Next Article in Journal
Pharmacological Inhibition of Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV)
Next Article in Special Issue
Herpes Virus Fusion and Entry: A Story with Many Characters
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Vulnerability: Bacterial Arrangements, Microcolonies, and Biofilms as Responses to Low Rather than High Phage Densities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Paramyxovirus Fusion and Entry: Multiple Paths to a Common End
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 4
Issue 5
10.3390/v4050688
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Poxvirus Cell Entry: How Many Proteins Does it Take?

by
Bernard Moss
Laboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Viruses 2012, 4(5), 688-707; https://doi.org/10.3390/v4050688
Submission received: 10 April 2012 / Revised: 21 April 2012 / Accepted: 23 April 2012 / Published: 27 April 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Virus-Induced Membrane Fusion)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
For many viruses, one or two proteins enable cell binding, membrane fusion and entry. The large number of proteins employed by poxviruses is unprecedented and may be related to their ability to infect a wide range of cells. There are two main infectious forms of vaccinia virus, the prototype poxvirus: the mature virion (MV), which has a single membrane, and the extracellular enveloped virion (EV), which has an additional outer membrane that is disrupted prior to fusion. Four viral proteins associated with the MV membrane facilitate attachment by binding to glycosaminoglycans or laminin on the cell surface, whereas EV attachment proteins have not yet been identified. Entry can occur at the plasma membrane or in acidified endosomes following macropinocytosis and involves actin dynamics and cell signaling. Regardless of the pathway or whether the MV or EV mediates infection, fusion is dependent on 11 to 12 non-glycosylated, transmembrane proteins ranging in size from 4- to 43-kDa that are associated in a complex. These proteins are conserved in poxviruses making it likely that a common entry mechanism exists. Biochemical studies support a two-step process in which lipid mixing of viral and cellular membranes is followed by pore expansion and core penetration.

1. Introduction

Poxviruses comprise a family of genetically related, large, enveloped, DNA viruses that replicate exclusively within the cytoplasm of vertebrate or invertebrate cells [1]. Homologs of approximately 100 of the 200 or more genes are present in all Chordopoxviruses and 50 are recognizable in both Chordopoxviruses and Entomopoxviruses [2]. The products of the highly conserved genes are involved in cell entry, gene expression, DNA replication, intramolecular disulfide bond formation and virion assembly; products of the less conserved genes participate in specific host interactions. The most intensively studied poxviruses belong to the Orthopoxvirus genus, including variola virus (causative agent of smallpox, eradicated from nature), vaccinia virus (VACV; the modern smallpox vaccine, now endemic in Brazil), cowpox virus (the original smallpox vaccine, indigenous in Europe, occasionally infects humans) and monkeypox virus (indigenous in Africa, causes a smallpox-like disease of humans). Studies of VACV have provided most of what we know about poxvirus entry [3].
For historical reasons, VACV genes and open reading frames are commonly identified with a capital letter (representing a HindIII restriction endonuclease genome fragment), an arabic number (representing the position within the HindIII fragment) and L or R (indicating transcription to the left or right, respectively). Proteins have the corresponding designation except that L or R is omitted. For example L1 is the protein encoded by L1R. The www.poxvirus.org is a useful website for correlating these common names, which are listed for the Copenhagen strain of VACV, with GenBank annotations for other VACV strains such as Western Reserve (WR).

2. Poxvirus Replication Cycle

DNA viruses typically replicate and express their genomes in the nucleus making extensive use of cellular proteins. In contrast, poxviruses rely heavily on virus-encoded proteins enabling them to replicate in the cytoplasm [1]. The infectious VACV membrane-bound particle contains a core, within which reside the linear, double-stranded DNA genome and virus-encoded enzymes and factors that allow transcription of the early set of genes. When the core enters the cytoplasm, early mRNA and protein synthesis occur, followed by DNA replication [4a]. The replicated DNA provides a template for the synthesis of intermediate and late classes of mRNA. The most recent analysis of VACV WR suggests that there are 118 early, 53 intermediate and 38 late genes [4b]. Following late gene expression, virus assembly begins. The initial infectious form, called a mature virions (MV) [5], has a single external membrane [6,7,8] (Figure 1). Some MVs are wrapped in a modified trans-Golgi or endosomal membrane to become triple-membrane particles called wrapped virions (WVs), whereas other MVs remain free or in inclusions within the cytoplasm until liberated by cell lysis [9,10,11]. The WVs are transported on microtubules to the periphery of the cell where the outer membrane fuses with the plasma membrane to release an extracellular enveloped virion (EV), consisting essentially of a MV with one additional membrane [12,13] (Figure 1). At least 20 proteins are associated with the MV membrane and 6 others with the outer EV membrane. In older papers and some recent ones, MVs may be referred to as INVs or IMVs; WVs as IEVs; and EVs as EEVs and CEVs.
Viruses 04 00688 g001 1024
Figure 1. Two major forms of infectious virions. The mature virion (MV) contains more than 80 proteins and consists of a nucleoprotein core surrounded by a lipid membrane (black) with about 20 proteins. Approximately 20 proteins within the core are devoted to synthesis and modification of mRNA. The enveloped virion (EV) consists essentially of a MV with an additional membrane (red) containing about 6 proteins distinct from those in the MV membrane.
Figure 1. Two major forms of infectious virions. The mature virion (MV) contains more than 80 proteins and consists of a nucleoprotein core surrounded by a lipid membrane (black) with about 20 proteins. Approximately 20 proteins within the core are devoted to synthesis and modification of mRNA. The enveloped virion (EV) consists essentially of a MV with an additional membrane (red) containing about 6 proteins distinct from those in the MV membrane.
Viruses 04 00688 g001
MVs are very stable and are thought to mediate transmission between host animals, whereas EVs have a fragile outer membrane and are specialized for exiting the intact cell and spreading within the host. EVs can remain associated with the tips of actin-containing protrusions at the cell surface or released into the surrounding fluid but the former are predominant in most VACV strains and are largely responsible for cell-to-cell spread [14,15,16,17,18]. However, a few VACV strains, such as IHD-J, release relatively large numbers of EVs [19]. Enhanced EV release may be a tissue culture adaptation of some VACV strains. The difference in the amounts of EVs released by WR and IHD-J is largely due to a single amino acid change in the A34 EV membrane protein [20]. Mutations of other EV proteins can also increase EV release [21]. Partly for technical reasons, the majority of entry studies have been carried out with MVs, usually of the WR VACV strain. A high percentage of EVs that are released from cells have a partly disrupted outer membrane, making experiments with these particles difficult to interpret. There have been virtually no investigations of entry mediated by cell-associated EVs, despite their biological importance.

3. Entry Pathways

Entry of the core or nucleoprotein of enveloped viruses requires fusion of the viral membrane with either the plasma or endosomal membrane [22]. The latter route is thought to provide an advantage in providing passage through the dense cell cortex. For VACV, it is necessary to consider the existence of two infectious forms of virus, the single-membrane MV and the double-membrane EV. On theoretical grounds alone it seemed unlikely that the outer EV membrane would fuse since that would leave a membrane bound MV-like particle in the cytoplasm. Indeed, some electron microscopic images show fusion of the single MV membrane with the plasma membrane of the cell [23,24,25]. Moreover, electron microscopic images show MVs fusing with plasma membrane after dissolution of the EV membrane, apparently by interaction with glycosaminoglycans at the cell surface [26].
In addition to the above images of VACV fusing with the plasma membrane, other images show MVs within endosomes [27,28]. Further microscopic (Figure 2) and biochemical studies indicate that VACV MVs can enter cells via neutral pH plasma membrane or low pH endocytic pathways [25]. The strong enhancement of entry following brief low pH (<6) treatment of cell-bound virions (mimicking the low pH of late endosomes) and inhibition of entry by preventing acidification of endosomes (Figure 3) suggests that the endocytic route is dominant for the WR strain of VACV [25].
Viruses 04 00688 g002 1024
Figure 2. Transmission electron micrographs showing a VACV MV fusing with the plasma membrane (A) and endosomal membrane (B). Prior to cryosectioning, the infected cells were stained with a monoclonal antibody to the MV membrane protein D8 followed by protein A conjugated to gold spheres. Modified from reference [25].
Figure 2. Transmission electron micrographs showing a VACV MV fusing with the plasma membrane (A) and endosomal membrane (B). Prior to cryosectioning, the infected cells were stained with a monoclonal antibody to the MV membrane protein D8 followed by protein A conjugated to gold spheres. Modified from reference [25].
Viruses 04 00688 g002
Viruses 04 00688 g003 1024
Figure 3. Effects of low pH and inhibitors of endosomal acidification on VACV MV entry. (A) Following adsorption of a recombinant VACV MV that expresses firefly luciferase at 4 °C, cells were incubated with buffers at the indicated pH for 3 min at 37 °C. The cells were then incubated with regular medium for 1 h at 37 °C, lysed and luciferase activity measured; (B) Cells were pretreated with indicated concentrations of bafilomycin A1 for 50 min at 37 °C and then infected with MVs, briefly exposed to pH 5 or 7.4 buffer, and luciferase activity measured as in panel A. Note that incubation at pH 5 allows fusion at the plasma membrane and bypasses the effect of the inhibitor. Modified from reference [25].
Figure 3. Effects of low pH and inhibitors of endosomal acidification on VACV MV entry. (A) Following adsorption of a recombinant VACV MV that expresses firefly luciferase at 4 °C, cells were incubated with buffers at the indicated pH for 3 min at 37 °C. The cells were then incubated with regular medium for 1 h at 37 °C, lysed and luciferase activity measured; (B) Cells were pretreated with indicated concentrations of bafilomycin A1 for 50 min at 37 °C and then infected with MVs, briefly exposed to pH 5 or 7.4 buffer, and luciferase activity measured as in panel A. Note that incubation at pH 5 allows fusion at the plasma membrane and bypasses the effect of the inhibitor. Modified from reference [25].
Viruses 04 00688 g003
Low pH as well as brief proteinase treatment can stably activate MVs prior to their adsorption to cells suggesting a triggering or unmasking effect, but these procedures do not alleviate sensitivity to inhibitors of endosomal acidification [29]. Entry of some other VACV strains, such as IHD-J, are not accelerated by low pH or inhibited by lysomotropic agents indicating entry through the plasma membrane or a neutral pH endocytic route [30]. Adaptation of entry pathways could have occurred during extensive cell culture passaging of VACV strains. Several recently isolated orthopoxviruses have been shown to be more similar to WR than IHD-J with regard to entry pathway, emphasizing the importance of the endocytic route (Z. Bengali, P.S. Satheshkumar and B. Moss, unpublished). There have been few studies of members of other poxvirus genera. Myxoma virus entry is not enhanced by low pH [31].
Recent evidence suggests that the VACV A25 and A26 proteins serve as fusion suppressors for MVs and determine strain-specific virus entry pathways [32]. Thus, MVs containing functional A25 and A26 proteins do not fuse readily with the plasma membrane and enter through the endocytic pathway, whereas those missing these proteins enter through the plasma membrane. Further discussion of these proteins and mechanistic aspects of the model will be presented below. The route of infection also depends on the cell type [30,33]. VACV can even enter insect cells, though replication is abortive [34,35,36]. Entry into Drosophila S2 cells is exclusively through the endocytic route [36].
Engulfment of the large VACV MV particles occurs by clathrin- and caveolin-independent macropinocytosis or fluid phase endocytosis and is dependent on actin dynamics and cell signaling [37,38,39]. The requirement for cell signaling may have led to earlier proposals that chemokine receptors serve as poxvirus entry portals [40,41,42]. Two cellular proteins, VPEF and CD98, associated with lipid rafts participate in the fluid phase uptake of MVs [37,43]. EVs may enter through the plasma membrane or following endocytosis [26,44,45].
The infectivity of intact and detergent extracted MVs can be enhanced by incubation with liposomes containing phosphatidylserine [46,47]. This finding was recently confirmed and extended by Mercer and Helenius [37], who also showed that annexin 5 inhibits VACV entry. They proposed that the role of phosphatidylserine in MV endocytosis is similar to the role of this lipid in uptake of apoptotic bodies. The infectivity of lipid-extracted MVs could also be enhanced by the non-biologically relevant D-stereoisomer of phosphatidylserine as well as by other phospholipids that are not known to signal uptake of apoptotic debris [48]. Therefore, the putative lipid receptor would have low specificity suggesting a role for bridging molecules. A soluble protein called Gas6 can bridge phosphatidylserine and the TAM receptor tyrosine kinase Axl on certain cells [49]. However, Gas6 had little or no effect on MV entry, although EV entry was enhanced [49]. Paradoxically, annexin 5 was reported not to inhibit EV entry, suggesting that phosphatidylserine is not involved [45]. Further studies are needed to understand the role of lipids in VACV entry.

4. Attachment

Proteinase treatment of cells can prevent binding of MVs suggesting a role for cell surface proteins [50,51]. Four viral proteins can mediate MV attachment. D8 binds chondroitin sulfate [52] and A27 and H3 proteins bind heparan sulfate [53,54,55,56] indicating the importance of glycosaminoglycans (Table 1). Heparin appears to have a greater inhibitory effect on VACV strains that preferentially enter by a neutral pH mechanism [30]. The A26 protein binds laminin [57]. Of the four attachment proteins, only H3 is highly conserved among poxviruses. D8 and H3 have transmembrane domains; the A26 and A27 proteins interact with each other and the latter is anchored by the A17 transmembrane protein, which is an important structural element of the MV membrane [58,59,60]. The attachment proteins are multifunctional and are not individually essential, though deletion of A27 and H3 severely reduce VACV infectivity [55,61,62]. H3 also participates in MV assembly and A27 is required for formation of the WV. In addition, the A26 protein mediates the incorporation of MVs into so-called A-Type cytoplasmic inclusion bodies of some orthopoxviruses including cowpox virus and ectromelia virus [63]. The A25 protein of VACV, recently described as a fusion suppressor [32], is a truncated form of the A-type inclusion protein [64,65]. A soluble, truncated, recombinant form of the L1 protein, described below, can attach to cells lacking glycosaminoglycans and prevent VACV entry suggesting that it is a receptor binding protein [66]. However, the putative cellular protein interacting with L1 remains to be determined. The binding of EVs was not diminished by proteinase treatment of cells and the attachment molecules have not been identified [50].
Table
Table 1. VACV MV attachment and entry proteins.
Table 1. VACV MV attachment and entry proteins.
ProteinkDaTM aExpr bCons cProperties
Attachment
A2658-L-Binds laminin; assoc. with A27
A2713-I-Binds heparan; assoc with A17; N d
D835NI-Binds chondroitin; N
H338CIPBinds heparan; N
Entry
A1643CIPEFC e; paralog G9, J5; binds G9; C-C f
A2114NLPEFC; C-C
A2816NLPEFC; N; binds H2; C-C
F924CLPEFC associated; C-C
G313NLPEFC; binds L5
G939CLPEFC; paralog A16, J5; binds A16; C-C
H222NLPEFC; binds A28; C-C
I28CLCEFC?
J515CLPEFC; paralog A16, G9; C-C
L127CLPEFC associated; N; C-C; Myr g
L515CLPEFC; binds G3; C-C
O34NICEFC
a TM, N- or C-terminal transmembrane domain; b Expr, expressed at I (intermediate) or L (late) times of replication; c Cons, conserved in all poxviruses (P) or all chordopoxviruses (C); d N, target of neutralizing antibody; e EFC, component of entry-fusion complex; f C-C, intramolecular disulfide bond(s); g Myr, myristoylated.

5. Identification of Viral Proteins that Mediate Core Entry

Although many enveloped viruses encode one or two proteins that are sufficient to mediate attachment and entry, VACV is exceptional. Thus far, 11 to 12 proteins have been implicated in a post-attachment entry step (Table 1). These proteins are conserved in all poxviruses with the possible exception of O3; although the small size of the latter protein makes it difficult to detect statistically significant homology, all chordopoxviruses encode a protein with similar features at the same genome location as O3 [67]. Entry proteins were originally discovered by identifying genes predicted to encode transmembrane proteins that are conserved in all poxviruses, constructing inducible mutants, and determining their phenotypes [68,69,70]. MVs that formed in the absence of inducer, and therefore lacking the specific target protein, could bind to cells but had low infectivity and the cores did not enter the cytoplasm as determined by microscopy. Furthermore, cells infected with the mutant viruses were unable to form syncytia following a low pH pulse. Additional entry proteins conserved in all poxviruses were identified by mass spectroscopy of complexes captured with antibodies to the above entry proteins [71] and subsequently confirmed by constructing conditional lethal mutants. Presently, nine proteins (A16 [72], A21 [69], A28 [68,73], G3 [71,74,75], G9 [76], H2 [77,78], J5 [79], L5 [70] and O3 [67,80]) are considered to be integral components of the entry fusion complex (EFC) and two more, F9 [81] and L1 [82], have been designated EFC-associated. The phenotypes resulting from failure to express the integral or associated EFC proteins are similar and the distinction is based mainly on their contribution to the stability of the complex, which may depend on their relative locations and subunit interactions. The EFC proteins are synthesized following viral DNA replication and are dedicated to entry, since in their absence normal looking virions that are competent to synthesize mRNA in vitro but are unable to initiate an infection, are assembled.
The involvement of several additional VACV proteins in entry has been proposed. The phenotype of a conditional lethal I2L mutant is similar to that of EFC mutants and the I2 protein is listed in Table 1 [83]. However, the repression of I2 expression results in diminished amounts of EFC proteins in the viral membrane, raising the possibility of an indirect effect on entry [83] and association of I2 with the EFC has not been demonstrated. The heterologous expression of A17 was reported to cause fusion of transfected cells suggesting a similar role during entry [84]. A17 is a major component of the virion membrane and conditional lethal A17 mutants are blocked in viral membrane formation [85,86], where fusion may have a role, making it difficult to confirm an additional entry function.

6. Organization of the EFC and Structure of Subunit Proteins

The EFC has been isolated by immunoaffinity capture from non-ionic detergent-treated cytoplasmic extracts and membrane fractions of VACV-infected cells, probably representing immature virions [71]. The EFC fails to form when formation of the viral membrane is inhibited [71], thus preventing its synthesis in heterologous systems and hindering its physical characterization. The proteins are tightly bound to the membrane of the MV, making it difficult to extract as a complex even with non-ionic detergents, explaining why the infectivity of detergent extracted MVs can be partially reconstituted with lipids [47]. The EFC is destabilized when synthesis of any one of the nine integral component proteins is prevented, suggesting that it is held together by multiple subunit interactions. However, under destabilizing conditions, some subunit interactions are retained; these include interactions of A28 to H2 [78], A16 to G9 [87] and G3 to L5 [88] (Table 1). As will be detailed in a subsequent section, A16:G9 can also bind to the A56:K2 heterodimer of fusion regulatory proteins [87] and the A26 protein [119].
The entry proteins vary in size from 4- to 43-kDa, are non-glycosylated, and resemble neither type 1- nor type 2-fusion proteins of other viruses (Table 1). The combined mass of the EFC and EFC-associated proteins is 232 kDa, assuming each component is represented once. Five of the proteins, comprising A21, A28, G3, H2 and O3 have a N-terminal transmembrane domain; the others consisting of A16, F9, G9, J5, L1 and L5 have a C-terminal transmembrane domain. Interestingly, A16, G9, and J5 are related in sequence and apparently the progenitor was duplicated and diverged early in poxvirus evolution. Similarly, L1 and F9 are structurally related. Nevertheless each paralog is encoded by all poxviruses and is individually required for entry. With the exceptions of O3, G3 and I2, the entry proteins contain conserved intramolecular disulfide bonds that are formed by a novel cytoplasmic redox system that is encoded by all poxviruses [89]. No other viral proteins are known substrates of the poxvirus redox system, suggesting co-development with the EFC proteins perhaps because of their cytoplasmic domains. The cellular redox system, in contrast to the poxvirus system, is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. The possibility that disulfide interchange has a role in activation of the EFC to initiate fusion is an intriguing thought, as this has been suggested for some other viruses [90,91,92,93].
Remarkably, O3 consists of only 35 amino acids, making it the smallest protein encoded by VACV [80]. The homologs in other poxviruses range from 29 to 48 amino acids in length and have a low degree of amino acid identity yet can complement an O3 deletion mutant [67]. The characteristic feature of the O3 homologs is the N-terminal transmembrane domain, which is essential and sufficient for its association with other EFC proteins [67].
Mutagenesis of the H2 protein defined a highly conserved region that is important for interaction with the A28 protein [78]. The A28 protein is a target of neutralizing antibodies [94] indicating an exposed location on the surface and its immunogenicity is specifically enhanced by association with H2 [95].
The EFC-associated L1 protein has been subjected to detailed analysis. L1 is a target of potent neutralizing antibodies indicating that it is exposed on the MV surface [96,97]. The protein is myristoylated at the N-terminal glycine residue [98,99] and contains three intramolecular disulfide bonds [89,100]. Mutation of the N-terminal glycine prevents the complementation of VACV infectivity [101], alters the intracellular localization of L1 as determined by confocal microscopy and reduces intramolecular disulfide bond formation [102], although the protein still associates with the EFC and MVs [103]. The crystal structure reveals a fold composed of a bundle of α-helices packed against a pair of two-stranded β-sheets [104]. The 7D11 neutralizing monoclonal antibody binds to a discontinuous epitope containing two loops that are held together by a disulfide bond [105]. Interestingly, there is a large hydrophobic cavity that could accommodate the N-terminal myristate moiety [104] and recent studies indicate that mutations within the cavity inhibit infectivity without affecting myristoylation [103]. Taken together, these results suggest a “myristate switch” model in which the acyl chain is released from the cavity during entry.

7. Membrane Fusion

Entry of the nucleoprotein or core of enveloped viruses is usually divided into three steps: close apposition of the viral and cellular membrane, lipid-mixing of the outer membrane leaflets leading to the formation of a hemifusion intermediate, and formation and expansion of a pore [22]. The lipid-mixing step can be studied by loading the virion membrane with a self-quenching lipophilic dye such as R18 and measuring an increase in fluorescence. Fusion of VACV MVs and EVs with cells was demonstrated in that way [106]. By using recombinant VACV expressing firefly luciferase regulated by an early promoter, it has been possible to distinguish lipid-mixing and later steps dependent on core entry (Figure 4).
Viruses 04 00688 g004 1024
Figure 4. Membrane fusion and core entry. R18-loaded MVs that express firefly luciferase were incubated with HeLa cells at 4 °C to permit binding. Washed cells were then placed in a cuvette containing pre-warmed media at 37 °C and fluorescence was monitored over time (red line; left y-axis). In parallel, unlabeled MVs were bound to cells in the cold and then shifted to 37 °C. Cell lysates were prepared at indicated times and assayed for luciferase (LUC) activity (purple line; right y-axis). Modified from ref [107].
Figure 4. Membrane fusion and core entry. R18-loaded MVs that express firefly luciferase were incubated with HeLa cells at 4 °C to permit binding. Washed cells were then placed in a cuvette containing pre-warmed media at 37 °C and fluorescence was monitored over time (red line; left y-axis). In parallel, unlabeled MVs were bound to cells in the cold and then shifted to 37 °C. Cell lysates were prepared at indicated times and assayed for luciferase (LUC) activity (purple line; right y-axis). Modified from ref [107].
Viruses 04 00688 g004
The roles of individual EFC and EFC-associated proteins were investigated using MVs deficient in a single component, derived from a panel consisting of 10 conditional lethal inducible mutants [107]. The mutant virions were all able to attach to cells but most were unable to carry out even the initial lipid-mixing step. However, lipid-mixing occurred with the A28, L1 and L5 mutants but further steps did not. Two possibilities were considered: one is that the latter proteins are specifically required for pore formation or expansion; the other is that traces of A28, L1 and L5 remain in the MVs (though undetectable by Western blotting) and that this is sufficient for lipid mixing but not pore formation. Interestingly, neutralizing 7D11 monoclonal antibody to L1 also allows lipid mixing but not core entry [107]. Regardless of which hypothesis is correct, the data support a two-step model in which lipid mixing of the outer leaflets of the viral and cellular membranes occurs followed by merging of the inner leaflets and expansion of the pore to permit core entry.
Although low pH accelerates entry of MVs as measured by the luciferase assay [25,29], lipid mixing is not enhanced by low pH [106,107]. Inhibitors of tyrosine protein kinases, dynamin GTPase and actin dynamics have little effect on binding of virions to cells but impair membrane fusion measured with R18, whereas partial cholesterol depletion and inhibitors of endosomal acidification and membrane blebbing have a more severe effect at the later stage of core entry [107]. Extensive actin remodeling and mobilization occur during MV binding to cell surfaces [37,38,108] suggesting that actin-enriched projections enhance the intimacy of membrane contact allowing virus-cell membrane fusion. Actin remodeling has been proposed to facilitate fusion by forcing membranes together and enlarging pores in a variety of systems [109,110,111] including viral protein-induced cell-cell fusion and virus entry [112,113,114,115,116,117]. In HIV entry, actin remodeling has a more important role in pore expansion and content mixing than hemifusion [118,119]. Cytochalasin D and latrunculin have a greater inhibitory effect on VACV core entry than hemifusion, suggesting that actin dynamics may be required for both hemifusion and pore formation [107].

8. Cell-Cell Fusion

Infection with certain VACV mutants causes cells to form syncytia. The mutations are in the A56R [120] and K2L [121,122,123] genes. Although referred to as fusion from within, syncytia formation is dependent on the formation and externalization of virions and on components of the EFC suggesting that the phenomenon has features related to virus entry [124]. A56 and K2 form a complex on the plasma membrane and the EV membrane [125]. This complex can interact with the A16 and G9 subunits of the EFC to prevent spontaneous activation of the fusion apparatus by progeny virions [87]. Uninfected cells expressing A56 and K2 but neither alone are resistant to forming syncytia when mixed with cells infected with an A56R deletion mutant [126]. Therefore, the A56-K2 complex acts as a fusion suppressor.
Wild type VACV-infected cells can also form syncytia if they are briefly exposed to low pH [106,127], similar to that occurring at neutral pH with A56R and K2L mutants. This process has also been called fusion from within, although again it is dependent on virions on the cell surface [128] and the EFC [68,69,70]. The low pH may assist in removing the outer EV membrane [129] and synchronizing the fusion process [3]. Low pH can also induce syncytium formation immediately after infection with a high multiplicity of MVs and this has been called fusion from without [127]. A recent report demonstrates that the A26 protein, like A56-K2, binds to the A16 and G9 components of the EFC, that this association is weakened by low pH, and that A26 deletion mutants can induce fusion from without at neutral pH [130].

9. Inhibition of Superinfection

VACV employs mechanisms to prevent superinfection of previously infected cells by MVs [131,132,133]. Superinfection exclusion operates between virus adsorption and early gene expression and is nearly complete by 6 h. Recent studies show that this early exclusion phenomenon occurs at the lipid-mixing step and is not dependent on expression of A56 (Laliberte, J. and Moss, B., unpublished). The association of the A16 and G9 components of the EFC with the A56-K2 complex, however, suggests that the latter represents a second mechanism of preventing superinfection as well as syncytia formation. A56 and K2 expressed by infected cells reduces the entry of superinfecting virus at late times, apparently on top of the already reduced superinfecton exclusion [134]. Moreover, uninfected cells stably expressing A56 and K2 are resistant to infection indicating that these proteins are sufficient for superinfection exclusion [126].
Superinfection exclusion also operates at the level of EVs [135]. Incorporation of VACV early proteins A33 and A36 into the plasma membrane leads to repulsion of superinfecting EVs providing a mechanism for the rapid spread of infection.

10. Final Thoughts

VACV has the remarkable ability to infect a wide variety of cells including those of insects, birds and mammals, although in some cases the infection is aborted following early gene expression. Perhaps the ability to infect diverse cells is a benefit of the complex poxvirus fusion apparatus and the use of alternative entry pathways. A subject that has been largely absent from this review is the existence of specific cell receptors that directly activate the viral fusion apparatus. The wide variety of permissive cells could suggest multiple or ubiquitous receptors, which would make it difficult to identify them, or alternatively the absence of such receptors. It would not be the first situation in which poxviruses demonstrate reliance on their own proteins e.g., they encode their own enzymes for gene expression, DNA replication, and disulfide bond formation. At least 11 VACV proteins are dedicated to post-attachment steps in MV entry. Although conserved in all poxviruses, these proteins have no non-poxvirus homologs nor do they resemble fusion proteins of other viruses. The combined mass of the EFC and EFC-associated proteins is 232 kDa and it is possible that several of the small proteins together form a non-linear hydrophobic face that comprises a fusion domain. A high-resolution structure of the EFC is sorely needed. The mechanism used by cell-associated EVs to enter neighboring cells is another area requiring further research. This process could be investigated using live cell imaging. Hopefully, the next review of poxvirus entry will address why so many proteins are needed rather than how many.

Addendum

After completion of this manuscript, a related review that emphasizes poxvirus cell entry pathways was published [136].

Acknowledgments

I gratefully acknowledge past and present members of our laboratory that contributed to research on poxvirus entry over the past seven years. Tatiana Senkevich (Koonin) and Alan Townsley made early contributions followed by Suany Ojeda, Erica Brown, Tim Wagenaar, Himani Bisht, Gretchen Nelson, Jason Laliberte, Zain Bengali, P.S. Satheskumar and Cindy Wolfe. J.L. and P.S.S. kindly made comments on the manuscript. The work was supported by the Division of Intramural Research, NIAID.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moss, B. Poxviridae: The Viruses and Their Replication. In Fields Virology; Knipe, D.M., Howley, P.M., Eds.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007; Volume 2, pp. 2905–2946. [Google Scholar]
  2. Upton, C.; Slack, S.; Hunter, A.L.; Ehlers, A.; Roper, R.L. Poxvirus orthologous clusters: Toward defining the minimum essential poxvirus genome. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 7590–7600. [Google Scholar]
  3. Moss, B. Poxvirus entry and membrane fusion. Virology 2006, 344, 48–54. [Google Scholar]
  4. Moss, B.; de Silva, F. Poxvirus DNA Replication and Human Disease. In DNA Replication & Human Disease; DePamphilis, M.L., Ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 707–727. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang, Z.; Reynolds, S.E.; Martens, C.A.; Bruno, D.P.; Porcella, S.F.; Moss, B. Expression profiling of the intermediate and late stages of poxvirus replication. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 9899–9908. [Google Scholar]
  6. Condit, R.C.; Moussatche, N.; Traktman, P. In a nutshell: Structure and assembly of the vaccinia virion. Adv. Virus Res. 2006, 66, 31–124. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hollinshead, M.; Vanderplasschen, A.; Smith, G.L.; Vaux, D.J. Vaccinia virus intracellular mature virions contain only one lipid membrane. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 1503–1517. [Google Scholar]
  8. Heuser, J. Deep-etch EM reveals that the early poxvirus envelope is a single membrane bilayer stabilized by a geodetic “Honeycomb” Surface coat. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 169, 269–283. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cyrklaff, M.; Risco, C.; Fernandez, J.J.; Jimenez, M.V.; Esteban, M.; Baumeister, W.; Carrascosa, J.L. Cryo-electron tomography of vaccinia virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 2772–2777. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hiller, G.; Weber, K. Golgi-derived membranes that contain an acylated viral polypeptide are used for vaccinia virus envelopment. J. Virol. 1985, 55, 651–659. [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmelz, M.; Sodeik, B.; Ericsson, M.; Wolffe, E.J.; Shida, H.; Hiller, G.; Griffiths, G. Assembly of vaccinia virus: The second wrapping cisterna is derived from the trans Golgi network. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 130–147. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tooze, J.; Hollinshead, M.; Reis, B.; Radsak, K.; Kern, H. Progeny vaccinia and human cytomegalovirus particles utilize early endosomal cisternae for their envelopes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 60, 163–178. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ward, B.M.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus intracellular movement is associated with microtubules and independent of actin tails. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 11651–11663. [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith, G.L.; Vanderplasschen, A.; Law, M. The formation and function of extracellular enveloped vaccinia virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2002, 83, 2915–2931. [Google Scholar]
  15. Blasco, R.; Moss, B. Role of cell-associated enveloped vaccinia virus in cell-to-cell spread. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 4170–4179. [Google Scholar]
  16. Roper, R.; Wolffe, E.J.; Weisberg, A.; Moss, B. The envelope protein encoded by the A33R gene is required for formation of actin-containing microvilli and efficient cell-to- cell spread of vaccinia virus. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 4192–4204. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sanderson, C.M.; Frischknecht, F.; Way, M.; Hollinshead, M.; Smith, G.L. Roles of vaccinia virus EEV-specific proteins in intracellular actin tail formation and low pH-induced cell-cell fusion. J. Gen. Virol. 1998, 79, 1415–1425. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wolffe, E.J.; Katz, E.; Weisberg, A.; Moss, B. The A34R glycoprotein gene is required for induction of specialized actin-containing microvilli and efficient cell-to-cell transmission of vaccinia virus. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 3904–3915. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wolffe, E.J.; Weisberg, A.S.; Moss, B. Role for the vaccinia virus A36R outer envelope protein in the formation of virus-tipped actin-containing microvilli and cell-to-cell virus spread. Virology 1998, 244, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
  20. Payne, L.G. Significance of extracellular virus in the in vitro and in vivo dissemination of vaccinia virus. J. Gen. Virol. 1980, 50, 89–100. [Google Scholar]
  21. Blasco, R.; Sisler, J.R.; Moss, B. Dissociation of progeny vaccinia virus from the cell membrane is regulated by a viral envelope glycoprotein: Effect of a point mutation in the lectin homology domain of the A34R gene. J. Virol. 1993, 67, 3319–3325. [Google Scholar]
  22. Katz, E.; Ward, B.M.; Weisberg, A.S.; Moss, B. Mutations in the vaccinia virus A33R and B5R envelope proteins that enhance release of extracellular virions and eliminate formation of actin-dontaining microvilli without preventing tyrosine phosphorylation of the A36R protein. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 12266–12275. [Google Scholar]
  23. White, J.M.; Delos, S.E.; Brecher, M.; Schornberg, K. Structures and mechanisms of viral membrane fusion proteins: Multiple variations on a common theme. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 43, 189–219. [Google Scholar]
  24. Armstrong, J.A.; Metz, D.H.; Young, M.R. The mode of entry of vaccinia virus into L cells. J. Gen. Virol. 1973, 21, 533–537. [Google Scholar]
  25. Carter, G.C.; Law, M.; Hollinshead, M.; Smith, G.L. Entry of the vaccinia virus intracellular mature virion and its interactions with glycosaminoglycans. J. Gen. Virol. 2005, 86, 1279–1290. [Google Scholar]
  26. Townsley, A.C.; Weisberg, A.S.; Wagenaar, T.R.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus entry into cells via a low pH-dependent-endosomal pathway. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 8899–8908. [Google Scholar]
  27. Law, M.; Carter, G.C.; Roberts, K.L.; Hollinshead, M.; Smith, G.L. Ligand-induced and non-fusogenic dissolution of a viral membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 5989–5994. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dales, S.; Siminovitch, L. The development of vaccinia virus in earle's L strain cells as examined by electron microscopy. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 1961, 10, 475–503. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dales, S.; Kajioka, R. The cycle of multiplication of vaccinia virus in earle’s strain L cells. I. Uptake and penetration. Virology 1964, 24, 278–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Townsley, A.C.; Moss, B. Two distinct low-pH steps promote entry of vaccinia virus. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 8613–8620. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bengali, Z.; Townsley, A.C.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus strain differences in cell attachment and entry. Virology 2009, 389, 132–140. [Google Scholar]
  32. Villa, N.Y.; Bartee, E.; Mohamed, M.R.; Rahman, M.M.; Barrett, J.W.; McFadden, G. Myxoma and vaccinia viruses exploit different mechanisms to enter and infect human cancer cells. Virology 2010, 401, 266–279. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chang, S.J.; Chang, Y.X.; Izmailyan, R.; Tang, Y.L.; Chang, W. Vaccinia virus A25 and A26 proteins are fusion suppressors for mature virions and determine strain-specific virus entry pathways into hela, CHO-K1, and L cells. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 8422–8432. [Google Scholar]
  34. Whitbeck, J.C.; Foo, C.-H.; Ponce de Leon, M.; Eisenberg, R.J.; Cohen, G.H. Vaccinia virus exhibits cell-type-dependent entry characteristics. Virology 2009, 385, 383–391. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, Y.; Yuan, S.; Moyer, R.W. The non-permissive infection of insect (gypsy moth) LD-652 cells by vaccinia virus. Virology 1998, 248, 74–82. [Google Scholar]
  36. Moser, T.S.; Jones, R.G.; Thompson, C.B.; Coyne, C.B.; Cherry, S. A kinome RNAi screen identified AMPK as promoting poxvirus entry through the control of actin dynamics. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000954. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bengali, Z.; Satheshkumar, P.S.; Yang, Z.; Weisberg, A.S.; Paran, N.; Moss, B. Drosophila S2 cells are non-permissive for vaccinia virus DNA replication following entry via low pH-dependent endocytosis and early transcription. PLoS One 2011, 6, e17248. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mercer, J.; Helenius, A. Vaccinia virus uses macropinocytosis and apoptotic mimicry to enter host cells. Science 2008, 320, 531–535. [Google Scholar]
  39. Huang, C.Y.; Lu, T.Y.; Bair, C.H.; Chang, Y.S.; Jwo, J.K.; Chang, W. A novel cellular protein, VPEF, facilitates vaccinia virus penetration into hela cells through fluid phase endocytosis. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 7988–7999. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mercer, J.; Knebel, S.; Schmidt, F.I.; Crouse, J.; Burkard, C.; Helenius, A. Vaccinia virus strains use distinct forms of macropinocytosis for host-cell entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9346–9351. [Google Scholar]
  41. Marsh, Y.V.; Eppstein, D.A. Vaccinia virus and the EGF receptor: A portal of entry for infectivity? J. Cell. Biochem. 1987, 34, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Eppstein, D.A.; Marsh, Y.V.; Schreiber, A.B.; Newman, S.R.; Todaro, G.J.; Nestor, J.J. Epidermal growth factor receptor occupancy inhbits vaccinia virus infection. Nature (London) 1985, 318, 550–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lalani, A.S.; Masters, J.; Zeng, W.; Barrett, J.; Pannu, R.; Everett, H.; Arendt, C.W.; McFadden, G. Use of chemokine receptors by poxviruses. Science 1999, 286, 1968–1971. [Google Scholar]
  44. Schroeder, N.; Chung, C.S.; Chen, C.H.; Liao, C.L.; Chang, W. The lipid raft-associated protein CD98 is required for vaccinia virus endocytosis. J. Virol. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sandgren, K.J.; Wilkinson, J.; Miranda-Saksena, M.; McInerney, G.M.; Byth-Wilson, K.; Robinson, P.J.; Cunningham, A.L. A differential role for macropinocytosis in mediating entry of the two forms of vaccinia virus into dendritic cells. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000866. [Google Scholar]
  46. Schmidt, F.I.; Bleck, C.K.; Helenius, A.; Mercer, J. Vaccinia extracellular virions enter cells by macropinocytosis and acid-activated membrane rupture. EMBO J. 2011, 30, 3647–3661. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ichihashi, Y.; Oie, M. The activation of vaccinia virus infectivity by the transfer of phosphatidylserine from the plasma membrane. Virology 1983, 130, 306–317. [Google Scholar]
  48. Oie, M. Reversible inactivation and reactivation of vaccinia virus by manipulation of viral lipid composition. Virology 1985, 142, 299–306. [Google Scholar]
  49. Laliberte, J.P.; Moss, B. Appraising the apoptotic mimicry model and the role of phospholipids for poxvirus entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 17517–17521. [Google Scholar]
  50. Morizono, K.; Xie, Y.; Olafsen, T.; Lee, B.; Dasgupta, A.; Wu, A.M.; Chen, I.S. The soluble serum protein gGas6 bridges virion envelope phosphatidylserine to the tam receptor tyrosine kinase axl to mediate viral entry. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 9, 286–298. [Google Scholar]
  51. Vanderplasschen, A.; Smith, G.L. A novel virus binding assay using confocal microscopy: Demonstration that intracellular and extracellular vaccinia virions bind to different cellular receptors. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 4032–4041. [Google Scholar]
  52. Chahroudi, A.; Chavan, R.; Koyzr, N.; Waller, E.K.; Silvestri, G.; Feinberg, M.B. Vaccinia virus tropism for primary hematolymphoid cells is determined by restricted expression of a unique virus receptor. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 10397–10407. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hsiao, J.C.; Chung, C.S.; Chang, W. Vaccinia virus envelope D8L protein binds to cell surface chondroitin sulfate and mediates the adsorption of intracellular mature virions to cells. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 8750–8761. [Google Scholar]
  54. Chung, C.-S.; Hsiao, J.-C.; Chang, Y.-S.; Chang, W. A27L protein mediates vaccinia virus interaction with cell surface heparin sulfate. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 1577–1585. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hsiao, J.C.; Chung, C.S.; Chang, W. Cell surface proteoglycans are necessary for A27L protein- mediated cell fusion: Identification of the N-terminal region of A27L protein as the glycosaminoglycan-binding domain. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 8374–8379. [Google Scholar]
  56. Lin, C.L.; Chung, C.S.; Heine, H.G.; Chang, W. Vaccinia virus envelope H3L protein binds to cell surface heparan sulfate and is important for intracellular mature virion morphogenesis and virus infection in vitro and in vivo. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 3353–3365. [Google Scholar]
  57. Vazquez, M.I.; Esteban, M. Identification of functional domains in the 14-kilodalton envelope protein (A27L) of vaccinia virus. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 9098–9109. [Google Scholar]
  58. Chiu, W.L.; Lin, C.L.; Yang, M.H.; Tzou, D.L.M.; Chang, W. Vaccinia virus 4c (A26L) protein on intracellular mature virus binds to the extracellular cellular matrix laminin. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 2149–2157. [Google Scholar]
  59. Rodriguez, D.; Rodriguez, J.R.; Esteban, M. The vaccinia virus 14-kilodalton fusion protein forms a stable complex with the processed protein encoded by the vaccinia virus A17L gene. J. Virol. 1993, 67, 3435–3440. [Google Scholar]
  60. Howard, A.R.; Senkevich, T.G.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus A26 and A27 proteins form a stable complex tethered to mature virions by association with the A17 transmembrane protein. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 12384–12391. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ching, Y.C.; Chung, C.S.; Huang, C.Y.; Hsia, Y.; Tang, Y.L.; Chang, W. Disulfide bond formation at the C termini of vaccinia virus A26 andA27 proteins does not require viral redox enzymes and suppresses glycosaminoglycan-mediated cell fusion. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 6464–6476. [Google Scholar]
  62. da Fonseca, F.G.; Wolffe, E.J.; Weisberg, A.; Moss, B. Effects of deletion or stringent repression of the H3L envelope gene on vaccinia virus replication. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 7518–7528. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ward, B.M. Visualization and characterization of the intracellular movement of vaccinia virus intracellular mature virions. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 4755–4763. [Google Scholar]
  64. McKelvey, T.A.; Andrews, S.C.; Miller, S.E.; Ray, C.A.; Pickup, D.J. Identification of the orthopoxvirus p4c gene, which encodes a structural protein that directs intracellular mature virus particles into A-type inclusions. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 11216–11225. [Google Scholar]
  65. Patel, D.D.; Pickup, D.J.; Joklik, W.K. Isolation of cowpox virus A-type inclusions and characterization of their major protein component. Virology 1986, 149, 174–189. [Google Scholar]
  66. Amegadzie, B.Y.; Sisler, J.R.; Moss, B. Frame-shift mutations within the vaccinia virus A-type inclusion protein gene. Virology 1992, 186, 777–782. [Google Scholar]
  67. Foo, C.H.; Lou, H.; Whitbeck, J.C.; Ponce de Leon, M.; Atanasiu, D.; Eisenberg, R.J.; Cohen, G.H. Vaccinia virus L1 binds to cell surfaces and blocks virus entry independently of glycosaminoglycans. Virology 2009, 385, 368–382. [Google Scholar]
  68. Satheshkumar, P.S.; Moss, B. Sequence-divergent chordopoxvirus homologs of the O3 protein maintain functional interactions with components of the vaccinia virus entry-fusion complex. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 1696–1705. [Google Scholar]
  69. Senkevich, T.G.; Ward, B.M.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus entry into cells is dependent on a virion surface protein encoded by the A28L gene. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 2357–2366. [Google Scholar]
  70. Townsley, A.; Senkevich, T.G.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus A21 virion membrane protein is required for cell entry and fusion. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 9458–9469. [Google Scholar]
  71. Townsley, A.; Senkevich, T.G.; Moss, B. The product of the vaccinia virus L5R gene is a fourth membrane protein encoded by all poxviruses that is requried for cell entry and cell-cell fusion. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 10988–10998. [Google Scholar]
  72. Senkevich, T.G.; Ojeda, S.; Townsley, A.; Nelson, G.E.; Moss, B. Poxvirus multiprotein entry-fusion complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 18572–18577. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ojeda, S.; Senkevich, T.G.; Moss, B. Entry of vaccinia virus and cell-cell fusion require a highly conserved cysteine-rich membrane protein encoded by the A16L gene. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 51–61. [Google Scholar]
  74. Senkevich, T.G.; Ward, B.M.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus A28L gene encodes an essential protein component of the virion membrane with intramolecular disulfide bonds formed by the viral cytoplasmic redox pathway. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 2348–2356. [Google Scholar]
  75. Turner, P.C.; Dilling, B.P.; Prins, C.; Cresawn, S.G.; Moyer, R.W.; Condit, R.C. Vaccinia virus temperature-sensitive mutants in the A28 gene produce non-infectious virions that bind to cells but are defective in entry. Virology 2007, 366, 62–72. [Google Scholar]
  76. Izmailyan, R.A.; Huang, C.Y.; Mohammad, S.; Isaacs, S.N.; Chang, W. The envelope G3L protein is essential for entry of vaccinia virus into host cells. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 8402–8410. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ojeda, S.; Domi, A.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus G9 protein is an essential component of the poxvirus entry-fusion complex. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 9822–9830. [Google Scholar]
  78. Senkevich, T.G.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus H2 protein is an essential component of a complex involved in virus entry and cell-cell fusion. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 4744–4754. [Google Scholar]
  79. Nelson, G.E.; Wagenaar, T.R.; Moss, B. A conserved sequence within the H2 subunit of the vaccinia virus entry/fusion complex is important for interaction with the A28 subunit and infectivity. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 6244–6250. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wolfe, C.L.; Ojeda, S.; Moss, B. Transcriptional repression and RNA silencing act synergistically to demonstrate the function of the eleventh component of the vaccinia virus entry-fusion complex. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 293–301. [Google Scholar]
  81. Satheshkumar, P.S.; Moss, B. Characterization of a newly identified 35 amino acid component of the vaccinia virus entry/fusion complex conserved in all chordopoxviruses. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 12822–12832. [Google Scholar]
  82. Brown, E.; Senkevich, T.G.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus F9 virion membrane protein is required for entry but not virus assembly, in contrast to the related L1 protein. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 9455–9464. [Google Scholar]
  83. Bisht, H.; Weisberg, A.S.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus L1 protein is required for cell entry and membrane fusion. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 8687–8694. [Google Scholar]
  84. Nichols, R.J.; Stanitsa, E.; Unger, B.; Traktman, P. The vaccinia I2L gene encodes a membrane protein with an essential role in virion entry. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 10247–10261. [Google Scholar]
  85. Kochan, G.; Escors, D.; Gonzalez, J.M.; Casasnovas, J.M.; Esteban, M. Membrane cell fusion activity of the vaccinia virus A17-A27 protein complex. Cell. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 1149–1164. [Google Scholar]
  86. Rodríguez, D.; Esteban, M.; Rodríguez, J.R. Vaccinia virus A17L gene product is essential for an early step in virion morphogenesis. J. Virol. 1995, 69, 4640–4648. [Google Scholar]
  87. Wolffe, E.J.; Moore, D.M.; Peters, P.J.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus A17L open reading frame encodes an essential component of nascent viral membranes that is required to initiate morphogenesis. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 2797–2808. [Google Scholar]
  88. Wagenaar, T.R.; Ojeda, S.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus A56/K2 fusion regulatory protein interacts with the A16 and G9 subunits of the entry fusion complex. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 5153–5160. [Google Scholar]
  89. Wolfe, C.L.; Moss, B. Interaction between the G3 and L5 proteins of the vaccinia virus entry-fusion complex. Virology 2011, 412, 278–283. [Google Scholar]
  90. Senkevich, T.G.; White, C.L.; Koonin, E.V.; Moss, B. Complete pathway for protein disulfide bond formation encoded by poxviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 6667–6672. [Google Scholar]
  91. Ryser, H.J.; Levy, E.M.; Mandel, R.; DiSciullo, G.J. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus infection by agents that interfere with thiol-disulfide interchange upon virus-receptor interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 4559–4563. [Google Scholar]
  92. Markovic, I.; Stantchev, T.S.; Fields, K.H.; Tiffany, L.J.; Tomic, M.; Weiss, C.D.; Broder, C.C.; Strebel, K.; Clouse, K.A. Thiol/disulfide exchange is a pre-requisite for CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 envelope-mediated T-cell fusion during viral entry. Blood 2004, 103, 1586–1594. [Google Scholar]
  93. Wallin, M.; Ekstrom, M.; Garoff, H. The fusion-controlling disulfide bond isomerase in retrovirus Env is triggered by protein destabilization. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 1678–1685. [Google Scholar]
  94. Jain, S.; McGinnes, L.W.; Morrison, T.G. Thiol/disulfide exchange is required for membrane fusion directed by the newcastle disease virus fusion protein. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 2328–2339. [Google Scholar]
  95. Nelson, G.E.; Sisler, J.R.; Chandran, D.; Moss, B. Vaccinia virus entry/fusion complex subunit A28 is a target of neutralizing and protective antibodies. Virology 2008, 380, 394–401. [Google Scholar]
  96. Shinoda, K.; Wyatt, L.S.; Moss, B. The neutralizing antibody response to the vaccinia virus A28 protein is specifically enhanced by its association with the H2 protein. Virology 2010, 405, 41–49. [Google Scholar]
  97. Wolffe, E.J.; Vijaya, S.; Moss, B. A myristylated membrane protein encoded by the vaccinia virus L1R open reading frame is the target of potent neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. Virology 1995, 211, 53–63. [Google Scholar]
  98. Ichihashi, Y.; Oie, M. Neutralizing epitopes on penetration protein of vaccinia virus. Virology 1996, 220, 491–494. [Google Scholar]
  99. Franke, C.A.; Wilson, E.M.; Hruby, M.D. Use of a cell-free system to identify the vaccinia virus L1R gene product as the major late myristylated virion protein M25. J. Virol. 1990, 64, 5988–5996. [Google Scholar]
  100. Ravanello, M.P.; Hruby, D.E. Characterization of the vaccinia virus L1R myristylprotein as a component of the intracellular virion envelope. J. Gen. Virol. 1994, 75, 1479–1483. [Google Scholar]
  101. Aldaz-Carroll, L.; Whitbeck, J.C.; Ponce de Leon, M.; Lou, H.; Pannell, L.K.; Lebowitz, J.; Fogg, C.; White, C.; Moss, B.; Cohen, G.H.; et al. Physical and immunological characterization of a recombinant secreted form of the membrane protein encoded by the vaccinia virus L1R gene. Virology 2005, 341, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ravanello, M.P.; Hruby, D.E. Conditional lethal expression of the vaccinia virus L1R myristylated protein reveals a role in virus assembly. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 6401–6410. [Google Scholar]
  103. Bisht, H.; Brown, E.; Moss, B. Kinetics and intracellular location of intramolecular disulfide bond formation mediated by the cytoplasmic redox system encoded by vaccinia virus. Virology 2010, 398, 187–193. [Google Scholar]
  104. Foo, C.H.; Whitbeck, J.C.; Ponce de Leon, M.; Saw, W.T.; Cohen, G.H.; Eisenberg, R.J. The myristate moiety and amino-terminus of the vaccinia virus L1 constitute a bipartite functional region needed for entry. J. Virol. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Su, H.P.; Garman, S.C.; Allison, T.J.; Fogg, C.; Moss, B.; Garboczi, D.N. The 1.51-Å structure of the poxvirus L1 protein, a target of potent neutralizing antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 4240–4245. [Google Scholar]
  106. Su, H.P.; Golden, J.W.; Gittis, A.G.; Hooper, J.W.; Garboczi, D.N. Structural basis for the binding of the neutralizing antibody, 7D11, to the poxvirus L1 protein. Virology 2007, 368, 331–341. [Google Scholar]
  107. Doms, R.W.; Blumenthal, R.; Moss, B. Fusion of intra- and extracellular forms of vaccinia virus with the cell membrane. J. Virol. 1990, 64, 4884–4892. [Google Scholar]
  108. Laliberte, J.P.; Weisberg, A.S.; Moss, B. The membrane fusion step of vaccinia virus entry is cooperatively mediated by multiple viral proteins and host cell components. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002446. [Google Scholar]
  109. Locker, J.K.; Kuehn, A.; Schleich, S.; Rutter, G.; Hohenberg, H.; Wepf, R.; Griffiths, G. Entry of the two infectious forms of vaccinia virus at the plasma membrane is signaling-dependent for the IMV but not the EEV. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11, 2497–2511. [Google Scholar]
  110. Zheng, Q.A.; Chang, D.C. Reorganization of cytoplasmic structures during cell fusion. J. Cell Sci. 1991, 100, 431–442. [Google Scholar]
  111. Eitzen, G. Actin remodeling to facilitate membrane fusion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1641, 175–181. [Google Scholar]
  112. Massarwa, R.; Carmon, S.; Shilo, B.Z.; Schejter, E.D. WIP/WASp-based actin-polymerization machinery is essential for myoblast fusion in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 2007, 12, 557–569. [Google Scholar]
  113. Kallewaard, N.L.; Bowen, A.L.; Crowe, J.E., Jr. Cooperativity of actin and microtubule elements during replication of respiratory syncytial virus. Virology 2005, 331, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
  114. Gower, T.L.; Pastey, M.K.; Peeples, M.E.; Collins, P.L.; McCurdy, L.H.; Hart, T.K.; Guth, A.; Johnson, T.R.; Graham, B.S. RhoA signaling is required for respiratory syncytial virus-induced syncytium formation and filamentous virion morphology. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 5326–5336. [Google Scholar]
  115. Pontow, S.E.; Heyden, N.V.; Wei, S.; Ratner, L. Actin cytoskeletal reorganizations and coreceptor-mediated activation of rac during human immunodeficiency virus-induced cell fusion. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 7138–7147. [Google Scholar]
  116. Schowalter, R.M.; Wurth, M.A.; Aguilar, H.C.; Lee, B.; Moncman, C.L.; McCann, R.O.; Dutch, R.E. Rho GTPase activity modulates paramyxovirus fusion protein-mediated cell-cell fusion. Virology 2006, 350, 323–334. [Google Scholar]
  117. Stantchev, T.S.; Markovic, I.; Telford, W.G.; Clouse, K.A.; Broder, C.C. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein blocks HIV-1 infection in primary human macrophages. Virus Res. 2007, 123, 178–189. [Google Scholar]
  118. Harmon, B.; Ratner, L. Induction of the Gαq signaling cascade by the human immunodeficiency virus envelope is required for virus entry. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 9191–9205. [Google Scholar]
  119. Harmon, B.; Campbell, N.; Ratner, L. Role of Abl kinase and the Wave2 signaling complex in HIV-1 entry at a post-hemifusion step. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000956. [Google Scholar]
  120. Miyauchi, K.; Kim, Y.; Latinovic, O.; Morozov, V.; Melikyan, G.B. HIV enters cells via endocytosis and dynamin-dependent fusion with endosomes. Cell 2009, 137, 433–444. [Google Scholar]
  121. Ichihashi, Y.; Dales, S. Biogenesis of poxviruses: Interrelationship between hemagglutinin production and polykaryocytosis. Virology 1971, 46, 533–543. [Google Scholar]
  122. Turner, P.C.; Moyer, R.W. An orthopoxvirus serpin-like gene controls the ability of infected cells to fuse. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 2076–2085. [Google Scholar]
  123. Law, K.M.; Smith, G.L. A vaccinia serine protease inhibitor which prevents virus-induced cell fusion. J. Gen. Virol. 1992, 73, 549–557. [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhou, J.; Sun, X.Y.; Fernando, G.J.P.; Frazer, I.H. The vaccinia virus K2L gene encodes a serine protease inhibitor which inhibits cell-cell fusion. Virology 1992, 189, 678–686. [Google Scholar]
  125. Wagenaar, T.R.; Moss, B. Association of vaccinia virus fusion regulatory proteins with the multicomponent entry/fusion complex. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 6286–6293. [Google Scholar]
  126. Turner, P.C.; Moyer, R.W. The cowpox virus fusion regulator proteins SPI-3 and hemagglutinin interact in infected and uninfected cells. Virology 2006, 347, 88–99. [Google Scholar]
  127. Wagenaar, T.R.; Moss, B. Expression of the A56 and K2 proteins is sufficient to inhibit vaccinia virus entry and cell fusion. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 1546–1554. [Google Scholar]
  128. Gong, S.C.; Lai, C.F.; Esteban, M. Vaccinia virus induces cell fusion at acid pH and this activity is mediated by the N-terminus of the 14-kDa virus envelope protein. Virology 1990, 178, 81–91. [Google Scholar]
  129. Blasco, R.; Moss, B. Extracellular vaccinia virus formation and cell-to-cell virus transmission are prevented by deletion of the gene encoding the 37,000 dalton outer envelope protein. J. Virol. 1991, 65, 5910–5920. [Google Scholar]
  130. Vanderplasschen, A.; Hollinshead, M.; Smith, G.L. Intracellular and extracellular vaccinia virions enter cells by different mechanisms. J. Gen. Virol. 1998, 79, 877–887. [Google Scholar]
  131. Chang, S.J.; Shih, A.C.; Tang, Y.L.; Chang, W. Vaccinia mature virus fusion regulator A26 protein binds to A16 and G9 proteins of the viral entry fusion complex and dissociates from mature virions at low pH. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 3809–3818. [Google Scholar]
  132. Joklik, W.K. The intracellular uncoating of poxvirus DNA. I. The fate of radioactively-labeled rabbitpox virus. J. Mol. Biol. 1964, 8, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Moss, B.; Rosenblum, E.N.; Grimley, P.M. Assembly of virus particles during mixed infection with wild-type vaccinia and a refampicin-resistant mutant. Virology 1971, 45, 135–148. [Google Scholar]
  134. Christen, L.; Seto, J.; Niles, E.G. Superinfection exclusion of vaccinia virus in virus-infected cell cultures. Virology 1990, 174, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  135. Turner, P.C.; Moyer, R.W. The vaccinia virus fusion inhibitor proteins SPI-3 (K2) and HA (A56) expressed by infected cells reduce the entry of superinfecting virus. Virology 2008, 380, 226–233. [Google Scholar]
  136. Doceul, V.; Hollinshead, M.; van der Linden, L.; Smith, G.L. Repulsion of superinfecting virions: A mechanism for rapid virus spread. Science 2010, 327, 873–876. [Google Scholar]
  137. Schmidt, F.I.; Bleck, C.K.; Mercer, J. Poxvirus host cell entry. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2012, 2, 20–27. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moss, B. Poxvirus Cell Entry: How Many Proteins Does it Take? Viruses 2012, 4, 688-707. https://doi.org/10.3390/v4050688

AMA Style

Moss B. Poxvirus Cell Entry: How Many Proteins Does it Take? Viruses. 2012; 4(5):688-707. https://doi.org/10.3390/v4050688

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moss, Bernard. 2012. "Poxvirus Cell Entry: How Many Proteins Does it Take?" Viruses 4, no. 5: 688-707. https://doi.org/10.3390/v4050688

APA Style

Moss, B. (2012). Poxvirus Cell Entry: How Many Proteins Does it Take? Viruses, 4(5), 688-707. https://doi.org/10.3390/v4050688

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop