Next Article in Journal
Transactivation of Human Endogenous Retroviruses by Viruses
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Ranking of Binding Sites from Structural Ensembles: Application to SARS-CoV-2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

SARS-CoV-2 Assembly: Gaining Infectivity and Beyond

1
Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
2
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
3
Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 2M1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2024, 16(11), 1648; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16111648
Submission received: 2 October 2024 / Revised: 12 October 2024 / Accepted: 21 October 2024 / Published: 22 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Coronaviruses)

Abstract

:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was responsible for causing the COVID-19 pandemic. Intensive research has illuminated the complex biology of SARS-CoV-2 and its continuous evolution during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. While much attention has been paid to the structure and functions of the viral spike protein and the entry step of viral infection, partly because these are targets for neutralizing antibodies and COVID-19 vaccines, the later stages of SARS-CoV-2 replication, including the assembly and egress of viral progenies, remain poorly characterized. This includes insight into how the activities of the viral structural proteins are orchestrated spatially and temporally, which cellular proteins are assimilated by the virus to assist viral assembly, and how SARS-CoV-2 counters and evades the cellular mechanisms antagonizing virus assembly. In addition to becoming infectious, SARS-CoV-2 progenies also need to survive the hostile innate and adaptive immune mechanisms, such as recognition by neutralizing antibodies. This review offers an updated summary of the roles of SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins in viral assembly, the regulation of assembly by viral and cellular factors, and the cellular mechanisms that restrict this process. Knowledge of these key events often reveals the vulnerabilities of SARS-CoV-2 and aids in the development of effective antiviral therapeutics.

1. Introduction

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of the global COVID-19 pandemic, has profoundly impacted societies, economies, and healthcare systems worldwide [1,2]. Since its initial outbreak in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, this virus has rapidly disseminated, infecting more than 776 million individuals and causing over 7 million fatalities worldwide [3]. SARS-CoV-2 is a member of the Coronaviridae family that also includes the highly pathogenic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), both of which have caused notable outbreaks in the past two decades [2,4,5]. The clinical presentations of SARS-CoV-2 infection can range from mild flu-like symptoms to respiratory distress syndrome, multi-organ failure, and death in severe cases [6,7,8]. Despite the success of COVID-19 vaccines and antiviral drugs in preventing and treating severe disease, SARS-CoV-2 continues to circulate in the population due to the constant emergence of highly transmissible and immune evasive variants [9,10].
While the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including viral entry, have been extensively studied for their relevance as targets of approved vaccines, the later stages of virion assembly remain relatively less examined [11]. In line with this, the currently approved drugs target these early stages, such as Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir coupled with ritonavir), a viral protease inhibitor that blocks viral non-structural polyprotein cleavage, or Molnupiravir and Remdesivir, which inhibit SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and disrupt RNA synthesis [12,13,14]. However, SARS-CoV-2 assembly, which generates infectious virus particles, is the final and critical stage of its replication [15]. Viral structural proteins are essential in this process for assembling SARS-CoV-2 and include the following: the spike (S), protruding from the virus surface and mediating viral entry into host cells; the envelope (E) and membrane (M) proteins, both embedded within the viral membrane; and the nucleocapsid (N), encapsulating the single-stranded positive-sense viral RNA genome into new virions [15,16,17].
This review is aimed at providing an updated overview of the known functions of these viral structural proteins in the assembly of SARS-CoV-2 particles, while also addressing the contributions of other viral proteins, the temporal and spatial regulation of viral assembly, and the cellular restriction mechanisms that target this crucial step in viral replication. Understanding the molecular details of SARS-CoV-2 assembly is essential for identifying potential drug targets that disrupt key steps in the assembly process, ultimately inhibiting the virus’s ability to replicate and spread.

2. Assembly and the Final Stages of SARS-CoV-2 Replication

The production of SARS-CoV-2 progeny marks the end of one replication cycle [11] (Figure 1). As the final stage of infection, assembly depends on earlier steps that not only synthesize balanced amounts of viral structural proteins and genomic RNA, but also alter the cellular environment to promote the assembly and release of viral progeny.
SARS-CoV-2 infection begins with the binding of the viral S protein to the host cell receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) [1,18,19]. Interaction with ACE2 exposes a site in S, called S2’, which is cleaved by cellular proteases such as TMPRSS2 or lysosomal cathepsins B and L [20,21]. Depending on the availability of these proteases, SARS-CoV-2 can complete membrane fusion, and thus entry, at the plasma membrane (TMPRSS2-dependent) or through endocytosis in lysosomes (cathepsin-dependent) [18,22]. Several other cell surface proteins, such as Asialoglycoprotein receptor-1 (ASGR1), Kringle Containing Transmembrane Protein 1 (KREMEN1), Scavenger receptor B type 1 (SR-B1), Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), Transmembrane protein 106B (TMEM106B), the transferrin receptor (TFR), and Niemann-Pick C1 (NPC1), have also been implicated in S interactions at the cell surface, and hence, in SARS-CoV-2 entry [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Their exact roles in relation to ACE2 and in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and transmission await further investigation.
After delivery into the cytoplasm, SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA (gRNA) can readily engage ribosomes to synthesize viral non-structural proteins (NSPs). These NSPs carry out essential functions. For instance, viral proteases NSP3 and NSP5 cleave the newly synthesized viral polyprotein to generate mature and functional proteins. Moreover, NSP3, NSP4, and NSP6 associate with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to drive the formation of double-membrane vesicles (DMVs). DMVs are the primary site for coronaviral RNA synthesis, whereas alternative replication organelles, like convoluted membranes and single-membrane vesicles, have also been observed [32,33,34]. This compartmentalization potentially helps SARS-CoV-2 to evade innate immune detection by shielding the newly synthesized dsRNA from sensing by host pattern recognition receptors like melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) [34,35]. RNA synthesis occurs discontinuously in these DMVs, with the transcription complex synthesizing both full-length viral gRNA and shorter subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) [4,36,37]. Additionally, the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) NSP12, together with NSP7-NSP10, NSP13, NSP14, and NSP16, transcribes and replicates viral RNA in DMVs [38,39,40,41,42,43]. The newly synthesized SARS-CoV-2 gRNA and sgRNA are then transported out of DMVs for subsequent translation and virion assembly, a process recently found to be mediated by a molecular pore on the DMVs formed primarily by NSP3 and NSP4 [37,44]. SARS-CoV-2, like other coronaviruses, requires mechanisms to reach a balance between the full-length gRNA and sgRNA, both of which are critical for viral assembly. Nevertheless, these mechanisms are not fully defined.
During later stages of assembly, SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins (M, E, N, and S), as well as accessory proteins, are synthesized from viral sgRNAs [4]. The relative abundance of these sgRNAs, and consequently the structural proteins, remains unclear, but may affect the stoichiometry of these components in the virion, ultimately affecting viral infectivity. It is also not well understood how the extensive rearrangement of the ER during DMV formation affects the downstream synthesis of viral M, E, S, and other membrane-bound viral and cellular proteins, nor the involvement of the Golgi in virus assembly. The M, E, and S proteins are synthesized in the ER and trafficked to the ER–Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), where they assemble with the viral N protein and genomic RNA to form new virions. These newly formed SARS-CoV-2 particles are then reported to egress via the lysosomal secretory pathway [45]. The detailed mechanisms are discussed in the following sections.

3. Experimental Systems to Study SARS-CoV-2 Assembly

The development of various experimental systems has been crucial to our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 assembly by enabling the detailed study of the molecular mechanisms and pathways involved in viral particle formation. In SARS-CoV-2-infected cells, the trafficking and localization of viral structural proteins and gRNA can be characterized by immunofluorescence and imaging techniques, while the formation of progeny viruses can be visualized by electron microscopy [33,46,47]. These methods have revealed key mechanisms of the assembly process, including the assembly site and egress pathway of SARS-CoV-2 particles, and membrane compartments where these virus particles are contained.
On the other hand, the functional investigation of viral structural proteins and their interactions with cellular factors can be challenging, and this is partly due to the complexities of performing reverse genetics to introduce mutations into recombinant viruses, as well as because of the overlapping roles of several cellular proteins throughout the viral replication cycle. These difficulties can therefore be circumvented with the virus-like particle (VLP) system, which can be safely handled in biosafety level 2 facilities. VLPs, produced through the co-expression of the four structural proteins M, E, N, and S, morphologically resemble live SARS-CoV-2 viral particles [48] and can induce protective immunity as vaccines [49,50]. Notably, an important improvement of the VLP assay includes the incorporation of a firefly luciferase reporter mRNA containing the SARS-CoV-2 RNA packaging signals, thus producing luciferase upon delivery into ACE2-positive target cells and providing a functional luminescence readout [51].
In addition to live SARS-CoV-2 virus and VLP systems, cell-free biochemical assays using purified viral proteins and lipids also offer mechanistic insights into the assembly processes [52,53,54]. Techniques such as cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and X-ray crystallography have provided atomic-level details of structural protein interactions essential for virus assembly [36,46,55,56]. Computational modeling and in silico studies complement the experimental approaches discussed above by predicting protein–protein interactions and membrane dynamics during assembly [57,58]. Collectively, these experimental approaches have allowed for the elucidation of what is known about the molecular mechanisms and pathways driving SARS-CoV-2 assembly.

4. Building Blocks of SARS-CoV-2 Particles

The viral E, M, N, and S proteins, along with the viral genomic RNA, are the fundamental components comprising an infectious SARS-CoV-2 particle (Figure 2a). In addition to these, a significant amount of accessory factor ORF3a, a homolog of the M protein, has also been found in SARS-CoV-2 particles, and emerging research has begun to elucidate cellular proteins that either support or hinder SARS-CoV-2 particle assembly [59].
Firstly, the M protein drives the assembly of SARS-CoV-2 particles [4]. It serves two main functions in this context: self-multimerization to induce membrane curvature for the formation of the budding particle, and the interaction and recruitment of E, S, N, and other viral and cellular proteins into the progeny particle [60]. As such, the M protein also dictates the intracellular site of SARS-CoV-2 particle assembly. The M protein is highly conserved across betacoronaviruses and within SARS-CoV-2 variants [61]. Structurally, it exhibits a triple-helix bundle shape with three transmembrane (TM) domains, a glycosylated N-terminal domain (NTD) in the lumen, and an extended C-terminal tail in the cytoplasm (Figure 2b) [62]. Its carboxy-terminal tail interacts with the N-RNA complex, which in turn stabilizes the M tail and maintains an optimal conformation for particle assembly [62]. Important trafficking motifs have been identified in the M carboxy-terminal tail of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, including the negatively charged C-terminal (SWWSFNPETNNL) domain, the trans-Golgi network (TGN) retention motif (KxGxYR), and the ER exit motif (DxE), altogether regulating the intracellular trafficking of M to the assembly site [63,64]. Additionally, M transmembrane domain interactions promote S protein incorporation into forming particles via M-S interactions [65,66,67]. Notably, multiple studies show that SARS-CoV-2 VLP formation mandates the co-expression of the M protein alongside either the E or N protein [48,49]. Altogether, this suggests that the oligomerization of M and the subsequent induction of membrane curvature may depend on interactions with another viral or host protein to initiate the assembly process.
The E protein also promotes virus assembly through its interactions with the M protein, with its viroporin activity, and with its ability to induce membrane curvature, altogether making it a key structural component in the final stages of this process [65]. E is a small transmembrane protein composed of 75 amino acids, with an N-terminal region of 12 amino acids, a hydrophobic TM domain of 25 amino acids, and a lengthy hydrophilic C-terminal domain (CTD) (Figure 2b) [68]. The TM domain can pentamerize to create an ion-channel pore, and the viroporin activity is involved in the deacidification of intracellular compartments, aiding efficient viral egress [69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76]. A previous study observed that the E protein can directly induce membrane curvature via the amphiphilic nature of its CTD [77]. This property was also found to be conserved across E proteins of related betacoronaviruses [61]. Hence, the E protein could play an important role in viral budding and in membrane scission to complete the formation of virus particles, in analogy to the role of the M2 protein of influenza viruses [78,79].
Also central to viral assembly, the N protein packages viral gRNA into newly formed particles. To accomplish this, N selectively binds viral gRNA while excluding viral sgRNA and cellular RNA, a complex termed the ribonucleoprotein (RNP), and then interacts with the M protein to ensure the proper packaging of this viral RNP into the virus particle [52]. The N protein is a 46 kDa RNA-binding protein with 419 amino acids divided into five domains: the NTD, an RNA-binding domain (RBD), a central linker (LINK), a dimerization domain, and the CTD, all well conserved across coronaviruses (Figure 2b) [80,81]. Important to its function, the N protein RBD binds the viral gRNA with high affinity, and leads to the formation of N-RNA complexes which align along the 30 kb viral RNA to create a “beads-on-a-string” structure [82]. Moreover, the central domain and RNA binding regions of N together promote phase separation with viral RNA, allowing for the transition of N-RNA complexes from a liquid-like to gel-like state during packaging to form biomolecular condensates (BMC) which help concentrate and form RNPs [52,80,82,83,84]. RNP formation is an important step, and it has recently been targeted for its therapeutic potential using a small molecule called PAV-104, which was found to inhibit assembly by preventing N oligomerization. However, further clinical data are required to assess the efficacy of this drug [85].
While not essential for the assembly process itself, the S protein is required for SARS-CoV-2 infectivity as it engages the ACE2 receptor and completes virus entry [86]. The S protein forms a trimeric crown-like structure, visible under electron microscopy and leading to the name “coronavirus” [87]. It is composed of three identical monomers, each about 180–200 kDa in size, and is 1273 aa long [88,89]. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein consists of two functional subunits: S1 (14–685 aa) for receptor binding, and S2 (686–1273 aa) for membrane fusion (Figure 2b) [89]. These subunits are linked by a Furin cleavage site (RRAR), which primes the S protein and facilitates its interaction with ACE2. Shortly after entering the human population, the S protein acquired the D614G mutation, which stabilizes the Furin-cleaved S1/S2 heterodimer and increases S incorporation into virions [90]. Although absent in the SARS-CoV S protein, the Furin cleavage site is not unique to SARS-CoV-2 S and is also present in other betacoronaviruses, such as MERS-CoV and common cold coronaviruses HCoV-HKU-1 and HCoV-OC43 [91]. The S protein also possesses an ER-retention signal at its C-terminus, which prevents its cell-surface trafficking and immune detection, thus enriching S at assembly sites for incorporation into viral particles [22,92,93]. Moreover, the S protein is heavily glycosylated, containing 23 N-linked glycosylation sites [94,95]. The S protein’s acquisition of the appropriate glycosylation profile is essential for its ability to recognize and bind to host cell receptors during viral entry, for immune evasion, and for its other properties which will be discussed in later sections [95,96].
Finally, viral gRNA is the cargo of SARS-CoV-2 particles, which is delivered into target cells to produce more viral progeny [82]. To ensure its selective packaging over sgRNAs and cellular RNAs, the viral gRNA has sequences that are absent in other RNA molecules and that bind with high affinity to the viral N protein. One study found that these sequences include the 5′ UTR and a fragment close to the 3′ terminus of ORF1ab [51]. Similar viral RNA packaging signals have also been described for other coronaviruses, such as the PS580 RNA sequence located close to the 3′ terminus of ORF1b (nt 19,715 to 20,294) in SARS-CoV [97]. The formation of the RNP in the cytoplasm not only shields the viral RNA from cellular defenses but also enables the trafficking of viral RNA to assembly sites, where it interacts with structural proteins for incorporation into the developing virions.

5. The Saga of SARS-CoV-2 Assembly

The formation of infectious SARS-CoV-2 particles follows a coordinated sequence of events that occur within specific membrane compartments, such as the ERGIC. These events include the trafficking of viral structural proteins and viral gRNA to sites of assembly, virus particle formation, membrane scission, and finally, egress of progeny virions from the infected cells (Figure 3). Each step of this directional process is either facilitated or antagonized by host cellular machineries. Although recent advancements have shed some light on the details of this complex process, many outstanding questions remain.

5.1. The Grand Gathering

Multiple studies have indicated that the minimal components M, E, S, and N proteins are sufficient to form VLPs, and hence, SARS-CoV-2 particles. Therefore, when these structural proteins are expressed from separate plasmids, transfected cells can produce and release VLPs into the culture media, although viral accessory proteins may also assist in achieving optimal infectivity [48,49,65]. Once these essential viral components are synthesized, they need to find one another to form virions. They likely act in two groups based on where they are synthesized within cells.
The first group comprises the M, E, and S proteins and is synthesized in the ER, while the second group includes the N protein and viral gRNA in the cytosol. Given that the sgRNAs encoding M, E, and S are transcribed in DMVs and share the same 5′ and 3′ UTRs, which bind proteins involved in mRNA trafficking and translation, it is likely that these mRNAs exit the DMVs together and hence coordinate protein synthesis at the same or proximal ER sites. One apparent advantage of their spatial proximity is that it facilitates interactions between the M, E, and S, and that they may be sorted into the same COP-II vesicles, responsible for protein transport from the ER to the Golgi. While the M, E, and S proteins interact via their transmembrane domains and intracellular sequences, the molecular details remain to be resolved [16,57]. Currently, it is believed that each of these viral membrane proteins bear short peptide sequences in their cytoplasmic regions to regulate their trafficking between cellular membrane compartments. For example, the S protein possesses an ER-retention signal (“KxxHxx”) which interacts with trafficking components to retrieve the S protein from the ERGIC and cis-Golgi back to the ER [98,99]. This retrieval activity is suppressed when either the M or E proteins are present, since their interactions allow S to be sequestered in the Golgi [65,99].
The N protein, on the other hand, is synthesized by ribosomes in the cytosol. In SARS-CoV-2-infected cells, electron microscopy has revealed that the N protein localizes to the cytoplasmic face of the pore in the viral DMVs and associates with viral RNA exiting these sites [36,46]. This RNP must then find the M/S/E clusters in order to get packaged into the newly assembled particles. N binds to the cytoplasmic tail of M [52], which not only promotes the packaging of the viral RNP but may also stimulate M oligomerization, as the viral RNP complex acts as a scaffold to concentrate M, helping it reach the threshold for particle formation. This critical event likely occurs at the ERGIC, where N, S, and M proteins have been experimentally demonstrated to accumulate in foci with the viral gRNA and ERGIC53, an ERGIC marker [47]. Indeed, budding of newly formed SARS-CoV-2 particles into single-membrane vesicles (SMVs) has been captured by electron microscopy [46], and these SMVs may be derived from the ERGIC, since ERGIC53 was detected by mass spectrometry in SARS-CoV-2 particles that were produced from Calu-3 cells [59].

5.2. SARS-CoV-2 Budding

Once assembled, SARS-CoV-2 must solve the universal problem faced by other enveloped viruses: closing the lipid membrane and completing budding. Some viruses, such as HIV-1, hijack the cellular endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) machinery to achieve budding [100,101,102,103,104,105,106]. The ESCRT machinery is involved in many cellular processes that require membrane scission away from the cytoplasm, such as endosomal sorting, cytokinesis, plasma membrane wound repair, nuclear membrane maintenance, and the repair of endo-lysosomal membranes [107,108,109,110]. HIV-1 and other viruses use short peptide motifs called late domains to interact with components of the ESCRT complexes and eventually recruit ESCRT-III and Vps4 to accomplish viral membrane scission and budding [101,102,103]. SARS-CoV-2, on the other hand, does not seem to recruit the ESCRT machinery for budding, because the dominant negative mutant of Vps4 which blocks HIV-1 budding does not compromise the production of SARS-CoV-2 VLPs [111].
ESCRT-independent budding, though less understood and more diverse, can either recruit other cellular factors or depend solely on viral proteins, and it has been reported in several other instances. A notable example is the mechanism of influenza A virus (IAV) ESCRT-independent budding, where membrane scission during budding at the plasma membrane is mediated by the viroporin M2 [79]. M2 insertion parallel to the lipid membrane via its amphipathic helix induces membrane curvature, leading to scission of the bud neck [78,112,113]. Interestingly, the use of amphipathic helices in an ESCRT-independent manner to induce membrane deformation is also employed by cellular proteins [114], including bar domain proteins and the Epsin protein family [115,116].
Although the mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses bud remains elusive, several studies have suggested that the E protein may play a key role in inducing membrane curvature through an amphipathic helix in its highly conserved post-transmembrane region [111,117]. For instance, the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) E protein was found to induce membrane curvature and be released in lipid vesicles when expressed in the absence of other structural proteins in mammalian cells, suggesting that E alone can drive the production of virus particles [117,118]. Similarly, in SARS-CoV-2, the E protein has remained the least mutated structural protein over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, and it is indispensable for the production of infectious virus particles [48,49,111,119,120,121,122]. It is also reported that the SARS-CoV-2 E protein induces asymmetry between the two leaflets of the lipid bilayer, which increases membrane curvature and favors the formation of vesicles [71]. Nevertheless, research on the exact role of E during SARS-CoV-2 assembly and budding is still underway.

5.3. Egress and the Great Escape

After their assembly within intracellular membrane compartments, SARS-CoV-2 particles must exit producer cells to infect new target cells. Similar to other betacoronaviruses such as MHV, egress of SARS-CoV-2 does not depend on the conventional secretory pathway from the trans-Golgi to the plasma membrane, but rather appears to follow a lysosome-dependent pathway, as demonstrated by the co-localization of viral particles with lysosome marker LAMP1 [45]. Indeed, inhibiting the lysosomal GTPase Rab7 or Arl8b, key factors in lysosome-mediated secretion, impairs the release of both MHV and SARS-CoV-2 particles [45]. It is thus believed that SARS-CoV-2 particles in the ERGIC eventually reach lysosomes as they exit cells. In support of this egress strategy, SARS-CoV-2 uses its ORF3a and E proteins to deacidify lysosomes and inactivate lysosomal proteases [45,73,123].
While the mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 particles reach the lysosomes after their formation at the ERGIC remains unclear, tracking the post-assembly modifications of these viral particles could provide valuable insights into this process. One such modification is protein glycosylation on the S and other viral proteins. Protein glycosylation begins at the ER with the conjugation of high-mannose glycans, and these are subsequently trimmed at the cis-Golgi, followed by the acquisition of complex glycans upon transiting through the medial- and trans-Golgi [124]. Importantly, when SARS-CoV-2 particles form in the ERGIC, spike and other viral structural proteins only bear high-mannose glycans, whereas upon successful release from cells, virion-associated S protein has been shown to bear mainly complex-type glycans [82,125]. Without this modification in the Golgi apparatus, the abundant high-mannose glycans on the S protein would be detected by immune sensors such as mannose-binding lectin (MBL), which would then activate the complement pathway to trigger inflammation [126].
One challenge to the acquisition of complex glycans by SARS-CoV-2 spike is the fragmentation or dispersal of the Golgi apparatus observed in infected cells [47]. While the functionality of these Golgi fragments has not been directly examined in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells, a similar phenomenon has been reported for other viruses such as poliovirus, where Golgi dispersion upon infection did not block protein secretion [127]. Likewise, dispersing the Golgi with the microtubule inhibitor nocodazole does not inhibit protein secretion either [128,129]. SARS-CoV-2 may therefore exploit Golgi fragmentation as a strategy to better access Golgi-resident enzymes to acquire complex glycans, since viral particles averaging 100 nm in size may be too large to efficiently traverse through the lumen of the Golgi cisternae that are 20–70 nm in size [130]. In support of this possibility, one study demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 virions are enriched in dispersed Golgi fragments, and that this fragmentation may occur through SARS-CoV-2-mediated downregulation of GRASP55 [131].

6. Regulation of SARS-CoV-2 Assembly

SARS-CoV-2, like other viruses, relies on viral and cellular factors to regulate each stage of its replication cycle, including assembly. The virus has thus evolved numerous mechanisms, like host shutoff to hijack cellular machinery, post-translational modifications (PTMs) of viral proteins which modulate their functions, and interactions with host factors to facilitate efficient virion assembly and release.
Host shutoff suppresses the translation of cellular mRNAs to maximize the availability of cellular resources for the synthesis of viral proteins, including structural proteins [132,133]. A key SARS-CoV-2 protein in this process is NSP1, which binds to the 40S ribosomal subunit to block the access of cellular mRNAs, allowing only SARS-CoV-2 RNA to bypass this blockade and efficiently engage ribosomes for viral protein synthesis [134,135,136]. After SARS-CoV-2 release into the cytosol, the viral NSPs 2–16 also facilitate viral RNA replication by significantly remodeling host ER membranes into DMVs [39,55].
The functions of SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins in viral assembly are also subject to regulation by PTMs. For example, appropriate glycosylation of spike, which was previously described, is not only important for immune evasion but also for proper folding and intracellular trafficking for assembly [137]. Both S and E proteins also contain a cysteine-rich region adjacent to their TM domain, which undergoes palmitoylation [138,139,140]. The conjugated palmitoleic acid is inserted into the lipid membrane, directing the membrane topology of the S and E proteins, and concentrating S and E to the same membrane domains [137,138,139]. Furthermore, the N protein has been shown to acquire multiple types of PTMs, including phosphorylation and arginine methylation [141]. Between the independently folded N-terminal RNA-binding domain and the C-terminal dimerization domain of the N protein is a disordered Ser/Arg-rich region that is phosphorylated, and this has been shown to be important for viral replication and immune evasion as a result of regulating N-RNA condensates and the self-associating function of a leucine-rich helix [142,143]. Also in the N, two arginine residues R95 and R177 in the context of the RGG motifs undergo methylation by protein arginine methyltransferases, which regulates N binding to viral RNA and its ability to disrupt stress granules [144]. Additionally, the M protein has been shown to undergo ubiquitination at K15 by the ER ubiquitin ligase RNF5, which was found to promote stronger M-E interactions and efficient virus assembly and release [145].
The assembly function of SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins may also be mediated by a rich list of cellular proteins with which they interact, as revealed by proteomic studies [11,59,146,147]. It is conceivable that some of these host factors are able to modulate SARS-CoV-2 assembly through regulating the functions of these viral structural proteins. While more details are yet to be unveiled by future studies, some examples have been reported. One example is the stress granule proteins G3BP1/2 that interact with the N protein via their “ITFG” motif and get incorporated into SARS-CoV-2 particles, likely favoring the recruitment of N-RNA complexes to virus assembly sites containing the S protein (Figure 3) [59]. Efforts are underway to develop drugs that work by binding to G3BP1/2 more effectively than the SARS-CoV-2 N protein, aiming to disrupt the assembly of RNPs. However, these are early-stage genomic and in silico studies that require further validation through detailed characterization and clinical trials [148].
Viruses rely on both viral and host factors to facilitate their assembly. Paradoxically though, some host factors can also serve as restrictors or inhibitors, demonstrating the tug-of-war between viral strategies and host defense mechanisms. Several cellular proteins that have been reported to restrict the assembly of other RNA viruses were also shown to inhibit the production of infectious SARS-CoV-2 particles (Figure 3). For instance, BST-2 and SERINC5 inhibit SARS-CoV-2 release and viral infectivity, respectively [149,150]. In addition, the cellular RNA helicase MOV10 was shown to interact with the N protein of SARS-CoV-2 and other human coronaviruses, exhibiting antiviral activity through the sequestration of viral RNA in cytoplasmic granules [151]. Furthermore, cellular nucleic acid-binding protein (CNBP) competes with the viral N protein in binding to viral RNA and prevents the viral RNA and N protein from forming liquid—liquid phase separation condensates [152]. Genome-wide functional screens have provided a comprehensive view of cellular proteins that either promote or suppress SARS-CoV-2 replication, although data remain limited due to assay design challenges in measuring SARS-CoV-2 assembly [11,149,153,154]. Nevertheless, a screen of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) does reveal a short list of ISG products, particularly those involved in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) and vesicle trafficking pathways, that exhibit inhibitory effects on the late assembly stage of SARS-CoV-2 replication [149]. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.
In addition to SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins, viral accessory and non-structural proteins also play significant roles in promoting viral assembly by modulating subcellular environments to favor virus production or by countering host cell restriction. A notable example of the latter is the deacidification of lysosomes by accessory factor ORF3a to warrant successful egress of SARS-CoV-2 particles [45,123]. As a second example, SARS-CoV-2 accessory protein ORF7a counters the cellular restriction factor BST-2, which would otherwise inhibit the release of virus particles [149,155]. ORF7a has also been shown to block the incorporation of cellular protein SERINC5 into SARS-CoV-2 particles, a restriction factor that inhibits membrane fusion during virus entry [150] (Figure 3). Interestingly, a recent mass spectrometry analysis of SARS-CoV-2 virions indicates the presence of ORF7a in the particles [59].
After evading the intracellular restriction factors, nascent SARS-CoV-2 particles face extracellular antiviral molecules, particularly antibodies which target the highly antigenic S protein and can neutralize virus particles. These immune pressures select for escape mutations in the S protein and other viral structural proteins, and play a key role in driving the continuous emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants. In turn, these escape mutations in viral structural proteins may affect the assembly and infectivity of viral progenies, consequently impacting viral pathogenicity.

7. Conclusions

Producing infectious SARS-CoV-2 particles is a complex task that involves more than just the four viral structural proteins (M, E, N, and S) and the viral genomic RNA. Instead, it requires the coordination of their congregation at the right subcellar compartments, precise timing, and proper amounts of each component. A myriad of cellular factors, such as proteins and lipids, are assimilated by the virus to assist in the assembly process, often through their interactions with essential viral components. Simultaneously, SARS-CoV-2 must successfully counteract cellular factors that target and inhibit the production of infectious viral particles. Elucidating the molecular details of SARS-CoV-2 assembly and identifying the involved cellular factors requires an experimental system that is able to accurately recapitulate the assembly process taking place during viral replication. More is expected to be learned from the SARS-CoV-2 VLP assay using the luciferase mRNA reporter as the functional readout of infectivity, such as about the interactions of structural proteins essential for assembly, protein motifs orchestrating the trafficking of structural proteins to the assembly site, and the mechanism of viral RNA packaging. This assay can be adapted for screening both pro- and anti-assembly cellular factors and characterizing the functions of viral structural proteins in greater detail. Given the simplification of the VLP system which bypasses the earlier steps of viral replication, results from VLP assays will need to be validated in experiments with live SARS-CoV-2. Ultimately, exciting discoveries are expected regarding this important viral process, which will not only enrich our knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 replication, but also offer a promising strategy for antiviral drug development, potentially inhibiting viral replication and reducing infection rates. Moreover, this approach could lead to the development of broad-spectrum antivirals capable of combating not only SARS-CoV-2 but other related viruses as well.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, H.K. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, H.K., A.A. and C.L.; visualization—figure preparation, H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) project grants PJT-166048, PJT-185996 to C.L. Ariana Arduini is a recipient of the CIHR Doctoral Award.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The Species Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus: Classifying 2019-nCoV and Naming It SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 536–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization WHO COVID-19 Dashboard. Available online: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases (accessed on 27 September 2024).
  4. V’kovski, P.; Kratzel, A.; Steiner, S.; Stalder, H.; Thiel, V. Coronavirus Biology and Replication: Implications for SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hu, B.; Guo, H.; Zhou, P.; Shi, Z.-L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sun, P.; Qie, S.; Liu, Z.; Ren, J.; Li, K.; Xi, J. Clinical Characteristics of Hospitalized Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Single Arm Meta-Analysis. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gandhi, R.T.; Lynch, J.B.; Del Rio, C. Mild or Moderate COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1757–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Berlin, D.A.; Gulick, R.M.; Martinez, F.J. Severe COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2451–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Harvey, W.T.; Carabelli, A.M.; Jackson, B.; Gupta, R.K.; Thomson, E.C.; Harrison, E.M.; Ludden, C.; Reeve, R.; Rambaut, A.; COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Variants, Spike Mutations and Immune Escape. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. 10. Carabelli, A.M.; Peacock, T.P.; Thorne, L.G.; Harvey, W.T.; Hughes, J.; COVID-19 Genomics UK Consortium; De Silva, T.I.; Peacock, S.J.; Barclay, W.S.; De Silva, T.I.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Variant Biology: Immune Escape, Transmission and Fitness. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 162–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Steiner, S.; Kratzel, A.; Barut, G.T.; Lang, R.M.; Aguiar Moreira, E.; Thomann, L.; Kelly, J.N.; Thiel, V. SARS-CoV-2 Biology and Host Interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024, 22, 206–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sheahan, T.P.; Sims, A.C.; Zhou, S.; Graham, R.L.; Pruijssers, A.J.; Agostini, M.L.; Leist, S.R.; Schäfer, A.; Dinnon, K.H.; Stevens, L.J.; et al. An Orally Bioavailable Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 in Human Airway Epithelial Cell Cultures and Multiple Coronaviruses in Mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eabb5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Owen, D.R.; Allerton, C.M.N.; Anderson, A.S.; Aschenbrenner, L.; Avery, M.; Berritt, S.; Boras, B.; Cardin, R.D.; Carlo, A.; Coffman, K.J.; et al. An Oral SARS-CoV-2 M pro Inhibitor Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of COVID-19. Science 2021, 374, 1586–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, M.; Cao, R.; Zhang, L.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, M.; Shi, Z.; Hu, Z.; Zhong, W.; Xiao, G. Remdesivir and Chloroquine Effectively Inhibit the Recently Emerged Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Vitro. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bracquemond, D.; Muriaux, D. Betacoronavirus Assembly: Clues and Perspectives for Elucidating SARS-CoV-2 Particle Formation and Egress. mBio 2021, 12, e02371-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. De Haan, C.A.M.; Rottier, P.J.M. Molecular Interactions in the Assembly of Coronaviruses. In Advances in Virus Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 64, pp. 165–230. ISBN 978-0-12-039863-8. [Google Scholar]
  17. Siu, Y.L.; Teoh, K.T.; Lo, J.; Chan, C.M.; Kien, F.; Escriou, N.; Tsao, S.W.; Nicholls, J.M.; Altmeyer, R.; Peiris, J.S.M.; et al. The M, E, and N Structural Proteins of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Are Required for Efficient Assembly, Trafficking, and Release of Virus-Like Particles. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 11318–11330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jackson, C.B.; Farzan, M.; Chen, B.; Choe, H. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Entry into Cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.-L.; Wang, X.-G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.-R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.-L.; et al. A Pneumonia Outbreak Associated with a New Coronavirus of Probable Bat Origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bayati, A.; Kumar, R.; Francis, V.; McPherson, P.S. SARS-CoV-2 Infects Cells after Viral Entry via Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shang, J.; Wan, Y.; Luo, C.; Ye, G.; Geng, Q.; Auerbach, A.; Li, F. Cell Entry Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11727–11734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Collins, D.P.; Steer, C.J. Binding of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein to the Asialoglycoprotein Receptor on Human Primary Hepatocytes and Immortalized Hepatocyte-Like Cells by Confocal Analysis. Hepatic Med. Evid. Res. 2021, 13, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gu, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhang, X.; Gao, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; He, J.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, J.; Shen, G.; et al. Receptome Profiling Identifies KREMEN1 and ASGR1 as Alternative Functional Receptors of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Res. 2022, 32, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lu, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhao, S.; Gomez Castro, M.F.; Laurent-Rolle, M.; Dong, J.; Ran, X.; Damani-Yokota, P.; Tang, H.; Karakousi, T.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Exacerbates Proinflammatory Responses in Myeloid Cells through C-Type Lectin Receptors and Tweety Family Member 2. Immunity 2021, 54, 1304–1319.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wei, C.; Wan, L.; Yan, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, C.; Li, D.; Deng, Y.; et al. HDL-Scavenger Receptor B Type 1 Facilitates SARS-CoV-2 Entry. Nat. Metab. 2020, 2, 1391–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Perez-Miller, S.; Patek, M.; Moutal, A.; Duran, P.; Cabel, C.R.; Thorne, C.A.; Campos, S.K.; Khanna, R. Novel Compounds Targeting Neuropilin Receptor 1 with Potential To Interfere with SARS-CoV-2 Virus Entry. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2021, 12, 1299–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, F.; Li, W.; Feng, J.; Ramos Da Silva, S.; Ju, E.; Zhang, H.; Chang, Y.; Moore, P.S.; Guo, H.; Gao, S. SARS-CoV-2 Pseudovirus Infectivity and Expression of Viral Entry-related Factors ACE2, TMPRSS2, Kim-1, and NRP-1 in Human Cells from the Respiratory, Urinary, Digestive, Reproductive, and Immune Systems. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 6671–6685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baggen, J.; Jacquemyn, M.; Persoons, L.; Vanstreels, E.; Pye, V.E.; Wrobel, A.G.; Calvaresi, V.; Martin, S.R.; Roustan, C.; Cronin, N.B.; et al. TMEM106B Is a Receptor Mediating ACE2-Independent SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry. Cell 2023, 186, 3427–3442.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liao, Z.; Wang, C.; Tang, X.; Yang, M.; Duan, Z.; Liu, L.; Lu, S.; Ma, L.; Cheng, R.; Wang, G.; et al. Human Transferrin Receptor Can Mediate SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2317026121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Khan, I.; Li, S.; Tao, L.; Wang, C.; Ye, B.; Li, H.; Liu, X.; Ahmad, I.; Su, W.; Zhong, G.; et al. Tubeimosides Are Pan-Coronavirus and Filovirus Inhibitors That Can Block Their Fusion Protein Binding to Niemann-Pick C1. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Snijder, E.J.; Limpens, R.W.A.L.; de Wilde, A.H.; de Jong, A.W.M.; Zevenhoven-Dobbe, J.C.; Maier, H.J.; Faas, F.F.G.A.; Koster, A.J.; Bárcena, M. A Unifying Structural and Functional Model of the Coronavirus Replication Organelle: Tracking down RNA Synthesis. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cortese, M.; Lee, J.-Y.; Cerikan, B.; Neufeldt, C.J.; Oorschot, V.M.J.; Köhrer, S.; Hennies, J.; Schieber, N.L.; Ronchi, P.; Mizzon, G.; et al. Integrative Imaging Reveals SARS-CoV-2-Induced Reshaping of Subcellular Morphologies. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 28, 853–866.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Roingeard, P.; Eymieux, S.; Burlaud-Gaillard, J.; Hourioux, C.; Patient, R.; Blanchard, E. The Double-Membrane Vesicle (DMV): A Virus-Induced Organelle Dedicated to the Replication of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Positive-Sense Single-Stranded RNA Viruses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2022, 79, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mohan, J.; Wollert, T. Membrane Remodeling by SARS-CoV-2 - Double-Enveloped Viral Replication. Fac. Rev. 2021, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Klein, S.; Cortese, M.; Winter, S.L.; Wachsmuth-Melm, M.; Neufeldt, C.J.; Cerikan, B.; Stanifer, M.L.; Boulant, S.; Bartenschlager, R.; Chlanda, P. SARS-CoV-2 Structure and Replication Characterized by in Situ Cryo-Electron Tomography. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wolff, G.; Limpens, R.W.A.L.; Zevenhoven-Dobbe, J.C.; Laugks, U.; Zheng, S.; de Jong, A.W.M.; Koning, R.I.; Agard, D.A.; Grünewald, K.; Koster, A.J.; et al. A Molecular Pore Spans the Double Membrane of the Coronavirus Replication Organelle. Science 2020, 369, 1395–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Snijder, E.J.; Decroly, E.; Ziebuhr, J. The Nonstructural Proteins Directing Coronavirus RNA Synthesis and Processing. Adv. Virus Res. 2016, 96, 59–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ricciardi, S.; Guarino, A.M.; Giaquinto, L.; Polishchuk, E.V.; Santoro, M.; Di Tullio, G.; Wilson, C.; Panariello, F.; Soares, V.C.; Dias, S.S.G.; et al. The Role of NSP6 in the Biogenesis of the SARS-CoV-2 Replication Organelle. Nature 2022, 606, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zimmermann, L.; Zhao, X.; Makroczyova, J.; Wachsmuth-Melm, M.; Prasad, V.; Hensel, Z.; Bartenschlager, R.; Chlanda, P. SARS-CoV-2 Nsp3 and Nsp4 Are Minimal Constituents of a Pore Spanning Replication Organelle. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Q.; Wu, J.; Wang, H.; Gao, Y.; Liu, Q.; Mu, A.; Ji, W.; Yan, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, C.; et al. Structural Basis for RNA Replication by the SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase. Cell 2020, 182, 417–428.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ge, J.; Zheng, L.; Gao, Y.; Wang, T.; Jia, Z.; Wang, H.; Huang, Y.; Li, M.; et al. Architecture of a SARS-CoV-2 Mini Replication and Transcription Complex. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yan, L.; Yang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, L.; Ge, J.; Huang, Y.C.; Liu, Z.; Wang, T.; Gao, S.; et al. Coupling of N7-Methyltransferase and 3′-5′ Exoribonuclease with SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase Reveals Mechanisms for Capping and Proofreading. Cell 2021, 184, 3474–3485.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Huang, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhong, L.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.; Yuan, S.; Ni, T. Molecular Architecture of Coronavirus Double-Membrane Vesicle Pore Complex. Nature 2024, 633, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ghosh, S.; Dellibovi-Ragheb, T.A.; Kerviel, A.; Pak, E.; Qiu, Q.; Fisher, M.; Takvorian, P.M.; Bleck, C.; Hsu, V.W.; Fehr, A.R.; et al. β-Coronaviruses Use Lysosomes for Egress Instead of the Biosynthetic Secretory Pathway. Cell 2020, 183, 1520–1535.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mendonça, L.; Howe, A.; Gilchrist, J.B.; Sheng, Y.; Sun, D.; Knight, M.L.; Zanetti-Domingues, L.C.; Bateman, B.; Krebs, A.-S.; Chen, L.; et al. Correlative Multi-Scale Cryo-Imaging Unveils SARS-CoV-2 Assembly and Egress. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Scherer, K.M.; Mascheroni, L.; Carnell, G.W.; Wunderlich, L.C.S.; Makarchuk, S.; Brockhoff, M.; Mela, I.; Fernandez-Villegas, A.; Barysevich, M.; Stewart, H.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein Adheres to Replication Organelles before Viral Assembly at the Golgi/ERGIC and Lysosome-Mediated Egress. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabl4895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xu, R.; Shi, M.; Li, J.; Song, P.; Li, N. Construction of SARS-CoV-2 Virus-Like Particles by Mammalian Expression System. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Plescia, C.B.; David, E.A.; Patra, D.; Sengupta, R.; Amiar, S.; Su, Y.; Stahelin, R.V. SARS-CoV-2 Viral Budding and Entry Can Be Modeled Using BSL-2 Level Virus-like Particles. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chang, Y.-S.; Chu, L.-W.; Chen, Z.-Y.; Wu, J.-S.; Su, W.-C.; Yang, C.-J.; Ping, Y.-H.; Lin, C.-W. Development of Fluorescence-Tagged SARS-CoV-2 Virus-like Particles by a Tri-Cistronic Vector Expression System for Investigating the Cellular Entry of SARS-CoV-2. Viruses 2022, 14, 2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Syed, A.M.; Taha, T.Y.; Tabata, T.; Chen, I.P.; Ciling, A.; Khalid, M.M.; Sreekumar, B.; Chen, P.-Y.; Hayashi, J.M.; Soczek, K.M.; et al. Rapid Assessment of SARS-CoV-2–Evolved Variants Using Virus-like Particles. Science 2021, 374, 1626–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lu, S.; Ye, Q.; Singh, D.; Cao, Y.; Diedrich, J.K.; Yates, J.R.; Villa, E.; Cleveland, D.W.; Corbett, K.D. The SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Phosphoprotein Forms Mutually Exclusive Condensates with RNA and the Membrane-Associated M Protein. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Moradi, S.V.; Wu, Y.; Walden, P.; Cui, Z.; Johnston, W.A.; Petrov, D.; Alexandrov, K. In Vitro Reconstitution and Analysis of SARS-CoV-2/Host Protein–Protein Interactions. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 25009–25019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Carlson, C.R.; Adly, A.N.; Bi, M.; Howard, C.J.; Frost, A.; Cheng, Y.; Morgan, D.O. Reconstitution of the SARS-CoV-2 Ribonucleosome Provides Insights into Genomic RNA Packaging and Regulation by Phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 102560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Castro, V.; Pérez-Berna, A.J.; Calvo, G.; Pereiro, E.; Gastaminza, P. Three-Dimensional Remodeling of SARS-CoV2-Infected Cells Revealed by Cryogenic Soft X-Ray Tomography. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 22708–22721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bergner, T.; Zech, F.; Hirschenberger, M.; Stenger, S.; Sparrer, K.M.J.; Kirchhoff, F.; Read, C. Near-Native Visualization of SARS-CoV-2 Induced Membrane Remodeling and Virion Morphogenesis. Viruses 2022, 14, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Monje-Galvan, V.; Voth, G.A. Molecular Interactions of the M and E Integral Membrane Proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Faraday Discuss. 2021, 232, 49–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aldaais, E.A.; Yegnaswamy, S.; Albahrani, F.; Alsowaiket, F.; Alramadan, S. Sequence and Structural Analysis of COVID-19 E and M Proteins with MERS Virus E and M Proteins—A Comparative Study. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2021, 26, 101023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Murigneux, E.; Softic, L.; Aubé, C.; Grandi, C.; Judith, D.; Bruce, J.; Le Gall, M.; Guillonneau, F.; Schmitt, A.; Parissi, V.; et al. Proteomic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Particles Unveils a Key Role of G3BP Proteins in Viral Assembly. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mahtarin, R.; Islam, S.; Islam, M.J.; Ullah, M.O.; Ali, M.A.; Halim, M.A. Structure and Dynamics of Membrane Protein in SARS-CoV-2. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 40, 4725–4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bianchi, M.; Benvenuto, D.; Giovanetti, M.; Angeletti, S.; Ciccozzi, M.; Pascarella, S. Sars-CoV-2 Envelope and Membrane Proteins: Structural Differences Linked to Virus Characteristics? BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 4389089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Z.; Nomura, N.; Muramoto, Y.; Ekimoto, T.; Uemura, T.; Liu, K.; Yui, M.; Kono, N.; Aoki, J.; Ikeguchi, M.; et al. Structure of SARS-CoV-2 Membrane Protein Essential for Virus Assembly. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Arndt, A.L.; Larson, B.J.; Hogue, B.G. A Conserved Domain in the Coronavirus Membrane Protein Tail Is Important for Virus Assembly. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 11418–11428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Desmarets, L.; Danneels, A.; Burlaud-Gaillard, J.; Blanchard, E.; Dubuisson, J.; Belouzard, S. The KxGxYR and DxE Motifs in the C-Tail of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Membrane Protein Are Crucial for Infectious Virus Assembly. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2023, 80, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Boson, B.; Legros, V.; Zhou, B.; Siret, E.; Mathieu, C.; Cosset, F.-L.; Lavillette, D.; Denolly, S. The SARS-CoV-2 Envelope and Membrane Proteins Modulate Maturation and Retention of the Spike Protein, Allowing Assembly of Virus-like Particles. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kumar, P.; Kumar, A.; Garg, N.; Giri, R. An Insight into SARS-CoV-2 Membrane Protein Interaction with Spike, Envelope, and Nucleocapsid Proteins. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2023, 41, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. De Haan, C.A.M.; Smeets, M.; Vernooij, F.; Vennema, H.; Rottier, P.J.M. Mapping of the Coronavirus Membrane Protein Domains Involved in Interaction with the Spike Protein. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 7441–7452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Duart, G.; García-Murria, M.J.; Grau, B.; Acosta-Cáceres, J.M.; Martínez-Gil, L.; Mingarro, I. SARS-CoV-2 Envelope Protein Topology in Eukaryotic Membranes. Open Biol. 2020, 10, 200209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Verdiá-Báguena, C.; Nieto-Torres, J.L.; Alcaraz, A.; DeDiego, M.L.; Torres, J.; Aguilella, V.M.; Enjuanes, L. Coronavirus E Protein Forms Ion Channels with Functionally and Structurally-Involved Membrane Lipids. Virology 2012, 432, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, R.; Qin, H.; Prasad, R.; Fu, R.; Zhou, H.-X.; Cross, T.A. Dimeric Transmembrane Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 E Protein. Commun. Biol. 2023, 6, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wölk, C.; Shen, C.; Hause, G.; Surya, W.; Torres, J.; Harvey, R.D.; Bello, G. Membrane Condensation and Curvature Induced by SARS-CoV-2 Envelope Protein. Langmuir 2024, 40, 2646–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, W.-A.; Carreras-Sureda, A.; Demaurex, N. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Alkalinizes the ERGIC and Lysosomes through the Viroporin Activity of the Viral Envelope Protein. J. Cell Sci. 2023, 136, jcs260685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pearson, G.J.; Mears, H.; Broncel, M.; Snijders, A.P.; Bauer, D.L.V.; Carlton, J.G. ER-Export and ARFRP1/AP-1-Dependent Delivery of SARS-CoV-2 Envelope to Lysosomes Controls Late Stages of Viral Replication. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadl5012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mandala, V.S.; McKay, M.J.; Shcherbakov, A.A.; Dregni, A.J.; Kolocouris, A.; Hong, M. Structure and Drug Binding of the SARS-CoV-2 Envelope Protein Transmembrane Domain in Lipid Bilayers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2020, 27, 1202–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ewart, G.; Bobardt, M.; Bentzen, B.H.; Yan, Y.; Thomson, A.; Klumpp, K.; Becker, S.; Rosenkilde, M.M.; Miller, M.; Gallay, P. Post-Infection Treatment with the E Protein Inhibitor BIT225 Reduces Disease Severity and Increases Survival of K18-hACE2 Transgenic Mice Infected with a Lethal Dose of SARS-CoV-2. PLoS Pathog. 2023, 19, e1011328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Medeiros-Silva, J.; Dregni, A.J.; Somberg, N.H.; Duan, P.; Hong, M. Atomic Structure of the Open SARS-CoV-2 E Viroporin. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadi9007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kuzmin, A.; Orekhov, P.; Astashkin, R.; Gordeliy, V.; Gushchin, I. Structure and Dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 Envelope Protein Monomer. Proteins 2022, 90, 1102–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Martyna, A.; Bahsoun, B.; Badham, M.D.; Srinivasan, S.; Howard, M.J.; Rossman, J.S. Membrane Remodeling by the M2 Amphipathic Helix Drives Influenza Virus Membrane Scission. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rossman, J.S.; Jing, X.; Leser, G.P.; Lamb, R.A. Influenza Virus M2 Protein Mediates ESCRT-Independent Membrane Scission. Cell 2010, 142, 902–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cubuk, J.; Alston, J.J.; Incicco, J.J.; Singh, S.; Stuchell-Brereton, M.D.; Ward, M.D.; Zimmerman, M.I.; Vithani, N.; Griffith, D.; Wagoner, J.A.; et al. The SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein Is Dynamic, Disordered, and Phase Separates with RNA. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Peng, Y.; Du, N.; Lei, Y.; Dorje, S.; Qi, J.; Luo, T.; Gao, G.F.; Song, H. Structures of the SARS -CoV-2 Nucleocapsid and Their Perspectives for Drug Design. EMBO J. 2020, 39, e105938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yao, H.; Song, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, N.; Xu, J.; Sun, C.; Zhang, J.; Weng, T.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, Z.; et al. Molecular Architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus. Cell 2020, 183, 730–738.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Savastano, A.; Ibáñez de Opakua, A.; Rankovic, M.; Zweckstetter, M. Nucleocapsid Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Phase Separates into RNA-Rich Polymerase-Containing Condensates. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jack, A.; Ferro, L.S.; Trnka, M.J.; Wehri, E.; Nadgir, A.; Nguyenla, X.; Fox, D.; Costa, K.; Stanley, S.; Schaletzky, J.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein Forms Condensates with Viral Genomic RNA. PLoS Biol. 2021, 19, e3001425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Du, L.; Deiter, F.; Bouzidi, M.S.; Billaud, J.-N.; Simmons, G.; Dabral, P.; Selvarajah, S.; Lingappa, A.F.; Michon, M.; Yu, S.F.; et al. A Viral Assembly Inhibitor Blocks SARS-CoV-2 Replication in Airway Epithelial Cells. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zhao, P.; Praissman, J.L.; Grant, O.C.; Cai, Y.; Xiao, T.; Rosenbalm, K.E.; Aoki, K.; Kellman, B.P.; Bridger, R.; Barouch, D.H.; et al. Virus-Receptor Interactions of Glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 Spike and Human ACE2 Receptor. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 28, 586–601.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Masters, P.S. The Molecular Biology of Coronaviruses. In Advances in Virus Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 66, pp. 193–292. ISBN 978-0-12-039869-0. [Google Scholar]
  88. Wrapp, D.; Wang, N.; Corbett, K.S.; Goldsmith, J.A.; Hsieh, C.-L.; Abiona, O.; Graham, B.S.; McLellan, J.S. Cryo-EM Structure of the 2019-nCoV Spike in the Prefusion Conformation. Science 2020, 367, 1260–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Walls, A.C.; Park, Y.-J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 181, 281–292.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhang, L.; Jackson, C.B.; Mou, H.; Ojha, A.; Peng, H.; Quinlan, B.D.; Rangarajan, E.S.; Pan, A.; Vanderheiden, A.; Suthar, M.S.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Spike-Protein D614G Mutation Increases Virion Spike Density and Infectivity. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wu, Y.; Zhao, S. Furin Cleavage Sites Naturally Occur in Coronaviruses. Stem Cell Res. 2020, 50, 102115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xia, X. Domains and Functions of Spike Protein in Sars-Cov-2 in the Context of Vaccine Design. Viruses 2021, 13, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cattin-Ortolá, J.; Welch, L.G.; Maslen, S.L.; Papa, G.; James, L.C.; Munro, S. Sequences in the Cytoplasmic Tail of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Facilitate Expression at the Cell Surface and Syncytia Formation. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gong, Y.; Qin, S.; Dai, L.; Tian, Z. The Glycosylation in SARS-CoV-2 and Its Receptor ACE2. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhang, F.; Schmidt, F.; Muecksch, F.; Wang, Z.; Gazumyan, A.; Nussenzweig, M.C.; Gaebler, C.; Caskey, M.; Hatziioannou, T.; Bieniasz, P.D. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycosylation Affects Function and Neutralization Sensitivity. mBio 2024, 15, e01672-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Lusvarghi, S.; Stauft, C.B.; Vassell, R.; Williams, B.; Baha, H.; Wang, W.; Neerukonda, S.N.; Wang, T.; Weiss, C.D. Effects of N-Glycan Modifications on Spike Expression, Virus Infectivity, and Neutralization Sensitivity in Ancestral Compared to Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Variants. PLoS Pathog. 2023, 19, e1011788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hsieh, P.-K.; Chang, S.C.; Huang, C.-C.; Lee, T.-T.; Hsiao, C.-W.; Kou, Y.-H.; Chen, I.-Y.; Chang, C.-K.; Huang, T.-H.; Chang, M.-F. Assembly of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus RNA Packaging Signal into Virus-Like Particles Is Nucleocapsid Dependent. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 13848–13855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jennings, B.C.; Kornfeld, S.; Doray, B. A Weak COPI Binding Motif in the Cytoplasmic Tail of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Is Necessary for Its Cleavage, Glycosylation, and Localization. FEBS Lett. 2021, 595, 1758–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. McBride, C.E.; Li, J.; Machamer, C.E. The Cytoplasmic Tail of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein Contains a Novel Endoplasmic Reticulum Retrieval Signal That Binds COPI and Promotes Interaction with Membrane Protein. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 2418–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Meng, B.; Ip, N.C.Y.; Prestwood, L.J.; Abbink, T.E.M.; Lever, A.M.L. Evidence That the Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport-II (ESCRT-II) Is Required for Efficient Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Production. Retrovirology 2015, 12, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. VerPlank, L.; Bouamr, F.; LaGrassa, T.J.; Agresta, B.; Kikonyogo, A.; Leis, J.; Carter, C.A. Tsg101, a Homologue of Ubiquitin-Conjugating (E2) Enzymes, Binds the L Domain in HIV Type 1 Pr55 Gag. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 7724–7729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Garrus, J.E.; Von Schwedler, U.K.; Pornillos, O.W.; Morham, S.G.; Zavitz, K.H.; Wang, H.E.; Wettstein, D.A.; Stray, K.M.; Côté, M.; Rich, R.L.; et al. Tsg101 and the Vacuolar Protein Sorting Pathway Are Essential for HIV-1 Budding. Cell 2001, 107, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Martin-Serrano, J.; Zang, T.; Bieniasz, P.D. HIV-1 and Ebola Virus Encode Small Peptide Motifs That Recruit Tsg101 to Sites of Particle Assembly to Facilitate Egress. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 1313–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Demirov, D.G.; Ono, A.; Orenstein, J.M.; Freed, E.O. Overexpression of the N-Terminal Domain of TSG101 Inhibits HIV-1 Budding by Blocking Late Domain Function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Freed, E.O. Viral Late Domains. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 4679–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Welker, L.; Paillart, J.-C.; Bernacchi, S. Importance of Viral Late Domains in Budding and Release of Enveloped RNA Viruses. Viruses 2021, 13, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Vietri, M.; Radulovic, M.; Stenmark, H. The Many Functions of ESCRTs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Raiborg, C.; Stenmark, H. The ESCRT Machinery in Endosomal Sorting of Ubiquitylated Membrane Proteins. Nature 2009, 458, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hurley, J.H. ESCRT s Are Everywhere. EMBO J. 2015, 34, 2398–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Schöneberg, J.; Lee, I.-H.; Iwasa, J.H.; Hurley, J.H. Reverse-Topology Membrane Scission by the ESCRT Proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Miura, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Ishida, K.; Arakawa, M.; Wu, H.; Fujioka, Y.; Emi, A.; Maeda, K.; Hamajima, R.; Nakano, T.; et al. Distinct Motifs in the E Protein Are Required for SARS-CoV-2 Virus Particle Formation and Lysosomal Deacidification in Host Cells. J. Virol. 2023, 97, e00426-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hu, B.; Siche, S.; Möller, L.; Veit, M. Amphipathic Helices of Cellular Proteins Can Replace the Helix in M2 of Influenza A Virus with Only Small Effects on Virus Replication. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e01605-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Schmidt, N.W.; Mishra, A.; Wang, J.; DeGrado, W.F.; Wong, G.C.L. Influenza Virus A M2 Protein Generates Negative Gaussian Membrane Curvature Necessary for Budding and Scission. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 13710–13719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhukovsky, M.A.; Filograna, A.; Luini, A.; Corda, D.; Valente, C. Protein Amphipathic Helix Insertion: A Mechanism to Induce Membrane Fission. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Gallop, J.L.; Jao, C.C.; Kent, H.M.; Butler, P.J.G.; Evans, P.R.; Langen, R.; McMahon, H.T. Mechanism of Endophilin N-BAR Domain-Mediated Membrane Curvature. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 2898–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Horvath, C.A.J.; Vanden Broeck, D.; Boulet, G.A.V.; Bogers, J.; De Wolf, M.J.S. Epsin: Inducing Membrane Curvature. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 39, 1765–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Alsaadi, E.A.J.; Neuman, B.W.; Jones, I.M. Identification of a Membrane Binding Peptide in the Envelope Protein of MHV Coronavirus. Viruses 2020, 12, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Maeda, J.; Maeda, A.; Makino, S. Release of Coronavirus E Protein in Membrane Vesicles from Virus-Infected Cells and E Protein-Expressing Cells. Virology 1999, 263, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wang, Y.; Pan, X.; Ji, H.; Zuo, X.; Xiao, G.-F.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.-K.; Xia, B.; Gao, Z. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Envelope Protein Mutations on the Pathogenicity of Omicron XBB. Cell Discov. 2023, 9, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Abavisani, M.; Rahimian, K.; Mahdavi, B.; Tokhanbigli, S.; Mollapour Siasakht, M.; Farhadi, A.; Kodori, M.; Mahmanzar, M.; Meshkat, Z. Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Structural Proteins: A Global Analysis. Virol. J. 2022, 19, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kumar, B.; Hawkins, G.M.; Kicmal, T.; Qing, E.; Timm, E.; Gallagher, T. Assembly and Entry of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2): Evaluation Using Virus-Like Particles. Cells 2021, 10, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Gourdelier, M.; Swain, J.; Arone, C.; Mouttou, A.; Bracquemond, D.; Merida, P.; Saffarian, S.; Lyonnais, S.; Favard, C.; Muriaux, D. Optimized Production and Fluorescent Labeling of SARS-CoV-2 Virus-like Particles. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chen, D.; Zheng, Q.; Sun, L.; Ji, M.; Li, Y.; Deng, H.; Zhang, H. ORF3a of SARS-CoV-2 Promotes Lysosomal Exocytosis-Mediated Viral Egress. Dev. Cell 2021, 56, 3250–3263.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Reily, C.; Stewart, T.J.; Renfrow, M.B.; Novak, J. Glycosylation in Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019, 15, 346–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Brun, J.; Vasiljevic, S.; Gangadharan, B.; Hensen, M.; V Chandran, A.; Hill, M.L.; Kiappes, J.L.; Dwek, R.A.; Alonzi, D.S.; Struwe, W.B.; et al. Assessing Antigen Structural Integrity through Glycosylation Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 Viral Spike. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Turner, M.W. The Role of Mannose-Binding Lectin in Health and Disease. Mol. Immunol. 2003, 40, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Beske, O.; Reichelt, M.; Taylor, M.P.; Kirkegaard, K.; Andino, R. Poliovirus Infection Blocks ERGIC-to-Golgi Trafficking and Induces Microtubule-Dependent Disruption of the Golgi Complex. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120, 3207–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Rogalski, A.A.; Bergmann, J.E.; Singer, S.J. Effect of Microtubule Assembly Status on the Intracellular Processing and Surface Expression of an Integral Protein of the Plasma Membrane. J. Cell Biol. 1984, 99, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Cole, N.B.; Sciaky, N.; Marotta, A.; Song, J.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Golgi Dispersal during Microtubule Disruption: Regeneration of Golgi Stacks at Peripheral Endoplasmic Reticulum Exit Sites. Mol. Biol. Cell 1996, 7, 631–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Klumperman, J. Architecture of the Mammalian Golgi. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a005181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhang, J.; Kennedy, A.; de Melo Jorge, D.M.; Xing, L.; Reid, W.; Bui, S.; Joppich, J.; Rose, M.; Ercan, S.; Tang, Q.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Remodels the Golgi Apparatus to Facilitate Viral Assembly and Secretion. BioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. 2024, 2022.03.04.483074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Aranda, M.; Maule, A. Virus-Induced Host Gene Shutoff in Animals and Plants. Virology 1998, 243, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Finkel, Y.; Gluck, A.; Nachshon, A.; Winkler, R.; Fisher, T.; Rozman, B.; Mizrahi, O.; Lubelsky, Y.; Zuckerman, B.; Slobodin, B.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Uses a Multipronged Strategy to Impede Host Protein Synthesis. Nature 2021, 594, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Schubert, K.; Karousis, E.D.; Jomaa, A.; Scaiola, A.; Echeverria, B.; Gurzeler, L.-A.; Leibundgut, M.; Thiel, V.; Mühlemann, O.; Ban, N. SARS-CoV-2 Nsp1 Binds the Ribosomal mRNA Channel to Inhibit Translation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2020, 27, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Thoms, M.; Buschauer, R.; Ameismeier, M.; Koepke, L.; Denk, T.; Hirschenberger, M.; Kratzat, H.; Hayn, M.; Mackens-Kiani, T.; Cheng, J.; et al. Structural Basis for Translational Shutdown and Immune Evasion by the Nsp1 Protein of SARS-CoV-2. Science 2020, 369, 1249–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Vora, S.M.; Fontana, P.; Mao, T.; Leger, V.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, T.-M.; Lieberman, J.; Gehrke, L.; Shi, M.; Wang, L.; et al. Targeting Stem-Loop 1 of the SARS-CoV-2 5′ UTR to Suppress Viral Translation and Nsp1 Evasion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2117198119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Tien, C.-F.; Tsai, W.-T.; Chen, C.H.; Chou, H.-J.; Zhang, M.M.; Lin, J.-J.; Lin, E.-J.; Dai, S.-S.; Ping, Y.-H.; Yu, C.-Y.; et al. Glycosylation and S-Palmitoylation Regulate SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Intracellular Trafficking. iScience 2022, 25, 104709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Ren, C.; Li, Y.; Gao, L.; Liang, X.; Wang, P.; Ma, C. Palmitoylation of SARS-CoV-2 S Protein Is Essential for Viral Infectivity. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Sun, S.; Karki, C.; Aguilera, J.; Lopez Hernandez, A.E.; Sun, J.; Li, L. Computational Study on the Function of Palmitoylation on the Envelope Protein in SARS-CoV-2. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 6483–6490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Puthenveetil, R.; Lun, C.M.; Murphy, R.E.; Healy, L.B.; Vilmen, G.; Christenson, E.T.; Freed, E.O.; Banerjee, A. S-Acylation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein: Mechanistic Dissection, in Vitro Reconstitution and Role in Viral Infectivity. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 101112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sun, Z.; Zheng, X.; Ji, F.; Zhou, M.; Su, X.; Ren, K.; Li, L. Mass Spectrometry Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein Reveals Camouflaging Glycans and Unique Post-Translational Modifications. Infect. Microbes Dis. 2021, 3, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Stuwe, H.; Reardon, P.N.; Yu, Z.; Shah, S.; Hughes, K.; Barbar, E.J. Phosphorylation in the Ser/Arg-Rich Region of the Nucleocapsid of SARS-CoV-2 Regulates Phase Separation by Inhibiting Self-Association of a Distant Helix. J. Biol. Chem. 2024, 107354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Botova, M.; Camacho-Zarco, A.R.; Tognetti, J.; Bessa, L.M.; Guseva, S.; Mikkola, E.; Salvi, N.; Maurin, D.; Herrmann, T.; Blackledge, M. A Specific Phosphorylation-Dependent Conformational Switch in SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein Inhibits RNA Binding. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eaax2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Cai, T.; Yu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liang, C.; Richard, S. Arginine Methylation of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein Regulates RNA Binding, Its Ability to Suppress Stress Granule Formation, and Viral Replication. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 100821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Yuan, Z.; Hu, B.; Xiao, H.; Tan, X.; Li, Y.; Tang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, K.; Ding, B. The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase RNF5 Facilitates SARS-CoV-2 Membrane Protein-Mediated Virion Release. mBio 2022, 13, e03168-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Liu, X.; Huuskonen, S.; Laitinen, T.; Redchuk, T.; Bogacheva, M.; Salokas, K.; Pöhner, I.; Öhman, T.; Tonduru, A.K.; Hassinen, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2-Host Proteome Interactions for Antiviral Drug Discovery. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2021, 17, e10396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Stukalov, A.; Girault, V.; Grass, V.; Karayel, O.; Bergant, V.; Urban, C.; Haas, D.A.; Huang, Y.; Oubraham, L.; Wang, A.; et al. Multilevel Proteomics Reveals Host Perturbations by SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Nature 2021, 594, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ali, N.; Prasad, K.; AlAsmari, A.F.; Alharbi, M.; Rashid, S.; Kumar, V. Genomics-Guided Targeting of Stress Granule Proteins G3BP1/2 to Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Propagation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 190, 636–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Martin-Sancho, L.; Lewinski, M.K.; Pache, L.; Stoneham, C.A.; Yin, X.; Becker, M.E.; Pratt, D.; Churas, C.; Rosenthal, S.B.; Liu, S.; et al. Functional Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Cellular Restriction. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 2656–2668.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Timilsina, U.; Umthong, S.; Ivey, E.B.; Waxman, B.; Stavrou, S. SARS-CoV-2 ORF7a Potently Inhibits the Antiviral Effect of the Host Factor SERINC5. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, L.; Sola, I.; Enjuanes, L.; Zuñiga, S. MOV10 Helicase Interacts with Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Protein and Has Antiviral Activity. mBio 2021, 12, e01316-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Chen, Y.; Lei, X.; Jiang, Z.; Humphries, F.; Parsi, K.M.; Mustone, N.J.; Ramos, I.; Mutetwa, T.; Fernandez-Sesma, A.; Maehr, R.; et al. Cellular Nucleic Acid-Binding Protein Restricts SARS-CoV-2 by Regulating Interferon and Disrupting RNA-Protein Condensates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2308355120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gupta, S.; Paramo, M.I.; Hou, Y.; Mao, C.; Luo, Y.; Judd, J.; Wierbowski, S.; Bertolotti, M.; et al. A Comprehensive SARS-CoV-2-Human Protein-Protein Interactome Reveals COVID-19 Pathobiology and Potential Host Therapeutic Targets. Nat. Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhang, J.; Li, Q.; Cruz Cosme, R.S.; Gerzanich, V.; Tang, Q.; Simard, J.M.; Zhao, R.Y. Genome-Wide Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Cytopathogenic Proteins in the Search of Antiviral Targets. mBio 2021, 13, e00169-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Taylor, J.K.; Coleman, C.M.; Postel, S.; Sisk, J.M.; Bernbaum, J.G.; Venkataraman, T.; Sundberg, E.J.; Frieman, M.B. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus ORF7a Inhibits Bone Marrow Stromal Antigen 2 Virion Tethering through a Novel Mechanism of Glycosylation Interference. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 11820–11833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic of the SARS-CoV-2 replication cycle. (1) SARS-CoV-2 initiates infection by binding to ACE2 on the host cell surface and enters either via membrane fusion at the plasma membrane in the presence of TMPRSS2 or via endocytosis using cathepsins. (2) The viral positive-sense RNA genome is released into the cytoplasm and translated by host ribosomes to produce polypeptides. (3) These are subsequently cleaved by viral proteases to form the NSPs which form the RdRp complex and double-membrane vesicles (DMVs). (4) Negative-sense RNAs are synthesized using the positive-sense RNA genome as a template. (5) These negative-sense RNAs serve as templates for synthesizing new positive-sense genomic and subgenomic RNAs. (6) The subgenomic RNAs are translated into structural and accessory proteins. (7) The genomic RNA is bound by the nucleocapsid protein, while structural proteins S, E, and M are embedded on the endoplasmic reticulum–Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC). (8–9) Virions assemble in the ERGIC and are transported out of the cell via exocytosis. Created in BioRender.com, accessed on 21 October 2024.
Figure 1. Schematic of the SARS-CoV-2 replication cycle. (1) SARS-CoV-2 initiates infection by binding to ACE2 on the host cell surface and enters either via membrane fusion at the plasma membrane in the presence of TMPRSS2 or via endocytosis using cathepsins. (2) The viral positive-sense RNA genome is released into the cytoplasm and translated by host ribosomes to produce polypeptides. (3) These are subsequently cleaved by viral proteases to form the NSPs which form the RdRp complex and double-membrane vesicles (DMVs). (4) Negative-sense RNAs are synthesized using the positive-sense RNA genome as a template. (5) These negative-sense RNAs serve as templates for synthesizing new positive-sense genomic and subgenomic RNAs. (6) The subgenomic RNAs are translated into structural and accessory proteins. (7) The genomic RNA is bound by the nucleocapsid protein, while structural proteins S, E, and M are embedded on the endoplasmic reticulum–Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC). (8–9) Virions assemble in the ERGIC and are transported out of the cell via exocytosis. Created in BioRender.com, accessed on 21 October 2024.
Viruses 16 01648 g001
Figure 2. SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins. (a) Schematic of the SARS-CoV-2 particle and its structural proteins, depicting its spherical, enveloped form with protruding spike (S) proteins (PDB: 6VXX). The envelope (E) (PDB: 7K3G) and membrane (M) (PDB: 8CTK) proteins are embedded within the lipid bilayer, providing structural integrity and shape to the virus. Inside the virion, the nucleocapsid (N) protein (PDB: 8FG2) encapsulates the positive-sense RNA genome, forming the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex. (b) Domain organization of the four structural proteins, with amino acid positions denoted. Key functional sites are depicted, including the Furin and TMPRSS2 cleavage sites in spike, the NTD (N-terminal domain), RBD (receptor-binding domain), FP (fusion peptide), HR (heptad repeat), TMD (transmembrane domain), and CTD (C-terminal domain). Created in BioRender.com, accessed on 21 October 2024.
Figure 2. SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins. (a) Schematic of the SARS-CoV-2 particle and its structural proteins, depicting its spherical, enveloped form with protruding spike (S) proteins (PDB: 6VXX). The envelope (E) (PDB: 7K3G) and membrane (M) (PDB: 8CTK) proteins are embedded within the lipid bilayer, providing structural integrity and shape to the virus. Inside the virion, the nucleocapsid (N) protein (PDB: 8FG2) encapsulates the positive-sense RNA genome, forming the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex. (b) Domain organization of the four structural proteins, with amino acid positions denoted. Key functional sites are depicted, including the Furin and TMPRSS2 cleavage sites in spike, the NTD (N-terminal domain), RBD (receptor-binding domain), FP (fusion peptide), HR (heptad repeat), TMD (transmembrane domain), and CTD (C-terminal domain). Created in BioRender.com, accessed on 21 October 2024.
Viruses 16 01648 g002
Figure 3. SARS-CoV-2 assembly and its regulation. Viral structural proteins S, E, and M are synthesized and processed in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The genomic RNA, bound by the N protein, joins the S, E, and M proteins at the ER–Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) to form new virions. Shown are host factors that have been reported to restrict (in red) or promote (in green) SARS-CoV-2 assembly. Viral accessory protein ORF7a antagonization of SERINC5 and BST-2 is depicted. Created in BioRender.com, accessed on 26 September 2024.
Figure 3. SARS-CoV-2 assembly and its regulation. Viral structural proteins S, E, and M are synthesized and processed in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The genomic RNA, bound by the N protein, joins the S, E, and M proteins at the ER–Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) to form new virions. Shown are host factors that have been reported to restrict (in red) or promote (in green) SARS-CoV-2 assembly. Viral accessory protein ORF7a antagonization of SERINC5 and BST-2 is depicted. Created in BioRender.com, accessed on 26 September 2024.
Viruses 16 01648 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Katiyar, H.; Arduini, A.; Li, Y.; Liang, C. SARS-CoV-2 Assembly: Gaining Infectivity and Beyond. Viruses 2024, 16, 1648. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16111648

AMA Style

Katiyar H, Arduini A, Li Y, Liang C. SARS-CoV-2 Assembly: Gaining Infectivity and Beyond. Viruses. 2024; 16(11):1648. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16111648

Chicago/Turabian Style

Katiyar, Harshita, Ariana Arduini, Yichen Li, and Chen Liang. 2024. "SARS-CoV-2 Assembly: Gaining Infectivity and Beyond" Viruses 16, no. 11: 1648. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16111648

APA Style

Katiyar, H., Arduini, A., Li, Y., & Liang, C. (2024). SARS-CoV-2 Assembly: Gaining Infectivity and Beyond. Viruses, 16(11), 1648. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16111648

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop