBL2 as described previously [33]. A randomized siRNA sequence was used as a control [37]. For RuvBL2 overexpression, the coding sequence of RuvBL2 was inserted into pcDNA3.1 plasmid, and the resulting construct was transfected into Vero cells using Lipofectamine LTX PLUS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.6. Western Blotting

Western blotting was performed as described previously [33,37]. Antibodies against RuvBL1, beta-actin, and Annexin I were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotech (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Antibodies against RuvBL2 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) were from BD (San Jose, CA, USA). A mouse monoclonal anti-NS1 antibody was kindly provided by Dr. Stephan Ludwig (University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany).

2.7. Caspase 3/7 Assay

The activities of caspase 3/7 were determined with the Caspase-Glo 3/7 kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the treated Vero cells or A549 cells in 96-well plates were incubated with caspase reagent provided by the kit at room temperature for 1 h, and the luminescence was then measured by a spectrofluorometer (SpectraMax Gemini XS, Molecular Devices). All analyses were performed with 3 separate sample preparations.

2.8. Pretreatment of Vero Cells with Recombinant IFN-α

Vero cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS in 6-well plates overnight, and the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium containing the recombinant universal human IFN-αA/D (rHuIFN-αA/D; PBL Biomedical Labs, Piscataway, NJ, USA) at 1000 units mL−1 [40,41] the next morning. After incubation with IFN-α for 6 h, the cells were infected with WT or delNS1 virus at an MOI of 1 and harvested at 36 and 48 hpi for analysis.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The Student’s t-test was used to assess statistical significance. Data were expressed as mean ± SE. Differences were tested by a two-tailed t-test. Differences in mean values were considered significant when p was ≤0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Identifications of the Proteins That Potentially Interact with the NS1 Protein

A 2-DE-based proteomic method [36,37] was used to identify cellular proteins associated with the NS1 protein of PR8 virus. The results revealed that multiple protein spots appeared in the “NS1 gel” (the gel that resolved the proteins pulled down from the lysate of the cells expressing the NS1) but not in the control gel (the gel that resolved the proteins pulled down from the lysate of the cells expressing Flag alone) (Figure 1). LC-MS/MS analysis of the proteins in those spots and a subsequent database search against the SwissProt human database revealed that multiple proteins were unambiguously identified (Table 1). Two of the most abundant proteins that were pulled down with the Flag-NS1 were RuvBL1 and RuvBL2 (Table 1), which were also the two largest protein spots in the 2-D gel (Figure 1, Spots 1 and 5) except for the bait protein (Spots 23 and 24; see below). The two proteins were identified with high confidence by LC-MS/MS: 22 and 25 peptides unique to RuvBL1 and RuvBL2, respectively. RuvBL1 and RuvBL2 are members of the AAA+ family of helicase [14,15] and have been shown to play important roles in a variety of cellular activities [13,20]. In relation to IAV infection, Mayer et al. (2007) and Kakugawa et al. (2009) reported that RuvBL2 interacted with influenza A viral ribonucleoproteins (vRNPs) [26,27] and inhibited the viral polymerase via disrupting the assembly of NP protein oligomers [26].
Multiple other proteins were also identified to potentially interact with the NS1 (Table 1). The remaining proteins were members of either the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) family or the heat-shock protein family (Table 1). hnRNP A2/B1 (Figure 1, Spot 13) plays important roles in RNA processing [42], and has previously been shown to interact with the NS1 and inhibit IAV replication [37]. We also searched the SwissProt protein database taxonomic field for viruses using the LC-MS/MS data to reveal the bait protein NS1. As expected, the NS1 (Spot 23) was the most abundant protein in the pulled-down proteins. The bait protein NS1 was so abundant that it could not be well-separated by isoelectric focus in the 2-DE (Figure 1; Figure S1 and Table S1). Interestingly, besides the full-length NS1 (Spot 23), a much less-abundant and shorter version of the NS1 was also revealed by 2-D gel (Spot 24). At present, it is not clear whether the shorter NS1 was truncated in vivo under physiological conditions or in vitro in the processes of cell lysis preparation, affinity purification, and/or 2-DE. If it is the former, it would be interesting to understand whether the truncated version plays any role in IAV replication. In addition to the top-ranked proteins with the highest spectrum count in each protein spot in the 2-D gel, which are listed in Table 1, typically several other proteins with lower spectrum counts were also identified in each spot. Furthermore, some proteins were identified in more than one protein spot. The complete list of the identified proteins, including those lower-ranked proteins in each spot and the proteins identified in fainter protein spots, were listed in Table S1, and the corresponding 2-D gel spots are shown in Figure S1. From the identified proteins (Table S1), it is clear that we were unable to identify some of the proteins that have been shown to interact with the NS1, such as PI3K [12], DDX21 [43], TRIM25 [44], and RIG-1 [7,8,45]. The lack of those proteins in the present identification likely resulted from the limitation of the 2-DE, which has limited capacities in resolving low-abundant proteins, large proteins, membrane proteins, and proteins with high or low isoelectric points [46]. Because RuvBL1 and RuvBL2 were abundantly associated with the NS1 (Table 1 and Figure 1), and RuvBL2 has been shown to affect IAV infection [26,27], we selected these two proteins for further characterization of their interactions with the NS1 and their potential roles in IAV infection.

3.2. RuvBL1 and RuvBL2 Interact with the NS1

To validate the interactions between the NS1 protein and RuvBL1/RuvBL2, we performed reciprocal co-IPs [37,47]. While an immobilized anti-Flag antibody precipitated significant amounts of HA-RuvBL1 and HA-RuvBL2 from the cells that expressed Flag-NS1 and HA-RuvBL1 or HA-RuvBL2, respectively, the antibody did not precipitate detectable levels of HA-RuvBL1 and HA-RuvBL2 from the cells that expressed Flag alone and HA-RuvBL1 or HA-RuvBL2 (Figure 2A). Similarly, in the reciprocal co-IPs, an immobilized anti-HA antibody precipitated large amounts of Flag-NS1 from the cells that expressed Flag-NS1 and HA-RuvBL1 or HA-RuvBL2, whereas the immobilized anti-HA antibody failed to precipitate any detectable amount of Flag-NS1 from the cells that expressed Flag-NS1 and HA tag alone (Figure 2B).
Because our subsequent functional studies showed that IAV infection affected protein levels of RuvBL2 but not RuvBL1 (see below), we focused further protein–protein interaction studies and functional studies on RuvBL2. The NS1 and RuvBL2 are both RNA-binding proteins; we first examined whether the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction was RNA-dependent. For this purpose, we pulled down the NS1 and its associated proteins with immobilized anti-Flag antibody from the lysate of the cells expressing Flag-NS1 (Flag alone for control) and endogenous RuvBL2, treated the bound proteins on beads with RNase A, washed the beads, eluted the bound proteins with 3X Flag peptide, and analyzed the bound proteins with Western blotting. The results demonstrated that RNase A digestion did not affect the interaction between the NS1 and endogenous RuvBL2 (Figure 3A), suggesting that the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction is not RNA-dependent. To test whether RuvBL2 interacts with the NS1 of seasonal influenza A viruses, we ectopically expressed Flag-NS1 (Flag alone for control) of a 2013 H7N9 virus (strain A/Zhejiang/DTID-ZJU01/2013) [35] in 293T cells, pulled down the NS1 and its associated proteins, and analyzed the bound proteins with Western blotting. The results demonstrated that immobilized anti-Flag antibody pulled down more HA-RuvBL2 from the lysate of Flag-NS1-expressing cells than from the lysate of Flag alone-expressing cells (Figure 3B), suggesting that the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction is not restricted to the NS1 of PR8 viruses but is shared by the NS1 of other IAVs.

3.3. RuvBL2 Physically Binds the RNA-Binding Domain (RBD) of the NS1

To further assess whether the NS1 directly binds RuvBL2, we expressed Flag-tagged RuvBL2 and the GST-tagged full-length NS1 of PR8 virus in E. coli, purified them with affinity purification, and performed in vitro GST pulldown assays. The results demonstrated that the NS1 physically bound RuvBL2 (Figure 4A, upper panel). The NS1 protein is composed of an N-terminal RBD domain and a C-terminal effector domain (ED) linked by a short linker [2,3]. To determine which domain of the NS1 binds RuvBL2, we expressed the GST-RBD domain (amino acids 1–73), GST-ED domain (amino acids 85–230) of the NS1 of PR8 virus, and Flag-RuvBL2 in E. coli, purified them, and performed in vitro GST pulldown assays. The results demonstrated that RuvBL2 bound the RBD domain but not the ED domain of the NS1 of PR8 virus (Figure 4B, upper panel). We confirmed that appropriate amounts of GST, GST-ED, GST-RBD, and GST-NS1 were used in the pulldown assays (Figure 4, lower panels).

3.4. IAV Infection Leads to Reductions in RuvBL2 Protein Abundance in Infected Cells, and the NS1 Inhibits the Infection-Induced Reduction in RuvBL2 Abundance

To assess the potential role of the interactions between the NS1 and RuvBL1 or RuvBL2 proteins in IAV replication, we infected A549 cells with WT PR8 virus at MOIs of 0.02, 0.075, and 0.3 (or mock-infected for control) for 36 h, and then examined the protein levels of RuvBL1 and RuvBL2 in infected cells with Western blotting. The results demonstrated that RuvBL2 protein levels in infected cells were reduced by PR8 virus infection. In contrast to RuVBL2, the infection had no apparent effect on RuvBL1 protein levels (Figure 5A). To assess whether the NS1 protein is involved in regulating RuvBL2 protein abundance in infected cells, we infected Vero cells, which are type I IFN-deficient [48], with either WT or delNS1 [34] PR8 virus at an MOI of 1 and harvested the cells at 24, 36, and 48 hpi for Western blot analysis. The results demonstrated that RuvBL2 protein levels were suppressed by both types of viruses in Vero cells, but delNS1 virus resulted in more pronounced reductions in RuvBL2 protein levels than did WT virus (Figure 5B). As expected, delNS1 virus-infected cells did not contain the NS1 protein (Figure 5B). These results suggest that (1) PR8 virus infection suppresses RuvBL2 protein abundance in infected cells, and a non-NS1 viral element or elements in PR8 virus are responsible for the reduction of RuvBL2 protein levels, and (2) the NS1 protein antagonizes the non-NS1 viral element-induced reduction in RuvBL2 protein abundance in infected cells.

3.5. IAV Infection Induces Host Cell Apoptosis by Suppressing Cellular RuvBL2 Protein Abundance

To examine the biological consequences of IAV-induced reduction in RuvBL2 protein abundance in infected cells, we used small interfering (siRNAs) to knock down RuvBL2 expression and examined the effect of the knockdown on viral protein synthesis, virus replication, and apoptosis. The results demonstrated that knockdown of RuvBL2 in Vero cells had no significant effect on the NS1 protein levels and PR8 virus replication (data not shown). However, knockdown of RuvBL2 induced apoptosis in Vero cells (Figure 6A). The result is consistent with a previous report, which demonstrated that knockdown of RuvBL2 by siRNAs induced apoptosis in human liver cancer cells [24]. To determine how the NS1 protein affects RuvBL2-regulated apoptosis in infected cells, we infected Vero cells with WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1 and examined apoptosis at 24, 36, and 48 hpi. The results demonstrated that both WT and delNS1 viruses induced apoptosis, evidenced by increased cleavage of PARP (Figure 6B) and the activations of caspase 3/7 (Figure 6C, fold changes: 2.9–6.5), and delNS1 virus induced more apoptosis than did WT virus (Figure 6B,C at 24 hpi). This result coincides with the results shown in Figure 5B, which shows that delNS1 virus induced more reductions in RuvBL2 protein levels than did WT virus, suggesting that IAVs might induce apoptosis by suppressing RuvBL2 protein abundance in infected Vero cells. To test this possibility, we overexpressed RuvBL2 in Vero cells by transiently transfecting the cells with a plasmid that expressed RuvBL2 or empty vector for control, followed by infection of the transfected cells with WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1 (mock infection for control) 24 h after the transfection. The transfected/infected cells were harvested at 36 hpi for Western blot analysis, or 24, 36, and 48 hpi for caspase 3/7 activity determinations. The results demonstrated that, like what was observed in the untransfected cells (Figure 5B), infection with WT or delNS1 PR8 virus reduced the protein levels of RuvBL2 in the transfected cells regardless if RuvBL2 was overexpressed or not (Figure 7A, compare lanes 3 and 5 with lane 1, and compare lanes 4 and 6 with lane 2), and delNS1 virus infection resulted in more reductions in RuvBL2 protein levels than did WT virus (Figure 7A, compare lane 5 with lane 3 in reference to lane 1; compare lane 6 with lane 4 in reference to lane 2). Importantly, the cells that overexpressed RuvBL2 were more resistant to WT or delNS1 virus-induced apoptosis than the corresponding control cells that did not overexpress RuvBL2 at 36 and 48 hpi (Figure 7B; except for the delNS1-infected cells at 48 hpi). These results suggest that IAV infection induces apoptosis by suppressing RuvBL2 abundance in infected Vero cells.

3.6. Type I IFNs Counteract the Viral Infection-Induced, RuvBL2-Regulated Apoptosis

We also tested the effect of WT and delNS1 PR8 viruses on apoptosis in IFN-competent A549 cells. In contrast to IFN-deficient Vero cells, in which WT or delNS1 PR8 virus infection increased caspase 3/7 activity by approximately 6-fold at 36 and 48 hpi (Figure 6C), infection of A549 cells with WT or delNS1 virus at the same MOI (an MOI of 1) increased the activity less than 1.5-fold at 36 and 48 hpi (Figure 8A), suggesting that the type I IFNs inhibit apoptosis in infected cells. To test this notion, we pretreated Vero cells with a recombinant universal human IFN-α and infected the pretreated cells with WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1, and harvested the infected cells at 24, 36, and 48 hpi for Western blot analysis and caspase activity determination. We found that both WT and delNS1 viruses reduced RuvBL2 protein levels in infected cells at 36 and 48 hpi (Figure 8B) but did not induce significant apoptosis (Figure 8C; fold changes: 0.9–1.8), which was comparable to what was observed in A549 cells (Figure 8A). These results contrast sharply with what was observed in Vero cells without IFN pretreatment (Figure 6B,C), which demonstrated that WT or delNS1 virus infection induced substantial increases in apoptosis in infected cells at 36 hpi and 48 hpi (fold changes at 36 hpi and 48 hpi in Figure 6C: 5.2–6.5). The contrast suggests that type I IFNs counterbalance the RuvBL2-regulated apoptosis in infected cells.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we identified RuvBL1 and RuvBL2 as interacting partners of the NS1 protein of IAVs (Figure 1 and Table 1). We verified the interactions by reciprocal co-IPs (Figure 2) and demonstrated that the NS1 interacts with endogenous RuvBL2 and the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction was not RNA-dependent (Figure 3A). Furthermore, we showed that RuvBL2 physically bound the RBD domain of the NS1 protein (Figure 4). Functional studies demonstrated that delNS1 PR8 virus induced more reductions in RuvBL2 protein levels than did WT virus (Figure 5B), suggesting that a non-NS1 viral element or elements are responsible for the reduction in RuvBL2 abundance in infected cells, and NS1 acts to maintain RuvBL2 protein abundance by antagonizing the non-NS1 element-induced reduction in RuvBL2 protein abundance in infected cells. Knockdown of RuvBL2 in Vero cells by siRNAs induced apoptosis (Figure 6A) and overexpression of RuvBL2 resulted in increased resistance to IAV-induced apoptosis (Figure 7), suggesting that IAV infection induces apoptosis by suppressing RuvBL2 protein abundance in infected cells. Further studies demonstrated that the viral infection-induced, RuvBL2-regulated apoptosis in IAV-infected cells was overwhelmed by IFN signals (Figure 6 and Figure 8), which suggests that RuvBL2 and IFNs may regulate apoptosis in IAV-infected cells through a shared pathway.
One potential mechanism by which RuvBL2 regulates apoptosis in IAV-infected cells is through affecting the apoptotic activity of the proapoptotic protein Bad (Figure 9). It has been reported that the expression of Bad was upregulated when RuvBL2 was silenced by siRNA [24], suggesting that RuvBL2 negatively regulates Bad expression. Thus, it is possible that IAV infection-induced RuvBL2 reduction can upregulate the expression of Bad, which in turn triggers apoptosis (Figure 9). It is interesting to note that Bad activation is required for efficient IAV replication in host cells [49,50]. However, it is not clear how Bad is activated in IAV-infected cells. Mayer et al. (2007) and Kakugawa et al. (2009) reported that influenza A viral ribonucleoproteins (vRNPs) interacted with RuvBL2 [26,27]. Perhaps the vRNPs could serve as the potential non-NS1 elements that act to suppress RuvBL2 abundance in the infected cells observed in the present study. If this is the case, when vRNPs are accumulated in the nucleus of infected cells, vRNPs can upregulate Bad by suppressing RuvBL2 protein abundance (Figure 9). The upregulated Bad can then facilitate the export of vRNPs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, presumably by activating other proapoptotic factors such as caspase 3, whose activation is known to also be required for the nuclear export of vRNPs [51]. It was previously thought that IAVs simply take advantage of proapoptotic signaling events, such as the activations of Bad [50] and caspase 3 [51], for efficient IAV replication in infected cells [52]. Based on the present model (Figure 9), it is possible that instead of passively taking advantage of proapoptotic signaling events, IAVs may have evolved a strategy to activate the required molecules (e.g., activated Bad and caspase 3) for the efficient nuclear export of vRNPs when vRNPs are accumulated in adequate amounts in the nucleus of infected cells and are ready for export.
In addition to the antiviral and proapoptotic functions [58], type I IFNs can produce strong cell survival signals to protect cells from apoptosis by activating PI3K and Akt [53,54]. Thus, while IAVs may induce apoptosis in infected cells by downregulating RuvBL2, which in turn upregulates Bad expression [24], type I IFNs can overwhelm the RuvBL2-regulated apoptosis in infected cells by activating PI3K and Akt, which in turn inactivate Bad by phosphorylating Bad at Ser-136 [55,56]. The two pathways may converge on controlling the apoptotic activity of Bad (Figure 9). This proposed model explains why the apoptosis induced by reductions in cellular RuvBL2 abundance occurred only in IFN-deficient Vero cells (Figure 6) but not in IFN-competent A549 cells (Figure 8A), and why IFNs could counterbalance the apoptosis in IAV-infected cells (Figure 8). Because IAVs have evolved several strategies to suppress IFN production in infected cells [7,8,9,10,59], it is possible that the infection-induced, RuvBL2-regulated apoptosis may play a significant role in IAV-induced apoptosis even in IFN-competent cells under certain circumstances. The NS1 protein of IAVs is known to inhibit apoptosis in IAV-infected cells by binding PI3K and activating the PI3K/Akt pathway [11,12]. The results from the present study demonstrate that the NS1 can also inhibit apoptosis in infected cells by maintaining cellular RuvBL2 protein abundance in infected cells (Figure 9). Whether the NS1-RuvBL2 interactions are required for maintaining cellular RuvBL2 protein abundance remains unclear and merits further investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v13061038/s1. Table S1: List of all proteins identified in 2-D gel spots by LC/MS/MS; Figure S1: 2-D gels with all visible protein spots.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W., J.Z., Y.D.; data curation, Y.W., J.Z., Y.D.; formal analysis, Y.W., J.Z., Y.D.; funding acquisition, Y.D., S.G.M.; investigation, Y.W., J.Z., S.G.M., Y.D.; methodology, Y.W., J.Z., S.G.M., Y.D.; supervision, Y.D.; writing—original draft, Y.W., Y.D.; writing—review & editing, Y.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, Grant numbers P30 GM103450 and 3P20RR015569-10S2 (Y.D.), and R24GM137786, P20GM121293, and P20GM103429 (S.G.M.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee of the University of Arkansas (protocol # 10004 and 2018-06-25).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Table S1 and Figure S1.

Acknowledgments

We thank Adolfo Garcia-Sastre (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY) for providing influenza A/PR8/delNS1 virus strain, Stephan Ludwig (University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany) for mouse monoclonal antibody against the NS1 protein, and Ralph Henry (University of Arkansas) for pGEX-6P-2 plasmid.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

2-DEtwo-dimensional gel electrophoresis
BadBcl-2 antagonist of cell death
delNS1influenza A virus lacking the gene encoding the non-structural NS1 protein
EDeffector domain
GSTglutathione S-transferase
hnRNPheterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein
hpihours post-infection
IAVinfluenza A virus
IBimmunoblotting
IFNinterferon
IPimmunoprecipitation
MOImultiplicity of infection
NS1non-structural protein 1
PARPpoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase
PI3Kphosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
RBDRNA-binding domain
PR8 virusinfluenza A/PR/8/34 virus
RuvBLRuvB-like protein
siRNAsmall interfering RNA
vRNPviral ribonucleoprotein
WTwild-type

References

  1. Randall, R.E.; Goodbourn, S. Interferons and viruses: An interplay between induction, signalling, antiviral responses and virus countermeasures. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89 Pt 1, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ayllon, J.; García-Sastre, A. The NS1 Protein: A Multitasking Virulence Factor. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 386, 73–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Krug, R.M. Functions of the influenza A virus NS1 protein in antiviral defense. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2015, 12, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Barber, G.N. Host defense, viruses and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2001, 8, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kurokawa, M.; Koyama, A.H.; Yasuoka, S.; Adachi, A. Influenza virus overcomes apoptosis by rapid multiplication. Int. J. Mol. Med. 1999, 3, 527–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hale, B.G.; Randall, R.E.; Ortín, J.; Jackson, D. The multifunctional NS1 protein of influenza A viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89 Pt 10, 2359–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mibayashi, M.; Martínez-Sobrido, L.; Loo, Y.-M.; Cárdenas, W.; Gale, M.; García-SastreA. Inhibition of Retinoic Acid-Inducible Gene I-Mediated Induction of Beta Interferon by the NS1 Protein of Influenza A Virus. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Opitz, B.; Rejaibi, A.; Dauber, B.; Eckhard, J.; Vinzing, M.; Schmeck, B.; Hippenstiel, S.; Suttorp, N.; Wolff, T. IFNbeta induction by influenza A virus is mediated by RIG-I which is regulated by the viral NS1 protein. Cell. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 930–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.; Chen, Z.Y.; Wang, W.; Baker, C.C.; Krug, R.M. The 3′-end-processing factor CPSF is required for the splicing of single-intron pre-mRNAs in vivo. RNA 2001, 7, 920–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nemeroff, M.E.; Barabino, S.M.; Li, Y.; Keller, W.; Krug, R.M. Influenza virus NS1 protein interacts with the cellular 30 kDa subunit of CPSF and inhibits 3′end formation of cellular pre-mRNAs. Mol. Cell 1998, 1, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ehrhardt, C.; Wolff, T.; Pleschka, S.; Planz, O.; Beermann, W.; Bode, J.G.; Schmolke, M.; Ludwig, S. Influenza A Virus NS1 Protein Activates the PI3K/Akt Pathway To Mediate Antiapoptotic Signaling Responses. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 3058–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hale, B.G.; Jackson, D.; Chen, Y.-H.; Lamb, R.A.; Randall, R.E. Influenza A virus NS1 protein binds p85beta and activates phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 14194–14199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Nano, N.; Houry, W.A. Chaperone-like activity of the AAA+ proteins Rvb1 and Rvb2 in the assembly of various complexes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 368, 20110399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Neuwald, A.F.; Aravind, L.; Spouge, J.L.; Koonin, E.V. AAA+: A class of chaperone-like ATPases associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. Genome Res. 1999, 9, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Ogura, T.; Wilkinson, A.J. AAA+superfamily ATPases: Common structure-diverse function. Genes Cells 2001, 6, 575–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gorynia, S.; Bandeiras, T.; Pinho, F.G.; McVey, C.; Vonrhein, C.; Round, A.; Svergun, D.I.; Donner, P.; Matias, P.M.; Carrondo, M.A. Structural and functional insights into a dodecameric molecular machine—The RuvBL1/RuvBL2 complex. J. Struct. Biol. 2011, 176, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dauden, M.I.; López-Perrote, A.; Llorca, O. RUVBL1–RUVBL2 AAA-ATPase: A versatile scaffold for multiple complexes and functions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2020, 67, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gorynia, S.; Matias, P.M.; Bandeiras, T.M.; Donner, P.; Carrondo, M.A. Cloning, expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the human RuvBL1–RuvBL2 complex. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 2008, 64 Pt 9, 840–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Niewiarowski, A.; Bradley, A.S.; Gor, J.; McKay, A.R.; Perkins, S.J.; Tsaneva, I.R. Oligomeric assembly and interactions within the human RuvB-like RuvBL1 and RuvBL2 complexes. Biochem. J. 2010, 429, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gallant, P. Control of transcription by Pontin and Reptin. Trends Cell Biol. 2007, 17, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tarangelo, A.; Lo, N.; Teng, R.; Kim, E.; Le, L.; Watson, D.; Furth, E.E.; Raman, P.; Ehmer, U.; Viatour, P. Recruitment of Pontin/Reptin by E2f1 amplifies E2f transcriptional response during cancer progression. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 10028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Armenteros-Monterroso, E.; Zhao, L.; Gasparoli, L.; Brooks, T.; Pearce, K.; Mansour, M.R.; Martens, J.H.A.; De Boer, J.; Williams, O. The AAA+ATPase RUVBL2 is essential for the oncogenic function of c-MYB in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2019, 33, 2817–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mao, Y.-Q.; Houry, W.A. The Role of Pontin and Reptin in Cellular Physiology and Cancer Etiology. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2017, 4, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Rousseau, B.; Menard, L.; Haurie, V.; Taras, D.; Blanc, J.F.; Moreau-Gaudry, F.; Metzler, P.; Hugues, M.; Boyault, S.; Lemiere, S.; et al. Overexpression and role of the ATPase and putative DNA helicase RuvB-like 2 in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2007, 46, 1108–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yenerall, P.; Das, A.K.; Wang, S.; Kollipara, R.K.; Li, L.S.; Villalobos, P.; Flaming, J.; Lin, Y.-F.; Huffman, K.; Timmons, B.C.; et al. RUVBL1/RUVBL2 ATPase Activity Drives PAQosome Maturation, DNA Replication and Radioresistance in Lung Cancer. Cell Chem. Biol. 2020, 27, 105–121.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kakugawa, S.; Shimojima, M.; Neumann, G.; Goto, H.; Kawaoka, Y. RuvB-Like Protein 2 Is a Suppressor of Influenza A Virus Polymerases. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 6429–6434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mayer, D.; Molawi, K.; Martínez-Sobrido, L.; Ghanem, A.; Thomas, S.; Baginsky, S.; Grossmann, J.; García-Sastre, A.; Schwemmle, M. Identification of Cellular Interaction Partners of the Influenza Virus Ribonucleoprotein Complex and Polymerase Complex Using Proteomic-Based Approaches. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 672–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Mu, X.; Fu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, X.; Xuan, Y.; Shang, H.; Goff, S.P.; Gao, G. HIV-1 Exploits the Host Factor RuvB-like 2 to Balance Viral Protein Expression. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 18, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Morwitzer, M.J.; Tritsch, S.R.; Cazares, L.H.; Ward, M.D.; Nuss, J.E.; Bavari, S.; Reid, S.P. Identification of RUVBL1 and RUVBL2 as Novel Cellular Interactors of the Ebola Virus Nucleoprotein. Viruses 2019, 11, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yasunaga, A.; Hanna, S.L.; Li, J.; Cho, H.; Rose, P.P.; Spiridigliozzi, A.; Gold, B.; Diamond, M.S.; Cherry, S. Genome-Wide RNAi Screen Identifies Broadly-Acting Host Factors That Inhibit Arbovirus Infection. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1003914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Olanubi, O.; Frost, J.R.; Radko-Juettner, S.; Pelka, P. Suppression of Type I Interferon Signaling by E1A via RuvBL1/Pontin. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e02484-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Nishitsuji, H.; Ujino, S.; Harada, K.; Shimotohno, K. TIP60 Complex Inhibits Hepatitis B Virus Transcription. J. Virol. 2018, 92, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Ruan, C.; Du, Y. Inhibition of Type I Interferon Production via Suppressing IKK-Gamma Expression: A New Strategy for Counteracting Host Antiviral Defense by Influenza A Viruses? J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. García-Sastre, A.; Egorov, A.; Matassova, D.; Brandtbc, S.; Levy, D.E.; Durbin, J.E.; Palese, P.; Musterbc, T. Influenza A Virus Lacking the NS1 Gene Replicates in Interferon-Deficient Systems. Virology 1998, 252, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Huang, X.; Zheng, M.; Wang, P.; Mok, B.W.-Y.; Liu, S.; Lau, S.-Y.; Chen, P.; Liu, Y.-C.; Liu, H.; Chen, Y.; et al. An NS-segment exonic splicing enhancer regulates influenza A virus replication in mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zhou, Z.; Zhou, J.; Du, Y. Estrogen Receptor Alpha Interacts with Mitochondrial Protein HADHB and Affects Beta-Oxidation Activity. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2012, 11, M111-011056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Du, Y. hnRNP A2/B1 interacts with influenza A viral protein NS1 and inhibits virus replication potentially through suppressing NS1 RNA/protein levels and NS1 mRNA nuclear export. Virology 2014, 449, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Liu, L.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Mason, R.J.; Funk, C.J.; Du, Y. Proteome Alterations in Primary Human Alveolar Macrophages in Response to Influenza A Virus Infection. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 4091–4101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Watkins, N.J.; Lemm, I.; Ingelfinger, D.; Schneider, C.; Hossbach, M.; Urlaub, H.; Luhrmann, R. Assembly and maturation of the U3 snoRNP in the nucleoplasm in a large dynamic multiprotein complex. Mol. Cell 2004, 16, 789–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yi, L.; He, Y.; Chen, Y.; Kung, H.-F.; He, M.-L. Potent inhibition of human enterovirus 71 replication by type I interferon subtypes. Antivir. Ther. 2011, 16, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Carlos, T.S.; Fearns, R.; Randall, R.E. Interferon-Induced Alterations in the Pattern of Parainfluenza Virus 5 Transcription and Protein Synthesis and the Induction of Virus Inclusion Bodies. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 14112–14121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kamma, H.; Horiguchi, H.; Wan, L.; Matsui, M.; Fujiwara, M.; Fujimoto, M.; Yazawa, T.; Dreyfuss, G. Molecular characterization of the hnRNP A2/B1 proteins: Tissue-specific expression and novel isoforms. Exp. Cell Res. 1999, 246, 399–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Chen, G.; Liu, C.-H.; Zhou, L.; Krug, R.M. Cellular DDX21 RNA Helicase Inhibits Influenza A Virus Replication but Is Counteracted by the Viral NS1 Protein. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 15, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gack, M.U.; Albrecht, R.; Urano, T.; Inn, K.-S.; Huang, I.-C.; Carnero, E.; Farzan, M.; Inoue, S.; Jung, J.U.; García-Sastre, A. Influenza A Virus NS1 Targets the Ubiquitin Ligase TRIM25 to Evade Recognition by the Host Viral RNA Sensor RIG-I. Cell Host Microbe 2009, 5, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Guo, Z.; Chen, L.-M.; Zeng, H.; Gomez, J.A.; Plowden, J.; Fujita, T.; Katz, J.M.; Donis, R.O.; Sambhara, S. NS1 Protein of Influenza A Virus Inhibits the Function of Intracytoplasmic Pathogen Sensor, RIG-I. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2007, 36, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Wu, C.C.; Yates, J.R., 3rd. The application of mass spectrometry to membrane proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Du, Y.-C.; Gu, S.; Zhou, J.; Wang, T.; Cai, H.; MacInnes, M.A.; Bradbury, E.M.; Chen, X. The Dynamic Alterations of H2AX Complex during DNA Repair Detected by a Proteomic Approach Reveal the Critical Roles of Ca2+/Calmodulin in the Ionizing Radiation-induced Cell Cycle Arrest. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2006, 5, 1033–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Desmyter, J.; Melnick, J.L.; Rawls, W.E. Defectiveness of interferon production and of rubella virus interference in a line of African green monkey kidney cells (Vero). J. Virol. 1968, 2, 955–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. McLean, J.E.; Datan, E.; Matassov, D.; Zakeri, Z.F. Lack of Bax Prevents Influenza A Virus-Induced Apoptosis and Causes Diminished Viral Replication. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 8233–8246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Tran, A.T.; Cortens, J.P.; Du, Q.; Wilkins, J.A.; Coombs, K.M. Influenza Virus Induces Apoptosis via BAD-Mediated Mitochondrial Dysregulation. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 1049–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Wurzer, W.J.; Planz, O.; Ehrhardt, C.; Giner, M.; Silberzahn, T.; Pleschka, S.; Ludwig, S. Caspase 3 activation is essential for efficient influenza virus propagation. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 2717–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Herold, S.; Ludwig, S.; Pleschka, S.; Wolff, T. Apoptosis signaling in influenza virus propagation, innate host defense, and lung injury. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2012, 92, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ruuth, K.; Carlsson, L.; Hallberg, B.; Lundgren, E. Interferon-α Promotes Survival of Human Primary B-Lymphocytes via Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 284, 583–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, C.H.; Murti, A.; Pfeffer, S.R.; Kim, J.G.; Donner, D.B.; Pfeffer, L.M. Interferon alpha/beta promotes cell survival by activating nuclear factor kappa B through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Akt. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 13756–13761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Datta, S.R.; Dudek, H.; Tao, X.; Masters, S.; Fu, H.; Gotoh, Y.; Greenberg, M.E. Akt Phosphorylation of BAD Couples Survival Signals to the Cell-Intrinsic Death Machinery. Cell 1997, 91, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Del Peso, L.; González-García, M.; Page, C.; Herrera, R.; Nuñez, G. Interleukin-3-Induced Phosphorylation of BAD through the Protein Kinase Akt. Science 1997, 278, 687–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dugan, K.A.; Wood, M.A.; Cole, M.D. TIP49, but not TRRAP, modulates c-Myc and E2F1 dependent apoptosis. Oncogene 2002, 21, 5835–5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Maher, S.G.; Romero-Weaver, A.L.; Scarzello, A.J.; Gamero, A.M. Interferon: Cellular executioner or white knight? Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 1279–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lu, Y.; Wambach, M.; Katze, M.G.; Krug, R.M. Binding of the influenza virus NS1 protein to double-stranded RNA inhibits the activation of the protein kinase that phosphorylates the elF-2 translation initiation factor. Virology 1995, 214, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Viruses 13 01038 g001 550
Figure 1. Two-dimensional gel fractionation of the affinity-purified proteins. The Flag-NS1 and its associated proteins were pulled down by immobilized anti-Flag antibody and fractionated with 2-DE. The fractionations of the proteins pulled down from the lysate of the cells expressing Flag alone (control, left panel), and the cells expressing Flag-NS1 (right panel) are shown. The prominent proteins identified in the indicated protein spots by LC-MS/MS are listed in Table 1.
Figure 1. Two-dimensional gel fractionation of the affinity-purified proteins. The Flag-NS1 and its associated proteins were pulled down by immobilized anti-Flag antibody and fractionated with 2-DE. The fractionations of the proteins pulled down from the lysate of the cells expressing Flag alone (control, left panel), and the cells expressing Flag-NS1 (right panel) are shown. The prominent proteins identified in the indicated protein spots by LC-MS/MS are listed in Table 1.
Viruses 13 01038 g001
Viruses 13 01038 g002 550
Figure 2. Validation of the interactions between the NS1 and RuvBL1/RuvBL2. (A) co-IPs: Cell lysates from the cells expressing Flag-NS1 and HA-RuvBL1/HA-RuvBL2, or the cells expressing Flag alone and HA-RuvBL1/HA-RuvBL2 (control), were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag M2 resin, and the immunoprecipitated proteins were probed with an anti-HA antibody in Western blotting. (B) Reciprocal co-IPs, cell lysates from the cells expressing Flag-NS1 and HA-RuvBL1/HA-RuvBL2, or the cells expressing HA alone and Flag-NS1 (control), were precipitated with an immobilized anti-HA antibody, and the immunoprecipitated proteins were probed with an anti-Flag antibody in Western blotting. IP: immunoprecipitation; IB: immunoblotting.
Figure 2. Validation of the interactions between the NS1 and RuvBL1/RuvBL2. (A) co-IPs: Cell lysates from the cells expressing Flag-NS1 and HA-RuvBL1/HA-RuvBL2, or the cells expressing Flag alone and HA-RuvBL1/HA-RuvBL2 (control), were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag M2 resin, and the immunoprecipitated proteins were probed with an anti-HA antibody in Western blotting. (B) Reciprocal co-IPs, cell lysates from the cells expressing Flag-NS1 and HA-RuvBL1/HA-RuvBL2, or the cells expressing HA alone and Flag-NS1 (control), were precipitated with an immobilized anti-HA antibody, and the immunoprecipitated proteins were probed with an anti-Flag antibody in Western blotting. IP: immunoprecipitation; IB: immunoblotting.
Viruses 13 01038 g002
Viruses 13 01038 g003 550
Figure 3. The NS1 interacts with endogenous RuvBL2 and the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction is RNA-independent. (A) The NS1 interacts with endogenous RuvBL2 and the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction is RNA-independent. Cell lysates of the cells expressing Flag alone and an endogenous RuvBL2, or the cells expressing Flag-NS1 and an endogenous RuvBL2 were pulled down by an immobilized anti-Flag antibody, and the precipitated proteins on beads were treated with the indicated concentrations of RNase A, washed, and the bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (B) RuvBL2 interacts with the NS1 of the seasonal IAV H7N9 virus. The experiment was performed similarly to that shown in Figure 2A.
Figure 3. The NS1 interacts with endogenous RuvBL2 and the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction is RNA-independent. (A) The NS1 interacts with endogenous RuvBL2 and the NS1-RuvBL2 interaction is RNA-independent. Cell lysates of the cells expressing Flag alone and an endogenous RuvBL2, or the cells expressing Flag-NS1 and an endogenous RuvBL2 were pulled down by an immobilized anti-Flag antibody, and the precipitated proteins on beads were treated with the indicated concentrations of RNase A, washed, and the bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (B) RuvBL2 interacts with the NS1 of the seasonal IAV H7N9 virus. The experiment was performed similarly to that shown in Figure 2A.
Viruses 13 01038 g003
Viruses 13 01038 g004 550
Figure 4. RuvBL2 binds the RBD domain of the NS1 protein. (A) RuvBL2 physically binds the full-length NS1. (B) RuvBL2 physically binds the RBD domain of the NS1. Purified GST, GST tagged full-length NS1, GST-ED, or GST-RBD was incubated with equal molar amounts of purified Flag-RuvBL2, followed by pulldown by glutathione beads. The bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting.
Figure 4. RuvBL2 binds the RBD domain of the NS1 protein. (A) RuvBL2 physically binds the full-length NS1. (B) RuvBL2 physically binds the RBD domain of the NS1. Purified GST, GST tagged full-length NS1, GST-ED, or GST-RBD was incubated with equal molar amounts of purified Flag-RuvBL2, followed by pulldown by glutathione beads. The bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting.
Viruses 13 01038 g004
Viruses 13 01038 g005 550
Figure 5. IAV infection suppresses cellular RuvBL2 protein abundance, and the NS1 protein acts to maintain RuvBL2 protein abundance. (A) IAV virus infection suppresses the protein levels of RuvBL2 but not RuvBL1 in A549 cells. A549 cells were mock-infected or infected with WT PR8 virus at the indicated MOIs for 36 h and the lysates were analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) IAV infection suppresses the protein levels of RuvBL2 in Vero cells and the NS1 protein acts to maintain RuvBL2 protein levels in infected cells. Vero cells were mock-infected or infected by WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1 for 24, 36, or 48 h, and the cell lysates were then analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. Annexin-1 was used as a loading control [38].
Figure 5. IAV infection suppresses cellular RuvBL2 protein abundance, and the NS1 protein acts to maintain RuvBL2 protein abundance. (A) IAV virus infection suppresses the protein levels of RuvBL2 but not RuvBL1 in A549 cells. A549 cells were mock-infected or infected with WT PR8 virus at the indicated MOIs for 36 h and the lysates were analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) IAV infection suppresses the protein levels of RuvBL2 in Vero cells and the NS1 protein acts to maintain RuvBL2 protein levels in infected cells. Vero cells were mock-infected or infected by WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1 for 24, 36, or 48 h, and the cell lysates were then analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. Annexin-1 was used as a loading control [38].
Viruses 13 01038 g005
Viruses 13 01038 g006 550
Figure 6. Knockdown of RuvBL2 induces apoptosis in Vero cells. (A) Knockdown of RuvBL2 by siRNAs leads to increased PARP cleavage in Vero cells. (B,C) IAV infection induces apoptosis in Vero cells, and the NS1 protein acts to inhibit virus-induced apoptosis in Vero cells. Vero cells were mock-infected or infected by WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1 for 24, 36, and 48 h and then harvested for analysis by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies (B) or determination of caspase 3/7 activities (C). Values in (C) are the means ± SE of three separate sample preparations. * p < 0.05. Actin and annexin I in (A,B) were used as loading controls. fPARP, full-length PARP; cPARP, fragments of cleaved PARP.
Figure 6. Knockdown of RuvBL2 induces apoptosis in Vero cells. (A) Knockdown of RuvBL2 by siRNAs leads to increased PARP cleavage in Vero cells. (B,C) IAV infection induces apoptosis in Vero cells, and the NS1 protein acts to inhibit virus-induced apoptosis in Vero cells. Vero cells were mock-infected or infected by WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1 for 24, 36, and 48 h and then harvested for analysis by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies (B) or determination of caspase 3/7 activities (C). Values in (C) are the means ± SE of three separate sample preparations. * p < 0.05. Actin and annexin I in (A,B) were used as loading controls. fPARP, full-length PARP; cPARP, fragments of cleaved PARP.
Viruses 13 01038 g006
Viruses 13 01038 g007 550
Figure 7. Overexpression of RuvBL2 promotes resistance to infection-induced apoptosis. Vero cells were transfected with an empty vector (control) or a plasmid that expressed RuvBL2, and the transfected cells were then mock-infected or infected with WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1. The cells were either harvested at 36 hpi for Western blot analysis (A), or at the indicated time points for measurements of caspase 3/7 activities (B). Values in (B) are the means ± SE of three separate sample preparations. * denotes p < 0.05 and indicates the statistical differences between the cells that overexpressed RuvBL2 (over) and the corresponding control cells that did not overexpress RuvBL2 (control).
Figure 7. Overexpression of RuvBL2 promotes resistance to infection-induced apoptosis. Vero cells were transfected with an empty vector (control) or a plasmid that expressed RuvBL2, and the transfected cells were then mock-infected or infected with WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1. The cells were either harvested at 36 hpi for Western blot analysis (A), or at the indicated time points for measurements of caspase 3/7 activities (B). Values in (B) are the means ± SE of three separate sample preparations. * denotes p < 0.05 and indicates the statistical differences between the cells that overexpressed RuvBL2 (over) and the corresponding control cells that did not overexpress RuvBL2 (control).
Viruses 13 01038 g007
Viruses 13 01038 g008 550
Figure 8. IFNs inhibit IAV-induced apoptosis in infected cells. (A) IAV infection does not induce apoptosis in A549 cells. A549 cells were mock-infected or infected with WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1 for 36 and 48 h, and then harvested for determinations of caspase 3/7 activities. (B,C) IAV infection suppresses RuvBL2 cellular protein abundance but does not affect apoptosis in the Vero cells pretreated with a recombinant IFN. Vero cells were pretreated with a recombinant universal human IFN-α at 1000 U mL−1 for 6 h, and then mock-infected or infected with WT or delNS1 virus at an MOI of 1. The cells were harvested at the indicated time points either for Western blotting analysis (B) or caspase 3/7 activity measurement (C). Values in (A,C) are the means ± SE of three separate sample preparations.
Figure 8. IFNs inhibit IAV-induced apoptosis in infected cells. (A) IAV infection does not induce apoptosis in A549 cells. A549 cells were mock-infected or infected with WT or delNS1 PR8 virus at an MOI of 1 for 36 and 48 h, and then harvested for determinations of caspase 3/7 activities. (B,C) IAV infection suppresses RuvBL2 cellular protein abundance but does not affect apoptosis in the Vero cells pretreated with a recombinant IFN. Vero cells were pretreated with a recombinant universal human IFN-α at 1000 U mL−1 for 6 h, and then mock-infected or infected with WT or delNS1 virus at an MOI of 1. The cells were harvested at the indicated time points either for Western blotting analysis (B) or caspase 3/7 activity measurement (C). Values in (A,C) are the means ± SE of three separate sample preparations.
Viruses 13 01038 g008
Viruses 13 01038 g009 550
Figure 9. A proposed model underlying the regulation of apoptosis by RuvBL2 in IAV-infected cells. IAV infection suppresses cellular RuvBL2 protein abundance via a non-NS1 viral element(s) (potentially vRNPs), and reduction in RuvBL2 protein abundance induces apoptosis potentially through the upregulation of Bad expression [24]. Type I IFNs counterbalance the infection-induced, RuvBL2-regulated apoptosis in IAV-infected cells by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway [53,54], which, in turn, inactivates Bad [55,56]. The NS1 protein inhibits apoptosis in infected cells through activating the PI3K/Akt pathway by interacting with the p85 subunit of PI3K [12] and by maintaining cellular RuvBL2 protein abundance in IAV-infected cells (present study). IAV infection does not directly affect RuvBL1 protein abundance (Figure 5A). However, RuvBL1 may modulate c-Myc-regulated apoptosis by binding the transcription factor E2F1 [57].
Figure 9. A proposed model underlying the regulation of apoptosis by RuvBL2 in IAV-infected cells. IAV infection suppresses cellular RuvBL2 protein abundance via a non-NS1 viral element(s) (potentially vRNPs), and reduction in RuvBL2 protein abundance induces apoptosis potentially through the upregulation of Bad expression [24]. Type I IFNs counterbalance the infection-induced, RuvBL2-regulated apoptosis in IAV-infected cells by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway [53,54], which, in turn, inactivates Bad [55,56]. The NS1 protein inhibits apoptosis in infected cells through activating the PI3K/Akt pathway by interacting with the p85 subunit of PI3K [12] and by maintaining cellular RuvBL2 protein abundance in IAV-infected cells (present study). IAV infection does not directly affect RuvBL1 protein abundance (Figure 5A). However, RuvBL1 may modulate c-Myc-regulated apoptosis by binding the transcription factor E2F1 [57].
Viruses 13 01038 g009
Table
Table 1. Short list of proteins identified by affinity purification, 2-DE, and LC-MS/MS analysis a.
Table 1. Short list of proteins identified by affinity purification, 2-DE, and LC-MS/MS analysis a.
CategorySpot # bProtein NameSwissProt acc.#MW
(kDa)/pI		Mascot Protein ScoreUnique Peptide CountExclusive Spectrum CountSequence Coverage (%)
ATPase1RuvBL2Q9Y23051.2/5.51859259053
5RuvBL1Q9Y26550.2/6.01402225756
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein2hnRNP KP6197851.0/5.41062173739
9hnRNP LP1486664.1/8.51113152539
11hnRNP QO6050669.6/8.7675132418
13hnRNP A2/B1P2262637.4/9.01207163355
17hnRNP D0Q1410338.4/7.65545921
19hnRNP D-likeO1497946.4/9.649981216
20hnRNP A/BQ9972936.2/8.23622711
Heat shock protein3Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein P1114270.9/5.41566184532
4Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1BP0DMV8/P0DMV970.1/5.51395164532
Influenza A viral protein23NS1P0349625.9/6.212791810780
24NS1P0349625.9/6.21123166876
a If two or more proteins were identified in a 2-D gel spot, only the top one was listed in this table. If a protein was identified in two or more spots, only the one with higher or the highest abundance was listed here. Each identified protein contains at least two peptide matches that meet or exceed the threshold values for a 95% confidence level. Refer to Table S1 for the list of all the identified proteins. b Spot numbers correspond to those in Figure 1.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Mackintosh, S.G.; Du, Y. RuvB-Like Protein 2 Interacts with the NS1 Protein of Influenza A Virus and Affects Apoptosis That Is Counterbalanced by Type I Interferons. Viruses 2021, 13, 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061038

AMA Style

Wang Y, Zhou J, Mackintosh SG, Du Y. RuvB-Like Protein 2 Interacts with the NS1 Protein of Influenza A Virus and Affects Apoptosis That Is Counterbalanced by Type I Interferons. Viruses. 2021; 13(6):1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yimeng, Jianhong Zhou, Samuel G. Mackintosh, and Yuchun Du. 2021. "RuvB-Like Protein 2 Interacts with the NS1 Protein of Influenza A Virus and Affects Apoptosis That Is Counterbalanced by Type I Interferons" Viruses 13, no. 6: 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061038

APA Style

Wang, Y., Zhou, J., Mackintosh, S. G., & Du, Y. (2021). RuvB-Like Protein 2 Interacts with the NS1 Protein of Influenza A Virus and Affects Apoptosis That Is Counterbalanced by Type I Interferons. Viruses, 13(6), 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061038

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop