Next Article in Journal
Gene Therapy Strategies to Exploit TRIM Derived Restriction Factors against HIV-1
Previous Article in Journal
Estimating Hantavirus Risk in Southern Argentina: A GIS-Based Approach Combining Human Cases and Host Distribution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Functional Characterization of a Bidirectional Plant Promoter from Cotton Leaf Curl Burewala Virus Using an Agrobacterium-Mediated Transient Assay

by
Muhammad Aleem Ashraf
*,
Ahmad Ali Shahid
,
Abdul Qayyum Rao
,
Kamran Shehzad Bajwa
and
Tayyab Husnain
Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB), University of the Punjab, Lahore 53700, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2014, 6(1), 223-242; https://doi.org/10.3390/v6010223
Submission received: 14 October 2013 / Revised: 14 December 2013 / Accepted: 24 December 2013 / Published: 14 January 2014
(This article belongs to the Section Viruses of Plants, Fungi and Protozoa)

Abstract

:
The C1 promoter expressing the AC1 gene, and V1 promoter expressing the AV1 gene are located in opposite orientations in the large intergenic region of the Cotton leaf curl Burewala virus (CLCuBuV) genome. Agro-infiltration was used to transiently express putative promoter constructs in Nicotiana tabacum and Gossypium hirsutum leaves, which was monitored by a GUS reporter gene, and revealed that the bidirectional promoter of CLCuBuV transcriptionally regulates both the AC1 and AV1 genes. The CLCuBuV C1 gene promoter showed a strong, consistent transient expression of the reporter gene (GUS) in N. tabacum and G. hirsutum leaves and exhibited GUS activity two- to three-fold higher than the CaMV 35S promoter. The CLCuBuV bidirectional genepromoter is a nearly constitutive promoter that contains basic conserved elements. Many cis-regulatory elements (CREs) were also analyzed within the bidirectional plant promoters of CLCuBuV and closely related geminiviruses, which may be helpful in understanding the transcriptional regulation of both the virus and host plant.

1. Introduction

Geminiviruses are plant pathogens with small, circular single stranded (ss) DNA genomes of 2.5–3.0 kb that are encapsidated in characteristic twin quasi-icosahedral particles. These viruses are differentiated into four genera (Topocuvirus, Curtovirus, Mastrevirus, Begomovirus) based upon genome organization, insect vector, and sequence homology [1,2]. Geminiviruses serve as a good source for regulatory elements, which can be used to drive transgene expression in plants. Promoters from Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) [3], Cotton leaf curl Multan virus (CLCuMuV) [4], and Strawberry vein banding virus (SVBV) [5] display strong and consistent constitutive expression in transgenic plants. The large intergenic region (LIR) of the DNA-A component from the monopartite begomovirus genome contains plant cis-acting DNA regulatory elements and transcription factor binding sites (TFBs) required for the control of viral gene expression and replication [6]. Sequence and functional characterization of large intergenic regions (LIR) from monopartite and common regions from bipartite geminiviruses Digitaria streak virus (DSV) [7], Tomato golden mosaic virus (TGMV) [8,9,10,11], African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) [12,13,14,15], Maize streak virus (MSV) [16], Cotton leaf curl Multan (CLCuMuV) [4], Wheat dwarf geminivirus (WDG) [17], Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV) [18], and Mungbean yellow mosaic geminivirus (MYMV) [19] revealed that this region, which is located between the 5' ends of the first complementary and virion sense open reading frames (ORFs), possesses promoter activity and is essential for the bidirectional transcription of both complementary (Rep) and virion (Cp) genes. In the case of ACMV, TGMV, CLCuMuV, and MYMIV, the LIR has much stronger promoter activity in the complementary sense than in the virion sense in the absence of transcriptional activator protein C2 [4,8,12,18,20].
Transcription of the replication associated protein (Rep) gene and coat protein (Cp) gene is governed by a bidirectional promoter that is present in the large intergenic region (LIR). Rep downregulates its own expression by binding to an iterative motif located between the TATA box and transcription start site [20]. The LIR also possesses an origin of replication (ori) for the viral genome. The stem-loop structure motif and iterated elements (8–13 nt) have been identified in the vicinity of the putative TATA box in the complementary (C1) sense promoter [21,22]. The iterated elements have been suggested to play pivotal roles in both the replication and transcriptional repression of complementary sense genes [22].
Cotton leaf curl Burewala virus (CLCuBuV) is a whitefly-transmitted monopartite begomovirus that infects cotton and has a recombinant genome composed of sequences derived from the Cotton leaf curl Multan virus (CLCuMuV) and Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus (CLCuKoV) [23,24,25]. The DNA-A component of the monopartite begomovirus genome is organized into six open reading frames (ORFs), C1 (Rep), C2 (Trap), C3, C4, V1 (CP), and V2, which are transcribed bidirectionally from the LIR [6,26,27].
In this study, Agrobacterium-mediated delivery into plants was used as a transient assay system to qualitatively, as well as quantitatively study promoter activity. The LIR sequence from the CLCuBuV genome was isolated, and CLCuBuV C1and V1 promoter activity was investigated using GUS reporter gene transient expression in plants. We found that the CLCuBuV C1 promoter had strong and consistent transient expression in plant leaves compared to the CLCuBuV V1 and CaMV 35S promoters. The present study was designed to characterize the bidirectional gene promoter of CLCuBuV to use it in recombinant DNA technology to combat the spatio-temporal expression pattern of an insecticidal gene (Cry1Ac) in transgenic cotton in the future.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Plant Material and Bacterial Strain

Seeds from a cotton (G. hirsutum) cultivar (MNH-786) were grown in composite soil (peat, sand, soil 1:1:1) in greenhouse at 25 + 2 °C. Seeds from tobacco (N. tabacum) were grown in loamy soil in a farmhouse at Chak No.59/F Hasilpur, Pakistan. After four weeks, the plants were moved greenhouse. Seeds from legumes (Mung bean, French bean, and Cow pea) were grown in Murashige and Skooge (MS) medium under a 16 h light and 8 h dark cycle at 22 °C. After one week, the older plants were subjected to transient expression. The Escherichia coli strain DH5α cells were used to clone all of the recombinant plasmid vectors. The Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 was used for the leaf and root infiltration.

2.2. Isolation of CLCuBuV Bidirectional Promoter

Based on the characterized CLCuBuV genome, 455 bp fragments from both CLCuBuV C1 and V1 were amplified from a CLCuBuV genomic plasmid using promoter-specific primer sets. These primers were designed from the LIR of the CLCuBuV genomic clone (accession number FR750318) using the Primer 3 online software version 0.4 [28]. The PCR conditions were as follows; 94 °C for 3 min followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min while the final holding temperature was 4 °C. The primer sets were as follows:
(i)
5'- CCATGGTGACTTTGGTTTAGAGACAACAAC-3' and 5'- CTGCAGTAATTCCTAGCCCTTATTACCAG-3'
(ii)
5'- CTGCAGTGACTTTGGTCAATTAGAGACAAC-3' and 5'- CCATGGTAATTCCTAGCCCTTATTACCAG-3'
The underlined sequences are the restriction enzyme sites engineered for cloning of both promoters. The contents of the 20 µL reaction PCR reaction were: 10 µL PCR master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), forward primer 1 µL (10 µM), reverse primer 1 µL (10 µM), template 0.5 µL, and 7.5 µL of PCR grade DNase/RNase-free distilled water (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The amplicons were separated on 1.5% agarose gel in Tris-Acetate-EDTA buffer, pH 8.0 and stained using ethidium bromide staining. Bands were visualized under UV on gel documentation system. The amplicons were cloned into an Invitrogen TA vector (pCR®2.1).

2.3. Plasmid Construction

The binary vector pCAMBIA1301 (Cambia, Canberra, Australia) was used in the Agrobacterium transient plant transformation experiment. The T-DNA region of pCAMBIA1301 includes a selectable marker gene construct for hygB resistance and CaMV 35S promoter upstream of the GUS reporter gene. The CaMV 35S promoter was removed by excision of the Nco I–Pst I fragment containing the 35S promoter. The CLCuBuV C1 and V1 promoters were digested from the TA vector using the Nco I–Pst I restriction enzymes and subsequently cloned into pre-digested pCAMBIA1301 at the desired sites. The resulting plasmids were named pC1GUS1301 and pV1GUS1301. The integration of the promoters in both constructs was confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion and PCR.

2.4. Sequence Analysis

The bidirectional promoter sequence was analyzed for the presence of cis-regulatory elements using the Plant Cis-Acting Regulatory Element (PlantCARE) database [29]. To identify the TFBs, we analyzed the activity of cis-elements using PLAnt Cis-acting Elements (PLACE) database [30]. The program SIGSCAN version 4.0.5 was used to search for more TFBs from the TRANScription FACtor database (TRANSFAC) database [31]. The transcription start site (TSS) was predicted using the Neural Network Promoter Prediction (NNPP) server [32]. Nucleotide sequence comparisons were performed using the CLUSTALW algorithm in the MegAlign program using the default settings in the Lasergene software from DNASTAR Inc. (Madison, WI, USA). The overrepresented CREs were identified using the MEME (Multiple EM for Motif Elicitation) tool version 4.4.0 [33]. The sequence logo was obtained from JAPSAR database [34].

2.5. Preparation of the Agrobacterium Suspension

Approximately 250 µL of the A. tumefacience strain of LBA4404 containing individual constructs was inoculated in 5 mL of YEP solution supplemented with kanamycin (50 µg/µL) and grown at 28 °C for two days while shaking at 180 rpm. Approximately 500 µL of Agrobacteria was then transferred to 50 mL of fresh YEP solution containing 10 mM MES, 20 µM acetosyringone and kanamycin at the same final concentration as above. After 24 h in culture (28 °C, 180 rpm), the Agrobacterium cells were collected by centrifugation for 10 min at 3,000 rpm and resuspended to an OD600 of 0.6–0.9 in suspension solution (MS medium supplemented with 10 mM MES and 200 mM acetosyringone) and incubated at room temperature for 2 h before Agroinfiltration.

2.6. Agrobacterium-Mediated Infiltration

Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation of the tobacco and cotton leaves was conducted in middle-sized to near fully expanded leaves that were still attached to old transplanted plant seedlings. The experiment was repeated on three individual plants with five infiltrations each. Using a 1 mL syringe, 500 µL of the bacterial suspension was infiltrated into the intercellular spaces on the abaxial side of each intact leaf. The infiltrated borders were marked with a permanent marker. The plants were placed into a phytotron and analyzed after three days. Agroinoculation was carried out in the root-hypocotyl axis region of old sprouted seeds of Cowpea, French bean and Mung bean. After 72 h, the seedlings were trimmed, washed well to remove traces of the Agrobacterium culture on the surface and used for qualitative and quantitative assays of the reporter gene GUS.

2.7. Histochemical Detection of GUS Activity

GUS activity was histochemically detected by incubating overnight at 37 °C in staining solution composed of 0.1% w/v 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-glucoronic acid (X-Gluc; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 100 mM Na2HPO4 pH 7.0, 0.01% w/v Chloramphenicol, 20% Triton X-100, 20% v/v Methanol. Chlorophyll was extracted from the photosynthetic tissues with 70% v/v ethanol. Transient GUS expression was detected microscopically by visualizing the distinct blue color that results from the enzymatic cleavage of X-Gluc. The samples were stored at 4 °C in 70% v/v ethanol.

2.8. Fluorometric Determination of GUS Activity

The infiltrated marked leaf and root areas were excised and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen plant tissue was ground into a fine powder. After grinding, 1.0 mL of extraction buffer was mixed and centrifuged for 10 min (13,000 rpm) at 4 °C. A 5 µL aliquot of supernatant was mixed with 400 µL of pre-warmed (37 °C) GUS assay solution. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C, and 1.6 µL of the stop buffer (0.2 M Na2CO3) was added after 15 min. The stop buffer and 50 nM to 1 µM of 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) was used for calibration and standardization. The relative fluorescence was measured using a TKO 100 fluorometer (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco, CA, USA) with an excitation wavelength of 360 nm and an emission wavelength of 465 nm. The detected fluorescence was expressed in relative fluorescence units (RFU) (1pM-4MU is equal to 1RFU mg−1 protein min−1). The protein concentrations were estimated by performing the Bradford assay [35]: 20 μL extract was mixed with 780 μL 1× PBS buffer and added to 200 μL dye reagent concentrate (Bio-Rad, München, Germany). Sterile water (dye reagent added) was used for reference setting and 10 mg/mL to 100 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) (dye reagent added) were used as standards. Protein concentration in the extract was determined using a standards-based calibration curve (exponential) established with Microsoft Excel.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The quantification expression data was analyzed statistically by using ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (honest significant difference) and Fisher’s LSD (least significant difference) (individual and pairwise) for completely randomized designs (CRD) by using a Statistix 8.1 software. p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Structure and Sequence Analysis

The CLCuBuV bidirectional gene promoters were isolated from the LIR of the DNA-A genomic clone from CLCuBuV, as previously characterized [25]. The complete DNA-A component of the CLCuBuV genome has been reported (Genbank accession number: FR750318 CLCuBuV-MV12). The nucleotide sequence of the CLCuBuV bidirectional gene promoter (CLCuBuV genomic coordinates 2595–292 bp) is shown in (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The 455 bp DNA sequence of the full-length transcript of the bidirectional gene promoter of the CLCuBuV coordinates from 2595–292 nucleotides in the viral genome. The putative motifs are in bold and underlined. The replication initiation site/putative stem-loop motif was composed of 35 bp consisting of ATC-motif (GGCCATCC) and GC-rich region (GGCCGCGC) around the nonanucleotide. The conserved late element (CLE) was present at position +185 was suggested to functional target for C2. The POLASIG3 motif (AATAAT) was also identified at position +242. The TATA-box for Rep promoter was found at position 65 nucleotide and TATA-box for Cp promoter was located at position 259 nucleotide in the LIR. The Box-II are predicted at position 433 in the LIR. MBS (MYB drought responsive element) was found at position 20 within the LIR. The labeling of motifs are indicated above the line. The right-side numbering shows the position of LIR in the genome.
Figure 1. The 455 bp DNA sequence of the full-length transcript of the bidirectional gene promoter of the CLCuBuV coordinates from 2595–292 nucleotides in the viral genome. The putative motifs are in bold and underlined. The replication initiation site/putative stem-loop motif was composed of 35 bp consisting of ATC-motif (GGCCATCC) and GC-rich region (GGCCGCGC) around the nonanucleotide. The conserved late element (CLE) was present at position +185 was suggested to functional target for C2. The POLASIG3 motif (AATAAT) was also identified at position +242. The TATA-box for Rep promoter was found at position 65 nucleotide and TATA-box for Cp promoter was located at position 259 nucleotide in the LIR. The Box-II are predicted at position 433 in the LIR. MBS (MYB drought responsive element) was found at position 20 within the LIR. The labeling of motifs are indicated above the line. The right-side numbering shows the position of LIR in the genome.
Viruses 06 00223 g001
The cloning of both promoters is represented in Figure 2. The bidirectional promoter sequence contains several consensus eukaryotic regulatory domains, such as TATA, GC-rich, and CAAT boxes, which are present in almost all geminivirus LIRs [21,36]. The LIR consisted of 455 bp and contained cis-acting DNA elements that are involved in begomovirus replication and transcriptional regulation, including a Rep-binding site (iterons), TATA boxes, GC boxes, and stem-loop elements that contain the conserved nonanucleotide (TAATATTAC) sequence. The TATA box is located 30 bp upstream of the transcription start site. The TATA boxes and GC-rich box have been shown to be essential for geminivirus promoter activity within the LIR. The putative CLE (TTGTGGGCCC) was suggested to be a potential functional target for C2 to trans-activate virion sense gene transcription [21,37]. The sequence comparison revealed several potential TFBs in the CLCuBuV LIR region, such as the E-box motifs (CANNTG) [38] at sites +21, +77, +220, −21, −77, and −220 and the maize DOF transcription factor recognition core sequence AAAG [39] at sites +141, +234, −4, −32, and −129. The TATA and CAAT boxes are located at +141, +234, −4, −32, and −129. The CARGCW8GAT (CWWWWWWWWG) motif, which are responsible for regulating nectory-specific gene expression, at positions +61, +256, −61, and −256. The plant polyA signal consensus sequence POLASIG3 motif (AATAAT) was also identified at position +242. Other potential plant cis-regulatory DNA elements and TFBs that were identified searching the PlantCARE and PLACE databases are listed in Table 1 and Table 2.
Figure 2. (A) Genome organization of the DNA-A component of CLCuBuV. Five ORFs are shown with the arrows. V1 and V2 (coat protein) are located on the plus strand, C1 (replication associated protein), C3 (replication enhancer protein) and C4 (unnamed) are located on the complementary sense strand. The 455 bp large intergenic region (LIR) contains the potential stem-loop with nonanucleotides conserved among all geminiviruses. Sequence numbering begins at base 8 of the conserved nonamer; (B) A schematic drawing of the CLCuBuV LIR. Shown, is the invariant loop sequence with the nonanucleotide sequence (grey box) flanked by inverted repeats (short arrows); the viral protein start sites and replication associated proteins; (C) A schematic representation of both expression vectors shows the cloning of the C1 and V1 promoters; (D) Schematic representation of important features of large intergenic region (LIR) of CLCuBuV including REP-binding sites (iterons), TATA box and structure of hair pin showing nonanucleotide (underlined). The TATA box for Rep promoter was to be present at position 2660–2664 in the genome. Two directly repeats iteron motifs AAATTC were predicted at position 2709–2715; 2715–2721 present downstream to TATA box and immediate upstream to stem-loop motif .The stem-loop motif composed of 35 bp was predicted at position 2738–15 in the CLCuBuV genome.
Figure 2. (A) Genome organization of the DNA-A component of CLCuBuV. Five ORFs are shown with the arrows. V1 and V2 (coat protein) are located on the plus strand, C1 (replication associated protein), C3 (replication enhancer protein) and C4 (unnamed) are located on the complementary sense strand. The 455 bp large intergenic region (LIR) contains the potential stem-loop with nonanucleotides conserved among all geminiviruses. Sequence numbering begins at base 8 of the conserved nonamer; (B) A schematic drawing of the CLCuBuV LIR. Shown, is the invariant loop sequence with the nonanucleotide sequence (grey box) flanked by inverted repeats (short arrows); the viral protein start sites and replication associated proteins; (C) A schematic representation of both expression vectors shows the cloning of the C1 and V1 promoters; (D) Schematic representation of important features of large intergenic region (LIR) of CLCuBuV including REP-binding sites (iterons), TATA box and structure of hair pin showing nonanucleotide (underlined). The TATA box for Rep promoter was to be present at position 2660–2664 in the genome. Two directly repeats iteron motifs AAATTC were predicted at position 2709–2715; 2715–2721 present downstream to TATA box and immediate upstream to stem-loop motif .The stem-loop motif composed of 35 bp was predicted at position 2738–15 in the CLCuBuV genome.
Viruses 06 00223 g002
Table 1. List of putative cis-regulatory elements found in the large intergenic region (LIR) of CLCuBuV.
Table 1. List of putative cis-regulatory elements found in the large intergenic region (LIR) of CLCuBuV.
No.TFBs aFunction of the motiforganismSequenceStrandPosition
1Box-ILRE bPisum sativumTTTCAAA110
TTTCAAA286
2Box-IILRESolanum tubersumTGGTAATAA+433
3Box-W1Fungal elicitor REPetroselinum crispumTTGACC7
4C-Repeat/DRECold and dehydration REArabidopsis thalianaTGGCCCGAC209
5CAAT-boxCore promoter elementsmanymany+,−many
6CGCG-boxSignal REArabidopsis thalianaACGCGC+226
GCGCGG173
7CGTCA-motifMeJA REHordeum vulgareCGTCA223
8CircadianCircadian controlLycopersicon esculentumCAANNNNATC178
9EREEthylene REDianthus caryophyllusATTTCAAA+110
10GATA-motifLREArabidopsis thalianaGATA+many
11G-boxLRETriticum aestivumTCCACATGGCA+74
12GC-motifunknownOryza sativaGCCGCGCCG+171
13GT-1motifLREAvena sativaGGTAAT161
Oryza sativaGAAAAA+290
Pisum sativumGGTAAT+435
14HSEHSE cBrassica oleraceaAGAAAACTT+380
15I-boxLREmanymany+,−many
16MBSMYB drought REArabidopsis thalianaCAACTG+20
TAACTG355
TAACTG366
17Skn-1_motifEndosperm expression REOryza sativaGTCAT222
18TATA-boxCore elements located at −30 of TSSmanymany+,−many
19TGACG-motifMeJA REHoredeum volgareTGACG+223
20W-boxLREArabidopsis thalianaTTGACC7
Both the AC1 and AV1 promoters share common promoter elements. The LIR is flanked by the Rep and virion sense genes. The nucleotide immediately preceding the Rep (C1) gene is numbered 1; a Transcriptional factor binding sites; b Light responsive elements; c Heat shock responsive elements.
Table 2. The putative transcriptional factor binding sites (TFBs) identified from the PLACE database.
Table 2. The putative transcriptional factor binding sites (TFBs) identified from the PLACE database.
TFBsPLACE IDPLACE accession IDSequenceCopy numberDescription
Cytokinin relatedARFAT(Aux RE)S000270NGATT2“ARR1-binding element” found in rice andArabidopsis;ARR1 is response regulator;N = G/A/C/T [40]
ARR1ATS000454TGTCTC5“ARF biding site” found in the promoters of primary/early response gene [41]
Auxin relatedSURECOREATSULTR11S000499GAGAC8Core of sulfur-responsive element SURE); containing ARF binding sequence GAGACA(complementary AuxRE TGTCTC)[42]
CATATGGMSAURS000370CATATG2Multiple auxin response modules in the soybean SAUR15A promoter [43]
Mesophyll-specificCACTFTPPCA1S000449YACT8Mesophyll-specific gene expression in C4 plant Flaveria trinervia [44].
Pollen-specificPOLLEN1LELAT52S000245AGAAA1Pollen-specific expression of tomato Late52 gene [45]
Root-specificROOTMOTIFTAPOX1S000098ATATT5Root-specific motifs found in the rolD promoter [46].
OSE2ROOTNODULES000468CTCTT1Nodule specificity of soybean lbc3 and N23 gene promoters [47].

3.2. Transient Expression of the Bidirectional Promoter

In the agroinfiltration of the leaves in both hosts (cotton and tobacco), the AC1 promoter construct (pRepGUS1301) revealed Gus-positive expression in vascular and mesophyll cells. The AV1 promoter construct (pCPGUS1301) showed very weak GUS transient expression. The CaMV 35S promoter also displayed high GUS activity levels. There was no difference in the pattern of expression of the AV1 and AC1 promoters at 48 and 72 h post-delivery into the plants. To quantify GUS expression, two separate leaves of N. tobacum were agroinoculated with each promoter construct in triplicate. Equivalent amounts of protein were harvested and assayed for fluorescence. The CLCuBuVC1 promoter showed higher activity when compared with the CLCuBuV V1 and CaMV 35S promoters, as shown in (Figure 3) GUS activity from each promoter construct was highly uniform in the different leaves. Transient GUS expression from all three constructs was uniform in both host plant leaves. All three constructs were GUS positive in the root hypocotyl axis of the sprouted French bean seeds. The transient expression of the CLCuBuV V1 promoter was very low compared to the CLCuBuV C1 promoter; one or two blue spots were observed microscopically in few explants. To determine whether the CLCuBuVC1 promoter was differentially expressed in other legume hosts, cow pea, and mung bean seedlings were also tested. All three constructs had similar GUS expression levels in these hosts as in the French bean seedlings as shown in (Figure 3). The statistical analysis revealed that there were significant differences (p < 0.05) for all promoters. Lowest coefficient of variance was recorded for cow pea while higher for French bean. Highest mean performance was recorded for tobacco (1,320 ± 441.99) while lowest for French bean (532.72 ± 247.45). The results indicated that CLCuBuV C1 promoter performed better as compared to other promoters in all plants while lower performance was recorded for CLCuBuV V1 promoter. The combined effects of all promoters indicated significant differences among the promoters, crops, and their attractions.
Figure 3. Transient GUS expression in plant leaves and roots agro-inoculated with the AC1 and AV1 promoter constructs from CLCuBuV (pV1GUS1301, pC1GUS1301) in comparison with positive control CaM 35S promoter (pCAMBIA1301) and a negative promoterless control (pCAMBIA1391-Z). Error bars represent standard deviation.GUS activity measured in RFU mg−1protein min−1. Each treatment was carried out in three replications.
Figure 3. Transient GUS expression in plant leaves and roots agro-inoculated with the AC1 and AV1 promoter constructs from CLCuBuV (pV1GUS1301, pC1GUS1301) in comparison with positive control CaM 35S promoter (pCAMBIA1301) and a negative promoterless control (pCAMBIA1391-Z). Error bars represent standard deviation.GUS activity measured in RFU mg−1protein min−1. Each treatment was carried out in three replications.
Viruses 06 00223 g003

3.3. Nucleotide Sequence Comparison of the CLCuBuV LIR

The 455 bp LIR sequence of CLCuBuV acts as a bidirectional promoter and is homologous to the LIRs from several other CLCuV isolates. The CLCuBuV LIR showed 81%–82% nucleotide sequence identity with the LIR from CLCukoV, CLCuMuV, and Cotton leaf curl Shahdadpur virus (CLCuShV) but only 32% and 65.7% sequence identity with the LIRs from Cotton leaf curl Gezira virus (CLCuGeV) and Cotton leaf curl Alabad virus (CLCuAV), respectively. The nucleotide sequence identities of the CLCuBuV LIR with other begomoviruses are listed in (Table 3). The transcription start site was predicted to be 30 bp downstream of the consensus TATA box. This is consistent with the PlantCARE database results, which indicate that the consensus TATA box is located at the −30 site of TSS, as listed in Table 1. These results are in agreement with a previous study involving the transcript mapping of CLCuBuV [48]. The A+T content of the CLCuBuV LIR is approximately 60%. The CLCuBuV bidirectional gene promoter showed 70% nucleotide sequence identity with the WDG [17].
Table 3. Nucleotide sequence comparison of the LIR from CLCuBuV with other closely related geminivirus LIRs.
Table 3. Nucleotide sequence comparison of the LIR from CLCuBuV with other closely related geminivirus LIRs.
NoVirus Acronym% identity aLIR size (bp)Accession IDs
1CLCuBuV100455FR837932
2CLCuMuV81.8440AJ496287
3CLCuKoV81.6447AJ496286
4CLCuShV81.9447FN552004
5HYVMV77.4437FR772082
6CLCuBaV76.4444NC_007290
7MaYVCMV73.6440FR715681
8PaLCuV70.1478FM955602
9AEV69.9445AM698011
10CYVMV69.8451FN645926
11ToLCPKV68.1456AM948961
12ChiLCMuV68.7450FM149613
13SiLCV66.9447DQ641706
14CLCuAaV65.2434AJ002452
15CLCuRaV64.6444JF502364
16CLCuGeV-PK32.7453FR751142
17CLCuGeV-SD32.6451AY036007
a % identity with CLCuBuV LIR.

3.4. Enriched Regulatory Elements in the Geminivirus Bidirectional Promoters

Transgene expression is regulated by the interaction of transcription factors and target cis-regulatory elements in the promoters. The identification of potential regulatory elements acting in the geminivirus bidirectional promoters can be a useful tool to understand the regulatory network. We scanned enriched cis-acting regulatory DNA elements in the bidirectional promoters of CLCuBuV and closely related geminiviruses to determine possible functions. We first analyzed known plant regulatory elements in these promoter sequences using PLACE collection. We used CREs within the LIR of CLCuBuV and other geminivirus to compare different sequences. The names of 21 broadly distributed CREs and their occurrence in each promoter sequence are shown in Figure 4.
The ranking of these 21 CREs with total occurrence are shown in Figure 5A. The distribution and occurrence of the CREs in the bidirectional promoter of CLCuBuV is shown in Figure 5B. Several enriched PLACE motifs are universal or structural CREs that are similar to geminivirus bidirectional promoters, such as TATABOX5 [49], POLASIG1, and POLASIG3 [50,51]. Many CREs are environmental responsive motifs, such as MYCCONSENSUSAT for cold [52,53], WRKY71OS for gibberellins and pathogenesis [54,55], IBOXCORE for lights [56,57], MYBCORE for water stress [58], and GT1GMSCAM4 for pathogens and salt [59]. To complement the searches for possible motifs that have a statistically overrepresented frequency in the LIR, we computationally analyzed the closely related promoters using MEME. As a result, six motifs were found enriched within the twelve promoters (Figure 6).
Figure 4. Occurrence of 21 enriched cis-acting regulatory DNA elements distributed in the 12 bidirectional geminivirus promoters.
Figure 4. Occurrence of 21 enriched cis-acting regulatory DNA elements distributed in the 12 bidirectional geminivirus promoters.
Viruses 06 00223 g004
Figure 5. (A) Occurrence of the top 21 CREs with a total occurrence in 12 promoters; (B) Occurrence of 32 CREs distributed in the CLCuBuV bidirectional promoter.
Figure 5. (A) Occurrence of the top 21 CREs with a total occurrence in 12 promoters; (B) Occurrence of 32 CREs distributed in the CLCuBuV bidirectional promoter.
Viruses 06 00223 g005
Figure 6. Overrepresented sequences in the bidirectional promoters of geminiviruses used in this study. Letters abbreviating the nucleotides (A, C, G, T) in the images are sized to their relative occurrence. (A) MNB1A motif (MA0053.1) p-value 3.1e-075 belongs to Zinc-coordinating class and Dof family; (B) HAP4 motif (MA0315.1) p-value 4.2e-027; (C) HAP5 motif (MA0316.1) p-value 7.33e-05; (D) NFYA motif (MA0060.1) p-value 5.3e-06; (E) PBF motif (MA0064.1) p-value 1.4e-017 belongs to Zinc-coordinating class and Dof family; (F) HAP3 motif (MA 00314.1) p-value 1.2e-07. All HAP motifs belong to Alpha Helix class and NFY CCAAT-binding family.
Figure 6. Overrepresented sequences in the bidirectional promoters of geminiviruses used in this study. Letters abbreviating the nucleotides (A, C, G, T) in the images are sized to their relative occurrence. (A) MNB1A motif (MA0053.1) p-value 3.1e-075 belongs to Zinc-coordinating class and Dof family; (B) HAP4 motif (MA0315.1) p-value 4.2e-027; (C) HAP5 motif (MA0316.1) p-value 7.33e-05; (D) NFYA motif (MA0060.1) p-value 5.3e-06; (E) PBF motif (MA0064.1) p-value 1.4e-017 belongs to Zinc-coordinating class and Dof family; (F) HAP3 motif (MA 00314.1) p-value 1.2e-07. All HAP motifs belong to Alpha Helix class and NFY CCAAT-binding family.
Viruses 06 00223 g006

3.5. Identification of TFBs that Bind to the Promoters of ds-DNA Animal Viruses

The TFBs in various organisms were searched for in the databases to determine more regulatory elements in the large intergenic region of CLCuBuV. Apart from the sites for TFs that bind to promoter elements, more than 40 TFBs were identified in plants, mammals and yeast. The binding sites of TFs that bind to the promoters of certain ds-DNA animal viruses were also found, such as CRF and NF-1, which bind to the E2 late promoter [60] and early gene (E1A) [61], respectively, of adenoviruses; Cx and NF-Y, which bind to immediate early gene-3 (IE-3) [62] and thymidine kinase [63], respectively, of herpes simplex virus (HSV-1); and T-Ag that binds to Polyoma viruses [64].

4. Discussion

Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation has been used to analyze foreign gene expression [65,66,67,68], gene silencing [69,70], and gene interactions [71,72,73]. More recently, the Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression assay has been demonstrated to be a simple and efficient method for the quantitative analysis of plant promoter and cis-element/trans-factor interactions in vivo [74]. In a previous study, our group has characterized the cotton universal stress protein promoter and cotton heat shock protein promoter in response to abiotic stresses in tobacco using the Agrobacterium-mediated transient assay [75,76]. We utilized six-week old tobacco leaves for agro-infiltration because of the excellent transformation efficiency and minimization of assay variation [74].
In this study, the LIR sequence of the DNA-A component of the CLCuBuV genome was isolated and analyzed. In the transient expression assay with tobacco and cotton leaves, the CLCuBuV C1 promoter displayed strong GUS activity, while the CLCuBuV V1 promoter displayed weak activity in the absence of the C2 (Trap) gene product. CLCuBuV lacks the transcriptional activator protein C2 (Trap) [23,25]. The GUS quantitative assay revealed that CLCuBuV C1 promoter activity was two- to three-fold higher than the CaMV 35S promoter, while the activity of CLCuBuV V1 was three- to four-fold lower than the CaMV 35S promoter. It has been reported that virion sense promoters need trans-activator AC2/C2 [77,78]. The superiority of the C1/AC1 promoter compared to the V1/AV1 promoter in the absence of transcriptional activator protein C2 (Trap) was also reported in ACMV [12], wheat dwarf virus (WDV) [79], CLCuMuV [4], and MYMIY [18]. We have previously characterized the DNA-A component of the CLCuBuV genome and phylogenetically analyzed the LIR, which displayed homology with the LIRs from CLCuKoV and CLCuMuV [25]. The transient GUS expression analysis of CLCuBuV C1 and V1 in this study is consistent with the CLCuMuV C1 promoter, which displayed four- to five-fold higher GUS activity than the CaMV 35S promoter in transgenic tobacco plants [4]. Similar to other geminiviruses, CLCuBuV produces multiple overlapping polycistronic RNA species that diverge from the LIR, confirming a bidirectional transcriptional strategy. The TATA and CAAT boxes are located approximately 30 bp from the transcription initiation site (TIS), which is consistent with a previous study involving the long complementary sense transcript mapping of CLCuBuV [48]. This previous study suggested that CLCuBuV uses a bicistronic transcription strategy to translate C2 and REn (replication enhancer protein) from a single transcript [48,80]. The homologous regulatory modules responsive to light, heat, wounds, hormones, and salicylic acid that have been identified in different monocots and dicots were found in the bidirectional promoter of CLCuBuV. The transcription regulation of geminiviruses share many common features with papavoviruses and adenoviruses. In that context the presence of TF binding sites in the CLCuBuV bidirectional promoter that are also found in adenoviruses and papavoviruses gain significance. Though hundreds of begomoviruses have been cloned and sequenced, analysis of promoters had been carried out for only few begomoviruses. The information that we have generated on the bidirectional promoter of CLCuBuV, a very distinct newly emerged Old World begomovirus would help in further elucidating transcription regulation in begomoviruses. The expression of RNAi construct (hairpin) of LIR of CLCuBuV to control Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) and expression of an insecticidal gene (Cry1Ac) under the CLCuBuV C1 promoter in transgenic cotton are in progress.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have computationally characterized the bidirectional gene promoter from CLCuBuV and 11 other closely related geminiviruses that specifically drive gene expression. These findings provide important tools for transgene expression studies and crop breeding. Particularly, of the promoters studied, CLCuBuV C1 is a prime candidate for high gene expression, which is desired in green tissues, using recombinant DNA technology.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by (i) Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan under the “Indigenous 5000 PhD Fellowship Program (Batch-IV)” and (ii) ICARDA PAK-USDA project ID-1198. The acknowledgements are also due to Muhammad Ashraf Saeed from Chak No.59/F-Hasilpur for providing tobacco seedlings, to Muhammad Shahzad Latif (CEMB) for assistance in statistical analysis and to Azeem Mehmood Butt (CEMB) for assistance in manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References and Notes

  1. Fauquet, C.; Briddon, R.; Brown, J.; Moriones, E.; Stanley, J.; Zerbini, M.; Zhou, X. Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature. Arch. Virol. 2008, 153, 783–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stanley, J.B.D.M.; Briddon, R.W.; Brown, J.K.; Fauquet, C.M. Geminiviridae. In Virus Taxonomy, Viith Report of the Ictv; Fauquet, C.M., Mayo, M.A., Maniloff, J., Desselberger, U., Ball, L.A., Eds.; Elsevier/Academic Press: London, UK, 2005; pp. 301–326. [Google Scholar]
  3. Odell, J.T.; Nagy, F.; Chua, N.-H. Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35s promoter. Nature 1985, 313, 810–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xie, Y.; Liu, Y.; Meng, M.; Chen, L.; Zhu, Z. Isolation and identification of a super strong plant promoter from cotton leaf curl multan virus. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 53, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pattanaik, S.; Dey, N.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Maiti, I.B. Isolation of full-length transcript promoter from the strawberry vein banding virus (SVBV) and expression analysis by protoplasts transient assays and in transgenic plants. Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 427–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hanley-Bowdoin, L.; Settlage, S.B.; Orozco, B.M.; Nagar, S.; Robertson, D. Geminiviruses: Models for plant DNA replication, transcription, and cell cycle regulation. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1999, 18, 71–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Accotto, G.P.; Donson, J.; Mullineaux, P. Mapping of digitaria streak virus transcripts reveals different RNA species from the same transcription unit. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar]
  8. Petty, I.; Coutts, R.; Buck, K. Transcriptional mapping of the coat protein gene of tomato golden mosaic virus. J. Gen. Virol. 1988, 69, 1359–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sunter, G.; Bisaro, D.M. Transcription map of the B genome component of tomato golden mosaic virus and comparison with a component transcripts. Virology 1989, 173, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sunter, G.; Hartitz, M.D.; Bisaro, D.M. Tomato golden mosaic virus leftward gene expression: Autoregulation of geminivirus replication protein. Virology 1993, 195, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sunter, G.; Bisaro, D.M. Identification of a minimal sequence required for activation of the tomato golden mosaic virus coat protein promoter in protoplasts. Virology 2003, 305, 452–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhan, X.; Haley, A.; Richardson, K.; Morris, B. Analysis of the potential promoter sequences of african cassava mosaic virus by transient expression of the beta-glucuronidase gene. J. Gen. Virol. 1991, 72, 2849–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Haley, A.; Zhan, X.; Richardson, K.; Head, K.; Morris, B. Regulation of the activities of African cassava mosaic virus promoters by the AC1, AC2, and AC3 gene products. Virology 1992, 188, 905–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hong, Y.; Stanley, J. Regulation of African cassava mosaic virus complementary-sense gene expression by N-terminal sequences of the replication-associated protein AC1. J. Gen. Virol. 1995, 76, 2415–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Frey, P.M.; Schärer-Hernández, N.G.; Fütterer, J.; Potrykus, I.; Puonti-Kaerlas, J. Simultaneous analysis of the bidirectional African cassava mosaic virus promoter activity using two different luciferase genes. Virus Genes 2001, 22, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fenoll, C.; Black, D.M.; Howell, S.H. The intergenic region of maize streak virus contains promoter elements involved in rightward transcription of the viral genome. EMBO J. 1988, 7, 1589–1596. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dinant, S.; Ripoll, C.; Pieper, M.; David, C. Phloem specific expression driven by wheat dwarf geminivirus V-sense promoter in transgenic dicotyledonous species. Physiol. Plant. 2004, 121, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Usharani, K.; Periasamy, M.; Malathi, V. Studies on the activity of a bidirectional promoter of Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus by agroinfiltration. Virus Res. 2006, 119, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sunitha, S.; Mahajan, N.; Veluthambi, K. The TrAP/REn monodirectional promoter of Mungbean yellow mosaic geminivirus (MYMV) displays root-specific expression in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell 2012, 109, 535–545. [Google Scholar]
  20. Eagle, P.A.; Hanley-Bowdoin, L. cis Elements that contribute to geminivirus transcriptional regulation and the efficiency of DNA replication. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 6947–6955. [Google Scholar]
  21. Argüello-Astorga, G.; Guevara-Gonzalez, R.; Herrera-Estrella, L.; Rivera-Bustamante, R. Geminivirus replication origins have a group-specific organization of iterative elements: A model for replication. Virology 1994, 203, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Eagle, P.A.; Orozco, B.M.; Hanley-Bowdoin, L. A DNA sequence required for geminivirus replication also mediates transcriptional regulation. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 1157–1170. [Google Scholar]
  23. Amrao, L.; Amin, I.; Shahid, M.S.; Briddon, R.W.; Mansoor, S. Cotton leaf curl disease in resistant cotton is associated with a single begomovirus that lacks an intact transcriptional activator protein. Virus Res. 2010, 152, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nawaz-ul-Rehman, M.S.; Briddon, R.W.; Fauquet, C.M. A melting pot of old world begomoviruses and their satellites infecting a collection of Gossypium species in Pakistan. PLoS One 2012, 7, e40050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ashraf, M.A.; Shahid, A.A.; Mohamed, B.B.; Dahab, A.A.; Bajwa, K.S.; Rao, A.Q.; Khan, M.A.U.; Ilyas, M.; Haider, M.S.; Husnain, T. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of a variant of highly infectious cotton leaf curl Burewala virus associated with CLCuD from Pakistan. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2013, 7, 1113–1122. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mullineaux, P.M.; Rigden, J.E.; Dry, I.B.; Krake, L.R.; Rezaian, M.A. Mapping of the polycistronic RNAs of tomato leaf curl geminivirus. Virology 1993, 193, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dry, I.; Krake, L.; Mullineaux, P.; Rezaian, A. Regulation of tomato leaf curl viral gene expression in host tissues. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2000, 13, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Untergasser, A.; Cutcutache, I.; Koressaar, T.; Ye, J.; Faircloth, B.C.; Remm, M.; Rozen, S.G. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. Plantcare, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Higo, K.; Ugawa, Y.; Iwamoto, M.; Korenaga, T. Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (place) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wingender, E.; Dietze, P.; Karas, H.; Knüppel, R. Transfac: A database on transcription factors and their DNA binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996, 24, 238–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reese, M.G. Application of a time-delay neural network to promoter annotation in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Comput. Chem. 2001, 26, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. Meme suite: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Portales-Casamar, E.; Thongjuea, S.; Kwon, A.T.; Arenillas, D.; Zhao, X.; Valen, E.; Yusuf, D.; Lenhard, B.; Wasserman, W.W.; Sandelin, A. Jaspar 2010: The greatly expanded open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, D105–D110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fenoll, C.; Schwarz, J.J.; Black, D.M.; Schneider, M.; Howell, S.H. The intergenic region of maize streak virus contains a GC-rich element that activates rightward transcription and binds maize nuclear factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 1990, 15, 865–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ruiz-Medrano, R.; Guevara-Gonzalez, R.; Argüello-Astorga, G.; Monsalve-Fonnegra, Z.; Herrera-Estrella, L.; Rivera-Bustamante, R. Identification of a sequence element involved in AC2-mediated transactivation of the pepper huasteco virus coat protein gene. Virology 1999, 253, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schwarz, J.J.; Chakraborty, T.; Martin, J.; Zhou, J.; Olson, E.N. The basic region of myogenin cooperates with two transcription activation domains to induce muscle-specific transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992, 12, 266–275. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yanagisawa, S.; Schmidt, R.J. Diversity and similarity among recognition sequences of Dof transcription factors. Plant J. 1999, 17, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ross, E.J.; Stone, J.M.; Elowsky, C.G.; Arredondo-Peter, R.; Klucas, R.V.; Sarath, G. Activation of the Oryza sativa non-symbiotic haemoglobin-2 promoter by the cytokinin-regulated transcription factor, arr1. J. Exp. Botany 2004, 55, 1721–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Goda, H.; Sawa, S.; Asami, T.; Fujioka, S.; Shimada, Y.; Yoshida, S. Comprehensive comparison of auxin-regulated and brassinosteroid-regulated genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1555–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maruyama‐Nakashita, A.; Nakamura, Y.; Watanabe‐Takahashi, A.; Inoue, E.; Yamaya, T.; Takahashi, H. Identification of a novel cis-acting element conferring sulfur deficiency response in Arabidopsis roots. Plant. J. 2005, 42, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, N.; Hagen, G.; Guilfoyle, T. Multiple auxin response modules in the soybean SAUR 15A promoter. Plant Sci. 1997, 126, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gowik, U.; Burscheidt, J.; Akyildiz, M.; Schlue, U.; Koczor, M.; Streubel, M.; Westhoff, P. cis-Regulatory elements for mesophyll-specific gene expression in the C4 plant Flaveria trinervia, the promoter of the C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase gene. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1077–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Filichkin, S.A.; Leonard, J.M.; Monteros, A.; Liu, P.-P.; Nonogaki, H. A novel endo-β-mannanase gene in tomato LeMAN5 is associated with anther and pollen development. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Elmayan, T.; Tepfer, M. Evaluation in tobacco of the organ specificity and strength of therold promoter, domain a of the 35S promoter and the 35S2 promoter. Transgenic Res. 1995, 4, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Stougaard, J.; Jørgensen, J.-E.; Christensen, T.; Kühle, A.; Marcker, K.A. Interdependence and nodule specificity of cis-acting regulatory elements in the soybean leghemoglobin lbc 3 and N23 gene promoters. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1990, 220, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Akbar, F.; Briddon, R.W.; Vazquez, F.; Saeed, M. Transcript mapping of cotton leaf curl burewala virus and its cognate betasatellite, cotton leaf curl multan betasatellite. Virol. J. 2012, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tjaden, G.; Edwards, J.W.; Coruzzi, G.M. cis Elements and trans-acting factors affecting regulation of a nonphotosynthetic light-regulated gene for chloroplast glutamine synthetase. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 1109–1117. [Google Scholar]
  50. Joshi, C.P. Putative polyadenylation signals in nuclear genes of higher plants: A compilation and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15, 9627–9640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. O’Neill, S.D.; Kumagai, M.H.; Majumdar, A.; Huang, N.; Sutliff, T.D.; Rodriguez, R.L. The α-amylase genes in Oryza sativa: Characterization of cDNA clones and mRNA expression during seed germination. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1990, 221, 235–244. [Google Scholar]
  52. Abe, H.; Urao, T.; Ito, T.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hartmann, U.; Sagasser, M.; Mehrtens, F.; Stracke, R.; Weisshaar, B. Differential combinatorial interactions of cis-acting elements recognized by R2R3-MYB, BZIP, and bHLH factors control light-responsive and tissue-specific activation of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 57, 155–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Schmelzer, E.; Hahlbrock, K.; Somssich, I.E. Early nuclear events in plant defence signalling: Rapid gene activation by WRKY transcription factors. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 4689–4699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, Z.-L.; Xie, Z.; Zou, X.; Casaretto, J.; Ho, T.-h.D.; Shen, Q.J. A rice WRKY gene encodes a transcriptional repressor of the gibberellin signaling pathway in aleurone cells. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1500–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bovy, A.; van den Berg, C.; de Vrieze, G.; Thompson, W.F.; Weisbeek, P.; Smeekens, S. Light-regulated expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana ferredoxin gene requires sequences upstream and downstream of the transcription initiation site. Plant Mol. Biol. 1995, 27, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Simpson, S.D.; Nakashima, K.; Narusaka, Y.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi‐Shinozaki, K. Two different novel cis-acting elements of erd1, a clpA homologous Arabidopsis gene function in induction by dehydration stress and dark-induced senescence. Plant J. 2003, 33, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Urao, T.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Urao, S.; Shinozaki, K. An Arabidopsis MYB homolog is induced by dehydration stress and its gene product binds to the conserved MYB recognition sequence. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 1529–1539. [Google Scholar]
  59. Park, H.C.; Kim, M.L.; Kang, Y.H.; Jeon, J.M.; Yoo, J.H.; Kim, M.C.; Park, C.Y.; Jeong, J.C.; Moon, B.C.; Lee, J.H.; et al. Pathogen- and NACL-induced expression of the SCaM-4 promoter is mediated in part by a GT-1 box that interacts with a GT-1-like transcription factor. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 2150–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Goding, C.; Temperley, S.; Fisher, F. Multiple transcription (actors interact with the adenovirus-2 EII-late promoter: Evidence for a novel CCAAT recognition factor. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15, 7761–7780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Koikeda, S.; Ibuki, R.; Sawada, Y.; Nagata, K.; Shibata, H.; Masamune, Y.; Nakanishi, Y. Nuclear factor I stimulates transcription of the adenovirus 12 E1A gene in a cell-free system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1990, 1048, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bovolenta, C.; Tognon, M.; Liboi, E. Epidermal growth factor induces, in the EL alpha 4–2 cell line, herpes simplex virus-1 alpha 4 gene transcription in the absence of the viral trans-activator VP16. Virus Res. 1991, 19, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dorn, A.; Bollekens, J.; Staub, A.; Benoist, C.; Mathis, D. A multiplicity of CCAAT box-binding proteins. Cell 1987, 50, 863–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cowie, A.; Kamen, R. Multiple binding sites for polyomavirus large T antigen within regulatory sequences of polyomavirus DNA. J. Virol. 1984, 52, 750–760. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kapila, J.; de Rycke, R.; van Montagu, M.; Angenon, G. An Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression system for intact leaves. Plant Sci. 1997, 122, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Leckie, B.M.; Neal Stewart, C., Jr. Agroinfiltration as a technique for rapid assays for evaluating candidate insect resistance transgenes in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, J.F.; Nebenfuhr, A. FAST technique for Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression in seedlings of Arabidopsis and other plant species. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zheng, L.; Liu, G.; Meng, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y. A versatile Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression system for herbaceous plants and trees. Biochem. Genet. 2012, 50, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Baulcombe, D.C. Gene silencing: RNA makes RNA makes no protein. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, R599–R601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bhaskar, P.B.; Venkateshwaran, M.; Wu, L.; Ane, J.M.; Jiang, J. Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression and silencing: A rapid tool for functional gene assay in potato. PLoS One 2009, 4, e5812. [Google Scholar]
  71. Scofield, S.R.; Tobias, C.M.; Rathjen, J.P.; Chang, J.H.; Lavelle, D.T.; Michelmore, R.W.; Staskawicz, B.J. Molecular basis of gene-for-gene specificity in bacterial speck disease of tomato. Science 1996, 274, 2063–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Frederick, R.D.; Thilmony, R.L.; Sessa, G.; Martin, G.B. Recognition specificity for the bacterial avirulence protein AvrPto is determined by Thr-204 in the activation loop of the tomato Pto kinase. Mol. Cell 1998, 2, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tsuda, K.; Qi, Y.; Nguyen le, V.; Bethke, G.; Tsuda, Y.; Glazebrook, J.; Katagiri, F. An efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012, 69, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yang, Y.; Li, R.; Qi, M. In vivo analysis of plant promoters and transcription factors by agroinfiltration of tobacco leaves. Plant J. 2000, 22, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zahur, M.; Maqbool, A.; Irfan, M.; Barozai, M.Y.K.; Rashid, B.; Riazuddin, S.; Husnain, T. Isolation and functional analysis of cotton universal stress protein promoter in response to phytohormones and abiotic stresses. Mol. Biol. 2009, 43, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zahur, M.; Maqbool, A.; Irfan, M.; Barozai, M.Y.K.; Qaiser, U.; Rashid, B.; Husnain, T.; Riazuddin, S. Functional analysis of cotton small heat shock protein promoter region in response to abiotic stresses in tobacco using Agrobacterium-mediated transient assay. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2009, 36, 1915–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sunter, G.; Hartitz, M.D.; Hormuzdi, S.G.; Brough, C.L.; Bisaro, D.M. Genetic analysis of tomato golden mosaic virus: ORF AL2 is required for coat protein accumulation while ORF AL3 is necessary for efficient DNA replication. Virology 1990, 179, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hong, Y.; Saunders, K.; Hartley, M.R.; Stanley, J. Resistance to geminivirus infection by virus-induced expression of dianthin in transgenic plants. Virology 1996, 220, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hofer, J.; Dekker, E.L.; Reynolds, H.V.; Woolston, C.J.; Cox, B.S.; Mullineaux, P.M. Coordinate regulation of replication and virion sense gene expression in wheat dwarf virus. Plant Cell 1992, 4, 213–223. [Google Scholar]
  80. Shivaprasad, P.; Akbergenov, R.; Trinks, D.; Rajeswaran, R.; Veluthambi, K.; Hohn, T.; Pooggin, M.M. Promoters, transcripts, and regulatory proteins of Mungbean yellow mosaic geminiviru. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 8149–8163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ashraf, M.A.; Shahid, A.A.; Rao, A.Q.; Bajwa, K.S.; Husnain, T. Functional Characterization of a Bidirectional Plant Promoter from Cotton Leaf Curl Burewala Virus Using an Agrobacterium-Mediated Transient Assay. Viruses 2014, 6, 223-242. https://doi.org/10.3390/v6010223

AMA Style

Ashraf MA, Shahid AA, Rao AQ, Bajwa KS, Husnain T. Functional Characterization of a Bidirectional Plant Promoter from Cotton Leaf Curl Burewala Virus Using an Agrobacterium-Mediated Transient Assay. Viruses. 2014; 6(1):223-242. https://doi.org/10.3390/v6010223

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ashraf, Muhammad Aleem, Ahmad Ali Shahid, Abdul Qayyum Rao, Kamran Shehzad Bajwa, and Tayyab Husnain. 2014. "Functional Characterization of a Bidirectional Plant Promoter from Cotton Leaf Curl Burewala Virus Using an Agrobacterium-Mediated Transient Assay" Viruses 6, no. 1: 223-242. https://doi.org/10.3390/v6010223

APA Style

Ashraf, M. A., Shahid, A. A., Rao, A. Q., Bajwa, K. S., & Husnain, T. (2014). Functional Characterization of a Bidirectional Plant Promoter from Cotton Leaf Curl Burewala Virus Using an Agrobacterium-Mediated Transient Assay. Viruses, 6(1), 223-242. https://doi.org/10.3390/v6010223

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop