Next Article in Journal
Retrospective Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 Infection Profile in COVID-19 Positive Patients in Vitoria da Conquista, Northeast Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
Epidemiology of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus in Poland during 2016–2022
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of Feline Calicivirus Isolated in Guangdong Province, China from 2018 to 2022
Previous Article in Special Issue
Occurrence of Equine Foamy Virus Infection in Horses from Poland
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 14
Issue 11
10.3390/v14112423
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

European Brown Hare Syndrome in Poland: Current Epidemiological Situation

by
Andrzej Fitzner
1,*,
Wiesław Niedbalski
1,
Andrzej Kęsy
1,
Bogusław Rataj
2,* and
Marian Flis
3,*
1
Department of Foot and Mouth Disease, National Veterinary Research Institute, ul. Wodna 7, 98–220 Zduńska Wola, Poland
2
Polish Hunting Association, District Board Nowy Sącz, 33–300 Nowy Sącz, Poland
3
Department of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Akademicka 15, 20–950 Lublin, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2022, 14(11), 2423; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112423
Submission received: 21 September 2022 / Revised: 24 October 2022 / Accepted: 27 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Animal Virus Research in Poland II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
European brown hare syndrome (EBHS) is one of the main causes of mortality in brown hares (Lepus europaeus) and mountain hares (Lepus timidus) in Europe. Since the mid-1990s, this highly lethal and contagious plague has been widespread in many European countries, contributing to a drastic decline in the number of free-living and farmed hares. A second lagovirus, able to infect some species of hares is rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2; GI.2) recognised in 2010, a new viral emergence of RHDV (GI.1) which is known to be responsible for haemorrhagic disease in rabbits—RHD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current EBHS epidemiological situation on the basis of the presence of antibodies to European brown hare syndrome virus (EBHSV) and anti-RHDV2 antibodies in sera collected from free-ranging hares in Central and Southeastern Poland in 2020–2021. Additionally, studies on the presence of EBHSV and RHDV2 antigens or their genetic material in the blood and internal organs taken from brown hares between 2014–2021 have been carried out. The results of the serological examination showed nearly 88% of tested blood samples were positive for EBHSV antibodies. No EBHSV was identified in the examined hares using virological and molecular tests. The positive results of EBHS serological studies confirmed the circulation and maintenance of EBHSV in free-living brown hares in Poland. However, no serological, virological or molecular evidence was obtained indicating that the brown hares tested had been in contact with RHDV2.

1. Introduction

European brown hare syndrome (EBHS) is a highly contagious and fatal viral disease of the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) and mountain hare (Lepus timidus) affecting free-ranging and farmed hares in Europe. The disease was first recognised in 1980 in Sweden, although there are many indications of its earlier occurrence [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In the mid-1990s, as a result of the intensive spread of the highly lethal and contagious EBHSV in many European countries, a drastic decline in the number of free-living hare populations was noted [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. EBHS shares clinical, pathological and epizootic similarities with another fatal viral disease occurring in Leporidae—rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD)—recognised in 1984 [15]. Both aetiological agents, EBHSV (GII.1) and RHDV (GI.1–2) are members of the family Caliciviridae, genus Lagovirus [16]. The first EBHSV isolate in Poland was confirmed in 1992 [17,18]. At that time, the presence of EBHS infections in the native hare population was also proven on the basis of serological investigations [19,20].
Diagnostic methods of EBHS include serological tests, such as ELISA tests using monoclonal antibodies (e.g., IZSLER kits, Brescia, Italy) to detect the presence of EBHSV-specific antibodies, as well as virological tests for direct recognition of the antigen formed by the major structural protein of the capsid (VP60). Both conventional and real-time RT-PCR tests are available for the detection of EBHSV RNA [21,22].
In addition to the natural host, EBHSV genetic material was also detected in faecal swabs of wolves [23] and in fox carcasses [24], indicating that sympatric hare predators may play a role in the passive dissemination of the EBHSV.
In 2010, a new type of RHDV (GI.1), RHDV2 (GI.2) was diagnosed in France [25]. RHDV2, similar to RHDV and its antigenic subtype RHDVa (GI.1a) is responsible for a fatal infection in wild and domesticated rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). However, RHDV2, unlike to the previous two forms of this pathogen, is also capable of overcoming the interspecies barrier and causing a fatal disease with clinical symptoms similar to EBHS in various hare species, including brown hares as well as infecting non-lagomorph species [22,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The first Polish RHDV2 outbreak was confirmed in 2016 in Łódź Voivodeship [33]. Recently, the presence of lagoviruses recombinants of the non-structural part of the EBHSV genome and structural genes of RHDV2, resulting in the origin of a novel form of RHDV2, was found [34]. At present, only one serotype of EBHSV is known, whereas due to the significant antigenic differences found between RHDV2 and RHDV/RHDVa, two serotypes of RHD causative lagoviruses can be identified [25,35,36].
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current EBHS situation in Poland based on a serological survey as well as virological and molecular analysis of samples obtained from a free-living population of brown hares. The main serological study was carried out on the native brown hares hunted in Central and Southeast Poland, for two winter seasons, from December 2020 to December 2021. The blood samples and organ specimens were taken from hares of both sexes, adults and young, of different weights in hunting districts managed by Polish Hunting Association. Moreover, the results of the study on the presence of RHDV2 in native, free-living hares by the serological, virological and molecular methods were presented.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimens

In total, the samples of sera and internal organs from 170 free-living brown hares were tested for the presence of EBHSV and RHDV2. Of these, 113 sera from wild brown hares shot off in three hunting districts located in Southeast and Central Poland between December 2020 and December 2021 were used for serological examinations. For the sake of clarity of the description, two neighbouring hunting districts of the Lublin Voivodeship (units no 199 and 216) are further treated as a common territory (Figure 1). Of this district, 103 samples of sera (batches I—IV) were collected over two successive hunting seasons from 2020–2021 (n = 73) and 2021–2022 (n = 30). The remaining 10 sera (batch V) were obtained in December 2021 from the Łódź Voivodeship (hunting unit 252). Moreover, five reference anti-EBHS hare sera were obtained in Poland in the period 1999–2000 (collection of the Department of Food and Environmental Virology of the NVRI) and two sera anti-RHDV2 taken from convalescent rabbits from RHD outbreaks in 2016 and 2021 (FMD laboratory’s own collection) were included for serological examinations.

2.2. The Characteristics of the Hunting Areas

The areas are suitable for hares. In hunting units No 199 and 216 (adjacent to each other), hare hunting on a limited scale has been practised continuously for many years. This region includes 13,600 ha of fertile soil with 25.2% of forest covering. It is considered that many small farms (<1 ha) and the strong heterogeneity of the environment are conducive to the maintenance and development of the hares’ population in this area, where in 2017, their number was estimated at 10 hares/100 ha [37]. The hunting district no 252, situated in Central Poland near the village Rozprza (51°18′09″ N; 19°38′44″ E), includes 9500 ha encompassing 49% of forests and 51% of arable agricultural land, with participation of grasslands, meadows and peat bogs. The collective hare hunt in the 2021/2022 hunting season was carried out for the first time after more than ten years of interruption. The decision was based on a noticeable increase in hare population density and the effectiveness of the predator reduction program implemented, including the red fox.

2.3. Hares Body Weight, Sex and Age

The body weight of the animals was determined with an accuracy of 0.1 kg immediately after the shooting. The sex of the hares was also determined directly in the field, immediately after weighing, on the basis of the inspection of secondary sex characteristics. The age of the hares was initially assessed on the basis of palpation detection of cartilage thickening on the outer part of the ulna, which occurs in young hares. This made it possible to divide the material into young (up to 1 year old) and adult (over 1 year old) hares [38,39]. Additionally, in order to verify the results obtained with the field method, the left eyeball was dissected from each hunted hare and preserved in 10% buffered formalin. In laboratory conditions, lenses were prepared from the secured material and dried in a laboratory dryer at a temperature of 100 °C for 24 h to a constant weight [40]. After drying, the lenses were weighed on a laboratory balance with an accuracy of 0.001 g and divided into those weighing up to 290 mg (juveniles) and those weighing over 290 g (adults) [37,40,41,42,43].
Additionally, 57 animals from seven voivodeships, collected over the period 2014–2021 from hare deceased due to traffic incidents (n = 22), found dead in forest and rural environments (n = 5), sent from the animal shelters (n = 8), and shot for hunting purposes (n = 22), were used for examinations (Table 1). The samples are archival biological material stored frozen (−20 °C). Almost all of them were collected and made available by another laboratory that had previously tested them for parasites and bacterial pathogens, but not for lagoviruses. Some of the samples (n = 8) came from young hares, about 2 months old, who died shortly after being placed in the animal shelter. These hares did not come from the breeding sites and were not used for reintroduction.

2.4. Serological Methods

Antibodies to EBHSV and anti-RHDV2 in sera from 113 hares were detected using two inhibition ELISA kits commercially available from the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’ Emilia (IZSLER), Brescia, Italy, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Each ELISA kit contains the appropriate negative and positive control sera, viral antigen, and specific Mabs conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, enabling highly sensitive detection of EBHSV or RHDV2 antibodies. The serum titre corresponds to the dilution of the serum tested, which inhibits the absorbance (492 nm) value of negative control serum by 50%.

2.5. Virological and Molecular Tests EBHSV and RHDV2 Detection

The internal organs liver (n = 167), lungs (n = 14), kidneys (n =13), spleen (n = 10), duodenum (n = 67), heart (n = 6), faeces (n = 3), and blood samples (n = 113) of 170 brown hares were tested for the presence of EBHSV and RHDV antigens using RHD-EBHS ELISA kit (IZSLER, Brescia, Italy) according to the manufacturer’s instruction, as previously described [44]. For the detection of the genetic material of the relevant lagoviruses, the real-time RT-qPCR with TaqMan primer and probe sets, which had been established for RHDV2 [21] and EBHSV [22] were used. Amplification was carried out using the QuantiTect Probe RT-PCR Kit (QIAGEN) and AB 7500 thermocycler.

3. Results

3.1. Seroprevalence

The total seroprevalence of EBHS virus antibodies in 113 free-living hares from two different geographical regions of Poland, collected from December 2020 to December 2021, has been estimated at 87.6% with a titre range of >10 ≤2560. In individual batches of the samples, the percentage of seropositive hares was 91%, 75%, and 90% in five lots tested. No EBHS antibodies were detected in 12.4% of the animals (Table 2).
The distribution of the EBHSV antibody in 113 sera showed 51.5%, 43.4%, and 5.1% positive results with titres ranging from 10–80, 160–640, and >640, respectively. The highest antibody titre (2560) was found in one adult female hare from Lublin voivodeship (batch III from hunting season 2020/2021). In the two groups tested in this province, the percentage of sera with low titres (10–80) was higher than sera with medium titres (160–640) and ranged from 61% to 33%. In one of the two remaining groups of the region, the percentage of hares with low and medium titres were evenly distributed (about 48%), while the other showed an advantage of medium titres over low titres in the ratio of 53% to 33%. In the hunting district located in the central part of Poland, the percentage of hares with low and medium titres ranged from 55.6% to 44.4%. The overall proportion of EBHS seropositive females (48.7%) was higher than that of males (38.9%) (Figure 2). The relationships in individual batches of animals were similar or the percentage of positive results for females was slightly higher than for males, both in the range of low and medium titres. Depending on age, a generally higher percentage of EBHS-positive animals was found in adult hares (50.4%) compared to young hares (37.2%). Similar relationships were observed in young and adult hares in five lots tested (Figure 3).

3.2. RHDV2 Serology

No RHDV2-specific antibodies were detected in the brown hares’ sera tested.

3.3. EBHSV and RHDV2 Detection

No EBHSV and RHDV2 antigens or their genetic material were detected in the internal organs and blood samples of 170 brown hares tested (killed for hunting purposes, found dead following traffic incidents in rural and forest areas, as well as in hares showing nonspecific symptoms that died in an animal shelter) using the RHDV-EBHSV CR ELISA kit and two RT-qPCR methods specific for each virus. RHDV2 and EBHSV virus RNA was not detected by real-time RT-PCR also in blood samples of seropositive EBHSV hares, including the hare with the highest anti-EBHSV antibody titres (2560).

4. Discussion

Data available from some European countries from the last 50 years show a drastic decline in the abundance of free-living brown (Lepus europaeus) and mountain (Lepus timidus) hares due to environmental, and demographic reasons, as well as the effect of diseases [1,2,45,46,47,48,49]. In Poland, a constant trend in the decline of the abundance of brown hares and grey partridges accelerated dramatically at the beginning of the 1990s [50,51]. At the end of the 20th century, the average autumn hare density decreased twice as compared to the 1970s and remained at a low level, ranging from 2 to 20 hares/100 ha, over the next two decades. Unfavourable trends in the density of the hares’ population influenced the safety of hunting exploitation of this species. As a result, in many hunting districts shooting was discontinued or suspended. In the years 2014–2017, only 13–18 thousand hares per year were obtained from hunting [50,52,53]. Among the main reasons for the decrease in the population of hares in Poland, apart from the increase in the number of natural predators, such as foxes, the chemicalisation of agricultural crops, and far-reaching urbanisation the emergence of the viral, deadly plague disease, EBHS, should be indicated [2,50]. The attempts to increase the native population of hares by introducing captive-bred animals bring limited results due to the low survival rate [54]. However, the latest official data show a slight, systematic increase in the total number of hares in Poland, from about 560,000 animals in 2010 to almost 710,000 in 2015 and 870,000 in 2021. The most hares were recorded in voivodeships of central and eastern parts of the country: Masovia, Lublin, and Łódź voivodeships [55]. Accordingly, serological studies on EBHS presented in this paper were carried out in hunting districts located in two of the aforementioned provinces, with the highest population density of hares (Figure 1). In terms of the structure of agricultural crops and intensification of agricultural production, the hunting areas from which samples for serological tests were obtained can be defined as areas of low of agricultural production intensity, with a predominance of small farms. These can be compared to one of the hunting districts in Central Poland, where recently, hare density from 16.4 to 37.5 hares/100 ha was found [45].
It can be assumed that EBHSV antibodies detected in this study in both juvenile (J) and adult (A) apparently healthy hares of both sexes were produced as a result of contact of these animals with EBHSV, despite the fact that the last time EBHSV-RNA was detected in Poland in 2012 [56]. No EBHSV-positivity in 57 hares from 2014–2021 (the specimens not related with hunting seasons 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 described) may be explained by the fact that only 8.8% (n = 5) of these samples comprised animals found dead in the field. As a highly pathogenic virus, EBHSV probably causes death in a short period so the window of opportunity to find positive hares is narrow.
On the other hand, since the first data on the occurrence of EBHS in Poland were described in the early 1990s, it can also be assumed that the disease has been endemic here since then [17,19]. The above assessment is reflected in the phylogenetic characteristics of the EBHS strains isolated in Poland between 1992–2004, confirming the close relationship of the EBHSV G104 strain from 2004 with younger European EBHSV strains [44]. New strains of EBHSV, which have recently been detected in the eastern regions of Germany adjacent to Poland, also point out the active circulation of EBHSV in this part of Europe. Moreover, genomic recombination between the non-structural part of the EBHSV genome and the genes of the RHDV2 structural proteins indicates new scenarios of genetic variation of both lagoviruses with the perspective of antigenic changes [33].
RHD has been endemic in Poland since 1988 [53,57]. The first classic strains of RHDV (currently classified in the genetic group GI.1c) were detected at the same time as in neighbouring countries—in Slovakia, Germany and the Czech Republic. The outbreaks were linked to the spread of the RHD pandemic wave, which began in China in 1984, then spread through Asia, and Europe and reached Mexico in North America [15]. At this point, it should be explained that the emergence and maintenance of RHD in Poland are related to the presence of numerous small-scale breeding rabbit farms, having a significant quantitative advantage over industrial breeding farms. In recent years, companion rabbits have gradually been playing an increasingly important role in the epidemiology of RHD. RHDVa strains appeared in Poland 7–8 years after their diagnosis in Italy and Germany [58,59,60,61]. In turn, the first RHDV2 strains were diagnosed in Poland in domestic rabbits (including companion animals) 6 years after their detection in France [25,33]. Currently, RHD outbreaks are still detected in domestic rabbit farms, caused by both RHDVa and RHDV2. However, the severity of the disease is not as high as in the early 1990s or the first decade of the 2000s. Contrary to many Western European countries, wild rabbits do not seem to play a significant role in the epidemiology of RHD in Poland. Their general low numbers and occurrence restricted to small enclaves may favour the preservation of the antigenic and genetic stability of RHDV [44]. So far, only the presence of RHDVa has been confirmed in these rabbits. As there were no wild rabbits in the study area and there was no direct evidence of the presence of RHDV2 in breeding rabbits in close proximity, at the time of the survey, the chance of detecting RHDV2 antigen or its RNA in hares was significantly lower than in a case of EBHSV.
NoRHDV2 transmission to the brown hares examined was also confirmed by the serological results. Since the pathogenic RHDVa and RHDV2 lagoviruses appeared in Poland a few years later than in many other European countries, it can be expected that in the near future, RHDV2 infections will also occur in native hares. To verify this assumption, it will be necessary to continue research and obtain samples from other regions of the country.
The results of the EBHS serological survey presented in this paper are similar to the data received in Italy in the early 1990s and previous serological investigations of Polish free-living brown hares from 1992–1995, which showed 95% and 86% seroconversion, respectively [13,19]. Italian data pointed out that the most numerous were the animals with low (≤160) to average (1:320–1:640) antibody titres [13]. A study by Frölich and colleagues performed in Poland in this period has shown a 38% prevalence of antibodies to EBHSV in hares in the Czempin area (Greater Poland Province) [20]. At that time, the high and mild seropositivity of EBHS in wild and captive hares was also recorded in Austria (87.5%), Slovakia (73–90%), and Germany (29%) [10,62,63]. The observations in areas where EBHS is endemic have shown that the circulation of the virus is linked to hare population densities, the age and sex of the animals. According to this, the young hares, less than 2–3 months old, are naturally resistant to EBHSV infection. In the light of these data, a high percentage of seropositive hares found in the presented research may result from a higher population density in the studied areas than it would appear from official data. In turn, early subclinical contact of juveniles with EBHSV would favour the development of long-term protective immunity and a high percentage of seropositive hares, which is also characteristic of areas with a high population density of hares and may explain their low mortality [36,64,65,66]. The results of our research indicate that in the analysed populations these key conditions, relating to a large percentage of seropositive young hares, were met (Figure 3). The serological study of brown hares performed in two independent territories located in Southeastern and Central Poland and used for hunting purposes confirmed the high seroprevalence of anti-EBHSV seroreagents and, thus, the circulation and impact of the virus on this species. The result of the presented serological study proves that EBHS is still endemic in Poland. Based on our results, it can be assumed that the endemic presence of EBHS, still one of the most important infectious diseases of hares, in addition to many other pathological factors [67] does not have such a negative impact on the decline in the population of these animals. At present, environmental changes are considered the main cause of a deep decline in brown hare populations [45]. Moreover, it can be concluded that, according to the data from other EBHS endemic infections [36], the high seroprevalence in the hares tested was the result of early and regular contact of young hares with EBHSV. This situation probably creates a certain state of equilibrium between the virus and the susceptible hares, finally leading to low animal mortality. It can also be assumed that hares living in freedom in the examined areas (possibly throughout the entire country) are prepared for contact with the current antigenic and genetic form of EBHSV.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study confirmed the maintenance of EBHSV in the field and its role as an important factor which can affect the mortality of the brown hare population in Poland. The high percentage of seropositive hares shows that EBHS still has a significant impact on hare density. This confirms the importance of diseases as an influencing factor responsible for the survival of small game, a key element in maintaining the balance and biodiversity in wildlife. The results obtained indirectly indicate the presence of a higher density level of hares than expected in the native population of free-living brown hares and the existence of a fairly high-level population immunity limiting the negative impact of the EBHSV. The lack of evidence for the presence of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus 2 in the examined brown hares does not exclude the possibility of its appearance and supports the continuation of research on both pathogenic lagoviruses, taking into account the other areas of the existence of hares (a potential host of RHDV2) in the country.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, A.F. and M.F. methodology, A.F. and W.N. investigation, A.F., W.N. and M.F. formal analysis, A.F., W.N. and M.F. writing—original draft preparation, A.F., W.N. and M.F. writing—review and editing, A.F., W.N., A.K., M.F. and B.R. visualisation, A.F. supervision, A.F. and M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Poland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not require the approval of the Ethics Committee. The study did not involve humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to members of hunting clubs leasing hunting districts number 199, 216 and 252 for providing samples for research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Edwards, P.J.; Fletcher, M.R.; Berny, P. Review of the factors affecting the decline of the European brown hare, Lepus europaeus (Pallas, 1778) and the use of wildlife incident data to evaluate the significance of paraquat. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2000, 79, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gavier-Widén, D.; Mörner, T. Epidemiology and diagnosis of the European brown hare syndrome in Scandinavian countries: A review. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1991, 10, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Henriksen, P.; Gavier, D.; Elling, F. Acute necrotising hepatitis in Danish farmed hares. Vet. Rec. 1989, 125, 486–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Löliger, H.C.; Eskens, U. Incidence, epizootiology and control of viral haemorrhagic disease of rabbits and the European brown hare syndrome in Germany. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1991, 10, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Morisse, J.P.; Le Gall, G.; Boilletot, E. Hepatitis of viral origin in Leporidae: Introduction and aetiological hyptheses. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1991, 10, 283–295. [Google Scholar]
  6. Poli, A.; Nigro, M.; Gallazzi, D.; Sironi, G.; Lavazza, A.; Gelmetti, D. Acute hepatosis in the Eurpoean brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Italy. J. Wildl. Dis. 1991, 27, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cancellotti, F.M.; Renzi, M. Epidemiology and current situation of viral haemorrhagic disease of rabbits and the European brown hare syndrome in Italy. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1991, 10, 409–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chasey, D.; Duff, P. European brown hare syndrome and associated virus particles in the UK. Vet. Rec. 1990, 126, 623–624. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Frölich, K.; Haerer, G.; Bacciarini, L.; Janovsky, M.; Rudolph, M.; Giacometti, M. European brown hare syndrome in free-ranging European brown and mountains hares from Switzerland. J. Wildl. Dis. 2001, 37, 803–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Frölich, K.; Wisser, J.; Schmüser, H.; Fehlberg, U.; Neubauer, H.; Grunow, R.; Nikolaou, K.; Priemer, J.; Thiede, S.; Streich, W.J.; et al. Epizootiologic and ecologic investigations of European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) in selected populations from Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. J. Wildl. Dis. 2003, 39, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Le Gall-Reculé, G.; Zwingelstein, F.; Laurent, S.; Portejoie, Y.; Rasschaert, D. Molecular epidemiology of European brown hare syndrome virus in France between 1989 and 2003. Arch. Virol. 2006, 151, 1713–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nauwynck, H.; Callebaut, P.; Peeters, J.; Ducatelle, R.; Uyttebroek, E. Susceptibility of hares and rabbits to a Belgian isolate of European brown hare syndrome virus. J. Wildl. Dis. 1993, 29, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Scicluna, M.T.; Lavazza, A.; Capucci, L. European brown hare syndrome in northern Italy: Results of a virological and serological survey. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1994, 13, 893–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Syrjälä, P.; Nylund, M.; Heinikainen, S. European brown hare syndrome in free-living mountain hares (Lepus timidus) and European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) in Finland 1990–2002. J. Wildl. Dis. 2005, 41, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Abrantes, J.; Van der Loo, W.; Le Pendu, J.; Esteves, P.J. Rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) and rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV): A review. Vet. Res. 2012, 43, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Le Pendu, J.; Abrantes, J.; Bertagnoli, S.; Guitton, J.S.; Le Gall-Reculé, G.; Lopes, A.M.; Marchandeau, S.; Alda, F.; Almeida, T.; Celio, A.P.; et al. Proposal for a unified classification system and nomenclature of lagoviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 1658–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chrobocińska, M.; Górski, J. Prevalence of infection with EBHS (European Brown Hare Syndrome) virus in hares in Poland. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 1995, 39, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chrobocińska, M. Analysis of the fragment of capsid protein gene sequences of Polish strains of European brown hare syndrome virus. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2002, 46, 213–222. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chrobocińska, M.; Górski, J. Prevalence of antibodies to EBHS (European brown hare syndrome) virus in sera of hares in Poland. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 1995, 39, 97–102. [Google Scholar]
  20. Frölich, K.; Meyer, H.; Pielowski, Z.; Ronsholt, L.; von Seck-Lanzendorf, S.; Stolte, M. European brown hare syndrome in free-ranging hares in Poland. J. Wildl. Dis. 1996, 32, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Duarte, M.D.; Carvalho, C.L.; Barros, S.C.; Henriques, A.M.; Ramos, F.; Fagulha, T.; Luis, T.; Duarte, E.L.; Fevereiro, M. A real time Taqman RT-PCR for the detection of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2). J. Virol. Methods 2015, 219, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Le Gall-Reculé, G.; Lemaitre, E.; Bertagnoli, S.; Hubert, C.; Top, S.; Decors, A.; Marchandeau, S.; Guitton, J.S. Large-scale lagovirus disease outbreaks in European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) in France caused by RHDV2 strains spatially shared with rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Vet. Res. 2017, 48, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Di Profio, F.; Melegari, I.; Sarchese, V.; Robetto, S.; Bermudez Sanchez, S.; Carella, E.; Orusa, R.; Cavadini, P.; Lavazza, A.; Marsilio, F.; et al. Potential role of wolf (Canis lupus) as passive carrier of European brown hare syndrome virus (EBHSV). Res. Vet. Sci. 2018, 117, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chiari, M.; Molinari, S.; Cavadini, P.; Bertasi, B.; Zanoni, M.; Capucci, L.; Lavazza, A. Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) feeding brown hares (Lepus europaeus) infected by European brown hare syndrome virus (EBHSV) might be involved in the spread of the virus. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2016, 62, 761–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Le Gall-Reculé, G.; Lavazza, A.; Marchandeau, S.; Bertagnoli, S.; Zwingelstein, F.; Cavadini, P.; Martinelli, N.; Lombardi, G.; Guérin, J.L.; Lemaitre, E.; et al. Emergence of a new lagovirus related to Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease Virus. Vet. Res. 2013, 44, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Abade dos Santos, F.A.; Pinto, A.; Burgoyne, T.; Dalton, K.P.; Carvalho, C.L.; Ramolo, D.W.; Carneiro, C.; Carvalho, T.; Peleteiro, M.C.; Parra, F.; et al. Spillover events of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus 2 (recombinant GI.4P-GI.2) from Lagomorpha to Eurasian badger. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, 1030–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Calvete, C.; Mendoza, M.; Sarto, M.P.; de Bagüés, M.P.J.; Luján, L.; Molin, J.; Calvo, A.J.H. Detection of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus GI.2/RHDV2/b in the Mediterranean Pine Vole (Microtus duodecimcostatus) and White-Toothed Shrew (Crocidura Russula). J. Wildl. Dis. 2019, 55, 467–472. [Google Scholar]
  28. Camarda, A.; Pugliese, N.; Cavadini, P.; Circella, E.; Capucci, L.; Caroli, A.; Legretto, M.; Malia, E.; Lavazza, A. Detection of the new emerging rabbit haemorrhagic disease type 2 virus (RHDV2) in Sicily from rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and Italian hare (Lepus corsicanus). Res. Vet. Sci. 2014, 97, 642–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hall, R.N.; Peacock, D.E.; Kovaliski, J.; Mahar, J.E.; Mourant, R.; Piper, M.; Strive, T. Detection of RHDV2 in European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) in Australia. Vet. Rec. 2017, 180, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Neimanis, A.; Ahola, H.; Larsson Petersson, U.; Lopes, A.M.; Abrantes, J.; Zohari, S.; Esteves, P.J.; Gavier-Widen, D. Overcoming species barriers: An outbreak of Lagovirus europaeus GI.2/RHDV2 in an isolated population of mountain hares (Lepus timidus). BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Puggioni, G.; Cavadini, P.; Maestrale, C.; Scivoli, R.; Botti, G.; Ligios, C.; Le Gall-Reculé, G.; Lavazza, A.; Capucci, L. The new French 2010 variant of the rabbit of the hemorrhagic disease virus causes an RHD-like disease in the Sardinian Cape hare (Lepus capensis mediterraneus). Vet. Res. 2013, 44, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Velarde, R.; Cavadini, P.; Neimanis, A.; Cabezon, O.; Chiari, M.; Gaffuri, A.; Lavin, S.; Grilli, G.; Gavier-Widen, D.; Lavazza, A.; et al. Spillover events of infection of Brown hares (Lepus europaeus) with rabbit haemorrhagic disease type 2 virus (RHDV2) caused sporadic cases of an European Brown Hare Syndrome-like disease in Italy and Spain. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 1750–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fitzner, A.; Niedbalski, W. Detection of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus 2 (GI.2) in Poland. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2018, 21, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Szillat, K.P.; Höper, D.; Beer, M.; König, P. Full-genome sequencing of German rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus uncovers recombination between RHDV (GI.2) and EBHSV (GII.1). Virus Evol. 2020, 6, veaa080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wirblich, C.; Meyers, G.; Ohlinger, V.F.; Capucci, L.; Eskens, U.; Haas, B.; Thiel, H.J. European brown hare syndrome virus: Relationship to Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus and other caliciviruses. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 5164–5173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chiari, M.; Ferrari, N.; Giardiello, D.; Avisani, D.; Zanoni, M.; Alborali, G.L.; Lanfranchi, P.; Guberti, V.; Capucci, L.; Lavazza, A. Temporal dynamics of European brown hare syndrome infection in Northern Italian brown hares (Lepus europaeus). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2014, 60, 891–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Flis, M.; Rataj, B. Characteristics of population indicators of brown hare (Lepus europaeus Pall.) obtained during group hunting in the region with the highest density in western part of the Lublin region in Poland. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 13701–13711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pielowski, Z. Zając. In Monografia Przyrodniczo−Łowiecka; PWRiL: Warsaw, Poland, 1979. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  39. Stroh, G. Zwei sichere Altersmerkmale beim Hasen. Berl. Tierärztl. Wochenschr. 1931, 47, 180–181. [Google Scholar]
  40. Méres, J.; Ostrihoň, M.; Slamečka, M.; Kaštier, J. Population structure of brown hare (Lepus europaeus): A case study in selected areas of Nitra region. Acta Fac. For. Zvolen 2013, 1, 43–58. [Google Scholar]
  41. Caboń-Raczyńska, K.; Raczyński, J. Method of determination of age in the European hare. Acta Theriol. 1972, 17, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hruška, J.; Matoušková, J.; Ernst, M.; Slamečka, J. Populační dynamika zajíce polního v letech 2008–2010 na základe stanovení hmotnosti očných čoček. In Zajac Poľný pred Štvrťstoročím a Dnes; CVŽV Nitra: Nitra, Slovakia, 2011. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  43. Pintur, K.; Popović, N.; Alegro, A.; Severin, K.; Slavica, A.; Kolić, E. Selected indicators of brown hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) population dynamics in northwestern Croatia. Vet. Arh. 2006, 76, 199–209. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fitzner, A.; Kęsy, A.; Bulenger, K.; Niedbalski, W. Evidence of independent introductions of RHDV2 strains in Poland based on the genome analysis of viral isolates from 2016–2018. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2021, 68, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gryz, J.; Krauze-Gryz, D. Why did Brown hare Lepus europaeus disappear from some areas in central Poland. Diversity 2022, 14, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hacklander, K.; Schai-Braun, S. Lepus europaeus. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2019; p. eT41280A45187424. [Google Scholar]
  47. Misiorowska, M.; Ludwisiak, Ł.; Nasiadka, P. Population parameters of brown hare (Lepus europaeus L.) in regions of the species highest density in Poland. Sylwan 2014, 158, 901–910. [Google Scholar]
  48. Smith, R.K.; Jennings, N.V.; Harris, S. A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. Mammal Rev. 2005, 35, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Garcia-Bocanegra, I.; Camach-Sillero, L.; Risalde, M.A.; Dalton, K.P.; Caballero-Gomez, J.; Agüero, M.; Zorilla, I.; Gomez-Guillamon, F. First outbreak of myxomatosisin Iberian hares (Lepus granatensis). Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 66, 2204–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Panek, M. Current situation of hares and partridges and the management of their populations. In Animal Population Management; Polski Związek Łowiecki: Warsaw, Poland, 2016; pp. 99–109. Available online: www.czempin.pzlow.pl (accessed on 1 June 2022). (In Polish)
  51. Panek, M. Habitat factors associated with the decline in brown hare abundance in Poland in the beginning of the 21st century. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 85, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kamieniarz, R.; Panek, M. Game Animals in Poland at the Turn of the 20th and 21st Century; Stacja Badawcza Polskiego Związku Łowieckiego (Research Station of the Polish Hunting Association): Warsaw, Poland, 2008; pp. 78–83. Available online: www.czempin.pzlow.pl (accessed on 1 June 2022). (In Polish)
  53. Zalewski, D.; Okarma, H.; Panek, M. Monitoring Liczebności i Jakości Populacji Dzikich Zwierząt (Monitoring the Abundance and Quality of Wild Animal Populations); The Monograph; Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie: Olsztyn, Poland, 2018; pp. 53–55. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  54. Misiorowska, M.; Wasilewski, M. Survival and causes of death among released brown hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) in Central Poland. Acta Theriol. 2012, 54, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Statistics Poland. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry; Statistics Poland: Warsaw, Poland, 2021.
  56. Kwit, E.; Chrobocińska, M.; Grądzki, Z.; Jarosz, Ł.; Majer-Dziedzic, B.; Bigoraj, E. The genetic analysis of new Polish strains of European brown hare syndrome virus. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2014, 17, 353–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Górski, J.; Mizak, B.; Mizak, Z.; Komorowski, A. Clinical and anatomopathological features of rabbits peste (viral haemorrhagic disease of rabbits). Życie Weter. 1988, 63, 266–269. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  58. Capucci, L.; Fallacara, F.; Grazioli, S.; Lavazza, A.; Pacciarini, M.L.; Brocchi, E. A further step in the evolution of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus: The appearance of the first consistent antigenic variant. Virus Res. 1998, 58, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chrobocińska, M.; Mizak, B. Phylogenetic analysis of partial capsid protein gene of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) strains isolated between 1993 and 2005 in Poland. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2007, 51, 189–197. [Google Scholar]
  60. Fitzner, A. Characterization and immunogenic properties of Polish strains of RHD virus. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2009, 53, 575–582. [Google Scholar]
  61. Schirrmeyer, H.; Reimann, I.; Köllner, B.; Granzow, H. Pathogenic, antigenic and molecular properties of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) isolated from vaccinated rabbits: Detection and characterization of antigenic variants. Arch. Virol. 1999, 144, 719–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Steineck, T.; Novotny, N. European Brown Hare Syndrome (EBHS) in Austria—Epidemiologic investigations. Tierarztl. Umsch. 1993, 4, 225–229. [Google Scholar]
  63. Frölich, K.; Fickel, J.; Ludwig, A.; Lieckfeldt, D.; Streich, W.J.; Jurcik, R.; Slamecka, J.; Wibbelt, G. New variants of European brown hare syndrome virus strains in free-ranging European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) from Slovakia. J. Wildl. Dis. 2007, 43, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Paci, G.; Lavazza, A.; Ferretti, M.; Santilli, F.; Bagliacca, M. Relationship between anti-European Brown Hare syndrome serological titers and Brown Hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas) densities. Int. J. Zool. 2011, 2011, 436193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Lavazza, A.; Guberti, V.; Ferri, M.; Zanni, M.L.; Poglayen, G.; Nardin, A.; Capucci, L. Epidemiology of Euroean brown hare syndrome (EBHS) in Modena Province (North Italy). In Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of the European Society for Veterinary Virology, Edinburgh, UK, 24–27 August 1997; pp. 34–37. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lavazza, A.; Cavadini, P.; Barbieri, I.; Tizzani, P.; Pinheiro, A.; Abrantes, J.; Esteves, P.J.; Grilli, G.; Gioia, E.; Zanoni, M.; et al. Field and experimental data indicate that the eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) is susceptible to infection with European brown hare syndrom (EBHS) virus and not with rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) virus. Vet. Res. 2015, 46, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Tsokana, C.N.; Sokos, C.; Giannakopoulos, A.; Birtsas, P.; Valiakos, G.; Spyrou, V.; Athanasiou, L.V.; Burriel, A.R.; Billinis, C. European Brown hare (Lepus europaeus) as a source of emerging and re-emerging pathogens of Public Health importance: A review. Vet. Med. Sci. 2020, 6, 550–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 14 02423 g001 550
Figure 1. Location of the places of blood sampling used.
Figure 1. Location of the places of blood sampling used.
Viruses 14 02423 g001
Viruses 14 02423 g002 550
Figure 2. Distribution of EBHSV antibodies in seropositive hares, related to sex, place and period of sampling.
Figure 2. Distribution of EBHSV antibodies in seropositive hares, related to sex, place and period of sampling.
Viruses 14 02423 g002
Viruses 14 02423 g003 550
Figure 3. Distribution of EBHSV antibodies in seropositive hares, related to age, place and period of sampling.
Figure 3. Distribution of EBHSV antibodies in seropositive hares, related to age, place and period of sampling.
Viruses 14 02423 g003
Table
Table 1. The type and origin of hare samples used in the study.
Table 1. The type and origin of hare samples used in the study.
Date of Collection/Additional InformationGeographical Region of Poland
/Voivodeship		No. of HaresSex
M/ F		WeightSpecimens Collected
Age
J/A		(kg)Blood LiverDuod.LungsKidneysSpleenFaeces (f)/Heart (h)
Hunting season
2021–2022		Central/Łódź10
serol. study batch V		2MJ, 2MA,
2FJ, 4FA		3.3–4.8101070000
Hunting season
2021–2022		Southeastern/
Lublin		30
serol. study batch IV		5MJ, 9MA, 8FJ, 8FA3.2–5.03030200000
Hunting season
2020–2021		20
serol. study batch III		4MJ, 6MA,
4FJ, 6FA		3.5–5.0202050000
20
serol. study batch II		2MJ, 5MA, 7FJ, 6FA3.0–5.02020100000
33
serol. study batch I		7MJ, 8MA,
6FJ, 12FA		3.6–5.03332320000
2021/traffic incidentNorth-Central/
Kuyavian-Pomeranian
(Bydgoszcz)		1A-0111100
2021 /animals shelter3J (8 weeks)-0330000
2020 /animals shelter1J (4 weeks)-0100000
2020/traffic incidentSoutheastern/
Lublin		1A-0101110
2019/group hunting5A-0500001 (h)
2019/animals shelterNorth-Central/
Kuyavian-Pomeranian
(Bydgoszcz)		1J (4 months)-011011 0
2019/traffic incident3A-0303303 (h)
2018/animals shelter3J (10 weeks)-0303303 (f)
2016/traffic incident1J (11 weeks)-0100000
2A-0202200
2016/traffic incidentNorth/
Pomeranian
(Gdańsk)		1A-0101011 (h)
2016/found in the forest1A-0100101 (h)
2015/traffic incidentSouthwestern/
Lower Silesia (Wrocław)		1A-0100010
2015/found in the forest1A-0101 10
2015/traffic incidentNorth-Central/
Kuyavian-Pomeranian
(Bydgoszcz)		2A-0201020
8A-0800020
2015/found in a rural environment2A-0000010
2015/group huntingCentral/Łódź12A-01200000
2014/found in a rural environmnetCentral/Masovia
(Warszawa)		1A-0101100
2014/traffic incidentSouthwestern/Opole2A-0200000
2014/group huntingSoutheastern/
Lublin		5A-0500000
A—adult (>1 year); J—juvenile (<1 year); M—male; F—female.
Table
Table 2. Prevalence of antibodies to EBHSV in brown hares (Lepus europaeus) in the southeastern and central region of Poland over the period December 2020—December 2021.
Table 2. Prevalence of antibodies to EBHSV in brown hares (Lepus europaeus) in the southeastern and central region of Poland over the period December 2020—December 2021.
Batch/
Hunting Season		No.
of
Hares
Tested		PositiveNegative
No.Percentage 1Anti-EBHSV Antibody Titre Distribution 2
Titre (Pab ELISA/Mab ELISA)		No.Percentage 1
%
>10–80160–640>640<10
No.%No.%No.%No.%
I/2020–2021333090.918601136.6613.3339.1
II/2020–2021201575533.33853.33213.33525
III/2020–20212018901161.1633.3315.6210
IV/2021–20223027901348.11348.113.7310
V/2021–202210990444.4555.600010
Total1139987.65151.54343.455.11412.4
Males494438.92323.22020.21154.4
J201916.81010.188.11110.9
A292522.11313.11212.10043.5
Females645548.72828.32323.24498
J282320.41313.199.11154.44
A363228.31515.21414.13343.5
1 Percentage of positive/negative in relation to the number of hares tested (in groups/total); 2 percentage of positive sera with the specified titre in relation to the total number of positives. A: adult (>1 year); J: juvenile (<1 year).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fitzner, A.; Niedbalski, W.; Kęsy, A.; Rataj, B.; Flis, M. European Brown Hare Syndrome in Poland: Current Epidemiological Situation. Viruses 2022, 14, 2423. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112423

AMA Style

Fitzner A, Niedbalski W, Kęsy A, Rataj B, Flis M. European Brown Hare Syndrome in Poland: Current Epidemiological Situation. Viruses. 2022; 14(11):2423. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fitzner, Andrzej, Wiesław Niedbalski, Andrzej Kęsy, Bogusław Rataj, and Marian Flis. 2022. "European Brown Hare Syndrome in Poland: Current Epidemiological Situation" Viruses 14, no. 11: 2423. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112423

APA Style

Fitzner, A., Niedbalski, W., Kęsy, A., Rataj, B., & Flis, M. (2022). European Brown Hare Syndrome in Poland: Current Epidemiological Situation. Viruses, 14(11), 2423. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112423

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop