Virological Findings and Treatment Outcomes of Cases That Developed Dolutegravir Resistance in Malawi’s National HIV Treatment Program
by
, , ,
Hope Kanise
1,†, 
Joep J. van Oosterhout
1,2,*,†,
Pachawo Bisani
3,
John Songo
1,
Bilaal W. Matola
4,
Chifundo Chipungu
1,
Katherine Simon
5,6,
Carrie Cox
5,6,
Mina C. Hosseinipour
7,8,
Jean-Batiste Sagno
9,
Risa M. Hoffman
2,
Claudia Wallrauch
3,
Sam Phiri
1,10,
Kim Steegen
11,12,
Andreas Jahn
4,13,
Rose Nyirenda
4 and
Tom Heller
3,14 1
Partners in Hope, Lilongwe P.O. Box 302, Malawi
2
Division of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
3
The Lighthouse Trust, Lilongwe P.O. Box 106, Malawi
4
Directorate of HIV, STI and Viral Hepatitis, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe P.O. Box 30377, Malawi
5
Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation-Malawi, Lilongwe P.O. Box 110, Malawi
6
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
7
University of North Carolina Project Malawi, Lilongwe Private Bag A-104, Malawi
8
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
9
DREAM, Communion of St. Egidio, Blantyre, P.O. Box 30355, Malawi
10
School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe P.O. Box 30184, Malawi
11
Department of Haematology & Molecular Medicine, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg 2131, South Africa
12
Department of Haematology & Molecular Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2017, South Africa
13
Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
14
International Training and Education Center for Health (ITECH), University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2024, 16(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010029
Submission received: 3 November 2023
/
Revised: 28 November 2023
/
Accepted: 19 December 2023
/
Published: 23 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current ART, Virologic Failure and Implications for HIV Drug Resistance)
Abstract
:Millions of Africans are on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), but few detailed descriptions of dolutegravir resistance and its clinical management exist. We reviewed HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing application forms submitted between June 2019 and October 2022, data from the national HIVDR database, and genotypic test results. We obtained standardized ART outcomes and virological results of cases with dolutegravir resistance, and explored associations with dolutegravir resistance among individuals with successful integrase sequencing. All cases were on two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)/dolutegravir, and had confirmed virological failure, generally with prolonged viremia. Among 89 samples with successful integrase sequencing, 24 showed dolutegravir resistance. Dolutegravir resistance-associated mutations included R263K (16/24), E138K (7/24), and G118R (6/24). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age and the presence of high-level NRTI resistance were significantly associated with dolutegravir resistance. After treatment modification recommendations, four individuals (17%) with dolutegravir resistance died, one self-discontinued ART, one defaulted, and one transferred out. Of the 17 remaining individuals, 12 had follow-up VL results, and 11 (92%) were <1000 copies/mL. Twenty-four cases with dolutegravir resistance among 89 individuals with confirmed virological failure suggests a considerable prevalence in the Malawi HIV program. Successful management of dolutegravir resistance was possible, but early mortality was high. More research on the management of treatment-experienced individuals with dolutegravir resistance is needed.
1. Introduction
The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir is an antiretroviral drug with favorable characteristics. It is very effective in controlling HIV infection, has a high genetic barrier to drug resistance, limited potential for drug interactions, is well tolerated compared to other antiretroviral drugs, and is available in affordable, generic, multidrug-tablets, as well as in convenient and palatable pediatric formulations [1]. For these reasons, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends dolutegravir as a preferred drug for first- and second-line ART regimens for adults and children [2]. Over the last few years, HIV programs in Malawi and other countries in sub-Saharan Africa have transitioned most individuals on ART to dolutegravir-based regimens [3].
Dolutegravir resistance was initially reported in individuals who experienced ART failure after exposure to raltegravir, an older integrase inhibitor with a lower genetic resistance barrier [4]. Among individuals who started a dolutegravir-based regimen when ART-naïve, dolutegravir resistance has been described in very few cases [5,6,7]. Based on in vitro observations and small case series, some risk factors for dolutegravir resistance have been suggested, such as infection with a non-B subtype of HIV, high viral load (VL) and low CD4 cell count at the start of the dolutegravir-based regimen, insufficient adherence to ART, and factors reducing dolutegravir drug levels [5]. Despite the huge population on dolutegravir-based regimens in sub-Saharan Africa, few studies have addressed dolutegravir resistance, likely due to the limited availability of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing for individual client management. To our knowledge, reports on risk factors for dolutegravir resistance, as well as on clinical outcomes of individuals with dolutegravir resistance, have not been published from the region.
Despite poor socio-economic circumstances, Malawi has a successful HIV program. In a 2020–2021 survey, 88% of around 950,000 persons aged 15–49 years living with HIV (PLHIV) knew their status, of whom 98% were on ART, with 97% having a suppressed viral load (VL). More than 98% of persons on ART are on dolutegravir-based regimens [8].
We have previously described a small number of initial cases with dolutegravir resistance from Malawi [9], and now present a larger case series with more details on observed resistance-associated mutations, and with clinical outcomes after recommendations based on HIVDR test results. We also explored factors associated with dolutegravir resistance.
2. Methods
2.1. Setting
Full transition to dolutegravir-based regimens took place in Malawi’s HIV program between 2019 and 2021. Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NNRTI)-based first-line regimens, as well as Protease Inhibitor (PI)-based first-line and second-line regimens, were replaced with two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NRTI) + dolutegravir regimens for children and adults. This usually happened without available recent VL results or in the presence of non-suppressed VL results [10].
National guidelines indicate that all individuals who have been on PI- or dolutegravir-based regimens for at least one year, and who have confirmed virological failure (defined as a VL result ≥ 1000 copies/mL, confirmed after 3 months with a second VL result ≥ 1000 copies/mL and with recent adherence reported as good), are recommended to have a genotypic HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) test to guide switching to next line regimens [11]. Clinicians need to submit standardized HIVDR test application forms to a national committee that approves HIVDR testing, and later provides clinical recommendations based on genotyping results. Approval was based on information that supports guidelines criteria for HIVDR testing, in particular confirmed virological failure and adequate recent adherence [12].
2.2. Genotypic HIVDR Testing
After approval for HIVDR testing, clients provided dried blood spot (DBS) samples for transport to the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa. Here, two DBS spots (75 μL each) were added to 2 mL of lysis buffer for RNA extraction using NucliSENS easyMAG. HIVDR testing was performed using previously validated in-house protocols adapted from Zhou et al. and Van Laethem et al. [13,14]. Partial pol gene sequences were assembled and edited using RECall (British Columbia’s Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS Research). Sequences were loaded onto the Stanford HIV database, genotypic resistance system, version 9.0 (https://hivdb.stanford.edu/hivdb/by-sequences/; accessed on 27 October 2023) to generate resistance reports that provide drug resistance levels and -scores. Resistance was defined as a resistance score of ≥15 (low-level resistance), and INSTI and PI mutations were classified as either major or minor, as per Stanford HIV data base recommendations. In case of failed sequencing, clinicians received a communication with a request to call the client back to the clinic to obtain a new sample for HIVDR testing in South Africa. This was often a protracted process and was not always completed.
2.3. Data Collection and Analysis
We reviewed HIVDR testing applications from June 2019 through to October 2022, and we included all individuals on dolutegravir-based regimens at time of application for further analysis. Data were extracted from three sources: the national HIVDR database, based at the Lighthouse Trust, Lilongwe, that included all applications from the country; HIVDR test application forms, and genotyping result forms. We contacted treating clinicians in case of missing data, and to obtain information about standardized ART outcomes and VL results for individuals whose sample contained dolutegravir resistance mutations. We used standardized ART outcomes as defined in Malawi HIV management guidelines [11], as follows: Defaulted—not returned to the clinic for at least 2 months after the patient is expected to have run out of ART drugs, and not known to have transferred to another clinic, stopped ART or died; Stopped ART—last known to be alive and known to have stopped taking ART; Died—reliable report about the death; Alive on ART—registered on ART at the clinic and not defaulted, died or stopped ART. We provide details of client characteristics and genotyping results by 3 categories: 1. presence of major dolutegravir resistance-associated mutations; 2. presence of major NRTI, NNRTI and/or PI resistance-associated mutations but no dolutegravir resistance-associated mutations; and 3. wild type (no mutations). For clinical outcomes after implementation of clinical recommendations based on HIVDR results, we categorized VL results according to national guidelines as suppressed (<200 copies/mL), low level viremia (200–999 copies/mL), and high (≥1000 copies/mL). We used logistic regression analysis to explore factors associated with presence of dolutegravir resistance-associated mutations among samples that had undergone successful integrase sequencing. We categorized samples as with or without dolutegravir resistance (≥15 Stanford resistance score) as the outcome variable. We first fitted univariate logistic regression models with the outcome variable against each of the explanatory variables in our dataset to obtain unadjusted odds ratios. To obtain adjusted odds ratios, we then fitted a multivariable logistic regression model where age, sex, high-level NRTI resistance, TB treatment during dolutegravir-based ART, and duration of viremia during dolutegravir exposure were included based on presumed biological plausibility of their association with the outcome. We subsequently used forward stepwise elimination to add/drop the other variables to/from the model. Variables were retained in the model if statistically significant, which was determined with the Wald test. This approach was taken to control for possible confounding in the absence of a formal causal theory guided by literature.
3. Results
3.1. HIVDR Testing Cascade
During the study period, 317 applications for HIVDR testing for clients on dolutegravir-based regimens were received. Of these, 51% that fulfilled eligibility criteria for HIVDR testing were approved. Further drop-offs occurred at subsequent steps of the HIVDR testing cascade (Figure 1). No sample was collected in 26% of approved applications. Sequencing failed completely in 21 samples, and of the 98 samples with sequences, integrase gene sequencing failed in nine, meaning that integrase sequencing was successful in 75% of the samples received. Out of 89 integrase sequences that formed the population for further analysis, 24 (27%) had dolutegravir resistance-associated mutations.
3.2. Characteristics of Individuals with Integrase Sequences and Their HIVDR Results
An overview of the client characteristics whose samples underwent successful integrase sequencing is provided in Table 1. The median age was 29 years, and clients with dolutegravir resistance were older than those in the two categories without dolutegravir resistance. At the time of application, all clients were on 2NRTI + dolutegravir regimens. None were on a third line regimen, which in Malawi always contains a PI, generally darunavir. In two of the 89 samples with integrase sequences, the protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences were missing. All 24 cases with dolutegravir resistance had been on a 2NRTI + NNRTI regimen initially. Ten had been exposed to PIs and none to raltegravir or elvitegravir. Of the 22 samples with dolutegravir resistance mutations that were fully sequenced (i.e., with available PR and RT sequences), 20 (91%) had NRTI resistance mutations, and two (3.4%) PI resistance mutations. In the category “HIVDR mutations present, no DTG resistance”, 20/35 (57%) only had NNRTI mutations, and had no resistance-associated mutations to drugs in their regimen (i.e., 2NRTI + dolutegravir) at the time of application for HIVDR testing. The prevalence of the M184V, the signature lamivudine mutation, was remarkably low in the same category: 8.6% (3/35).
The dolutegravir resistance-associated mutations observed in our cases are summarized in Table 2. There were seven different mutations detected in various combinations. R263K was the most common (67%; 16/24), followed by E138K (28%; 7/24), and G118R (25%; 6/24). Apart from these major dolutegravir resistance associated mutations, we also observed the minor dolutegravir resistance-associated mutations H51Y, L74M, Q95K, G149A, S153SF, and E157Q. Overall, dolutegravir resistance scores indicated low-level resistance in 8% (2/24), intermediate resistance in 54% (13/24), and high-level resistance in 38% (9/24). In eight samples, a combination of three major INSTI mutations was detected; whereas the remaining 16 patients presented with a single integrase inhibitor resistance-associated mutation, including one individual with a single minor dolutegravir resistance associated mutation (S153SF), interpreted as low-level resistance.
3.3. Factors Associated with HIVDR Resistance
We compared individual characteristics among clients with and without dolutegravir resistance-associated mutations (any level of resistance). In an unadjusted analysis, male sex and age ≥ 40 years, as well as high-level NNRTI resistance, high-level NRTI resistance, and presence of the M184V mutation were significantly associated with dolutegravir resistance (Table 3). While differences were present between the two groups in duration on ART, duration of viremia while on dolutegravir, year of application, and taking tuberculosis treatment while on dolutegravir (all 3 individuals who developed dolutegravir resistance received double-dosed dolutegravir), these associations were not statistically significant. In the multivariable analysis, only age ≥ 40 years and presence of high-level NRTI resistance remained significantly associated with dolutegravir resistance. The association of TB treatment during dolutegravir-based ART showed borderline significance.
3.4. ART Outcomes of Individuals Diagnosed with Dolutegravir Resistance (Table S1)
Recommended regimens for individuals with dolutegravir resistance, based on HIVDR test result and ART history, included 2NRTI + PI (n = 7), 2NRTI + dolutegravir (double-dose) + PI (n = 14), and 2NRTI + dolutegravir (double-dose) (n = 3). Of 24 individuals with dolutegravir resistance, 4 (17%) died, of whom one death occurred before the HIVDR result became available; 1 self-discontinued ART; 1 defaulted; and 1 transferred to another clinic before the recommended regimen was implemented. Of the remaining 17 clients alive on ART, VL results were available for 12 (71%) at a median of 12 (range 3–17) months after the treatment recommendation. Five clients had not yet undergone VL testing after the recommended change of regimen. Of 12 VL results, 10 (78%) were <200 copies/mL, 1 was low-level viremia (265 copies/mL), and 1 was >1000 (1562) copies/mL. VL results did not appear to differ substantially by recommended regimen or dolutegravir resistance score (Table S1). One of the cases with intermediate dolutegravir resistance (score 30) achieved suppressed VL (<200 copies/mL) despite continuing on the same regimen (TDF/3TC/DTG) due to a miscommunication.
4. Discussion
The importance of the emergence of dolutegravir resistance in sub-Saharan Africa cannot be underestimated. In Malawi, around 99% of 940,000 individuals on ART in the Malawi national HIV program were on dolutegravir-based regimens by half 2023 [15]. In this setting, we found 24 cases with dolutegravir resistance among 89 samples (27%) from individuals with confirmed virological failure while on regimens with dolutegravir and 2NRTIs. Given that this was not a representative national survey, that there were large drop-offs in the HIVDR testing cascade (only 28% of applications underwent successful integrase sequencing), and with the prolonged viremia prior to resistance testing in the study population, this likely represents a select population, limiting the generalizability of our prevalence estimate of dolutegravir resistance for Malawi. Few reports on dolutegravir resistance from sub-Saharan African countries have been published. An observational study from 2019 in Chiradzulu District, Malawi included around 1300 participants who had transitioned to dolutegravir in programmatic circumstances [16]. After six months, six individuals had confirmed virological failure, of whom two had dolutegravir resistance. A study of children and adults from Tanzania found 5.8% (8/137) prevalence of dolutegravir resistance in individuals with VL results of ≥1000 copies/mL [17]. In a report from Botswana, 11 cases with INSTI resistance-associated mutations were found in 34 integrase sequences (32.4%), though seven of these had been induced by raltegravir exposure only [18]. In Nigeria, one case of dolutegravir resistance was found among 66 individuals (1.5%) with virological failure on dolutegravir regimens [19]. These reports indicate that persons who transitioned to dolutegravir from mainly NNRTI-based regimens infrequently develop dolutegravir resistance. The observations we present here suggest that dolutegravir resistance may be more common among individuals with confirmed virological failure in Malawi, particularly in individuals with prolonged viremia who continued dolutegravir-based ART. A national survey was completed recently, and will provide more representative and generalizable estimates of dolutegravir resistance prevalence in Malawi.
We observed seven of the ten mutations that the Stanford database recognizes as major integrase inhibitor resistance mutations [20]. Of interest, S147G, while not recognized as a major dolutegravir resistance mutation, occurred regularly among the cases with dolutegravir resistance (17%), none of whom had been exposed to integrase inhibitors other than dolutegravir, and it induced low-level dolutegravir resistance as a single mutation (case 7). Seven different mutation patterns were observed. 15/24 (63%) cases had a single mutation, including R263K, G118R, and S147G. R263K was by far the most common mutation. A recent global review of emergent dolutegravir resistance mutations suggests that four largely non-overlapping dolutegravir resistance pathways exist that are characterized through mutations at four signature positions: R263K, G118R, N155H, and Q148H/R/K [21]. In our cases, we observed the R263K (15/24) and G118R (5/24) pathways. As previously reported [22], G118R occurred together with R263K in one case, and Q148R with N155H in another, with both combinations resulting in high-level resistance. Based on these observations, we note that subtype C seems to follow a similar genotypic resistance development as indicated in the Stanford database. We also speculate that the variety of mutations found is an indication of progression of dolutegravir resistance in the population on ART.
Some factors that may favor dolutegravir resistance development are prevalent in programmatic circumstances in Malawi, including the predominance of HIV subtype C [9,23] and the occurrence of functional dolutegravir monotherapy. The latter may have occurred frequently, given that transitions to dolutegravir-based regimens often happened without suppressed VL, or without a recent VL result [9]. In such a situation, dolutegravir may be introduced in the presence of extensive resistance to the NRTI backbone. On the other hand, a study that included individuals with long-term virological failure of first-line NNRTI-based ART in resource-limited settings [24], demonstrated that high levels of viral suppression were achieved with dolutegravir-based second-line regimens in the presence of resistance to NRTI backbone drugs. This may question the relevance of functional dolutegravir monotherapy, although this randomized clinical trial may not fully reflect the programmatic circumstances of our cases. In our cases, long delays in high VL management and HIVDR testing procedures generally resulted in long-term HIV replication in the presence of dolutegravir exposure, which may facilitate development and accumulation of dolutegravir resistance mutations. In a multivariable analysis, we observed that older age and presence of high-level NRTI resistance were associated with higher probability of dolutegravir resistance. Similar to our findings, a recent study from Western countries and South Africa, the latter country contributing only 2% of 599 participants with virological failure on dolutegravir-based ART, found that the risk of dolutegravir resistance was increased with presence of NRTI resistance [25]. Investigators from the ADVANCE study in South Africa have proposed that virological failure on a dolutegravir-based regimen may be facilitated by baseline NNRTI resistance [26], but the mechanism for this association is not clear, and virological failure was not caused by dolutegravir resistance. We are not aware of other reports from sub-Saharan Africa that determined factors associated with dolutegravir resistance.
We have earlier reported one individual (also included in this case series) [9], who was ART naïve and developed dolutegravir resistance on first-line treatment, which happens extremely rarely [5]. However, the presence of NNRTI drug resistance mutations in this case opened the possibility of undisclosed previous ART.
Four of the 24 cases (17%) with dolutegravir resistance died within one year after HIVDR testing. This underlines that HIVDR needs to be managed diligently to prevent severe morbidity and mortality. However, uncertainties about the management of patients with persistent viremia on dolutegravir-based regimens in settings with limited HIVDR testing capacity remain, including about the optimal duration of adherence support measures, and the timing of genotyping and ART switches [27]. Such decisions may be facilitated by adding a point-of-care (POC) tenofovir urine assay in algorithms for management of individuals with high VL results, to help differentiating between non-adherence and potential resistance [28]. Recently developed POC HIVDR tests may also become beneficial in this regard, if dolutegravir resistance mutations can be demonstrated directly, or if they can detect the M184V mutation, given that 91% of our cases with dolutegravir resistance had M184V, while among cases without dolutegravir M184V prevalence was 5%. However, POC HIVDR tests do not yet have the required characteristics for use in our setting [29]. The high mortality that we observed also points to the need to do routine advanced HIV disease screening among individuals with longer-term virological failure.
Individuals with dolutegravir resistance who remained on ART had satisfactory virological results (92% with VL < 1000 copies/mL). As publications about ART outcomes after occurrence of dolutegravir resistance are restricted to case reports [30], we cannot compare these results to studies from the region. In cases with low- and intermediate-level dolutegravir resistance, doubling the dose of dolutegravir as the only intervention may be a viable management approach. This has been associated with successful outcomes in ART experienced patients who harbored HIV with integrase inhibitor resistance mutations due to previous treatment with raltegravir or elvitegravir [4]. We only had one case where this approach was implemented and a VL result was available. While that led to VL suppression, it remains uncertain if this strategy is as successful as switching to a PI-based regimen, especially with higher dolutegravir resistance scores. More research from sub-Saharan Africa is needed to determine optimal management approaches for treatment-experienced persons with dolutegravir resistance.
Our study benefited from a substantial number of cases with dolutegravir resistance in real-life, programmatic circumstances. We also point to some limitations, including the non-representativeness of the study sample, as well as the low power of the analysis of factors associated with dolutegravir resistance. Therefore, these results should be confirmed in larger studies. Routine CD4 count monitoring is not recommended in national guidelines, and CD4 testing was not available in many clinics. Therefore, we did not have CD4 count results for most cases at the time of application nor at transition to dolutegravir-based ART. We also had very few VL results at the start of dolutegravir-based ART and therefore could not assess the importance of low CD4 and high VL as drivers of dolutegravir resistance. We did not include adherence data, however approval for HIVDR testing was granted only if recent good adherence had been documented with pill counts and self-report on application forms. Duration of follow up after treatment switch recommendations was variable and in some cases short. Lastly, follow-up virological results were not available for five individuals with dolutegravir resistance due to delayed VL sampling at the health facility.
5. Conclusions
We observed dolutegravir resistance in 24 out of 89 (27%) successfully sequenced samples from individuals with confirmed virological failure in the routine setting of the Malawi HIV program. This raises concern that prevalence of dolutegravir resistance may be considerable, particularly with prolonged viremia. Seven out of ten recognized major integrase inhibitor resistance mutations have now been found in Malawi, and specific mutation patterns were recognized. Successful management of dolutegravir resistance was possible, but early mortality was high. These findings indicate the need for a better and more expedient capacity to distinguish dolutegravir resistance from poor adherence in our setting. In addition, more research is needed to determine optimal ART management of treatment-experienced individuals harbouring dolutegravir resistance.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v16010029/s1, Table S1: Standardized ART outcomes and viral load results of individuals with dolutegravir resistance.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.K. and J.J.v.O.; Methodology, H.K., J.J.v.O., R.M.H. and T.H.; Validation, H.K., P.B., B.W.M., R.N. and T.H.; Formal Analysis, J.S. and A.J.; Investigation, H.K., J.J.v.O., K.S. (Katherine Simon), K.S. (Kim Steegen), C.C. (Carrie Cox), J.-B.S., C.W. and T.H.; Data Curation, P.B., R.N., T.H., H.K., K.S. (Katherine Simon) and C.C. (Chifundo Chipungu); Writing—Original Draft, J.J.v.O. and H.K.; Writing—Review & Editing, all authors; Supervision, J.J.v.O., M.C.H., R.N. and T.H.; Project Administration, H.K., J.J.v.O., S.P. and M.C.H.; Funding Acquisition, S.P., M.C.H. and J.J.v.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
HIVDR testing in the Malawi national HIV program is funded by PEPFAR, through USAID and CDC. HK was supported by an MHIRST-Fogarty internship grant for this work.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The National Health Science Research Committee (NHSRC), Lilongwe, Malawi, waived scientific review, ethical review, and individual informed consent. It provided ethical approval for dissemination of the routinely collected, anonymized data used in this analysis (NHSRC, date 1 November 2023).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data are owned by the Ministry of Health. Requests for review of the data can be submitted to Bilaal W Malata, Ministry of Health, Department of HIV-AIDS, Lilongwe, Malawi. [email protected].
Acknowledgments
We thank clients whose samples were included, their clinicians and health care providers, the secretariat of HIVDR testing of the Malawi HIV program based at the Lighthouse Trust, and the Partners in Hope molecular laboratory for making this work possible.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Zhao, A.V.; Crutchley, R.D.; Guduru, R.C.; Ton, K.; Lam, T.; Min, A.C. A clinical review of HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) for the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection. Retrovirology 2022, 19, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Prevention, Testing, Treatment, Service Delivery and Monitoring. Recommendations for a Public Health Approach; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240031593 (accessed on 27 October 2023).
- World Health Organization. Update on the Transition to Dolutegravir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy; Report of a WHO meeting, 29–30 March 2022; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053335 (accessed on 27 October 2023).
- Castagna, A.; Maggiolo, F.; Penco, G.; Wright, D.; Mills, A.; Grossberg, R.; Molina, J.M.; Chas, J.; Durant, J.; Moreno, S.; et al. VIKING-3 Study Group. Dolutegravir in antiretroviral-experienced patients with raltegravir- and/or elvitegravir-resistant HIV-1: 24-week results of the phase III VIKING-3 study. J. Infect Dis. 2014, 210, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lübke, N.; Jensen, B.; Hüttig, F.; Feldt, T.; Walker, A.; Thielen, A.; Däumer, M.; Obermeier, M.; Kaiser, R.; Knops, E.; et al. Failure of Dolutegravir First-Line ART with Selection of Virus Carrying R263K and G118R. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 887–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Venter, W.D.F.; Moorhouse, M.; Sokhela, S.; Fairlie, L.; Mashabane, N.; Masenya, M.; Serenata, C.; Akpomiemie, G.; Qavi, A.; Chandiwana, N.; et al. Dolutegravir plus two different prodrugs of tenofovir to treat HIV. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 803–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kouanfack, C.; Mpoudi-Etame, M.; Omgba Bassega, P.; Eymard-Duvernay, S.; Leroy, S.; Boyer, S.; Peeters, M.; Calmy, A.; Delaporte, E.; NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Study Group. Dolutegravir-Based or Low-Dose Efavirenz-Based Regimen for the Treatment of HIV-1. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Payne, D.; Wadonda-Kabondo, N.; Wang, A.; Smith-Sreen, J.; Kabaghe, A.; Bello, G.; Kayigamba, F.; Tenthani, L.; Maida, A.; Auld, A.; et al. Trends in HIV prevalence, incidence, and progress towards the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets in Malawi among individuals aged 15–64 years: Population-based HIV impact assessments, 2015–2016 and 2020-21. Lancet HIV 2023, 10, e597–e605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Oosterhout, J.J.; Chipungu, C.; Nkhoma, L.; Kanise, H.; Hosseinipour, M.C.; Sagno, J.B.; Simon, K.; Cox, C.; Hoffman, R.; Steegen, K.; et al. Dolutegravir Resistance in Malawi’s National HIV Treatment Program. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2022, 9, ofac148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamisi, T.; Chimpandule, T.; Jahn, A.; Chiwandira, B.; Kalua, T.; Nyirenda, R. Transition to dolutegravir-based regimens improves overall viral-load suppression in the national ART cohort in Malawi and closes the gender gap. In Proceedings of the 23rd International AIDS Conference 2020, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–10 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Malawi Ministry of Health. Clinical Management of HIV in Children and Adults: Malawi Integrated Guidelines; Malawi Ministry of Health: Lilongwe, Malawi, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Heller, T.; Ganesh, P.; Gumulira, J.; Nkhoma, L.; Chipingu, C.; Kanyama, C.; Kalua, T.; Nyrienda, R.; Phiri, S.; Schooley, A. Successful establishment of third-line antiretroviral therapy in Malawi: Lessons learned. Public Health Action 2019, 9, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Wagar, N.; DeVos, J.R.; Rottinghaus, E.; Diallo, K.; Nguyen, D.B.; Bassey, O.; Ugbena, R.; Wadonda-Kabondo, N.; McConnell, M.S.; et al. Optimization of a low cost and broadly sensitive genotyping assay for HIV-1 drug resistance surveillance and monitoring in resource-limited settings. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Laethem, K.; Schrooten, Y.; Covens, K.; Dekeersmaeker, N.; De Munter, P.; Van Wijngaerden, E.; Van Ranst, M.; Vandamme, A.M. A genotypic assay for the amplification and sequencing of integrase from diverse HIV-1 group M subtypes. J. Virol. Methods 2008, 153, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Government of Malawi Ministry of Health. Directorate of HIV-AIDS Website. Available online: https://dms.hiv.health.gov.mw/link/khw0bvaq (accessed on 27 October 2023).
- Schramm, B.; Temfack, E.; Descamps, D.; Nicholas, S.; Peytavin, G.; Bitilinyu-Bangoh, J.E.; Storto, A.; Lê, M.P.; Abdi, B.; Ousley, J.; et al. Viral suppression and HIV-1 drug resistance 1 year after pragmatic transitioning to dolutegravir first-line therapy in Malawi: A prospective cohort study. Lancet HIV 2022, 9, e544–e553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kamori, D.; Barabona, G.; Rugemalila, J.; Maokola, W.; Masoud, S.S.; Mizinduko, M.; Sabasaba, A.; Ruhago, G.; Sambu, V.; Mushi, J.; et al. Emerging integrase strand transfer inhibitor drug resistance mutations among children and adults on ART in Tanzania: Findings from a national representative HIV drug resistance survey. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2023, 78, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seatla, K.K.; Maruapula, D.; Choga, W.T.; Ntsipe, T.; Mathiba, N.; Mogwele, M.; Kapanda, M.; Nkomo, B.; Ramaabya, D.; Makhema, J.; et al. HIV-1 Subtype C Drug Resistance Mutations in Heavily Treated Patients Failing Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Botswana. Viruses 2021, 13, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdullahi, A.; Kida, I.M.; Maina, U.A.; Ibrahim, A.H.; Mshelia, J.; Wisso, H.; Adamu, A.; Onyemata, J.E.; Edun, M.; Yusuph, H.; et al. Limited emergence of resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in ART-experienced participants failing dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: A cross-sectional analysis of a Northeast Nigerian cohort. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2023, 78, 2000–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stanford University. HIV Drug Resistance Database. INSTI Resistance Notes. Available online: https://hivdb.stanford.edu/dr-summary/resistance-notes/INSTI/ (accessed on 31 October 2023).
- Tao, K.; Rhee, S.Y.; Chu, C.; Avalos, A.; Ahluwalia, A.K.; Gupta, R.K.; Jordan, M.R.; Shafer, R.W. Treatment Emergent Dolutegravir Resistance Mutations in Individuals Naïve to HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitors: A Rapid Scoping Review. Viruses 2023, 15, 1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, M.A.; Cleyle, J.; Yoo, S.; Forrest, M.; Krullaars, Z.; Pham, H.T.; Mesplède, T. The G118R plus R263K Combination of Integrase Mutations Associated with Dolutegravir-Based Treatment Failure Reduces HIV-1 Replicative Capacity and Integration. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2023, 67, e0138622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Geubbels, E.; Bowie, C. Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS in adults in Malawi. Malawi Med. J. 2006, 18, 111–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paton, N.I.; Musaazi, J.; Kityo, C.; Walimbwa, S.; Hoppe, A.; Balyegisawa, A.; Asienzo, J.; Kaimal, A.; Mirembe, G.; Lugemwa, A.; et al. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir or darunavir in combination with lamivudine plus either zidovudine or tenofovir for second-line treatment of HIV infection (NADIA): Week 96 results from a prospective, multicentre, open-label, factorial, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV 2022, 9, e381–e393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Sighem, A.; Stecher, M.; d’Arminio Monforte, A.; Gill, M.J.; Sabin, C.A.; Maartens, G.; Günthard, H.F.; Sterne, J.A.C.; Lessells, R.; Egger, M.; et al. HIV-1 drug resistance in people on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: A collaborative cohort analysis. Lancet HIV 2023, 10, S2352-3018(23)00228-X. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siedner, M.J.; Moorhouse, M.A.; Simmons, B.; de Oliveira, T.; Lessells, R.; Giandhari, J.; Kemp, S.A.; Chimukangara, B.; Akpomiemie, G.; Serenata, C.M.; et al. Reduced efficacy of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors in patients with drug resistance mutations in reverse transcriptase. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, J.; Pals, S.; Chang, J.; Hackett, S.; Godfrey, C.; Raizes, E. Monitoring Emerging Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Resistance in Sub-Saharan Africa in the Era of Dolutegravir. J. Infect Dis. 2022, 225, 364–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hermans, L.E.; Umunnakwe, C.N.; Lalla-Edward, S.T.; Hebel, S.K.; Tempelman, H.A.; Nijhuis, M.; Venter, W.D.F.; Wensing, A.M.J. Point-of-Care Tenofovir Urine Testing for the Prediction of Treatment Failure and Drug Resistance During Initial Treatment for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Infection. Clin. Infect Dis. 2023, 76, e553–e560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chua, R.J.; Capiña, R.; Ji, H. Point-of-Care Tests for HIV Drug Resistance Monitoring: Advances and Potentials. Pathogens 2022, 11, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahomed, K.; Wallis, C.L.; Dunn, L.; Maharaj, S.; Maartens, G.; Meintjies, G. Case report: Emergence of dolutegravir resistance in a patient on second-line antiretroviral therapy. S. Afr. J. HIV Med. 2020, 21, a1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
HIV drug resistance testing cascade (July 2019–October 2022), National HIV Program Malawi.
Figure 1.
HIV drug resistance testing cascade (July 2019–October 2022), National HIV Program Malawi.
Table 1.
Characteristics of clients with samples that underwent successful integrase sequencing and HIVDR result summaries.
Table 1.
Characteristics of clients with samples that underwent successful integrase sequencing and HIVDR result summaries.
| Variable | Samples with Integrase Sequences | DTG Resistance Mutations Present | Wild Type | HIVDR Mutations Present, No DTG Resistance Mutations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 89 | 24 | 30 | 35 | ||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Presence high level NNRTI resistance # | ||||||||
| No | 35 | 40.7 | 4 | 18.2 | 30 | 100.0 | 1 | 2.9 |
| Yes | 51 | 59.3 | 18 | 81.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 33 | 97.1 |
| Presence of high level NRTI resistance * | ||||||||
| No | 69 | 80.2 | 11 | 50.0 | 30 | 100.0 | 28 | 82.4 |
| Yes | 17 | 19.8 | 11 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 17.6 |
| Presence of M184V mutation | ||||||||
| No | 63 | 74.3 | 2 | 9.1 | 30 | 100.0 | 31 | 91.2 |
| Yes | 23 | 26.7 | 20 | 90.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 8.8 |
| Median age (range) | 29 (4–63) | 40 (5–63) | 26 (11–56) | 20 (4–54) | ||||
| age 0–9 | 5 | 5.6 | 2 | 8.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 8.6 |
| age 10–19 | 32 | 36.0 | 4 | 16.7 | 14 | 46.7 | 14 | 40.0 |
| age 20–49 | 42 | 47.2 | 14 | 58.3 | 13 | 43.3 | 15 | 42.9 |
| age 50+ | 10 | 11.2 | 4 | 16.7 | 3 | 10.0 | 3 | 8.6 |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Female | 51 | 57.3 | 9 | 37.5 | 20 | 66.7 | 22 | 62.9 |
| Male | 38 | 42.7 | 15 | 62.5 | 10 | 33.3 | 13 | 37.1 |
| ART regimen at time of resistance testing | ||||||||
| TDF/3TC/DTG | 62 | 69.7 | 16 | 66.7 | 23 | 65.7 | 23 | 63.6 |
| AZT/3TC + DTG | 9 | 10.1 | 2 | 8.3 | 2 | 6.7 | 3 | 13.6 |
| ABC/3TC + DTG | 16 | 18.0 | 6 | 25.0 | 4 | 13.3 | 6 | 17.1 |
| pABC/3TC + DTG | 1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 3.3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| pABC/3TC + pDTG | 1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 2.9 |
| Median duration ART, months (range) | 87 (14–231) | 97 (20–202) | 53 (14–231) | 92 (27–216) | ||||
| ART 0–36 months | 17 | 19.1 | 3 | 12.5 | 7 | 23.3 | 3 | 8.6 |
| ART 37–72 months | 20 | 22.5 | 4 | 16.7 | 12 | 40.0 | 6 | 17.1 |
| ART 73+ months | 52 | 58.4 | 17 | 70.8 | 11 | 36.7 | 26 | 74.3 |
| Median duration on DTG, months (range) | 22 (5–56) | 24 (8–46) | 22 (8–51) | 20 (5–56) | ||||
| DTG 0–12 months | 18 | 20.2 | 5 | 20.8 | 5 | 16.7 | 8 | 22.9 |
| DTG 13–24 months | 36 | 40.4 | 7 | 29.2 | 14 | 46.7 | 15 | 42.9 |
| DTG 25+ months | 35 | 39.3 | 12 | 50.0 | 11 | 36.7 | 12 | 34.3 |
| Median duration viremia on DTG, months (range) | 12 (0–35) | 14 (0–31) | 13 (2–35) | 9 (0–28) | ||||
| 0–12 months | 50 | 56.2 | 10 | 41.7 | 15 | 50.0 | 25 | 71.4 |
| 13+ months | 39 | 43.8 | 14 | 58.3 | 15 | 50.0 | 10 | 28.6 |
| TB treatment during DTG regimen | ||||||||
| No | 82 | 92.1 | 21 | 87.5 | 28 | 93.3 | 33 | 94.3 |
| Yes | 7 | 7.9 | 3 | 12.5 | 2 | 6.7 | 2 | 5.7 |
| Application year | ||||||||
| 2020 | 2 | 2.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 6.7 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2021 | 52 | 58.4 | 12 | 50.0 | 18 | 60.0 | 22 | 62.9 |
| 2022 | 35 | 39.3 | 12 | 50.0 | 10 | 33.3 | 13 | 37.1 |
# High level is based on Stanford HIVDR dB version 9.0, HIVDR resistance score ≥ 60. * High level resistance to at least one of TDF, AZT, ABC. TDF, tenofovir disoproxil; 3TC, lamivudine; DTG, dolutegravir, AZT, zidovudine; ABC, abacavir; pABC, pediatric ABC; ART, antiretroviral therapy; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI, non-NRTI.
Table 2.
Observed dolutegravir resistance associated mutations $ with resistance score and level †.
| Case # | R263K | E138K | S147G ^ | T66A/I | G118R | Q148R | N155H | Stanford Resistance Score (Level) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | x | 40 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 2 | x | 30 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 3 | x | x | x | 60 (high) | ||||
| 4 | x | 30 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 5 | x | 40 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 6 | x | 30 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 7 | x | 20 (low) | ||||||
| 8 | x | 30 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 9 | x | 30 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 10 | x | x | x | 70 (high) | ||||
| 11 | x | 30 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 12 * | 15 (low) | |||||||
| 13 | x | x | x | 80 (high) | ||||
| 14 | x | 60 (high) | ||||||
| 15 | x | x | x | 85 (high) | ||||
| 16 | x | x | x | 60 (high) | ||||
| 17 | x | 30 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 18 | x | 30 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 19 | x | x | x | 125 (high) | ||||
| 20 | x | 50 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 21 | x | x | x | 80 (high) | ||||
| 22 | x | 30 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 23 | x | 30 (intermediate) | ||||||
| 24 | x | x | x | 110 (high) |
$ Major INSTI mutations E92, G140 and Y143 were not observed during the study period (Y143 mutations do not affect dolutegravir susceptibility). † Based on Stanford HIVDR dB version 9.0. # Cases are listed in chronological order of the application date. ^ S147G is not considered a major dolutegravir resistance-associated mutation, but was common among our clients who had not been exposed to integrase inhibitors other than dolutegravir and as a single mutation induced low-level resistance. * The minor dolutegravir resistance associated mutation S153SF classified the dolutegravir resistance level in this sample as low.
Table 3.
Factors associated with dolutegravir resistance among samples from individuals with confirmed virological failure and successful integrase sequencing.
Table 3.
Factors associated with dolutegravir resistance among samples from individuals with confirmed virological failure and successful integrase sequencing.
| Variable | Unadjusted ORs for DTG Resistance | Adjusted ORs for DTG Resistance | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTG Resistance (n = 24) | No DTG Resistance (n = 65) | OR | 95% CI | p-Value | OR | 95% CI | p-Value | |||
| Age categories, years (%) | ||||||||||
| 0–19 | 25.0 | 47.7 | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||||||
| 20–39 | 16.7 | 27.7 | 1.15 | 0.29 | 4.62 | 0.846 | 2.63 | 0.42 | 16.6 | 0.305 |
| 40+ | 58.3 | 24.6 | 4.52 | 1.46 | 14.0 | 0.009 | 4.77 | 1.13 | 20.1 | 0.033 |
| Male sex (%) | 62.5 | 35.4 | 3.04 | 1.15 | 8.03 | 0.025 | 2.72 | 0.69 | 10.8 | 0.16 |
| TDF/3TC (%) vs. any other (AZT/3TC & ABC/3TC) backbone | 66.7 | 70.8 | 0.83 | 0.30 | 2.25 | 0.709 | ||||
| Median duration on ART (months) | 97.0 | 83.0 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.299 | ||||
| Median duration on DTG (months) | 24.0 | 21.0 | 1.02 | 0.97 | 1.06 | 0.452 | ||||
| Median duration viremia on DTG, months (%) | ||||||||||
| 0–12 | 41.7 | 61.5 | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||||||
| 13+ | 58.3 | 38.5 | 2.24 | 0.86 | 5.81 | 0.097 | 1.66 | 0.50 | 5.54 | 0.41 |
| TB treatment during DTG regimen (%) | 12.5 | 6.2 | 2.18 | 0.45 | 10.6 | 0.333 | 5.04 | 0.79 | 32.0 | 0.09 |
| Application year 2022 (%) vs. 2020 or 2021 | 50.0 | 35.4 | 1.83 | 0.71 | 4.71 | 0.213 | ||||
| Presence high level NNRTI (NVP and/or EFV) resistance (%) | 81.8 | 51.6 | 4.23 | 1.29 | 13.9 | 0.018 | ||||
| Presence high level NRTI (TDF, AZT and/or ABC) resistance (%) | 50.0 | 9.4 | 9.67 | 2.96 | 31.6 | 0.000 | 10.0 | 2.57 | 39.1 | 0.00 |
| Presence of M184V mutation (%) | 90.9 | 4.7 | 203 | 31.7 | 1305 | 0.000 | ||||
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil; 3TC, lamivudine; DTG, dolutegravir, AZT, zidovudine; ABC, abacavir; ART, antiretroviral therapy; NVP, nevirapine; EFV, efavirenz; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI, non-NRTI.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kanise, H.; van Oosterhout, J.J.; Bisani, P.; Songo, J.; Matola, B.W.; Chipungu, C.; Simon, K.; Cox, C.; Hosseinipour, M.C.; Sagno, J.-B.; et al. Virological Findings and Treatment Outcomes of Cases That Developed Dolutegravir Resistance in Malawi’s National HIV Treatment Program. Viruses 2024, 16, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010029
AMA Style
Kanise H, van Oosterhout JJ, Bisani P, Songo J, Matola BW, Chipungu C, Simon K, Cox C, Hosseinipour MC, Sagno J-B, et al. Virological Findings and Treatment Outcomes of Cases That Developed Dolutegravir Resistance in Malawi’s National HIV Treatment Program. Viruses. 2024; 16(1):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010029
Chicago/Turabian StyleKanise, Hope, Joep J. van Oosterhout, Pachawo Bisani, John Songo, Bilaal W. Matola, Chifundo Chipungu, Katherine Simon, Carrie Cox, Mina C. Hosseinipour, Jean-Batiste Sagno, and et al. 2024. "Virological Findings and Treatment Outcomes of Cases That Developed Dolutegravir Resistance in Malawi’s National HIV Treatment Program" Viruses 16, no. 1: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010029
APA StyleKanise, H., van Oosterhout, J. J., Bisani, P., Songo, J., Matola, B. W., Chipungu, C., Simon, K., Cox, C., Hosseinipour, M. C., Sagno, J.-B., Hoffman, R. M., Wallrauch, C., Phiri, S., Steegen, K., Jahn, A., Nyirenda, R., & Heller, T. (2024). Virological Findings and Treatment Outcomes of Cases That Developed Dolutegravir Resistance in Malawi’s National HIV Treatment Program. Viruses, 16(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010029
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
