Next Article in Journal
Progress towards the Development of a Universal Influenza Vaccine
Next Article in Special Issue
SARS-CoV-2 in a Mink Farm in Italy: Case Description, Molecular and Serological Diagnosis by Comparing Different Tests
Previous Article in Journal
Deletion of the EP296R Gene from the Genome of Highly Virulent African Swine Fever Virus Georgia 2010 Does Not Affect Virus Replication or Virulence in Domestic Pigs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Safety of Biologic-DMARDs in Rheumatic Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Population-Based Study over the First Two Waves of COVID-19 Outbreak
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Prognostic Value of Mid-Region Proadrenomedullin and In Vitro Interferon Gamma Production for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia and Respiratory Failure: An Observational Prospective Study

Viruses 2022, 14(8), 1683; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081683
by Davide Mangioni 1,2,*, Massimo Oggioni 3, Liliane Chatenoud 4, Arianna Liparoti 1,2, Sara Uceda Renteria 3, Laura Alagna 1, Simona Biscarini 1, Matteo Bolis 1, Adriana Di Modugno 3, Marco Mussa 1, Giulia Renisi 1, Riccardo Ungaro 1, Antonio Muscatello 1, Andrea Gori 1,2, Ferruccio Ceriotti 3 and Alessandra Bandera 1,2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Viruses 2022, 14(8), 1683; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081683
Submission received: 4 July 2022 / Revised: 26 July 2022 / Accepted: 29 July 2022 / Published: 30 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art SARS-CoV-2 Research in Italy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors present a very well prepared and well written manuscript describing the prognostic value of MR-proADM and in vitro interferon gamma production in COVID-19 patients and how these biomarkers could potentially predict clinical outcomes and survival. Although the MR-proADM provides a clear correlation with clinical outcome, in vitro IFNg levels were less clear as a predictor of adverse outcome making the manuscript less appealing. The study of MR-proADM as a prognostic marker has been studied extensively and the current study further validates these findings.

1. The use of the in vitro IFNg levels as a biomarker is less clear and the authors take some liberties with non-significant findings and suggest that this may also be important. This could be accounted for by low numbers of samples or due to random chance since these did not reach statistical significance. I would recommend that the authors change their wording in places where they state that differences occurred. Example (Abstract; lines 31 and 32)

2. There was very little discussion about the role of T-cells in the COVID-19 samples tested in vitro for IFNg production. The authors use a standardized protocol for specifically stimulating T-cells and then follow up with measurement of IFNg however there is  no discussion relevant to the impact of stimulating T-cells in this manner that would provide some mechanistic insight regarding the IFNg changes.  I think additional discussion regarding the role of T-cells at T0 and at T1 and how IFNg production might be effected at these timepoints would improve the manuscript and provide broader appeal.    

 

Author Response

see cover letter (attached)

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript described interesting theme and entire structure was well arranged. Relatively small number of deceased patients may attenuate detection power. However, the usefulness of MR-proADM for prognostic estimation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients was well addressed as in previous studies. What is the novelty of your study compared with previous studies? Additionally, I want to know the relationship between MR-proADM and other clinical markers like CRP, lymphocyte or D-dimmer.

Author Response

see cover letter (attached)

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop