Next Article in Journal
Global Down-regulation of Gene Expression Induced by Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus (MMTV) in Normal Mammary Epithelial Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
A Bioreactor-Based Yellow Fever Virus-like Particle Production Process with Integrated Process Analytical Technology Based on Transient Transfection
Previous Article in Journal
Horses as Sentinels for the Circulation of Flaviviruses in Eastern–Central Germany
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Virus-like Particle Vaccines and Platforms for Vaccine Development

School of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2023, 15(5), 1109; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15051109
Submission received: 31 March 2023 / Revised: 25 April 2023 / Accepted: 26 April 2023 / Published: 2 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Virus-Like Particle Vaccines 2023)

Abstract

:
Virus-like particles (VLPs) have gained a lot of interest within the past two decades. The use of VLP-based vaccines to protect against three infectious agents—hepatitis B virus, human papillomavirus, and hepatitis E virus—has been approved; they are very efficacious and offer long-lasting immune responses. Besides these, VLPs from other viral infectious agents (that infect humans, animals, plants, and bacteria) are under development. These VLPs, especially those from human and animal viruses, serve as stand-alone vaccines to protect against viruses from which the VLPs were derived. Additionally, VLPs, including those derived from plant and bacterial viruses, serve as platforms upon which to display foreign peptide antigens from other infectious agents or metabolic diseases such as cancer, i.e., they can be used to develop chimeric VLPs. The goal of chimeric VLPs is to enhance the immunogenicity of foreign peptides displayed on VLPs and not necessarily the platforms. This review provides a summary of VLP vaccines for human and veterinary use that have been approved and those that are under development. Furthermore, this review summarizes chimeric VLP vaccines that have been developed and tested in pre-clinical studies. Finally, the review concludes with a snapshot of the advantages of VLP-based vaccines such as hybrid/mosaic VLPs over conventional vaccine approaches such as live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines.

1. Introduction

Viruses infect a wide range of organisms, ranging from humans, plants, animals, birds, and insects to microorganisms (e.g., eukaryotes and prokaryotes). One unique feature of viruses is that their structural proteins, envelope proteins, or capsid proteins, along with other structural proteins, can, either independently or collectively, spontaneously self-assemble to form virus-like particles (VLPs) without the viral genome. Thus, any virus can be utilized to develop VLPs; VLPs can be developed by cloning the structural genes that code for the proteins of a virus of interest into an expression vector (Figure 1). The expression vector depends on the expression system in which the protein(s) will be expressed and, sometimes, the protein is codon-optimized if the expression system (including that of mammalian, insects, and bacteria) is different to the cells which the virus of interest normally infect. The vector harboring the DNA of the structural protein(s) is then transfected/transformed into cells of interest, where the DNA is transcribed and translated. Translated protein folds and assembles to form VLPs [1]. VLPs have many applications in biomedical sciences, such as: (i) therapy—the delivery of drugs/cargo to specific cancer cells; (ii) in vivo imaging—VLPs loaded with fluorophores; (iii) diagnostic tests—utilizing armored RNA as positive controls for infectious diseases; iv) vaccine development [2,3,4]. This review focuses only on the latter: the application of VLPs in vaccine development.
VLPs have many features, unlike conventional vaccines, which make them very attractive platforms for vaccine design. They mimic the viruses from which the VLPs are derived in terms of size (20–200 nm) [5], geometry (i.e., icosahedral structures with multivalent epitopes) [5,6,7,8], and the ability to activate T-helper cells. VLPs naturally encode T-helper cell epitopes, which are presented to T-helper cells by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in association with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II. The presentation of the epitopes in addition to the co-stimulatory molecules from APCs leads to the activation of T-helper cells. This activates T-helper cells’ secret cytokines that activate other immune cells, such as macrophages, B-cells, and T-cells (Figure 2) [6]. VLPs can also be engineered to encapsidate endogenous adjuvants such as single-stranded (ss)RNA to stimulate innate immune responses as follows [5,9,10,11]: ssRNA binds to Toll-like receptors TLR7 and TLR8, which are located in the intracellular compartments (e.g., the endosome) of immune cells. The binding of ssRNAs to TLR7 and TLR8 leads to the activation of the receptors, which send signals downstream, leading to the expression/secretion of cytokines (e.g., interferon α, interferon γ, TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12). Secreted cytokines activate innate immune cells, as well as the cells of the adaptive immune system which control the invasion of pathogens [12,13,14,15]. This feature also enhances the immunogenicity of VLPs even at lower doses [16,17].
Moreover, VLPs are considered safe, since they do not contain the viral genome, and therefore, they cannot replicate. It is worth mentioning that, like any vaccine, VLPs can cause side effects such as pain and swelling at the injection site. Hence, it is no surprise that VLPs have gained considerable attention over the past two decades as an attractive platform for vaccine design. While VLPs derived from human and animal viruses are developed to protect humans and animals against viruses from which the VLPs are derived, VLPs from other organisms (including plants and prokaryotic microorganisms) are developed to display heterologous antigens from human and animal viruses, i.e., to develop chimeric VLPs (Figure 1, bottom). The goal of chimeric VLPs is to elicit immune responses against heterologous antigens displayed on the platform and not necessarily the platform. It is worth mentioning that VLPs derived from human or animal viruses can also be used to develop chimeric VLPs, whereby a heterologous antigen displayed on the VLP is derived from other human viruses (Figure 1, bottom).

2. VLP Vaccines Derived from Human Viruses

VLPs have been developed (while others remain under development) using viruses that infect humans (Table 1). In fact, VLP-based vaccines have been approved to protect against three human viral infections, namely, hepatitis B virus (HBV), human papillomaviruses (HPV), and hepatitis E (HEV). Among these, at least nine HBV VLP-based vaccines have been approved globally, and these include Engerix-B, Recombivax HB, Euvax B, Hepavax-Gene, GenHevac B, GenVac B, and Heberbiovac HB (this is reviewed in [1,18,19]). The vaccines are based on the HBV surface antigen; some of the vaccines; for example, Engerix-B and Recombivax HB, have been in use since the mid-1980s, and they offer cross-protection against other HBV genotypes, such as A and C [20]. Although the vaccines cross-protect against other genotypes, several vaccine-escape viral mutants have been reported for the vaccines (reviewed in [21]). Regardless of this, HBV protective antibodies last up to 30 years in some individuals [22,23]. Age at the time of vaccination seems to be associated with HBV antibody responses. For example, individuals vaccinated at an average age of 36 years developed fewer anti-HBV antibodies compared to those who were vaccinated at an average age of 32 years. However, a single boost enhanced antibody levels in 94% of individuals who had low levels of antibodies [22,23].
Three VLP-based vaccines—Gardasil-9, Gardasil-4, and Cervarix—have been approved around the world to protect against human papillomaviruses [24,25,26,27,28,29]. These VLPs are derived from the major capsid protein L1; they offer protection against two to seven HPV types—HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58—and these are associated with 70–90% of cervical cancer cases. They also offer protection against two HPV types—HPV6 and 11—associated with ~90% of genital warts [29]. Immune responses to Cervarix and Gardasil-4 last at least 13 years [30,31,32], while those for Gardasil-9 last at least 6 years [33]. The Cervarix vaccine offers 21–64% cross-protection against HPV35, 31, 33, 45, and 58 after 11 years. On the other hand, 90% of individuals vaccinated with Gardasil-4 had antibodies against heterologous HPV types (HPV6, 11, and 16) and 52% had antibodies against HPV18 after 14 years [30,31,32]. It is worth mentioning that longevity studies for all three vaccines are ongoing. Two other HPV vaccines with the potential to offer broader protections are in clinical trials; an 11-valent candidate vaccine with undisclosed HPV types [34] and a 14-valent candidate vaccine [35] are in phase III and phase I clinical trials, respectively. The 14-valent candidate vaccine is expected to protect against HPV6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59.
One VLP-based vaccine (Hecolin) used to protect against HEV is approved in China; clinical trials to assess its efficacy in other countries—Bangladesh and the U.S.—are ongoing [36,37]. The vaccine is based on amino acids 368–606, derived from the open reading frame 2 of the capsid protein of HEV genotype 1. Vaccine efficacy after 12 months and three doses in 16–64-year-old individuals is 100% [38]. In the elderly, i.e., >65 years old, 97.3% of individuals vaccinated with Hecolin seroconvert 1 month after the third dose at month 7 [39]. Moreover, 87% of the vaccinees had detectable antibodies that lasted for at least 4.5 years [40]. The vaccine protects against genotypes 1, 2, and 4 and is expected to cross-protect to a lesser extent against genotype 3 [41,42].
In addition to the approved VLP-based vaccines above, several candidate VLP-based vaccines are under development. An excellent new book by Pumpens and Pusko provides a comprehensive summary of candidate VLP-based vaccines that have been developed from various viruses [1]. VLPs that have been developed and tested include influenza viruses, SARS-CoV-2, human immunodeficiency virus, and the Zika virus. Table 1 summarizes some of the VLPs developed from human viruses in pre-clinical and clinal trails. The VLPs are derived from either the envelope protein, the capsid protein, or both and are expressed using various expression systems, such as mammalian cells, insect cells, yeast cells, and bacterial cells, as well as transgenic plants. The efficacy of some of these VLPs is comparable to those of approved vaccines developed using conventional approaches. For instance, immunization with hybrid VLPs developed using structural proteins from two influenza A subtypes—H1N1 and H3N2—is as immunogenic as an approved inactivate influenza virus vaccine (Vaxigrip; H2N3); IgG responses had a normalized median fluorescence intensity of >107 [43]. Similarly, the immunization of mice with VLPs derived from the Zika virus or Ebola virus offers a survival rate of up to 100%, unlike control mice, where there was no survival [44,45].
VLPs derived from human viruses have also been used to develop candidate vaccines against other human viruses. For example, VLPs derived from HBV have been used to develop candidate vaccines against Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) bacteria, hepatitis C virus (HCV), HPV-associated cancers, and four serotypes of dengue virus (Table 2). In preclinical studies, mice immunized with chimeric HBV VLPs displaying peptides derived from H. pylori had a reduced bacterial burden [46]. In other studies, sera from mice immunized with HBV VLPs displaying peptides from HCV and dengue viruses neutralized and protected mice from HCV and dengue virus infection, respectively [47,48]. Additionally, HBV VLPs displaying peptides from HPV16 E7 suppress tumors in a mouse model for HPV-associated cancer [49].
Table 1. VLPs derived from human viruses.
Table 1. VLPs derived from human viruses.
Name of VirusStructural Protein Used to Make VLPsSource of Structural Protein (Capsid/Envelope)Expression SystemImmune ResponsesReferences
Influenza A subtypes (H1N1 and H3N2)Hemagglutinin (HA),
matrix protein 1 (M1), and
neuraminidase (NA)
EnvelopeMammalian cell lines (Chinese hamster ovary cells—CHO-K1, vero cells, human embryonic kidney—HEK 293T cells)Mice immunized with the hybrid VLPs elicited antibody titers against A/Hong Kong (H3N2) strain that were similar to those of an approved inactivated vaccine (Vaxigrip)[43]
Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf)9 insect cellsFerrets immunized with the VLPs were protected against Influenza virus A H3N2[50]
Influenza A virus (H7N9)HA, M1, NASf9 insect cellsHemagglutination inhibition antibody titers against H7N9 were from 1:80 to 1:173[51]
Influenza B/Shanghai/361/2002Hemagglutination inhibition antibody titer against the strain was 1:1280[50]
Influenza virusesHeadless HA gene with an extracellular region of matrix protein 2 gene insertion (from human, avian, and swine influenza), nucleoprotein, and M1 from H5N1EnvelopeSf9 insect cellsMice immunized with chimeric VLPs were protected against homologous (H5N1) and heterologous influenza viruses (H1N1, H3N2, or H7N7); infections were reduced by 4.6–6.7-fold.[52]
HPVMajor capsid protein (L1)CapsidSaccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae)Gardasil-9 vaccine contains VLPs from 9 HPV types; protects against HPV associated with 90% of cervical cancer and 90% of genital warts[53]
Trichoplusia ni insect cellsCervarix vaccine contains VLPs from HPV16 and HPV18; protects against these two HPV types (associated with ~70% of cervical cancer); it also cross-protects against other HPV types[54,55]
HPV (type 6 and 11)L1CapsidE. coliNeutralizing antibody titers (100–1000 in monkeys) against HPV6 and HPV11 were similar to those of Gardasil-4[56]
HBVHBV small surface antigen (HBsAgS)EnvelopeYeast cells [S. cerevisiae, Pichia pastoris (P. pastoris), Hansenula polymorpha]Immune responses cross-protect against different serotypes and last up to 30 years (Engerix-B, Recombivax HB vaccines)[20,21,22,23]
HBsAgS and middle proteinMammalian cells (CHO)94% of vaccines seroconvert and 84% were seroprotected (GenHevac B vaccine)[57]
HEVCapsid proteinCapsidE. coliHecolin vaccine (HEV 239) has efficacy of 97–100%. It cross-protect against other genotypes. Immunity lasts for at least 4.5 years.[38,39,40,41,42]
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (HIV 1)Envelope and GagEnvelope and capsidHEK 293T cellsImmunization with the VLPs, without any adjuvant, elicited neutralizing antibodies and cytotoxic T-cell responses in mice.[58]
Glycoprotein (gp) 120EnvelopeSf9 insect cellsSera derived from mice immunized with VLPs neutralized (at 1:10–1:80) homologous and heterologous isolates of HIV[59,60,61]
Human noroviruses (genotype GI.1 and consensus GII.4)
Human norovirus (consensus GII.4)
Virus protein (VP)1CapsidSf9 insect cellsSeven days post-immunization, IgA and IgG antibody secreting cells in humans increased by more than 4-fold for genotype GI.1 and consensus GII.4 viruses[62]
VP1CapsidP. pastorisSera and fecal antibodies derived from mice immunized with VLPs block binding of VLPs to receptors[63]
Parvovirus B19VP1, VP2CapsidS. cerevisiaeVLPs elicited high antibody responses (>4 logs) in a mouse model for sickle cell disease; responses persisted for >80 days.[64]
VP1, VP2CapsidSf9 insect cellsGeometric mean neutralizing antibody titers in humans ranged from 6.45–20.29; reactogenicity was reported in a lot (up to 73%) of participants[65]
** Chikungunya virus (CHIKV)Capsid (envelope) 1, E2, E3, 6KCapsid and EnvelopeP. pastorisPassive transfer of antibody to neonatal mice offered protection from CHIKV infection[66,67,68,69]
HEK 293T cellsIgG from monkey immunized VLPs protected mice from dying following lethal infection with CHIKV
SF21 cellsMice vaccinated with VLPs were protected from viremia/arthritis following infection with CHIKV
Coxsackievirus A16 (CA16)VP1, VP3, and VP0 (VP2 and VP4)CapsidS. cerevisiaePassive transfer of anti-CA16 VLP sera to neonatal mice protected mice against lethal CA16 challenge[70]
Enterovirus 71 (EV71)VP0, VP1, VP3CapsidS. cerevisiae90–100% of neonatal mice infected with a mixture of EV71 VLP-derived sera and EV71 were protected from infection (i.e., did not die)[71,72]
Nipah virus-Glycoprotein, Matrix protein, Fusion proteinEnvelopeHEK 293T cellsAll ferrets immunized with Nipah virus VLPs survived infection with Nipah virus compared to control animals (40–75%)[73]
RotavirusVP2, VP6, VP7CapsidTransgenic tobacco plantsMice orally immunized with VLPs (made up of VP2/6/7) elicited serum IgG and fecal IgA antibodies; serum antibody levels were comparable to those of an attenuated rotavirus vaccine.[74]
SARS-CoV-2SpikeEnvelopeNicotiana benthamiana tobacco plantNeutralizing antibody titers in immunized individuals were greater than those in individuals recovering from COVID-19.[75]
Dengue virus 2Envelope protein and 5′ pre-membrane signal peptideEnvelopeP. pastorisAG129 mice immunized with VLPs elicited neutralizing antibodies (titers > 1200) that protected them against lethal challenge with homologous dengue virus 2.[76]
Zika virusEnvelope protein and pre-membraneEnvelopeHEK 293T cells100% of AG129 mice immunized with 10 μg of VLPs survived infection with Zika virus compared to control mice (no survival) after day 21.[44]
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV)Envelope protein and pre-membraneEnvelopeLepidoptera mosquito cellsVaccinated mice elicited a balanced immune response (Th1/Th2) and neutralized both JEV genotypes I and III (neutralizing antibody titers 10–320).[77]
Ebola virusGlycoprotein (GP) and matrix proteinEnvelopeHEK 293T cells30% of mice immunized with VLPs (without adjuvant) survived following challenge with a mouse-adapted Ebola virus strain; 100% of mice survived infection when they were immunized with the VLPs in the presence of GLA-SE or GLA-AF adjuvants.[45]
Ebola virus Sudan strainGP and matrix proteinEnvelopeSf9 insect cellsSera from horses immunized with VLPs blocked infection with HIV pseudovirus expressing Ebola Sudan glycoproteins[78]
** Completed phase I clinical trial [69].

3. VLP Candidate Vaccines Derived from Veterinary Viruses

VLPs derived from viruses that infect animals and fish have also been used to develop vaccines against viruses that affect various animals, including pigs, rabbits, sheep, horses, chickens, and fish(Table 3). For instance, VLPs derived from porcine circovirus-2 (PCV-2) elicit better antibody responses in mice, superior to those of a commercial subunit vaccine [86]. PCV-2 is associated with postweaning multisystem wasting syndrome in young pigs. In sheep, immunization with VLPs derived from bluetongue virus offers the same level of protection as immunization as a live-attenuated commercial vaccine (monovalent BTV-8) [87]. In foals, immunization with chimeric VLPs derived from three African horse sickness viruses—AHSV-6, AHSV-3, and AHSV-1—elicited neutralizing antibodies against these viruses, albeit at low levels [88]. In chickens, immunization with mosaic VLPs derived from different subtypes/strains of influenza A or immunization with VLPs derived from infectious bursal disease virus offered better protection than commercial inactivated vaccines (e.g., H6N2 for influenza virus) [89,90,91] (Table 3). Meanwhile, in fish, immunization with VLPs derived from red-spotted grouper nervous necrosis virus (RGNNV) lowered the mortality rate to ~3.3%, compared to immunization with a commercially inactivated vaccine, OceanTect viral nervous necrosis, and the control group (which had mortality rates of 10% and ~79%, respectively) [92]. Additionally, the immunization of fish with VLPs derived from Atlantic cod nervous necrosis virus lowered the mortality rate to 14%, compared to immunization in the control group, where the mortality rate was lowered to only ~80% [93].
VLPs derived from animal viruses have also been used as platforms to develop candidate vaccines against other viral infections (Table 4). For example, VLPs from canine parvovirus have been used to display peptide antigens from Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and the VLPs elicited a balanced immune response in mice; sera from immunized mice neutralized pseudo-MERS-CoV [94]. Furthermore, immunization with VLPs derived from Newcastle disease virus displaying a Brucella antigen—BCSP31—offered protection against a virulent strain (16M) of Brucella melitensis; the protection level was similar to that of a commercial live-attenuated vaccine: Brucella melitensis strain M5 [95]; Brucella melitensis is a zoonotic disease associated with brucellosis.
Table 3. VLPs derived from animal and fish viruses.
Table 3. VLPs derived from animal and fish viruses.
Name of VirusStructural Protein Used to Make VLPsSource of Structural Protein (Capsid/Envelope)Expression SystemImmune ResponsesReferences
PCV-2Capsid proteinCapsidNicotiana benthamianaMice immunized with PCV VLPs elicited antibodies 42 days after immunization. Antibody levels were higher than those elicited by a commercial subunit vaccine (Ingelvac CircoFLEX®).[86]
Porcine parvovirus (PPV)VP2CapsidE. coliVaccinated mice and pigs generated neutralized antibodies; antibodies significantly reduced PPV content in the spleen of pigs 14 days after PPV challenge.[96]
Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV)VP60 from two genotypes (RHDV GI.1- and RHDV GI.2)CapsidTricholusia ni insect pupaeHybrid VLPs elicited antibodies that protected rabbits against lethal challenge with the 2 RHDV genotypes, (RHDV. GI.1 and GI.2). Immunization with 40 µg offered 100% protection compared to immunization with 20 µg (80% protection).[97]
Bluetongue virusVP2, VP3, VP5 and VP7 from serotype 8CapsidNicotiana benthamianaSheep immunized with VLPs had the same efficacy of protection as the live-attenuated commercial vaccine; no clinical signs of disease were observed.[87]
AHSVVP2, VP3, VP5, and VP7 from serotype 5CapsidNicotiana benthamianaSera from guinea pigs immunized with VLPs neutralized serotypes 5 and 8 (to a lesser degree). No cross-neutralization of serotype 4.[98,99]
VP2, VP3, VP5 and VP7 from serotype 1; VP2, VP5, from serotype 7; VP2, from serotype 6; VP5 from serotype 3CapsidNicotiana benthamianSingle, double, and triple chimeric VLPs were developed; anti-VP7 specific responses were detected in foals immunized with triple chimeric VLP (AHSV-6/AHSV-3/AHSV-1). However, single AHSV-6 VLPs elicited a weak neutralizing humoral immune response against homologous AHSV virus. Low neutralization levels were also observed with a control live-attenuated AHSV-6 vaccine.[88]
Goose hemorrhagic polyomavirus (GHPV)VP1 with or without VP2CapsidSf9 insect cells and S. cerevisiaeThe VLPs expressed by yeast were of smaller size. VLPs (as a diagnostic antigen) detected GHPV-specific antibodies in up to 85.7% of geese sera with hemorrhagic nephritis and enteritis.[100]
Canine influenza virus (CIV) H3N2M1 and hemagglutinin proteinsEnvelopeSf9 insect cellsDogs vaccinated with the VLPs and later challenged with CIV H3N2 did not show clinical signs of respiratory disease, unlike control dogs.[101]
Influenza A virusHA protein from (A/chicken/South Africa/N2826/2016 (H6N2)) and M2 protein from strain A/New Caledonia/20/1999 (H1N1)EnvelopeNicotiana benthamianaA total of 100% of chickens immunized with the mosaic VLPs did not shed virus via the respiratory tract (at day 21) following a challenge with strain A/chicken/South Africa/H44954/2016 (H6N2): 58% of chickens immunized with a commercial inactivated H6N2 vaccine shed virus, as opposed to 36% unimmunized.[89]
Influenza A virusHemagglutinin antigen from H5N1, H7N3 and H9N2 viruses. neuraminidase 1 antigen from influenza H5N1 and gag protein from a retrovirusEnvelopeSf9 insect cellsChickens immunized with mosaic VLPs and later challenged with H5N2 and H7N3 viruses survived while all control unimmunized birds died.[90]
Rabies virusGlycoproteinEnvelopeHEK 293Antibody titers were >4 log10 and were similar to those of two licensed inactivated rabies vaccines (for humans and animals). A 0.3 μg dose elicited similar antibody titers. Elicited antibodies neutralized a pseudotyped lentivirus (expressing rabies virus G protein).[17,102]
Foot-and-mouth disease virusVP1 from serotype O and VP2, VP3, and VP4 from serotype ACapsidSf9 insect cellsGuinea pigs immunized with the mosaic VLPs elicited both humoral and cellular immune responses; the protective efficacy of the mosaic VLPs against serotype O virus was 80% compared to 0% in the control group.[103]
Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)VP2 proteinCapsidP. pastorisAll chickens immunized with IBDV VLPs survived after challenge with the virus; 10% of chickens immunized with a commercial inactivated vaccine died; 80% of control chickens died.[91]
RGNNVCapsid proteinCapsidNicotiana tabacum cv. XanthiCumulative mortality (within 14 days) in fish vaccinated with RGNNV-VLPs was 3.3% compared with 10% and 60–66.7% mortality in fish immunized with commercial inactivated vaccine and control plant extract, respectively.[92]
S. cerevisiaeMice immunized with the VLPs elicited saturated IgG antibody titers (5.8 log10).[104]
Piscine myocarditis virusORF1CapsidNicotiana benthamianaVLPs elicited an innate immune response in fish, which was associated with reduced viral replication in the heart, spleen, and kidney of salmon, and reduced inflammatory lesions in cardiomyocytes.[105]
Atlantic cod nervous necrosis virusCapsid proteinCapsidNicotiana benthamiana and tobacco BY-2 cellsVLPs significantly lowered the mortality in vaccinated groups compared to control group; vaccinated fish showed relatively higher percent survival (from 63.6 to 86.5%) compared to the control group (~20.8%).[93]

4. VLP Candidate Vaccines Derived from Plant and Bacterial Viruses

VLPs have been developed not only from human and animal viruses, but also from plant viruses and bacteria viruses. Plant-derived VLPs have been developed using various viruses such as alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), physalis mottle virus (PhMV), potato virus Y (PVY), cucumber mosaic virus, and malva mosaic virus (MaMV) (Table 5). VLPs from AMVs displaying an antigen (Pfs25 protein) from Plasmodium falciparum have been shown to be safe and tolerable in a phase I clinical trial [110,111]. PhMV VLPs displaying HER2 peptide were found to slow tumor growth in mice and delay their death [112,113]. In addition to this, PVY VLPs displaying a cat allergen peptide—Feline domesticus—elicited high-antibody titers against the antigen [114]. Moreover, immunization with MaMV-displaying canine influenza virus H3N8 antigen protected mice from lethal challenge with homologous and heterologous mouse-adapted influenza virus strains, unlike control mice [115].
On the other side of viruses that infect bacteria (bacteriophages or phages), VLPs have been developed from bacteriophage AP205, MS2, PP7, Qβ, P22, etc. (Table 6). Immunization with MS2 and PP7 VLPs displaying HPV peptides protects mice from infection with 11 HPV pseudovirus types associated with cancer [116,117,118]. Bacteriophage VLPs have also been used in cancer research. Bacteriophage P22 VLPs displaying B and T cell epitopes from ovalbumin inhibit EG.7-OVA lymphoma cells in mice [119].
Table 5. VLPs derived from plant viruses (chimeric VLPs) displaying foreign antigens.
Table 5. VLPs derived from plant viruses (chimeric VLPs) displaying foreign antigens.
Name of Virus Used to Develop VLPsStructural Antigen Used to Make VLPsCapsid or Envelope ProteinsForeign Antigen Displayed on VLPExpression SystemImmune ResponsesReferences
** AMVCapsid proteinCapsidPfs25 protein of Plasmodium falciparumNicotiana benthamiana tobacco plantsIn a phase I study, VLPs were shown to be safe and tolerable; reactogenicity was also reported. IgG responses > 3 log10 were observed with a dose of 100 μg.[110,111]
Cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV)Capsid proteinCapsidTetanus toxin epitopeE. coliRound-shaped CCMVTT-VLPs drained more efficiently to secondary lymphoid organs than rod-shaped CCMVTT-VLPs. Additionally, round-shaped CCMVTT-VLPs increased IgG and IgA antibody levels by 100-fold compared to rod-shaped CCMVTT-VLPs.[120]
Capsid proteinCapsidS9 peptide from group B streptococcal type III capsular polysaccharideP. pastorisImmunization with VLPs displaying S9 peptide elicited a Th1 response against the peptide. However, immunization with the peptide conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin elicited a Th2 response.[121]
PhMVCapsid proteinCapsidHER2-derived CH401 epitopeE. coliVLPs elicited a strong immune response. Chimeric VLPs slowed the growth of DDHER2 tumor cells in mice and also delayed death by more than 15 days compared to control mice that were immunized with just the CH401 epitope.[112,113]
PVYCapsid proteinCapsidHBV preS1 epitopeE. coliChimeric VLPs elicited high-titer (1:8620) anti-HBV preS1 antibodies in mice without adjuvant.[122]
Cat allergen Feline domesticus (Fel d 1)E. coliAll chimeric VLP vaccines elicited high antibody titers (up to 1:52,938) against Fel d 1 in mice. IgG1 was the dominant IgG subclass produced.[114]
Cucumber mosaic virusCapsid proteinCapsidT-cell epitope derived from the tetanus toxin, dimeric murine IL-17A of psoriasis, cat allergen feline domesticus 1 (Fel d 1), and Aβ1–6 of Alzheimer β-amyloidE. coliChimeric VLPs elicited antibodies that protected/reduced psoriatic disease and cat allergy. Antibodies from mice immunized with VLPs displaying Aβ1–6 reacted with plaques of Aβ (in brain sections from Alzheimer’s patients).[123]
Papaya mosaic virusCapsid proteinCapsidHCV E2 epitopeE. coliChimeric VLPs elicited HCV E2 antibodies that lasted more than 4 months. A balanced T cell (Th1/Th2) immune response was observed.[124]
Tobacco mosaic virusCapsid proteinCapsidL2 epitopes from cottontail rabbit papillomavirus and rabbit oral papillomavirusNicotiana benthamiana or Nicotiana tabacumRabbits immunized with the chimeric VLPs were protected from developing papillomas.[125]
MaMVCapsid proteinCapsidM2e peptide from influenza virus AE. coliMice immunized with the VLPs elicited antibodies that protected them from death following challenge with homologous mouse-adapted virus (H3N8 virus) or heterologous mouse-adapted virus (H1N1). Control mice died.[115]
** Completed phase I clinical trial.
Overall, VLPs from viruses that infect humans, animals, plants, and bacteria have been used to develop vaccines/candidate vaccines against infectious agents, as well as metabolic diseases. Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 provide an overview of the different VLPs developed from various viruses and their potential applications.

5. Expert Review Commentary and Future Perspectives

VLP vaccines are proteins, and thus, they cannot be amplified in the body (i.e., transcribed and translated to make more copies) like other recombinant vaccines such as viral vector vaccines and mRNA vaccines. Nevertheless, VLP vaccines are better alternatives to the two recombinant vaccines. VLP vaccines do not need freezing conditions of −20 to −80 °C for transportation and storage, like mRNA vaccines. In addition to this, VLPs are immediately processed by APCs once they are injected into the body, unlike DNA and mRNA vaccines, whereby cells first need to transcribe (for DNA vaccines) and translate their mRNAs into proteins before they can be processed by APCs to be presented to the immune system.
VLP vaccines are also better alternatives to conventional vaccines (live-attenuated vaccines and inactivated vaccines) for several reasons: First, VLP vaccines do not replicate, and thus, they can be used for everyone, including women who are pregnant or people with a compromised immune system. Additionally, coat proteins—including other structural proteins—from viruses that have segmented genomes (e.g., influenza viruses, AHSV, and bluetongue virus) can also be used to develop hybrid/mosaic VLP-based vaccines without fear of genetic reassortment, like in live-attenuated vaccines. Viruses with segmented genomes have the ability to undergo genetic reassortment; unfortunately, a live-attenuated polyvalent vaccine derived from an AHSV led to the virulent reversion of AHSV type 1 and genomic reassortments with segments from AHSV types 1, 3, and 4, leading sporadic outbreaks of AHSV [128]. Second, VLPs closely mimic the structure of authentic viruses, unlike inactivated vaccines, whose structural proteins may be modified during inactivation, leading to compromised immunogenicity [129]. VLP vaccines, therefore, serve as a better alternative to inactivated vaccines. They are also immunogenic at lower doses [16,17]; in fact, studies show that immunization with 0.3 μg of a candidate rabies virus VLP vaccine elicits antibody titers that are comparable to immunization with 3 μg of the VLPs or with veterinary and human vaccines [17].
Although VLP vaccines are immunogenic at smaller doses, it is unclear whether smaller doses of VLPs can provide long-term protection against viruses with different genotypes such as HBV (which has at least nine genotypes [130]), HPV (more than 20 types associated with cancers [29]), or HEV (which has at least seven genotypes [131]). As mentioned above, immune responses to VLP-based vaccines offer cross-protection against different HBV, HPV, and HEV genotypes [20,29,41,42] but less protection against other genotypes or escape mutants (e.g., HBV) [21,41,42]. These vaccines are given at doses of at least 10 μg/immunization (for example, Engerix-B for HBV [132]); therefore, reducing the dose/immunization may not enhance cross-protection. We believe that increasing the concentration of VLPs (antigens in general) or the number of booster doses may enhance cross-protection. For example, studies have shown that cross-protection against an influenza virus subtype and mice survival following challenge are enhanced at higher doses of antigen, for example, 90 μg, compared to 10 μg [133]. Similarly, immunization with a high dose (106 plaque forming units) of an ASFV vaccine offers complete cross-protection against an ASFV strain compared to partial cross-protection following immunization with half the dose [134].
VLP-based vaccines against viruses of interest should therefore elicit cross-protective immunity against all genotypes of the virus of interest to ensure global efficacy, given the fact that the distribution of genotypes vary from one geographical region to another. For example, HBV genotypes vary from one continent to another, with genotype A being more prevalent in North America, South America, Africa, and Europe, while genotypes B and C are prevalent in Southeast and East Asia. Genotypes D is prevalent in western/central/southern Asia and in Europe [135]. A VLP-based HBV vaccine for global use should offer protection against all HBV genotypes irrespective of where an individual lives. The same applies to HPV- and HEV-based vaccines. Although efforts have been made with the development of Gadarsil-9 to broaden the spectrum of protection against the oncogenic HPV types (HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58) prevalent in other parts of the world than those mentioned above, there are still some HPV types (HPV35, 39, 51, 59, etc.) associated with 10% of cervical cancer against which the vaccine does not protect (this is reviewed in [29]). For example, while Gadarsil-9 offers protection against the majority of HPV types associated with ~90% of cervical cancer cases in Africa, Europe, North America, and Latin America and the Caribbean, it only provides 86.5 and 87.5% protection in Australia and Asia, respectively (this is reviewed in [29]). The vaccine does not protect against HPV35, which is associated with 3.4% of cervical cancer cases in Africa, 1.6% of those in Asia, 2.3% of those in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1.8% of those in Australia, and 1.4% of those in Europe. HPV56 is another prevalent HPV type against which the vaccine does not protect, and it is associated with 1.4% of cervical cancer cases in both Europe and Africa and 1.0% of those in North America (this is reviewed in [29]). The development of a 14-valent candidate vaccine (including HPV35, 39, 51, 56, and 59, which are not covered by Gadarsail-9) will protect against the aforementioned HPV types worldwide.
To be effective globally, an HEV-based VLP vaccine such as Hecolin must provide protection against all four HEV genotypes (HEV1–4) prevalent in humans in different geographical regions around the world. As mentioned above, the Hecolin vaccine is derived from HEV genotype 1 and it cross-protects against genotypes 2 and 4. The vaccine is also expected to offer some degree of cross-protection to genotype 3 [41,42,136]. However, since genotype 3 is prevalent worldwide [137], while genotypes 1 and 2 are prevalent mainly in developing countries in Asia and Africa, where the vaccine is currently being tested (i.e., in Bangladesh, but not in Africa), it is crucial to conduct protective studies that include genotype 3 in other regions of the world to ensure the vaccine’s effectiveness on a global scale; genotype 4 is also prevalent in China. It is worth mentioning that the Hecolin vaccine is developed using the bacterial expression system. The use of the bacterial expression system is cheaper than the use of eukaryotic expression systems. However, bacterial expression systems, unlike eukaryotic expression systems, lack post-translational modifications such as glycosylation. Although the lack of glycosylation has been associated with the poor efficacy of some vaccines [138], this does not seem to be the case with the Hecolin vaccine; as a matter of fact, monkeys vaccinated with the vaccine were completely protected from infection with HEV genotype 1 [41].
As mentioned earlier, VLPs (especially those from HBV and HPV) have also been used as display platforms to enhance the immunogenicity of peptides derived from other infectious agents (e.g., bacteria and other viruses) and non-infectious agents (e.g., cancer) [46,49,80,81,82,139], with the ultimate goal of protecting against these agents. However, using VLPs from human viruses as display platforms for foreign peptides presents a challenge due to the presence of pre-existing antibodies in the human population, either from natural infection or vaccination, against the platforms (this is reviewed in [140]). In fact, some studies have shown that high levels of pre-existing antibodies to some platforms can reduce the immunogenicity of the platforms as well as the efficacy of heterologous antigens displayed by the platforms [141,142,143,144,145,146]. For example, pre-existing maternal antibodies to poliovirus in children have been shown to reduce vaccine efficacy by up to 28% following the immunization of the children with the same antigen [144]. To overcome this limitation, VLPs from animal viruses (which do not colonize humans), plant viruses, and bacterial viruses can be used to display foreign peptides.
Overall, VLPs are versatile and efficient platforms for vaccine development. They can be used to develop vaccines which act not only against the viruses from which they are derived, but also against other infectious and non-infectious agents. Furthermore, they are excellent platforms for the development of hybrid/mosaic vaccines against viruses with segmented genomes, especially those that are transmitted by insects (e.g., AHSV). Their inability to replicate in insects reduces the risk of reassortment events that can occur with live-attenuated vaccines developed from viruses with segmented genomes. Additionally, a VLP-based vaccine for viruses such as AHSV may also help in differentiating vaccinated horses from infected horses, which may be challenging with a live-attenuated vaccine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K. and E.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K., H.L. and E.T.; writing—review and editing, M.K., H.L. and E.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by start-up funding from the School of Veterinary Medicine at Texas Tech University and by grant number 7R15AI146982-02 from the US National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the National Institutes of Health.

Conflicts of Interest

Ebenezer Tumban is a co-inventor of an L2-bacteriophage VLP-related patent, managed by the University of New Mexico in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.

References

  1. Pumpens, P.; Pushko, P. Virus-like Particles: A Comprehensive Guide; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pumpens, P.; Renhofa, R.; Dishlers, A.; Kozlovska, T.; Ose, V.; Pushko, P.; Tars, K.; Grens, E.; Bachmann, M.F. The True Story and Advantages of RNA Phage Capsids as Nanotools. Intervirology 2016, 59, 74–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shirbaghaee, Z.; Bolhassani, A. Different applications of virus-like particles in biology and medicine: Vaccination and delivery systems. Biopolymers 2016, 105, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yan, D.; Wei, Y.Q.; Guo, H.C.; Sun, S.Q. The application of virus-like particles as vaccines and biological vehicles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 10415–10432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bachmann, M.F.; Jennings, G.T. Vaccine delivery: A matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chackerian, B.; Durfee, M.R.; Schiller, J.T. Virus-like display of a neo-self antigen reverses B cell anergy in a B cell receptor transgenic mouse model. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 5816–5825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yuseff, M.I.; Pierobon, P.; Reversat, A.; Lennon-Dumenil, A.M. How B cells capture, process and present antigens: A crucial role for cell polarity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zabel, F.; Kundig, T.M.; Bachmann, M.F. Virus-induced humoral immunity: On how B cell responses are initiated. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2013, 3, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ibanez, L.I.; Roose, K.; De Filette, M.; Schotsaert, M.; De Sloovere, J.; Roels, S.; Pollard, C.; Schepens, B.; Grooten, J.; Fiers, W.; et al. M2e-displaying virus-like particles with associated RNA promote T helper 1 type adaptive immunity against influenza A. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manolova, V.; Flace, A.; Bauer, M.; Schwarz, K.; Saudan, P.; Bachmann, M.F. Nanoparticles target distinct dendritic cell populations according to their size. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 38, 1404–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tumban, E.; Peabody, J.; Peabody, D.S.; Chackerian, B. A universal virus-like particle-based vaccine for human papillomavirus: Longevity of protection and role of endogenous and exogenous adjuvants. Vaccine 2013, 31, 4647–4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lund, J.M.; Alexopoulou, L.; Sato, A.; Karow, M.; Adams, N.C.; Gale, N.W.; Iwasaki, A.; Flavell, R.A. Recognition of single-stranded RNA viruses by Toll-like receptor 7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 5598–5603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, H.; Li, Y.M.; Zhang, P.; Xing, H.Z.; Zhao, S.; Song, Y.P.; Wan, D.M.; Yu, J.F. Targeting toll-like receptor 7/8 for immunotherapy: Recent advances and prospectives. Biomark. Res. 2022, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Diebold, S.S. Recognition of viral single-stranded RNA by Toll-like receptors. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 2008, 60, 813–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Biologicals, N. Toll-like Receptors; updated ed.; Novus Biologicals, LLC: Littleton, CO, USA, 2014; p. 187. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tumban, E.; Peabody, J.; Tyler, M.; Peabody, D.S.; Chackerian, B. VLPs displaying a single L2 epitope induce broadly cross-neutralizing antibodies against human papillomavirus. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fontana, D.; Kratje, R.; Etcheverrigaray, M.; Prieto, C. Rabies virus-like particles expressed in HEK293 cells. Vaccine 2014, 32, 2799–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moradi Vahdat, M.; Hemmati, F.; Ghorbani, A.; Rutkowska, D.; Afsharifar, A.; Eskandari, M.H.; Rezaei, N.; Niazi, A. Hepatitis B core-based virus-like particles: A platform for vaccine development in plants. Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 29, e00605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ho, J.K.; Jeevan-Raj, B.; Netter, H.J. Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Subviral Particles as Protective Vaccines and Vaccine Platforms. Viruses 2020, 12, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hamada-Tsutsumi, S.; Iio, E.; Watanabe, T.; Murakami, S.; Isogawa, M.; Iijima, S.; Inoue, T.; Matsunami, K.; Tajiri, K.; Ozawa, T.; et al. Validation of cross-genotype neutralization by hepatitis B virus-specific monoclonal antibodies by in vitro and in vivo infection. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Inoue, T.; Tanaka, Y. Cross-Protection of Hepatitis B Vaccination among Different Genotypes. Vaccines 2020, 8, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chroboczek, J.; Szurgot, I.; Szolajska, E. Virus-like particles as vaccine. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2014, 61, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gara, N.; Abdalla, A.; Rivera, E.; Zhao, X.; Werner, J.M.; Liang, T.J.; Hoofnagle, J.H.; Rehermann, B.; Ghany, M.G. Durability of antibody response against hepatitis B virus in healthcare workers vaccinated as adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 60, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Brown, D.R.; Kjaer, S.K.; Sigurdsson, K.; Iversen, O.E.; Hernandez-Avila, M.; Wheeler, C.M.; Perez, G.; Koutsky, L.A.; Tay, E.H.; Garcia, P.; et al. The impact of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV; types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine on infection and disease due to oncogenic nonvaccine HPV types in generally HPV-naive women aged 16-26 years. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 199, 926–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Joura, E.A.; Giuliano, A.R.; Iversen, O.E.; Bouchard, C.; Mao, C.; Mehlsen, J.; Moreira, E.D., Jr.; Ngan, Y.; Petersen, L.K.; Lazcano-Ponce, E.; et al. A 9-valent HPV vaccine against infection and intraepithelial neoplasia in women. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Smith, J.F.; Brownlow, M.; Brown, M.; Kowalski, R.; Esser, M.T.; Ruiz, W.; Barr, E.; Brown, D.R.; Bryan, J.T. Antibodies from women immunized with Gardasil cross-neutralize HPV 45 pseudovirions. Hum. Vaccin. 2007, 3, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Toft, L.; Storgaard, M.; Muller, M.; Sehr, P.; Bonde, J.; Tolstrup, M.; Ostergaard, L.; Sogaard, O.S. Comparison of the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of Cervarix and Gardasil human papillomavirus vaccines in HIV-infected adults: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 209, 1165–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wheeler, C.M.; Kjaer, S.K.; Sigurdsson, K.; Iversen, O.E.; Hernandez-Avila, M.; Perez, G.; Brown, D.R.; Koutsky, L.A.; Tay, E.H.; Garcia, P.; et al. The impact of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV; types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine on infection and disease due to oncogenic nonvaccine HPV types in sexually active women aged 16–26 years. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 199, 936–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhai, L.; Tumban, E. Gardasil-9: A global survey of projected efficacy. Antivir. Res. 2016, 130, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kjaer, S.K.; Nygard, M.; Dillner, J.; Brooke Marshall, J.; Radley, D.; Li, M.; Munk, C.; Hansen, B.T.; Sigurdardottir, L.G.; Hortlund, M.; et al. A 12-Year Follow-up on the Long-Term Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in 4 Nordic Countries. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 66, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsang, S.H.; Sampson, J.N.; Schussler, J.; Porras, C.; Wagner, S.; Boland, J.; Cortes, B.; Lowy, D.R.; Schiller, J.T.; Schiffman, M.; et al. Durability of Cross-Protection by Different Schedules of the Bivalent HPV Vaccine: The CVT Trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2020, 112, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kjaer, S.K.; Nygard, M.; Sundstrom, K.; Dillner, J.; Tryggvadottir, L.; Munk, C.; Berger, S.; Enerly, E.; Hortlund, M.; Agustsson, A.I.; et al. Final analysis of a 14-year long-term follow-up study of the effectiveness and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in women from four nordic countries. Eclinicalmedicine 2020, 23, 100401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huh, W.K.; Joura, E.A.; Giuliano, A.R.; Iversen, O.E.; de Andrade, R.P.; Ault, K.A.; Bartholomew, D.; Cestero, R.M.; Fedrizzi, E.N.; Hirschberg, A.L.; et al. Final efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety analyses of a nine-valent human papillomavirus vaccine in women aged 16–26 years: A randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2017, 390, 2143–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. A Phase III Clinical Trial of a 11-Valent Recombinant Human Papillomavirus Vaccine (Hansenulapolymorpha) in Chinese Women Aged 9–45 Years. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT05262010 (accessed on 8 June 2022).
  35. A Phase I Safty and Immunogenicity Study of SCT1000 in Healthy Women Aged 18 to 45 Years. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT04921111 (accessed on 17 September 2021).
  36. Zaman, K.; Dudman, S.; Stene-Johansen, K.; Qadri, F.; Yunus, M.; Sandbu, S.; Gurley, E.S.; Overbo, J.; Julin, C.H.; Dembinski, J.L.; et al. HEV study protocol: Design of a cluster-randomised, blinded trial to assess the safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of the hepatitis E vaccine HEV 239 (Hecolin) in women of childbearing age in rural Bangladesh. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e033702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. NIAID Safety Study of Hepatitis E Vaccine (HEV239). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03827395 (accessed on 24 September 2021).
  38. Zhu, F.C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.F.; Zhou, C.; Wang, Z.Z.; Huang, S.J.; Wang, H.; Yang, C.L.; Jiang, H.M.; Cai, J.P.; et al. Efficacy and safety of a recombinant hepatitis E vaccine in healthy adults: A large-scale, randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2010, 376, 895–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yu, X.Y.; Chen, Z.P.; Wang, S.Y.; Pan, H.R.; Wang, Z.F.; Zhang, Q.F.; Shen, L.Z.; Zheng, X.P.; Yan, C.F.; Lu, M.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of hepatitis E vaccine in elderly people older than 65 years. Vaccine 2019, 37, 4581–4586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.F.; Huang, S.J.; Wu, T.; Hu, Y.M.; Wang, Z.Z.; Wang, H.; Jiang, H.M.; Wang, Y.J.; Yan, Q.; et al. Long-term efficacy of a hepatitis E vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 914–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, S.W.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.M.; Ou, S.H.; Huang, G.Y.; He, Z.Q.; Ge, S.X.; Xian, Y.L.; Pang, S.Q.; Ng, M.H.; et al. A bacterially expressed particulate hepatitis E vaccine: Antigenicity, immunogenicity and protectivity on primates. Vaccine 2005, 23, 2893–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wen, J.; Behloul, N.; Dai, X.; Dong, C.; Liang, J.; Zhang, M.; Shi, C.; Meng, J. Immunogenicity difference between two hepatitis E vaccines derived from genotype 1 and 4. Antivir. Res. 2016, 128, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Buffin, S.; Peubez, I.; Barrière, F.; Nicolaï, M.-C.; Tapia, T.; Dhir, V.; Forma, E.; Sève, N.; Legastelois, I. Influenza A and B virus-like particles produced in mammalian cells are highly immunogenic and induce functional antibodies. Vaccine 2019, 37, 6857–6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vang, L.; Morello, C.S.; Mendy, J.; Thompson, D.; Manayani, D.; Guenther, B.; Julander, J.; Sanford, D.; Jain, A.; Patel, A. Zika virus-like particle vaccine protects AG129 mice and rhesus macaques against Zika virus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sunay, M.M.; Martins, K.A.; Steffens, J.T.; Gregory, M.; Vantongeren, S.A.; Van Hoeven, N.; Garnes, P.G.; Bavari, S. Glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant enhances immune response to Ebola virus-like particle vaccine in mice. Vaccine 2019, 37, 3902–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kotiw, M.; Johnson, M.; Pandey, M.; Fry, S.; Hazell, S.L.; Netter, H.J.; Good, M.F.; Olive, C. Immunological response to parenteral vaccination with recombinant hepatitis B virus surface antigen virus-like particles expressing Helicobacter pylori KatA epitopes in a murine H. pylori challenge model. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2012, 19, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Czarnota, A.; Offersgaard, A.; Pihl, A.F.; Prentoe, J.; Bukh, J.; Gottwein, J.M.; Bieńkowska-Szewczyk, K.; Grzyb, K. Specific antibodies induced by immunization with hepatitis B virus-like particles carrying hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein 2 epitopes show differential neutralization efficiency. Vaccines 2020, 8, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ramasamy, V.; Arora, U.; Shukla, R.; Poddar, A.; Shanmugam, R.K.; White, L.J.; Mattocks, M.M.; Raut, R.; Perween, A.; Tyagi, P. A tetravalent virus-like particle vaccine designed to display domain III of dengue envelope proteins induces multi-serotype neutralizing antibodies in mice and macaques which confer protection against antibody dependent enhancement in AG129 mice. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chu, X.; Li, Y.; Long, Q.; Xia, Y.; Yao, Y.; Sun, W.; Huang, W.; Yang, X.; Liu, C.; Ma, Y. Chimeric HBcAg virus-like particles presenting a HPV 16 E7 epitope significantly suppressed tumor progression through preventive or therapeutic immunization in a TC-1-grafted mouse model. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 2417. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ross, T.M.; Mahmood, K.; Crevar, C.J.; Schneider-Ohrum, K.; Heaton, P.M.; Bright, R.A. A trivalent virus-like particle vaccine elicits protective immune responses against seasonal influenza strains in mice and ferrets. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hu, C.-M.J.; Chien, C.-Y.; Liu, M.-T.; Fang, Z.-S.; Chang, S.-Y.; Juang, R.-H.; Chang, S.-C.; Chen, H.-W. Multi-antigen avian influenza a (H7N9) virus-like particles: Particulate characterizations and immunogenicity evaluation in murine and avian models. BMC Biotechnol. 2017, 17, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, J.; Ren, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wilker, P.R.; Yu, Z.; Sun, W.; Wang, T.; Feng, N.; Li, Y. Influenza virus-like particles composed of conserved influenza proteins and GPI-anchored CCL28/GM-CSF fusion proteins enhance protective immunity against homologous and heterologous viruses. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018, 63, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Merck GARDASIL9 (Human Papillomavirus 9-Valent Vaccine, Recombinant). Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/90064/download (accessed on 1 April 2023).
  54. Wheeler, C.M.; Castellsagué, X.; Garland, S.M.; Szarewski, A.; Paavonen, J.; Naud, P.; Salmerón, J.; Chow, S.-N.; Apter, D.; Kitchener, H. Cross-protective efficacy of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by non-vaccine oncogenic HPV types: 4-year end-of-study analysis of the randomised, double-blind PATRICIA trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. GSK CERVARIX [Human Papillomavirus Bivalent (Types 16 and 18) Vaccine, Recombinant]. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/78013/download (accessed on 31 December 2009).
  56. Pan, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Song, S.; Wang, D.; Wei, M.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Xia, N. Bacterially expressed human papillomavirus type 6 and 11 bivalent vaccine: Characterization, antigenicity and immunogenicity. Vaccine 2017, 35, 3222–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jungers, P.; Chauveau, P.; Couroucé, A.-M.; Devillier, P.; Excler, J.L.; Bailleux, F.; Saliou, P. Immunogenicity of the recombinant GenHevac B Pasteur vaccine against hepatitis B in chronic uremic patients. J. Infect. Dis. 1994, 169, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhao, D.; Meng, X.; Zhao, X.; Yu, X.; Kong, W. Design and immunogenicity assessment of HIV-1 virus-like particles as a candidate vaccine. Sci. China Life Sci. 2011, 54, 1042–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Buonaguro, L.; Racioppi, L.; Tornesello, M.; Arra, C.; Visciano, M.; Biryahwaho, B.; Sempala, S.; Giraldo, G.; Buonaguro, F. Induction of neutralizing antibodies and cytotoxic T lymphocytes in Balb/c mice immunized with virus-like particles presenting a gp120 molecule from a HIV-1 isolate of clade A. Antivir. Res. 2002, 54, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Buonaguro, L.; Visciano, M.; Tornesello, M.; Tagliamonte, M.; Biryahwaho, B.; Buonaguro, F. Induction of systemic and mucosal cross-clade neutralizing antibodies in BALB/c mice immunized with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clade A virus-like particles administered by different routes of inoculation. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 7059–7067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Su, F.; Patel, G.B.; Hu, S.; Chen, W. Induction of mucosal immunity through systemic immunization: Phantom or reality? Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2016, 12, 1070–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ramani, S.; Neill, F.H.; Ferreira, J.; Treanor, J.J.; Frey, S.E.; Topham, D.J.; Goodwin, R.R.; Borkowski, A.; Baehner, F.; Mendelman, P.M. B-cell responses to intramuscular administration of a bivalent virus-like particle human norovirus vaccine. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2017, 24, e00571-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Xia, M.; Farkas, T.; Jiang, X. Norovirus capsid protein expressed in yeast forms virus-like particles and stimulates systemic and mucosal immunity in mice following an oral administration of raw yeast extracts. J. Med. Virol. 2007, 79, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Penkert, R.R.; Young, N.S.; Surman, S.L.; Sealy, R.E.; Rosch, J.; Dormitzer, P.R.; Settembre, E.C.; Chandramouli, S.; Wong, S.; Hankins, J.S. Saccharomyces cerevisiae-derived virus-like particle parvovirus B19 vaccine elicits binding and neutralizing antibodies in a mouse model for sickle cell disease. Vaccine 2017, 35, 3615–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bernstein, D.I.; Sahly, H.M.E.; Keitel, W.A.; Wolff, M.; Simone, G.; Segawa, C.; Wong, S.; Shelly, D.; Young, N.S.; Dempsey, W. Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate parvovirus B19 vaccine. Vaccine 2011, 29, 7357–7363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Saraswat, S.; Athmaram, T.; Parida, M.; Agarwal, A.; Saha, A.; Dash, P.K. Expression and characterization of yeast derived chikungunya virus like particles (CHIK-VLPs) and its evaluation as a potential vaccine candidate. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Akahata, W.; Yang, Z.-Y.; Andersen, H.; Sun, S.; Holdaway, H.A.; Kong, W.-P.; Lewis, M.G.; Higgs, S.; Rossmann, M.G.; Rao, S. A virus-like particle vaccine for epidemic Chikungunya virus protects nonhuman primates against infection. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Metz, S.W.; Gardner, J.; Geertsema, C.; Le, T.T.; Goh, L.; Vlak, J.M.; Suhrbier, A.; Pijlman, G.P. Effective chikungunya virus-like particle vaccine produced in insect cells. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Chang, L.J.; Dowd, K.A.; Mendoza, F.H.; Saunders, J.G.; Sitar, S.; Plummer, S.H.; Yamshchikov, G.; Sarwar, U.N.; Hu, Z.; Enama, M.E.; et al. Safety and tolerability of chikungunya virus-like particle vaccine in healthy adults: A phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet 2014, 384, 2046–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhao, H.; Li, H.-Y.; Han, J.-F.; Deng, Y.-Q.; Li, Y.-X.; Zhu, S.-Y.; He, Y.-L.; Qin, E.-D.; Chen, R.; Qin, C.-F. Virus-like particles produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae elicit protective immunity against Coxsackievirus A16 in mice. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 10445–10452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, X.; Xiao, X.; Zhao, M.; Liu, W.; Pang, L.; Sun, X.; Cen, S.; Yang, B.B.; Huang, Y.; Sheng, W. EV71 virus-like particles produced by co-expression of capsid proteins in yeast cells elicit humoral protective response against EV71 lethal challenge. BMC Res. Notes 2016, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, H.-Y.; Han, J.-F.; Qin, C.-F.; Chen, R. Virus-like particles for enterovirus 71 produced from Saccharomyces cerevisiae potently elicits protective immune responses in mice. Vaccine 2013, 31, 3281–3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Walpita, P.; Cong, Y.; Jahrling, P.B.; Rojas, O.; Postnikova, E.; Yu, S.; Johns, L.; Holbrook, M. A VLP-based vaccine provides complete protection against Nipah virus challenge following multiple-dose or single-dose vaccination schedules in a hamster model. Npj Vaccines 2017, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yang, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, H.; Qian, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, R.; Chen, X. Immunogenicity and virus-like particle formation of rotavirus capsid proteins produced in transgenic plants. Sci. China Life Sci. 2011, 54, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ward, B.J.; Gobeil, P.; Séguin, A.; Atkins, J.; Boulay, I.; Charbonneau, P.-Y.; Couture, M.; D’Aoust, M.-A.; Dhaliwall, J.; Finkle, C. Phase 1 randomized trial of a plant-derived virus-like particle vaccine for COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mani, S.; Tripathi, L.; Raut, R.; Tyagi, P.; Arora, U.; Barman, T.; Sood, R.; Galav, A.; Wahala, W.; de Silva, A. Pichia pastoris-expressed dengue 2 envelope forms virus-like particles without pre-membrane protein and induces high titer neutralizing antibodies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chang, Y.-H.; Chiao, D.-J.; Hsu, Y.-L.; Lin, C.-C.; Wu, H.-L.; Shu, P.-Y.; Chang, S.-F.; Chang, J.-H.; Kuo, S.-C. Mosquito cell-derived Japanese encephalitis virus-like particles induce specific humoral and cellular immune responses in mice. Viruses 2020, 12, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wu, F.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Mo, R.; Yan, F.; Wang, H.; Wong, G.; Chi, H.; Wang, T.; Feng, N. A chimeric Sudan virus-like particle vaccine candidate produced by a recombinant baculovirus system induces specific immune responses in mice and horses. Viruses 2020, 12, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Brown, C.S.; Welling-Wester, S.; Feijlbrief, M.; Van Lent, J.W.; Spaan, W.J. Chimeric parvovirus B19 capsids for the presentation of foreign epitopes. Virology 1994, 198, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Schellenbacher, C.; Kwak, K.; Fink, D.; Shafti-Keramat, S.; Huber, B.; Jindra, C.; Faust, H.; Dillner, J.; Roden, R.B.; Kirnbauer, R. Efficacy of RG1-VLP vaccination against infections with genital and cutaneous human papillomaviruses. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 2706–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Varsani, A.; Williamson, A.-L.; De Villiers, D.; Becker, I.; Christensen, N.D.; Rybicki, E.P. Chimeric human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) L1 particles presenting the common neutralizing epitope for the L2 minor capsid protein of HPV-6 and HPV-16. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 8386–8393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kondo, K.; Ochi, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Yoshikawa, H.; Kanda, T. Modification of human papillomavirus-like particle vaccine by insertion of the cross-reactive L2-epitopes. J. Med. Virol. 2008, 80, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Jiang, L.; Fan, R.; Sun, S.; Fan, P.; Su, W.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, F.; Xu, F.; Kong, W.; Jiang, C. A new EV71 VP3 epitope in norovirus P particle vector displays neutralizing activity and protection in vivo in mice. Vaccine 2015, 33, 6596–6603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tan, M.; Xia, M.; Huang, P.; Wang, L.; Zhong, W.; McNeal, M.; Wei, C.; Jiang, X. Norovirus P particle as a platform for antigen presentation. Procedia Vaccinol. 2011, 4, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Di Bonito, P.; Grasso, F.; Mochi, S.; Petrone, L.; Fanales-Belasio, E.; Mei, A.; Cesolini, A.; Laconi, G.; Conrad, H.; Bernhard, H. Anti-tumor CD8+ T cell immunity elicited by HIV-1-based virus-like particles incorporating HPV-16 E7 protein. Virology 2009, 395, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Gunter, C.J.; Regnard, G.L.; Rybicki, E.P.; Hitzeroth, I.I. Immunogenicity of plant-produced porcine circovirus-like particles in mice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 1751–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Thuenemann, E.C.; Meyers, A.E.; Verwey, J.; Rybicki, E.P.; Lomonossoff, G.P. A method for rapid production of heteromultimeric protein complexes in plants: Assembly of protective bluetongue virus-like particles. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2013, 11, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rutkowska, D.A.; Mokoena, N.B.; Tsekoa, T.L.; Dibakwane, V.S.; O’Kennedy, M.M. Plant-produced chimeric virus-like particles—A new generation vaccine against African horse sickness. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Smith, T.; O’Kennedy, M.M.; Wandrag, D.B.R.; Adeyemi, M.; Abolnik, C. Efficacy of a plant-produced virus-like particle vaccine in chickens challenged with Influenza A H6N2 virus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 502–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Pushko, P.; Tretyakova, I.; Hidajat, R.; Zsak, A.; Chrzastek, K.; Tumpey, T.M.; Kapczynski, D.R. Virus-like particles displaying H5, H7, H9 hemagglutinins and N1 neuraminidase elicit protective immunity to heterologous avian influenza viruses in chickens. Virology 2017, 501, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wang, M.; Pan, Q.; Lu, Z.; Li, K.; Gao, H.; Qi, X.; Gao, Y.; Wang, X. An optimized, highly efficient, self-assembled, subvirus-like particle of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Vaccine 2016, 34, 3508–3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Nakahira, Y.; Mizuno, K.; Yamashita, H.; Tsuchikura, M.; Takeuchi, K.; Shiina, T.; Kawakami, H. Mass Production of Virus-Like Particles Using Chloroplast Genetic Engineering for Highly Immunogenic Oral Vaccine against Fish Disease. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 717952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Marsian, J.; Hurdiss, D.L.; Ranson, N.A.; Ritala, A.; Paley, R.; Cano, I.; Lomonossoff, G.P. Plant-made nervous necrosis virus-like particles protect fish against disease. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, C.; Zheng, X.; Gai, W.; Wong, G.; Wang, H.; Jin, H.; Feng, N.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Li, N. Novel chimeric virus-like particles vaccine displaying MERS-CoV receptor-binding domain induce specific humoral and cellular immune response in mice. Antivir. Res. 2017, 140, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Xu, X.; Ding, Z.; Li, J.; Liang, J.; Bu, Z.; Ding, J.; Yang, Y.; Lang, X.; Wang, X.; Yin, R. Newcastle disease virus-like particles containing the Brucella BCSP31 protein induce dendritic cell activation and protect mice against virulent Brucella challenge. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 229, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ji, P.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, A.; Jiang, D.; Zhao, B.; Wang, J.; Chai, S.; Zhou, E.; Zhang, G. Porcine parvovirus capsid protein expressed in Escherichia coli self-assembles into virus-like particles with high immunogenicity in mice and guinea pigs. Antivir. Res. 2017, 139, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dalton, K.P.; Alvarado, C.; Reytor, E.; del Carmen Nuñez, M.; Podadera, A.; Martínez-Alonso, D.; Alonso, J.M.M.; Nicieza, I.; Gómez-Sebastián, S.; Dalton, R.M. Chimeric VLPs Bearing VP60 from Two Serotypes of Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease Virus Are Protective against Both Viruses. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dennis, S.J.; Meyers, A.E.; Guthrie, A.J.; Hitzeroth, I.I.; Rybicki, E.P. Immunogenicity of plant-produced African horse sickness virus-like particles: Implications for a novel vaccine. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Dennis, S.J.; O’kennedy, M.M.; Rutkowska, D.; Tsekoa, T.; Lourens, C.W.; Hitzeroth, I.I.; Meyers, A.E.; Rybicki, E.P. Safety and immunogenicity of plant-produced African horse sickness virus-like particles in horses. Vet. Res. 2018, 49, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Zielonka, A.; Gedvilaite, A.; Ulrich, R.; Lüschow, D.; Sasnauskas, K.; Müller, H.; Johne, R. Generation of virus-like particles consisting of the major capsid protein VP1 of goose hemorrhagic polyomavirus and their application in serological tests. Virus Res. 2006, 120, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Lee, D.-H.; Bae, S.-W.; Park, J.-K.; Kwon, J.-H.; Yuk, S.-S.; Song, J.-M.; Kang, S.-M.; Kwon, Y.-K.; Kim, H.-Y.; Song, C.-S. Virus-like particle vaccine protects against H3N2 canine influenza virus in dog. Vaccine 2013, 31, 3268–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Fontana, D.; Kratje, R.; Etcheverrigaray, M.; Prieto, C. Immunogenic virus-like particles continuously expressed in mammalian cells as a veterinary rabies vaccine candidate. Vaccine 2015, 33, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liu, X.; Fang, Y.; Zhou, P.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Xiao, S.; Dong, Z.; Pan, L.; Lv, J.; Zhang, Z. Chimeric virus-like particles elicit protective immunity against serotype O foot-and-mouth disease virus in guinea pigs. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 4905–4914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Choi, Y.R.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Kang, H.A.; Kim, H.-J. Chromatographically-purified capsid proteins of red-spotted grouper nervous necrosis virus expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae form virus-like particles. Protein Expr. Purif. 2013, 89, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Su, H.; van Eerde, A.; Steen, H.S.; Heldal, I.; Haugslien, S.; Ørpetveit, I.; Wüstner, S.C.; Inami, M.; Løvoll, M.; Rimstad, E. Establishment of a piscine myocarditis virus (PMCV) challenge model and testing of a plant-produced subunit vaccine candidate against cardiomyopathy syndrome (CMS) in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Aquaculture 2021, 541, 736806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Pascual, E.; Mata, C.P.; Gómez-Blanco, J.; Moreno, N.; Bárcena, J.; Blanco, E.; Rodríguez-Frandsen, A.; Nieto, A.; Carrascosa, J.L.; Castón, J.R. Structural basis for the development of avian virus capsids that display influenza virus proteins and induce protective immunity. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 2563–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Crisci, E.; Fraile, L.; Moreno, N.; Blanco, E.; Cabezon, R.; Costa, C.; Mussa, T.; Baratelli, M.; Martinez-Orellana, P.; Ganges, L.; et al. Chimeric calicivirus-like particles elicit specific immune responses in pigs. Vaccine 2012, 30, 2427–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shen, H.; Xue, C.; Lv, L.; Wang, W.; Liu, Q.; Liu, K.; Chen, X.; Zheng, J.; Li, X.; Cao, Y. Assembly and immunological properties of a bivalent virus-like particle (VLP) for avian influenza and Newcastle disease. Virus Res. 2013, 178, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Ding, P.; Jin, Q.; Chen, X.; Yang, S.; Guo, J.; Xing, G.; Deng, R.; Wang, A.; Zhang, G. Nanovaccine confers dual protection against influenza A virus and porcine circovirus type 2. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 7533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Jones, R.M.; Chichester, J.A.; Mett, V.; Jaje, J.; Tottey, S.; Manceva, S.; Casta, L.J.; Gibbs, S.K.; Musiychuk, K.; Shamloul, M. A plant-produced Pfs25 VLP malaria vaccine candidate induces persistent transmission blocking antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum in immunized mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Chichester, J.A.; Green, B.J.; Jones, R.M.; Shoji, Y.; Miura, K.; Long, C.A.; Lee, C.K.; Ockenhouse, C.F.; Morin, M.J.; Streatfield, S.J. Safety and immunogenicity of a plant-produced Pfs25 virus-like particle as a transmission blocking vaccine against malaria: A Phase 1 dose-escalation study in healthy adults. Vaccine 2018, 36, 5865–5871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sastri, M.; Kekuda, R.; Gopinath, K.; Kumar, C.R.; Jagath, J.; Savithri, H. Assembly of physalis mottle virus capsid protein in Escherichia coli and the role of amino and carboxy termini in the formation of the icosahedral particles. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 272, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hu, H.; Steinmetz, N.F. Development of a virus-like particle-based anti-HER2 breast cancer vaccine. Cancers 2021, 13, 2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ogrina, A.; Skrastina, D.; Balke, I.; Kalnciema, I.; Jansons, J.; Bachmann, M.F.; Zeltins, A. Comparison of Bacterial Expression Systems Based on Potato Virus Y-like Particles for Vaccine Generation. Vaccines 2022, 10, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Leclerc, D.; Rivest, M.; Babin, C.; López-Macias, C.; Savard, P. A novel M2e based flu vaccine formulation for dogs. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhai, L.; Yadav, R.; Kunda, N.K.; Anderson, D.; Bruckner, E.; Miller, E.K.; Basu, R.; Muttil, P.; Tumban, E. Oral immunization with bacteriophage MS2-L2 VLPs protects against oral and genital infection with multiple HPV types associated with head & neck cancers and cervical cancer. Antivir. Res. 2019, 166, 56–65. [Google Scholar]
  117. Zhai, L.; Peabody, J.; Pang, Y.S.; Schiller, J.; Chackerian, B.; Tumban, E. A novel candidate HPV vaccine: MS2 phage VLP displaying a tandem HPV L2 peptide offers similar protection in mice to Gardasil-9. Antivir. Res. 2017, 147, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tumban, E.; Peabody, J.; Peabody, D.S.; Chackerian, B. A pan-HPV vaccine based on bacteriophage PP7 VLPs displaying broadly cross-neutralizing epitopes from the HPV minor capsid protein, L2. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Li, W.; Jing, Z.; Wang, S.; Li, Q.; Xing, Y.; Shi, H.; Li, S.; Hong, Z. P22 virus-like particles as an effective antigen delivery nanoplatform for cancer immunotherapy. Biomaterials 2021, 271, 120726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zinkhan, S.; Ogrina, A.; Balke, I.; Reseviča, G.; Zeltins, A.; de Brot, S.; Lipp, C.; Chang, X.; Zha, L.; Vogel, M. The impact of size on particle drainage dynamics and antibody response. J. Control Release 2021, 331, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Pomwised, R.; Intamaso, U.; Teintze, M.; Young, M.; Pincus, S.H. Coupling peptide antigens to virus-like particles or to protein carriers influences the Th1/Th2 polarity of the resulting immune response. Vaccines 2016, 4, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Kalnciema, I.; Skrastina, D.; Ose, V.; Pumpens, P.; Zeltins, A. Potato virus Y-like particles as a new carrier for the presentation of foreign protein stretches. Mol. Biotechnol. 2012, 52, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zeltins, A.; West, J.; Zabel, F.; El Turabi, A.; Balke, I.; Haas, S.; Maudrich, M.; Storni, F.; Engeroff, P.; Jennings, G.T. Incorporation of tetanus-epitope into virus-like particles achieves vaccine responses even in older recipients in models of psoriasis, Alzheimer’s and cat allergy. Npj Vaccines 2017, 2, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Denis, J.; Majeau, N.; Acosta-Ramirez, E.; Savard, C.; Bedard, M.-C.; Simard, S.; Lecours, K.; Bolduc, M.; Pare, C.; Willems, B. Immunogenicity of papaya mosaic virus-like particles fused to a hepatitis C virus epitope: Evidence for the critical function of multimerization. Virology 2007, 363, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Palmer, K.E.; Benko, A.; Doucette, S.A.; Cameron, T.I.; Foster, T.; Hanley, K.M.; McCormick, A.A.; McCulloch, M.; Pogue, G.P.; Smith, M.L. Protection of rabbits against cutaneous papillomavirus infection using recombinant tobacco mosaic virus containing L2 capsid epitopes. Vaccine 2006, 24, 5516–5525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Stander, J.; Chabeda, A.; Rybicki, E.P.; Meyers, A.E. A Plant-Produced Virus-Like Particle Displaying Envelope Protein Domain III Elicits an Immune Response Against West Nile Virus in Mice. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 738619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Maphis, N.M.; Peabody, J.; Crossey, E.; Jiang, S.; Jamaleddin Ahmad, F.A.; Alvarez, M.; Mansoor, S.K.; Yaney, A.; Yang, Y.; Sillerud, L.O. Qß Virus-like particle-based vaccine induces robust immunity and protects against tauopathy. Npj Vaccines 2019, 4, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Weyer, C.T.; Grewar, J.D.; Burger, P.; Rossouw, E.; Lourens, C.; Joone, C.; le Grange, M.; Coetzee, P.; Venter, E.; Martin, D.P. African horse sickness caused by genome reassortment and reversion to virulence of live, attenuated vaccine viruses, South Africa, 2004–2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 22, 2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Kim, N.; Lee, T.-Y.; Lee, H.; Yang, J.-S.; Kim, K.-C.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, H.-J. Comparing the Immunogenicity and Protective Effects of Three MERS-CoV Inactivation Methods in Mice. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Elizalde, M.M.; Tadey, L.; Mammana, L.; Quarleri, J.F.; Campos, R.H.; Flichman, D.M. Biological characterization of hepatitis B virus genotypes: Their role in viral replication and antigen expression. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 758613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Bruni, R.; Villano, U.; Equestre, M.; Chionne, P.; Madonna, E.; Trandeva-Bankova, D.; Peleva-Pishmisheva, M.; Tenev, T.; Cella, E.; Ciccozzi, M. Hepatitis E virus genotypes and subgenotypes causing acute hepatitis, Bulgaria, 2013–2015. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. FDA. In FDA: 1989. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/engerix-b (accessed on 10 March 2019).
  133. Huang, B.; Wang, W.; Li, R.; Wang, X.; Jiang, T.; Qi, X.; Gao, Y.; Tan, W.; Ruan, L. Influenza A virus nucleoprotein derived from Escherichia coli or recombinant vaccinia (Tiantan) virus elicits robust cross-protection in mice. Virol. J. 2012, 9, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Bosch-Camós, L.; Alonso, U.; Esteve-Codina, A.; Chang, C.-Y.; Martín-Mur, B.; Accensi, F.; Muñoz, M.; Navas, M.J.; Dabad, M.; Vidal, E. Cross-protection against African swine fever virus upon intranasal vaccination is associated with an adaptive-innate immune crosstalk. PLoS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1010931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. MacLachlan, J.H.; Cowie, B.C. Hepatitis B virus epidemiology. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a021410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wen, G.-P.; He, L.; Tang, Z.-M.; Wang, S.-L.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.-Z.; Lin, X.; Liu, C.; Chen, J.-X.; Ying, D. Quantitative evaluation of protective antibody response induced by hepatitis E vaccine in humans. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Smith, D.B.; Simmonds, P. Classification and genomic diversity of enterically transmitted hepatitis viruses. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2018, 8, a031880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zost, S.J.; Parkhouse, K.; Gumina, M.E.; Kim, K.; Perez, S.D.; Wilson, P.C.; Treanor, J.J.; Sant, A.J.; Cobey, S.; Hensley, S.E. Contemporary H3N2 influenza viruses have a glycosylation site that alters binding of antibodies elicited by egg-adapted vaccine strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 12578–12583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chen, C.-W.; Saubi, N.; Kilpeläinen, A.; Joseph-Munné, J. Chimeric Human Papillomavirus-16 Virus-like Particles Presenting P18I10 and T20 Peptides from HIV-1 Envelope Induce HPV16 and HIV-1-Specific Humoral and T Cell-Mediated Immunity in BALB/c Mice. Vaccines 2022, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Mok, D.Z.; Chan, K.R. The effects of pre-existing antibodies on live-attenuated viral vaccines. Viruses 2020, 12, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Zak, D.E.; Andersen-Nissen, E.; Peterson, E.R.; Sato, A.; Hamilton, M.K.; Borgerding, J.; Krishnamurty, A.T.; Chang, J.T.; Adams, D.J.; Hensley, T.R.; et al. Merck Ad5/HIV induces broad innate immune activation that predicts CD8(+) T-cell responses but is attenuated by preexisting Ad5 immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E3503–E3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Knuchel, M.C.; Marty, R.R.; Morin, T.N.; Ilter, O.; Zuniga, A.; Naim, H.Y. Relevance of a pre-existing measles immunity prior immunization with a recombinant measles virus vector. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2013, 9, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zarnitsyna, V.I.; Lavine, J.; Ellebedy, A.; Ahmed, R.; Antia, R. Multi-epitope Models Explain How Pre-existing Antibodies Affect the Generation of Broadly Protective Responses to Influenza. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Voysey, M.; Kelly, D.F.; Fanshawe, T.R.; Sadarangani, M.; O’Brien, K.L.; Perera, R.; Pollard, A.J. The Influence of Maternally Derived Antibody and Infant Age at Vaccination on Infant Vaccine Responses: An Individual Participant Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017, 171, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Masat, E.; Pavani, G.; Mingozzi, F. Humoral immunity to AAV vectors in gene therapy: Challenges and potential solutions. Discov. Med. 2013, 15, 379–389. [Google Scholar]
  146. McCluskie, M.J.; Evans, D.M.; Zhang, N.; Benoit, M.; McElhiney, S.P.; Unnithan, M.; DeMarco, S.C.; Clay, B.; Huber, C.; Deora, A.; et al. The effect of preexisting anti-carrier immunity on subsequent responses to CRM197 or Qb-VLP conjugate vaccines. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2016, 38, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic illustrating the generation of VLPs and chimeric VLPs. A coat protein from a virus is cloned to an expression vector. The vector with the coat protein can also be used to insert a foreign peptide into the coat protein (bottom). Each vector is then transformed or transfected to an expression system where the proteins are expressed and assembled into VLPs.
Figure 1. A schematic illustrating the generation of VLPs and chimeric VLPs. A coat protein from a virus is cloned to an expression vector. The vector with the coat protein can also be used to insert a foreign peptide into the coat protein (bottom). Each vector is then transformed or transfected to an expression system where the proteins are expressed and assembled into VLPs.
Viruses 15 01109 g001
Figure 2. The activation of immune responses by VLPs. Antigen-presenting cells phagocytose and process VLPs into fragments, which are presented to T-helper cells with the help of MHC class II (tope image). This leads to the activation of T-helper cells, which secrete cytokines that activate B-cells (below). B-cells are also activated by the cross-linking of B-cell receptors (BCRs) by VLPs. Activated B-cells divide and differentiate into plasma cells and memory cells (not shown here). Plasma cells secrete antibodies into the body, which neutralize the virus of interest from which the VLPs were derived. The figure is adopted from [5].
Figure 2. The activation of immune responses by VLPs. Antigen-presenting cells phagocytose and process VLPs into fragments, which are presented to T-helper cells with the help of MHC class II (tope image). This leads to the activation of T-helper cells, which secrete cytokines that activate B-cells (below). B-cells are also activated by the cross-linking of B-cell receptors (BCRs) by VLPs. Activated B-cells divide and differentiate into plasma cells and memory cells (not shown here). Plasma cells secrete antibodies into the body, which neutralize the virus of interest from which the VLPs were derived. The figure is adopted from [5].
Viruses 15 01109 g002
Table 2. VLPs derived from human viruses (chimeric VLPs) displaying foreign antigens.
Table 2. VLPs derived from human viruses (chimeric VLPs) displaying foreign antigens.
Name of Virus Used to Make VLPsStructural Protein Used to Make VLPsCapsid or Envelope ProteinsForeign Antigen Displayed on VLPExpression SystemImmune ResponsesReferences
Parvovirus B19VP2CapsidLinear epitopes from human herpes simplex virus (HSV type 1) and mouse hepatitis virus (MHV)A59Sf insect cellsMice immunized with the chimeric VLPs were partially protected against infection with HSV or MHV.[79]
* HPVMajor capsid proteinCapsidHPV16 L2 (aa 17–36)Sf9 insect cellsSera from immunized mice neutralized or protected against infection with HPV pseudovirus types: 5/6/11/16/18//26/31/33/34/35/39/43/44/45/51/52/53/56/58/59/66/68/70/73[80,81,82]
HBVHBsAgSEnvelope130-amino acid from the C-terminus of KatA of Helicobacter pyloriHuman hematoma-7 cellsBacterial load was reduced in mice vaccinated with chimeric VLPs by at least 50%[46]
HCV envelope glycoprotein 2 epitopes (HCV 412–425, 434–446, 502–520, and 523–535)Leishmania tarentolaeSera from mice immunized with VLPs displaying epitope 412–425 neutralized (80–100%) HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, 4a, and 5a[47]
NorovirusProtrusion domainCapsid10 different epitopes from four capsid proteins (VP1-VP4) of enterovirus A (EV71)Rosetta competent cells (DE3 strain)Mice immunized with VLPs displaying amino acid 176–190 from VP3 and amino acid 208–222 from VP1 (both from EV71) were completely protected from E71 infection.[83]
Rotavirus VP8 (159 amino acid from the capsid)E. coli BL21 cellsImmunized mice reduced mouse rotavirus shedding by 89–99.2%.[84]
HIV-1VHIV-1 Nef mutEnvelopeHPV16 E7 proteinHEK 293 G protein-coupled receptor cellsMice immunized with VLPs developed anti-E7 cytotoxic T-cell response and were protected from developing HPV-related tumors.[85]
HBVHBcAgCapsidPeptide from HPV 16 E7 protein (amino acid 49–57)E. coliVLPs suppressed the development of tumors in a TC-1 grafted mice model.[49]
HBVHBsAgEnvelopeDengue virus envelope protein (specifically, domain III of dengue virus 1–4)P. pastorisMosaic VLPs elicited neutralizing antibodies against dengue 1–4. Antibodies protected AG129 mice against lethal challenge with dengue virus 4[48]
* Received approval for phase I clinical trial.
Table 4. VLPs derived from animal viruses (chimeric VLPs) displaying foreign antigens.
Table 4. VLPs derived from animal viruses (chimeric VLPs) displaying foreign antigens.
Name of Virus Used to Develop VLPsStructural Antigen Used to Make VLPsCapsid or Envelope ProteinsForeign Antigen Displayed on VLPExpression SystemImmune ResponsesReferences
Infectious bursal disease virusVP2 precursor (466-residue)CapsidHA and M2 protein epitopes derived from the mouse-adapted A/PR/8/34 influenza virusTrichoplusia ni (H5) insect cellsA total of 100% of mice immunized with chimeric VLPs were protected against lethal challenge with influenza virus; in control groups; 83% of mice died 7–9 days after infection.[106]
Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virusVP60CapsidT-helper epitope from 3A protein of foot-and-mouth disease virusTrichoplusia ni (H5) insect cellsVaccinated pigs generated specific IgA and IgG responses, had high IFN-γ-secreting cells and 3A-specific lymphoproliferative specific T cell responses.[107]
Influenza A virusHA, NA, and M1 of H5N1 virusEnvelopeEctodomain of Newcastle disease virus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase proteinSf9 insect cellsVaccinated chickens were completely protected against Newcastle disease F48E9 virus.[108]
Canine parvovirusVP2CapsidReceptor binding domain of MERS-CoVSf9 insect cellsSera from mice immunized with VLPs neutralized a pseudo-MERS-CoV. A balanced T-cell (Th1 and Th2) response was elicited.[94]
Newcastle disease virusM proteinEnvelopeBrucella antigen BCSP31Sf9 insect cellsMice immunized with VLPs elicited humoral and cellular immune responses in mice. Protection efficacy against a virulent strain of Brucella melitensis (strain 16M) was comparable to a commercial live-attenuated vaccine: Brucella melitensis strain M5.[95]
PCV-2Capsid proteinCapsidEctodomain of matrix protein 2 (M2e) of influenza A virusE. coliVLP-immunized mice were protected against challenge by A/swine/Zhucheng/90/2014 (H1N1) or A/swine/Henan/1/2010 (H3N2) strains. Control mice died from the challenge. Immunized mice were also protected against human [A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)] and avian [A/chicken/Guangzhou/GZ/2005 (H9N2)] influenza viruses.[109]
Table 6. VLPs derived from bacterial viruses (chimeric VLPs) displaying foreign antigens.
Table 6. VLPs derived from bacterial viruses (chimeric VLPs) displaying foreign antigens.
Name of Virus Used to Develop VLPsStructural Antigen Used to Make VLPsCapsid or Envelope ProteinsForeign Antigen Displayed on VLPExpression SystemImmune ResponsesReferences
Bacteriophage AP205Capsid proteinCapsidWest Nile virus envelope protein domain III (WNV EDIII)Nicotiana benthamianaMice immunized with only 5 μg of chimeric VLPs elicited potent IgG responses (1:32,000) that were 4-fold higher compared to mice with immunization with only soluble WNV-EDIII protein.[126]
Bacteriophage MS2Capsid proteinCapsidConcatemer of L2 peptides from two HPV types and a consensus sequence from different HPV typesE. coliMixed MS2-L2 VLPs protected mice against 11 oncogenic HPV pseudovirus types which are associated with around 95% of cervical cancer. Spray-freeze drying increased the thermostability of the VLPs (stored at room temperature for up to 60 days).[116,117]
Bacteriophage QβCapsid proteinCapsidMicrotubule-associated protein tau peptideE. coliMice immunized with chimeric VLPs had reduced levels of hyperphosphorylated pathological tau.[127]
Bacteriophage P22Capsid proteinCapsidB and T epitopes (OVAB and OVAT peptide) of ovalbuminE. coliVLP-OVAT vaccine significantly inhibited tumor growth and lowered the proportion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells among tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and splenocytes.[119]
Bacteriophage PP7Capsid proteinCapsidL2 peptides from eight different HPV typesE. coliMice immunized with VLPs (individually or as a mixture) elicited high-titer anti-L2 IgG serum antibodies; immunized mice were protected from a high-dose challenge with HPV pseudoviruses (PsVs).[118]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kheirvari, M.; Liu, H.; Tumban, E. Virus-like Particle Vaccines and Platforms for Vaccine Development. Viruses 2023, 15, 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15051109

AMA Style

Kheirvari M, Liu H, Tumban E. Virus-like Particle Vaccines and Platforms for Vaccine Development. Viruses. 2023; 15(5):1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15051109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kheirvari, Milad, Hong Liu, and Ebenezer Tumban. 2023. "Virus-like Particle Vaccines and Platforms for Vaccine Development" Viruses 15, no. 5: 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15051109

APA Style

Kheirvari, M., Liu, H., & Tumban, E. (2023). Virus-like Particle Vaccines and Platforms for Vaccine Development. Viruses, 15(5), 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15051109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop